Organizer
Gadget news
Realme Neo8 comes with Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, an 8,000mAh battery, and an IP69 rating
4:41 pm | January 22, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Realme Neo8 has just gone official in China. It is the latest entry in the Neo series and comes with a large 8,000mAh battery and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset. The phone is available for purchase in three colors. It sports a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with a Full-HD+ resolution and a refresh rate of up to 165Hz. The Neo8 uses the Samsung M14 panel that is claimed to deliver a peak brightness of 6,500 nits. At the back, the phone features a transparent design with the ‘Awakening Halo’ RGB light strip that corresponds to notifications and more. The rear panel is made from glass...

Apple’s next wearable tipped to be an AI pin with cameras
3:07 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

Fancy an Apple-branded wearable AI pin? A new report suggests Apple is working on a compact AI-powered pin, roughly the size of an AirTag. If it makes it to market, the device would mark Apple’s first product built primarily around AI and could run the revamped Siri chatbot. According to a report from The Information, the wearable is still in development, though the project could face delays or even be shelved altogether. An AI-generated image of the rumored Apple AI pin. The AI pin is reportedly circular in shape, closely resembling the AirTag in both size and design, with an...

I tested this budget, subscription-free fitness tracker and it actually offers Whoop some serious competition – especially in terms of value
3:06 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Fitness Trackers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Comments: Off

Amazfit Helio Strap: One minute review

The Amazfit Helio Strap is a good lower-cost alternative to a Whoop band or even some of the best fitness trackers like Fitbit, as long as you enter with the right expectations. The hardware itself is substantially cheaper, and no subscription is required for day-to-day use of a Helio Strap.

In return, you get all-day health and fitness tracking, with more of a focus on active forms of exercise than some lifestyle wearables. Amazfit doesn’t provide quite as explicit training readiness insights as a Whoop band, but with stats that focus on your training load and overall condition, it doesn’t take a degree in sports science to join the dots for yourself and get most of the benefits.

This is a less upmarket band than some of the competition. Its central part is plastic, with no metal parts, but this is a win for comfort as it further lowers weight.

Amazfit Helio Strap: Specifications

Amazfit Helio Strap

(Image credit: Future / Andrew Williams)

Component

Amazfit Helio Strap

Price

$99.99 / £99.00 / $179.00AU

Dimensions

33.97 x 24.3 x 10.59mm

Weight

20g with band

Case/bezel

Fiber-reinforced polymer

Display

N/A

GPS

N/A

Battery life

Up to 10 days

Connection

Bluetooth

Water resistant

Yes, 5ATM

Amazfit Helio Strap: Price and availability

  • It costs $99.99 / £99.00 / $179.00AU
  • Less than the Polar Loop
  • Much less than the ongoing Whoop subscription

Despite having less tech inside than a more traditional fitness tracking wearable, the pricing of these screenless wearables (other than the Whoop MG) is less aggressive than some other categories. It’s because they’re a lifestyle buy as much as anything

The Amazfit Helio Strap is one of the better-priced options, though. It costs $99.99 / £99.00 / $179.00AU, far less than a Whoop band or the Polar Loop.

There’s no need for an ongoing subscription here either, although one is of course offered. It’s called Aura (not to be confused with Oura). This adds an AI-based wellness advisor and lots of audio-based relaxation content, costing $69.99 (around £52 / AU$100) a year, although during testing we were offered a year’s worth for £19.99. There’s a 14-day free trial too.

  • Value score: 4/5

Amazfit Helio Strap: Design

Amazfit Helio Strap

(Image credit: Future / Andrew Williams)
  • Screen-free
  • Does not feel premium, no metal
  • Extremely light – set and forget

The Amazfit Helio Strap is a screen-free wearable, and an exceptionally light one. It weighs just 20g, strap included. You can thank the relatively low-frills style of the central unit for this, which is just a puck of plastic. All you see when wearing the Hello Strap is the fabric of the strap itself, which hooks up to the tracker’s block using traditional watch fastenings. Amazfit also offers an arm strap, should you prefer to wear it off the wrist.

I have at times had to check whether the watch was actually still attached, which is just not something that happens with the GPS running watches I tend to wear daily. There is one important caveat to note on the design, though; the Amazfit Helio Strap is not as slimline as you might guess. It sticks out a way from your wrist and its sides don’t fully hug its surface either. In person it’s thicker than the Coros Pace 4 watch I was using at the same time, which is at odds with the vibe most of these screenless wearables try to give out.

That said, Amazfit doesn’t sell the Helio Strap as a casual step and sleep tracker. It apparently has the keener exerciser in mind, as you can see from the Hyrox-themed strap attached here. Hyrox and Amazfit have entered a partnership (Amazfit is now the official timekeeper for the event), but the standard version of the strap is plain two-tone dark grey.

This watch isn’t a friend to those tight-fit long-sleeved base layers that hug the wrist, but actually wearing the Hello Strap has been an entirely discomfort-free experience. Of course, you will still need to make the strap reasonably tight for the most accurate heart rate results so the little sensor mount on the back will leave an imprint in your wrist. It comes with the territory.

Amazfit rates the watch’s water resistance at 5ATM, so you won’t have to take it off too often. The official guidance is the Helio Strap is “suitable for splashes, snow, showering, swimming” but shouldn’t be worn in the sauna or for a “hot shower” as the steam can damage the internal seals.

  • Design score: 4/5

Amazfit Helio Strap: Features

Amazfit Helio Strap

(Image credit: Future / Andrew Williams)
  • Relatively slight on features
  • Transmit HR data to gym machines and fitness watches
  • Set up to 10 haptic alarms

Wearables like the Amazfit Hello Strap are not out to wow us with their expansive feature lists (after all, they’re designed not to be interacted with) but it does do more than you might guess.

It has a temperature sensor, for example, used to check for variations from the norm overnight. Such a change could be an indicator of illness. You can set up to 10 alarms too, which use the Helio Strap’s vibration motor to alert you. It’s not a massively powerful buzz, though, so you might not want to rely on it to wake you up for work each day.

A little unusual for a screenless wearable, Amazfit also stresses its active fitness tracking skills. You can manually start a specific tracked exercise in the app on your phone, and the Helio Strap can also be set to automatically detect workouts and log them as such. When you start a tracked session in the app, the Helio Strap can transmit live heart rate data to another device. Some more advanced gym machines support this, as do cycling computers and some fitness watches. It uses Bluetooth for this, not ANT+, which was the classic technology of heart rate chest straps.

What else is there to note? The Hello Strap uses a tiny little charge puck that connects to a pair of metal contacts on the back. Easy to lose, but also easy to transport in a pocket.

  • Features score: 4/5

Amazfit Helio Strap: Performance

Amazfit Helio Strap

(Image credit: Future / Andrew Williams)
  • Battery life as described
  • Solid heart rate accuracy
  • Plenty of metrics provided in-app

Low upkeep is one of the best parts of the Amazfit Hello Strap. Despite weighing next-to-nothing, Amazfit still says it delivers “up to 10 days” of battery life. And that is entirely consistent with our experience. After using it for a week, the Helio Strap had 35% charge left. While two-week battery watches with screens are common enough, they weigh a lot more than the Helio Strap.

A lot of this wearable’s metrics rely on heart rate data. The Hello Strap’s is mostly solid with some small issues that may not dull its appeal too much, especially at this price point. Throughout the day, passive tracking is decent and there are no wild spikes as you walk around your home or office. This can happen when a tracker takes any sign of walking as a suggestion your HR is likely rising fast.

You don’t manually start tracked activities on the watch, but when comparing the results of long runs on the Helio Strap with those of a chest strap, though, the Amazfit Hello Strap occasionally overestimates heart rate by around 10bpm. Not a hugely meaningful difference to most, and certainly good enough for an indication of heart rate zones, but still not quite as accurate as the best Apple Watches. Amazfit does talk about the Helio Strap as a wearable to pair with another fitness watch, to fill in stat gaps throughout the day and night, and during other workouts the results were (relatively) bang-on accurate. But there’s definitely scope for tracking accuracy to improve in a firmware update.

As for tracking steps, the Amazon Helio Strap recorded slightly lower counts over a five day period, apart from one day when they were almost identical just 3000 steps apart. Over the five day period the Helio Strap recorded 94% of the steps of the Garmin Forerunner 970. It’s also worth noting the Garmin was worn on my dominant arm (the Helio Strap was not) so that could have a part to play here.

Sleep tracking performance is solid. A couple of nights during testing I wore the Amazfit Helio Strap alongside three other wearables to see how great the disparities would be: the Garmin Forerunner 970, Polar Loop and Coros Pace 4. All four of these watches failed to pick up on any of the moment you briefly wake up and wonder why the alarm clock reads 4:55am. But those times you actually have to get up to go to the toilet? It picks them up. The Amazfit Helio Strap also did consistently note a change in sleep state and heart rate during those missed moments of wakefulness, though the next best thing.

It’s also important not to underrate the quality of the Amazfit Helio Strap app. It’s Zepp, shared with other Amazfit wearables. And its layout is kinda great for the purposes of a wearable like this. On the front page you get a handy summary of stats you likely want to see daily, with a traffic light system too show which (if any) are a bit dodgy. These include resting heart rate, sleep duration, Skin temperature, exertion load and more.

This layout returns in a separate Sleep tab, where we get stats like heart rate variability, Deep Sleep duration and skin temperature, again with the traffic light system.

Amazfit also goes big on a concept called BioCharge, which is an estimation of your overall energy level. The one missing next step is what you get with Whoop, where such data and other bits are used to more explicitly tell you whether you should work out on a specific day or not. And the paid-for Aura subscription is more about wellness and relaxation that that kind of athlete-focused experience.

  • Performance score: 4/5

Amazfit Helio Strap: Scorecard

Category

Comment

Score

Value

Cheaper than most and with a no forced subscription? Typical of Amazfit, the Hello Strap is decent value.

4/5

Design

It may not be a luxury wearable but the super-low weight is fantastic for comfort.

4/5

Features

While screen-free wearables are never feature-packed, this one has a few neat extras including heart rate broadcasting.

4/5

Performance

You get good overall stat accuracy with just some missed wakeful moments during sleep tracking.

4/5

Amazfit Helio Strap: Should I buy?

Amazfit Helio Strap

(Image credit: Future / Andrew Williams)

Buy it if...

You want a good-value screen-free wearable

While not Amazfit’s most aggressively-priced tracker, it beats the big-name competition and then some.

You value comfort highly

At just 20g, you can often forget the Amazfit Helio Strap is even on your wrist.

You want quick daily dose health stats

The Amazfit app does a good job of highlighting unusual health stats, with a colour highlight system.

Don't buy it if...

You want a wearable for run tracking

This band doesn’t have GPS (or a screen, obviously) so is not ideal for more hardcore run training.

If luxury style is a priority

A fabric strap and plastic housing are great for low weight, but there are no luxe touches here.

You want a direct Whoop replacer

The stats the Amazfit Helio Band are much more classic lifestyle fitness tracker fodder instead of Whoop’s hyper-detailed recovery focus.

Also consider

Whoop MG

The most premium version of the original screenless wellness wearable.

Read our full Whoop MG review

Polar Loop

A little more money, but a more premium stainless steel design.

Read our full Polar Loop reviewView Deal

First reviewed: January 2026

Report claims Honor Magic V6 will have the largest battery on a foldable
2:41 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Honor Magic V5 launched last July shipped with a 6,100 mAh Si/C battery in China, while other markets got the foldable with a 5,820 mAh Si/C battery. Honor hasn't revealed the Magic V6's launch date yet, but some of its specs have already surfaced online, with the latest rumor talking about its battery. [#InlinePriceWidget,13982,1#] According to tipster Digital China Station, the Honor Magic V6 will have a battery with a capacity of at least 7,000 mAh, which, if true, would make the V6 a foldable with the highest battery capacity. Machine translated from Chinese to...

Report claims Honor Magic V6 will have the largest battery on a foldable
2:41 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Honor Magic V5 launched last July shipped with a 6,100 mAh Si/C battery in China, while other markets got the foldable with a 5,820 mAh Si/C battery. Honor hasn't revealed the Magic V6's launch date yet, but some of its specs have already surfaced online, with the latest rumor talking about its battery. [#InlinePriceWidget,13982,1#] According to tipster Digital China Station, the Honor Magic V6 will have a battery with a capacity of at least 7,000 mAh, which, if true, would make the V6 a foldable with the highest battery capacity. Machine translated from Chinese to...

NexPhone is a desktop replacement smartphone that multi-boots Android, Linux and Windows 11
1:22 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Nex Computer has been tinkering with ways to get more use out of smartphones for the better half of a decade. The company’s NexDock lineup allows compatible Android phones to power a laptop-style shell for added productivity on the go and its latest attempt is the NexPhone. This is an Android 16 smartphone that also boots Linux (Debian) and Windows 11 and can serve as your one and only computing device. The key here is the custom NexOS, which includes Linux as an app inside its Android interface, which you can freely launch on the go. You also get the option to boot into the...

Huawei introduces nova 15 x ROBBi edition
12:25 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Huawei unveiled the nova 15 series last month in China, which includes the nova 15, nova 15 Pro, and nova 15 Ultra. Alongside these, Huawei had teased a collaboration with ROBBi Global for ROBBi-based themes on the nova 15 smartphones. Now, Huawei has announced a limited edition nova 15 x ROBBi gift box, which includes ROBBi goodies. ROBBi is a Chinese designer art toy, and the ROBBi gift box Huawei announced will include a ROBBi toy, a sticker, a flight tag bag, and a phone case. The ROBBi gift box will only be available with the nova 15 Ultra, which will come with ROBBi-based...

Apple to turn Siri into a full-fledged chatbot with iOS 27, report claims
10:36 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Following confirmation that Google’s Gemini will power Siri’s upcoming revamp, a new report claims Apple will introduce a chatbot-style version of the assistant with its next major software updates. A Bloomberg report claims Apple is working on a new Siri chatbot, internally codenamed Campos, that will roll out with iOS 27, macOS 27, and iPadOS 27 and replace the existing Siri. The report states that the Siri chatbot will function as a standalone app built into Apple devices. It will support natural language conversations similar to ChatGPT and Gemini, and can be invoked using the...

I tested the GTBox T1 – and while the designers did something different with this mini PC, I’m debating whether it was a good idea
10:15 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

GTBox T1: 30-second review

Since Intel stopped its NUC platform, and by its definition guidance, we’ve seen a significant number of mini PC designs that have stepped outside the norms of shape and size in mini systems.

GTBox makes a mix of conventional designs and more out-there options, and the T1 is distinctively different. This NUC-sized motherboard is vertically mounted in a cylindrical speaker case measuring 115mm in diameter and 165mm high.

Because of that ergonomic choice, there is no front or back, only a single I/O section where all the ports and the power button are located. That’s a bit of a crunch, and due to this, there is only one USB4 and LAN port, but there are HDMI and DisplayPort video outs.

Inside the cylindrical speaker case is a punchy AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS processor, Zen 4 architecture from the 2023 Hawk Point series. In this context, it's combined with 32GB of DDR5 memory and a 1TB Gen 4 NVMe SSD.

This makes the T1 a powerful small system eclipsed only by Ryzen AI platforms, and the pre-release pricing is extremely competitive.

However, the downside to this design is that there is no access to the memory or storage, and you are specifically told that opening up the T1 to do this is ‘irreversible’.

If you are happy with those limitations, then the T1 might be a good choice, but the lack of flexibility precludes it from being one of the best mini PCs I've tested. Maybe with the T2, or whatever, GTBox can work out a way to put the mainboard on sliding rails to make memory and storage upgrades (or replacements) possible.

GTBox T1: Price and availability

  • How much does it cost? From $700
  • When is it out? Available now
  • Where can you get it? Direct from GTBox

At the time of review, there is only a single SKU of the GTBox T1 available from the official GTBox site.

That model comes with 32GB of DDR5 and 1TB of storage. The cost is $699.99 for US customers with shipping included. GTBox doesn’t quote specific prices in other currencies, but they will ship to the UK, EU and Switzerland.

One oddity I noticed is that before you add this system to the cart, it tells you that “Free standard shipping on orders over $99” and “Free shipping and tax included in Europe and the United States.”

When you add it, it says that if you spend another $100, you can get free shipping.

I hope that’s a mistake. In both the UK and the EU, there are rules about real price discounts, where you can’t say you’ve made a reduction if you never sold it at the pre-discount price. GTBox has this machine reduced from $799.99 to $699.99, and I suspect it had that from the start.

Looking at competitor systems using the same platform, the candidates include the Bosgame M4 and the Acemagic W1.

The Boxgame M4 has had some hardware changes since I reviewed it, but you can still find the original M4, which uses the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS and costs $559 for the 32GB+1TB SKU, via Amazon.com.

And, the Acemagic W1 is $549, but there is no stock of the memory and storage options. However, Acemagic will sell you the barebones model for only $280.

All of these systems, when in stock, are cheaper than the GTBox T1, and all of them also have the ability to be internally upgraded with extra RAM and storage.

On that basis, the T1 doesn’t look like an especially hot deal.

  • Value: 3 / 5

GTBox T1 mini PC

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

GTBox T1: Specs

Item

Spec

CPU:

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS ( 8C/16T, 3.8GHz up to 4.9GHz)

GPU:

AMD Radeon 780M, 12 cores, up to 2.6 GHz

NPU:

AMD Ryzen AI 16 TOPS (38 TOPS total)

RAM:

32GB DDR5-4800 (16GB x 2) not expandable

Storage:

1TB M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 4

Expansion:

N/A

Ports:

1x USB4, 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x 3.5mm Audio

Networking:

1x 2,5GbE Realtek RTL8125, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2

OS:

Windows 11 Pro (pre-installed)

Base Power:

35W-54W

PSU:

19V 6.32A 120W

Dimensions:

115 x 115 x 165 mm

GTBox T1: Design

  • Speakerific
  • Limited ports
  • Zero internal access

There is something about the mesh covering that speakers use that is lovely to touch, with a distinctly fabric feel. As this system is a computer-in-a-speaker, with a slate blue colour scheme, it looks great perched on the edge of a desk.

That’s where this system was designed to sit, since it doesn’t have any VESA mounting options, and you wouldn’t be able to hear the sounds it generates if it were out of sight.

On top is a circular depression with an LED light that can be set to pulse through various RGB colours via the BIOS. That there isn’t a software component to set this is disappointing, as repeatedly going into the BIOS to make changes seems excessively complicated.

But where this system entirely leaves behind the current world of mini PCs is that it only has one place where ports are accessible, and there is no access whatsoever to the internal system.

All the ports are on a single I/O shield, and that includes five USB ports, one USB4, three USB 3.2 Gen 2 and one USB 2.0. There are both HDMI and DisplayPort, and if you use the USB4 port for video, it allows triple displays to be operated from this one computer.

There is also a 3.5mm audio jack, a single 2.5GbE LAN port, the power inlet and a power button. But there is no security slot to stop anyone from walking off with the T1.

With things so tight in this area, maybe the top might have been utilised for a second USB4 port, but that wasn’t something the designers embraced.

GTBox T1 mini PC

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Having more ports is always better, but what really confronts the reality of this system is the lack of internal access. With no approved way in, should you want more memory (if it's even socketed) or to replace the storage, there are no options. That limitation is problematic for a business customer as it reduces the flexibility of this design considerably.

What you do get is a system with an inherently fairly loud speaker, but you can’t really use this for conferencing, since there is no corresponding microphone.

  • Design: 2.5 / 5

GTBox T1 mini PC

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

GTBox T1: Hardware

  • AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
  • One USB4 port
  • Unused PCIe lanes

Many mini PC builders are turning to AMD, largely due to the affordability of its components and the generous number of PCIe lanes, which allow for an array of high-speed ports. The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a Hawk Point processor that, to my knowledge, was originally released in June of 2023.

This chip boasts eight cores with hyperthreading, enabling it to handle sixteen concurrent threads. It offers a slightly improved power profile over the Ryzen 7 8745H, resulting in modestly higher clock speeds.

While there are several advantages to this processor, but also one notable drawback. That caveat is the age of the 780M GPU, which has now been superseded by the 890M and also the new 8060S integrated GPUs. It’s not Intel UHD Graphics bad, but there are faster options that aren’t discrete video cards.

On the upside, it utilises Zen4 architecture, matching the performance of the previous generation's 7745HX. Additionally, it supports DDR4, DDR5, and the latest LPDDR5x memory standards. Its most significant advantage for mini PC applications lies in the twenty PCIe 4.0 lanes provided by AMD, which facilitate multiple ports and significant expansion capabilities.

The capacity of these lanes has enabled the implementation of USB 4 and Oculink on some systems, but here there is only one USB4 port and no Oculink. However, the M.2 SSD slot does at least get PCIe 4.0 lanes, even if you can’t get inside to use an SSD of this spec in that slot.

GTBox T1 mini PC

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

With only one USB4 port, no Oculink and a single M.2 Gen 4 slot, this machine has PCIe lanes that sit entirely idle and contribute nothing to the overall experience.

Therefore, this system is something of a contradiction, as it has a decent processor and DDR5 memory technology with dual modules, providing ample bandwidth and enhancing GPU performance.

But, there are also at least eight PCIe lanes doing nothing, no way to exploit the PCIe 4.0 M.2 slot, and no expansion path other than using a single USB4 external drive or the LAN.

  • Features: 3.5 / 5

GTBox T1: Performance

Mini PC

GTBox T1

Bosgame M4

CPU

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

Cores/Threads

8C 16T

8C 16T

RAM

32GB DDR5 (2x16GB)

32GB DDR5 (2x16GB)

Storage

1TB GTP3000-1TB

1TB NVMe Kingston OM8PGP41024N

Graphics

Radeon 780M

Radeon 780M

3DMark

WildLife

19813

17746

FireStrike

7726

7448

TimeSpy

3194

3126

Steel Nom Lt.

2765

2559

CineBench24

Single

103

104

Multi

903

909

Ratio

8.8

8.71

GeekBench 6

Single

2587

2609

Multi

12380

12840

OpenCL

30593

26664

Vulkan

25443

31667

CrystalDisk

Read MB/s

3431

4087

Write MB/s

2258

3142

PCMark 10

Office

7458

6992

WEI

8.2

8.2

As a counterpoint to the T1, I chose the excellent Bosgame M4. But if you go to the Bosgame website now and select the M4, it shows as discontinued for the M4 Neo and the M4 Plus. However, it is still possible to get the original M4 from other outlets.

The reason I went with the M4 was that it uses the same CPU, GPU, and memory as the T1, giving some indication of whether the T1 is a good version of this platform.

And, looking at the first part of this benchmark collection, all the signs are good, as it edges the M4 in the GPU tests and matches it in most of the processing metrics.

But where it all goes slightly awry is when we get to the CrystalDisk benchmark and discover that the best performance the GTP3000-1TB can achieve is below the 4,000Mb/s threshold that PCIe 3.0 M.2 NVMe drives can almost reach.

This is a guess, since I can’t identify the maker and spec of the GTP3000-1TB, but given the number, I’m inclined to believe that this is a Gen 3 drive, which, as this system has a Gen 4 slot, is a depressing conclusion. If it is a Gen 4 drive, then it's one of the slowest I’ve ever seen. What makes this even worse is that because you can’t get inside the T1, this drive can’t be replaced with something quicker or larger.

The phrase grasping defeat from the jaws of victory seems suitable for the T1, since it had all the pieces it needed to be a winner, and then blew it with an apparent cost-cutting exercise.

Overall, aside from the storage, this machine performs well and is perfect for a power user, or rather one who doesn’t need more than 32GB of RAM or 1TB of quick storage.

  • Performance: 4 / 5

GTBox T1: Final verdict

GTBox T1 mini PC

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

There are two elephants in the GTBox T1 room, and the first of those is a design where you explicitly can’t get inside the system to do any form of upgrades. There are plenty of appliances where that sort of limitation is considered normal, but the PC isn’t one of them.

And, given the upgrade paths that other mini PCs provide, that’s a significant problem.

I’d had less of an issue with this if GTBox had at least made some sort of effort to make the M.2 slot accessible, but the owner is told not to open the T1 under any circumstances.

The other elephantine problem is the asking price, which seems about $150 more than it should be with this specification. It may be that, with this unique speaker styling, GTBox assumed a price premium was in order, but nothing about this design justifies it.

With memory and storage going up in price, the cost of the T1 might suddenly become something of a bargain, but based on other machines using the same platform, it's way too high, and there are Ryzen AI systems that aren’t much more than this cost.

But, if we put our purchasing blinkers on and ignore the lack of flexibility and the price, this is a decent mini PC with a great hardware platform (ignoring the SSD) that delivers a good user experience.

However, business IT buyers don’t tend to wear those blinkers much these days, and they’d reject this due to the cost and the lack of internal access.

Should I buy a GTBox T1?

Value

Expensive for the spec

3/5

Design

Zero internal access and limited ports

2.5/5

Features

Powerful CPU and USB4, but unused PCIe lanes

3.5/5

Performance

Decent performance on CPU and GPU

4/5

Overalls

Interesting take, but it lacks flexibility

3.5/5

Buy it if...

If you want a power-user NUC

The T1 has an excellent Zen4 system at its heart, which is perfect for those who want more power, and the DDR5 memory used in it makes the most of that CPU and GPU combination. However, the lack of any memory or storage upgrades needs to be considered for its role.View Deal

You hate upgrades
Not everyone sees buying hardware as the start of a path to enhancement. If you have no intention of ever putting more memory or storage into your systems, then the T1 might be perfect for you. Though this also means that should anything go wrong with the SSD, then this system is junk.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

If you need a flexible mini PC
The lack of internal access and the inclusion of only one USB4 port make this mini PC highly inflexible, since you can’t upgrade either memory or storage, and what you can connect externally is limited by only having one high-performance port.View Deal

You want ultimate performance
This is a value-led mini PC, so it's not going to be as powerful as machines loaded with the fastest processors - for top performance, check out mini PCs using the AMD Ryzen AI platforms like the Ryzen AI Max+ 395, with 16 cores and 32 threads.View Deal

Also consider

Bosgame M4
Built around the same platform as the T1, the Bosgame M4 is a more traditional NUC design.
While it doesn’t have a metal case, the M4 ticks every other box for a successful NUC design. The asking price is low, the performance is good, and it’s a highly flexible system that can perform many tasks. Little to dislike here.

Check out my Bosgame M4 review View Deal

iQOO 15 Ultra design and colors teased, launch timeline confirmed
8:17 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

iQOO has officially teased the iQOO 15 Ultra, its next gaming-focused smartphone, offering a first look at the device’s design and colour options while also confirming its launch timeline in China. In a Weibo post, the brand confirmed that the iQOO 15 Ultra will make its debut in China in early February. The vivo sub-brand also revealed the handset’s design in two colour options. The rear of the phone closely resembles that of the iQOO 15, but it features a honeycomb-like pattern on the back panel and a redesigned camera module. Notably, the lower section of the camera housing...

« Previous PageNext Page »