The Apple Nike Sport Band is a workout-ready wrist strap that’s built for the sporty type. At $49 / £49, this is by no means one of the cheaper Apple Watch bands available, but it does, admittedly, have a premium feel to it that takes your workout monitoring to the next level.
Specifically, this band is constructed of the sweat and waterproof material, fluoroelastomer. Apple says that each strap has at least 30% recycled fluoroelastomer and that the flakes littered across the strap are made from a minimum of 66% fluoroelastomer – pretty neat. Interestingly, these flakes are scattered in a randomized manner, ensuring that each Nike Sport Band is unique.
More generally, this is a very nice looking band. I tested the Midnight Sky variant, where the flakes created a starry sky impression against the gray-black strap. Other than Midnight Sky, you can choose from: Blue Flame (blue and orange); Cargo Khaki (green and blue); Desert Stone (a sandy color with orange and blue details); Magic Ember (pink); Pure Platinum (white with mulit-colored splodges); and Volt Splash (green). I was a big fan of the many color options available – whether you want a more muted, professional looking option like Midnight Sky or an in-your-face vibrant band like Magic Ember, there’s a style for anyone – something we always look for on our hunt for the best Apple Watch bands.
That’s not the only variability to mention, though, because there are also a number of size options. This strap is compatible with three different case sizes: 40, 42 and 46mm. You can also get it in either small-to-medium (140-190mm) or medium-to-large (160-210mm). I used the former and found it very easy to get a comfortable fit – just poke the aluminum pin through one of the many holes in the strap and you’re good to go.
Even when keeping this strap on for entire days at a time, I never felt any irritation or annoyance. The high density of holes means there’s plenty of room for your wrist to breathe and the material is inherently resistant against water and sweat, making this strap ideal for workouts, for instance. I went on a run and many a walk and never realized any strain or damage, so you can rest assured that there’s plenty of quality here.
And quality is exactly what you’d expect for an Apple Watch band of this price. At $49 / £49 this thing isn’t cheap. There are some third-party alternatives – like the CeMiKa Silicone Sport Straps or Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap – that can be yours for less than $15 / £15. But really, I think you’ll feel the difference. The quality of material, excellent color design and more premium look of the Nike Sport Band makes it a superior companion for your Apple Watch – especially if you’re someone that loves to get active.
(Image credit: Future)
Apple Nike Sport Band review: Price & specs
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Apple Nike Sport Band?
Buy it if…
You’re the active type If you’re someone that likes to stay in shape – whether that’s running, lifting weights, swimming (maybe all of the above?) – this is the ideal watch strap for you. It’s made from a water-resistant material and has holes to let your wrists breathe – it doesn’t get much better than that.
You want an easy-to-fasten strap Something I love about the Apple Nike Sport Band is how easy it is to fasten to your wrist. Just poke the aluminum pin through one of the strap’s holes and it will lock into place. No more messing around with an awkward buckle.
Don't buy it if…
You’re on a tight budget The only real issue I can take with this strap is its price. I don’t think it’s crazy expensive given the quality on offer, but it’s certainly not cheap. If you’re looking for a massively budget-friendly strap, this one is to be avoided, unless you find it at a significantly discounted price.
You want an ultra premium option If you’re on the other end of the spectrum and want a top-tier premium watch strap, this might not be flashy enough for you. There are high-calibre metallic options like the Milanese Loop, for instance, but that will set you back almost $100 / £100.
Apple Nike Sport Band review: Also consider
Apple Braided Solo Loop We’ve been hands on with the Apple Braided Solo Loop and found it to be comfortable, easy to fit and conveniently waterproof. It is certainly quite pricey though, coming in at $99 / £99 – ouch. The stretchy band is ultra-easy to slip on, but it may cause some overhang – so maybe stick with this Nike strap if you want a more practical, fitness-oriented option. Read our full Apple Braided Solo Loop review.
The Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro toothbrush from Swiss company Curaden is a sonic brush that looks good, packs a fair bit of power and offers a comprehensive clean. Its octagonal shape and clinical whites and grays remind me of a satellite or space station, and the electric toothbrush itself is certainly a high-flier, and a contender for the title of “best electric toothbrush I’ve tried in 2025”, delivering a premium clean, albeit for a premium price.
The Curaprox is well-designed and functional. In the box you get the handset, a trio of brush heads equipped with soft Curen fibers, a plastic travel case, and a USB-A ‘nub’ type charging stand typical of many electric toothbrushes. Charging takes 10 hours, and the brush will last for 60 minutes on a full charge, which equates to around two weeks of use. As is the case with many toothbrushes, Curaden recommends that you don’t leave the Curaprox on charge constantly, and only charge it when the battery drops below 20%, as indicated by the LEDs running up the side of the handset.
Overall, it’s a pretty good package, although it would be nice at this price point if the case charged the brush too, so that you never have to worry about it on the go. I suppose that given its two-week battery life, the idea is that you should make sure the brush is fully charged before you go on your holidays.
(Image credit: Future)
The trio of brush heads comprise one for power cleaning, one for sensitive cleaning, and one for precision cleaning. The single brush head really allows you to get between teeth and gums, and I was very impressed: it’s bent backwards where the others have been bent forward, to account for the difference of use.
Curaprox says the Hydrosonic Pro has been designed for professional-level cleans at home (what electric toothbrush isn’t, according to the marketing people?) and the three brush heads coupled with the seven intensities mean you get a total of 21 bespoke cleaning modes. There’s also lots of helpful information in the manual, and it makes for quite interesting and educational reading when it comes to how to use the brush. I’d rather read the manual than have to follow the instructions in an app any day – I’ve got too many wellness apps on my phone as it is.
Replacement brush heads can be bought in packs of two of each kind from Curaprox, and, like the brush itself, they’re not cheap at $25.20 / £24.50 / AU$42.00 for a pack on Amazon.
That powerful motor can go from whisper quiet to annoyingly loud at the highest setting – over 65 decibels, according to the Decibel X app, which is louder than the 53 decibels I recorded for the similarly premium Philips Sonicare 7100. However, it is a good indication of how powerful the clean is, and during my testing I found myself using the single brush to clean across my gumline quite often – it’s a great design element that I’d like to see more manufacturers adopt.
The Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro costs $199.99 in the US, £190 in the UK and AU$299 in Australia, with replacement brush heads available in packs of two of the same head, so if you want spares of the power clean, sensitive or the single clean, you’ll need to pay twice. Crafty.
As you’ve probably gathered, while there are more expensive toothbrushes on the market this is certainly a premium option, and an ongoing investment in your oral health. It’s a very well-designed system, you could certainly do a lot worse – I’m of the opinion AI guidance and app-based rewards are almost never used on more expensive toothbrushes, and therefore are usually unnecessary – but the Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro represents the upper limit of what I think anyone should prepare to pay for an electric toothbrush.
Value score: 3.5/5
(Image credit: Future)
Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro: Scorecard
Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro: Should I buy?
Buy it if...
You want power
The Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro is perhaps the loudest, most powerful toothbrush I’ve tested.
You want precision
The single brush head is a really great idea, enabling you to clean between your teeth and at the gumline with more accuracy.
You have sensitive teeth
With a brush head specifically for sensitivity and Curen’s special softer fibers, those needing a gentle clean are catered for.
Don't buy if if...
You’re on a budget
If you’re just after a simple sonic clean that does the job, you could spend half the money and get a suitable brush.
You want a charging case
The Philips Sonicare 7100 comes with a charging case rather than a non-electronic plastic one
I used the Curaprox Hydrosonic Pro for one week. I charged it using the plug-in base, used all seven modes and all three brush heads, and used a decibel meter app to calculate how loud the brush was compared to other brushes on the market.
The Upeak Sport Strap is an Apple Watch band designed for physical activity, and for those who want something light and comfortable. It adopts a fairly typical sports band aesthetic, with its silicone material and perforated holes.
There are multiple colorways available, from monochromatic shades to more vibrant, multi-hued combinations, so there’s a good match for everyone. The Charcoal variant I had was understated, making it suitable for all sorts of occasions.
It feels reasonably durable, although it’s perhaps not as tough as some of the best Apple Watch bands out there. It also picks up blemishes and small scratches relatively easily too.
It installs quite easily into an Apple Watch. I did notice a small amount of play, wobbling very slightly from side to side within the strap recess, although not enough to cause a problem or warrant concern.
The Upeak Sport Strap is pleasingly light and reasonably thin. It’s also quite pliant with a small amount of elasticity, meaning you can stretch it slightly to adjust on your wrist.
These aspects help to make it very comfortable. The multiple fastening holes ensure an easy fit, while the material is soft enough to prevent irritation occurring. In fact, I could barely feel it on my wrist at times, which is always a good sign in a watch strap.
Despite this, the Upeak Sport Strap also offers a good amount of grip. Even when I had it relatively loose on my wrist, my Apple Watch still didn’t move around. The buckle is equally secure, so I wasn’t worried about it coming loose. This makes it great for physical activity, and means you don’t need an uncomfortably tight fit to keep it stable.
What also supports physical activity is how the Upeak Sport Strap deals with sweat and water. It stays comfortable even when drenched, without rubbing on the skin or causing irritation. Even better is just how quickly it dries, and a small dab of a towel is all that’s required in the most extreme cases.
One drawback of the Upeak Sport Strap, though, is just how easily it picks up debris, such as dust and hair, thanks to the sticky nature of the silicone. This can be hard to remove without the aid of a brush or lint remover.
Despite this, the Upeak Sport Strap remains good value for money at under £10. The comfort levels and ease of use are great, so even though it mightn’t be the most premium Apple Watch band out there, it still makes for the ideal workout partner.
(Image credit: Future)
Upeak Sport Strap review: Price & specs
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Upeak Sport Strap?
Buy it if…
You want supreme comfort Regardless of what you’re doing, the Upeak Sport Strap remains comfortable in all situations.
You want to save money Many equivalent sports bands, especially those from the big brands and Apple itself, are considerably more expensive.
Don't buy it if…
You want minimal upkeep Thanks to the sticky nature of the Silicone, dust and debris stick easily to the Upeak Sport Strap, which can be awkward to clean.
You want something formal Despite being relatively understated, it still isn’t among the most premium or elegant of Apple Watch straps.
Upeak Sport Strap review: Also consider
Nike Sport Band If you’re after something more premium, then the Nike Sport Band is a good choice. It’s made from fluoroelastomer and is comfortable and breathable no matter what kind of activity you’re up to. It’s also durable, and the range of colors, including a Pride option, mean there’s a variant for everyone. We think it’s one of the best Apple Watch bands for working out with.
The Apple Milanese Loop can be considered a mid-range Apple Watch band offering, coming in at $99 / £99 / AU$149. It’s neither as cheap and cheerful as the $49 / £49 / AU$69 Sport Bands, nor as unabashedly expensive as the premium $349 / £299 / AU$549 Link Bracelet bands. It can also be picked up in a newer Titanium edition for the Apple Watch Ultra 2, which retails for $199 / £199 / AU$299.
Its stainless steel mesh wraps smoothly around the wrist, free of any kinks or rigidity, feeling comfortable yet suitably premium. And for those who are sustainability conscious, it’s made of 65% recycled materials, while 100% of the energy used for manufacture is from renewable sources. Here we review the dark gray Slate color; but the Milanese Loop is available in a Gold and silvery Natural finish, too.
Putting it on and taking it off is a breeze. As is the case with all of the best Apple Watch bands, clicking it into place simply requires you to slide it into the connectors on either side of the Apple Watch, while to disconnect it, you simply press the release buttons on the Watch’s underside. Tightening and fastening the clasp is achieved via a magnetic clasp that affixes to the band itself, which feels delightfully innovative and typically Apple-esque. Unfortunately, it does have a slight tendency to snap to itself when you’re just trying to adjust the strap; this isn't a deal breaker, but it can make things more fiddly than they need to be.
We found during our Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap review that the lookalike band showed quite a bit of scuffing after just a few weeks of wear. Conversely, the Apple Milanese Loop looks as perfect now as the day I first clasped it round my wrist. While I didn’t risk wearing it during high-risk activities such as weightlifting, this band's superior build quality will shrug off damage like John Wick wearing a kevlar business suit.
Its mesh build also makes it far more breathable than many other Apple Watch bands. During my weekly bouldering session, the skin beneath my Milanese Loop strap didn’t become sweaty as it can with synthetic rubber straps, while flexing sufficiently to remain comfortable. I also found I rarely needed to take it off to shower; in contrast to Apple’s sports bands, which trapped water against my skin, the Milanese Loop allowed my skin to stay dry and protected, even when wearing it for days on end.
The weave of the Milanese Loop does periodically pick up fibers here and there. Unlike the Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap, it doesn’t tend to leave your garments looking like a shorn spring lamb, although it does occasionally require you to undo it to pluck out rogue threads. All in all, I didn’t find this happened often enough to be a bother, however.
All in all, the Apple Milanese Loop is a fantastic Apple Watch band. It looks great, it’s relatively sustainable, and it's more hard-wearing than cheaper rivals. Ultimately, whether you decide it’s the right strap for you will come down to cost. If you’re happy parting with $99 / £99 / AU$149 for an accessory for your smartwatch, it’s an easy recommend. If not, a cheaper lookalike such as the Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap might suit you better.
(Image credit: Future)
Apple Milanese Loop review: Price & specs
Released alongside the original Apple Watch back on September 9, 2014, the Milanese Loop is available now direct from Apple for $99 / £99 / AU$149. It arrives in Natural, Gold and Slate finishes. Alternatively, if you own a Titanium watch such as the Apple Watch Ultra 2 or Apple Watch 10, you can pick up the Titanium edition of the strap to match, which will be as hard-wearing as your wearable.
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Apple Milanese Loop?
Buy it if…
You want a band that will always look its best Not only is Apple’s Milanese Loop gorgeously premium in its design, it’s hardy too. After two weeks of solid testing, it looks as good as it did out of the box – which is more than we can say for some of its cheaper rivals.
You’re interested in sustainability Given 65% of it is made from recycled sources, while 100% of the energy used to make it comes from renewables, this is a suitably green option for anyone wanting a strap that doesn’t deplete the earth’s resources.
Don’t buy it if…
You want an affordable Apple Watch band At $99 / £99 / AU$149, the Milanese Loop is hardly the most inexpensive Apple Watch band on the market. While not an unreasonable price to pay, given its quality, if you don’t want a quarter of the cost of your Apple Watch to be its band, you’d be wise to look elsewhere.
You don’t want a lint trap on your wrist It isn't quite as bad as options such as the Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap, but the Milanese Loop still likes to accumulate errant fibers. It won’t depilate your favourite cardigan, but you will occasionally need to pluck the odd filament out of its mesh.
Apple Milanese Loop review: also consider
Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap The Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap comes with a couple of compromises: it can be a bit stiff to slide in and out of your Apple Watch, and it scuffs more easily. On the flip side, however, it looks great, it’s breathable and, most importantly, it’s super affordable – it costs from as little as £8.99 to a max price of £15.99, making it an easy choice for someone who wants their Watch to look fancy but can’t quite stretch to the Milanese Loop’s asking price.
The Amazfit Helio Ring is the first smart ring from Chinese tech company Amazfit, best known for its budget-friendly fitness trackers, like the Amazfit Active 2 and its new open-ear earbuds, the Amazfit Up. Staying true to its brand, the Helio Ring undercuts the competition on price, offering a more affordable alternative to rivals like Oura with no added subscription fee.
The design is sleek and minimalist, with a titanium outer shell, and the ring is very comfortable to wear all day and night – possibly the most comfortable smart ring I’ve tested. The downside? It comes in just one finish and only three size options at the time of writing, which significantly limits your choice compared to competitors.
Functionally, the Helio Ring is built for sleep and wellness tracking. It offers in-depth sleep insights, heart rate monitoring, and energy tracking. There’s no auto-detection for workouts and there are only four workout modes to pick from. But, if one of those is your exercise of choice, you do get comprehensive data after each workout – and heart rate tracking as you exercise is accurate, too.
Having said that, if you’re looking for a fully-fledged fitness tracker, this isn’t it. Most smart rings out there can’t compete with fitness watches in those stakes – but that’s never been the point of them. Amazfit does say that the ring would work very well if you pair it with one of its smartwatches, and this will be too much hassle and expense for some, but if you’re already in the Amazfit ecosystem, it’ll make a lot of sense.
Overall, the Amazfit Helio Ring is a solid choice for sleep tracking and general wellness monitoring. While it lacks some of the refinement of its more premium rivals, especially in terms of battery life and app experience, it’s a welcome new option in the smart ring space. It'll especially appeal to those already in the Amazfit ecosystem – or anyone looking for a more affordable yet equally capable alternative to some of the best smart rings on the market.
Amazfit Helio Ring review: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
Launch price of $299.99 / £269 / AU$399
Official price now of $199.99 / £169 / AU$269
No subscription required
The Amazfit Helio Ring originally retailed at $299.99 / £269 / AU$399 in 2024. But now you’ll find it for $199.99 / £169 / AU$269 on the Amazfit website and some regions also stock it on Amazon. For example, you’ll find it on Amazon in the UK right now for a slightly cheaper £149.
How does that stack up against the competition? The Oura Ring 4 starts at $349 / £349 for some designs and colors, but others cost much more. For example, the rose gold version is $499 / £499. Not only is the latest Oura Ring significantly more expensive than the Helio Ring, you’ll also need an Oura Ring Membership to unlock its potential, which is $5.99 / £5.99 a month.
For comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Ring is our top smart ring pick at the moment and that currently costs the most at $399 / £399 / AU$749, but that doesn’t need an additional subscription.
When the Amazfit Helio Ring first launched, some features required an additional payment. Fortunately, Amazfit appears to have removed that model, making the device even more appealing. With no subscription fees, it stands out from Oura.
Whether the Amazfit Helio Ring offers good value depends entirely on what you need from a wearable. At a lower price point than the Oura Ring, and with no must-buy subscription, it’s a solid choice for those focused on sleep and recovery tracking.
If sleep tracking is your top priority, the Helio Ring offers strong value. However, if you’re looking for comprehensive workout tracking, a smartwatch or fitness tracker is likely a better buy. Smart rings, this one included, aren’t designed to replace a sports watch, and the Helio Ring’s limited workout modes prove that. But for those seeking a sleek, comfortable sleep and wellness tracker at a lower cost than the best in the game, it’s a strong contender.
Value score: 4/5
Amazfit Helio Ring review: Specifications
Amazfit Helio Ring review: Design
(Image credit: Future)
My favorite smart ring in terms of design
Only three sizes
Only one finish (but I love it)
The Amazfit Helio Ring is one of my favorite smart rings in terms of design. It’s sleek, lightweight, and comfortable. It has a titanium alloy exterior, giving it a more high-end feel than its price suggests. While the inner side (where the sensors sit) is plastic and comfortable. It’s impressively slim at just 2.6mm and light at 3.65g. This is very similar to the Oura Ring, which is 2.88mm thick and weighs from 3.3g to 5.2g depending on the size. In short, there’s not much in it, so don’t assume affordability means bulkier or heavier.
However, where it does fall short is the Helio Ring comes in only one finish, a brushed silver with tiny dots on the front, which I personally love. The popular matte black options from other brands tend to scratch easily, and gold versions can be too flashy and shiny for me to wear everyday. Of course, this is all down to personal preference, and if you want something that looks different, Oura andSamsung offer more color choices.
Fit-wise, there are just three sizes available (8, 10, and 12), which is far more limited than other smart rings that offer a wider range of sizes. Oura offers 12 different sizes. If one of these fits you, great – but if not, you’re out of luck.
Another big plus is durability. Some smart rings I’ve tested got scuffs within hours, especially those with matte finishes, but the Helio Ring has held up well with only minor scratches after several weeks.
The Amazfit Helio Ring is rated at 10 ATM water resistance, meaning it can handle surface swimming and snorkeling, but not scuba diving. In practical terms, it’s safe for most daily water exposure, including showers, workouts, and casual swims.
A small vertical line on the exterior of the ring marks the sensor placement, which should face the inside of your finger for the best tracking. Unlike some other smart rings, Amazfit makes this clear, which is a nice usability touch.
This is one of the best-designed smart rings I’ve tested. It’s slim and lightweight, subtly stylish, and surprisingly scratch-resistant. The limited sizes and finishes might be a drawback for some, but if the fit works for you, it's a great-looking, comfortable option.
Design score: 4 / 5
Amazfit Helio Ring review: Features
(Image credit: Future)
Excels at sleep and general wellbeing tracking
Limited workout tracking
App is simple but works well
For a more affordable smart ring, the Amazfit Helio Ring packs in plenty of features. Sleep tracking is where this ring shines. You get everything you’d expect, sleep stages, duration, and detailed metrics presented in easy-to-read charts.
But it also monitors breathing, skin temperature, heart rate variability, and resting heart rate while you sleep. All this data is used to generate a morning readiness score, telling you how well you’ve recovered, how much energy you have, and what kind of activity you’re primed for.
There’s also an EDA sensor (electrodermal activity), which, combined with heart rate data, aims to track stress and emotional responses throughout the day.
Unlike fitness watches, smart rings aren’t designed for workouts, and the Helio Ring is no exception. It only offers four workout modes, which is a bit disappointing. But if you mostly run or walk, you’ll still get solid data like workout time, speed, heart rate, VO2 max, calories burned, and GPS-tracked routes.
Amazfit suggests pairing the ring with an Amazfit smartwatch – the idea being that the watch handles workouts, while the ring tracks sleep and recovery. Both sync seamlessly in the Zepp app, making it a well-rounded system if you’re in the Amazfit ecosystem.
There are a couple of other features here worth mentioning, like PAI (Personal Activity Intelligence). This is your unique cardiovascular fitness score based on heart rate and daily activity. At first, it felt like just another number, but PAI actually provides a useful gauge of overall fitness. As someone shifting from a weightlifting and yoga focus to more cardio, I found it surprisingly helpful.
You can also track your menstrual cycle from within the Zepp app, which works similarly to period apps like Flo or Clue, predicting cycles and sending reminders. I didn’t test this, but it’s a solid addition if you want all of your health and fitness data in one place.
With all this data, a good app is crucial. The Zepp app has improved recently and while it’s not as sleek as Oura’s, it’s clean, intuitive, and lets you find key insights quickly. Personally, I prefer a simple interface over something overly designed anyway.
At launch, some features within the app required a Zepp Aura subscription, this is Amazfit’s extra sleep and recovery assistant, this included deeper sleep insights, relaxation tracking, and personalized sleep music. But they’re now all free to Helio Ring users.
Features score: 4 / 5
Amazfit Helio Ring review: Performance
(Image credit: Future)
Solid at sleep tracking
Really comfortable to wear
Won’t replace your fitness tracker
Amazfit claims the Helio Ring lasts up to four days, but in real-world use, I got closer to three-and-a-half days with all health tracking features turned on. That’s noticeably less than the six days you’ll get from the Oura Ring and the seven days from the Samsung Galaxy Ring. Charging is quick, taking about an hour and a half via a USB-C wireless charging plinth.
In terms of comfort, this is one of the most wearable smart rings I’ve tested. The lightweight, slim design makes it easy to forget you’re even wearing it. The size 8 fit perfectly on my index finger, making it feel seamless throughout the day and night. However, with only three sizes available (8, 10, and 12), finding the right fit might be tricky for some. Hopefully, future versions will offer more size options.
Sleep tracking is where the Helio Ring really stands out. It provides a detailed breakdown of sleep stages alongside heart rate and breathing monitoring. The data syncs quickly to the Zepp app, where you can view trends and graphs over time. Compared to other wearables, the sleep tracking felt mostly accurate, though it occasionally overestimated my sleep by a few minutes. One feature I particularly liked was nap tracking, which tends to be hit-or-miss with other devices, but as long as I napped for more than 20 minutes the Helio Ring picked it up accurately.
One of its standout features is how sleep data influences readiness, exertion, and recovery scores, giving you real insights into how well your body has recovered overnight. You can even toggle off certain metrics, like hypopnea (airway obstruction) detection for sleep apnea risk if they’re not relevant to you, which helps conserve battery life.
For me, the recovery tracking was especially useful. Not just physically as I recover from a back injury, but also mentally, after dealing with seasonal depression earlier in the year. If you’re in a similar situation – trying to rebuild fitness or improve sleep – this kind of data can be genuinely helpful. On the other hand, if you’re already in peak shape, I’m not sure these insights would add much value.
When it comes to workout tracking, there are some limitations. Unlike smartwatches or fitness trackers, it doesn’t auto-detect workouts and only supports manual tracking for running, walking, cycling, and treadmill sessions. This was frustrating, as my fitness routine includes a lot of yoga and strength training, neither of which are supported. However, for the workouts it does track, the data is solid. When I took the Helio Ring for a run, I could see everything I needed in the Zepp app, including workout time, average speed, heart rate, VO2 max, calories burned, and GPS-tracked routes.
So while it’s not a dedicated fitness tracker, it does a decent job for running and walking. For more complete sports tracking, pairing it with an Amazfit smartwatch is the best way to get a broader picture of both fitness and recovery.
Performance: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Scorecard
Should I buy the Amazfit Helio Ring?
Buy it if…
You already have a watch in the Amazfit ecosystem The ideal setup is a smartwatch for fitness and daytime tracking and a smart ring for sleep and recovery at night.
Sleep tracking is your top priority The Helio Ring excels at sleep monitoring, using data like heart rate, temperature, and breathing patterns to inform your Readiness and Exertion scores.
You find other wearables uncomfortable This is one of the most comfortable smart rings I’ve tested. If you’ve struggled with wristbands or smartwatches for sleep tracking, this could be the perfect solution.
Don’t buy it if…
You’re willing to pay more for a premium experience If budget isn’t a concern, the Oura Ring offers a more refined experience, plus better battery and size and finish options – just expect to pay extra, both upfront and for the subscription.
You need a strong workout tracker If all you need is tracking for walking and running, you do get good data. But for anything beyond that, there are limited workout modes.
The sizes don’t work for you The Helio Ring only comes in three sizes (8, 10, and 12). If your index finger (the most comfortable placement) doesn’t match one of these, you’ll need to look elsewhere.
Amazfit Up: Also consider
Oura Ring 4 If you’re looking for a more refined experience with a wider range of colors and sizes, as well as a better battery the latest Oura Ring is a great choice. Just be prepared to pay more upfront – and for the ongoing subscription to unlock full features Read our full Oura Ring 4 review
Ultrahuman Ring Air Pricier than both the Oura and Helio Rings at the time of writing, but it comes without a subscription. If you want more finish and size options with no additional monthly costs and a solid battery, this is a strong alternative. Read our full Ultrahuman Ring Air review
How I tested the Amazfit Helio Ring
(Image credit: Future)
Worn 24/7
Tested for several weeks
Lots of expertise testing smart rings to compare
I tested the Amazfit Helio Ring for three weeks, pairing it with an iPhone 14 Pro. Aside from taking it off for charging and showers (it’s waterproof, but I was cautious about soap and shampoo), I wore it 24/7 – through outdoor runs, gym sessions, long workdays in coffee shops, evenings at home, and, of course, while sleeping. It’s been put through its paces in a wide range of real-world environments.
As someone who has reviewed numerous wearables over the years, I’ve tested a variety of smart rings – including models from Ultrahuman, Motiv, Ringconn, Evie, multiple generations of the Oura Ring, and more. The smart ring market is only just breaking into the mainstream, but having worn so many, I have a solid sense of what to expect, how they should feel, and what makes a great user experience.
The Philips Sonicare 7100 isn’t quite as eye-wateringly expensive as the Philips Sonicare 9900 Prestige, but at £350 (around $450 or AU$715) it’s still extremely pricey for a sonic toothbrush with a lithium rechargeable battery that will eventually decay. However, it’s a gorgeous piece of kit with a powerful motor, four brushing modes, three intensities, and a couple of cool accessories such as a charging travel case (downgraded from the Prestige's leather to cheaper plastic) as well as a stand. It's definitely up there with the best electric toothbrushes on our list.
The brush is very satisfying to hold and use. It feels premium: I’m used to very plasticky cheaper electric toothbrushes, so I’m pleased to say that if you're paying all this money, the Philips at least is satisfyingly weighty and incorporates metal into its design. Coupled with the black outer shell, it’s slightly reminiscent of a lightsaber, albeit one that cuts through plaque rather than Sith lords.
At 62,000 bristle motions per minute, the Philips Sonicare 7100 is on a par with the Sonicare 9900 Prestige in terms of its brushing performance. It’s got four brushing modes (Clean, Sensitive, White and Gum Health), and each one has three intensities, for 12 brush settings in total. It’s a case of trial-and-error to find the right one for your brushing routine, and I have a sneaking suspicion that a few of these setting and intensity combinations end up being repeated, based on sound and mouthfeel alone.
However, one thing’s for sure: this toothbrush is powerful. After using my cheaper, lower-powered brush for a while, the blast of the full-power Clean setting on the Philips was surprising, to say the least – a bit like grabbing onto a metal handrail and experiencing a static shock. After prolonged usage, and with the option for such a high-power setting should I want it, I’m not sure I could go back to my comparatively underpowered usual toothbrush.
(Image credit: Future)
The power is evident in the motor, which does emit a moderate whine: using my phone’s decibel meter app, I measured readings of 55-57 decibels, equivalent to a soft conversation. The Ultim8 Supermouth brush, which I’m also testing, measured 44-46 decibels in comparison. The Philips is at the louder end, then, but it’s worth it for that extra oomph.
The battery life – up to three weeks – is largely immaterial, as your brush will likely either be on the charging stand or in the charging travel case most of the time. However, such a good battery life does mean that when you’re caught on the hop – for example, taking your case on long trips – that the brush will hold out and still provide a good clean.
There are only two issues I have with the Philips Sonicare 7100. The first is its price: while it’s an excellent toothbrush, it is more expensive than most in its category, although it does seem to receive frequent discounts. The second is in its name – Sonicare. This is a sonic toothbrush, which is a lot better than a manual brush, but some studies have shown that some oscillating brush heads are marginally more effective at getting rid of plaque than sonic ones. Our guide to sonic vs rotating toothbrushes can tell you more, but the power of the Philips will ensure that with regular proper usage, you’re still getting a great clean.
Philips Sonicare 7100: Specifications
Philips Sonicare 7100: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
£349.99 in the UK (around $450 / AU$715)
Frequently on sale
The Sonicare Expertclean 7500 is the similar equivalent model in US and Australia
The Philips Sonicare 7100 is available in the UK priced at £349.99 (around $450 / AU$715). This is crazy money for a toothbrush, but it’s frequently on sale: at the time of writing, Amazon has it for £158.99 (around $205 / AU$325). I don’t know what it is about electric toothbrushes that means they're priced so highly and then get such severe and almost permanent discounts, but it’s a recognized phenomenon.
Want one in the US or Australia? Philips doesn’t sell the Sonicare 7100 there as it categorizes its products differently in those regions. However, it does sell a very similar Sonicare Expertclean 7500, with four relabelled modes (Clean, White+, Gum Health and Deep Clean) and a slightly differently-shaped charging case. That retails for $199 / AU$312.
If the Sonicare 7100 wasn’t so frequently on sale I’d consider it poor value. However, it should be fairly easy to pick this brush up for around £150-£200, which makes it a very good buy indeed.
Value score: 3.5/5
(Image credit: Future)
Philips Sonicare 7100: Scorecard
Philips Sonicare 7100: Should I buy?
Buy it if...
You want more power
Want a serious sonic clean? The Sonicare 7100 has the power to tackle the toughest plaque.
You want to brush on the go
The charging case is convenient and very well-designed, with space for your brush head.
You want lots of options
With four modes, each with three intensities, you’ve got 12 combos to choose from.
(Image credit: Future)
Don't buy if if...
You can’t find it on sale
No toothbrush that I’ve yet tried is worth spending £350 / $450 / AU$715 on.
You want an oscillating brush head
As powerful as the Sonicare line is, if you’ve been advised to use an oscillating brush head by your dentist, consider the Oral-B iO Series.
You want to repair it
Unlike sustainable toothbrush manufacturer Suri, this toothbrush is not designed to be taken apart.
I used the Philips Sonicare 7100 for one week. I charged it using both the plug-in base and carry case, tried all the different modes on the toothbrush, and used a decibel meter app to calculate how loud the brush was compared to other brushes on the market.
In my 10 years of using Apple Watch, the Amazfit Active 2 is the closest I've ever come to ditching my Apple Watch Ultra 2.
Subjectively, the styling of the Active 2 isn't normally what I'd lean to, but Amazfit has nailed a clearly classic stainless steel design that will delight fans looking for a more subtle, understated smartwatch.
For just $99, the Amazfit Active 2 far outstrips its price tag, punching well above its weight in terms of features, fitness tracking accuracy, and more. Its battery life is to be lauded and definitely holds up to Amazfit's claims.
It's not perfect: it doesn't quite sit flush on my wrist, and to get NFC you have to pay $30 extra for the premium model. However, the astonishing $99 price tag covers up all of the quirks to render this a pure five-star pick in my book.
It's miles ahead of the CMF Watch Pro 2, and easily on a par with some more expensive mainstream offerings.
Nitfy features including an on-board AI assistant add to the experience. The Strength Training feature could use a little refinement, but its intelligent rep counter and timer are handy in the gym.
Overall, there's very little not to like here, and even the $129 premium model (not tested here) strikes me as good value for money.
Amazfit Active 2: Specifications
Amazfit Active 2: Price and Availability
(Image credit: Future)
$99/£99/AU(tbc)
Two versions
Premium version is more expensive and includes premium strap, NFC
The Amazfit Active 2 is available now from the company's website, as well as Amazon and a range of third-party retailers.
The base model reviewed here costs $99/£99, with Australia pricing and availability to be confirmed. For that you get the Watch, a sport strap, and the charging puck (but no USB-C cable).
The premium version is $129/£129 and includes a more premium leather strap, as well as a free silicone sport band. Upgrading to the premium version also gets you more durable sapphire glass and NFC for contactless payments.
Given the overall quality and what you get for your money, I think it's a fantastic price and a real value-for-money pick.
I'll touch on this more in my review, but given the overall price and what you get extra, I'd also have no reservations recommending the more premium model. However, both are excellent value.
Value score: 5/5
Amazfit Active 2: Design
(Image credit: Future)
New round display
Classic look with premium stainless steel
Imperfect fit
When it comes to smartwatches, I'm definitely team squircle. However, Amazfit made a big change with the design of the Active 2 that is slowly growing on me.
Where the original was really a clone of the Apple Watch in many respects, the Amazfit Active 2 boasts a stunning round design with a stainless steel body.
This is absolutely a smartwatch designed to look like a classic watch, with a really premium feel and finish. It's much more refined and less bulky than the CMF Watch Pro 2 I tested recently, and it's also really comfortable.
You get two buttons used for power, triggering workouts, and activating the AI assistant, as well as various other tasks you can assign.
I honestly can't believe how premium the design feels for a $99 smartwatch, Amazfit has really smashed it with this one and there's very little not to like.
(Image credit: Future)
Of course, it's not perfect: the bezel between the stainless steel chassis and the edge of the display is a little large, but even this doesn't look out of place and actually lends to the overall aesthetic.
The display is a 1.32-inch AMOLED display identical (in size and shape) to the aforementioned CMF Watch Pro 2. However, this one puts out 2,000 nits of peak brightness rather than Nothing's 600 nits.
On the back you get your usual array of heart rate tracking paraphernalia and LED sensors. The Active 2 is extremely light; our model tested here weighs less than 30 grams. It's super comfortable, although I did find the fit to be slightly imperfect, as it doesn't quite sit flush to my wrist. However, this is a very minor issue and doesn't detract from the overall experience. The sport strap, while comfortable, is also a little finicky to apply at first. The premium version features a more elegant black leather strap that I'd wager is easier to put on, and you get the sports strap included for free anyway.
These are very small gripes though. I have to say that at this price point, the Active 2 is one of the most impressive-looking smartwatches on the market, and will delight prospective users looking for a more classic look and feel rather than the chunkier aesthetic of other cheap smartwatches.
It's also one of the most comfortable I've ever worn, and you'll forget you're wearing it after a few hours out of the box.
Compared to the slightly cheaper CMF Watch Pro 2, a top pick in our best cheap smartwatch guide, the Active 2 has several key design advantages despite only being 30 bucks more.
There's the aforementioned brightness gulf, and crucially the Active 2 also has 5 ATM water-resistance, meaning it can withstand up to 50 meters of pressure, and can be worn for showers or brief swims. It's not waterproof by any means, but it's a lot better than most other options in this cheap smartwatch bracket, and it's really nice to know you don't have to take it off for every shower, cold plunge, or hot tub session.
Other impressive features include anti-fingerprint coating glass on the standard version. If you opt for the premium model, you don't get this, but you do get sapphire glass, which is much harder to scratch.
Design score: 4.5/5
Amazfit Active 2: Features
(Image credit: Future)
Vast feature set
Unique strength training and HYROX Race modes
AI coach, 164 sport modes, extensive health tracking
I'm frankly astounded at how many features you get with the Amazfit Active 2 considering its price tag.
I'd say the Active 2's feature-set is impressive for a smartwatch of any price tag, let alone one that costs less than $100. Starting with sport, exercise, and health, the Active 2 features nearly every feature you'd expect in a cheap smartwatch.
There's workout tracking for 164 sport modes, with a couple of unique advanced features. If you're training strength, there's smart recognition of 25 movements, automatic rep tracking, and a built-in exercise timer/workout plan generator you can follow. (I'll address the efficacy of this more in the performance section).
Runners will find a Track Run mode, smart trajectory correction, and even a virtual pacer. There's also Zepp Coach, an AI-powered workout companion that can generate customized training plans.
Health-wise, you'll find a daily Readiness score and insights and monitoring for heart rate, as well as blood oxygen, stress, temperature, heart rate, sleep heart rate variability, sleep stages and schedule, sleep scores, and more. There are reminders on board for high and low heart rates, low blood oxygen, and even high stress levels with prompts to perform breathing exercises.
Elsewhere, there's an onboard AI companion, Zepp Flow, that can pull up metrics with voice commands and change settings. Zepp Pay, powered by NFC, is only available on the more expensive premium model we didn't test, so if that's an important feature to you, it might be worth paying the extra.
You do get a separate wallet app for membership cards though, and other cool software features like To Do List. The Active 2 works with both Android and iPhone, and can be used to control your phone's music via Bluetooth, you'll also get call and SMS notifications as well as app notifications, and even Find My Phone.
Under the hood, you get GPS (Amazfit says there are five satellite positioning systems but hasn't shared any further info) and Bluetooth 5.2 BLE, as well as a microphone and speaker. It also, rather essentially for a watch, tells the time.
If I were being harsh, reserving NFC for the premium model is arguably a shame, but this is a technicality. Honestly, I can't believe how much smartwatch you get from the Active 2 for $99. You don't find features like ECG at this price point in the smartwatch market(even the doubly expensive Apple Watch SE doesn't offer it), but it's important to note that there are always going to be limitations in a $99 smartwatch.
Still, at this price, you'll struggle to find a more extensive set of features in a smartwatch, and the lack of NFC isn't enough to merit deducting any points when you can add it for $30.
Features score: 5/5
Amazfit Active 2: Performance
(Image credit: Future)
Exceptional battery life
Very accurate fitness and heart rate tracking
Snappy everyday use
Useful AI assistant
All of these features don't mean much if a smartwatch can't perform, but I'm happy to report that the Amazfit Active 2 has excelled in testing, handling everything I've thrown at it with ease.
Starting off with everyday use, the Active 2 is very snappy to use in day-to-day tasks. I've found scrolling menus, changing settings, reading messages, and more to all be very responsive and seamless.
Obviously, the Active 2 doesn't have the same polish as Apple's watchOS 11, and doesn't even run Wear OS, but it's still very impressive. It also features some very sharp-looking faces including the Vital face pictured here.
I conducted a series of tests to check the accuracy of the Active 2's exercise tracking and was really impressed. A gentle 34-minute run with the Active 2 on my left wrist and the best Apple Watch, the Apple Watch Ultra 2, on my right wrist, yielded exceptional parity.
The Active 2 nailed the GPS route map and the exact distance within two decimal places. Apple Watch gave my average heart rate as 135 bpm, while the Active 2 said 136.
Active calories for the Apple Watch and Active 2 were listed as 341 and 372 respectively, which is a bigger gap but still respectable. The jury is out on just how accurate any smartwatch calorie tracker is, so just being in the relative ballpark is enough for us here. For all we know, the Active 2 could well be the more accurate reading.
The Active 2 pinged 1km intervals at exactly the same time as the Ultra 2, and its heart rate monitor is actually more responsive, delivering more frequent reading updates than Apple's version, always within one or two bpm.
Comparing every metric gave a positive match, which I can only conclude indicates that this Active 2 can keep up with pretty much any smartwatch on the market when it comes to fitness tracking. It of course lacks the depth of the best Garmins, but so does pretty much every other smartwatch out there.
(Image credit: Future)
The Active 2 delivered similar competitive measurements versus the Ultra 2 during a strength workout test I did. It was here that I was first exposed to the Active 2's unique Strength Training features.
The watch features a built-in rep counter and system for logging weight, timing rest, and more. I can see that with plenty of practice, this could be a handy tool for strength training, because you can track your weightlifting on the fly and check your progress after the fact.
I found the automatic rep tracking worked most of the time, it's not perfect and obviously not as useful for exercises that don't involve moving your arms, but there's promise here. There's also a gym routine planner in the app, however, this is less intuitive. I was able to put together a test workout and follow the plan in the gym, but was left bamboozled by a number of strange quirks.
Each unit you add to the training is called an "interval", not to be confused with actual interval training. The app refers to reps (how many times you lift in a single set) as "times", and these are, somewhat confusingly, logged under the duration section of the exercise you want to add.
Likewise, sets (the number of times you do a certain number of reps) are referred to as "repeats" or "loop counts". The terminology is very confusing, and the first few times I tried to create a workout I really mangled it. The language is generic so that it can also be applied to other workout modes including intervals, running, and more, which is fine, but it's definitely clunky.
Furthermore, rest isn't added automatically between sets, but has to be put in manually. With practice I'm sure it's helpful but it is definitely not easy to do.
(Image credit: Future)
This was my only wrinkle in an otherwise flawless performance. The Strength Training feature is a very small part of the overall experience, so again it doesn't detract too much, and it's nice to have.
In my opinion, the coup de grace is battery life. Rated for up to 10 days of "typical usage," I started my battery life testing at around 9 am with 55%. 24 hours later I had used barely 15% battery.
53 hours later, my battery was 13%, using up less than 0.8% an hour, almost bang on the up to 5 days of heavy usage Amazfit promises. During that time I conducted three strength workouts, a run, and two full nights of sleep tracking, never taking the watch off or charging it.
As with any smartwatch, your mileage may vary and battery life can be influenced by a ton of factors including GPS usage and the always-on display. As it stands, though, the Active 2 is certainly good for its promised longevity.
The Active 2 also has an AI assistant party piece dubbed Zepp Flow. Powered by OpenAI, it's like Amazfit's own version of Siri, except it actually works and is useful. You can assign it one of the buttons for quick access, and use your voice to input simple commands.
You can adjust and tweak settings, call up health metrics using questions such as "How many steps have I walked today?", and even reply to messages on Android with the feature. Of all the prompts and questions I tried, Zepp Flow didn't put a foot wrong once, and it's incredible to see an AI-powered wrist assistant that's actually useful, especially on a $99 smartwatch.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Amazfit Active 2: Scorecard
Amazfit Active 2: Should I buy?
(Image credit: Future)
Buy it if...
You want the ultimate cheap smartwatch
You won't find a better smartwatch at this price, or one with this many features.
You're on a budget
This is much less expensive than cheap options from the likes of Garmin and Apple.
Don't buy it if...
You want elite fitness tracking
The Active 2 can't keep up with Garmin's industry-leading fitness tracking, and there are more capable pure fitness watches out there.
You want full iPhone or Android integration
Eschewing watchOS or Wear OS will always lead to quirks, so if you want the most seamless experience with your iPhone or Android, buy an Apple Watch or Wear OS model respectively.
Amazfit Active 2: How we tested
I used the Amazfit Active 2 as my main smartwatch for an entire week. I tested it during running and strength workouts, as well as overnight for sleep tracking. Comparisons were conducted using the Apple Watch Ultra 2, and I tried and tested all of the Zepp app features and functionality using an iPhone 16 Pro.
Amazfit Active 2: Also consider
The Original CMF Watch Pro is a pretty stylish and capable watch. It's cheaper than the Active 2, and has better battery life and a larger display over the newer CMF Watch Pro 2.
In terms of features and performance, the Active 2 is actually closer to the Apple Watch SE 2 than it does a lot of cheap smartwatches. Apple's version is more polished and the perfect iPhone option, but is much more expensive.
When I got the chance to try the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0, I was ecstatic. It looked plush and had a rocker design, known to alleviate pain and stress in feet and ankles. This sounded like a shoe I needed to test: two years ago, I was dealing with constant pain in my toes, upper foot, and hips when I ran, so often that I had to stop running for weeks at a time. Finally, I found the HOKA Stinson 7, a trail running shoe that was plusher and relieved my pain when nothing else (stretching, doctor visits, etc.) would. That said, most of the time I run on the road, and that trail running shoe was heavier and bulkier than I liked. HOKA may have started out with a trail running shoe, but since then, they’ve been putting out impressive road running shoes year after year and regularly feature in our best running shoes roundup. The HOKA Cielo X1 2.0 launched in February 2025, the second iteration of the Cielo X1 which launched a year before in February 2024. The Cielo X1 2.0 has a more breathable upper made of engineered jacquard mesh – so breathable and clear that I could see my socked toes and feel the wind and some light rain when I ran on a drizzly day.
HOKA also enhanced the forefoot cushioning and improved the outsole traction. During my testing period, it was particularly rainy in Texas and so I had to run on light rain days or after the rain had stopped. I always felt secure and never slipped, not even when I had to run over slick brick roads in my city’s historic downtown.
(Image credit: Future)
The biggest improvement to the Cielo X1 2.0 has to be in the weight and more aggressive rocker profile. Where the Cielo X1 is 9.3 ounces, the Cielo X1 2.0 has dropped to 8.10 ounces. For those who race, an extra 1.2 ounces can go a long way. To achieve the weight reduction, HOKA utilized significant cutouts on the bottom of the shoe.
Perhaps the most noticeable change is the more pronounced rocker design. Running shoes used to be flat with a slight uptilt near the toe, but rocker shoes changed the game when they came on the scene. They get their name from the pronounced curve on the underside of the shoe, which looks like a rocking chair base. The idea behind the design is that once the runner’s foot hits the ground, they’ll naturally and effortlessly rock forward, resulting in more speed. They’re not only designed to make you run faster and without your feet or legs having to do much work, but rocker shoes may alleviate toe, forefoot, and Achilles heel pain, and reduce stress on your ankles and calves.
I had never tried a rocker shoe before, so I felt like a newborn wobbly colt the first time I stood while wearing the Hoka Cielo X1 2.0. That wobbly feeling disappears when you start to run in the shoes.
I initially found the shoe to be springy and quite plush. HOKA notes that this shoe has a “low profile cushion bed that keeps your foot closer to the ground,” but I have to disagree. It doesn’t feel low profile, especially considering that the thickest part of the footbed is two inches; this shoe is lower in profile compared to HOKA’s other – notoriously – thick shoes.
My feet are not narrow by any means but they’re not quite ‘wide-wide’ either. I was able to comfortably run in these shoes, but I can see the toebox being a problem for wide-footed runners who might feel more comfortable with more space.
From the very first run, I really enjoyed the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0. The instability I felt when I first put them on almost immediately disappeared when I started to run. Right away, I felt stable and confident, and I noticed that I was moving faster than normal but without the usual strain or heavy weight of my previous running shoes. I didn’t have to put much effort into running faster, because my ankle and foot worked seamlessly with the rocker profile to propel me forward. There’s a bounce and springiness to the shoe that felt nice on my stride.
(Image credit: Future)
To be fair, my ankles felt a bit shaky during the first few runs. I think this had to do with the cutouts on the bottom of the shoe and how I naturally pronate with one foot and supinate with the other. I’ve rolled my ankles so many times in my life that I’ve lost count, so I don’t have the strongest ankles to begin with, but because the cutouts near the arch are prominent, I could feel my ankles trying to prevent my foot from pronating too much and the other from supinating. It was awkward at first, but after each run, I noticed that my ankles felt stronger, and my feet were pronating and supinating far less than before.
The way I ran also shifted during testing. I realized that with my previous running shoe, I had been effectively “clomping,” and striking with my midfoot and forefoot as I ran. With the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0, more often than not, I struck with my heel or midfoot and then rocked forward on my toes. This new running style felt more natural and resulted in less strain on my feet and legs. If you naturally strike with your forefoot, you can absolutely run in these shoes, but I think you might be missing out on the benefits of the rocker design.
This is definitely a shoe for long-distance runners who run a variety of distances (especially those training for marathons), as it offers a low-effort and speedy running experience. Sure, there may be an adjustment period with the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0, but it’s well worth it in the long run (pun not intended).
HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: price & availability
(Image credit: Future)
$275/£250/AU$399
Available in Frost/Black
The Hoka Cielo X1 2.0 is not cheap by any means. At $275/£250/AU$399, they’re on the pricier end for rocker running shoes, though this isn’t surprising for a brand like HOKA that aims to provide the best type of running shoe for marathon runners. Currently, the Cielo X1 2.0 is only available in a single color option – Frost/Black – and is sold through HOKA and running stores like Road Runner Sports, Marathon Sports, and Paragon Sports. HOKA offers free delivery and free 30-day returns.
HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: specifications
HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: scorecard
Should I buy the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0?
(Image credit: Future)
Buy if it...
You’re a road racer looking for speed.
Combine the lightweight nature of the shoe with the rocker design, and you’ll notice an increase in your running speed.
You prefer a super cushioned running shoe.
HOKA notes that the Cielo X1 2.0 has a low profile (maybe in comparison to their other shoes), but at its thickest point, the cushion bed is two inches thick. During a run, your joints will benefit from the thicker sole, just ask the science.
You suffer from plantar heel, toe, and Achilles pain or ankle and calf injuries.
Studies have found that rocker running shoes can decrease the load on ankles, feet, and calves, minimizing a host of pains or injuries. View Deal
Don't buy it if...
You have no interest in adjusting your run
There is a bit of a learning curve to running with the Cielo X1 2.0, and because of its considerable rocker design, it could adjust the way you run.
You’re looking for a multi-purpose running and workout shoe
Due to the prominent rocker design, it’s only suitable for roads and paved trails. It would feel awkward to lift weights or go to the store in these shoes.
You’re on a budget
The HOKA Cielo X1 2.0 is $275. Unless you consistently run or are training for a marathon, you could find a great pair of running shoes at a more affordable price. View Deal
Also consider
(Image credit: Future)
Altra FWD VIA
The Altra FWD VIA has a smaller drop of 4 mm and a wider toe box.
I tested the Cielo X1 2.0 over the course of a week and a half, by running a variety of distances on the road, paved trails, and on an indoor track. During the testing period, I was able to gauge the shoe’s effectiveness in various weather conditions – sunny, dry days, and during light rain – and how well they did in terms of comfort and foot and joint relief. Everything from the shoe’s weight to the materials and design were considered during testing.
When I first jumped on the Specialized Vado SL2 Carbon, it instantly reminded me of my time with the Tenways CGO600 Pro. It had something to do with the form factor and sleek design but above all, it was the smooth ride and effortless power delivery that never left you wanting.
I used the Vado SL2 Carbon on a variety of different routes, including to travel between home and work, which itself includes city streets and rural roads. I found that it performed admirably and is most definitely worthy of consideration as one of the best e-bikes around.
It’s been a while since we reviewed the first iteration of this e-bike, the Vado SL, but suffice it to say, Specialized has made it better in almost every way. That includes the design, performance, and battery life.
Few e-bikes deliver this premium level of quality, but with great results comes a pretty hefty price tag. As a result, the Vado SL2 Carbon is only for elite commuters who have more money than they really know what to do with.
Specialized Vado SL2: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
$6,500 USD, £5,500 UK / $9,900 AUS
Available in black or red paint finishes
At $6,500 USD, £5,500 UK / $9,900 AUS, the Specialized Vado SL2 Carbon Equipped is, hands down, the most expensive e-bike I’ve ever had the pleasure of riding. Second to it would be the Brompton Electric P Line Urban, which retails at $4,750 / £3,695 and is a positive steal in comparison. The Vado SL2 Carbon is available in either black or red paint finishes.
Value score: 3.5/5
Specialized Vado SL2: Design
(Image credit: Future)
Carbon frame
Non-detachable battery
Excellent handlebar screen
The smooth and sleek design means you’ll look the part as you commute between home and work and back again. Compared to the previous iteration of this e-bike, Specialized has opted for a much smoother and streamlined aesthetic. I know I’m not alone in thinking this but they have absolutely nailed it. It shouts premium from every single angle.
The frame and other components are made of carbon, which results in one seriously light e-bike. Now I’m no weightlifter, but I had no problems lifting the whole thing with just one hand. At 17.9kg / 39.7 lbs you’ll be hard-pressed to find a lighter e-bike of the same size. Despite not being foldable and therefore not suitable for car trunks, the minimal weight will make it easy to throw up onto a bike rack.
The weight and ergonomic positioning of the seat and handlebars make for an effortless telepathic handling experience. With some e-bikes, it feels like you’re shifting a truck around but not so with the Vado SL2. Turning round corners and making quick adjustments is as easy as it could be. Overall, the e-bike delivers a surprising level of balance considering it has a heavy battery built into it. This isn’t the case for many e-bikes but during the more challenging inclines, I was even able to stand up and ride.
Thanks to Future Shock 3.2, Specialized has produced an e-bike that effortlessly cushions any uneven bike track or potholed road surface. Every ride is therefore super smooth, an ideal experience for commuters who want to turn up to work without feeling like they’ve done a workout.
I tested the EQ (equipped) version, which includes a range of extra features that are not available in the base package. These include a rear rack with lights, cage mounts, fenders, and a kickstand. I was glad to have these extra parts, especially while cycling through the British winter, which is known for being wet, muddy, and dark!
The e-bike also has one of the best handlebar screens that I’ve ever come across, with a well-designed interface that provides sufficient data, including speed, distance traveled, and battery life left. There is a Specialized app that takes this to a whole new level but I opted to stick with the e-bike’s built-in screen on account of not wanting to have to mount my phone each time I went for a ride.
Design Score: 4.5/5
Specialized Vado SL2: Performance
(Image credit: Future)
Smooth power delivery
Responsive handling
Effective shockproof technology
The Specialized Vado SL2 Carbon is a powerhouse of performance. Having tested the e-bike on a range of surfaces over a period of several weeks, I never found myself wanting. This is rarely the case when I’m testing e-bikes with either the torque, handling, or motor sensitivity falling short of what I want. Not so with the Vado SL2 Carbon.
Formidable power and high torque are delivered from Specialized’s bespoke SL 1.2 motor. As soon as I had clocked up my first kilometer of riding, I knew this was one special e-bike. I was particularly impressed with both the responsiveness and smooth power delivery that this bike provides. With no delay between turning the pedals and power delivery, I knew I could trust the SL2 to give me exactly what I needed when accelerating from a stationary position.
With the motor up and running, I loved how it smoothly went through the motions all the way up to top speed, even when traveling up medium inclines. As is the case with most e-bikes the SL2 struggled to provide the power required for steeper hills. I don’t mind getting the muscles burning at this stage but if this is a problem for you, then you might want to explore other options.
Due to the seriously lightweight carbon frame, I was a little concerned that handling was going to be twitchy and unreliable but all my concerns were unfounded. Rather, handling was beautifully telepathic thanks to the ergonomic layout of the handlebars and seat. If anything, the reduced weight meant strain on my arms was limited
The 12-speed rear derailleur provides a superb range of gears but was unfortunately a little clunky during gear changes. I was able to access all gears but moving between gears was slower than I would have expected for an e-bike at this price point. While we’re on the subject of things that could be improved, I found the effectiveness of the disc brakes meant I wasn’t able to stop as quickly as I would have expected.
More positively, I loved the Future Shock 3.2 technology, which effortlessly dealt with any uneven surfaces that I cycled on. This was particularly noticeable when traveling over pothole-laden roads around where I live.
I was also sure to test the e-bike at night to see how the lights performed. Both front and rear lights are powered by the battery but only the rear is integrated into the frame. Both provide adequate light levels to be seen by others but the front lacks the strength to light up country roads that don’t have street lighting. I therefore found myself requiring a secondary front light to do this for me.
Overall, the Vado SL2 Carbon is one of the highest-performing e-bikes I’ve ever had the pleasure of riding. It’s powerful, smooth, and delivers fantastic handling.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Specialized Vado SL2: Battery life
(Image credit: Future)
Up to five hours range
Specialized SL2-520
Fully integrated
Specialized is strangely silent on how many miles or kilometres the e-bike will manage but it does commit to a range of five hours. This is likely to be at the lowest level of pedal assist, minimal rider weight, and no headwind.
During my test rides, I found that I achieved around 35 miles per full charge, which equated to around two and a half hours. These rides included a range of terrains and weather conditions that would have made the e-bike work harder than usual.
If range is likely to be a concern for you, then you could always buy a Specialized range extender battery, which is likely to give you an additional 1 hour of range. This is likely to be less in real-world tests and is nowhere near the same as buying a second battery. The extender does have the benefit of being super portable, though.
The battery is integrated within the frame, which means you’ll have to be able to charge it where you store the e-bike. This is far from ideal for me and I much prefer batteries that I can take indoors overnight.
Battery life score: 3.5/5
Specialized Vado SL2: Scorecard
Buy it if...
You want a seriously premium e-bike
With high-class components and excellent engineering, the Vado SL2 Carbon is almost everything you could ever want in an e-bike.
You have money to burn
If money is not much of an issue, then it’s hard to come up with many reasons why you wouldn’t buy one of the best options out there at the moment.
You want a quiet e-bike
The motor performs with minimal buzz and is ideal for people who want a quiet ride.
Don't buy it if...
You want a detachable battery
The Vado SL2 battery is built in so you’ll be limited to charging wherever you store your e-bike.
You need a portable e-bike
With no foldable mechanism, the Vado SL2 won’t fit in many cars and will take up a lot of space on a train.
Also consider
(Image credit: Engwe)
ENGWE MapFour N1 Air
The lightest 100 km range carbon e-bike around. A perfect e-bike solution for commuters.
Tenways CGO600 Pro
The magnetic torque sensor and carbon belt drive deliver smooth and seamless performance. Read our full review here.
How I tested the Specialized Vado SL2
As soon as the e-bike dropped onto my doorstep, I cracked straight on with getting it built. It didn’t take long, thanks to the way it was packaged and mostly pre-setup. With the rest of the setup completed, I proceeded to use the e-bike for all my rides across a six-week period. This included my daily 7-mile commute through the country, along heavily congested roads, and through city streets. My testing period was during the winter season so I was able to test the e-bike during a range of weather conditions, including rain and ice.
Writing this OnePlus Watch 3 review, I was struck by how much smaller of a leap we've seen from the OnePlus Watch 2 to the OnePlus Watch 3, compared to the leap the Watch 2 made from the original. The first OnePlus Watch was considered bad by every metric, but the OnePlus Watch 2 was a spectacular improvement in every way.
The OnePlus Watch 3 has much less work to do, iterating on an already successful design. Like the OnePlus Watch 2, it’s got the look of a classic dress watch with its outer casing and bezel, now upgraded from stainless steel to titanium. Its AMOLED display is now comprised of 2D sapphire crystal for improved durability, and its battery life has been extended from the OnePlus Watch 2’s 100 hours to 120 hours, beating rivals like the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra and Apple Watch Ultra for longevity.
I’ve only used it for a few hours, but functionally it performs as smoothly and as well as any Wear OS watch I’ve yet used, including the Google Pixel Watch 3. It’s an option most Android phone users should consider, and it’s sure to make its way into our best Android watches list in future.
Its usability is vastly improved by the addition of a rotating digital crown, allowing for easier scrolling and navigation, especially during sweaty workouts in which the touchscreen would be harder (or grosser) to use.
My main gripe is with the watch’s size: I would have loved to see OnePlus bring out a second, smaller model for those with smaller wrists. Many people, including a lot of women, will find it’s just too big and heavy for daily wear. However, this issue aside, it’s a powerful, robust daily driver with modern health tools and a timeless look.
OnePlus Watch 3: Specifications
OnePlus Watch 3: price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
£319 in the UK (approximately $400 / AU$630)
Available in the UK / EU
Availability for other regions is TBC
The OnePlus Watch 3 is available in the UK, where it's priced at £319 (approximately $400 / AU$630), and in the EU. It's available to order from today.
We’re currently unsure if the watch will be available in the US and AU markets, but will update this full review with that information when we get it.
OnePlus Watch 3: Design
(Image credit: Future)
Sumptuous screen
Rotating crown
Very big for smaller wrists
As mentioned, the OnePlus Watch 3 shares many design similarities with the OnePlus Watch 2. However, there are a few changes both under the hood and, erm, over it. The watch still runs Wear OS 5 on its Snapdragon W5 chipset, but it also runs a second operating system, RTOS, powered by a new BES2800 MCU chip.
By switching from Wear OS to the low-power RTOS, the OnePLus Watch 3 is able to extend its battery life. In conjunction with the new chip, a bigger 631mAh battery means the Watch 3 lasts up to 120 hours, compared with the older model's 100 hours.
The shape and design of the OnePlus Watch 3 are very similar to the Watch 2 pictured below. At 46.6mm x 47.6mm x 11mm, not including the thickness of the sensor, it’s a hefty watch at 81g including strap. It might look like a timeless metal dress watch, which helps, but the sheer size of it will be off-putting to a lot of people.
However, its size does mean it’s packing a lovely big screen. Its 2D sapphire crystal and buttery-smooth AMOLED puts out 2,000 nits, the same brightness as the Apple Watch Ultra 2. The big screen makes reading messages and notifications a pleasure rather than an annoyance to, doubly so thanks to the other big new addition: a rotating digital crown. Pressing the crown takes you back to the main menu, and its wheel is used for scrolling, while the side button starts workouts. Coupled with the touchscreen, it’s all very intuitive, and a design that will be familiar to users of the best Apple Watches.
OnePlus Watch 3: Features
(Image credit: Future)
60-second heart health check-in
New ECG functionality
Dual-frequency GPS
As well as the rotating digital crown, tougher new screen and bezel, and longer battery life, there are software features aplenty, both new and returning. The beauty of the best Android watches (much like the best Apple Watches) is that you can stuff them full of third-party apps, and it’s the same case here. I’ve already got Strava, Spotify, AllTrails, Audible… all my usual suspects.
First up among the new stuff is the 60-second health check-in. By pressing your finger on the All-In_one sensor button, the OnePlus Watch 3 measures your heart rate, conducts an electrocardiograph scan (this feature will be available later in the year), and tracks blood oxygen levels, mental wellness, wrist temperature, sleep quality, and a new metric called ‘vascular age’, similar to Garmin’s Fitness Age, but specifically tailored to heart health.
A big emphasis is placed on heart heath, with vascular elasticity measured and the new ECG functionality working with this to create benchmarks based on age. Essentially, the OnePlus Watch 3 can tell you a rough idea of how 'old' your heart is in comparison to the rest of your body. If you’re in your thirties but very fit, you might have the heart of a 25-year-old for example, whereas someone out-of-shape might have a heart age edging towards the forties.
GPS is now dual-frequency for additional accuracy. The Watch’s basic workout app supports over 100 different sports mode, but only 11 of these offer ‘professional modes’ or unique metrics, such as running. The rest are nice-to-haves for instant input into your digital training diary.
I’ll be adding a Performance section, along with final scores, in my full review after I've worn and tested the watch over a longer period. Check back soon!
