Organizer
Gadget news
Samsung Galaxy Watch8 review: Unequivocally the best mainline Galaxy Watch in ages
5:00 pm | July 9, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: One minute review

Every time I try a big-name smartwatch these days, I’m slightly disappointed. Not because they’re bad devices (they’re certainly not) but because all too often, they tend to be very similar to their predecessors with very incremental, minor changes, such as a new software feature or slightly brighter screen, which isn’t the most exciting thing to write about.

However, not so this year. Samsung has decided to buck the trend with a comprehensive redesign, extending from its hardware to its software. The watch itself is thinner with a brighter screen and bigger battery (although battery life is still allegedly the same), keeping the round display but adopting a Watch Ultra-style metal cushion in an attempt to give Samsung watches a distinctive brand identity

In the software stakes, there are several useful updates that change how you use the watch day-to-day. A Now Bar widget allows you to quickly access the task you’re currently running in the background (such as a timer or workout) from the watch face screen, while at-a-glance views are more useful thanks to a nifty redesign. On-device Gemini has also been added out of the box, allowing you to complete complex multi-step tasks with a simple audio request, such as “find the best gym nearby and ask Julie if she wants to join it”.

There's also a running coach, which analyses your form and performance during a 12-minute test run and assigns you one of 160 running performance plans, switching you from plan to plan if you repeatedly exceed its expectations (or don’t perform as expected). A new antioxidant index measures the level of carotenoids, a beneficial antioxidant, using your thumb as another metric to indicate general health. Sleep apnea detection has also landed, just like this year’s crop of the best Apple Watches.

This is all in addition to the other features present on other watches: heart rate, advanced sleep algorithms, body composition, third-party apps, social features, music control, 32GB storage and more. Samsung’s eighth iteration of its Galaxy Watch series is the most comprehensive change I’ve seen from the company in years, sporting plenty of genuinely useful improvements.

Having lived with the watch for a week, it performs up to expectations: it's fast, accurate and looks great, although I didn't use the on-watch AI for anything much more sophisticated than the usual Assistant functionalities, preferring the larger format of my phone's screen for anything more detailed. The wellness metrics were comparable to a top Garmin watch too, and surprisingly, I preferred the slimmer Watch8 to the bulkier Watch8 Classic.

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: Specifications

Component

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 (40mm)

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 (44mm)

Price

From $349.99 / £319 / AU$649

From $399.99 / £349 / AU$699

Dimensions

42.7 x 40.4 x 8.6mm

46.0 x 43.7 x 8.6mm

Weight

30g

34g

Case/Bezel

Armor Aluminum

Armor Aluminum

Display

1.3-in super AMOLED

1.5-in super AMOLED

GPS

GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo

GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo

Battery Life

Up to 30 hours

Up to 40 hours

Connection

Wi-Fi, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3

Wi-Fi, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3

Water Resistance

5ATM

5 ATM

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: Price and availability

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8

(Image credit: Future)
  • 40mm Bluetooth model starts at $349.99 / £319 / AU$649
  • 44mm model starts at $399.99 / £349 / AU$699
  • Available to pre-order July 9

The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 series is available to pre-order now. Prices start at $349.99 in the US, £319 in the UK for the 40mm Bluetooth model, rising to £369 for the LTE-enabled version, and AU$649 in Australia, rising to AU$749 for the LTE model. The 44mm Bluetooth-only version starts at $399 in the US, £349 in the UK and AU$699 in Australia.

This is a slight price rise from the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, which started from $299.99 / £289 / AU$549 when it was released last year.

  • Value score: 4/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: Design

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8

(Image credit: Future)
  • Slimmer new cushion shape
  • 3000-nit brightness
  • Software revamp

Let’s talk about some of the new changes. First and foremost, the display is still perfectly round, but the casing no longer hugs that shape to create a cylinder. Instead, it’s a squarish cushion designed to emulate the shape of the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra. Samsung representatives have mentioned that it’s an instantly recognizable brand identity, in the same way you see a ‘squircle’ watch with a digital crown and immediately understand it as an Apple Watch.

The most surprising thing about the redesign is that where the Ultra looks awkward and boxy at times, the Galaxy Watch8 looks good. This is partially down to the watch being 11% thinner than its predecessor, and a whole lot thinner than the Ultra or the other new kid on the block, the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, as you can see above. It’s a lovely minimalist design, and I like it a lot. The display is brighter now, capable of up to 3,000 nits, and the battery is 8% larger to accommodate.

There’s also less case movement on-wrist now, thanks to the Dynamic Lug system ported over from the Galaxy Watch Ultra. Getting the straps on and off using this system was a bit more fiddly than anticipated, especially if you have short nails like mine, but it’s hard to deny the watch was an incredibly snug and comfortable fit, even during runs.

The UI has also received an upgrade. A Now Bar, similar to those on the best Samsung phones, pops up on the watch face when a task is running in the background such as Timer or Workout. It's a satisfyingly slender widget showcasing a piece of information, like the time remaining, which you can tap to balloon it to full-screen. At-a-glance app views and collections have also received a revamp, emphasizing usability. I loved all of these changes, especially the Now Bar; it’s such a simple concept executed wonderfully.

  • Design score: 5/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: Features

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8

(Image credit: Future)
  • Gemini on wrist
  • Advanced new health features
  • Running Coach with 160 plans

First and foremost, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is the first watch with Google Gemini on-wrist out of the box. It’s finally here, and as you might expect, it’s very handy when it comes to performing simple tasks. My demonstration involved simple requests, such as starting a 20-minute running workout, but also more complex examples – such as the aforementioned “find the best gym near me and text Julie” prompt.

It has the potential to be transformative in the way we interact with smartwatches going forward, but I'll be honest, I rarely used it beyond simple assistant features. In its most useful instance during my week of everyday wear, I asked Gemini to show me directions to the nearest supermarket on my watch, at which point it promptly called up Google maps. That I found very cool indeed: it's likely to change how we use our smartwatches in small ways.

Another new feature I can’t wait to get stuck into is the new Running Coach. After inputting your goals and completing a 12-minute test run, you’ll be assigned one of 160 different running plans, ranging from a first 5K to a complete marathon. If your performance looks like you’ll outperform your goal at any point, Samsung Health will switch you to another running plan that more closely matches your capabilities.

Other new health features include the Antioxidant Index, which detects the level of a single antioxidant, carotenoids, in your blood to give you an indication of whether you’ve eaten enough fruit and vegetables to support a healthy diet using your thumb. I got to try this: sadly, my carotenoid levels were not up to scratch, though I don’t have any way of verifying the reading.

Otherwise, the watch is still packing all its existing health and fitness credentials and plenty of robust hardware and software features. Hardware features such as the camera viewfinder and body composition sensor are all present and correct, as are Samsung’s app drawer and the litany of third-party apps the watch, which uses Samsung’s One UI Watch 6 skin of Wear OS, is capable of accommodating.

  • Features score: 5/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: Performance

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and Garmin Venu X1 worn during run on separate wrists

(Image credit: Future)
  • Battery life performed as described, albeit sluggish charging
  • Excellent running metrics
  • Gemini on-wrist is a fun addition

I wore this watch pretty much constantly until the battery was completely drained, sleeping and exercising in it, and I can confirm after several short workout sessions (one 25-minute run, and a few automatically-detected walks), the battery gave up after around 25 hours with the always-on display on. That’s as described by Samsung, and longer than your average Apple Watch, but still far shorter than most of the best running watches.

When it comes to its workout performance, I was impressed. I tested the Watch8 against the Garmin Venu X1, and its metrics fell comfortably within the margin of error to suggest sufficient accuracy for both watches. It really is a great running watch; it fits flush on the wrist, doesn’t move around, remains super comfortable, and shows consistently useful information.

Even after my run finished, Samsung Health highlighted issues it thought I could improve upon, and recommended me specific drills as an action plan to address them. That, in particular, is a wonderful addition to Samsung Health, and it’s great to see some actionable insights rather than the watch simply throwing more stats without context into the mix.

I found sleep tracking with the Watch8 to be accurate, at least as far as sleep duration goes, and its slim profile ensured comfort overnight. During my testing, I woke up in the middle of the night with a cough, and Samsung correctly identified my time spent awake. Samsung’s Sleep Animal feature, gleaned from historic data from the Samsung Galaxy Ring and Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, offered me the light-sleeping Nervous Penguin profile.

The much-hyped on-watch Gemini feature was fine, though I certainly feel like I’m becoming numb to AI notification summaries and simple voice-command tasks these days, even if this is the first on-watch representation of Google’s Gemini AI Assistant. In fact, this has come to the Samsung Galaxy Watch series even before the Google Pixel Watch. Perhaps we’ll all have to reorient the way we feel about AI when we’re wearing it on our bodies, and it’s nice at least to have the option to ask Gemini to start a workout instead of swiping through tiles, and you can do some cool things with notifications.

One notable gripe I had with the watch, hand-in-hand with the lackluster battery, was the disappointing charge time. Using the Watch8’s proprietary charger, I started charging the watch from 0% at 08:18am. It took until 10:12am to completely fill the gauge, almost two hours.

Samsung Galaxy Watch8: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You’re a Samsung phone user

The latest iteration of the Galaxy Watch knocks it out of the park.

You want a slim watch

Rather than the bulky Ultra or Classic, the sleek and light mainline Watch8 looks positively elegant.

You want Gemini on-wrist.

At present, this is one of the very first watches with on-wrist Gemini via Wear OS 6.

Don't buy it if...

You value battery life

At a piddly 30 hours with a two-hour charge time, you’ll be taking the watch on and off quite often.

You’re an iPhone user

Get an Apple Watch, you know the drill.

You want the rotating bezel

For my money, the Watch8 looks better slim. However, if you simply must go for the addition of the rotating bezel, the Watch8 Classic is also available. View Deal

Also consider

OnePlus Watch 3

One of the best alternative Android watches

Read our full OnePlus Watch 3 review

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

A weighty, powerful watch and the best Samsung watch for active people.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra review

How I tested

I wore the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 for a week, draining the battery down completely and charging back up to full. I slept with it on, paired it with a Samsung phone, and tried all the features such as antioxidant index and on-wrist Gemini. I completed multiple GPS workouts, comparing the results to a top Garmin watch for accuracy.

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic review: A Galaxy Watch Ultra that’s dressed to impress
5:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic: One-minute review

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is different from its predecessors. The Classic series crops up every two years like clockwork, and all feature that rotating bezel, which serves as a way to interact with the watch.

However, while the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic and Watch 4 Classic bear a resemblance to their namesake mainline entries in the Galaxy Watch series, the Watch 8 Classic draws more from the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra.

This new influence means the body is a whole different shape to the new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, which has slimmed down by 11% to become the thinnest Galaxy Watch yet. The Classic is still chunky, and features the Ultra’s programmable Quick Button in addition to the rotating bezel. The Quick Button can be programmed and used in many different ways, from starting your most-used workout to opening music controls. The rotating bezel also allows you to scroll through apps, lists, and messages without using the touchscreen.

These two features, combined with voice commands aided by the Google Gemini AI assistant, mean you have lots of different ways to interact with the watch, which is great. The bezel feels smooth in use, and it feels very natural to use the wheel to scroll through long passages of text and lists of apps alike.

Other new features include sleep apnea detection, a new Running Coach with 160 running plans to recommend and track, useful redesigned software (including new at-a-glance app collection displays and a minimalist widget called a Now Bar, which lives on your watch face when a task is running in the background) and of course, that previously mentioned AI assistant. It’s also got Samsung’s existing suite of features, such as a BioActive heart rate sensor, sleep coach recommendations, accurate body composition, and lots more.

I’ve tested the watch for around a week alongside the Samsung Galaxy Watch8, and can confirm it's the full package inside an attractive but thick and chunky casing. It's great, but I do prefer the slender Galaxy Watch8 for day-to-day and active wear.

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic: Price and availability

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic

(Image credit: Future)
  • Bluetooth-only model starts at $499 / £449 / AU$899
  • LTE model is $549 / £499 / AU$999
  • Pre-orders available July 9

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is available for pre-order now priced at $499.99 / £449 / AU$899 for the Bluetooth-only model. Considering the mainline Watch8 is available for $150 / £100 cheaper, you’re paying for the upgraded stainless steel body, the rotating bezel, and the added Quick Button. LTE connectivity is available for an additional $50 / £50 / AU$100.

This certainly isn’t a small price increase between editions, and it's a big jump from the previous-generation Classic as well: the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic started at $399 / £369 / AU$699, although that was a smaller-sized 43mm model, whereas, like the Ultra, the Classic 8 is a one-size-fits-all 46mm.

  • Value score: 3.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: Design

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8

(Image credit: Future)
  • The rotating bezel is back
  • Added Quick Button
  • Redesigned UI/software

The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic only comes in a single size, 46mm, where 40mm and 44mm options are offered with the mainline Samsung Galaxy Watch 8. This is a watch for bigger wrists only, as it’s also thick and chunky due to the added height and heft from the bezel. However, the machined bezel is a lovely design, and intuitive to use when scrolling through options on the watch.

It looks and feels like a Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra, especially with the addition of the Quick Button – so if you liked that design, you’ll also like this one. The Watch8 Classic's display is tied with the 8 for the brightest yet, at 3,000 nits. You also get double the internal storage of the standard Samsung Galaxy Watch8 – 64GB, instead of the standard 8’s 32GB.

As mentioned above, the Quick Button can be programmed for different purposes, and the bezel is used like the digital crowns on the best Apple Watches in that you use it to cycle through options, but the real magic is in the redesigned UI, which I love.

At-a-glance views now offer more information on your limited display, while a new watch face widget called the Now Bar, an idea borrowed from the best Samsung phones, allows tasks running in the background – like Timers and Workouts – to have a small presence on your regular watch face. It works very well in practice, and I loved using it.

My main design concern, other than the limited size options and thickness of the watch, is the Dynamic Lug system, which is borrowed from the Galaxy Watch Ultra. I mentioned in my Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review that I found it fiddly, especially as a man with short nails.

However, it does mean there’s less case movement during exercise, and the watches (in white and black) look snappy with the leather-effect strap provided. If you’re keen to use it for exercise, especially swimming, it may also behoove you to pick up a silicone one, further inflating the price of the watch as you’ll need to buy this separately.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: Features

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic advanced running metrics

(Image credit: Future)
  • Tons of third-party apps
  • Powerful wellness metrics
  • New hardware features like the Antioxidant Index

Aside from the design differences, many of the new features on offer are the same as the ones described in my Samsung Galaxy Watch8 review, but I’ll repeat them here. Sleep apnea detection is added to Samsung’s extensive suite of sleep-tracking features, which also includes sleep coaching, snore detection, and Energy Score.

A new Running Coach helps calibrate your running and can recommend one of 160 different training plans, intelligently switching between plans on the fly based on your performance. The new Antioxidant Index detects the level of the beneficial antioxidant carotenoids in your body, found in leafy greens and orange vegetables: if this score is low, you likely need to eat more vegetables.

Gemini on the Samsung Galaxy Watch, the first of its kind, is a headline feature here, and based on my time with the watch, it seems to work well in practice. I normally used it as a standard Google Assistant for hands-free texting, but every now and again it did something smart enough to really impress. For example, I asked it for directions to the nearest Sainsbury's supermarket, and the watch automatically brought up Google Maps with turn-by-turn directions already plugged in. Sweet.

All of this is added to Samsung’s existing suite of health tracking, fitness, and lifestyle features, which are further enhanced by third-party apps from Wear OS. These include advanced fitness features like dual-frequency GPS to better calculate runs, hikes, and rides, TrackBack to stop you getting lost, and body composition analysis to determine your ratio of fat to muscle to bone.

This is surprisingly accurate: we tested Samsung’s feature against a smart scale with favorable results.

  • Features score: 5/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: Performance

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic

(Image credit: Future)
  • Great wellness metrics
  • Programmable Action button & satisfying bezel rotation
  • Battery life still frustrates

The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic’s rotating bezel, plus its programmable Quick button (not an Action button a la the Apple Watch Ultra) offer more interaction options than the Samsung Galaxy Watch8, and the watch is all the better for it. The Watch8 Classic’s rotating bezel spins back and forth with satisfying tactile clicks, used to scroll between tiles and up and down lists in grid view.

The Quick button allows you to set two functionalities to a short press and a long press: I used a short press for Google Gemini and a long press to automatically start a running workout. These two functions were for my most-used apps. I found the Quick button useful and intuitive, but I ended up doing this in the first place as I didn’t find saying “Hey Google” always brought up Gemini, as I found speech recognition struggled to pick up the wake-word. However, once the app was active, it had no problems interpreting my requests, usually simple things I would already use the voice assistant for, such as texting brief message responses.

However, I did use more complex prompts on occasion, such as asking it to recommend good walks within five miles of my location, and Gemini had no problem doing so. Some requests, such as asking it about my sleep, simply pull up the corresponding app (in this case, Samsung Health) and the correct tile within that app (in this case, sleep scores).

Wellness metrics were great. I tested the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 against the Garmin Venu X1 in a detailed test which you can read about here, but I also ran with the Galaxy Watch8 Classic and got a similar reading. The strap provided is a leather-look exterior with a silicon underside, so I felt like I could exercise with the watch without changing straps – which is a good thing too, as the new quick release strap is actually more fiddly to use with short nails than first thought. A colleague with long nails agreed it wasn’t easy, and required a very firm press to release.

The Watch8 Classic wasn’t as comfortable to wear as the vanilla Watch8, largely down to the bulkier profile. You can see both watches compared above, but the bigger bezel changes the shape of the Watch, causing it to shift around due to how lightweight it was. During the run, I had to stop and tighten the strap a notch beyond how I’d wear it normally, because I could feel it shifting around on my wrist. Because it’s so lightweight for its size, however, I was ok with wearing it overnight, allowing Samsung’s smorgasbord of sleep information to come into play.

Sleep, exercise and recovery metrics alike were detailed and full of actionable, useful information: not always a given, as many smartwatches are content to merely throw more stats at you without context as to what they meant or how to improve them. My only gripe is the battery, which is still too short, and the watch took over 100 minutes to charge from 10% to full.

  • Performance score: 5/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic: Scorecard

Category

Comment

Score

Value

Relatively expensive considering the price of the standard Galaxy Watch8

3.5/5

Design

Bulky, but the rotating bezel is a winner

4.5/5

Features

A wealth of metrics, hardware tricks and third-party apps.

5/5

Performance

Interactive and comprehensive with great wellness metrics.

4/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic: Should I buy?

Weather report on Samsung watch

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

You want a chunky watch

That bezel adds a lot of height to the overall watch.

You want a statement piece

There’s no denying with all its stainless steel and classic bezel, that this watch looks lovely on wrist.

You want a fitness companion

This watch is packed with comprehensive, actionable exercise and recovery insights.

Don't buy it if...

You dislike sleeping in chunky watches

Unless you’re going to also spring for a Galaxy Ring, you’re better off getting the slimmer Watch8 series.

You’re an iPhone user

Almost self-explanatory, but you’ll be far better off with an Apple Watch Ultra.

You already own and love the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

There’s almost nothing the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic can do that last year’s Ultra can’t, with more battery life left over than the Classic.

Also consider

Samsung Galaxy Watch8

The mainline Watch8 is slimmer, cheaper and offers the same great functionalities.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Watch8 review here

OnePlus Watch 3

Now available in two sizes, the onePlus is another chunky steel Wear OS watch that will appeal to fans of this one.

Read our full OnePlus Watch 3 review

How I tested

I wore the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic for a week, trying all the features, draining the battery down to its fullest, and completing multiple workouts. I tested its running GPS against a top Garmin watch, tried the health features such as the Antioxidant Index, composed prompts for the on-wrist Gemini assistant and downloaded third-party apps onto the watch such as Strava and Spotify.

The Garmin Descent Mk3i is a 5-star dive watch that blows the Apple Watch Ultra 2 out the water
2:00 pm | June 21, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: | Comments: Off

Garmin Descent Mk3i: Two-minute review

Sitting at the top of Garmin’s recreational dive watch family, and by extension the best swimming watch for divers, the Descent Mk3i’s AMOLED display – 43mm or 51mm – uses a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal lens – something that’s more important than you might realize in scuba diving, where you and your buddy can be exposed to a variety of hard materials like other watches, knives and the natural topography, such as rocks and wrecks.

I didn’t treat the Descent Mk3i any differently to how I dive with any of my own watches (slap it on and forget about it without being overly cautious), and so far, the display has proven to live up to its scratch-resistant claims. That titanium case has also held up well during testing, but be aware that the Mk3 without air integration is a stainless steel model.

Getting used to the five physical buttons can take some getting used to, but take the time to explore their functionalities, and you’ll be swimming. And on that, if you’re not swimming and are instead in a dry environment, you can use the touchscreen to navigate the Decent Mk3i.

Where this dive computer stands out against virtually all of its rivals is with its SubWave sonar technology, which enables diver-to-diver communication up to 30 meters. None of my buddies have one of these for me to try it with, but you can be sure that I’ve done my fair share of research on the feature and it comes highly recommended. However, I’ve just highlighted the biggest problem of SubWave-based communication – you need to be diving with like-minded Garmin fans.

Garmin Descent Mk3i

(Image credit: Craig Hale)

If you are in that position, especially if you’re running a dive school, then you’ll also love being able to monitor the tank pressures of up to eight divers (who are within a tighter 10-meter range).

Compared with other recreational watches, the Garmin Descent Mk3i is much closer to the boundary of tech diving – apart from single gas mixes, you can also set it up for multi-gas dives and rebreathers, so if you plan on going deeper or staying for longer, then your requirement to use different equipment and gasses will be supported by this high-end watch.

It also works all the way down to 200 meters – that’s way below recreational diving limits, but is a welcome upgrade over most watches, which cut out at 40 meters (around 10-20 metres short of maximum recreational diving limits). Many rivals can withstand water pressures down to 100-200 meters, but they tend to stop tracking your diving activity way before this.

When you’re on land, the sensors take regular readings of your heart rate, respiration rate, pulse oximetry and more to estimate your in-the-moment health like the rest of the best Garmin watches, and these metrics feed the Dive Readiness score.

There’s even a Jet Lag Adviser to offer guidance on light exposure, sleep schedule and exercise – perfect for those action-packed dive holidays. Although the science behind preventing decompression sickness is still being developed, we do know that physical exertion can bring on the effects, so being advised of your dive readiness before you get in the water is a handy tool.

Garmin Descent Mk3i

(Image credit: Craig Hale)

Unlike the Apple Watch Ultra 2, which lives on my left wrist 24/7 (apart from when it’s charging), the Descent Mk3i’s battery life promised 30 whole hours of diving, which was more than enough to cover my weekend of four dives. And on the weeks when I wasn’t diving, I made a habit of charging it on a Sunday evening – that 10-day battery life is a game-changer, even with all the sensors going every few seconds.

Besides being deep in the Apple ecosystem, the only reason I can think of stopping me from moving over to Garmin fully is the fact that it still has a relatively clunky UI, but that’s hard to solve given how unbeatably feature-ridden it is. It has features like Garmin Pay and a voice assistant, but it’s not quite as slick as native Apple or Google watches.

On the whole, though, if you can look past the high price point, I think the Garmin Descent Mk3i might just be the best all-in-one smartwatch for divers you can buy today, and even with its four-figure price tag, it still represents good value for money on the basis that you get one of the most comprehensive and reliable sports trackers in the business.

Garmin Descent Mk3i: Specifications

Component

Garmin Descent Mk3i (model tested: Carbon grey DLC titanium with black silicone band, 51mm)

Battery life

Up to 10 days (4 days always-on display, 30 hours diving mode)

Charging cable

Garmin proprietary clip charger with USB-C connection

Diving depth rating

200m

Sensors

GPS, GLONASS and Galileo satellite systems, heart rate, pulse oximeter, altimeter, compass, gyroscope, accelerometer, thermometer, ambient light sensor, depth sensor

Gas mixes

Air, Nitrox and Trimix, up to 100% O2; 1 bottom gas and up to 11 deco and/or backup gases

Component

Garmin Descent Mk3i (43mm)

Price

Starts at $1,400 / £1,250 / AUD $2,500

Dimensions

43 x 43 x 14.13 mm

Weight

68.3g with bands

Case/bezel

Fiber-reinforced polymer / stainless steel

Gas mixes

Air, Nitrox and Trimix, up to 100% O2; 1 bottom gas and up to 11 deco and/or backup gases

GPS

GPS, Galileo, GLONASS

Battery life

Up to 10 days (30 hours diving mode)

Connection

Bluetooth, Wi-Fi

Water resistant

Yes, 200m depth

Garmin Descent Mk3i: Price and availability

Garmin Descent Mk3i

(Image credit: Craig Hale)
  • $1,400 / £1,250 / AUD $2,500 for 43mm
  • $1,600 / £1,600 / AUD $3,200 for 51mm
  • T2 tank pressure transmitter: $500 / £430 / AUD $900

The top-of-the-range Garmin Descent Mk3i (with transmitter) is a $2,000+ wearable, which puts it right at the top of its class, but it could still end up costing you less than buying a dedicated dive watch and a second fitness tracker for land.

To fully benefit from the Mk3i’s capabilities, you’ll need to pair it with the T2 tank pressure transmitter for a fair chunk more cash.

If you’re on a tighter budget, there’s also the Descent Mk3. The removal of the ‘i’ in its name means it won’t work with the tank pressure transmitter, but you can save yourself some cash and pick it up for $1,200 / £1,100 / AUD $1,250.

Garmin Descent Mk3i: Scorecard

Garmin Descent Mk3i

(Image credit: Craig Hale)

Category

Comment

Score

Value

It’s loaded with more features than most rivals, but it’s still very expensive

4/5

Design

Rugged and durable design with high-end titanium finish on Mk3i models

5/5

Features

There’s no denying this is the ultimate watch for outdoor and diving enthusiasts

5/5

Performance

Responsive operating system and long-lasting battery life

5/5

Garmin Descent Mk3i: Should I buy?

Garmin Descent Mk3i

(Image credit: Craig Hale)

Buy it if...

You want something that can do it all

It’s expensive, but there’s not much that comes near to offering as much functionality as the Descent Mk3i.

You’re a tech-reational diver

You can push the limits of recreational diving with this watch, which offers tools to support tech diving.

You spend a lot of time outdoors

Superb GPS tracking, detailed body metrics and endless workout options help you to go wild.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget

There are watches that offer similar metrics and tank pressure monitoring for less money.

You’re a novice diver

Chances are you don’t need everything the Descent Mk3i offers, so why not consider a Fenix 8?

Also consider...

Garmin Fenix 8

A high-quality all-in-one dive watch for true outdoor enthusiasts.

Read our Garmin Fenix 8 review

Suunto Ocean

A user-friendly, minimalist dive watch with support for wireless air pressure monitoring

Read our Suunto Ocean review

First reviewed: June 2025

This cheap Apple Watch dupe is under $100 and actually stuffed with features
4:54 pm | May 13, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Tozo S6: Two minute review

The Tozo 6 is unlikely to make it into our guide to the best smartwatches, but it's certainly good value for money, comparable with some of the best cheap fitness trackers. What you get for the $79.99 / £54 / around AU$111 price tag is pretty impressive, although you’ll be purchasing it knowing its limited feature set. Despite being relatively feature-rich, there are a lot of limitations. We’ll get into those alongside what’s good and commendable about this budget-friendly option below.

The Tozo S6 looks almost identical to the Apple Watch SE, a cheap dupe. I appreciate it can be difficult to make smartwatches stand out from each other, but if you put these two smartwatches next to each other, you’d be amazed at how similar they are. It’s not even just the shape, but also the location of the crown and secondary button, as well as the strap's style.

The Tozo S6 plastic case boasts a smooth curved bezel from back to front, culminating in a sizable 1.82-inch AMOLED display. Tozo has done a superb job of engineering a screen that is both clear and bright, especially for the price. Colors are generally replicated accurately, with a slight tendency towards being too vibrant. Customizable watch faces are an expected, but welcome addition.

On the right-hand side, you’ll find a rotating crown above a secondary button. The crown performs nicely with sufficient resistance and satisfying ‘feedback’ to enable predictable and controlled scrolling. The secondary button protrudes from the case and is easy to locate without looking.

The silicone strap took a while to install due to some rather fiddly pins but once in place, it was pretty comfortable. Once tightened, the rest of the strap folds up underneath so it’s not flapping around. At first, I thought this would be unbearably uncomfortable but in reality, it caused no discomfort at all.

Tozo S6

(Image credit: Future)

Moving on from the design and onto the features, we find a smartwatch that covers all the expected bases when it comes to smartwatches, health trackers, and fitness trackers.

The Tozo S6 provides the ability to track metrics, including heart rate monitoring and blood oxygen levels. Unfortunately, the watch is slow to generate results, with a heart rate measurement taking upwards of 30 seconds. This is noticeably slow compared to other smartwatches, including the Huawei Watch GT5, which takes between 10 and 15 seconds. Having to wait for metrics is one of the downsides of paying so little for the watch.

Exercise activities can be tracked using one of 10 sports modes, although more can be added by using the app, which is a slightly odd system. Your desired sports mode can be located by swiping up and down through the list, although the scrolling experience is far from smooth and reliable. However, once in, the interface is actually quite nice; stats during runs and cycles, such as time elapsed, calories burned and distance traveled are prominently displayed, enabling them to be easily seen even during intense exercise or adverse weather conditions.

The accuracy of metrics collected during my test cycles is comparable with other smartwatches that I’d worn while cycling the same routes. These include the recently-tested Huawei GT5 and Suunto Race S, which are both at the more premium end of the market. Recorded activities are nicely displayed in the Tozo app.

I liked how these were organized and presented in a calendar format, with each one showing a set of key stats and presented in easy-to-digest graphs. For such a cheap smartwatch, the Tozo app is actually comparable with anything you’d find from Huawei or Samsung.

Smartwatch features include receiving notifications and reminders. These are delivered reliably and instantly, as long as the device is connected through the app. I did find the device dropping connection more often than I would have liked, but thankfully the pairing process is both quick and easy. For the price, I was impressed that Bluetooth calling was available, although you have to add contacts into the Tozo app first. Audio quality could be improved, but what are we really expecting for one of the most budget smartwatches around?

The watch is advertised as lasting around 15 days on a single charge, although I barely managed 10 days during my ‘only check the time and notifications’ testing period. With activity tracking and health monitoring performed each day, the battery life dropped nearer to 5 days.

Tozo S6: Specifications

Price:

$79.99 US / £54 UK

Dimensions:

44.5*38.5*10.8 mm

Weight:

39.5g

Case/Bezel:

PC+ABS

Display:

1.85-inch AMOLED 390x450 ppi

GPS:

None

Battery life:

Up to 15-days battery life

Connection:

Bluetooth

Water resistance:

1 ATM

Tozo S6: Price and availability

  • $79.99 US / £54 UK
  • One size only

The Tozo S6 is only available in one size and one color (black). It retails at an unbelievably low $79.99 US / £54 UK. Shipping takes between three and seven days. Every purchase includes a 30-day money-back guarantee, a one-year hassle-free warranty, and lifetime customer support.

Tozo S6: Scorecard

Category

Comment

Score

Value

For $79.99 / £54, you'd be hard pressed to get anything better.

4.5/5

Design

An Apple Watch-style design but without the class. The 1.85-inch AMOLED screen is a redeeming quality.

3.5/5

Features

With only relatively basic and limited health and exercise tracking, the Tozo S6 doesn’t score too highly.

3.5/5

Performance

Given the cost, the performance is quite impressive. But compared to more expensive alternatives, it really lacks features and accuracy.

3.5/5

Total

A basic smartwatch with the budget price to match

3.5/5

Tozo S6: Should I buy?

Tozo S6

(Image credit: Future)

Buy if it...

You want a cheap smartwatch
At $79.99 / £54, there aren’t many cheaper options. It’s incredible that you’ll still benefit from a range of tracking for health and exercise.

You want a crisp and clear display
The 1.85-inch AMOLED Ultra-Clear screen looks fantastic.

You are only a casual tracker of exercise
The limited tracking options are good for generalists but not for tracking specific sports.

Don't buy it if...

You like a premium smartwatch
At $79.99 / £54, almost everything about the Tozo S6 is cheap. It also looks cheap and if that’s not what you want, then I’d steer clear.

You want good fitness tracking
For better tracking of your exercise and fitness, you’d be better off investing in one of the budget Fitbit watches.

Also consider

Amazfit Active 2

A gold standard for cheaper smartwatches.

Read our full Amazfit Active 2 review

Garmin Forerunner 165

A more expensive watch, but a better outdoor companion.

Read our full Garmin Forerunner 165 reviewView Deal

How I tested

I wore the Tozo S6 for over a month, during which time I tracked a range of activities, including walking, cycling, and running. I also tested every single health-tracking feature that the smartwatch offers. I paired the watch with my iPhone although there’s also a Tozo Android app.

First reviewed: May 2025

I didn’t fall in love with the Apple Nike Sport Loop but I’d still recommend it – here’s why
9:00 pm | April 14, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Comments: Off

Apple Nike Sport Loop review

If you want to jazz up your Apple Watch, then look no further than the Nike Sport Loop. This lightweight, yarn-crafted strap has a woven design that’s a bit more charismatic than more basic silicone alternatives. But still, it’s not the cheapest option, coming in with a list price of $49 / £49 – so is that splash of pizzazz truly worth it?

Well, if you’re big into workouts or running, then the answer may well be a resounding ‘yes’. That’s because this durable band is constructed of a double-layer nylon weave, which forms a cushioned layer on the skin-side while still enabling moisture to escape. Its breathable design means you’re not going to be irritated by excess sweat, which is a big benefit.

Having said that, I didn’t personally find this band to be as comfortable as some of the best Apple Watch bands around. That’s due to its use of a nylon material that could sometimes feel a little bit fuzzy and overly noticeable on my wrist. Of course, that’s going to come down to personal preference – not everyone will love the fluoroelastomer material used on the Apple Sport Band, say, but I much preferred its smoother texture.

One thing that’s undeniable, though, is that this strap is ultra quick and easy to fasten. It comes in a loop shape and can be attached using its velcro strips. Simply stick the band down and you’re ready to go – just like that you’ve got a secure, hassle-free way to wear your Apple Watch. That’s a significant plus, especially given some cheaper alternatives, like the Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap can be a tad stiff to fix on.

As well as being quick to fasten, this strap has a flexible design, meaning it rarely feels too tight. The Nike Sport Loop’s inherent flexibility also means that it comes in one size only – though it will suit any wrist size between 145 and 220mm, meaning almost anyone can find a snug fit.

One last critique before I sum up: this strap is fairly playful, but isn’t exactly the most distinguished or premium-looking. Its use of a yarn material reminds me almost of a fabric watch I had as a kid – especially in colorways like Blue/Red and Green/Grey. There are some more low-key color options like Black/Blue, but if you want something classier, you’re better off with an option like the Apple Milanese Loop.

In the end, the Apple Nike Sport Loop is undoubtedly a practical, workout-friendly band that’s going to hit the spot for a lot of you out there. I didn’t adore the sensation of the nylon material or the aesthetic of the band, but that’s very much down to personal taste – I’m sure there will be plenty of you who disagree wholeheartedly! So, if you want a high quality strap and you’re into the Nike Sport Loop’s flexy, playful look, it’s certainly well worth considering.

Apple Nike Sport Loop on wrist

(Image credit: Future)

Apple Nike Sport Loop review: price & specs

Apple Nike Sport Loop on block with watch displaying the weather

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Apple Nike Sport Loop?

Buy it if…

You want a more flexible fit
The loop design and velcro strips mean that the Apple Nike Sport Loop is super easy to fasten. The flexibility of its material also means it won’t feel too tight or rigid, ideal for when you’re on a run or mid workout.

You need an option for workouts
The Nike Sport Loop’s flexible fit is only one aspect that makes it optimal for workouts. It’s also constructed of a fabric material that’s both breathable and sweat resistant. It doesn’t get much more practical than that!

Don't buy it if…

You want a more sophisticated look
This isn’t the most distinguished-looking Apple Watch strap on the market, in my view. If you want something a little more premium looking, check out the Apple Milanese Loop, for instance – though beware, this model will set you back $100 / £100.

You’re looking for an ultra-cheap option
At $49 / £49, this is far from the most expensive watch strap around, but there are a whole host of cheaper, third-party alternatives to consider too. For example, the CeMiKa Silicone Sport Straps will only set you back between £8.99 - £12.29 if you’re in the UK – though bear in mind, you won’t get the most stylish band around.

Apple Nike Sport Loop review: also consider

Apple Nike Sport Band
The Apple Nike Sport Band is still my go to Apple Watch strap and it’s going to take something special to push it off that pedestal. It has a smooth, comfortable design, exciting color options, a highly adjustable fit and plenty of breathability. This one’s made of fluoroelastomer, which I found to be a lot kinder on my skin, plus its sweat and water-resistant. You can’t ask for much more, really. Read our full Apple Nike Sport Band review.

This Apple Watch band got some exciting new color options in 2025 – I tested it out to see if its still a top-class strap
9:00 pm | April 11, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Comments: Off

Apple Solo Loop review

If you ever get fed up with fastening up your Apple Watch every morning, the Apple Solo Loop is sure to liberate you from frustration. The Apple Solo Loop is as simple as it gets – a plain Apple Watch strap that slips straight onto your wrist – no buttons, buckles or the like to contend with here. And although it’s not quite the perfect strap, it’s still a favorite of mine – here’s why.

Firstly, the absence of any fastening features is a big time saver. Sure, that means this watch is non-adjustable – not ideal if you’re sharing your Apple Watch with another person, for instance, but the ability to just slip it on was a plus for me overall. Simply check out Apple’s size guide on its website and find the fit that works for you. Easy as you like.

I tried out the Size 6 edition and found it to be both snug and secure – just as all the best Apple Watch bands should be. But there were more design aspects that I loved. Firstly, this band is made from liquid silicone rubber – a material that felt comfortable on my skin and smooth to the touch. It’s also both swimproof and sweatproof, making it totally workout-ready.

And there’s more. This band comes in a variety of eye-catching colorways, including Northern Lights (neon green), Periwinkle (a blue-ish purple) and Peony (pink). These colors were added in Spring 2025 – just after I picked up the far less adventurous black variant. I know. I’m still not over it.

But look, I’m going to have to burst the Apple Solo Loop’s bubble for a second. It's pretty prone to picking up loose fibers and dust, which means it may need a bit of a clean every few days – something that won’t bother you with a model like the Apple Nike Sport Loop. On top of that, the closed nature of this band means it’s not the most breathable, so it’s not the best suited for runs or gym sessions.

One more thing – this isn’t the cheapest Apple Watch band on the market, carrying a list price of $49 / £49. Sure, that’s in line with the more affordable first-party options, like the Apple Sport Band, for instance. But it’s worth noting that there are some more budget-friendly third-party options out there, like the Upeak Sport Strap and Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap – both of which you can often get for less than £10 in the UK.

So when all’s said and done, I think it’s fair to say that the Apple Solo Loop is a very solid option for anyone seeking out a new Apple Watch band. It’s comfortable, easy to fit and vibrant (if you want it to be), not to mention the fact it's both swim and sweatproof. Sure, it’s not as breathable or dust-resistant as some of its rivals, but in the end, the Solo Loop is still worthy of my recommendation.

Apple Solo Loop on wrist

(Image credit: Future)

Apple Solo Loop review: price & specs

Apple Solo Loop on block

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Apple Solo Loop?

Buy it if…

You want ultimate simplicity
If you don’t want to mess around with fastening up your Apple Watch, I understand – it can be kinda annoying, especially when you’re in a rush. With the Apple Solo Loop, all you have to do is slide the strap over your hand and onto your wrist. That’s really it!

You want to add a splash of color to your wrist
Look… I know the black band I picked out isn’t the most vivid, but there are much more exciting options for the Apple Solo Loop, I promise! There’s Peony, Periwinkle, Northern Lights… even Light Blush if you’re into that. So rest assured, there’s plenty of ways to spice things up a bit.

Don't buy it if…

You want the best watch strap for workouts
Unlike alternatives such as the Apple Nike Sport Band, there are no holes in the Apple Solo Loop. That means it’s not as breathable – something that’s not ideal if you’re in the midst of a sweat-heavy workout. It’s great for underwater activities though, thanks to its swimproof material, so it just depends what kinda activities you’re getting into.

You want a more dust-resistant option
This Apple Watch band is slightly prone to picking up dust and fibers and if that’s something that’ll annoy you, it’s probably best avoided. Instead, I’d suggest checking out the Apple Nike Sport Loop. That model is made from nylon yarn and is much less susceptible to picking up unwanted fluff.

Apple Solo Loop review: also consider

Apple Nike Sport Band
The Apple Nike Sport Band is still my go-to whenever I’m wearing the Apple Watch SE. That’s because it has a smooth, breathable design, cool color options and a highly adjustable fit.. On top of that, it’s sweat and water-resistant. I mean, what more could you want? Read our full Apple Nike Sport Band review.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch FE is one of the most confusing smartwatches I’ve ever tested
2:06 pm | April 9, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: Two minute review

First unveiled in mid-2024, the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE is Samsung's answer to the Apple Watch SE. At least in theory. It's designed to be a cheap, entry-level smartwatch that offers many of the features you'd expect from a wearable without the loftier prices of the best smartwatches on the market.

For Apple, it's a strategy that works well. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 and Apple Watch Series 10 stand out against the very cheap Apple Watch SE 2. You get some basic features and a much friendlier price tag.

Yet, Samsung's attempt to emulate this strategy has left me confused and bewildered, and after a few days with the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE, I'm afraid I simply can't make head or tail of this watch or the purpose that it serves.

I could tell you about the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE's figures and performance statistics. I could tell you that during workout tracking, it performs generally well against my Apple Watch Ultra 2, tracking heart rate, distance, and GPS admirably. I could also tell you that it needs to be charged out of the box for around 90 minutes before you can use it and that even with the always-on display turned off, battery life will offer just 22 hours on a single charge.

Samsung Galaxy Watch fE

(Image credit: Future)

I could tell you that Wear OS, while amply equipped with plenty of health tracking and smartphone connectivity features, performs very poorly, thanks to a rather underpowered chip borrowed from the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4.

I could also tell you that the strap is fairly comfortable, but that the 40mm size, very large bezel, and small display make for a quite disappointing viewing experience.

Really though, the only thing I'm actually going to tell you is that you should buy a Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 instead.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 is only one year older than the FE. Despite this, it sports a more powerful CPU – clocked to 1.4GHz, not 1.18GHz – and more memory that will give you snappier performance, faster app loading, and more longevity from software updates.

While the FE is available as a 40mm model only, the Watch 6 can be found in two different sizes, including a larger 44mm configuration. The display on the Galaxy Watch 6 is larger and brighter, measuring 1.3 inches on the 40mm as opposed to 1.2 inches on the FE.

The Galaxy Watch FE also features the same internal storage and comes with more sensors. Finally, the battery capacity of the Galaxy Watch 6 is considerably larger.

This all makes sense on Samsung's website, where the Galaxy Watch 6 is considerably more expensive than the FE. However, out in the real world, you'll routinely find the Galaxy Watch 6 discounted to the same price or less than the enigma that is the Galaxy Watch FE.

If I may be so bold, I've even seen the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 discounted to less than the list price of the Galaxy Watch FE in both the UK and the US. Even at its own discounted prices, I've generally seen the FE similarly priced to the Galaxy Watch 6 on numerous occasions.

There's one scenario in which the FE makes more sense, and at the time of writing, I recently saw it half price. If you can get one for literally $100/£100, it's more enticing. However, that puts you squarely in really cheap smartwatch territory, and for that price, I'd recommend the absolutely stunning Amazfit Active 2, which handsomely beats the Galaxy Watch FE in terms of style, performance, features, and battery life. That's why we crowned it one of the best cheap smartwatches money can buy.

As such, while there's more I could say about the Galaxy Watch FE's performance, it's a smartwatch that I find myself unable to recommend to anyone.

At its usual price, it's simply no match for a discounted Galaxy Watch 6 or Galaxy Watch 7. Even with the heftiest discount, it's no match for the more stylish and performant Amazfit Active 2.

If the Galaxy Watch 8 arrives later this year, I'll return to this review and replace all the 6's to 7's to reflect that the Galaxy Watch 7 is now a better proposition than the FE.

Sorry, Samsung, but this one is a swing and a miss.

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: Price and Availability

Samsung Galaxy Watch fE

(Image credit: Future)
  • $199 / £199 / AU$399
  • LTE Version $249 (US only)
  • Barely cheaper than the much better Galaxy Watch 6

Available now, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE at a host of different retailers around the world. Prices start at $199/£199/AU$399, the only exception being the $249 LTE version that gets you cellular connectivity and is only available in the US.

Strangely, the only place you won't find it is Samsung's UK website, which lists the device as no longer available. However, UK fans can get their fix at the likes of Currys, Argos, and, of course, Amazon.

Price-wise, the FE is an extremely strange proposition. Despite being essentially a repackaged Galaxy Watch 4, the FE retails for more than you can buy a distinctly more impressive Galaxy Watch 6. For all the aforementioned reasons, you should probably buy that instead.

The FE is also priced squarely alongside the Apple Watch SE and is vastly more expensive than many of the best cheap smartwatches, notably the Amazfit Active 2 and Nothing's CMF Watch Pro range.

  • Value score: 1/5

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: Scorecard

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: Should I buy?

Samsung Galaxy Watch fE

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

It's less than $100 / £100

This is the only price at which this smartwatch makes sense, and even then, I'd consider alternatives.

Don't buy it if...

You want value for money

The FE is generally the same price or more expensive than the much better Galaxy Watch 6

You want a good budget smartwatch

If you're really on a budget, consider the Amazfit Active 2 or a CMF Watch Pro from Nothing.

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: How we tested

I used the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE as my main smartwatch for fitness tracking, sleep tracking, and more. I fully drained the battery to test battery life and tracked multiple workouts against my Apple Watch Ultra 2 to compare accuracy.

Samsung Galaxy Watch FE: Also consider

One of our very favorite cheap smartwatches, the Amazfit Active 2, is cheaper and has better battery life than the Galaxy Watch FE.

Read our full Amazfit Active 2 Review

The CMF Watch Pro 2 is a classy circular smartwatch that's very cheap, has great battery life, and performs more consistently than the FE

Read our full CMF Watch Pro 2 Review

The Galaxy Watch 6 is often the same price as the FE, if not cheaper. It comes in more sizes, is faster, and has more features.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 review

First reviewed: April 2025

I tested this understated yet convenient Apple Watch strap for a week – here’s why you should buy it now
10:20 pm | March 24, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: | Comments: Off

Apple Sport Band review

The Apple Sport Band is a basic, albeit high-quality Apple Watch strap that’s ready for all activity, whether that be a stroll in the park or a run around the block. At $49 / £49, it’s not the cheapest Apple Watch band in the world, but its price is very much in-line with other official first-party accessories, like the Sport Loop, for instance.

This band is made of fluoroelastomer – ideal for sports due to its inherently sweat and waterproof nature. When I went on walks and did a home workout, I never found that the band was irritating on my skin or accrued any kind of damage.

On top of that, it’s super comfortable for everyday use. Even fastening the band on is quick and easy – just poke the aluminum pin through one of the strap’s holes and you’re good to go. That combination of comfort and convenience is a must-have for all of the best Apple Watch bands.

Something I would have liked to see, though, is a few more holes in the strap for fitness activity. That’s something that I loved about the Apple Nike Sport Band, for example, because it offers added breathability when you’re working up a sweat. Another aspect of the Nike Sport Band I appreciated was that it is composed of 30% recycled fluoroelastomer, but the Apple Sport Band doesn’t come with this sustainability pledge.

But enough moaning – I want to get back to the positives again. This band is available in a wide array of colorways – seven to be precise. I tested out the Plum variant, but this strap also comes in: Black; Denim; Lake Green; Light Blush; Starlight; and Stone Gray. All of these look fairly understated, making for a more discreet look, if that’s what you’re after.

In addition, this strap is compatible with three different case sizes: 40, 42 and 46mm. You can grab it either in small-to-medium (130-180mm) or medium-to-large (150-200mm).

Even if this band comes in at $49 / £49, you’re still getting value for money. Sure, you could opt for a third-party alternative – like the Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap – for less than $15 / £15, but this will be more prone to scuffs and won’t be so easy on the eye. Meanwhile, the Apple Sport Band has a satisfying material, reliable fastening method and classy looks. That makes it well worth the extra spend as far as I’m concerned.

All in all, I think the identically priced Apple Nike Sport Band beats this one out thanks to its more airy design and vibrant looks. But for anyone that likes a more reserved aesthetic, I’d say the Apple Sport Band is a great option for you. It has that real quality feel and it's super simple to slip on if you’re on-the-go. That alone earns it a recommendation in my book.

Apple Sport Band on block

(Image credit: Future)

Apple Sport Band review: Price & specs

Apple Sport Band on wrist

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Apple Sport Band?

Buy it if…

You want an understated look
The Apple Sport Band comes in seven color options. None of these are dazzling and vibrant, but all of them play into a smooth, discreet look very nicely. When testing out the plum band, for example, I never felt that it stuck out like a sore thumb against my clothing.

You want to get fastened up quickly and easily
Just poke the aluminum pin through one of the Apple Sport Band’s holes and bam! It will lock into place straight away. There’s no frustrating buckle or unorthodox contraption to wrestle with here, just pop and go. Simple, yet effective.

Don't buy it if…

You want a cheap replacement strap
If you’re on the hunt for the ultimate bargain option, this ain’t it, I’m afraid. The Apple Sport Band will set you back $49 / £49 – by no means cheap for an Apple Watch accessory. Sure, that’s in line with the Nike Sport Loop, for example, but there are some really cheap third-party alternatives, like the CeMiKa Silicone Sport Straps if you’re looking for savings.

You want a super-classy band
If you want a super swanky band, then you’re in luck – there are plenty of premium alternatives to be discovered on the Apple Store. Options like the Milanese Loop or Hermès En Mer, for instance, carry that air of high class that some of you may be craving – but these options will set you back by at least $100 / £100.

Apple Sport Band review: Also consider

Apple Nike Sport Band
This one’s extremely similar – it even comes in at the same price. But if you want a bit more flair in your watch band’s design, the Apple Nike Sport Band is the perfect option. It has more vibrant, loud color options, eye-catching fluoroelastomer flakes throughout and breathable holes when you need to sweat it out. It’s been my go-to band since I started using the Apple Watch SE, so why not give it a try? Read our full Apple Nike Sport Band review.

The Apple Nike Sport Band is the best watch strap I’ve ever used, here’s why
10:20 pm | March 18, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Comments: Off

Apple Nike Sport Band review

The Apple Nike Sport Band is a workout-ready wrist strap that’s built for the sporty type. At $49 / £49, this is by no means one of the cheaper Apple Watch bands available, but it does, admittedly, have a premium feel to it that takes your workout monitoring to the next level.

Specifically, this band is constructed of the sweat and waterproof material, fluoroelastomer. Apple says that each strap has at least 30% recycled fluoroelastomer and that the flakes littered across the strap are made from a minimum of 66% fluoroelastomer – pretty neat. Interestingly, these flakes are scattered in a randomized manner, ensuring that each Nike Sport Band is unique.

More generally, this is a very nice looking band. I tested the Midnight Sky variant, where the flakes created a starry sky impression against the gray-black strap. Other than Midnight Sky, you can choose from: Blue Flame (blue and orange); Cargo Khaki (green and blue); Desert Stone (a sandy color with orange and blue details); Magic Ember (pink); Pure Platinum (white with mulit-colored splodges); and Volt Splash (green). I was a big fan of the many color options available – whether you want a more muted, professional looking option like Midnight Sky or an in-your-face vibrant band like Magic Ember, there’s a style for anyone – something we always look for on our hunt for the best Apple Watch bands.

That’s not the only variability to mention, though, because there are also a number of size options. This strap is compatible with three different case sizes: 40, 42 and 46mm. You can also get it in either small-to-medium (140-190mm) or medium-to-large (160-210mm). I used the former and found it very easy to get a comfortable fit – just poke the aluminum pin through one of the many holes in the strap and you’re good to go.

Even when keeping this strap on for entire days at a time, I never felt any irritation or annoyance. The high density of holes means there’s plenty of room for your wrist to breathe and the material is inherently resistant against water and sweat, making this strap ideal for workouts, for instance. I went on a run and many a walk and never realized any strain or damage, so you can rest assured that there’s plenty of quality here.

And quality is exactly what you’d expect for an Apple Watch band of this price. At $49 / £49 this thing isn’t cheap. There are some third-party alternatives – like the CeMiKa Silicone Sport Straps or Yoohoo Adjustable Metal Strap – that can be yours for less than $15 / £15. But really, I think you’ll feel the difference. The quality of material, excellent color design and more premium look of the Nike Sport Band makes it a superior companion for your Apple Watch – especially if you’re someone that loves to get active.

Apple Nike Sport Band on block against pink background

(Image credit: Future)

Apple Nike Sport Band review: Price & specs

Apple Nike Sport Band on wrist

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Apple Nike Sport Band?

Buy it if…

You’re the active type
If you’re someone that likes to stay in shape – whether that’s running, lifting weights, swimming (maybe all of the above?) – this is the ideal watch strap for you. It’s made from a water-resistant material and has holes to let your wrists breathe – it doesn’t get much better than that.

You want an easy-to-fasten strap
Something I love about the Apple Nike Sport Band is how easy it is to fasten to your wrist. Just poke the aluminum pin through one of the strap’s holes and it will lock into place. No more messing around with an awkward buckle.

Don't buy it if…

You’re on a tight budget
The only real issue I can take with this strap is its price. I don’t think it’s crazy expensive given the quality on offer, but it’s certainly not cheap. If you’re looking for a massively budget-friendly strap, this one is to be avoided, unless you find it at a significantly discounted price.

You want an ultra premium option
If you’re on the other end of the spectrum and want a top-tier premium watch strap, this might not be flashy enough for you. There are high-calibre metallic options like the Milanese Loop, for instance, but that will set you back almost $100 / £100.

Apple Nike Sport Band review: Also consider

Apple Braided Solo Loop
We’ve been hands on with the Apple Braided Solo Loop and found it to be comfortable, easy to fit and conveniently waterproof. It is certainly quite pricey though, coming in at $99 / £99 – ouch. The stretchy band is ultra-easy to slip on, but it may cause some overhang – so maybe stick with this Nike strap if you want a more practical, fitness-oriented option. Read our full Apple Braided Solo Loop review.

The Upeak Sport Strap is so comfortable I forgot I was wearing my Apple Watch – but it’s not the most premium band out there
3:38 pm | March 14, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Comments: Off

Upeak Sport Strap review

The Upeak Sport Strap is an Apple Watch band designed for physical activity, and for those who want something light and comfortable. It adopts a fairly typical sports band aesthetic, with its silicone material and perforated holes.

There are multiple colorways available, from monochromatic shades to more vibrant, multi-hued combinations, so there’s a good match for everyone. The Charcoal variant I had was understated, making it suitable for all sorts of occasions.

It feels reasonably durable, although it’s perhaps not as tough as some of the best Apple Watch bands out there. It also picks up blemishes and small scratches relatively easily too.

It installs quite easily into an Apple Watch. I did notice a small amount of play, wobbling very slightly from side to side within the strap recess, although not enough to cause a problem or warrant concern.

The Upeak Sport Strap is pleasingly light and reasonably thin. It’s also quite pliant with a small amount of elasticity, meaning you can stretch it slightly to adjust on your wrist.

These aspects help to make it very comfortable. The multiple fastening holes ensure an easy fit, while the material is soft enough to prevent irritation occurring. In fact, I could barely feel it on my wrist at times, which is always a good sign in a watch strap.

Despite this, the Upeak Sport Strap also offers a good amount of grip. Even when I had it relatively loose on my wrist, my Apple Watch still didn’t move around. The buckle is equally secure, so I wasn’t worried about it coming loose. This makes it great for physical activity, and means you don’t need an uncomfortably tight fit to keep it stable.

What also supports physical activity is how the Upeak Sport Strap deals with sweat and water. It stays comfortable even when drenched, without rubbing on the skin or causing irritation. Even better is just how quickly it dries, and a small dab of a towel is all that’s required in the most extreme cases.

One drawback of the Upeak Sport Strap, though, is just how easily it picks up debris, such as dust and hair, thanks to the sticky nature of the silicone. This can be hard to remove without the aid of a brush or lint remover.

Despite this, the Upeak Sport Strap remains good value for money at under £10. The comfort levels and ease of use are great, so even though it mightn’t be the most premium Apple Watch band out there, it still makes for the ideal workout partner.

Upeak Sport Strap on Apple Watch on wrist

(Image credit: Future)

Upeak Sport Strap review: Price & specs

Close-up of buckle on Upeak Sport Strap on wrist

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Upeak Sport Strap?

Buy it if…

You want supreme comfort
Regardless of what you’re doing, the Upeak Sport Strap remains comfortable in all situations.

You want to save money
Many equivalent sports bands, especially those from the big brands and Apple itself, are considerably more expensive.

Don't buy it if…

You want minimal upkeep
Thanks to the sticky nature of the Silicone, dust and debris stick easily to the Upeak Sport Strap, which can be awkward to clean.

You want something formal
Despite being relatively understated, it still isn’t among the most premium or elegant of Apple Watch straps.

Upeak Sport Strap review: Also consider

Nike Sport Band
If you’re after something more premium, then the Nike Sport Band is a good choice. It’s made from fluoroelastomer and is comfortable and breathable no matter what kind of activity you’re up to. It’s also durable, and the range of colors, including a Pride option, mean there’s a variant for everyone. We think it’s one of the best Apple Watch bands for working out with.

« Previous PageNext Page »