Gadgets - Organizer

Testing the GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra made me realize just how flexible an entry-level mini PC can be

11:45 pm | January 13, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets | Tags: PC, VESA | Comments: Off

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: 30-second review

GMKtec is an established brand that makes a wide selection of mini PCs, and the M5 Ultra is a follow-up to the previous M5 and M5 Plus models (see my M5 review and the M5 Plus review).

The original M5 used a Ryzen 7 5700U, a Zen 2 architecture chip, the M5 Plus used the Zen 3 era Ryzen 7 5825U. And, the new M5 Ultra goes Zen 4 with a Ryzen 7 7730U.

From the outside, these all look remarkably similar, but internally, the M5 Ultra is 2023 technology and not the 2022 and 2021 tech used in the previous generations.

While the number of cores remains the same, the Ryzen 7 7730U offers better CPU and GPU clock speeds and better power efficiency.

However, it still uses DDR4 memory, and the best USB it has to offer is USB 3.2 Gen 2. Those wanting USB4 need to consider the M7 Ultra that I’ll be reviewing on Tech Radar Pro shortly.

But what made the original M5, and then the M5 Plus, so popular was their competitive pricing, and the M5 Ultra is also remarkably cheap, especially if you buy it ‘barebones’ and provide your own memory and storage.

With a starting price of under $260 for a barebones machine, this is a well-specified NUC system that has enough power for general office tasks once you’ve added memory, storage and an OS.

And with dual 2.5GbE LAN ports and easy internal upgrades, this is a highly flexible system that can be repurposed if required.

While this system doesn’t offer the raw performance of Ryzen AI or Ryzen 9 systems, or the latest USB4 technology, it’s a logical replacement for older desktop systems.

The inclusion of dual LAN ports, dual M.2 slots, and easily upgradable RAM might see this system join our best mini PC round-up, purely on the basis of flexibility and great value.

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: Price and availability

How much does it cost? From $260/£210/€240
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Direct from GMKtec and via online retailers

The M5 Ultra is available in a range of SKUs from GMKtec directly, though through online retailers, these are either ones with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, or 32GB of memory and 1TB of drive space.

It's also available from Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk, among other online retailers.

And I'm seeing a few sites selling ones with those memory capacities and storage mixed up, but the cheapest option is to buy this system directly from GMKtec as a barebones system.

If you have spare DDR4 SODIMMs and a Gen 3 NVMe module to install, that could get you this system for only $259.99 in the US, £209 in the UK and €239.99 across the EU.

The review specification costs $489.99 for US residents via GMKtec.com, £382 for UK residents, and €439.99 for Europe, direct from GMKtec in Germany.

What’s most striking here is the difference between the barebones and populated system, which can be interpreted as 1TB of storage and 32GB of DDR4 being worth almost half the cost of the system. Therefore, if you have those things, the barebones makes more sense, and if you don’t, then the intermediate SKU with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage is worth considering, as it could save you $90 on the whole system.

Looking for machines that use this same processor, these are thin on the ground. According to my searches, these include the AceMagic Kron Mini K1, Kamrui E3B Mini PC, GenMachine Ren7000 and FakestarPC Fanless Mini PC. Of these, I’ve only got direct experience with AceMagic, and this brand typically delivers quality construction and innovative designs.

The Kron Mini K1 bears an uncanny resemblance to the M5 Ultra, and sells for $408.49 via Amazon for a system with 32GB of RAM and 1TB of storage. Making it cheaper than the equivalent M5 Ultra. Also from Amazon, the Kamrui E3B Mini PC is $479. I couldn’t find either the FakestarPC Fanless Mini PC or GenMachine Ren7000 available.

The fact that so few designs exist for this platform suggests that not many Mini PC makers thought it was a good idea, and the few who did pitched it as a mid-range device, where a good portion of the cost is determined by how it is outfitted with memory and storage. And it's worth noting that if you go barebones with this gear, the price doesn't include the Windows 11 Pro license.

Value: 4 / 5

GMKtec M5 Ultra — (Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: Specs

Item	Spec
CPU:	AMD Ryzen 7 7730U ( 8C/16T, up to 4.6GHz)
GPU:	AMD Radeon Vega 8, up to 2.0 GHz
NPU:	N/A
RAM:	32GB DDR4-3200 (16GB x 2) expandable to 64GB
Storage:	1TB M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3
Expansion:	1x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3
Ports:	1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 2x USB 2.0, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x 3.5mm Audio
Networking:	2x 2,5GbE Realtek RTL8125, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2
OS:	Windows 11 Pro (pre-installed)
Base Power:	15W
PSU:	19V 3.42A 65W
Dimensions:	128.8 x 127 x 47.8 mm

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: Design

Basic build quality
VESA mountable
Easy internal access

If this NUC has a significant weakness, it's that it's entirely built from plastic. And, if you look at some of my images, you might notice that the one I was sent already got a scuff along the way.

Because it might not be the most durable case, mounting it on the rear of a monitor using the VESA bracket GMKtec provides could be a strategic move to keep it out of harm's way.

I think part of the issue here is that GMKtec has used a fine paint finish on its enclosure that highlights any contact rather than ignoring it.

Better considered are the port positions, where the USB options are liberally distributed with both Type-A and Type-C ports on the front, and more Type-A ports on the rear. There is only one USB-C port, and all the ports with USB 3.2 Gen 2 specifications are on the front.

The rear has to USB 2.0 ports for mouse and keyboard, two video outputs (one each of HDMI and DisplayPort) and dual 2.5GbE LAN ports.

That last option makes this platform perfect for a hardware firewall, since you could buy it barebones, add some memory and install a Linux firewall distro on it extremely cheaply.

One interesting sidenote to the LAN ports is that GMKtec has taken to putting a label over the ports, suggesting that if you want to use the machine immediately, then don’t connect the network. Microsoft seems oblivious to how annoying it is for new owners to wait while Windows 11 devours the medieval feast of updates to the distribution installation. Why Microsoft hasn’t bundled these into the base install, I’ve no idea, but it probably rhymes with the word decrepitude.

Sadly, because this is Windows, eventually connecting the network will become a necessity, but at least warning people that this comes with a downside was good on GMKtec’s part.

As with all the GMKtec Nuxbox designs I’ve seen, access to the inside is remarkably straightforward.

On this model, the top of the machine can be easily pulled off, and that reveals four screws that hold a plastic fan mount, blowing air on the system, which can be removed. With this part out of the way, the memory and storage are all available to be replaced or, in the case of the storage, upgraded.

There are two SODIMM slots for DDR4, which on the review hardware were occupied with two 16GB modules. The maximum addressable memory by the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U is 64GB, so you could install two 32GB modules to achieve that. But, from an economic point of view, I’d consider choosing a system that used DDR5, rather than adding more RAM to a DDR4 system.

The M.2 situation is even better, since this machine has an unused 2280 M.2 NVMe slot. While both the M.2 slots in here are only Gen 3, and not Gen 4, for those with the modules, you could use two 8TB sticks, giving a combined storage of 16TB. That would hold a decent media collection or a significant amount of data.

Overall, within the limitations of a system that uses DDR4 and PCIe 3.0, the M5 Ultra provides the best possible options and makes what is already a flexible solution even more adaptable.

Design: 4 / 5

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: Hardware

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
DDR4 Memory
PCIe Gen 3 M.2 Slots

As I mentioned earlier, not many systems have used the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, and maybe some of the reason is that this is a Zen 3 architecture CPU that was officially released with other 7030 series Barcelo-R chips in early 2023.

These were the tail end of AMD’s TSMC 7nm FinFET products before they shifted to 6nm on the 7025 series and then 4nm fabrication with the 7040 series. The first 7040-series chips with Zen 4 architecture appeared only three months after the Ryzen 7 7730U, so it never had much of an opportunity to develop a following.

That’s a shame, because the 7020 series it replaced only used the Zen 2 architecture, didn’t have any Ryzen 7 models, and had a maximum of four cores (eight threads). However, the 7020 series did at least support DDR5, which this processor did not, reverting to DDR4.

That’s the critical choice that erodes much of the performance benefit of having eight cores and sixteen threads.

This design also offered built-in USB ports, avoiding the need for PCIe lanes to be used for that function. This was also one of the last CPU designs to use the older Vega 8 GPU before the RDNA2 680M appeared with the 7035 series.

In short, this CPU and GPU combination where at the cusp of a major change, and the timescale between the rollover to DDR5, RDNA2 graphics and 4nm fabrication took away this silicon as an obvious choice for system builders.

It’s a guess, but a good number of these chips were probably made, and AMD might have a significant number that they are willing to sell cheaply now, which would explain their appearance here.

One downside to this architecture compared to later designs is that it only supports PCI Express 3.0 and has only 16 usable lanes, giving it the equivalent of 8 PCIe 4.0 lanes in later series.

Because it has built-in USB technology that isn’t a huge issue, but it does limit the M.2 slots here to Gen 3 mode, so buying Gen 4 drives for this machine is pointless. There are sufficient lanes for dual PCIe 3.0 M.2 slots, and for dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, since this system doesn’t have USB4 or other bandwidth-eating options.

Overall, the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U was a slightly odd choice, and its existence would suggest that in 2023, at the very least, AMD was strategically all over the place.

Releasing a new series when you intend to stomp on it within three months now looks like a severe lack of planning, and this system is one of the ripples of those rock-in-the pond choices.

Features: 3.5 / 5

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: Performance

Mini PC		GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra	Alliwava U58
CPU		AMD Ryzen 7 7730U	AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Cores/Threads		8C 16T	8C 16T
RAM		32GB DDR4 (2x16GB)	32GB DDR4 (2x16GB)
Storage		1TB NVMe	512GB SSD
Graphics		Radeon Vega 8	Radeon Vega 8
3DMark	WildLife	6711	8218
	FireStrike	3154	3764
	TimeSpy	1264	1402
	Steel Nom Lt.	1035	1307
CineBench24	Single	78	85
	Multi	414	473
	Ratio	5.29	5.59
GeekBench 6	Single	1806	1978
	Multi	5939	7941
	OpenCL	12823	16925
	Vulkan	11472	15457
CrystalDisk	Read MB/s	3624	3650
	Write MB/s	2642	2717
PCMark 10	Office	5581	6445
WEI		8.1	8.1

I’ve not seen any other system with this processor, so I decided to compare it to another mini PC that also uses older AMD chip technology - the Alliwava U58 I recently reviewed.

Where the M5 Ultra uses the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, U58 uses the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, a 5000 series processor from exactly a year earlier, in January 2022.

On paper, these processors have the same number of cores and threads, the same DDR4 memory technology, the same base and boost clocks, and very similar Vega 8 GPUs.

It’s tempting to think that the 7730U is just a rebranded 5825U, and there is some truth in that.

However, in these tests, for reasons I can’t fathom, the Alliwava U58 performs better or the same as the GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra across a wide range of benchmarks.

Typically, the U58 is 10% better, but in some of the graphics tests, it manages to be even more superior.

Not sure why this is the case, but due to the U58 only having a single 1GbE LAN port, and a single M.2 slot, I’m still not convinced that it’s the better option.

Perhaps a firmware upgrade of the M5 Ultra might bring it up to a similar performance level at some point. However, if you want more power, then I’d avoid systems that use DDR4 and pay the extra to have a DDR5 system.

Performance: 3.5 / 5

GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra: Final verdict

This is an odd system, as it ended up with a CPU that few system builders considered and even fewer made into machines.

Looking at the performance, the reason is obvious, because it didn’t deliver a dramatic improvement over previous generations, and it was overtaken by new products in three months.

That said, it works perfectly well in this context, and for someone with spare DDR4 handy, it’s an inexpensive system that is dramatically better than an Intel N300-powered NUC or a Ryzen 5 system.

What GMKtec got right with the M5 Ultra is that it supports a decent amount of memory, has dual M.2 slots and dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, which increases the number of roles that this system could occupy exponentially. There are plenty of medium-power NUCs around, but like the U58 I mentioned in the benchmarking, they don’t have the LAN ports or the storage expansion options.

Those who are interested in those features, and perhaps less concerned with raw performance, might find the GMKtec M5 Ultra an interesting proposition.

Should I buy a GMKtec NucBox M5 Ultra?

Value	Affordable system, especially barebones	4/5
Design	Mostly plastic, but the port layout is logical	3.5/5
Features	Odd processor, but easy upgrades	3.5/5
Performance	Not the fastest Ryzen 7, but powerful enough for most jobs	3.5/5
Overalls	Flexible and easy to upgrade at a bargain price	4/5

Buy it if...

You want a low-cost NUC
Even with memory and storage, this NUC is affordable, and barebones, it's a bargain. It might not be the fastest Ryzen around, but it's quick enough for daily Office tasks.View Deal

You want a flexible mini PC
Compared to some NUC designs, this one is very flexible. With two 2.5GbE LAN ports, it could be used as a hardware firewall, a media server, or in a dozen other contexts. The power and performance of this platform allow it to drive up to three monitors for promotional graphics, and it has more than enough power for typical office tasks.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You want ultimate performance
This is a value-led mini PC, so it's not going to be as powerful as machines loaded with the fastest processors - for top performance, check out mini PCs using the AMD Ryzen AI platforms like the Ryzen AI Max+ 395, with 16 cores and 32 threads.View Deal

Also consider

Geekom A5
The Geekom A5 mini PC delivers a decent user experience for office work in a small, easy-to-deploy package. It doesn't have a second M.2 slot, but it does have a SATA and a place for a 2.5-inch drive.
In testing it produced almost identical performance to the M5 Ultra, using its AMD Ryzen 5 7430U CPU.

Check out my Geekom M5 review View Deal

GMKtec NucBox M5 Plus
Another mid-tier mini system, this time the prior design from the same brand as the M5 Ultra. This one utilises the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (8 cores, 16 Threads) CPU and features 1TB of onboard NVMe storage. Where this is slightly better than the A5 is that the second M.2 slot is 2280, and it has dual 2.5GbE LAN ports.

Check out my GMKTec NucBox M5 Plus review View Deal

These super cheap noise-cancelling headphones boast a 110-hour battery, but I still can’t recommend them — here’s why

4:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones Wireless Headphones | Tags: ANC | Comments: Off

Tribit QuietPlus 81: review

If you’re looking for an ultra-cheap pair of noise cancelling headphones, the Tribit QuietPlus 81 appear to be a very tempting option indeed. With a list price of just $49.99 / £49.99 (about AU$75), they pack a lot in – ANC, a ton of playtime, and a neat, foldable design. But are they really worth checking out?

Well, in a lot of ways, these headphones are impressive. Above all, I was blown away by their ultra-long battery life. You get 70 hours with ANC on, and a whopping 110 hours with ANC off. That means you’ll barely have to charge these cans, ideal if you’re someone that’s on the go quite a bit… or are just forgetful like I am.

Like the best headphones around, these also have pretty extensive EQ options. There are a range of genre and situation-specific presets, but you can also set your own with the included 10-band equalizer. This means that you can create the sound that works best for you – an important inclusion, given that these headphones do not sound great out of the box.

Yes, I understand that these are incredibly cheap, and I didn’t have big expectations for these headphones, sonically speaking. But still, I think there are better-sounding options in the budget category – more on those in the ‘Also consider’ section. But essentially, these cans just lack the clarity, dynamism, and detail that others offer.

When listening to Black Eye by Allie X, synth beat intro lacked the razor-sharp delivery that makes it so impactful. The drum machine that follows sounds pretty deep, but also quite bloated, leaving the track devoid of its intense, energetic character. With the standard ‘Music’ tuning, instruments in the treble range are concealed, but even with a custom setup, I wasn’t able to get the expressive sound I was chasing.

Moving over to 12 O.C Riddim by M-High – a track that’s great for testing the low-end capabilities of headphones – and the picture was fairly mixed. High-pitched percussion in the build up again lacked the vibrancy and edge I was looking for, and although the headphones could reach down to the track’s dark depths, bass wasn’t agile or clean enough for a truly immersive listen.

Just generally, these headphones lack the refined sound you’d expect from a budget model like the 1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51. With a custom EQ, you can get adequate sound when listening at mid-volumes, just don’t expect to get anything out of the ordinary for $50 / £50 headphones.

Man holding the Tribit QuietPlus 81 — (Image credit: Future)

Let’s get onto another crucial area and discuss ANC. So, these headphones can be used in normal mode, transparency mode (for enhanced awareness), and with noise cancelling on. I spent most of my time testing the headphones with ANC on, and in honesty, it was about as good as I’d expected.

When working in the office, I could still hear chatter and typing with volume set to 70%. On walks, traffic noise was still pretty prominent too, as was the sound of passerbys talking. Sure, these dampen surrounding sounds decently enough, but they’re unlikely to impress on the noise cancelling front.

One feature that interested me on these headphones, though, was their ability to trigger transparency mode in an instant. You can simply hold down on the right earcup, and hear your surroundings – as seen on the excellent Sony WH-1000XM6. Is this the most responsive? No – the feature doesn’t activate instantly as it would on the XM6. But still, it’s fairly effective, and a worthwhile inclusion.

More generally though, controls on the QuietPlus are pretty poor. After a firmware update, I was able to access ‘customizable touch controls’, but I couldn’t set playback control to the right ear cup… that’s limited to physical button controls. These buttons are black on black, and are slightly hard to read – and the volume controls being bound to one small-sized button is very impractical.

Touch controls themself are fairly responsive, but all they can do is activate XBass mode – which doesn’t sound good – or summon a voice assistant. I personally would’ve preferred standard touch controls to play, pause, or skip music – as seen on a model like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen).

There are a few other features to explore, like a lower-latency game mode, wired listening via a 3.5mm slot, and hearing protection. You can find just about everything you need in the Tribit app, although this is a pretty rudimentary piece of software – something I flagged in my review of the Tribit PocketGo.

In terms of design, these headphones are hit and miss. They’re foldable, which makes them pleasingly compact, and their adjustable headband makes them easy to fit. One thing that's not too well-designed is the packaging. The box says these headphones offer "ULTRA LONG BATT" and "SMOOTH TALKING"... that's one way to make a first impression.

Anyway, in spite of their use of ‘protein leather cushioning and memory foam’, I found the QuietPlus 81 to be a little uncomfortable for extended use. To me, they’re a little tight-feeling, and padding on the headband feels a little thin. Looks-wise, however, these headphones are solid. They don’t look ultra plasticky, and the earcups have a rounded look, which is fairly appealing.

In the end, then, would I recommend the Tribit QuietPlus 81 headphones? Unfortunately, the answer is no. There are certainly some commendable qualities on offer here, like that brilliant battery life and ten-band equalizer. But sonically, these fail to beat out rivals in their price category. Combine that with some unremarkable ANC and features, and I’d say you’re better off putting that $50 / £50 towards a pair of the best cheap headphones instead.

Tribit QuietPlus 81 leaning against block on pink background — (Image credit: Future)

Tribit QuietPlus 81 review: specs

Drivers	40mm dynamic
Active noise cancellation	Yes
Battery life	70 hours ANC on; 110 hours ANC off
Weight	283g
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.0, 3.5mm
Frequency range	20Hz-20kHz

USB-C cable plugged into the Tribit QuietPlus 81 — (Image credit: Future)

Tribit QuietPlus 81 review: price and release date

$49.99 / £49.99 (about AU$75)
Launched in December 2025

The Tribit QuietPlus 81 headphones were released in December 2025, and are available via Tribit’s website directly, or over on Amazon. They have a list price of $49.99 / £49.99 (about AU$75), which plants them firmly in the budget category.

Earcup with USB-C slot and 3.5mm slot on the Tribit QuietPlus 81 — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Tribit QuietPlus 81?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Excellent battery life, but unremarkable ANC and clunky app.	3/5
Sound quality	Can get pretty deep, but audio is pretty muddy and lacks dynamism.	2.5/5
Design	Not particularly comfortable, poor controls, but decent looking.	2/5
Value	Cheap, but quality doesn’t match up to other budget rivals.	3/5

Buy them if...

You want ANC for less
The Tribit QuietPlus 81 provide active noise cancelling capabilities for less than $50 / £50. Sure, it’s not the most amazing ANC around, but these headphones will still dampen noise from your surroundings decently.

You want headphones with a whole lot of battery life
With 110 hours of battery life with ANC off and 70 hours with it on, the Tribit QuietPlus 81 supply a whole lot of playtime. That’s more than the majority of budget rivals, and makes them ideal for those who don’t want to charge their headphones all too often.

Don't buy them if...

You want some comfy cans
In my experience, the QuietPlus 81 weren’t very comfortable. There’s not much padding on the adjustable headband, and they were a slightly tight fit, meaning they’re not ideal for longer listening sessions. If you want some seriously comfortable headphones, my top recommendation would be the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro.

You’re looking for good sound quality
The underwhelming audio of the Tribit QuietPlus 81 is one of their key flaws, and sees them lag behind some of the budget-friendly competition. If you want better audio at a still-low price, I’d recommend one of the options down below.

Tribit QuietPlus 81 review: also consider

	Tribit QuietPlus 81	1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51	OneOdio Focus A6
Price	$49.99 / £49.99 (about AU$75)	$89 / £99 / AU$130	$55 / £55 (about AU$110)
Drivers	40mm dynamic	40mm dynamic	40mm composite
Active noise cancellation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Battery life	70 hours ANC on; 110 hours ANC off	65 hours ANC on; 100 hours ANC off	75 hours ANC off; 40 hours ANC on
Weight	283g	246g	240g
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.0, 3.5mm	Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm	Bluetooth 6.0, USB-C audio passthrough
Frequency range	20Hz-20kHz	20Hz-40kHz	20Hz-40kHz

1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51
The 1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51 remain as the top budget pick in our guide to the best noise-cancelling headphones, and for good reason. With genuinely good ANC, seriously impressive audio, and plenty of playtime, they feel like the ultimate cheap pair of headphones. They’re often on sale for less than their already phenomenally low list price, and I’d certainly recommend them over these Tribit cans. Read our full 1More Sonoflow Pro HQ51 review.

OneOdio Focus A6
These ultra-cheap headphones really impressed us with their comfy fit and quality build, their exhaustive suite of features, and their genuinely good sound quality. You really can’t do much better than this for cans sitting around the $50 / £50 mark, so these are well-worth checking out. Read our full OneOdio Focus A6 review.

How I tested the Tribit QuietPlus 81

Tested for one week
Used in the office and while on walks
Predominantly tested using Tidal

I spent one week testing the Tribit QuietPlus 81, during which time I took them just about everywhere I went. Whether I was on a walk, working in the office, or doing chores at home, I made sure to have the headphones at hand – allowing me to test the quality of their ANC in a wide range of settings.

When listening to music, I predominantly made use of Tidal, but I did dip into Spotify from time to time as well. As always, I commenced my testing by running through the TechRadar testing playlist, which features songs from a wide range of genres, but I also tuned into a heap of tracks from my personal music library.

On top of that, I made use of the various features on the QuietPlus 81, messing around with the customizable controls, ANC modes, and custom equalizer. More generally, I’ve been a Reviews Writer here at TechRadar for almost two years, during which time I’ve tested a whole lot of headphones, including premium releases like the Sennheiser HDB 630 and budget alternatives like the Baseus Bowie 30 Max.

First reviewed: January 2026
Read more about how we test

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat is smart heating made simple

7:00 pm | January 11, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Smart Home Smart Thermostats | Comments: Off

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat is an easy-to-use Energy Star certified thermostat. It’s not the most sleek or modern-looking device, but it does the job.

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat is compatible with up to 2 heat/2 cool conventional, up to 2 heat/1 cool heat pump with electric backup, hot water heat, forced air (gas, oil, or electric.) It isn't compatible with electric baseboard heat (120-240V).

This thermostat comes with detailed installation instructions, but we found it beyond us and ended up hiring a professional to do it. Installation does require a C wire, though Honeywell Home does sell an adaptor kit if your home lacks one. Once the thermostat was physically installed in my home, I had no trouble at all setting it up with the app and getting it working. And it works beautifully.

You’ll need to download the First Alert by Resideo app initially to set up your schedule. You can create a 5-1-1 day cycle, 5-2 day cycle, 7-day cycle, or set up one-week increments. You can also create a vacation schedule, even after you've left. Toggle on the Auto Away feature to allow the thermostat to update automatically based on your phone's location. You can also have the app send you filter change reminders. The First Alert app can also control any of their other home devices you may own, such as CO2/smoke alarms, security cameras, air quality filters, water leak sensors, and more.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat First Alert app setup — (Image credit: Future)

Don't like using a separate app? You can also control the thermostat with your ecosystem of choice, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, or Apple HomeKit (Matter certified.) I'm an Apple user, and I did not find that Siri voice control worked properly. However, Control Center worked just fine.

You can also manage the thermostat the old-fashioned way, toggling through the menu with the six buttons next to the display.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat finger on controls — (Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat: Price and availability

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat was announced at CES in January 2025 and was released for sale in the US and Canada in the spring of 2025. As of this writing, it retails for $79.99 in the US but isn’t for sale yet outside of North America. You can find it at Amazon, Walmart, and tons of other major retailers online and in brick and mortar stores.

This model, otherwise known as RTH2CWF/U X2S Smart Thermostat, replaces Honeywell Home’s RTH6580 WiFi 7-day Programmable Thermostat, which retailed for a similar price. It’s not as fancy-looking as some of the models you’ll find on our roundup of the best smart thermostats, but it gets the job done.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat display off — (Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat: Design

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat comes in just one colorway. Honeywell Home calls it “white,” but I’d call it dove gray and off-white to be more specific. It measures 3.44 in/87 mm high, 5.13 in/130 mm wide, and 1.188 in/29.5 mm deep. It has a basic black-on-gray LCD display that lights up when you press a button. When dormant, the thermostat screen shows Mode, Current Temperature, Set Temperature, Status Display, Fan, and Time. It’s much easier to read when lit up, but it can be read when dormant as well.

The thermostat comes with detailed directions, so you can install it yourself if you’re fairly handy. I ended up calling a professional to install it, since I was unable to do it myself and I was having some other work done as well. It didn’t take the professional long at all. Installation does require a C-wire (24 VAC), which my home didn’t have. Honeywell Home does sell an adapter kit in case your home doesn’t have this wire. You also need to have WiFi 2.4 or 5GHz (802.11 b/g/n) in order for the smart features to work properly. Once you install Honeywell Home’s UWP wall plate, future upgrades will be easier, since you can just change the thermostat without redoing all of the wiring.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat side view — (Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat is Energy Star certified. You’ll need to download Resideo’s First Alert app on your smartphone in order to set up the thermostat. It’s also the easiest way to control the thermostat. But once you’ve set it up, you can control it manually on the thermostat itself, or with Amazon Alexa, Apple Home, or Google Assistant. The thermostat is Matter-certified.

The thermostat is compatible with up to 2 heat/2 cool conventional, up to 2 heat/1 cool heat pump with electric backup, hot water heat, forced air (gas, oil, or electric.) It does not work with electric baseboard heat (120-240V).

You don’t need to waste money heating or cooling your home unnecessarily when you’re away. Set up the thermostat’s schedule for a 5-1-1 day cycle, 5-2 day cycle, 7-day cycle, or one-week increments. You can also set up a vacation schedule. Toggle on the Auto Away feature to allow the thermostat to update based on your location.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat auto away in menu — (Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat: Performance

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat was only released months ago, but it looks like something from an earlier time. It’s not unattractive, but it doesn’t look particularly modern either. You can fully operate with the buttons just like you could in the 'old days', but you’ll have to go through a lot of menus to do so. It’s easier just to operate it within the app.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat First Alert app screenshots — (Image credit: Future)

I hate to put yet another app on my iPhone, but this one, First Alert by Resideo, is important for the best experience with the Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat. I did try controlling it from Control Center on my iPhone, but features are limited there. I also tried voice commands to Siri, but it didn’t work well. The thermostat definitely 'heard' me and changed the temperature, but it did not go to the temperature I said.

Using the First Alert app, the Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat works great. I set it to heat my home to 68°F/20°C during the day and 63°F/17°C at night. Since my husband and I both often work from home, I didn’t set a daytime “away” temperature, though I could. I did take a nine-day vacation and set up a special vacation schedule, which worked beautifully. I checked multiple times on my vacation to make sure my home was only heated enough to avoid the pipes freezing. My home was comfortably warm when I returned on a particularly cold January day.

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat in Control Center on iPhone — (Image credit: Future)

The Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat is compatible with Apple HomeKit (Matter enabled), Google Assistant, and Amazon Alexa. The First Alert app makes it easy to change the temperature, set up a daily/weekly schedule, turn your fan on and off, switch from heat to cool, and create vacation settings. You can also track your HVAC runtime in the app. You can also run other First Alert products via the app, such as air filters, smoke/CO2 alarms, security cameras, and water leak/freeze detectors.

I found that the Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat worked quite well in heating my home to my specifications. I like being able to set the schedule to my precise daily needs, and being able to set up vacation mode even while already away on vacation. I feel like there is a lot less wasted HVAC use, as the thermostat makes it easy to set up a tailored schedule.

Should you buy the Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat?

Buy it if

You want a reasonably-priced smart thermostat

While not the cheapest option on the market, there are certainly pricier ones out there. You can find this one well under the retail price if you shop around.View Deal

You only want to pay to heat and cool your home when you’re in it

Set up granular daily and weekly controls tailored to your schedule. Plus you can set up Auto Away so the thermostat updates based on your phone’s location and Vacation Settings as needed.View Deal

You want a flexible smart thermostat

The First Alert app is very easy to use, but you can also control the thermostat with your home’s ecosystem of choice. You can also go old school and use the buttons on the thermostat itself.View Deal

Don't buy it if

You don’t want to deal with another app

Yes, you do have to install the First Alert by Resideo app to get the thermostat set up. However, you could delete it later and just use your home’s ecosystem assistant or the buttons to control it.View Deal

You’re not handy and don’t want to pay a pro to install it

My husband is pretty handy (I’m not) but we ended up having to pay a pro to install the thermostat. Your mileage may vary.View Deal

You prefer to use voice activation

I had no trouble using Control Center on my iPhone to control the thermostat, but Siri’s voice activation didn’t work for me.View Deal

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat: alternatives to consider

If you're in the market for a smart thermostat and you're not sure Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat is the one, here are some others you might consider checking out.

Google Nest Learning Thermostat (Gen 4)

This one topped our Best Smart Thermostat list due to its great looks, automatic heating schedule creation, and the fact that it compensates for outdoor temperature. It doesn’t require a C wire, which may make installation easier. However, it’s not compatible with Apple HomeKit.

Read our full review: Google Nest Learning Thermostat (Gen 4)View Deal

Hive Thermostat (2024)

This one is compatible with Alexa, Google Home, and Apple HomeKit. You can also use the Hive app if you don’t have any of them. The thermostat has a clear touchscreen display instead of buttons and it makes home heating more efficient.

Read our review: Hive Thermostat (2024)View Deal

Image 1 of 4

Honeywell Home X2S Smart Thermostat menu items — (Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

Image 2 of 4

Image 3 of 4

Image 4 of 4

The Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are a good choice if you want to buy a pair of earbuds almost exclusively for FPS games

6:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: FPS, Metal Gear Solid | Comments: Off

Sony Inzone E9: Two-minute review

Sony makes it very clear who the Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are for. Developed in partnership with eSports team Fnatic, these wired in-ear monitor (IEM) style earbuds are squarely aimed at competitive first-person shooter (FPS) players or those with a generous budget aspiring to become one.

Retailing for $149.99 / £129 / AU$209, they’re competing closely with some of the best gaming earbuds like the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds, but don’t deliver the same all-round performance. If you’re looking for something that will elevate your experience in some of the best story games like God of War Ragnarok or Cyberpunk 2077, then these are certainly not it.

The Sony Inzone E9 headphones are highly comfortable to wear and come with a superb carrying case, but the unapologetically flat sound is not going to help cutscenes or action sequences sound their best. The GameBuds, or even Sony’s own but more expensive Inzone Buds, are clearly better choices, but it's hard to fault the Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones for that, as that’s obviously not what they’re for.

The Sony Inzone E9 gaming earbuds on a colorful desk mat. — (Image credit: Future)

They really come into their own in a competitive first-person shooter (FPS) setting, pairing well with games like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and Call of Duty: Black Ops 7. Here, the lack of bass prevents explosion and gunfire sound effects from overwhelming your senses, allowing you to focus on the impressive directional reproduction instead. The direction of key audio cues like footsteps is crystal clear and remarkably easy to discern, potentially giving you an advantage over those without such specialised audio gear.

The noise isolation is exquisite, thanks in no small part to the excellent seal of the headphones in your ears. A plethora of ear tips is included in the box to make it easy to find the perfect fit, and the included USB-C audio box stores EQ profile settings to make for a hassle-free setup every time - ideal if you’re competing in tournaments and need to access the same settings on a new machine.

Sony Inzone E9: Price and availability

$149.99 / £129 / AU$209
Available directly via Sony
Also at a range of retailers including Amazon

The Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are priced at $149.99 / £129 / AU$209. This is a significant investment for a pair of wired gaming earbuds, with top wireless options like the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds costing not much more at $159.99 / £159.99 / AU$359.

In addition to traditional gaming options, the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are also competing with the pricey in-ear monitor (IEM) earbuds favored by some FPS players. Here they come in at a very similar price to relatively affordable models from other big brands, such as the $149.99 / £129.99 Sennheiser IE 200. The Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are made specifically for gaming, however, setting them apart from most of the market and helping to justify the price.

The Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are available directly via Sony in the US and UK. They can also be found at a wide range of retailers, such as Best Buy in the US or Amazon in the UK. In Australia they’re in stock at both JB Hi-Fi and Harvey Norman.

Sony Inzone E9: Specs

Price	$149.99 / £129 / AU$209
Weight	0.16oz / 4.7g
Compatibility	PS5, PS4, Xbox Series X and Series S, Xbox One, PC, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile
Connection type	Wired (3.5mm / USB-C with audio box)
Battery life	N/A
Features	USB-C audio box, spatial audio
Software	Inzone Hub (PC)

Sony Inzone E9: Design and features

IEM style design
Included USB-C audio box stores settings
Fantastic carrying case

The Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones will have a familiar design if you’ve used a pair of IEM earbuds before.

They’re lightweight, with rounded earbuds connected to a rigid section of cable that hooks around the top of your ears. Two colorways are available: black and white. Both are rather plain, but the abundance of Inzone logo branding printed on the earbuds does give them some character.

Sony has definitely made some smart decisions when it comes to practicality, particularly with the length of the headphone’s cable. At 5.9ft / 1.8m, I found that it was more than long enough to comfortably reach my ears directly from my gaming PC’s 3.5mm headphone jack without the need for a cable extender. If you play on a console, you won’t have any issues hooking it up to your controller.

I also appreciate the clear left / right marking that’s printed on each earbud, with the latter presented in a bright red that makes it easy to spot at a glance.

A wealth of alternate ear tips come in the box, with a total of eight pairs to choose from. This includes standard silicone rubber ear tips and more foamy noise isolation earbud tips, both in four sizes (ranging from extra small to extra large). These are Sony’s widespread EP-EX10A and EP-NI1010 series tips - so replacements are easy to find if you need them later down the line.

You get a USB-C audio box for use with PCs, too. This can be used to store settings from the compatible Inzone Hub software, like your desired equalizer pre-sets or custom profiles. It also lets you use a dedicated spatial sound mode, giving a good impression of sound in a 3D space, albeit at the cost of some overall fidelity.

Between uses, you can store everything in the included carrying case that benefits from a surprisingly unique design. It’s divided into two compartments (one for the earbuds and the other for the audio box) joined together by a springy rubberized strip.

The underside of the strip has little magnetic buttons, clipping down to keep everything in place. It might be a bit hard to imagine, but it works really well and is much more practical than the cheap pouches included with most earbuds these days.

You also get a little Inzone-branded cable tidy, which is a neat bonus.

Sony Inzone E9 review: Performance

Clear sound
Highly tuned for FPS games
Underwhelming with other genres

The Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones have quite a flat sound profile out of the box, though this is presumably intentional. There’s not a lot of bass leading to quite an unexciting sound. Playing through some Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater and Assassin’s Creed Shadows on PS5, key story moments felt a tad muted with the backing music missing the punch needed to really drive the emotion home.

You can address this somewhat by tweaking the EQ settings in the compatible Inzone Hub software, but there’s only so much that you can do to increase the bass on hardware that’s not designed for it. For story-focused games, the results were never punchier than what you get out of the box with the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds and far less effective than even cheap wired over-ear sets like the Corsair HS50.

This lack of bass makes a lot more sense when you jump into a competitive shooter like Counter-Strike 2. Flashbangs and grenades are no longer overwhelming and don’t threaten to deafen you if you’re playing at higher volumes. Gunfire is more subdued, helping you stay focused in firefights.

The sound is crystal clear too, with an impressive level of directionality that makes it easy to track enemy movements using key sounds like footsteps. It’s very impressive, especially given how well the effect holds up in more frantic situations. Diving into an explosive match of Nuketown in Black Ops 7, I was able to accurately hear where nearby opponents were moving, even against the constant barrage of explosions conjured by grenades and killstreaks.

The detail is excellent, which is borderline essential in tense extraction shooters such as Escape From Tarkov, where being able to discern the subtle snapping of a twig can often mean the difference between life and death. If you’re currently one of the many people devoting every waking moment to Arc Raiders, I could see the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones being worth the asking price on this fact alone.

Despite offering no active noise cancellation (ANC), the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones do a commendable job of blocking out background noise by virtue of the strong seal of their fit. No, it’s not as effective as the ANC of the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds, but it is good enough to drown out household sounds and conversations with the volume set at a decent level.

Although very uncommon in the IEM market, I’m also a little disappointed that the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones don’t come with a small built-in microphone. It’s not a dealbreaker by any means, but it did mean that I had to reach for my Final VR2000 gaming earbuds when I wanted to chat with a friend while playing an Xbox Series X game.

Should I buy the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones?

Buy it if...

You’re a die-hard FPS fan
If you’re an FPS-head shopping for a pair of earbuds that you want to use exclusively to play the latest shooters, then the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones could be a very worthwhile investment.

You want every possible advantage
The directionality offered by the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones is excellent and could mean the difference between a win and a loss in a competitive gaming setting. Pick up a pair if you want to ensure you have every possible advantage.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You want a general use pair
The flat sound profile of the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones means that they’re not ideal for general use. At this price, there are loads of strong alternatives if you want something designed for a wider selection of genres with a microphone to help you chat with friends.

Also consider...

Not sure whether the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones are worth it for you? Check out these two compelling alternatives.

	Sony Inzone E9	SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds	Sony Inzone Buds
Price	$149.99 / £129 / AU$209	$159.99 / £159.99 / AU$359	$199 / £179.99 / AU$249
Weight	0.16oz / 4.7g	0.19oz / 5.3g (each bud); 1.7oz / 48.7g (case)	0.2oz / 6.8g
Compatibility	PC, Xbox Series X and Series S, Xbox One, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, Mobile	GameBuds for PlayStation: PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, PC, Mac, Meta Quest 2/3, mobile; GameBuds for Xbox: Xbox Series X\|S, Xbox One, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, PC, Mac, Meta Quest 2/3	PS5, PS4, PC, Nintendo Switch, Mobile
Connection type	Wired (3.5mm / USB-C with audio box)	2.4Ghz (via USB-C), Bluetooth 5.3 (mobile)	2.4GHz wireless (via dongle), Bluetooth 5.3
Battery life	N/A	Up to 40 hours (buds 10 hours; case 30 hours)	Up to 24 hours (buds 12 hours; case 12 hours)
Features	USB-C audio box, spatial audio	360° Spatial Audio, Qi Wireless Charging Case, 6mm neodymium drivers, four-mic ANC, transparency mode, in-ear detection/sensor, IP55 rating, fast charge, companion app with more than 100 presets	360 spatial sound, optimization for your ear, tap controls. 8.4mm drivers, IPX4 waterproof
Software	Inzone Hub (PC)	Arctis Companion App (mobile), SteelSeries Sonar (PC)	Inzone Hub (PC)

SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds
The SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds are a brilliant all-rounder. They’re wireless, compatible with most platforms, and offer superb sound that can be fully customized to your liking. They have microphones for chatting, plus effective ANC built in.

For more information, check out our full SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds review

Sony Inzone Buds
If you’re shopping for something specifically in the Inzone product line but don’t care about competitive FPS games, then the more general Inzone Buds are a better pick. They offer spatial sound, ANC, and a low-latency wireless connection.

For more information, check out our full Sony Inzone Buds review

How I tested the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones

Tested for nearly three months
Used with a wide range of platforms
Compared to lots of other products

I tested the Sony Inzone E9 in-ear gaming headphones over a period of roughly two and a half months. During that time, they were my primary gaming earbuds across all of my usual platforms. This included PS5, Xbox Series X, and PC.

I tried the earbuds with a wide selection of games, ranging from story-based titles such as Assassin’s Creed Shadows and Metal Gear Solid: Snake Eater to some of the most popular FPS games like Call of Duty: Black Ops 6, Black Ops 7, Valorant, and Counter-Strike 2.

Throughout my time with the earbuds, I compared their performance to my hands-on testing of a wide range of other gaming audio devices across the price spectrum.

Marinamantra Flow: Price and availability

The Marinamantra Flow is retailing for $1049 on the Marinamantra Flow website.

At the time of review, you can choose between a white or black frame, with a desktop size of 26 x 58in.

Marinamantra Flow: Unboxing and First Impressions

Again, I’ve done a good number of these now, but this desk was unique. The assembly wasn’t overly hard, but due to the unique design, the scissor legs, and the felt-covered undercarriage, this desk had a way of stamping itself on my memory.

The closest thing I can compare it to is the Lilipad standing desk. But where the Lillipad retracts so low is because it's designed to be stowed away after use, the primary reason the Flow reaches those low heights is to enable floor-sitting.

Unboxing and setting up was different than all the other desks I have set up, but not difficult. I just felt like, for the first time in a long time, like I was having to pay attention to the instructions rather than relying on past desk building experience.

Marinamantra sent all the proper tools, though I still used my Hoto electric screwdriver when I could just to help speed up the screwdriver process a little bit. The legs came connected together, so I simply had to get them connected in the proper location on the underside of the desk and then latch them in place.

Once I got everything attached, I added in the felt undercarriage and cabling, and then we were ready to flip over and get to work.

Marinamantra Flow: Design & Build Quality

The felt cable tray is shockingly good. At first, I thought it was clunky and perhaps a gimmick. But once I got everything put together, I realized it was very helpful for keeping the built-in desk cables tucked away, leaving only what I add visible. If desired, and if I wanted to build out a more complex desk here, I could tuck more cables in that felt liner, though I’d want to take it off to make sure that I am not getting cables stuck in the tracks.

Speaking of cables, one thing this does right is that it has power through the leg. I’ve started to see desks do this now. The first one I noticed doing it was the Secretlab Magnus Pro. Since then, I’ve seen a few more taking that approach, helping with cable management, not having a cable dangling down from the top of the desk at whatever height it may be, all the way down to either outlet height or the floor. This seemingly small element really helps declutter the workspace.

I also like that there are two outlets on the desktop that run through the same power line that goes out of the base, plus the power for actually raising and lowering the desk, of course. Marinamantra chose to have one of those available outlets in the back of the desk, in the built-in cable tray, which is excellent, and another in the front, making it super easy for the user to power whatever they need.

At first, I wanted another outlet on the back of the desk, but after getting everything set up, I realized I wouldn’t even use it for my setup, and if I did need it, it's easy enough to add an additional power strip.

Marinamantra Flow: In use

Specs

Desktop size: 28 x 56in
Lifting capacity: 176lb / 80kg
Height range: 14.9 to 47in

I’ve had this desk on the second floor of my home for the last three months. I’ve used it for at least 5 days a week during that time, sometimes for many hours at a time.

Since assembling it, I’ve raised and lowered the desk an obnoxious number of times, I’ve used both power ports, I’ve run my forearm on the control panel and accidentally changed the height, and I’ve even caught my kids playing under the desk, treating it as a fort. So far, stability is solid, height adjustments are smooth, though there are some clicking sounds from the legs when adjusting, and the desk itself has held up well.

I’m 6’2”, so for me, having a desk that can reach my preferred standing height is not always possible. But the Marinamantra Flow can get my preferred height and drop all the way down to a great seated or floor-sitting height without any problem. It’s probably due to the scissor-leg style instead of the standard leg, but that comes with trade-offs as well.

I love how smooth it moves up and down, and the incredible range, dropping so low and also so high, but as a taller individual, having the legs cross right where my knees means I have to contort my legs around the scissor legs if I’m pulled all the way into the desk. The only spot I can kick my legs out is in the dead center, so using anything to rest my legs on would not work with this desk, nor would kicking my legs out with a chair that has a leg rest.

Speaking of the legs, another thing that I noticed, perhaps because I previously used the Lilipad desk, is that the caps on the legs are mediocre. I can tell that this is a first-generation desk from Marinamantra. However, with that being said, it’s a spectacular attempt at a new desk style in almost every way,

Back to the legs, the power inlay through the legs makes a bigger difference than I originally thought. I expected it to be helpful, but not a game-changer. But for this style desk, which, for me, has stayed relatively minimal and straightforward, I haven’t needed anything more than what has been given.

I have a simple, yet powerful setup. I have an Anker Prime Docking Station plugged into the power port on the back of the desk, with the dock sitting on the top left, plugged into that I have the power line that runs to my laptop, a USB-C desk lamp. I ran one to the right side where I plug in my iPad, hard drive, or iPhone, and that’s about it. I can plug in some other drives or accessories on the dock itself, but beyond that, I have intentionally kept it pretty clean and straightforward.

There's something about this desk that makes me want to keep it simple in the best way. The front power port has come in super handy for charging my chair (review coming soon), yes, you read that right, or for other miscellaneous things I need to charge or plug into power in this room.

Last but not least, I’ll talk a little bit about the control panel. It’s simple, it reminds me of Ergonofis, and it works pretty well. In fact, it may be a bit too sensitive. My wife bumped it a few times with her forearm while we wrapped presents on this desk, and it sprang into height-adjusting action.

Marinamantra Flow: Final verdict

The Flow is a fantastic first-generation standing desk from Marinamantra, and it gets the fundamentals right. It’s designed to be minimalist, though it could be built out for more if you wanted, and it’s got a few great features up its sleeve that other desk companies could learn from.

If you are looking for a desk that can drop down to the ground, and then back up to meet the height of even some of the tallest people around, it's worth checking out.

Image 1 of 15

Image 2 of 15

Image 3 of 15

Image 4 of 15

Image 5 of 15

Image 6 of 15

Image 7 of 15

Image 8 of 15

Image 9 of 15

Image 10 of 15

Image 11 of 15

Image 12 of 15

Image 13 of 15

Image 14 of 15

Image 15 of 15

For more office furniture, check out our guide to the best office chairs we've tested.

I tested the Canon EOS R6 Mark III — it’s a near-perfect hybrid camera, with one major drawback

4:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Mirrorless Cameras | Tags: RF | Comments: Off

Canon EOS R6 Mark III: two-minute review

The Canon R6 Mark III is the brand's latest enthusiast-level hybrid camera, and successor to one of Canon's most popular models. It's perhaps the clearest expression of a 'hybrid' Canon camera yet within its price range, with a fresh 33MP sensor that not only offers a significant bump in resolution (from 24MP), but a host of new video features such as 7K open-gate.

Outwardly, you could be mistaken in thinking that the Mark III offers a relatively iterative upgrade versus the previous generation. The overall design of the camera is essentially identical. Under the hood, however, subtle tweaks and improvements provide an upgrade that's bigger than the sum of its parts.

Everything is just a little bit better with the Mark III. You get a nice bump in resolution, a massively expanded video tool-kit, and useful autofocus features from the higher-end bodies like Priority People Detect. Even minor annoyances like video white balance have been smoothed out. Overall, it's an incredibly refined and well-designed camera that simply just works without any fuss. That's high praise, indeed.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III with no lens mounted, next to the RF 20mm f/1.4 and RF 85mm f/1.4 lenses — (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

In real-world testing, the R6 Mark III is also a stunning stills and video camera, capable of producing superb results in both fields. In a field where competitors are eager to champion stacked BSI sensors, the Mark III proves that you need neither to achieve great performance. Images are detailed with great dynamic range and flexibility, and you still get an impressive 40fps burst rate, despite the significant jump in resolution.

Perhaps the biggest stumbling block for the R6 III isn’t necessarily the camera itself, but the increasingly competitive field it sits within. Rival brands are not only producing exceptional cameras currently, but they do so on democratized and open lens mounts.

For example, the Nikon Z6 III undercuts the R6 on price, the Panasonic S1 II features more powerful video tools, and the Sony A7 V falls back on its vast lens ecosystem. In comparison, the R6 III looks like the jack of trades - a safe, if somewhat unexciting pick in the best mirrorless cameras landscape.

Those already faithful to the Canon RF-Mount will be overjoyed with this camera, however. As previously stated, there's a refined assuredness to the R6 Mark III that makes it a reliable hybrid workhorse. Regardless of whether you're a professional wedding photographer, amateur videographer, or even a serious beginner, it's hard not to recommend the R6 Mark III because of its compelling mix of usability, image quality, and value. Yes, it's pricier than the Mark II, but considering the new sensor (and inflation), you definitely get a good amount of camera for the money here.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III specs

Canon EOS R6 Mark III specs
Type:	Mirrorless camera
Sensor:	Full-frame (36x24mm) FSI CMOS
LCD:	3-inch, fully-articulated, 1.62M dots
Memory:	1x UHS-II SD, 1x CFexpress Type B
Resolution:	32.5-megapixels
Video:	Up to 7K30p (open gate)
ISO range:	ISO 50-102,400
Mechanical Shutter speeds:	30-1/8000sec
Electronic Shutter speeds:	30-1/16000sec
Viewfinder:	3.69M dot, OLED EVF, 0.76x
Processor:	DIGIC X
Connectivity:	WiFi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI, audio, mic
Weight:	609g

Canon EOS R6 Mark III: Price and availability

Announced November 6th, 2025
Body only price of $2,799 / £2,799.99 / AU$4199.95
Kit options available, including RF 24-105mm f4 L IS

The R6 Mark III retails for $2,799 / £2,799.99 / AU$4199.95, which makes it pricier than the previous iteration by a few hundred dollars / pounds. Interestingly, the EOS R6 II isn’t being discontinued (at least, immediately), and instead will be available for a list price of 1,979 / £1,918 / AU$3,099.

The Mark III is essentially slotting in the market between its two major competitors - the Sony A7 V for $2900 / £2800 and the Nikon Z6 III for $2700 / £2500. Of the three, however, it’s worth noting that the Z6 III has been on the market for the longest time and tends to be particularly partial to price cuts. You’ll likely have to wait a while to find an R6 Mark III or Sony A7 V for anywhere near as cheap as Nikon's alternative.

Price score: 4/5

Canon EOS R6 Mark III: Design

New CF-Express Type B card slot
3.69M dot 120Hz OLED EVF
3.0-inch 1.62M dot panel articulating rear display

What can I say about the design of the R6 Mark III? Well, it’s typical Canon, in the most refined and best manner possible. If you’re familiar with the Mark II, the design is essentially identical, with only a few minor tweaks to the buttons surrounding the shutter, a new tally light, and revisions to the mode dial.

Is it boring? Well, it’s certainly sensible. All of the camera’s main functions are laid out in a purposeful and meticulous manner. The thumb, for example, naturally rests next to the back-button focus, an AF joystick, and an autofocus mode quick select. On the top, you have the typical three-way on-off switch, top-mounted dial, and extremely useful M-Fn quick dial menu that are again extremely easy to operate.

All of the above, of course, are fully mappable with the camera’s extensive customization options. A total of nine buttons are fully mapable, so you have plenty of options here for both video and photo applications.

Image 1 of 3

A shot of the R6 Mark III from above, showing the viewfinder housing, hotshoe, and control layout. — The camera is made of a sturdy polymer outer shell with environmental weather sealing (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 3

A shot of the R6 Mark III from the front, showing the RF lens mount and protective shutter. — The R6 Mark III has a protective shutter to keep the sensor clean when no lens is mounted. (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 3 of 3

A shot of the R6 Mark III from above, showing the control layout on the right-hand side of the camera. — The camera retains the classic Canon button control layout (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

If you’re already a Canon shooter, no doubt you’ll be right at home here. My only minor criticism is that I wish Canon would add a second ring/middle finger button on the front of the body next to the grip. It’s something that’s featured on the higher-end Canon bodies, but it’s conspicuously missing from the R6 and R5 line. With such expansive customization features, it would be a fantastic addition to the body in my opinion.

In the hand, the R6 Mark III is sturdy and solid, with a generous grip that pairs well with popular lenses like the 24-70mm f/2.8. As part of the review process, Canon also sent me the EOS R8, and in comparison to the lower-end model, the R6 Mark III is much better suited to the chunkier RF glass. Unlike the feather-weight R8, the R6 Mark III balances well with fast primes like the 20mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.4 - both of which are noticeably front-heavy on the entry-level model.

Image 1 of 2

A shot of the Canon R6 Mark III lined up next to the R6 Mark II. — The Canon R6 Mark III next to the Mark II (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 2

A top-down shot of the R6 Mark III next to the R6 Mark II showing the control layout of both cameras. — The cameras are almost identical, with the only changes being to button graphics, the mode dial, and the addition of a tally light. (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

In terms of viewfinder and display, you get a 3.69M dot 120Hz OLED and 3-inch 1.62M dot panel respectively; both of which are holdovers from the previous model. The R6's displays are bright, relatively wide, and easy to use. No complaints here, although it's worth noting that both the Nikon Z6 III and Sony A7 V do have a slight edge over the R6. In the case of the Nikon, you get a higher-res 5.76M dot EVF, while the Sony A7 V features a 2.1M dot rear display that both articulates and tilts - a handy feature for both stills and video.

For ports, one of the main changes from the second-generation model is that the Mark III now features one CFexpress Type B slot and one UHS-II SD instead of two of the latter. Upgrading to a CFexpress card will incur a slight cost, but you’re going to need it if you want to record Raw video internally or make full use of the uncapped 40fps burst rate. Videographers will also be pleased to note that the Mark III now features a full-size HDMI port rather than the MicroHDMI on the previous iteration.

Image 1 of 3

Canon EOS R6 Mark III — The R6 Mark III now features a CF-Express Type B card slot (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

The R6 Mark III now utilizes the newer LP-E6P battery from the R5 Mark II. The older LP-E6NH batteries are still technically supported, but you'll need to use the newer iteration to fully unlock all the R6 Mark III's features. In this case, smartphone connectivity and the full array of 6K open-gate video modes.

Note that the R6 Mark III's battery is rated for 270 shots with the viewfinder and 510 with the rear screen. On paper, that's significantly lower than the Sony Alpha A7 V's rating of 630 / 750 shots respectively. I wouldn't say battery life is particularly poor, however. In real-world testing, I found the battery life to be far better than the ratings would suggest, with more than enough juice for a full day of stills photography. Videographers may want to pack a second battery just in case, though.

Design score: 5/5

Canon EOS R6 Mark III: Performance and features

Reliable autofocus for stills and video
Registered People Priority mode
7K footage at 30p ‘open-gate’

The R6 Mark III is interesting in that it lacks a few of the high-end features from the R5 II like the ability to control the focus point with your eye, in-camera 'AI' upscaling, and Action Priority modes. What it does offer, however, is rock-solid performance for a vast range of both photo and stills applications.

As the ‘enthusiast’ level body in the range, the R6 has a lot of ground to cover, but it essentially achieves the mark on all counts. Using the camera, is again, a very refined experience in terms of operation and ease-of-use.

For example, the R6’s autofocus performance is accurate and reliable even with fully automated operation. A simple press of the ‘set’ button will engage subject tracking, which is easily one of the ‘stickiest’ I’ve ever used on a camera. Even without the advanced bells and whistles of the R5, the R6 Mark III is exceptional at both subject tracking and detection.

There were only a few rare occasions when the autofocus missed the mark. For example, a case in a relatively dimly-lit room where the camera failed to focus on my parents’ cat’s eyes. This subject, with his black coat, is notoriously difficult to photograph. Even specifically engaging the R6 MIII’s animal detection mode gave me a few examples where the camera focused on his ears or whiskers rather than his eyes.

Another extreme example was a moving human target in a low-light situation. Even with a high-contrast backlit scene the camera slightly missed the mark when shooting with a 20mm prime fully wide open at f/1.4.

Image 1 of 3

A low-light scene where a woman's face is backlit by a circular blue window with fluorescent lighting. — The R6 Mark III slightly forward-focused in this extreme low-light scene at f/1.4. (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 3

A portrait shot of a black cat's face — The camera ever-so-slightly missed focus on the cat's eye in this scene at f/2.8, instead focusing on the ear. (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 3 of 3

Are these fair use cases? Well, certainly they are extreme situations where any camera would be tested. By most accounts, the R6 Mark III’s autofocus is still one of the best I’ve ever used on any camera.

We’re reaching a point now where all major camera brands have excellent out-of-the-box autofocus performance on reasonably priced bodies, but Canon does still have a few unique tricks. The Registered People Priority mode, for example, is the closest thing to a 'killer-app' I've seen on an enthusiast-level camera.

As a brief overview, this feature allows you to map autofocus tracking to specific faces, with the idea that the camera will prioritize them even in crowded scenarios. If you have a reference shot like a group headshot, then the camera detects and allows you to pick a specific face via the RPP mode.

During my testing, I didn't have a scenario where I could really stress-test this feature with large groups. In small groups of two to three people, however, the tracking was reliable. Overall, the Registered People Priority mode definitely has the potential to be a useful feature for certain scenarios, like event or wedding photography.

Canon EOS R6 Mark III video modes
Aspect / Mode	Dimensions	Frame rates
3:2 / 7K RAW	6960 x 4640	30, 25, 24, 23.98
3:2 / 7K Compressed	6912 x 4608	30, 25, 24, 23.98
1.89:1 / 7K	6960 x 3672	60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98
1.89:1 / DCI 4K	4096 x 2160	120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98
1.89:1 / DCI 2K	2048 x 1080	180, 150, 120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98
16:9 / UHD 4K	3840 x 2160	120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98
16:9 / Full HD	1920 x 1080	180, 150, 120, 100, 60, 50, 48, 30, 25, 24, 23.98

In terms of video, the R6 Mark III features an impressive array of recording options. There's not only the option for oversampled 4K up to 120p, but 7K footage at 30p ‘open-gate’ on the camera’s native 3:2 aspect ratio. For maximum post-production flexibility, there’s the option to shoot in Canon’s proprietary Cinema Raw format or the brand’s Clog 2 or Clog 3 profiles.

If all these features look familiar, it’s because the R6 Mark III shares the same sensor and bones as the Canon EOS C50. Unlike its video-centric sibling, however, the R6 doesn’t feature an in-built fan, so you will face restricted recording times for the heavier open-gate and 7K capture modes. That's also a key advantage of the rival Panasonic S1 II, alongside support for 120p at 4K.

One other upgrade for the Mark III is the camera’s overall burst-rate performance. While the camera lacks the Action Priority autofocus mode from the higher-end Canon bodies, it manages to retain the 12fps mechanical / 40fps e-shutter burst rates from the previous model despite the significant jump in resolution. You’ve still got the helpful inclusion of pre-burst capture here, but unlike the Mark II, the III doesn’t feature a standalone “Raw Burst mode” to enable it. It’s instead now integrated into the standard drive mode menu.

Performance score: 5/5

Canon EOS R6 Mark III: Image quality

33MP resolution (up from 24MP)
Pleasing, warm colors
Sharp video with flexible profiles

The Canon R6 Mark III is somewhat unusual in its peer group in that its sensor is neither back-side-illuminated nor ‘stacked’ like rivals from Sony or Nikon. It's an interesting distinction because rivals have long trumpeted the various advantages of these additions in a world where sensor development has seemingly slowed in recent years.

On paper, a stacked sensor does enable faster readout speeds, whereas a back-side-illuminated sensor should, in theory, give you cleaner images at high ISO. Recent testing has even proven that the Sony A7 V and Panasonic S1 II have slightly better ISO invariance than the Canon R6 Mark III thanks to dual-gain readouts.

So, does the Mark III lag behind the competition in terms of image quality? I'd have a hard time believing so. Based on real-world testing, I've found the camera to produce consistently excellent stills.

Out in the wild, I imagine the differences between all of these cameras is likely to be so minimal that you'd almost certainly not notice outside of incredibly niche use cases. It certainly shouldn't be the main deciding factor behind these cameras; ergonomics, video features, and available lenses are all much more important.

Image 1 of 4

A wide-angle shot of Bristol Harbour taken at sunset — Original shot, RAW, shot with the RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 4

Image 3 of 4

A wide-angle shot of St Nick's market in Bristol, showing market stands and the building's large central skylight. — Another RAW example taken with the same 24-70mm f/2.8 lens (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 4 of 4

In terms of dynamic range, for example, you have heaps to work with here. Despite the significant increase in resolution from the previous iteration, the R6 Mark III produces lovely, clean RAW files (and even JPEGs) with ample headroom.

On several test shots, I was able to salvage significant details from a scene without much color cast or noise. Zooming in, noise is certainly still present, but it's relatively well controlled and very much in line with other modern full-frame bodies.

In low light the R6 Mark III handles exceptionally well, too. I shot a few hundred images in a local indoor amusement park that features a host of strobe and fluorescent lighting. It's the kind of environment that not only tests autofocus to the extreme, but often results in strange colors that are a nightmare to post-process.

When I pull up the files from the R6 Mark III, colors are well captured, even at ISO 10,000 and over. The first example in the gallery below was shot at that ISO, and the colors are absolutely spot-on for the scene, despite there being noise present in some of the shadows. Again, the R6 Mark III is an extremely capable stills camera in real-world testing.

Image 1 of 6

Scene with three fluorescent desk lamps arranged in a line with an industrial fluorescent backdrop. — RAW sample shot, ISO 10,000, taken with RF 20mm f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 6

Image of an optical illusion in a theme park, where a series of books is arranged to look like an infinite tunnel. — RAW sample shot, ISO 1,250, taken with RF 20mm f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 3 of 6

Scene from an indoor theme park, where various objects are arranged in a post-industrial scene with low light — RAW sample shot, ISO 320, taken with RF 20mm f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 4 of 6

Scene from an indoor theme park, where a large face is being projected with distortion onto a fluorescent backdrop. — RAW sample shot, ISO 640, taken with RF 20mm f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 5 of 6

Scene from an indoor theme park, where a room features various lines and shapes to form a large optical illusion. — RAW sample shot, ISO 200, taken with RF 20mm f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 6 of 6

An indoor scene where various objects are laid out in a steam punk style scene, including paper notes, clocks, books, and various mechanical contraptions. — RAW sample shot, ISO 1,600, taken with RF 20mm f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Briefly touching on resolution; the upgrade from 24MP to 33MP does give you a nice bump in cropping potential without resulting in massive file sizes. Arguably, 24MP is still more than enough for most use cases, but 33MP is definitely a 'nice to have'. I certainly appreciated the little bit extra when cropping all the sample images on this page from the camera's native 3:2 to a web-friendly 16:9 format.

Colors are gorgeous, too. Even with RAW files, the images have a pleasing warmth to them without being overbearing. Skin tones look great straight from the camera, and in all cases, the files were great to work on in Adobe Lightroom.

In the gallery below, you can see a selection of RAW files. The opening shots are tweaked in Lightroom to my own tastes, whereas the following portrait shots show you both RAW files and a few of the camera's built-in JPEG profiles.

Image 1 of 10

A scene of Bristol Harbour, with a boat in the foreground — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 2 of 10

Shot of an ornate building in Bristol, UK — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 3 of 10

Shot of a large graffiti dog on the side of a building in Bristol, UK — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 4 of 10

Shot of the old harbour cranes in Bristol, UK — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 5 of 10

Shot of St Nick's market in Bristol UK, showing food stands and the building's skylight. — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 6 of 10

Shot of St Nick's market in Bristol, UK, showing various stands and signs — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 7 of 10

Outside shot of a pub in Bristol, with a bench and multi-coloured phone box painted in rainbow colours. — RAW edited to taste in Lightroom, taken with RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 8 of 10

A portrait shot of a man, with a close-up of his face — An example of a RAW file from a studio scene, taken with the RF 24-70mm f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 9 of 10

Three portait headshots of a man, with different JPEG profiles, arrayed next to each other — An example of a RAW file, next to the camera's 'Vivid' and 'Warm' JPEG profiles (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

Image 10 of 10

Three identical vertical shots of an abandoned building, arrayed next to each other to showcase the Canon R6 Mark III's different JPEG profiles. — Examples of the camera's black-and-white, 'Vivid', and 'Warm' JPEG profiles (Image credit: Future / Alex Whitelock)

For video, you have a flexible set-up thanks to the R6 Mark III's myriad record modes and support for Clog2 and Clog3 formats. Of the two, the former gets you a flatter image with the most dynamic range possible for color grading, while the latter offers a more saturated and clean image for quick and easy editing. In either case, you can upload your own LUTs to the camera, and white balance can also be set in video mode, which was a common annoyance with the previous model.

As you'd imagine with a body that shares the same sensor as the Canon EOS C50, the R6 Mark III captures excellent footage. In my testing, I mostly used Canon's proprietary Canon 709 standard color profile (non-flattened), and the 4K footage in particular was fantastic. Colors were rich but true-to-life, the image was detailed, and there was plenty of dynamic range.

For an easy video workflow, there is very little to fault the R6 Mark III on. Even if you're a video-heavy hybrid shooter, don't overlook the Mark III in favor of the C50. You get a great video toolkit here with the added benefit of image stabilization and a mechanical shutter for stills.

Image quality score: 4.5/5

Canon EOS R6 Mark III: testing scorecard

Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Price	The R6 Mark III is well priced considering the level of performance. That said, it is pricier than the previous iteration, and it sits within a competitive field.	4/5
Design	The R6 Mark III is almost identical to the previous iteration. It's a super design, however, with fantastic ergonomics and customization.	5/5
Performance	Autofocus is superb for both stills and video. IBIS works admirably. Registered People Priority is a genuinely useful feature.	5/5
Image quality	Great straight-out-of-camera files for both stills and video. Flexible RAWs, and a huge array of video formats for both casual and professional use.	4.5/5

Should I buy the Canon EOS R6 Mark III?

Buy it if...

You're already invested in the Canon RF mount

Those already invested in the eco-system will absolutely love the R6 Mark III. It sits in a competitive field, but if you already have plenty of RF glass, then you're getting a lot of camera for your money here.View Deal

You shoot stills, with a bit of video

The Canon R6 Mark III is perfect if you're primarily a photographer but also need an easy video workflow. You get everything you need here for excellent results.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You need advanced video options

With that said, if you're primarily a videographer, you may want to consider the Canon EOS R50 or Panasonic S1 II. Both include longer recording times thanks to internal fans. View Deal

You're on a budget

If you need a powerful hybrid camera but want to save some cash, there are strong rival options right now. The Nikon Z6 III, for example, undercuts the R6 Mark III on price. Even the older R6 Mark II is still available and offers a viable alternative without the newer bells and whistles.View Deal

Also consider

Sony A7 V

As if on cue, Sony released the Alpha A7 V just one month after the R6 Mark III. In comparison, the A7 V is a little pricier than the R6 and doesn't have options for open gate video. It does, however, have a much more diverse lens ecosystem and innovative dual-gain ISO read-out thanks to its partially stacked sensor, which gives a slight edge in stills dynamic range.

Read our in-depth Sony A7 V review

Nikon Z6 III

Nikon's all-rounder, the Z6 III also features a partially stacked sensor, but with a resolution of just 24MP. That said, video recording is up to 6K 60p, and the Z6 III is blazing fast, also being supported by powerful in-body image stabilization. Launched in July 2024, it has come down in price and can be had for much less than the Canon EOS R6 Mark III.

Read our in-depth Nikon Z6 III review

How I tested the Canon EOS R6 Mark III

I tested a full production model
I used several lenses, including the RF 24-105mm f/4 kit lens
Samples were shot in a diverse range of environments, including low light
Subject detection was tested using real-world situations

Canon loaned me the R6 Mark III alongside the R8, R6 Mark II, and several lenses for an extensive three-week period. In that time, I was fully able to test the camera in a range of scenarios for both stills and video.

As an overview, the lenses used include the RF 20mm f/1.4, the RF 85mm f/1.4, the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L, and the RF 24-105mm f/4 - the latter of which is available as a kit lens for the R6 III. All of the above image samples on this page were taken with these lenses in various scenarios, including both mid-day and difficult low-light environments.

First reviewed December 2025

I’ve already played Star Wars Outlaws on PS5, but Gold Edition makes it worth revisiting on Nintendo Switch 2

4:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Consoles & PC Gadgets Gaming Nintendo | Tags: Nintendo Switch, Star Wars | Comments: Off

Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition is an excellent version of the 2024 open-world Star Wars game. It runs incredibly well overall, with a frame rate that rarely dips below its 30 frames per second (fps) target while also pushing some impressive ray tracing effects. It might just be the best Nintendo Switch 2 port that we’ve seen yet, especially considering the fact that the original release would sometimes stutter on more powerful hardware like the PlayStation 5.

Review info

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: Nintendo Switch 2, PS5, Xbox Series X and Series S, PC
Release date: September 4, 2025 (Nintendo Switch 2)

The value proposition of this version is also off the charts. Rather than its usual Standard Edition, Deluxe Edition, Gold Edition, and Ultimate Edition release strategy, Ubisoft has opted to include all the Gold Edition content out of the gate for anyone buying on Nintendo Switch 2.

This means you get the full season pass with two substantial new story chapters that take a total of about 10 hours to beat. Oodles of cosmetics for protagonist Kay Vess and her companion Nix are also included, plus the short pre-order bonus Jabba’s Gambit mission.

While I could lament the fact that the handful of cosmetics from the Ultimate Pack haven’t been thrown in too (though they are still purchasable separately via the eShop if you want them), this is still an incredible amount of content that encompasses all the major DLC additions since launch.

It’s an easy sell at the asking price of $59.99 / £49.99 / AU$89.95 (or even less on sale) when you consider that the Gold Edition costs $109.99 / £104.99 / AU$169.95 on other platforms.

I find your lack of faith… disturbing

A screenshot of Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition on Nintendo Switch 2. — (Image credit: Ubisoft)

Everything we loved in our original Star Wars Outlaws review rings true for this newer version.

If you’re a fan of the Star Wars universe, then you’re going to love the peerless faithfulness of this adaptation. As an intergalactic rogue forced to go on the run after a heist gone wrong, you explore a series of large open-world planets as you gradually put together a crew and navigate relationships with some of the galaxy’s most notorious criminal clans.

Set between The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi films, familiar locations like the desert plains of Tatooine are wonderfully represented and seamlessly presented alongside new additions like the sandy Toshara Moon or dense jungle world of Akiva.

Best bit

The five planets of Star Wars Outlaws are all a fan’s dream. It includes the perfect mix of nostalgic favorites like Tatooine alongside some more interesting and beautiful inclusions like the snowy world of Kijimi.

Everywhere you explore looks superb on Nintendo Switch 2, especially in handheld mode. On the console’s 1080p screen, it appears delightfully crisp and, although the quality of 3D models does take a small hit, the overall experience feels about on par with that of an Xbox Series S, which is a very impressive result.

In some regards, it actually looks better here than on the Series S, with improved ray-tracing effects in interior environments. Wandering around the densely populated city of Mirogana early in the game, the lighting effects appear rich and complex. Locations are crafted with a high level of detail throughout the game, and I’m glad that the enjoyment of occasionally stopping to soak it all in and pore over every small element of a space hasn’t been lost in the jump over to less talented hardware.

Things do fare a little worse when the system is docked, though. Playing on a 4K TV, I noticed upscaling was used very liberally, which lends certain areas quite a blurry look. Anywhere with lots of plants, for example, tends to look rather fuzzy, and Kay’s hair suffers from some noticeable aliasing. The pop-in in the open world becomes more noticeable in docked mode, too. When you’re zooming around on your speeder, you’ll regularly see little bushes or shadows appearing in the distance - but you get used to this very quickly.

More powerful than you could possibly imagine

If you’ve experienced Star Wars Outlaws on another platform, then you’ll also need to acclimatize to the frame rate when jumping over to the Nintendo Switch 2 version. It's locked to 30fps here, a change that was especially noticeable as I compared the game with its PS5 port side by side.

When you’re actually playing, it is less apparent, though, and developers Massive Entertainment do deserve some serious credit when it comes to just how well Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition maintains that frame rate target.

Stutters are extremely rare, and I only noticed them starting to crop up in moments of very intense action with multiple explosions, many enemies on screen, moving vehicles, and the like, all at once. Importantly, the experience is never rendered unplayable, and I think the odd hiccup is a worthwhile trade-off for the opportunity to dip in and out of this game on the go.

I’ve been playing Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition sporadically since it launched back in September, and I did initially experience a few unexpected crashes in longer play sessions. With time, these seem to have been remedied through various patches, though, so those jumping in today can expect a relatively flawless experience.

With all of this said, Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition nets an easy recommendation as one of the best Nintendo Switch 2 games. If you’ve played it before, it’s a joy to re-experience in handheld mode with all the new DLC included. If you’re a newcomer, then you don’t need to worry about suffering a compromised experience due to your choice of hardware.

Should I play Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition on Nintendo Switch 2?

Play it if...

You want a huge open-world experience on the go
Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition offers tens of hours of content that’s wonderful to dip into on the go. With all major DLC included, this is an experience that you’re going to keep coming back to.

You’re a big Star Wars fan
Fans of the Star Wars universe will love the attention to detail of Star Wars Outlaws, all of which has been preserved wonderfully in this brilliant port.

Don't play it if...

You’re sick of open-world games
I enjoy Star Wars Outlaws, but it certainly doesn't reinvent the wheel in terms of Ubisoft open-world games. If you want a more novel experience, pick up something else from the Nintendo Switch 2’s expansive library, like Mario Kart World.

Accessibility features

Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition has a dedicated accessibility menu on Nintendo Switch 2 with a number of useful settings and presets.

By default, the HUD has been scaled up to 150% in handheld mode, with large text size enabled.

There are also four menus designed to address gameplay, cognitive, color, vision, and hearing needs. Color settings can be fully customized, and there is a range of difficulty options.

How I reviewed Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition on Nintendo Switch 2

I played nearly 15 hours of Star Wars Outlaws Gold Edition on Nintendo Switch 2, constantly comparing my experience of the game with that of the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X and Series S versions.

I primarily played in the console’s handheld mode, but also endeavored to spend a few hours in docked mode in order to assess its performance.

Of the two modes, handheld mode is definitely the strongest as the smaller screen does a good job of smoothing over many of the visual cutbacks. While playing in docked mode, I relied on the official Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller.

First reviewed January 2026

I tested the Leica Q3 Monochrom – it’s a top digital camera for black-and-white photography purists

11:00 pm | January 10, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Compact Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: JPEG, RAW | Comments: Off

Leica Q3 Monochrom: two-minute review

Money no object, I'd probably pick the Leica Q3 as my favorite compact camera. It's a fabulous 61MP full-frame camera with an extremely sharp, fixed 28mm f/1.7 wide-angle lens, and the ultimate everyday carry.

I'm also partial to black-and-white photography, especially on sunny days when light and shade are the stars of the show. So it was a delight to kick off 2026 by getting out and about on frosty mornings in the UK, with the low-lying sun illuminating my surroundings and the Leica Q3 Monochrom in my hand – it's identical to the original Q3 in practically every way, except that it only shoots in monochrome.

This camera is as niche as they come, and for many it also begs the question: why would you pick a camera that only takes black-and-white images when you can simply select a black-and-white color profile in a regular camera, like the original Q3, which also shoots in color when you want to? Why restrict yourself? That was the focus of my testing over the course of three weeks with the Q3 Monochrom.

Image 1 of 2

Leica Q3 Monochrom compact camera outside on a snow-dusted log — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 2

For me, the reasons I would opt for a camera like this are twofold – one technical, and one creative. The creative reason is simple: its restricted parameters. I can't switch to color. I'm seeing the real-time image in black and white, and it helps me to truly appreciate light and shade, form and composition.

Shooting in black-and-white can be a great exercise to help you elevate the quality of your photography in general, should you bring color into the equation at other times. You can, however, get this experience with a 'regular' camera by using a black-and-white color profile, so that by itself is not enough reason. The second technical reason is, though – and that's increased light sensitivity.

In simple terms, all sensors in digital cameras see in black and white. To produce color images, a color filter array is placed in front of the sensor, the most common of which is the Bayer pattern with red, green and blue pixels (RGB – with twice the number of green pixels).

The drawback is that a color filter array reduces light sensitivity, leading to an increase in noise and decreased sharpness. In short, it reduces image quality by a small amount, which is seen more clearly in challenging light conditions.

So – and particularly if you mostly like to shoot black-and-white images anyway – a color filter is more of a hinderance than a help. With those image quality drawbacks, it's like watering down juice when you could otherwise enjoy the full flavor straight from the source.

A monochrome-only digital camera offers the purest form of black-and-white photography you'll get from a digital camera; and from my experience with the Q3 Monochrom, there's something a little extra about the quality of the black-and-white images it produces. A subtle improvement, a pleasing grain rather than noise, and filmic quality. Highlight clipping is, however, a major drawback to this kind of sensor.

Yes, the Leica Q3 monochrom is as niche as they come, and it costs a pretty penny too at $7,790 / £5,800 / AU$12,090. But, if you love black-and-white photography, it's the ultimate everyday carry, and one of the best compact cameras around.

Leica Q3 Monochrom: price and availability

Announced on November 20, 2025 and available now
Priced from $7,790 / £5,800 / AU$12,090

Leica unveiled the Q3 Monochrom in November 2025 and it went on sale immediately, costing $7,790 / £5,800 / AU$12,090. That's a mark-up of about 5% over the Q3, which was launched in 2023.

The Q3-series models use the same BP-SCL6 battery, while Leica sells a variety of accessories at its online store, including a leather half case, thumb supports, and carrying straps.

Leica Q3 Monochrom: specs

Leica Q3 Monochrom Specs
Sensor	Stabilized, full-frame
Resolution	61MP
Video	8K
Lens	28mm f/2.8-16
Screen	3.0-inch, 1.84m-dot tilt
Viewfinder	5.76m-dot
Dimensions	130 x 80.3 x 92.6mm
Weight	746g / 662g (with / without battery)
Battery life	300 shots (approx)
Memory	SD (UHS-II)

Leica Q3 Monochrom: design

Same design as the Q3, save for Monochrom logo
Divine lens quality and handling
Awkward tilt touchscreen

The Q3 Monochrom essentially has the same premium, minimalist design as the original Q3, save for its suitably monochromatic logo. That means it operates in exactly the same way as the original model, for good and for bad.

The 28mm lens is the star of the show, not only in terms of the images it produces, but because of how it handles; it's equipped with decent autofocus, but is designed in a way to please manual-focus fans, with autofocus activated via a well-hidden button on the manual-focus ring.

It also looks just like a manual-focus-only lens. There are focus distance markings, and a macro mode that's activated by turning a dial which reveals new focus distance markings – a design masterstroke.

Image 1 of 4

Image 2 of 4

Image 3 of 4

Image 4 of 4

Other design features are the same, too. We have a decent 5.76m-dot viewfinder, plus a crisp 1.84m-dot tilt touchscreen. I'm not a fan of the tilt design, though – it protrudes from the back of the camera and it's awkward to grip and pull out for waist-level shooting. For the next Q installment, Leica should take notes from Fujifilm and others.

Every touch screams premium quality, from the knurled control dials with just the right amount of resistance, to the pop-out battery and the viewfinder's pop-out diopter adjustment. The memory card door design could do with a little tweaking because it feels like one weak point, but quality-wise I can't otherwise fault the Q3 Monochrom.

Image 1 of 6

Image 2 of 6

Image 3 of 6

Image 4 of 6

Image 5 of 6

Image 6 of 6

For a deeper dive into the design of the Leica Q3 Monochrom, check out my Leica Q3 review.

Leica Q3 Monochrom: features and performance

High-resolution 61MP sensor with digital crop modes
Reasonable autofocus performance and precise manual focus
Average battery life

There's no change from the original Q3 regarding features or performance, either, save for the monochrome-only images, which is what I'll double down on in this section.

To summarize the other aspects first, the Q3 Monochrom's startup time is rapid, battery life is average at best, autofocus accuracy and speed are good, while in-body image stabilization performance is only okay, but certainly welcome in a camera capable of capturing such high-resolution photos.

And with 61MP to play with there's huge scope for cropping into images to emulate the look of tighter lenses – a feature that can be accessed directly using one of the two buttons above the LCD screen (the gallery below shows a selection of digitally cropped images using the maximum in-camera crop setting, then the full un-cropped version for comparison). The other button above the LCD switches from stills to video, with 8K video recording once again present.

Image 1 of 8

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: branch overhanging a frozen lake — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 8

Image 3 of 8

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: tree on the horizon — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 8

Image 5 of 8

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: an old church — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 6 of 8

Image 7 of 8

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: an elevated viewpoint of a common — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 8 of 8

The macro setting of the lens reduces its close-focusing distance, making it possible to capture flowers and other small subjects in exquisite detail – that's another string to the bow of the Q3 series (see the gallery directly below).

I also love how the maximum aperture of the lens is nice and bright at f/1.7. Pair that with the image stabilization, and Q3 cameras feel more versatile overall than the stunning Fujifilm GFX100RF, even if that camera has an even sharper lens – check out my Q3 vs GFX100RF real-world test to see how those premium compacts compare.

The 28mm lens also produces some of the crispest sunstars I've seen (check out the backlit tree image two galleries down); again, for more details, check out the Q3 review.

Image 1 of 7

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: gauze closeup — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 7

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: closeup of frost-covered heather — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 3 of 7

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: closeup of frost-covered ferns — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 7

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: closeup of frost-covered grass — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 5 of 7

Image 6 of 7

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: long fine grass — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 7 of 7

Now, let's get on to black-and-white image quality. Firstly, there are three main monotone profiles to choose from: natural (which is the profile I used for most of this review), plus a sepia and a blue-tone look.

I was surprised and disappointed to see how limited the customization options are for these profiles, though. For example, contrast can be tweaked for these presets, but you can't apply a filter effect, as you can to, say, Fujifilm and Ricoh alternatives.

That said, it's possible to upload LUT profiles to the camera from the Leica app for other creative styles, or of course attach a physical filter to the 28mm lens. I like using an orange filter to create dramatic skies with an infrared-type look, while a green filter can emphasize skin tones.

Image 1 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: gnarled trees in a common — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 10

Image 3 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: gnarled trees in a common, sunstars — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: children stepping onto a frozen pond — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 5 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: old church — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 6 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: old door with a wreath — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 7 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: street of old buildings — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 8 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: Christmas tree in Lond onstreet — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 9 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: toy soldier in London street — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 10 of 10

I've taken photos with the Q3 Monochrom in a wide range of scenarios, shooting all images in RAW (DNG) and JPEG. When comparing the two, the natural profile brightens shadows, at the cost of rich contrast.

In all images detail is seriously sharp, with a pleasing fine grain – kind of like an ISO 50 film photography feel.

Image 1 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: smokehouse sign, at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: outside a hotel at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 3 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: bus windows misted up — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: boy playing football in urban street — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 5 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: commuter on the underground looking at thier phone — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 6 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: drink being poured into a glass — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 7 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: man's selfie — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 8 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: a horse — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 9 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: hotel hallway — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 10 of 10

Leica Q3 Monochrom sample gallery: phone line mast — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Sadly, I didn't have the original Q3 at the same time as the Q3 Monochrom to make direct comparisons. However, I have prior experience for such comparisons, and so I know that images shot in black-and-white on a color camera have more pronounced noise, and detail is slightly softer.

I've since done a little research, and found that YouTuber Florian Froschmayer has posted a really useful video which shows the ins and outs for each Q3 model, with comparisons that back up my experience.

His video also hammers home a major warning for using a monochrome-only digital camera: highlight clipping is unforgiving. If you were to overexpose an image – that is, with highlights blown out – you wouldn't be able to recover this detail to nearly the same extent as with a color model, like the original Q3.

Already knowing this, I factored in underexposing when shooting with the Q3 Monochrom. To a degree, this approach can offset the image-quality benefits of its better light sensitivity, but the fact remains that its images are sharper and cleaner than the Q3's when viewed closely. If you're into black-and-white photography, with a good handle on exposure, the Q3 Monochrom's black-and-white image quality exceeds the Q3's.

Should I buy the Leica Q3 Monochrom?

Buy it if...

You want a pure black-and-white digital photography experience
No color, clean detail and filmic quality – the Q3 Monochrom is for black-and-white photography purists.

You love camera design
I've reviewed the Q3 and the Q3 Monochrom extensively and I adore their premium design and quality, especially the stunning lens and how it handles.

Don't buy it if...

You want a versatile digital camera
Not only is color photography out of the picture, but the Q3 Monochrom is a compact camera with a fixed 28mm wide-angle lens.

It'll be your main camera
The Q3 Monochrom is an extravagance, a back-up for the times you fancy something a little different to your main camera. And for that reason its lofty asking price is hard to swallow – I'm personally keeping my eye out for the upcoming Ricoh GR IV Monochrome instead.

Also consider

Leica Q3

If you're not all-in for black-and-white photography, the image-quality improvements the Q3 Monohcrom delivers are hardly justifiable when you consider the greater versatility of the Leica Q3, which also shoots in color, has a greater ceiling for highlight recovery, and costs less.

Read my Leica Q3 review

How I tested the Leica Q3 Monochrom

Leica loaned me the Q3 Monochrom for three weeks
I used it as my everyday carry, shooting images in a variety of scenarios
I shot all images in RAW and JPEG, and used the macro setting and all focus modes

I spent three weeks using the Leica Q3 Monochrom as my primary camera, shooting all photos in RAW and JPEG. I've used the macro setting for close-up photography, tested the digital crop mode, and swapped between manual and autofocus modes.

When editing, I've looked at shadow and highlight recovery, and taken a close look at the quality of detail, especially in low-light photos where this type of sensor excels.

First reviewed January 2026

I can’t stop playing Assassin’s Creed Shadows on Nintendo Switch 2 now it no longer crashes all the time

5:30 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Consoles & PC Gadgets Gaming Nintendo | Tags: Nintendo Switch | Comments: Off

Assassin's Creed Shadows is hands-down one of the best Assassins Creed games of the last decade, but does it run well on the Nintendo Switch 2?

The short answer is "Yes, but...", because it's hard to call this particular port an all-round win. At launch, my answer would have been "No", as I was plagued by hard crashes and constant frame rate fluctuation that made the game near unplayable.

Review info

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, PC, Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: December 2, 2025 (Nintendo Switch 2)

Thankfully, Ubisoft has bucked the trend in more ways than one with Assassin's Creed Shadows. Not only did the Switch 2 port land mere months after the game's console release, but a major patch arrived just two weeks later, fixing a vast majority of the game-breaking issues. I'm reviewing the (now broadly) fixed port, so I won't languish on those early problems too much.

We reviewed the game itself earlier this year, scoring it an impressive 4.5/5 for its rich combat system, ample content, and dual-protagonist system, and all of these highlights naturally carry across to the Switch port.

The story pacing is a little slow in places, and as Managing Editor Rob Dwiar noted, it peters out the further you get along in Naoe and Yasuke's journey, but broadly speaking, it's a brilliant game worth picking up. If you want our full thoughts on the game's story, combat system and beyond, check out our original review.

Performance, on the other hand, is naturally very different on Nintendo’s hybrid handheld console, and concerns over whether the Switch 2 could handle such a meaty game – especially in handheld mode – were clearly justified. Still, I'm impressed.

No man left behind

Assassin's Creed Shadows — (Image credit: Ubisoft)

Shadows is the first Assassin's Creed game to really capture my interest since Black Flag. However, being a Nintendo fan can spell disappointment when it comes to ports; not only do you have to wait longer for a well-optimized version, but the optimization process can also involve removing some content.

With this Switch 2 port, however, you get full access to the game in its entirety (barring, as of writing, the DLC) as well as cross-save, meaning you can pick up where you left off on your PS5, Xbox, or gaming PC.

You do benefit from a few further features fit for the Switch 2's form factor - and, contain your excitement, that means touchscreen menus. Of course, the real benefit is being able to crack your way through the game's many side quests and explorable regions without being glued to your TV or desktop.

Best bit

Assassin's Creed Shadows is a massive game with plenty to explore and do. This makes it a great fit for playing on the go, as it's perfect to dip in and out of.

More than this, though, some elements of the game have been revamped to suit the Switch 2, and the game makes great use of the console's hardware. Switching from docked to handheld mode is seamless, with automatic UI adjustments for easy transitions, for example.

Impressively, the Nintendo Switch 2 can convincingly render 16th-century Feudal Japan in great detail despite the obvious hardware limitations, achieving this feat with clever optimizations for both handheld and docked modes. In fact, having experienced how bad it could be pre-patch, I can appreciate all the more the ways Ubisoft has crammed this massive, sprawling game into such a small package.

A downgrade, but no downer

In part, that's thanks to Nvidia's Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) technology, which works to upscale lower resolution images in the background. Although capped at 30fps, the game remains highly immersive and visually stunning, especially now that this framerate is more stable post-patch.

Where pre-patch, dense areas and busy combat could lead to huge stutters and even forced ejection to the menu, the game now runs impressively smoothly, though I wouldn't quite go as far as to call it buttery. You'll still occasionally find loading into a new area a bit choppy, and loading screens themselves can be quite intensive on the system.

You're obviously not getting the fidelity of a more powerful console like the PS5 Pro's Ray Tracing tech, but all things considered, the world is rich and immersive. When you hone in on the finer details, you'll notice the cracks more; the lack of light and shade and textures like water look a little cartoonish, crowds of NPCs are thinner, the level of detail in distant objects is lower, and the movements of clothing and facial expressions all suffer a little, but it isn't enough to prevent you from enjoying the game overall.

Docked and handheld mode respectively.

There are more glaring issues that break immersion, like the occasional pop-in and anti-aliasing shimmer. In docked mode, these feel more offensive, but Assassin's Creed Shadows really shines in handheld mode, where the smaller screen can compensate for the game's overall quality, plus a dedicated algorithm keeps variable refresh rate (VRR) enabled even at 30 FPS, according to developers.

Despite this, and that I preferred playing in handheld mode overall, the game can be almost blurry at times, and you'll most certainly notice the difference in the level of detail.

Fundamentally, all the moments that really matter in an Assassin's Creed game stick the landing in the post-patch version of the game; combat is snappy and rewarding, unlocking vantage points oozes grandeur and marvel, and naturally, the world is a delight to explore on foot, too.

If you're coming across from a more powerful console, prepare for an adjustment period, but if it's your first time playing Assassin's Creed Shadows, you may come away thinking that's how the game was always meant to play, and that's a real testament to a well-made port.

Should you play Assassin's Creed Shadows on Nintendo Switch 2?

Play it if...

You want a huge open-world AC game to sink hours into
Shadows is the next big Assassin’s Creed game and if you’ve been after another experience like that of Odyssey or Valhalla then Shadows will not disappoint with its large world and the amount of things to do.

You’ve been pining for a Feudal Japan setting for Assassin’s Creed
The wait for Assassin’s Creed to take the adventure to Feudal Japan has been absolutely worth it. The landscapes, characters, and history of the place are perfect for the series and Shadows capitalizes on that well.

You enjoy different combat playstyles
If you’re an action-adventure fan who likes to constantly mix things up in combat or have multiplayer playstyle options, then those offered by Naoe and Yasuke could scratch quite the itch.

You want an open-world game with rewarding exploration
Shadows shakes up the series’ traditional exploration and offers something far more nuanced, immersive, and rewarding. Nothing is fed to you, and areas aren’t suddenly filled after reaching viewpoints; the world entices you to explore it and the satisfaction of doing it is excellent.

Don't play it if...

You prefer the smaller Assassin’s Creed adventures
Assassin’s Creed Mirage this is not, and if you prefer the more focused, small-scale adventures that the series has been known for in the past, then Shadows might be a bit overwhelming.

You don’t want to devote hours to resource-gathering and location completing
While there’s so much to do across Shadows’ landscapes, you’ll need to spend a good while gathering resources to get the most out of the hideout mode and complete a lot of minigames and locations to unlock the top skills.

Accessibility

Ubisoft’s modern suite of strong accessibility options is available in Assassin’s Creed Shadows. There are multiple difficulty levels (all of which are described in full) that affect combat and stealth, and you can also change the game to have one-hit assassinations. If you want to make exploration easier, you can turn on guidance for that to make discovery more straightforward.

There are options to change or turn off graphic effects such as blood, as well as alter the camera, and change inputs for actions. There are also plenty of options for subtitles, text size, background color for text, and language options. The game also features modes to cater to Red-Green and Blue-Yellow colorblindness.

How I reviewed Assassin's Creed Shadows on Nintendo Switch 2

I've spent 20 hours in Assassin’s Creed Shadows on Nintendo Switch 2, comparing my experience against that of our original reviewer and Xbox Series X performance to assess how well optimized the game is for the console.

In that time, I explored vast swathes of feudal Japan, engaged in plenty of combat sequences, developed my hideout and progressed through the storyline to make my comparisons.

I reviewed Assassin’s Creed Shadows on my Nintendo Switch 2 in both handheld and docked mode using a Corsair Void Max Wireless v2 headset and through the Switch 2 speakers.

First reviewed January 2026

I tested the Dezctop Revon Elite – a quality standing desk with modular organization and accessories like I haven’t seen before

3:15 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

At first glance, you could hardly call the Revon Elite by Dezctop the best standing desk I've reviewed. But don't let first impressions fool you.

Once you factor in the unique leg shape and the magnetic DivMag accessories, you get yourself a unique desk that holds its own. From there, the potential really starts to open up.

For instance, it could be uniquely positioned as a desk for co-working, giving the natural divide from one workspace to another with the DivMag accessory. It's well placed, fact, to help add a level of organization, order, and structure that I just don't see on many of today's standing desks.

Decztop Revon Elite: Price and availability

Dezctop | Revon Elite — (Image credit: Collin Probst // Future )

The Revon Elite ranges from $610 - 740 depending on the size and style you choose, available from the official Decztop website and Amazon.com.

There's a heavy focus on modularity here with the DivMag accessory kit. While the panels themselves are proprietary, the metal plates allow for any magnet to stick to it, so you don’t have to just buy their trays and cups, though Dezctop does have plenty of accessories available.

Decztop Revon Elite: Unboxing and First Impressions

The Revon Elite was a pretty simple install. It has two main boxes: one with the legs and basic accessories, and the other with the desktop itself. Each box has pretty good packaging, keeping things secure and safe in transit. Thankfully, I didn’t get any dents or scratches on my unit; it came in perfect condition. It was unique in the order of some of the leg and frame assembly, but not in a negative way, just interesting.

Another thing that I noticed right away is how easy it would be to swap out some parts to make for a more customized version if I wanted. The wooden plates in the legs are easily swappable if you want to make some custom combinations. Though, fun fact, I had to go digging to find these faceplates for the legs, as they were buried in the boxes since I wasn’t looking for them.

Overall, assembly took me about 45 minutes on my own. The process was about 70% similar to every other desk setup, with a few unique cases when attaching the frame to the desktop. But then again, unless you build desks regularly, this isn’t something anyone else would probably even notice as odd. There are easy-to-follow assembly instructions to help those who may not know how to build a desk.

There are some desks that, while building, I can tell feel a bit cheap. And of those who think cheaply, some are trying to be, and some are trying not to be, but either way, certain things are notable right away. With the Dezctop Revon Elite, I feel like these materials are more on par with standard furniture, not just a standing desk. Granted, this could be partly due to the leg shape and the pop in the paneling, but it could also just be the focus of the design.

The last thing I’ll mention in this section is the controller. I’ve seen controllers for a lot of desks, and this one is the most unique. It’s connected via a Network cable and has ports on either end, making it easy to move around and connect wherever needed. For me, I put it on the left side, tucked under the desktop, and on the leg frame.

After the pictures were taken, I also played around with having this controller above the desktop in a super unique setup that I have never been able to do with any other desk. This is only possible because the controller is not mounted but is simply magnetic, and there is a lot of metal in this desk setup. So you could, really easily, put this controller just about anywhere.

Decztop Revon Elite: Design & Build Quality

The unique frame engineering of the Revon Elite provides good front-to-back stability. And, although the leg design is quite prominent, the setup uses a simple C-shaped leg structure.

Another notable feature of this desk is, of course, the hybrid divider/cable management. They are definitely unique, but they can be incredibly useful depending on your use case. They can be used for the simple act of keeping your workspace clean in a bullpen or co-working space (queue flashbacks to that episode of The Office with Jim and Dwight fighting over having things spill over on each other’s desks).

Another way that this desk is helpful is if you just like the cable management below and then perhaps just like the look of the organization tools above, regardless of whether they split the space up or give you defined space, these magnetic panels above the desk can be used with magnetic drawers or hooks to keep an eye on things.

The build quality on this desk feels pretty good, too. It’s not the highest-quality material, but it’s also not meant to be. Not everyone wants a slab of solid walnut for their desktop for many reasons, price being a very prominent one.

However, for those who care about the desk functionality and not having the mast premium solid wide plank, custom real wood panels, this is great. The quality is solid enough to last you a while, all without costing you both kidneys.

Decztop Revon Elite: In use

Specs

Lifting Capacity: 264lbs
Height Range: 25.6–51.2 inches

Day to day, this desk has functioned surprisingly well. I was even able to temporarily use this as a storage desk during the holidays, when I had guests staying in my studio space. It easily held heavy boxes on top and then lift them away with ease.

Afterwards, I was able to get this set up and use it as a desk in my workstation. It’s great for laptop use while you still want some space. I could also see building out a more robust setup. You’d probably want to go with a monitor arm rather than a desk shelf, and once you get that set up, you can use the metallic panels to organize the desk with cups, shelves, pen holders, and more. It's not the only desk to offer this sort of wide-ranging accessories (Vari and Secretlab also offer a range of connected peripherals), but it's certainly one of the strongest uses.

At 6’2” I have a hard time getting all of my desks to reach my ideal height, but the Dezctop Revon Elite met the height I needed without any problems, allowing me to work at my ideal height while standing and sitting. Plus, with the controller’s presets, I can easily jump between my set height and standing at the press of a button rather than having to press and hold a button.

I’m a big fan of cable management. I take great pride in clean setups, even though my desk setups usually have an absurd number of cables, especially the ones I can build out with tons of gear, ready to roll for whatever I may send their way. The Dezctop Revon Elite’s cable management solution actually worked for my desk styling.

While I may not build my most robust setups on here, it can easily handle the average desk and even some pretty robust setups. Depending on how you space out the sections, you can make a pretty sizable tray for cables, bricks, adapters, or other things you have that run your desk, but that you don’t necessarily want showcased on top.

I’ve used this desk in a few ways for testing. I’ve had it work as a single laptop desk for testing some laptops, I’ve thrown a monitor with the standard monitor base on here, I’ve run with a monitor on a monitor arm clamped to the side of the desk, I have had a clear desk and used this just for some unboxing and I’ve had this as a desk that I stored some boxes on for a week as well. So far, this desk has not shown any concerns, no issues, and it’s worked great in all of those scenarios.

Decztop Revon Elite: Final verdict

The Dezctop Revon Elite is a not as well known sleeper desk. It's great for those who want a modular setup, a simple setup, or even a desk that can be flexible over the years or through your days.

Sure, it's not the standard slab of walnut for those who are on the hunt for an aesthetically pleasing desk setup, but, it is a fantastic desk that changes the game a little bit. The modular sections are brilliant and flexible to what you want, where you want it. In fact, if you don't like the metallic panel, you can even take that off to give you just cable management below.

If you like to change up your desk a lot, if you want something that's a little different than every other desk, or if you really like vertical organization and magnets, then you should absolutely check this desk out. It's unique, it's got great potential to grow the ecosystem, and it's a quality desk for a great price.

Image 1 of 23