Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro: Two-minute review
The Antennas Direct CleaStream Max-V Pro is about as powerful an indoor antenna as you can buy. Antenna gain matters for receiving more distant or lower-power broadcast TV stations, and that gain comes from multiple, large elements like those employed in the ClearStream Max-V Pro. Compared to the best indoor TV antennas, this is quite large at about 32 x 17 x 4 inches and is billed by Antennas Direct as an “indoor/outdoor” design, with both a wall-mount bracket and mast-mount hardware included. (No mast is included, but the company has several options available on its website.)
The Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro uses two double-loop UHF elements (the figure-8 shaped things) and a VHF element (the straight horizontal rod) to maximize signal-pulling abilities. All of this must be assembled out of the box, fixed to a central pod that holds a short output-cable “whip” terminated with a standard F-connector. Using supplied longer and shorter screws and plastic stand-offs, this requires only a screwdriver and should be doable by even the un-mechanically minded in 15 minutes or so, though the supplied instructions could be a lot clearer and more detailed.
The payoff, however, is the performance. The ClearStream Max-V Pro pulled in more stations from my semi-rural test location than any other indoor antenna I’ve tried – and that was without a signal amplifier, as none is included in the package. But remember, location and, especially, elevation is everything for antenna performance. My spot is about 700 feet above sea level, with clear line-of-sight to a variety of transmitters to the east, south, and southwest at distances ranging from 17 miles to more than 75 – a very nearly ideal location.
While temporarily set in a second-story window facing southeast, the ClearStream Max-V Pro received 13 main-channel carriers, spanning that full range of distances, for a total of 48 main- and sub-channels combined. And this was with no signal amplifier. When I re-scanned with a ClearStream’s18 dB “Jolt-USB” amp in line ($25, or in a bundle with the antenna, mast, and other extras for $199), these totals went up to 15 and 64 respectively – close to the results delivered by the attic-mounted full-sized, multi-element outdoor-type antenna that normally serves this location.
Of course, the price for this performance is size and bulk, in an antenna that stretches the definition of “indoor” a bit: despite its less-angular, all-black design, the Max-V Pro is going to dominate any wall upon which it’s mounted. (The fact that the supplied wall-mount bracket is plain, unfinished metal doesn’t sweeten the deal much.) And then there’s the actual price: the Max-V Pro is two to three times the cost of typical indoor antennas.
That said, this is an antenna that will bring in nearly as many stations as possible in a far-suburban or fringe/rural location, especially if located higher up in an attic or roof/mast-mount setup. In such installations, an RF signal amplifier to maximize reception and overcome the losses from longer cabling should certainly be considered (ClearStream offers a bundle that adds a short mast, signal amplifier, and splitter for $50 more on its website).
Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro: Price and release date
First available: March 2023
Price: $159.99 ($199.99 with mast and RF amplifier)
The Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro commands a premium price but delivers premium performance, especially when combined with the optional RF amplifier. If you're looking for a less expensive but similarly powerful option specifically for an indoor installation, check out the Antop HD Smart Bar AT-500SBS.
Should you buy the Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro?
Buy it if...
You live in a fringe/suburban or semi-rural location: The ClearStream Max-V Pro offers maximum signal-pulling ability, especially when combined with the optional RF amplifier.
You want an indoor/outdoor antenna: The Max-V Pro is designed to be mounted both indoors and outdoors, though an outdoor installation will require paying extra for the optional hardware package.
Don't buy it if...
You’re on a tight budget: The Max-V Pro’s excellent performance comes at a cost, with even the base package priced considerably higher than other indoor antennas.
You don’t want to see your antenna: This is a large, somewhat bulky and imposing antenna that will be hard to conceal in an indoor location unless you install it in an attic.
Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro review: Also consider
Antop HD Smart Bar AT-500SBS This antenna provides nearly the same performance as the ClearStream Max-V Pro but at a lower price. It's specifically designed for indoor installation and, like the ClearStream Max-V Pro, is large and bulky.
Winegard FlatWave Amped Pro TH-3000 This indoor antenna has a more discreet design than the ClearStream Max-V Pro and provides very good performance over a 60-mile range. At around $110, it's not cheap, but a useful installation app enhances its value.
How I tested the Antennas Direct ClearStream Max-V Pro
Tested at semi-rural location
Compared with powerful "reference" antenna
I test indoor TV antennas at a semi-rural, hilltop location with good elevation and a clear line-of-sight over nearly 360 degrees to TV transmitters ranging from about 15 to about 70 miles. This testing environment gives me the ability to evaluate models catering to a full spectrum of indoor antenna needs.
For the testing process, I first place the antenna high up in a south-facing window and run the tuning process on a TV with an ATSC 3.0 “next-gen TV” tuner. I then record the number of carriers tuned, along with the total number of sub-channels. A powerful inside-the-attic rooftop-type antenna at the same location is also used as a reference for comparison.
How do you improve on one of the outright best cameras, the EOS R5? By making its successor quicker in just about every regard, which is what Canon has managed to do with the new Canon EOS R5 II.
It's a versatile professional camera that captures high-resolution 45MP stills and 8K video like the EOS R5, but with a few new features under the hood that improve overall performance, and an impressive array of video features and high-speed modes.
The sensor resolution stays at 45MP, but it's now a stacked sensor with faster readout that should eliminate rolling shutter distortion, as on the Nikon Z8. Canon says the EOS R5 II (and new flagship EOS R1) boast the fastest sensor readout speed on the market.
We also get what Canon calls a 'DIGIC Accelerator' – which is effectively a new second processor to bolster the DIGIC X and deliver faster processing speeds, resulting in faster burst-shooting speeds, now up to 30fps, that can be sustained for longer, with pre-recording up to 15 frames.
Another major new feature for the line is Eye Control AF (as used in the EOS R3) and the latest version of Canon's Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system, now equipped with what Canon calls deep learning and specific Action Priority modes including basketball, football, and volleyball. The autofocus system is able to recognize and store specific faces and body postures, and predict movement to focus sharply on what's important in the frame.
You could be forgiven for thinking that these new features sound like they should be in a pro sports camera, like the pricier EOS R1 announced on the same day; and indeed they are, so it's majorly impressive that Canon has also added them to a cheaper, all-purpose professional camera like the EOS R5 II.
Canon needed to add in these improvements really, because how else could it improve on the four-year-old EOS R5, a camera which has stood the test of time and remains one of the best cameras for photography?
For a certain type of photographer, though, the EOS R5 II is overkill, and the EOS R5 will do just fine: landscape and portrait photographers, stand down. But if you ever shoot action, or would like a better-equipped video camera, then the EOS R5 II steps in.
It's a faster camera in every way, impressively tracking subjects in high-speed action scenarios. However, I didn't have the older model to compare just how much faster and reliable the EOS R5 II is for action, impressive as the new AF modes appear to be. Image stabilization performance has, at least on paper, been improved too, while there are some intriguing new in-camera AI-powered image-editing tools, of which more later.
Outwardly the EOS R5 II has changed little compared to its predecessor, although I was pleased to see new cooling vents on the underside of the EOS R5 II to minimize overheating, which was a well-publicized criticism of the EOS R5. There are also not one, nor two, but three optional vertical grip accessories to choose from, one of which includes a cooling fan to extend video record times.
There's lots to talk about in the new model, but I've only had a day with a beta version of the EOS R5 II, and I'm still working on a more in-depth full review. For now, my first impressions are highly positive, and the Canon EOS R5 II could be the new full-frame mirrorless camera to beat.
Canon EOS R5 II: release date and price
Body-only price is $4,499 / £4,499 / AU$6,699
Available from August 2024
Three optional grips: Standard BG-R20, battery BG-R20EP and cooling fan CF-R20EP
The Canon EOS R5 II launches with a body-only price of $4,499 / £4,499 / AU$6,699, which is around 10% more than the launch price of the EOS R5. The price difference feels about right allowing for inflation and the new features on offer, although it would have been nice to see it priced a little closer to the EOS R5's launch price to better compete with the Nikon Z8. You can also pick up the EOS R5 II with the 24-105mm F4L lens for $5,699 / £5,799.99 / AU$8,549.
The EOS R5 II is set to be available from August 2024, and there will be no fewer than three optional grips to choose from (prices TBC), which is a first. The Cooling Fan grip improves video record times, but lacks the vertical grip control layout which you can find in the Battery Grip that can extend battery life.
Canon EOS R5 II: design and handling
New blackout-free 5.76m-dot OLED EVF with Eye Control AF
Cooling vents on the underside to minimize overheating
Dual card slots: CFexpress Type B and SD
Canon hasn't tinkered too much with the EOS R5 II design compared to its predecessor, and that's a wise move. It weighs just 26.3oz / 746g, and is a smaller camera than the Nikon Z8 – it's more in line with a Sony A7R V – though you can beef it up with an optional grip to improve the balance with larger lenses. Nonetheless, the EOS R5 II is comfortable in the hand over long sessions shooting with pro lenses, like the 24-70mm F2.8L that I used for most of this hands-on review.
Canon EOS R5 II key specs
Sensor: 45MP full-frame BSI stacked CMOS sensor AF system: Hybrid with phase-detect Dual Pixel Intelligent EVF: 5.76m-dot OLED ISO range: 100 to 51,200 (ISO 50-102,400 extended range) Video: 8K/60fps raw, 4K 120fps, Full HD 240fps LCD: 3.2-inch vari-angle touchscreen, 2.1m-dots Max burst: 30fps (electronic shutter, continuous autofocus) Connectivity: USB-C 3.2, Wi-Fi 6GHz, Bluetooth 5.0 Weight: 656g (body-only), 746g including battery and card
Familiar it may be, the EOS R5 II actually has a few refinements over the EOS R5. The 5.76m-dot viewfinder is new: Canon says it's twice as bright, and it's blackout-free and equipped with Eye Control autofocus that's twice as responsive as on the EOS R3.
If you haven't tried Eye Control AF before, let me tell you: it's brilliant. It tracks your eye as you scan the scene through the viewfinder, and moves the focus point accordingly, pinpointed to where you're looking in the frame.
I initiated the autofocus function with two presets: one for horizontal shooting and the other for vertical, and the EOS R5 II had no problem recognizing my eye. In use, it performed really well, especially in tandem with subject-tracking autofocus.
Image 1 of 3
Image 2 of 3
Image 3 of 3
Build quality is excellent, with a magnesium alloy chassis, weather-sealed exterior, and robust controls. However, I was also testing the new EOS R1 at the same time as the EOS R5 II, and to me the pro sports model had a better feel overall. For example, the control wheel on the EOS R1's rear is nicely dampened and rotates smoothly, making the wheel on the EOS R5 II feel cheaper by comparison.
Filmmakers will appreciate the fact that the EOS R5 II has a full-size HMDI port (the EOS R5 doesn't) and a tally lamp to indicate when you're recording, and key info, such as waveform monitor, can be displayed on-screen.
Image 1 of 7
Image 2 of 7
Image 3 of 7
Image 4 of 7
Image 5 of 7
Image 6 of 7
Image 7 of 7
There are also cooling vents on the camera's underside. We don't have official information as to how much these vents alone improve the EOS R5II's ability to stay cool under heavy use. However, they do work with the optional Cooling Fan grip, and with this installed Canon says you'll get over 120 minutes of continuous video record time without overheating; and Canon will certainly want to avoid any of the overheating dramas that dogged the EOS R5.
Otherwise the EOS R5 II is standard fare for a camera at this price range. You get a typical array of controls that are well laid out, a back-illuminated top-LCD, an AF joystick on the rear, control dials for quick exposure changes, and twin card slots; there's one CFexpress Type B and one SD, and you'll need the former, which is the faster (and pricier) card type, to make the most of the EOS R5 II's high-speed features.
Naturally, there are both mic and headphone ports, plus USB-C for charging. The battery is the existing LP-E6P unit, which delivers up to 640 shots on a full charge, although that number will be a lot higher if you're capturing lots of high-speed bursts.
Image 1 of 4
Image 2 of 4
Image 3 of 4
Image 4 of 4
Canon EOS R5 II: features and performance
Improved in-body image stabilization up to 8.5EV
Refined 'intelligent' dual-pixel AF
Up to 30fps with pre-recording
Proxy recording can speed up video workflow
I had the opportunity to put the EOS R5 II through its paces in various high-speed scenarios, including basketball and breakdancing, rattling off thousands of frames over a relatively short period.
If you're going to be using the EOS R5 II for action you'll want to utilize the faster CFexpress Type B memory card. I was getting fairly short 30fps sequences when using an SD card, and the camera was getting a little warm to touch under heavy use (though that didn't affect performance). CFexpress Type B, on the other hand, lets you shoot for much longer – I'll confirm the numbers in my full review.
Pre-recording is new for the R5 line, and by half-pressing the shutter you can have up to 15 frames prepped before you fully press the shutter – that's up to half a second of additional time to react to the action and start shooting.
Image 1 of 1
Following the hands-on sessions, I put Canon's Product Marketing Manager, John Maurice, on the spot by asking him what Canon thinks is the single most notable improvement in the EOS R5 II over the EOS R5, and he said it was autofocus performance.
Put simply, Canon says the EOS R5 II's autofocus is more intelligent than the EOS R5. The 'intelligent' part of Canon's refined Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system refers to deep-learning technology, colloquially called 'AI autofocus'. There's plenty to get to grips with here: for one thing, the EOS R5 II can register people, and once that person's face is recognized they take priority, plus you have the option to quickly select from multiple registered faces for autofocus tracking using the AF joystick.
The EOS R5 II can store up to 10 faces, ideal for prioritizing the players of one football team, while if you're a wedding photographer, being able to prioritize the bride and groom among many people would be super-handy.
Image 1 of 7
Image 2 of 7
Image 3 of 7
Image 4 of 7
Image 5 of 7
Image 6 of 7
Image 7 of 7
There are also three Action Priority sports modes covering football, basketball and volleyball. Canon says the EOS R5 II recognizes which player has the ball and can prioritize that person, plus it knows various key sporting moves to prioritize, such as a volleyball player spiking.
Intelligent autofocus all sounds highly impressive, but is it any good? I shot basketball as a test scenario and, once I started getting to grips with the settings, was getting virtually every photo in sharp focus where I wanted it, although I can't be sure yet if that success is specifically down to choosing the 'correct' autofocus mode. Was it better with Eye Control AF? Would I get the same results using the 'incorrect' setting? I'll need to do more testing with a full production model to find out for sure. But the bottom line is that my hit ratio of sharp action photos has been staggeringly high.
Canon EOS R5 II: image and video quality
Same 45MP resolution as the EOS R5, but the sensor is quicker
New AI-powered in-camera edits, including upscaling and noise reduction
8K 60p RAW video capture and slow-motion 4K
With speed being the name of the EOS R5 II upgrade game, and the new camera having the same 45MP resolution as the EOS R5, you could be forgiven for thinking that image quality would be essentially the same, despite there being four years between the two models. That might be true for single-shot photography in good light, but the quicker processor and sensor make a difference to image quality in high-speed scenarios. For example, Canon says the stacked sensor minimizes the rolling shutter distortion that can distort movement in photos and videos by up to 40%.
I tried the new in-camera upscaling and Neural Network noise-reduction functions, too. Upscaling works on an existing image, quadrupling its resolution, and when you're shooting 45MP stills already that means a huge 180MP image, or 16,384 x 10,928 pixels. Canon says upscaling is better than the 'high-res shot' modes found in other cameras, which effectively does the same thing but by another means, using pixel shift and rapidly shooting multiple images that are then combined into one larger image.
The problem with high-res shot modes is that images are taken sequentially, and so if there's any movement between those shots you get a ghosting effect. There are no such problems with upscaling, as you're increasing the size of a photo that you've already taken.
I used upscaling on a portrait, and for an image in which the subject only took up a small portion of the frame, with the idea of enlarging it to then crop in for a better composition. The AI upscaling does a decent job, but it's not perfect: there's a sort of processed look to upscaled photos when you're pixel peeping. The same can be said for the new Neural Network noise reduction, which can be applied to JPEG images in-camera. However, these images were shot and processed on a pre-production Canon beta sample model, so final image quality may vary; the upscaling. feature in particular has huge potential, if it can be applied effectively.
Image 1 of 5
Image 2 of 5
Image 3 of 5
Image 4 of 5
Image 5 of 5
There's a good range of video codecs and frame rates, which makes the EOS R5 II a more versatile tool for filmmakers than the EOS R5. You get 8K 60fps raw video (onto CFexpress Type B card, not SD), 4K up to 120fps in 10-bit, and even 240fps in 2K.
What's missing here is open gate recording, which for now remains a trump card for Panasonic and Blackmagic video cameras. With a generous 8K video resolution to play with, it seems like a missed opportunity to go up one on Sony and Nikon by offering open gate – which means recording from the full height and width of the sensor. We're instead limited to 16:9 and cropping into that frame for other aspect ratios used for social.
We'll be sure to run further image and video quality tests in a full review.
How I tested the Canon EOS R5 II
A single day with the Canon EOS R5 II and Canon EOS R1 at the pre-launch event for press in Munich, Germany
Pre production beta sample
Paired with the RF 24-70mm F2.8L and RF 85mm F1.2L lenses
Outdoor portraits, indoor sports, photo and video using the various shooting modes
My time with the Canon EOS R5 II was brief: just a day's session, when I also had the Canon EOS R1. It was also a pre production beta sample and so final image quality and performance may vary in finalized samples. However, I was given decent scenarios and lenses to use with both cameras to put them through their paces.
There were two sports scenarios: basketball and breakdancing, both indoors. Another indoor setup involved a skilled cocktail maker, plus an outdoor session with models and classic German automobiles. I was armed with the RF 24-70mm F2.8L and RF 85mm F1.2L lenses.
I had time after the shoot day to further familiarize myself with the camera and run some speed tests. Tests involved using the various burst modes and video capture to see how the EOS R5 II fared in heavy use, plus checking out the new in-camera AI-editing tools.
Our full review of the Canon EOS R6 II is only just in, and now a more affordable camera that sits below it, and with a lot of the same features, has entered the fray: the Canon EOS R8, which could ramp up what we should expect from the best beginner mirrorless cameras.
While the new full-frame EOS R8 delivers much of the performance of the mid-level EOS R6 II, it has an entry-level body and stamina similar to the EOS RP. It’s priced accordingly, smack in the middle of the price range between those two cameras to provide yet another Canon full-frame mirrorless option in what is an ever-growing system.
We’ll break down the key differences between the EOS R8 versus the EOS R6 II separately in our upcoming Canon EOS R8 vs EOS R6 II article. This hands-on reflects our first impressions based on the brief time we’ve had with the R8 ahead of its launch – we’ll bring you our full review after we’ve had more time to thoroughly test it.
Canon EOS R8: release date and price
£1,699.99 / $1,499 / AU$3,000 (approx) body-only
£1,899.99 / $1,699 / AU$3,300 (approx) with RF 24-50mm F4.5-6.3
Set to hit the shelves in March
The Canon EOS R8 was announced on February 8 2023, and is set to hit the shelves in March, priced at £1,699.99 / $1,499 / AU$3,000 (approx) body-only.
Launched on the same day is the RF 24-50mm F4.5-6.3 collapsible lens, with a price of £379.99 / $350 (approx) / AU$660 (approx). The new camera and lens are available as a kit for £1,899.99 / $1,699 / AU$3,300 (approx), which represents a decent saving for what is a super-compact and lightweight full-frame pairing.
This is the sixth Canon mirrorless full-frame series model number (EOS R3, EOS R5/R5C, EOS R6 II, EOS R8, EOS RP and EOS R), and the EOS R8 occupies new ground, with no direct competition from other brands; its features, design and price position it between entry-level and mid-level alternatives.
For around the same money, the Canon EOS R7 is another option. It’s Canon’s flagship crop-sensor (APS-C) mirrorless camera, with specs that read even better on paper, with 32.5MP resolution and serious action-photography capabilities. The winner, as is the choice of product names, is not immediately clear.
Canon EOS R8: design
Canon’s lightest full-frame mirrorless camera
Simplified controls considering the features on offer
An excellent pairing with the new 24-50mm kit lens
The EOS R8 effectively has the same chassis as the EOS RP, which is Canon’s smallest full-frame mirrorless camera. But it goes one step further, shedding around 24g, to become the lightest available at 461g with a memory card and battery inserted.
Despite its diminutive stature, the EOS R8 packs a decent EVF with a 120fps refresh rate and the OVF (optical viewfinder) simulation mode first seen in EOS R3, which is designed to ease the fears of those making the switch to mirrorless from a DSLR. The simulation uses HDR to reveal details in shadow areas that you might see more clearly through an optical viewfinder.
There’s also a responsive vari-angle touchscreen, which is a feature demanded by hybrid shooters these days, and which makes the camera a genuinely viable option for vloggers and other content creators.
Image 1 of 5
Image 2 of 5
Image 3 of 5
Image 4 of 5
Image 5 of 5
Given how small the camera is, and how large full-frame lenses can be, there isn’t a great choice of lenses that balance well in the hand when attached to the EOS R8. The EOS R8’s design makes it a better match with small lenses, which is why the new 24-50mm F4.5-6.3 collapsible kit lens makes so much sense.
The new kit lens might not excite on paper, but it fits well with the EOS R8. In fact, at under 700g for the camera and lens pairing it’s one of the lightest full-frame combinations available. As this is a ‘short’ camera, larger front-heavy lenses will tug at the wrist, so hopefully more small lenses are on the horizon.
There’s a dedicated photo / video switch, as found on the EOS R6 II, giving a further nod to a hybrid future for the EOS R system. However, the control layout is simplified in this smaller body. You don’t get a joystick, there’s a simple D-pad rather than a rear wheel, and there are less buttons to customize.
Some of the shooting modes – for example Raw Burst – are buried in the main menu, which is a world you’ll need to get used to given how few settings can be found on the camera’s exterior. Still, there’s a nifty Guided UI, and there is space on the exterior for a mic input and headphone jack, as well as HDMI and remote ports. So all in all, the EOS R8 packs a heck of a lot into what is effectively an entry-level body.
Canon EOS R8: features and performance
Some serious action-photography power
Responsive subject-tracking AF
An array of high-speed burst modes
The EOS R8 is powered by the same processor and image sensor as the EOS R6 II, making it a camera that punches above its weight.
Action addicts will enjoy the class-leading 40fps burst shooting using the electronic shutter, a figure that is, however, reduced to 6fps using electronic first curtain.
The Raw Burst mode shoots for a single second at 30fps, with 0.5 seconds pre-capture before the shutter is pressed, thus maximizing your chances of capturing fast action sequences that are hard to predict. Those 30 frames are saved in a roll for you to choose the best frames to save.
Autofocus is another area that impresses. Canon has a long history of offering excellent AF for photo and video, and here we again have Dual Pixel CMOS II AF with tracking AF available for all modes. Just like the EOS R6 II, the EOS R8 offers an array of subject-detection AF options for humans, animals and vehicles, and thankfully has the option of automatic detection to make those choices for you.
Image 1 of 4
Image 2 of 4
Image 3 of 4
Image 4 of 4
With Flexible AF, the AF zone size can be adjusted to best suit your subject. You’ll come to rely on it for precise focusing in situations like a portrait shoot when your subject doesn’t fill the frame, especially as Flexible AF can be paired with Eye Tracking. Canon also claims that autofocus is effective for sharp focusing down to -6.5EV – that is seriously low light.
Areas in which the EOS R6 II has the edge include a superior battery life. From a full charge, the EOS R8 only offers half the number of frames at a CIPA rating of 400 approximately. There’s also only one SD card slot in the EOS R8, while the EOS R6 II has twin slots.
Elsewhere, the usual connection options are available: a multi-function shoe for compatibility with a range of accessories including external flash, 2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth 4.2, and MFI for direct connection with an Apple device, in addition to Android devices.
Canon EOS R8: image and video quality
Proven 24MP full-frame sensor
Sharp oversampled 4K video with C Log 3 color profile
Lacks IBIS
There are no surprises when it comes to the Canon EOS R8’s image quality; after all, it’s using the same 24MP full-frame sensor as the EOS R6 II. With a sensitivity up to ISO 102,400, the EOS R8 is well positioned as an all-rounder camera, delivering sharp photos in almost all scenarios; daylight, candlelight, wherever.
Video resolution is up to 4K / 60p without a crop, oversampled from 6K footage for sharp detail, although the EOS R6 II offers 6K video recording outright. Dial down to Full HD and 180p is possible for some serious slow motion effects. It really is an impressive array of video modes.
The Canon Log 3 color profile is included – it’s arguably the most popular of Canon’s video log profiles as it’s the most accessible, being easier to grade than the flatter Canon Log 2, which offers greater dynamic range. Still, when you get the exposure correct – something that’s made easier by using the false color tool which is included here – grading C Log 3 clips is a cinch.
There are other factors at play in the EOS R8 that indirectly affect image quality for particular situations. The camera doesn’t have in-body image stabilization (IBIS), so you’re more limited in terms of the shutter speeds at which you can shoot handheld and still expect sharp shots.
The lack of IBIS also results in shakier handheld video clips. Electronic stabilization for video is present, but it’s not a patch on IBIS, and a small crop from the frame is incurred, too.
Canon EOS R8 early verdict
Logical concessions, given the EOS R8’s price and size, include no IBIS, a pared-down camera body, and battery life that you’d expect from an entry-level camera, and which isn’t a patch on the EOS R6 II’s.
Appearances can be deceptive, though, and the EOS R8 packs a punch. There’s the same 24MP full-frame sensor as in the EOS R6 II, the 30fps Raw Burst mode, and up to 40fps continuous shooting using the electronic shutter, complemented by rapid Dual Pixel CMOS II autofocus.
The video spec is comprehensive, too, with 4K up to 60p oversampled from 6K and no record limits (although the battery will have something to say about that).
It’s a highly capable performer wrapped in a beginner-friendly shell, and with a respectable price tag – the same price as the more-capable but crop-sensor EOS R7. Put all of this together, though, and it’s actually not entirely clear who the EOS R8 is for. I’m sure we’ll find out in the coming months, as reaction from reviewers and users comes in.
Look, we know that when we first tell you that Philips is trying to sell you some internet-connected lightbulbs that you control from your iPhone for[……]