Organizer
Gadget news
Apple faces £1.6b lawsuit in the UK over iPhone throttling
1:32 pm | May 3, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

Apple could face yet another lawsuit regarding the purposeful throttling of the iPhone 6 and 6s, colloquially known as batterygate. The suit in question is worth £1.6b and is by Justin Gutmann on behalf of UK-based users affected by Apple's "throttling" of the iPhone 6 and 6s. Gutmann's lawyers argue that Apple concealed issues with the older iPhones' batteries by limiting performance. Apple is trying to block the suit by appealing to a London tribunal. Cupertino's lawyers claim the suit is "baseless", and that only a small number of old iPhone batteries are defective, for which Apple...

Weekly deals: the best smartphone deals from the UK, the US, Germany and India
4:25 pm | April 30, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

This week brings discounts for Samsung and Apple flagships and there are many interesting offerings in the mid-range too. You can use the links below to jump to the region that’s relevant to you: The UK USA Germany India UK The Samsung Galaxy A34 is barely a month old, but its price is falling significantly – the 8/256GB model is down to £300. For comparison, the 6/128GB model launched at £350. The phone is a solid mid-ranger with a 6.6” 120Hz FHD+ AMOLED display, IP67 rating, a Dimensity 1080 chipset, a 48+8+5MP camera setup and a 5,000mAh battery with 25W...

LG Gram Style review: all style, little substance
8:00 pm | April 27, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

LG Gram Style: Two-minute review

LG seems to be targeting a specific audience that loves some of the best ultrabooks on the market, with its sleek, lightweight, and very stylish LG Gram Style. This ultrabook stretches light to its absolute limits, as the laptop weighs less than three pounds despite the 16-inch display size. It’s honestly incredible how little this laptop weighs, and how beautiful it looks. The Gram Style is a lovely white color, but what makes it even more striking is the pearlescent finish that seems to glow and change color depending on how light hits it.

Its display is also quite impressive, as even the base model is an OLED panel with 2.8K resolution while the other versions hit 3K. The screen supports HDR with a refresh rate of 120Hz and a 100% DCI-P3 color gamut, making it (theoretically) excellent for creative projects as well. Another highlight is the backlit keyboard, which has this satisfying snappy feedback that along with its well-sized keys makes for a great typing experience. 

I wish I could extend the goodwill to the touchpad, but it honestly gives a bad name to haptic touchpads. The edges are defined by lights instead of an actual groove, which looks pretty but isn’t accessible in the slightest. I also noted a delay after not touching it for a while, in which the pad needs a free click to ‘wake up’ before anything actually happens.

The webcam is also lackluster, featuring the same issues that even many of the best laptops suffer from: a dull, slightly grainy image quality and a middling framerate. Thankfully the sound quality is much better, boasting pretty clear audio that puts out most songs just fine. Just don’t ask it to play anything with bass, or anything too loudly, since the speakers are kind of quiet. There's also some good pre-installed software variety, including programs that control settings like fan speed, display, keyboard shortcuts, security software, and more.

As for performance, it functions well as a productivity and creative machine, thanks to the 13 Gen Intel Core i7-1360P CPU under the hood, which is made for work tasks. However, the GPU is merely integrated Intel Iris Xe Graphics, meaning its overall performance is somewhat lacking - disappointing considering the hefty price tag. 

However, unlike some of the best gaming laptops, don't think you'll be running Cyberpunk 2077 or most of the other best PC games on this anytime soon. It's a shame because, had it been much more consistent, it could have easily been one of the best thin and light laptops around.

LG Gram Style: Price & availability

closeup of white keyboard

(Image credit: Future)
  • Starting at $1,499.99 (£2,399.98 / around AU$2,270)
  • Available now
  • Available in the US and the UK

The LG Gram Style starts at $1,499.99 (£2,399.98 / around AU$2,270) for the basic model, while my review unit is priced at $1,799.99 (£2,499.98 / around AU$2,724). 

This places it at the higher end of ultrabooks, surpassing the HP Dragonfly Pro and the MacBook Pro 13-inch (M2, 2022) and approaching the starting MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra - which, notably, does have a dedicated GPU.

As for availability, you’ll find several models in both the US and UK, but unfortunately, Australia has been shafted with no release at all in the region. The LG Gram Style in the UK is also far more expensive than the US models, and there's no clear reason why.

  • Price score: 3 / 5

LG Gram Style: Specs

closeup of evo sticker

(Image credit: Future)

The specs for the LG Gram Style review unit sent to me are as follows: Intel Core i7-1360P CPU, Intel Iris Xe GPU, 32GB LPDDR5 of RAM, and 1TB SSD of storage. 

In both the US and the UK there are three main configurations, with the baseline one featuring 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. However, unlike the top-of-the-line US model, the UK model has 2TB of storage instead of 1TB.

And while customers can choose between three configurations depending on the region, each model cannot be customized individually, nor can the specs be upgraded by the buyer at a later time. 

  • Specs score: 4 / 5

LG Gram Style: Design

white laptop sitting on desk

(Image credit: Future)
  • Absolutely gorgeous
  • Great keyboard and display
  • Terrible touchpad

The LG Gram Style’s design is easily the best part of this laptop. LG certainly put a lot of stock into its looks, with a beautiful iridescent white chassis, a form factor that’s light and thin beyond belief, a gorgeous OLED display with anti-reflection, and a keyboard with feedback so snappy and sharp it makes typing a dream. 

However, in order to get this ultrabook so air-light, concessions clearly had to be made in the build quality. This is not a laptop that can take being dropped, thanks to the chassis being made of a nano-magnesium alloy base instead of aluminum. This is especially true in the hinge, which has a noticeable wobble to it and does not bode well for its overall lifespan. Another issue stemming from its thing frame is that it can get a bit warm after being exerted for a decent amount of time. And even on normal settings, the fans can get a bit loud.

The audio quality is good as well, being able to discern between various instruments and singing voices when I tested the speakers. However, the volume is lower than most other laptops I’ve tested, so you might have to hook up speakers or use a headset if that poses an issue.

Another defining feature of this laptop is its invisible haptic feedback touchpad which, if you remember my review of the Dell XPS 13 Plus, I am not personally a fan of. First, it’s very inaccessible, as it’s nearly impossible for a person with vision impairment to discern the start and end of their touchpad.

Second, there are often sensitivity issues involved with these sorts of haptic touchpads. Unfortunately, the LG Gram Style is hit with both of these drawbacks. It’s genuinely a terrible, clunky, and annoying pad to use, to the point where I had to switch to a mouse, hurting its portability.

Image 1 of 5

white laptop sitting on desk

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

closeup of white keyboard

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

closeup of white touchpad

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

white laptop sitting on desk

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

white laptop sitting on desk

(Image credit: Future)

Port selection isn’t bad considering the thinness of this ultrabook, with two USB Type-C Thunderbolt 4 ports, one USB Type-A port, one mini SD card reader (something of a rarity these days), and one audio jack. The ethernet port and HDMI port are missing, which hurts the connectivity options, but every other port is accounted for at least, which gives users a decent amount of options - though you may want to invest in a Thunderbolt 4 hub if you plan to connect lots of other devices.

There’s also something I believe that factors into the very high pricing, other than the thin and light chassis. There’s a phenomenon called the ‘Pink Tax,’ which sees products that are marketed to women feature a massive increase in price and a decrease in quality versus products for men or that are gender neutral. 

Looking at the marketing for the LG Gram Style, the promotional material prominently features women, the main draw is how beautiful and lightweight the laptop is, and I noticed that even the accent color for the system’s Theme was set to pink rather than the usual blue of other Windows laptops. Compared to the Pro version, which has better hardware for a slightly higher price, or other ultrabooks with better specs and similar pricing, it feels that LG has succumbed to this ‘Pink Tax’ phenomenon.

  • Design score: 3.5 / 5

LG Gram Style: Performance

white laptop sitting on desk

(Image credit: Future)
  • Functions just fine as a productivity machine
  • Specs are mixed
  • Doesn’t stand out compared to the competition
LG Gram Style: Benchmarks

Here's how the LG Gram Style performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

3DMark: Night Raid: 15,260; Fire Strike: 4,363; Time Spy: 1,593
Cinebench R23 Multi-core: 8,088 points
GeekBench 5: 1,778 (single-core); 8,667 (multi-core)
25GB File Copy: 16.5
Handbrake 1.6: 11:41
CrossMark: Overall: 1,555 Productivity: 1,513 Creativity: 1,668 Responsiveness: 1,367
PCMark 10 (Home Test): N/A
Battery Life (TechRadar movie test): 7 hours, 2 minutes
Sid Meier's Civilization VI: Gathering Storm: (1080p, Ultra): 60 fps; (1080p, Low): 47 fps

When running the benchmarks for the LG Gram Style, I couldn’t help but notice that its overall performance is mediocre. Some of the scores, like the single-core Geekbench, compare to most of its competitors, but others like the multi-core Geekbench, Cinebench, and 3DMark are handily beaten by not only most of its competitors this year but by laptops over a year old on specs just as dated. What’s worse, this laptop weirdly wasn’t capable of running PCMark 10 without crashing, so that data can’t even be compared.

Its specs are a mixed bag, with a solid CPU but the Intel Iris Xe iGPU weighing it down. This was of course the norm for past ultrabooks, but there are laptops this gen at around the same price point releasing with RTX 4000-series GPUs like the Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra, and even the LG Gram Pro features an RTX 3050 for a few hundred bucks more. It’s hard to justify the Gram Style’s price point with only integrated graphics on the table.

In terms of everyday use, it works quite well, being able to handle pretty much any productivity task I threw at it. It’s wired for creative works as well, thanks to its excellent color gamut, CPU, and display. But again, the GPU lacking compared to other ultrabooks buries this, as there are simply better choices on the market if you’re going in that direction.

Like many other ultrabooks from 2022 and earlier, it handles gaming just the same. Mainly stick to low and mid-range PC game options that are more CPU intensive. But with this year already opening up with ultrabooks sticking RTX 4000-series boards in, there’s little excuse for not having the same - especially with how expensive this laptop gets.

  • Performance score: 3 / 5

LG Gram Style: Battery

closeup of time and date

(Image credit: Future)
  • Average battery life
  • Charge time not great

After stress-testing, I found the LG Gram Style to have fairly average battery life. When undergoing the movie test, it lasted about seven hours. And when using it normally, I needed to recharge after a little over six hours. While it’s not offensive, for an ultrabook it isn’t great either. The point of ultrabooks is to have excellent, long-lasting battery life and it feels like - for the price of entry - it should last a lot longer.

Not only that, but charging isn’t particularly fast either, and not especially with the cable it comes with. It takes over an hour to get a full charge, and this is using one of the Thunderbolt 4 ports.

  • Battery score: 2.5 / 5

Should you buy the LG Gram Style?

Buy it if...

You want an extremely lightweight laptop
Most likely the lightest laptop I ever reviewed, it's like lifting air. You won't feel anything at all carrying it around, even with such a large screen size.

You want a visually stunning laptop
This laptop truly lives up to its name, with a white color that is also iridescent. In various lighting conditions, it changes from light pink to light blue.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget
This is an ultrabook through and through and it's certainly priced as such, regardless of its specs.

LG Gram Style: Also consider

If the LG Gram Style has you considering other options, here are two more laptops to consider...

How I tested the LG Gram Style

  • I tested the LG Gram Style for about a week
  • I tested it using a variety of productivity applications
  • I stress-tested the battery using the TechRadar movie test

First, I tested the general weight and portability of the LG Gram Style by carrying it around in a laptop bag. After I set it up, I ran several benchmarks to thoroughly test out the processor and graphics card. Finally, I used a variety of programs and applications to test out both battery life and general performance during work-like conditions. 

The LG Gram Style is an ultrabook that's meant to be both a portable laptop with a thin and light chassis, as well as an excellent productivity machine. I spent a good amount of testing not only on performance issues but looking for any ventilation issues. I also tested out battery life to see how long it could last off AC power.

I've tested plenty of gaming PCs and laptops, making me more than qualified to understand benchmark test results and how to properly stress test machines to see how well they perform as a work machine.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed March 2023

Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision blocked by UK regulator
5:13 pm | April 26, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has ruled against Microsoft’s $68.7 billion acquisition deal of Blizzard Entertainment. As per the CMA, the potential deal for Blizzard Entertainment would make Microsoft a dominant player in the cloud gaming sphere while in turn stifling competition and leaving UK gamers with less choice in the years to come. Cloud gaming needs a free, competitive market to drive innovation and choice. Microsoft already enjoys a powerful position and head start over other competitors in cloud gaming and this deal would strengthen that advantage giving it...

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: a bright screen isn’t enough for this to shine
7:00 am | April 24, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Motorola Edge 30 Neo: Two-minute review

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the baby of the Edge 30 family. It's a fairly petite and light phone that does not cost a fortune and has some great everyday ease of use features like super-fast charging. 

However, compare it to its siblings, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and you have to conclude a lot of the most interesting stuff has been snipped out. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo loses the higher-end build elements, the true high-end camera hardware, and a processor powerful enough to coast through high-end games.

Display quality is the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s main strength. The P-OLED panel has exceptional outdoor visibility and, as usual, an OLED panel leads to a punchy and colorful appearance.

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the back, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)

That is worth some kudos points, but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo can’t compete elsewhere with some of the ultra-aggressive phones available for similar money, like the OnePlus Nord 2T, Nothing Phone 1, and Google Pixel 6a

Those phones take much better low-light photos, play 3D games at higher frame rates, have classier body designs, and capture far higher-quality video.

When you take the high-quality screen away, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo doesn’t actually have all that much going for it in this crowd. However, it still holds real appeal for the less techy phone user.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: price and availability

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Launched in September 2022
  • Cost £349 / AU$599 (around $375) at launch
  • Now reduced to £299.99 in the UK

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo was announced as part of the second wave of Edge 30 phones of 2022, in September 2022, alongside the Edge 30 Ultra and Edge 30 Fusion. 

It launched for £349 / AU$599, which is roughly equivalent to $375 in the US, although at the time of review the phone was not officially on sale in the US. Since launch, the phone has dropped in price in the UK, with the Motorola Edge 30 Neo being widely available for £299.99.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: specs

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the back, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: design

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the back

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Funky Pantone color panel
  • Fairly petite plastic body
  • Very basic IP52 water resistance

Successful phone designs have to seem deliberate, each part chosen carefully. You can do this with a very distinctive 'look', as in the Google Pixel 7 or Samsung Galaxy S23. Or you can use high-end materials like curved glass. 

Motorola has instead evoked the mighty color company Pantone, putting a virtual swatch of one of the company's colors on the back of the purple model. The message: this isn’t just a color, it’s a Pantone-certified color. There are a few different options available, namely Very Peri, Ice Palace, Black Onyx, and Aqua Foam, and it's the first of those that we used for this review.

“Very Peri helps us to embrace this altered landscape of possibilities, opening us up to a new vision as we rewrite our lives,” says Pantone, which calls Very Peri Color of the Year 2022. 

Sure thing. A lovely purple it is too, but the reason for the figurative medal on the back of the Very Peri model is partly to distract from the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s prosaic build.

Its back and sides are plastic, lacking the high-end feel of the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and Edge 30 Ultra. The screen covering is glass, of course, but Motorola does not specify it as Gorilla Glass, which usually means it uses a cheaper form of toughened glass from another brand.

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the back

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The purple is nice, the lightly sparkly finish on the plastic rear looks good. And, from what we can tell from online images, the other green, white and black shades look good too. But this is actually one of the less impressively-built phones in this class. Vivo, OnePlus, Google and Nothing all offer at least some use of glass or aluminum outside of the display panel at this level.

However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is at least light and pocketable. It weighs just 155g, and is around 7.8mm thick. Thin and light. Motorola also includes a slim snap-on case in the box, rather than the much floppier silicone kind it usually bundles with its phones.

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has no memory card slot or headphone jack, because it’s self-consciously not a true budget model. And it also has an in-screen fingerprint sensor, not the side-mounted kind used in most cheaper Motorolas. 

This is one of the slowest in-screen fingerprint sensors we’ve used recently though. While that means it takes maybe 1/2 to 2/3 of a second to work, it’s still noticeable. And it is also more picky about the position of your finger than others, sometimes requiring a concerted press – presumably to ensure the thumb/finger is fully covering the pad area. 

Motorola says the Neo is water resistant to IP52, a form of protection so weak you should treat it like it has no water resistance rating at all. Finally, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has stereo speakers, and they are fairly loud and tonally solid, although the highest frequencies can get a little sharp when maxed. Still, a decent array.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: display

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the front, in someone's hand

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Brilliantly bright screen
  • Good color
  • 120Hz OLED delivers smoothness and excellent contrast

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's design may seem better from afar than in your hand, but the screen is an unexpected smash. It’s a petite 6.28-inch P-OLED panel with class-leading outdoor visibility.

Indoors the screen is capped to around 475 nits of brightness, enough to make the Motorola Edge 30 Neo slightly painful to look at in a dimly lit room. Outdoors on a sunny day it will hit up to 923 nits, which is extremely high for a lower mid-range phone – for almost any Android phone, actually, despite so many manufacturers claiming their screens are capable off 1,300-nit brightness.

The result is the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's screen looks very clear even in harsh direct sunlight.

Spec-wise the display is otherwise pretty normal. It’s a 1080 x 2400 pixel 120Hz panel with two color modes, Natural and Saturated. They perform just as their names suggest.

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a potent screen. But it does not support HDR video, for no obvious reason. The screen has the contrast, the brightness, and the color depth for the job. This could also be a limitation of the Snapdragon 695 processor, but then the Sony Xperia 10 IV uses the same chipset and does support HDR video playback. 

We’re going to have to shrug this one off.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: software and performance

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the front

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Snapdragon 695 is not a great gaming chipset
  • Good, non-bloated software
  • 128GB storage for your apps and photos

If you’re upgrading to the Motorola Edge 30 Neo from an older Motorola phone, you may notice this one looks a little different. That’s because, drum roll, it defaults to using a custom 'Moto' system font rather than a plainer Android one. 

It goes some way to making the Motorola Edge 30 Neo feel less like a 'vanilla' Android phone than other Motos, but if you don’t like it you can change it with a few screen taps and presses. And Motorola has otherwise not changed the classic Moto interface much here. 

This is a relatively clean and unencumbered version of Android with a handful of neat additions that can be toggled on and off in the Moto app. These include physical gestures to, for example, open the camera app or toggle the torch. 

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has Moto’s custom lock screen, Peek Display, which looks good and shows icons for recent notifications. However, unlike some other Moto phones there’s no “always on” display mode here.

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo from the front

(Image credit: TechRadar)

While general performance is good, we couldn’t help but notice app loads tend to be slightly slower than in the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, the phone we switched from. 

This is no great surprise given the Fusion has a flagship-tier chipset, while the Neo has a much less impressive mid-tier one. 

It’s the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, paired with 8GB of RAM and a 128GB of storage. This scores 1,901 in Geekbench 5. That's a little over half the score achieved by the OnePlus Nord 2T and its Dimensity 1300 chipset, or the Pixel 6a and its Google Tensor chip. 

The gap widens if we switch to a more GPU-dependent test like 3DMark’s Wild Life. Where the Moto scores 1,214 points, the OnePlus Nord 2T can hit around 4,600, and the Pixel 6a 6,300. 

Sometimes wide gaps in GPU performance are not all that noticeable in today’s games, but they are here. Fortnite will only run at the basic 'Medium' setting, and frame rate stability is not that great even at this level, which makes the game look significantly worse than in some other phones near the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s price. This mobile is clearly not made primarily for gamers.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: cameras

The cameras on a Motorola Edge 30 Neo

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • Camera tends to slightly overexpose images
  • Disappointing low-light performance in spite of OIS
  • Poor video quality

The hardware situation improves in the camera, at least superficially. Motorola only put two cameras on the Edge 30 Neo, but that simply means we miss out on the poor depth or macro sensors commonly seen in this price category. 

There’s a 64MP primary camera with OIS (optical image stabilization), and a 13MP ultra-wide. Both are technically above average, thanks to the use of OIS, and a higher-res, larger sensor ultra-wide than plenty of affordable mid-tier Androids. 

The main camera uses the 1/1.97-inch Samsung GW3 sensor, as seen in the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, and the ultra-wide a Hynix Hi1336, as used in the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE. Not bad bedfellows, right?

Results aren’t bad either. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo avoids the obviously oversaturated color you’ll often see in aggressively priced rivals from companies like Realme. 

Grass looks roughly as it does to your eyes, and in most shots the sky will look natural too. The phone does at times leave stills with a slight magenta cast, but it’s not immediately obvious. 

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Auto HDR is powerful and mostly reliable, meaning you can shoot pretty carelessly even directly into the sun. Having said that, there is a problem somewhat related to this area.

Slight overexposure seems to be the most common issue. The phone’s camera brain knows how to avoid blowing out bright clouds, but will happily overdo darker (i.e. normal) scenes and inadvertently overexpose elements that aren’t actually that bright in an attempt to make the picture pop. 

You can avoid this by manually dialing down the exposure – a control pops up if you pick a focal point. But we shouldn’t have to. 

And despite the power of the HDR software, too many of our shots were left with skies that look like a blue-to-turquoise gradient, likely an effect of the limited native dynamic range of the sensor. Looking back over the images we took, there are also a surprising number of out-of-focus images shot using the primary camera. Not dozens, but enough to mean it wasn’t pure user error. 

Focusing is not slow but, it would appear, sometimes just does not kick in.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera samples

Image 1 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

The Moto has overcooked this shot, blowing out parts of the church, most likely misled by the shadowed areas in the bottom half of the frame.

Image 2 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

This phone’s images are bright, and avoid comically oversaturated color. But once again the keen exposure leads to some small overexposed areas.

Image 3 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

When the HDR engine kicks in, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo can pretty much cope with whatever you like, including shooting directly into the sun without leaving any parts of the shots looking too shadowy.

Image 4 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Here’s another example of the maximum power of the phone’s Auto HDR processing.

Image 5 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Despite some quibbles, this phone can take generally pleasing photos during the day.

Image 6 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Low-light images just aren’t that good  note how the entire bottom left of this scene is basically black.

Image 7 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

A nice and bright photo with believable color, but again the exposure is a little hot, leading to a blown out portion in the left-most cloud.

Image 8 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Here’s the same scene through the ultra-wide camera. The 13MP sensor lets you comfortably crop into the image more than an 8MP rival.

Image 9 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

In shots like this you wonder why the HDR mode didn’t kick in more than it has to retain some of the background rather than letting it become a white mass.

Image 10 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

One of the more egregious examples of this phone’s over-bright exposure style, leading to much of the horizon becoming overexposed.

Image 11 of 11

A Motorola Edge 30 Neo camera sample

(Image credit: TechRadar)

A shot from the primary camera.

On a more positive note, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 13MP ultra-wide is miles better than some of the 8MP cameras seen in some comparable mid-tier Androids. There’s less distortion at the corners of the frame and its images don’t immediately look compromised as soon as you zoom in a bit.

Low-light performance is below average, though, and not what you might expect given the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has optical image stabilization. The phone has a Night Vision mode for low-light photography, but the results aren’t even in the same league as the Edge 30 Fusion’s.

Dynamic range is limited, detail is very poor outside the brightest parts of the picture, and the effect of Night Vision versus Auto shooting is not that great. Highlights and mid-tones get a boost, but shadow detail retrieval is still not good. 

This wouldn’t matter so much if we were just making a comparison between the Neo and the Fusion, but you can get Fusion-like results from phones such as the OnePlus Nord 2T and the Pixel 6a.

Video is probably the weakest area of the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's camera. You can only shoot at 1080p, at 30fps or 60fps, and clips look pretty awful in either mode. Stabilization is poor, overexposure is common, and the image appears soft, low on detail and, at times, pixelated due to poor handling of objects with hard edges. 

1080p video from the Edge 30 Fusion looks dramatically better. And most phones at this price can at least capture 4K video at 30fps. The Snapdragon 695 institutes a hard limit here, as it tops out at 1080p/60 capture. However, that is no excuse for the poor image quality. 

The front camera has a 32MP sensor that is, unfortunately, not nearly as good as the Samsung s5kgd2 camera used in the step-up Edge 30 Fusion. Fine detail is more likely to end up smushed in less than ideal lighting, and pictures look less confident up close. It’s a perfectly okay selfie camera, just nothing special.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo review: battery

The bottom edge of a Motorola Edge 30 Neo

(Image credit: TechRadar)
  • 4,020mAh battery
  • Lasts all day but not much more
  • 68W wired charging and 5W wireless

The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a 4,020mAh battery, which a worryingly small capacity. That’s lower than the Pixel 6a’s 4,410mAh, and dramatically lower than the Sony Xperia 10 IV’s 5,000mAh. 

It’s a setup for a disaster that never happens, though, because the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s battery life is entirely okay. It won’t last close to two days for most people, like the Sony Xperia 10 IV. But we didn’t find it frustratingly poor, which is what we half expected after seeing the capacity figure. It gets through a full day of use just fine, if not with much to spare by the end of the day. 

This seems further proof that the Snapdragon 695, for all its flaws, is a seriously efficient chipset – having contributed to the Sony Xperia 10 IV’s class-leading stamina. It’s good news for Snapdragon-maker Qualcomm, and non-news for us as battery life is basically not a reason to buy, or not to buy, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. 

Fast charging might be. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo includes a 68W charger and, unlike some of the 80W phones we’ve used recently, it does actually hit that rated charge power.

It takes 45 minutes for the phone to reach 100% charge, from a fully flat state. And it continues drawing charge until the 48 minute mark. 

Motorola has also implemented wireless charging, which is pretty unusual at this level. It tops out at 5W, so will work very slowly, but might appeal if you use a wireless charging pad on your desk at work.

Should you buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo?

Buy it if...

You want a bright screen
Its specs look pretty standard on paper but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an exceptionally bright screen, one that looks very clear outside on sunny days. This is probably the phone’s strongest area, and does wonders for its all-round usability.

A smaller phone appeals
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is light and fairly small, making it easy to handle compared to other mid-tier Androids, some of which feel absolutely huge by comparison. And the screen is still large enough to make watching YouTube feel comfortable.

You want a decent ultra-wide camera
This phone has a zero-fat approach to the camera, with a mostly decent primary camera and an above average 13MP ultra-wide. It’s better than the 8MP one used in a lot of more affordable mid-range Androids.

Don't buy it if...

You’re big into mobile gaming
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is not the most powerful gaming phone you can get for the money. Not even close. Top-tier titles like Fortnite do not run particularly well on the phone, so think twice if you play demanding 3D games a lot.

You care about low-light photo quality
Despite having optical image stabilization, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo cannot take particularly good low-light images. They don’t have anything like the shadow detail or dynamic range of top performers in this class.

You want a phone with high-end build
This is an all-plastic phone. Look elsewhere if you want the touch of luxury a glass back or aluminum sides provide. Such niceties are available at the price if you’re willing to shop around. The OnePlus Nord 2T is one example.

Motorola Edge 30 Neo: Also consider

There are lots of other phones at around this sort of price, including the following three options.

First reviewed: April 2023

Pure Free City e-bike review: Retro hybrid charm that falls slightly short
3:00 pm | April 23, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Pure Free City: One minute review

If you're looking for a fairly conventional electric bike the Pure Free City model is well worth considering. Everything about this two-wheeler is from the past, save for the battery and electric motor. Perhaps because of that, and the way it’s been built, the Pure Free City is quite likable in a retro kind of way. 

You get a step-through frame design, narrow spoked rims and tires, a workmanlike saddle, basic pedals, and caliper brakes. In a lot of ways that’s what makes the Pure Free City e-bike a safe bet, and it’s reasonably affordable too at just over a thousand quid. The downside is this is a hefty bike to lug around, with all of the weight sitting at the back end.

Usefully, however, the sober styling makes the Pure Free City of less appeal to thieves, which is always a bonus if you’re going to make regular forays into the less salubrious areas of town. If you can overlook the compromises in build quality and performance, this is a chunky everyday ride that’s simple but effective, although it might not quite make the list of best electric bikes

Pure Free City: Specifications

Pure Free City: Price and release date

Pure Free City electric bike

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • £999 in the UK
  • Approximately $1,340 / AU$1,900
  • Not available in other markets (except by international shipping)

The Pure Free City e-bike is available now and costs £999. The bike isn’t available in other markets, but if it was you’d be paying around $1,340 in the US and AUS $1,900 in Australia. Whichever way you look at it, the Pure Free City e-bike represents pretty good value for money.

Pure Free City: Design

Pure Free City electric bike

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • Simple design choices
  • Good for a first electric bike
  • Drab colorway

Pure has definitely played it safe with the styling of the Free City bike, but that’s actually not a problem. The plain and simple appeal of this bike will be a hit with anyone who’s moving up to their first electric cycle, and the step-through unisex frame makes it a doddle to ride by just about anyone. 

This being a relatively affordable electric bike, there is something of an issue with weight. The Pure Free City e-bike is quite heavy and weighs in at 23kg. The other thing that’s most noticeable as you lift it out of the box it arrives in is that this weight is largely found at the back. 

There’s a chunky battery pack, which sits under the cargo rack above the rear wheels. There’s a hub motor too, which along with the gearset, chain guard and what not leaves you with little desire to manhandle it very far. No matter though, because you’ve got the benefit of electric propulsion, which is just as well considering the bulk of the bike.

Our review model arrived in a very low-key black, with some minimalist Pure graphics and little else to provide much in the way of visual thrills. Again though, this actually works if you want a bike that isn’t going to turn heads. It’ll fit into a bike rack in town or at the supermarket and nobody will notice it. An e-bike with that credential is always a bonus in our experience. 

Full marks to Pure for making the Free City model a complete package, which doesn't have the annoying need to add on lots of vital extras. You get a luggage/pannier rack over the back wheels, the front and rear lights seem to be very good indeed and there’s the added benefit of full mudguards. 

While the saddle is very basic it does provide decent levels of comfort on short runs, which is what this e-bike is all about.

On first impression then the construction, fit and finish is reasonably on the money, though there are obvious compromises to be found along the way.

  • Design score: 3/5

Pure Free City: Performance

Pure Free City electric bike

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • Low range
  • Delivers as promised
  • 7 speed Shimano gearing is reliable

Given the 23kg weight of the Pure Free City electric two-wheeler it’s fair to expect rather pedestrian performance. In essence, that’s exactly what you get. The 250W motor is more than adequate, and there are three different power modes. These let you increase your speed in increments, 9mph, 12mph or 15mph as a maximum, which is standard fare for e-bikes in the UK.

Delivery of said power isn’t as smooth as some bikes we’ve ridden, but it is there when you need it. We’re also keen on the 7-speed Shimano gearing, which rarely disappoints and is no exception here. Range is a fairly economical 28 miles, so you might find that on occasions you’ll be relying on those gears more than expected as the battery ebbs away. However, a six-hour charge can get the power pack up to 100% ready for your next jaunt. All necessary cables come included.

As outlined above, the Pure Free City is a heavy bike, which combined with a rider on board can push the battery pack to the max. While it is possible to ride the e-bike with a less intense setting, we found that it worked to best effect with the most potent propulsion mode. Without assistance the bike is a hefty beast to haul around, so chances are you’ll do the same. 

Nevertheless, the 28 miles official range is good enough for trips to the shops, which appears to be the main thinking behind this bike. It’s got enough zestiness to be useful on a trip to the country too, but you might tend to keep an eye on the available power that’s left to avoid pushing the thing home again. The quoted six hours to recharge seems about right in our experience following a near flat run out on the two-wheeler.

  • Performance score: 3/5

Pure Free City: Buy it if...

Pure Free City: Don't buy it if...

Pure Free City: Also consider

First reviewed: June 2022

Swann CoreCam review: an easy-to-install wireless security camera with an informative app
6:00 pm | April 21, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

One-minute review

With its wide range of products in the security monitoring and consumer electronics space, Australian company Swann is today well known in more than 40 countries worldwide. Swann sells a customizable range of wireless devices and wired CCTV surveillance systems that feature video resolutions from 1080p Full HD to 4K Ultra HD. The Swann CoreCam is just one model of off-the-shelf wireless smart camera that you can buy from the brand's online selection.

Stylish and fuss-free in design, the Swann CoreCam wireless smart security camera comes with a rechargeable 6,000mAh lithium battery. Screws and plugs are included in the box, which make it easy – even for a DIY novice – to affix the camera to a wall. Once I had charged the camera battery via the micro-USB cable included (note that a plug isn't supplied), the trickiest part of setting up was deciding where to place the CoreCam.

The smart camera is weatherproof and can be positioned inside or outside. I chose to place it on an external wall of my home, overlooking my driveway. While I received instant alerts when it detected a person or package at my front door, I did experience some delay of the live feed whenever I tried to access it via the Swann app – possibly a result of poor Wi-Fi coverage. As such, if you’d like to place the CoreCam outside, you'll need to make sure your home Wi-Fi signal is strong enough. 

Overall, however, the camera did well to send instant alerts whenever someone passed, and recorded clips that I could easily view on a timeline in the app. 

Keep scrolling to find out how the Swann CoreCam performed outside my home and head to our best home security cameras guide for more comparisons.

Swann CoreCam review price & availability

  • List price: $129.99/£99.99/$AU 179 
  • Available in US, UK and Australia

Swann sells a wide range of security cameras, which are customizable depending on your requirements. The single CoreCam wireless security camera works well on its own, or as part of a larger smart home security setup with multiple cameras and alarms. These can all be linked to work in harmony and controlled easily via the Swann app. 

The Swann CoreCam is sold direct from the brand's website or via resellers such as Best Buy,  Walmart and JB Hi-Fi.

It arrives with a local 32GB microSD card pre-installed, which allows it to store video clips. To get the best from the camera, you'll need to sign up to a storage subscription service to benefit from the warranty, the best detection smart alerts, and cloud storage. Subscription services cost from $2.99 / £2.99 / $AU5.55 per month; plus you get a free three-month trial when you buy the camera. This stores video footage for up to 60 days in the cloud and offers extras such as Package, Pet & Vehicle detection in addition to the Person heat and motion detection.   

  • Price: 4/5

Swann CoreCam review specifications

These specs are the same for US and UK Swann CoreCam models.

Swann CoreCam capturing a person on camera

(Image credit: Future | Photo by Emily Peck)

Swann CoreCam review design

  • 100-degree wide angle view 
  • Weatherproof casing 
  • Built-in speaker and siren

The design of the Swann CoreCam is simple, yet the camera feels solid and well built. Finished in white, it possibly isn't the most discreet security camera you can buy; but if you're looking for a small and compact shape that won't interfere too much with your exterior decor, it feels like a safe bet. 

The CoreCam arrives with a rechargeable 6,000mAh lithium battery inside, which took six hours to fully charge. Built into the camera head is the local 32GB microSD card and True Detect PIR heat and motion sensor. There’s a speaker and siren, and lens with 100-degree wide-angle view, all built into the weatherproof design.

The Swann CoreCam also offers a pretty decent night vision distance of up to 50ft / 15m, and I was able to see clearly once night had fallen. However, the camera doesn't move around with whatever it has captured, which I think would provide more scope for better monitoring. 

Getting the camera out of the box and onto the wall took less than an hour. It was simply a matter of ensuring the wall I was fixing it to was suitable for a screw and mount, and then use the mounting kit included in the box to attach the mount to the wall. The camera can then be easily screwed on and off for recharging. While there's a USB charging cable included in the box, there's no plug, so I had to use my own.  

  • Design: 4 / 5

Swann CoreCam app control

The Swann CoreCam app features a range of information and controls (Image credit: Future | Photo by Emily Peck)

Swann CoreCam review performance

  • Live feed and recording of video and audio
  • Wi-Fi connection (2.4GHz)
  • Two-way talk and night vision

The CoreCam camera comes with all the usual features you’d expect from an intuitive smart home security camera, including heat and motion sensing, night vision and two-way talk.

Having charged the camera, I screwed the camera head onto the mount. I downloaded the Swann app and paired the camera with my smartphone over Wi-Fi. This was a surprisingly quick and smooth process. I then simply needed to move the camera head around on its mount to adjust the live video footage that was being fed to the app.

In terms of view, the camera could then send a 1080 HD quality feed to the app on my phone, with a wide-angle view of 100 degrees. This isn’t as wide as I’d like, but it did capture an ample area by the main entrance leading to my house – with the stairs and part of the drive in frame. Purists may find the feed a little grainy, but I was generally impressed. The color night vision was satisfactory, too. You can actually adjust the live view quality in the app from low to medium to high, depending on your preference.

Featuring True Detect technology, the camera has the ability to detect people, packages, pets and vehicles (depending on the subscription package you sign up for). You get the first three months for free, included in the price of the camera. So once I was linked to the app, I could set up on the 90-day free Unlimited Plan. This meant that the camera could generate motion clips whenever it detected someone passing by, or thought there was a package left in its view, and send me push notifications on my smartphone to alert me. I found the alerts came through thick and fast in the first week; it was usually the postman, visitors or footage of myself walking out to put the rubbish bins out. Luckily, no intruders in sight. 

While the alerts came through instantly whenever there was something detected, I did notice that there was a slight delay when I went to view the live feed. This was possibly due to my Wi-Fi or 4G connection playing up. Sometimes I was able to connect faster than at other times. 

Swann CoreCam mounted on exterior wall

(Image credit: Future | Photo by Emily Peck)

While there's no 24-hour recording capability, I do like the way the camera can distinguish between a person or a package, generating a motion clip and sending an alert to my smartphone. 

However, after a while, the frequency of the alerts became rather annoying. I realized that I could adjust the sensitivity of the camera to lower the frequency of the alerts when I was at home, reducing false alerts and prolonging battery life as a result. You do this through the Modes section, which has settings for when you’re Home, Away and at Night. 

While these modes are useful for adjusting the sensitivity on a single camera, I think this part of the app really comes into its own as part of an extended home security setup with multiple Swann cameras and an alarm all linked up. 

  • Performance: 4/5

Swann CoreCam review app

  • Live view with siren, two-way talk and camera
  • Modes to adjust sensitivity
  • Playback tab for motion recordings

The smart app brings lots of useful features, although possibly more than you'll need for just one camera. As well as the ability to adjust the sensitivity of the camera and reduce/increase the number of alerts you receive, there's also a chart that presents stats on the level of motion detected, the number of people and pets the camera captured over the course of a day, and over a week. Although interesting, it was perhaps a little unnecessary for my needs. 

I found all the recorded activity clear to see under the Playback tab in the app. It's presented in a daily timeline that's stored in the cloud from seven up to 60 days (depending on the subscription package you sign up to).

Click on the Live View mode in the app, and you can also make use of all the extras. These include the ability to take photos of the live view, record footage if needed, turn on the siren if you see cause for alarm, or just speak to the person in the picture. I tried the two-way talk feature when the postman came past and it worked well. 

  • App: 4/5

Swann CoreCam app control

The app comes with lots of useful features  (Image credit: Swann CoreCam )

Swann CoreCam review battery life

  • Takes 6 hours to charge 
  • USB to micro-USB charging cable
  • Up to 90 days of battery life depending on how you use it

The CoreCam's battery can last up to 90 days, but of course this will depend on how much you use the camera to record extra clips, take photos and how you configure the sensitivity modes. With the Away mode on, which signals high alert, I found the battery lasted around 12 days before it needed recharging. If you were to use Home mode, which reduces the amount of times you are disturbed with unnecessary alerts, the battery is likely to last longer. 

To recharge the camera I simply unscrewed it from the mount and took it indoors; via USB cable, the unit took six hours to top up to full. Note that while the cable is supplied, the plug isn't, so you'll need to source one for yourself.

  • Battery life: 3/5

Should you buy the Swann CoreCam home security camera?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Swann CoreCam review: also consider

If you want an outdoor security camera but want to shop around before you buy, here are a couple more options to consider...

How I tested the Swann CoreCam home security camera

  • I used the Swan CoreCam in my home for one month
  • I monitored my home both day and night to see how well it performed 

I trialled the Swann CoreCam at home over the course of a month. I attached it to the wall on the exterior of my property and paired it with the Swann app on my smartphone to monitor any comings and goings. 

I took note of how quickly and successfully it sent alerts to my smartphone when it detected human motion or a parcel, both day and night. I tried logging into the app when I was away from home (over 4G) and when I was at home (over Wi-Fi), too.  

Read more about how we test

First reviewed February 2023

Google Play to allow third-party billing options in the UK
12:55 pm | April 20, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Google detailed its propositions on billing for Android developers in the United Kingdom. The set of potential commitments includes lowering fees for app distribution and in-app purchases and introducing an alternative in-app billing system, presented in a neutral manner. The proposals are part of the UK’s Competition and Market Authority (CMA) investigation of whether Google infringed competition law by making app developers use only Google Play Billing (GPB). The changes for British developers are similar to what is already happening in Continental Europe - the service fee will be...

Polar Ignite 3 review: A mid-range running watch for fitness data nerds
5:38 pm | April 19, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Polar Ignite 3: One minute review

The Polar Ignite 3 is a follow up to the hugely impressive Polar Ignite 2, which emerged back in 2021. A couple of years is a long time in the fast-moving world of smartwatch tech, so Polar has revised the already excellent and undeniably attractive Ignite design to reflect as much. 

The good news is that it still delivers the same value appeal, sitting nicely into the mid-range pricing category, which makes it an affordable option for those looking for one of the best running watches on a budget. 

The vibrant AMOLED display is a definite highpoint, but there are also new features including multi-band GPS (which brings it up to par with other mid-range Garmins) and powerful statistics tools like SleepWise, which proves impressive at monitoring your levels of shut-eye. The svelte and very lightweight design means it sits easily on the wrist, even during sleep. 

Unfortunately, the Polar Ignite 3 is also plagued by less than impressive battery life and a touchscreen interface that frequently feels sluggish, verging on buggy. If you can live with its frustrating edge, it can offer pretty good value for money, but there are better options at this price point.

Polar Ignite 3: Specifications

Polar Ignite 3: Price and availability

Polar Ignite 3

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • $329.95 in the US
  • £289 in the UK
  • $428.67 in Australia

The Polar Ignite 3 is available now, directly from Polar itself or via many of the popular online outlets including Amazon. It has a current RRP of $329.95 in the US, £289 in the UK and $428.67 in Australia.  

Polar Ignite 3: Design

  • Bright, bold AMOLED screen
  • Slimline form factor
  • Cool color choices

The Polar Ignite 3 looks very tempting on the box, but it’s not until you take the watch out of its packaging that you realise just how good this slender creation looks. It’s just 9.5mm thick, weighs only 35 grams but still has a spacious touchscreen to enjoy. 

The 1.28-inch display is perhaps the highpoint of this model, which once powered up is gorgeous to look at with crisp, clear and very vibrant colours to enjoy. The edge of the bezel has a neat array of vertical grooves around its edge, although this does look and feel like it could be susceptible to marks and scratches over time.

It can be found in a number of colour options, including Night Black, Purple Dusk, Greige Sand and Brown Copper, so there’s a look that’ll suit just about any taste. Our review example was the Brown Copper model, which came with a spare strap in the box for when wear and tear gets the better of the original. 

Also in the box is a selection of micro manuals for just about any language plus a USB charging cable, which mates to the watch via a magnetic clip on the back. 

Meanwhile, the design of the supporting Polar Flow app is very respectable, with plenty of detailed metrics to get stuck into. It’s got comprehensive historic graphs of all your major data points with no additional subscription fees. It’s not quite as intuitive as it could be: it eschews nice well-rounded Sleep and Readiness scores in favor of complex graphs and data deep-dives, so it’s more for regular runners and data nerds rather than lifestyle and activity. 

Nevertheless, once you’ve figured out where everything lives, it is pretty comprehensive on the data front.

  • Design Score: 4/5

Polar Ignite 3: Features

Polar Ignite 3

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • SleepWise monitors shut-eye closely
  • Customizable widgets work well
  • Polar Flow app is nicely designed

While it’s undoubtedly a good-looking thing, the Polar Ignite is slightly less impressive on the typical smartwatch features front. At first glance, it has most things you need, with notification services for emails and messages, alarms, timers and the ability to control your music all housed inside the interface. Dig a little deeper though and there are omissions. There is no way to make contactless payments, which is increasingly appealing for folks at places like the gym or on a run, who don’t want to carry anything else with them.

Similarly missing is any way of answering calls, and you can’t ping off a text from the watch either, only receive one. In fact, if you want to get any real mileage from the Polar Ignite 3, you’ll most likely end up taking your phone with you, because you’ll need it to tap into your music collection due to limited storage on board the watch itself. 

The GPS system can track your route on a localised run but, again, it feels like the features are a little underwhelming. It’s a shame to have the watch so tethered to your phone, especially when the UX promises so much on your first viewing.

SleepWise analyses your sleep patterns well enough as does Nightly Recharge, which reports back on how your body deals with stress. Polar’s FitSpark service offers up on-demand exercise suggestions should you need them, which also cleverly take into account your training load and recovery needs. For example, on the day after a hard run, it’ll recommend a less strenuous exercise than it might on a day which you’re fully recovered, and you have a better Nightly Recharge score. In-training voice guidance from the watch is another cool add-on. 

Getting to the features and functions is where the frustration creeps in though: we found basic tasks, such as starting a cross-trainer session, erratic and less than user-friendly. People who are exercising want quick and easy access to simple Stop/Start controls, which just doesn’t seem to happen with the Polar Ignite 3. There’s too much fiddling around the watch face itself, not enough immediacy. No-one wants to waste time in the gym. 

  • Features score: 3/5

Polar Ignite 3: Performance

Polar Ignite 3

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • Dual-frequency GPS is solid
  • Latest processor is a step-up
  • Energy source breakdown is neat

While everything initially appears good in both the looks department and the feature setlist, it’s once you start using the Polar Ignite 3 that some holes start to appear. After installing the supporting Polar app, the setup process was okay – but not as seamless as some of its counterparts. The Polar Ignite 3 has subsequently seemed to be less than enthusiastic during syncing too, with often a few tries needed in order to get the process to kick into gear. 

More annoying though is the less-than-simple way this watch works during everyday use. It frequently seems unresponsive, promoting confusion as to whether or not it’s doing anything. That means repeated interaction with the screen, or pressing of the back button on the left-hand side of the bezel. 

This in itself feels quite stiff and unresponsive. It’s understandable to have a button that can’t be inadvertently pressed, thereby avoiding cancellation of workouts and suchlike, but it’s a bit too unforgiving for its own good.

Battery life isn’t too great either. Polar suggests that you’ll get up to five days in watch mode or up to 30 hours of continuous training using the GPS and heart rate monitoring features. That may well be right, but we found the watch battery ebbed away quite quickly during average everyday use, prompting you to feel like you need to charge it more frequently than the official figures suggest. 

Overall, performance and usability shortcomings are perhaps the biggest weakness with the Polar Ignite 3, which is a shame given just how good it looks.

  • Performance score: 3/5

Polar Ignite 3: Buy it if...

Polar Ignite 3: Don't buy it if...

Also consider

First reviewed: April 2023

Weekly deals: the best smartphone deals from the UK, Germany, the US and India
1:31 am | April 17, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Patience is a virtue – and savings too as smartphones both old and new have been slowly going down the price ladder. Also, this week there are a few bundles that include a free laptop, a free game or just a gift card. Use the links below to jump to your region. The UK Germany USA India UK The base Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (256GB storage) is £1,250 on Samsung.com. It costs that much on Amazon too, but the retailer will include a Galaxy Chromebook Go for free. This is as basic as it gets, an 11.6” laptop with an Intel Celeron N4500 (2 cores, 1.1GHz base, 2.8GHz...

« Previous PageNext Page »