Organizer
Gadget news
The Gozney Dome (Gen 2) might be the ultimate backyard pizza oven – but its pro features come with a steep price tag
4:39 am | December 18, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home | Comments: Off

Gozney Dome (Gen 2): Two-minute review

The Dome (Gen 2) is a beast. Eating 16-inch pizzas for breakfast and capable of firing multiple smaller pizzas at once, the Dome (Gen 2) and its even bigger Dome XL (Gen 2) sibling are something you’d expect in a commercial kitchen rather than in an urban backyard. This big presence is met with refined design and elegant coloring, giving it the personality to be the centerpiece of the most bourgeoisie of outdoor kitchens.

This grand oven is pitched by Gozney as a great outdoor all-rounder and while I agree with this sentiment, the truth is that your kitchen oven is easier to use for most oven-baked dishes and your stock standard barbecue is arguably more versatile. But what these other devices can’t do is make pizza, and the Dome (Gen 2) is the most competent and easy to master pizza oven that a backyard has ever been graced with.

Gozney’s decision to add a second thermometer under the thick pizza stone compliments the usual ambient temperature gauge and gives relatively inexperienced pizza makers the keys to the kingdom for perfectly cooked pizza every time. But the company has also shifted the dial meaningfully on wood-fired cooking capabilities with the new active rechargeable fan that lets you boost oxygen input to quickly adjust the oven’s temperature as if you’re cooking with gas.

The opportunity for wood-fire or charcoal cooking is where you start to see some of the real versatility of the oven, which can be used to infuse wood-cooked flavors into a variety of dishes that would otherwise require another separate technical oven like a Green Egg or an Argentinian grill.

The included dual meat probes and capability for high-heat cooking means it’s can cook proteins particularly well, possibly better than many barbecues if you pair it with a cast-iron skillet. The new lateral gas burners and redesigned interior arch stretch the flames and heat further and more evenly across the top of the oven, and while the ovens are bigger, they’re more efficient than their predecessor, using only fractionally more gas despite the additional internal space.

The new Dome and Dome XL Gen 2 ovens boast a number of new features that offer major advantages over the original design, but the headline act has to be the bigger internal space added without making the oven considerably bulkier. This additional internal floorspace means that the oven is large enough to cook multiple pizzas or dishes simultaneously, making it capable of serving large dinner parties.

The large cooking space is paired with the ability to achieve sustained temperatures up to 500ºC/932ºF for perfect pizzas in quick rotation, which also allows the user to experiment with wood-fire cooking and smoking to make it an extremely versatile outdoor oven that will appeal to a lot of people.

Gozney Dome (Gen 2)

(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)

Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Price & availability

  • Dome (Gen 2): $2,300 / £2,000 / AU$2,999
  • Dome XL (Gen 2): $2,800 / £2,500 / AU$3,999

The Dome XL (Gen 2) is at the top of Gozney’s current range of pizza ovens and at $2,800 / £2,500 / AU$3,999 the price is a major consideration for any one looking for an outdoor pizza oven. If you’re a sporadic at-home pizza maker, dropping this much cash is steep and, to be honest, the Gozney Arc at $699 / £600 / AU$1,200 or the Tread for $500 / £500 / AU$899 are excellent ovens that’ll more than scratch this level of itch.

Where the Dome (Gen 2) – listed at $2,300 / £2,000 / AU$2,999 – really starts to make a lot of sense is if you're after a professional-level pizza oven at home. Reputable built-in ovens start at more than double what you’re looking at for the Dome (Gen 2) and there are a lot of trade-offs you’ll have to consider if you do go the built-in route. The Dome (Gen 2) may lose out a little on overall thermal mass, but the dual-fuel versatility and Wood-fire Control Kit ($200 / £175 / AU$299), offers additional temperature control that makes it notably easier than managing a traditional pizza oven.

The Dome (Gen 2) can sit directly on the countertop of your outdoor kitchen or can be purchased with the Dome (Gen 2) Series Stand for an extra $500 / £500 / AU$849. The Gozney accessories are all crafted to the same standard as the ovens themselves, so the stand combines sturdy and durable materials with handy hooks for hanging peels, holding gas cylinders and storing wood.

Gozney Dome (Gen 2)

(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)

The Dome (Gen 2) Door ($100 / £90 / $149) is a handy bit of kit for those looking to use the oven for cooking anything under about 500ºF/250ºC, and the Dome (Gen 2) Mantle ($170 / £140 / $249) helps you use a peel to rotate pizzas and makes it easier to check on dishes using cast-iron pans, baking dishes or dutch ovens.

Gozney’s more recent Pro Placement Peels start at $90 / £90 / AU$179 for a 12-incher, but they are a big step forward from earlier iterations and have a more dispersed perforation pattern to help your bases slide on and off better. Even the $60 16-inch Acacia Wood Pizza Peel and Server boards earn their keep by giving you a board big enough to build on that’ll keep your pizza from sweating, sticking and ripping as can happen when using a metal peel.

Even the Dome (Gen 2) Neapolitan Arch ($60 / £50 / AU$89) makes it considerably easier to give your pizzas perfect leopard spots, although it’s important to note that it’ll make the opening of the Dome (Gen 2) too narrow to get a big 16-inch pizza peel in.

Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Specs

The Dome and Dome XL (Gen 2) ovens are both larger than the original Dome, offering 40% and 90% more internal cooking space respectively. While they’re big jumps in cooking real estate, the ovens actually only take up 17% and 43% more floor space than their predecessors respectively. The (Gen 2) range also includes dual temperature readouts so you can easily see the difference between your stone and ambient oven temperatures.

Both ovens come with LPG gas connections included, with compatibility for the optional Wood-fire Control Kit. Since it’s such a core feature, it would have made sense to include this by default, but those interested in gas only will appreciate the discount.

Dome (Gen 2)

Max temp:

500ºC / 932ºF

Heat time:

40 – 45 minutes

Pizza capacity:

1 x 16-inch pizza or 2x 10-inch pizzas

Weight:

136lbs / 62kg

External dimensions incl. flue (HWD):

986 x 826 x 652 mm / 38.8 x 32.5 x 25.7 in

Oven mouth size (HW):

140mm x 419mm / 5.2 x 16.5in

Dome XL (Gen 2)

Max temp:

500ºC / 932ºF

Heat time:

40 – 45 minutes

Pizza capacity:

1 x 18-inch pizza or 2x 12-inch pizzas

Weight:

161lbs / 73kg

External dimensions incl. flue (HWD):

997 x 946 x 697 mm / 39.3 x 37.2 x 27.4 in

Oven mouth size (HW):

140mm x 470 mm / 5.2 x 18.5 in

Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Design & features

  • Wood and gas temperature control
  • Extremely spacious
  • Stylish design

The overall material selection and considered design of the Dome (Gen 2) ovens are bold enough to make them a hero piece in even the most luxe outdoor kitchens, but the Bone and Off Black color options are also subdued enough to not clash with your home’s unique style.

This wide appeal and versatility continues through the overall design allowing users to make more than just excellent pizza, but also indulge in high-heat steak sears, wood-fired veggies and smoky slow cooks on occasions when you really want to lean into your outdoor cooking.

The original Dome included an adjustable air intake vent to facilitate some control over the heat generated by the wood fire, but the Dome (Gen 2) takes this convenient feature a step further by adding a rechargeable fan that actively pumps air through the burning wood to dramatically increase the level of temperature control. This active ventilation even includes a boost function to supercharge oxygen delivery and considerably speed up temperature-saturation time. The residual ash and other prep requirements mean the option to wood fire your pizza is more work than gas, but the additional airflow control makes this the easiest wood-fire oven on the market.

While Gozney has done an amazing job reducing the additional work in wood-fire cooking, the immediacy and control of gas means it’s still likely to be the go-to fuel for your day-to-day pizza making. The Dome (Gen 2) incorporates the lateral burner design that debuted on the Arc range and combines it with the reengineered ceiling shape to enable the flames to stretch right across to the far side of the oven. This helps to spread heat across the 30mm cordierite stone base during warmup and cooks pizzas more uniformly from the top down.

Gozney Dome (Gen 2)

(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)

There’s a new digital interface powered by a rechargeable battery that’ll get you through 10 pizza sessions (at least) before needing a recharge. The new display comes with an easy-to-use timer with readings for both stone base and ambient oven temperatures, which does away with the need for remote thermometers and guesswork.

For those that do want to cook non-pizza dishes, the Dome (Gen 2) comes with a pair of meat probes that plug directly into the display to help you cook proteins to the desired level using higher heat or wood-fire methods that would otherwise be a little tricky to translate.

The other main design feature is the flu extension, which helps maintain airflow and improves resilience in windy weather. The oven works best with little to no wind, but it’s also fine in winds that approach from behind the oven. If you do have gusts blowing directly in and you can’t reorient the wheeled oven stand, you’ll need to use the door (or a baking tray) a little off the mouth as a windbreak to help you maintain temperature control.

  • Design & features score: 5/5

Pizza cooking in the Gozney Dome (Gen 2)

(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)

Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Performance

  • Perfect pizza every time
  • Solid thermal retention
  • Easy wood-fire operation

It’ll come as no surprise that the Dome (Gen 2) is exceptional at cooking pizza. It nails the basics of being able to sustain 932oF/500oC temps and has a stone base thick enough to cook dough as quickly as the toppings, but all Gozney’s ovens (and many others) are able to achieve this.

Where this range really begins to separate from the pack is in offering a balance of insulation and thermal mass that facilitates back-to-back pizzas in minutes. The added luxury of cooking multiple pizzas at once without seeing major dips in core temperature means you can upscale your production and host larger pizza parties with confidence.

Nothing on the market comes close to the added speed and convenience of wood-fired pizza that the active fan adds. The fan boost function brings the control almost up to the level you get from gas-fired pizza making. This reduces the effort and required skill down considerably and means that frequent wood-fired pizza is a feasible staple rather than an occasional labor of love. This makes the Dome (Gen 2) a difficult option to pass up for anyone serious about wood-fire pizza.

Throw in the additional height of the Dome (Gen 2) Series stand and it elevates the cooking platform to a comfortable shoulder level for easier delivery and retrieval, plus it makes for better visibility without the need for crouching.

If you really want to perfect your traditional Neapolitan pizzas, then the Arch accessory intensifies the oven’s capacity to maintain perfect ambient temperatures for leopard spots. In fact, all the accessories add convenience or expand capabilities in different ways that do not disappoint.

The larger mouth opening means you can fit a dutch oven or taller pot in and the additional floor space can accommodate a pair of cast-iron skillets or multiple baking trays side by side. All of which adds considerable versatility to your outdoor cooking capabilities.

Two cooked pizzas from the Gozney Dome (Gen 2)

(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)

If you're hoping to use it more as an oven at lower temperatures, don’t expect it to be quite as easy as your electric oven. Maybe in Gen 3 we’ll get a wood-fire thermostat, but for now it still requires active management. The Door does reduce temperature loss to a degree every two or three seconds, so you can prep other dishes or have a short conversation before firing it up again.

The new series does miss out on the Steam Injector bread-making attachment, but given the oven is much better at high-heat cooking, it’s a sensible sacrifice that made way for the improved internal oven arch and heat distribution.

  • Performance score: 5/5

Should you buy the Gozney Dome (Gen 2)?

Buy it if...

You like wood-fire pizzas

The Dome (Gen 2)’s active wood-fire fan provides unparalleled control and ease for anyone interested in using wood to cook. The boost functionality considerably speeds up initial heating and the rechargeable fan provides enough control to make it easily to master.

You want to make more than pizza outdoors

For anyone hoping to get a little more out of their pizza oven, the Dome (Gen 2) is a standout when it comes to internal capacity and versatility. You can fit an entertainer's feast in there and utilize any oven-safe kit you’d usually use indoors to really stretch and experiment with your outdoor cooking.

You’re keen to make pizza at scale

There are plenty of cheaper Gozney options for those looking to make a few pizzas for the family once a week, but if you’re looking to cook pizza for larger groups or you often daydream about starting your own pizza truck business, then the heat retention of the Dome (Gen 2) allows you to upscale to make tens of pizzas back to back with minimal downtime.

Don't buy it if...

You need a portable oven

If you think you might like to make pizza while camping as much as you will at home, then the Gozney Roccbox or Tread are likely to serve you better.

You won’t cook more than five pizzas in a night

If you’re just going to cook pizza for your family and at the occasional dinner party, then an Arc or Arc XL is a considerably more compact and affordable offering.

You aren’t that interested in wood fire

The Wood-fire Control Kit is an optional extra and there are arguably enough features to justify the Dome (Gen 2) without this attachment, but a lot of the unique appeal of this device comes from its ability to use wood and charcoal to cook pizza and other dishes.

Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Also consider

Gozney Roccbox
This compact portable pizza oven is more than capable of cooking excellent 12-inch pizzas at home or anywhere you can think to carry it. It’s fast, efficient and makes pizza good enough to be the perfect option for most people’s requirements.

Read our full Gozney Roccbox review

Gozney Arc
The Arc and Arc XL are Gozney’s mid-range offerings that provide exceptional 14 or 16-inch pizza capacities in a small enough footprint to sit on an apartment balcony. If you’re keen for the most convenient way to make perfect pizza at home, then the value offered by the Arc ovens is unbeatable.

Read our full Gozney Arc review

Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: How I tested

  • Cooked over 40 pizzas
  • Noted heat-up time and used a thermometer for temperature readings
  • Used all available fuels

I tested the pizza oven over a period of a couple of months, making pizzas frequently for guests, family dinners and sometimes even for lunch.

Various other kitchen utensils were utilized to explore the versatility of the oven and all accessories mentioned (with the exception of the wood-fire kit) were tested for usability and frank feedback on each has been provided. The wood-fire kit was in short supply at the time of testing and will be tested following the review publication. The review will be updated with any pertinent findings at a later date.

The internal stopwatch was used to measure heat-up time and an infrared thermometer was used to verify the internal thermometer’s readings.

The oven was tested at various temperatures and using a range of settings to cook different toppings.

Over 40 pizzas and other dishes were cooked before coming to a final conclusion.

The Nex Playground is a fine entry-level video game console for preschoolers, elderly individuals and anyone interested in light fitness
10:00 pm | December 17, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Nex Playground: two-minute review

More of a purpose-built living room toy box, the Nex Playground is quick to set up, easy to understand, and designed to get bodies moving immediately. Yes, you’ll notice the technical ceiling in visuals and occasional frame stutters, and the Play Pass model won’t work for everyone. But as a family-friendly, camera-controlled alternative that’s safe, approachable, and surprisingly versatile, from party chaos to light fitness, it delivers on its core promise: making play feel effortless for all ages.

The console has carved out a rare lane in gaming, so much so that it reportedly outsold both the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series gaming consoles during one week in November 2025. That outcome isn’t hard to understand: as development budgets climb, hardware R&D gets pricier, and tariffs add pressure, mainstream gaming has become an increasingly expensive form of entertainment. At the same time, the motion-control boom of the mid-to-late 2000s, the massive growth of mobile gaming, and the rise of free-to-play games have expanded the audience, making it easier than ever for anyone to pick up a controller.

Spending over a year with the Nex Playground, I’ve realized that this small cube-shaped gaming console is the little engine that could. On a surface level, this device feels like an extension of what Nintendo did with the Wii. Outside of an included remote to select games alongside managing settings and your account, the 40+ games available are all controlled through an ultra-wide camera that sits on the console’s front panel.

All of that comes at a cost of an MSRP of $249 (around £188 / AU$380 - worldwide availability TBC), despite a handful of retailers selling the Nex Playground at a sale price of $199. This definitely places it as a cheaper alternative to more mainstream consoles. When it comes to games, users of the console are provided five games to start with: a full-scale version of Fruit Ninja, Whack-a-Mole, Goal Keeper, mini-game-centric Party Fowl, and rhythm title Starri. They all do a great job in setting the tone for what the Nex Playground is actually capable of.

An image of the Nex Playground by itself, showing off its cubic shape and bottom ventilation.

(Image credit: Future)

Anyone looking to go deeper into the console’s library of games will need the Play Pass subscription service, which opens users up to over 40 games that, unfortunately, can’t be purchased individually. Some folks may also have an issue with the service only being available in three-month $49 and one-year $89 intervals.

Regardless, the variety of games does offer something for everyone, with age ranges split between preschool level to around 10 years old. It also helps that the Playground is kidSafe+ COPPA certified and lacks any online play capabilities. So games are family-friendly, lacking mature or inappropriate content here.

Alongside fun games like Tennis Smash and Arrow Party, there are more action-oriented options like Sword Slash Adventure, which has some clever RPG elements, alongside Aeon Guard. There are also various licensed IP games, including Bluey, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Miraculous, Barbie, and Peppa Pig, among others. There is also a fitness section featuring games such as Nex Fitness and Zumba Fitness. These games control fairly well and are definitely fun in short bursts or at parties.

Most of the games outside a handful lack depth, length or visual fidelity compared to what’s coming out of mainstream consoles, and many have some performance issues. In fact, many look like games that would be either on the Wii in 2006 or early 2010s mobile games. That’s because the Nex Playground isn’t that powerful when it comes to performance specs.

What’s packed into this small cube is run by an Amlogic A311D2-NOD CPU, Mail-G52 MC4 GPU, and 16GB LPDDR4X RAM. That’s enough to play these games at 4K resolution and up to 120 frames per second. With the specs, that trade means very low poly models, unsophisticated lighting and lack of post-processing effects. So don’t expect anything like Ray Tracing and the likes. When it comes to storage, there’s 64GB of SSD storage, which is fine, as many of the games don’t get any larger than a few gigabytes anyway.

Nex Playground review: price and availability

  • List price: $249
  • Available now in the US, worldwide availability to be confirmed
  • Available through the Nex Playground store alongside other retailers, including Amazon and Walmart

Currently available in the US, the Nex Playground can be purchased right now through the manufacturer’s online store or through other retailers, including Amazon and Walmart. It's available at a retail price of $249, though some retailers occasionally have it listed at an introductory sale price of $199.

Though it’s not directly available in the UK and Australia, individuals in those territories can still purchase the device from the US storefront through services like Big Apple Daddy or Amazon. The price alone places the Nex Playground below mainstream consoles, including the Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 5, and both Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S.

In a modern world where development costs are pushing price points of games to nauseating degrees, the Nex Playground comes packed with a five-game starter pack.

Buyers looking for a bigger selection will need the Play Pass subscription. That’ll run users $49 for three months or $89 for a year. And the catalog of around 40 games has been steadily growing as well. Out of all of the games I played, more than half of the 40+ games provide adequate levels of entertainment. Regardless, for what users pay for the console and the subscription service, it’s definitely worth it.

Nex Playground review: Specs

Price

$249 (around £188, AU$380)

Weight

14.2oz / 403g

Dimensions

5 x 5 x 5in / 127 x 127 x 127mm

CPU

Amlogic A311D2-NOD

GPU

Mail-G52 MC4

RAM

16GB LPDDR4X

Frame rate

Up to 120fps

Resolution

Up to 4K

Optical

N/A

Storage

64GB SSD

The Nex Playground console alongside its included remote accessory

(Image credit: Future)

Nex Playground review: design and features

The Nex Playground is beautiful with its yellow and teal accents at the top and off-white on everything else. With dimensions of 5 x 5 x 5 inches (127 x 127 x 127mm) and an overall weight of 0.89lbs / 14.2oz (430g), it’s impressively portable, and there’s a handy carrying case available for purchase through the Nex Playground site for $24.97.

Outside of the ultra-wide camera on the left side, the right side features a small horizontal LED bar that lights up when the device is switched on. On the bottom side, panels are small holes for ventilation purposes. The back panel is where the HDMI and USB-C power port are located. The USB-C power cord also has a string connected to the magnetic camera cover. It connects and disconnects fairly easily from the ultra-wide camera. This will give parents a sense of relief in terms of privacy concerns.

The Nex Playground is an incredibly simple machine and one that’s very easy to set up, then. Just plug in the HDMI cord alongside the power adapter, and users are ready to go.

Also included is a Roku-sized remote to move the on-screen cursor, make selections, return to previous menus, or go to the Home screen. Users initially will use the remote for the simple start-up screen, which also requires a phone to create a Nex Playground account for various settings. After that, the setup is complete, and you’re good to go.

The rear side of the Nex Playground showing off its HDMI and USB-C ports

(Image credit: Future)

Nex Playground review: Performance

As mentioned previously, the specs lean more toward a lower spec Android TV boxes include popular options like the Beelink GT King II, the Khadas VIM4 SBC, and a range of generic streaming players from brands such as SZ Tomato through its Amlogic A311D2-NOD CPU, Mail-G52 MC4 GPU, and 16GB LPDDR4X RAM.

Don’t expect anything on the level of Cyberpunk 2077 or even Super Mario Odyssey. The visuals here will remind many of something one would play on a smartphone in the 2010s or a higher-res Nintendo Wii game. Expect simple texture, animation, and lighting work all around that does exactly what it’s supposed to do.

To put things into perspective, Fruit Ninja made its debut in 2010 for iOS devices. Seeing it on the Nex Playground is fine as it runs great, but it’s just Fruit Ninja in 4K. Some games can rely on cool visual design that makes up for the lack of visual fidelity, such as Sword Slash Adventure and Aeon Guard.

Though it’s worth noting that some games I played had performance issues, with some going below 30fps. For example, when too many explosions and effects are happening in games like Arrow Party and Kart Racer Miniacs: Steering Madness, there are noticeable dips in frame rate.

One thing for sure is that the performance of the ultra-wide camera and AI-motion engine is top-notch when it comes to actually controlling games. If there’s an outstanding example of how well camera-based controls have evolved over the decade, the Nex Playground’s catalog of software is definitely it. Pulling an imaginary arrow with a friend feels really good in Arrow Party, and moving side to side while trying to serve in Tennis Smash does feel like an evolution of Wii Sports' Tennis.

The Nex Playground in a powered-on state, with the included privacy cap placed over the camera.

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Nex Playground?

Buy it if...

You need an affordable gaming console
Not only is the Nex Playground currently available at a $249 MSRP, but the cost of its Play Pass is also affordable.

You want an attractive, compact console that’s simple to set up
Setup is effortless; just connect the HDMI for video, plug it into a power outlet, and you’re ready to go. The process is simple enough that even kids or individuals who aren’t technologically savvy can jump in and start playing with ease.

You want a nice amount of games available that work really well
Several dozen games are available on the console, and most of them are fun to play solo or with friends. Most importantly, there’s a little something for everyone.

Don't buy it if...

You want games that offer significant amounts of depth and length
Most of the games offered on the Nex Playground are more for short bursts than anything incredibly deep.

You want to avoid subscriptions and buy individual games
Outside of the five games that come with the Nex Playground, the other several dozen games require a Play Pass service subscription that can only be purchased in three-month or one-year intervals. This also means that users can’t buy games individually.

You want cutting-edge graphics
The price and form factor alone should let anyone know that this isn’t going to be a graphical powerhouse. Most of the games on the Nex Playground are definitely mid-range mobile phone or Wii era visuals.

Nex Playground review: Also consider

The Nex Playground is certainly for a specific niche, so here are a couple of other console options worth considering, too.

Nex Playground

Nintendo Switch 2

Xbox Series S

Price

$249 (around £188 / AU$380)

$429.99 / £395.99 / $AU699.95

$399.99 / £349.99 / AU$599

Weight

14.2oz / 403g

18.8oz / 535g

68oz / 1,920g

Dimensions

5 x 5 x 5in / 127 x 127 x 127mm

10.7 x 4.5 x 0.6in / 272 x 114 x 15mm

10.8 x 5.9 x 2.6in / 275 x 151 x 65mm

Connection type

Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI Output

Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI output (in TV mode)

Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-A, HDMI output

Battery life

N/A

2-5 hours

N/A

Features

Ultra wide Camera control, Nex AI-Motion Engine, Remote Control

8-inch OLED multi-touch display (1080p resolution), 256GB internal storage, improved stereo speakers, next-gen dock with 4K output and integrated LAN port, reinforced adjustable kickstand

512GB Storage, Xbox Game Pass

Nintendo Switch 2
Users looking for a more traditional console that’s more family-friendly can look to the Nintendo Switch 2, which provides a wide variety of games that appeal to all age groups. Not only can you get more traditional first-party and third-party games, but the hybrid form factor lends to good portability.

Read our full Nintendo Switch 2 review

Xbox Series S
If a simple box and controller setup is what you’re looking for, then the Xbox Series S has a large library of modern games, backwards compatibility with previous Xbox generation titles, and is ideal for the Xbox Game Pass subscription service as well.

Read our full Xbox Series S review

How I tested the Nex Playground

  • Tested over the span of a year
  • Played a large share of the games including the starting five pack
  • Experienced the games included with the Play Pass subscription

I’ve owned the Nex Playground for about a year, which gave me plenty of time to really learn the ins and outs of this unique console. Beyond the five games included out of the box, my Play Pass subscription opened up access to more than 40 additional games.

The games that came closest to a traditional console experience were Sword Slash Adventure (RPG), the Wii Sports-inspired Tennis Smash, Arrow Party, and Aeon Guard. Together, they made it easy to see how well the ultra-wide camera and AI-powered motion engine work in tandem.

First reviewed December 2025

Read more about how we test

Watch out, Apple – the OnePlus Pad Go 2 just raised the bar for all mid-range tablets
8:10 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Tablets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

OnePlus Pad Go 2: two-minute review

As the successor to 2023’s OnePlus Pad Go, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is the latest mid-range tablet from OnePlus, sitting between the budget-friendly OnePlus Pad Lite and the premium-tier OnePlus Pad 3. As with any mid-range device, there’s always the expectation that one or two big compromises have been made to keep the price down, but with the OnePlus Pad Go 2, I’ve struggled to find one.

This is as good a mid-range tablet as I’ve tested yet, and it's emboldened by a handful of upgrades that give it far more in common with the more expensive OnePlus Pad 3 than its more affordable sibling. The jump to using the MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra chipset is the biggest change of the bunch, as it doesn’t just pave the way for amazing gaming and everyday performance; it also allows for the inclusion of OnePlus’ excellent Open Canvas software, which is a big win for productivity users.

Having Open Canvas available in tandem with the now larger 12.1-inch display, which uses a 7:5 ratio, means the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is an instant win for students or buyers on a budget who want the productivity experience provided by the OnePlus Pad 3 without having to fork out such a substantial amount of cash.

In fact, with the inclusion of 5G connectivity (something which the Pad 3 does not have), there’s a case to be made that, until OnePlus’ more powerful tablet gets the same treatment, the Pad Go 2 might be more preferable by default for anyone who’s constantly on the move and can’t stay connected to a single Wi-Fi network for too long.

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)

The battery in the OnePlus Pad Go 2 has also been beefed up, jumping from 8,000mAh to a whopping 10,050mAh cell, which means you can go for longer between charges (always helpful if there isn’t a power outlet in sight).

The only setback with the Pad Go 2 is that the design isn’t quite as striking as what we’ve had before, with the OnePlus moving away from the green colorway that made the original Pad Go stand out, and instead moving towards a subdued style that will feel familiar to anyone who’s seen the similarly redesigned OnePlus Nord 5.

Still, it’s a minor blemish on what is, overall, an outstanding tablet. The next time someone’s shopping on the mid-range market, I can’t imagine a world where the OnePlus Pad Go 2 isn’t immediately brought up as one of the first options to consider.

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: price and availability

  • Starts at $399.99 / £319 for 8GB of RAM and 128GB storage
  • A more expensive 8GB RAM/256GB storage model is available in the UK, which comes with 5G connectivity

The OnePlus Pad Go 2 has a starting price of $399.99 / £319 for the 128GB Wi-Fi-only model, which then jumps up to £399 for the UK-exclusive 256GB, 5G-enabled variant. We're still waiting for confirmation of the tablet's availability in Australia.

For context, the OnePlus Pad Go cost £299/$299 at launch, making it something of a lower mid-range option designed to compete with the likes of Apple’s entry-level iPad at the time.

Even though there is a slight uptick over what the original Pad Go went for at launch, such a price increase is far from unexpected given the current state of the world economy. But it doesn’t derail the Pad Go 2’s value, which is the most important thing.

With that $399.99 / £319 starting price, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is still $50 / £10 cheaper than the iPad 11-inch (2025), which is sure to make it a more tempting option for buyers who aren’t completely sold on Apple’s ecosystem.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: specs

As for the Pad Go 2's specs, there are quite a few upgrades this time around, the most notable of which have been applied to the display. With a larger 12.1-inch size, the screen also has a higher resolution and a faster refresh rate of 120Hz.

Although the Wi-Fi and 5G models of the OnePlus Pad Go 2 share a lot of key specs, the latter is ever-so slightly heavier at 599g (as opposed to 597g).

Here are the OnePlus Pad Go 2's specs in full:

Starting price

£319

Operating system

OxygenOS 15.0.1

Chipset

MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra

RAM

8GB

Storage

128GB/256GB

Display

12.1-inch 2800 x 1980 LCD, 120Hz

Weight

597g/599g

Battery

10,050mAh

Charging

33W wired charging

Cameras

8MP main, 8MP front

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: display

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)
  • A large 12.1-inch display that's brilliantly bright
  • The 7:5 ratio is perfect for productivity

As much as I enjoyed testing the OnePlus Pad Lite for what it was (a budget buy) earlier this year, its lower-resolution screen made me realize just how good I had it when the OnePlus Pad 3 came in for testing. I was bracing myself for a similar compromise with the Go 2, but ended up being pleasantly surprised by what's on offer.

Instead of having a display that's a major step down from its more premium siblings, the Pad Go 2 has a gorgeous 12.1-inch display that's both larger than before (up from 11.35 inches) and brighter, at 600 nits. There's even a 2.8k resolution, which makes everything look crisp.

The viewing experience overall is fantastic, and I've been using the tablet to catch up on It: Welcome to Derry, being massively impressed with how well the screen conveys both the saturated colours of 1960s Derry and also the dark, foreboding sewers connected to Pennywise’s lair.

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)

This alone would make it easy to recommend the OnePlus Pad Go 2 to users who just want a solid tablet to take with them on their next flight, but it's the use of a 7:5 ratio that allows it to double as a great productivity tablet.

With a more squat frame than the true wide-screen look of something like the Pad Lite, the Pad Go 2 is far more aligned with the Pad 3, offering plenty of space for multitasking with two apps sitting side by side. For when I'm studying a press release or testing notes for an article as I write, this is exactly the type of display I want – one that never asks me to squint to see what's right in front of me.

  • Display score: 5 / 5

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: design

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)
  • A bit more subdued than before
  • It can pick up fingerprints quite quickly

The OnePlus Pad Go 2 has undergone something of a design shift versus its predecessor, moving away from the green backing and center-facing rear camera of old and towards something that feels far more subdued – not too dissimilar to the changes implemented on the OnePlus Nord 5.

The Shadow Black variant that I had in for review feels particularly reminiscent of OnePlus’ mid-range phone, with a sleek albeit unexciting backing that’s designed to look confident rather than eye-catching. It’s also something of a fingerprint magnet, so you may want to put a case on the device before things get too smudgey. These sentiments don’t quite apply to the Lavender Drift alternative, but even that more colourful option is a world away from the head-turning pink of the 11th-gen iPad.

Before I run the risk of sounding overly negative, I want to point out that even though it’s less striking than before, I do like the design of the OnePlus Pad Go 2. As someone who regularly uses tablets for both productivity and entertainment, I appreciate having a device that can blend in as seamlessly as a laptop in my local cafe, and it’s now even easier to carry around in a backpack thanks to a slightly slimmed-down build.

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)

While the height and width of the tablet have increased, owing to the slightly larger display, OnePlus has managed to fit everything into a thinner chassis that rings in at just 6.83 inches. Not only does this mean it takes up less room in a bag (handy for someone like me who’s constantly carrying multiple devices), but it also makes the Pad Go 2 more comfortable to hold.

With the Wi-Fi and 5G models of the Pad Go 2 coming in at 597g and 599g, respectively, the Pad Go 2 is heavier than its predecessor, but that increase doesn't result in any negative change to the way it feels in the hand. On the contrary, there’s a nice bit of heft that complements the smooth backing of the Go 2, making it comfortable to hold for long periods of time.

Thanks to the more squat nature of the design, my hands were never at risk of covering the center-placed front-facing camera, so even if you are taking a call while holding the tablet vertically, you won’t have any issues there.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: software

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)
  • A wonderfully uncluttered experience with next to no bloatware
  • Having Open Canvas on board is a big win for productivity users

I've tested enough tablets now to know that OnePlus’ secret weapon is its software. OxygenOS is already a delight to use on the best OnePlus phones (which is why next year’s best phones really have their work cut out against the stellar OnePlus 15), but its value feels more palpable when it comes to tablets.

There's no denying that Apple has a comfortable lead above all Android competitors in this area. Everything just works in iPadOS, and it's exactly why the entry-level iPad 11 is such a great-value buy. But for my money, OxygenOS is the next best thing.

For starters, there really isn't any bloatware to speak of, which already sets OnePlus’ software apart. This was also the case with the OnePlus Lite, and nothing’s changed with the Pad Go 2. The only thing that could vaguely be considered bloatware is a handful of OnePlus’ own brand apps, but they’re fairly well designed. OnePlus’ Notes app in particular is a much sleeker alternative to Google Keep, so these apps are worth exploring to see if they can work for you.

It also helps that OxygenOS has a much nicer look than most Android overlays. With circular app icons and easy-to-navigate menus, it feels far more akin to what you’ll find in Google’s stock Android package, and you get a nice selection of wallpapers built in, including OnePlus’ signature mountain range collection.

What really separates the Pad Go 2 from the Pad Lite, however, is the inclusion of Open Canvas. Whether it’s been on the Pad 3 or the OpenPlus Open, I've loved my time with OnePlus’ multitasking software, as it makes the process of setting up apps side by side an easy one. As mentioned earlier, it works so well with the Pad Go 2’s 7:5 display that you could easily use this tablet for work, either as a student or a professional.

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)

Of all the layout options available via Open Canvas, it’s the 90/10 split that I really enjoy using. As its name implies, this allows one app to take up the majority of the display while another is just peeking out from the side, but the latter can be brought out in a 50/50 split the moment you tap on it. Again, when I want to quickly check on my notes while writing a review like this one, it works incredibly well.

Another key difference here is that, unlike the Pad Lite, the Go 2 has OnePlus’ AI features built in. This may differ for some people, but personally, I can’t stand the way in which a big push in AI is being shipped as a viable alternative to new features in modern tech. Honor is guilty of this, as is Apple, but OnePlus has a fairly relaxed approach, which I appreciate.

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)

There are AI features onboard, like an AI writer as well as an AI summarizer for web pages, but neither of them is forced upon you and are fairly easy to miss if you’re not looking for them. While I don’t have much use for AI in general, I have appreciated OnePlus’ AI summarizer on occasion if I need to know more about a certain product but don’t have time to read a full breakdown, as it does a decent job of honing in on what’s important and getting that information to me in a concise way.

OnePlus has yet to confirm how long it will be supporting the OnePlus Pad Go 2, but this section will be updated once that information is made clear.

  • Software score: 4.5 / 5

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: performance

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)
  • The MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra is a capable chipset
  • The tablet doesn't buckle under heavy multitasking

Even though it was pitched as a more affordable tablet, the OnePlus Pad Go certainly wasn’t lacking in terms of performance for its price point. The MediaTek Helio G99 chip did a solid job of keeping day-to-day use feeling smooth, but now that the Go 2 has additional features like Open Canvas and AI integration to consider, a leap forward in performance was always going to be a necessity.

This time around, it’s the MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra powering the show, which is built on a more efficient 4nm process. Almost by design now, I get a bit weary whenever I see a chipset listed that isn’t from Qualcomm (almost certainly a result of Snapdragon chips dominating the flagship market), but any concerns were quickly abated the moment I switched on the Go 2 and started using it.

Jumping between apps felt very smooth, and they would load quickly, too. Wanting to see how far I could push the CPU, I jumped into Open Canvas with Chrome and YouTube sitting side by side, but then had picture-in-picture video playing from Sky Go on top of it, whilst also bringing in OnePlus Notes as a floating window. With effectively four apps running at the same time, I waited to see if the Go 2 would buckle under the pressure of it all, but to my amazement, such a moment never came to pass. For the mid-range market, the Pad Go 2 is a real powerhouse.

When swapping over to a bit of gaming, I connected a wireless Xbox controller over Bluetooth and dove into a match of Call of Duty: Mobile. As expected, based on my experience with the CPU up until that point, it all ran flawlessly (and I knew as much because I won the match, which is rarely a guarantee). Not only did the gameplay run smoothly without any lag or stuttering, but the colors came through tremendously, and I didn’t feel any disconnect between my actions on the controller and what was taking place onscreen.

Moving over to Honkai Star Rail – a more demanding title that can trip up a lot of lesser-powered tablets and phones, I’m glad to relay that the Pad Go 2 ran the game rather well. It didn't run quite as flawlessly as Call of Duty, with the odd frame rate dip when exploring the world of the game, but performance during battles was pretty solid, and even when performing special moves that can involve particle effects and more objects appearing onscreen, the tablet didn’t really budge under the pressure.

What helps the performance of the CPU in delivering a great entertainment experience is the jump to having a 120Hz refresh rate, which, as any gamer can attest, is a night and day difference, but the quad-speaker system that’s onboard is important, too. Even when using the speakers at a low volume, the Pad Go 2 does a great job at projecting its soundscape, so you won’t have to crank up the audio in order to hear anything.

The Pad Go 2 is also the first OnePlus tablet to feature 5G connectivity (in the UK at least), which, oddly enough, might make it a more tempting buy over the Pad 3 for productivity users who are constantly on the go. Even though the Pad 3 is more powerful overall, the ability to latch on to a 5G signal when you’re away from a trusted Wi-Fi network is a huge win.

Alongside my review unit of the tablet, OnePlus was kind enough to send over the OnePlus Pad Go 2 Stylo, which I’ve also put to use during this testing period. Admittedly, I’m not a digital artist (I only wish I had that talent), but I am someone who carries a Remarkable Paper Pro with me at all times for digital notetaking, and in that regard I found the Stylo to be quite handy. It’s a long way from the pen and paper feeling of the Remarkable and similar tablets like the Kindle Scribe (2024), but the Stylo itself is responsive and very comfortable to use, so I can see it being an instant buy alongside the tablet for some users.

  • Performance score: 4.5 / 5

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: battery

OnePlus Pad Go 2 review images

(Image credit: Future)
  • A much larger 10,050mAh cell is included
  • Reverse charging is now possible
  • No charging brick included

One of my favourite aspects of the OnePlus Pad 3 is just how big the onboard battery is. The company’s flagship tablet packs a 12,140mAh cell, which can really go the distance, but what’s great to see is that the Pad Go 2 has been given such an upgrade in this department that it really isn’t all that far behind what’s achievable on its more powerful sibling.

For the Go 2, OnePlus has leapt from an 8,000mAh battery to a massive 10,050mAh alternative, and it makes a huge difference. OnePlus claims that you can now get up to 15 hours of video streaming at a time, as well as 60 days of standby, which is a big win for anyone who’s always worried about getting to a charger in time.

When testing the tablet on my own terms, I was able to get through about an hour of streaming, half an hour of gaming (which involved online play and downloaded texture packs/content), and another half an hour of web browsing, all with the brightness turned up almost to the max, and the battery had only gone down from 100% to 82%.

Under typical use, I wouldn’t have the brightness anywhere near as high as I did, so I have no worries about getting much closer to OnePlus’ claims of longevity when using the Pad Go 2.

Things have stayed the same where charging is concerned, with 33W SUPERVOOC available on the Pad Go 2, but I don’t see this as a major issue. Of the two options, I would much rather have a larger battery than faster charging, and with the Go 2 now able to run for longer between charges, you won’t have to spend all that much time topping up the tablet anyway.

As an added benefit, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 now supports reverse charging, so if you do need to give your phone or earbuds a quick top-up and you don’t have a battery pack to hand, the Go 2 can step in to plug the gap.

  • Battery score: 4.5 / 5

Should you buy the OnePlus Pad Go 2?

OnePlus Pad Go 2 scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

With only a minor uptick in price and a ton of upgrades, the Pad Go 2 is a mid-range bargain.

4.5 / 5

Display

The increased resolution and brightness make for a better viewing experience overall.

4.5 / 5

Design

While functional, the Pad Go 2 isn't as exciting as its predecessor, and it can catch fingerprints.

4 / 5

Software

With Open Canvas and OnePlus' AI features being brought into the mid-range, there's now greater functionality.

4.5 / 5

Performance

The newer chipset is capable of heavy-duty multitasking and solid gaming performance.

4.5 / 5

Battery

With a big 10,050mAh cell, you'll struggle to drain the entire battery in a day.

4.5 / 5

Buy it if…

You want a productivity tablet without spending too much
Thanks to its 7:5 aspect ratio and Open Canvas multitasking software, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is perfect for users who want to work on the go.

You want a proper all-day battery life
With a massive 10,050mAh cell now under the hood, the Pad Go 2 is capable of going the distance over an intensive day of use.

You want a simple Android overlay free of clutter
With a hands-off approach to AI alongside next to no bloatware, OxygenOS is a joy to use.

Don’t buy it if…

You only need a tablet for entertainment
If all you want to do is stream films and TV shows, then the OnePlus Pad Lite fits the bill perfectly with a very affordable price tag.

You don’t plan on using 5G connectivity
Even with the Wi-Fi version available, you can save more money by opting for a tablet that doesn’t feature network connectivity.

You want super-fast charging
If you’re more concerned with having faster charging than a longer battery life, you may want to look elsewhere.

Also consider

Wondering whether or not the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is right for you? Here are some alternatives worth considering:

OnePlus Pad Go 2

Apple iPad 11-inch (2025)

OnePlus Pad Lite

Price

£319 / £399

$349 / £329

£199 / €229

Storage

128GB/256GB

128GB / 236GB / 512GB

128GB

Screen size

12.1-inch 2800 x 1980 LCD, 120Hz

11-inch Liquid Retina, 60Hz

11-inch 1920 x 1200 LCD, 90Hz

Chipset

MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra

Apple A16 Bionic

MediaTek Helio G100

Battery

10,050mAh

28.93Wh

9,340mAh

Charging

33W

20W

33W

Cameras

8MP main, 8MP front

12MP main, 12MP front

5MP main, 5MP front

OS

OxygenOS 16

iPadOS 18

OxygenOS w/ Android 15

Apple iPad 11-inch (2025)
Apple’s entry-level iPad is a bargain, given that you’re getting access to almost all of the main features from iPadOS. Despite its low-level price tag, you can still use the tablet for productivity as well as entertainment, especially since the iPadOS 26 update, which allows apps to be windowed, much like how you’d see them on a Mac.

Read our full Apple iPad 11-inch (2025) review

OnePlus Pad Lite
Unless you’re dead set on having features like OpenCanvas and AI integration that make productivity feel more seamless, the OnePlus Pad Lite already has the entertainment side of things on lock. With a more portable build and a wide screen that’s perfect for cinematic viewing, the Pad Lite is a great device for on-the-go entertainment, and it’ll save you quite a bit at checkout as well.

Read our full OnePlus Pad Lite review

How I tested the OnePlus Pad Go 2

For the purpose of this review, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 was used over the course of a week to determine how well it functions as an everyday tablet for both productivity and entertainment needs.

Streaming was conducted via the Sky Go app, whlie Call of Duty Mobile and Honkai Star Rail were used to verify the tablet’s abilities as a gaming machine.

First reviewed December 2025

Nikon ZR review: cinema cameras just got a major new player
8:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Video Cameras | Tags: | Comments: Off

Nikon ZR: two-minute review

The new Nikon ZR is the first in a new line of Nikon / RED cinema cameras, and instantly makes Nikon a major new player in this space, capable of going to toe-to-toe with Sony, Canon, Blackmagic and Panasonic.

Nikon only acquired RED Digital Cameras 18 months ago, and it's made fast work of producing the surprisingly polished and capable ZR, adorned with Z Cinema Camera and Nikon / RED branding, and available for a tantalizing price that significantly undercuts rivals.

It packs a bunch of Nikon Z6 III tech, including the same 24MP partially stacked full-frame sensor, 5-axis image stabilization, subject-detection tracking autofocus and more, into an extremely compact, weather-sealed cinema camera body.

We get 6K 60fps video with internal RAW recording, with any one of nine industry-favorite RED color profiles baked in – that's the Nikon / RED amalgamation truly bearing fruit – plus 4K 120fps and Full HD 240fps slow-motion recording.

Handily, shutter angle can be set automatically to 180 degrees, so there's no need to mess around with manual exposure settings, plus the shutter angle can be set to any position between five and 360 degrees manually, should you wish.

Nikon ZR camera with mic attached under low key magenta lighting

The Nikon ZR with new ME-D10 shotgun mic attached – the mic supports the camera's 32-bit float audio capture skills (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

We don't get open gate video recording as in some rivals like the Canon EOS C50, but the ZR has another trick up its sleeve: hold the camera vertically, and its UI automatically rotates, with the vertical orientation embedded in the video files and automatically detected in Nikon's editing software, delivering full-resolution vertical video.

The ZR is the first camera of its kind with internal 32-bit float audio capture, plus what Nikon says is the best-quality internal mics yet – a triple mic combo with Ozo audio and a choice of five directional pickup patterns, including binaural.

Alongside the ZR, Nikon has launched the ME-D10 directional mic (you can see it slotted into the camera's hotshoe in the image above), which is compatible with the camera's 32-bit float capabilities.

This is also the smallest cinema camera I’ve used, yet it still squeezes in a large, brightest-in-class 4-inch vari-angle touchscreen which could do away with the need for attaching a bulky external monitor – which is something I would do with other cameras that feature a smaller 3-inch display. Naturally, there's no viewfinder.

Rear of the Nikon ZR camera under low key magenta lighting

Nikon has put both its own and RED's branding on the ZR, together with Z Cinema Camera (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Given its tiny size, there are compromises. We don’t get some of the pro connectivity found in other pricier compact cinema cameras – for example there’s only a micro HDMI port, not a full-size one. However, if you still feel the need to use an external monitor even with the large 4-inch built-in display, all you'll need is a micro-to-full-size HMDI adaptor to get connected.

SmallRig Advanced Cage Kit for the ZR

SmallRig kindly sent me its dedicated Zr rig for this review, and you can see the setup in the images below. The SmallRig Advanced Cage Kit costs $164.99 at B&H Photo (US) or it costs £149.90 at SmallRig (UK).

Sadly, the ZR lacks mounting points for video accessories and, with no grip, you’ll definitely want to rig it up with a grip or a cage for a better hold. That means forking out for ZR-dedicated gear – Nikon outsources to leading accessory maker SmallRig.

However, at just $2,199.95 / £2,199.99 / AU$3,499, no other cinema camera comes close to the ZR for video features – and this aggressive pricing will soften the blow of any additional outlay on accessories.

I can see the Nikon ZR as a go-to b-cam for many pros, especially those already shooting with a RED camera, for whom the color profile matching will make for a seamless workflow. That said, this is a capable video camera in its own right too.

The Nikon ZR is an incredibly capable and polished compact cinema camera with world-first features, and an exciting first step into the filmmaking space for Nikon. After the ZR launch, Nikon announced at IBC in Amsterdam that it's making video lenses (most Z lenses are designed primarily for photography), so it's clearly gunning to be taken seriously. If it were to launch a higher-end cinema camera with pro connectivity to sit above the ZR, then Nikon will truly find its footing in this space.

Top plate of the Nikon ZR camera under low-key magenta lighting

The compact body is the smallest in this class of cinema camera, with a fairly simple control layout (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Nikon ZR: price and release date

  • Costs $2,199.95 / £2,199.99 / AU$3,499
  • There will be various accessory bundles, TBC
  • Sales started in October

The Nikon ZR costs $2,199.95 / £2,199.99 / AU$3,499. At that price it significantly undercuts rivals – such a feature set is typically found in cameras that cost around 50% more, and more often in cameras closer to twice the price, even if design-wise it has more in common with the Sony ZV-E1 which is closer in cost.

That said, there are no video accessories included, and you'll want to fork out for some in order to enjoy the ZR's handling and feature set to its full potential. These will likely include a grip and / or cage, plus Nikon's new ME-D10 directional mic, which is compatible with the camera's 32-bit float audio format.

Nikon doesn't make its own accessories such as grips or rigs, relying on third parties such as SmallRig to supply those (see prices in the boxout above).

The Nikon ZR went on sale in October 2025.

Nikon ZR camera under low key magenta lighting

The ZR is compact cinema camera for run-and-gun filmmaking – an ideal b-cam (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Nikon ZR: specs

Video

6K up to 60fps, Raw internal

Photo

24MP full-frame

Lens mount

Nikon Z

Autofocus

Dual Pixel CMOS AF II

Screen

4-inch, 3.07m-dot, vari-angle

Viewfinder

N/A

Weight

19oz / 540g (body only)

Battery

EN-EL15 (same type as Nikon Z6 III / Z8)

Nikon ZR: Design

  • Smallest and lightest cinema camera of its kind; weather-resistant
  • Large 4-inch, 3.07m-dot touch LCD with brightest in-class display, no viewfinder
  • No mounting points for accessories
  • 3x internal mics, Ozo audio with five directional pickup patterns

As far as I know, the Nikon ZR is the smallest and lightest camera of its kind, weighing just 19oz / 540g (body-only). It's also weather-resistant, which is a rarity in the cinema camera world.

There are pros and cons resulting from the tiny dimensions. Drawbacks include enthusiast-level connectivity, like micro HMDI rather than full-size (though you only need an adaptor to remedy this), and the absence of a grip or mounting points for accessories. A camera like the Canon EOS C50 feels more high-end, given its pro-level connectivity.

It feels best to keep things simple with the ZR, making the most of its compact body and powerful features by minimizing the number of accessories in play. A grip is the one accessory I would absolutely look into buying, while if you want to rig up the ZR you'll need a cage, which will in turn allow you to attach accessories such as lights and mics – Nikon has partnered with SmallRig to create grips and cages for the ZR (pricing above).

Despite its tiny body, the ZR packs a large 4-inch touch display. As such, I don't really see the need for attaching a bulky external 5-inch monitor. It certainly helps that the ZR's 3.07m-dot display is wonderful bright and vivid – the brightest in its class, says Nikon. I've used the ZR in a studio and outdoors, and have been seriously impressed.

Other cinema cameras, like the Sony FX3 and Canon EOS C50, only have 3-inch displays, while the Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K has a mega 5-inch unit. In the case of the Sony and Canon models, I'd absolutely want to add a monitor to my setup.

As great as the screen is – a real standout feature – it's only a flip-out screen. You can't tilt the screen with it tucked up neatly into the camera body, only when it is flipped out. There are unique benefits to both types, but some filmmakers would probably rather a tilt screen instead. There are a few cameras with 4-axis (dual hinge) displays which offer both, such as the Panasonic Lumix S1 II and Sony A7 V.

The camera's top plate is pretty simple: there's a photo / video switch (though sadly the UI remains the same whichever setting you're in, rather than there being dedicated menus for photo and video), record button with rocker, plus three buttons for accessing items such as display settings.

The rear is dominated by the large touch display, which when folded away reveals the Nikon / RED branding. Beside it are a joystick for controls such as autofocus point selection, a menu button (a quick press brings up the main menu and a long press brings up the quick menu, which is a nice touch) and a playback button.

Battery life promises to be okay, given that the ZR uses the same EN-EL15 battery as the Nikon Z6 III and Nikon Z8. There are no vents or cooling fans, though, which would normally suggest that a camera of this type would be prone to overheating during long recording sessions.

I've recorded short and long clips during my in-depth testing, and haven't run into overheating issues, but I haven't really, really pushed the camera. However, Nikon says the camera's magnesium alloy body is a natural heat sink, and promises that long record times are possible – up to 125 minutes of 6K in one take – and based on my experience with previous Nikon cameras I have no reason to doubt it.

There's exciting tech under the hood, too, namely a totally new Ozo audio setup, which comprises three mics. Together, these offer five directional pickup patterns, including front narrow (like a shotgun mic), front wide, rear and binaural 3D stereo.

Nikon says this Ozo system is the best internal mic setup of any camera, and it's supported by a world-first: in-camera 32-bit float audio capture. Nikon's new ME-D10 shotgun mic, released at the same time as the ZR, supports 32-bit float audio too. Those are impressive audio features for any camera, let alone one at this price point.

Nikon ZR: Performance

  • 6K up to 60fps, 4K up to 120fps, Full HD up to 240fps
  • Internal RAW recording and RED color profiles (up to nine in-camera at any time)
  • Subject-detection autofocus and 5-axis image stabilization
  • 24MP stills, partially stacked full-frame sensor

For the most part, the Nikon ZR has the same photo and video specs as the Z6 III (which we awarded five stars out of five in our in-depth review), which means a full-frame partially stacked 24MP sensor equipped with 5-axis image stabilization.

Add in decent subject-detection tracking autofocus and the ZR is a capable stills shooter, although while this is useful for on-set stills, the main focus of my testing is of course the ZR's video chops.

Nikon ZR camera under low key magenta lighting

There's the partially stacked 24MP full-frame sensor and Nikon Z mount (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Like the Z6 III, the Nikon ZR shoots 6K up to 60fps, 4K up to 120fps and Full HD up to 240fps. There's the option for shooting internal RAW with a 12-bit color depth, or keeping things simple and baking in the look at capture with 10-bit recording.

Given the array of creative styles and color profiles on board, which includes space for up to nine RED color profiles at any one time, you might just feel happy to skip shooting RAW, with its large file sizes and grading demands, and use one of the many baked-in color profiles instead to save editing time and space on your hard drives.

I shot a variety of video clips during a half-day session with a drummer in action inside a studio, including 6K RAW, a few of the RED profiles baked in, and 240fps slow-motion – see my sample video, above. In this setting, the ZR delivered some superb-looking video. Outside of the studio, the ZR continued to impress me.

Including image stabilization certainly bolsters the ZR's handheld use credentials, but I've shot with other cameras recently with better stabilization for video, such as the Lumix S1 II.

Nikon ZR: testing scorecard

Nikon ZR

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Price

Incredible value considering the features on board, if not the pedigree of design

5/5

Design

Designed to be as compact as possible, it misses pro-level connectivity, but comes with a 4-inch screen

4/5

Performance

Long record times, powerful audio recording options, average image stabilization

4.5/5

Image and video quality

6K video up to 60fps, internal RAW recording, RED color profiles – the results can be stunning

4.5/5

Should I buy the Nikon ZR?

Buy it if...

You want maximum video bang for buck
Majoring on video features, the ZR can deliver stunning 6K video and crisp audio.

You want a compact body for on-the-go video
The smallest camera of its kind but with a bright and large 4-inch screen that eliminates the need for an external monitor, the ZR is the ultimate portable package.

Don't buy it if...

You want pro-grade design
Yes it's weather sealed and sturdy, but the ZR lacks some of the pro-level video camera features such as mounting points.

You prefer a tilt screen
The ZR's screen is fabulous, but it's only a flip-out one. If you want the 4-axis tilt and flip-out design, there are alternatives like the Lumix S1 II

Nikon ZR: also consider

Canon EOS C50

Canon announced the EOS C50 just a day before the Nikon ZR. It costs around 50% more, but comes with a top grip. In many ways the two cameras' video features are similar, including video resolution, maximum frame rates, internal RAW recording and autofocus. However, the Canon camera feels slightly more high-end with pro connectivity, while in the ZR's favor are its compact size, larger touch display and, impressively, its sensor-based stabilization.

See my Canon EOS C50 reviewView Deal

Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K

The Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K is pretty much the same price as the Nikon ZR, and in many respects has similar video features: a full-frame sensor with 6K video, 12-bit internal RAW recording and dual base ISO. It also packs a mammoth 5-inch display and has a solid choice of L-mount lenses. However, its slow-motion recording is more limited, while autofocus performance isn't a patch on Nikon's. It's also much bulkier and heavier.

See our Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K reviewView Deal

Sony FX3

The Sony FX3 is an industry-favorite compact 4K cinema camera with superb low-light skills, thanks to its 12MP full-frame sensor. Like the ZR, it's designed to be rugged, with accessories such as its (bundled) top handle. It has the pro connectivity you'd hope for, excellent battery life, and a wide range of video lenses. However, its video recording feels somewhat dated compared to the ZR's 6K internal RAW, and it's practically twice the price. In some ways, the ZR has more in common with the Sony ZV-E1 which uses the same sensor as the FX3, but in a more enthusiast-level compact body.View Deal

Top of Nikon ZR camera under low key magenta lighting

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

How I tested the Nikon ZR

  • I had an initial half a day with the ZR in a studio, follwed by a Nikon-hosted event at the IBC show, and then for an extended loan period at my own leisure
  • I paired the ZR with multiple Nikon Z lenses and tried out the new ME-D10 mic
  • I've used the camera handheld without any accessories, but also in the dedicated SmallRig cage

I had the opportunity to shoot with the Nikon ZR for half a day ahead of its launch, using it for an indoor stage-lit shoot of a drummer in action. Nikon supplied an array of Z-mount lenses for the shoot, of which I used a few primes and zooms. The new ME-D10 directional mic was also available on the day.

There followed another shoot experience with Nikon at the IBC show, and consequently a long loan of several weeks. SmallRig supplied me with its Advanced Cage kit for that extended review period.

During my test time, I have shot in 6K RAW, 240fps slow motion, and to try out various color profiles, focusing on the RED looks.

I have plenty of experience using rival cinema cameras such as the Sony FX3, so I'm well equipped to make an informed initial assessment of the ZR. That said, cinema cameras need to prove themselves as tools their users can rely on shoot after shoot, which is not something anyone has had the luxury of yet with the camera being so new.

I tested the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod, and it’s the best set of legs for the modern content creator
6:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II: two-minute review

Many years ago I worked in a camera store, and a regular topic of conversation was how to make tripods sound exciting to customers.

Admittedly, they are accessories that many photographers see as necessary tools, but not ones worthy of the same attention as the latest cameras and lenses. I doubt every photographer would be as actively vocal about a new tripod as they might the release of the Canon EOS R6 Mark III, Leica M EV1, or even an action camera like the DJI Osmo Action 6.

Every so often, however, a tripod comes along that truly defines what every content creator should aspire to own in a camera support. These are the models that usually make it onto our list of the best tripods guide.

Some tripods, like the fabulous Manfrotto One hybrid photo and video tripod, hit the headlines due to their mainstream appeal, while others quietly fill a gap in the market for specific uses and a tightly-targeted customer base, and the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II is one such model.

Before diving into what makes this set of legs the best for shooting video, it’s important to understand how a video-centric tripod differs in its features compared to one made solely for stills photography.

Unsurprisingly, a photo tripod is all about providing the ultimate stability for sharpness in a single frame. You need these models to allow you to precisely place the camera for a stationary composition. With a video tripod, meanwhile, you need the freedom to move the camera during a shot, to create a cinematic pan that follows the subject.

You need to keep the target in the frame as it moves through the scene, while maintaining smooth, fluid movement that isn’t jerky or rife with distracting micro-vibrations. If you're shooting with one of the best 4K cameras or best cameras for professional filmmaking, you want to ensure the quality of your footage isn't let down by your tripod.

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II has a rugged aluminum construction with high-grade plastic joints and control knobs (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

When fully extended, the head can be comfortably raised to head height for dynamic framing opportunities (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

Video models also have a greater provision of accessory attachment points, which allow the user to add audio and lighting equipment, a larger external monitor or teleprompter, for example. The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II has three 3/8-inch accessory mounting points arranged around the tripod bowl, which not only enables multiple accessories to be added to your system but also allows you to select a position for the optimal balance of the setup.

Speaking of stability and balance, the Ace M MS Mk II features a mid-level spreader to prevent leg creep under the weight of a heavier cine camera system and to ensure that all of the legs are properly spaced. The camera level changing between shots is a pain for photographers, but a potential disaster if it happens mid-video clip. The unit on the Ace M MS Mk II is sturdily constructed, and easily removed when it’s not required.

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

The bundled spreader is well-made, matching the metal construction of the legs themselves (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

The leg sections slide past each other externally, meaning they can be more easily cleaned after a shoot than a collapsing stacked design (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

I’ve always preferred a mid-level type, rather than ground-level, which might provide good stability in a studio setting but quickly becomes an obstruction and speed killer when on location. It’s ideal that such a spreader is removable, giving users the stability needed for high payloads, but the flexibility to spread the tripod and capture lower-level shots.

The Ace M MS Mk II an aluminum tripod, rather than carbon fiber, and with an aluminum design there is always going to be a weight penalty. None of Sachtler’s tripods could be described as lightweight, but this is not uncommon for video models; indeed, it’s necessary to provide the proper support for the larger gear they will be paired with.

Yet at 4.4kg, the Ace M MS Mk II is still highly manageable compared to other professional video products. The Manfrotto MVH502A, for example, weighs in at 11.7lbs / 5.3kg while supporting up to a 22lbs / 10kg payload. Meanwhile, the Sirui BCT-3203 matches the Sachtler’s weight exactly despite being made from carbon fiber.

Build quality is impressive throughout, from the aluminum tubes of the legs themselves to the high-impact plastic of the control points and bowl surrounds. All of the materials are solid to the touch, notably the plastic components, which have very little give when depressed. All threads and screws are precisely milled, and didn’t exhibit any sticking or slipping when operated during testing.

I liked that there didn’t seem to be many potential points for moisture and dirt ingress. Unlike the common stacked multi-segment leg design seen in many photo tripods, where one section collapses into the other, possibly taking contaminants with it that can cause seizing over time, most moving components are external and can be accessed on the Ace M MS Mk II. This makes cleaning and maintenance easier, and less likely to be neglected post-shoot.

Functionality is also excellent. The many dials, knobs, and locks take some familiarization when you first use the tripod, but every control is smooth and logically placed. The friction controls for both head pitch and pan movements are exceptionally effective, allowing fluid motion in dynamic footage. Meanwhile, when locked, static clips were sharp and generally vibration-free, at least in moderately still air.

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

There are three levels of friction selectable for rotational panning and for pitch control (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

The knobs and locks on the bundled video head are made from plastic, but still have a knurled, high-quality finish (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

The less rigid microstructure of carbon fiber means it has fewer resonant properties, so it transmits less vibration to the tripod head. Despite this, the overall weight of the aluminum Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II made it more resistant to wind buffeting than my Gitzo carbon tripod, and I was able to capture sharper images once the wind speed increased.

Similar to the excellent Manfrotto One hybrid tripod, the legs of the Ace M MS Mk II can be extended with a reduced number of actions. Rather than having to unlock each leg section individually, unscrewing the mid-level locks raises the head to chest height, and then the lower section can be further extended with the secondary screw locks. It’s not quite as smooth an operation as the Manfrotto One, but it still wins points for speed.

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

The tripod can be extended to full height in two actions, using the leg locks at the mid-point and base of the legs (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

I must also give a mention of the tripod feet, which are both tough and easy to adjust. By simply rotating them on their screw thread, you can reveal or retract the spikes within, depending on the terrain type on which you plan to use the legs. It might sound like a minor point, but I really appreciate that they are also bright red. The weakness of this screw-thread design is that it’s not too difficult to over-loosen a tripod foot, which then detaches, and standard black rubber feet are easy to miss – I’m ashamed to add up how many tripod feet I’ve ‘misplaced’ like this over the years. Perhaps I’m just careless, but in the heat of a rapid shoot, where you're changing locations a lot, the highly visible color is a thoughtful touch.

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

The mid-level spreader can be removed when the need arises to place the legs on an incline or when uneven ground makes the setup unstable with it in place (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II: key specs

Maximum height:

66.5 inches / 169cm

Closed height:

30.7 inches / 78cm

Bowl size:

75mm

Materials:

Aluminum

Max payload:

8.8lbs / 4kg

Leg sections:

Two

Tilt Range:

90 to -75 degrees

Attachment points:

3x 3/8-inch accessory threads

Weight:

9.7lbs / 4.4kg

Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II price and availability

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod was launched in April 2024 and is available from several specialist photographic retailers, bundled with the Ace M Fluid Head and flowtech®75 Mid-level spreader. The cost of the kit is $985 / £858 / AU$1,545.

The tripod is available across major markets, in the USA, UK, and Australia, although as this is a specialist video accessory it can be trickier to find at some mainstream retailers, or it is listed but with limited availability. We sourced examples at Adorama in the United States, WEX in the UK, and Videocraft in Australia.

Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II: Also consider

Manfotto One hybrid tripod

The Manfrotto One is probably the best alternative option if you shoot both video content and still photos. It combines several features catered for each type of user. While it lacks a spreader, it does feature a rapid extension system and a balancing center column.

Read our Manfrotto One hybrid tripod review

Should I buy the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II?

The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod

(Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)

Buy it if...

Video content is your primary focus
The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II is a video-oriented product from the ground up, so you'll find plenty of tailored features for motion content creation. The included spreader, quick set-up speed, and fluid head are the ideal tools for pro-looking video.

You use a mirrorless camera system
The 4kg payload limit might not be enough if you regularly use a large camcorder or interchangeable lens video camera system. If, however, you make lots of content with your mirrorless system, such as a Canon EOS R5 Mark II, or Sony A7 V, the load-weight balance is perfect.

Don't buy it if...

You don't use lots of accessories
The tripod is designed to support a modular system of accessories, which is in part what you're paying for. If you don't plan on using an external monitor, or a rig such as a Magic Arm, these attachment points will be somewhat wasted on you.

You're a vlogger
While vlogging still requires a good-quality camera support, if you're used to a POV style of filmmaking, you might find the bulk and weight of the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II more of a hindrance than a help.

How I tested the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II

  • I spent approximately one month testing the tripod in a variety of weather conditions
  • I used the tripod to support my camera in various locations, across multiple types of terrain
  • I mounted a variety of camera types on the tripod to test stability, from a lightweight mirrorless system to a pro DSLR

To ensure I got a representative idea of the capabilities of the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II, I took it out on location with me several times over several weeks. These shoots covered landscapes, coastal shots, woodland scenics, and even low-light cityscapes.

I captured video footage and examined frame grabs to assess sharpness in windier conditions or when water was moving around the tripod feet. I also shot some long-exposure still images to get a better picture of the type and direction of vibrations, where present.

I tried using the legs with and without the spreader fitted. I placed the feet on different terrain conditions as a routine part of my test shooting, including waterlogged soil, sand, and concrete. I also used the tripod at various heights to test how stability and vibration absorption changed as the legs were extended.

First reviewed December 2025

The Honor Band 10 is such good value that I bought one myself, and I’ve been using it every day for months
12:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Fitness Trackers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Honor Band 10: One-minute review

When I made the jump over to using an Honor phone as my daily driver, it only made sense to leave my old Huawei Band 9 behind and pick up a matching fitness tracker. Enter the Honor Band 10, the Chinese tech brand’s latest affordable fitness tool promising a wealth of smartwatch-lite features at an incredibly low price.

But does the Honor Band 10 actually deliver? Absolutely, although there are one or two rough edges to bear in mind before you rush to add it to your cart. Starting with the good, the sleek design is a winner; there’s only one color available, a basic black, but a charming golden accent around the edges of the sleek 1.57-inch AMOLED touchscreen make it look far more premium than the price would suggest.

Sure, the body of the Honor Band 10 is made from plastic, or ‘durable polymer materials’ according to the manufacturer, but it doesn’t feel cheap and my model hasn’t managed to pick up any noticeable scratches even after months of daily use. Unlike other options on the market, the Honor Band 10 doesn’t have any buttons either, giving it a very streamlined appearance.

When you first take it out of the box you have to turn it on by plugging it into its magnetic changing cable and during use, waking the screen is as simple as raising your wrist or a quick tap on the glass – a very seamless, almost Apple-like experience.

The Honor Band 10 being used outside.

(Image credit: Dashiell Wood / Future)

The battery life is solid, lasting about three days with the always-on-display enabled, but there are plenty of smart features to extend that to over a week. I particularly like the ability to schedule the always-on-display, so you don’t waste any charge keeping a clock on screen outside the times you really need it.

It's compatible with the Honor Health app (which you can sync with the likes of Apple Health easily), which is simple to use and offers access to a good amount of data including the usual overall activity level, daily step count, total calories burned, sleep tracking and your heart rate, in addition to a daily health report. The watch comes with a decent number of faces out of the box in both analog and digital styles, but you can always download more if you’re not happy with them thanks to a wide range of both official and community-made options to choose from.

My one complaint comes from the step tracking on the band itself. It’s a little optimistic, especially compared to my other fitness trackers. I make an effort to hit 10,000 steps per day and when I wore it at the same time as an old Fitbit Charge HR, I found that the Honor Band 10 was off by about ten percent or so in the upwards direction, which isn’t the end of the world given the low price – but could be a good reason to consider a more premium option instead.

There are also some small issues with the smartwatch features. Notifications come through almost instantly, but the media playback controls are very hit-and-miss. I often have to tap multiple times to skip a song, or notice that the song title hasn’t actually updated to reflect what’s playing. This feature is also entirely disabled if you’re using iOS, which is a shame. However, you’re not really missing out on too much in my experience.

Honor Band 10: Specifications

Price

£44.99 (around $60 / AU$90)

Dimensions

43.2 x 28.2 x 8.99mm

Display

1.57-inch AMOLED

GPS?

No

Battery life

14 days

Honor Band 10: Price and availability

  • Costs £44.99 (around $60 / AU$90)
  • Not available in the US
  • Expect frequent discounts

I purchased the Honor Band 10 when it first arrived on the Honor store back in May.

It was priced at £49.99 and cost me a total of £44.99 plus shipping thanks to a £5 launch day discount. I can confidently say that the band is great value at the price I paid, though its going rate has since been lowered to £44.99, with frequent discounts down to £39.99, making it an even more tempting proposition.

Unfortunately, as with other Honor products it’s hard to find in the US as it’s not officially sold. Your best option would be to import the band from third-party sellers on sites like Aliexpress, but you should be aware that you may lose any warranty or support and that compatibility isn't guaranteed.

Honor products are also not officially available in Australia, so expect similar hurdles there.

Scorecard

Category

Comment

Score

Value

The Honor Band 10 is fantastic value, especially if you grab it one of the many sales throughout the year.

4.5/5

Design

The classy buttonless look of the Honor Band 10 helps it stand out from the crowd, though it is still a plastic body.

4/5

Features

There are plenty of features here given the low price, including some that you would usually expect from a more expensive smartwatch.

4.5/5

Performance

The performance is good, but has some compromises. The step counter is a tad optimistic, and media playback controls are a bit iffy.

4/5

Should I buy the Honor Band 10?

The Honor Band 10 being used outside.

(Image credit: Dashiell Wood / Future)

Buy it if…

You want a fantastic value fitness tracker
It’s hard to complain about the Honor Band 10 given its rock bottom price tag. You’re getting an awful lot of smart band here for not very much cash.

You love the look
The Honor Band 10 stands out from its biggest competitors with its sleek, buttonless design. It only comes in black, but the gold accent looks lush on your wrist.

Don’t buy it if…

You want perfect accuracy
If you’re after the most accurate possible step counter, then you should probably swerve the Honor Band 10 as it is a little off. You’ll need to spend more to get something significantly better, though.

Also consider

Xiaomi Smart Band 9
This is the budget fitness tracker to beat, and the Honor Band 10 puts up a pretty good fight. The Smart Band 9 is a little cheaper and is more widely available, but I prefer the design of the Honor.
Read our full Xiaomi Smart Band 9 review

Fitbit Charge 6
The Fitbit Charge 6 is double the price of the Honor Band 10, but delivers much more accurate step tracking. It’s the one to choose if that’s your biggest concern, though it comes with its own drawbacks.
Read our full Fitbit Charge 6 review

How I tested the Honor Band 10

I bought the Honor Band 10 back in May 2025 and have been using it daily since. I’ve taken it on plenty of walks in my quest to hit 10,000 daily steps and measured its accuracy against other fitness trackers that I own. I’ve also been using it as a watch – even occasionally glancing at the time throughout the writing of this review.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed November 2025

I was stunned by the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robovac’s excellent cleaning performance – but it’s slightly undermined by minor inefficiencies
7:50 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Robot Vacuums Smart Home | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra: Two-minute review

Innovation in the world of robot vacuum cleaners is evolving by leaps and bounds – you only have to look at the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra and the Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone to see how far we’ve come. While the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra isn’t so groundbreaking, it still boasts industry-leading vacuum suction (30,000Pa) and features I’ve not seen anywhere else – like all brushes getting raised when mopping and the mop getting covered when rolling over a carpet. In fact, this is Dreame’s first robovac to get a roller mop.

While these unique features are welcome additions, the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra shines where it matters the most – cleaning floors. I’ve previously said the same thing in my Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni review, but this Dreame does a better job of vacuuming carpets.

I wouldn’t put too much stock in that 30,000Pa of suction as that spec doesn’t always translate to 100% hair pickup on very dirty carpets, but I’d say it gets close – 98% to 99% – which is much better than most other robovacs I’ve tested. Edge cleaning on carpets, though, is a little disappointing in comparison, but this isn’t unique to Dreame – most side brushes don’t have stiff bristles to sweep up embedded hair, fur and fibres along room edges of wall-to-wall carpets, and suction power isn’t distributed evenly across the entire length of the central bar brush. In fact, even my Dyson V15s Detect Submarine finds it hard to get right to the edge where carpet meets wall – unless I use the crevice tool.

Hard-floor cleaning, however, is 100% pickup of all visible dirt and debris. Importantly, there's very little scattering of larger debris as the side brush is raised when it senses excessive dirt. And mopping by the roller results in perfect stain removal, no matter how old and deep-seated it is. I love that it dries the dust bag after each cleaning run, which means it can safely go over a little wet area and suck up some moisture, although I would still hesitate to send it over a large wet spill.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot moving away from its dock

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Mobility is fantastic, with extremely silent wheels, although the raising mechanism can be heard and the robot dropping back to its normal position after crossing a threshold sounds like something is breaking. And despite some teething issues when I first set it up, I found its navigation abilities quite efficient. I will admit, however, that it does occasionally clean one spot repeatedly even though it’s not excessively dirty, and that eats into its battery life.

Battery use is also affected slightly by the fact that its suction kicks in as soon as the robot exits its dock, so it’s using up precious power even before it gets to its starting point. In my tests, the battery would drop by 1% to 2% depending on which room I would send it to before it began its task. This isn’t a deal breaker for some homes, but it may not finish cleaning larger spaces in one go.

Another minor complaint I have is the app. As nice as it looks, it takes a little getting used to and, even for someone like me who has ample experience with robovacs, I struggled to find some necessary settings (in my case, carpet-cleaning options). Again, not a deal breaker – and I’m yet to meet a robot vacuum with the perfect app (Roborock comes close) – but a touch of streamlining would make it a lot easier to use, especially if you’re going to shell out a four-figure sum on the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot on a carpet

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Price & availability

  • List price: $1,599 / £1,299 / AU$2,999
  • Released date: November 2025
  • Available in most major markets, including the US, UK and Australia

With a suggested retail price of $1,599 / £1,299 / AU$2,999, there’s no denying that the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra sits firmly in the premium robovac space, although it’s not as expensive as the $1,999.99 / £1,399 / AU$3,499 mop-swapping Dreame Matrix10 Ultra. It’s still a flagship model and has features to justify its high asking price but, if clean floors is what you’re after, you can get something a little cheaper and not compromise on what’s important.

Case in point is the Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni: it performs wonderfully well although, like most robovacs, its app leaves much to be desired, and you get flagship cleaning for $1,099 / £1,099 / AU$2,499 at full price. Given how often robot vacuums get discounted, this Deebot can be had for around the $800 / £800 / AU$1,500 mark, if not cheaper. I suspect the Aqua10 Ultra will also see a similar treatment during major sales, but its full price stings a little.

In comparison, the Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone brings some cutting-edge tech to the table – fast charging and an agentic AI helper to name just a couple – and does away entirely with the replaceable dust bag. It costs $1,499 / £1,199 / AU$2,999 and potentially offers better value for larger homes.

Dreame, however, is known for pricing its robot vacuums quite high – the X50 Ultra Complete, which uses traditional mop pads instead of a roller and doesn’t have all the fancy features of the Aqua10 Ultra, has a list price of $1,699 / £1,299 / AU$2,999.

• Value score: 3.5 / 5

The large control button on the top of Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Specs

Max suction

30,000Pa

Robot dimensions (W x H)

35cm x 120cm (LDS raised) / 35cm x 9.75cm (LDS lowered)

Robot weight

5.8kg

Dock dimensions (H x D x L)

50.5cm x 44cm x 42cm

Dock weight

11.1kg

Robot bin volume

220ml

Dust bag capacity

up to 3.2L

Dock water-tank volume

4L clean / 3.5L dirty

Mop type

Roller

Battery capacity

6,400mAh

Robot max clearance

4.2cm single step / 8cm double step

Navigation

Retractable LiDAR

Dock type

Charge, dusty emptying, roller hot-water washing, roller drying, auto-dispensing one of two detergents

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Design

  • First Dreame robovac to get a roller mop
  • Boasts step-vaulting feet and a retractable navigation turret
  • Boxy and classy dock design with dual-detergent dispenser drawer

The moment I took the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra out of its box, my first thought was, “It looks like a large Marshall speaker!”. If you aren’t familiar with this speaker brand, they’re quite boxy and most of the models I know about have a black finish. This is in no way a complaint; it’s my brain making connections I didn’t expect it to – and I love the look. It’s very classic, with clean lines and metallic accents that ooze ‘premium-ness’. Somehow even the green light around the main control button of the robot while it's charging makes it look fabulous rather than garish.

There are a lot of thoughtful design elements here other than the looks, like soft rubber washers that make it easy to remove the dock cover, a dual detergent dispenser drawer and a retractable navigation puck on the top of the robot. It even comes with a brush to clean the wash tray, which I’ve even used to scrub the dirty-water tank.

Brass accents on the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra dock

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Robot design

Sticking with the usual round robot, the Aqua10 Ultra isn’t all that different from many of its premium competitors, with a sleek look – a black robot in my case – that’s enhanced by a retracting navigation puck. When docked, the puck stays lowered and has a ring of green light when it’s moving up or down, or when it’s charging – but is unlit when fully topped up and on standby.

The top of the puck is brass coloured and houses the main controls. It looks like a single button that’s divided in two, with one half to power the robot up or down, while the other half is to send it back to its dock (home button).

Around the puck is a fully removable lid, under which you’ll find a dust box which, strangely, is a lot smaller than I’ve seen in competing models. It’s just 220ml and while it’s not affected my cleaning routines, I suspect it will be emptying itself a lot more frequently in homes with pets.

Under the lid is also the Wi-Fi indicator light and the all-important QR code to get you set up with the companion app. Watch out for how much you handle the robot, though, because it’s highly prone to picking up fingerprint smudges that aren’t easy to wipe off (I’m fussy, what can I say?).

The front of the robot, as with all others like it, is the camera window that houses not one, but two AI cameras with HD quality that, Dreame says, allows it to capture a 3D image of the robot's surroundings. A side sensor window is also visible towards the end of the bumper.

The undercarriage is where all the action is and here’s where the Aqua10 Ultra differs from many of its competitors. Firstly, it has a dual-brush system for better cleaning on carpets and hard floors alike without hair tangles.

Second, it’s the first Dreame robot vacuum to get a roller mop and here too there’s been some innovation. The roller is made from slightly more bristly fibres than fluff or microfibre to allow it to get into cracks or grouting to ‘scrub’ as it passes over hard floors. It also has a fluffer that spins in the opposite direction to the roller to keep the fibres, well, fluffed so it’s effective at all times.

The underside of the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Importantly, this is the first robovac I’ve tested that actually has a cover for the roller that engages automatically when it senses a carpet. I couldn’t even see the cover when it was doing a mop and went over my living room rug, but no part of my colorful carpet was damp, something I’ve experienced with other robot vacuum cleaners. The roller also extends to clean along edges, although it does miss corners like pretty much every other robovac I’ve tested.

Like its X50 Ultra and Matrix10 Ultra siblings, the Aqua10 also gets the ProLeap system that allows the robot to traverse shallow steps – it can climb 4cm in one step, and another 4cm in a second step if it needs to. It’s no stair climber though, this only helps it get across higher thresholds that some other robots would have trouble with. At setup, the app will even ask you if you want it to use one ‘foot’ at a time, like a human, or raise both feet and roll over.

I’ve gotten to a point where I wish robovac makers would use stiffer bristles for the side brush because I’ve seen them all struggle to push dirt when moving over carpets, although they work very well on hard floors. It’s the same here – stiffer bristles on my fully carpeted bedroom would have been fabulous. This isn’t a complaint, more a wish for the next iteration.

Dock design

I was sent a black unit for this review, although I’ve seen pictures of a white model too. Either way, the base station for the Aqua10 Ultra looks darn good. Sharp corners and clean lines are reminiscent of mid-Century architectural aesthetics and, as I’ve said before, I get Marshall speaker vibes. And that’s a compliment – I love it!

A lot of thought has gone into the various parts of the base station too. For example, I love that the front cover that hides the dust bag and detergent dispenser is tight thanks to a rubber washer around it, but it comes off and slips on smoothly – no harsh clicks or excessive elbow grease needed as I’ve experienced with other such models that make me feel like I’m about to break something.

I have to mention the dispenser here before moving on. It has two slots for different solutions (there’s a bottle of detergent and pet odor neutralizer in the box – color-coded so you know which goes in what slot), so you could switch up your detergent use if you wish, but the grip to pull the dispenser out of the base station is designed for right-handed people. That’s not to say left-handers can’t remove it, it will just need a little wrist twisting.

Above this slot is the covered hatch for the two water tanks, while below is the housing for the robot itself. Inside, the wash tray can be removed for cleaning as necessary and you’ll find a brush in the box to aid with that. In fact, I found the brush to be handy in scrubbing out the dirty-water tank when I’ve forgetfully let a little ecosystem grow inside it.

Handily, the rear of the base station has a niche for your fingers when you need to move it to another location, plus cable management that is missing from some robovacs I’ve previously reviewed.

• Design score: 5 / 5

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Performance

  • Arguably the best vacuuming and mopping I’ve experienced with a robovac
  • 100ºC/212ºF roller mop washing
  • Mostly good navigation and battery life, but it could be better

Getting the Aqua10 Ultra connected to my phone and set up for mapping barely took any time. Before the map creation, though, I allowed the robot to charge fully while I tried to get familiar with the app.

Mapping took no more than seven minutes in the test space for this review, which was a one-bedroom apartment of about 40sqm/430sq ft area. It has mixed flooring, with wall-to-wall carpeting in the bedroom and two types of tile flooring everywhere else. The map was accurate for the most part, but I merged and divided a couple of rooms to delineate the open-plan space.

One thing I loved about the initial mapping process was that I didn’t hear the robot at all. Other such models I’ve tested, I’ve at least heard the wheels – here, not a sound. Wheels are well oiled and very smooth, at least on the tiles in my test space.

I then had some teething issues with the Aqua10 Ultra in that my very first task for it was a single-room clean, which it refused to do. I kept getting a ‘destination not found’ error. Even after a full reset and remapping, the issue didn’t go away. I later got it to do a full-home clean (what Dreame calls “global cleaning” in the app) and everything worked a charm after that, even custom routines or single-room cleans.

The headline of Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot shining under furniture

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Vacuuming tests

Dreame lists the suction power at an industry-leading 30,000Pa, but don’t get taken in by that number – a few factors go into how well a robot vacuum can suck up hair, dirt and debris, including airflow through the inside of the bot. That said, the Aqua10 Ultra doesn’t disappoint.

I don’t think I’ve been better impressed by any other robovac as much as I’ve been by this Dreame. I made sure there was a lot of hair embedded into the carpet fibers of the bedroom before its first real test and it did a fantastic job on its Intense setting (there is a Max suction too). On hard floors, Standard is more than enough for regular cleaning tasks, although I would recommend switching it up to Intense if you’re trying to clean up a relatively dirty section of tile or wood.

The Aqua10 Ultra is a rare robovac that also managed to get bits of dirt out of grout too. I tested this by sprinkling some tea from a bag into spaces between tiles in my kitchen and not a speck of black was visible on the white background after it was done on its Intense suction setting. Other premium models I’ve tested have struggled with this task.

Another vacuuming feature I love is the raising of the side brush. This happens every time the robot senses a very dirty area with larger pieces of debris (oats in testing) to prevent scattering. And that translates to 100% pickup across the entire area.

The only time I used Max suction power was when I allowed dust and hair to collect on the bedroom carpet over three weeks and pickup was about 98%, with only the edges suffering from a not-so-good vacuuming. The reason that edge cleaning on the carpet suffers is not unique to Dreame, it’s all robovacs – the bristles of the side brush just aren’t stiff enough to push all hair and debris within carpet fibers along room edges towards the central brushes.

I tried the lowest suction setting (Quiet) only once and I wasn’t particularly impressed – it might be fine if your floors are cleaned daily and you don’t have pets or kids.

Mopping tests

Mopping is probably what the Aqua10 Ultra was truly designed to do and it does it very well. Not only is the roller continually washed with fresh water as it’s mopping, but you also get two choices of pressure the roller can apply on floors. The latter might seem like a good thing on paper but, to be honest, Light pressure is fine for daily mopping when the floors are relatively clean. I would think Normal pressure is what most users would need on a regular basis.

With water levels set to high (level 27) to suit the kind of tiles in my test space, I found the Aqua10 Ultra was capable of tackling most dried stains. Dusty footprints are very easy for it to remove, but it also managed to get rid of spilt-and-dried tea. It even got rid of an unidentified caked-in stain close to my living room rug that my previous robot vacuum wasn’t able to mop up.

Extended roller mop under the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

For the first time when testing a robovac I felt comfortable sending it to mop up a small wet spill – and that’s only because Dreame promised that the central and side brushes would be raised. Sure enough, a few drops of water weren’t an issue and any moisture that got sucked into the onboard dust box and, hence, into the dust bag, isn’t going to be an issue as the bag in the dock is dried after every single vacuum or mop-after-vacuum session is complete.

Admittedly this test is based on small spills, like a few drops of water on the bathroom floor or a tiny bit of milk on the kitchen tiles, but I’ve previously avoided sending any robovac over something wet, no matter how small. That being said, I’d still be very hesitant to get the Aqua10 Ultra to clean a larger wet spill as I’d worry about the filter inside the onboard dust box.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra roller mop under the robot

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

If you’ve got mixed flooring, you can choose what action the robot takes when mopping – avoid carpets altogether, raise the roller mop or cross without cleaning. I had the Aqua10 Ultra set to mop-raise at all times and, the best part, the roller has its own cover that automatically engages as soon as it senses a carpet.

I’ve never been able to see the cover engage, but I’ve had no damp patches on my carpets, not even the edges or corners where other robovacs would be too slow to raise mops.

Mopping can be done with detergents and a small bottle ships in the box to get you started. Dreame doesn’t specify that the floor cleaner needs to be proprietary, but I’d err on the side of caution and purchase what the brand recommends to avoid damaging the internal mechanisms and voiding warranty.

Dock performance

The standout feature here is the dust-bag drying, which you will need to toggle on in the app under Dock Settings. When switched on, the dock will dry the dust bag with warm air after every cleaning session. This prevents odors building or an ecosystem growing inside if moisture gets trapped when the robot vacuums over a few drops of water or any other small spill.

That's not all, though, because the Aqua10 Ultra also looks after the roller well by washing it at 100ºC / 212ºF. That's as good as sterilization and eliminates any odors, washes out stains and gets the roller ready for its next clean. This feature is optional and, if you don't have pets, you could just have the roller cleaned with warm water, sterilizing it every once in a while. The usual hot-air drying takes place to make sure the roller is dried between uses.

A long-handled brush on top of the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra dock

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

The first time I used the Aqua10 Ultra, though, I thought it was using a lot of water, but from the second mopping run onwards, water use has been quite efficient and I didn't need to constantly ensure the clean-water tank was topped up. The only thing that needs doing is ensuring the dirty-water tank is cleaned frequently or you will have nasty odors to contend with. However, not only does the tank have a tight lid, but there's another lid (not hermetically sealed, though) between you and the bad smells. You still wouldn't want to leave dirty water in there for long.

The Aqua10 Ultra dock also allows you to ensure the wash tray is cleaned thoroughly. This is done via the app to start, wherein clean water is poured over the washboard and excess moisture is removed from the roller. The robot will then exit the dock so you can use the provided brush to scrub the tray – just click on finished button on the app when you're done and the dock will take care of the drying once the bot is nestled back in.

Long story short, dock functionality is just as good as the robot's cleaning.

Obstacle avoidance & navigation

Not only does the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra clean well, but its obstacle avoidance is superb. Every robot vacuum I’ve tested until now has gotten thin charging cables entangled with the central bar brush – not so here. Even when unfurled (lying stretched out on the floor), the Aqua10 Ultra’s sensors can spot a cable and it just cleans right along the side without trying to roll over it (as pictured below).

I have one area in my living room where most robovacs get confused – a narrow section of hard floor edged by a wall on one side, a carpet on the other, plus a couch and a slim-legged chair to add to confusing textures. Not only did the Aqua10 Ultra navigate around the legs of the chair well, but it also managed to ensure the strip of hard floor was cleaned each time without the mop rolling over the rug.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra cleaning alongside a charging cable on the floor

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

The automatic 4cm raising of the robot, however, is a little temperamental. Even with a threshold marked in the app – which should tell the robot to rise, step over and carry on – I found the Aqua10 Ultra didn’t often register the threshold and would try to navigate it as any other low-rise obstacle, trying to find the best way over it. When it did rise automatically on its wheels, it was a fun sight to see.

Overall, navigation is great, although I have to note that I had teething issues. Immediately after setup, I wanted to test the robot’s functionality in just one room and it just couldn’t “find the designated area”. A full reset and remapping didn’t fix the problem either. However, it worked just fine if I opted to do a full-house clean (what Dreame calls a “global” cleaning), after which choosing a single room or a zone was fine.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot vacuuming under a chair

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Battery life

Running on a 6,400mAh battery, which is quite standard these days, the Aqua10 Ultra should, on paper, give you upwards of 200 minutes of cleaning. In reality, that’s not going to be the case as most users won’t be running it on its lowest settings to conserve battery life.

In my testing, I found battery use inefficient during its first few runs where the drain was quite significant – dropping from full to 40% on Intense vacuuming after running for 30 minutes. That improved to falling to 62% on the same setting for the same duration as I used the bot more.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot on a carpet

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Depending on what kind of custom cleaning routine you choose, it’s possible an average one-bedroom home could be cleaned without needing additional time at the mains, but larger homes will definitely have a full-house cleaning interrupted due to battery drain. This is more so if you have mixed flooring as the robot automatically increases suction on carpets.

One small issue that Dreame could consider fixing is not getting the suction to start as soon as the bot leaves the base station. I found that a minimum of 1% battery would always drain before it reached its starting point. That might not seem like much, but that clocks up when it needs to empty its dust box regularly during a single vacuuming session. And unlike the Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone, it doesn’t have fast charging to top up a little while its mop is being washed.

• Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: App and voice control

  • Nicely designed app, but some setting options are unclear
  • Custom routines have limitations
  • Voice control is easy, but has limited functionality

The Dreame companion app in its current form isn’t bad at all – in fact, it’s one of the more appealing apps, with perhaps just Roborock outdoing it. However, it took me a while to wrap my head around the app as right from the get go I found no option to start the mapping process. A bit of playing around with it solved that problem, and the resulting map was accurate and I found it easy to edit.

What I love about the editing process is that I could manually add thresholds, something I’ve not seen on any other robot vacuum app – although I will admit that didn’t work as I expected it to (the bot sometimes didn’t even realize it needed to raise itself). In fact, the map adds room names intelligently as it’s being created, but it doesn’t always get it right.

Screenshots from the Dreame app for the Aqua10 Ultra robot vacuum

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dreame gives you a heck of a lot of control over the cleaning routines, like adjusting cleaning parameters such as suction strength or mop water flow rates on a per-room basis, while scheduling, remote control and notifications help keep cleaning convenient. This is the first time I’ve seen a robovac brand offer extensive control over the ‘intelligent’ automatic mode – I could choose my own suction and water levels here, while all other brands use machine learning to set these automatically. Dreame calls this the CleanGenius mode.

It took me a while to figure out how to set up custom Shortcut routines, like Bedroom Clean, or Daily Clean. Even then, I had to ensure I'd saved and tapped on any tick icons or it didn't save anything. Roborock and Ecovacs, on the other hand, have made setting up custom routines a lot simpler.

Screenshots from the Dreame app for the Aqua10 Ultra robot vacuum

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

I also couldn’t figure out why none of the carpets in my test space were getting vacuumed as they’re set to be ‘avoided’ by default and the app doesn’t make that clear – even when you choose to vacuum carpets first. These are little things, but small changes could make the app a lot more streamlined and easier to navigate.

I've also noticed that the Dreame app is slower to respond compared to some other brands I’ve tested – it’s just a few seconds of lag between choosing a clean and the robot exiting the dock, but I’ve seen other brands work a little quicker.

Smart home integration with Alexa, Siri and Google Assistant is available, but the Dreame voice assistant is quite quick to respond if you wake it up. The voice commands you give it are limited in nature, like telling it to start a saved Shortcut or returning to the dock, but it’s an excellent hands-free experience. There’s even Matter support on board for future smart home integration if you ever set up a central hub.

• App & voice control score: 4 / 5

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot with side brush extended

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Should I buy the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra?

Attributes

Notes

Score

Value

Competition is high and there are now models with cutting-edge technology at the same price point.

3.5 / 5

Design

With clean lines and a sleek robot, the Aqua10 Ultra looks classic and modern at once.

5 / 5

Performance

Arguably the best robovac I've tested to date, but its battery use might not be best for large homes.

4.5 / 5

App control

A well-designed app with a comprehensive list of features, but the learning curve is a touch steep.

4 / 5

Buy it if...

You have rigorous cleaning requirements

Whether it's vacuuming, mopping or doing both, the Aqua10 Ultra will not disappoint. While it's excellent for homes with pets, expect it to keep emptying its small onboard bin frequently.

You live in a home with plenty of obstacles

Whether that's kids toys, a pet running across the robot's path or just a charging cable you've forgotten to pick off the floor, you can trust nothing is going to get gobbled up or collided with.

You're wary of odors building

With intense hot-water washing for the roller and regular dust-bag drying, the Aqua10 Ultra eliminates any issues with bacterial or fungal growth. Just be sure to clean out the dirty-water tank regularly.

Don't buy it if...

Money is an obstacle

There's no denying the Aqua10 Ultra is expensive, and even with discounts, there'll always be something a lot cheaper. However, at a discounted price, I'd definitely recommend it over many of its competitors.

You don't need too many bells and whistles in a robot vacuum

If you don't have pets or live in a large home, you could well not need all the features the Aqua10 Ultra offers. That could save you a lot of money too.

You live in a home with wall-to-wall carpets

If you don't have hard floors, buying a robovac that mops is a moot point. Not only that, the edges of the rooms will remain dirty as I am yet to meet a robot vacuum that can do edge cleaning on carpets well.

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Also consider

Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni

Despite missing out on some of the features that you'll find on the Dreame, this Deebot proved to be an excellent cleaning machine, even along room edges. Importantly, it's cheaper even at full price, but is now frequently discounted.
Read my Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni review to learn more

Roborock Saros 10R

Our reviewer called it the "perfect hybrid robot vacuum cleaner even for the most cluttered of homes". Improved navigation and a low profile means it can get to places other robovacs will typically avoid. It's also quiet, has excellent vacuum and mop skills, and it's pretty much a master of its trade.
Read our in-depth Roborock Saros 10R review for more details

How I tested the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra robot moving away from its dock

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

For this review, I used the Aqua10 Ultra for a period of five weeks, running it on mixed flooring an average of twice a week (there were times when I ran it about four times in a day for various tests).

I initially had issues with the robot unable to navigate to its designated area, but that issue was solved after it did a full-home clean. The test space, as mentioned earlier in this review, was a small one-bedroom apartment with carpet in the bedroom and tiles everywhere else.

I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand the app, but once things were set up as I wished them to be, running the Aqua10 Ultra was easy. I performed full-home cleans, custom routines, single-room cleans, even zone cleaning for some tests. I used the shower divider in the bathroom to test its ProLeap system to clear thresholds.

I also used the provided detergent and odor neutralizer in the dock.

I put the Aqua10 Ultra through TechRadar's usual tests for vacuuming and mopping (using oats and tea from a bag for the former, and a dollop of chutney for the latter). I also conducted our standard obstacle avoidance test, but paid special attention to how it handles cables as Dreame does advertize it to be excellent.

As you've probably already read, the Aqua10 Ultra passed all its tests with flying colors, and my complaints were mostly minor.

Read more about how we test vacuum cleaners

[First reviewed December 2025]

The Housemaid review: this violent pantomime turns the book into a grotesque nightmare
8:00 pm | December 16, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Entertainment Gadgets Streaming | Comments: Off

Paul Feig... we need to have a chat. Bridesmaids was legendary, A Simple Favor was strong, Another Simple Favor was fun, but new movie The Housemaid? Where have things gone wrong?

The director's outlandish comedic vision hasn't been without its hiccups over the years, but I don't think it sits in cohesion with The Housemaid. Adapted from the hit novel of the same name by Freida McFadden, the film follows enigmatic Millie (Sydney Sweeney) who has just taken a live-in nanny job at the wealthy Winchester's house. While husband Andrew (Brandon Sklenar) seems like a breath of fresh air, off-the-rails Nina (Amanda Seyfriend) is much harder to manage.

As more time passes, Nina's behavior gets increasingly more erratic, with plenty of family secrets bubbling up to the surface. Sadly, you can guess what the deepest of those secrets is at around the halfway mark.

It's never a good sign when you can immediately tell that the screenplay hasn't been adapted by the book's author, and for besotted book fans, the film has a more-than-healthy dose of creative licence. Key changes to the novel become more apparent the more you watch, and they make the overarching storyline a lot more violent.

The Housemaid is no longer an accessible crime thriller you want to devour as quickly as possible, but a soft body-horror movie with disturbing undertones and ridiculous B-plots. When the action isn't gory, it's laughable.

How The Housemaid turned from an acclaimed mystery into a cinematic mess

As I've touched on, the biggest problem in The Housemaid is the story itself – or more specifically, how the original tale has been interpreted. The casting wildly contrasts with how characters are painted in the book (Millie is more demure and innocent than Sweeney's version is, for example), and there's a much bigger emphasis on shock factor.

In short, we lose the beautiful subtleties of an unfolding whodunnit in favor of big-impact twists and turns that don't always pay off. If you're not a fan of blood, you'll need to bring a pillow to hide behind. By the time The Housemaid draws to a close, it rivals The Substance in terms of bloodshed and body horror, only in a much softer environment.

Largely, the movie hits the same beats as the novel, only there's another problem even when it's behaving. Scenes that should be serious and reflective become so farcical, you're stifling giggles so the people you're watching with don't think you're sociopathic.

While that isn't going to please everyone, I was thrilled to loudly witch cackle at the most preposterous things. From dialogue (Sweeney has a 30-second monologue about a manky Troll doll that she delivers with all the sincerity of being on her metaphorical death bed) to physical movement (some of Andrew's scenes are a unique laugh, let's put it that way), there is something to inappropriately chuckle at every few minutes.

It almost becomes a game: can you and your friends try not to laugh first while Amanda Seyfried is hurling priceless plates around her kitchen?

The performances are standard for a mediocre movie, but entertainment value varies.

Amanda Seyfried looks at Sydney Sweeney in a mirror

Just two average frenemies here, nothing to see. (Image credit: Lionsgate)

I've been an Amanda Seyfried truther since Mamma Mia!, and she's consistently turned out dazzling performances across the two decades since. Frankly, she's earned the right to have fun making a far-from-serious movie where she can be a pantomime villain.

If you think of The Housemaid like this, Seyfried does the least amount of damage. Brandon Sklenar, however, is in his acting element. In the last two years alone, we've seen him in equally questionable movies such as Drop and It Ends With Us, and he fleshes out morally bankrupt husband Andrew with next to no effort. The man knows the landscape, and he isn't afraid to deliver genuinely terrible script with a completely deadpan expression.

I hate to say it, but Sweeney is the biggest problem I have with the cast. At no point do I buy her double-edged persona as a housemaid and stowaway criminal, and her romantic chemistry with Sklenar is non-existent. Where her natural style works in Euphoria and Anyone But You, it doesn't here.

Millie is a character you could root for, but it's frustrating work. In real-life, you'd have told Nina to stick her stupid housemaid job where the sun doesn't shine, walk out of her minimalist mansion and maybe hit a few objets d'art over on the way. I know why Millie rides her unhealthy situation out, but she's not making the best decisions.

If you're choosing to watch The Housemaid this Christmas, let it be known that a) it's not a Christmas movie, and b) it's perhaps the most painful present you could give yourself. Stay for the unintentional laughs, but brace yourself for anything in between.

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

The Housemaid review: this violent pantomime turns the book into a grotesque nightmare
8:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Entertainment Gadgets Streaming | Comments: Off

Paul Feig... we need to have a chat. Bridesmaids was legendary, A Simple Favor was strong, Another Simple Favor was fun, but new movie The Housemaid? Where have things gone wrong?

The director's outlandish comedic vision hasn't been without its hiccups over the years, but I don't think it sits in cohesion with The Housemaid. Adapted from the hit novel of the same name by Freida McFadden, the film follows enigmatic Millie (Sydney Sweeney) who has just taken a live-in nanny job at the wealthy Winchester's house. While husband Andrew (Brandon Sklenar) seems like a breath of fresh air, off-the-rails Nina (Amanda Seyfriend) is much harder to manage.

As more time passes, Nina's behavior gets increasingly more erratic, with plenty of family secrets bubbling up to the surface. Sadly, you can guess what the deepest of those secrets is at around the halfway mark.

It's never a good sign when you can immediately tell that the screenplay hasn't been adapted by the book's author, and for besotted book fans, the film has a more-than-healthy dose of creative licence. Key changes to the novel become more apparent the more you watch, and they make the overarching storyline a lot more violent.

The Housemaid is no longer an accessible crime thriller you want to devour as quickly as possible, but a soft body-horror movie with disturbing undertones and ridiculous B-plots. When the action isn't gory, it's laughable.

How The Housemaid turned from an acclaimed mystery into a cinematic mess

As I've touched on, the biggest problem in The Housemaid is the story itself – or more specifically, how the original tale has been interpreted. The casting wildly contrasts with how characters are painted in the book (Millie is more demure and innocent than Sweeney's version is, for example), and there's a much bigger emphasis on shock factor.

In short, we lose the beautiful subtleties of an unfolding whodunnit in favor of big-impact twists and turns that don't always pay off. If you're not a fan of blood, you'll need to bring a pillow to hide behind. By the time The Housemaid draws to a close, it rivals The Substance in terms of bloodshed and body horror, only in a much softer environment.

Largely, the movie hits the same beats as the novel, only there's another problem even when it's behaving. Scenes that should be serious and reflective become so farcical, you're stifling giggles so the people you're watching with don't think you're sociopathic.

While that isn't going to please everyone, I was thrilled to loudly witch cackle at the most preposterous things. From dialogue (Sweeney has a 30-second monologue about a manky Troll doll that she delivers with all the sincerity of being on her metaphorical death bed) to physical movement (some of Andrew's scenes are a unique laugh, let's put it that way), there is something to inappropriately chuckle at every few minutes.

It almost becomes a game: can you and your friends try not to laugh first while Amanda Seyfried is hurling priceless plates around her kitchen?

The performances are standard for a mediocre movie, but entertainment value varies.

Amanda Seyfried looks at Sydney Sweeney in a mirror

Just two average frenemies here, nothing to see. (Image credit: Lionsgate)

I've been an Amanda Seyfried truther since Mamma Mia!, and she's consistently turned out dazzling performances across the two decades since. Frankly, she's earned the right to have fun making a far-from-serious movie where she can be a pantomime villain.

If you think of The Housemaid like this, Seyfried does the least amount of damage. Brandon Sklenar, however, is in his acting element. In the last two years alone, we've seen him in equally questionable movies such as Drop and It Ends With Us, and he fleshes out morally bankrupt husband Andrew with next to no effort. The man knows the landscape, and he isn't afraid to deliver genuinely terrible script with a completely deadpan expression.

I hate to say it, but Sweeney is the biggest problem I have with the cast. At no point do I buy her double-edged persona as a housemaid and stowaway criminal, and her romantic chemistry with Sklenar is non-existent. Where her natural style works in Euphoria and Anyone But You, it doesn't here.

Millie is a character you could root for, but it's frustrating work. In real-life, you'd have told Nina to stick her stupid housemaid job where the sun doesn't shine, walk out of her minimalist mansion and maybe hit a few objets d'art over on the way. I know why Millie rides her unhealthy situation out, but she's not making the best decisions.

If you're choosing to watch The Housemaid this Christmas, let it be known that a) it's not a Christmas movie, and b) it's perhaps the most painful present you could give yourself. Stay for the unintentional laughs, but brace yourself for anything in between.

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

Avatar: Fire and Ash is just a flame-filled version of The Way of Water — are we ready to admit that the franchise is getting boring?
5:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Entertainment Gadgets Streaming | Comments: Off

Don't start a flame war with me just yet, James Cameron fans. Avatar: Fire and Ash is a movie that I genuinely enjoyed, but its cinematic baggage is a huge problem.

By 'baggage,' I of course mean the two previous Avatar films. When the original was released back in 2009, I quickly assumed (as did the rest of the world, I think) it would be a historical, record-breaking standalone. Now that the sequels have started landing, however, I think the concept has lost its shine.

The most straightforward way of describing Fire and Ash is that it's exactly the same movie as The Way of Water. For about 90% of its arduously long runtime (wear comfy clothes and book a recliner seat, if possible) the only difference is which natural element has stepped into the spotlight.

I'm even convinced that a pivotal scene has been cut and pasted in from the second film, so strong was the sense of déjà vu I experienced while watching it. There's the same inciting incident, the same challenges, and the same conclusion, for the third outing in a row.

However, if we look at Fire and Ash in isolation, I think that it's the strongest film of the bunch. It has the tightest pacing, the most impressive payoff, and Cameron's overall vision for Pandora gets more spellbinding as time goes on.

It's such a shame that it's brought down by context, much as a young person might be blighted by their family history before they've started to make their way in the world. We can't ignore that our third movie functions as a cog in the overarching Avatar machine... and that machine can only tell one, now fairly grating, tale.

Avatar: Fire and Ash's beauty tricks us into thinking that it's interesting

Usually, when I tell people that I find the Avatar movies boring, they look at me as if I've just kicked their dog. But I stand by my overriding IP argument – we are being hoodwinked into believing that what we're watching is interesting because it's so visually transcendent. In other words, beautiful cancels out boring.

I would give 35 stars, rather than 3.5, to how Avatar: Fire and Ash looks alone if the conventions of reviewing let me. I wanted to reach out and touch the Na'avi, marvelling at the detailed wrinkles, blemishes and intricate patterns being beamed across the big screen (in 3D, no less). I felt grateful to have hours witnessing it with my own eyeballs, worshipping at the altar of a kind of filmmaking that has yet to be matched or replicated.

Now imagine we took all of that away ,and the same story was acted out by humans or fully animated characters (let's hypothetically say in a Pixar movie style). What we're left with is a fairly run-of-the-mill sci-fi story comprised of fighting, disagreements, and themes of discovering your own identity and power. That could be applied to pretty much any movie in this genre, and others do it infinitely better (Aliens and The Abyss are Cameron's best work as it is).

Instead, Avatar is heralded as untouchable because of its astonishing visuals, regardless of the fact that The Way of Water and Fire and Ash are telling the same story, even though Fire and Ash does it more successfully. There are virtually no differences between them, especially if it's been a while since you've seen the second movie. How many times can you recycle the same ideas and get away with it, even if you're James Cameron?

Is everything else brilliant or oddly strange? I can't decide

Varang stands outside a tent

Fire queen Varang in Avatar: Fire and Ash. (Image credit: 20th Century Studios)

As I've said, Fire and Ash is easily the strongest Avatar entry in isolation. Our fire Na'avi, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin) are an invigorating addition to Pandora's worldbuilding, giving both Jake (Sam Worthington) and Quaritch (Stephen Lang) a run for their money.

We surprisingly get much more whale time than in The Way of Water, and that's sensational news if you're a Payakan fan like me. There are a couple of aquatic creatures introduced that I'd like to have seen more of (there are some strange-but-cute-looking otters), and it remains the most remarkable biome in Pandora. It's also the place where the younger cast members can be the most themselves, and they're collectively the strongest performance in our Na'avi ensemble.

This doesn't include Sigourney Weaver, though. Kiri is a major player in Fire and Ash, and in the full pomp of her "this is what I'm capable of" journey. However, I think it's blindingly obvious that a 76-year-old woman is playing a 14-year-old. The giveaway is in the way Kiri moves, which is clearly the one downside of Cameron's maverick filming approach.

The main detail that bothers me, though – in the sense that I can't decide if it's satisfying or dreadful – is the conclusion. Without giving away what actually happens, there's narratively no need for any further movies. We get complete answers to any loose threads that may have been hanging over the franchise, so what does this mean for Avatar 4 and 5?

My guess is that they will each be a huge departure from what we've seen before, and while I should be grateful for that fact (given my biggest complaint here), that's also a concern. Our trilogy currently feels nicely rounded off, and any future sequels could feel gratuitous... or dare I say, like cash grabs.

But that's a problem for 2029, when Avatar 4 is set to arrive. In the meantime I'll remain conflicted about my enjoyment of Fire and Ash, even though I ultimately feel that it's monotonous. Still, at least you can watch essentially the same movie on Disney+ globally right now if you don't want to see Fire and Ash in theaters or wait for it to arrive on streaming – Avatar and Avatar: The Way of Water are already on there, and Fire and Ash will likely join them in 2026.

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

« Previous PageNext Page »