Organizer
Gadget news
iQoo 11 review: a speedy phone that’s hard to find
3:00 pm | June 7, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

iQoo 11: Two-minute review

The iQoo 11 probably won’t be launching in the west, but as one of the first ever phones to run on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, it's worth acknowledging, even now some more widely available handsets use this chipset too.

While this Vivo sub-brand sells largely to the Asian market, it’s clearly mulling over a push into new territories at some point. There aren’t many Chinese brands that bother to supply their pre-launch test handsets with a UK power adapter, but iQoo did, which has to signify something.

Given the strength of the iQoo 11 package, we would welcome it (or a future handset) to our shores. Maybe the brand could take up OnePlus’s former role as market disruptor and flagship killer-in-chief.

An iQoo 11 from the front

(Image credit: TechRadar)

iQoo’s customary team-up with BMW sees a fairly generic design lifted by a white vegan leather back with a three-stripe decal. There’s a black option, but this themed one is way more fun.

The headline feature here, however, is that cutting-edge chipset, which instantly makes the iQoo 11 one of the most powerful smartphones on the market. The iQoo brand presents itself as gamer-friendly, and its latest phone certainly flies through demanding games like Wreckfest and Genshin Impact on maxed-out settings.

This gaming-friendly status is further enhanced by a 6.78-inch AMOLED display that’s similarly cutting-edge. Besides using the very latest Samsung E6 panel, it sports a rare combination of QHD sharpness and a 144Hz refresh rate, as well as getting really bright.

While the iQoo 11 won’t be joining the iPhone 14 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and the Google Pixel 7 Pro at the top of the camera phone tree, it does a creditable job of turning out bright, balanced shots across its three cameras. It could use a little work when the light drops, though.

Throw in a full day of battery life from its 5,000mAh cell and rapid 120W wired charging (but not wireless, alas), and you have a fine entry-level flagship phone.

iQoo 11 review: price and availability

An iQoo 11 from the back, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Arrived December 8, 2022
  • No western availability
  • Price works out to around $700 / £580 / AU$1,050

The iQoo 11 hit Indonesia and Malaysia on December 8, 2022, and Thailand on December 15, followed by India on January 13, 2023.

There are no plans for the iQoo 11 to hit the US, UK, or Australia, which is a real shame. With an Indonesian launch price of IDR10,999,000 working out to around $700 / £580 / AU$1,050, it could very well have undercut – or at least provided genuine competition for – the Pixel 7 and the OnePlus 10T.

We’re hopeful of a wider rollout for the brand in future. The company supplied a UK power brick with our test iQoo 11, so it’s clearly thinking about branching out.

  • Value score: 4.5 / 5

iQoo 11 review: specs

An iQoo 11 from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)

iQoo 11 review: design

An iQoo 11 from the back, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Typical design, lifted by vegan leather/three stripe finish
  • No IP rating
  • Camera module scratches easily

The iQoo 11 has a pretty generic Android design, with a flat display, a subtly curved back, and a metal frame.

However, it’s rescued from bland uniformity by the Legend model we’ve been sent. This sports a mixture of fiberglass and vegan leather on the rear, rendered in brilliant white, and with a colorful triple stripe running down the entire length of the phone.

The latter is courtesy of a longstanding brand partnership with BMW M Motorsport. It’s just as effective a design flourish here as it was on the likes of the iQoo 7.

If you opt for the Alpha edition, you’ll receive an altogether more sober black shade and a glass back. iQoo calls this a “classic, premium aesthetic”, but others might call it boring.

Image 1 of 3

An iQOO 11 from the side

(Image credit: TechRadar)
Image 2 of 3

An iQOO 11 from the back

(Image credit: TechRadar)
Image 3 of 3

The bottom half of an iQOO 11 from the back

(Image credit: TechRadar)

One negative point we did notice towards the end of our time with the phone was that the black paint coating the thin metal frame surrounding the camera module had begun to scratch off along the bottom edge. Presumably this was where the phone made contact with whatever surface it was laying on, but it started to give the phone a somewhat scruffy edge after just a week or two of usage.

This isn’t a small phone at 8.7mm thick and 205g, but nor is it distractingly hefty. We found it very easy to live with, and that vegan leather has proved both grippy and mercifully non-freezing-to-the-touch when taken out on cold days.

The lack of an IP rating – meaning no official water resistance – is a bit of a downer, and one sign that we’re not dealing with an out and out flagship phone here. So too is a chin bezel that’s slightly thicker than the forehead, which is always a dead giveaway that a phone isn’t gunning for the elite league, regardless of what its spec sheet might say.

There’s stereo sound provided by a pair of speakers, but one is positioned on the bottom edge of the phone, and proves a little too easy to cover during landscape gaming. This is a common concession on phones of all price ranges, but when a phone claims to be geared towards gamers it’s worth calling out.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

iQoo 11 review: display

An iQoo 11 from the front

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • 6.78-inch AMOLED screen
  • Next-gen Samsung E6 panel 
  • QHD+ and 144Hz in one package

While the iQoo 11’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip is getting most of the headlines, its display is similarly cutting-edge and just as worthy of attention.

Where most flagship Android phones in 2022 featured Samsung’s E5 panel, this phone switched up to the E6.

The baseline stats are strong. It’s a 6.78-inch AMOLED with a QHD+ (1440 x 3200) resolution, though you’ll need to activate that in the settings menu. We experienced some issues with font sizing following this switch, but that’s an issue with iQoo’s software.

Two other specs stand out here. One is a higher-than-usual 144Hz maximum refresh rate, though again, you’ll need to crank this up in the settings. It really is very responsive indeed.

An iQoo 11 from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)

We’ve seen 144Hz (and higher) refresh rates before, but never in conjunction with a QHD resolution.

The other stand out spec is a peak brightness of 1800 nits. That’s beyond even the mighty Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and just a little shy of the iPhone 14 Pro Max.

One other gaming-focused feature is a pressure-sensitive screen, which can be mapped to controls in certain games. Pressing both sides firmly in landscape serves as a shortcut to booting up the phone’s Game Space gaming UI, which is a nice touch.

We haven’t seen too much of this pressure-sensing technology since Apple removed it from its iPhones, so it’s good to see it implemented here – even if it’s not as deeply integrated into the UI as Apple’s 3D Touch was to iOS.

  • Display score: 4.5 / 5

iQoo 11 review: software

An iQoo 11 from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Funtouch 13 is busy and full of bloat for local markets
  • Somewhat buggy UI
  • Only 2 years of Android updates

Software is arguably the weak point with the iQoo 11, with Funtouch 13 proving to be a rather busy custom UI layered over Android 13.

It’s worth mentioning that there are mitigating circumstances here. As discussed, this is a phone that’s intended for the Indonesian market, which explains why it comes laden with so much bloatware, including local apps like Lazada and Viu.

Even setting the matter of pre-installed apps aside, though, Funtouch 13 feels somewhat buggy and unfinished. There’s the UI’s apparent inability to adjust to bumping up the display resolution to full QHD+, resulting in comically small text in the Messages app and the clock widget. Adjusting the system font size didn’t seem to help here.

An iQoo 11 from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Then there’s the fact that WhatsApp notifications continued to break through for us when the phone was in Do Not Disturb mode, which spoiled a couple of attempted weekend lie-ins.

All of this can be fixed in future software updates, of course. However, that just brings into focus iQoo’s two-year Android update promise, which is looking rather stingy and outdated compared to many other high-end handsets.

  • Software score: 2.5 / 5

iQoo 11 review: cameras

The camera block on an iQoo 11

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Same 50MP main camera sensor as Galaxy S22
  • 13MP telephoto, 8MP ultra-wide
  • Slightly artificial but even tone across the three cameras

If the iQoo 11 is mixing it with the big boys in terms of power and display technology, then it steps back into the second tier with its camera offering.

That still makes it a decent photography tool however, and it does some things we like a lot. We particularly appreciate the provision of a dedicated telephoto camera to accompany the wide and ultra-wide. That’s often one of the first features on the chopping block when putting together a more affordable flagship.

This is a nicely balanced setup too. The main camera uses  the same 50MP sensor as you’ll find in the Samsung Galaxy S22 and Galaxy S22 Plus, as well as a number of previous iQoo models. It’s not exactly a cutting-edge component, but it’s a decent-sized 1/1.57" sensor, and it produces punchy shots in good lighting.

This is accompanied by an 8MP ultra-wide and a 13MP telephoto sensor, both also from Samsung. These support sensors aren’t up to the standard of the main sensor in terms of color depth, detail, or dynamic range, but they’re perfectly serviceable – especially that telephoto.

iQoo 11 camera samples

Image 1 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The overall tone can be rather cool.

Image 2 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The telephoto does a good job matching the main sensor’s tone.

Image 3 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The ultrawide lacks detail, but again matches the tone of the others.

Image 4 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Not much in the way of noise or artifacts here.

Image 5 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Again, the telephoto matches up well.

Image 6 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Edge distortion, but a consistent tone.

Image 7 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Indoor shots can look a little murky.

Image 8 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

A reasonably sharp, if dark, food shot.

Image 9 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Shots can look a little washed out.

Image 10 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The dedicated telephoto is way better than cropping in.

Image 11 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The ultrawide struggles for detail.

Image 12 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Night mode isn’t up there with the best.

Image 13 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Good low light shots are possible if you keep movement to a minimum.

Image 14 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

A shot showing the iQoo 11’s performance in low indoor lighting.

Image 15 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Showing the main camera’s cool tone and exaggerated greens.

Image 16 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The 2x telephoto is a solid performer.

Image 17 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Selfies are fine, once you deactivate beautification.

Image 18 of 18

An iQOO 11 camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The camera is least impressive in middling/indoor lighting situations.

One of the best things about this camera setup is that the tone of the shots stays relatively consistent across all three sensors. Take three shots of the same scene, one with each camera, and they all look more or less of a piece.

True, that shared tone can be a little too cool and icy for our liking, with slightly punched up greens and a hint of overexposure. But that’s a color science choice that some will be more fond of than others, especially if you’re mainly in the business of sharing your shots on social media. 

What’s more, there’s a toggle on the main camera UI that switches to a more natural, restrained look should you prefer it, which we did. It’s a shame this isn’t the default selection, but at least the camera app remembers your choice should you choose to activate it.

Low light performance is decent, if not among the best. Taking pictures of static scenes with a suitably steady hand yielded some clear results, but we also shot the odd dud that didn’t quite lock on properly, or which yielded excessive noise, while any form of movement in the shot tended to be picked up. 

Shots in artificially lit indoor environments, and those in that murky zone between light and dark, could be a little hit and miss on the focusing front, and sometimes looked a little flat and washed out. This is a camera that rewards a steady hand and a little patience once the light drops.

The 16MP front camera does a reasonable job with selfie skin tones, though you’ll want to turn off the default beautifying effect, which smooshes and smudges facial textures in that disconcerting way that certain manufacturers seem to favor.

Overall, this is a solid camera setup, and none of the traits we mention are egregious given what appears to be the competitive pricing of the device. They merely illustrate that the iQoo 11 isn’t in the conversation with the genuinely top tier camera phone crowd like it is in other departments. With the Pixel 7 and the Google Pixel 6a both available for a very reasonable price, that’s worth mentioning. 

  • Camera score: 3.5 / 5

iQoo 11 review: performance

An iQoo 11 from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • One of the first Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 phones
  • Extremely impressive CPU and GPU performance
  • Stays cool and fast under gaming load

While it doesn’t make gaming phones in the strictest of senses, gaming prowess is undoubtedly a core component of the iQoo brand. The iQoo 11 is no different, standing as one of the very first instances of the flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip being used.

The resulting benchmarks are suitably impressive, with an average Geekbench 5 single-core score of 1,462 and a multi-core score of 4,855. That beats a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 phone like the Samsung Galaxy S22 by around 200 points in single-core and a whopping 1,500 points in multi-core.

The Asus Zenfone 9 with its Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 chipset gets a little closer, but still falls short by around 100 points single-core and 500 points multi-core.

On the GPU front, an average Wild Life Extreme score of around 3,750 (with an average frame rate of 22.50fps) is very strong indeed, outgunning even the mighty iPhone 14 Pro. Just as impressive is the fact that this level of graphical performance remains relatively stable over time in the extended Wild Life Extreme Stress Test, which runs the same high-intensity GPU workout 20 times in a row.

There’s a slight dip for the final few loops, but not by much, indicating that the iQoo 11 has its thermals in order. That can be attributed to the efficiency of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, but also to a multi-layer vapor chamber that iQoo has implemented.

In practical terms, we were able to play Genshin Impact and console-quality racer Wreckfest on maxed out graphical settings, with performance remaining silky smooth. We didn’t observe any serious thermal build-up or throttling over the space of a 20-minute gaming session, either.

Another performance point we should note is the inclusion of iQoo’s V2 chip, which apparently inserts frames to keep gameplay nice and smooth, even when the game itself doesn’t support higher frame rates of 90 or 120fps (as most games don’t). All in all, the iQoo 11’s level of performance is extremely impressive.

  • Performance score: 5 / 5

iQoo 11 review: battery

The bottom edge of an iQoo 11

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • 5,000mAh battery
  • Comfortable all-day battery life, even with heavy usage
  • Rapid 120W wired charging but no wireless

The iQoo 11 has been fitted out with a 5,000mAh battery. That’s not an uncommon sight in an Android flagship, but it’s reassuring nonetheless, especially when combined with that efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset.

We were able to get through a full 15-hour day of heavy usage (just shy of 6 hours of screen-on time) with the screen set to QHD and 144Hz, and the iQoo 11 still had around 30% left in the tank.

On days with more moderate usage, it wasn’t uncommon to be left with around half a tank left. That’s a very solid showing.

Charging is also extremely rapid, with a 120W charging brick bundled in. We found that a 15-minute charge would get the phone from empty to 74%, while it hit 100% in around 25 minutes.

The only real disappointment here is that the iQoo 11 doesn’t support wireless charging. This isn’t a given at less-than-flagship prices, of course, but the Pixel 7 and Nothing Phone 1 show that such an inclusion isn’t outside the realms of possibility.

  • Battery score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the iQoo 11?

Buy it if...

You want top power for a reasonable price
The iQoo 11 packs the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, and it knows what to do with it, while undercutting many rivals in terms of price.

You want an outstanding display for less
The iQoo 11 uses the latest Samsung E6 AMOLED panel - it’s big, bright, sharp, and at 144Hz it’s also unusually fluid.

You don’t mind importing
The iQoo 11 isn’t coming to western markets, so you’ll need to be comfortable with importing if you want to buy it.

Don't buy it if...

You highly value the camera
The iQoo 11’s main camera isn’t bad by any means, but nor is it the best you can get for the money, and it struggles with indoor lighting.

You like a clean or stock Android experience
The Funtouch 13 overlay here is far from unusable, but it is busy, buggy, and bloated. It's one of the very weakest points of the iQoo 11.

You want high-end extras
Water resistance and wireless charging are fairly standard high-end smartphone features, yet neither are present here.

iQoo 11: Also consider

The iQoo 11 isn't the easiest phone to get hold of in most regions, so for alternatives, consider the following options.

Google Pixel 7

Available for about the same price – and in more markets – the Pixel 7 might not have the impressive performance and display specs of the iQoo 11, but it’s an altogether classier phone with a superior main camera.

OnePlus 10T

Also similarly priced, the OnePlus 10T lacks the cutting edge specs of the iQoo 11, but isn’t lacking in the performance or display stakes. It’s also available in more markets, features cleaner software, and charges even faster.

Nubia Red Magic 7

If it’s a pure-bred gaming phone you’re after for this sort of money, then the Nubia Red Magic 7 goes above and beyond what the iQoo 11 has to offer. While its processor isn’t quite as impressive, its thermal system is even more extensive and its display is even more fluid, while dedicated physical controls will further enhance your gaming performance.

First reviewed: April 2023

Apple Developer Program access no longer requires $99 subscription
2:34 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

In an interesting turn of events, Apple no longer requires a $99 yearly subscription to test out its latest developer betas meaning anyone can sign up and download the latest version of Apple software completely free of charge. This includes the developer betas for iOS 17, iPadOS 17 as well as macOS Sonoma and watchOS 10. Those of you who want to test out the new software(s) can simply sign up for the Apple Developer Program with your Apple ID. After that users be able to enroll and download developer betas without waiting for the public beta launches. Apple Developer Program tiers...

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 rumored specs point to larger cover display, new chipset and little else
1:42 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra set the new benchmark for cover displays on flip foldables – its 3.6” 1,056 x 1,066px display (413ppi) is about as large as possible, it even has punch holes for the rear cameras. The consensus in the rumor mill is that the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 will not be able to match it. Current info suggests that the new Flip will have a 3.4” 720 x 748p (304ppi) display that stops short of the cameras and goes around them with a shallow notch as can be seen in early 3D renders. Galaxy Z Flip4 (left) • Galaxy Z Flip5 (right, speculative render) Yogesh Brar posted a...

Tenorshare 4DDig review
1:33 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

If you're stuck with your options for data recovery software you could do far worse than install Tenorshare 4DDiG data recovery tool. The software itself is available free of charge and you can use it to preview missing files before signing up. 

The utility supports a number of file types and different file systems, so it's likely whatever your device or what type of data you've lost 4DDig can come to the rescue. 

Tenorshare 4DDiG: Plans and pricing

Technically you can download Tenorshare 4DDiG free of charge. It's available for both Windows and macOS. Whilst using the free version you're able to preview certain file types but you'll need to upgrade to do this for all data types, as well as copy recovered files outside the utility.

Paid versions of 4DDiG begin at $45.95 for a 1 month license. For just $14 more you can buy an annual license for $59.95. A lifetime license costs $79.95. There are also business packages starting at $89.95 for installation on up to 5 PC's.

Given that you can upgrade from within the program, we recommend installing the free version first to check if your files are detected using the "Preview" feature. 

Tenorshare 4DDiG 1

(Image credit: Future)

Tenorshare 4DDiG: Features

Tenorshare's 4DDiG's product page makes some very bold claims. The utility can apparently recover over 1,000 different file types. This places it in the big leagues as far as Data Recovery tools go. 

The main website says that 4DDiG for Windows supports the NTFS, exFAT, and FAT16/FAT32 file systems. However there's also a page stating that it's possible to recover data from ext4 partitions for Linux. As always we recommend trying the free version to check your drive's detected before  subscribing.

One advertised feature we thought might be useful, is the ability to pause scans, then resume them later. This certainly would be appreciated by users who are trying to recover files on a work device.

There are also built-in features for repairing corrupted pictures or videos. These files need to already be saved somewhere on a drive : it doesn't seem you can repair from within the app. This is a shame, as we've reviewed data recovery utilities in the past that will automatically detect damaged files and try to repair them and display a preview so they can be recovered.

If you install the utility on a working computer, you can also use it to create a bootable USB device to try and recover data from a crashed computer. 

Tenorshare 4DDiG 3

(Image credit: Future)

Tenorshare 4DDiG: Setup

Tenorshare 4DDiG for Windows was one of the simplest tools to set up that we've ever reviewed. You can download the small installer from the Tenorshare website, then launch it to download additional files. 

A helpful "Start" button appears immediately once this is complete and the installer even places a handy shortcut on your desktop.

On first launch we particularly enjoyed the "Quick Start Guide" which greys out the rest of the screen then takes you step by step through the process of selecting the drive, then begin scanning. You can run the Quick Start Guide again at any time by clicking on the icon at the bottom left of the program window. 

This was the point where we decided to put 4DDiG through its paces.

Tenorshare 4DDiG 4

(Image credit: Future)

Tenorshare 4DDiG: How we tested

For our data recovery tests we used a virtual machine with a clean install of Windows 11. The only third-party tools installed besides Tenorshare 4DDiG were VLC Media Player and GIMP. 

Data files

The files we chose for recovery are an album of Mozart's Music available from the Internet Archive. 

We did this as we wanted to see how the utility performed with a wide variety of files.The album included 4 music files (2 in Mp3 and 2 in FLAC) format, 6 JPG image files of album covers (with thumbnails) and 4 PNG image files. The files also included 2 XML files, a torrent file and an 'SQLite' file containing details of the album. There were 25 files in total. 

We copied the files in the music album to a 512MB virtual NTFS-formatted hard drive, which was then attached to the Windows 11 virtual machine.

Data tests

The tests were performed one after the other on three separate virtual drives:

1. File deletion : the album files were simply deleted from the drive and the Recycle Bin emptied. No other data was copied to the drive. We then tried to recover the files. 

2. Delete & Format : The files were deleted as outlined above and we also performed a 'Quick Format' using the 'Disk Management' utility built into Windows 11. We then tried to recover the files from the formatted partition. 

3. Recover corrupted files: We used the freeware program 'Victoria' to overwrite the volume header of the drive containing the files with zeroes. The drive didn't mount automatically in File Explorer and showed as being unpartitioned in Windows "Disk Management" utility. We then checked if the utility could see it and if so, recover the files. 

We do not believe that running data recovery tools in a virtual environment has a significant effect on how they function. Still, if you're considering buying software we encourage you to read all reviews thoroughly and make sure that the developer offers a refund policy.

Test results

Given that the results of trying to recover fragments of files can be very overwhelming, we were very pleased to see that Tenorshare 4DDiG tries to display them in an organized way. 

You can choose to scan drives but the utility also supports analysis of the Desktop, Recycle Bin and most importantly single folders. 

When you're offered the chance to scan you can choose to look for a particular type of file such as images. By default system files are disabled. 

For each scan we ran, files were grouped into 4 categories.

1. Deleted Files (Where you can usually find accidentally deleted files)

2. File Path Not Found (Deleted files who've lost their original path)

3. Tagged Files (Files with no name that are associated with their corresponding tags)

4. File name not found (As the name says, these are files where the name isn't found but you can still preview them to check if they're the ones you've lost).

Our first test on the drive where files had simply been deleted from the Recyle Bin was a resounding success. The scan revealed 69 files in total. The original 25 files were all found under the 'Deleted' category with filenames intact. They all opened without any issue.

Our next test was on the drive which had been formatted after the files were deleted. In this case, we had to do some hunting to find intact files.

44 files were found in total. 14 files were listed in the 'Tagged' category. These were 12 of the 12 JPG images and both MP3 files. We also found both audio FLAC files under the "File Name Not Found" category along with the torrent file, .sqlite file and all 4 PNG files. The filenames for all files weren't recovered. The remaining files were corrupted, so couldn't be viewed. That makes a total of 17 out of the 25 files successfully recovered.

When we attached the drive with the corrupted volume header, Tenorshare 4DDiG recognized the "Lost Partition" immediately. The utility automatically began "Deep Scanning" and 54 files were detected in total.

After reviewing "Deleted Files" we found the two XML files were intact. The remaining files were listed but couldn't be opened. 11 files were listed under "Filename not Found" but only the bittorrent one was readable. We checked the "Tagged Files" category and also recovered 11 JPGS intact. This makes a total of 14 out of the 25 files successfully recovered without their filenames. 

Tenorshare 4DDiG 5

(Image credit: Future)

Tenorshare 4DDiG: Performance

Although the recovery process could be hit and miss, we were impressed to see that all scans were completed in seconds. Even when scanning the 200GB virtual C drive, Tenorshare 4DDiG used less than 20% of CPU power with a memory footprint of only around 250MB.

The 'Preview' feature is an excellent way to view images, as well as play media files but be warned the free version only allows previewing of a few file types. After that you'll run up against a software paywall asking you to upgrade. 

Tenorshare 4DDiG 6

(Image credit: Tenorshare 4DDiG)

Tenorshare 4DDiG: Support

The 'Help Center' option from within Tenorshare 4DDiG will take you to a contact form within the app. Tenorshare also have a dedicated, installable guide to talk you through the data recovery process.

This is available as a free download, which you can access by clicking 'Guide' from the help menu from within the utility. 

Tenorshare 4DDiG: Final Verdict

There's a lot to like about this utility. It's xtremely easy to download and install. The 'Quick Start Guide' also gently walks you through the process of selecting the location from where you want to recover missing files. 

Unlike some other data recovery utilities, it's also possible to specify a particular folder for recovery.

Tenorshare 4DDiG performed well on our tests for files that had simply been deleted and it wasn't fazed at all by more unusual formats like FLAC audio. Recovery was less successful when we simulated a corrupted/damaged drive. 

Still, given that it costs nothing to download the free version of the app in order to scan and preview files, you have nothing to lose by trying it out. 

We've listed the best free data recovery software.

vivo X Flip review
12:09 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones reviews | Comments: Off

Xiaomi 13 Ultra launches in Hong Kong, Europe to follow on June 12
11:38 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , | Comments: Off

As expected, Xiaomi launched its Xiaomi 13 Ultra in Hong Kong today, marking the first international launch of the device since its announcement in China back in April. Xiaomi 13 Ultra is available in black and olive colors in a single 12/512GB trim for HKD 8,999 ($1,148 converted). Pre-orders start tomorrow, June 8 while open sales are set to begin on June 13. In related news, Xiaomi revealed it will bring the 13 Ultra to European markets on June 12. Xiaomi’s official channels in Germany, France, Spain and Italy have confirmed the flagship is due to launch on June 12. Based on...

Moto G53 5G review: an affordable phone with too many compromises
9:26 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Moto G53: One-minute review

Motorola’s Moto G series of wallet-friendly smartphones have always had the aim to offer the essential features you need from a phone without a sky-high price tag, and that is certainly the case with the Moto G53. While there are always going to be some trade-offs when comparing it against some of the best phones available right now, as an overall budget phone experience, Motorola remains unrivalled.

The main aim of the Moto G53 is to put 5G data speeds in the hands of many, while offering a perfectly usable smartphone experience. It’s a solidly built device, even if its overall design is a little uninspired, but the star of the show is its battery life, which should keep you going for well over a day. 

Motorola has also done well to include a 120Hz refresh rate screen, especially in a phone that costs as little as this, which helps to give general navigation a less-budget feel, but the display quality in general does live up to its low-cost nature.

Elsewhere, however, you are going to have to make some compromises. The camera, for example, isn’t as amazing as its specs would have you believe. A 50MP sensor sounds appealing but, in practice, it leaves a lot to be desired, especially if you’re trying to take photos in low light. It’s also not a phone to get if you plan on playing any graphically-intensive games, as the processor just isn’t up to the task. 

And while it may feel nice to hold and comes with a pretty responsive fingerprint reader for unlocking the device, its plastic build and lack of any worthwhile waterproofing means you’ll want to be extra careful with how you treat it. But you have to remember how little the G53 costs and, if you’re looking at spending as little as possible on a phone, we suspect you’re not going to be looking for flagship features in the first place. 

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Price and availability

  • List price of £190 / AU$329
  • Available in some markets now
  • No US availability, equivalent phone costs $249.99

Availability of Motorola smartphones differs between the US, UK and Australia. The Moto G family of phones often has multiple members, but what you’ll find in the US, for example, may not be available in Australia and vice versa. 

In the case of the Moto G53 5G, it launched in the UK and Australia on March 30, 2023 for £190 / AU$329. The Moto G53 5G doesn’t exist in the US under the same name, but the Moto G 5G is the most closely matched model at $250, although this has a slightly different camera system and can accept a slightly higher charging throughput. 

• Value score: 4/5

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Specs

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Design

  • Good-looking handset, if a little uninspired
  • Lightweight and comfortable to hold in one hand, despite its large size
  • MicroSD expansion will please most users

Motorola Moto G53 5G rear panel with included case attached

(Image credit: Future)

The Moto G53 isn’t a bad-looking phone by any means, but it doesn’t quite have the wow factor of some other devices on the market. Having said that, I did let out a discernible gasp when I first took it out the box when I realized just how light it was.

At 183g, the Moto G53 5G is practically a feather and its lack of weight certainly helps with being able to hold it with one hand. Sporting a 6.5-inch screen, it is quite a large device – and certainly one of the largest phones I’ve personally held in a while. I do have fairly big hands, and was only just about able to use it one-handed, but it wasn’t the most comfortable experience ever, especially with no gestures available to bring the screen down, as you’ll find in iOS. I would expect most people will want to use it two-handed.

Its featherweight figure is afforded by its plastic frame and back panel, and while this can inherently make it feel cheap – which of course, in terms of price, it is – the G53 does feel like a solid device in the hand. The rear panel feels particularly lovely to the touch and, in the blue color of my review sample at least, does well to hide fingerprints. 

There’s no mention of Gorilla Glass being used on the front panel in Motorola’s official specs list, so you’ll definitely want to invest in a tempered glass screen protector, and while an official IP rating is not offered, the company says it has a “water-repellant” design that can survive the odd splash or spill, but you’ll want to refrain from submerging it in water at all costs. 

The rear dual camera system sits within its own little bump, and Motorola has managed to keep the extrusion to a minimum – it certainly sticks out less than the camera bump on the newer iPhones at least. Motorola also ships the G53 with a clear case already attached, and not only does this save you having to buy your own, it also helps the slight camera bump to sit fully flush with the rear of the phone. Overall it’s a slim device at just 8.2mm thick, meaning you should have no issue sliding into a pocket. 

On the right side of the phone you’ll find the power button, complete with built-in fingerprint scanner, which I found to be quick and responsive, and I liked the fact you don’t need to actually press the button for it to work. Instead, just touch your finger on it and the G53 will unlock. 

On the left of the G53 is where you’ll find the SIM card tray, which also houses a slot for a microSD card, allowing for up to 1TB of additional storage to go with the 128GB that’s already built in. Finally, on the bottom, there’s a USB-C charging port and a 3.5mm headphone jack, for anyone who still wishes to use wired headphones over the best wireless headphones

Design score: 3.5/5

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Display

  • 6.5-inch LCD with 120Hz refresh for smoother motion
  • Lack of full HD resolution may put some off

Motorola Moto G53 5G display

(Image credit: Future)

A 6.5-inch LCD display dominates the front of the Moto G53, with a small punch-hole cutout at the top to house the front camera. Bezels around the sides and at the top are kept relatively slim, but there is a slightly larger one at the bottom. I don’t think this detracts from the overall viewing experience because, since the screen is so large, my eyes were never really drawn to the chin at the bottom. 

The screen has full HD+ 1600 x 720 resolution with 269ppi. It’s a bit upsetting that Motorola hasn’t fitted the G53 with a 1080p display, especially since you do get one with the Moto G62 (along with an extra camera sensor) without having to spend too much more money. 

Despite the lack of resolution, the G53’s screen does go nice and bright, with a peak brightness of around 450 nits. It’s not the most color-accurate display ever though, with the whole viewing experience feeling a little flat – especially when compared against an OLED screen or an LCD on a more expensive device – and blacks in particular fail to reach inky depths. Motorola gives you the option of choosing between Natural and Saturated modes in the display settings menu, with the latter being the default. 

I experimented using both modes and found Natural to be the better of the two. Saturated was just a little too ‘in your face’ and fake-looking for my liking.

To really test the G53’s ability to handle color, I loaded up a stream of The Incredibles on Disney Plus. Remembering once again just how little this phone costs, the Motorola does a fine job, serving up a perfectly passable image that demonstrates good contrast. The red suits of The Incredibles family stand out particularly well in a predominantly green forest-based scene towards the end of the movie, although as mentioned before, they’re not as vibrant as you’d get from a more capable display, or one that uses OLED technology. 

Perhaps the headline figure where the display is concerned is its 120Hz refresh rate. This is a rarity for devices in this price bracket – not even the iPhone 14 or iPhone 14 Plus can lay claim to having it – and it’s certainly a welcome one. Motion when scrolling is definitely smooth, although the odd stutter can be seen when moving particularly quickly, likely spurred on by the underpowered processor. You have the option of setting the refresh rate to automatic, or you can choose to keep it locked at 120Hz or 60Hz, but doing so can affect battery life.

Display score: 3.5/5

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Cameras

  • 50MP main, 2MP macro and 8MP front cameras
  • Takes OK-looking photos in good lighting
  • Struggling autofocus and lack of OIS means low-light photos suffer

Motorola Moto G53 5G camera module

(Image credit: Future)

Motorola has equipped the Moto G53 with a dual camera system, comprising a 50MP f/1.8 main sensor and a 2MP f/2.4 macro sensor. While 50 megapixels may sound like an enticing number, it doesn’t tell the whole story and it doesn’t necessarily equate to high-quality images. 

The sensor used by Motorola is a Samsung JN1, which is a relatively small sensor with small pixels and, as such, has a harder time drawing in light. This not only affects how vibrant and detailed images appear, but also means the G53 has a hard time autofocusing well on whatever or whoever your subject is.

If you find yourself in good, bright sunlight, then you are able to take OK-looking photos, although the best camera phones aren’t going to be quaking in their boots. Images do still lack any real vibrancy and clarity, and results suffer with worsening light conditions. This was proven when I took the Moto G53 to Sydney's annual Vivid event. Even with several bright light installations, the Motorola struggled to focus and a lack of optical image stabilization certainly didn't help matters. Results turned out blurred and lacking any notion of color or detail.

As for the macro lens, an on-screen prompt pops up telling you to get up close with the subject, but I struggled to get it to focus on anything. I actually had more success using the main lens up close instead.

In the gallery below, I've included images taken on the Moto G53 in good lighting, in low-lighting and some comparison shots of a leaf taken using the standard camera and macro camera.

Results taken on the front camera aren't overly terrible, although I did find I could look pale and overexposed in some instances. I also found that when I came to view the selfie I'd taken, some processing appears to take place on the image, which makes it look more blurred. I toggled the automatic HDR setting on and off, assuming this was the culprit, but the same effect was applied each time. 

Camera score: 2.5/5

Image 1 of 8

Still life taken on Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 8

Picture of leaf taken on Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 8

Macro shot of leaf taken on Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 8

Image taken at dusk on Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 8

Image taken at night at Vivid Sydney with Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 8

Image taken at night at Vivid Sydney with Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 8

Close up image of speaker taken with Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 8

Selfie take on Moto G53 5G

(Image credit: Future)

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Software & performance

  • Android 13
  • Dated Snapdragon 480 Plus processor
  • Will struggle to perform any intense tasks

The Moto G53 runs the latest version of Android 13 and is kept largely free of any added bloatware. Motorola has its own app onboard, which you can use to customize various aspects of the phone, such as the color theme, the layout of the home screen (how many rows and columns of apps you can have displayed) and which gestures you want to use – if any – to open apps or enable features. 

On Geekbench 6, the Moto G53 5G returned a single-core score of 719, a multi-core score of 1743 and 979 in 3DMark Wild Life. These are all pretty low figures, and you shouldn’t expect to do any intensive gaming on it, but in comparison with some of its similarly priced peers, the G53 actually fares pretty well.

The Samsung Galaxy A23, which costs around $299 / £289 / AU$400 returned a single-core score of 522 and a multi-core score of 1669, along with a 3DMark score of 440, for example, making the G53 a better performer on paper. 

The TCL 20S launched in 2021 with a price of $249 (around £180 / AU$345) returned an average Geekbench score of 1343, compared to the G53’s 1231 (there isn’t a published 3DMark score for it).

But benchmark scores only tell some of the story and, in general day-to-day use, I found the G53 to perform well. Navigating through menus only incurred the occasional stutter and apps loaded relatively quickly. The takeaway is to not expect flagship-level performance, as this is a budget device that’s on par with its peers. It may come down to whichever costs the least for you, or if you have a particular affinity for a certain brand that will persuade you to part with your cash. 

Software and performance score: 3/5

Motorola Moto G53 5G review: Battery

Motorola Moto G53 5G lying on table

(Image credit: Future)
  • 5,000mAh battery lasts well over a day
  • Slow to charge with just 10W wired charging, no wireless

Motorola has fitted a 5,000mAh battery into the Moto G53 5G, which is something we’ve now pretty much come to expect in the G series. It’s a solid offering and one that should comfortably last you a day with moderate use, and with some battery life to spare. 

To put it to the test, I loaded up an 11-hour long YouTube video of various nature scenes, with resolution set to automatic – 720p in this case – and screen brightness set to 50%. I left the video playing on a loop in TechRadar's Sydney office, where lighting conditions were constant, so that the display wouldn’t keep adjusting its brightness level. 

I came back to the video still playing the next morning and the battery usage statistics said it had been running for 21 hours 35 minutes, and still had 8% battery left. This is mighty impressive and, despite the screen offering 120Hz refresh rate, the Full HD+ resolution, coupled with a large 5,000mAh battery unit no doubt helps the G53 to last for close to two days with average use.

Which is good news, because it takes a fairly long time to fully recharge the G53’s battery. The phone only supports up to 10 watts of maximum throughput from a wired charge, which meant it took just over two hours to top up to 100% from seven. 

Battery score: 4.5 / 5

Motorola Moto G53 5G: Score card

Should I buy the Motorola Moto G53 5G?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

If you're looking at the Motorola Moto G53, then it's most likely because you're looking to spend as little as possible on a phone. But you're also going to want to get the absolute most bang for your buck. Here are some good alternatives that do cost a little bit more, but which don't scrimp on features. 

How I tested the Motorola Moto G53 5G

I used my review unit of the Motorola Moto G53 5G mainly for leisure during my testing period of a few weeks. I predominantly used it to browse web pages, scroll through social media and to take some pictures. I also attempted to play a few games on it to best mimic the most likely real-world use case scenarios. 

I didn't use it to replace my usual phone, an iPhone, but I was still able to send messages to friends via social media apps when connected to Wi-Fi. I also used my iPhone as a means to compare picture-taking abilities, being well aware that the iPhone was going to take more impressive shots due to its more capable camera system. 

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed June 2023]

It’s official: Samsung Galaxy Unpacked will be hosted in last week of July for the unveiling of Fold5 and Flip5
8:14 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Last week, Lee Young-hee, the President of Samsung DX's Global Marketing Center, confirmed that Samsung's next Galaxy Unpacked event will be held in Seoul, South Korea. Young-hee didn't reveal the event venue, but today, Samsung sent a press note to the media, confirming the Galaxy Unpacked will be hosted in Seoul at COEX in Samseong-dong, Gangnam, since "This unique location offers the world an opportunity to experience the captivating blend of past, present and future that defines Seoul." Since the first Unpacked in 2010 in Las Vegas, Samsung has held the global Unpacked event in key...

OnePlus Fold to be unveiled in August in New York
12:59 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

The mythical first OnePlus foldable smartphone is coming in the third quarter of this year, according to CEO Pete Lau himself. Now a new rumor from a generally reliable source hones in on some of the minute details. First up, the unveiling will apparently take place in New York in the first half of August. That means it will be announced only a week or two after Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold5 and Flip5, if we go by the latest rumors saying the Korean company's next Unpacked event is scheduled for July 26. That's a pretty brave stance on OnePlus' part, wanting to steal some thunder from...

Hot Take: Apple Vision Pro
9:20 pm | June 6, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Apple's AR initiative has been a long time coming. We first caught wind of Apple being interested in this space when the iPhone 8 Plus featured some new AR capabilities courtesy of the company's new ARKit. It seemed unlikely even back then that Apple's vision for AR would be limited to just the iPhone and that the company had something bigger cooking in the background. Fast forward six years and the company just announced the Apple Vision Pro. While Apple would like you to refer to it as a “spatial computer”, in the end, what it really is is a very sophisticated AR headset. The Vision...

« Previous PageNext Page »