This article is part of our Get Fit for '26 series, in which our writers talk about the wellness and fitness challenges and experiences they've taken on, and the ones set to shape the year ahead. You can read all the articles in the series here.
It's safe to say that the Altra Timp 5 Boa trail running shoes stand out from all the other pairs I've used over the years, including from the likes of Nike, Asics and Inov-8 among others.
The Inov-8 Trailfly G270 V2's are typically a sweet spot for me as someone who lives in the countryside with trails on my doorstep who wants a lightweight but durable, mostly off-road shoe. So how do the Timp 5 Boa trail shoes compare, and could they be one of the best running shoes for my broad feet?
Well, they certainly are an altogether different shoe from those Inov-8's. Altra's hallmarks are a particularly wide toe box and zero drop – two features I appreciate and drew my attention to the brand in the first place.
However, it's the unique lacing system of the 'Boa' version of the Timp 5's that peaked my curiosity. Swapping out traditional laces, there's a dial which tightens and loosens the lace, enabling quick and precise adjustments. Kind of like ski boots.
I was concerned how effective this system would be, expecting the lace to regularly work its way loose, but those worries were unfounded following multiple 5 mile trails runs over several weeks, tackling hills and all manner of terrain.
Push in the dial, rotate, and the lace tightens. Pull out the dial and the whole lace loosens. The unique lacing system is super easy. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Quick and micro adjustments are a doddle with this lacing system, which was a godsend given that I broke two fingers during the review period (unrelated, I promise – I stacked it in a skate park when rolling back the years on my daughter's scooter), and had limited use of one hand.
I've consequently lived in the Timp 5 Boa's because traditional laces were particularly tricky, but this lacing dial is manageable with one hand.
I found the Altra Timp 5 Boa's a little slow for running, but they are supremely comfortable for long days on your feet. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
I like the look of the Timp 5 Boas too, even if the upper mesh is hard to clean after muddy trail runs to smarten them up for use afterwards as a day shoe.
And at 10oz / 286g, they are heavier than the average running shoe – I found them slow going for running (compared to those light Inov-8 shoes), so my pace was a little slower than I would like.
I'm used to zero drop shoes, but I did get a small strain on my achilles after totting up the miles in those Altra shoes. You might not be affected in the same way.
Image 1 of 5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
The stretch 'sock' fabric cut into the outside of my ankle on occasion, too, if I had the tightening set incorrectly to my feet. Again, that might not be an issue for you.
I don't think I've find my new fast trail shoes, sadly, but the Timp 5 Boa's have otherwise been supremely comfortable and are clearly durable. These are my new top pick for long days on my feet, and I will definitely get a lot of use from them.
No discount at the time of writing at Altra, and relatively pricey
4/5
Design
Wide toebox gives room for feet to breathe, zero heel drop might not suit all
4.5/5
Features
Unique lacing system works a charm for micro adjustments and snug support, Vibram midsole adds durability
4.5/5
Performance
Supremely comfortable, but not the quickest running shoe
4/5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Altra Timp 5 Boa: Should I buy?
Buy it if...
You have wide feet
The wide toe box is designed for people with wide feet and is certainly spacious.
You want a comfortable every day shoe
Slighly heavy for running, the cushioned Timp 5 Boa's are arguably a better pick for long days on your feet.
Don't buy it if...
You want a high speed running shoe
At 10oz / 286g, these are heavier than average shoes, not PB-assisting ones.
You want a smart-looking running shoe
I love the lacing system and overall like the look, but the hard-to-clean mesh isn't ideal for a trail shoe.
Also consider
Inov-8 Trailfly G270 V2
If you want a faster trail running shoe, I recommend the Inov-8 Trailfly G270 V2 instead – it's lighter, extremely durable and likewise has a zero drop.
Used as my primary everyday shoe and running shoe for 1 month
My typical running distance was around 25km per week
I ran on mixed terrain; technical trails, footpaths and roads, flat and hilly, and used these as day to day shoes
I pretty much lived in the Altra Timp 5 Boa's for a month, using them as my every day shoe for walking, hiking and commuting. I also completed numerous trail runs – about three per week for a month, with a typical weekly distance of around 25kms.
I live in the hilly countryside and most of the running I do covers mixed terrain and run in all kinds of weather. I've run on trails, footpaths and roads; wet and dry; flat and hilly. Just about any scenario you can imagine.
It was a surprise to many fans of Nanoleaf's popular smart-lighting products when the brand expanded into wellness, releasing a selection of devices including the Nanoleaf LED face mask and 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand.
Given its experience in making some of the best smart lights,it makes sense that the brand should know what it's doing when it comes to light therapy, and based on my experience so far, it’s best demonstrated by the new light wand.
Offering six treatments (anti-aging, acne, repair, soothing, heating and cooling), the Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand is a veritable facial in your pocket, clad in a stylish sage green and weighing just 201g. I’ve been using it two or three times a week for five weeks at the time of writing this review, and I can already tell that it’s working well for me, and that’s not just because the treatment itself is better.
Specs
Weight
201g
Dimensions
187 x 40 x 55mm (L x W x H)
Temperature
Heating Temperature: 38±3℃
Cooling Temperature: 15±3℃
Wavelengths
Red + NIR: 630nm + 850nm
Blue: 460nm
There are three key reasons why I prize my Nanoleaf light wand over and above the brand’s LED face mask, which I enjoyed, albeit with some reservations.
Firstly, the device is lightweight and very portable, making it an excellent travel companion. This is something I also appreciated about Nanoleaf’s silicone face mask, especially in comparison to the bulky and rigid Shark Cryoglow,and the handheld wand amps up the convenience by being portable enough to stash in a toiletries bag and lasting up to three hours on a single charge.
Each treatment lasts just four minutes, with Nanoleaf recommending two to three sessions per week, meaning the wand can comfortably go weeks without charging, too. It takes three hours to recharge via USB-C, so it’s plenty convenient even if you're traveling.
The second reason I’m drawn back to the Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand over its competition in the face-mask market is its versatility. To use the wand, you glide its light panel and metallic face across your skin in a circular motion, choosing one of its six presets depending on your needs.
Each preset is paired with a different combination of temperature, LEDs, and vibration, which I’ve detailed below. Each setting can be adjusted to one of three intensity settings, though I’d always recommend sticking with the factory settings.
Treatment
Light therapy
Temperature
Vibration
Intensity (default)
Anti-aging
Red Light + NIR
Heating
Y
3
Acne
Blue Light
None
Y
3
Repair
Red Light + NIR
Cooling
N
3
Soothe
N
Heating
Y
3
Cooling
N
Cooling
N
1
Heating
N
Heating
N
1
Much like the Shark Cryoglow, there’s a cooling element around the light panel, except here this effect can be used on your whole face rather than just your under-eye area.
Cryotherapy treatments can help to constrict blood vessels under your skin, reducing redness, puffiness and inflammation and helping to tighten pores and improve circulation; all things my acne-prone skin can benefit from.
However, it’s not just cooling that can maximize the benefits of light therapy; some modes instead utilize a heating effect, which can help to loosen debris and cleanse the skin, reduce tension and even stimulate skin regeneration according to some research.
Neither heating nor cooling is too intense, with the former reaching up to 42C and the latter at a lowest temperature of 12C, meaning both treatments can be enjoyed as a relaxing step of your skincare routine.
That’s an excellent segue into the final feather in the Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand’s cap, which is the fact that you can use it to apply products to your skin as part of your daily routine.
I loved starting my nightly skincare routine with a round of heating to help open my pores and clear my skin of the day’s grime, and relax myself for bedtime, applying my various lotions and potions and massaging them into the skin while treating it with heat, light and massaging vibrations.
Personally, I think this is what has made all the difference for me (and my skin!) compared to Nanoleaf’s LED-only face mask; my skin is a lot clearer, and after a slightly painful few days where it seemed my acne worsened and came to the fore, weeks down the line it’s settling and looking clearer than it has since I was using Shark’s Cryoglow every day.
(Image credit: Future)
While I love these three benefits, none of this is to say Nanoleaf’s 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand is perfect. One major design flaw is that you should never look directly at these LEDs, yet it’s really easy during use to slip or misplace the wand and blast bright lights straight into your eyes. Of course this can be remedied with eye masks or keeping them closed, but I personally don’t find jabbing blindly at my face with a hard surface particularly relaxing.
Also noteworthy is that, much like the brand’s face mask, the light wavelengths on offer still aren’t quite within peak performance based on currently available scientific studies; its blue light emits at 460nm versus the recommended 415nm and near-infrared (NIR) at 850nm versus 830nm. Thankfully, though, red light bucks the trend with its 630nm output vs 633nm peak performance.
That doesn’t necessarily mean Nanoleaf’s product isn’t effective; it just means that more premium products that align more closely with scientifically backed peak-performance levels might be better, and the results more noticeable.
As I always caveat when reviewing these products, the science behind light therapy is still in its infancy, and my review experience can be described as anecdotal at best. Still, I have noticed some moderate improvements which, while non-permanent, are helping me manage my adult acne.
(Image credit: Future)
Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand review: Price and availability
Price: $99 / £99 / AU$159.99
Affordable alternative to masks, best price option for wands
At its list price, Nanoleaf’s 6-in-1 LED Light Therapy Wand is an excellent budget-friendly alternative to a full face mask, and even offers some benefits that make it a better choice overall.
Even when compared to other skin-therapy wands, Nanoleaf stands out as a uniquely affordable offering. There are cheaper LED-only wands, yes, and there are similarly priced cooling/heating products at similar price points, but not many (if any) that can do both, and certainly not so affordably.
At this price, it's better value than most (if not all) budget-friendly LED masks and most wands.
5/5
Design
Handheld, easily portable and stylish enough to leave out on your vanity.
4.5/5
Performance
Light wavelengths aren’t optimal but slightly improved upon Nanoleaf’s facemask, plus added heating/cooling features improve efficacy.
4/5
Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand: Should I buy it?
Buy it if...
You’re looking for a travel-friendly light-therapy device
Easily slipped in a travel bag and lightweight, this is an excellent travel companion and alternative to a bulkier or unwieldy mask.
You’re on a budget
The Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand is a great budget option, especially if you can find it on sale.
Don't buy it if...
You want peak power and performance
With some of the light therapies falling outside of recommended wavelengths, you’re not getting peak performance from this mask, though it’s by no means bad.
You're nervous of eye strain
If you're really careful, you can avoid accidental blasts of LEDs to your eyes, but I found it hard to relax and ensure that I benefitted from the treatments without the occasional slip.
(Image credit: Future)
How I tested the Nanoleaf 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand
I used Nanoleaf’s 6-in-1 Light Therapy Wand for five weeks, primarily trialling its acne treatment, which is my primary skin concern. However I also used its anti-aging setting for a fortnight for good measure, having tried other products against which I could benchmark its effectiveness.
I’ve been testing beauty devices for four years, considering everything from product design and functionality to performance, affordability and any available medical research to assess their efficacy and value for customers. With this particular product, I considered everyday use-cases like travel, charging and beauty routines, researched optimal light wavelength compared to the product’s stated output, and the price and availability of the device to come to a decision on its overall score.
The Noise Luna Ring 2 is the second generation of the Luna Ring. I reviewed the original in early 2025 and liked that it felt comfortable, offered solid insights, and was impressively accurate for sleep tracking from a first-gen product.
On paper, the Luna Ring 2 doesn’t sound like a huge leap forward and, visually, you’d be forgiven for not immediately spotting what’s changed. The design tweaks are subtle, and if you already own the first Luna Ring I don’t think this is a must-have upgrade.
But taken on its own, this is a good smart ring. A few pain points have been ironed out. The ring is around 10% slimmer, there’s a new charging case which looks great and stores multiple top-ups, battery performance has improved slightly and the app feels quicker to update. I also felt like sleep tracking was more precise this time round, which is probably due to the improved sensor accuracy.
The main advantage here remains the same as last time round, there’s no subscription here. That immediately makes it more appealing than the Oura Ring 4 (the most popular smart ring) if you’re not keen on adding another subscription to your life, especially if you consider that the Oura Ring 4 is more expensive to begin with.
Personally, the best new feature here is Luna’s circadian alignment tools, presenting guidance about when to get sunlight, drink coffee and exercise throughout the day. It includes a “caffeine window” that tries to stop you sabotaging your sleep with badly timed coffee. These are genuinely useful, presented nicely and feel actionable and meaningful than an arbitrary score.
There are still some things I didn’t like here. The app is pretty information dense and yet again the typography choices feel too small and fussy, which makes daily use less enjoyable than rivals. There’s an AI coach here, but it delivers generic chatbot advice rather than anything helpful. And while battery life here is good, it doesn’t quite make it as long as some rivals.
But the biggest issue here is the market. When I first reviewed the Luna Ring Gen 1, I said one of the main problems wasn’t the ring itself but the competition. That’s even more true now. The Oura Ring 4 still offers the most refined overall experience, the Samsung Galaxy Ring is great as long as you’re not on iOS and the Ultrahuman Ring Air and RingConn 2 Air are strong subscription-free alternatives to both. More and more cheaper alternatives are now entering the market too, like the Amazfit Helio Ring, which isn’t as good but is cheaper.
If you want a capable, subscription-free smart ring with strong sleep tracking and don’t mind that it doesn’t look quite as premium as the big names, the Luna Ring 2 is a good choice. It’s just not the obvious pick and even though I like it I’m not sure there’s anything standout here to recommend it over the competition.
Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2) review: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
Price is around $329/£299/AU$510
No subscription fee
Several color options at the same price
The Luna Ring 2 is available for around $329/£299/AU$510. I say around as pricing seems to vary across regions and I’m writing this during sale season when prices are fluctuating.
It comes in a range of finishes, including Sunlit Gold, Stardust Silver, Rose Gold, Midnight Black and Lunar Black – that last one is a matte shade. All of these finishes are the same price, which is good as some rivals charge more for specific colors or materials. Then again, that could explain why the Luna Ring 2 has a less premium look and feel than rivals, but I’ll get to that later.
That puts it below the Oura Ring 4, which typically retails for $349/£349 at full price, though more premium materials and colors can push that up to $499/£499. What’s more, you’ll need an ongoing membership to unlock full insights, which is a further $5.99/£5.99. The Samsung Galaxy Ring was also more expensive at launch at $399/£399/around AU$750, though it’s hard to compare given it’s not for iOS users.
Meanwhile, subscription-free rivals include the Ultrahuman Ring Air at £329 (it isn’t available in the US at the time of writing) and RingConn Gen 2 Air at $299/£280/AU$570 (approx). You can also find the Amazfit Helio Ring for £119.90 as a budget option.
All of this means the Luna Ring 2 is more affordable than the Oura Ring 4 but not a budget pick. The lack of subscription does help it seem better value, but it’s not so cheap that it’s a no-brainer over the rest.
Value score: 3.5 / 5
Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2) review: Specifications
Colors
Silver, Black, Matte Black, Rose Gold, Gold
Weight
3-5g (depending on size)
Material
Titanium
Battery life
Up to 7 days
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Waterproofing
Up to 50m/164 ft
(Image credit: Future)
Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2) review: Design
Light and comfortable
Slightly slimmer than first Luna Ring
Can look cheaper than rivals, especially in gold
The Luna Ring (Gen 2) is a light and compact ring, weighing between 3g and 5g depending on the size you need. On paper, that’s a small shift from the Gen 1 ring, and Luna says its Gen 2 ring is 10% slimmer and lighter overall. In reality, the difference is subtle. But the Gen 2 is genuinely very comfortable to wear 24/7.
Sizing runs from 6 to 14 and you get a sizing kit in advance, which works the same way as most smart ring brands. It’s based on standard ring sizes, but I still find that different brands fit slightly differently, so the kit is worth using.
The ring itself is made from titanium with a PVD coating and there’s a non-allergenic and seamless inner surface that sits against your skin. It’s rated 5ATM, which means you don’t need to take it off for showers, swimming or getting caught in the rain. Ideal if you’re trying to build a habit of wearing it constantly.
(Image credit: Future)
As for colors, there’s a nice choice here. Stardust Silver, Rose Gold, Sunlit Gold, Midnight Black and Lunar Black, a matte shade. The marketing images make most of them look shiny, and in real life the Sunlit Gold I tested is particularly shiny. Other brands have glossy finishes too, but here it tips over into looking a bit more like a plastic gold ring rather than blending in to look like jewellery, at least to my eye.
The real star of the design in this newer version isn’t the ring itself, but the new charging case that comes with it. Instead of the little charging plinth that came with the Gen 1 version, you now get a compact case that looks more like the cases you get with earbuds, or the Samsung Galaxy Ring. Not only does it pack in lots of extra charges, it’s one of the nicest smart ring charging solutions I’ve used so far.
Design score: 4 / 5
Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2) review: Features
(Image credit: Future)
Strong core health and sleep data
Circadian alignment tools genuinely helpful
AI integration feels gimmicky
The Luna Ring (Gen 2) follows the familiar smart ring formula, lots of sensors in a tiny band. You get green and red LEDs for heart rate, blood oxygen and skin temperature tracking, photodiodes and a 3-axis accelerometer for movement.
From those, Luna tracks your sleep time, sleep stages and sleep score, resting heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory rate and SpO2, temperature fluctuations, stress, activity and menstrual and ovulation tracking, based on temperature and HRV.
There’s automatic detection for walking and running, plus basic workout logging for other exercises. Though, as with most smart rings right now, this isn’t designed to replace a full-on running or fitness watch, but it works well for general movement.
It’s worth noting there’s no VO2 max estimate here, which you’ll find on some rival rings and many of the best smartwatches. If you like that training metric, you might miss it here.
The more interesting additions on the software side are Luna’s “Life OS” platform, which has been updated in this version. It brings new tools like the aforementioned circadian alignment guide and a “caffeine window”. These suggest the best times to get sunlight, eat, exercise and drink coffee based on your patterns, with the aim of nudging you into a more consistent rhythm and protecting sleep.
I found those features genuinely useful and really nicely presented. Even if they don’t transform your sleep overnight, they did gently encourage me to think about my day in a way that’s more aligned with my sleep and rhythms.
There’s also an AI coach here, but I found it quite gimmicky (like most AI integrations these days). It’s essentially a chatbot bolted onto your health data. Now, some people might enjoy asking it questions, but in my testing the nutrition and lifestyle advice felt generic. Responses could be slow and if you already know the basics of health and fitness you might find it a little condescending.
On the integration front, the Luna Ring currently works with Apple Health and Google Fit, which at least lets you pull workouts from other platforms. But there are no deeper third-party integrations yet, so you can’t plug it directly into more specialized training apps or health dashboards, for example.
Features score: 3.5 / 5
Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2) review: Performance
(Image credit: Future)
Sleep tracking feels upgraded
Battery life is good, not class-leading
Good app but a bit cramped
Let’s start with the battery, as that’s been updated over the previous version. Noise says you’ll get between 4 to 7 days, which is quite a broad amount of time. During my testing I consistently got just under 6 days out of it, which I think is good. It’s an improvement over the first ring, which only ever reached 4 days.
The charging case can store around 30 days of power before you need to plug it in, which was really handy. Especially considering the charging case is light, small and looks nice.
For content, the Oura Ring 4 and Ultrahuman Ring Air can deliver six to eight days, while the RingConn Gen 2 Air can stretch to 10 to 12 days. So Luna sits in the good but not outstanding bracket where battery is concerned. Good thing it’s got the charging case this time around, which helps – did I mention I love the charging case?
The Luna Ring (Gen 2) will automatically detect walking and running and in my experience it did this reliably. You’re prompted to confirm detected sessions, which is handy.
For other exercise types, you’ll need to log activities manually and there are lots to choose from, including yoga, treadmill, cycling, bouldering, pilates, even surfing. As with most smart rings, it’s not a hardcore training tool, there’s no GPS or dedicated workout models. Think of it more as an everyday health tracker that handles simple workouts reasonably well rather than something you’d use for serious training.
I have mixed feelings about the Luna app. On the plus side, it’s packed with information and you can dig deeper into information about sleep, readiness, activity, temperature and more. In some places, scores are accompanied by short explanations, which I always appreciate more than a bare number.
(Image credit: Future)
However, the presentation of the data still doesn’t quite land for me. Fonts are tiny and a lot of elements are tightly packed together. It’s a subjective complaint, sure, but one that does impact on my day to day enjoyment of using it.
Some of the language and flagging around health data also feels more alarming than it needs to be. For example, waking up to a red exclamation mark on my SpO2 with a blunt “Pay Attention” message isn’t in line with how I think wearables should be talking to us about health. The same goes for some of the coaching prompts, they’re technically accurate, but not particularly warm or human.
Sleep tracking is where the Gen 2 shines, it does a great job at picking up on sleep and wake times, even on nights when my sleep was broken. I often wake up around 3am, read for a few hours, then go back to sleep. The Luna Ring 2 picked up this pattern consistently, where in the past other wearables have not detected the break or not detected me falling back to sleep again. It also detected short naps accurately.
You get a full breakdown of your sleep stages, a nightly sleep score and insights into what’s pushing that score up or down. Over time, trends are handy to see.
(Image credit: Future)
As for whether those circadian tools I mentioned earlier improve my sleep, that’s hard to say definitively, but having prompts about when to get outside, drink coffee or exercise did make me more intentional about my routine.
Finally, there’s the AI coach. I know other reviewers enjoy this kind of feature, but here it still feels like a very basic chatbot sat on top of your data rather than anything geared to personalized guidance. Generic nutrition tips, slow responses and a lack of nuance mean it’s not something I enjoyed using.
Though I will say one of the suggested prompts was “Which health metric needs my attention today?” which does highlight anything noticeable without digging around. Without that I’d say it was a bit useless.
Performance: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Scorecard
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Design
Light, comfortable and slightly slimmer than Gen 1. The gold color looks less premium than rivals. But the charging case is excellent.
4 / 5
Features
Strong core health and sleep tracking with useful circadian alignment feature. The AI coach and lack of VO2 max are my only bugbears.
3.5 / 5
Performance
Accurate sleep tracking, decent activity detection and good but not class-leading battery. App is overall great but needs a design refresh in my opinion.
4 / 5
Value
Cheaper than some rivals and subscription-free but not cheap enough or polished enough to be a really obvious choice over rivals.
3.5 / 5
Should I buy the Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2)?
Buy it if…
You want a smart ring without an added subscription Oura is still the most popular choice, but its monthly membership and initial price make it an expensive choice. The Luna Ring 2 is one of several capable subscription-free alternatives.
You want accurate tracking and plenty of data I’ve focused a lot on rivals in this review, but taken by itself this is a good device with accurate sleep and recovery tracking, and a generous amount of data and trends to explore.
You want strong sleep tracking without bulk If you mainly care about sleep and general recovery, smart rings are hugely appealing because you can ditch the bulk of a smartwatch at night.
Don’t buy it if…
You want the absolute best tracking and polish I was impressed by the Luna Ring 2 overall but the Oura Ring 4 will still deliver the most polished experience in terms of design, app refinement and depth of insights.
You care a lot about premium materials and finishes If you want your smart ring to double as jewellery, Oura’s rings do look and feel more high-end.
You already own the first Luna Ring This is a nice step up with a better charging experience and extra features. But if you’re happy with the Gen 1 and not itching for a new ring, there isn’t a killer upgrade here.
Noise Luna Ring (Gen 1): Also consider
Oura Ring 4 Still the best all-rounder for design, app experience and depth of data across iOS and Android. More expensive than the Luna Ring 2 and does require a subscription to unlock its full potential. But for some the extra polish and insights will be worth it. Read our full Oura Ring 4 review
Ultrahuman Ring Air A strong subscription-free alternative. With a slick design, polished app and good sleep and recovery tracking. It’s widely considered the second best option after Oura. Ultrahuman Ring Air review
How I tested the Noise Luna Ring (Gen 2)
(Image credit: Future)
Paired with an iPhone 16 Pro
Wore the ring 24/7
I’ve been testing wearables for 12+ years
I tested the Noise Luna Ring 2 for several weeks, paired with an iPhone 16 Pro. I wore it all day and night, including running outdoors, to gym sessions, during long workdays in coffee shops, evenings at home and, of course, while sleeping. I only took it off to charge it or when showering – yes, it’s waterproof but I never like to risk soap or shampoo messing it up.
Over the past 12 years I’ve reviewed dozens of wearables, including smart watches, fitness trackers and smart rings from Oura, Ultrahuman, RingConn, Motiv, and more. Having got hands-on with so many, I’ve got a strong sense now of what makes a smart ring comfortable, truly useful – from design and comfort to performance, app quality, and long-term wearability – and standout in a busy and competitive space.
No, it’s not a Garmin. The Coros Nomad may look ever so slightly like the Instinct 3, but in many ways it’s more exciting, since it boils that excellent smartwatch down to a less feature-packed but still compelling alternative that’s considerably cheaper.
It’s strictly in fitness tracker territory, with features like NFC payments not making the cut, but it does have the advantage of offering locally stored maps. Add to that more than three weeks of battery life on a single charge, a handy action button, and a really nice, lightweight design, and there’s an awful lot to like about this upstart.
Memory in Pixel displays aren’t for everyone as they’re duller than most smartwatches’ AMOLED screens, but they do conserve battery as a result. If you’re happy with one here, you’re getting excellent value for money and fantastic battery life.
Coros Nomad: Price and availability
(Image credit: Coros)
Starts at $349 / £319 / around AU$640
Considerably cheaper than rivals
Available in three color options
The big pull for the Coros Nomad is how favorable it compares to the Garmin Instinct 3 price-wise. It starts at $349 / £319 / around AU$640, compared to the Garmin model’s $449 / £389 / AU$829, and it comes in Dark Grey, Green, and Brown finishes – I tested the green version.
Value score: 5/5
Garmin Venu 4: Specifications
Component
Coros Nomad
Price
$349 / £319
Dimensions
47.8 x 47.8 x 16.4mm
Weight
49g with band
Case/bezel
Polymer Case
Display
1.3 inch Memory-in-Pixel display (260x260 resolution)
GPS
Dual frequency GPS
Battery life
22 days of standard use, 34 hours in GPS mode
Connection
Bluetooth
Water resistant
50M
Coros Nomad: Design
(Image credit: Coros)
Durable, but fairly lightweight
Action button
Given that this is billed as a rugged smartwatch, there’s a good chance the first thing you notice when picking up the Coros Nomad is that it’s not all that heavy at all.
The Polymer case feels strong (although you won’t catch me hurling my review unit at a concrete floor), but it’s also nice and light. That’s particularly helpful given that this is a device you can wear for up to three weeks without taking it off for a charge, and the strap is comfortable, too (albeit I’m not a big fan of the pin-based method of attaching them).
The case envelops the display, and provides plenty of clearance to keep it from being dinged if you were to drop the watch or swing your arm into something, although Coros says it’s a mineral glass display that should be tough to crack anyway.
Controls-wise, there are two buttons for interacting with the UI, as well as an action button that can be programmed to perform different functions such as the backlight, adding a voice pin along a route, or switch between activity data and map view. Charging is handled via a small proprietary port on the back.
Design score: 4.5/5
Coros Nomad: Features
(Image credit: Coros)
Offline maps
No smartwatch features
Where Garmin’s Instinct 3 doesn’t offer map functionality, the Coros Nomad does, making it an attractive choice for trail runners who may not know a route very well. This works with Coros’ companion app, allowing you to store routes and save them to quickly check conditions before you head out the door.
There’s dual-band GPS for tracking, too, and it proved exceptionally accurate in my testing, whether I was out for a wander in the countryside or standing amidst London’s largest buildings.
It’s really built for the great outdoors, as the name suggests. As well as all the usual maps and GPX routing functionality, you can drop voice pins using the onboard mic during walks and runs, which will replay thoughts that occur to you at specific points during routes, such as descriptions of landmarks. You can add photos in the app too, creating an adventure journal.
Fishing modes, which don’t normally get a lot of love, get a digital anchor, putting a pin in a spot so you can see if you’re drifting during the activity. Niche, but eminently useful to the right person. Health-wise, you get an ECG sensor, SpO2 monitor, and Safety Alerts allowing you to send your location to emergency contacts. However, this is more like Garmin’s LiveTrack than SOS messaging, as it’s done on your phone rather than satellite, and thus requires phone signal. Still, a nice-to-have.
The only real downside is that some smartwatch features are lacking. To be clear, Coros is marketing the Nomad as a fitness watch, but I’d have liked NFC payments and maybe some music options here for the days when I want to leave my phone at home.
Features score: 4.5/5
Coros Nomad: Performance
(Image credit: Coros)
MiP display
Up to 22 days of battery
Heart rate accuracy is up there with the best
The Coros Nomad’s performance is pretty fantastic across the board. A single charge can last you a whopping 22 days, while you’ll get around 50 hours if you’re using GPS mode for more intensive location tracking, or 34 hours for dual band. I found this was accurate during testing.
Unfortunately, I didn’t get to go fishing with the watch during my testing period, but I did use its headline feature: maps.
This is something many similarly-priced rivals don’t offer, and it’s great to have offline maps downloaded if you’re unsure of where you are and you’ve left your phone at home. It’s nice and easy to get them downloaded via the companion app, and the maps themselves are easy to read with color-coding for route types.
You can zoom in and out with the crown, too, making it easier to get context for your current route.
Another nifty feature, I’ve not seen anything like Voice Pin on a watch before. The idea is relatively simple, letting you leave an audio note on a run or hike tailored to a location. In theory, this could mean you could create curated audio cues for a route you’re sharing with a friend, or provide additional notes on how to get home.
Heart rate tracking matches up to the current gold standard in my experience – the Apple Watch Ultra series. Despite the Coros Nomad costing less than half the price, it pretty much matched Apple’s most rugged watch beat-for-beat. We’ve independently tested the Ultra against a Polar H10 heart rate monitor, finding it very accurate, so to have Coros match this is very encouraging.
Performance score: 5/5
Coros Nomad: Scorecard
Attribute
Comments
Score
Value
Undercuts a Garmin while offering additional features.
5
Design
Easy to use, comfortable, and rugged.
5
Features
Plenty of health monitor features, but lacking in terms of NFC payments.
4.5
Performance
Offline maps and voice pins are great.
5
Coros Nomad: Should I buy?
(Image credit: Future)
Buy it if...
You want a Garmin, but don’t want to pay Garmin money
The Coros Nomad certainly pushes Garmin’s Instinct lineup into a corner, offering many of the same features for much less than the Garmin Instinct 3.
You want to wear it for weeks without charging
More than three weeks of battery is great, even without any Garmin-esque Solar charging.
Don't buy it if...
You’re a gym person
The Coros Nomad is wasted during indoor workouts, operating best outdoors.
You’re looking for a watch to take off-grid
There’s no satellite SOS messaging unlike the Google Pixel Watch 4, Garmin Fenix 8 Pro and Apple Watch Ultra 3.
You want a communication-based smartwatch
Don’t expect much in the way of smartwatch features – there’s no NFC for payments, notifications are basic, and no option to run third-party apps.
Also consider
(Image credit: Future)
Component
Coros Nomad
Garmin Instinct 3 (45mm) AMOLED
Apple Watch Ultra 3
Price
$349 / £319
$449 / £389 / AU$829
$799 / £749 / AU$1,399
Dimensions
47.8 x 47.8 x 16.4mm
45 x 45 x 14.9mm
49 x 44 x 12 (mm)
Weight
49g with band
53g
62g
Case/bezel
Polymer Case
Fiber-reinforced polymer / aluminum
Titanium
Display
1.3 inch Memory-in-Pixel display (260x260 resolution)
AMOLED, 390 x 390px
Liquid retina LTPO3 OLED
GPS
Dual frequency GPS
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, SatIQ
L3 dual-band GPS
Battery life
22 days of standard use, 34 hours in GPS mode
Up to 18 days (smartwatch), up to 32 hours (GPS)
42 hours smartwatch mode
Connection
Bluetooth
Bluetooth, ANT+
Bluetooth, LTE
Water resistant
50M
10ATM
WR100
Garmin Instinct 3
The closest thing to a Coros Nomad, except within Garmin's excellent ecosystem.
I wore the Coros Nomad in daily life, during sleep and workouts. I went rucking with the Coros Nomad a handful of times, comparing its GPS and biometric information to both the recently-reviewed Suunto Race 2, the Apple Watch Ultra and Apple Watch Series 11. I also visited some cities to test its GPS system amid larger crowds and buildings during workouts.
When I made the jump over to using an Honor phone as my daily driver, it only made sense to leave my old Huawei Band 9 behind and pick up a matching fitness tracker. Enter the Honor Band 10, the Chinese tech brand’s latest affordable fitness tool promising a wealth of smartwatch-lite features at an incredibly low price.
But does the Honor Band 10 actually deliver? Absolutely, although there are one or two rough edges to bear in mind before you rush to add it to your cart. Starting with the good, the sleek design is a winner; there’s only one color available, a basic black, but a charming golden accent around the edges of the sleek 1.57-inch AMOLED touchscreen make it look far more premium than the price would suggest.
Sure, the body of the Honor Band 10 is made from plastic, or ‘durable polymer materials’ according to the manufacturer, but it doesn’t feel cheap and my model hasn’t managed to pick up any noticeable scratches even after months of daily use. Unlike other options on the market, the Honor Band 10 doesn’t have any buttons either, giving it a very streamlined appearance.
When you first take it out of the box you have to turn it on by plugging it into its magnetic changing cable and during use, waking the screen is as simple as raising your wrist or a quick tap on the glass – a very seamless, almost Apple-like experience.
(Image credit: Dashiell Wood / Future)
The battery life is solid, lasting about three days with the always-on-display enabled, but there are plenty of smart features to extend that to over a week. I particularly like the ability to schedule the always-on-display, so you don’t waste any charge keeping a clock on screen outside the times you really need it.
It's compatible with the Honor Health app (which you can sync with the likes of Apple Health easily), which is simple to use and offers access to a good amount of data including the usual overall activity level, daily step count, total calories burned, sleep tracking and your heart rate, in addition to a daily health report. The watch comes with a decent number of faces out of the box in both analog and digital styles, but you can always download more if you’re not happy with them thanks to a wide range of both official and community-made options to choose from.
My one complaint comes from the step tracking on the band itself. It’s a little optimistic, especially compared to my other fitness trackers. I make an effort to hit 10,000 steps per day and when I wore it at the same time as an old Fitbit Charge HR, I found that the Honor Band 10 was off by about ten percent or so in the upwards direction, which isn’t the end of the world given the low price – but could be a good reason to consider a more premium option instead.
There are also some small issues with the smartwatch features. Notifications come through almost instantly, but the media playback controls are very hit-and-miss. I often have to tap multiple times to skip a song, or notice that the song title hasn’t actually updated to reflect what’s playing. This feature is also entirely disabled if you’re using iOS, which is a shame. However, you’re not really missing out on too much in my experience.
Honor Band 10: Specifications
Price
£44.99 (around $60 / AU$90)
Dimensions
43.2 x 28.2 x 8.99mm
Display
1.57-inch AMOLED
GPS?
No
Battery life
14 days
Honor Band 10: Price and availability
Costs £44.99 (around $60 / AU$90)
Not available in the US
Expect frequent discounts
I purchased the Honor Band 10 when it first arrived on the Honor store back in May.
It was priced at £49.99 and cost me a total of £44.99 plus shipping thanks to a £5 launch day discount. I can confidently say that the band is great value at the price I paid, though its going rate has since been lowered to £44.99, with frequent discounts down to £39.99, making it an even more tempting proposition.
Unfortunately, as with other Honor products it’s hard to find in the US as it’s not officially sold. Your best option would be to import the band from third-party sellers on sites like Aliexpress, but you should be aware that you may lose any warranty or support and that compatibility isn't guaranteed.
Honor products are also not officially available in Australia, so expect similar hurdles there.
Scorecard
Category
Comment
Score
Value
The Honor Band 10 is fantastic value, especially if you grab it one of the many sales throughout the year.
4.5/5
Design
The classy buttonless look of the Honor Band 10 helps it stand out from the crowd, though it is still a plastic body.
4/5
Features
There are plenty of features here given the low price, including some that you would usually expect from a more expensive smartwatch.
4.5/5
Performance
The performance is good, but has some compromises. The step counter is a tad optimistic, and media playback controls are a bit iffy.
4/5
Should I buy the Honor Band 10?
(Image credit: Dashiell Wood / Future)
Buy it if…
You want a fantastic value fitness tracker It’s hard to complain about the Honor Band 10 given its rock bottom price tag. You’re getting an awful lot of smart band here for not very much cash.
You love the look The Honor Band 10 stands out from its biggest competitors with its sleek, buttonless design. It only comes in black, but the gold accent looks lush on your wrist.
Don’t buy it if…
You want perfect accuracy If you’re after the most accurate possible step counter, then you should probably swerve the Honor Band 10 as it is a little off. You’ll need to spend more to get something significantly better, though.
Also consider
Xiaomi Smart Band 9 This is the budget fitness tracker to beat, and the Honor Band 10 puts up a pretty good fight. The Smart Band 9 is a little cheaper and is more widely available, but I prefer the design of the Honor. Read our full Xiaomi Smart Band 9 review
Fitbit Charge 6 The Fitbit Charge 6 is double the price of the Honor Band 10, but delivers much more accurate step tracking. It’s the one to choose if that’s your biggest concern, though it comes with its own drawbacks. Read our full Fitbit Charge 6 review
How I tested the Honor Band 10
I bought the Honor Band 10 back in May 2025 and have been using it daily since. I’ve taken it on plenty of walks in my quest to hit 10,000 daily steps and measured its accuracy against other fitness trackers that I own. I’ve also been using it as a watch – even occasionally glancing at the time throughout the writing of this review.
The Jabees 7Seven swimming headphones pack some features you don’t even find on their contemporaries at Shokz for around half the price. For many, that’s plenty of reason to buy. The 7Sevens are light as a feather at 28g and packs an ample 32GB of MP3 storage, essential for underwater listening where Bluetooth connectivity is weaker. This storage space outdoes quite a few older bone conduction headphones sets that have retained their price over the years, and puts the 7sevens in the same league as the Nank Runner Diver2 Pro and H20 Audio Tri 2 Pro.
Multipoint connectivity and Bluetooth 6.0 are great quality-of-life upgrades we wouldn’t expect on cheap headphones, allowing you to link to multiple devices and switch between them seamlessly. This is nice to swap between the phone for running and commuting and laptop for work, and works well in practice. Phone calls with the built-in microphone are, unfortunately, a bit tinny: the recipient of my test calls could hear me fine outside on a rainy run, but even at max volume the other person’s voice wasn’t great.
Music fared much better. Regardless of whether it was streamed via Bluetooth or loaded onto the headphones via the MP3 storage feature, quality was good, especially considering these are cheap bone conduction headphones. The transistors do vibrate at higher volumes during bassy tracks, which is especially noticeable above-ground on runs and in the office. However, in the water during swims, the vibrations are greatly reduced.
(Image credit: Future)
Controls are simple and intuitive, with volume up and down also allowing you to skip tracks as usual. Everything else is handled by the multifunction power button with a variety of long and short presses, and it’s generally easily remembered, although I kept the manual to refer back to.
Generally speaking, the Jabees 7Seven headphones offer good quality that bely their price, but there are still some niggles here and there that have been ironed out in more expensive offerings. The fit around the ears isn’t adjustable: instead, the 7Sevens are packaged with a “secure fit loop”, a little piece of elastic common in bone conduction headsets that are supposed to tighten the band around the head. The battery only covers five hours of playback time, so they’ll need to be quite frequently charged. And then there are the high vibrations from the transistors at full volume and slight call quality issues.
However, none of these annoyances are enough to reduce the 7Seven’s status as a value-for-money alternative to the likes of Shokz and H20. It’s got some great features, stores a ton of music, and that five-hour playback will be enough for several pool sessions and a run. They won’t last all the way through an ironman event, but if you’re into that, you’re probably opting for the more expensive headphones anyway.
Jabees 7Seven headphones: Price and availability
$59.99 / £47.99 / AU$99
Cheaper than most high-quality swimming headphones
Same 32GB storage as more expensive brands
The Jabees 7Seven bone conduction headphones are available for $59.99 / £47.99 / AU$99, and bundle deals on multiple headphones can be found on the Jabees’ website. Considering some of their competitors are double, sometimes triple the price, you’re getting a lot for your buck with 32GB storage
Jabees 7Seven headphones: Scorecard
(Image credit: Future)
Category
Comment
Score
Value
For the price, they are terrific.
4.5/5
Design
Some more attention to the fit and transistor vibration would have been nice-to-haves.
3.5/5
Features
Multipoint connectivity, Bluetooth 6.0, 32GB storage. No notes.
5/5
Performance
Good in the water and on runs, although a couple of niggles.
3.5/5
Jabees 7Seven headphones: Should I buy?
Buy it if...
You’re on a budget
At under $60 / £50 / AU$100, these headphones are great value.
You’ve got a big music library
32GB is a lot of space for MP3 storage.
You’re a regular swimmer
As opposed to dedicated runners, these headphones are great for mixed disciplines.
Don't buy it if...
You do long multi-sport events
Five hours of battery isn’t enough for long days on the trail.
You don’t own your own music
Without a library of MP3s to listen to in the pool, these headphones become less attractive.
Also consider
Shokz OpenRun
The best cheap bone conduction headphones for running.
I tested the Jabees 7Seven underwater and on various runs. I drained the battery down, tested onboard MP3s and Bluetooth streaming alike, and adjusted the fit using the included secure fit loop.
The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is a great fitness watch, which isn’t something I was necessarily expecting from Garmin’s slimmer, more budget-friendly offering. It’s stuffed with features such as PacePro, Garmin’s virtual pacing system for runners, which generally belong on more expensive, more specialist watches like Garmin’s Forerunner series.
Still, the Vivoactive series is a lifestyle watch for active people. It shares a lot of DNA with Garmin’s other lifestyle watch, the Venu 4, but it’s cheaper and made from less premium materials. If the Venu 4 is like an Apple Watch, the Vivoactive 6 is more like an Apple Watch SE: there have been some compromises made to lower the price, but it’s still a really effective, comfortable activity watch I enjoyed wearing.
Like the Apple Watch SE 3, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is very light, weighing in at just 36g with a band, and slim at just 10.9mm thick. This means it’s comfortable for all-day wear, and you can go from the gym to the office and even to bed and basically forget about wearing it. It slipped easily under my shirt cuff during daywear when other Garmin watches would bulge. Any sleep tracker has to be comfortable to wear throughout the night, and this was the case with the Vivoactive more so than the Venu, which is a milimeter or so thicker and much heavier due to its metal construction.
Smart wake alarm, a new feature for Garmin, was long missing from its lineup, and I was pleased yet surprised to see it in the Vivoactive line. It wakes you up with haptic vibrations at the lightest point in your sleep cycle, within a 30-minute window. Having tried it for a few days, I found it a much more pleasant way to wake up than my usual alarm, and I feel anecdotally less groggy in the mornings.
I enjoyed the Auto Activity Start feature too, which I set to start recording after one minute of road running. It really contributes to a seamless, super-light smartwatch experience when you don’t have to toggle around to get to the running settings – just run. It’s a nice-to-have, but it adds to the overall ‘virtual assistant’ experience many smartwatches are now striving for, to anticipate your needs without you having to wade through menus. I do wish the Vivoactive 6 had a microphone and voice assistant, but I can accept shortcomings at this price point.
It’s not necessarily the watch I’d recommend to adventurers or serious runners due to missing features from other Garmin watches, and it’s packing the older Elevate V4 heart rate sensor, which is functional but not as accurate as the upgraded Elevate V5, and my tests against the Polar H10 heart rate monitor corroborate that. But it’s a great fitness tool and the best cheap Garmin watch of 2025.
Garmin Vivoactive 6: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
$299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549
Affordably priced compared to other Garmins
Comparable to most smartwatches from Apple and Samsung
The Garmin Vivoactive 6 retails at $299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549, although can be found on sale for slightly less.
That's very comparable with the likes of the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 and Google Pixel Watch 4, and slightly more expensive than the Apple Watch SE 3. Although it's perhaps leaning more towards fitness enthusiasts than those all-rounder watches, I'd say this is a great price for the amount of features on offer.
Garmin Vivoactive 6: Scorecard
Category
Comment
Score
Value
Cheap and most certainly cheerful, stuffed with premium features for the price.
5/5
Design
Two buttons and a touchscreen, nice and light, with a redesigned UI.
4/5
Features
Tons if you like your fitness, but lacking some modern smartwatch amenities like a microphone.
4/5
Performance
Accurate enough, comfortable to wear and lasts ages. I do wish it was packing Garmin’s more accurate HR monitor though.
4/5
Garmin Vivoactive 6: Should I buy?
(Image credit: Future)
Buy it if...
You want an Apple Watch SE alternative
The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is an excellent value package, with an AMOLED screen and loads of training tools.
You’re a runner
PacePro, automatic run tracking, and Garmin’s advanced suite of fitness and recovery tools make it a comprehensive run tracker ideal for most people.
You struggle with comfort
Bulky, heavy watches are difficult to wear at night. The Vivoactive 6 is practically invisible on-wrist, and ideal for slimmer wrists.
Don't buy it if...
You want an adventure watch
The Garmin Instinct 3 is a little bit more expensive and packs lots of outdoor-focused navigation features.
Accuracy is everything
If you need the latest Elevate V5 heart rate sensor for pinpoint precision rather than an estimate, go for the Venu 4.
Also consider
Garmin Forerunner 570
The best Garmin watch for runners: it’s more expensive, but ideal if you love pounding the pavement.
I wore the Garmin Vivoactive 6 for 10 days, performing different kinds of workouts, sleeping with it on, and draining the battery down. I tested its various functions, including the new Smart Wake alarm, and tested its Elevate V4 heart rate sensor against a Polar H10 chest-mounted heart rate monitor.
The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is a great fitness watch, which isn’t something I was necessarily expecting from Garmin’s slimmer, more budget-friendly offering. It’s stuffed with features such as PacePro, Garmin’s virtual pacing system for runners, which generally belong on more expensive, more specialist watches like Garmin’s Forerunner series.
Still, the Vivoactive series is a lifestyle watch for active people. It shares a lot of DNA with Garmin’s other lifestyle watch, the Venu 4, but it’s cheaper and made from less premium materials. If the Venu 4 is like an Apple Watch, the Vivoactive 6 is more like an Apple Watch SE: there have been some compromises made to lower the price, but it’s still a really effective, comfortable activity watch I enjoyed wearing.
Like the Apple Watch SE 3, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is very light, weighing in at just 36g with a band, and slim at just 10.9mm thick. This means it’s comfortable for all-day wear, and you can go from the gym to the office and even to bed and basically forget about wearing it. It slipped easily under my shirt cuff during daywear when other Garmin watches would bulge. Any sleep tracker has to be comfortable to wear throughout the night, and this was the case with the Vivoactive more so than the Venu, which is a milimeter or so thicker and much heavier due to its metal construction.
Smart wake alarm, a new feature for Garmin, was long missing from its lineup, and I was pleased yet surprised to see it in the Vivoactive line. It wakes you up with haptic vibrations at the lightest point in your sleep cycle, within a 30-minute window. Having tried it for a few days, I found it a much more pleasant way to wake up than my usual alarm, and I feel anecdotally less groggy in the mornings.
I enjoyed the Auto Activity Start feature too, which I set to start recording after one minute of road running. It really contributes to a seamless, super-light smartwatch experience when you don’t have to toggle around to get to the running settings – just run. It’s a nice-to-have, but it adds to the overall ‘virtual assistant’ experience many smartwatches are now striving for, to anticipate your needs without you having to wade through menus. I do wish the Vivoactive 6 had a microphone and voice assistant, but I can accept shortcomings at this price point.
It’s not necessarily the watch I’d recommend to adventurers or serious runners due to missing features from other Garmin watches, and it’s packing the older Elevate V4 heart rate sensor, which is functional but not as accurate as the upgraded Elevate V5, and my tests against the Polar H10 heart rate monitor corroborate that. But it’s a great fitness tool and the best cheap Garmin watch of 2025.
Garmin Vivoactive 6: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
$299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549
Affordably priced compared to other Garmins
Comparable to most smartwatches from Apple and Samsung
The Garmin Vivoactive 6 retails at $299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549, although can be found on sale for slightly less.
That's very comparable with the likes of the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 and Google Pixel Watch 4, and slightly more expensive than the Apple Watch SE 3. Although it's perhaps leaning more towards fitness enthusiasts than those all-rounder watches, I'd say this is a great price for the amount of features on offer.
Garmin Vivoactive 6: Scorecard
Category
Comment
Score
Value
Cheap and most certainly cheerful, stuffed with premium features for the price.
5/5
Design
Two buttons and a touchscreen, nice and light, with a redesigned UI.
4/5
Features
Tons if you like your fitness, but lacking some modern smartwatch amenities like a microphone.
4/5
Performance
Accurate enough, comfortable to wear and lasts ages. I do wish it was packing Garmin’s more accurate HR monitor though.
4/5
Garmin Vivoactive 6: Should I buy?
(Image credit: Future)
Buy it if...
You want an Apple Watch SE alternative
The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is an excellent value package, with an AMOLED screen and loads of training tools.
You’re a runner
PacePro, automatic run tracking, and Garmin’s advanced suite of fitness and recovery tools make it a comprehensive run tracker ideal for most people.
You struggle with comfort
Bulky, heavy watches are difficult to wear at night. The Vivoactive 6 is practically invisible on-wrist, and ideal for slimmer wrists.
Don't buy it if...
You want an adventure watch
The Garmin Instinct 3 is a little bit more expensive and packs lots of outdoor-focused navigation features.
Accuracy is everything
If you need the latest Elevate V5 heart rate sensor for pinpoint precision rather than an estimate, go for the Venu 4.
Also consider
Garmin Forerunner 570
The best Garmin watch for runners: it’s more expensive, but ideal if you love pounding the pavement.
I wore the Garmin Vivoactive 6 for 10 days, performing different kinds of workouts, sleeping with it on, and draining the battery down. I tested its various functions, including the new Smart Wake alarm, and tested its Elevate V4 heart rate sensor against a Polar H10 chest-mounted heart rate monitor.
In recent years, Huawei has dedicated itself so aggressively to wearables that in 2025 they shipped more watches than any other brand – including Apple. In the past year I’ve reviewed a number of the best smartwatches from Huawei, including the GT5, the D2 and the Fit 3. I awarded all three an impressive 4.5 stars, which just goes to show what a good track record Huawei has created thus far.
The Ultimate 2 represents Huawei’s most advanced smartwatch to date and is perhaps the pinnacle of what is currently possible with smartwatch technology. It’s packing sonar communications, a world first for a smartwatch, and an X-Tap feature for measuring blood flow through the finger. Huawei has aimed high, and as far as specs on paper go, they’ve achieved exactly what they set out to do. Look out, Apple Watch Ultra 3.
This is not a smartwatch for the casual user but rather a dedicated device for professional athletes and serious recreational fitness enthusiasts. The primary focuses are diving and golfing, although Huawei promotes the watch as being ideal for a much broader range of activities. As you’d expect, there’s also a full set of health tracking capabilities.
As well as rugged and premium materials, performance across the board is very strong, indeed. The display is super-bright, even when being used in direct sunlight. The interface is fast, responsive, and finely tuned for an optimum user experience. GPS tracking is quickly found and always accurate. Extreme waterproofing is engineered to perfection. The positives go on. I think if it could have been made slightly smaller and dealt with the pesky Huawei app side-loading issue, Huawei would have had the perfect package.
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2: Specifications
Component
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2
Price
£899.99 (Blue) / £799.99 (Black)
Dimensions
47.8 x 47.8 x 12.9 mm (Blue) / 48.5 x 48.5 x 12.9 mm (Black)
Weight
80.5g without strap
Caze/bezel
Zirconium-based Liquid Metal (Amorphous Alloy) / Nanocrystal Ceramic
Display
1.5 inch AMOLED (466 × 466 pixels)
Operating System
HarmonyOS
GPS
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, and QZSS
Battery life
4.5 days typical usage, 11 days in power saver mode
Connection
eSIM (for phone-free calls), Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi, and NFC
Water resistance
20 ATM
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2: Price and Availability
Blue: £899 / Black: £799
Not available in the US or AUS
It’s expensive, but very advanced
There’s no getting away from it. The Ultimate 2 Blue, at £899, is one of the most expensive smartwatches on the market, only beaten by the likes of the Garmin Fenix 8 Pro, which retails for £1,119. If you’d like the Black version, then that retails at £799.
The most similar price is the Apple Watch Ultra 3, which costs £749 and will always be a winner amongst Apple fans. If you’re not concerned about sonar communication but want a premium rugged offering, then the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra for £599 is a great shout and works well with Android phones, being compatible with Google’s Play Store.
Value score: 4.5/5
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2: Design
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
One of the largest smartwatches on the market
Premium and rugged materials throughout
Bright and high-resolution AMOLED display
It’s difficult to make any mention of the design without first stating that this is one of the largest smartwatches I’ve ever worn. With a 47.8mm case diameter and a 12.9mm thickness, it’s in the realm of the chunky Garmin Epix Pro (although they range up to 51mm) and the Apple Watch Ultra 3. I get that this is a rugged smartwatch packed full of innovative hardware, but this size of watch won’t be for everyone. I, for one, didn’t like wearing it while exercising. You can see it in the photos, but even on my reasonably sized wrist, the watch looks and feels odd. Slender-wristed folks, you’ve been warned.
That being said, everything else about the design of this watch is incredible. Beginning with a zirconium-based liquid metal case, the Ultimate 2 packs high-performance materials for a premium and rugged build. This metal is strong, hard, and allegedly more corrosion-resistant than stainless steel, which means users will have no problems exposing this watch to saltwater environments, even for long periods of time.
The bezel (blue and white on mine) is nanocrystal ceramic (sometimes dual-color) which is smooth, durable, and most importantly, scratch-resistant. If I'm honest, I think it looks a little too much like a plastic finish, which detracts from the overall premium feel.
The display is a 1.5-inch LTPO AMOLED screen made of sapphire glass. You'll be hard-pressed to find a harder or more scratch-resistant material when it comes to smartwatches. I experienced zero scratches or cracks during my few weeks of testing, and I do not expect to have any problems in the future either.
The strap I've been testing is a durable fluoroelastomer strap with a blue/white color combo. It suits the overall watch aesthetic and is flexible enough to get a comfortable fit. It’s ideal for adventuring and exercising, but if you'd prefer a more polished and professional look, then there's also a metal link strap in the box. Huawei also throws in a longer diving strap when you purchase the blue package.
Design score: 4.5/5
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2: Features
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Industry-leading waterproof rating
New X-TAP for PPG and ECG
No third-party apps
One of my biggest bugbears with all Huawei watches is the copious number of legal agreements that have to be agreed to. Rather than providing a single agreement that users consent to before using the watch, Huawei has determined that it's better for users to provide specific consent at the point of using each individual feature. This is the only smartwatch company that seems to do this, and I think it significantly interrupts the user experience.
The diving and water-related features are by far the biggest selling points of the Ultimate 2, and the 20ATM waterproof rating means it can be subjected to rain, swimming, diving, snorkeling, and high-speed watersports. It also boasts a diving certification of 150m.
Despite not being able to test the more extreme parts of these claims, I can confirm that I had no performance issues after submerging it for several minutes. By way of comparison, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 tops out at a waterproof rating of 10ATM, which makes the Ultimate 2 the industry leader at the time of writing.
The Ultimate 2 is also the first smartwatch to feature a sonar-based underwater communication feature, which lets two Ultimate 2s exchange messages up to 30 metres apart. You can say goodbye to traditional forms of underwater communication, although the requirement for both users to need the exact same Huawei watch is limiting. It'll be interesting to see whether the diving industry begins to adopt this technology or whether Huawei has gone more niche than they needed to.
Aside from these groundbreaking features, the Ultimate 2 includes top-level health tracking. It centers around a Distributed Super-Sensing Module that is paired with Huawei’s TruSense system. This combines multiple sensor types (optical, electrical, acoustic, and mechanical) to improve health tracking accuracy.
Huawei has integrated a sensor, named X-TAP, on the side of the watch which measures blood flow through the finger, making it capable of taking ECG and PPG readings. Taking health readings from the wrist has always been notoriously inaccurate, so a feature like this that uses more reputable sensor technology is very welcome indeed.
Features score: 4.5/5
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2: Performance
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Accurate metrics
Between three and eight days of use
Too bulky
We've recently seen a rise in silicon-carbon battery technology that adds silicon to the graphite anode and thereby increases the capacity of the battery. Huawei has brought this new tech to their Ultimate 2 smartwatch, although it's labeled the battery technology 'high-silicon'.
As a result, we're looking at an 867mAh battery rather than the 510mAh battery that was found in the first version of this watch. That's quite the upgrade considering the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra sit just below 600mAh batteries.
While testing the watch, I achieved between three and eight days of use depending on how intensely I was using it and whether I was using GPS on a regular basis. Having always-on-display activated significantly reduced the battery life, but there are no surprises there. My normal smartwatch habit involves performing daily GPS tracking for around 30 minutes, tracking health metrics regularly, and actioning dozens of notifications each day. Doing this drained the battery in just under five days.
The specs state that normal use will result in 3.5 days of use on iOS and 4.5 days on Android. The additional life on Android is on account of having to perform less frequent refreshes to maintain the connection. Either way, having a smartwatch that can last several days between charges is fine by me, especially given the rich feature set.
After comparing it to other Huawei smartwatches and my Suunto Race S during activity tracking, I have to say I was very impressed with both the responsiveness and the accuracy while tracking metrics, including heart rate, SpO2, and ECG.
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Huawei has upgraded its Sunflower GPS technology. I tested its GPS capabilities in built-up urban areas as well as in dense woods, and it was capable of finding a signal quickly, with and without fuss. There was absolutely no inaccuracy or drift while tracking my runs and bike rides. If you need GPS that you can rely on, then there are very few watches on the market that will match it.
As accurate as the Ultimate 2 is in terms of tracking exercise, I actually think the watch is just too bulky to make it comfortable for most types of exercise. You certainly wouldn't want to wear it for long periods of time while running, swimming, or when in the gym. As a result, I'm not quite sure who this watch is designed for. If Huawei could reduce it by a few grams and slim it down a little, I'd be giving it a five-star rating without reservations.
If you can cope with the size, you'll be pleased with the user experience. The software, HarmonyOS, is fast and well laid out and integrates surprisingly well with Apple and Android phones. I especially like the addition of text labels to icons, which significantly helped me find features quickly and efficiently. Interaction with calls, texts, and other types of notifications was equally seamless.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Scorecard
Category
Comment
Score
Value
An expensive smartwatch but the technology is very advanced.
4.5/5
Design
It's large but there are premium and rugged materials throughout
4.5/5
Features
A range of innovative features set it apart, including sonar communications.
4.5/5
Performance
Accurate health metrics and solid fitness tracking alongside a reasonable battery life.
4.5/5
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2: Should I buy?
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Buy it if...
You’re a serious diver that needs the tech to back you up
With a range of diving-specific features, including sonar communication, the Ultimate 2 is hands down the go-to product for divers.
You want finger-based health measurements
The sensor on the side of the watch is capable of measuring blood flow through the finger, a type of measurement that is regarded as more accurate than through the wrist.
Don't buy it if...
You have a slender wrist
It’s big, chunky, and not always that comfortable. This is a watch for larger wrists or medium-sized wrists at a push.
You’re not into diving
With cheaper and more lightweight alternatives, the Ultimate 2 is not ideal for runners and gym enthusiasts.
Also consider
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Component
Huawei Watch Ultimate 2
Apple Watch Ultra 2
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Price
£899.99 (Blue) / £799.99 (Black)
$799 / £799 / AU$1,399
$649 / £599 / AU$1,299
Dimensions
47.8 x 47.8 x 12.9 mm (Blue) / 48.5 x 48.5 x 12.9 mm (Black)
49 x 41 x 14 (mm)
47.4 x 47.4 x 12.1mm
Weight
80.5g without strap
61g
60.5g
Caze/bezel
Zirconium-based Liquid Metal (Amorphous Alloy) / Nanocrystal Ceramic
Titanium
Titanium
Display
1.5 inch AMOLED (466 × 466 pixels)
49mm poly-silicon always-on OLED Retina Display
480 x 480 full-color AMOLED
Operating System
HarmonyOS
watchOS
Wear OS
GPS
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, and QZSS
Dual-frequency (unspecified)
Dual-frequency GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Battery life
4.5 days typical usage, 11 days in power saver mode
36 hours
590mAh, up to 100 hours
Connection
eSIM (for phone-free calls), Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi, and NFC
Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, LTE
Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi
Water resistance
20 ATM
Yes, WR100 (diveproof)
10ATM + IP68
Apple Watch Ultra 2
The best all-rounder running smartwatch for iPhone users.
I tested the Huawei Watch Ultimate 2 in much the same way as we test all smartwatches here at TechRadar. Over the period of several weeks I wore and interacted with the watch on a daily basis. This included daily activity tracking using the built-in GPS and regular health metrics monitoring, as well as responding to dozens of notifications each day.
In addition to this, I also ran tests on numerous other features found in the watch, including listening to music and playing games. One of the biggest selling points is the set of diving features, including tech that allows for diving down to 150 meters. Unfortunately I didn't have the opportunity to verify Huawei’s claims that the watch can cope with the pressure at this depth, but I did test its ability to cope with water submersion.
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle : One minute review
The best electric bikes come in many shapes and sizes. Some e-bike manufacturers embrace a brutalist and utilitarian design philosophy, while others try and keep their e-bikes looking as much like traditional push bikes as possible. The Quella Imperial Electric Courier before us today most definitely falls into the second category.
Quella is a British-based bicycle brand with a passion for fixed-gear bikes. It continues Quella's focus on creating stylish, minimalist bicycles. The Imperial is unlike a lot of other e-bikes on the market in that it features a rear hub that contains both the motor and the battery. This leaves the rest of the e-bike to adopt any design Quella decides, rather than being limited by bulky batteries and trailing cables. I loved the bike from my first ride.
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Specifications
Component
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle
Size range:
51cm, 54cm, 58cm, 61cm
Motor:
Zehus Gen 2 all-in-one rear hub motor
Top speed
15.5mph / 25kmh (UK)
Power:
155Wh (watt-hour) battery unit
Control:
Phone app
E-bike classification:
Pedelec
Speeds:
Single-speed
Brakes:
Radius dual-pivot caliper brakes
Frame material:
4130 chromoly steel, with track geometry
Weight:
15.2 kg / 33.5 lbs
Range:
60 km / 37 miles
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Price and availability
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
$2,289 USD / £1,699 UK / $3,500 AUD
Located in the middle of the market
Fantastic spec for the price
The Quella Imperial sits comfortably in the mid-range of the e-bike market, competing with brands like VOLT and some models from manufacturers like Trek and Cube. These bikes, like the Imperial, offer a balance of features, performance, and price.
Even though the price will put a lot of people off, if you’re not comfortable spending more than this for a higher-spec e-bike, then the Imperial is an incredible offering.
Value score: 4/5
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Design
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Rear hub with integrated motor and battery
Regenerative braking feature
Classic aesthetic with a modern twist
One of the most important features of the Quella Imperial e-bike is that the electric motor and the battery are integrated into the rear hub. This creates a beautifully clean and minimalist aesthetic, to the point that many would think it was a standard push bike. As a result, the frame is not cluttered by a battery, which means that the top, down, and seat tubes are free from electronic clutter.
There are, however, two distinct downsides to this type of hub design. The first is that the battery can't be removed, and therefore you need to bring the whole e-bike to mains power. I'm a big fan of removable batteries, as I can separate the battery from the frame and therefore charge it wherever I like. The other downside to this design is that if the battery fails, then you'll need a complete hub replacement or, worse, potentially a whole new bike.
While we're on the subject of the battery, it includes a Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) that recharges the battery as you pedal backward. This is similar technology to that used in Formula One engines, and even though I didn't find myself using it very much, it is a clever and simple way to extend the bike's range.
Moving onto the design of the bike itself, Quella has created a modern e-bike that still embraces a classic, minimalist aesthetic. I love the vintage-inspired track frame made from 4130 chromoly steel that continues Quella's heritage style. In particular, it features a unique and eye-catching chrome-plated finish, giving it a polished, premium, luxurious look.
Quella has also inserted aggressive-looking deep-section rims and bullhorn handlebars, and I loved the riding position that this afforded me. The single-speed design won't be for everyone, but I love its simplicity, and the lack of derailleurs, shifters, and multiple sprockets means it's super low maintenance.
Design Score: 4.5/5
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Performance
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Smooth and reliable power assistance
Perfect for city living
Effective regenerative braking feature
The Quella Imperial e-bike is far from a powerhouse, but despite this, it’s a very clever, lightweight, and efficient city commuter. Having tested numerous e-bikes, it doesn't get much better than this, especially if you have an aversion to heavy and bulky e-bikes that are hard to manoeuver around.
The assistance comes from a 250W motor and 40Nm of torque, which serves up smooth, subtle, and natural-feeling power delivery. It won't zoom around but rather provides a "helping hand" to make starts easier, maintain speed on flats, and take the sting out of minor inclines. The motor kicks in rapidly after you begin pedaling and is reliable enough to give you the assistance you need when pulling away from standing still.
The rear-hub motor is less efficient than mid-drive alternatives, especially when riding routes with a lot of inclines. This is further compounded by the single-speed design that restricts the rider to only one gear. As a result, the motor has to work much harder, which can lead to rapid battery drain and the risk of overheating. This makes it a less ideal choice for riders who frequently encounter hilly terrain.
Image 1 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Image 2 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Image 3 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Image 4 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Image 5 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Image 6 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Image 7 of 7
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
But given this isn't the target market of this e-bike, I don't see a problem with that. I actually really loved the simplicity of the single-speed design that meant I wasn't faffing around with gears all the time. This is an e-bike that you can just jump on and ride, and in all honesty, that's my favorite type of ride.
The regenerative braking, KERS, is one of its best features. In terms of functionality, when you backpedal, the motor acts as a generator, not only slowing the bike down but also recharging the battery. This worked incredibly well and was a serious game changer when I needed to finely manage any remaining battery life.
The Quella Imperial is about simplicity and efficiency, rather than brute force. It provides a seamless, non-intrusive power assist that makes urban cycling a breeze.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Battery life
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Small battery located in the rear hub
A range of 37 miles (60 km)
Two to three hours to recharge the battery
The Imperial e-bike has a 155Wh (watt-hour) battery unit that is significantly smaller in capacity compared to many other e-bikes that feature 400Wh batteries or more. The small battery is due to Quella's integration of the battery into the hub. This has the added benefit of reduced weight and minimalist design, but it does have an impact on range.
Quella claims the e-bike has a maximum range of 37 miles (60 km) on a single charge. I always find it near impossible to achieve an e-bike manufacturer's range claims because there are too many varying factors. These include the terrain, wind strength, temperature, and, of course, my weight. I gave it a go, though, and managed to achieve around 75% (just under 30 miles) of the advertised range. That's still not bad.
The limited range, compared to many competitors, can be offset by the fact that this is primarily an urban city bike and that journeys are likely to be much shorter between charging locations. If you're doing those types of rides, then you'll have no issues at all. If you're doing long daily commutes, then you will find that a daily charge is required – but you’ll need an extension cord, or to lug the whole bike over to a mains socket to do so, rather than removing the battery.
The battery takes approximately two to three hours to charge due to the smaller battery size, which is really quite fast for an e-bike.
Battery life score: 3.5/5
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Scorecard
Category
Comment
Score
Value
A high-spec e-bike that sits in the middle of the market.
4/5
Design
A rear hub with an integrated motor and a seriously classy frame.
4.5/5
Performance
Smooth and reliable power assistance with a cool regenerative braking feature.
4.5/5
Battery Life
A small battery that yields around 37 miles / 60 km of range
3.5/5
Buy it if...
You prefer a classic look to your e-bikes
With an integrated motor and battery in the rear hub, the Quella Imperial looks much like a traditional push bike.
You value smooth power delivery
It doesn’t get much smoother than the Quella Imperial. I found it to be reliable and consistent and couldn’t ask for anything more.
Don't buy it if...
You need a top-range
37 miles (60 km) the Imperial is far from the highest performing in this area.
You want a removable battery
The battery is located in the rear hub and therefore can’t be removed for charging purposes.
Also consider
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle: Also consider
Component
Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle
Brompton Electric G Line
ENGWE MapFour N1 Air
Size range:
51cm, 54cm, 58cm, 61cm
Small, medium, large
Not specified
Motor:
Zehus Gen 2 all-in-one rear hub motor
250W
250W In-Rotor Motor
Top speed
15.5mph / 25kmh (UK)
15.5mph / 25kmh (UK)
15.5mph / 25kmh (UK)
Power:
155Wh (watt-hour) battery unit
345-wh. 4-hour full charge using included 2A charger
360Wh 10Ah high-capacity battery
Control:
Phone app
LCD Display
LCD Display
E-bike classification:
Pedelec
Class 3
Class 3
Speeds:
Single-speed
4-speed + 3-speed (electric assist)
Shimano 7 speed
Brakes:
Radius dual-pivot caliper brakes
Tektro Hydraulic Disc brakes with 140mm Front / 160mm Rear
Hydraulic Disc Brakes
Frame material:
4130 chromoly steel, with track geometry
Steel
Carbon
Weight:
15.2 kg / 33.5 lbs
16.1 kg / 35.5 lbs
15.6kg / 34 lbs
Range:
60 km / 37 miles
30-60km / 20-45 miles
100 Km / 62 miles
(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)
Brompton Electric G Line
A foldable e-bike with off-roading smarts. For anyone who wants the classic Brompton experience with a little bit more comfort.
How I tested the Quella Imperial Electric Courier Bicycle
I had the e-bike in my possession for around one month and used it to carry out a variety of different rides. I focused on shorter rides rather than longer commutes, as I wanted to be fair to the e-bike's core target market.