Organizer
Gadget news
Sony WF-C510 review: I’d pick these cheap earbuds over more expensive AirPods 4
2:17 pm | September 17, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Sony WF-C510: Two-minute review

Sony is one of the biggest players in the audio market but its focus has always seemed to lean towards the elite, top-quality premium earbuds or over-ears market. The Japanese tech giant doesn’t need to break a sweat to keep on top of the best budget earbuds market though, if the new Sony WF-C510 are anything to go by.

The company’s follow-up to 2021’s Sony WF-C500, and a newer and more affordable alterative to the top-rated WF-C700N, these new earbuds come at a time when there’s more and more competition at the low-end of the market. I’d name some competitors but I don’t really need to – not when Sony’s offerings are this good.

In fact, I think the WF-C510 could draw some fans away from the top-end Sony WF-1000XM5 and the new sans-ANC entry-level AirPods 4. Who needs to pay double, triple or even quadruple the price when cheap and cheery gets you this far?

I really liked the sound of the new Sonys; I prefer sound that prioritizes clean treble over thumping bass, and so the Sony WF-C510 tick all my boxes and then some. Home-brewed Sony algorithms and a reasonably responsive equalizer just add to my enjoyment of the audio.

The design is stellar too – the buds stuck in my ears like the Abba songs they played stayed stuck in my head. Thanks to the nice grippy material used for the tips, and each earpiece weighing less than 5g, never once did a bud fall from my ears. I even cycled confidently with them and completed a full workout at the gym without gravity doing its thing to them.

This lightweight design extends to the case too, which is tiny and can easily disappear into a pocket. Unfortunately this does contribute to one of my gripes: the case only offers 11 hours of extra listening time, which is much less than basically any rival on the market.

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)

That’s extra listening time over what the buds offer by default, but contrarily you can go 11 hours with these without needing to return them to the case. This is a fantastic amount of listening time, and the WF-C510 would be my first port of call over pricier rivals for long trips.

Part of the reason for this long battery life is that the Sonys don’t have ANC (Active Noise Cancellation), which is something I can’t knock the buds for as it’s a feature that’s never guaranteed at this price. Instead, they have an ambient mode which is pretty commonplace in wireless earbuds, but it’s only useful in certain situations so I didn’t use it much.

Noise cancellation isn’t the only feature that the WF-C510s lack: wear detection, low-latency mode, 'find my' locaters and a few other more premium perks don’t rear their heads here. Again, the price justifies this, but it’s something I’d be remiss not to flag – if you’ve got a certain mode or feature you love to use, you’d better check that the Sonys offer it.

Given that this is a two-minute review, I probably don’t have time to go into lots of detail about the other great parts of the Sony WF-C510, but between the responsive and easy-to-use touch buttons, the useful eartip fit test, the range of color options and the audio avoiding all the pitfalls I usually see in budget earbuds, I feel comfortable recommending these over some of the much pricier competitors I’ve tested this year.

Sony WF-C510 review: Price and release date

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Released in September 2024
  • Cost $59.99 / £54.99 / AU$109

The Sony WF-C510 were released in September 2024 as the new entries in Sony’s WF-C line of low-cost earbuds.

You can pick them up for $59.99 / £54.99 / AU$109, and at that price point they’re in contention with our list of the best cheap earbuds. In fact, as of their launch, they’re Sony’s cheapest true wireless earbuds, drastically undercutting the $119 / £89 / AU$199 WF-C700N (which we gave five stars to in our review). The WF-C500 aren’t officially ranged by Sony any more, but they launched for $99 / £89 / AU$149 three years ago, and have seen price cuts from third-party retailers since.

The cheap earbuds market is a competitive one, with fresh competitors hitting the market all the time; in the months before this Sony proposition I've also tested the likes of the Earfun Air Pro 4 and CMF Buds Pro 2 for the same price. And the WF-C510 is my pick of the bunch. 

Sony WF-C510 review: Specs

Sony WF-C510 review: Features

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • In-bud battery life is great – but the case less so
  • No ANC, but there is 'sound control'
  • Headphones app brings some extra features

Something I both love and hate about the Sony WF-C510 is the battery life. 

The buds themselves have a fantastic battery life: 8 hours with sound control on, and 11 hours with it off, makes these Sonys some of the longest-lasting earbuds I’ve tested recently. However, the case itself only offers one extra charge-up, while basically all others on the market give you at least two extra charges. As a result, these buds gave me more battery anxiety on trips than most others I’ve tested.

That 11-hour figure is Sony's. In my testing, with sound control turned off, the right bud lasted for 10 hours and 42 minutes, while the left one was still somehow blasting out music 40 minutes later when my phone ran out of charge. Gaping inconsistency aside, that averages over 11 hours, so I'll concur with Sony's estimate.

Audio fans might be wondering why I’ve referred to ‘sound control’ and not active noise cancellation – this is because the Sonys don’t have ANC, but do offer noise cancellation in the form of an ‘Ambient Sound Control’ mode. This amplifies sounds around you, so you can be aware of what’s going on regardless of how much noise would otherwise be drowned out by your music. It’s a fine mode, with results that are more subtle and nuanced than the similar equivalent that many rival earbuds have, but ambient modes are generally quite situational so I didn’t find myself using it a whole lot.

Of course, ambient noise control isn’t the same as noise cancellation – it’s ANC you may want at home – but the passive noise cancellation offered by the ear-tips was enough to make me happy.

For the rest of the feature set we’re going to have to boot up Sony’s Headphones app, which, while a great addition at this level, has a logo so generic that I kept losing it on my phone’s menu.

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)

Using said Headphones app, you can see the battery life of the earbuds, arrange which devices they’re connected to (up to two – yes, there's multi-point), toggle ambient mode off or on to a variety of intensities, play with an equalizer (including a test to find the best preset for you, and another to detect which eartips are best for you), set up 360 Reality Audio (Sony’s version of spatial audio), change what the buttons do, and enable Spotify Tap which basically makes Spotify play by default.

The equalizer gives you quite a few presets, with the ability to modify them too, and lots of the rest is par for the course. However, I found the EQ test quite confusing – unlike Nothing Ear’s fantastic automatic detection test, you basically have to ‘blind test’ some presets to see which you prefer. I found the difference between many of them inaudible, and sometimes I liked two equally. Ultimately, the mode is fine for people who know the sound they want (or the parts of recordings they usually augment), but for everyone else it’s perhaps not worth bothering with, although it does add value at this level.

Beyond ANC, there are a few features not present in the WF-C510 that some might miss, although I can’t hold these cheap buds to blame given the price. The major one is wear detection, so you have to pause music manually when you remove the buds. There’s also no low-latency mode which is quite common even amongst cheap buds, or any kind of ‘find my buds’ feature.

Another thing I should note, which is a problem I’ve had with other Sony audio products too, is that by default the volume sounds incredibly low – even when it shouldn’t. It’s because there’s a volume slider in the app, separate to your phone’s one, which I’d recommend you immediately raise to near-full intensity and rely on your phone’s volume rocker for control. The first time I used Sony headphones I thought they were incredibly quiet until I noticed this feature – what I should also note is that the in-app volume resets to 50% if you pair the earphones to a different device and then back to your phone, so you’ll need to rectify it manually. This is an irksome feature for people who are unaware, but even for those of us who’ve been using them for years, it’s an unnecessary extra step that most other earbuds don’t require.

  • Features score: 3.5/5

Sony WF-C510 review: Design

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Incredibly lightweight case
  • Buds fit nice and snug – and don't budge
  • Convenient-to-use physical button

The Sony WF-C510 charging case is lovely and svelte – it’s one of my favorite cases for slipping into my pocket or bag. 

A lozenge-shaped slither of plastic, it measures about 6.8 x 2.7 x 3.1 cm (all my measurements – I couldn’t find any on the Sony website) and weighs “approx” 31g (that’s Sony’s exact wording). Vague measurements aside, it’s really slender, with basically enough space for the buds and not much excess (which is probably why it doesn’t provide much charge!). Main points to note here are the USB-C port for charging, a small button for pairing and an LED status indicator. All par for the course, really.

I liked the textured plastic case, but I can see some finding it a bit cheap-feeling, and it does creak a little if you put pressure on it. That’s the trade-off with its light build.

The buds are equally light, weighing 4.6g each. At least Sony has an exact measurement for that! They’re in-ear buds so this particular figure is really important, as heavy in-ear buds (or those that aren't shaped carefully to distribute said weight) sometimes have trouble staying in the ear.

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)

No issue for the Sonys though: they always felt rigid in my testing, never once falling out or even feeling loose. The box includes larger and smaller alternatives, with the app having an ear fit test, if the default tips don’t fit. 

The fact that they fit and stay securely in my ears sounds simple enough, but so many competing options at double the price can't seem to do it. If you want cheap earbuds that don't budge and sound good, the Sony WF-C510 are it. 

There are a few color options for the aspiring fashionistas out there: black and white are pretty standard, but there’s also light blue and light yellow. The latter hue is modelled by me in the pictures.

One feature of note on the WF-C510s is a button on each bud – it’s quite big, and takes up most of the body of each. It’s a physical button, meaning you have to actually depress it to trigger it, but I found it sensitive enough that it was easy to use. The size also ensures that you don’t have to keep jabbing at the bud, and shoving it into your ear, to trigger the function (which is customizable in the app).

In terms of waterproofing, the buds are IPX4 resistant to water, which means they’ll survive splashes from any angle, but not jets. That’s what the rating stands for but in real life the difference between ‘splashes’ and ‘jets’ isn’t always apparent so I’d recommend doing your best to keep these away from anything wetter than rain or sweat.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

Sony WF-C510 review: Sound quality

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Bright sound; some might miss bass
  • High-quality given price
  • DSEE improves compressed music

I really like the sound of the Sony WF-C510s – obviously you have to set your expectations to a certain level with low-cost earbuds, but I found the audio high-quality and also certainly distinct in that Sony, "have this sound, and have it good and clear" way.

This is possibly thanks, at least in part, to Sony’s DSEE, which stands for digital sound enhancement engine – basically it’s tech that restores the range of the compressed audio tracks you’re playing from your chosen streaming service. It gives Sony earbuds, including the WF-C510, an edge over similar alternatives, as long as you remember to turn it on via the app.

The driver itself is a 6mm unit, so not necessarily as big as some similar-priced alternatives, but bigger than the more expensive WF-C700N.

The Sony WF-C510s have a slightly forward sound profile (and I say this as a compliment rather than a shortfall), offering clear and pronounced treble sounds like your guitars, vocals and piano parts. This is great for some genres of music, and I enjoyed listening to songs with prominent and distinct vocal lines that were beamed into my ears.

The flip side is that you can’t feel the bass quite as much in certain genres of music, which might be an issue for people who like their bass thumping to their back teeth. You can rectify it to a degree using the in-app equalizer, but not quite enough to please bass-heads.

I was surprised by the lack of peaking or distortion at normal listening volumes, and I had to really push the buds to a painfully-loud volume to hear any crackling, muddying or artefacts.

  • Sound quality: 4.5/5

Sony WF-C510 review: Value

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Look at the price
  • Seriously, look at it

I’d consider the Sony WF-C510 great value for money even if the audio was only ‘fine’. It’s not, though, and fans of Sony's typical sound profile (that's most of us) will really love what they’re getting here.

If you’re being offered the Sonys as a gift or bundled with another Sony product, you might think you’re just getting some cheap buds thrown in to sweeten the deal, but trust me when I say these are better than their lowly price suggests.

  • Value: 5/5

Should I buy the Sony WF-C510?

Buy them if…

Don’t buy them if…

Sony WF-C510 review: Also consider

How I tested the Sony WF-C510

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Tested for two weeks
  • Tested at home, in the office and on trips

The Sony WF-C510 enjoyed two weeks of listening time for this review, and as mentioned earlier I've tested a string of their closest rivals recently, which helped with the comparisons.

I tested the buds while they were paired to my Android smartphone, and I connected them to a different mobile to test multi-point pairing. Mostly I listened to music with Spotify but to fully test the buds I also tried other apps including games and streaming services. Testing was done at home, in the office and on various trips around my city, including walks in the park and gym excursions.

I've been testing gadgets at TechRadar for over five years now, and in that time have used plenty of budget earbuds and other Sony products. Outside of reviewing headphones, my trusty Sony WH-1000XM3 are my go-to headphones so I'm well versed in Sony's audio products and software.

  • First reviewed in September 2024
Hands-on Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Higher-end features for all
3:20 pm | September 16, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation: Two-Minute Review

When they're in the ear, at first glance the Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation might not look much different to the third-generation AirPods. However, the design has been streamlined for a better fit, while the internal hardware has been upgraded, with many of the best features of AirPods Pro 2 trickling down to Apple's new entry-level earbuds, making them a tempting option among the best AirPods.

For one, both styles of AirPods 4 – these and the standard version, which don’t offer noise cancellation – are powered by the Apple-made H2 chip that stretches the battery life, delivers excellent audio playback, and provides enough horsepower for Apple to offer Adaptive Audio on the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation. 

While it doesn't entirely block out the world around you in the way that the best noise cancelling earbuds do – remember these are open-ear earbuds – when paired with music, it can reduce loud rumbles, like a jet engine, down to a drastically reduced sound. 

I think folks who desire the ability to block out the world around them without fully sealing off the ear will find a nice middle ground here. The Transparency mode, as well as how these pick up the user's voice, is very well done and sounds incredibly natural.

You'll also be able to answer or decline calls with a shake of your head and press the stems for easy control, other than for adjusting the volume. Sadly, the ability to swipe to change the volume didn't trickle down from AirPods Pro 2. However, excellent audio quality with a wide soundstage did, and that's paired with support for Personalized Spatial Audio. 

Overall, the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation make a bit more sense over the entry-level for the price and provide some future-proofing, but they also make an impact as powerful open-ear earbuds.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Pricing and Availability

The Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation are priced at $179 / £179 / AU$299. They're available from September 20th, 2024, though are available to order already. 

The $129 / £129 / AU$219 entry-level AirPods 4 do not offer noise cancellation, or, as their pricier siblings do, a Find My-enabled case and a couple of other features, but they still offer excellent audio quality and spatial audio support.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Specs

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Features

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

Much like the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation, AirPods Max, or even the third-generation model that they replace, the AirPods 4 – with or without active noise cancellation – offer several useful features, which make them an excellent choice for anyone with an iPhone, or who’s otherwise invested in Apple’s device ecosystem.

After unboxing, you need to flip the lid open and hold the AirPods 4 near your iPhone to start the pairing process. You’ll see a prompt appear on the bottom half of your screen and can click ‘Connect’ to pair the AirPods 4 with your iPhone and your iCloud account for easy syncing between devices. I found that this process took just a few seconds to complete. 

Fast-pairing and quick switching between devices have long been staples of AirPods, with the former dating back to the first generation, and they perform well here. Right after pairing, I was able to begin listening on my iPhone, and I could quickly switch to listening to audio on a 14-inch MacBook Pro or an iPad. Apple’s various platforms will even automatically switch your AirPods between devices based on what you’re actively using or playing audio on,, but I found this to be a little less helpful. 

One very helpful feature here, though, is the arrival of gesture controls. First announced as an upgrade for the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation at Apple’s WWDC in June, these head gestures launch on day one with AirPods 4, allowing you to easily answer or dismiss a call with a simple head shake. Just in my few days of using the AirPods 4 this has come in handy several times, especially when my hands are full or I’m walking around town. It works for phone calls, FaceTime, and other calling apps that use Apple’s APIs.

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

Aside from nodding your head or saying “yes” or “no”, you can also press the stems, or press and hold, to trigger a few actions. A single press lets you play or pause, while a long press lets you select listening modes. While these open-ear earbuds won’t fully isolate you from your surroundings, the AirPods 4 offer active noise cancellation, transparency, and Adaptive Audio (blending those two) modes. You cannot, however, swipe or down on the stem to adjust the volume – the ability to do this on the AirPods Pro is super-handy, but seemingly, Apple wants to keep that feature for its flagship earbuds.

Apple’s H2 chip – the same chip found in AirPods Pro – powers all of these features, as well as the microphones, custom algorithms, and sensors. As I wrote in my hands-on review, after I tried the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation right after the launch event to quiet down a noisy space, they offer seriously impressive noise cancellation for open-ear earbuds or buds that don’t fully seal off the ear. In that space, with ANC engaged, the sound of the crowded space was muffled, and when music playback began, it was mostly quieted down.

On an airplane, it was much the same experience – you can get some peace and quiet with them, but they won't fully drown out the environmental noise as the AirPods Pro can. Part of this might be due to the fact that your body is feeling vibrations and wants to match them with sound, but I think another factor is that without the full seal and as you move your head, ambient sound has more opportunity to enter your ear. The result is that AirPods 4 block out most sound, but on an airplane – or a train – you’ll still hear the engine roar and even some cabin noise. Still, though, these effectively block out a lot of noise.

I’ve long thought that the AirPods Pro offered the best transparency mode, in which they intelligently let environmental sounds in and lower the decibels so as not to harm your ears. I think the AirPods 4 outpace those, though – with transparency mode enabled here, any sense of roboticness or noise being piped in is pretty much removed; with Conversation Awareness turned on, you can also effectively have conversations with folks quite naturally, at times even forgetting these are in your ears. Your own voice, or in this case my voice, sounds a bit more natural and less processed as well.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Design

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

The AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation don’t stray too far from the working formula of Apple’s other true-wireless earbuds. They opt for short stems like the AirPods Pro or the AirPods 3rd Generation that these directly replace. The curved portion of hard plastic that sits in your ear has been slightly redesigned and is now more curved, to provide a better fit in the ear.

I found the AirPods 4 to be pretty cozy in my ears. I comfortably wore them for over four and a half hours while on a flight and for countless hours with intermittent usage while working. They still just kind of plop in your ear and rest there. I didn’t have them fall out on any occasion, whether on a turbulent flight, while working out, or while walking indoors and outside in a bustling city. 

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

The case is downright tiny given the smaller footprint that the left and right AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation take up. It’s much smaller than the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation case, and even the case for the cheaper AirPods 4, and is shorter than the AirPods 2nd Generation’s case. You still flip it open to take out or put back your AirPods 4, and there’s a multi-purpose indicator light on the front.

There’s no back button on the back case for easy pairing, though. Instead, you’ll double-press the back to trigger pairing for other devices, including non-Apple ones. It’s an easter egg that Apple needs to publicize a bit more.

To charge the AirPods 4, you can plug them in via USB-C, though there’s no longer a charger in the box. If you get the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation, you can also place them on any Qi-wireless charger or Apple Watch charging puck.

In my testing, I found that with active noise cancellation, transparent, or Adaptive Audio enabled, you’ll get around four hours and 15 to 20 minutes of usage. That’s beyond Apple’s promised four hours of playback with a listening mode enabled. With no mode on, you can get about five to five-and-a-half hours of playback, depending on the volume you’re listening at. A quick five minutes of charging in the case also provides at least an hour of listening.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Sound Quality

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

To sum up, the AirPods 4 essentially sound as good as AirPods Pro 2nd Generation, and, as with their predecessors, that’s without the buds providing a true seal of the ear. There’s a clear and rich audio mix with a fairly wide sound stage, but the real chef’s kiss here would be the Spatial Audio support.

Powering the audio experience is Adaptive EQ via the H2 chip, and pushing out sound is a custom high-excursion drive and a high-dynamic range amplifier. It’s also worth noting that there’s a single H2 chip in each bud, with audio sent over Bluetooth 5.3 from the connected device. 

This all comes together to give you a balanced representation of the track you’re listening to, but if you’re listening to something that bops with more oomph the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation won’t shy away from raising the lower-end or really offering a surprising amount of bass for earbuds of this size. For instance, with Burnin’ Train by Bruce Springsteen, the track starts off with a rising guitar riff that’s quickly joined by drums, piano, and vocals all across the sound spectrum – it sounds sonically here and in lossless via Apple Music I didn’t notice any distortion or dropouts. 

With a pop/EDM track like Apple by Charli XCX, you can see how the AirPods 4 handle layering of sound, with a surprisingly sharp bass track that doesn’t distort with the singer’s vocals on top at higher frequencies, with various electrical beats in between. The AirPods 4 tend to handle almost all genres well, and even without a full seal, deliver a great balanced mix, although at higher volumes you will have some sound leakage. 

Spatial Audio here essentially gets rid of stereo’s left and right channels, with various elements of a track flowing around you. It’s a more immersive listening experience, and Apple’s implementation here is excellent. I particularly like spinning it with a live track, but I think the album version of Down On The Corner by Creedence Clearwater Revival is one of the best examples. Not to mention, it also works with some movies and TV shows to put you right in the middle of the action.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Value

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

At $179 / £169 / AU$279 with active noise cancellation or $129 without, AirPods 4 offers a variety of features previously found only on Apple’s most high-end earbuds. The new design language streamlines the AirPods' appearance, as they all look similar. 

If you’re sold on open-ear earbuds or ones that lack silicone tips, AirPods 4 are likely your best bet if you want to be within Apple’s ecosystem. The higher price might only be $70 away from AirPods Pro, but you still get a lot of value for the price: three listening modes, a comfortable open-ear design that doesn’t fall out, solid battery life, and a findable case should they go missing. 

The $129 / £129 edition of AirPods 4 will lose the listening modes and the Find My enabled case, but it still offers a rich, crisp audio experience, all of the handy Apple ecosystem features, and support for Spatial Audio. 

Should I Buy Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation?

Buy them if...

If you want an open-ear fit that works in the Apple ecosystem

Replacing AirPods 2nd and 3rd gen, AirPods 4 are the new open-ear, non-ear sealing earbuds that work extremely well with the iPhone, iPad, Apple TV, and Mac.

Don't buy them if...

If you want the best noise cancellation in an earbud

Considering AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation don't seal off your ear with a silicone ear-tip, these earbuds won't block out all environmental sound. So if you're looking for that consider another pair like AirPods Pro 2nd Gen or one of the best wireless earbuds from elsewhere.

How I tested Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

For the past several days, I've been living with and using Apple's AirPods 4 and AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation with an iPhone 15 Pro Max, iPad Mini, iPad Pro, 14-inch MacBook Pro, Apple Watch Ultra 2, and Apple TV 4K. 

I tested audio playback, standard, and Spatial Audio tracks in various locations to gauge and track performance and see if there was sound leakage since these are open-ear earbuds. I threw various tracks across genres at AirPods 4, streamed from Apple Music, Spotify, YouTube Music, and Nugs.net. 

I used active noise cancellation, transparency, and "Adaptive Audio" listening modes in various locations, including at home, in an office environment, while walking around a city, on a train, in a car, and on a plane. I tracked and measured how long the battery lasted with these modes on and off and the charging time. 

  • First reviewed September 2024. 
AirPods 4 review – Seriously impressive noise cancellation for no ear tip earbuds
8:05 pm | September 10, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Hands-on AirPods 4 review: Two-minute preview

AirPods fans take notice: You no longer need to go Pro to get active noise cancellation. Furthermore, Apple has answered the call if you have a distaste for ear tips or simply don’t want your ears sealed off.

AirPods 4 are now official and come in two flavors: just AirPods 4 at $129 and AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation at $179. After spending some time with the iPhone 16 and Apple Watch Series X, I dashed over to the AirPods 4 on display. I got the chance to briefly test the higher-end option – including putting the noise cancelation to the test in a noisy, loud, and crowded hands-on area. 

For one, the case is very compact and tiny, appearing smaller than the AirPods Pro or even the third-generation AirPods. In fact, it’s kind of like a shorter AirPods second-generation carrying case in terms of width across. You should have no issue bringing these with you and fitting them within most pockets.

Apple AirPods 4, bottom of case.

(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation also trickles down some of my favorite features of the AirPods Pro case. Bluetooth Low-Energy is inside and a speaker, making the case here findable within Find My. So, if you lose it, you can ping it from another Apple device to help you find it. There is also a USB-C port for charging, and a cable comes in the box, but the rear here also supports recharging with an Apple Watch charger or a standard Qi charger. 

Flip open the lid, and you’ll find the left and right AirPods 4, which Apple dubs the “best-fitting AirPods ever.” I’ll need to spend more time with them, but they’re very compact, with short stems containing the force sensor for intuitive controls. However, the overall look is similar to that of AirPods' third generation. 

Apple has redesigned the fit here to better stay in the ear, be comfortable for an extended period, and for the best acoustic performance. I found them comfortable during my brief demo, and even with a few headshakes, I couldn’t get them to fall out. However, I haven’t had that issue with previous open-ear style AirPods like the first-, second-, or third-generation models. 

With their lack of silicone ear tips, AirPods 4 rest in your ear and won’t fully seal it off from the world around you. With no audio playing and no listening mode on, you will still hear a good bit of the world around you. With the H2 onboard here and the higher price, these feature listening modes, though.

These seriously impressed me in my brief demo – I started with Transparency mode engaged and 1901 by Phoenix playing in the background at a low volume. I could hear the track playing and the noisy crowd of folks demoing other gadgets around me, albeit at a slightly lower volume. The overall audio mix was vibrant and crisp. I couldn't test out "Personalized Spatial Audio" in this space, but AirPods 4 does support it.

AirPods 4 in hand

(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)

When I engaged the AirPods 4's Active Noise Cancellation feature and had the track playing, it pretty much lowered the volume of the crowd completely – this was with audio at about 60-70%. At a lower volume, that crowd roar can still be there a bit, but considering the open style of AirPods 4, these performed way better than I had initially anticipated. I’m curious how these might perform with blocking out noise in other situations, be it a plane or a place with a roaring HVAC system. I didn’t get the chance to try Adaptive Audio here, but I look forward to testing that and seeing how it handles blending transparency and active noise cancellation together.

That about sums up my first impressions of AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation. For one, they make noise cancellation more affordable within the AirPods lineup – though $179 is still not the cheapest – and also deliver a potentially more comfortable fit for folks who don’t like ear tips. I especially like that it ushers in some of the nicer-to-have features of AirPods Pro, like Find My for the case and the H2 chip, which should deliver great sound playback. AirPods 4 will also feature gesture controls like nodding your head up or down to answer a call or left and right to ignore it. 

AirPods 4 tour in case

(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)

You can also use “Hey Siri” hands-free for things like sending a message or asking a topical question. Apple promises five hours of playback on a full charge and 30 hours with recharges in the case. If you engage Active Noise Cancellation, Transparency, or Adaptive Audio, that will drop to 20 hours with recharges.

Of course, if you don’t need noise cancellation and can live without wirelessly charging the AirPods case, the $129 AirPods 4 might be a better fit – pun intended – and won’t be as big of a hit on your wallet. These have the same fit from the redesign and have the H2 chip inside.

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar
Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: affordable, superb-sounding wireless headphones crammed with features
12:52 pm | September 7, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones Wireless Headphones | Tags: | Comments: Off

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro: Two-minute review

The Anker Soundcore Space One Pro are the most expensive headphones Anker has ever released. Sure, they're still a lot cheaper than the likes of the Sony WH-1000XM5, but it does pile on a bit of pressure for these headphones to deliver, especially considering top-rated headphones like the Sennheiser Accentum Plus come in at nearly the same price. Happily, though, the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro are a great-sounding pair of wireless headphones that kept me listening for hours on end, day in, day out.

Thanks to LDAC codec compatibility, you’re getting hi-res audio, which helps the Soundcore Space One Pro to deliver rich, well-weighted all-round sound. If you appreciate some depth, these will likely pique your interest, thanks to the impressively weighty bass and sub-bass on offer. More generally, audio is to a high standard – it's not always as sharp as it could be or as clean-sounding as some top-of-the-range headphones, but it'll satisfy the vast majority of listeners.

Thanks to the Soundcore app, you can also find the perfect sound for you. There are classic EQ settings, which include a huge array of presets and a custom option too. But what’s really exciting is the HearID setting which assesses your personal tastes and hearing capabilities to suggest the perfect calibration – something that even some of the best headphones don’t offer. Not only that, but there’s a Dolby Audio mode available for those looking for a more expansive soundstage when watching movies or TV shows on the go.

More broadly, you’re getting a strong feature-set here. There’s Easy Chat for having conversations without needing to pause your tunes, multi-point connectivity and adjustable active noise cancellation settings. Speaking of ANC, you’re getting cancellation that’s a cut above some of the best cheap headphones. Some high-pitched sounds will still creep through, even when listening at higher volumes, but overall, you’re not going to get too distracted by the outside world when using the Space One Pro.

You’ll also be able to listen pretty much unbroken thanks to two key factors: battery life and comfort. Firstly, you’re getting plenty of playtime with the Space One Pro, which can go for 40 hours with ANC on and 60 hours with ANC off – although beware, with hi-res audio switched on, this number will be significantly cut. In terms of comfort, it really doesn’t get much better. Wearing the Space One Pro is never grating, even after listening for multiple hours consecutively – a fantastic plus given a lot of over-ear headphones fall at this hurdle.

It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, though. One of the Space One Pro’s biggest flaws for me is their looks. Although when folded they’re ultra-compact, in use they appear chunky and a little bit disappointing quality-wise – especially the button controls. This might not be a deal breaker for many, but Soundcore has increased its asking price for these headphones. Don’t get me wrong, these are good quality cans, but with this amount of cash, there are some outstanding alternatives from the likes of Sony and Sennheiser available to you – are the Space One Pro better than these? I’m not too sure.

Still, they sound great and you’ll happily keep playing your favorite tracks for hours on end. The main issue is the strength of the competition. For example, in our Sennheiser Accentum Plus review, we gave these similarly priced headphones 4.5 stars, thanks to their impeccable sound quality – although their fit isn’t suited to every head. Some people may find the Soundcore more comfortable, and prefer them for that reason, but most people will probably want to go for the better sound quality.

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Price & release date

  • $199.99 / £149.99 (about AU$300)
  • Launched on September 5 2024 in UK/US
  • Launching in Australia in October 2024

With the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro headphones, the brand has ventured into slightly more premium territory. These cans will set you back $199.99 / £149.99 (about AU$300) – that puts them in the same ballpark as the Sennheiser Accentum Plus, which retail for $‌179.95 / £169.99 / AU$299, and the Sony ULT Wear, which go for $199.99 / £149 / AU$348.

It’s a significant price jump on the classic Soundcore Space One, which were just $99 / £99 at launch. Of course, the newer model is more compact, has more mics and higher-quality audio, but that’s still a big jump considering the Space One still has ANC, a very similar battery life and hi-res audio capabilities.

The headband of the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro resting on a concrete pillar in front of a pink wall

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Specs

A closeup of the earcups of the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro resting on a marble surface

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Features

  • Solid active noise cancellation
  • Hi-res audio capability
  • Feature-rich companion app

Something I love about the Space One Pro is that they boast a pretty expansive feature-set. You get the classic options you’d expect from modern wireless headphones, including multi-point connectivity and EQ settings, but there’s a good amount more to uncover.

One of my favorite features was Easy Chat, which lowers the music volume playing and makes voices clearer. This was incredibly useful in an office setting, especially when I had to respond to questions or chat with colleagues briefly, making for a seamless transition from listening to talking. You can easily adjust the time it takes for music to fade back in after using Easy Chat in the Soundcore app, with 5, 10 and 15 second wait times available, although I found the default 5 was ideal. Sensitivity here was just right too; for instance, the sound of typing wouldn’t set off Easy Chat, making for a near-flawless user experience. You will have to resist singing along to the music, though…

Another neat little feature is Safe Volume. When I listen to music, I like to listen at loud volumes – maybe a bit too loud sometimes. However, the Soundcore app has a decibel reading meter that displays whether your volume level is normal, acceptable (ie, a bit on the loud side but probably okay), or too high. This is useful for keeping yourself in check, and you can set a high volume limit too, if you want to be on the cautious side, or to keep kids' hearing safe if you give the headphones to them.

As I mentioned, there are classic EQ settings here, including a bunch of neat presets for various genres and the option to make a totally custom sound. However, one of the coolest settings available is HearID Sound, which assesses your hearing capabilities at various frequencies and asks you to pick your preferred sound through a small handful of multi-choice questions to find your perfect sound. This worked fantastically well and gave me some added depth in the bass department, a little bit of additional height in the treble, with a dip in the mid-range – a calibration that suited my taste very nicely.

One more feature that enables you to customize sound is Dolby Audio. This is useful if you want a more immersive, expansive sound from your headphones, but is likely better suited towards people watching videos. I found that this did add a bit of width to the soundstage, but I rarely used it when listening to tunes. When you are blasting your favorite songs, though, you can activate the LDAC audio codec (compatible with most Android phones), which delivers richer, more detailed hi-res audio – something I kept turned on throughout most of the testing process.

The earcups Anker Soundcore Space One Pro resting on a concrete pillar in front of a pink wall

(Image credit: Future)

Another part of the Space One Pro that’s decently customizable is ANC. You can toggle on Wind Noise Reduction when out and about and switch between full, normal, and transparent levels of noise cancellation. But how is the ANC itself? Pretty good actually.

In a café, I could still hear a conversation on my table with music at half volume, but at a more realistic listening level of 65-70%, I could barely hear any words at all. When listening to more mellow classical music, however, sounds like plates being placed down crept through sometimes, even at high volumes.

At around 60% with Wind Noise Reduction on, traffic was barely audible, although some higher pitched noises did seep through from time to time. Similarly, when using a hairdryer, the screech-like noise it emitted was still audible when listening to a bass-heavy track.

With the lower-frequency tones of a microwave, I heard almost nothing at 50-55% volume, although this didn’t surprise me a lot as the Space One Pro seemed to be very competent at blocking out lower-frequency sounds, as is common with the best noise cancelling headphones.

I compared this to the more budget 1More Sonoflow and Sony WH-CH720N in the same environments, and the Space One Pro were a clear upgrade over them both.

To top everything off, the Space One Pro have a very respectable battery life of 40 hours with ANC on and 60 hours with ANC off. This is, of course, reduced if you’re using hi-res audio. When testing battery life with ANC on, I found the 40-hour claim to be accurate.

Sure, there are some headphones out there, such as the Cambridge Audio Melomania P100, that can go for up to 60 hours with ANC on, but they’re about $80 / £80 more expensive. And this battery life is 10 hours longer with ANC on (and 20 hours with ANC off) than the considerably pricier Sony WH-1000XM5. So, all in all, it's fair to say the Space One Pro are a top choice if longevity matters a lot to you.

  • Features score: 4.5/5

A closeup of a man wearing the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro in front of a pink wall

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Sound quality

  • Full-sounding hi-res audio
  • Satisfying bass
  • Audio isn’t perfectly sharp

Overall, we were pretty positive about the original Anker Soundcore Space One’s audio, particularly because of its ability to offer strong bass, clear vocals and LDAC support. Thankfully, all of this holds true for the Pro model, which more generally delivers great audio quality.

Let’s start with bass: if like me you’re someone that appreciates lots of depth, these are gonna hit the spot. Sub-bass in Backseat Freestyle by Kendrick Lamar was perfectly weighted, never feeling overly dominant in the mix – a lot of cheaper headphones struggle to handle this level of depth, but not the Space One Pro. When listening to Black Eye by Allie X, the dynamism of the bass connecting up to the mid-range was impressive too, although the kick of the drum machine was slightly lethargic.

Mid-range sounds come through clearly and with solid levels of detail. When comparing these to the cheaper Sony WH-CH720N, the Space One Pro achieved a fuller sound, helping to expose a few more sonic intricacies. This is, of course, helped further if you activate the LDAC codec for hi-res audio.

Like the ‘non-Pro’ edition, these produce a pleasingly wide soundstage experience, which is ideal for atmospheric tracks like Rains again by Solji. This track sounded a little bit constrained with the CH720N, but when using the Space One Pro, the intro’s rain sound effects were natural and quieter vocal segments were more controlled. The soft vocals maintained their intended levels of delicacy too and highs often sounded sweet when using these headphones. From time to time, vocals could be a little harsh at top volumes, something I discovered when listening to the opening of SICKO MODE by Travis Scott, but this wasn’t too common.

All in all, I found the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro to be very good in the audio department. They’re not going to deliver the incredible accuracy, intricate detail and flawlessly clean audio that super-premium competitors can offer, but for some headphones below the $200 / £150 / AU$300 mark they perform well. Bass is the star of the show here, but there’s excellent customizability if you’re more of an avid podcast fan looking for an emphasis on clear vocals, for example.

  • Sound quality score: 4/5

The folded up Anker Soundcore Space One Pro resting on a marble surface

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Design

  • Ultra-compact foldable design
  • May be a little chunky looking for some
  • Super comfortable fit

When I first unboxed the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro, I got more of an earmuff than headphone vibe. Initially, I was struck by how chunky they were – even the headband is pretty thick and padded. Don’t get me wrong: the Space One Pro aren’t horrible looking, but I don’t think there’s gonna be a rush to hang them in the Louvre.

Even in terms of build quality, I wasn’t massively impressed. That’s mainly because the buttons and silver detail on the headphones look and feel a bit cheap. I did, however, quite like the Cream White color that these cans came in, though a Jet Black alternative is also available.

It’s not all about the looks, of course, and thankfully these headphones are incredibly comfortable. Every day I’ve tested the Space One Pro, I’ve used them for at least five hours and have not once felt a smidge of discomfort, so if coziness is the number one thing for you, these are absolutely perfect.

Another smart aspect of these headphones is their compact nature. Thanks to what Anker calls a FlexiCurve Structure, these can halve in size when fully folded, perfect if you’re a bit limited for space in your backpack or tote bag.

A case is available for them (added free for initial order, but that may not be the case if you buy in the future) that's also waterproof, unlike the headphones themselves, which don’t have a dust or waterproof rating.

Something these do lack is touch controls – which may be pleasing to some, but I would’ve personally appreciated them. Instead, you’re stuck with plain old button controls and unfortunately they’re a bit lacking. I already mentioned they’re not the prettiest, but I also found the volume controls to be quite unresponsive and I had to hold down the power button for quite a while to switch the headphones on or off. You can customize which button controls do a little bit in the Soundcore app, but options are pretty limited.

Overall, I don’t love the Space One Pro’s button controls and I’m not an enthusiast when it comes to their looks either. However, what I can’t deny is that they’re massively comfortable and super-compact, making them totally user-friendly. Fashionistas – you’re probably best served elsewhere I’m afraid, but otherwise I’d urge you not to rule these out on looks alone.

  • Design score: 3.5/5

The earpads and headband of the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro in front of a pink wall

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Value

  • Anker’s most expensive headphones ever
  • Stack up to similarly-priced competitors on features and sound
  • Still a tad too costly at launch

I’ll be real, reader, I’m conflicted here. I’ve really enjoyed my time with the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro; they’re a great-sounding, ultra-comfortable pair of wireless headphones that have kept me listening for hours on end. But there’s a massive amount of competition in this price range from some of the most well-respected tech companies in the game.

For example, the aforementioned Sennheiser Accentum Plus offer confident, punchy sound, a longer battery life and a more attractive design for a similar price. And the Sony ULT Wear are also super comfortable and offer the LDAC codec – although in our Sony ULT Wear review we had a mixed response to its bass-boosting ULT button. Good options abound at this price point, making any one choice harder to justify.

And there are often bargains available on more premium options: for instance, the legendary Sony WH-1000XM4 are regularly available at a similar price to these these headphones, and they are going to offer almost everything you get here, but with even better audio and a classic design. However, it is worth noting that this only applies to when the Sonys have their price cut, and the Space One Pro will inevitably also see strong discounts, probably as soon as Black Friday, shortly after launch.

What I’m more confident in stating, though, is that these outperform the stronger budget wireless headphones, such as the Sony WH-CH720N and 1More Sonoflow, both of which we’ve spoken about highly on numerous occasions. These have considerably better ANC, audio quality and features. So, although I wouldn’t expect these to be listed at a way lower price, I think these will be extremely attractive on sale, when they’re closer to the $150 / £120 mark.

  • Value score: 3.5/5

A man putting on the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro in front of a pink wall

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro?

Buy them if…

Comfort is a priority for you
A lot of over-ear headphones tend to get uncomfortable after a while, but not these. The Anker Soundcore Space One Pro are a delight to wear, even for hours on end, thanks to their soft ear cushions and well-padded headband. Say goodbye to headphone fatigue, and hello to hours of back-to-back bangers.

You want highly customizable audio
If you have specific tastes when it comes to audio, these headphones are a good pick. That’s mainly because of the HearID feature, which provides a custom EQ configuration suited to your ears. There’s also Dolby Audio for a more expansive sound and LDAC compatibility for hi-res output.

Don’t buy them if…

You’re on a budget
These aren’t ultra-premium headphones or anything, but they’re not the most affordable cans out there either. If you’re on a budget there are so many fantastic cheap options out there for under $100 / £100 / AU$200, check out our guide to the best cheap headphones for some recommendations.

Style is your main concern
Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion, but I think many will agree with me here – the Space One Pro aren’t the most attractive cans out there. If you want some sleeker headphones, the likes of Sony and Bose have plenty of excellent options that avoid the chunky look that Anker has adopted here.

The earcups of the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro resting on a concrete pillar in front of a pink wall

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: Also consider

Sennheiser Accentum Plus
The Sennheiser Accentum Plus are a fantastic pair of mid-range over-ear headphones. They offer beautiful sound quality, a clean design, decent ANC and an epic battery life. And once you factor in their price, which is scarcely any higher than the Space One Pro, they become a very attractive option indeed – as you can see from the fact we granted them 4.5 stars in our Sennheiser Accentum Plus review.

Sony WH-CH720N
I’ve owned these headphones myself for about one year and can say they’re very good if you want a cheaper option than the Space One Pro. Sure, they don’t support LDAC or produce a super-expansive audio overall, but you still get a nicely balanced sound with solid detail. Not only that, but they have awesome battery life, 360 Reality Audio support, competent ANC and a lightweight design. Given they’ve gone on sale for less than $90 / £80 in the past, they’re an incredible option if you’re working with a tighter budget. Read our full Sony WH-CH720N review.

Anker Soundcore Space One Pro review: How I tested

  • Tested for one week
  • Used in the office, in a café and while on walks
  • Predominantly tested using Tidal on Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4

I tested the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro over the course of a week. During this time, I took to a number of environments including a café, built-up roads, the office and my apartment. I typically connected the headphones to Tidal on my Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 with the LDAC codec active in order to access the best quality audio. I also tested the headphones with the FiiO M11S hi-res music player, my Windows laptop, and an iPhone 13 Pro. When listening to music, I went through the TechRadar testing playlist, which includes tracks from a number of genres, before expanding to a wider music selection. When appropriate, I also compared the Soundcore Space One Pro directly to the Sony WH-CH720N and 1More Sonoflow.

First reviewed: September 2024
Read more about how we test

Final D7000 review: huge planar magnetic over-ear headphones that, when properly driven, deserve their huge price-tag
11:30 am | September 2, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Final D7000: Two-minute review

It goes without saying that $3499 / £2999 / AU$5899 is an awful lot of money to consider spending on a pair of wired over-ear headphones – and yet you’re almost spoiled for choice here, as our best wired headphones guide proves. What sets the D7000 apart, though, is that Final Audio has gone to town where the technology of planar magnetic headphones is concerned, and consequently has a pretty compelling story to tell.

It’s developed something it calls an ‘air film damping system’ to overcome the low-frequency limitations of the planar magnetic driver technology. It’s created a ‘pinna-aligned diffuser’ to overcome the variations in the shape of the human ear. It’s gone so far as to build its own manufacturing and assembly jigs in order to keep the entire construction process in-house and under its control. It's not a stretch to say that Final's need to get the science of bringing sound to your ears just right borders on obsessive.

The D7000 is far from the most cooperative headphone this sort of money can buy, so you’ll need to spend more – on a headphone amplifier with a fair bit of grunt. But if you’re able to drive the D7000 effectively, there’s a lot to enjoy about the sound. 

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

Yes, the case is huge (Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Price & release date

  • Released February 27, 2024 
  • Priced $3499 / £2999 / AU$5899

The Final Audio D7000 are available to buy now, and have been since the end of February 2024. A price of $3499 / £2999 / AU$5899 lets you know the company is not messing around with this model, and it also lets you know that alternatives from the likes of Focal (see the May-launch Azurys), Grado (see our Grado Hemp review) and Meze Audio (that would be the Meze Audio Liric) are firmly in Final Audio’s sights.

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Specs

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Features

  • ‘Pinna-Aligned Diffuser’ 
  • ‘Air Film Damping System’ 
  • Not the easiest headphones to drive

Wired headphones seldom bristle with features – and the Final Audio D7000 are no different in that they have what they need to get the job done and nothing else. But it’s fair to say that Final Audio has applied itself to these features rigorously.

For instance, the company has addressed the inherent problems planar magnetic drivers have in producing properly low frequencies by developing something it calls an ‘Air Film Damping System’. If you play at significant volume, the movement of the diaphragm when it’s delivering bass information can be exaggerated to the point that it contacts the magnets that are driving it – which obviously is undesirable. Final Audio suggests that a) every other planar magnetic design consequently doesn’t dig as deep into the frequency range as is ideal, and b) it has solved the issue. 

A necessarily complicated system involving perforated metal shields suspended on either side of the diaphragm creates a layer of air between the diaphragm and its magnets - it acts as a braking system and allows the diaphragm to generate the desired low frequencies without the danger of contact with the magnets around it. The diaphragm itself is thin and light even by prevailing standards, and has a super-thin spiral-pattern aluminum coil etched onto it.

The other major feature here is the ‘Pinna-Aligned Diffuser’. The concept of acoustic adjustment via diffusion has been gaining traction for some time – but Final Audio feels it has identified, and subsequently solved, an important issue: the shape of the wearer’s pinna. The pinna (the shape of the outer ear) obviously varies widely from person to person, and it can significantly affect a headphone listening experience. Final Audio’s listening tests, using both real live ears and simulations, have resulted in a diffuser shape that is, according to the company, optimal for every listener regardless of the shape of their pinna. 

The driver arrangement has resulted in a headphone with an impedance of 50Ω and sensitivity of 89dB/mW – this translates to ‘quite difficult to drive’. It seems likely that anyone spending the thick end of three grand on a pair of headphones is not going to connect them directly to a laptop headphone socket or something like that – but equally, these numbers suggest a sturdy headphone amp will be a necessity.

The amount of oomph that’s likely to be required to drive the D7000 makes the supplied cable seem slightly odd. It’s three meters long, for starters, which is far from the most practical length, and is terminated in an unbalanced 6.3mm jack – which is not the most helpful (or premium) option. At this sort of money it’s not unreasonable to expect a variety of cables, in a variety of lengths, with a variety of terminations – a 4.4mm balanced jack, for instance, would help the headphone amp into which it’s plugged deal with the rather tricky load the D7000 present.

  • Features score: 4.5/5

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Sound quality

  • Tremendous powers of insight and analysis 
  • Open, organized and utterly believable sound 
  • Could quite easily be more dynamic

In many ways, the sound the Final Audio D7000 make is approaching ideal – or, at least, it is for someone with similar sonic priorities to mine. If you admire high detail levels, nicely neutral tonality, a beautifully balanced frequency response and a big, well-organized soundstage, then we have something in common. And you’ll no doubt enjoy the D7000 as much as I do.

A big 24bit/96kHz FLAC file of Weyes Blood’s Grapevine is exactly the sort of thing the Final Audio excel at dealing with. Their carefully judged tonality gives a touch of warmth to the acoustic instruments and the staggeringly direct and informative midrange, and their response from the bottom of the frequency range to the top is impressively even. The hard work Final Audio has done in an effort to liberate dynamic driver-type levels of bass extension and substance from the planar magnetic arrangement has without doubt paid off; the D7000 dig respectably deep and hit with determination. They may not be the punchiest headphones this sort of money can buy, but they’re certainly no slouches.

The top of the frequency range is open and airy, but more than enough substance to avoid sounding in any way thin  or hard. And with the impeccable vocal, they demonstrate real midrange fidelity and positivity – there’s an enormous amount of detail, both broad and fine, extracted and contextualized. The D7000 communicate through the midrange in the most eloquent and expressive manner, and singers sound direct and characterful as a result.

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

The soundstage these headphones can generate is extremely wide and respectively deep, so even a recording as relatively complex as Stevie Wonder’s He’s Misstra Know-It-All (as a DSD64 file) sounds organized and coherent – even the layout of the drum kit is absolutely explicit. And this recording demonstrates that what the D7000 lack in outright low-frequency impact, they make up for in control – rhythmic expression is always convincing.

Up to this point, the Final Audio combine analysis with entertainment in a most agreeable manner. They’re fun to listen to, musical in their approach, and have so many pertinent observations to make about the minutiae of recordings that each listen is a little voyage of discovery.

The only significant drawback is a relative lack of dynamism. While they’re very attentive to the low-key dynamics of harmonic variation, the D7000 aren’t all that inclined to really lean in when the going gets intense or big shifts in volume occur. That’s not much of an issue with the recordings I’ve mentioned so far, because they both offer very polite increases in attack – but when you ask the Final Audio to deliver something along the lines of My Bloody Valentine’s Feed Me With Your Kiss as a 24bit/96kHz FLAC file, they can sound slightly undemonstrative. The D7000 are either unwilling or unable to properly track the variations in intensity with proper determination, and they are slightly short of the sort of headroom that allow significant distance between the quietest and loudest moments in the recording.

  • Sound quality score: 4/5

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Design

  • 437g 
  • Washi’ fabric for headband and earpads 
  • Aluminum/magnesium alloy housing

‘Big’ seems as good a word as any to start with. The Final Audio D7000 aren’t outrageously heavy at 437g, they stay comfortable through long listening sessions thanks to the materials used in their construction and their careful hanger arrangement… but they nevertheless feel big because, well, they are. Or, at least, their earcups and earpads are. If you’re blessed with a smaller-than-average head, there’s a good chance the D7000 will prove to be rather more headphone than you’re comfortable with.

Final Audio has designed the D7000 to be as repairable and serviceable as possible and that is to be commended. Those tiny exposed screw-heads tell their own story – almost every part of these headphones can be removed if required. So hardware upgrades are possible, as is replacement or repair. In other words, the D7000 should last you a very long time. This is just one advantage derived from Final Audio’s insistence on conducting the entire manufacturing process in-house – even to the point that it’s designed and built its own assembly jigs and measurement jigs in order to ensure the quality of build and finish is exactly how it wants it to be.

The earcup housings are made from machined aluminum/magnesium alloy, which helps keep weight down, and they feel just as good as they look (as long as you’re fine with black – it’s the only option where finish is concerned). They adjust on the headband using a fairly rudimentary ‘friction pole’ arrangement, but that does at least mean the arms don’t flare out from the side of the weather’s head all that far. 

Final Audio has used a light, breathable fabric for the covering of the headband and earpads. It’s derived from ‘washi’, a traditional Japanese paper – and as well as offering good moisture control, lightness of build and excellent durability, we will all be pleased to learn it also has excellent anti-bacterial and odor eliminating properties.

  • Design score: 4/5

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Value

  • Well built; exceptional attention to materials used
  • Requires good amplification – and expensive regardless

If you’ve read this far then you know the D7000 are very well built and finished, using high-quality materials. You’ll know they use some quite innovative technologies in order to do their thing, and you’ll know their modular construction should mean they last for years. You’ll know that in pretty much every respect except dynamic response, they’re a profoundly enjoyable listen – as long as you have amplification capable of driving them efficiently. And you’ll also know they’re by no means your only choice if you want to spend big on some new headphones…

  • Value score: 4/5

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Final D7000?

Buy them if...

Don't buy them if...

Final D7000 headphones outside, on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)

Final D7000 review: Also consider

Focal Stellia
Focal's stunning – and we mean that visually as well as aurally – over-ears have been sitting pretty among the audiophile-grade elite for a few years now. Think high-quality craftsmanship with a stunning open presentation that leads to mind-blowingly good sound. Yes, that $3,000 price tag could be a tad excessive, but if you've got Final Audio money, you've got Focal money…
See our Focal Stellia review for the full story

How I tested the Final D7000

  • Connected to an iFi iDSD Diablo 2 headphone amplifier 
  • With a variety of digital audio file types and sizes
  • For well over a working week

My reference amplifier (a Naim Uniti Star) has a 3.5mm headphone socket – and so all my testing was done using a (hugely capable) iFi iDSD Diablo 2 headphone amplifier connected via UBS-C to an Apple MacBook Pro loaded with Colibri software in order to play proper high-resolution content. I listened to less information-rich stuff too, of course, and to music of every style and genre. And I did this for well over a working week, because frankly it was no kind of hardship at all…  

Dyson OnTrac review: a valiant second attempt that’s blown away by the competition
8:54 am |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Dyson OnTrac: Two-minute review

Well, the Dyson Zone wasn’t an April Fool’s joke and the company best known for its vacuums was indeed dead serious about entering the audio market – because, lo and behold, we now have Dyson’s second pair of headphones. This time around, they go without the Bane-like air purification mask and, instead, focus solely on what’s important to a pair of headphones: sound quality. It also introduces a more accessible aesthetic in the process. 

Called the OnTrac, Dyson is now unequivocally aiming for a share of a crowded market currently occupied by some of the best headphones and best noise-cancelling headphones from more well-established brands.

The OnTrac’s spec sheet certainly implies Dyson is in with a fair shout. Music is delivered via custom 40mm neodymium drivers that are tilted 13˚ towards the ear, which allows your ear canal to suck up the waves as confidently as the maker’s iconic vacuums. ANC is onboard, which utlizes a custom algorithm to cancel up to 40dB worth of unwanted ambient noise and, in practice, it works very well indeed, with office chatter all but silenced and screaming babies on trains dulled to a whisper. It doesn’t quite reach the lofty heights of the best-in-class sets (Bose, I’m looking at you), but you can also do an awful lot worse.

Comfort is subjective. I have to agree that, despite the size and 451g weight of the OnTrac, it doesn’t feel like it when worn, thanks in no small part to Dyson’s rather clever move of attaching two small battery units to the headband (rather than the ear cups) for more even weight distribution. But the weight does become a little uncomfortable over prolonged periods (something I don’t experience with my daily pair of Sonos Ace cans). I do appreciate the fact that the OnTrac can be customized to a great degree thanks to interchangeable ear cushions and ear cups, plus the headband is available in four color finishes. It makes an already unique-looking set of headphones even more so.

On the sound quality front, the Dyson OnTrac delivers an overall presentation that is cleaner than I was initially expecting. Vocals, in particular are handled with poise and there is a discernible soundstage within which instruments are placed. While detail is also good, the OnTrac lacks dynamic punch and music can sound a little flat. It’s not an offensive or ‘bad’ listen by any means, but when competitors do sound better and for less money, it becomes tricky to recommend.

How much is the Dyson OnTrac I hear you ask? At $499 / £449.99 / AU$799, the OnTrac enters right near the top of the premium headphone market, and immediately gains the Apple AirPods Max and Bose QuietComfort Ultra as natural competitors. Sony’s WH-1000XM5 also gets a deserving mention here. These three pairs all represent some of the best wireless headphones currently available and all come from established brands. In the OnTrac, Dyson has to be rather optimistic, expecting potential customers to part with a big chunk of cash despite not having a lot of audio experience.

If you value having the option to customize your headphones, though, and you want something that is genuinely unique, the OnTrac should be at the top of your wishlist. And if Dyson can release a future firmware update that allows for greater customization of the EQ, it could be onto a genuine winner.

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

Dyson OnTrac review: Price and release date

  • Announced July 18, 2024
  • List price of $499 / £449.99 / AU$799
  • Additional cost for customizing ear cushions and ear cups

The Dyson OnTrac headphones were announced on July 18, 2024 and are now available to purchase outright directly from Dyson and select authorized retailers for $499 / £449.99 / AU$799. At this price, they sit at the upper end of the premium headphones market. The Apple AirPods Max are officially priced higher at $549 / £499/ AU$899 but can be picked up at a discounted price during big sale events, while the Bose QuietComfort Ultra – comfortably the best noise-cancelling headphones available right now – retail for $429 / £449 / AU$649 and, again, are often discounted.

If you want to customize your OnTrac headphones, ear cushions and outer caps are available for $49.99 / £49.99 / AU$79.99 a pair, although, at the time of writing, these are only available directly from Dyson.

For anyone else wanting to personalize their headphones, adding one pair of each soon adds up, so you’ll need deep pockets if you want to unleash the full potential of Dyson’s latest headphone effort.

Pricing the OnTrac so high definitely doesn’t work in its favor. It’s fair to say Dyson isn’t a ‘market leader’ when it comes to audio products, so to price its second pair of headphones much higher than five-star pairs from established audio brands is a bit delusional. Even if the OnTrac were brandished with a Sony or Bose logo, it would still be a tough sell. If the headphones were brought down to around the $400 / £400 / AU$600 mark, I think it would be a bit easier to be a little more positive about them.

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

Dyson OnTrac review: Specs

Dyson OnTrac review: Features

  • Up to 55 hours battery life
  • Good, not ‘best-in-class’, noise cancellation
  • No wired listening or hi-res audio

One of the headline features of the Dyson OnTrac is its 55-hour battery life. It’s quite exceptional and eclipses much of its closest competition. The Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless (60 hours) and Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 (60 hours ANC on / 100 hours off) are similarly-priced pairs that do better, but nothing from Sony or Bose comes even close. Dyson includes a 1.2m braided USB-C cable in the box for the moment you do eventually run out of juice.

Alongside the exceptional battery life, Dyson is also keen to emphasise the capabilities of its noise-cancellation system. Eight mics are deployed in total across both ear cups to constantly listen to the world around you – 384,000 times a second, Dyson stresses – and cancel out external sound up to 40dB. This isn’t an adaptive noise-cancellation system, meaning it’s either ‘on’ or ‘off’, although there is a Transparency mode that lets in ambient sounds. This can be activated with a strong double tap on either ear cup. If you want to turn it off entirely, you’ll need to use the MyDyson app.

In real-world testing, the noise cancellation works incredibly well. Office chatter was canceled out entirely and screaming babies on public transport were reduced to near-silence. It’s certainly one of the better iterations of noise cancellation I’ve personally come across, although I would say the Bose QC Ultras do still claim the title of truly best in class.

Alongside being able to adjust noise cancellation, the MyDyson app is where you can (sort of) tailor the sound. There are three EQ presets to choose from: Enhanced (on by default), Bass Boost and Neutral. It would have been nice to be given the opportunity to fully personalize the EQ settings in a similar vein to what Bowers & Wilkins or Bang & Olufsen offer through their respective apps.

Screenshots taken from the MyDyson app when connected to Dyson OnTrac headphones

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

The MyDyson app also displays a live sound exposure graph that constantly monitors noise levels both inside and outside the ear cups, clearly showing you whenever the levels become potentially harmful. It turns out I prefer to listen at a volume level that borders on ‘not recommended’. It doesn’t send you notifications when the audio you’re listening to encroaches into harmful territory, but you can toggle a setting that will ensure the volume doesn’t go above 80dB.

The Dyson OnTrac also features wear detection, meaning they’ll automatically play and pause when you put them on or off respectively, and it works with pinpoint accuracy. The headphones will also turn themselves off after 30 minutes of inactivity.

Elsewhere in regard to the feature set, the OnTrac falls a little short in comparison to the best at this level. Firstly, the Bluetooth 5.0 standard is used which is pushing seven years old and now lags behind Bluetooth 5.3. We’re also starting to see Bluetooth 5.4 show up in equally premium models. While it still serves up a reliable connection to source devices – I did experience the very occasional issue where the app didn’t immediately recognize the headphones were connected – it means some important features are missing, including multipoint connectivity for simultaneously connecting to two devices.

As far as audio codec support goes, the list is pretty short with just the basic SBC and AAC codecs alongside the rather niche LHDC. It’s a bit disappointing that a pair of headphones that cost as much as the Dyson OnTrac doesn’t support aptX in one form or another, or true high-resolution audio. There’s also no support for spatial audio or wired listening.

  • Features score: 3.5/5

Dyson OnTrac review: Sound quality

  • Clean and detailed
  • Bass Boost increases the low end but delivers a pleasant soundstage
  • Not the most dynamically adept

Despite their rather ‘in ya face’ looks, the Dyson OnTrac is a lot more delicate in its audio presentation. To earn its pay, Dyson places emphasis on the OnTrac’s ability to cater to a broad frequency range of 6Hz to 21kHz. That’s much lower – and a bit higher – than the human ear can hear, but Dyson says it made the decision to ensure the OnTrac could comfortably handle all sounds within the ear’s range of detection and to minimize distortion at higher volumes.

With the Neutral EQ preset selected, Dua Lipa’s Training Season bops along nicely in its opening verse with a decent helping of bass, and her vocal comes through crisp and cleanly. There is a good sense of space, with instruments and various other aspects of a track being clearly placed. But when compared to other pairs such as the Sonos Ace or the Bose QuietComfort Ultra, the sound delivered by the OnTrac feels more constrained with less room to breathe. It’s feels more like how on-ear headphones sound rather than over-ears, which the OnTrac technically is in the way they fit (I discuss this in the design section below).

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

It certainly pays to play around with the EQ presets as I found what worked for one song didn’t necessarily work for the other. Training Season sounded fine on the Neutral preset, but Miley Cyrus’ Flowers was given an extra pop of energy when selecting Enhanced. On several occasions, Neutral flattens things to the point where it wasn’t all that engaging or fun.

And while the OnTrac could certainly keep up with the boogie rhythm of AC/DC’s Whole Lotta Rosie (I am reviewing these in Australia, after all), their lack of dynamic clout is exposed. It’s not to say there isn’t a change between the quieter intro vocal and louder burst of up tempo guitar, it just lacks a little bit of punch compared to some competitors. The Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless, for example, are just way more keen to rock out playing the same track. It’s as if they’re saying “alright, let’s do this!” compared to OnTrac's more reserved, “are you sure? You might damage your hearing” mentality.

It’s a similar story with Rammstein’s Los. Comparing the performance of the OnTrac against the Bose QuietComfort Ultra and there’s a noticeable difference in clarity. Till Lindeman’s vocal is far more pronounced when played through the Bose and, when the full band comes in at around 30 seconds, there’s greater depth. The OnTrac sounds more two dimensional in comparison. It’s good in the sense there’s decent drive behind the sound, but there are more competent performers that cost less money.

Bass heads will enjoy the Bass Boost EQ preset as it does certainly ramp up the low end, but it does muffle the overall sound somewhat. The pulsing bass rhythm throughout Planetary Assault System’s Desert Races benefitted far greater from the Enhanced preset instead.

Overall it’s not exactly a bad sound produced by the Dyson OnTrac. It’s clean and can unearth some detail, but their more neutral sound profile won’t be to everyone’s taste. An adjustable EQ could potentially help to some degree, and I hope this can be made available with a future firmware update, but with such a high-end price tag, it would be fair to expect a high-end sound straight out of the box.

  • Sound quality score: 3.5/5

Dyson OnTrac review: Design

  • Up to 2,000 color combinations
  • Large ear cushions for noise isolation
  • Can run hot

Dyson’s first foray into headphones was shockingly different to say the least, and while the OnTrac are far more headphone-y, they still deviate from the headphone norms of black, white and the occasional green or blue if a manufacturer is feeling adventurous.

The headband, which employs a modular-like design, is available in four different colors, and each comes with a default set of ear cushions and outer ear cups. Copper features navy-blue headband panels and copper ear cups; Black/Nickel has a black headband and shiny grey ear cups; Aluminum has a black headband, silver ear cups and yellow ear cushions; finally, Ceramic Cinnabar (the color of my review unit) features a coral-like orange headband and matching ear cups.

The headband colorway you choose is what you’ll live with, but the ear cushions and outer ear cups can be swapped out to any of seven choices for each, with a claimed total of 2,000 variations possible, paving the way for complete headphone personalization unlike anything I’ve seen before.

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

Changing the cushions and cups isn’t difficult, as both come off with a slight twist. When you take the removable ear cups off, Dyson has added a nice little touch on the main ear cup by showing where each component can be found by way of a blueprint-style design.

The ear cups, despite being physically large, are actually incredibly slim and don't protrude much from the head. I previously thought the Sonos Ace were among the more aesthetically pleasing pairs of headphones in this sense, and so I have to give Dyson credit here.

The ear cushions are made from a microfiber material as opposed to the often used memory foam with a PU leather coating. It’s soft to touch and, indeed, soft when they’re on your head. But they’re not exactly what you would call breathable. Dyson has opted for the large cups and cushions to aid with passive noise isolation if you switch noise cancellation off, but also to increase the effectiveness when it’s turned on. But the size of the cushions and the material, combined with the fact they clamp onto your head tightly (which I do ultimately like as it instills confidence they won’t slip off) means things can get real hot real quick. I carried out most of my testing with the season coming into Australian spring and, after wearing them for a couple of hours, my ears were sweating despite the milder temperatures.

I also found I needed to wiggle the OnTrac around more than normal to get a comfortable fit so that the cutouts fully enveloped my ears. By comparison, the Sonos Ace, which I wear on a daily basis, slides right into place with no adjustments needed, making me think I was wearing headphones that felt more like on-ears than over-ears.

The ear cups themselves rotate so that they can be slid into the case and, in theory, you can wear them around your neck. But because they’re so large, it’s incredibly uncomfortable to do the latter.

Image 1 of 3

Close up image of the physical buttons on the Dyson OnTrac headphones

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Image 2 of 3

The Dyson OnTrac headphones viewed when worn on the head, from the front and side

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Image 3 of 3

The Dyson OnTrac headphones viewed when worn on the head, from the front and side

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

There are two physical buttons on the OnTrac – one button for power and initiating Bluetooth pairing mode on the left ear cup and a small joystick on the right ear cup is used to adjust volume, skip tracks and play/pause. During my testing I found the joystick was responsive for the most part, although I occasionally had issues with adjusting the volume – it didn’t register me thumbing it up or down and I found you may have to give it a really good push. As mentioned earlier, a solid double tap on either ear cup will switch between noise cancellation and transparency modes and you'll get an audible feedback letting you know your command has been received.

The Dyson OnTrac comes supplied with a case (expectedly so, given the price) that has seemingly been inspired by the minimalist slip-case aesthetic employed for the AirPods Max, but offers a little bit more protection than Apple does. Think of a conventional headphone travel case, but remove the zipper sides so you’re left with just the front and back pieces. That’s what Dyson has done here, and attached them with a piece of elastic so when the OnTrac is out of its case it compresses down flat. 

The headphones slip back in without any trouble, but they’re exposed at both the top and the bottom, meaning they’re susceptible to dust ingress at the very least and the headband is left exposed for keys to scratch up against it when the case is in your bag. I love the intention of the fold-flat case, but the execution doesn’t quite nail it, and when you’re spending this much on a set of cans, you’re going to want to protect them as much as you can.

Image 1 of 3

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Image 2 of 3

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Image 3 of 3

Dyson OnTrac headphones in Ceramic Cinnabar colour

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
  • Design score: 3/5

Dyson OnTrac review: Value

  • Cheaper competitors offer better sound and more features
  • Customization can get expensive

As I’ve already mentioned, the Dyson OnTrac costs an eye-watering $499 / £449.99 / AU$799. While that seems on brand for Dyson (everything the company makes is expensive), it would be easier to recommend the headphones if they cost a little less. After all, competing pairs of premium headphones have to be considered and, ultimately, the OnTrac falls short of what is now expected in this space. Battery life is fantastic and is a big gold star for Dyson, and the sound is certainly passable, but the fact is you can find greater sonic insight from others.

Hi-res audio support, or at the very least support for wired listening would have been nice to see, too. And, while I do think the ability to customize the headphones is an interesting and unique one, the added cost makes it much less of an impulse decision and I feel Dyson should throw in a bonus set of cushions and/or ear cups with the purchase of a pair of OnTrac headphones to justify the high price tag.

  • Value score: 2/5

Should I buy the Dyson OnTrac?

Buy it if...

You want a unique-looking pair of headphones

The ability to personalize the OnTrac headphones is a unique proposition and there’s no denying that they’re solidly built.

You need long battery life

While it’s not quite the class leader, the OnTrac’s 55 hours of battery life trumps much of the competition.

Don't buy it if...

You want best-in-class ANC

Noise cancellation is really very good, but if you want to block out everything from the world around you, Bose is still the option to go for.

You want an in-depth app

There’s no ability to fully adjust the EQ settings, and you’re instead given just three fixed presets. Some people may also miss the option to tailor the level of noise cancellation.

You listen in spatial audio

It might not be a dealbreaker for everyone, but given many other pairs in this space support some form of spatial audio, its omittance here is more noticeable.

Dyson OnTrac review: Also consider

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

It's going to take a lot to topple Bose from the top of the noise-cancellation headphone pack, although the Dyson OnTrac does come agonisingly close. These also add spatial audio and a more engaging sound, although the 24-hour battery life falls well short of Dyson's effort.

Read our full Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones review

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100

Class-leading 100 hours of battery life make Cambridge Audio's first pair of headphones the ones to get for frequent flyers. They deliver a glorious sound, too.

Read our in-depth Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 review

Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless

A more lively and detailed sound is what you'll get from these Sennheisers, along with slightly better battery life, improved connectivity and a more impressive feature set.

Read our full Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless review

How I tested the Dyson OnTrac

  • Using iOS and Mac devices
  • Using a variety of music genres
  • In a variety of real-world scenarios

I used the Dyson OnTrac for a couple of weeks, listening to them at home, in the office and when commuting to work on loud, busy trains. I connected them to an iPhone 15 Pro and a MacBook Pro, and listened to a variety of music genres to determine if and how the EQ presets would affect them. During my two-week listening period, I never had to reach for the charging cable, owing to the OnTrac's incredible battery life.

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed September 2024]

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: super-cheap earbuds with a literal twist
4:30 pm | August 28, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

CMF Buds Pro 2: Two-minute review

British tech brand Nothing has, in just a few short years, become a popular name for tech fans with its smartphones and earbuds proving you don’t need to spend a lot to get decent quality. It’s recent CMF by Nothing sub-brand pushes that idea to its extreme, but it doesn’t always work.

The CMF Buds Pro 2 are a good example of that: if you’re used to getting a lot more than you pay for with Nothing products, you’ll be surprised to find that these CMF earbuds give you exactly what you pay for. Nothing more, nothing less.

These are really budget earbuds too; you won’t find worthwhile products for less, and they’re among the cream of the bargain bin… if not the crop. At $59 / £59 / AU$99, your wallet will thank you.

Your ears might thank you too, because the CMF Buds Pro 2 sound good compared to same-price rivals, likely thanks to the union of a bass driver and a tweeter. Bass is the focus of music for sure but treble isn't lost, and the equaliser gives you some customization over your sound. I've certainly tested worse earbuds, including some that cost more.

The noise cancellation is a feature that doesn’t really impress, sadly. I found that it didn’t really compare to most of the CMF Buds’ rivals, even similarly-priced ones, and the Transparency mode was particularly poor. Still, any level of ANC is nothing to get snobby about, given that many rivals in this super-affordable category lack it.

What could have been the redeeming feature of the Buds Pro 2 is a returning feature from other CMF earbuds: the case has a swivel dial which you can use to control your music, rotating it to alter volume or pressing it for play/pause, and this partly replaces on-bud controls that most headphones have. 

In practice, though, the implementation of this feature is poor. The dial is prone to accidental turns or presses in your pocket, the notification sound to tell you that a function has been triggered is startlingly loud, and there’s a significant delay between using the dial and hearing its result. 

Lots of these issues can be overlooked if you consider the low price, but I’d recommend putting a little extra aside beyond the Buds 2 Pro’s asking price: the in-box ear tips are made from a material that isn’t very grippy, and they didn’t reliably stick in my ears. I’d recommend you look to third-party ear tips if you’re considering the CMFs.

There are some parts of the CMF Buds that I liked. The case-buds combo comes in four colors, including a distinctive orange (pictured) and a suave navy blue, so you have more options than for many other buds you may be considering. Plus a few Nothing-exclusive features like its bass boost mode and ChatGPT integration (as long as you’re using a Nothing phone) return, even if the overall feature set is nothing impressive.

It’s easy to look at any super-cheap earbuds and hand-wave any issues as being a symptom of the price, and that’s true with the CMF Buds Pro 2 as well – they’re basically what you’d expect for buds costing this much. However the budget bud market is competitive and a few rivals get you better value for money – more on them in the 'Also consider' section below.

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Price and release date

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Unveiled in July 2024
  • Costs you $59 / £59 / AU$99

The CMF Buds Pro 2 were but on sale in July 2024, just a short time after two other pairs of earbuds from Nothing: the Nothing Ear and Nothing Ear (a). This won’t be the last time you hear about these rivals in this review.

You can pick up the Buds Pro 2 for $59 / £59 / AU$99, so they’re not just cheap earbuds, but they’re cheap earbuds. That’s a $10 / £10 / AU$10 price increase over the original Buds Pro, and I can’t compare the price to a non-Pro CMF Buds 2 because, at the time of writing, no such model exists.

This area of the market is incredibly competitive, with Nothing itself offering some tempting entries into the sub-$100 / £100 / AU$200 price bracket, and so a low price alone isn’t enough for the CMFs to get winning grades.

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Specs

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Features

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 11-hour buds battery, 43-hour with case
  • Limited features in app, including spatial audio
  • Mediocre ANC

The CMF Buds Pro 2 uses Nothing’s smartphone tie-in app, called Nothing X, and as a result it borrows a few Nothing features.

Using Nothing X you can fiddle with an equalizer, change the case control scheme, toggle Spatial Audio, change between a few ANC modes and turn on ‘Ultra Bass’ which does what it says on the tin. Hidden in a menu are toggles for wear detection, high-latency mode, a default to LDAC audio, a find-my-buds feature, and an ear tip fit test. Good for the money, eh? Well, on paper, yes. 

I'm going to get into the equaliser in the sound section, so stay tuned for that. The noise cancellation in the app is similar, in theory, to other Nothing earbuds: you can change between it being off, in Transparency mode (which belts surrounding sounds into your ears so loud that you can barely hear your music) and between four ANC intensities: low, mid, high and adaptive. 

I’d recommend sticking with high ANC mode; the Buds Pro 2’s noise cancellation isn’t very strong, and you’ll want to make the most of it when you can. In testing it struggled to do anything about surrounding chatter, air conditioning unit hums, microwaves and other similar noises. Saying that, ANC is far from a given in buds this cheap and so knocking what there is here, rudimentary though it is, feels a little churlish.

Features like Spatial Audio, in-ear detection and an ear tip fit test are useful, but there are a few far more basic features lacking, that many of similar-priced rivals have. The lack of touch controls is something I’ve mentioned before, but many rivals have a full equalizer experience, not truncated ones like this. I also miss Nothing’s much more effective custom listening profile detector from the Nothing Ear.

In terms of battery life, the CMF Buds Pro 2 hit that ‘bang-average’ button: the buds will get you roughly six and a half hours of listening if you’ve got ANC turned on, and 11 if you’ve got it turned off. Those figures are pretty standard for wireless earbuds.

By using the case you can dial those figures up to 26 or 43 hours respectively, the latter of which is actually rather respectable, but remember, the ANC isn't amazing. 

  • Features score: 3/5

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Design

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Novel dial-toting case has issues
  • Earbuds don't stick in ear well
  • Buds and case are light and protected

Perhaps the most unique part of the CMF Buds Pro 2 is the case design. 

It starts with the color: no boring black or white here but dark gray, light gray (okay, those two are a bit boring), navy blue and bright orange. You can tell which one I tested – ‘bright’ is an understatement – and it’s nice to see earbuds with a range of colors.

The next special feature is the dial, which can be turned left or right or pressed in. This lets you change the volume or pause/play songs easily. 

In theory this is a novel concept, and I did find it really easy to pause music when the case was within reach, but changing volume definitely wasn’t as convenient as bud touch controls tend to be, and I found a range of inconveniences with the buds over the testing period. In fact, I ended up turning off the controls by the latter half of my testing time.

Firstly, rotating the dial resulted in a deafening beep to indicate that the volume was changing. I can see what Nothing was going for here, but the beep didn’t correspond with the new volume; the noise could be painfully loud at times. That became especially annoying bearing in mind that the dial didn’t adjust music much, and I’d need to turn it through endless resolutions to get the same effect as one simple press on my phone’s volume rocker. Oh, and there was a delay between using the dial and seeing an effect which effectively ruled out swiveling the dial loads to bump up the sound, as I’d only find out too late if I’d turned it far too loud.

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)

However, the most annoying aspect for me was that the dial could be quite sensitive in my pocket; I was subjected to endless accidental presses. On one journey in a closely-packed bus, people walking past me would nudge the case in my jacket pocket, pausing my music. When I wore certain pairs of trousers, the constricting and flexing of my pockets when I walked would sometimes press the pause button. And sometimes when I put the case loose in my bad, its companion items would jostle against it and press the button. In the end these everyday annoyances pushed me to turn off the controls, despite my best attempts to like the controls.

Looking at the case itself, it measures 53.4 x 53.4 x 23mm and weighs 46g (not including the buds). Beyond the dial it only has a small button to enable pairing, and a USB-C port for charging.

The earbuds themselves match whichever color of case you opt for. They’re lightweight stem-toting buds weighing 4.9g each. Despite what you'd think given the presence of the dial, the buds also do have touch controls, but I found them quite sensitive and would often accidentally press them when trying to re-align the buds in my ear every time they slipped (for reasons you'll learn in just a moment). As a result I turned them off pretty quickly.

The buds have an IP55 rating against dust ingress and showers of water, though the case has no official rating.

While these buds are light enough to sit comfortably in your ear, they’re also light enough that you might not notice if they fall out of your ear (well, other than your music stopping). And fall they will: Nothing has seemingly opted to use soap for its ear tip material given how slippery they are, and during testing they just wouldn’t stay in my ears reliably, even when I tried different tip sizes. I put this down to the material, which doesn’t seem to have as much friction as the usual silicon tips you see in earbuds. 

It’s fairly easy to remove the Buds 2 Pro ear tips and I’d recommend you try out some third-party ones if you can, because the in-box ones just weren’t reliable for me. Worst of all, they kept sliding just far enough out of my ear for wear detection to think I wasn’t wearing them any more, so it kept pausing my music, and as a result I had to turn that feature off too.

Side-note: if you turn off wear detection, the buds don't even pause your music when you return them to the case, unlike basically every other earbud I've tested. Remember to turn your tunes off yourself!

  • Design score: 2.5/5

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Sound quality

  • Heavy bass focus, but treble isn't lost
  • Limited sound stage
  • Equaliser brings some benefits

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)

As in many other Nothing-built earbuds, bass is the focus of the CMF Buds Pro 2. Whatever genre of music I listened to, the bass was the most palpable part of any song.  

That might put some people off, but it's a staple feature of cheap and cheery earbuds like this. Treble and especially upper mids do suffer a little, but much less than in some other buds I've tested at this price.

That's possibly thanks to the fact that the 11mm bass driver is joined by a 6mm tweeter to carry the flag for higher-pitched lines.

I did miss the sense of soundstage that some other buds offer: the CMF seem to present all elements of a song in one solid block rather than spread out, and it meant that some instruments disappeared behind the omnipresent bass.

The Nothing X app offers the ability to add even more bass to its buds, and I've enjoyed this feature in other propositions from the company. However I couldn't hear much of a bass boost in the CMF Buds Pro 2, even when ratcheting it up to full power.

The equalizer in the app also lets you tweak your music, to a degree. For those of you who’ve cut your teeth on earbud app equalizers, this isn’t quite as in-depth; you can change the prominence of bass, mid and treble, to +/- 6 points. There are also six presets: pop, rock, classic, electronic, vocal enhancement or something called Dirac Opteo which apparently changes the EQ based on your music, but to my ears had little effect.

This EQ isn't hugely powerful, but it's a lot simpler to use than some others, and I did manage to rescue the treble somewhat from songs.

  • Sound quality: 4/5

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Value

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)
  • The incredibly low price means they offer value for money
  • Definitely consider buying extra eartips though

I've been quite critical of the CMF Buds Pro 2 throughout this review, and that's because the design and feature set don't quite work for me. That said, the price makes the setbacks all-too-easy to overlook.

For just $59 / £59 / AU$99, these are some of the cheapest buds you can find from a reputable company, and while it's a very low benchmark, these buds do offer you reasonable value for money.

That's because you can de-activate the annoying features, leaving a case with an ornamental wheel, earbuds that sound decent for your price, and maybe a slight extra bill for when you buy third-party ear tips.

  • Value: 3.5/5

Should I buy the CMF Buds Pro 2?

Buy it if…

You're on a budget
It's easy to overlook many issues when buds are so gentle on the bank account, and so if you want super-cheap buds the CMF could be a safe bet.

Don’t buy it if…

CMF Buds Pro 2 review: Also consider

How I tested the CMF Buds Pro 2

The CMF Buds Pro 2 on a white-and-orange background.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Tested for 3 weeks
  • Tested at home, in the office and on walks

I tested the CMF Buds Pro 2 for over three weeks, and that review time saw them paired with both my Android smartphone and Windows laptop. I didn't test them alongside a Nothing phone.

To test the buds I listened to music on Spotify, watched TV shows on Netflix and Prime Video, partook in voice and video calls and played games on my phone. Most of this was done at home or in the office but I used the buds on several long journeys on trains and buses.

I've been testing gadgets for TechRadar for over five years, and in that time I've reviewed many budget headphones, as well as phones, tablets, watches and electric scooters.

  • First reviewed in August 2024
Earfun Air Pro 4 review: good-value cheap earbuds with just a few too many features
2:40 pm | August 14, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Tags: | Comments: Off

Earfun Air Pro 4: Two-minute review

I never thought I’d be knocking a set of good budget earbuds having too many features, or excluding a set of earbuds from our best noise-cancelling earbuds guide for offering too many ANC profiles. But this Earfun Air Pro 4 review changes that.

If you’ve ever heard of Earfun before, you’ll know it as a brand well versed in putting out low-cost but competitive earbuds. You'll also know that its naming conventions can be quite baffling. 

The Air Pro 4 are the successors to 2023’s Air Pro 3 (which we gave a near-perfect review to), and their main difference from the same-priced Free Pro 3 from late 2023 is that they have stems, rather than being purely in-ear beans. They’re also more premium alternatives to the Earfun Air 2, released earlier in 2024, which (like all those other Earfun options) offered some great features at really low prices. But that's a lot of Frees, Airs and graces Pros to get your head around. 

Suffice to say that Earfun has a bustling product suite, perhaps an overwhelming number for people who don’t know which to opt for, and ‘too much’ is the theme of this review too.

In its quest to offer buyers on a budget a wide range of options, Earfun has gone a bit too far, and I found some elements of the experience a little too overwhelming. There are five different ANC modes (not counting ‘off’ and ‘ambient’) and I couldn’t get my head around the differences; there are a whopping 30 equalizer presets and scrolling through the list to find the right option for certain songs or genres was more work than it was worth.

So testing the Earfun Air Pro 4 was initially a bit exhausting – until I gave up, and just stuck to the same modes. I think that's what you'll do too. Do that, and you'll reveal great low-budget earbuds that offer loads of options and fairly respectable, robust audio quality for the price. It's just that wading through the extraneous options becomes a little wearying. 

They feel premium enough too, with a lightweight minimalist design that remains comfortably in the ear, and the case is lovely and small enough to slip into little pockets even though it packs a few premium features like wireless charging.

The sound quality is perfectly acceptable for the price (though if your budget breaches the $/£100 barrier, you’ll have a few more tempting options) and definitely matches the ‘cheap’ with the ‘cheerful’ for most songs.

I also appreciated how the Earfun Air Pro 4’s battery life outstrips most competitors, with 7.5 hours per bud with ANC on and 11 hours with it off. That’s a fair few songs more than you’ll get on most earbuds in this price bracket. 

So if you’re happy to ignore a few too many superfluous and potentially confusing features, or are willing to try and get your head around them, then the Earfun Air Pro 4 are good picks for people on a budget. But if not, then the company has loads more options for you – as do its competitors (more on that later).

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Price and release date

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)
  • Unveiled in July 2024
  • Cost $89.99 / £79.99 (roughly AU$140) 

The Earfun Air Pro 4 were announced right at the end of July 2024, and became available to purchase shortly afterwards. The company sells them in certain regions but also has a global option on its website, listed in USD, which is why we don’t have an AUD price.

The buds cost $89.99 / £79.99 (roughly AU$140) which is notably a lower price than the $99.99 / £99.99 (roughly AU$160) Air Pro 3 – those earbuds got price cuts almost immediately after launch, so it's possible that the Air Pro 4 could too.

Earfun has a busy line-up of earbuds and the Air Pro 4 slot in just ahead of most of the others in terms of price; the Air Pro 3, Free Pro 3 and Air Pro SV all cost just a small amount less. The company specializes in low-cost earbuds and these new models are no different.

So yes, the Earfun Air Pro 4 definitely count as cheap earbuds; they won’t break the bank and that fact helps set expectations with the sound quality and features.

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Specs

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Features

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)
  • Many (many) equalizer presets
  • ANC is good but too many modes
  • Good battery life compared to rivals

One of my favorite things about Earfun’s other earbuds is that they often trump the competition in terms of battery life, and that’s certainly the case with the Air Pro 4.

With ANC turned on, the buds last for roughly seven and a half hours before you need to return them to the case to power back up; turn ANC off and that figure is even longer at 11 hours. Most same-price rivals go for about 6 and 9 hours respectively, so the Pro 4 is, ahem, Pro-4-ming well here.

Earfun has said that the case can provide up the 52 hours of music playback between all its charges; the website doesn’t state whether that’s with ANC on or off, but I’d imagine it’s with it off. At an estimate, I’d give you 35 and a half hours of listening time from the case if you only listen with ANC on.

On the topic of ANC: it has potential on the Air Pro 4, but an annoying abundance of choice makes it hard for you to make the most of it.

The standard ANC is pretty heavy-duty, cutting out annoying background noises to help you enjoy your music without the chattering of keyboards or whine of noisy trains that you’re working on (at least, those are my favorite uses of it!).

The thing is, in the app there’s no one noise cancellation mode. Instead, there are seven.

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)

These include ambient mode and no ANC (pretty self-explanatory) but five different versions of ANC: strong, balance, AI environment adaptive, AI ear adaptive, and wind noise cancellation. These five all have descriptions about how they’re different but it’s all very vague and I couldn’t hear much of a difference between them, especially the adaptive one. After a few listening sessions of confused testing, I decided just to stick to ‘strong’ and hope for the best.

Beyond this confusing ANC situation, the Earfun app offers the basic features that most companion apps do: a few toggle-able features such as wear detection and low-latency mode for gaming, the ability to customize the controls and a ‘find my headphones’ feature.

There’s an equalizer too and I really took to it: you can customize your sound yourself, or rely on a sound profile mode that tests your hearing (I didn’t find this mode quite as accurate or useful as other companies’ equivalents though, like Nothing’s in the Nothing Ear (a) and Nothing Ear). But the best part is the presets: there are 30 in all, and lots of them make marked differences on the sound profile, so it’s useful if you want to tailor your mix to what you’re listening to.

Frankly, 30 is far too many, and I didn’t want to scroll through a whole list of ‘Bass Reducer 1, 2 and 3’s in order to find specific ones. Instead I stick to a core 15 based on genres of music, and that seemed enough – in situations like this, less is definitely more. I’m just surprised that there can be 30 without any for spoken word or podcasts!

  • Features score: 3.5/5

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Design

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)
  • AirPods-style stem earbuds
  • Fairly small charging case
  • IPX5 rating against limited showers

The Air Pro 4 aren’t the smallest earbuds I’ve ever seen, even within Earfun's lineup, but they’re still pretty slender. The buds weigh roughly 5g each (according to my kitchen scales; no official weight is listed) and consist of an eartip, a small body and an AirPods-style stem.

The default tip fit in my ear comfortably and stayed nice and secure through the entire testing process, but Earfun has packed four extra sizes into the box, which is at least one more than you normally see in earbuds – and two more at this budget level. These range from extra-small to extra-large and I commend Earfun on it.

Each bud has a small button, which is the round indentation at the top of the stem that you can see in the images. This only required a gentle touch and so I found them easy to use, although there was a noticeable delay between the press and the desired action being triggered.

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)

The buds have an IPX5 rating, making them protected from streams of water but not immersion in liquid, so you can wear them in the rain or even in the shower, but not in the bath (or pool).

Keeping the Air Pro 4 cozy and safe when you’re not using them is their charging case; from product listing images and the size of the box, you’d imagine this would be quite big, but it was a lot smaller than I expected. It weighs 56g (when the buds are in) and measures 62.4 x 46.6 x 29.2mm.

Said case, which opens in a clamshell style, has a USB-C port for charging but also supports wireless powering. Despite being a small plastic pebble that’s smaller than the average size of a field mouse, it felt sturdy enough to protect the buds well.

  • Design score: 3.5/5

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Sound quality

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)
  • Good sound, rather than great
  • Equalizer gives you customization over sound
  • Several upgrades over predecessor

It’s good that the Earfun equalizer is so in depth in letting you customize your music, because in default mode the buds are good, but not great. For the price, they are better than lots of rivals, but you’d definitely get better audio by paying more.

Unless you boost the treble in the app, it’s a little lacking by default, falling in the mix behind the relatively meaty bass. Mid is also hiding in the back, but I found it susceptible to peaking and distortion at times, with instruments like hi-hats and acoustic guitars getting mushy.

However once you turn to the equalizer, and push the music to its limits, you can get a lot more legroom for enjoying your music. Bass, which is already pretty meaty by default, can gain even more prominence, though it’ll never turn as forceful as on something like the Nothing Buds. 

I enjoyed rescuing the treble, with certain presets pulling it further forward, and the mid to a certain extent – though this put both at higher risk of peaking in songs. And while the presets let you play around with how the different sounds interact, I rarely felt that sounds found energetic.

A few additions to the Air Pro 4 over the Pro 3 is support for a new audio codic, LDAC, allowing for 24-bit/96kbps streaming from supported files or apps, as well as Bluetooth 5.4 for a more reliable connection. This offsets what might, on paper, look like a downgrade in the driver size to 10mm from 11mm.

  • Sound quality: 3.5/5

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Value

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)
  • Good feature set for price
  • More cash will get you better audio

If you know low-cost earbuds, you’ll know that Earfun always gives you good value for money, and that’s no different here.

The Air Pro 4 give you decent music quality, a long-lasting battery and admirable noise cancellation, and the only thing more slender than the easily-pocketable charging case is the price.

Sure, the Earfun Air Pro 4 isn’t quite as feature-packed as some of the biggest names on the market, but it also costs a third of its big Bose, Apple and Samsung alternatives. 

  • Value: 4/5

Should I buy the Earfun Air Pro 4?

Buy them if…

Don’t buy them if…

Earfun Air Pro 4 review: Also consider

How I tested the Earfun Air Pro 4

The Earfun Air Pro 4

(Image credit: Future)
  • Tested for two weeks
  • Tested at home, in the office and on trips

I tested the Earfun Air Pro 4 for two weeks to write this review, which is the standard testing time for earbuds like this. I mainly used them connected to my Android phone, but also paired them to my Windows laptop and iPad during testing.

The listening for this review was done at home, in the office, at the gym, on walks around my neighborhood and also on a couple of long train journeys, so their ANC was really put to the test. I listened to music, podcasts and audio books on Spotify and also watched YouTube videos, streamed Netflix movies, caught lots of the Olympics on Discovery Plus and partook in phone and video calls, all using the buds.

I've been testing gadgets at TechRadar for over five years now, and in that time have used plenty of budget earbuds including previous Earfun options.

  • First reviewed in August 2024
I tried the new Google Pixel Buds Pro 2, and the fit is way less clunky than before
8:10 pm | August 13, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Google first introduced the inaugural Pixel Buds Pro back in 2022, so it’s about time we had a new model, and the technology giant has unveiled just that, alongside the third-generation Pixel Watch and four phones under the Pixel 9 umbrella. 

Google’s Pixel Buds Pro 2 might look a bit similar to their older siblings, but the portion that rests in your ear is slimmer and delivers a more comfortable fit, at least from my first impressions. Under the hood, these are the first earbuds with a Google Tensor chip to power some Pixel Buds-only features like ‘Clear Calling’ and promise improvements to both noise cancellation and battery life.

Now, ahead of a full-fat review, I’m sharing my very early first impressions. How early are we talking? I got to wear them in my ears with a medium-sized ear tip, but I didn’t get to listen to music or test out the new features. So I’ll share my opinions on fit and also run through the latest promised enhancements. And of course, I'll go hands-on as soon as possible and fully test them for a review as well.

Pricing and availability

Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 in pink, on a desk

(Image credit: Future)

Regardless of which color you choose, Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 will cost $229.99 / £219 / around AU$379. You can pick between Hazel, Porcelain, Wintergreen, or Peony – and having seen 'em all, those last two are my favorite and the most fun.

If you’re already sold, preorders are open. However, Google isn’t shipping the Pixel Buds Pro 2 until September 26, 2024, so you’ll have to wait a bit – in fact, that’s after the Pixel 9 family, including Pixel 9 Pro, Pixel 9 Pro XL, Pixel 9 Pro Fold, and Pixel Watch 3

The wait to jam might very well be worth it, though.

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar

Much lighter and way more cozy

Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 in Wintergreen

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

The earbuds still have a friendly circle that sticks out of your ear to the world with a “G” Google logo and capacitive touch controls, but it’s no longer attached to a longer, ovular piece that goes in the ear and attached to the ear tip. 

It’s now a molded, black, circular piece of plastic with an ear tip attached to the end. You’ll still get several sizes in the box, but the real significance is that each Pixel Bud Pro 2 weighs in at just 4.7 grams, which is 27% lighter than the original.

In my short first impressions, I slid the Pixel Buds Pro 2 into my ears and immediately noticed a more nestled, cozy fit that didn’t weigh down my ears as much. They also protrude far less and have a new twist-to-adjust stabilizer, which is not a wing tip but, like Studio Buds Plus from Beats, kind of like a corkscrew that you can turn to the left or right to stabilize these in your ear.

It aims to ensure the Pixel Buds Pro 2 won’t fall out, but the added bonus is a better seal in your ear. This way, whatever you’re listening to sounds better, and you can passively block out environmental sounds around you. This refreshed design and the onboard Google-made Tensor A1 chip also promises up to two times more effective active noise cancellation. Google is calling this Silent Seal 2.0, and I’m really keen to try it out, especially considering how good of a passive seal these provide. 

Google Pixel Bud Pro 2 in Wintergreen

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

Much like AirPods Pro 2, Google’s Pixel Buds Pro 2 have a conversation detection feature that allows you to have a conversation with someone without removing the earbuds. The device switches into a listening mode that lets environmental sound in.

Powering the audio in each Pixel Buds Pro 2 will be a new 11-millimeter driver with a high-frequency chamber that works with the Tensor A1 chip for audio processing. These also still offer support for ‘Spatial Audio with Head Tracking’ with the right tracks.

Aside from music playback and noise cancellation, like other listening modes, the Pixel Buds Pro 2 will also pair and connect seamlessly between other Pixel devices –be it a Pixel phone, Tablet, or Watch. Similar to how Google Gemini is unashamedly front-and-center within its latest phones, you will be able to use Gemini on Pixel Buds Pro 2, and it will effectively be the smart assistant here. I hope it yields some improvements with the live translation features of the past.

Regarding battery life, Google says that Pixel Buds Pro 2 can last for up to 12 hours with active noise cancellation off or 8 hours with that listening mode enabled. That’s pretty much in line with other similarly priced earbuds, and I’m eager to see how this claim runs in our testing. When you factor in recharges in the case, the Pixel Buds Pro 2 should last for up to 30 hours. Here's the rub: the older set will serve up to 11 hours from the buds, or up to 31 hours total listening time with the wireless charging case… so a minor downgrade there. 

Google Pixel Buds Pro 2, bottom of case

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

As I was hoping to see, just like the AirPods Pro 2, Google added a speaker to the Pixel Buds case. This means that when you misplace the Pro 2, you can still see the location but can also ping the case, and make it emit a sound so you can hear it. 

Considering the improved design – and the lovely shades of Peony and Wintergreen – plus the more comfortable design, I have high hopes for the audio playback and noise cancellation chops here. 

Most importantly, though they stick out less and aren’t as cumbersome. So, let’s just hope the other aspects live up to the hype.

You may also like

Beats Solo Buds review: budget earbuds with an epic battery… but where’s the bass?
2:34 pm | August 9, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Beats Solo Buds: two-minute review

The Beats Solo Buds are the cheapest earbuds the brand has ever made. Arriving in a compact package, they’re easy to sling in a bag or back pocket, lacking the bulk of many  more premium true wireless options. They also come with possibly the best in-bud battery life I’ve ever seen, stretching easily to several days of intense listening. Nevertheless, they make several compromises that mean they're harder to recommend for serious music fans.

The Beats Solo Buds offer a good range of features – although, inevitably, not anywhere close to the number that come with pricier models. Multi-point pairing is rock solid, while one-touch pairing makes connecting them a dream for Apple users. Literally all I had to do was tap them to my devices and I was good to go.

Once you’re connected, you can settle in for a lengthy listening session: Beats states that the earbuds’ internal battery will last for an epic 18 hours – which rivals that of almost any of the best wireless earbuds. And while there’s no additional charge in the case, the Solo Buds’ fast-charging means you’ll gain a full hour of listening from plugging them in for just five minutes. No more worrying about your buds dying when you’re only part of the way home from work.

There are definitely a few features absent here, though. The lack of active noise cancellation means these aren’t the best buds for keeping background noise at bay. Often I also found myself missing the in-ear detection that many rivals offer, so they auto-pause when you remove them. There are no fancy smart features here such as spatial audio with head tracking or adaptive EQ, either.

In addition, when it comes to sound quality, the Solo Buds are a bit of a mixed bag. For a lot of people, Beats means bass; but the brand has changed its priorities in recent times, refocusing on feature-set over whomping bass. This is fully evident in the Solo Buds, which lack impact and definition in the low end; without the bass to provide a firm footing, busier mixes can end up sounding a little ill-defined.

It’s not all disappointing, though: the Beats Solo Buds deliver crisp and clear mids, showcasing vocals and many acoustic instruments at their best. Admittedly, the highest trebles do pull a few punches – but for me, that remains preferable than an overly bright and brittle edge to hats and guitars. Plus, they still manage a good sense of separation between different instruments when you’re listening to less crowded recordings.

Perhaps not surprisingly for a brand such as Beats, design is where the Solo Buds really shine. They’re some of the smallest buds I’ve ever seen: they sit relatively discreetly in your ears unlike many of the gargantuan earbuds on the market. And thanks to the lack of a separate battery, their case is slight enough that I could carry the buds around in my pocket everywhere I went, and only really think of them when I needed them.

Moreover, they’re some of the most comfortable buds I’ve ever worn. Being secure enough to stay in your ears while not being so unyielding that they start to ache during long listening sessions is a tightrope many earbuds struggle to walk; the Beats Solo Buds cartwheel along it. The only discomfort I ever experienced was due to the placement of their button – given it sits opposite your ear canal, I felt like I might  puncture my brain or had to grasp the bud awkwardly every time I went to press it.

Not everyone is looking for the same things from earbuds. So if your priority is cool-looking, super-comfortable buds with a life that would make Methuselah envious, then they’re a solid choice. However, those looking for superior sound quality or features such as ANC would ultimately be better off with the Sony WF-C700N for a very similar price, or opting for another pair from our list of the best budget wireless earbuds instead.

Beats Solo Buds review: price & release date

The Beats Solo Buds come with a price tag of $79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.95. This makes them the cheapest wireless earbuds the brand has ever produced, something that I’m certain makes them a super-tempting proposition for cash-strapped fans of the best Beats headphones.

They come in four different colorways. Matte Black and Storm Grey probably speak for themselves, given they’re basically the same hues that the majority of earbuds arrive in, but the Beats Solo Buds are also available in the more vibrant options of Arctic Purple (our review model), which is a pleasingly subtle lavender hue, and Transparent Red, a bold crimson with a translucent case.

Beats Solo Buds review: specs

The Beats Solo Buds

(Image credit: Future)

Beats Solo Buds review: features

  • Epic in-bud battery life…
  • … but no in-case charging
  • Fewer features than more expensive buds

For a pair of affordable earbuds, the Beats Solo Buds have a very solid feature set – even if they can’t eclipse many of their more high-end rivals.

Apple’s one-touch pairing is excellent, as always. Holding up the Solo Buds’ case to my iPhone 13 Pro, they paired in a trice. Pairing with my MacBook required a few more steps, but it was still trivially simple. In addition, the improvements in recent versions of Bluetooth have made chopping and changing between devices so much easier – I never once struggled to switch between my phone and laptop, with the buds switching as soon as I tapped their icon in Bluetooth settings.

Perhaps the biggest selling point of the Solo Buds is their battery life, which Beats maintains is an absurd 18 hours. This is a hell of a claim – and naturally, I wasn’t going to just take it as granted, so I set them to play continuous 256kbps audio at half volume for six hours. My skepticism was entirely unfounded. During that time, the battery drained just 34%, meaning that a rough life of 17.5 hours is entirely realistic. That’s an unreal amount of listening to get from a single charge, and I’ve never seen another pair of earbuds come close.

However, this does come with a heavy caveat. The Solo Buds’ super-slim case comes at the cost of an internal battery, which means that 18 hours is the total: you won’t get any more juice while the buds are stowed in the case.

Nevertheless, their fast-charging feature – or Fast Fuel, as it’s inexplicably dubbed – is a huge help when that battery does finally run flat. Keen to test Beats’ claims that it would deliver a full hour of juice after just five minutes of charging, I plugged them in for five minutes via USB-C and then listened at half volume until the battery died. They lasted 75 minutes, smashing the figure the brand promised.

The ability to charge the buds from your phone is also a seriously helpful feature when you’re caught short and don’t have access to a socket. However, it’s worth bearing in mind that you’ll only be able to access this feature if you have an iPhone 15 or a compatible Android device; sadly, anyone without a USB-C-powered device is out of luck. Still, you’ll likely be topping up far less than you’d expect, making these buds a good choice for someone who loves marathon listening sessions.

As mentioned, there are a fair few features missing from the Beats Solo Buds compared to more premium buds. If you’re hoping for active noise cancelling, you should look elsewhere – for example, the Nothing Ear (a) and Sony WF-C700N for only slightly more, or the Earfun Air Pro 3 for slightly less (though these are much bulkier).

Some of the features of Apple’s AirPods haven’t trickled down here, either: there’s no adaptive EQ that uses clever algorithms to optimize audio to the shape of your ears. Additionally, despite still having settings on the iPhone referring to Automatic Ear Detection, so they pause when removed or play when replaced automatically, the Solo Buds don’t actually offer it. It isn’t an essential feature; but once you’ve been relying on it, it’s hard to go back to buds that aren’t capable of it.

Finally, while the box advertises that the Beats Solo Buds have Spatial Audio, don’t get too excited – it doesn’t offer the fancy head-tracking that the AirPods Pro 2 and Beats Fit Pro do. Instead, this simply means you’ll get the same audio processing algorithms that allow other bog-standard buds to add extra separation to Dolby Atmos music with Apple devices.

  • Features score: 3.5 / 5

The Beats Solo Buds

(Image credit: Future)

Beats Solo Buds review: sound quality

  • Weak bass
  • Bit on the quiet side
  • Call quality is decent

I’ll be 100% honest: when I first listened to the Beats Solo Buds, my response was… not good. The sound struck me as anemic, with a weak low end and a muffled treble; it gave me the uncomfortable sensation of my ears being stuffed with cotton wool. Worse, the volume was deeply underwhelming. I worked out that I was listening in Dolby Atmos mostly, and this was the culprit – it's much quieter, and mixed differently. I wouldn’t recommend dabbling in this for music with these buds, since it involves a few too many compromises.

So how do the Beats Solo Buds perform when they’re not attempting to simulate 3D soundtracks? The answer is probably “better… but not the best”. 

For a brand that was once synonymous with bountiful bass, Beats has really struggled to get much oomph out of the Solo Buds’ low end. Listening to Go Your Own Way by Fleetwood Mac, I found the toms and snares cut through well, giving the song a decent pace, while those crisp guitar strings displayed plenty of bite. Unfortunately, though, the bass guitar was almost entirely lost in the mix, which is a bit of a shame and makes the result feel a bit lacking in guts.

It’s not all bad news: these earbuds can definitely make certain frequencies in the mix shine. When I listened to St. Thomas by Sonny Rollins, Tommy Flanagan, Doug Watkins and Max Roach, Rollins’ sax line clearly sat in that acoustic sweet spot, soaring over the mix with all the expected harmonic richness, while the click of Roach’s drumsticks and the taut skins of the toms were easily appreciable. Unfortunately, the piano was mostly lost in the mix – it felt like a word that was on the tip of my tongue, so nearly in grasp and yet just out of reach.

And this becomes more noticeable depending on the quality of the material you feed these buds. While listening to Black Eye by Allie X on Apple Music’s higher-quality 256kbps AAC setting, I was impressed with the punch of the snare and the trebly kick, while those poppy synth lines really felt clear and immediate. However, swapping to Spotify’s more lossy, 160kbps free tier showed up more of the Solo Buds’ flaws – the mix sounded a little more cohesive but also quite insubstantial, with the sound much more concentrated around the mid-highs and coming out quite a bit quieter to boot.

On the plus side, when you’re listening to sparser recordings, the Beats Solo Buds do a pretty respectable job of positioning things in the mix, with each element able to enjoy much more space and clarity. Listening to Timeless by Poppy Ackroyd, I could hear the timbre of instruments much better than in more crowded recordings – the pizzicato strings and the creak of the piano mechanism were so wonderfully crisp in comparison to the more muted tone of the keys and the sweet ebb and flow of the bowed violin.

Sadly, the Beats Solo Buds aren’t especially loud. Often when I was using them in the office, it felt like the sounds of typing, chatter and gadget wrangling were more audible than the music to which I was listening. This wouldn’t be a massive issue in and of itself, but the earbuds also don’t present the best noise isolation. Playing podcasts in a quiet room, you can hear all the facts and banter with crystal clarity; when you’re walking along a busy street, they have stiff competition from the world around you. This means the Beats Solo Buds are almost certainly safe for listening to while cycling during rush hour, but less good if you’re looking to shut the world out on your commute.

While I was out and about, I also tested the Solo Buds’ leading-edge microphones to see how they handled voice quality for phone calls. While I didn’t get quite the crystal clarity you sometimes get from premium, over-ear cans, the people on the other end of the line said they could always hear me just fine, even when cars were tearing past. And this was borne out when I recorded some voice notes: traffic caused a slight whoosh as it went by, but not the roar you’d expect, showing how hard the algorithm is working to keep your voice clear.

  • Sound quality: 3 / 5

Female reviewer with blonde and pink hair modeling the Beats Solo Buds

TechRadar’s reviewer Cesci Angell kindly modeling the Beats Solo Buds for me – my nails are definitely not that well manicured. (Image credit: Future)

Beats Solo Buds review: design

  • Super comfortable fit
  • Attractive design and slim case
  • Button placement isn’t particularly ergonomic

While the Beats Solo Buds might not be an unqualified sonic success, their design definitely still feels like it has plenty of the old Beats magic. Visually, they’re deeply pleasing, featuring gentle rounded curves, rather than the unsightly tacked-on discs, stems and other protuberances you often see in earbuds these days. And while the buds themselves are slight and lightweight, it’s the case that really impresses: it’s far more slimline than many others out there, which makes losing out on extra battery charges for your buds an almost worthwhile sacrifice.

The various colors available look great as well. Personally, I feel that the Arctic Purple I received for review is the best of the bunch; but Transparent Red also looks great and is the obvious choice for anyone wanting to shout about their new pair of Beats from the rooftops. Matte Black and Storm Grey are more restrained but nevertheless exude class. No matter which color you choose, you can be sure of one thing: these look far better than your average pair of budget earbuds.

Both the buds and the case are made from a gloriously smooth matte plastic that feels great under your fingertips. The buds themselves feel particularly tactile; often I found myself reaching for them over other earbuds just because I enjoyed the way they felt in my hands. And they pop in and out of the case with a satisfying click as the magnets lock them into place – a nice bit of near-haptic feedback, so you know immediately that your buds have found their way home.

The Beats Solo Buds come with silicone ear tips in four different sizes, from small to extra large. After experimenting with every size, I found that the medium provided me with the best seal; but, naturally, you’ll want to try them all to find what works best for your ears.

Having tested no end of earphones and earbuds over the years, I can honestly say that the Beats Solo Buds are some of the most comfortable I’ve ever tried. They sat snugly in my ears, with the ear tips forming a close seal in my ear canal. Their contours closely mirrored the shape of my ear, meaning they never once felt loose or even needed adjusting, and they didn’t get uncomfortable, even after long listening sessions.

Keen to really put this fit to the test, I even tried doing a couple of workouts with the buds in my ears. Now, the Beats Solo Buds aren’t really designed for exercise, and their lack of IP rating means that they won’t be able to withstand sweat as well as actual dedicated workout buds – so you might not want to try this at home. Still, the buds stayed firmly in place, even during my most high-intensity workout, which means you can definitely count on them to stay put while you dash for a train.

That’s not to say the Beats Solo Buds are completely free of missteps where their design is concerned. First of all, their lack of stems and relatively uniform design means that, on occasion, I’d absent-mindedly find myself trying to put them in the wrong way up. This can be solved fairly simply by looking closely at the bud before you insert it, but it’s easy to forget this when you’re in the middle of other things.

Personally, though, I find this less of an issue than the controls. Like many earbuds, the Solo Buds feature a multi-purpose button on each bud that you press a certain number of times for various actions: once, for play/pause; twice, for skip forward; and three times, for skip backward. Unfortunately, the positioning of the button means pressing it drives the whole bud deep into your ear canal, making me feel like I was going to perforate an eardrum every time I paused my music. Eventually I realized that gripping the bud at the top and bottom with my fingers stabilized it enough to allow me to press the button without discomfort; but I feel like lowering the pressure required to push the button or repositioning the button would have been much more ergonomic.

  • Design: 4.5 / 5

Beats Solo Buds review: value

  • Cheapest earbuds Beats have ever sold…
  • But they don’t offer as good value as other affordable buds
  • You can get better sound for your spend

How sweet a deal you’re getting with the Beats Solo Buds will almost certainly depend on your perspective. As I’ve already mentioned, these are the cheapest wireless earbuds the brand has ever offered, and if you’ve been clamoring for a pair of Beats but have only a modest budget, then these will definitely scratch that itch for you.

However, in comparison to other products on the market, I’m not convinced that they offer the absolute best return on investment. Both the Sony WF-C700N and Nothing Ear (a) offer more well-rounded, energetic sound, not to mention ANC to boot – and while they both retail for $20 / £20 or less more, they’re often on sale for a similar price or even cheaper than the Solo Buds.

If you’re not so bothered about sound quality and just want a stylish, super-comfortable set of buds with epic battery life, this is still a very reasonable price. But if you want the best sound quality for your buck, you might be better off looking elsewhere.

  • Value score: 3 / 5

Should I buy the Beats Solo Buds?

Buy them if…

You want super-comfortable buds you can slip in a pocket
These tiny buds not only feel comfortable for long listening sessions but their super-slimline case is easy to slip into a pocket and forget it’s even there. That makes them perfect for carrying wherever you go.

You want hours of listening without having top them up
With their 18-hour battery life, the Beats Solo Buds will go on and on without you ever having to take them out of your ears. If you have a long trip or a marathon coming up, these buds will last you – and then some.

Don’t buy them if…

You want the best audio quality for your buck
Frankly, well-rounded audio is not the Solo Buds’ strong suit. And while no budget earbuds will offer truly audiophile-grade sound, many similarly priced buds offer more confident, satisfying sound.

You want to hear your tunes and nothing else
Given their relative quietness and their lack of noise isolation, these aren’t buds for shutting out the world. Instead, they’ll leave you very aware of your surroundings – whether you want to be or not.

Beats Solo Buds review: also consider

Nothing Ear (a)
Costing only $20 / £20 (roughly AU$52) more than the Solo Buds – and often less than that – the Nothing Ear (a) are an enticing all-round package. They offer emphatic, detailed sound, effective noise-canceling, and in-ear detection. And that zesty yellow colorway makes them even more eye-catching than a pair of Beats. Here's our full Nothing Ear (a) review.

Sony WF-C700N
Not only do the Sony WF-C700N offer wonderfully clear, well-rounded sound, but they also rock Sony’s spatial-audio equivalent 360 Reality Audio. On top of this, their Adaptive Sound Control learns your routine, automatically tailoring their noise canceling based on whether you’re sat at your desk or out for a run. Here's our full Sony WF-C700N review.

Beats Solo Buds review: How I tested

  • I used them for over two weeks
  • Listened to a wide array of music, podcasts and movie soundtracks
  • Compared them against other affordable earbuds

To test the Beats Solo Buds, I used them for over two weeks. I connected them to multiple different devices, including my iPhone 13 Pro and MacBook Pro. 

I listened to a wide range of content, from compressed Spotify streams to higher-quality audio on Apple Music. Not only did I listen to tracks from TechRadar’s testing playlist, but a wide variety of genres outside of this, as well as listening to a range of podcasts and watching several TV shows and movies.

I tested their fit doing both cardio and weight-training workouts. And I tested their microphones by recording multiple voice notes and making several phone calls.

I also compared the Beats Solo Buds directly against similarly priced earbuds, as well as utilizing years of experience testing other headphones and audio gear.

« Previous PageNext Page »