Organizer
Gadget news
After I tried the Anker Laptop Power Bank I’ll never again worry about forgetting to pack my charging cord
8:09 pm | February 10, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

Anker Laptop Power Bank review

The Anker Laptop Power Bank is designed to charge large devices on the go, thanks to its high 165W output, large 25,000mAh capacity, and convenient extra features. For such a heavy-duty battery, the Anker Laptop Power Bank does a good job of remaining slender, although it’s as weighty as you might expect it to be. It’s also quite thick, so certainly better stored in your bag than in your pocket.

The Anker Laptop Power Bank is very well built, with every material and panel feeling solid. The screen has hardly any flex either, so I would be confident in it withstanding normal wear and tear.

This display provides various readouts, including those for temperature and wattages for each of the four outputs, which is more than some of the best power banks offer. It’s a shame, however, that it only covers a small area – smaller than the physical size of the screen would lead you to believe, which seems like a missed opportunity to me.

As a result, some figures can appear quite small. This can lead to misreadings when, for instance, charging the bank itself; since it gives the battery percentage to two decimal places, 10% can look like 100% when you glance at it from afar.

It features one USB-C and one USB-A port, both located on the side. This might seem like a strange placement, but the Anker Laptop Power Bank has an ace up its sleeve – two, in fact.

This is because it comes with two inbuilt cables. One loops round into its own clip, creating a makeshift carrying handle (which Anker condones; it can withstand over 20,000 bends), while the other is retractable, with the jack end connecting magnetically to the base to keep it tucked away. This keeps cable clutter to a minimum, as well as saving you the trouble of bringing your own.

Both cables feel very durable and thick, as do the strain reliefs at the base of the jacks themselves. However, they’re flat and rectangular rather than round, which means that they tend to twist themselves when you go to use them, but I only found this to be a minor inconvenience.

The charging performance of the Anker Laptop Power Bank is good. All three USB-C outputs can deliver up to 100W, and Anker claims an M3 MacBook Pro or an iPhone 16 can charge to 50% in about half an hour each. While charging, the display also usefully tracks the output wattage in real time.

I managed to charge a Lenovo IdeaPad 4G in about two hours, which is an admirable performance. More impressively, though, the battery only dipped to about 50% – which means you might just be able to get two full charges out of it – and replenishing its battery from 0% to 100% took just 90 minutes.

The Anker Laptop Power Bank can also charge four devices simultaneously, with the power output dipping to a maximum of 130W. There’s also a trickle charging mode for devices that only need low currents, such as smartwatches and earbuds.

For $99 / £89, the Anker Laptop Power Bank represents good value, considering its power, versatility, and convenience. If you’re a power user who travels with large devices, you likely won’t be disappointed with the Anker Laptop Power Bank as your companion.

Side view of Anker Laptop Power Bank on desk with pink background

(Image credit: Future)

Anker Laptop Power Bank review: price & specs

Three-quarter view of Anker Laptop Power Bank with screen on showing 16% battery level on pink background

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Anker Laptop Power Bank?

Buy it if…

You have large devices
All three of the Anker Laptop Power Bank's USB-C outputs can charge at 100W, which is more than enough for many modern laptops and tablets.

You're forgetful
The two integrated USB-C cables, one of which doubles as a carrying handle, are handy additions if you regularly forget to bring your own.

Don't buy it if…

You want something light
At over half a kilo, the Anker Laptop Power Bank isn't exactly light. The thickness means you probably can't carry it in your pocket either.

You're not a power user
The 165W output and 25,000mAh capacity are probably overkill if you're only ever going to charge your phone and other small devices.

Anker Laptop Power Bank: also consider

Anker Prime 27,650mAh Power Bank (250W)
As the best power bank for power users, the Anker Prime has the output and capacity for serious demands, eclipsing the Anker Laptop Power Bank on both fronts. It also features similarly detailed readouts. However, it has three outputs rather than four, it’s marginally heavier, and doesn’t have any inbuilt cables. But if power is your primary concern, you can’t do much better than the Prime.

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra is a high-spec phone that doesn’t do enough to earn its ‘Ultra’ name
8:35 pm | February 7, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Asus Phones Computers Gadgets Phones | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra two-minute review

If you're going to call a smartphone ‘ultra’, it needs to embody that adjective. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a top-tier camera system. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has mind-boggling charging speeds and a chic textured look. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a stylus (and lots more besides).

Throughout my testing of the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra, I couldn't quite put my finger on what made it worthy of the 'ultra' designation. It’s undoubtedly a highly capable premium Android phone, but in the competitive mobile market, ‘good’ just isn’t good enough.

The latest entry in Asus’ one-per-year line of flagship Zenfone mobiles, the Zenfone 12 Ultra is another top-spec handset that costs a blisteringly large amount of money. On paper, it's a stablemate of the best Android phones and best iPhones – and it certainly competes with those devices in some areas.

Indeed, if you look at the specs sheet below, you’ll see that the Zenfone 12 Ultra bears all the hallmarks of a premium smartphone. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite processor provides a huge amount of processing power, and its giant 6.78-inch display is great for gaming or streaming movies. The phone's three-lens rear camera array also gives shutterbugs much to delight in.

Certainly, from a specs perspective, there's nothing to dispute the Zenfone 12 Ultra's status as an 'ultra' phone. But that's no longer enough.

All of those aforementioned ‘ultra’ phones go that extra mile to justify the suffix, offering unique features or specs that make their hefty price tags seem almost reasonable. I don’t see any such selling point in the Zenfone 12 Ultra. It’s not ‘ultra’, it just is. Ironically, the lack of a non-ultra Zenfone 12 seems to underline this fact.

If you were to ask Asus, the company would likely say that the killer additions here are the phone's AI features. Most new phones nowadays tout a long list of ‘AI features’, a buzzword given to what we’d otherwise call ‘new software tools’ or, less forgivingly, ‘unnecessary software extras’ – but you need to call everything ‘AI’ in today's tech landscape.

Among the Zenfone 12 Ultra’s AI features are an article summary tool, call translation, a feature that creates AI-generated wallpapers, and plenty of AI-powered camera tools. Now, regardless of the usefulness of many of these features (how many people actually phone someone else who doesn't have a language in common?) and the unproven interest of normal tech buyers in AI features, they don’t allow the Zenfone 12 Ultra to collect the 'ultra' suffix for one simple reason – so few of them are actually new. Honestly, the Zenfone 11 Ultra had most of them.

Speaking of the Zenfone 11 Ultra, the 12 Ultra barely brings any upgrades over it to the table. A newer chipset and some minor tweaks to the camera lenses are the only improvements I could discern. I checked the price of the now-year-old Zenfone 11 Ultra one week prior to the 12 Ultra’s release, and it was going for over a third off from Asus itself. So, you’d be saving loads of money on a pretty similar mobile.

What's more, the Zenfone 12 Ultra has even more similarities to the recent Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro. Their appearances are near-identical, as are their specs, with the scant differences being the 12 Ultra's smaller battery and a refresh rate that doesn’t go quite as high, and the ROG Phone's trigger sensors and LED back panel.

Okay, let's take a breath. I may sound down on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra in this review, but it's undoubtedly a good phone. It provides a top-tier experience across the board and I enjoyed using it throughout my testing process.

That said, Asus loaned me the device for review purposes, meaning I didn’t have to part with a scary amount of my salary to buy it. When you factor in the phone's high price, it’s hard to see why you should opt for the Zenfone 12 Ultra over its equally expensive rivals – or, for that matter, mid-range rivals that offer similar specs for a dramatically lower price.

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: price and availability

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Released in February 2024
  • Costs €1,099.99 in European markets
  • US, UK, and Australian availability unconfirmed for now

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra was launched in early February 2024, a year on from its predecessor, and with nary a standard or Pro sibling to speak of.

At the time of writing, it's only available in European markets for a price of €1,099.99, which will net you 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. "As for pricing and availability in the US, UK, and Australia", Asus told TechRadar, "we have yet to get a clear date or price at this moment." That said, we expect the Zenfone 12 Ultra to launch in at least some of these regions soon.

For a little bit of context, the Zenfone 11 Ultra started at $899.99 / £869.99 (around AU$1,450) for its 12GB/256GB starter model. There was also a 16GB/512GB model, which offers a better price comparison to the Zenfone 12 Ultra, but it was only on sale in the UK (for £949.99). The Asus Rog Phone 9 Pro, meanwhile, is available globally for $1,199.99 / £1,099.99 / AU$1,999.99.

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: specs

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: design

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Blocky phone that looks like predecessor
  • Still has a 3.5mm jack
  • IP68 protection

There’s no getting around it: the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra is a blocky phone. I won’t quite call it ‘ugly’, not when the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra lays claim to that term with such an iron rule, but it’s a little on the boring side.

It looks almost identical to the Zenfone 11 Ultra, and pretty similar to the ROG Phone 9 Pro, but without the lines pattern of the former and the ‘gamer chic’ of the latter.

It’s a big phone, measuring 183.8 x 77 x 8.9 mm and weighing 220g, so if you remember how Asus used to cater to the small-phone market with its Zenfones, you’ll be disappointed. It stretched my hands out and I’ve got fairly average-sized mitts, and it was a pretty big burden in the pocket too.

The right edge of the mobile has the power button – pretty easy to reach, despite the phone’s big size – and the volume rocker, which was a little harder to stretch to. There’s also an in-screen fingerprint sensor, positioned higher up than on other phones, which took a little getting used to.

Talking of acclimatizing, the USB-C charging port on the phone’s bottom edge isn’t right in the middle. Instead, it’s to the left – as far as I’m aware, Asus is the only company that uses this design quirk. There’s nothing wrong with it, once you get through the first few days of jamming your charger into the wrong place. There’s another novelty here too, in the form of a 3.5mm headphone jack. How many mobiles cater to wired headphone users these days?! Props to Asus for that.

I mostly used the Zenfone 12 Ultra in a protective case (provided) but even when I didn’t, it took drops and bumps like a champ. It has an IP68 rating, so it can withstand dust ingress, as well as brief drops in the tub or pool.

  • Design score: 3.5 / 5

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: display

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 6.78 inches, 1080 x 2400 resolution
  • 144Hz refresh rate max, though usually at 120Hz
  • A few display customization features

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra has a nice big display: it’s 6.78 inches diagonally, which explains how much of a hand-stretch the mobile itself is.

The screen’s resolution is FHD+ or 1080 x 2400 — that’s pretty standard for most smartphones, although you’d be forgiven for wanting a little more at this price range.

Mind you, the phone's refresh rate is super fast at 144Hz (good luck finding many games to utilize that spec, though) and the max brightness is nice and high at 2500 nits. In typical use, you can expect a buttery smooth 120Hz refresh rate.

There's another feature here I love to see in smartphones: a color temperature and balance mode for adjusting the way the screen looks. Max saturation with the warmest possible temperature? Don't mind if I do!

  • Display score: 4 / 5

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: software

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Android 15 with optional Asus overlay
  • Only two years of OS updates
  • AI features aren't very useful

In a pretty unusual move for an Android phone, you actually have your pick between two software systems when you first boot up the Zenfone 12 Ultra. Both are technically Android 15, but you can choose between stock Android and Asus’ reskinned version. The differences are minimal but it's nice to be given the choice.

Stock Android is, if you don’t know, the standard Google-made version of the Android operating system, and it’s popular for being quite clean-looking. However, it misses many custom features that certain other versions of Android have. Asus doesn’t add any of these features in its own version, mind; it’s just a redesign for how menus and icons look.

Whether you pick stock or Asus Android, you’re getting software that’s quite minimal, which is a good thing; there are few pre-installed apps (beyond lots of Google ones) and a smartly laid-out quick-settings menu with big icons that are easy to press.

Asus has only promised two years of software updates for the Zenfone 12 Ultra, which isn’t a particularly ‘ultra’ commitment given how many years of updates rivals offer. That doesn’t mean it’ll stop working after two years, but you won’t get new features added after that point.

As mentioned in the introduction to this review, a few AI features on the Zenfone 12 Ultra seem to be its main selling point, but I wasn’t hugely impressed by any of them. The option to use them is often buried in menus (to use the AI article summarizer, for instance, you need to go into the browser’s ‘share’ menu to share it with the summary tool) and they were often pretty slow to work. In fact, for summarizing articles online, I found it quicker to literally just read the article than to wait for the summary tool to work.

You have to download extra kits for most of the AI features, too, and they’re pretty big, often several GB each. I can see these tools eating up a fair amount of storage space.

I’m always a little cynical of AI features on phones, with most of them seemingly designed to fix problems that no one actually has, and offered in lieu of actual improvements to a given device. Suffice to say, I never used these AI features on the Zenfone 12 Ultra beyond my obligatory testing of them.

  • Software score: 3.5 / 5

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: cameras

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 50MP main, 13MP ultra-wide and 32MP telephoto lenses
  • 32MP selfie snapper
  • Scene optimization comes in clutch

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra may not offer the megapixel overload of its rivals, but it covers its bases.

On the back of the phone is a 50MP main camera, which is joined by a 13MP ultra-wide and a 32MP telephoto, the latter of which can reach 3x optical zoom.

All three combine to give you a decent level of versatility and control over the shots you take (as long as you don't want to go above the 30x digital zoom cap), and there's largely a consistency between image quality at these ranges

Coming in clutch is the image optimization and HDR, which was quick to punch up the contrast and saturation of pictures to improve their vibrancy without making them look unnatural. Look at the curry bowl or football field images below as cases in point; neither looked as bright in real life as they do on camera.

These improvements increase the Zenfone's camera grade from 'fine' to 'good', even if the phone misses the extra lenses, sensitive sensors, and super-high-res MP counts of its competitors. That said, the latter would have been preferable for situations in which the AI optimization didn't step in, like in the pizza pic below.

Another thing to note is that photos often took longer to capture than I'd expect; I'd often press the shutter button and assume the photo had been taken, only to move the phone and end up with a blurry end image. My advice to owners would be to hold the Zenfone 12 Ultra in place for a few seconds longer than you think you need to, or else you'll end up with a long list of camera reel mistakes.

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)

The selfie camera hits 32MP, and its result is largely similar to the rear ones: it has the potential to make some bright and bold pictures, and succeeds most of the time, thanks to software.

The phone can record video in 8K/30fps, 4K/60fps, or down to HD/480fps in the slow-mo realm.

The Zenfone 12 Ultra also has a small selection of extra modes. Some, like Night and Portrait, work well; the latter was great at balancing contrast and exposure, as you can see in the photo below, and Portrait was fantastic at adding a natural-looking bokeh and also balancing the colors and tones of a shot.

There are a few modes being touted as 'AI' ones too, despite the fact that almost all camera software features use artificial intelligence in some way or another. These include AI Panning, which creates a "dynamic focus effect" on a moving object, and in effect, this is very similar to Portrait mode. The other is AI Tracking, which lets you record a video of something moving and it'll output a zoomed-in photo that keeps the moving subject framed center. I can see this being situationally very useful, although I only ever found myself using it for testing's sake.

  • Camera score: 4 / 5

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra camera samples

Image 1 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing a football field at 0.7x zoom.

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing a football field at 1x zoom.

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing a football stand at 3x zoom.

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing a curry bowl.

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing a pizza.

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing a light installation.

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 7

A camera sample captured on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra showing the sun setting over a river.

(Image credit: Future)

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra: performance and audio

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
  • Fast for gaming and everyday use (mostly)
  • Range of audio options

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra really embodies the ‘ultra’ in its name when it comes to performance: it’s a certifiable beast.

The processor at work here is Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, which is the chipset you'll find inside many of the current best Android phones (at the time of writing, at least) and it tells. It’s paired with 16GB RAM and 512GB storage.

Games were snappy to play, and could easily handle the highest graphical settings; they didn’t lag or stutter once and, in the most noticeable improvement (in my mind) over a lesser chipset, they were really quick to open too.

In a Geekbench 6 multi-core test, the Zenfone 12 Ultra returned a score of 9,818, putting it in the higher echelons of phones we’ve tested. For context, Geekbench’s own rankings mark the iPhone 16 Pro at a score of 8,528 (though no recent 8 Elite-toting phones are listed).

The speed is mostly noticeable in other parts of the phone, too, for example when you’re trying to edit a big photo. However, I noticed that the AI features could cause the phone to slow down noticeably. This isn't a deal-breaker, especially given that most of the features take only a second to use, but the minor slowdown was still noticeable.

The Zenfone 12 Ultra has stereo speakers and, in a surprisingly retro turn, a 3.5mm headphone jack. As a result, audio fans have a choice as to how they’d like to listen to content on this phone, which is a rarity in this day and age.

  • Performance score: 5 / 5

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: battery life

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Pretty big 5,500mAh battery
  • Lasts for over a day of use
  • 65W charging, 15W wireless

The Zenfone 12 Ultra packs a 5,500mAh battery — that's pretty big, but it’s also necessary for a phone of this size and power.

When I used the Zenfone as a normal mobile (i.e. not as a gaming phone) it could reliably coast through a single day of use and reach mid-way into the second day without trouble, but I wouldn’t go quite so far as to say it’s got two-day battery life.

When I did go heavier on the gaming side of things, I was happy with how well the Zenfone 12 Ultra could handle a few hours of gaming without losing too much battery — it’s hard to be scientific when talking about experiential battery use, but the phone lost charge slower than lots of other handsets I’ve tested recently.

Charging is a little slow. That feels silly to say for a phone with 'fast charging', but it’s at 65W, which is slower than lots of its rivals. There’s also 15W wireless charging.

  • Battery score: 3.5 / 5

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: value

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra on a bookshelf.

(Image credit: Future)

The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra is an undeniably pricey premium phone. While an argument could be made that no phones in this price range really offer value for money, it's doubly the case with the Asus.

I say this because it doesn't really offer any killer features, either over its predecessor or comparatively priced rivals, that make it a must-buy. When you cost this much, specs alone will only get you so far.

If you can find the Zenfone 12 Ultra at a meaty discount, it's potentially more deserving of your money, but I'm talking a 25% discount as a minimum for that to be the case.

  • Value score: 2.5 / 5

Should you buy the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra?

Buy it if...

You need lots of processing power
The Zenfone 12 Ultra is one of the most powerful phones on the market right now, and it'll stay a contender for years to come.

You're a wired audio fan
Few Android phones come with headphone jacks these days, especially towards the premium end of the market.

You play 144Hz games
Very select mobile games can play at 144 fps, but for the ones that do, it's hard to find mobiles that support this high refresh rate. The Zenfone 12 Ultra is one of them.

Don't buy it if...

You don't like big phones
The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra will stretch smaller hands; don't buy it thinking it's one of the compact Zenfones of old.

You find the Zenfone 11 Ultra discounted
The Zenfone 12 Ultra doesn't offer that many upgrades over its predecessor, and that older phone is now poised for sizeable sales.

Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: Also consider

If you want other 'ultra' smartphones to compare the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra to, here are some other similar-priced picks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The natural rival, this Android powerhouse has a wider array of cameras, a bigger and higher-res display, and a stylus. However, its chipset is the same as the one in the Asus, its battery is smaller, and it charges slower.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review

iPhone 16 Pro
The other natural rival, the iPhone 16 Pro, costs roughly the same as the Asus. It has a smaller screen, a weaker battery, and, if the benchmarks are anything to go by, a lesser chipset. But I'd be remiss not to mention the Apple rival at a phone this costly.

Read our full iPhone 16 Pro review

Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Another ultra-branded Android phone, this Xiaomi has an unbeatable camera array, a better display, and faster charging, but last year's chipset and software.

Read our full Xiaomi 14 Ultra review

How I tested the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra

  • Review test period = 2 weeks
  • Testing included = Everyday usage, including web browsing, social media, photography, video calling, gaming, streaming video, music playback
  • Tools used = Geekbench 6, Geekbench ML, GFXBench, native Android stats

To properly test the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra, I used it daily for two weeks; this doesn't include a short period beforehand when I set it up, took the review photos, and played a few games on it.

The testing of the handset occurred in two parts. The first saw me run benchmark tests, take sample photos, and run down the battery. The other was more experiential; I used the handset for personal things like music and video streaming, social media scrolling, mobile game-playing, and other everyday tasks.

At the time of this review's publication, I've been writing reviews for TechRadar for exactly 6 years (happy anniversary, me!). I've reviewed countless smartphones in that time, including multiple Asus models as well as headphones, smartwatches, and tablets.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed February 2025

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review: Android users rejoice! finally a good wireless charger that’s not made just for iPhones
12:00 pm | February 6, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review

The INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger is listed at $32.99 / £26.99 on the INIU website and is also available to purchase at Amazon. This price makes it a more costly alternative to the similar non-MagSafe Anker 313 Wireless Charger Stand, but this is warranted due to its performance and flexible design.

As this isn't a magnetic charger (although phones do need to be MagSafe to charge on it), there's nothing to stop a phone from sliding off if knocked, but the design is otherwise pretty sturdy thanks to the charging stand's overall weight and square base.

The adjustable viewing angle is my favorite part of the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger's design. The phone cradle pivots on the top with a range of 90 degrees, so my phone could be positioned vertically or laid back almost flat. The included USB-C power cable is only a meter long – this may be adequate for some, but I would have preferred a longer length, as it limited my placement options.

The INIU I212 Adjustable Wireless Charger holds an iPhone and is angled as far back as it will go.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

At first, I was unimpressed with the charging speed of the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger, as it took over three hours to charge an iPhone 13 Pro from 0% - 100%, a test I perform on all chargers I review to be able to make a solid comparison. As this was a questionably long time for a charger that claims to be "fast", I had a read of the small print and found that INIU recommends using a charging adapter of 18 watts or higher.

Personally, I feel that any charger requiring a wall adapter above a specific output to achieve anywhere near the charging speeds stated should include one in the box. The INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger does not. Naturally, I have plenty of spare plugs about, but the average buyer may not; so it's worth bearing this in mind, as a further purchase may be needed to get the most out of this charger.

The INIU I212 Adjustable Wireless Charger is pictured sitting on a grey stone surface against a pink background. There is an iPhone on the charger; its screen shows that it is charged to 100%.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Once I'd repeated the test with a suitable plug, the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger was able to fully charge the iPhone 13 Pro in 2 hours and 16 minutes, putting it in the same league as most of the MagSafe chargers I've tested so far. This also makes it much faster than the Anker 313 Wireless Charger Stand that currently features in our list of the best wireless chargers. This result made me do a 360 on my opinion of the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger, as this charging speed is good for the price.

Overall, this is a well-designed and versatile phone charging stand. The vast majority of the wireless chargers I test are compatible with iPhones only, so to test a charger that can charge a range of devices at a good speed with a sturdy and adjustable design has been refreshing. So if you're on the lookout for a decent and fairly priced phone charger that'll remain usable even if you switch your allegiance come upgrade time, the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger is a good shout.

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review: Price & specs

Should I buy the INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger?

Buy it if…

You want viewing flexibility
If you're anything like me and will more often than not continue to use your phone as it recharges, then an adjustable stand is a must. The viewing angle on this INIU charger is easy to alter, making it easy to consume content while it's juicing up.

You want a versatile charger
Whether you're rocking two phones, or want a simple charging solution located in a communal space, this INIU charger's compatibility with both iPhones and Androids means less cables and clutter.

Don't buy it if…

You're a die-hard iPhone user
As much as I like this charger, as an avid iPhone user, I much prefer the reassurance that a MagSafe charger provides. It provides a more secure hold, which is appreciated by someone as klutzy as me.

You don't want to feel tethered
Granted, this isn't the only charger that comes with a disappointingly short power cable, but the 3.3 ft / 1 m cable can limit placement options.

INIU I212 Adjustable 15W Fast Wireless Charger review: Also consider

Anker 313 Wireless Charger Stand
If you're just looking for something cheap and cheerful, and aren't fussed about charging speeds or adjustable angles, then this Anker charger may just take your fancy. Like the I212, it's compatible with iPhones and Androids and can accommodate phones up to 5mm thick.

Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review: it’s cute, but cute only gets you so far when you’re a battery
8:00 pm | February 5, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review

The Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank is a low-cost portable phone charger compatible with the iPhone 12 – 16. Its list price is $59.99 / £59.99 / AU$93.99 on the official Iniu website; however, discounts are often applied. At the time of writing, a 55% – 57% discount is available, and it's also available for less than the list price at Amazon. Unlike some other brands' power banks, it comes with a USB-C cable and a little travel pouch, providing it a little protection against scuffs and scratches when on the go.

I would argue that the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank isn’t the most compact example of a MagSafe charger. Its dimensions are 3.8 x 0.9 x 2.7 inches / 97 x 23 x 69mm, which feels quite bulky in one’s hand when trying to continue using a phone as it charges. It feels pretty weighty, too, at 9.2oz / 261g.

An iPhone is charging on the INIU B43 power bank which sits on a marble-effect surface.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

The Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank features a super-soft touch matt finish and smooth rounded corners. It offers both MagSafe charging, plus there is a USB-C in/out, and a USB-A out port for wired charging, too. The MagSafe charging area stands proud of the power bank’s surface by roughly 2mm.

The design of the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank isn’t a far cry from your typical power bank. On the front face of the charger, there is the Iniu logo in the top-right corner, while in the bottom left, there’s an animal paw print that acts as an indicator light to communicate the level of charge remaining in the battery pack.

Charging an iPhone 13 Pro with the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank proved disappointingly slow, taking three hours and ten minutes to achieve a full charge. To put this in context, it took the similarly priced Anker 633 Magnetic Battery just two hours and fifteen minutes to do the same, plus it has the added bonus of a built-in stand, so it’s easy to continue watching content as your phone charges.

The charging pad of the INIU B43 power bank sits on a marble-effect surface.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Overall, if you’re not fussed about fast charging and like the novelty of the blue paw print, the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank wouldn’t be a bad choice. However, there are certainly faster alternatives within the same price range, like the UGREEN Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W, for example, that have novelty value of its own, displaying cute little faces on its screen depending on the level of charge.

So it’s clear the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank isn’t up to the standard required to feature in our selection of the best wireless chargers or the best iPhone chargers, but it would make an adequate enough purchase if you’re prepared to forgo fast charging speeds.

The INIU B43 power bank sits on a marble-effect surface, with the paw print-shaped light angled slightly toward the camera.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review: Price & specs

The INIU B43 power bank sits on a marble-effect surface, with the paw print-shaped light angled slightly toward the camera.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Should I buy the Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank?

Buy it if…

You don't want any bells or whistles
Aside from the light-up paw print, there's nothing particularly fancy about this charger. There's no built-in stand or LED screen, so if you want something super simple, this charger would prove satisfactory.

You like tactile finishes
One thing I liked about this power pack was the soft matt finish of the material and its nicely rounded corners.

Don't buy it if…

You want to use your phone as it charges
Although marketed as a compact power bank, its depth makes it a little too bulky to be comfortable to hold when attached to your phone. I recommend checking out our pick of the best power banks if you'd like to continue scrolling as you juice up your phone.

You want a built-in stand
Many portable chargers make terrific travel companions, but this power bank sadly isn't one of them. With no stand included, you're limited to lying it flat on a surface to charge, making it hard to binge-watch Netflix during a flight or hotel stay.

Iniu B43 MagSafe 10000mAh Compact Power Bank review: Also consider

Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank
Not only is this power bank lower in price, it's also slimmer and lighter. It offers similar charging speeds, but would make an ideal alternative for anyone who struggles to put their phone down for extended periods of time. If you'd like to learn more, head over to the full Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review.View Deal

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: At first I thought it was just cute, but this power bank means business
12:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: don't be fooled by its cute expressions, this power bank charges fast

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: Quirky but quick, this expressive MagSafe power bank left me smiling

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review

Although the cute faces of the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W may not be to everyone's taste, if you're looking for a fast-charging MagSafe power bank with character, this charger was made for you.

The Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W has a list price of $69.99 / £64.99 on the official Ugreen website, but this price is often cut due to regular deals. I have been advised that Ugreen is due to launch this charger in Australia around the beginning of 2025 at a list price of AU$89.99. The Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W can also be purchased at Amazon US but at present, only the 5000mAh version is available at Amazon UK.

Neither super compact nor over-sized, the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W measures 3 x 0.9 x 4.3 inches / 75 x 23 x 109mm and weighs 8.1oz / 230g, which is pretty average for the best power banks. The surface of the MagSafe charging area appears to be soft-touch silicone, and the rest of the casing is metallic plastic, bar the TFT screen, which stands slightly proud from the back panel of the charger. There's a metal effect stand over the top of the charger which attaches to either side. This stand works well, but I found the marketing photos misleading, as I couldn't angle the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W to show the display screen when my phone was in situ.

The various emoji faces that appear on the TFT smart display communicate the level of battery left in the power bank; for example, it shows heart eyes when it's at full power, and pulls a somewhat dismayed face when the power is below twenty percent. I feel I must tell you these faces aren't displayed all the time, and I was a little disappointed by the frequency at which they appear. If you're not a fan of this novelty display, you'll be happy to know that the display can be turned off simply by pressing the side button.

I was pleasantly surprised by the charging speed when juicing up an iPhone 13 Pro from 0% - 100%, as the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W took just under two hours to do this, making it the fasted MagSafe power bank I've tested to date. I found that my phone got a little toasty on a couple of occasions, but nothing too drastic. There were also a few instances when my phone hadn't actually started to charge; I found that I either needed to click the power button again or remove and replace my phone. But, for the most part, there weren't any issues.

This may be down to personal taste, but the combination of fast charging speeds and the novelty of the emoji status symbols make the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W a worthy candidate to feature in our selection of the best wireless chargers or the best iPhone chargers, in my humble opinion. If this MagSafe power bank isn't singing your tune, then it's worth taking a look at the aforementioned guides, as you may well spot something better suited.

The back and charging faces of two UGREEN Uno 15W Qi2 power banks side by side on a marble effect surface.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: Price & specs

Heart eyes are visible on the screen of a purpleUGREEN Uno 15W Qi2 power bank.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell / Future)

Should I buy the Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W?

Buy it if…

You want fast-charging
You could be forgiven for thinking that Ugreen simply focused on the novelty aspect with this MagSafe power bank, but I'm delighted to say they've created a charger that's as fast as it is cute.

You want something whimsical
It won't be for everyone, but for anyone like me who appreciates anything adorable and eccentric, these emoji battery status symbols will bring a smile to your face.

Don't buy it if…

You want something super compact
I'm not complaining about the size of this power bank, its size and weight are pretty standard, but if you're after a super slim option that's barely noticeable when it's attached to your phone, this isn't the charger for you.

You need total reliability
Now, this may have just been the case with my sample, but it was a shame that my phone didn't always begin to charge after I'd attached it to the MagSafe charging pad. It's worth keeping an eye out for this for the first few uses, just in case.

Ugreen Uno Magnetic Wireless Power Bank 10000mAh 15W review: Also consider

Anker 633 Magnetic Battery
Another firm favorite of mine is this MagSafe power bank with its springy integrated stand. It took about fifteen minutes longer to charge the iPhone 13 Pro, but its charging time is still perfectly adequate. Plus, the weight and dimensions of this charger are roughly the same as this Ugreen Uno, but without a smiley in sight.

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review: it’s fast charging and compact, but that neck doesn’t bend
12:38 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review

The ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) has a list price of $74.99 / £71.99 / AU$134.99, which may seem expensive to some. However, when compared to the cost of other 3-in-1 MagSafe chargers by the likes of Anker, and indeed some other models from ESR themselves, it's a reasonable price to pay for a speedy and sturdy charger.

In use, the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) was easy to lift and reposition on my desk. The weight of the stand, helped along by the sturdy metal post, meant that I didn't experience any issues with it toppling over. It did feel like it'd be easier to tip than the Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand, however.

I found it a bit frustrating that the charging area is static and cannot be angled for better visibility of my phone screen. The vast majority of the best wireless chargers I've tested so far have had adjustable angles, so I wasn't a fan of this limitation.

The matte finish of the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) shows fingerprints easily, and they're not easy to remove once they're there. The shiny surface of the circular Qi2 charging area proved to be quite the dust magnet when the phone wasn't in situ, with dust particles being very noticeable on top of the deep black.

As with the ESR's Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set, the Apple Watch charger is a separate packaged component that comes within the main charger box. It has a magnetic cover to protect the USB-C connector, which connects to the area at the back of the iPhone charging pad with ease. I wasn't a fan of this in the travel set, as it seemed risky to have such a small and losable component as part of a portable charger; I don't mind it as much in the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock), though.

When it came to charging speed, I was impressed with how quickly the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) charged an iPhone 13 Pro and Series 9 Apple Watch. It was able to juice up my Apple Watch from 0%-100% in an hour and 13 minutes, making it much faster than ESR's Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set, which took just under an hour longer.

It took an hour and 52 minutes to fully charge an iPhone 13 Pro, which is impressive. But it is lagging a little behind the Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand, which took an hour and 38 minutes to charge the same iPhone 13 Pro, and a commendable one hour and 14 minutes to charge up my Apple Watch.

As was the case with the ESR Qi2 Magnetic Wireless Car Charger (HaloLock), the iPhones I tested got warm while charging, but in this case, the watch got rather toasty too. It was also distractingly noisy, making various ticking and whirring noises as it charged, even after repositioning, something I'd never encountered before. My Apple Watch didn't appear to suffer any effects from this, but still, those noises made me nervous.

Overall, though, this charger proved its worth. With its speedy charging times, reassuring stability, and small footprint, it efficiently charges three types of Apple devices and other compatible earbud cases.

If you're interested in looking at alternative chargers, we have curated a selection of the best iPhone chargers and best wireless chargers. Within these guides, we suggest the most suitable option based on different needs, and you'll find plenty of options for charging the best iPhones in both.

The ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set sits facing to the right on a light grey stone surface against a pink background. On the surface to its right sit the plug adapter, USB-C charging cable and the watch charging component with its cap removed.

(Image credit: Future)

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review: Price & specs

A close-up of the charging pad and watch charger of the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set.

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock)?

Buy it if…

You want to charge three devices without sacrificing space
With the earbuds charging area inlaid in the base, and the iPhone and Apple Watch charging pads located at the top of the stand, this 3-in-1 charger is pleasantly compact, so won't take up too much valuable desk or nightstand space.

You want a quick charge
While this isn't the fastest MagSafe charger I've tested, it still charged devices satisyingly quickly, with the Apple Watch charger fully replenishing the battery faster than the ESR's Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set, and the Mous MagSafe Compatible 3-in-1 Portable Charger by just under an hour.

Don't buy it if…

You want to look at things from a different angle
It's a shame that the position of the charging pad is fixed, as it limits you to one viewing angle. The phone can still rotate into landscape mode without issue, but I would have liked to be able to position my phone to make it easier to use as it charged.

You want to keep things clean
Unfortunately, due to the matte finish on the majority of the charger and the shiny surface of the MagSafe charging pad, this charger collects dust and fingerprints for a pastime. This is only a minor issue that may not prove an issue for some, but if this kind of thing gets your goat, this may be a charger to avoid.

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Watch Wireless Charging Set (HaloLock) review: Also consider

Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand
It takes up more space, but its design is aesthetically pleasing, and it offers speedier charging – taking just over an hour to fully charge a Series 9 Apple Watch and an hour and 38 minutes to charge an iPhone 13 Pro. Check out our full Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand review to see just why we awarded it four and a half stars.

I tested this premium wall charger to see if it’s really worth more than $100
8:00 pm | February 2, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger review

If you’re looking to juice up multiple power-hungry devices at once, the UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger could be the perfect solution for you. This quad-port charger packs in ThermalGuard temperature control, multiple USB types (3x USB-C and 1x USB-A) and 160W of power, to ensure your phones, laptops, tablets and more can get back up and running in a flash.

You get access to super-speedy charging here, no matter how many devices you have plugged in. If you’re only charging one at a time in USB-C Port 1, you can access lightning quick charging speeds of up to 140W, that’s great for demanding devices like the newest MacBook or handsets like the Xiaomi 14T Pro. Even with three or four ports in use, the top USB-C ones can supply up to 65W each – not bad at all!

And when I tested out performance for myself, I found that the UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger could easily compete with some of the best Android phone chargers and best iPhone chargers. I tried charging up the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE in USB-C port 1, alongside the Soundcore Space One Pro headphones, LG Tone Free T90S earbuds and FiiO M11S hi-res music player. To my delight, this UGreen charger brought my phone back to life in under 80 minutes – exactly what I’d expect from a fast-charging wall plug like this.

Now, if you’ve seen my reviews of the other Nexode Pro chargers, you’ll probably know what I’m going to say about this one’s appearance. Once again, the prongs look shoehorned on with the UK model – I was wondering if there would be a way for me to detach the adapter, but it seems to just be attached in a not-so-elegant manner.

In addition, this is by some distance the chunkiest charger in the Nexode Pro family. That’s to be expected given it has the largest power output and four ports, but still, it may not fit into smaller spaces. Is it as big and bruising as some of the MacBook Pro chargers, for instance? No. But it's still quite a large plug.

This charger is perhaps not the cheapest out there, carrying a list price of $119.99 / £99.99 (about AU$190). Of course, you’re getting a lot of power, quad-port charging and modern GaN technology for a safe, heat-protected charging experience. But still, it’s a lot to pay for a charger with no display or charming design quirks.

All in all, the UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger is an excellent performer with lots of power to play with, but some may find it a little on the pricey side. It may not be the most stunning looker, either, but it does offer solid build quality, four-port charging and effective temperature control, making it worth considering – if you have the cash.

Ports on the UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger

(Image credit: Future)

UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger review: Price & specs

UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger on block against pink background

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger?

Buy it if…

You want top-of-the-range charging performance
This charger has an almighty maximum power output of 160W, which is more than enough to revive all of your devices in a pinch. The top USB-C port is also capable of blindingly fast 140W charging – pretty cool.

You need a travel-friendly multi-port charger
This may not be the smallest charger around, but it’s certainly compact enough to take on flights or train journeys. On top of that, you get four charging ports, meaning you could get your headphones, phone, laptop and smart watch back to life simultaneously, for instance.

Don't buy it if…

You’re working with a tight space
But if you’re working with a really tight space, such as a socket placed behind your desk or couch, this UGreen charger might not be the ideal option. It’s considerably larger than the other models in the Nexode Pro family, so perhaps consider a slimmer option if you’re limited on room.

You’re working with a moderate budget
And it might go without saying, but this is not a charger for those of you on a tight budget. At $119.99 / £99.99 (about AU$190) it’s a more premium option, but rest-assured, there are plenty of cheaper options available to you. It won’t pack in quite as much power, but the UGreen Uno Charger 100W has four ports and a fun display which I couldn’t get enough of – and it’s much cheaper than this Pro option.

UGreen Nexode Pro 160W 4-Port charger: Also consider

Anker Prime Charger (200W, 6 ports, GaN)
OK, this one’s something a bit different, but it's well-worth considering if you need to charge lots of devices simultaneously. The Anker Prime Charger (200W, 6 ports, GaN) is a desk charger that can bring up to six devices back to life simultaneously. It’s equipped with 200W worth of power to ensure speedy charging and has a mixture of USB-C and USB-A ports too. Sure, it’s even less compact than this UGreen charger, but it's also cheaper, with a list price of $84.99 / £79.99 / AU$149.95, so if you just need a charger for desktop use, this is a better option in my view. Read our full Anker Prime Charger (200W, 6 Ports, GaN) review.

UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank review: a heavy-duty battery without the juice to keep going
6:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank review

The UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank is designed for charging all manner of devices, from smartphones to laptops, thanks to its powerful 100W output. Despite its capabilities, it’s surprisingly light; I’ve tested other, less capable power banks that weigh more. It’s also quite narrow, but very thick too, meaning it won’t be one to carry around in your pocket. This is justifiable, though, given it’s designed for charging big ticket items.

The UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank looks smart with its dark grey finish, the signature colorway of Ugreen’s Nexode series. Unfortunately, this premium look belies its actual build quality: the chassis is a little too flimsy for my liking, even audibly creaking when I pressed its sides. Suffice to say it wouldn’t be my first choice of power bank for taking on more rugged excursions.

One of the standout features of the UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank is its display. This provides useful information in a large format, making it clear to see. The percentage figures adopt a dot-matrix format, which may divide some users, but I didn’t have an issue with this. However, clarity is somewhat compromised by its matt finish, which is rather hazy in certain viewing angles and lighting conditions.

It has one USB-C port and one USB-A port, which is a little disappointing for a power bank with this much power on offer; there are many, less powerful power banks on the market with greater port selections.

The UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank managed to charge a Lenovo IdeaPad 4G 14 inch laptop from 50% to 100% in about 90 minutes, which is a decent performance. It also stayed cool throughout, which again is also impressive. However, it depleted the bank’s battery from 100% to 12% in the process, which disappointingly means you’ll only get a single charge out of it for large devices.

Thankfully, the UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank only takes about the same amount of time to fully replenish, thanks to its 65W input via the same USB-C port.

The USB-A port provides 22.5W of power, and charging from this and the USB-C port at the same time is possible, although this drops the output of both to just 10W. The UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank also features trickle charging, used for devices with low current draws, such as wireless earbuds and smartwatches. This can be easily toggled by holding the power button.

With a price of $49.99 / £49.99 (about AU$80), the UGREEN Nexode 12,000mAh 100W Power Bank sits admirably close in the market to less powerful rivals. Its 100W power output is useful if you need to charge larger items – but you’ll only be able to charge them once. It really needs a capacity higher than 12,000mAh to make it practical for charging large devices on the go, and more ports wouldn’t go amiss either.

Close-up of USB ports on UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank

(Image credit: Future)

UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank review: price & specs

Side view of UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank?

Buy it if…

You want to charge big devices
Laptop charging is possible with the Nexode, and it can top them up with relative speed.

You want something simple
Simply plug in your device and away you go. The readout is simple to understand, and activating trickle charging is easy as well.

Don't buy it if…

You want the best build quality
Although it’s pleasingly light, it isn’t as solidly built as some of its rivals, such as those from Anker.

You want to charge multiple times
Yes, you can charge power-hungry devices with that high output, but the relatively low capacity means you’ll only be able to do so once.

UGREEN Nexode 12000mAh 100W Power Bank review: also consider

Anker Prime 27,650mAh Power Bank (250W)
If it’s power you need, then this Anker Prime model is for you. We think it’s the best power bank for power users, thanks to its massive 250W output and 27,650mAh capacity. However, it’s large and heavy compared to other power banks, and expensive too, so this is only for those who’ll need days of charging available to them.

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: one of the best-value cheap phones you can buy right now
1:00 am | January 27, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phones Xiaomi Phones | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro two-minute review

For some reason, Chinese phone maker Xiaomi doesn’t make as much of a song-and-dance about devices from its budget sub-brand Poco as it does about those from its other budget sub-brand, Redmi. However, the Poco X7 Pro is a great example of why it should.

Released at the start of 2025 alongside a non-Pro sibling (and some Redmi phones), the Poco X7 Pro has a price that firmly puts it in the cheap phone category, costing less than half the price of a new iPhone. However, it offers enough useful features that you might consider putting down your Apple mobile or Samsung Galaxy S device for this budget blower. The Poco X7 Pro does a great job at pretending to be a premium handset in all departments except the price.

Like many other Pocophone handsets, the X7 Pro is designed with power in mind — it has the same amount of processing power as many 2024 flagships, as well as oodles of RAM and loads of storage space. In my experience, gaming was just as quick and smooth here as on some of the best Android phones.

The display is fantastic-looking too, squeezing extra pixels compared to most Android phones and offering more nits (the measurement of brightness). It’s bright and colorful enough to make iPhone users green (and you’ll be able to tell which shade of green too!).

You can rely on cheap phones to offer huge batteries but again, Poco has gone above and beyond with the X7 Pro, packing in a 6,000mAh battery. That’s one of the biggest power packs you’ll find on a phone that’s not designed for building sites or wilderness survival, and it’ll make sure the average user can text for days on end without needing a recharge.

The version of the Poco X7 Pro I tested also had a faux leather textured cladding which just adds points to the premium tally, however not all versions of the phone are like this. The green and black versions are just plastic.

Not everything is sunshine and rainbows here and, as usual, Poco drops the ball — or, more likely, opts not to carry it in the first place — in the camera department. Photos aren’t awful but they often look denatured and there aren’t many features you can use to super-charge your photography.

Plus, as phone fans will have been able to guess from the word ‘Xiaomi’ in the headline, the phone’s user interface is chock-full of bloatware when you boot it up.

These are little annoyances but I still feel comfortable recommending the Poco X7 Pro as one of the best budget mobiles you can buy right now.

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: price and availability

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Starts at $299 / £309 (roughly AU$480)
  • Several variants on offer depending on region
  • Only costs a little more than Poco X7

The Poco X7 Pro was announced alongside its non-Pro sibling right at the beginning of January 2025, and went on sale immediately afterwards.

There are a few versions of the Poco X7 Pro. The cheapest has 8GB of RAM, 256GB of storage, and costs $299 / £309 (roughly AU$480). If you want more RAM, the 12GB/256GB model sells for $239 (around £320 / AU$450). The more powerful version that I tested goes for $369 / £349 (around AU$600) and in the US there’s also an Iron Man Edition of the powerful one for $30 more.

As you can tell from the prices I’ve shared, different options are available in different regions. It's rare to see a Xiaomi phone in the US but the company lists itself on Amazon in the States.

I tested the Poco X7 Pro for a week without knowing the price, and was very surprised at how little it cost when I finally found out. It’s a great-value phone which gives buyers on a budget a really solid option.

For context, the Poco X7 costs $314 / £249 for its cheapest option, and it has a few spec downgrades across the board including a weaker processor and a smaller battery. It’s still pretty good value for money, though.

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: specs

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: design

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Three color options
  • Mid-sized phone that'll be big for some users
  • IP68 protection

Depending on which version of the Poco X7 Pro you pick up, you might deem it a generic-looking Android phone, or one that looks oddly like a race car.

The phone comes in black or green versions – which clad the mobile in a plastic frame – or, as you can see from the review images, a more unique yellow-and-black one. This version, which uses silicone polymer to create a textured faux leather feel, reminds me of racing-themed mobiles like the Realme GT, and it certainly is a distinctive look. It also feels more premium, and a touch more grip-able in the hand. If you think it’s a bit too ‘extra’, though, you should probably opt for the standard models.

These variants have the almost same dimensions: they’re 160.75 x 75.24 x 8.29 (add 0.14mm to that latter version for the yellow option) and weigh 195g (add 3g for yellow). A difference of under a millimeter, and only 3 grams, is a pretty negligible size and weight difference.

The phone has flat edges, so I could stand mine upright without a support, but they’re not as comfortable to hold in the hand as a curved-edge mobile. The power button and volume rocker are on the right edge while the USB-C port is on the bottom edge.

If you’ve got big hands, you’ll be alright with the Poco X7 Pro, but people with smaller ones should know that you probably won’t be able to reach the volume rocker — I couldn’t and I have pretty average-length digits.

All versions of the phone have IP68 certification, protecting you from submersion in water (for a limited time) and dust ingress. The Poco X7 Pro felt pretty hardy to me.

  • Design score: 3.5 / 5

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: display

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 6.67 inches, 1220 x 2712 resolution
  • High max brightness and 120Hz refresh
  • Well-protected with Corning Gorilla Glass 7i

The Poco X7 Pro’s display clocks in at 6.67 inches, which is basically the average size for a Xiaomi mobile — it’s nice and big without being too unwieldy.

That’s one of the only areas in which the Poco phone aims for ‘average’, though, because many other of its display specs exceed others at its price tag.

You get a few more pixels than on most of its FHD rivals with a 1220 x 2712 resolution, and the maximum brightness reaches up to 3200 nits (that’s in lab conditions, at least, but from my testing, it got really bright).

That latter spec, combined with the use of an AMOLED panel, means that you can get some pretty vibrant colors out of the Poco X7 Pro.

Two other important specs are the 120Hz refresh rate — this feature is par for the course on most Android phones — and the use of Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, which probably explains how the X7 Pro survived so many drops during my testing.

  • Display score: 4 / 5

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: software

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Android 15 with Xiaomi's HyperOS 2 over the top
  • Three years of OS updates and four of security updates
  • Bloatware-riddled software

When you boot up the Poco X7 Pro, you’ll find it running Android 15 with Xiaomi’s HyperOS running over the top. The company has promised three years of updates for the phone, and an extra one of security updates.

A common gripe I have with Xiaomi software is that it comes chock-full of pre-installed third-party apps. These include a huge number of ‘normal’ ones like calculators, compasses and a calendar but for me there were also six games, a Poco app and nine third-party apps including some that I studiously avoid.

If, like me, you’re never going to use AliExpress or WPS Office (or whatever the pre-installed apps are in your region), then you’ll have to start with an app-deletion blitz when you first start using your phone.

Beyond that, HyperOS functions much the same as other Android user interfaces, in that you’re given lots of customization freedom. You can choose the font, always-on display, how icons look, how notifications appear, whether new apps get added to an app drawer or straight to your homepage, and more.

A few AI features are new here; the Notes app can translate, proofread, or summarize your notes; Recorder can create transcriptions; and videos can get AI subtitles. However, these aren’t available in all regions and none were enabled on my test phone.

  • Software score: 3.5 / 5

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: cameras

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 50MP main and 8MP ultra-wide cameras, 20MP for selfies
  • Photos look a little dull
  • Some AI features coming to the phone after release

Camera capabilities have never been the focal point of Poco devices and that stays true here. The phone packs 50MP f/1.5 main and 8MP f/2.2 ultra-wide cameras on the back as well as a 20MP f/2.2 selfie camera on the front, and both are totally fit for purpose without being wildly impressive.

Pictures taken on the main camera are clear and bright but lack a bit of flair and color, leading to lifeless shots. It’s apparent in some pictures more than others but greenery lost some zest.

The phone is really quick to try and edit your pictures afterwards though. By default, all are taken in Live Photo mode, in case you press the shutter button at the wrong time and want to see a frame just before or after you pressed. The gallery also employs very obvious processing when you zoom into a photo, noticeably changing its color profile, which sometimes results in worse pictures.

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)

A warning to buyers: the rear camera is exactly where you rest your fingers when you’re holding the phone landscape to take a photo. Remember to move your fingers out of the way — about half the snaps I took during my main photo session have my finger poking into the frame.

Jump over to the ultra-wide camera and you’re getting pictures that don’t look great. They’re desaturated and lose lots of detail in darker areas, leading to a lifeless photo.

Video recording goes up to 4K and 60fps and there’s also Director mode, which lets you adjust things like the white balance, ISO, and aperture for video recording. Not all budget phones have this so it’s a nice addition, although I wouldn’t recommend the X7 Pro for prospective Oscar-winners.

‘Fine’ is also an accurate description of pictures taken on the front-facing camera. Generally, selfies were clear and bright, although again the colors weren’t always sparkling. Portrait mode sometimes had trouble working out where my hair began and ended but it was good at applying correct depth to objects in the mid- and background.

Other than the ones already mentioned, the Poco X7 Pro ticks off the usual camera modes: document scanning, night photography, high-res to shoot at 50MP instead of using pixel binning, slow motion filming, and Pro mode.

Some of the headline camera features of the Poco X7 Pro are AI-based ones: AI Erase Pro works like Magic Eraser to delete unwanted elements of photos, while AI Image Expansion reframes and expands snaps to change their composition. At the time of testing, though, these aren’t available on the phone — Xiaomi says they’ll arrive around March 2025 — so I didn’t test them.

  • Camera score: 3 / 5

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

Image 1 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 7

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: performance and audio

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Packs a Dimensity 8400 Ultra chipset
  • Really powerful for gaming
  • Stereo audio but no 3.5mm jack

The Poco X7 Pro is powered by the Dimensity 8400 Ultra, a top-end chipset from Mediatek. It’s paired with RAM and storage that depends on whichever variant you picked up: 8/256GB or 16/512GB.

I had the latter and the phone was fast – it didn’t feel much different to use than a flagship which would cost you $/£1,000 more. Gaming was quick and easy, with the phone handling online titles and intensive single-player ones better than any other mobile I’ve tested at the price. It was seriously impressive.

Moreover, when I was using the mobile intensively, I never suffered any stuttering, and the phone didn’t overheat at all either. If you’re a mobile gamer, I’m going to have to give this device two thumbs up.

In a Geekbench 6 multi-core test, the average score was in the 6,100s, which cements this as a really solid performance phone. It puts it in league with 2024’s top-end phones, and possibly 2025’s too.

For audio, there’s no 3.5mm headphone jack, so if you like wired music you’ll have to get an adaptor for the USB-C jack, and if not rely on the BlueTooth 5.4. There are also stereo speakers and these are fine for unfussy gamers but audiophiles won’t be rocked out of their socks.

  • Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: battery life

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Huge 6,000mAh battery
  • Lasts for about two days of use
  • 90W fast charging

Phone batteries are constantly creeping up in size, as the Poco X7 Pro reminded me: it has a 6,000mAh power pack, which is bigger than that of the standard Poco X7 or the Poco X6 Pro. In fact, it’s rare to see mobiles with power packs quite this big.

People with battery anxiety, then, will find the X7 Pro a breath of fresh air — it can keep your phone ticking through intensive gaming blasts or long days out.

From my testing, the phone waltzed through a day of use and marched steadily into the second day before needing a recharge. And I used it pretty intensively too — if you don’t pick up your mobile much during the day, I can see it lasting through two full days of use.

On the topic of charging, it’s 90W, which is nice and fast. There’s no wireless or reverse charging, but with speeds like that, I can forgive it.

Poco predicts that this will see your X7 Pro go from empty to full in just over 40 minutes — in my testing period I usually powered the phone from about 10-20% to full and it took about half an hour. It’s a nice fast speed that ensures you can keep the X7 Pro going with brief charging windows, instead of having to tether your mobile to the wall for ages.

  • Battery score: 4 / 5

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro review: value

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)

For certain kinds of users, the Poco X7 Pro offers incredible value for money. It’s relatively cheap but has an impressively fast chipset and great-looking screen.

If you’re into your entertainment, be it gaming or streaming TV shows on the go, you’ll be getting a steal with the X7 Pro.

The Poco still makes a great value proposition for other kinds of users, and it’ll go toe-to-toe with much more expensive rivals, though if you want a camera phone, it won’t cut the mustard.

  • Value score: 4.5 / 5

Should you buy the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro?

Buy it if...

You're a mobile gamer
Offering blazing-fast performance, the Poco X7 Pro is a great get for mobile gamers, even ones who aren't budget-conscious.

You're on a limited budget
If you don't want to spend too much on your new phone, the Poco X7 Pro offers great value for money.

You need a long-lasting phone
A 6,000mAh battery is huge, so if you want a smartphone that'll easily last through long use periods, this Poco is a sure bet.

Don't buy it if...

You're a photographer
It's many things, but the Poco X7 Pro isn't a camera phone. Don't buy it if you want to take amazing photographs.

You're cynical about AI features
Lots of the Poco's main features are AI-related, like its camera or Notes tools. If you're not a fan of generative AI features (an understandable stance), you won't like being bombarded with said features here.

Poco X7 Pro review: Also consider

If you want to know what else is out there at this price, beyond the Poco X7 Pro, here are some other phones you should consider:

Poco X7
Naturally, the first phone to compare the Pro to is its non-Pro alternative. It's not as powerful and its battery is smaller but the display is the same, and the cameras basically are too (with the addition of a 2MP macro one). We haven't reviewed the Poco X7 yet, mind.

Moto G85
This similarly-priced phone may not be as powerful as the Poco, but on paper, it makes up for it with a chic design and clean software. We were impressed with this phone's predecessor in our Motorola Moto G84 review.

Samsung Galaxy A35
Costing the same as the higher-end Poco X7 Pros, this mobile gets you into Samsung's product range with its camera skills and extra apps.

Read our full
Samsung Galaxy A35 review

How I tested the Poco X7 Pro

  • Review test period = 2 weeks
  • Testing included = Everyday usage, including web browsing, social media, photography, video calling, gaming, streaming video, music playback
  • Tools used = Geekbench 6, Geekbench ML, GFXBench, native Android stats

I tested the Poco X7 Pro for just over two weeks for this review.

To test it, I put it through the paces of my normal phone: I texted, streamed music and TV, took photos, navigated my way around the city, and woke up from its alarms. Significantly, I also played lots of games on it.

As well as real-world use, the phone saw me perform some more 'scientific' tests including performance benchmarking and charging speed tests.

I've been testing smartphones for TechRadar for six years now, and in that time have tested plenty of low-budget mobiles including loads of Poco and Xiaomi devices.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed January 2025

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: I used it for two weeks, and it’s so good I don’t understand why anyone would buy the Galaxy S25 UItra
9:00 pm | January 22, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phones Samsung Galaxy Phones | Tags: | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Two-minute review

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing TechRadar.com Galaxy S25 Ultra review

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Galaxy S25 Plus is much better than good enough. For a few hundred more than the Galaxy S25 you’re getting a major upgrade over that phone – much bigger than the step up from the Plus to the Galaxy S25 Ultra. If you’re looking for a larger-screen Android phone and you like the smell of what Samsung is cooking, the Galaxy S25 Plus is easy to recommend. It does everything well, and you won’t be wasting your time and money on features you don’t need.

Don’t call the Galaxy S25 Plus a Goldilocks phone. It isn’t just a slightly bigger Galaxy S25, or a slightly cheaper Galaxy S25 Ultra. The screen size is actually in the middle, fractionally smaller than the Ultra display, but it feels like a much larger phone compared to the Galaxy S25’s more pocket-friendly size.

The Galaxy S25 Plus’s secret weapon is its display. It packs the same number of pixels as the larger S25 Ultra, but more densely into a 6.7-inch panel, instead of the 6.9 inches of the Ultra. That means it’s technically Samsung’s sharpest phone screen, with a higher pixel density than the more expensive flagship, even if you might not notice the difference in day-to-day use.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue next to Galaxy S25 both showing always on displays

Galaxy S25 on the left, Galaxy S25 Plus on the right (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

What else do you get with the Galaxy S25 Plus, besides the best display? The Plus charges a bit faster, up to 45W, than the Galaxy S25, which charges at up to 25W. Of course it has a larger battery inside as well, which translates to longer battery life. In our battery tests, the S25 Plus actually beat the S25 Ultra by 10 minutes – a nice win considering it has a slightly smaller battery cell.

Another fun advantage the Galaxy S25 Plus has over the Ultra is the choice of colors. Samsung sent me the S25 Plus in blue, and it's the nicest-looking blue phone I’ve ever seen. It’s a deep, rich hue that changes as it refracts light. I’m almost relieved that I didn’t get a case with it, because I love showing off this phone.

During my review period, the Galaxy S25 Plus was a joy to use, and I found myself using the larger Plus much more often than the smaller Galaxy S25. I loved having more screen real estate, especially when it came to shooting photos.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing TechRadar.com with Galaxy S25 Ultra review

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

I wish I had more to say about Galaxy AI, but in the two weeks I spent with the phone, it didn’t do very much. I was expecting more suggestions and recommendations, if not a complete AI takeover like we’re seeing with Apple Intelligence. Instead, during my time with the Galaxy S25 Plus, Galaxy AI was… quiet?

I didn’t mind. The Galaxy S25 Plus is solid, really pleasing in almost every way – and I wonder if more AI would have made my experience worse, rather than better.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Price and availability

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue behind Galaxy S25 in silver, both from back showing cameras

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Available for $999 / £999 / AU$1,699 with 256GB of storage
  • Better display than Galaxy S25, cameras a step down from S25 Ultra

While Apple charges $100 / £100 / AU$200 for its ‘Plus’ iPhone 16 over the smaller model, Samsung asks for more when you upgrade to Plus, and it gives you more. The Galaxy S25 Plus isn’t just a larger version of the Galaxy S25; it’s a step up in terms of the display, and it has better battery life with faster charging. Frankly, that puts the Galaxy S25 Ultra in a precarious position, priced as it is above the $1,000 / £1,000 threshold.

What the Galaxy S25 Plus lacks, compared to the flagship Ultra, is the best cameras Samsung offers. The Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus have the same cameras as last year’s Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus, and frankly these cameras look suspiciously similar to the Galaxy S23 and S23 Plus. If you want Samsung’s best cameras, and one of the best camera phones you can buy, you’ll need to pay an exorbitant $300 / £250 / AU$450 premium, although you do also get the S Pen.

The Galaxy S25 Plus comes in the brighter, more vibrant colors that you’ll also find on the Galaxy S25, not the made-for-business hues of the Galaxy S25 Ultra. My review sample is, to my mind, the best color, the striking Navy Blue; you also get the Plus in Icyblue, Mint, and Silver Shadow, along with some exclusive colors that Samsung is saving for its own web store.

At this price tier the competition is especially fierce. You can forgo the basic iPhone 16 and get the titanium iPhone 16 Pro. You can get a Google Pixel 9 Pro for around the same price, but the Pixel phone often drops closer to the Galaxy S25’s price level, so it can look a bargain next to the Samsung. The OnePlus 13 is cheaper than the Galaxy S25 Plus, and OnePlus has a perpetual trade-in deal in the US that keeps the final price even lower.

I’m just saying, this phone is a good choice, but it would be even easier to recommend if it had some new, amazing cameras.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Samsung Galaxy S25 series: $900 instant trade-in credit and up to $300 credit at Samsung
Looking for an unlocked device? This right here is your best option by far. The official Samsung Store is offering an excellent trade-in rebate of up to $900 and $300 of store credit on the house for both carrier and unlocked devices today. The trade-in here is superb and the $300 credit is also a significant bonus that can be used to pick up any number of cheap accessories at the Samsung Store. Overall, a superb opening deal and one that's even better than I anticipated.View Deal

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Specs

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing more setting options

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Galaxy S25 Plus gives you more than just a bigger display and battery, compared to the Galaxy S25. The display is much bigger, a full half-inch diagonally, which makes the phone seem a whole larger category of device. It’s also a better display, with more pixels per inch, making it seem just a touch sharper than the Galaxy S25 – as mentioned, it’s technically more sharp than even the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

You also get a bigger battery in the Galaxy S25 Plus than in the Galaxy S25 Ultra, and Samsung also increases the charging speed to 45W versus the Galaxy S25’s 25W charging. In our testing, that translated to about 10% more battery every 15 minutes of charging, a nice little boost.

The Galaxy S25 Plus starts with 256GB of storage, which is twice what most of the world will find on the base model Galaxy S25. Every Galaxy S25 model, including the Plus and Ultra, comes with 12GB of RAM inside.

Samsung offers enough of a spec bump with the Galaxy S25 Plus to justify its price jump over the Galaxy S25, but I wonder if it could have made better choices. At this price range, Apple, Google, and OnePlus give you the best cameras those phone makers offer. With Samsung, you still need to spend more to get the best cameras, and then you’ll end up with the Ultra, which might be more phone than you need, and more money than you’d like to spend.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Design

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing back of phone and bottom USB-C port

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Much bigger than the Galaxy S25, not much smaller than the Ultra
  • Half the buttons of an iPhone 16

Samsung has stagnated when it comes to its phone design, and the Galaxy S25 Plus looks just like the Galaxy S25, as well as the Galaxy S24 and S23. That’s not the worst thing – the Galaxy S25 Plus feels like a polished, well-built, premium smartphone – but it also feels like a missed opportunity.

Maybe Samsung doesn’t need a full redesign, but can’t we at least have one more button? When the iPhone 16 got the Camera Control and an Action button I predicted that Samsung would eventually catch up; but the Galaxy S25 was already too far along, I suppose, for Samsung to add more hardware to keep parity with Apple’s base model iPhone.

The Galaxy S25 Plus just needs… something. The side button can now activate Google Gemini, in addition to Bixby, but I kind of like using that button for Bixby, to turn on the flashlight or turn on my Wi-Fi hotspot. I don’t need a Gemini button; I want my hardware buttons to control the hardware.

I’d love to see Samsung nail the camera button, because Apple left me wanting something softer, with more travel. Or maybe a temperature sensor, like the Pixel 9 Pro. Or maybe an infrared emitter to control my home gear, like the OnePlus 13. See, the Galaxy S25 Plus needs something, because the competition is offering more and more for the same price, or less.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue held in hand from side showing volume and power button

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Also, the overall design hews too close to the iPhone… again. If you’d never seen a smartphone and I handed you a Galaxy S25 Plus and an iPhone 16 Plus, you’d think they were made by the same people. That’s a backhanded compliment, but Google, OnePlus, and even Motorola have shown us that there is room for originality in phone materials and design – not every handset has to be hazy glass and metal slabs with rounded corners, and cameras in the upper-left corner.

  • Design score: 3 / 5

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Display

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing home screen with AI generated lighthouse, standinng in between two adorable Android figurines

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Higher resolution than the Galaxy S25, not just bigger
  • Fingerprint scanner didn’t work consistently

The Galaxy S25 Plus has a fantastic display, and it might be Samsung’s best, on paper at least. Instead of blowing up the Galaxy S25 display, with its lower resolution, Samsung shrank the Galaxy S25 Ultra display a bit, so both phones pack the same pixels. Because the S25 Plus is a bit smaller, it packs those pixels more tightly, resulting in a display that’s technically sharper. I couldn’t see a difference from the Ultra, but the step up from the smaller Galaxy S25 is noticeable, and significant.

The Galaxy S25 Plus is especially bright, which helps when you need to use the phone outdoors. This phone is great for taking photos, because the viewfinder is easy to see in any situation, and I preferred shooting with the larger S25 Plus versus the Galaxy S25 because the larger display made it easier to see my subjects.

The Galaxy S25 Plus, like the S25 Ultra, gets Samsung’s new ProScaler technology, which the phone maker says it’s borrowed from the Samsung TV group. This tech is supposed to upscale the resolution on any video content you watch on the Galaxy S25 Plus. It won’t change the frame rate, so you won’t get the weird motion effect you see on some TVs; it just improves the resolution.

In practice, I didn’t notice much difference between regular HD video quality on this phone and the smaller Galaxy S25. If I paused a video, I could see less blurriness on the Plus, but it wasn’t noticeable while the video was playing.

Like the Galaxy S25, the Galaxy S25 Plus has a fingerprint scanner that gave me some trouble. About once a day it failed to open for my fingerprint, and I had to use my password instead. I’ve seen much more reliable scanning from competitors, especially the OnePlus 13.

  • Display score: 5 / 5

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Software

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue with two windows open and a pop-up video call all at once

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Samsung One UI is colorful but more polished than ever
  • Galaxy AI isn’t overbearing, at least not yet

I usually complain about Samsung phone software – I find the settings and the sheer number of features and options to be confusing and excessive. In this case, I’m going to let things slide. The Galaxy S25 Plus has the latest One UI 7 version of Android 15 from Samsung, and it looks good. It’s colorful and original, and it still offers plenty of customization, but now the phone does more of the work for you, thanks to improved AI.

For instance, every time I opened the Widgets menu to add a new widget to my home screen, the Galaxy S25 Plus had new suggestions for me – and they weren’t bad! I found some useful widgets this way, even though I’m not sure what criteria the AI uses to decide what I’d like. The Galaxy S25 Plus also did a fine job with other suggestions, like suggesting replies to text messages, or suggesting edits in the photo Gallery app.

Somehow Samsung has struck the best balance between powerful AI and obtrusive AI of any phone maker. Galaxy AI appears in the form of suggestions, not demands. You can almost ignore the AI features entirely, or just have all of the AI results computed on your phone, instead of in the cloud. This is a nicely measured approach to mobile AI, and Samsung is doing it best.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing settings Quick Settings drop down, standing in between two adorable Android figurines

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

I also appreciate the improvements to Samsung’s own Bixby AI. Bixby is better than ever at finding and controlling features on your phone. We’re still not at the finish line – I think Bixby could become even more helpful if it could explain things better. Still, for finding features and taking actions on the phone, Bixby is the best AI, better than Siri or Gemini, for sure.

Sadly, Bixby has been cut off from most of the Galaxy S25 Plus. At startup, your phone encourages you to make Gemini your side-button companion, relegating Bixby to the settings menu or its own Bixby app. I worry that most people won’t find my friend Bixby, which makes me sad, because Bixby has finally gotten smart enough to be interesting.

It’s still early days for all of this mobile AI stuff, and even new phones like the Galaxy S25 Plus will have years to improve, with Samsung promising seven full Android OS updates. As my phone collects more data about me and learns to do more itself, and once Samsung figures out how to integrate Gemini and Bixby properly, I think Samsung could have the best mobile AI device around.

For now, the AI just doesn’t do much, and I’m fine with that – it doesn’t do too much. I wish it did everything Samsung promised at launch, like turning off my TV when I fall asleep or suggesting better lighting for bed time. We’ll get there. For now, I’m just enjoying the suggestions.

  • Software score: 3 / 5

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Cameras

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue held in hand showing the back

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Solid cameras that work well in a variety of situations
  • Great pro settings, though some require extra downloads

The Galaxy S25 Plus takes great photos, and I especially like Samsung’s Camera app for all of its shooting modes, though it can get a bit confusing, in classic Samsung style. If you like shooting bright blue skies, crispy croissants, and colorful crowds, the Galaxy S25 Plus is the right camera for you, because Samsung excels at photos that are meant for sharing.

You won’t get the most accurate colors or the most detail, but the Galaxy S25 Plus is very reliable, and I knew it could capture low-light photos and get me the details I wanted, or close-up macro photos to catch that bug before it skittered away. It feels versatile, and there’s no situation it can’t handle.

There are, perhaps, a couple too many shooting modes. There’s a Pro mode, as well as Pro Video, and you can get even more Pro and become an Expert Raw user. Expert Raw is a separate app, though you access it through the Camera, and it gives you features like astrophotography and even more photo controls.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing a TechRadar Google Meet video call, standing in between four adorable Android figurines

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

If you shoot mostly video, the Galaxy S25 Plus now supports Log file recording, which gives you much more control over your color profile at the editing stage. The maximum video resolution is 8K at 30fps, which is higher-resolution than any monitor I own.

I’m skeptical about AI photo editing, but the Galaxy AI tools have become truly impressive. For fun, I decided to cut my exes out of old photographs, and the Galaxy S25 Plus gave me perfect selfie shots in romantic locations – nobody else included. It even managed to create proper folds in my pullover, or add landscape to fill in the blanks. Only the closest scrutiny would cause a viewer to suspect the photo was altered by AI, were it not for the ‘AI-generated content’ logo that appears at the bottom after you make such changes.

  • Camera score: 4 / 5

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Camera samples

Image 1 of 6

Camera samples from the Galaxy S25 Plus

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 2 of 6

Camera samples from the Galaxy S25 Plus

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 3 of 6

Camera samples from the Galaxy S25 Plus

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 4 of 6

Camera samples from the Galaxy S25 Plus

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 5 of 6

Camera samples from the Galaxy S25 Plus

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 6 of 6

Camera samples from the Galaxy S25 Plus

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Performance

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue with Star Wars Hunters title screen showing

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Top-ranking performance from the Snapdragon 8 Elite
  • Where does all that power go? It’s hard to tell

The Galaxy S25 Plus is one of the best-performing phones I’ve ever tested, matched only by the other two Galaxy S25 devices. That’s thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset inside, a bespoke version of Qualcomm’s Elite mobile platform that has been just slightly overclocked for Samsung, and while it’s enough for Samsung to claim bragging rights, this processor was already plenty fast.

In fact, I’m not sure why I need all that power? Last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 could already run all of the best Android mobile games at the top performance settings. What’s above the top? Samsung hasn’t done much visually to take advantage of the improved performance, though I suspect that the Galaxy AI features, especially the AI features that will eventually come to this phone, will take up much of the processor’s clock time.

For now, you can choose to run most of the Galaxy AI computations on the phone instead of sending that work to the cloud, if you’re especially security conscious or worried about the impact on the environment.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing always on display with photograph in color

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

You can also run DeX, Samsung’s desktop environment, though DeX is looking more and more mobile these days, more like a big iPad than a Chromebook. If you want to get some work done on a bigger screen, and with a bigger keyboard, and a mouse even, you can plug all of those into the USB port on the Galaxy S25 Plus (or connect wirelessly), and you suddenly have a mini desktop computer. It’s pretty sweet for the right circumstance, like answering work emails or checking out photos on a big screen.

I still wonder if it’s time for the Galaxy series to step up to a more advanced experience. I’d love to see more desktop-level apps, like a real Adobe Photoshop or Lightroom, since the Snapdragon seems to have that kind of power. I haven’t seen huge improvements in Android apps for a while, besides some choice games, which the Galaxy S25 Plus can handle easily, with all the ray tracing and pixel pushing required.

  • Performance score: 5 / 5

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Battery

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus in Navy Blue showing USB-C port on bottom

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Best battery life of the Galaxy S25 family
  • Faster charging than the Galaxy S25

Battery life on the Galaxy S25 Plus is remarkable. The phone easily lasted through a full day in my time using it for work and play alike, and probably could have made it through two days with more conservative usage – but I take a lot of photos.

Our Future Labs testing agrees. In our battery rundown test, the Galaxy S25 Plus is our new Samsung battery champ, beating even the Galaxy S25 Ultra, which is odd considering that the Ultra has a slightly larger battery. The S25 Plus lasted 18 hours and 45 minutes, while the Ultra lasted 18 hours and 35 minutes. Both of those are stellar results. The smaller Galaxy S25 was also admirable, but it lasted less than 16 hours in our testing; so if you want the best battery from a Samsung Galaxy, get the Galaxy S25 Plus.

That said, the OnePlus 13 lasted 19 hours and 45 minutes in the same battery rundown test, making it our outright battery champ, but all of these phones will easily get you through an active day of use.

The Galaxy S25 Plus charges faster than the other Galaxy phones as well. With a 45W charger, you can charge the S25 Plus to 70% in 30 minutes, and my phone was fully charged within 50 minutes. That’s faster than the iPhone 16 or the Galaxy S25, which both max out at a slower 25W charging speed. Once again, however, the OnePlus 13 steps out ahead with incredibly fast 80W charging (with a 100W charger on the way).

It’s strange that Samsung hasn’t improved its charging speed, whether that’s for USB-C or wireless charging. Phones from many Chinese brands can charge much faster, but I guess that since Apple and Google aren’t competing with faster charging, Samsung hasn’t stepped up. Hopefully we’ll see this improve with in the next generation.

  • Battery score: 4 / 5

Buy it if...

You want a Galaxy S25, only bigger and better
You might spend more to get a larger screen and more battery life, but the Galaxy S25 Plus also gives you faster charging and a sharper display.

You have hope for the future
Galaxy AI doesn’t do much right now, but there are seven years of Android updates ahead for this phone. It can only get better, right?

You’re all-in on Galaxy gear
If you have a Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Book, or Galaxy Buds, the Galaxy ecosystem is growing, and Galaxy devices work better together.

Don't buy it if...

You want the best cameras
Unlike Apple and Google, Samsung makes you pay more if you want the best cameras. Only the Ultra has the best cameras Samsung makes, sorry Plus.

You’re buying a house, or you like to draw
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has the S Pen, which is useful if you sign a lot of digital documents, or you want professional-strength drawing capabilities.

You want something fresh and new
The Galaxy S family has been stagnant for a while, so if you don’t need a new phone right away, maybe wait until Samsung has some new ideas.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus review: Also consider

OnePlus 13
For less than the Galaxy S25 Plus you can have much better battery life, better ultra-wide and zoom cameras, and a more durable phone in the OnePlus 13.

Read our full OnePlus 13 review

Galaxy S25 Ultra
Let’s be honest, cameras are the most important feature, and the Galaxy S25 Plus just doesn’t have them. If you want the best cameras, you need the Ultra.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review

How I tested the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus

  • I tested the phone for two weeks
  • I took dozens of photos
  • I played games and watched movies
  • I checked email and worked in Slack
  • I used AI features extensively
  • Benchmark testing is for comparison, not scoring purposes

I received the Galaxy S25 Plus almost two weeks before this review was published. I tested the phone extensively, alongside the Galaxy S25, using the same work and personal apps and accounts on each.

I used the Galaxy S25 Plus for taking photos, communicating with work colleagues using messages and Slack, and conducting video conference calls. I played games, and edited photos from my Google Photos library.

I connected the Galaxy S25 Plus to a Galaxy Watch Ultra and Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, supplied by Samsung. I wore the Galaxy Watch to sleep, and let the Galaxy S25 Plus listen to me as I slept. I also connected an Xbox wireless controller to play games. I connected the S25 Plus to my car for Android Auto and multimedia. I connected the phone to my Steelseries USB-C keyboard, my MX Master mouse, and my Dell monitor for DeX capabilities.

I used Smart Things on the Galaxy S25 Plus to control my home thermostat, lights, security, and television. I used Gemini as my primary side-button AI, but I also used Bixby extensively.

Why you can trust TechRadar

☑️ 100s of gaming laptops reviewed
☑️ 15 years of product testing
☑️ Over 16,000 products reviewed in total
☑️ Nearly 200,000 hours testing tech

Next Page »