Organizer
Gadget news
Apple Vision Pro is now available in two more countries
1:59 am | November 17, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Apple Vision Pro, which was unveiled last June and released in February this year, is now available in two more countries - South Korea and the United Arab Emirates. The Apple Vision Pro is sold through Apple's websites and Apple Stores in these countries. It starts at KRW4,990,000 ($3,575/€3,395/INR302,045) in South Korea and AED13,999 ($3,810/€3,620/INR321,970) in the UAE. Interested customers can book a free 30-minute demo at Apple Store locations to experience the Cupertino-based tech giant's "spatial computer" before spending money. With the launch in South Korea and UAE,...

Deals: Apple MacBook Air (2024) laptops are $200 off, iPad Air and Pro are $100 off
11:59 pm | November 16, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Apple’s refreshed Mac line went on sale last week – it included brand new devices with the efficient M4 chip, as well as some models that were updated to support Apple Intelligence (which works better when there’s more RAM available). This meant that the MacBook Air laptops – which are 2024 models, even though they use the M3 chip instead of the M4 – now have 16GB of RAM in the base configuration, up from 8GB. Naturally, retailers that had 8GB models stocked up dropped their prices to clear them out of their inventory. But now even the 16GB versions are discounted – the MacBook Air...

OnePlus 13 gets a Macro Mode with a software update
9:49 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The OnePlus 13, unveiled last month in China, has picked up a software update that comes with a Macro Mode. Once you download and install this update, you'll see a petal icon in the OnePlus 13's default camera app, allowing you to click pictures in macro with the 50MP ultrawide camera. The OnePlus 13 features three Hasselblad-branded 50MP cameras on the rear - primary, ultrawide (120˚), and periscope telephoto (3x optical). For selfies and video calls, there's a 32MP camera on the front. The OnePlus 13 is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite and runs Android 15-based ColorOS 15 out of...

Deals: Google Pixel 9 series is £100 off, Pixel 8 series is up to 50% off
7:59 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

Amazon is calling this an early Black Friday sale and of the various offers that it includes, we focused in on the Google phones. The Pixel 9 series is £100 off across the board (except the foldable, which is £300 off), while the 8-series is up to 50% off. Starting with the base Google Pixel 9, you get the new Tensor G4 chipset, which is faster and more efficient than the G3. The dual camera combines a large 1/1.31” 50MP sensor in the main with a 48MP 123° ultra wide. The 6.3” OLED display is not an LTPO panel, but it does run at 120Hz. As for the battery, it has 4,700mAh capacity and...

Blink Mini 2 review: this home security camera is good price, but unimpressive performance might make you think twice
7:30 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Home Security Smart Home | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Blink Mini 2 review: two-minute review

The Blink Mini 2 is a home security camera that can be used indoors, and outside when combined with the Blink Weather Resistant Power Adapter sold separately. It has a list price of $39.99 / £34.99 / AU$69 and is available to buy at Amazon.

Blink has followed in many other brands footsteps and requires you to pay a subscription fee to access recordings and most of the Blink Mini 2’s features. However, the camera does have the benefit of manual recording backup, though this will require an additional purchase of the Blink Sync Module 2 and a compatible USB drive.

The setup process was blissfully straightforward, and the Blink Home Monitor app worked well for the most part, aside from a couple of random glitches and the over-complicated process of getting to the device settings from the homepage.

A close-up of the front of the Blink Mini 2, shows the camera and spotlight.

(Image credit: Future)

The design of the Blink Mini 2 is small and simple; the camera is cube-shaped and sits on a ball joint that connects it to the compact circular base slash bracket, depending on whether it’s placed on a surface or fixed to a wall or ceiling. The ball joint only allows for manual repositioning, so regrettably, unlike many of the best home security cameras, there’s no capacity for remote control movement, meaning I could only view one static area at a time. Unfortunately, it doesn’t have a privacy cover, so while camera and audio feeds can be disconnected in the app, if multiple people have access there’s no guarantee of privacy while the camera is operational.

The activity and privacy zones did their job well. However, the process to select the areas was basic and was limited to a square or rectangular shape, which isn’t ideal if you want to block off your neighbor's yard but the boundary isn’t straight or at the right angle. The privacy zones were also unsightly on the feed and recorded footage, replacing the area with an expanse of grey.

In terms of performance, the Blink Mini 2 didn’t bowl me over. The video and audio quality were disappointing, but not bad considering how cheap the hardware is. The footage was grainy on the default standard image quality setting, and the picture pixelated when there was movement on the screen. The best picture quality setting fared better, with little pixelation and a slight improvement to the graininess.

The round base and ball joint of the Blink Mini 2.

(Image credit: Future)

For the most part, motion detection and person detection worked well. I needed to up the motion sensitivity from the default level of five to seven as it didn’t detect me on my return to the room. The Blink Mini 2 didn’t detect my cats when it was set to this sensitivity level, but there were a few occasions when it recognized my cats as people when I upped it to the maximum setting of nine.

Overall, I wasn’t blown away by the Blink Mini 2, but for the price, it’s a good basic camera for those who don’t require crystal-clear footage or audio, and are just looking for something that won’t cost the earth to keep an eye on a particular area. If you’d like to check out some alternatives I recommend checking out our best home security cameras buying guide, which features several alternatives tailored to specific requirements.

Blink Mini 2 review: price and availability

  • List price: $39.99 / £34.99 / AU$69
  • Availability: US, UK, and Australia
  • Release date: May 2024

The Blink Mini 2 is available at a list price of $39.99 / £34.99 / AU$69, which is fairly low cost for a smart indoor/outdoor home security camera. It was released in May 2024 and is available to purchase at Amazon, which is no coincidence when Blink is in fact an Amazon company.

An upgrade to the previous generation, the Blink Mini, the Blink Mini 2 has been given some welcome new features including color night view, a wider field of view of 143 degrees and a built-in spotlight as standard. Additionally, it offers person detection and can be used outdoors, but additional purchases are required.

It’s a big positive that it’s possible to store recordings locally, which requires an additional Blink device and a compatible USB drive. As with other smart home security cameras, it also offers a cloud subscription service that gives access to recordings and additional features via the Blink Home Monitor app, downloadable from the App Store, Google Play, or Amazon Appstore.

If you intend to store your recordings locally, you’ll need to purchase a Blink Sync Module 2, and a suitable USB flash drive, which will save photos and videos from up to ten Blink cameras. Without a subscription plan, you’ll have access to your recordings if you’re backing them up via the Blink Sync Module 2 (but you’ll have to back them up manually), will receive motion-activated notifications, and can access the live view for up to five minutes at a time. It’s worth stressing here that if you choose not to continue with the initial free trial all recordings will be deleted, so make sure to back them up first if you take this route.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Blink Mini 2 subscription options

Blink Basic Plan:
In addition to the features available without a plan, you also get live view and motion event recording, unlimited cloud storage for up to 60 days, automatic local storage backup every 24 hours, instant video access, video sharing, person detection, and photo capture. Applicable to one device only.
Price: $3 / £2.50 / AU$4.95 per month, $30 / £24.99 / AU$49.95 per year

Blink Plus Plan:
Along with the benefits of the Basic Plan, you’re able to snooze notifications, get 10% off Blink device purchases at Amazon, and use the Blink Moments feature, which seamlessly stitches together multiple events into one video. Applicable to all Blink devices.
Price: $10 / £8 / AU$15 per month, $100 / £80 / AU$150 per year

Blink Mini 2 review: specifications

Blink Mini 2 review: design and features

  • Easy setup
  • No privacy cover
  • No remote control capabilities

The setup process was fairly quick and simple, I just needed to download the Blink Home Monitor app, scan the barcode on the back of the Blink Mini 2, and follow the step-by-step instructions. The only small stumbling block was when the app claimed that my phone failed to connect to the Mini 2’s Wi-Fi hotspot automatically and to select it manually in my Wi-Fi settings. Before I got to my settings, the app pinged me a notification to let me know that the camera had connected successfully, so we got there in the end.

Available in black or white, the Blink Mini 2 is similar in size to its predecessor and has a rather dazzling spotlight above the camera lens that can be toggled on or off from the app. The camera sits on a sturdy but easily adjustable ball joint that connects it to the base, but this is only for manual positioning, meaning it cannot be moved remotely.

The Blink Mini 2 is angled as far back as it can go, pointing up towards the top right corner of the image.

(Image credit: Future)

As an indoor/outdoor camera, the Blink Mini 2 can sit happily on a flat surface on its stand or can be screwed to a wall or ceiling using the bracket that's integrated into the base. It’s worth noting that to use outside it will require the Blink Weather Resistant Power Adapter, which is sold separately.

Along with the Sync Module 2, the Blink Mini 2 can connect to other Blink devices, such as the Blink Video Doorbell, transforming the Mini 2 into a plug-in chime every time the doorbell rings.

Unlike some other indoor cameras, such as the 4.5-star rated Ring Pan-Tilt Indoor Cam, the Blink Mini 2 doesn’t feature a privacy cover, so there’s no way to manually cut the audio and visual feed to the camera short of just unplugging it. It was possible to block the camera view via the app if necessary by setting a privacy zone, though.

A close-up of the front of the Blink Mini 2, showing the camera and spotlight.

(Image credit: Future)

When I set one of these zones up myself to check how efficient they were, the live feed kept showing me the spinning-wheel-of-doom and wouldn’t load, so it seemed to struggle with this extra requirement initially. The video clips still recorded when spotting movement, however, and it was undoubtedly clear where the privacy zone was, as the image in this area was covered by a grey rectangle. By the time I’d finished testing this, the live feed had gotten itself back together, and the privacy area was again marked by a grey block, so nothing was viewable within that area.

It’s also possible to disable video recording and, as promised, it didn’t record anything after I switched it on. There’s also a setting to disable the audio connection, and true enough after applying this setting it cut off the feed to the microphone both on the live view and in recorded footage, so it was still possible to see what was going on but no sound was present. So while these are good features, privacy cannot be guaranteed if others can access the camera feed.

  • Design and features score: 3 / 5

Blink Mini 2 review: performance

  • Some lag and pixelization
  • Privacy areas work well, but they’re unattractive
  • Standard IR night vision performs better than best daytime setting

I used the Blink Home Monitor app to enable the different settings for testing and to view the live feed and recordings. In my opinion, the process required to get to the camera’s settings is somewhat inefficient. To access the camera settings for the Blink Mini 2 from the homepage I had to go into the settings menu, into device and system settings, then into Office (which is what I’d named my location), click on an inconspicuous all devices button, then click on TechRadar Office (the name of my Blink Mini 2), before I’m finally shown the device settings that I need. Admittedly, if I clicked on the three dots icon from the live view and then tapped device settings, it got me there too, but if you install a few cameras or devices at once, getting to the devices' settings all gets a bit long-winded.

Video quality is set to standard by default, and although I wasn’t impressed with it, it was acceptable for the low price. The footage and live view were quite grainy, and some pixelization occurred when movement was present on the screen. This isn’t what I expected to see after viewing the marketing material, but at a $40 price tag, I suppose you get what you pay for.

The other two settings available were saver mode, which reduces video quality, and best, which is meant to be higher quality. The best footage was still grainy – but not as severely as it was in standard mode – and it did seem to pixelate less when there was movement present, so there was some improvement.

A black-colored Blink Mini 2 sits on a light wooden surface against a pink background. The camera is angled up towards the top right corner of the image.

(Image credit: Future)

As was the case with the Ring Pan-Tilt Indoor Cam, the Blink Mini 2’s Night View in Color was only functional with enough ambient light. I found that I needed an LED lamp on in the corner at medium brightness for the image to be colored, and it did a good job of that. But if the environment was any darker than this it reverted to the standard black and white mode that we’re used to from other indoor security cameras. The black and white infrared night vision picture quality was great, and an improvement on the normal quality that’s recorded in daylight.

The audio quality left me unimpressed. There was loud static noise when there wasn’t any sound to relay, and voices weren’t particularly clear – but it was adequate enough for a cheaply priced security camera.

It was frustrating that clips didn’t auto-record if I happened to be viewing the live feed when an event happened. There was a button to save the recording on the bottom right of the screen, which is helpful and means that the clip can be saved. But I can err on the forgetful side, so if I happened to be looking at the feed when a burglar broke in, for example, I might well forget to hit save before coming off the feed to call the police.

The back of the Blink Mini 2 showing the USB-C power-in port and scannable QR code.

(Image credit: Future)

I tested out the privacy and activity zones and found that the selection process is a little more restricted than in other brand’s apps, like Ring, for example. Instead of having adjustable multi-point areas, the Blink Home Monitor app only offers square privacy zones, with just four adjustable points. The activity zone area selection was even more basic, with an 8x8 grid of selectable rectangles. There was an advanced button I could click, but this only zoomed in on the image and offered more rectangles, so setting up the activity zones proved far more laborious than I’m used to. Nonetheless, the privacy zones worked, although it meant dealing with large grey squares over the live view and footage where I’d set them, which wasn’t the most aesthetically pleasing.

Although my iPhone 12 Pro worked fine for viewing recorded content, and I could view it on my iPad too, I would have liked the option to view it on a browser as I could with some other brands' camera feeds. So if you wanted to use Blink cameras to watch over your business, or to keep track of your pets around the house, you’re limited to smaller screens to do this.

I kept the motion sensitivity on the default setting of five, to begin with, and for the most part, it worked well. Unfortunately, though, it missed me a few times when I came back in from leaving my living room. It had detected me each time I left, but despite me facing the camera each time I reentered a little while later, it didn't react upon my return. I raised the sensitivity level to eight, and it detected me that time, so it’s worth testing out which sensitivity works best for you if you purchase a Blink Mini 2.

A close-up of the front of the Blink Mini 2, shows the camera and spotlight.

(Image credit: Future)

At the same time, I was testing the motion detection, and I also tested out the person detection setting, which is meant to limit motion recordings and alerts to only trigger when a person is present. My two Maine-Coon-cross cats were the perfect test subjects for this experiment. They didn’t set off the motion recording when the motion sensitivity was set to seven; however, when it was set to nine, which is the highest setting available, it detected my bigger cat, Mr Jinkx, on a few occasions that he wandered through the viewing area. On the other hand, it only detected his daintier sister, who is only slightly larger than the average cat, on one occasion when she jumped onto the TV cabinet (and made a lot of noise while doing it). So I’d wager that you may get away with not receiving unnecessary notifications if you have a standard-sized pet cat, but it could be a different story if your pets are any larger.

It was really easy for me to share recorded videos. I simply had to swipe left on the clip I wanted to send from the list, and it showed me the options to share or delete. Unfortunately, though, the first time I did this it caused the app to fall over. It returned to the clip list with the share screen still visible, and wouldn’t acknowledge any of my taps, so I had to force quit the app and reopen it. The recording did send, however, so that’s a positive, and the camera continued to detect my movements. I’m pleased to say I didn’t experience any further issues sharing clips after this occasion, though.

When I tried to share a clip of Mr Jinkx sitting on the window sill, I found I couldn’t unlink it from the next clip, which also included me, having to tell him that he can’t jump through a closed skylight. Eventually, I found that the icon of a film snippet and a clock on the “cloud storage” bar at the bottom of the screen was to switch the list of recorded footage from moments to separate events. I’m glad the function was there, but as it looked more like a scheduling icon I didn’t find it very clear.

  • Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Should I buy the Blink Mini 2?

Buy it if...

You want to store your footage without paying monthly
Although there’s an extra cost involved, as you’ll need to purchase the Blink Sync Module 2, it’s reassuring to know that you won’t need to tie yourself to a subscription plan in order to back up the recorded footage.

You don’t want to blow your budget
Although the Blink Mini 2 may not have all the bells and whistles we’d like, at this price it’s a good option if you just want a lower-cost camera that’s quick to set up and easy to view the live feed.

You want a compact outdoor camera
Thanks to its IP65 rating, the Blink Mini 2 is all good to use outdoors, and its small size means it’s less likely to stand out to passers-by. It’s worth keeping in mind that the camera still requires plug-in power though, so you’ll need to purchase the Blink Weather Resistant Power Adapter for peace of mind.

Don't buy it if...

You want a 360-degree view
Unfortunately, the Blink Mini 2 doesn’t possess remote movement functionality, so you’re limited to the static view from where the camera is placed.

You value your privacy
There’s an unfortunate lack of privacy cover on this home security camera, which may not be an issue for some, but if multiple people have access to your feed it would be reassuring to have a manual privacy cover for peace of mind when you’re home.

You want a perfect picture
It’s still clear to see who people are and what they’re up to on the Live feed and recordings, but the image quality isn’t the best. The footage I viewed and recorded was often a bit grainy, and the feed often pixelated slightly when there was movement onscreen.

Blink Mini 2 review: Also consider

Ring Pan-Tilt Indoor Cam
This camera will require a little more investment, and sadly doesn’t allow for any kind of local storage, but it has fantastic image quality that didn’t present any lag or pixelization during testing, and you have access to a vast viewing area thanks to its 360-degree rotation and 169-degree tilting capabilities. If you’d like to read more, check out my full Ring Pan-Tilt Indoor Cam review by clicking on the link.

Wyze Cam v3
Another example of an indoor and outdoor security camera, except you don’t have to make an additional purchase to use it outside, as it already has a rubber sleeve to protect the camera's inlet, along with the IP65 water resistance rating. You can learn more about it in the full Wyze Cam 3 review.

How I tested the Blink Mini 2

  • I tested it for a week at home and in a busy office
  • I tested the sound and video quality, live and recorded
  • I tested the ease of setup, usability, privacy settings, and motion detection

I reviewed how easy the Blink Mini 2 was to set up, and tested its app and features.

I tested the Blink Mini 2 in our busy TechRadar reviews office along with a quieter area of my home to establish how sensitive the motion detection was, and how efficient the privacy and activity zones were.

I tested the frequency of notifications and reviewed live and recorded footage, paying close attention to the visual and sound quality, and evaluating how well the camera handled movement.

I observed how well the Night Color Vision worked in different environments, testing how well it performed in darkness and with varying levels of ambient lighting.

I compared the Blink Mini 2 against our previous camera reviews, and benchmarked it against other indoor cameras I am currently testing.

Read more about how we test.

First reviewed October 2024

Roku Ultra (2024) review: a souped-up streamer with a fantastic remote
5:31 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Streaming Devices Televisions | Comments: Off

Roku Ultra (2024): Two-minute review

Roku Ultra (2024) screen interface

Roku Ultra (2024) home screen interface (Image credit: Future)

The Roku Ultra (2024) is as capable a streaming player as I’ve yet come across, though whether it’s one of the best streaming devices will depend entirely on how you feel about Roku’s onscreen interface. I am a fan. While I’ll dig into that a little more below, I find Roku’s software (and hardware) approach one that prioritizes convenience. It’s one of the reasons there’s still a need for external streaming players even though most contemporary TVs have their own built-in smart capabilities, which are usually not all that user-friendly.

The Roku Ultra (2024) is twice the price of Roku’s next most expensive streamer, the Roku Streaming Stick 4K, and in the upper range of price when it comes to these types of devices. It’s still worth it, not to mention it’s ultimately not that expensive either. Plus, if you go cheaper, you could lose out on support for Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HLG, and HDR10+, all of which are available here. The performance is speedy and the remote is about as good a remote as I’ve personally used. All it’s missing is a passthrough HDMI that might be a benefit in certain setups.

As far as the physical design, the Roku Ultra (2024) is about what one would expect from a Roku streaming player. It comes in the same matte black as all of the company’s products, with just a shiny “Roku” logo emblazoned on the top. There’s also a shiny patch on the front where its sensor resides and a little purple Roku tag on its right flank.

It’s fairly slim, only an inch in height (its full dimensions are 4.9 x 5 x 1 inches), and has just one physical button on the side that offers dual functionality, with one side used for power and the other triggering the “find my remote” feature. Pressing the find my remote portion will cause the remote to ping until you press a button to indicate you’ve found it.

The port selection is pretty streamlined, as is to be expected. There’s a single HDMI, an Ethernet port – Wi-Fi 6 is also available – and a USB-A port. The USB port is a nice addition as it will give you an on-unit port to charge the remote as it comes with a rechargeable battery.

Regarding the HDMI, I would have liked a pass-through HDMI port. Though this feature generally isn’t found on streaming devices, it would have made it easier to use the Roku Ultra as the main hub of a setup (for instance, if you have a gaming console).

On that note, if you have a relatively contemporary TV with HDMI eARC (I can’t speak to older ones), the Roku Ultra (2024) can be set up to automatically turn the TV on and off and also adjust volume levels. You don’t necessarily have to do any menu diving for this either, as it’s part of the streaming player’s setup to enable that feature.

Roku Ultra (2024) remote control

The Roku Ultra (2024) comes with a backlit remote control (Image credit: Future)

Now, let’s discuss the remote. This is not my first rodeo with the Roku Voice Remote Pro (2nd edition) that comes stock with the Roku Ultra (2024). I was a fan of the remote when I reviewed the Roku Pro Series TV and I’m a fan now.

It’s only different than Roku’s other remotes on close inspection as it keeps the general shape and layout. It has a USB-C port on its butt for charging, which is an upgrade from previous rechargeable remotes that used micro-USB, a form factor I’ve had general reliability issues with. It has a toggle on one side for hands-free voice support (more on that later).

The Roku Voice Remote Pro also has a couple of extra buttons on it. There’s a reprogrammable launch button that can be used if you want a shortcut to launch an app that doesn’t already have a dedicated button on the remote, or to quickly turn on/off closed captions, just for a few examples. There’s also a guide button that launches Roku’s live TV guide channel and four app-specific launch buttons for Netflix, Disney+, Apple TV+, and Prime Video.

My only gripe is that these should all be reprogrammable (in a perfect world) since not everyone is going to be subscribed to those four apps. But my remote complaints start and end there, as the fact that its keypad is backlit – it will automatically light up when you pick it up – is fantastic.

And the Roku hands-free functionality is nice. No longer do I have to press the “listening” button, though it’s still there, to use my voice to navigate the interface. I can just say “Hey Roku, launch Netflix” to launch Netflix. It’s not perfect that you don’t have to be very clear and concise about your requests, but it generally works very well.

As far as voice assistant support goes, the Roku Ultra (2024) is compatible with Roku Smart Home, Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple AirPlay and HomeKit. It also has Bluetooth support so you can pair headphones with it for late-night viewing.

As far as the Roku Ultra (2024)’s performance, Roku advertises its streaming device as “30% faster than any other Roku player.” While the company doesn’t advertise what the CPU is inside or even its speed, it definitely feels very speedy. The fact that it supports Wi-Fi 6, something other Roku streaming players don’t, will in and of itself contribute to the player’s faster response.

I was able to compare the Roku Ultra (2024) to the Roku Streambar for a baseline. Loading the Roku Channel on the Streambar took seven seconds and loading a movie took four. The Roku Ultra (2024) took four seconds to load the same app and one second to load the same movie. Even navigating through Roku’s interface is almost immediate.

There aren’t any holes in what the Roku Ultra (2024) supports as long as you don’t care about a 120Hz refresh rate – none of the external streaming players support that at the moment, however. What you do get is Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, HLG and HDR10/10+. None of the other Roku streaming players support all those formats. The next most expensive one in Roku’s lineup is missing Dolby Atmos, for instance.

Lastly, we need to discuss the interface. To start, setup is easy like it always is with Roku. As long as you know your Wi-Fi password and Roku account password, all you have to do is follow the steps on the screen. Creating a new account or resetting a password (like I had to do) is easy as well. Just make sure to have access to your email for doing so.

If you’ve used previous Roku devices registered to your email and had apps installed also registered to your email, those apps will automatically be installed and logged in once you’re done with the setup.

As far as the interface itself, the main page with all the apps listed is easy to read and as intuitive as an interface could be. Deeper features, settings and such are all listed on the left side, including a few new ones like the dedicated “Sports” page. Getting through those is also intuitive. Everything makes sense in where they’re listed. For instance, when going to the section for remotes and devices, all external devices that you might connect would be listed here, or connected through settings here.

There’s also plenty of Roku-related and free content available for those of us hurting from the ever-increasing app prices. The only slightly annoying thing is the Roku content ads on the right side of the screen or during a screensaver.

I’ve always thought of Roku as a convenience-first company where making products that are easy to interact with is the priority. That’s the case with the Roku Ultra (2024), too, but in this case, performance is also a factor.

Roku Ultra (2024) held in hand showing ports

Ports on the Roku Ultra (2024) include HDMI, USB-A, and Ethernet (Image credit: Future)

Roku Ultra (2024): Price and release date

  • Price: $99.99 (about £80 / AU$150)
  • Release date: September 2024

For whatever reason, Roku’s presence outside of the US is somewhat spotty. That means, at the time of writing, those in the UK or Australia will have to just look on in envy (or invest in a capable competitor).

The actual price is $99.99 (about £80 / AU$150) – at the upper price range for most streaming players outside of the Apple TV 4K – though it is already seeing discounts. That’s twice the price of the Roku Streaming Stick 4K, the next most expensive streaming-only player Roku makes (so excluding soundbars and TVs). You’ll have to decide if you care about Wi-Fi 6 support, Dolby Atmos, or the new backlit remote, which are all part of the Ultra package, but not the Streaming Stick 4K.

The new Google TV Streamer (4K) goes for the same price and has the same 4K, Dolby Atmos, Dolby Vision, and HDR10+ support, but not Wi-Fi 6 – a probable factor in how speedy these devices function. It does have a redesigned remote from the previous Chromecast players, so it’s to be seen how it compares to the new remote from Roku.

Of course, you can go a little cheaper and still keep most of the same support for HDR10+, Dolby Vision and Atmos with the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2023), though Atmos is only available on select services. While it is cheaper at $59.99 / £69.99 / AU$119 (not including its many discounts), its OS is a bit heavy on Amazon Prime material, including a bunch of related ads, so keep that in mind with the price difference.

Roku Ultra (2024) remote held in hand

The rechargeable remote features a toggle button that lets you select the streamer's hands-free voice command option (Image credit: Future)

Should you buy the Roku Ultra (2024)?

Buy it if...

You want a really cool remote
I raved about it with the Roku Pro Series TV and I’ll rave about it here. The new remote is worth the extra cost, from the backlighting to the reprogrammable buttons to the “find my remote” feature.

You want speed
Whether it’s the Wi-Fi 6 support or some upgraded processor that Roku keeps under wraps, this is a speedy streaming player. You won’t have to wait for your favorite apps, shows, or movies to load.

You want support for all formats
Most streaming players support 4K at 60Hz these days. But only the more premium ones support HDR10+, Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. And many don’t support all three, but the Roku Ultra (2024) does.

Don't buy it if...

You’re looking for a discreet streaming player
It’s not all that big, but it’s not going to tuck away the way a stick-type player will. If you want to go as minimal as you can, Roku’s Streaming Stick 4K or the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2023) are almost as capable.

You’re looking to save money
The cost of the Roku Ultra (2024) is really not that high. It is, however, still on the higher end when it comes to streaming players. You can find capable options at less than half the price.

Roku Ultra (2024): Also consider

Apple TV 4K (2022)
Apple’s streamer has a similar box form factor and an equally zippy and responsive interface that’s easy to browse and doesn’t saturate you with ads. It’s recommended mainly for Apple fans and offers multiple features that work seamlessly with the company’s other products.

Read our full Apple TV 4K (2022) review

Google TV Streamer (4K)
Priced similarly to the Roku Ultra, the Google TV Streamer (4K) is Google’s update on its Chromecast streaming players, pumped with faster processing, 32GB of storage, and support for Dolby Vision and Atmos, HDR10+, and 4K. It doesn’t have support for WiFi 6E, unfortunately.

Read about the Google TV Streamer (4K)

Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2023)
If you prefer the type of streaming player that’s a bit more discreet, the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2023) is of the stick variety, as the name suggests, so it hides behind your TV. It’s still fast with Wi-Fi 6E, not to mention 16GB of storage and Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and Dolby Atmos support. It is very Prime-centric, however, and shows ads for Prime content every time it’s on idle.

Read our full Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2023) review

Roku Ultra (2024) remote held in hand with TV in background

Luna gaming on the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Max (2023) (Image credit: Future)

How I tested the Roku Ultra (2024)

  • Used regularly for several weeks
  • Tested with all sorts of apps
  • Tested the remote

I used the Roku Ultra (2024) regularly for several weeks. I used it with Roku content, popular third-party content like Max, as well as free offerings from the company. I also spent time using the remote and its various functions.

I’ve tested a lot of tech gear over the years from laptops to keyboards and speakers, and so have been able to use my expertise towards giving an honest and fair opinion, not to mention a critical eye, to any product I test.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed November 2024

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra Workstation review
5:29 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Lenovo is a well-known brand in the world of professional business computing. They make phenomenal computers of all shapes, sizes, budgets, and performance. The ThinkStation P3 Ultra targets design, engineering, and video editing professionals who need high-powered machines capable of some serious computing power.

The ThinkStation P3 Ultra is on the higher end of Lenovo Workstations, and can be spec'd up to a 14th Gen i9, Windows 11 Pro for Business, NVIDIA RTX A5500, up to 128 GB RAM, up to 4TB of storage, and even an M.2 RAID. This can be a pretty hefty computer with a pretty hefty price tag. But how does it compare to the best workstations we've reviewed? We put the ThinkStation P3 Ultra to the test. 

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra: Price and Availability

Since there are so many upgrades available to the ThinkStation P3 Ultra, there are even more possible price tags thanks to the different possible combinations of these upgrades. However, what is easy to state is that the starting price for all base features is $934.45 at the time of writing this article, and the price, of course, climbs from there. The highest-end model can reach nearly $5,000. Compared to similar PCs, there is some competitive pricing for some of the features.

The Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra is available in multiple regions, such as the US and the UK. For more information on whether this computer is available for you, the best place to start looking is on Lenovo's website. However, it is available on multiple other retailers as well.

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra: Unboxing and First Impressions

Unboxing the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra was about like unboxing any other Lenovo computer. The box is simple and contains the workstation, a power cable, an adapter for Wi-Fi, and setup guides. Right away, I could tell this machine meant power, partly due to the abundance of DisplayPorts in the back and partially because it looked beefy, like every square millimeter of space packed with power on the inside. The compact nature was immediately noticeable, yet it does not feel compact when using it; instead, it feels quite expansive, powerful, and like a supercar at the start of an open highway.

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra: Design and Build Quality

As expected for a high-end workstation, the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra has excellent build quality. It seems durable -- though I don't feel any desire to push this to the limit due to the cost of this machine -- it feels like it cools pretty easily, the machine is relatively quiet even when under heavy loads, and it has easy to access ports, without any being hidden, or in dumb spots, as some compact units choose to do to save space. However, one thing that I did notice that I did not love was the absence of Thunderbolt ports at the back of the unit. There are two in the front, which is helpful, especially for large file transfers, but none in the back. 

As someone who loves and gets to utilize some of the best Thunderbolt Docks on the market, I am pretty bummed none of mine will reach full potential unless the Thunderbolt cable is plugged into the front of the unit. Additionally, if I had a Thunderbolt or even a USB-C display I wanted to use, I would have to also run a DisplayPort cable up to my monitor of choice. But, especially with the newest Apple Computers releasing Thunderbolt 5, having the Thunderbolt 4 ports on the front of the machine will help with data transfer, and that's probably why they are there in the first place.

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra: In use

Specs

CPU: Intel 13th-gen Core (up to i9) or Xeon
GPU: NVIDIA RTX A2000 to A5000 options
RAM: Up to 64GB DDR5 ECC memory
Storage: Up to 4TB SSD
Ports: USB-C, USB-A, Ethernet, HDMI, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt
OS: Windows 11 Pro

The Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra is not the computer you would get to run a few Chrome (or any other browser) Tabs. It's different from one you would use for essential business or admin work. This is the kind of machine you get when you have advanced 3D rendering jobs, CAD projects, or even video editing that need to be done. During my testing, I pushed the RAM and GPU by exporting four lines of 4k footage through DaVinci Resolve, and it sliced through it like butter. I also used this to finish some CAD projects I had started for some 3D printing projects I am working on (for more, see our round-up of the best 3D printers). I found the workstation was able to render incredibly fast, and it sliced the .stl so I could send it to my 3D printer super quick, too.

I will be the first to admit I am a heavy and intense computer user, but at the same time, I am nowhere near the most powerful user there is. I wouldn't need this kind of power in my day-to-day, but it is very nice to have. This powerhouse would be helpful for professional video editors, those who use CAD for 3D renderings, and even some intense coders or programmers.

For the raw power that this computer can output, even when under heavy load, it remains pretty quiet. And, when it's not maxing out its cores, it's pretty quiet and could sit out on your desk without needing to be tucked away due to loud fans.

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Ultra: Final verdict

Overall, The ThinkStation P3 Ultra from Lenovo is an excellent choice for those who prioritize power and want a compact form factor. Granted, there are some limitations in ports when it comes to Thunderbolt placement and lack of HDMI, but even with that being the case, this computer is still highly versatile and incredibly powerful for those who need a powerful compact desktop.


For portable powerhouses, we tested the best mobile workstations and the best Lenovo ThinkPad laptops

Oppo Reno 13 and 13 Pro are both said to run on the Dimensity 8300 chipset
5:29 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

If you’ve been keeping a close eye on the rumor mill lately, then the image below will definitely look familiar to you. We’ve already seen the same image in a previous leak, albeit edited in a slightly different manner. It allegedly shows the upcoming Oppo Reno 13 and Reno 13 Pro in the wild. Two devices with an unmistakable iPhone look. Global release in Jan, powered by Dimensity 8300 on both vanila and Pro https://t.co/qfYjdPZSj0— yawn (@chunvn8888) November 15, 2024 An insider source has now shared a few extra bits of alleged information regarding the pair. Apparently, both will be...

Planet Coaster 2 review: take the plunge
4:01 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Comments: Off
Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on:
PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5
Release date:
November 7, 2024

Offering you the chance to build a theme park (almost quite literally) brick by brick, Planet Coaster 2 builds on the series’ strengths and addresses some of its most glaring weaknesses. Couple these quality-of-life improvements with a brand new category of attraction – pools, flumes, and water parks – and it certainly seems to be offering a lot to a new generation of theme park fans.

As a creative person who shades on the obsessive side, I’ll admit I’m pretty much genetically predisposed to being a Planet Coaster 2 addict. The series offers almost complete creative freedom at the cost of hours spent meticulously arranging scenery parts and is almost pharmaceutically engineered to squirt dopamine around my pixel-addled brain. As a result, I’ve spent many hours boring the pants off my nearest and dearest about my latest rides and animal enclosures, to the extent I can almost hear the glop of their eyes glazing over as I talk.

But as the oenophile has the shrewdest expectations of the wine they imbibe and the true caffeine addict won’t sip anything other than locally roasted micro-lot beans from a tiny farm in El Salvador, I’ve also got pretty high expectations of my chosen vice. Both Planet Coaster and Planet Zoo helped me scratch my creative itch as PC games while also coming with some limitations that sometimes made me question my habit. So the announcement of Planet Coaster 2 did make me wonder: has developer Frontier Developments finally found a cleaner way for me to get my creative kicks?

A rainbow-colored waterslide leading into a pool.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

Pool party

If you’ve seen any of the Planet Coaster 2 trailers, you’ll already be well aware of Frontier Developments’ big pitch for the sequel: water parks. In fact, in terms of new content, they are the only substantial addition the game brings. I was initially slightly nonplussed by this: could the inclusion of one new ride category encourage me to do any more than dip my toe into this sequel? Do pools and flumes really offer enough to justify sinking hours of my time into a new Planet game? In a word: yes. Yes, they do.

First of all, Planet Coaster 2 allows you to create a wide array of pools. Want to create a classy resort vibe, complete with cabanas, palm trees, and juice shacks? Or maybe you want to create a shallow kiddy pool, replete with donut-shaped swim rings and wave machines? You’re free to shape, customize, and decorate your pools however you like and, as in previous Frontier Developments titles, the only limit is your imagination. New tools allow you to carve out pools in any shape you desire, adjust the depth as you see fit, and adorn them with everything from sunloungers to beachballs.

Flumes also add a lot of fun to your water park. From basic chutes to gargantuan inner tube slides with switchbacks and speed bowls, you can create thrilling flumes that will draw more visitors to your pools. As with rollercoasters, they’re fully customizable – you’ll place them piece by piece, controlling both vertical and horizontal bends, adding special parts, and trying to hit that sweet spot between exciting and nausea-inducing that will encourage your guests to take the plunge.

A curling purple waterslide silhoutted against a blue sky.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

As with your rollercoasters, your flumes will need to be tested before they can be opened, to make sure they provoke just the right amount of excitement and not too much nausea or fear. While testing you can view the results as they change from moment to moment or check out heatmaps of the whole ride to spot problem areas.

It’s not all fun and games though: you’ll also have to watch over your guests’ safety and make sure the water stays free of pe… err, dirt. Nobody’s at risk of drowning in Planet games – they’re far too cozy for that – but swimmers will panic, so you’ll need to make sure your pool is covered by lifeguards to help calm their distress. Meanwhile, you’ll have to add pool filtration to make sure that water remains crystal clear, hooking up water filters to flumes or to the pool itself.

Speaking of pipes, the utilities in Planet Coaster 2 have had an overhaul as well. While the original Planet Coaster was seemingly a Tesla-inspired free-energy utopia and Planet Zoo just required a generator plonking down here or there, hooking up power and water in Planet Coaster 2 requires a bit more thought. Not only will your generators and pumps need regular maintenance from your mechanics but the resulting electricity and water will need to be distributed around your park. Using underground wires and pipes, you’ll hook them up to power distributors and water filters, which will provide the required resources to everything within a set radius. It hardly requires Factorio levels of micromanagement and can easily be switched off but it adds a little extra realism to your parks.

In comparison to the water parks, traditional rides in Planet Coaster 2 have had much less of an overhaul. You can still design a wide array of rickety wooden coasters, water rides, and super-modern hanging coasters, as well as place thrilling flat rides and customize their sequences. They’re as fun as ever to design and integrate well with your water parks but, if you’re expecting a sea change here, you’ll be disappointed. However, I feel like the water parks add plenty of new challenges and creativity to the game and definitely justify picking up Planet Coaster 2 over firing up the original.

A seaside theme park and a pier.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

A smooth ride

As you might expect, Planet Coaster 2 has had a bit of a facelift compared to its eight-year-old predecessor.

Unsurprisingly, the most work has gone into improving water effects – lakes and beaches now look much more realistic, with the gradation between shallow and deep water looking much more true to life. Not only does the sunlight glimmer across the surface of your swimming pools but this casts underwater ripples across the ceramic tiles as well. All the water in the game feels like it’s had a literal glow up and it does help to add some visual polish to your waterparks and natural water alike.

Terrain textures too have received some love. There’s a wider variety than ever: alongside familiar terrain from Planet Zoo, like long and short grass, hard and soft rock, there are now multiple rock types, gravel, scree, and several densities of shrubbery, which help really add variation to the landscape. Whether I was creating small coves or craggy peaks, these extra textures really helped make the terrain look richer and more organic.

This ties in nicely with some of the new Scenery Themes, making it easier to match your landscape to various regions. As well as the classic theme park style, the new game also offers Viking, Mythological (read: Ancient Greece), Resort, and, predictably, Aquatic themes. Some of these are fantastic: Viking offers fantastic runic statues, Aquatic beautiful corals and the Greek pack allowed me to relive some of my favorite Aegean destinations.

A mountainous landscape featuring two plateaus covered in trees.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

However, I do miss the versatility of some of PlanCo’s original themes and the relative paucity of animatronics in the sequel does make sequencing ride scenery less exciting. Being able to perfectly program an explosion in a Wild West mine as a coaster roared past, complete with terrified miners leaping to escape the flames, was one of my favorite moments in the original and I hope new content packs will restore some of this creative potential.

I was expecting this graphical boost to have a noticeable impact on performance but I was pleasantly surprised. Playing on an Acer Predator Helios 300 with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080, I found my frame rate rarely ever dropped below 65 frames per second, even on the Ultra graphics settings. With all of its AI pathfinding and animal behavior, I found Planet Zoo could get pretty sluggish on some rigs, especially at high guest counts, but Planet Coaster 2 seems to run smoothly even on an older graphics card.

Not only that but, despite assuming the game would be an absolute no-go on the Steam Deck, it actually runs pretty adequately. Yes, your graphics settings will have to plunge like you’re on a drop tower but the game still runs smoothly, averaging out at a decent-for-Deck 30fps. How true this will remain when you’re working with Disney World-sized parks remains to be seen but it shows there has been some effort to optimize things behind the scenes.

Theme park guests walking along a path in front of a gate made out of broken Grecian seal.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

Breaking new paths

As someone who has sunk thousands of hours into the original Planet Coaster and Planet Zoo, I’ll be the first to admit that they can be… a little idiosyncratic. It’s become something of an inside joke among fans of the series that the games offer almost unlimited creative potential while also forcing you to butt heads with some frustrating design limitations. Paths and scenery placement in particular have drawn ire for being unnecessarily convoluted.

To its credit, Frontier Developments has tackled some of these complaints head-on in Planet Coaster 2. Object placement has received some much-needed love: you can now turn Snap Distances on and off for all objects, meaning you’re no longer forced to keep building parts on a grid but can also set props to move in relation to the grid when you want. And the new Scale Tool allows you to tweak the size of individual items, something I’ve been desperate to see for a long time, and makes it much easier to create organic variations in the sizes of objects. All in all, this adds a great deal of flexibility to the Blueprints you can create.

There are also plenty of labor-saving tweaks that have been made: the new scenery brush groups together similar items like tropical trees or Mediterranean rocks and quickly paints them across the landscape. You can also easily create your own presets by adding a selection of scenery items. The end result definitely requires some editing to get it looking natural but, as someone who has spent many hours in Planet Zoo getting each collection of bushes and stones looking just right, automating a part of this process is definitely something I appreciate.

Best bit: swimming pools

A theme park guest hurtling down a transparent flume, with a pool and tropical plants in the background.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

Pools are a blast: not only are the flumes fun to build, there is a good degree of freedom in how you shape and decorate your pools. I can’t wait to start building a tropical indoor swimming paradise replete with beaches, slow rivers and smoothie bars.

In past games, paths were easy to place in general and maddeningly difficult to place in specific circumstances – anyone who has also lost a whole evening trying to stack paths on top of each other in multi-story buildings shares my pain here. Fortunately, path placement has had a complete overhaul: in addition to the Classic Paths tool, there is now an overhauled Line Builder tool, options to manually draw the edges of paths line by line, a Stamp Builder tool to place geometrically shaped paths, and an Edit tool to manually tweak paths point by point. This gives you a whole lot more variability in terms of the shapes of path you can create, making plazas, buildings, and a whole heap more much easier to create.

Water mechanics have previously been this series’ Achilles heel: creating natural ponds, rivers, and lakes was always a bit of a finicky process, often requiring a lot of tinkering before the games would acknowledge water placement as valid. Fortunately, Planet Coaster 2’s swimming pools utilize the new path mechanics – you can carve out pools using shapes or manually set their boundaries by drawing lines, then round their edges using the Smooth Brush. Depth is set according to presets at first – either shallow, wading, swimming, or diving – but you can set the depth to whatever you want with the Edit tool. And you can add paths around the edges automatically using the Customize Brush.

All in all, these features go a long way to reducing the slog involved in perfecting your park.

A rollercoaster as it plunges into a hole in the ground.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

Off the rails

This isn’t to say that some of Frontier Developments’ more eccentric tendencies aren’t on display: you’ll definitely encounter bugs and odd design choices here and there.

Designing rollercoasters is still that same combination of childlike delight and frustratingly finicky refinement. Having spent roughly 20 minutes designing an old-school log flume that wound through forests, plunged down mountainsides, and splashed through salt lakes, I was pretty happy with my handiwork. But I then had to spend at least another 30 minutes closing the loop: there’s no auto-complete function for certain rides and trying to get the returning track on the same height as the station platform required a tedious process of trial and error.

Ride testing has also maintained some of its irksome habits from the original. Any time I’ve attempted a coaster or flume of significant ambition, it still required a high degree of testing and tweaking to keep speed and G-forces within safe limits. And there are still some glitches here. One of my early flumes repeatedly tested as being around a 15 in terms of fear overall – a bowel-liquefying level of terror that wouldn’t allow me to open the ride – despite the fact heatmaps showed the fear didn’t hit much higher than a 6. I’d imagine minor bugs like this will be fixed in future patches but it can be confusing trying to work out whether your design is at fault or an unpatched bug.

But, as I say, I’d maintain these kind of issues are the flipside of the creative freedom Planet Coaster 2 offers. What I’ve come to expect from the Planet series of games is the ability to create pretty much whatever I want and an inevitable side effect of trying to create something the developer never anticipated is the fact I may run up against the odd hard limit where the engine struggles to deliver what I’ve asked for. Ultimately: with great flexibility, comes great errors.

A seaside cove with a rollercoaster running through an arch in the rock.

(Image credit: Frontier Developments)

Should I play Planet Coaster 2?

Play it if…

You want your theme parks to make a splash
The addition of pools and flumes adds a substantial new dimension to creating your fantasy theme park. If you felt the original was a little on the dry side, the sequel should whet your appetite.

You want improved tools over the original
While they’re still not foolproof, tools for object placement, path placement, and scenery creation have all had quality-of-life improvements that make them smoother to use.

Don't play it if...

You want a game you can casually dip into
As fans of the series will know, Planet games can require an obsessive attention to detail. If you really want to customize every element of your park, be prepared to sink a lot of time into this game.

You’re expecting to only have to pay once
The relatively limited scenery items and themes are likely to be augmented by paid-for DLCs. If you’re not prepared to sink extra money into expansions, you may miss out on some of the things Planet Coaster 2 has to offer.

Accessibility

Planet Coaster 2 has a reasonable number of accessibility options, although perhaps there’s room for improvement too. You can scale the interface if you find smaller type hard to read and can tweak color palettes to improve readability if you have protanopic, deuteranopic, or tritanopic color blindness.

For those who have auditory processing problems, you can set the game to mute all other audio when narrative dialogue is playing. Meanwhile, for those with reduced hearing in one ear, you can switch on a mono mix to ensure you’re receiving all sounds.

However, you don’t seem to be able to adjust gamepad controls, which might make things harder for those who require certain tweaks to be able to use controllers.

How I reviewed Planet Coaster 2

I sank over 23 hours into playing Planet Coaster 2. I tried to cover as much of the game as possible, dividing my time between Career Mode, Franchise Mode, and Sandbox Mode. I tried the game out on Low, High, and Ultra graphics settings.

In terms of hardware, I played Planet Coaster 2 on an Acer Predator Helios 300 with a 12th-gen Intel Core i9-12900H CPU and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 GPU. During this testing, I used the laptop’s built-in keyboard and an external Logitech B100 mouse. I also played the game for hours on my LCD Steam Deck.

My past experience of the Planet series of games includes almost 400 hours on the original Planet Coaster and over 1,000 hours on Planet Zoo.

Ticwatch Atlas review: A formidable Android smartwatch for the great outdoors
3:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: , | Comments: Off

TicWatch Atlas: One minute review

The TicWatch Atlas is a brilliant rugged Android smartwatch and a fantastic alternative to mainstream options like the Google Pixel Watch or the Samsung Galaxy Range. It boasts an impressive chassis made of stainless steel, aluminum, and fiberglass that feels really premium and sturdy, and it’s competitively priced around other Android smartwatches while offering the rugged durability you’d expect from an Apple Watch Ultra or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra.

The dual display means you can switch between a healthy-looking AMOLED display or an essentials-only low-power option that’s good for 45 days of battery life. The TicWatch Atlas comes absolutely packed with fitness and health-tracking tools and features, including more than 100 exercises. It also features heart-rate monitoring, sleep tracking, blood oxygen monitoring, and more.

The Snapdragon W5+ chip ensures performance all-round is snappy with no hang-ups, and there’s a wealth of health data at your fingertips. The screen isn’t as vibrant as an Apple Watch display, and blood oxygen readings weren’t always spot on, but overall fitness tracking for calories and heart rate kept up with more expensive Apple Watch alternatives, and the GPS showed pretty solid accuracy.

The TicWatch Atlas currently runs Wear OS 4 with no sign of Wear OS 5 coming any time soon, but for those who can do without the latest software, it’s an extremely enticing option in this price bracket and one of the best Android smartwatches this year.

TicWatch Atlas: Specifications

TicWatch Atlas: Price and Availability

Ticwatch Atlas Review

(Image credit: Future)
  • $349/£329/AU$519
  • Two colors

The TicWatch Atlas is available now from Mobvoi.com and Amazon in a multitude of territories. There’s only one size and two colors, retailing at $349 / £329 / AU$519. We’ve seen it officially discounted through Mobvoi’s website and Amazon in the UK to just £264.99. In Wear OS terms, that’s around the same price as the list price of the Galaxy Watch 7, but cheaper than the similarly-sized Pixel Watch 3. It’s also, confusingly, the same price as Ticwatch’s other smartwatch offerings, the Pro 5 Enduro and the regular Pro 5.

  • Value score: 4/5

TicWatch Atlas: Design and screen

Ticwatch Atlas

(Image credit: Future)
  • Premium design
  • Very rugged and durable
  • Dual display is enticing

Out of the box, the Ticwatch Atlas really dazzles as a rugged and well-designed smartwatch. The circular chassis measures 52.2mm in height by 47.8mm in width, and the whole package is just 12.05mm thick. The watch housing itself is a mixture of stainless steel, 7000-series aluminum, and nylon with fiberglass. That means you aren’t getting the premium titanium finish of an Apple Watch Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra, but the whole package exudes premium build quality and a rugged durability that really gives you confidence in the watch day-to-day. The TicWatch Atlas is Mobvoi’s adventure-going watch for the great outdoors and the company has really nailed it with this fantastic design.

Garmin fans will find themselves at home here thanks to a raised, chunky bezel that houses a circular AMOLED display, and to one side are a side button and a crown for scrolling. The latter is smooth and precise to operate, and the former takes you to Wear OS 4’s recent apps with a satisfying click, or Google Wallet with a double click.

The fluororubber band shipped as standard is also really excellent – the rubber is soft and grippy, and the metal clasp feels safe and secure to use.

The TicWatch Atlas boasts a dual-display configuration, with an always-on AMOLED and the Ultra-low-power display. Starting with the AMOLED, this tech definitely lags behind options like the Apple Watch Series 10, which looks altogether more vibrant. Upping the brightness to full really improved the experience, but at the default setting I thought it looked ever-so-slightly washed out. However, the text and metrics all look very clear, and the default Wear OS faces show good color performance. Raise-to-wake was a tad sluggish for my liking, but I’m really nitpicking what’s otherwise a very enjoyable experience.

Ticwatch atlas display

(Image credit: Future)

There’s also the Ultra-low-power display, which gives you a slew of essential metrics (date, time, steps, heart rate, battery) in a crisp two-tone format. You can pick the color, and the low-power display also has dynamic color changes that reflect your heart rate, so you can gauge what HR zone you’re running in with the quickest of glances. The real selling point of this Ultra-low-power display, however, is the battery life, with TicWatch promising up to 45 days of use in Essential Mode using this feature.

Overall, the TicWatch Atlas is really comfortable on the wrist, with no noticeable wrist fatigue. At 47.2 grams it’s not a heavy beast, but you’ll definitely notice its presence. As noted, it’s circular and quite a bit wider than your average Apple Watch, which I’d say disqualifies it for use in strength training. That’s because the design, coupled with the protruding crown, lends itself to accidental button presses, a fatal flaw that also hamstrings the Apple Watch.

Worth mentioning design-wise are the Atlas’ durability ratings. It’s 5ATM waterproof-rated for open-water swims, and certified to MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability. Essentially, the TicWatch Atlas can handle almost everything you throw at it, rain or shine.

  • Design score: 4/5

TicWatch Atlas: Features

Ticwatch Atlas Review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Packed with fitness-tracking features
  • Heart rate monitoring and Afib alerts
  • Wear OS 4

TicWatch Atlas arrives sporting Wear OS 4 and a host of impressive features. A lot of these will be familiar to anyone who’s used any of the best Android smartwatches on the market. There are workout tracking modes for over 100 different exercises, including all the usual suspects. You’ll also get 24/7 heart-rate monitoring, recovery time readouts, VO2 Max measurements, calories, blood oxygen, and more.

Overnight there’s sleep tracking which triggers automatically, and health features like irregular heartbeat sensing and atrial fibrillation detection, which are constantly monitored in the background.

Safety features include emergency SOS and Fall Detection, the effectiveness of which I can attest to because I accidentally triggered it during a gym workout when I flopped a bit too dramatically onto a bench while doing barbell bench presses.

Navigation is provided by GPS tracking, which can also give you retrospective routes for your outdoor workouts and is impressively accurate, even when not tethered to a phone. There’s also a compass and barometer, the latter of which will be of particular note to climbers and hikers, who can use it to gauge height and atmospheric conditions that could indicate changes in the weather.

Another standout feature that I wasn’t able to test was Heat Map. With GPS and network connectivity, you can track your heat map for ball games including American football, Aussie rules, basketball, rugby, soccer, and tennis, as well as Frisbee, with your activity displayed as a satellite image of your exploits that you can customize and share with friends.

There’s also TicMotion, proactive tracking for outdoor workouts that can detect walking, running, or cycling without the need for user input, providing heart rate, calories, and VO2 max info automatically. I’ve already mentioned the dynamic screen, which changes color to match your heart rate in Ultra-low-power mode, another epic feature for fitness enthusiasts.

You also get the usual slew of Wear OS features from Google, including G-Suite integration for Maps, Calendar, and Gmail, apps from the Play Store, messaging, Google Wallet, and more. 32GB of onboard storage ensures you can load music and playlists onto your device, so you can run without your smartphone if you’d prefer

Overall, the TicWatch Atlas is packed with features for a $329 smartwatch. The feature-set generally lends itself to the adventuring fitness enthusiast, there is a lot going on when it comes to fitness tracking, health, performance, and more. I’d be inclined to compare the Atlas more to some of the best Garmin watches on the market, rather than something like a Google Pixel Watch 3. As with TicWatch’s Pro 5 offering, LTE is the only glaring omission. Mobvoi has also confirmed to us that there isn’t currently any information about Wear OS 5 support, the rollout of which to old Pixel models was confirmed recently, so this doesn’t put it at a huge disadvantage versus other Android rivals.

TicWatch Atlas review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Features score: 4.5/5

TicWatch Atlas: Performance

Ticwatch Atlas

(Image credit: Future)
  • Snappy processor
  • Accurate metrics
  • Phenomenal battery life

In my three weeks using the Atlas TicWatch I’ve been really impressed by the overall performance. My daily driver is usually an Apple Watch Series 10, or latterly, the Ultra 2. Personally, I find that the animations of Wear OS 4 leave a bit to be desired, with the lack of bounce and responsiveness versus watchOS 11 making for a more clunky experience; however, the TicWatch’s Snapdragon W5+ chip is more than enough to handle Wear OS. The user experience overall is snappy and responsive, with no processor hang-ups. The Atlas can process a lot of workout data including heart rate metrics, steps and calories, and cadence, and it’s definitely a solid piece of kit.

Accuracy-wise, it leaves little to be desired. In side-by-side tests with my $699 Apple Watch Ultra 2, the TicWatch broadly kept up with heart rate measurements including changes to my pulse. In a 1km test walk, the TicWatch slightly over-egged the distance, giving me 1km when I’d only walked 956m, with a slightly ambitious GPS route that artificially inflated the distance. However, that’s not a massive margin of error, and the Atlas clocked my average heart rate at 89bpm compared to the Apple Watch’s 90, and calories burned at 58 vs Apple Watch’s 60. For almost everyone that’s a perfectly acceptable margin of error, and an impressive set of results. In fact, I was surprised that workout summaries and metrics generally felt more comprehensive than with the Apple Watch and iOS, with step count, VO2 max, average speed, and workout zones served up in addition to Apple’s data offering.

TicWatch Atlas review

(Image credit: Future)

The only suspect reading I’ve found on the Atlas is blood oxygen, with a couple of erratic readings suggesting that my level was changing quite rapidly to as low as 92% percent and as high as 100%. It seems to have evened out over time, but I’ve wondered if the TicWatch has been giving me readings even when it wasn’t quite able to. On other occasions, however, it matched the Apple Watch in more controlled conditions. Given that this measurement relies heavily on you being at rest and having your watch fitted properly, this could be an error, and it’s one I’m keeping an eye on with continued testing.

Metrics and results are delivered via the Mobvoi Health app, available on the Google Play Store. It’s certainly comprehensive and colorful, but the app’s design and interface aren’t enthralling. Still, it’s practical and easy to navigate.

The aforementioned TicMotion workout detection is impressive, as is the automatic sleep tracking, however, the Atlas’ party piece is definitely its battery life. The TicWatch Atlas is rated for 90 hours of use as a regular smartwatch, or an eye-watering 45 days using the ultra-low-power display. In three weeks of use, I’ve only had to charge it twice, and it easily clears three days of constant use on a single charge, including one workout a day. Charging speed is also impressive, and the standard included cable is good for 2 days of usage from just 30 minutes of charging. Otherwise, a full charge in my experience takes about 90 minutes, and TicWatch’s interface shows the battery charging in real-time to two decimal places for a reassuring sense of progress.

  • Performance score: 4.5/5

TicWatch Atlas review: Scorecard

TicWatch Atlas: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You want a rugged Wear OS fitness tracker

The TicWatch Atlas excels at fitness and health tracking and has a brilliant, rugged durability.

You want a stylish alternative to mainstream Android smartwatches

The TicWatch Atlas’ design stands out against Pixel Watch and Galaxy alternatives.

Don't buy it if...

You own an iPhone

The TicWatch Atlas is an Android-only smartwatch.

You want Wear OS 5

The TicWatch Atlas doesn’t currently support the latest Android wearable software.

TicWatch Atlas: How we tested

I used the TicWatch Atlas for almost three weeks as my main smartwatch. It was connected to a Samsung S21 Ultra, on which I tested the Mobvoi Health app and connectivity. I used the watch to track my sleeping, as well as multiple strength and running workouts. I also conducted controlled testing to directly compare metrics to the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and the Series 10, including a 1km test walk to measure the accuracy of heart rate and calorie tracking.

TicWatch Atlas: Also consider

Samsung Galaxy Watch 7

One of the best Wear OS 5 watches on the market right now, packed with fitness tracking and health features, solid battery life, and more.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 review

Garmin Forerunner 265

With its brilliant OLED screen, comprehensive fitness tracking, and great battery life, the Garmin Forerunner 265 is a great alternative for runners, although slightly more expensive.

Read our full Garmin Forerunner 265 review

First reviewed: November 2024

« Previous PageNext Page »