Organizer
Gadget news
Galaxy S26 FE hits Geekbench, reveals the chipset Samsung chose
8:20 pm | April 3, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The upcoming Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is now listed in the Geekbench online database, as someone in possession of a prototype has run the benchmark (version 6.2.2 to be precise). The phone managed a single-core score of 2,426 and a multi-core score of 8,004, as you can see from the screenshot below. The prototype in question has 8GB of RAM and runs Android 17. It's powered by the Exynos 2500 SoC. The Android version tells us the S26 FE isn't launching anytime soon, since Android 17 hasn't even been released by Google. So it might be a few months away still, which isn't surprising...

Galaxy S26 FE hits Geekbench, reveals the chipset Samsung chose
8:20 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The upcoming Samsung Galaxy S26 FE is now listed in the Geekbench online database, as someone in possession of a prototype has run the benchmark (version 6.2.2 to be precise). The phone managed a single-core score of 2,426 and a multi-core score of 8,004, as you can see from the screenshot below. The prototype in question has 8GB of RAM and runs Android 17. It's powered by the Exynos 2500 SoC. The Android version tells us the S26 FE isn't launching anytime soon, since Android 17 hasn't even been released by Google. So it might be a few months away still, which isn't surprising...

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 review: An impressive collection of creative software for PC and Mac — now with added AI
7:05 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro Software & Services | Tags: , | Comments: Off

CorelDRAW has long been one of our favorite creative apps, and it's especially notable that unlike so many similar software services, it's still - even in 2026 - offering a one-time fee instead of being subscription-only (although that is available too).

The tools here blend together graphic design software, drawing tools, and even a photo editor into a well-rounded alternative to Adobe Photoshop.

Well, time waits for no successful software package. It's got a new iteration and a bunch of new features for the new year, so, I’ve come to check out what’s changed in Corel’s flagship bundle of applications since I last explored it last year.

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026: Pricing & plans

  • One-time fee option
  • Monthly and annual subscriptions also available
  • Works across PC and Mac

The CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 is available to download or try free for 15 days by clicking here.

When it comes to prices, the trend is increasingly moving towards renting your software, and here the monthly subscription cost is $22.42 / £26.58, or $269 / £319 for the year. This allows you to take advantage of any future major updates, but as always, once you stop paying, you have nothing to show for it.

Which is why I’m glad they also offer the option to actually purchase the software, for a one-time fee of $549 / £659, which is about two years’ worth of rental and you own it for good.

On top of that, Corel allows you to have a 15-day trial of their software to make sure it’s exactly what you’re after. The cherry on top? It’s compatible with Windows and Macs.

I found the specs are quite generous. For instance, PCs need Windows 10 or 11, at least an Intel Core i3 processor, or an AMD Ryzen 3, while Macs have to run Monterey (version 12) or above, and either be powered by an Intel multiprocessor or any of Apple’s own CPUs (M1 or better).

When it comes to RAM and storage space, you should never base your decision on a manufacturer’s minimum requirements, especially for a graphics application. Cram your computer with as much RAM as you can afford - you’ll never regret it.

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026: The suite

Using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 on a Mac during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)
  • A portfolio of applications including DRAW for vector and page layout work, and PHOTO-PAINT for pixel manipulation
  • Frustratingly, Macs don’t have access to CAPTURE yet pay the same price as PC users

The main tool in this suite of apps lends its name to the suite itself: CorelDRAW. Its focus is on vector-based illustration and layout design, so if you think about it in Adobe terms, it’s a mix of Illustrator and InDesign.

On top of that, PowerTRACE is built inside CorelDRAW, which is an AI-based tool designed to improve image quality during the tracing process, for instance.

Next, is Corel PHOTO-PAINT, which is Corel’s Photoshop: pixel-based photo editing and digital painting tool.

There’s also the Corel Font Manager, which is software designed to help you manage and organise your fonts, kind of like Apple’s own Font Book.

And finally, there’s CAPTURE, which is a screen capture tool - although there’s a big caveat with that one: it’s only available for Windows users. Mac users are left out in the cold.

Still, Apple does have built-in ways to take screenshots and recordings of their screen, so it’s not that big a loss. However, paying the same price and not getting all the same tools as PC users is somewhat of a disappointment.

That’s quite a lot to include in a single suite. With it, you should have all the tools you need to create any kind of graphics work. There is however one additional tool I should briefly mention…

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026: CorelDRAW Go & Web

Using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 on a Mac during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)
  • Corel provides two services to work online from a web browser:
  • CorelDRAW Go is for beginners and intermediates
  • CorelDRAW Web for advanced users, and included in the Suite’s subscription

CorelDRAW Go is a very clever service: it allows you to work in CorelDRAW inside a web browser. It’s like you’re drawing with Corel...on the go (get it?).

The service is truly excellent and it’s amazing to think how far we’ve come in terms of online technology, that you can create art inside a webpage and forget the tools you’re using aren’t actually installed on your machine. This means you can use it from any computer, just about anywhere. Just login to your account and you’re good to go.

It’s definitely worth checking out, especially since, just like the main suite, Corel offers you a free 15-day trial. The service itself would cost you $10 a month or $100 for the year. Think of it more as an entry level beginner’s design tool.

The reason I thought I’d mention it, is to casually highlight an advantage to the Suite’s subscription package.

No, CorelDRAW Go isn’t included, but CorelDRAW Web is. Web comes with more advanced tools, including vector illustration and page layout design - all from a web page.

Crazy, right? Companies will do anything to get you to subscribe to their services, including creating really impressive tools, like CorelDRAW Go, and especially CorelDRAW Web.

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026: What’s new

Using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 on a Mac during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)
  • Improved interface
  • New AI tools like background removal and generative AI art

As you’d expect, the CorelDRAW Suite comes with a mighty large collection of tools, and if you’d like an idea of what software such as DRAW and PHOTO-PAINT are like to work with, I’d recommend you check out my review of the Suite’s previous version, since it’s still relevant today, as I’ll be focussing the rest of this current review on what’s new in 2026.

Right out the gate, you’ll notice the interface has been upgraded. The look feels cleaner, with more condensed icons and menus, that allow more tools to be seen in a smaller footprint. The effect can be subtle in parts, but you definitely end up having more screen real-estate for your artwork, which is a very positive thing.

The blurb states that performance has been improved compared to previous versions, but that can be a very subjective thing, as performance greatly depends on your computer’s own specs. Personally, I didn’t notice much difference, but I have a fairly beefy machine. If you’ve got a powerful processor and oodles of RAM, you should be able to power through any project with CorelDRAW Suite 2026 with ease.

But the biggest draw is all the AI tools they’re peppering throughout the interface. Now I know there can be a lot of issues surrounding AI, and Corel is aware of that too. In fact, their spiel is that their AI tools focus more on empowering the artist rather than replacing them, and for some tools, I can certainly see that. Take ‘Remove Background’ as an example. In one word, the results are impressive.

It does something that was totally possible to do manually, but depending on the complexity of the background, such a process could take minutes to hours to achieve. Here, in seconds, the background disappears, leaving you with the foreground object, with clean sharp edges. That’s certainly empowering, and the results are definitely on par with its competitors, such as Adobe Photoshop and Pixelmator Pro.

Using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 on a Mac during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)

What’s more contentious is ‘Generative AI’, and like it or not, it’s now available directly from within Corel’s software interface, with its own dedicated button, top right of the window. Through it, you get to either let the software create an image for you, or remix an existing one.

What I really like was that you’re given a choice of which generative algorithm you’d like to use; ‘Nano Banana’ is the one selected by default, and it produces excellent results for not too many credits (more on those in a bit), but you’ve got the option of six other algorithms for you to try out.

The same goes for one of 6 styles on offer, from photorealistic, to line art, 3D render and pop art, and you can even control the colour palette, if that’s your thing. As always, there’s a text prompt field where your own creativity gets slotted in, but even that can be taken care of by an algorithm if you’re stuck with writer’s block: simply click on the ‘inspire me’ button, and the interface will also create a prompt for you.

I particularly liked the Remix option. I took the image this AI created for me, fed it into Remix and asked it to turn the autumn setting into a summer one, and the results was astonishing. The exact same image, from the exact same angle, nothing’s changed, except it’s now a beautiful sunny day. Turn the scenery to winter, and the outcome was just as good.

Now there’s no doubt that all of this is impressive, and the results are astonishing, but how does a machine creating an image for you from nothing equate to empowering the artist, as no artist was actually involved in that particular ‘creation’ process?

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026: AI costs

Using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 on a Mac during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)
  • You get some credits when you purchase the software
  • Monthly credits available when subscribing but don't roll-over
  • Extra credits can be bought

It’s obvious a lot of fun can be had with generative AI, but you need to be aware that each image will cost you. Nano Banana eats 16 credits a pop. The most expensive algorithm is Nano Banana Pro, with 86 credits per image.

If you subscribe to the Suite, you get to play with 2,000 credits each month. Those who purchase the software outright, only get 2,000 credits in total (another push to incentivise the subscription model).

Now if you love generative AI, you have other purchase options open to you, starting at $20 for 2,000 credits, to $200 for 35,000. There’s even another subscription model, costing you $100 a year to get 2,500 each month, or $10 a month for 2,000.

There’s no doubt the subscription model is yet again, better value. Although there is a drawback: the credits you purchase last forever, those you rent, reset on the first of each month (so make sure you don’t start your agreement on the 30th!)

Should I buy CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026

Using CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 2026 on a Mac during our review

(Image credit: Corel // Future)

Buy it if...

If you’re looking for a powerful image editor, vector illustrator and page layout suite, with numerous tools that are easy to learn and use, and include generous lashings of AI.

Don't buy it if...

You’re not a fan that most of the new features are AI-based, and you feel scared moving away from the Adobe hegemony.

Samsung Galaxy A57 in for review
6:02 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Galaxy A57 is here, and it's an easy pick to be one of Samsung's hottest prospects of the year. In fact, it may not be too early to say that it will be the company's best seller, following in the footsteps of its predecessors. The Galaxy A57 ships with a USB-C cable and a SIM tool in the box. It comes in Awesome Navy, Awesome Gray, Awesome Icyblue, and Awesome Lilac, and starts from €430/$450. There's a lot in common between the Galaxy A57 and its stablemate, the Galaxy A37, pictured below. To make it easier to follow, we got the A57 in Icyblue and the A37 in Lavender. The...

‘The longest-lasting phone I’ve ever reviewed’ — I spent 3 weeks with the Poco X8 Pro Max, and it beats Apple and Samsung rivals in one big way
5:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phones Poco Phones Xiaomi Phones | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Poco X8 Pro Max two-minute review

It may not be the best Android phone ever made, but if you need a certain type of mobile, the Poco X8 Pro Max might just end up being the best phone you can buy.

This new Android-powered device from Xiaomi’s mid-range sub-brand is the first of its family to bear the iPhone-copying ‘Pro Max’ suffix — an odd decision, since there’s no non-Pro model at the time of writing, but for all intents and purposes, this is the top-end Poco phone of 2026.

While most ‘Pro Max’ or ‘Ultra’ phones opt for flashy features and high prices, Poco goes the other way. The X8 Pro Max is possibly the ultimate workhorse smartphone, designed not for fancy gimmicks you play with once and forget about, but to be a handset you can use every day for years without worry.

Case in point: it has one of the biggest batteries you'll find in a smartphone. Its 8,500mAh power pack is absolutely huge, and it allows the Poco to last for literal days without needing to be recharged. 'Two-day battery life’ is a common claim you hear from Apple and Samsung, with dubious accuracy, but in the Poco, it’s a reality.

I imagine light phone users could even get three days' use out of the X8 Pro Max, and when you do run low, its fast charging capabilities will get you back on the move in minutes. I comfortably kept to a two-day routine, but I was using the Poco intensively to review it, and you (hopefully) won't use your device as much as me.

This is no one-trick pony either. The charging speed is equally impressive, hitting 100W, which means you can fill that massive power pack up in a reasonable time (about 45 minutes, depending on your charger). Its processor and display are both pretty great for the price, too, and I used the phone for gaming without issue.

The Poco X8 Pro Max isn’t a phone for everyone. Its cameras are fine for day-to-day use but aren’t designed for photographers, and the software isn’t as refined as on some alternatives. The addition of two LED ring lights around the camera lenses is a neat addition on paper, but they don't amount to much in practice.

But when you consider that this is a fairly affordable phone, it’s easy to forgive a few rough edges. The X8 Pro Max is a mid-range mobile that’s easy to pick up without worrying too much about the up-front cost, and it’ll last you for absolutely ages, so you won’t need to think about replacing it for many years.

Poco X8 Pro Max review: price and availability

The Poco X8 Pro Max's home screen, while the phone is leaning on a plant pot.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Released on March 17, 2026
  • 256GB storage: $469 / £469 (about AU$940)
  • 512GB storage: $519 / £519 (about AU$1,040)

The Poco X8 Pro Max was announced alongside its non-Max equivalent, the Poco X8 Pro, on March 17, 2026, and at the time of writing, there's no non-Pro entry in the lineup. We’ll wait and see, though.

The handset starts at $469 / £469 (about AU$940, but Xiaomi doesn’t sell its Poco phones in Australia). Despite the presence of a USD cost, Xiaomi phones aren’t technically available in the US, and this is just the official reference price for the device. You can still ship the X8 Pro Max to the US, but it'll incur additional costs, and you might find support spotty.

That base model has 12GB RAM and 256GB storage, but for an extra $50 / £50 (about AU$100) you can double the latter capacity to 512GB storage. If you're buying this as a power-hungry work phone, that's not much money for a lot more storage.

Poco X8 Pro Max review: specs

Poco X8 Pro Max specs

Dimensions:

162.9 x 77.9 x 8.2mm

Weight:

218g

Screen:

6.83-inch FHD (1280 x 2772) 120Hz AMOLED

Chipset:

MediaTek Dimensity 9500s

RAM:

12GB

Storage:

256/512GB

OS:

Android 16, HyperOS 3

Primary camera:

50MP, f/1.5

Ultra-wide camera:

8MP f/2.2

Front camera:

20MP, f/2.2

Audio:

Stereo speakers

Battery:

8,500mAh

Charging:

100W wired, 27W reverse

Colors:

White, black, blue

Poco X8 Pro Max review: design

The Poco X8 Pro Max fron the side, while it's held in a man's hand.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Average-looking Android in black, blue or white
  • Not too thick, but a little heavy
  • Ring lights around camera

The Poco X8 Pro Max isn't as chunky as you'd expect for a phone harboring a veritable power bank under its skin. It measures 162.9 x 77.9 x 82.mm, which is about average for a phone of its ilk, and it only tips the scales a little more than average at 218g.

That weight likely comes from the glass front and back, and the aluminum frame, more than anything. The phone is IP68-rated, so it's well-protected against dust and immersion in water, though in some regions you'll get an additional IP69K rating. This isn't the case with the UK model.

At the end of the day, the X8 Pro Max is not an especially novel-looking phone. The model I tested, the white one, has a barely-perceptible vertical-stripe pattern on the back, but beyond that, it looks like your average Android. I presume the other models, which come in blue and black, are the same.

Look hard enough, and you'll find two LED rings; one surrounding each camera bump. These can be toggled to light up under specific circumstances: for an incoming call, to double as a camera app timer, or when music is playing. Honestly, though, I found these lights quite situational, and I barely saw them in action during my testing.

The power button and volume rocker, both on the right edge, were within reach of my thumb when I was using the handset one-handed, but that may not be true for smaller-handed users. The camera bump doesn't stick out too much, so the phone could be placed almost flush on surfaces. That's not a given these days.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Poco X8 Pro Max review: display

The Poco X8 Pro Max's side menu, showing an apps list, while the phone is leant on a wall.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 6.83 inches, 1280 x 2772 resolution
  • 120Hz refresh rate, 3,500 nits max brightness
  • AMOLED with 68 billion colors

The Poco X8 Pro Max has a sizeable 6.83-inch screen, like many other mid-priced Android phones on the market right now.

The rest of its display specs are in line with the competition too: you get a 1280 x 2772 resolution, a 120Hz refresh rate, 3,500 nits of max brightness, and support for HDR10+.

Thanks to its AMOLED panel and support for up to 68 billion colors, the phone has a little bit of extra juice for watching movies or TV shows. This technology reduces the amount of banding you see (no more weird stripey sunrises in your shows!), and it combines well with the Dolby Atmos support also offered by the phone.

  • Display score: 4 / 5

Poco X8 Pro Max review: software

The Poco X8 Pro Max in a man's hand, while it's in the app drawer.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Android 16 with HyperOS 3
  • Lots of bloatware to delete
  • Four years of OS updates

The perpetual problem of Xiaomi's cheaper phones is that they always come pre-loaded with loads of bloatware; random games, third-party apps, and the company's own apps result in your main menu being cluttered before you've even started using the device.

You can delete them, but it's a chore to do so. You essentially have to claw your way back to the basic interface, which is Android 16 with Xiaomi's HyperOS 3 laid over the top.

To the same degree as most Chinese-made OSes, you get out of HyperOS what you put in; it doesn't have distinctive system-wide theme controls like One UI or stock Android, and instead tasks you with building your own interface with controls over the app icons, font, wallpaper, and so on.

As someone who doesn't like the overbearing system-wide themes of rivals, I'm a fan of Poco's approach, but it's not for everyone. If you want a simple and cohesive 'look', this phone isn't for you (unless you're willing to play around with its settings).

Poco doesn't make a huge song and dance about the AI features available in HyperOS, probably recognizing that consumers are a little tired of the subject at this point, but there are a few hidden away nonetheless: Circle to Search, Speech Recognition, and wallpaper generation are all here, and both Gemini and Copilot come pre-installed.

In terms of longevity, you'll get four years of operating system updates and six years of security fixes with the Poco X8 Pro Max. That's not the longest update commitment around, but it's a lot better than two or three years offered by some mid-range Android phone manufacturers.

  • Software score: 3 / 5

Poco X8 Pro Max review: cameras

The Poco X8 Pro Max's camera bump.

(Image credit: Future)
  • 50MP main, 8MP ultra-wide, and 20MP front cameras
  • Pictures are detailed but not optimized
  • A few handy video features

Poco has never made a serious camera phone, and the X8 Pro Max doesn't change that fact. The phone has the same two-part lens array as basically every other Poco of the past few years: there's a 50MP f/1.5 main camera and 8MP f/2.2 ultra-wide, with a 20MP f/2.2 camera on the front to round out the party.

It’s a tried-and-tested combo for budget phones: these lenses are great for taking pictures of pets, scanning documents, and capturing holiday shots, which is what most casual users will be using them for anyway.

But people who take their photography seriously will want to opt for an alternative device with a telephoto lens or bespoke camera modes.

As you can see from the camera samples below, snaps I took on the Poco are perfectly fine: the phone performs admirably in low-light conditions, and captured plenty of detail in various environments. The f/1.5 aperture on the main camera is a bit wider than we sometimes see in this category, and that probably explains why my pictures were nice and bright.

What differentiates this device from a bona fide camera phone, other than its lack of a telephoto lens, is its optimization capabilities (or lack thereof). Post-processing on the Poco X8 Pro Max is light-touch — the phone's software will make slight brightness and contrast adjustments, but that’s it. It doesn’t add vibrancy or color to pictures, which makes some of the photos below look a little duller than they otherwise would.

Video recording goes up to 4K at 60fps, and I was pleasantly surprised by how stable the recorded footage came out. A few other tools, like focus peaking and exposure 'zebra stripes', make the Poco X8 Pro Max a little more advanced for videography than I’ve come to expect from budget phones. However, there's no slow-mo, which I’d come to understand was a staple of phones at this price range.

  • Camera score: 3.5 / 5

Poco X8 Pro Max camera samples

A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A pier at sunset, taken on the Poco's main camera.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A cacti, photographed on the Poco's main camera.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A night-time cityscape, captured on the Poco's main camera.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A red flower, photographed on the Poco's main camera.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A river view, photographed on the Poco's ultra-wide camera.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A river view, photographed on the Poco's main camera.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A river view, photographed on the Poco's main camera at 2x zoom.Future
A camera sample taken on the Poco X8 Pro Max camera sample.
A river view, photographed on the Poco's main camera at 10x zoom, its digital limit.Future

Poco X8 Pro Max review: performance and audio

The Poco X8 Pro Max laying flat on a ledge, showing its rear.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Solid Dimensity 9500s chipset + 12GB RAM
  • Performs well in gaming, even if not top-end
  • Stereo speakers or Bluetooth 6.0

If you want a solid, affordable phone for gaming, the Poco X8 Pro Max has you covered, as it’s one of the more powerful handsets you can buy without stretching your budget to the dizzy heights demanded by a top-end mobile.

The phone has a MediaTek Dimensity 9500s chipset, designed by MediaTek as a slightly stepped-down version of the brand’s flagship Dimensity 9500 processor (which itself is considered a step down from Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon range). That 9500s chipset is paired with 12GB RAM, whichever model you pick up.

Despite that 's' suffix, though, the Poco's Dimensity 9500s chipset proved an admirable performer in benchmark tests, even if it didn’t match up to the true top-end chipsets found in bespoke gaming phones. The phone's average Geekbench 5 multi-core score was 8603, while 3D Mark’s Wild Life Extreme scores hovered around the 6000 mark. For context, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, which I tested before, hit 7300.

What’s in 1300? Not much, because I found that the Poco X8 Pro Max could easily handle all the usual testing games I play: online shooters, PC strategy ports, and assorted indie titles. It could generally grapple with all the high-graphics options I threw at it, too, though sometimes it would find Ultra presets taxing. Still, titles loaded quickly and played smoothly, with none of the overheating issues that we often see on Snapdragon-loaded handsets.

For audio, you'll get a set of stereo speakers on the Poco X8 Pro Max, smartly positioned so you don't block them when holding the phone horizontally for gaming.

There's also Bluetooth 5.4 support for wireless headphones, but no 3.5mm jack for a cable connection.

  • Performance score: 4 / 5

Poco X8 Pro Max review: battery life

The Poco X8 Pro Max's USB-C port

(Image credit: Future)
  • Massive 8,500mAh battery
  • 2-3 days battery life, depending on use
  • 100W charging

It’s taken us a while to get here, but battery life is, for me, the best part of the Poco X8 Pro Max. Xiaomi has packed the phone full of juice: its battery is 8,500mAh, one of the biggest I’ve seen on a consumer smartphone before. Apparently, some even regions get a 9,000mAh version, but in the UK, that model isn’t on sale.

Suffice to say, an enormous battery like this lasts absolutely ages on a single charge. I’m talking two straight days of average phone use, and you’ll still have something left over. I have no doubt that the Poco X8 Pro Max is the longest-lasting phone I’ve ever reviewed.

Exorcising charging from your daily routine isn’t the only benefit of a huge battery like this. It ensures you can throw some gaming, video capture, or lots of screen time into your routine, without any kind of battery anxiety creeping in.

With such a big battery, fast charging seems almost unnecessary, but Poco has sweetened the deal with 100W wired powering. You’ll need to buy your own charger to hit this speed, though, as there’s a cable in the box but no wall plug.

With this charging speed, you can power the phone up from empty to full in just under 50 minutes. That doesn’t sound quick, but bear in mind the power pack is huge. You can also use the Poco as a power bank to charge up other devices, with 27W reverse wired charging. This phone is a battery champion.

  • Battery score: 5 / 5

Poco X8 Pro Max review: value

The Poco X8 Pro Max in a man's hand, while it's in the camera app showing a plant pot through the viewfinder.

(Image credit: Future)

I've never used a Poco smartphone that didn't offer value for money in some way, and that streak remains unbroken with the X8 Pro Max.

The phone offers an unparalleled experience if you need something reliable that'll last you for ages without charging. Sure, it doesn't offer flashy features or advanced cameras, but it's trying to be the panacea for people who just want a reliable mobile.

It's also built to last better than most flagships, ensuring you won't need to buy a replacement phone every other year.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the Poco X8 Pro Max?

Poco X8 Pro Max score card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

'Bang for your buck' is expected for a Poco phone.

4 / 5

Design

By-the-numbers design, but well-protected and hides the battery well.

4 / 5

Display

You're getting good camera specs with more colors than some rivals.

4 / 5

Software

The pre-installed bloatware is annoying, and some may consider the OS to look messy.

3 / 5

Camera

This isn't designed for photographers, but it'll do the job day-to-day for everyone else.

3.5 / 5

Performance

Most users won't be able to tell that it doesn't have a true top-end chipset.

4 / 5

Battery

This thing will last you ages, and charges incredibly quickly.

5 / 5

Buy it if...

You need a multi-day battery life
It's no exaggeration to say that this phone will last you for literal days on one charge. Usually, that's a marketing line; here, it's true.

You're a budget gamer
The Poco isn't expensive, but its chipset is solid for mobile gaming, with the display an extra bonus.

You need an alert LED
I didn't find it too useful, but I imagine some users will find the Poco's rear ring light handy if used well.

Don't buy it if...

You need a good camera phone
For the price, you can get better camera phones, with macro or zoom lenses.

You need a classy-looking OS
Forget the bloatware; HyperOS isn't exactly a looker. Many people won't mind, but if you like a system theme, you won't be impressed.

Poco X8 Pro Max review: Also consider

Not quite sold on this budget battery blower? Here are a few similarly-priced alternatives which are also worth your consideration.

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
This mobile is a budget camera beast, but it also offers a lot more to like: it looks distinctive, has unique-looking software, and offers a 'Glyph' display on the back. Unlike the Poco, it's no battery winner, though.

Read our full Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review

Samsung Galaxy A57
The Samsung Galaxy A57 offers a great-looking display, and it's also pretty slender, so is perfect for people who don't want a massive mobile. Don't expect much processing power though.

Read our hands-on impressions of the Samsung Galaxy A57

OnePlus 15R
Another phone that focuses on battery life, the OnePlus 15R has a slightly smaller battery but compensates with more processing power.

Poco X8 Pro Max

OnePlus 15R

Samsung Galaxy A57

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

Starting price (at launch):

$469 / £469 (about AU$940)

$699 / £649 (about AU$1,300)

$549.99 / £529 / AU$749

$499 / £499 (about AU$1,000)

Dimensions:

162.9 x 77.9 x 8.2mm

163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm

161.5 x 76.8 x 6.9 mm

163.7 x 76.6 x 8 mm

Weight:

218g

213

179g

210g

OS (at launch):

HyperOS 3, Android 16

OxygenOS 16, Android 16

OneUI 8.5, Android 16

Nothing OS 4.1, Android 16

Screen Size:

6.83-inch

6.83-inch

6.7-inch

6.83-inch

Resolution:

2772 x 1280

2800 x 1272

2340 x 1080

2800 x 1260

CPU:

Mediatek Dimensity 9500s

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5

Exynos 1680

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4

RAM:

12GB

12GB

8GB / 12GB

8GB / 12GB

Storage (from):

256GB / 512GB

256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB

Battery:

8,500mAh

7,400mAh

5,000mAh

5,080mAh

Rear Cameras:

50MP main, 8MP ultrawide

50MP main, 8MP ultrawide

50MP main, 12MP ultra-wide, 5MP macro

50MP wide, 50MP periscope telephoto, 8MP ultrawide

Front camera:

20MP

32MP

12MP

32MP

How I tested the Poco X8 Pro Max

The top of the Poco X8 Pro Max screen, showing its punch-hole camera.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Review test period = 3 weeks
  • Testing included = Everyday usage, including web browsing, social media, photography, video calling, gaming, streaming video, music playback
  • Tools used = Geekbench 6, 3D Mark, native Android stats

I used the Poco X8 Pro Max for roughly three weeks before writing this review, and tested it alongside the non-Max version of the phone, which I was also sent.

Part of testing was lab-based: I used benchmark apps like Geekbench and 3D Mark, conducted battery tests, and timed it charging. The rest of my testing was experience-based: I used the Poco for normal smartphone purposes, gaming, and taking photos.

I've been reviewing smartphones for TechRadar for seven years, and in that time have tested countless mobiles from a variety of brands and price points. These include past Poco and Xiaomi devices, and other battery-focused phones.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed March 2026

Oppo A6c is going international with different specs
4:53 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Oppo’s weird obsession with the A6 series is about to turn a new page soon with an international version of the Oppo A6c, which had previously launched in China. The Chinese A6c was all but a rebadged A6x 4G with a new back design, and its upcoming international variant will bring an updated back design alongside thoroughly different specs. Oppo A6c (global) hands-on images For one, it will feature a 6.75-inch IPS LCD with a 120Hz refresh rate and a notch for its 5MP front-facing camera. The device is also getting a larger 7,000mAh battery with 15W charging and the entry-level...

New Oppo Find X9 Ultra, X9s Pro details surface ahead of launch
2:02 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Oppo Find X9 Ultra and Find X9s Pro are set to launch in China on April 21, with the Ultra model also debuting globally on the same day. Ahead of the launch, new details about both phones have surfaced online. Well-known tipster Digital Chat Station has revealed new details about the upcoming Find X9 series in separate posts on Weibo. According to the tipster, the Find X9s Pro will feature a flat 6.32-inch Tianma U9 Pro AMOLED display with a 1.5K resolution, 144Hz refresh rate, and slim bezels. Oppo has already confirmed that the phone will include dual 200MP rear cameras, and...

Alogic Edge 40-inch 5K ultrawide monitor review: This stunning Mac-friendly display is outstanding for creatives — but calibration is needed before use
1:20 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets | Comments: Off

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: 30-second review

Unboxing the Alogic Edge 5K, and the scale of this monitor is immediately apparent. At 941mm wide, it’s significantly larger than the 27-inch 4K monitors I am used to, and the full metal chassis, Space Grey matte finish, and ultra-thin 8mm panel give it a premium look that looks great alongside my Laptop.

The Space Grey of my MacBook Pro M1 Max is matched closely by the monitor, so if pure aesthetics are important to you, then this monitor is Mac-centric and spot on.

Initial setup is out of the box is easy enough with screws from the base bolting into the stand, then the monitor clicks into place, the power adapter plugs in, and a single USB-C cable connects to the laptop, with the monitor's display, data, and 90W charging all running through that single cable. For my MacBook Pro, the power delivery of 90W also delivers the charge, so no need to bring the Mac's power adapter to the office.

Taking a look at the rear of the monitor, there's a protruding bar that runs for the entire length of the back of the monitor and houses the electronics, speakers, and ports. While it’s great to have the built-in Dock, there are no USB-A ports, which isn’t a bad thing, so I had to connect my keyboard and mouse through adapters; the network plugged straight in, along with a couple of other accessories.

That single connection gives you full access to the display quality that this monitor is able to deliver with full 5K resolution and 100Hz refresh rate; switching to HDMI maintains image quality, but with some resolution and refresh rates are dropped due to the older technology.

One issue that was apparent from the outset was the slightly off-colours. Delving into the menu soon showed that the display preset was set to Warm, which adds a noticeable yellow cast to whites. Switching to Standard made a dramatic difference, and as ever from there, running the Datacolor Spyder X2 calibration brought the display into a much more accurate state.

After calibration, colours were rich and natural with a close match to the MacBook Pro, although a little brighter at 50% brightness than the Mac. The Spyder analysis confirmed a measured gamma of 2.4 against the 2.2 standard target, meaning the display runs slightly darker in the shadow and midtone regions than the standard specifies, worth understanding for critical photographic work, as you may lose shadow detail, although the shift isn’t enough to be an issue for general use.

At 40 inches, imperfections become notable; however, as long as gaming isn’t your intent for the monitor, the 100Hz refresh rate is ideal for office work, photography and video editing. Scrolling through long documents, Lightroom catalogues, or Premiere Pro timelines is smoother than the 60Hz panels I normally use.

Another notable difference to many of the monitors that I look at in the mid-range is the anti-glare matte finish, which handles studio reflections well. This is common for premium monitors and really highlights the intended use and quality that is on offer with this display. That said, highlights will still be present from bright windows, depending on how you position the monitor, but nothing that interferes with working, and for creative applications, that matte surface just gives a more accurate visual of the image compared with using a glossy panel. For the price, it's sure to be featured in our best 5K monitors collection.

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: Price and availability

  • How much does it cost? From approximately $1259 / £1259
  • When is it out? Available now
  • Where can you get it? Directly from Alogic official store

The Alogic Edge 5K is available direct from Alogic in the US for $1529.99 and in the UK for £1259.99.

The display comes in Silver or Space Grey, and includes a DisplayPort cable, a USB-C cable, a power adapter, and a two-year warranty.

It's also available from other retailers, although availability is spotty right now - for example, it's listed but out of stock at Amazon at the time of review.

  • Value: 4 / 5

Alogic Edge 5K 40

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: Specs

Panel: 40-inch IPS
Resolution: 5120 x 2160 (5K2K)
Refresh rate: 60Hz / 100 Hz
Brightness: 400 nits
Contrast ratio: 1200:1 (typical)
Colour gamut: 100% sRGB / 99% DCI-P3 / 94% AdobeRGB
Pixel density: 139 PPI
Aspect ratio: 21:9
Viewing angle: 178° H / 178° V
Connectivity: USB-C (90W PD + data + display), HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4, USB-C downstream x2
Audio: 3W x 2 built-in speakers
Stand adjustment: Height 151–275mm from desk, tilt, VESA 100 x 100 mm compatible.
Dimensions with stand: 941 x 245 x 570mm
Panel depth: 41mm
Finish: Space Grey (also available in Silver)
In the box: DisplayPort cable, USB-C cable, power adapter

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: Design

The Alogic Edge 5K has been designed to be a perfect partner to the Mac computers, with two colour options that match the range and style perfectly. In this review, I’ve taken a look at the 40-inch 5120 x 2160 5K2K resolution screen and coupled it with the MacBook Pro M1 Max and a MinisForum MS-02 to test cross-platform compatibility.

The monitor option supplied is the Space Grey aluminium finish, with an ultra-thin 8mm panel profile, and matte surface. Out of the box, it all looks very Mac and premium, including the solid base that offers plenty of flexibility over the positioning. Looking over the monitor and the build quality throughout, the full metal assembly feels distinctly premium, all feeling solidly in line with the pricing.

Setting up is straightforward and the all-metal stand is solid, although with this size of desk, to avoid any wobble, positioning it on a good, solid desk is essential. Through the test, I found that a 40-inch width amplifies movement far more than a smaller display, and initially, on a cheaper desk, some wobble was notable.

However, this stopped as soon as the monitor was moved to a solid surface. The overall size of the monitor is 941x41x419mm, and with the stand, this comes to 941x245x694mm with the stand at max height.

There are several aspects aside from the design of the stand that stood out; the first is the flat base, which has been designed so that larger docks or other accessories can easily sit on top. This may seem like a small design feature, but for a creative studio where space often runs at a premium, any small design features like this are worth noting.

Alogic Edge 5K 40

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The stand also offers plenty of adjustment with a height that moves from 151mm to 275mm desk-to-monitor, which covers most working positions, especially if you work at a standing desk.

If I were to comment on anything, a little more travel at the lower end would be welcome for shorter users or lower chair positions, but for most setups, the range is fine. It’s also good to see that there’s a VESA 100x100mm on the back for arm mounting, though the monitor's aesthetics and size work best positioned directly on the desk.

The rear protruding bar houses the dock ports, speaker unit, and electronics, which keeps the front of the monitor clean and minimal. In practice, with keyboard, mouse, and network plugged into the rear ports, with an adapter for some, a single cable could then be used to connect to the laptop, leaving the desk tidy of cables.

The all-USB-C rear port selection should suit most modern setups, but will need adapters for older USB-A peripherals such as my Keyboard and mouse. It was also notable that there wasn’t an HDMI cable in the box, given that the port is present and directly relevant for Windows users.

  • Design: 4.5 / 5

Alogic Edge 5K 40

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: Features

The 5K2K resolution of this 40-inch 21:9 aspect ratio monitor is the headline feature and at this price makes it extremely appealing for creative users, especially when you start to delve into the specifications and the colour accuracy, gamut and resolution.

Screen sharpness is also well above your usual office monitor at 139 PPI, which just highlights that at this size, screen text will still be crisp, and UI elements are sharp, unlike looking at Mac or Windows OS on a TV. That PPI and resolution in the wider 21:9 aspect ratio make it perfectly suited for creative use, with plenty of real-world space for applications to run side by side.

Where this wider space really comes into its own is when running a video timeline alongside a reference panel, spreading a Lightroom catalogue across the full width, or keeping two to three application windows open, such as Word, browser, and Music.

Personally, the most unexpected benefit of using a 21:9 monitor was apparent when I started editing some anamorphic footage shot on the Canon EOS R5 C with Sirui Venus anamorphic lenses. Essentially, once the footage was de-squeezed, I was able to use the native aspect ratio, which filled the panel edge-to-edge, eliminating the letterbox effect that makes anamorphic content feel cramped on a standard 16:9 display. If you’re a video editor working regularly in anamorphic formats, this alone makes this monitor a great option.

One or two of the more quirky features of the monitor at the PiP (Picture-in-Picture) and PbP (Picture-by-Picture) options that can be run alongside the standard, extended, and mirrored display modes. PiP proved more useful in practice once I adjusted the size. This sets your laptop screen in a window on the main display.

There are thankfully some adjustments to the size and position, and I set this to 40% scale and positioned it in the bottom-right corner of the monitor, which left the majority of the 5K panel free for documents and applications. The PBP I found less useful, but it may have its uses.

To access these features and all image options, you can use the OSD display menu, which is accessed using the small joypad on the back of the monitor. The OSD configuration takes some working out initially, but once set up, it is a genuinely well-thought-out system and was one of the fastest that I have used when running through the display analysis test to change settings.

The 100Hz refresh rate is decent at this screen size and perfect for office and creative work; the only time that you may require an uplift in the speed is if you want to play action-packed games. However, for normal use, scrolling through long documents or a Premiere Pro timeline while at 60Hz when connected via HDMI, things can seem a little slow, but through the USB-C at 100Hz, everything seems smooth enough. For creative and admin use, this refresh rate is ideal.

The built-in USB-C dock is handy and does help to keep the desk tidy with one cable delivering display, data, and up to 90W power. This all worked well on both Mac and Windows during testing, and for studios or home offices, connecting everything in the morning with one cable just saves time and makes things easy. There’s also far less to remember as you’re rushing out of the house.

Another major feature for me is the anti-glare matte finish to the display, which, for Photoshop, Lightroom Classic, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or Final Cut Pro, the matte surface gives a better and more accurate idea of the image compared with an overly glossy panel. It is also considerably easier on the eye during long editing sessions, and for document work in Word or general Office applications, the difference in comfort over a full day was noticeable.

One of the other features that I was interested in was the built-in 3W x 2 speakers; however, these are a weak point of the design. The volume is lower than the monitor's size suggests, and the audio lacks the depth and richness the speaker grille suggests should be output. Compared directly with the MacBook Pro's built-in speakers, there’s just no point in using the Edge 5K speakers. If you’re buying this monitor with the intention of removing external speakers from your desk, don’t budget for a separate speaker or audio monitor to use with this display.

Alogic Edge 5K 40

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
  • Features: 4 / 5

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: Performance

Benchmark scores

Colour gamut: 100% sRGB / 89% AdobeRGB / 97% P3
Measured gamma: 2.4 (target 2.2 — display runs slightly dark in midtones and shadows)
White point at 50% brightness: ~6600K (slightly cool of D65 6500K standard)
Best contrast ratio: 1430:1 at 50% brightness
Colour accuracy average Delta-E: 1.60
Colour accuracy max Delta-E: 4.89
Colour uniformity max DeltaE at 100% brightness: 4.5 (bottom-right corner)
Luminance uniformity max variance at 100%: 10% (bottom-centre)
Spyder overall rating: 4.0/5.0

After unboxing and plugging in the monitor, the first thing that I noticed was the overly warm look to the display. Delving into the OSD, I noted that the preset was set to Warm and changing this to Standard instantly removed the overly yellow cast that was making whites immediately look unnatural, which is an issue for creative work but also made Microsoft Office applications look odd.

While the standard preset looked OK, it was obvious the monitor still needed calibration. I did this from the outset as colour and tone didn’t look great, and running the Datacolor Spyder X2 calibration was able to bring the display into a much more accurate state, and after calibration, the colours were much more closely aligned with the MacBook Pro .

I then ran the Spyder X2 analysis, and the report confirmed an average Delta-E colour accuracy of 1.60, which is excellent for a non-factory-calibrated display at this price. The 100% sRGB and 97% P3 coverage are pretty standard, and for video work, content creation, and enthusiast photography, they should suffice.

Opening files from the Canon EOS R5 C and Hasselblad X2D II 100C in Lightroom Classic and Photoshop, the 5K resolution made an immediate difference to viewing, as the detail within the images was far better defined than when compared with my standard 4K display. What’s more, with the wider panel, it meant that images were being viewed closer to their native resolution before reaching the edge of the screen. When it came to the colour and tone, after calibration, the images looked bright, rich, and highly detailed.

One issue that was highlighted with the display analysis was the 89% AdobeRGB figure, and this is where professional photographers will pay attention. That value is a usable result for drafting, client review, and editing, but careful calibration and checks will need to be in place for colour-critical output, particularly anything destined for print.

A dedicated Adobe RGB display remains the more accurate tool. Final images should always be checked on a properly calibrated, wide-gamut monitor before going to output. For in-house video teams and content creators working with P3 and sRGB delivery, the limitation is less relevant.

The measured gamma of 2.4 against the 2.2 standard that was input into the OSD means that the display runs slightly darker in the shadow and mid-tone regions than the standard specifies, which may mean shadow detail is not rendered as accurately as intended for photographic work.

In practice, at 50% brightness, the shadows looked deep, and the contrast, measured at 1430:1 at that setting, looks great, but you will need to calibrate printers to ensure that you are seeing all the shadow detail that is viewable on the display. For general photography and video use, the gamma figure is not a problem; for critical shadow work, it is something to watch for.

Colour uniformity is good at the 50% working brightness, and from the working position at the centre of the display, the panel looks even and consistent. However, as a point of note, there is some luminance variation visible when viewing a plain white screen across the full width, which is an angle-of-view effect rather than a panel uniformity problem. Keeping image editing work within the central portion of the screen avoids it entirely.

Through the test, I used the Edge 5K on both Mac and Windows and the performance was consistent. On the MacBook Pro M1 Max via USB-C, full 5K resolution, 100Hz, 90W charging, and dock functionality all worked without any configuration. On the Minisforum MS-02 Windows mini PC, the same connection delivered the same results, colour profiles, dock recognition, and display output all worked well.

By the end of the test, I was impressed with the overall quality, and while there are some small issues that those using the monitor for colour-critical work may encounter, for the most part, it stood up to the quality tests well. As a monitor, it has clearly been designed with Macs in mind, and the use and integration have been well thought through. Likewise, for most Windows machines, it also works exceptionally well, but it is worth confirming your machine's USB-C video output capability before assuming the full 5K and 100Hz will be available.

  • Performance: 4 / 5

Alogic Edge 5K 40

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor: Final verdict

Alogic Edge 5K 40

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Alogic Edge 5K with its 40-inch ultrawide design gives you a completely different way of working and a great option if you are looking to upgrade from a dual-monitor desk setup.

The 5K resolution, premium Mac-esque design, single-cable connection, and colour accuracy, once calibrated, help to give you a solid quality display for creative and office use. When it comes to its place in the field, it sits between the Apple Studio Display and the mid-range 4K ultrawide market, as its price reflects.

There are limitations and things that creative professionals should take note of, such as the 89% AdobeRGB coverage, as read through the display analysis. This means professional photographers should be aware that some colours may show a slight shift and watch shadow detail carefully.

There is also the issue with the built-in speakers, which are weak, and I would definitely recommend dedicated monitor speakers over the monitors' offerings. For home office professionals, content creators, video editors working to P3, and enthusiast photographers, these small points shouldn’t be an issue. As a display for all things creative for the price, there’s a great deal on offer here.

Should I buy the Alogic Edge 5K 40-inch ultrawide monitor?

Value

Good value for money for a 5K, 100Hz, USB-C dock, and 90W PD all within this stylish monitor.

4

Design

Premium metal construction that reflects Apple's computer product lines, finished in Space Grey

4.5

Features

Single-cable USB-C workflow, PiP/PbP support, 100Hz, anti-glare matte finish, and built-in dock.

4

Performance

Excellent calibrated colour accuracy and decent contrast, slightly lower 89% AdobeRGB and a measured gamma of 2.4

4

Overall

A well-made, Mac-friendly ultrawide monitor that's a perfect fit for home office users, content creators, and enthusiast photographers.

4

Buy it if...

You want to replace two monitors with one.

The 40-inch 21:9 panel gives you enough space to run three applications comfortably side by side, and PiP adds a second input source on top of that. For home office users or if you want an alternative to a dual-monitor setup, the Edge 5K is an impressive single-display solution.

You shoot and edit anamorphic video.

The native 21:9 aspect ratio fills the panel edge-to-edge with anamorphic footage, eliminating the letterbox effect of a standard 16:9 display. For anyone who regularly edits anamorphic content, this alone is a reason to go ultrawide.

Don't buy it if...

Colour-critical photography

At 89% AdobeRGB, the Edge 5K is an excellent drafting and client review monitor, but for final print preparation, a dedicated wide-gamut display may be a better idea.

You want to remove external speakers.

The built-in 3W x 2 speakers lack the volume and depth the monitor's size suggests should be possible.


For more picks, see our guide to the best business monitors we've tested.

Here’s the Infinix GT 50 Pro in two colors, more details about its gaming chops leak
1:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is on the way, and it was allegedly spotted in the Geekbench online database back in January, powered by the Dimensity 8400 SoC paired with 12GB of RAM. Then, in February, a leak revealed most of its specs. Today we can present you with some more information about this phone thanks to our trusted sources. We can also show you the device in two colors (see below). The GT 50 Pro has a premium Kevlar texture and aerodynamic design details, and a striking semi-transparent colored window which makes the cooling channels look like mechanical components. You can watch the...

‘An exceptional audio investment’: Audio-Technica’s new open-backs just jumped straight to the top of my headphone pile (and it’s not even close)
1:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones Wireless Headphones | Comments: Off

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: two minute review

The ATH-ADX7000 are Audio-Technica's flagship open-back headphones, with a lightweight design that's strong but just 270g. They deliver exceptional low-end power and a wide, precise sound stage, with a confidence and clarity no matter what kind of music you throw at them. They're astonishingly expensive, but if you can afford a pair you'll be very pleased with your purchase. Some of the best wired headphones around then? Oh, emphatically.

The key features here include Audio-Technica's new HXDT driver design, which is a large 58mm diaphragm with concentric alignment of the baffle plate, magnet and voice coil. The voice coil is located in the middle of the housing for what Audio-Technica says is "the purest motion and sound possible".

These are very high impedance headphones — 490 ohms — and that means you'll need an appropriately powerful amp to drive them. But get that right and they'll reward you no end.

Photos of the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: price and release date

  • $3,499 / £3,000 / AU$4,999
  • Launched October 2025

The Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones were announced in October 2025 and went on sale that same month with a price tag of $3,499 / £3,000 / AU$4,999.

That pricing means these are very much in audiophile territory; this is a flagship set of serious headphones made for people who want the very best of everything and can afford to pay for it.

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: specs

Type

Open air dynamic

Driver diameter

58mm

Frequency range

5 to 50,000 Hz

Sensitivity

100 dB/mW

Impedance

490 ohms

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: features

  • New 58mm HDXT driver with aligned circular components
  • 490 ohm high impedance voice coil
  • 1/4-inch stereo and 4-pin XLRM cables, both 3m

The Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones feature HDXT drivers, which are precision-molded to deliver a perfectly round diaphragm. The main driver is 58mm with aligned circular driver components (the baffle plate, magnet, voice coil and diaphragm) for what Audio-Technica says is a more accurate, dynamic and detailed sonic performance. It's teamed with a 490-ohm high-impedance voice coil that promises fast transients and defined low end.

The ATX-ADX7000s come with two detachable nylon-wound 3m (9.8') cables, one balanced with a 4-pin XLRM connector (but not a 4.4mm balanced connector; the expectation is that you'll be using a desktop or hi-fi amp here) and one with an unbalanced 6.3mm (1/4") gold-plated stereo plug. Both cables connect to the headphones with gold-tipped A2DC connectors.

  • Features score: 4.5/5

Photos of the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: sound quality

  • Exceptional clarity and precision
  • Superbly punchy bass without losing detail
  • Excellent in all kinds of genres

With a frequency response of 5Hz to 50kHz, the ATH-ADX7000 have a very impressive low end and airy highs, delivering a neutral overall sound with a little bit of warmth. Irrespective of genre or format I didn't need to reach for an EQ on any of my vinyl, CDs or files; even fairly cluttered, complex sounds like Mojo from Mike Patton's Peeping Tom project, which drops massive squelching sub-bass in the chorus with distorted guitars on top and which has defeated many headphones, didn't stress the Audio-Technicas at all.

These are very high-impedance headphones and on the Mac my SSL2 interface struggled to drive them; while it happily drives most demanding headphones it wasn't strong enough for these, and it felt like I was getting six out of ten when I needed eight or nine. Swapping it for my iFi Zen 2 DAC improved things dramatically, not just because of the extra power but because the ATH-ADX7000s could really breathe. What was already entertaining became an absolute hoot.

I laughed out loud when the bass dropped in SOPHIE's Reasons Why, and Beastie Boys' Root Down moved so much air it felt like I'd strapped big speakers to my head. Little Simz' Point and Kill was beautifully detailed, its snaking bassline, intertwining vocals and bursts of brass perfectly positioned. Radiohead's Reckoner had incredible presence, the Audio-Technicas giving the layered vocals great separation as guitars chimed in the left channel and the ride cymbal splashed in the right. Led Zeppelin's When The Levee Breaks was the best I've ever heard it, every part of John Paul Jones' bass distinct from John Bonham's thunderous drums and Jimmy Page's slide guitar.

Bass was something of a recurring theme in my testing because the ATH-ADX7000 headphones deliver it so well, whether it's the thumb-slaps and slides in The Blue Nile's Tinseltown in the Rain; the arpeggiated synth in Robyn's Dopamine; the dubstep thump in BLACKPINK's Go; Adam Clayton's grinding bass in U2's Vertigo; or Tony Levin's percussive, metronomic bass pulse and melodic walks in the live version of Peter Gabriel's Digging in the Dirt. Listening to and feeling Horace Pace's glorious Precision bass in The Specials' Ghost Town was close to a religious experience.

  • Sound quality score: 5/5

Photos of the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: design

  • Exceptionally lightweight honeycomb grille
  • Choice of velvet and alcantara ear cups
  • Lightweight but strong magnesium frame
  • Functional rather than flashy

The Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones are very visibly open-back thanks to a handmade honeycomb-punched aluminum grille that looks as if it's barely there when you're looking straight at it — although it is very strong and does also block unwanted side ventilation.

The large ear pads come with a choice of velvet and Alcantara cushions that promise to subtly alter the sound — velvet for "well-balanced" audio and Alcantara for more warmth — and the headphones use a lightweight magnesium frame with a wide, open headband. I found the headphones to be exceptionally comfortable even during long listening sessions. And unlike on-ear designs they stayed put when I was at my desk working in front of a big display.

Each pair of ATH-ADX7000 is laser-etched with its serial number and comes in a hard aluminium carrying case.

  • Design score: 5/5

Photos of the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: value

  • Undeniably expensive
  • Exceptionally good bass
  • Wonderfully comfortable

These are the best over-ear headphones I've ever tested, delivering the incredible clarity and realism of open-back headphones with the kind of low-end punch you'd normally need closed-backs for. Their light weight, wide headband and comfortable ear cups make them a real pleasure to wear for long listening sessions, and the sound they produce means that every listening session will become a long one.

Unfortunately they're also very expensive: $3,499 / £3,000 / AU$4,999 is twice what you'd pay for a Grado Signature pair, about three times the price of the equivalent Sennheisers and about seven times more than I've ever been able to spend on a pair of headphones. That price tag means they're simply out of reach for many of us.

For many musical products the difference between budget and mid-range models is much more dramatic than the difference between high end and super high end – so for example a $1,000 guitar will be much better than a $250 one, but as you move up the price range the differences start to become much more subtle. I think that's the case here. If you can easily afford these headphones you'll love them, but many headphones costing half as much are hardly horrific.

  • Value score: 4/5

Should I buy the ATH-ADX7000?

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

New driver design for exceptional clarity and responsiveness

4.5/5

Sound quality

Super clarity and jaw-dropping low end. Exceptional in all kinds of genres.

5/5

Design

Functional rather than flashy: solidly made and super lightweight

4.5/5

Value

Incredible headphones, but incredibly expensive

4/5

Buy them if…

You can afford nice things
There's no escaping that price tag. But these are headphones that'll make you want to cancel all your plans so you can listen longer.

You're all about that bass
The ATH-ADX7000 deliver huge bass but they don't exaggerate the low end or unbalance the overall performance; the power comes in a velvet glove.

You've got the power
In a sector where 300 ohms is considered very high impedance these are even higher at 490 ohms.View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You're on a budget
Other open-backs are a fraction of the cost and will still be very entertaining, even if you need to give their bass a bit of a boost.

You prefer on-ears
I like the enclosed feeling these headphones deliver, but you may prefer the on-ear positioning from the likes of Grado.

You're flying coach
Open-backs and shared public spaces don't mix. These headphones don't so much leak audio as broadcast it.View Deal

Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 review: also consider

The Sennheiser HD 800's revoiced, more bassy successor the HD 800 S is among the very best wired headphones, and retails for roughly one-third of the price of the Audio-Technicas. And while the fit wasn't right for me, when I reviewed the Grado Signature S750 open-backs I really loved their sound quality and clarity. Our current favorite among the best high-end headphones, the Meze Audio 105 Silva, are even cheaper while delivering a superb sonic experience.

How I tested the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 headphones

  • Tested for two weeks
  • Used with stereo amp, audio interface and headphone DAC/amp
  • Vinyl, CD, streaming, and hi-res audio files

I tested the Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000 for two weeks across a range of sources and genres: vinyl records via an Audio-Technica turntable and an Onkyo A-910 stereo amplifier; CDs with the same amp and a Marantz CD6007 CD player; and streaming, lossless and hi-res audio on a Mac mini via an SSL2 audio interface and an iFi Zen 2 DAC.

I've detailed some of the music I used in the main review but I tested across a range of artists and genres including acoustic and hyperpop, electronica and EDM, classic rock, alternative rock and chart pop.

Next Page »