Organizer
Gadget news
Microsoft Surface Pro X review
9:22 pm | November 21, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Laptops | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Editor's Note

• Original review date: November 2019
• Launch price: $999 (£999, AU$1,699)
• More modern Surface devices are much more successful

Update – September 2024: In many ways, the Surface Pro X was ahead of its time. When it launched in 2019 it was notable for coming with a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip, based on Arm technology, rather than the Intel hardware previous Surfaces came with. Unfortunately, back then, support for Arm hardware within Windows wasn't very good, and that meant the Surface Pro X felt underpowered and over priced, especially as many popular Windows 11 apps couldn't run on the device. These days, however, Arm-based Windows laptops are much more popular, thanks to Microsoft's Copilot+ PC initiative, which has seen the company, along with the likes of Asus, HP and Dell, release laptops like the Surface Pro 11 and Dell XPS 13 (2024), that come with Arm-based chips with specialist NPUs (Neural Processing Units) that are designed to perform AI tasks. While the Surface Pro X ended up being a noble failure, many of these new Copilot+ PCs are truly excellent devices, and many have started to appear on our best laptops of 2024 list.

Original review follows.

Two Minute Review

The Microsoft Surface Pro X is an undoubtedly stellar looking and feeling tablet. Microsoft’s newest attempt at an ARM-based Surface Pro device could have been impressive as well. It even boasts Microsoft’s first-ever original processor, the SQ1, which it co-developed with Qualcomm.

However, it unfortunately falls short of expectations. We’re more than a little let down by a few key Pro X design choices. Particularly, this tablet/laptop hybrid doesn’t have an audio jack, and its battery life, while decent, is subpar compared to predecessors and contemporaries. And, that’s without getting into the pricing.

At first glance, the Surface Pro X's price tag might seem rather appealing, especially next to some of its rivals. However, in reality, it's simply too pricey for the level of performance you’re getting. All told, we find the Surface Pro X hard to recommend for most people.

Microsoft Surface Pro X review

All Surface Pro X models include Microsoft’s Qualcomm Snapdragon-based processor and the 13-inch PixelSense touch display. (Image credit: Future)
Spec Sheet

Here is the Surface Pro X configuration sent to TechRadar for review:

CPU: 3.0GHz Microsoft SQ1 (based on Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx; octa-core)
Graphics: Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
RAM:  16GB LPDDR4x (2,133MHz)
Screen:  13-inch 2,880 x 1,920 (267 ppi) PixelSense display (3:2; 450 nits)
Storage:  256GB SSD
Ports: 2 x USB-C 3.1; Surface Connect port; nano SIM slot
Connectivity:  Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac); Bluetooth 5.0; Snapdragon X24 LTE modem
Cameras: 5.0MP webcam (1080p video; Windows Hello); 10.0MP rear camera (1080p/4K video; autofocus)
Weight:  1.7 pounds ( 774g)
Size: 11.3 x 8.2 x 0.28 inches (287x 208 x 7.3 mm; W x D x H)

Price and availability

The price of entry into Microsoft’s future-gazing Surface Pro X is $999 (£999, AU$1,699) – that gets you 8GB of memory (RAM) and a 128GB solid-state drive (SSD). You can double the storage, which ups the price to $1,299 (£1,269, AU$2,149), and double the RAM (16GB) with a 512GB SSD, which costs $1,799 (£1,819, AU$2,899).

All Surface Pro X models include Microsoft’s Qualcomm Snapdragon-based, 3.0GHz SQ1 system-on-a-chip (SoC) processor, as well as the 13-inch, 2,880 x 1,920-pixel (267 pixels per inch) PixelSense touch display in the signature 3:2 aspect ratio.

You already know the kicker, don’t you? That’s right, these prices do not include the Type Cover with the stowable and automatically charging Surface Slim Pen. That will cost you an additional $269 (£259, AU$429).

This means that the cheapest version of the complete Surface Pro X experience will cost you $1,269 in the US to start. That’s for the bare minimum of acceptable memory and storage these days, meanwhile a Surface Pro 7 goes for nearly $150 less and will get you a much stronger Intel Core i5 (Ice Lake) processor.

While the Surface Pro X is certainly an expensive device, it's price starts to look a little more tempting when compared to its chief rival: the 12.9-inch iPad Pro. That starts at $999 (£999, AU$1,699) for half as much storage (64GB), with a similarly-sharp display and just one USB-C port. 

Its keyboard accessory costs an exorbitant $199 (£199, AU$299), while the tablet’s Apple Pencil goes for another $129 (£119, AU$199). All told, that’s $1,329 in the US to get a comparable experience to the complete Surface Pro X.

So, unless you have a very specific use case that only the Surface Pro X can solve, there are a number of far more powerful, versatile and feature-rich (even thin-and-light) laptops out there for similar prices – just check out our best 2-in-1 laptops and best tablets with keyboards buying guides for some brilliant alternatives.

Image 1 of 11

The Surface Pro X feels just as pleasing and accurate to doodle and draw with.

The Surface Pro X feels just as pleasing and accurate to doodle and draw with. (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 11

The Surface Pro X simply trims and rounds out the classic yet dated Surface Pro design.

The Surface Pro X simply trims and rounds out the classic yet dated Surface Pro design. (Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 11

The new Type Cover is comfortable and impressively accurate for a keyboard cover.

The new Type Cover is comfortable and impressively accurate for a keyboard cover. (Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 11

The tablet feels impressively light, and slips easily into almost any bag – even with the Type Cover attached.

The tablet feels impressively light, and slips easily into almost any bag – even with the Type Cover attached. (Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 11

The stylus is now flatter than before in order to accommodate the new storing and charging functions.

The stylus is now flatter than before in order to accommodate the new storing and charging functions. (Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 11

The Surface Pro X has gained not one, but two USB-C ports.

The Surface Pro X has gained not one, but two USB-C ports. (Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 11

The Surface Pro X has gained not one, but two USB-C ports.

The Surface Pro X has gained not one, but two USB-C ports. (Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 11

The Surface Pro X has a 13-inch 2,880 x 1,920-pixel PixelSense touch display.

The Surface Pro X has a 13-inch 2,880 x 1,920-pixel PixelSense touch display. (Image credit: Future)
Image 9 of 11

The stylus is now flatter than before in order to accommodate the new storing and charging functions.

The stylus is now flatter than before in order to accommodate the new storing and charging functions. (Image credit: Future)
Image 10 of 11

The new Type Cover bounces under key presses more noticeably than before.

The new Type Cover bounces under key presses more noticeably than before. (Image credit: Future)
Image 11 of 11

The Surface Pro X looks and feels thinner, lighter and better than previous Surface Pro models.

The Surface Pro X looks and feels thinner, lighter and better than previous Surface Pro models. (Image credit: Future)

Design

The Surface Pro X simply trims and rounds out the classic yet dated Surface Pro design, bringing down its thinness and weight even further. Specifically, the Pro X measures 11.3 x 8.2 x 0.28 inches (287 x 208 x 7.3mm) and weighs 1.7 pounds (774g).

The tablet feels impressively light, and slips easily into almost any bag – even with the Type Cover attached. Microsoft has also eliminated the hard angles of the classic Surface Pro design, giving the Pro X a much more rounded and modern look and feel  that's closer to that of a smartphone. 

We appreciate these subtle design changes that make the Surface Pro X feel more like an iPhone XR than a Windows tablet – which is a compliment.

There’s just one color option for the Surface Pro X: a matte black aluminum finish paired with a black Type Cover that drops the Alcantara fabric, and that’s unfortunate. This is certainly a sleek and unassuming look, to be sure, so it’s not all that bad.

However, we have one massive problem with the Surface Pro X design. While it has gained not one, but two USB-C ports, there is no headphone jack on the tablet. This is essentially a $1,300 Windows laptop (after all, Microsoft claims that this tablet can replace your laptop) with no 3.5mm audio support.

We know that the iPad Pro has also dropped the headphone jack, and folks didn’t break a sweat over that. However, no one in their right mind seriously expects a laptop experience from an iPad, while that’s exactly what we’ve been trained to expect from a Surface Pro. This is a major detraction in our book, and should be rectified in any followup device that Microsoft produces.

As for typing on the new Type Cover, it’s plenty comfortable and impressively accurate for a keyboard cover, though it does bounce under key presses more noticeably than before. We also appreciate the ergonomic angle staying with the new stowaway barrel for the Surface Pen Slim.

While we’re at it, let’s discuss the Surface Pen Slim. The stylus is now flatter than before in order to accommodate the new storing and charging functions. However, it feels just as pleasing and accurate to doodle and draw with. All of the standard pressure sensitivity is present, and the display's palm rejection is still spot-on.

As for that display, it is a 13-inch PixelSense touchscreen with a 2,880 x 1,920 resolution (267 pixels per inch) and a 3:2 aspect ratio. This is a simply gorgeous screen with excellent color, and it's also impressively bright at 450 nits.

Honestly, we’re left a little puzzled by the Surface Pro X design. It certainly looks and feels thinner, lighter and better than previous Surface Pro models. However, it dropped the headphone jack to achieve that thinness, and that’s a really tough pill to swallow. 

Microsoft Surface Pro X review

The Surface Pro X has gained not one, but two USB-C ports. (Image credit: Future)

Performance

We’re getting similar vibes from the Surface Pro X’s power profile that we are from its design: some big sacrifices were made in the name of thinness, lightness and lasting power. Here’s the kicker: the latter point doesn’t even see a huge improvement. 

Benchmarks

Here’s how the Surface Pro X performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

PCMark 8 Home: Unable to run
3DMark: Unable to run
Geekbench 4 (Single-Core): 3,563; (Multi-Core): 11,769
Cinebench: Unable to run
PCMark 8 Battery Life: Unable to run
TechRadar Battery Life Test: 7 hours and 54 minutes

Unfortunately, because of the ARM-based SoC, we were only able to run Geekbench and our video-based battery rundown test on the Surface Pro X. That’s at least enough for us to compare it against its number one rival, the iPad Pro.

So, how does Qualcomm’s 7-nanometer SoC compare against the Apple A12X Bionic? Well, it gets trounced, to be frank. We’ve seen the latest 12.9-inch iPad Pro achieve numbers 40% to 50% higher than the Surface Pro X in the Geekbench 4 single- and- multi-core tests.

Granted, these are two different operating systems (OS), but both processors were designed specifically to perform within their respective OSes, so that explanation doesn’t fly these days.

While day-to-day tasks, like checking your emails, browsing the web and creating documents in Microsoft Office, ran pretty well on the Surface Pro X, trying to do anything more strenuous than that could cause problems. You might get away with editing photos and other images on this tablet via Photoshop, but that’s about it.

Microsoft Surface Pro X

The Surface Pro X battery life is undoubtedly long. (Image credit: Future)

Battery life

Microsoft promises up to 13 hours of mixed usage time for the Surface Pro X, touted as one of the tablet’s most appealing features due to its new ARM-based silicon. Well, we’re sad to say that this hasn’t panned out in our testing.

The Surface Pro X did last longer than the Surface Pro 7 (6 hours and 2 minutes) in our video rundown battery test, but the older Surface Pro 6 (8 hours and 45 minutes) lasted nearly an hour longer than this version. 

This is more than likely due to the even sharper display within the Surface Pro X than its two predecessors, not to mention brand new silicon compared to the umpteenth iteration of the 14nm Intel processor in the Surface Pro 6.

In the end, while the Surface Pro X battery life is undoubtedly long, it’s just not as long as Microsoft’s Pro 6, which holds the crown for longest lasting Surface Pro tablet to date.

Microsoft Surface Pro X review

The Surface Pro X boasts a gorgeous screen with excellent color and 450 nits of brightness. (Image credit: Future)

Software and features

As with every Surface that has preceded it, the Surface Pro X isn’t feature-rich nor are there many key pieces of software to discuss – in fact, many apps aren’t supported at all, due to the underlying processor architecture – which has its ups and downs. The major benefit here is that there is basically no bloatware on this tablet at all, as it’s sold directly by Microsoft.

Another gain is the Windows Hello facial recognition, using the tablet’s infrared camera next to its webcam, and is as quick and accurate as before. Just as they have before, we can open the tablet from its Type Cover and it’s already logged us into Windows 10. Talk about instant-on performance.

That said, this Surface in particular has the added benefit of optional LTE connectivity through a nanoSIM slot. This makes for an always-connected device, but will cost additional cash on a monthly basis. It’s up to you whether this feature is worthwhile, but we’ll keep on tethering on our laptops via our iPhone.

Microsoft Surface Pro X review

We’re getting similar vibes from the Surface Pro X’s power profile that we are from its design. (Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

You want the thinnest, lightest Surface yet
If portability is your chief concern in buying a new laptop, then consider the Pro X for sure. This is the thinnest, lightest Surface to date, making the ultimate Surface Pro for frequent travelers and others who simply appreciate these kinds of devices.

You want LTE baked into a laptop
If you absolutely must have instant LTE connectivity from a tablet and are willing to pay extra for that, then the Surface Pro X might be for you. This turns the Pro X into a more smartphone-like experience in that it is truly always connected, but it’s also additional cash.

Don’t buy it if…

You want the most powerful Surface Pro
Despite Microsoft’s team up with Qualcomm for its unique SQ1 processor, we’re not seeing better numbers from this tablet versus the Surface Pro 7. That’s a real shame, but again the focus here is portability.

You want the longest lasting Surface Pro
In spite of Microsoft’s promises, the Pro X is not the longest lasting tablet of this year (much less last year). We chalk this up to the upgraded display resolution and new silicon that isn’t as widely tested or established.

Nikon D7500 review
12:47 am |

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Mirrorless Cameras | Comments: Off

Editor's Note

• Original review date: November 2019
• Launch price: $1,249 / £1,299.99
• Official price now: around $699 / £649

Update: November 2024. Launched way back in 2017, the Nikon D7500 is by no means a cutting-edge camera. That said, if you prefer the handling of a DSLR and want an enthusiast-grade stills camera with solid specs, the D7500 represents fantastic value in 2024. In fact, we rate it as the top-value all-rounder in our list of the best DSLR cameras. Its excellent 20.9MP sensor and powerful 51-point AF system still stack up well today, even if its single SD card slot and slow Live View focusing show its age. We also rate its battery life and sturdy build quality. The D7500 is often on sale and we think you’ll still be hard-pushed to find a better DSLR camera for the money.

If you still prefer DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, there are some real bargains to be found among higher-end APS-C models from a few years ago – and the Nikon D7500 is a great example.

When it launched in April 2017, the D7500 was premium, enthusiast-level DSLR that borrowed a lot from what was then Nikon's flagship DX-format camera, the Nikon D500. It sat below the latter and above the D7200, which has now been discontinued.

So what does it still bring to the table? Well, the D7500 remains a fine choice for shooting sports and action, thanks to its 8fps burst shooting and generous buffer. Impressively for an enthusiast-level DSLR of its time, it also shoots 4K video at 30fps. And with weather-sealing and chunky handling, DSLR fans will right at home with the D7500's reassuringly weighty frame.

Of course, there are also excellent mirrorless cameras available for the D7500's new price tag, including the new Nikon Z50. But if it's the handling, battery life and optical viewfinder of a DSLR you're looking for, then the D7500 now offers excellent value for money. 

Image 1 of 8

Image 2 of 8

Image 3 of 8

Image 4 of 8

Image 5 of 8

Image 6 of 8

Image 7 of 8

Image 8 of 8

Features

  • APS-C CMOS sensor, 20.9MP
  • 3.2-inch tilt-angle touchscreen, 922,000 dots
  • 4K video capture

One of the biggest shake-ups the Nikon D7500 brought was its change of sensor. While both the D7100 and D7200 sported 24MP chips (as, for that matter, did the entry-level D3400 and D5600), here Nikon opted to use the slightly lower-resolution 20.9MP sensor from the D500, which, as in that camera, is teamed with Nikon's EXPEED 5 image processor.

As on the D500, omitting the low-pass filter has enabled Nikon to eke out that bit more detail from the 20.9MP sensor

As on the D500, omitting the low-pass filter enabled Nikon to eke out that bit more detail from the 20.9MP sensor, and while it may seem quite a sacrifice to lose almost 4MP compared to the D7200's 24.2MP, the minor drop in resolution does have advantages, particularly when it comes to sensitivity. 

Compared to the D7200’s ISO range of 100-25,600, the D7500’s 100-51,200 standard offers an extra stop of flexibility, but it’s the expanded range that impresses. There’s a low setting of ISO 50, while the upper ceiling is a staggering ISO 1,640,000. The reality is that these upper sensitivities are likely to be pretty much unusable, but the benefits will be felt further down the sensitivity range, and if the new camera performs like the D500 it should impress in this regard. 

While both the D7100 and D7200 sported 3.2-inch displays that sat flush with the camera body, the D7500 has a 3.2-inch tilt-angle touchscreen display with a 922,000-dot resolution (the D500 has a 2,359,000-dot resolution). There’s also an eye-level pentaprism optical viewfinder that offers 100% coverage.

Image 1 of 2

Nikon D7500 on an athletics track

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Nikon D7500 on an athletics track

(Image credit: Future)

We were pleased to see 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) video capture arrive on the D7500, at 30, 25 and 24p for up to 29 minutes and 59 seconds. As usual there are lower-resolution video modes, and Full HD footage can be shot in 60p for slow-motion playback. In addition, 4K UHD timelapse movies can be created in-camera, and there's electronic Vibration Reduction to reduce the impact of camera shake when shooting movies hand-held.

The D7500 also offers simultaneous 4K UHD output – to card, and uncompressed via HDMI – as well as a headphone and microphone jack for pro-level audio recording and monitoring.

Speaking of cards, the D7500 only features a single SD card slot, not two, as on the D7200, which will no doubt be a disappointment for some potential buyers.

As we’ve seen with the D500, D3400 and D5600, the D7500 sports Nikon's SnapBridge technology, enabling the camera to stay permanently linked to a smart device over a low-power Bluetooth connection (or via Wi-Fi). This means that after the initial connection has been made images can be transferred automatically to your phone whenever you shoot. 

Build and handling

  • Weighs 640g / 1lb 6.6oz
  • 5% lighter than the D7200
  • Comprehensive weather sealing

The Nikon D7500 is 5% lighter than the now discontinued D7200 (and 16% lighter than the D500), and tips the scales at a modest 640g / 1lb 6.6oz. Despite this minor weight saving though, it feels reassuringly solid in the hand.

Compared to the D7200 the handgrip is that bit deeper, and this, combined with the soft-texture coatings on the front and rear of the grip, ensures that the D7500 feels secure and comfortable in the hand. 

The D7500 is chunky enough that when we held the camera our little finger didn't slip off the bottom of the grip, which is just as well as those who want even better purchase and a more comfortable vertical shooting experience will be disappointed to hear that currently there isn't an optional vertical grip available.

Like the discontinued D7200, the D7500 is weather-proofed, so you'll be able to keep shooting when the elements turn against you. Interestingly, the magnesium alloy panels in the D7200's construction disappeared, and were replaced by a single monocoque construction in an effort to save weight, although despite this apparently retrograde step it still feels like a well-made piece of kit for the price – it certainly doesn't feel plasticky.

There have also been some tweaks to the Nikon D7500's button placement.

On the top plate the metering mode button has disappeared, to be replaced by a dedicated ISO button, as we saw on the D500. Its position has shifted slightly to be closer to the exposure compensation control, making it easier to reach when the camera is raised to your eye.

Moving round the back of the D7500, the general control layout is virtually identical to its predecessor. Metering mode now takes the spot vacated by the ISO control, while the 'info' and 'i' buttons have swapped sides.

Image 1 of 3

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

The rear display is a touch slimmer than the D500's when you pull it out and away from the body. It can be tilted downwards and upwards, and while touchscreens are now commonplace on mirrorless cameras, it was great to see one arrive on a Nikon DSLR when we reviewed the D7500 in 2017.

There's obviously tap-to-focus control (you can also tap the area of the screen where you want to focus and trigger the shutter at the same time), while the touchscreen makes reviewing images that much quicker too – you can swipe through photos and pinch-zoom images. The menus can also be navigated via the touchscreen, which was a first for a Nikon DSLR.

The drop in screen resolution, to 922,000 dots from the D7200's 1,299,000, seemed a bit of a backward step however – that was even lower than the D5600's 1,037,000-dot resolution, but in our time with the camera it didn't seem to impact on the user experience, with a decent amount of clarity and good color rendition. 

Autofocus

  • 51-point AF, 15 cross-type AF points
  • Group-Area AF added
  • Auto AF Fine Tune

While the Nikon D7500 borrows a lot from the D500, it doesn’t get the same sophisticated 153-point AF system the D500 enjoys. Instead, it gets an uprated version of the 51-point AF system that was in the D7200.

This system was getting a little long in the tooth even back in 2017, but it’s a tried and tested one that’s still work well. Fifteen of the 51 AF points are the more sensitive cross-type variety, which offer greater precision and accuracy, while the coverage can be configured down to 21 and nine points if you wish.

This AF system was getting a little long in the tooth even when the D7500 arrived, but it’s a tried and tested one

The D7500’s AF system received a Group-Area AF mode, which we first saw on the D810. This enhances subject detection and tracking, with the D7500 constantly monitoring five different AF fields, and improves focus acquisition and background isolation.

When using with 3D tracking, the D7500 does an excellent job of following subjects through the frame

Another subtle difference from the system in its predecessor was that the AF system hooked up to a different metering sensor, which is used to aid image recognition when focusing. While the D7200 used the older 2016-pixel RGB sensor, the D7500 enjoys the same 180,000-pixel RGB sensor as the D500, which when combined with the decent coverage of AF points across the frame  delivers reliable AF tracking performance.

Away from 3D tracking, and the D7500's Dynamic AF mode (using 9, 21 or 51 AF points) is again, very good

Like both the D500 and the D5, the D7500 has the Auto AF Fine Tune feature, which when in Live View enables users to automatically calibrate autofocus with specific lenses if required.

Despite the Live View AF not being quite as fast as rivals, it still does a decent job

Autofocus in Live View can be a bit of a clunky experience with many Nikon DSLRs, but it's a bit more refined on the D7500. It's not a match for Canon's excellent Dual Pixel AF system that we've seen in cameras for years, but focusing is better than we've experienced with a lot of other Nikon bodies, while the ability to tap-focus using the touchscreen speeds things up greatly.

Performance

  • 8fps burst shooting
  • 180K-pixel metering sensor
  • 950-shot battery life

With a raft of mirrorless cameras, such as the Fujifilm X-T3, overshadowing the 6fps burst shooting performance of the now discontinued D7200, it was no surprise to see the Nikon D7500 offering 8fps.

Helped by the new EXPEED 5 image processor, the D7500 can shoot a burst of 50 raw files before the buffer needs to clear – quite an improvement over the D7200’s 18 raw files at 6fps, and impressive for a non-professional DSLR.

The D7500's metering system performs very well

As we've touched upon, the D7500 inherited the D5 and D500’s 180,000-pixel RGB sensor, which handles metering and white balance, as well as informing the automatic scene recognition system to help improve autofocusing with better subject detection.

As expected the metering system performs very well, consistently delivering spot-on exposures, while the Auto White Balance does a solid job too. 

There's a new battery as well – the EN-EL15a is good for 950 shots before it needs charging. That's still streets ahead of most mirrorless cameras, for which you'd need two or more batteries to even think of getting that kind of endurance, but it's actually down 150 shots from the D7200's 1,100-shot battery life – undoubtably one of the trade-offs for having the more powerful EXPEED 5 image processor on board here.

Image quality

  • ISO100-51,200, expandable to 50-1,640,000
  • Impressive dynamic range
  • Excellent noise performance

With the same sensor as the fabulous D500 at the heart of things, the results from the Nikon D7500 are predictably excellent.

It may have slightly less pixels than more affordable DX Nikon DSLRs, but unless you're going to spend most of your time shooting at ISO 100, the minor drop in resolution is a compromise worth making.

Don't be put off by the D7500 having 'only' a 20.9MP resolution – there's still plenty of detail

This is underlined when you look at images through the ISO range. Shots taken at the lower end of the sensitivity range display excellent levels of detail, but the camera really starts to shine as you bump up the ISO setting. 

While detail does suffer a touch at ISO 6400, results stand up remarkably well. Increase the sensitivity a further stop to ISO 12,800, and while there's now a hint of chroma (color) noise in shots, results are still very good.

Image 1 of 5

The Auto White Balance is very good, while colors have a nice punch

The Auto White Balance is very good, while colors have a nice punch

Click here to see the full-size image

Image 2 of 5

Don't be put off by the D7500 having 'only' a 20.9MP resolution – there's still plenty of detail

Don't be put off by the D7500 having 'only' a 20.9MP resolution – there's still plenty of detail

Click here to see the full-size image

Image 3 of 5

At ISO100 JPEG files look very clean

At ISO100 JPEG files look very clean

Click here to see the full-size image

Image 4 of 5

Further up the D7500's sensitivity range, at ISO6400, results still look very good

Further up the D7500's sensitivity range, at ISO6400, results still look very good

Click here to see the full-size image

Image 5 of 5

Even at the highest native setting of ISO51,200, image quality holds up very well

Even at the highest native setting of ISO51,200, image quality holds up very well

Click here to see the full-size image 

As you'd expect, luminance (grain-like) noise becomes more pronounced at ISO25,600 and ISO51,200, but the results are still some of the best we've seen from a camera at these sensitivities. 

Once you go beyond the realm of the camera's native sensitivities, things do tail off. That said, results at Hi1 (ISO 102,400) are actually pretty good for such a high value, but banding starts to creep into images shot at Hi2 (ISO 204,800); we'd caution against using anything higher, as results can look pretty murky and suffer from a severe lack of detail. 

Dynamic range is also very impressive. It's possible to recover shadow detail in a shot that's been underexposed by some five stops – even six at a push – and still end up with a very satisfactory shot. 

Verdict

At the time of its launch, the Nikon D7500 represented the biggest revamp we'd seen in the series since the D7000 replaced the D90 back in 2010. It was an impressive little brother to the pro-level D500, which also remains on sale today.

With its price tag continuing to plummet, the D7500 remains an impressive performer, despite the mirrorless revolution that's taken place since it arrived in 2017. DSLRs still have traditional advantages over mirrorless cameras, such as battery life and handling, and if those are important to you, then it's a compelling option at the price.

While its 51-point AF system might sound a little dated, it is tried-and-tested and the D7500 does also 8fps burst shooting among some other tempting features. These include 4K video capture, a tilt-angle touchscreen display and that great combination of the 20.9MP sensor and EXPEED 5 image processing engine, in a body that's considerably smaller than the D500.

With the latter still going for a pro-level premium, the D7500 is an enthusiast-level DSLR with few rivals at its price point.  

Competition

Image 1 of 3

Nikon D500

The D500 is still Nikon's top-of-the-range DX-format DSLR, and a camera that the D7500 borrows a lot of features from, including the 20.9MP sensor. Pay the (considerable) extra though and you get even better AF performance, thanks to a brilliant 153-point AF system that'll cope with pretty much anything. Marry that to a camera that can shoot 10fps for 200 shots and a rock-solid build, and you have what is still one of the best DSLRs out there.

Read our in-depth Nikon D500 review

Image 2 of 3

Nikon D7200

Nikon's now discontinued D7200 was always a firm favorite amongst enthusiast photographers, and it's easy to see why. Packing in a brilliant sensor that was complemented by impressive specs, there was little not to like. The D7500 is the better camera overall, but it's still worth seeking out second-hand or refurbished D7200s if your budget's a bit tight.

Image 3 of 3

Canon EOS 80D

Perhaps the biggest non-Nikon rival to the D7500 is Canon's EOS 80D. This has now been succeeded by the Canon 90D, but it remains a hugely capable enthusiast DSLR that has similarly seen big price cuts. It's edged out by the D7500 when it comes to performance, but if you're going to be shooting a lot with the rear display, you may be tempted by the EOS 80D's rear vari-angle screen and brilliant Dual Pixel AF.

Read our in-depth Canon EOS 80D review

Dyson AirWrap review
8:02 pm | November 20, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Hair Care Home Small Appliances | Comments: Off

Dyson Airwrap: two-minute review

The Dyson Airwrap is a high-end multi-styler that can be used to create curls, waves, and bouncy blow drys. Tapping into the current vogue for 'healthy' hair styling, the Airwrap avoids extreme heat, instead employing something called the Coanda effect to bend and shape the hair as it dries it into place.

The Airwrap blew the beauty world away when it launched in 2018, and combined with the success of the Dyson Supersonic hair dryer (now updated to become the Dyson Supersonic Nural) to cement this brand as a force to be reckoned with in the haircare world.

The original Airwrap had a few flaws, but most of these were addressed in a revised version released in 2022. The current Airwrap comes bundled with more accessories to enable it to create a wider range of hairstyles, as well as new bi-directional barrels. The original Airwrap was good, but this now feels like a fully realized product – albeit still a frighteningly expensive one.

I've been using mine for a year now, and, as someone who doesn't take much joy in hairstyling, it's been a real game-changer. It's not quite perfect, but overall it delivers on what it promises: a swift, less damaging and easier way to achieve salon results from the comfort of your home. Its more recent attachments have diversified the range of hair types it can effectively work with, but there's still room for improvement if you've got Type 4 hair.

Product photo of the Dyson Airwrap with attachments

Note, different versions of the Airwrap come with different attachments (Image credit: Dyson)

Using traditional curling tongs can be time-consuming and damaging to your hair, but the Dyson Airwrap makes curling your hair a breeze (literally), and over time has left my hair looking far healthier than when I've previously used ceramic stylers. It dries your hair quickly (rivaling the best hair dryers on the market), it's incredibly light, and the design looks and feels luxurious.

But (and it's a big but), the Airwrap styler is incredibly expensive, at around five times the price of many other hair curlers on the market. If you want the best of the best, you'll have to spend big, and it's a testament to how good it is that the Airwrap remains incredibly popular despite its exorbitant price tag. Since its release, many Airwrap dupes have popped up on the market, but none quite compete in terms of build quality, design and raw power. That's the short version; read on for my full Dyson Airwrap review.

Dyson Airwrap review: price & availability

  • Dyson Airwrap Complete: $599.99 / £479.99 / AU$849.99
  • Dyson Airwrap Origin: £399.99 / AU$749.99
  • Launched: Original 2018; updated version 2022

There are two main configurations in which you can buy the Dyson Airwrap; the Complete (which comes with a broader array of attachments) or the Origin (which comes with fewer and isn't available in the US.)

The Dyson Airwrap Complete is available to buy for $599.99 / £479.99 / AU$849.99, and offers a selection of variants depending on your hair type. In the US, the variants are Straight+Wavy or Curly+Coily, in the UK it's Long Volumise and Short and Coarse, and Australia simply has the Long Complete and the Origin in circulation as of writing.

Such a lofty list price is going to put it out of the reach of many, and even the cheaper variants are an investment. For comparison, most other hair curlers on the market cost between $50 / £30 / AU$75 and $200 / £150 / AU$300.

You can also buy further attachments through Dyson, priced at $40 / £30 / AU$99 each, and these will all be backwards-compatible with the original Airwrap as well as existing models in circulation.

  • Value for money score: 3 out of 5

Dyson Airwrap review: design

As you would expect from a device of this price, the design and presentation of the Airwrap is pretty much impeccable. It comes in a leather-effect storage case in a variety of colors, depending on which model you choose, and looks attractive enough to make you want to leave it out instead of tucking it away in your cupboard when not in use.

The Styler itself consists of a cylinder, around 10 inches long, with a band around the top where the different attachments slot in. At the bottom you have a removable filter and a power cable to connect it to the mains. Towards the top of the Styler you'll find the control buttons; an on/off button, heat controls, and buttons that control the speed of the airflow. On the rear is the lock switch, which you'll toggle to release attachments.

Dyson Airwrap (2022 version) in reviewer's home

It's controlled via sliding switches on the handle (Image credit: Future)

The Dyson Airwrap Complete package comes with a number of different attachments, which vary depending on which configuration you get. My review model has a soft smoothing brush, firm smoothing brush, round volumizing brush, Coanda smoothing dryer and both the 30mm and 40mm barrels.

Now onto the Airwrap barrels themselves. The first iteration of the Airwrap came with four of these, and you'd have to manually swap over barrels to create curls going in different directions. The 2022 Airwrap was engineered so that the same barrel can be used to create clockwise or counterclockwise curls – a significant upgrade that drastically improves the user experience and has storage benefits too. On each of the barrels, you'll find an arrow that indicates which direction the hair will wrap around it when the styler is on.

How it works

While the blow dryer and brush attachments are pretty self explanatory, the Airwrap barrels and smoothing dryer use an interesting natural phenomenon called the 'Coanda' effect to curl your hair. The Coanda effect causes high speed air to follow the contours of a surface in a similar manner to a liquid – a phenomenon also used to high effect in motor racing.

This effect "attracts, wraps, and curls the hair around the barrel", which means you need only hold your hair close to the styler for the air to whip it around the barrel and create a curl. Aside from making it easier to curl your hair without having to manually wrap your hair around the barrel, it means your hair doesn't come into contact with a very hot surface like it would with a traditional curling iron.

Dyson Airwrap (2022 version) in reviewer's home

The 2022 version has bi-directional barrels (Image credit: Future)

Heat styling can often leave your hair feeling frizzy and dry, and can even lead to breakage if you use heat regularly, particularly if you have fine hair or tightly coiled Type 4 hair.

Dyson says that the Airwrap Styler "measures airflow temperature over 40 times a second and regulates heat, to ensure it always stays below 150C / 302F.” For comparison, it's not unusual for traditional curlers to reach 200C / 392F.

A quick note if you have a particularly jet-setting lifestyle: the Airwrap is not the best for travel overseas, because you can only use it in countries with the same electrical voltage as the country you purchased your device in. A particularly rude awakening for me when I lugged mine to the US from the UK and it refused to turn on.

  • Design score: 4.5 out of 5

Dyson Airwrap review: performance

It's important to note that the Airwrap will have different effects on different types of hair. My hair is thick, porous and just below shoulder length, but I've also tried it on more wiry hair as well as type 2A wavy hair. I don't generally use any styling products or hairspray, but I do shield my hair with a heat-protecting spray to help lessen any damage.

One of the first things I noticed about the Airwrap was how light it is; if you regularly use hair dryers you'll probably be well acquainted with the arm ache that occurs even after using them for short periods of time. Dyson advises that you use the Airwrap on damp rather than soaking wet locks (that's actually the 'official' advice for any hair dryer), but as I've got pretty porous hair that can take an absolute age to dry, I tend to rough-dry my hair using a combination of the round brush and the soft smoothing brush to help it along.

It takes a little practice to get the hang of using the Airwrap, but overall, I'm very impressed by how quickly it dries my hair, and I'm frequently pleased with how much volume I'm able to achieve. The process is quite simple, but the styler can feel a little unwieldy at first as it's so different from using a normal hairdryer. While working on one section of hair, the hot air can sometimes blow the rest of your hair into a frizzy mess, so it's worth taking the time to get the rest of your hair out of the way, and section properly.

Dyson Airwrap (2022 version) in reviewer's home

My review model in its storage case (Image credit: Future)

When it comes to the Airwrap barrels, it's impressively easy to achieve bouncy curls thanks to the Coanda effect. As mentioned earlier, it does take a little practice to get the technique right, and Dyson has some helpful demo videos on its YouTube channel if you need some guidance.

In short, though, you simply lift up a section of your damp hair about one inch wide (and here it really must be damp, not wet, otherwise it won't work properly), and hold the Airwrap curling barrel a few inches up from the end of the strand. Then, watch in amazement as the hair begins to coil itself up and around the barrel, moving it towards your head to encourage the whole strand to curl.

Press pics of models using the Dyson Airwrap

The Coanda effect causes the hair to wrap around the barrels as it dries (Image credit: Dyson)

From there, it's just a case of holding the curl until the hair is dry, and then pushing the temperature switch up to deliver a 'cold shot' to the hair – this helps to set the style and can make the curl look shinier.

The most difficult thing to get your head (or hair, as the case may be) around is the direction you need to curl your hair in. This arrow should be pointing away from your face when you look into your mirror, for face-framing curls.

One of the calling cards of the Airwrap is that is uses a relatively low heat to style your hair, and I definitely noticed the difference between using the styler (which Dyson says won't go over 150C / 302F) and traditional curling tongs that typically reach 200C / 392F or more. (Since the launch of the Airwrap, Dyson has tried to create lower-heat straightener options in the form of the Airstrait and Coralle.)

Press pics of models using the Dyson Airwrap

The Airwrap comes with a range of attachments to create different styles (Image credit: Dyson)

My hair looks shiny and healthy, and after a year of using it I've genuinely noticed an overall improvement in my hair health – and I've never encountered the burning smells that often come with using heated styler tools on the hair. Using a lower heat to style your hair also has the added benefit of preserving your hair's color if it's dyed, meaning you won't need to dye it as often to maintain a rich, vibrant hue.

Even though I've been impressed with the results, I definitely feel the Airwrap is better suited to longer hairstyles, particularly when it comes to the curling barrels – but that's why most regions now stock a version with shorter barrels, to help those with hair shorter than shoulder-length encourage their hair to wrap around effectively.

Reviews from those with tightly coiled Type 4 hair have been mixed as well, but with the release of new attachments this has improved somewhat. While some users were impressed with how quickly the Airwrap dried their hair, others noted that they would still need to use straighteners or curling tongs afterwards to achieve their desired style.

  • Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Should I buy a Dyson Airwrap?

Buy it if...

You care about heat damage
The Airwrap's USP is that it creates curls and waves without the extreme heat used on most stylers, which means healthier, less frazzled locks in the long run. View Deal

You regularly style your hair
The Airwrap isn't cheap, so it might only be worth the investment if you really care about hair styling, and regularly make the effort. Here's where the lower-heat benefits will make a difference, too. View Deal

You have long, wavy/straight hair
My own experiences, and other customer reviews, suggest you'll get the best results with the Airwrap if you have long, straight or wavy hair.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You have coily or short hair
Other customer reviews suggest that the Airwrap isn't well suited for use on tight curls, while those with short hair will struggle to make the most of the curl barrels.View Deal

You need something for travel
My own Airwrap refused to switch on when I took it overseas, so jet-setters might need to rethink.View Deal

You're on a budget
The sky-high price tag will put the Airwrap out of reach of many people. There are a number of Airwrap alternatives on the market, but be aware that none can really match up to the real thing. View Deal

  • Updated to reflect new version: September 2024
  • Original review: November 2019
Athenahealth Review: Pros & Cons, Features, Ratings, Pricing and more
6:00 pm | November 19, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Athenahealth is a US based company, started back in 1997, and combined with Virence Health in 2019. At the center of their services is a cloud-based electronic medical record service, known as athenaClinicals (with a quirky spelling that includes a lowercase first letter, and the capital letter in the middle). There is also an emphasis on networking for both exchange of patient information, and benchmarking of outcomes. AthenaHealth’s EHR solution is part of a larger ecosystem of services that includes Patient Engagement, Telehealth, Population Health and more.

Features

(Image credit: Athenahealth)

Features

The athenaClinicals EHR component has plenty of features to support clinician’s workflow. This includes functions such as appointment scheduling, billing, compliance tracking, charting and e-prescribing. Entering data is performed, in addition to the usual typing via a keyboard, via voice recognition - powered by Nuance, including  on a mobile device - although handwriting recognition is not offered. To keep this affordable, it is also certified for meaningful use (which can provide a financial incentive), and is fully HIPAA certified.

There is also support for a patient portal, as well as scheduling of patient appointments. Through this portal, patients can schedule their appointments, get access to practice forms, and pay their co-pays online. This then integrates with the automatic messaging tool, that then sends out automated reminders to patients for their appointments, and bills. Alerts are also messaged for test results that the patient can access in the patient portal. This level of automation is ideal for reducing staff time, and appeals to younger patients that are more likely to engage via this type of experience.

E-prescribing is an area where athenaClinicals shows its evolution and flexibility. E-prescribing is the important process of electronically transmitting prescriptions from prescribers to the patient’s pharmacies. With the current opioid crisis, many states now have instituted, and in some cases require, that prescribers check the database of prescriptions that the patient has received prior to entering the prescription. This state level database is known as a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), and not only does the prescriber in some regions have to check the database for other restricted prescriptions before , which can take some minutes each time, but also that the PDMP was reviewed as part of the prescribing process. Furthermore, this process needs to be documented, a laborious process  s the database is logged into, the patient is located, the information is reviewed, and then printed out to be separately scanned into the patient’s EHR. Well, with athenaClinicals this entire process is now streamlined, so the EHR now directly integrates with the PDMP, with the patient’s prior drug information instantly available to the clinician, and equally important that this whole process gets documented in real time- a major timesaver from the previous fragmented process.

There is also support for pediatric use, with support for vaccine management, and custom bundles.

In addition to direct clinical use, athenaClinicals also ties into administrative functions. This includes components that support medical billing, inventory management and physician management. There is also integration with accounting, and with policy management.

Finally, the athenaOne mobile app allows for access to the EHR from anywhere. A shortcoming is that it is only available for iOS, both iPad and iPhone, as we did not find it in the Google Play store. 

Drawbacks

No EHR is perfect, and athenaClinicals has its share of shortcomings. For example, some users complain that while the support is quite robust on the initial setup, that subsequently it can take significantly longer to get assistance, and it is not as readily available as on site. This can impact some more advanced tasks, such as clinicians creating templates for notes, and if not done at the outset, the support for this is lacking.

Billing is another service offered through the EHR, and it can certainly be an attractive savings proposition to any practice (and especially a solo practice) to eliminate their costly biller. However, this is not a realistic promise, with practices complaining about too aggressive statements being sent out by athenaClinicals to their patients that turn folks off, little experience with Medicaid billing, and overpriced fees, particularly with lower volume practices that get charged higher percentage collection rates. Another annoyance is the requirement for a physician practice to be limited to certain banks that AthenaHealth approves to receive their payments, and also a delay of a few days for the funds to be received into the account.

Furthermore, users indicate that onboarding is too difficult, and are disappointed at the level of support offered. 

Pricing

(Image credit: Athenahealth)

Pricing

The pricing for athenaClinicals, similar to other EHR products, is not available on the website. While this makes it a challenge to comparison shop between competing solutions, at least Athenahealth makes it simple as they do provide a link prominently on their website to “Schedule a 1:1 meeting,” to facilitate obtaining the custom pricing. It is indicated that there are no upfront costs, nor monthly premiums, but rather the pricing is based on a percentage of collections. 

While there is no free trial, a free demo is offered.

Support

(Image credit: Athenahealth)

Support

There is a phone number listed, with the phrase to “Call anytime,” but it is not specified if this is for sales, support, or both. The other options for support are limited to only online self help. We found possibilities for training which includes options for webinars, case studies, and whitepapers. 

The supported platforms gain access via a web browser. This is the simplest in this day and age, as just about every computer and device with a web browser can then gain access to athenaClinicals, without the need to install the software directly to your desktop. Additionally, no data gets stored locally, as athenaClinicals is a  SaaS, with all data hosted in ‘The Cloud.’ Finally, as detailed above, there is an iOS app as well.

Final verdict

Athenahealth offers a robust platform for an EHR, with many useful features. It focuses more on the physician practice market than on larger institutions, with useful features for e-prescribing with PDMP, clinic note writing and accounting. While integrated billing has particular attraction for smaller physician practices that generally do not have a dedicated billing department, the shortcomings should give these practices pause before adopting this platform. On balance, Athenahealth, with their athenaClinicals EHR platform offers a comprehensive and balanced solution to both the clinical, and the business side of a physician practice. 

Amazon Echo Spot review
3:22 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Smart Home Smart Speakers | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off
Editor's note

There's a new Echo Spot in town! Following the quiet discontinuation of the original Echo Spot from 2019, Amazon has rejuvinated the product with an all-new design, some clever features and improved hardware.

- Josephine Watson, Managing Editor of Lifestyle, 27/12/2024

Amazon first launched the original Echo smart speaker in 2014, but since then its Echo range has expanded to include the high-end Echo Plus, the screen-packing Echo Show and the teeny, tiny Echo Dot. There are now Echo devices to suit every mood, every room and every budget. But one of our firm favorites is still the Echo Spot.

That's because it has everything we could want from a smart speaker: cute looks, portable design and a video screen, which means it looks just as at home on your desk, your kitchen counter and your bedside table.

The Spot doesn't quite have the monopoly on compact smart displays as it used to, though. The new Echo Show 5 apes the rectangular shape of the larger Echo Show, but with a 5.5-inch screen around the size of a smartphone. At a lower price tag, too, it can be hard to justify the Spot in its stead – though if you're sold on its cute and quirky appearance, this is likely the model you'll want.

The best things about the Amazon Echo range in general apply to the Echo Spot too, including a decent price tag, heaps of functionality, and a voice interface easy enough for complete tech beginners to get a hold of. With that in mind, it’s no wonder the Echos have become essentials in a smart home setup over the last five years. 

The new Echo Studio may be best suited to audiophiles who want to blast their tunes, and the Echo Show is probably best in the kitchen, allowing cooks to watch recipe videos on YouTube – but the Amazon Echo Spot is the sort of device that can fit in just about anywhere.

Of course this is all subjective, and depends on how your home is set up, but if you do want our styling as well as our tech recommendations, then the Echo Spot is ideal for sticking next to your bed, much like the recently launched Echo Dot with Clock.

But enough about its looks. Let's explore how the Echo Spot is to use, whether its circular screen is useful day-to-day and how well its audio quality shapes up against its rivals. 

Amazon Echo Spot: design

With features and performance, Amazon's Echo Spot is much, more more than a smart alarm clock – even if that's the impression it gives off. For a lot of Echo Spot owners, chunky alarm clock may become the device's default use, but you'll find it's a lot more versatile than that.

In fact, the Amazon Echo Spot carves out its own niche in the Echo line up, and that's to its credit. The gadget's neatly curved shell does more than enough to make up for some of the design failings of its siblings.

So where the big, bulky and brash Amazon Echo Show tends to take over any area you put it in, for example, thanks to its black slab look and large screen, the Echo Spot is much more refined in its compact, circular design.

  • Try Amazon Music Unlimited with a FREE trial: US | UK | AU

Amazon Echo Spot review

Amazon Echo Spot review

The Echo Spot is proof that the best way to do a desk-based video device is to forgo the TV-lite look, and just go with something that's compact and well designed instead. Tech companies, please take note.

If you had to place this in context in the Echo line-up, it's a cross between an Echo Dot and a smaller version of the Amazon Echo Show – the rectangular video-driven gadget that looks a lot like a miniature TV. 

This is no Echo Dot replacement, though: the price puts it out of contention for that, and it's also a lot more versatile. To say it's a Dot with a screen would be doing it a disservice (sorry, Dot, we love you really). 

Size-wise, it's about the equivalent of a mango. Sure, mangoes may not be the most scientific way to measure things, but at least it gives you an indication that it’s a pretty compact device with a curved back and screen that's angled up, making it easy to view. 

The Amazon Echo Spot is a great-looking device, certainly something you won't mind having on show in your home... unlike the, er, original Show, which we always felt like tucking away on the kitchen counter.

Amazon Echo Spot: features and setup

The Echo Spot unit we reviewed was black but there's also a white one available. The screen is relatively small at 2.5 inches, with a 480 x 480 pixel resolution.

On the top of the screen there's space for a camera and on the top of the Echo Spot as a whole there are three buttons, which all sit flush against the surface for a really streamlined look. 

Anyone familiar with the Echo range will know what they are: volume up, volume down, and a mic mute button – that last one disables the camera too, so it's the button to press for a little added privacy. 

Plus, there are four small pin-prick holes too, housing the four-array mics that listen out for the wake word and for you barking commands at Alexa

Amazon Echo Spot review

Amazon Echo Spot review

On the back of the Echo Spot you have the standard Amazon branding, a slot for power and a 3.5mm audio jack.

The speaker grill for the Echo Spot is right at the base of the device, which makes it invisible when viewing the device face-on. Bluetooth functionality is also available for streaming audio to or from another device.

Setup is similar to other Echo devices, except for this one you can type in your Wi-Fi details straight on the screen instead of going through the Alexa app, thanks to that handy built-in display. 

Admittedly, it's a little bit fiddly putting in your details that way (it asks for your Amazon account password too) but the whole process should take less than five minutes. Then your Amazon Echo Spot is really ready to go.

Amazon Echo Spot review

Amazon Echo Spot review

Once your Echo Spot is up and running, you have the option to watch Amazon's promo video, which tells you what you can do with the device and gets you started. It's not a masterpiece, but it's worth sitting through so you get an idea about what you've just bought.

Then you get that warm chime sound, which means Alexa is online and ready to take orders. Once this appears it's a good time to read our best Amazon Alexa skills article, as well as follow the prompts that come up on the screen to find out what your new Echo Spot can do.

Swipe right on the screen at any time to bring up a whole load of Alexa commands you can use, which is a really nice way to learn what to do with the digital assistant. If you're looking for some fun and silly extras, give our Alexa Easter Eggs list a try, too.

Amazon Echo Spot review

Amazon Echo Spot review

These prompts can be turned off in the Spot's settings, and it's here in the settings where you can toggle home cards on and off as well (little blurbs of information that come up on the home screen).

You can have the home screen include your messages, weather, notifications, upcoming events, reminders, drop ins and trending topics. 

Amazon Echo Spot review

Image Credit: TechRadar

Amazon Echo Spot: performance

What you get from the Amazon Echo Spot in terms of performance depends on what you actually use it for. Like the rest of the Echo range, the smart Echo Spot is extremely versatile – in fact it may be the most versatile of the lot.

If you do use it as an alarm clock, then it's got everything you need. There are a myriad of clock faces to choose from on the Echo Spot, both analog and digital, and they're mainly color-based – so you have the choice of things like Tangerine, Onyx, Bold Teal, Modern Fuschia and Copper (there are a couple of themed ones thrown in too). 

We really liked the Record face, so give that a whirl, and there's an owl one available as well if you prefer something a bit more natural. 

The Echo Spot also has a night mode, which is really handy and works well: put this on and it will dim the screen for the hours that you choose. 

The Echo Spot can wake you with a song or a radio station. For the latter, made possible by the TuneIn skill, you need to say "Alexa, wake me up to [radio station] at [time]."

You can also read your messages on the screen and make calls. This is a new-ish addition to the Alexa smart commands in the UK that's been in the US for some time now. 

When we used the Echo Spot on our desk, it made us veer more towards the video functionality of the device. You can use the Amazon smart speaker to get your daily briefings, so BBC News (for example) will show you its briefing in video form.

Amazon Echo Spot review

Image Credit: TechRadar

At first, trying to watch a 16:9 video on a small, round screen looks a little strange, but Amazon has given the Echo Spot the option to 'zoom' the picture to fit the round shape. This probably wouldn't work on a larger display but we preferred using this mode on the Echo Spot.

Amazon Echo Spot review

Image Credit: TechRadar

The round screen is also perfect for room-to-room calling. This is functionality that Alexa has been able to do for a while and it works really well, turning the Spot smart speaker into an intercom of sorts. 

Ask Alexa to drop into another Echo Spot speaker, and a face pops up on the screen so you can have a chat, much like FaceTime. 

You can also 'drop in' on people in your phone book (if you and they allow it). This works really well on the Echo Spot – there's a blurred image for 10 seconds or so, just in case you need to make yourself decent, and then the screen appears clear.

Like the Echo Dot there's an integrated speaker and we were surprised with how good it sounds, considering the speaker's compact size. 

Unlike the Echo Dot, which is only really passable for things like voice, the Amazon Echo Spot had a nice sound to it. You will probably want to hook it up to a better speaker system via Bluetooth or aux if you're an audiophile, but if it's on your bedside table, then you won't complain about the sound. 

Amazon Echo Spot review

Image Credit: TechRadar

If you listen to something with Amazon Music, then you also get the added bonus of having lyrics come up on the screen. 

This can get addictive, watching the lyrics flow – and when it comes to swear words, we can confirm that Alexa kindly stars them out so your eyes aren't unduly offended.

Another way Amazon wants you to use the Echo Spot is as a smart cam monitor. 

We saw a demo where you could get a smart cam video link up on the screen – from a compatible smart cam – where it was streaming from a nursery. The stream on the demo was clear and bright. 

Unfortunately, our current setup at home is Hive and at the time of this review, the Hive View wasn't compatible (but might be soon).

In theory, this is a fantastic idea, especially if you have the camera set up in a nursery as we do. It will also work with a number of smart home brands, including Netgear Arlo, Logitech, Nest and smart doorbell manufacturer Ring (now owned by Amazon of course).

Amazon Echo Spot review

Image Credit: TechRadar

When it came to using the Echo Spot in the kitchen, we found it great to watch something on Amazon Prime while cooking our food. It synced really well with our Prime Video account and knew which episode of Red Oaks we were watching.

Having the ability to call up recipes and times and actually see them on the screen was a real boon, too – the ability to have multiple timers running at once really helped when cooking a roast dinner. 

Amazon Echo Spot review

Image Credit: TechRadar

Again, this is functionality you can have on other Echo devices but having it at-a-glance on the screen is great and means you don't have to whip your phone out for this sort of stuff.

The Alexa digital assistant continues to get smarter across all these Echo devices too, including the Echo Spot. Vague requests can now be directed to the appropriate skill, so you don't have to remember the exact wording every time. 

Another recent update means Alexa can more naturally understand what you're blabbing on about. It can also now keep listening and keep responding to questions even if you don't say "Alexa" each time.

Amazon Echo Spot: final verdict

The Amazon Echo Spot does everything the Echo Show does, but it all feels better in this smaller form factor. The design is great – it's available in black and white – and we can easily see the Spot being used in the bedroom, kitchen or even on a desk. In fact, you may want it in all of these places.

That's the thing with the Amazon Echo Spot – much like other Echo smart speakers, Amazon wants you to have a multitude of them in your home so you always have access to video chat and Alexa no matter where you are.

But the added screen enhances the look of the Spot and opens up the possibilities for it being much more than just a smart speaker – even if it Amazon hasn't nailed the video capability as of yet. The lower price of the Echo Show 5, too, makes the Spot harder to justify, but it has enough design charms to keep it in the runnings.

Capsule CRM review
7:46 pm | November 11, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Capsule is a reliable and useful toolkit for any corporation. Founded in 2009, Capsule is a UK-based Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform that promises to help you maintain close customer relationships and maximize sales opportunities, all with minimal user input.

The founders of Capsule felt that CRMs were either too difficult to use or too simplistic. That’s why the core aim of Capsule is to make it easy for users to access advanced CRM features through well-thought-out design. In this Capsule CRM review, you’ll see why this is one of the best CRMs in terms of price, usability, and features.

Plans and Pricing

There are three Capsule packages on offer, ranging in price from $0 to $36 per user per month. Paid plans come with a free 30-day free trial period, so there are plenty of ways to see if Capsule is the right tool for you before committing to a monthly payment. 

Capsule CRM 2

(Image credit: Capsule CRM)

The free version of the Capsule CRM comes with a minuscule 10MB of storage. This means it’s not a valid option for managing actual customer relationships as you’ll only be able to access a small amount of data. Instead, you should think of the base Capsule plan as an extended free trial.

Most organizations will find that the mid-tier $18 per month per user Professional plan fits their needs best. With it, you’ll get 10GB of storage for every account and the ability to manage 50,000 contacts. That should be enough room even for enterprise-scale businesses. The Professional package also gives you access to better security features with Google sign-in and two-factor authentication.

Finally, there’s the top-end Teams plan which costs $36 per month for every user. It comes with 20GB user storage space and room for 100,000 contacts. But the best thing about the Teams package is that it includes Advanced Sales Reporting features. Through these, you can get insights that reveal where bottlenecks are occurring in your sales operations, allowing you to identify areas for improvement.

Features

Keeping track of all the information you need to know about your clients and partners can be a seriously daunting challenge. Capsule presents a great solution to this problem with the Contact Management Software that is at the core of the Capsule CRM. 

Capsule’s contact software doesn’t just let you save contacts and share them with colleagues. It also allows you to store a complete record of all interactions you have with a client, and to add notes to email records so you never miss a detail when following up.

You can even create contact-specific tasks to complete for individual contacts. This ties in neatly with Capsule’s other powerful task management features. Through these, you can create a comprehensive task calendar for your business, with custom color coding, details, and repeat settings.

capsule-3

(Image credit: Capsule CRM)

But the most advanced Capsule task management feature is task ‘tracking’. With this, you can schedule tasks in relation to each other. For example, you can set things up so that an email follow-up task is automatically set for five days after an email send task is marked as complete. 

Advanced Sales Analysis

Sales analytics is another cornerstone of the Capsule platform. This platform will crunch your operation’s sales numbers, revealing valuable insights like where your sales pipeline is leaking, your average time per sale, and the number of opportunities won or lost by each team.  

Capsule 4

(Image credit: Capsule CRM)

What’s more, Capsule stands out for its ability to integrate with household name applications that you probably already use in another critical part of your business operations. 

For example, Capsule can use your Zendesk account to provide support desk service through your website. You can also sync Capsule contacts and tasks to your Google address book and calendar.

Interface and In Use

Capsule’s interface is extremely intuitive, so even employees who’ve never worked with a CRM before should feel at home immediately.

Take the customer relationship window, for example. Here, all the relevant contact information you need to see is available at a glance on the left-hand side of the screen while sales pipeline data and contact histories are just a click and a scroll away. Effectively, all the information you could need about a client is right there, but there’s no risk of the user being overwhelmed by unnecessary data. 

capsule-5

(Image credit: Capsule CRM)

Another trick that Capsule uses to make relationship management easy is to leave 6 key shortcut icons at the top of every capsule screen. These include links to home, people, and case pages, meaning that you can quickly find essential information no matter what you were doing before. 

Using Capsule On Your Mobile

There’s a good chance that you or your colleagues might need to interact with your business clients and partners while on the move. To help you do that, Capsule has developed a mobile app that can be installed on iOS and Android devices. 

capsule-6

(Image credit: Capsule CRM)

Almost all desktop program features are supported in the mobile application too. There are also several tools that are particularly suited for content management on the move: you can start calls, draft emails and open contact location maps directly from the app. 

Support

If you encounter a problem with a particular Capsule function, there’s a good chance you’ll be able to solve it yourself via the comprehensive guidance available in the Capsule Support Center. Also, the Capsule system has averaged a 99.99% uptime rate, so the chances are you won’t have any reason to request assistance from its technical support staff. 

capsule-7

(Image credit: Capsule CRM)

However, if you do need extra help for any reason, you can send the Capsule support team an email. They reply quickly, as long as you’re getting in touch during UK business hours.

The Competition

Capsule is user-friendly and has plenty of advanced features when it comes to task tracking and contact management. However, it’s not the most adept platform for handling mass marketing. If you want a CRM that’s better for working with large email lists rather than managing deep client relationships, you should consider Salesforce which is a CRM in the same pricing bracket as Capsule.

Final Verdict

Don’t let Capsule’s clean and intuitive interface fool you. This tool isn’t just for beginners; it’s a reliable and helpful platform that could help you to uncover inefficiencies in your organization’s sale processes and forge closer relationships with your clients and partners.

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII review
8:24 pm | October 18, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Compact Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Editor's Note

• Original review date: October 2019
• Most recent instalment in Sony's RX100 line
• Launch price: $1,198 / £1,200 / around AU$1,725
• Official price now: $1,299 / £1,049 / AU$1,569

Update: May 2024. Starting where the RX100 VI finished, the seventh iteration of Sony’s premium compact proved impressive in our original review. We continue to rate it highly today: thanks to its solid feature set, impressive performance and pocket-friendly design, we think it remains one of the best compact cameras you can buy. One of the major drawbacks at launch was its price, and the RX100 VII is still an expensive option in 2024. Sony has only offered minor reductions to its RRP in Australia and the UK, while the price has actually increased in the US. With no sign of a direct successor, we think its popularity is likely to endure for some time, which means its price will probably do the same. Seasonal discounts are also relatively rare, with any reductions usually limited to around $100 / £100. If you want to save on the RX100 VII, your best bet is to look for a second-hand model in good condition.

It's hard to think of another camera series that has made it through to its seventh iteration, but the popularity of Sony's RX100 line goes some way to explaining how we got here.

Previous RX100 models have found their way into many photographers' hands, both as backups to interchangeable-lens models or as primary cameras for those not wishing to be burdened by a larger and heavier system. It's also one of the best travel cameras. But with asking prices now firmly into four-figure territory, some may find the more recent offerings harder to justify.

Even so, with its most recent models sporting longer lenses and inheriting key features from Sony's Alpha line of mirrorless cameras, while keeping the bodies just as portable as before, the compact camera series still appears to be moving in the right direction. So what tricks does the Sony RX100 VII pull off that we haven't seen before? 

Features

  • 20.1MP 1-inch stacked CMOS sensor with DRAM chip 
  • 20fps with AF/AE and up to 90fps without
  • 4K video recording to 30p

While the first five RX100 models maintained a relatively restrained zoom range and a wide maximum aperture, the RX100 VI swapped it for a lens equivalent to 24-200mm in 35mm terms, and the RX100 VII retains this optic. The fact that Sony squeezed this lens into a body no larger than before was impressive, but the trade-off was a reduction in maximum aperture.

The lens has aspherical, advanced aspherical and extra-low dispersion glass on the inside to help keep things rosy, while Optical SteadyShot technology has also been included to keep thing stable. 

It's very unusual for a camera to have the same sensor resolution throughout seven consecutive models; however, the sensors haven't been the same this whole time, and it's no surprise that the RX100 VII has been blessed with a new one, albeit one that still conforms to the same 1-inch dimensions and stacked architecture as before.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: Future)

It also still has a separate DRAM chip to help crunch through all the data from the sensor at speed, and it now works with the latest version of the company's BIONZ X engine – and that partnership provides some pretty staggering burst-rate figures. 

Indeed, this is one of the big shifts from the RX100 VI, and brings what Sony claims to be performance in terms of speed that's on a par with its A9 model, which is still the flagship mirrorless camera in the Alpha family.

What does that mean in figures? It means 60 autofocus and auto-exposure calculations per second, which allows for burst shooting at 20fps with autofocus and auto-exposure working throughout, without any blackout of either the viewfinder or the LCD.

While that's impressive enough, if you're willing to sacrifice adjustments to autofocus and auto-exposure and call on the Single Burst Shooting drive mode, you can shoot images at 30fps, 60fps or a ridiculous 90fps at their full resolution – the other catch is that all of these modes can only be used to capture seven frames at a time.

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII specs

Sensor: 20.1MP 1-inch Exmor RS CMOS sensor

Lens: 24-200mm f/2.8-4.5 (35mm equiv.)

Screen: 3.0-inch tilting touchscreen, 921,600 dots 

Viewfinder: EVF with a 2.36 million-dot resolution

Burst shooting: 20fps (up to 90fps in Single Burst Shooting mode)

Autofocus: Hybrid AF: 357 phase-detect AF points and 425 contrast-detect AF points  

Video: 4K to 30p; Full HD to 120p

Connectivity: Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

Battery life: 260 (LCD), 240 (EVF)

Weight: 302g (including battery and card)

Videos are once again recorded to 4K UHD quality at a maximum 30p, with no pixel binning and the option of 4K Active SteadyShot, which is said to be eight times more effective at steadying footage than the more conventional 4K Standard SteadyShot.

If you don't need 4K recording, you can knock this down to Full HD at frame rates up to 120p. Various super-slow motion options lie on top of this, with frames rates of up to 960fps achievable, and it's also now possible to bypass the default five-minute recording restriction when shooting in 4K.

All of this is supported by a strong secondary video feature set, with a 3.5mm microphone port at the camera's side, S-Log2, S-Log3, S-Gamut3.Cine and Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG) modes, and the usual focus peaking and zebra options we've seen in many previous Sony models. The camera can also detect when you're shooting vertically, and preserves this orientation after footage has been offloaded. 

The big change with video is that the RX100 VII offers Real-time Tracking and Real-time Eye AF while recording. Up until now, these have only been made available for stills in the A9 and A6400 (and now the more recent A6600), although here it's on hand for both stills and movies – and we'll be exploring exactly what these allow and how well they work in a second.

Many things, however, haven't changed from before. The electronic viewfinder still neatly hides in the top plate when it's not required, and pops up into position with a single flick of the catch at its side, and this presents a feed with the same 2.36 million dots and 0.59x magnification (in 35mm terms) as before.

The 3-inch LCD touchscreen beneath this is also the same, with 921,600 dots. Once again, this is mounted on a relatively long bracket, which allows it to swing downwards to sit at a 90-degree angle to the camera, or upwards to face the front – perfect for vloggers, which is a key audience for the RX100 VII.

The battery provides 260 frames per charge, or 240 if you tend to use the viewfinder – a modest improvement of 20 frames on the RX100 VI

The battery provides 260 frames per charge, or 240 if you tend to use the viewfinder – a modest improvement of 20 frames on the RX100 VI. These figures hardly thrill, but they're somewhat expected for a camera with such a small body (and thus, a tiny battery). In any case, as is the case on all cameras, the average user will enjoy a higher battery life than these CIPA figures suggest in real-world use because of how they are determined – and USB charging helps here too.

Next to the battery is a single slot for SDHC and SDXC cards, which are supported to the UHS-I standard. That means you can still use the faster UHS-II cards, although you won't see any performance advantage in doing so.

Build and handling

  • Very compact and solid metal body
  • Lack of grip and only a little rubber used
  • De-clicked control ring around lens

The RX100 design has barely changed since the start of the series back in 2012, and with the exception of some minor cosmetic differences the Sony RX100 VII looks identical to the RX100 VI, while the metal body feels just as solid as those of previous models.

It's impressive when you consider the raft of features Sony has managed to pack inside that small body, not least that optic. But this also means the same criticisms can be aimed at the new model as were leveled at its predecessors, such as the lack of a grip around the front, and only a small square of rubber on the back plate where the thumb falls.

This makes it less comfortable to handle than rival models, such as the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III; it's clearly a camera that's designed to be as compact as possible, although you can get an optional grip if you decide you need one.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: Future)

One advantage the RX100 VII has over some rivals, however, is that the rear control dial can be rotated without the thumb constantly bashing into the side of the LCD screen, on account of it having a thin profile and being flush with the back plate. This is often a challenge on such small bodies, but here it's only really a small issue once the LCD is extended out from the body a little.

The electronic viewfinder springs up easily from the top plate when you release the catch at its side, and, as on the RX100 VI, you no longer need to pull the viewfinder back before you can use it.

One advantage the camera has over some rivals is that the rear control dial can be rotated without the thumb constantly bashing into the side of the LCD screen

The control ring around the lens has a knurled finish that makes it nice to operate. It's de-clicked, and provides no physical feedback as standard, although the camera does make small clicking sounds as it's rotated to make up for this. The fact that it's de-clicked makes it more suitable to use during video recording, where the camera would otherwise pick up operational sounds, although it's a minor annoyance that there's a slight lag between the dial being turned and settings being registered.

Autofocus

  • Real Time Tracking and Real Time AF
  • 357 phase-detect point and 425 contrast-detect points
  • Excellent face and eye detection

The RX100 VI packed a great autofocus system, but that didn't stop Sony making better autofocus one of the priorities in the RX100 VII. The AF systems on recent Alpha models, together with firmware updates to older cameras, have ramped up performance across that line, and now Sony is looking to bring same magic to its  Cyber-shot range.  

So what's new? Well, there are now more phase-detect AF points for a start, up from 315 on the RX100 VI to 357 here, and these cover 3% more of the frame than before. The previous 25-point contrast-detect AF system has also been ramped up to a 425-point system, with Sony promising that the camera can focus in as little as 0.02 seconds.

The biggest change autofocus-wise is Real Time Tracking, which uses AI-powered tools to automatically switch between standard autofocusing when tracking a moving subject and face/eye tracking when the system detects a person's face. This should make it easier to quickly focus on what's key as people step in and out of the frame, or change position in relation to the camera.

The biggest change is Real Time Tracking, which uses AI-powered tools to automatically switch between standard autofocusing when tracking a moving subject and face/eye tracking when the system notices a person's face

Partner this with continuous autofocus and you have a very powerful combination. The availability of usefully broad focal range shows just how impressively this can work, as you can zoom to the telephoto end, have the camera pick out a very small subject in the distance, and watch as it sticks with it. 

The face detection system doesn't need to have too big a face in the frame for it to recognize what it's shooting, although subjects do need to be a little closer in order for the system to start detecting and tracking the eye (eye detection is fairly pointless with more distant subjects anyway). When this does kick in, it manages to track eyes very well, even when the subject is side-on to the camera.  

This system works impressively well during video recording too, where the camera stays with a human subject both as they move across the frame and as they move closer to or further away from the camera. Sony has shouted loudly about this feature, and you can see why. 

There's little doubt that this is the best autofocus performance you can get on a compact camera right now, and this would make the RX100 VII a particularly strong choice for families – trying to keep a lock of a moving child can be quite the test for any camera.

Performance

  • Image stabilization system appears very effective
  • Viewfinder performs well
  • Touchscreen could do with more work

Sony has received some stick for its menu systems in the past, which are somewhat overflowing with options, although color coding has made them easier to navigate in recent models. 

What we have on the RX100 VII is much the same as before. There's a lot to wade through, but the option to set up a tab with your own options is a saving grace, although there's still the odd annoying abbreviation here and there.

The touchscreen works well for setting the focusing point, being nice and responsive to even lighter touches, and you can also use the screen as a touch pad when using the viewfinder – always handy in lieu of a joystick-type control. 

The screen can also be used to zoom into, and move around, captured images, but that's about it. It doesn't appear that anything has actually changed from the RX100 VI, which means the screen is fine for basic tasks, but it does place the camera behind its peers elsewhere; it would be good to see touch control come to the Fn menu at the very least in future models.

The viewfinder is a fair bit smaller than what we're used to on mirrorless models, but this is to be expected; the main thing is that it's relatively bright and sharp. While the lack of any kind of eyecup normally makes such viewfinders a bit of a pain to use in brighter conditions without cupping your hand around them, the RX100 VII's finder maintains very good visibility even when you don't.

The RX100 VII's 90fps burst capabilities are one of the main things that separate it from the previous model – and indeed, every other compact camera. It's certainly impressive that the camera is able to reach these heights and spit out full-resolution images, but the fact that its buffer depth is just seven frames makes you wonder just how practical it is.

In use, the camera will capture the first seven frames as you depress the button, and discard anything afterwards. Seven frames at 90fps equates to less than 0.8 seconds of reality being captured (though it'll be more if you use the 30fps or 60fps options), so you need to have pretty sharp reflexes to nail the perfect moment. 

Were the camera able to offer deeper buffer depths at its 60fps and 30fps settings, this burst rate would perhaps be more usable; but it can't, and presumably there's a technical reason for this, possibly the lack of UHS-II support. Ultimately, it ends up being impressive to play with, but potentially of limited use in reality. 

Most people would be better off using the more standard burst mode, which can chomp through a still respectable 20fps with autofocus and auto-exposure working throughout. Using the fastest UHS-I card we could get our hands on, the camera was able to capture round 100 raw and JPEG frames simultaneously, although, as you'd expect, these can take a little time to fully write to the card.

Image quality

  • Great details throughout, though corner softness visible
  • Great noise control at moderate ISO settings
  • Detailed 4K footage with effective face detection and tracking

We were impressed with the image quality from the previous RX100 VII, so does the Sony RX100 VII live up to our expectations?

In short, the camera manages to produce strong images across a range of conditions, with minimal intervention required. Detail is excellent overall, and what's particularly good is how well this is maintained when using ISO settings towards the middle of the sensitivity range; plenty of detail lurks in slightly noisier images, so it's just a case of removing this noise. 

On the whole, details are great in the center of the frame, and are generally well maintained to the edges, with just slight softness in the corners at both ends of the lens. This appears to be worse at the wide-angle end than at telephoto lengths, although it does improve a little as you stop down the aperture. 

Image 1 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/4, 1/30sec, ISO160

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/4, 1/30sec, ISO160 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 2 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 41.9mm, f/4.5, 1/125sec, ISO250

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 41.9mm, f/4.5, 1/125sec, ISO250 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 3 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 50.7mm, f/4.5, 1/160sec, ISO1250

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 50.7mm, f/4.5, 1/160sec, ISO1250 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 4 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/5, 1/160sec, ISO3200

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/5, 1/160sec, ISO3200 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 5 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/5.6, 1/800sec, ISO100

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/5.6, 1/800sec, ISO100 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 6 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/3.2, 1/30sec, ISO320

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/3.2, 1/30sec, ISO320 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 7 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/4.5, 1/30sec, ISO400

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 24mm, f/4.5, 1/30sec, ISO400 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 8 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 49mm, f/4, 1/100sec, ISO100

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 49mm, f/4, 1/100sec, ISO100 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Image 9 of 9

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 41.9mm, f/4.5, 1/125sec, ISO250

Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VII at 41.9mm, f/4.5, 1/125sec, ISO250 (Image credit: Future)

Click here to view the full-size image

Exposures are generally sound, although scenes with a relatively wide tonal range – if you're shooting indoors with windows in the frame, for example – will see a loss of detail in their highlights. Some of the details in these areas can be brought back with careful raw processing, though. 

Colors are very nice on standard settings, and there's a particularly broad range of color options in-camera if the default Standard mode isn't quite to your taste. It's a shame, however, that the absence of in-camera raw processing means these can't be tweaked post-capture without recourse to a computer.

Some lateral chromatic aberration can be seen in images, although the worst of this is lifted away from JPEGs in-camera, and it can be removed from raw files fairly effortlessly.

Video quality has impressed on previous RX100 models, and it continues to shine here. Detail is abundant, and rolling shutter is kept to a minimum as the camera moves around the scene. As with pretty much any compact camera like this, wind noise is easily picked up by the built-in microphones, although the fact that you can hook up an external mic gives the RX100 VII an advantage over many other models.

Verdict

There's no doubt that the Sony RX100 VII is an impressive camera. Given the strong performance and huge popularity of previous models it was likely that any changes Sony made here would only make it a better performer – and that's pretty much the case.

Special praise goes to the autofocus system, which is not only fast but remarkably good at keeping track of moving subjects, noticing faces at a distance and switching between face/eye detection and more standard tracking as the subject changes in distance and orientation. While some rival models aren't bad for speed by comparison, the fact that some are still based on contrast-detect AF alone means it's unlikely they'll be able to catch up with what Sony is doing here until that changes.

On top of that there's the excellent image quality, detailed 4K video, and considerable control over both. The retractable viewfinder and fine LCD screen make for a perfect partnership, while the body's high build quality and small size – especially when you consider the lens and inclusion of the viewfinder – make it easy to carry around and slip into a pocket, and be confident it will survive the odd bump and scrape. 

So there's lots to love about the RX100 VII – but lots that could be improved too. There's still no grip, which makes for less-than-ideal handling, nor is there the option to process raw images in camera. The touchscreen is still underdeveloped, and while the lack of an ND filter may be explained by the longer-than-usual lens, it still makes capturing videos in bright light more difficult. The option to shoot at up to 90fps sounds impressive, and in a way it is, but the shallow buffer depth makes this feature somewhat impractical. 

And that fact that all of this comes at a considerable cost makes you realize Sony's logic in keeping all of the previous RX100 models available. Many people either don't need this level of performance or are better served by the shorter, brighter lenses of previous models. Those expecting sharpness right to the corners of the frame, or flexibility in low light, may be better served by one of those cameras – but in terms of performance, those are the only major things to bear in mind. 

So, while this isn't a camera for everyone, and while its omissions make it less than ideal – even for those that are drawn to it – in terms of packing a whole lot of tech and generally solid performance into such a small body, it's impossible not to be impressed with what Sony has achieved here. For all its foibles and its lofty price tag, the RX100 VII is easily one of the most accomplished and desirable compacts on the market right now.

Competition

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Sony)

Sony RX100 VI

The RX100 VII's closest competitor is arguably the previous Mark VI iteration, given how similar the spec sheets of the two models are. The key differences are in the sensor, crazy-high burst speeds, autofocus systems and the fact that the newer model offers a mic port – but if you're happy with the rest of the spec sheet, you can save yourself a little cash by going for a camera that we still rate very highly.

Read our in-depth Sony RX100 Mark VI review 

Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Panasonic)

Panasonic ZS200 / TZ200

The ZS200 also sports a 1-inch sensor with 20.1MP, and is similarly fronted by a superzoom lens, although the one here reaches a little further than the RX100 VII's, stretching between 24-360mm in 35mm terms. It matches the RX100 VII is providing 4K video and has a small electronic viewfinder, and while it lacks a mic port and can't shoot at the lofty heights of 90fps, it's a hell of a lot cheaper.

Read our in-depth Panasonic ZS200 / TZ200 review

Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Future)

Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II

With a 20MP 1-inch sensor, a pop-up electronic viewfinder and 4K video squeezed into a pocket-friendly shell, Canon very much has the same kind of audience in mind for its PowerShot G5 X Mark II as Sony does for its own model. It's considerably cheaper, and has a grip that makes handling far nicer, but its lens doesn't reach anywhere near as far and its autofocus system, while perfectly capable, can't touch what the RX100 VII is packing.

Read our in-depth Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II review

Revlon Pro Collection One Step Dryer and Volumiser review
3:20 pm | October 7, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Hair Care Home Small Appliances | Comments: Off

• Original review date: October 2019
• Still Revlon's latest (and greatest) hair brush dryer
• Launch price: £60 / $60
• Official price now: £60 / $60, but very regularly discounted

Updated: February 2024. It's hard to beat perfection, and while this particular hair brush dryer isn't quite perfect, it's as close as we've seen. Offering an excellent balance of great performance, decent design, and excellent value, this is the brush dryer to beat. There is now a slightly more premium version, the One-Step Volumizer Plus, which has an oval head and activated charcoal pins and with a slightly more premium design for $10 / £10 more; to be honest, the ovular barrel of the original One-Step Volumizer is in part why it works so well, and I'm not one for the infused pin marketing gimmick. The rest of this review remains unchanged.

Back in the 1990s hair heyday of steam hair straighteners and crimpers, the 2-in-1 hair styler reigned supreme. At a time when professional-style dryers were overly expensive, brushes that doubled up as hair dryers were cheap, convenient and helped achieve the voluminous, bouncy style made famous by the likes of Jennifer Aniston. Yet, as hair dryers became more advanced, and dropped in price, 2-in-1s fell out of favour. 

Fast forward to today: not only are 2-in-1s back, but they also give many of their rival barrelled hair dryers a run for their money. The Revlon Pro Collection One Step Dryer & Volumiser reviewed here just happens to be our favorite of the lot – and it costs only $60 / £60 too.

Design

(Image credit: Vicky Woollaston)

The Revlon Pro resembles an oversized barrel brush with a chunky handle. At the bottom of this handle – where it meets the 2.5-metre cord – is a single switch that you rotate to select a temperature and speed setting. One rotation enables the cold shot function. A second rotation switches to the lower of the two speed settings, while a final rotation switches to the faster of the two. The heat increases between the speed settings, too. 

Instead of having a perfectly rounded barrel, the cylinder has two slightly flatter, longer sides, in order to help lift the hair from the roots and give it more volume.

The Pro is factually not much to look at, with Revlon’s bright pink colour scheme feeling like an unwelcome throwback to the original models. It’s also heavy. At 850g, the Revlon Pro is almost twice the weight of the Dyson Supersonic – with the long brush design preventing the weight from feeling evenly distributed.

This design choice, however, does make it more compact than a traditional barrelled dryer, while saving the hassle of having to take a separate brush when traveling. Plus, its performance soon helps you forget the Revlon Pro’s weight and style shortcomings.

Performance

(Image credit: Vicky Woollaston)

Even on the lowest of the two speed/temperature settings, the Revlon Pro dried our medium-length fine hair in an impressive three minutes and four seconds, which goes some way to negating its heavy, bulky design – as you won’t need to be using it for long. Its large size also means you can dry and style large sections of hair in one go. What’s more, because it styles as it dries, our arms didn’t ache from holding a brush and separate dryer at awkward angles – as is the case with some of its rivals  – and we didn’t have to do anything to finish our style once it was dry, saving even more time. 

This latter point is in part due to the Revlon Pro’s ionic technology, but also because the temperature remains constant throughout. Unlike with traditional dryers, the Revlon Pro is always at the same distance from the head because the hair is wrapped around it; you can’t accidentally place it too close on one section and too far away on another. This means it dries the hair evenly and gently. The ionic technology then smoothes the hair and the rounded design shapes it. We were, and continue to be impressed with just how voluminous, shiny and smooth our hair looks after using the Revlon Pro. 

(Image credit: Vicky Woollaston)

We didn’t see a noticeable difference in drying times on the hotter, faster setting and would often dry on the slower mode to help prevent causing damage to our hair. The faster setting is also incredibly loud, annoyingly so. In terms of decibels, it’s not drastically different to rivals but the tone of the sound is sharp and grating.

Finally, what we feel is the most significant feature of the Revlon Pro is the fact you can use it one-handed. When time is tight in the morning, or you just fancy an extra few minutes in bed, you can apply make-up at the same time as drying your hair. Believe us, we do this regularly. If that’s a little too ambitious, you can enjoy a cup of tea or eat toast at the same time. This, for us, is a gamechanger.

Verdict

If a little more care had been put into the design of the Revlon Pro and its motor wasn’t so annoyingly loud, we’d happily recommend it over more expensive rivals, such as the GHD Air, because it’s performance is just so good. Unless we’re looking to rough dry our hair or style it differently, the Revlon Pro is our go-to dryer. 

The fact that we can only use it for one drying and styling option does mean it lacks versatility, and if you’re particularly skilled at blow drying you likely won’t see the benefits of using it. 

If it did offer more versatility, or it had been better designed, it would likely cost more, though – so we’re willing to take that hit to get salon-style performance and extra time in bed for only $60 / £60. 

Sejda PDF editor review
5:51 pm | September 25, 2019

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Creative Software Gadgets Software | Tags: | Comments: Off

Sejda is a PDF editor that comes in free and paid-for versions, as well as online and desktop editions. The web and desktop interfaces look remarkably similar, and in fact the major difference here is that the Desktop version handles all of the processing locally rather than in the cloud – files never leave your computer, which will appeal to the security conscious. 

That sounds great to us, but how does it compare to the best free PDF editor and best PDF editor software out there? We put the latest version to the test. 

Sedja: Pricing & plans

  • You have access to Sejda’s arsenal of tools for free - but are laden with severe limitations. To remove them, get a subscription

Although you have access to all available tools with the free version, some severe limitations are applied to the service. For instance, you’re restricted to only being able to perform three tasks per day, can’t work with files larger than 50MB or 200 pages, can only OCR ten pages, and can only convert one file at a time.

If you want to remove these restrictions, getting a subscription is the way to go. Prices vary depending on how long you wish your contract to last. One week will cost you $5, a recurring monthly contract will set you back $7.50, and for a recurring yearly one, that’s $63.

You can try out Sejda by clicking here

Sejda: Interface

Sejda PDF editor during our review

Sejda has many tools available, and its search feature makes it easy to highlight the one you’re looking for (Image credit: Sejda)
  • The interface is simple, with some nice features, including instructions on how each tool works just below the tool itself

Sejda’s available tools are sorted by categories on the main page, which you can scroll through. Alternatively, going to the menu bar at the top of the page and clicking on ‘All Tools’, will not only showcase them in a smaller, condensed format, allowing you to see more of them in one go, but you’ll also find a search field at the bottom, helping you find what you’re after quicker.

We did appreciate the fact that as you select a tool, you’ll see at the bottom of the page instructions on how to use it. It’s a great way to get to grips with how Sejda works, while also not getting in the way, once you know your way around, although do note that these instructions only appear on the webpages, and don’t feature in the desktop version.

  • Score: 3.5/5

Sejda: Tools

Sejda PDF editor during our review

The interface is simple and easy to use, no matter which tool you’ve selected (Image credit: Sejda)
  • The gamut of the usual range of tools for such a service are available for you to choose from, and work with

The tools at your disposal will be familiar to anyone who’s explored such online PDF services before. You’re able to merge and split PDFs, delete pages, rearrange others, convert files from PDF to other formats, and vice versa, number pages, resize them, extract images, create bookmarks and edit a document’s metadata, among many others. 

More advanced tools are also available such as watermarking a file, password protecting it, filling in and signing a form, and of course, being able to edit a PDF.

  • Score: 4/5

Sejda: Editing

Sejda PDF editor during our review

Editing lets you alter a PDF’s existing content, but you can only select one original line at a time, creating potential issues when altering large sections of text (Image credit: Sejda)
  • Although you can edit a PDF’s existing text, you’re restricted to altering each line individually, making it tricky to rewrite a paragraph

Sejda’s editing capabilities are quite extensive, and in fact you gain access to additional tools within it, enabling you to do most of your editing in one place. For instance, you’re also able to fill in forms, sign a document, and even whiteout sections right from here. Do be aware however that whiteout is not the same as a proper redaction tool: the former’s hidden text can still be selected, whereas the latter won’t be - if you need to remove sensitive data, don’t use the whiteout tool; Sedja does not appear to have a redaction tool.

In addition to that, you have annotation tools to write notes, or even insert shapes. You can add or delete existing images, create new text boxes, and perhaps more crucially, edit a PDF’s existing text. This is great in many ways but there are some strong limitations, especially compared to other competing services. Take I Love PDF for instance: its PDF editing prowess is much greater. Not only can you move existing text boxes and images around, but I Love PDF is able to recognise entire sections of text as belonging together, making it much easier to rewrite paragraphs. With Sejda, the layout is fixed, and you can only select one line of text at a time. If your needs are simple, like fixing a typo, this is fine, but should you have to rewrite an entire section, this becomes a bit of a nightmare as the new text doesn’t flow to the next existing line, but instead creates an entirely new one, overlapping on top of any other already existing text, which you then have to select and delete. This also can affect line spacing, potentially making a mess of the page layout - unless you decide to select each line individually as you edit, which is really a very frustrating way to edit text.

  • Score: 3/5

Should I try Sejda PDF editor?

Sejda PDF editor during our review

You can use Sedja for free, but you’ll quickly encounter its many limitations - which disappear once you subscribe (Image credit: Sejda)

Try it if...

You need to work with PDF files, make simple edits, extract pages, delete others, and move from one format to another, all within a simple clean interface. 

Don't try it if...

You have more extensive editing needs, or are looking for a proper way to redact information.


For more PDF tools, we reviewed the best Adobe Acrobat alternatives.

SmallPDF review
5:25 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro Software & Services | Comments: Off

SmallPDF is an online PDF editor with a wide variety of tools to help you edit, convert, encrypt, merge, sign PDFs and more. In addition to working with PDF files online, the company also offers mobile apps for Android and iOS as well as a desktop app for Windows. While SmallPDF features plenty of tools, is it enough for your needs? 

Having tested the best PDF editor and even the best free PDF editor tools, we were keen to see if this popular software could still hold its own against - so, we put the latest version to the test.

SmallPDF during our latest review process

The Redaction tool is easy to use, and unlike PDF Candy, actually prevents you from selecting the redacted text (Image credit: SmallPDF)

SmallPDF: Pricing & plans

SmallPDF has various subscription plans on offer, mostly geared towards businesses, but do include an option for individuals. All allow you to pay yearly or monthly (the latter’s much more expensive).

‘Personal’ will cost you the equivalent of $9 a month on a yearly contract, or $12 on a month-by-month basis. ‘Team’ is for two to one hundred people, and will cost $7 or $10 respectively per account. The ‘Business’ plan (for over 100 people) is simply listed as having custom pricing that should be tailored for your unique business needs

Both ‘Personal’ and ‘Team’ offer you a seven-day free trial, and you can also check out the Free plan. However, although you can use 21 of Small PDF’s available tools with it, the Free account has a serious limitation: only allowing two conversions per day (that’s switching to and from PDFs); there doesn’t appear to be limits when using other non-premium tools.

SmallPDF during our latest review process

SmallPDF offers a broad range of tools, most of which are accessible with a free account (Image credit: SmallPDF)

SmallPDF: Features

SmallPDF’s main page showcases its six most popular tools, namely, PDF to Word, Merge PDF, JPG to PDF, eSign PDF, Edit PDF, and Compress PDF. The full gamut of features is revealed by clicking on the big blue ‘See All PDF Tools’ button beneath those, or by clicking on ‘Tools’ menu at the top of the page.

You’ll find 32 icons to choose from, allowing you to do anything with a PDF, including important features such as merging or splitting documents, redacting or watermarking files, scanning, locking, or signing PDFs.

There are even some AI tools to summarise or generate questions from a document. The conversion tools work both ways, but are limited to Microsoft file formats (Word, Powerpoint and Excel), and going to or from JPGs. Interestingly, there’s an OCR version which helps turn an image or an un-selectable PDF into selectable text.

The newest feature is the ability to edit the existing content of a PDF. This was severely lacking up to now, and it’s a great and important addition for anyone having to work with such files. It is however reserved for paying customers (or those using the free trial).

SmallPDF during our latest review process

Some basic tools include Merging multiple PDFs into one. Notice the ability to work with a PDF’s pages is a premium feature for this tool (Image credit: SmallPDF)

SmallPDF: Interface & experience

SmallPDF is a cloud based service, but also allows for offline working through its downloadable software, of which the mobile versions are even available with the ‘Free’ plan. You can grab a copy of it for Windows, iOS and Android. Sadly the Mac isn’t supported. SmallPDF also offers integration with Google Chrome, Google Drive and Dropbox.

We found the interface quite intuitive. After you’ve selected your first tool and uploaded your chosen document, You’ll find a list of features to the left. Mouse over some of them to reveal additional ones. What’s not clear at first is that selecting a new tool necessitates either uploading a new document, or opening one already in your SmallPDF account - you cannot work on the same file directly; you must first finish your work with one tool, save it, select another tool, and open your file from there once more. It’s convoluted, but you get used to it. And yes, you need to register and log in even if you’ve chosen the ‘Free’ account; doing so is free, and allows you to keep some files in the SmallPDF servers.

The Sign feature is great, as it not only lets you fill in forms and sign them, but lets you email documents to others and track their progress, just like any dedicated PDF Signing service. The Redaction tool is easy to use, and unlike PDF Candy, actually prevents you from selecting the redacted text.

SmallPDF during our latest review process

Annotating, highlighting, adding shapes and images is all part and parcel of SmallPDF’s service - editing a PDF’s original content is a new premium option (Image credit: SmallPDF)

SmallPDF: Support

SmallPDF has a full help desk on their site with an FAQ set up with additional ability to write in another question and/or suggest a new feature.

The frequently asked questions are quite helpful for a plethora of basic questions, however the more detailed questions will require further assistance. For these questions, SmallPDF has a contact form that allows for file uploads, categorical questions, and a textbox to ask whatever questions you may have.

SmallPDF: Final verdict

Small PDF is in a very crowded market, and although it’s not the sleekest service and downloadable software out there, it has made remarkable strides recently, even including new and crucial features. The interface is mostly nice to work with, and aside from the less than ideal way of switching between different tools, it does function very well, whatever you need to do with your PDF documents.

« Previous PageNext Page »