Netgear has always been happy to sit up at the more expensive end of the networking market but, following a management shake-up earlier this year, we’re pleased to see that it finally seems to be taking a more competitive approach with its pricing. The new Nighthawk RS200 is certainly the most affordable Wi-Fi 7 router that it’s released so far - although that low price does mean that it lacks some key features that most of its Wi-Fi 7 rivals take for granted.
Most notably, the RS200 is a dual-band router, which transmits a Wi-Fi signal on the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz frequency bands – whereas most Wi-Fi 7 routers are ‘tri-band’ devices that can also transmit on the 6.0GHz band as well (as do previous generation routers with Wi-Fi 6E too). Some people might argue that this omission means that the RS200 doesn’t even qualify as a true Wi-Fi 7 router at all, but there are other technical features within Wi-Fi 7 that enable the RS200 to squeeze better performance out of the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz bands. This ensures that it can outperform many of the older dual-band routers that are still in use in many homes, so it may be worth considering as an upgrade for people who are still using an old Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 router that was provided by their ISP.
Netgear Nighthawk RS200: Price and availability
How much does it cost? $229.99/£199.99/AU$449.00
When is it available? Now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, Australia
A price of $229.99/£199.99/AU$449.00 means that the RS200 is one of the most affordable Wi-Fi 7 routers we’ve seen so far – although, of course, Netgear had to omit support for the high-speed 6.0GHz band in order to achieve that price. However, its top speed of 6.5Gbps should still be adequate for most domestic broadband services. Netgear also states that it can connect to 80 different devices at the same time, and can cover homes up to 2,500sq.ft in size (although regions outside the US may quote that figure at 2,000sq.ft due to differences in national regulations).
Value: 3.5/5
Netgear Nighthawk RS200: Specs
Netgear Nighthawk RS200: Design
(Image credit: Future / Cliff Joseph)
Tower design provides 360-degree Wi-Fi
4x Ethernet ports for wired connections
USB for network storage
I still miss the streamlined design of the original Nighthawk routers, with folding wings that made it look like Darth Vader’s shuttle craft. But, like other new Nighthawk models since the introduction of Wi-Fi 7, the Nighthawk RS200 has a more upright design, looking like a tall, black obelisk that stands a full 249mm high. You’ll need to give it plenty of room when first setting it up, but this design does allow the router’s four internal antennae to more effectively transmit the Wi-Fi signal through 360-degrees all around, in order to achieve the high speeds that are provided by Wi-Fi 7.
(Image credit: Future / Cliff Joseph)
And, despite the low price, the RS200 provides wired good connectivity too, with a 2.5Gbps Ethernet port for a high-speed fibre or cable broadband connection. There’s another 2.5Gbps port to provide a wired connection for a PC or games console, and three Gigabit Ethernet ports for additional connections. It’s also possible to ‘aggregate’ – or combine – two of those Ethernet ports to provide a faster connection if required. There’s even a USB-A (3.0) port that will allow you to connect a USB storage device to your network, so that you can share files with other people at home or in an office.
Design: 4/5
Netgear Nighthawk RS200: Features
(Image credit: Future / Cliff Joseph)
There’s no getting around the fact that omitting the 6.0GHz frequency band is an odd decision for a Wi-Fi 7 router, as anyone who has a shiny new PC or smartphone that supports Wi-Fi 7 will want all the speed they can get from it. However, a speed of 6.5Gbps is still more than adequate for most home users, and many business users too, and the RS200 does include Wi-Fi 7 features – such as reduced latency – that still give it an edge over older dual-band routers.
The Nighthawk app is well designed too, and makes it easy to set up your new network in just a few minutes. There’s a QR code printed on top of the router, and you can just scan this code and then leave the app to set everything up for you automatically. You can simply use the default network name and password if you want, but the app allows you to create a new name and password for extra security. The only thing that slows you down is the need to create a Netgear account in order to keep using the app after the initial installation.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Cliff Joseph)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Cliff Joseph)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Cliff Joseph)
To keep things as simple as possible, the Nighthawk app combines the two frequency bands into a single network and automatically connects your computers and other devices to the fastest band available in that particular location within your home or office. But while the app is very easy to use, it doesn’t offer many additional features.
You can create a guest network, and there are tools for running a speed check and monitoring network traffic to ensure that everything is working properly. However, the app’s parental controls are very basic, simply allowing you to pause Internet access for individual devices. There are no weekly scheduling controls, or content filters to block web sites that might be unsuitable for children.
If you do want those additional features then you’ll need to pay a subscription fee for Netgear’s Smart Parental Controls service. There’s a 30-day free trial available, but once the trial ends you’ll need to pay $7.99/month or $69.99/year to continue the service. The same thing applies to Netgear’s Armor security service, which also provides a 30-day trial, but then costs $99.99 per year.
As we’ve said – many a time in the past – there are rival routers that provide better parental controls free of charge, so parents that do need these features may want to consider alternative routers.
Features: 3.5/5
Netgear Nighthawk RS200: Performance
6.5Gbps speed
Dual-band Wi-Fi 7 (2.4GHz/5.0GHz)
4 internal antennae
The lack of support for the 6.0GHz frequency band is clearly disappointing – and for some users it may well be a deal-breaker. Even so, the improved performance of the Nighthawk RS200 still allows it to beat the aging dual-band router in our office, which was provided by our ISP.
Our office broadband runs at 150Mbps, but our old router can normally only manage a top speed of 120Mbps even when connecting to devices that are close by in the same room.
Netgear Nighthawk RS200: Benchmarks
BENCHMARKS:
Ookla Speed Test – Single merged network (download/upload)
Within 5ft, no obstructions: 150Mbps/150Mbps
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps/150Mbps
20GB Steam Download - Single merged network
Within 5ft, no obstructions: 150Mbps
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps
We also have an office at the back of the building that our old router struggles to reach at all, forcing us to rely on PowerLine adaptors to provide a wired network connection instead. In contrast, the RS200 immediately hit the full 150Mbps speed that was available when connecting to devices in the same room for both the Ookla Speed Test and for large file downloads on Steam.
That speed did dip slightly as I picked up my laptop and wandered along the hall to the back office, but the RS200 took just a few seconds to roll up its sleeves and bump the speed back up to 150Mbps once more, and eliminate the need for those PowerLine adaptors. If you already own an expensive laptop or iPhone 16 that has full support for tri-band Wi-Fi 7 then it probably doesn’t make much sense to compromise on an entry-level router such as the RS200 that doesn’t support the 6.0GHz band. However, the RS200 can still provide a fast, reliable upgrade for people who are using an older dual-band router that is past its sell-by date.
Performance: 4/5
Should you buy the Netgear Nighthawk RS200?
Buy it if...
You Need An Affordable Upgrade
The dual-band Wi-Fi of the Nighthawk RS200 certainly isn’t state-of-the-art, but it can still provide a good upgrade for people who are using an old dual-band router provided by their ISP.
You’re A Network Newbie
Netgear’s Nighthawk app is a little basic, but it’s quick and easy to use. All you have to do is scan a QR code to set up your new network and then create a Netgear account to get started.
Don't buy it if...
You’re A Speed Demon
The relatively low price of the Nighthawk RS200 means that it’s limited to dual-band Wi-Fi using just the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz bands. Owners of new computers and mobile devices that support Wi-Fi 7 will be better off with a tri-band router that also supports the high-speed 6.0GHz band.
You Want Parental Controls
Netgear charges an additional subscription fee for its Smart Parental Controls service. There are rival routers that provide content filters and other parental controls free of charge.
Also consider
Netgear Nighthawk RS300
Owners of computers and mobile devices that already support Wi-Fi 7 may want to step up to the Nighthawk RS300. It’s 50% faster than the RS200, and also supports the high-speed 6.0GHz frequency band too.
From the affordable to the outrageous – the GT-BE98 from Asus is an all-out speed demon. Designed for gamers, it provides quad-band Wi-Fi 7 with a top speed of 24.4Gbps, and 10Gbps Ethernet for high-speed broadband connections.
BenQ has built a strong reputation for delivering great monitors that cater to creators and gamers. Supporting both ends of the spectrum is the BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX. One of the finest 32-inch mini-LED displays released this year, this 4K monitor is highlighted by an IPS panel that features a peak brightness of 1,000 nits and DisplayHDR 1000 certification. Offering a fantastic contrast ratio of 1000:1, there are 1,152 local dimming zones with a color gambit covering 99% Adobe RGB and 99% P3.
That alone would make this a fine monitor for creatives who stream or edit photos and videos. Meanwhile, PixSoul Engine does a fantastic job of making game visuals top-tier by using BenQ’s Game Color Database for advanced game-specific color modes. It also incorporates AI calculations for real-time adjustments of brightness and contrast, meaning regardless of what style of games you’re into, the visuals will look fantastic.
Performance-minded gamers needing a competitive edge have much to appreciate about the EX321UX. Paired with the respectable 144Hz refresh rate, the EX321UX also has a 1ms response time and FreeSync Premium Pro capabilities. Then there are various graphic overlays for both frame rate counters and crosshairs as well. Outside of PC gaming, there are enough ports to satisfy streamers and multi-platform gamers alike. As with most higher-end BenQ monitors, the EX321UX comes with an intuitive remote control, which makes applying various settings an easy task.
Those ports also allow for KVM, letting you use a set of keyboard and mouse inputs on two video import devices. This is great for streamers who use one PC for gaming and another for streaming with software like OBS. On the sound side of things, an eARC HDMI port gives 7.1 channel audio support for your choice of speakers.
The EX321UX could be considered the best mini-LED display in the 32-inch space now if a few things didn’t hold it back. The most notable aspect is the high $1,199 price point, which, when compared to the rest of the best 4K gaming monitors available that offer similar performance, might be a bit too much. Then again, the image quality alone is worth the price of admission.
The other issue is that the focus on adding eARC compatibility means this monitor doesn’t have a built-in speaker system. If money isn’t a problem and you have a nice speaker or headset system ready for use, the EX321UX is an absolute must-buy.
BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX: Price & availability
(Image credit: Future / Ural Garrett)
How much does it cost? $1,199/£ 1,099.99/ AU $2,199
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia
The BenQ EX321UX is now available in the US, UK, and AU territories for $1,199, £1,099.99, and AU $2,199 respectively. Potential buyers across those countries can buy directly from the manufacturer’s online store or various retailers like Amazon. For an IPS mini-LED panel, the cost may seem like a lot compared to other 32-inch 4K gaming monitors. However, the 1,000 nits brightness, HDR, PixSoul AI Engine, and 99% P3 and Adobe RGB makes this one of the best looking gaming monitors available. That doesn’t even count the loads of extras from eARC HDMI and KVM capabilities to the selection of ports and overlays.
If that’s a bit much, the Gigabyte M32UC is a wonderful alternative for around $450 and comes with built-in speakers. One would say that for the $1,199 price range, potential buyers could move into the OLED realm through outstanding gaming monitors like the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9.
Value: 4.5 / 5
BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX: Specs
BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX: Design
(Image credit: Future / Ural Garrett)
The overall design is more in line with function over form
Features remote control and loads of ports
Weighing in at around 16 lbs, the BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX is easy to control during setup. There’s an attached screw at the base that connects to the neck which is then linked to the display’s back panel. Once that’s done, you can adjust for height, tilt, and swivel. Going for more of a three-leg base means that the front legs aren’t obtrusive and won’t take up much space.
When it comes to the visual design on the EX321UX, it’s definitely more function over form. The front looks pretty boring - but who cares when the image quality is that beautiful? Having an all white back panel does offer a slight amount of aggressive flair, and you won’t find customizable RGB lighting.
Power comes from a standard power port that connects to a brick adapter before the power socket. The power port sits next to a large number of ports that allow you to connect various video and audio outputs alongside features like KVM capabilities. Outside of the singular eARC HDMI port, there are two standard HDMI 2.1 ports and a singular DisplayPort 2.1. Then there are three USB-C connections for various usage in addition to three USB-A ports. Rounding out the ports is a 3.5mm headphone jack so you can connect one of the best gaming headsets available to make up for the lack of built-in speakers.
On the bottom center is the power button, thumbstick for settings navigation, and quick switch button. These do a good enough job of changing various options, but the included remote comes in pretty handy, too. Navigating menus to change settings such as audio, video, and feature settings or even just turning it on and off was a breeze.
Design: 4 / 5
BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX: Features
(Image credit: Future / Ural Garrett)
PixSoul Engine provides great image enhancement
eARC HDMI allows great audio experiences
KVM and various overlays significantly add to the total package
As mentioned previously, the highlight of the BenQ EX321UX’s outstanding image quality is an accumulation of its mini-LED IPS panel, high brightness, and 1,152 local dimming zones with a color gambit covering 99% Adobe RGB and 99% P3. Taking things over the top is the PixSoul Engine, which utilizes BenQ’s Game Color Database for game-specific color modes and integrated AI algorithms for real-time adjustments of brightness and contrast. This does a fantastic job of making games look better while providing necessary visual information and avoiding damage to the immersive experience. Though the pre-selected image filtering looks great, the default Display HDR mode is simply wonderful in terms of image quality.
Not many gaming displays feature eARC HDMI as many gamers usually use headphones anyway. However, having the port that supports 7.1 channel audio on hand is something special for video editors and gamers who don’t want to put on a headset. Of course, video content through YouTube or streaming services like Netflix could benefit from the capability if you’re fine with using supported speakers.
KVM capabilities are perfect for streamers who offset the heavy computing of games on one computer with high-fidelity video streaming on another device. It works pretty simply and switching between devices takes roughly as long as switching between video inputs. Finally, there are various overlays for frame rates and crosshairs for shooter fans. All of these features are controlled through the in-display thumbstick or handy remote control.
Features: 4.5 / 5
BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX: Performance
(Image credit: Future / Ural Garrett)
Image quality is outstanding and enhanced by PixSoul
Game performance sets the standard for high-end gaming monitors
Modern PC gaming benchmarks of visual fidelity look amazing on the EX321UX, such as Cyberpunk 2077, Hellblade II: Senua’s Sacrifice, Alan Wake II, and more. The 1,000 nit brightness and 1,152 local dimming zones allow for bold, crisp color and incredibly deep blacks. HDR capabilities further enhance visuals without the brightness making images look flat. This even applies to more general computing tasks like web browsing where font reading is a pleasurable experience. Color accuracy is fantastic thanks to its high color gamut which many Adobe Suite users will appreciate.
Gaming performance is pretty top tier as well. The max 144Hz refresh rate allows for buttery smooth gameplay while the 1ms response time allows for lag-free tracking of on-screen elements. Holding all of that together to prevent screen tearing is FreeSync Premium Pro compatibility. Some of the games we tested, such as Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III, Forza Motorsport (2023), and Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon, proved that the EX321UX can handle fast-paced, twitch leaning gameplay. Add various overlays like crosshairs and competitive gamers will definitely have an edge with this display.
Performance: 5 / 5
Should you buy the BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX?
Buy it if...
You want fantastic gaming performance
Aspiring esports gamers or gaming enthusiasts are going to appreciate the 144Hz refresh rate, 1ms response time, and FreeSync Premium Pro.
You need outstanding image quality
The excellent image quality of this 32-inch mini-LED 4K gaming monitor is due to its 1,000 nits brightness, DisplayHDR 1000 certification, PixSoul AI Engine, and 99% DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB color coverage. This makes it ideal for gamers and creatives.
You want a lot of extra features
KVM and various screen overlays from frame rate counters to crosshairs are met with the fantastic PixSoul AI Engine.
Don't buy it if...
You need something affordable
$1,199 is likely out of the price range for more budget-minded consumers.
You want built-in speakers
Having a headset and eARC HDMI means users will be taken care of audio-wise, but other monitors for the same price offer in-display speakers.
Also consider
Gigabyte M32UC
Though the brightness and HDR doesn’t match the BenQ EX321UX, the $450 Gigabyte M32UC is more than serviceable for gamers in need of a 32-inch 4K gaming monitor.
Paying over $1,000 for a gaming monitor with an IPS panel may not make much sense when OLEDs are making waves. For example, the ultrawide Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 could be something potential buyers can consider.
The BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX was tested over a two-week period. During the day, tasks primarily involved using Google Chrome and Slack. This included working with Google Docs, project management software Asana, and social media management tools like Hootsuite.
Slack was also used extensively for communication across different channels, providing an opportunity to test the monitor's performance during general everyday use. Additionally, Adobe Suite software, including Premiere Pro and Photoshop, was used to evaluate color accuracy on the monitor.
To assess overall image quality, games such as Alan Wake II, Forza Motorsport (2023), and Hellblade II: Senua’s Sacrifice were played, focusing on technical visual details and art direction. Performance and game enhancement features were tested with games like Fortnite and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. Other games played included Starfield and Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon.
I have spent several years covering monitors and other PC components for TechRadar. In addition to gaming, I have over a decade of experience with Adobe Suite.
This generation of processors has been a mixed bag at best (and disappointing at worst), so it makes sense that Team Red would go all out to ensure the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivered something that exceeded expectations.
In that regard, the 9800X3D is a smashing success, delivering substantially better gaming performance than the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D that it replaces, though at a slightly higher $479 / £449.99 (about AU$700) price point. For gamers though, most will happily pay a bit more for a roughly 15% increase in gaming performance on average.
The chip isn't without faults, though. It isn't the absolute best processor for gaming in terms of framerates (that title belongs to the Intel Core i9-14900K over several games, averaged out), but where the last-gen Intel flagship simply threw raw wattage to get to the top, AMD's latest gaming processor uses substantially less power to come within 6% of the 14900K's overall gaming performance, a difference that is so close to being within the margin of variance and test setups that if I reran all my tests next week, the 9800X3D might beat it outright.
But, honestly, it doesn't need to do that. Intel's 14900K is overkill for anyone not running creative workloads like video editing, and the power cost is simply too high to justify getting an extra 6% overall gaming performance in synthetic tests. The Ryzen 9800X3D, meanwhile, will get you effectively identical actual performance and at a lower cost, both in MSRP terms, but also reduced power consumption and indirect savings like not needing to shell out for a 360mm AIO cooler to get the most out of the chip.
For that, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is indisputably the best processor for gaming you can buy right now, and it cements 3D V-Cache as the second most impressive innovation for gaming hardware after AI upscaling and it's something that Intel just doesn't have an answer for it.
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Price & availability
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
How much is it? Its MSRP is $479 / £449.99 (about AU$700)
When is it out? It went on sale November 7, 2024
Where can you get it? You can get it in the US, UK, and Australia
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is available now in the US, UK, and Australia for $479 / £449.99 / AU$799, respectively.
This is a bump up from the price of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D it replaces, which launched at $449 / £439 / AU$779. I would have loved to see the price remain the same, of course, but the last-gen chip wasn't exactly a cheap processor to begin with, and both chips are very much targeted at an enthusiast market where the price bump here isn't exactly going to be a dealbreaker—so long as the performance increase justifies the bump in price.
In terms of Intel's competing offerings right now, on the performance side, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (and Intel Core i9-14900K, for that matter) is $110 / £100 / AU$300 more expensive to get the same kind of gaming performance. As for in-class silicon, the 9800X3D is about 15-20% more expensive than the competing Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, and is roughly 33% more expensive than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X.
Essentially, the 9800X3D is a specialist chip for gamers, and while it isn't a performance slouch, at this price it's really only for PC gamers who want the best overall gaming processor and don't much care about stellar performance elsewhere. For those who need more than just a gaming chip, other options from AMD and Intel will be a better fit for the price.
Value: 3.5 / 5
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Features & chipset
(Image credit: AMD)
The fundamental specs of the 9800X3D aren't much different from the 7800X3D. They both sport the same 8-core/16-thread setup as the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, but like the 7800X3D, the 9800X3D has an additional 64MB L3 cache while the Ryzen 7 9700X only has 32MB L3 cache.
This 3D V-Cache in the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has been redesigned from the previous two generations of AMD X3D chips. This second-generation 3D V-Cache, as AMD calls it, fundamentally changes how the 3D V-Cache die interfaces with the main processing die, which addresses some of the main complaints of the previous two generations of X3D chips.
In the first iteration of 3D V-Cache, the extra cache die was stacked on top of the main processing cores, but with 2nd-generation V-Cache, the extra cache die is underneath the main die, leaving the main processing cores free to directly interface with the CPU cooler.
This is a big deal, since the processing cores are where all the heat is being generated, so having an extra layer of silicon between it and the CPU cooler had a lot of implications for what the chip could do. Thermals had to be carefully managed, so clock speeds had to be kept in check and there was no ability to overclock the chip.
By moving the 3D V-Cache die underneath the main processor core complex, the thermal restraints around clock speeds and voltage no longer apply, so the 9800X3D is the first 3D V-cache chip to feature full overclocking support, allowing precise voltage controls at the same voltage limits as the rest of the Ryzen 9000-series lineup.
Compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, then, the 9800X3D benefits from noticeably faster base clock and boost clock speeds out of the box, and overclockers can now tinker with their CPUs without too much concern that they'll brick the chip (though with overclocking, that is always possible and can void your warranty, so use caution).
Beyond that, the only major change from the previous generation is faster DDR5 memory support, from 5200MHz with the 7800X3D to 5600MHz with the 9800X3D, though both chips support AMD EXPO memory overclocking for even faster memory speeds.
Features: 4 / 5
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Performance
At the end of the day though, all that fancy new tech wouldn't amount to much if the chip's performance didn't deliver, and thankfully, it does - though not universally.
In the synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D showed very strong single-core performance on par with the rest of the Ryzen 9000-series lineup. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D, meanwhile, lags behind its Ryzen 7000 siblings noticeably, owing to the need to control thermals by limiting clock speeds. The Ryzen 9800X3D does not have this problem. Likewise, its multi-core performance is also unconstrained, running ahead of the Ryzen 7 9700X across the board.
On the creative front, this is generally not going to be a chip for creatives to concern themselves with - though there is one exception. If you're a photographer or graphic designer who does a lot of work in Adobe Photoshop or its alternatives, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's extra cache is going to be a serious benefit for your workflows, beating out even the Intel Core i9-14900K in PugetBench for Adobe Photoshop be a few hundred points.
Everyone else though, this chip is not going to do much for you.
On the gaming side, this is where the 9800X3D really shows off, though there's a bit of a caveat to that. In games where the main CPU bottleneck is game logic, such as Total War: Warhammer III or Civilization VI, the extra 3D V-Cache isn't necessarily going to help your game performance. In that instance, you're going to want something with the fastest clocks possible to plow through all those AI decision trees or physics calculations before a game frame is even drawn.
As such, Intel's last-gen (and even current-gen) chips have an advantage in some games like Returnal (where complex bullet and geometry physics are the main CPU workload) or Total War: Warhammer III (where a lot of individual actors need to have their logic calculated quickly) because these gaming workloads benefit from faster clock speeds.
Where 3D V-Cache really benefits gaming is when there's data being communicated from the CPU to the GPU, like texture files or model geometry, and that additional cache memory can retain these smaller-but-not-tiny files in the fastest possible memory that can hold it. This mitigates the latency introduced when drawing a new game frame when the CPU has to go back to RAM to fetch a file because it didn't already have it in its much closer cache memory.
Games like F1 2023 and Tiny Tina's Wonderland benefited mightily from the extra available cache. In the case of the former, the Ryzen 9800X3D just wallops the Intel Core i9-14900K, and in the case of the latter, runs a very close second to it.
Taken all together, the Intel Core has a slight advantage just given the mix of games I used to test these chips, but for most gamers, the odds are good that the thing you're going to be looking for is a processor that works with your graphics card the best most of the time, and in this case, that'll be the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
Overall, then, with performance that comes in neck-and-neck with the best Intel processors in gaming workloads on average, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D would already be an incredible chip.
But I simply can't get over the fact that the 9800X3D can do this with just 53% of the power of the Core i9-14900K. Add to that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's impressive single- and multi-core performance, surprisingly great Photoshop performance, and gen-on-gen performance gains at very little power or monetary cost, and the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is easily one of the best AMD processors ever made.
Performance: 5 / 5
Should you buy the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D?
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Buy the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D if...
On balance, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is as good a gaming processor as you'll ever need.
Unlike its predecessor, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D can keep up with its peer class in general performance as well, not just gaming.
Don't buy it if...
If you're looking for more of a general-purpose processor, this chip isn't really for you.
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D isn't cheap, and for those on a budget, there are good processors out there that will get the job done.View Deal
Also consider
The Intel Core i7-14700K is still my favorite processor for its incredible performance at an accessible price.
The iMac has been the all-in-one computer to beat since the jump to Apple silicon and a well-received redesign. MacOS teamed with an Apple-made processor make for an excellent experience, and with an iMac you get everything you need to get off to the races in the box.
The 2024 iMac doesn’t majorly depart from this working formula – but three changes, err four, if you’re willing to spend a bit more, make one of the best gadgets around even better. First, Apple has dropped the price by $100 / £100 / AU$200, setting it at $1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999. For that, you get an M4 chip, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage – that’s better specs than the M3 version, so you're getting good value here.
The design is identical to the previous model from a year ago and the M1 iMac, which arrived in 2021. It’s an excellent-looking machine that can fit in almost any space – be it a proper desk, a kitchen counter, or even a shelf. It still only comes in one size – 24-inch – which might be a deal-breaker for some, but it appears that Apple wants those folks to get a Mac mini and pair it with a display.
Apple’s only big change with the design is new colors, and I love them. These new shades are more vibrant and match Apple’s other products better, and the finishes can vary depending on how the light hits them. You can get the M4 iMac in Purple, Blue, Green, Orange, Yellow, or Silver, and you’ll get color-matched peripherals – a Magic Keyboard with a Magic Mouse or Magic Trackpad – which all finally feature USB-C ports. However, Apple didn’t see fit to redesign the Magic Mouse; the port is still on the bottom.
Under the hood, the M4 chip outpaces the M3, and delivers noticeable improvements over the M1-powered or previous Intel-powered iMacs. Applications open swiftly with no noticeable lag, and you can do much more on this iMac than on an iMac from years ago. MacOS Sequoia, complete with some early Apple Intelligence features, is preloaded.
The built-in FaceTime camera has also been upgraded with a higher megapixel count and Center Stage functionality to automatically keep you in the frame during video calls – you'll still be in the shot if you like to circle while talking.
So between a lower price for the entry model, the arrival of the M4 chip, and a swap in FaceTime cameras, there is a whole lot to like here, especially if you’re after a Mac – or a computer in general – that's ready to go out of the box. Further, though, if you want to ensure that you can use the screen in any lighting conditions, and plan to place it in a room where you can’t really control the lighting, the new nano-texture option does an impressive job of blocking reflections.
Between the new colors and the improved performance, the latest iMac is again the best all-in-one computer, and the complete package. If you have an M3 iMac or even an M1, I don’t think you need to run out and upgrade, unless you’re hitting a performance roadblock (which is unlikely); but if you have an older model you’ll be in for a treat. And, again, the colors are a delight.
Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Pricing and Availability
How much does it cost? Starts at $1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999
When is it available? Up for order now, with shipping from November 8
Along with the new Mac mini, 14-inch MacBook Pro, and 16-inch MacBook Pro, the iMac with M4 is up for order now, and begins shipping on November 8. The M4 iMac isn't only a better-specced machine than the M3; it's also cheaper. For $1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999, you get the 24-inch M4 iMac with an M4 chip (8-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine), 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. You also get your pick of color, and you no longer need to spend more to get the shade you want.
The step-up model gives you a better M4 chip with a 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine for $1,499 / £1,499 / AU$2,399. That is paired with 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, and a gigabit ethernet port. The top-of-the-line iMac, which we tested, costs $2,699 / £2,699 / AU$4,199 and comes with 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage. You can opt for the nano-texture display for an extra $200.
Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Specs
Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Design
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
The same design as the previous two models
New colors look great
Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse finally get USB-C
When Apple likes a design, it tends to stick with it, and it's done so here. The new iMac with the M4 chip looks nearly identical to the M3 iMac, and even the M1 model that ushered in the all-new look in 2021.
Aside from an ever-so-thin build that will take up minimal space on a desk (it weighs in at under 10lbs / 4.5kg), the main feature here is the 24-inch Retina 5K display. I’ll touch on this a bit more below, but for now know that it’s a vibrant and visually rich viewing experience.
The screen offers a 4480 x 5250 resolution with 218 pixels per inch, and maxes out at 500 nits of brightness. Perhaps the most meaningful addition here is a new Nano Texture option, a coating that enables you to place the iMac in almost any space and be able to see the screen clearly – including a room with massive windows throwing sunlight directly on it. Yes, it’s an extra expense, but it adds to an already rich Retina viewing experience, with support for the Wide Color P3 gamut and Apple’s True Tone technology, which adjusts the brightness to make viewing the screen easy on your eyes.
As on the M3 and M1 models, the 24-inch screen is wrapped in a white border all the way around. On a potentially very colorful all-in-one, this is a sensibly neutral choice that allows you to focus on the screen. Tucked above the display is the most welcome addition, a new 12-megapixel ultrawide camera with support for Center Stage. This not only provides better visual for calls or photos but also offers a wide shot, and thanks to some smart software it will automatically keep you in the frame. That means if you squat down, it pans down, or if you jump up, it pans up, and if another person walks into the shot it will center you both. Very handy.
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
The new iMac still has a chin on the bottom, but I don’t think most folks will mind, especially since it’s color-matched to whatever shade you choose. And it's no longer the case that you might need to pay more to get the color you want, as all seven shades are available in any configuration of the iMac. I’ve been testing the new iMac in Purple, which perfectly matches the latest iPad mini and new AirPods Max – a lovely, light, and airy hue, with a lilac feel on the front and a deeper purple on the back and the accompanying stand. Apple also offers the iMac in Pink – the pink of your dreams, it looks stunning – Green, Blue, Yellow, Orange, and Silver.
As with previous models, a Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse or a Magic Keyboard and Magic Trackpad color-matched to the iMac are included in the box. The colors are most visible on the keyboard, where the white keys are set on top of the colored aluminum and on the Touch ID rim.
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
The other big change is that Apple’s accessories have finally switched to USB-C. So we can finally say bye-bye to Lightning, at least for the Magic Keyboard, Magic Trackpad, and Magic Mouse. With the latter, you might assume that Apple also swapped the port, but it did not. The USB-C port still lives on the bottom of the Magic Mouse, just as with the previous Lightning port, so when it comes time to charge your mouse, once you've plugged it in you won't be able use the mouse until it’s charged. Maybe next year. A positive is that you get a color-matched braided USB-C to USB-C cable in the box.
Like the M3 iMac and the M1-powered edition, the higher-end iMac I reviewed has four Thunderbolt 4/USB-C ports on the rear right when looking at it from the front. These are great spots to connect peripherals, and the power button is on the other side. The base $1,299 iMac comes with two Thunderbolt 4/USB-C ports, and both models feature a headphone jack on the left-hand side.
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
If you opt for the iMac to have a gigabit Ethernet port, it’s found on the power brick. You’ll connect the iMac to the power center on the back with a proprietary circular connector.
To keep the design here so thin, there isn’t much room for other ports. Many of the actual components live in that chin on the bottom of the iMac. The stand is quite small at just 5.8 inches but it supports the iMac well, and thanks to some articulation you can tilt the display vertically up or down for the perfect viewing angle. The overall dimensions and weight are the same as the previous version as well – 54.7 x 46.1 x 14.7cm (21.5 x 18.1 x 5.8 inches) and 9.74lbs / 4.42kg, or 9.79lbs / 4.44 kg for the more expensive models. Even so, four USB-C ports, even on the base $1,299 configuration, would have been a welcome addition.
While you won’t physically see them, Apple has also built in a six-speaker system with force-canceling woofers that support Spatial Audio, and a three-microphone array – both are unchanged year on year, and audio playback for music and videos sounds rich. I also found the onboard speakers great for video calls, ensuring clear audio and blocking out any reverb when speaking.
As a whole, Apple’s iMac is still the best-looking all-in-one on the market. While it’s similar to two previous editions, the new colors – especially the more vibrant shades – ensure it provides a refreshing experience in use. It also looks simply stunning in any space.
Design score: 4.5/5
Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Display
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
24 inches is plenty of room for multitasking
Display gets vibrant, but is only 60Hz
Nano texture option is impressive at blocking reflections
Just like the new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro with M4 or the iPad Pro with M4, the iMac now comes with the option of a Nano-texture glass finish. It costs an extra $200, but it drastically reduces visible reflections from light or other sources. Apple includes a special ‘polishing cloth’ for the finish in the box.
My apartment’s living room has a lot of windows, and gets direct sunlight for almost the entire day, so it was the perfect spot to put the Nano-texture to the test – I frequently have to move around when using a MacBook Air or Pro to reduce reflections. Thanks to the special coating I was able to keep the iMac on my kitchen counter and sit on a barstool, regardless of whether the light, whether natural or artificial, was reflecting on it. Yes, if it’s super bright you’ll notice it to a degree, but it usually diffuses quite naturally and lets you work in very bright environments.
Basically, it can cut down most glare, be it from natural or environmental sources, and if you’re already investing in a new iMac it will make it that bit more versatile. Regardless of whether you opt for Nano-texture, you still get a Retina 4.5K display with a 4480 x 5250 resolution aat 218 pixels per inch. It’s still only a 60Hz display, which is a bit disappointing, but if you’re not coming from a display with a higher refresh rate I think you’ll be right at home.
The display is excellent for daily web browsing, FaceTime calls, and other productivity use cases. I noticed inky blacks and crisp letters while writing this review and with emails. Streaming movies or TV shows on the display is a real treat, and might be a true use case if you use this in a family room or as the main device in an apartment. I could also easily edit photos in Photos, Pixelmator, or Photoshop, and even tackle video edits in Final Cut Pro.
While not as rich and with fewer contrast points, the iMac can be used to game comfortably compared to a MacBook Pro. The M4 chip does support dynamic caching and ray tracing, so titles like Resident Evil 2 were enjoyable here.
The one issuse I could see carried over from the previous models, and for new folks, is that the iMac only comes in one size – 24 inches. There are no longer 21.5-inch and 27-inch options, as there were when Apple offered Intel iMacs. I recommend getting a Mac mini and the display of your choice if you want a bigger or smaller screen.
The iMac can handle work and play, including AAA gaming titles
Apple Intelligence features – like Writing Tools and Image Playground – run well here
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
There are two main configurations of the iMac with M4, depending on the type of M4 chip you want. The entry-level model should be just fine for most folks, thanks to Apple upping the base RAM to 16GB. That configuration includes an M4 chip with an 8-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine. You can pay a bit more, starting at $1,499, for an M4 Chip with a 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and a 16-core Neural Engine – the price will get higher as you up RAM and storage. The base configuration tops out at 24GB of RAM and 1TB of storage, while the higher-end versions go up to 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage.
I’ve been testing the iMac with the 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine M4, and 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage. Out of the box the new iMacs come with macOS Sequoia 15.1, and with it you're getting the first Apple Intelligence features like Writing Tools, a redesigned Siri with a rainbow glow, Clean Up in Photos, and Notifications in summaries, as well as general OS improvements like iPhone Mirroring, which is both super-handy and a little addictive.
In my daily testing, I could have Safari and Google Chrome both open with upwards of 20 tabs, as well as Slack, Messages, Pixelmator, Preview, Calendar, a couple more apps, and iPhone Mirroring open without the iMac losing speed. This was on the top configuration for the iMac, so your mileage might vary a bit, but as with most Apple silicon Macs should should find the iMac zippy, and be hard-pressed to get the onboard fan to kick in.
Benchmarks
Here's how the iMac with M4 (2024) performed in our TechRadar and Future Labs benchmarks:
Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core: 3,646
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core: 14,724
(Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)
With so much power packed inside a modern, sleek build, this is a versatile machine that will be at home in a range of setups. It might be ideal for a shared computer amongst a family – macOS supports multiple profiles, and you’ll find parental controls. It has more than enough horsepower for casual mail and web browsing, and plenty of power for word processing or creating a PowerPoint. Similarly, it could be used for businesses that can load massive, thousand-row spreadsheets in Excel or Numbers and other more specific applications. You can also power through creative tasks like a large Logic file with several dozens of tracks and AI session players.
Even with AI or ML tasks, the iMac did quite well – I could ask for a summary of a lengthy and messy meeting recap in Notes, see a list of bullets in just a few seconds, and remove unwanted people from a group photo in seconds. I could perform a super-resolution boost to up the quality in Pixelmator Pro, and easily make automatic edits in LightRoom, all without a long wait time.
I also spent a few hours with the latest beta of macOS Sequoia 15.2 and its Apple Intelligence tools on the iMac with M4. Making custom visuals in Image Playground or my creative emojis in Genmoji is a lot of fun on this all-in-one. We can expect these features, alongside other new Apple Intelligence ones, to arrive before the end of 2024.
The iMac with M4 doesn’t disappoint on performance, and while the scores aren’t dramatically better than the M3 variant, those with an M1, especially if it's Intel-powered, will be ripe for an upgrade, and will reap the benefits in terms of speed. And considering the price drop of $100 / £100 / AU$200, it's kind of a steal for a brand-new Apple product.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Should you buy the Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024)?
Buy it if...
You want the best all-in-one computer
With tremendous performance, a vibrant screen, and a modern build, the M4 iMac stands out from other all-in-one computers – and it's cheaper than the previous model.View Deal
You want a colorful and sleek desktop computer
With a sleek and impressively thin build, the iMac has long looked the part, and with the M4 chip inside it offers plenty of power. And the new colors are delightful. View Deal
Don't buy it if...
You want the most powerful Mac
With the Mac mini and MacBook Pro supporting up to M4 Pro and M4 Max chips, you'll want to look to those for maximum power.View Deal
You want a bigger screen
24 inches might not be enough real estate for your needs, and if so you might want to get a Mac mini and pair it with a larger screen.View Deal
How I tested
After receiving the new iMac from Apple for testing, I unboxed it and then set it up as a new machine. I used the M4-powered iMac for seven days as my daily driver for work, general productivity, and play. I ran through all of my daily tasks in myriad applications like Safari, Google Chrome, Slack, and Pixelmator Pro, among others, and I also edited photos and videos, and played some AAA titles.
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) : Two-minute review
Apple's MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 is the full package, a near-perfect blend of price, performance, and utility. The M4 is the base edition of the newest and most powerful generation of Apple silicon (it's the same chip that's already running in the iPad Pro 13-inch) but it's still bursting with power, and more than capable of doing most of the heavy-lifting you want from a pro-level portable machine, as ready to edit raw photos and 4K video as it is to stand in as an able gaming console.
I've long been a fan of the MacBook Pro design, especially since Apple refined it by removing the Touch Bar, a neat innovation that never reached its full potential. My M4 Pro review unit, supplied by Apple, is a sleek-looking Space Black that's both elegant and wonderfully functional. The Magic Keyboard is still a typing gem, and I love the massive trackpad and all that space for resting my hands. And the stereo speakers that straddle the keyboard deliver powerful, crisp, and clear audio that could provide the soundtrack for your party in a pinch.
When I think about the reasons why you'd buy an M4 14-inch Mac Pro over the cheaper M3-running MacBook Air, the list is smaller than when I've compared the Pro and Air options previously, but there are a handful of standout features that make this MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) a near-perfect choice.
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
For starters, you have the ports. Where the Air tops out at a Thunderbolt 3 port, you get a trio of speedy Thunderbolt 4 ports with the MacBook Pro (you'll need to upgrade to the M4 Pro model for Thunderbolt 5). You also gain the SD card slot, an instant bonus for photo and video professionals. The larger body and ever-efficient 3-nanometer system-on-a-chip (SoC) means a promised 24 hours of battery life – for a Pro-level system, that's unheard of. Naturally, real-world usage times varied widely in my testing based on activity (AAA gaming can quickly eat up battery).
The biggest difference between Air and Pro might be the display. This Liquid Retina XDR is an inch larger than the MacBook Air's, and it offers a nano-texture option (an extra $150 / £150 / AU$230), something I highly recommend for cutting down on reflections in almost any situation.
With the MacBook Pro 14-inch M4, Apple has created a pro-grade portable that impresses in every respect. It joins Apple's pantheon of outstanding laptops, and is set to take a well-deserved place at or near the top of our best laptops rankings.
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Price and availability
Starts at $1,599 / £2,149 / AU$3,199
Nano-texture (which you want) will run you another $150 / £150 / AU$230
Apple unveiled the M4 MacBook Pro 14-inch on October 30, along with the new MacBook Pro 16-inch, Mac mini, and iMac. All these new Macs are running variations of Apple's M4 silicon.
Pricing for the M4 MacBook Pro 14-inch starts at $1,599 / £1,599 / AU$2,499 for the base configuration, which comes with the standard M4 chip and 16GB of unified memory. If you want the M4 Pro chip, pricing starts at $1,999 / £1,999 / AU$3,299, while the M4 Max model starts at $2,399 / £2,399 / AU$3,999.
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
My Space Black review unit is the base model (10-core M4, 16GB of RAM, and 512GB of storage) but with one key enhancement: the aforementioned nano-texture Liquid Retina XDR display coating, which costs an extra $150 / £150 / AU$230.
Value score: 4/5
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Specs
The MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) comes in three main configurations: our test unit, the base M4; a pair featuring the M4 Pro chip with options of 16- or 20-core GPU and up to 1TB storage; and at the high end, the M4 Max model, which offers one configuration with a 14-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 32GB of unified memory, and 1TB of SSD.
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Design
Virtually the same design as the previous model
All the key ports you need
Fantastic screen
Over the last few years I've become an unabashed fan of Apple's increasingly iconic laptop design. Where competitors often try different and sometimes odd design flourishes, Apple carefully peeled away all but what matters, leaving a MacBook Pro that looks and feels as if it was carved from a couple of pieces of 100% recycled black aluminum. Nothing feels like, or works like, it was left to chance. That impression starts when you put your finger under the lip of the display and flip open the clamshell to reveal the screen and keyboard. That hinge is as sure as it gets, offering the perfect blend of tension and smooth movement.
At 3.4lbs / 1.55kg. the MacBook Pro 14 M4 is not the lightest laptop or even the lightest MacBook. The excellent MacBook Air holds that distinction, and if you prize portability over power you might be reading the wrong review. On the other hand, the MacBook Pro 14 is by no means heavy (the 16-inch MacBook Pro, by contrast, weighs nearly 5lbs / 2.27kg).
Folded close, the MacBook Pro 14 is just 0.61 inches tall, 12.3 inches wide, and 8.71 inches deep. It slips into my backpack and, even though I'm used to carrying the M3 MacBook Air, I mostly forget it's there.
Image 1 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 4 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 5 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 6 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 7 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 8 of 8
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Apple hasn't adjusted the ports since the M2 MacBook Pro, which is fine with me. We still have the HDMI-out port if you want to extend your display to a giant, high-resolution screen. Next to that is one of the three Thunderbolt 4 ports and an SD card slot, which I used to transfer some raw images from my DSLR. On the opposite side is the MagSafe charge port, two Thunderbolt 4 (40Gb/s) ports, and the 3.5mm headphone, although I generally connect my AirPods Pros 2 for audio. If you need Thunderbolt 5's 120Gb/s throughput speeds you'll want to upgrade to an M4 Pro chip.
The full-sized backlit Magic Keyboard is a pleasure to use (I'm composing this review on it), with ample travel and a satisfying typing feel. It includes the arrow keys and a full line of function keys. On the right side of that is the Touch ID power and sleep button. During setup, it took me a few moments to register my index finger which I now use to unlock the laptop and log into some online services. Below the keyboard is the massive, nearly 6-inch diagonal, and very responsive Forcetouch trackpad.
One of the benefits of a larger laptop is that Apple can fit a pair of speaker grilles on either side of the keyboard. They provide fantastic sound, especially when playing spatial audio (try Territory on Netflix).
The system features a pair of four-inch vents, one on each side. You usually won't hear the fan until you play AAA games or run benchmarks.
Design score: 5/5
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Display
It's gorgeous
Better brightness for SDR
The coating you want
While it might look like Apple left the Liquid Retina XDR display from the M2 MacBook Pro untouched, there are a couple of noteworthy differences. But let's start with what's the same.
It's still the same mini-LED technology offering a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio and one billion colors with a P3 wide color and ProMotion with up to 120Hz refresh rate. The resolution is still nearly 4K at 3096 x 1964 pixels. However, Apple has boosted the brightness a bit, with SDR content now getting up to 1,000 nits. HDR still gets a peak brightness of 1600. These numbers primarily matter outdoors, where you might be battling back the sunshine, and I found that the display was quite effective at remaining viewable and usable in direct sunlight. I attribute this, however, only in part to the heightened SDR nit capabilities.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
My screen came with the optional nano-texture coating. This adds a fine texture across the entire screen that's meant to diffuse direct sunlight (the MacBook Pro comes with a special cloth for cleaning the screen). It costs an extra $150 / £150 / AU$230, but it's transformative technology. Not only does it effectively kill outdoor reflections, it also transforms how streaming and gaming content looks on the display. No more desk and overhead lamp bulbs peaking into the frame. No more window light killing your gaming groove. I honestly wonder why all laptops, Macs and otherwise, do not come with this texture. It's a game-changer.
Image 1 of 2
The nano texture helps make the screen viewable in direct sunlight. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 2
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
The 14.2-inch screen is big enough for lots of side-by-side app work. It's the perfect canvas for photo editing in Adobe Lightroom and video work in FinalCut Pro. but is also well suited to lighter productivity (like my efforts to write this review), email, and web browsing. It's not a touch screen because Apple refuses to bring that technology to Macs, even as the touch-friendly iPad Pro becomes more and more Mac-like. The trackpad is large enough that I don't miss touching a screen (as I did for years for Microsoft Surface Pro) but I can't help but wonder how a MacBook Pro with a touch, and Apple Pencil-friendly, display would alter the way we use this laptop.
Almost twins. The MacBook Pro 14 M4 is on the left, the MaxBook Pro 14 (2023) in on the right. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
The other display change relates less to what you'll see on the Liquid Retina XDR panel and more to how others will see you through it. Apple has upgraded the FaceTime camera, which sits at the top of the display in a cutout notch, with a 12MP ultrawide that supports its Center Stage technology. Center Stage takes the full 12MP ultrawide frame and narrows the viewport so that you are always centered in the frame. It doesn't matter if you lean left or right or get up and walk around the room, Center Stage will follow. It's a useful feature in FaceTime – I tested it on a call with my wife who wondered why I kept moving around – and also on Zoom, where it worked well but was not useful in a broadcast video situation, so I turned it off. Center Stage did not work for me in Google Meet, where I conduct most of my video meetings.
The new Center Stage Camera (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Display score: 4.5/5
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Performance
M4 has the Pro power most need
macOS Sequoia is flexible and easy to use
AAA gaming on a Mac is real
Benchmarks
Here’s how the MacBook Pro 14-inch (2024) performed in our suite of TechRadar and Future Labs benchmark tests:
PugentBench Photoshop: 10,542 PugentBenchPremier Pro: 4,618 Blender:Monster: 115.8; Junkshop: 73.17; Classroom: 188.1 Battery Life (web site surfing rundown): 18 hours and 31 minutes
The last time we reviewed a 14-inch MacBook Pro, it was running an M2 Pro. The base M4 inside my test unit has similar but not equal specs. It's still a 10-core CPU, but where the M2 Pro had a 16-core GPU, the M4 starts with 10 cores. However the M2 chips were all built on a 5-nanometer process, and the M4 line is on the more efficient three nanometers, which could lead to a better combination of power and efficiency.
The Neural Engine, which handles a lot of onboard machine learning and AI tasks, still has the same 16 cores.
Image 1 of 2
The FPS ranged from low 40s to mid 60s on Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2
(Image credit: Future)
Apple is now backing all of its new Macs with at least 16GB of RAM. This pays dividends in AI (Apple Intelligence is on board) and graphically intense operations like ray tracing, which helps make games like Lies of P look incredible on the MacBook Pro 14.
In benchmark testing, I found the numbers in line with the M4 performance I saw from the iPad Pro 13 inch. Geekbench 6.3 numbers measurably exceed those of the M3 in my MacBook Air.
When I played Shadow of the Tomb Radar, Steam's internal frames per second counter showed I got anywhere between 42fps and 62fps. To my eyes, there was no tearing or dropped frames.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 3
I played games and dited RAW photos on the MacBook Pro. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Numbers only tell you so much, and what matters most is real-world experience. I did do a fair amount of gaming on this MacBook Pro. As I noted above, the nano-texture screen makes games look amazing. In my Lies of P sessions (I connected an X Box controller via Bluetooth), I took note of the rich atmospherics, from rain to fire, and the level of detail that never descended into unwatchable blurs. Gaming on the MacBook Pro benefits from macOS Sequoia's Game Mode, which prioritizes gaming tasks for truly smooth and responsive performance.
The one time the M4 couldn't handle the task: four 4K 120fps streams playing back through FinalCut Pro. It had no trouble with four 4K 30fps streams. (Image credit: Future)
In FinalCut Pro, I edited four 4K 30fps streams at once, which played back smoothly in full-screen preview. However, when I tried the same thing with four 4K 120fps video clips shot on the iPhone 16 Pro Max, full-screen playback started dropping frames – an on-screen message confirmed this. It was one of the rare times I found the limits of Apple silicon.
Editing raw photos in Adobe Lightroom is a breeze. It's also worth noting that I rarely shut down other apps while I performed these operations, and as I noted earlier, the only times I heard the fans were during console-grade gameplay and Cinebench 23 benchmarking.
Keep in mind that my tests were all with the base M4 Apple silicon; imagine what you can expect from the M4 Pro and M4 Max.
Connectivity is mostly what you would expect, with support for Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 6E. I am a bit disappointed, though, that Apple didn't future-proof the laptop a bit with Wi-Fi 7 support.
Performance score: 5/5
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Software
macOS 15.1
Some Apple Intelligence
Image 1 of 2
This is quite the long-form article boil-down. (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2
(Image credit: Future)
macOS Sequoia (macOS 15.1) has a lot to offer. There's the new Passwords app, which gives you a full-blown application for managing your passwords, and there's the updated Notes, which can now transcribe recordings. It's not as good as the transcription in Voice Recorder on Android (it doesn't identify multiple speakers) but it's still useful.
There are now Highlights in Safari that can take a 3,000-word-plus New Yorker article and boil it down to a one-paragraph summary. I worry that loses the nuance of such a piece, but if you're in a hurry...
iPhone mirroring is impressive. (Image credit: Future)
There's also iPhone Mirroring, which lets you access and control your iPhone from the MacBook Pro. It's supposed to be useful when you don't have access to your iPhone (maybe it's just in another room), and I found it easy to connect an iPhone 16 Pro and then have a virtual version of the iPhone on my MacBook Pro 14 desktop. What's even wilder is how I can control the phone from the desktop system. I can message, browse the web, and even drag and drop between the desktop and the iPhone interface. I did notice that while I can open the iPhone camera, I cannot use the MacBook Pro 14 to take a picture with the phone.
Apple Intelligence is here within macOS 15.1, in the form of a redesigned Siri that supports Type to Siri and which can be dragged around the desktop. I found that I could ask Siri how to do things with the MacBook Pro, like find my Wi-Fi settings and opening an app like Notes.
Apple Intelligence puts email summaries at the top of email, and the writing tools are embedded throughout the system. In Notes, I asked the Writing Tools to rewrite my lengthy meeting notes. It did a really good job of boiling it all down to a concise bullet list, which I could also easily undo. This could be very useful.
This is not all of Apple Intelligence. There's no Image Playground for instance, but that will show up with macOS 15.2, possibly by early December.
A taste of AI
During my testing, I did install the macOS 15.2 Developer Beta so that I could get a sample of this MacBook Pro 14 M4's Apple Intelligence capabilities. Because this update is not intended for the public, my thoughts on this dev beta were not considered as part of my final software, performance and overall review score.
First, I was excited to see Clean Up now inside of the Photos app. It works just as it does in iOS 18 on the iPhone, and was useful for removing some unwanted items from my photos.
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff)
Image 4 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff)
ChatGPT's Siri integration, which I had to enable, is quite smooth, and looks and works as if it's a part of Siri. I used it in the Type to Siri mode, entering my prompt about how to create a goods presentation. The answer I got from ChatGPT through Siri was solid.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Future)
Image Playground, the generative AI image tool which lives in an adorable kitty app icon in the Dock, is also part of this beta, but it's still gated by an invite and, as I write this, I still await mine.
Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Battery life
Rated for 24-hour video streaming
Lasted more than 18 hours in our tests
Battery life is dependent on activity
The MacBook Pro 14 M4 is, according to Apple's promises, perhaps the first truly all-day laptop, rated to last up to 24 hours on a charge. Naturally, that's if you do nothing but stream seasons 1 through 3 of Stranger Things. Once you start adding in activities like web browsing, and emailing, Slack, gaming, and photo and video editing, those numbers change.
In our Future Labs tests, we found that we could get 18.5 hours of web browsing, which is two hours more than Apple is promising. Once I started gaming, though, battery life took a fast tumble; the system is clearly hard at work rendering the exquisite detail in Lies of P. I heard the fans going full-blast, and noticed the bottom of the laptop got quite warm. My advice is if you want to use the MacBook Pro 14 M4 as a gaming rig, keep the included 70W charger and woven USB-C to MagSafe cable close by.
Speaking of that charger; when I drained the system to zero, I was able to use it to recharge the MacBook Pro 14 M4 to 43% in 30 minutes. That's a bit less than the 50% I was expecting. To fully recharge, it took more than an hour.
I've had incredible battery experiences with the MacBook Air and its M3 chip. I can already see that, in normal use, the MacBook Pro 14 M4 is a sun-up-to-sun-down kind of system. That's impressive, and a big win for Pro fans.
Battery score: 4.5 / 5
Should you buy the Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024)?
Buy it if...
You want portable power without breaking the bank The MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) is a good blend of performance, portability, and reasonable price.
You want sunrise-to-sunset battery life You can easily get a day of activity with the power-sipping system
You’re Team Apple There are great benefits to adding a MacBook when you already have an iPhone and an Apple account.
Don't buy it if...
You want the ultimate performance This is a baseline M4, but the new MacBook Pro comes in M4 flavors that run up to the new M4 Max and a 16-inch display.
You need a touch screen No MacBook offers it. Try an iPad or a Surface Pro.
You have a 2024 MacBook Pro Apple hasn't redesigned the MacBook Pro, and the M2 and M4 performance numbers are not that far apart.
MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Also consider
If our Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) review leaves you considering other options, here are two laptops to consider...
Apple MacBook Air (M3, 2022) The follow-up to one of the best laptops ever released, the 2022 MacBook Air is svelte and sleek, with a larger screen and the same outstanding battery life. If you want a MacBook, but don't need the power of the MacBook Pro 14-inch, this is the one to get.
Dell XPS 13 Plus Its sleek and slim design, combined with a gorgeous OLED screen, great sound quality, and lattice-free keyboard embodies the luxury inherent of an Ultrabook. However, it’s also prone to overheating, and the touch bar is annoyingly inaccessible.
Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) in studio (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
I spent more than a week with the MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024)
I used it as an everyday productivity, creativity, and entertainment device
I ran benchmarks
Apple provided me with the base MacBook Pro 14 M4 system, and I used it every day to test and help craft this review. I set it up as a work system, and as one for production and play. I used it indoors and outdoors.
The new Mac mini (M4, 2024) doesn’t just prove that good things come in small packages – it also confirms the old adage that good things come to those who wait.
That’s because ever since Apple’s rather strange decision to debut the M4 chip in the iPad Pro in early 2024, myself – and I’m sure other Mac fans – have been not-so-patiently waiting for Apple devices that can take full advantage of the M4 chip (as good as the iPad Pro is, you can only run iPadOS apps on it – which by their very nature are not that demanding).
Now that I’ve actually got the Mac mini (M4, 2024) in my hands (and on my desk), I’m pleased to say that I’ve not been disappointed, and once again the Mac mini is the most affordable way to get into the Mac ecosystem, while also proving that if you’re looking for a small form factor desktop PC, there’s not a single Windows 11 PC out there that can even come close.
Perhaps the best news (apart from the mere fact that the M4 Mac mini exists) is that Apple has kept the price of the base model at just $599 / £599 / AU$999, a welcome decision that—combined with the new design and improved specs—means the Mac mini is now better value than ever. If you’ve been keen to join the macOS ecosystem but can’t afford a MacBook or iMac, then the Mac mini remains an excellent choice.
(Image credit: Future)
For people after even more power, there’s an M4 Pro model as well that costs $1,399 / £1,399 / AU$2,199. Both models come with 16GB unified memory as standard (double the amount as the previous model), and will receive Apple Intelligence AI features as they are rolled out.
Not only do you get the latest slice of Apple Silicon with the new Mac mini, but it has also had a major redesign – its biggest in over a decade – making it more compact than ever. It’s seriously impressive how small the new Mac mini is, and it makes placing it in any room of your home (or office) easier than ever. Thanks to two USB-C ports at the front, the Mac mini (M4, 2024) is an ideal mini PC for your front room – especially as gaming is a renewed focus for Apple. This could be the closest we ever come to an Apple games console – and with a price tag below the PS5 Pro, this could be the start of a resurgence for Mac gaming.
From my time with the Mac mini I was incredibly impressed with the performance of this tiny PC. The latest version of macOS, Sequoia, ran smoothly, and even advanced tasks such as video editing were handled with ease – and the Mac mini kept virtually silent throughout. The model I reviewed is the M4 version, and to be honest it performed so well for all the tasks I used it for that I would recommend this model over the far more expensive M4 Pro iteration.
So, Apple has done it again: it’s released the best small form factor PC in the world, and I can’t see Windows 11 or Linux alternatives coming close to the build quality, performance and value for money of the new Mac mini for a long, long time. If ever.
(Image credit: Future)
Mac mini (M4, 2024) (M4 Pro, 2024) review: Price and availability
Starts at $599 / £599 / AU$999
Same price as M2 model
M4 Pro model much more expensive at $1,399 / £1,399 / AU$2,199
When the Mac mini (M4, 2024) was announced and pre-orders went live on October 29, 2024, one of the most pleasant surprises was that the base M4 model comes with the same price tag as the M2 model - starting at $599 / £599 / AU$999.
The M2 Mac mini already represented excellent value for money – it would be extremely difficult to find a compact Windows 11 PC at that price range that offered the same level of performance – so the fact that you’re getting an upgrade in both performance and design for no extra cost is something to applaud – though if you recently bought an M2 Mac mini, you might feel a bit aggrieved.
The M4 chip inside the Mac mini is the same as the one in much more expensive devices, including the iPad Pro (starting at $1,299 / £1,299 / AU $2,199), iMac ($1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999) and 14-inch MacBook Pro ($1,599 / £1,599 / AU$2,499). Sure, with the Mac mini you don’t get a screen, nor do you have the ability to work on it while traveling, but offering the same amount of power for around half the price still represents incredible value for money.
The M4 chip features up to a 10-core CPU (4 performance cores and 6 efficiency cores) and a 10-core GPU, up from the 8-core CPU and 8-core GPU of the base M3 chip (Apple never released a Mac mini with the M3, it should be noted), and supports up to 38 trillion operations per second (TOPS) in its 16-core neural engine (Apple's version of an NPU) - so when Apple Intelligence, the company’s generative AI (artificial intelligence) feature does come to macOS, the M4 Mac mini will be more than prepared.
It’s not just the M4 chip that brings a performance upgrade, as the base model now comes with 16GB of unified memory, twice that of the M2 Mac mini’s base model. Not only does this mean the new Mac mini is much better at multitasking (as there’s more memory to support multiple apps running at once), but it’s also more future-proof.
(Image credit: Future)
You can also get the new Mac mini with the more powerful M4 Pro chip, which starts at $1,399 / £1,399 / AU$2,199. That’s quite a price jump, and while the M4 Pro is certainly a promising bit of silicon on paper, it’ll have to really outperform the M4 to justify the price difference.
We’ve been sent the M4 version to review, and for the majority of people, that should be more than capable enough for the kind of tasks they’ll need this tiny PC to perform. Having the M4 Pro option is nice, despite the price hike, as you are getting a seriously powerful PC in a tiny and almost silent form factor.
There was also a brief moment between Apple announcing the new Mac mini and it revealing the new MacBook Pros with M4 Pro where the M4 Pro Mac mini was arguably the most powerful Mac device ever. Remarkable.
Value score: 5/5
Mac mini (M4, 2024): Specs
Mac mini (M4, 2024): Design
Brilliant, smaller design
Front USB-C ports are welcome
Power button placement is a bit awkward
The Mac mini (M4, 2024) has received its biggest redesign since arguably 2011, and it’s now what Apple calls its “smallest computer ever”.
Where the previous model had dimensions of 197 x 197 x 35.8 mm (7.75 x 7.75 x 1.41 inches), the new Mac mini (M4, 2024) measures just 127 x 127 mm x 50 mm (5 x 5 x 2 inches). When taking it out of the box, it’s seriously impressive how small it is, easily fitting in the palm of your hand. Placing it on top of the M2 model, the older Mac mini looked big and bulky – something I’d never have imagined, as that was an impressively small bit of kit when it launched.
The new Mac mini is a bit taller than the older models, but if that’s the sacrifice that had to be made in order to shrink the overall footprint of the PC, while packing it with the latest tech, then it’s one I’m happy with. It’ll easily fit behind a monitor, and even in front of a screen, it’s unobtrusive enough that you’ll hardly notice it. Its small size also means you can plug it into your TV and it won’t look out of place in your lounge. For anyone holding out for an Apple games console, the Mac mini (M4, 2024) could end up being as close as you’re going to get.
As if to prove that the new Mac mini can be just as at home in a lounge as in an office or studio, it now comes with two USB-C ports at the front, alongside a headphone jack for easy access.
(Image credit: Future)
At the rear there’s a power port (impressively, despite the tiny size, there’s no bulky external PSU), an Ethernet port and an HDMI that’s capable of up to 8K at 60Hz, or 4K at 240Hz.
There are also three additional USB-C ports. While the front USB-C ports are limited to USB 3 speeds (10Gb/s), the three on the back are much faster. With the M4 model, the rear ports are Thunderbolt 4, with speeds of up to 40Gb/s. If you go for the M4 Pro model, those are upgraded to Thunderbolt 5, with speeds of up to 120Gb/s.
While it’s a shame that the front USB-C ports are slower than the rear ones, if you’re mainly using them for plugging in and charging peripherals, they’ll be fine, leaving the rear ports for tasks that need faster data transfer speeds – such as external hard drives or additional screens.
While the new design is a triumph on the whole, one element of the redesign has caused controversy – the placement of the power button. Rather than being on the rear right-hand corner of the Mac mini, as with previous models, it is now located on the bottom of the Mac mini by the rear left-hand corner. While the Mac mini is raised from the surface you place it on by a circular air vent bottom-center of the PC, you still need to lift it up to reach the button. As the new Mac mini is so small and light, and there are no moving parts inside, this isn’t too much of a problem, though if you’ve placed the Mac mini in a TV cabinet or somewhere where it’s hard to reach, it could be frustrating.
There are workarounds – you could just put the Mac mini to sleep rather than shutting it down, and waking it up by moving the mouse or tapping the keyboard, but even Macs need to be fully powered down every now and again. You could also use the Wake-on-LAN feature of macOS, which allows you to turn on the Mac mini by sending a command over the internet, though again you’ll need the Mac mini to be asleep, not fully turned off.
It’s certainly not the end of the world, but it’s not one of Apple’s better design choices. Placing the power button on the top or front of the Mac mini might ruin the aesthetics, but would have been easier to reach – or even having the power button still on the bottom, but on one of the front corners would have helped.
(Image credit: Future)
The new Mac mini only comes with the device itself and a power cord. Any other cables or peripherals will need to be bought separately (though if you’ve already got, say, an HDMI cable and a mouse and keyboard, then that shouldn’t be too much of a burden).
If you need peripherals to go with the Mac mini you can buy the Magic Keyboard for $99 / £99 / AU$149, the Magic Trackpad for $129 / £129 / AU$209, and the Magic Mouse for $79 / £79 / AU$149. These have had slight design changes as they now use the universal USB-C cable to plug in and charge, rather than Apple’s proprietary Lightning cable, which is good to see.
Of course, you don’t need these new peripherals as any Mac-compatible mouse or keyboard (which is any mouse or keyboard, basically) will work – though there’s no full-size USB A port anymore, so if those peripherals aren’t USB-C or Bluetooth, then you might need to buy an adapter.
Design score: 4.5/5
Mac mini (M4, 2024) review: Performance
Excellent performance
Virtually silent
Can even play some games
Once upon a time I was rather worried that Apple had fallen out of love with Macs, and especially the Mac mini, as the company seemed far more enamored with its iPhone and iPads, leaving its Macs to make do with incremental hardware updates within increasingly outdated designs.
Then Apple dumped Intel and made its own chips, starting with the M1 in 2020, and my doubts have pretty much vanished, as every major Mac device has not only been upgraded to an M-series chip, but they’ve also had noticeable redesigns as well, proving that Apple is committed to its Mac lineup. So, it’s with some relief that the Mac mini has not just got the latest M4 (and M4 Pro) chips, but also a major redesign as well, as it’s likely to be one of Apple’s more niche products.
It shouldn’t be – since getting M-Series chips, the Mac mini has become the best small form factor PC you can buy. Small PCs with either Windows 11 or Linux simply cannot match the build quality, performance, and price of Apple’s tiny machine, and with the M4 chip, that gap has become even wider.
Along with the 10-core CPU and 10-core GPU of the M4, the chip contains 28 billion transistors, up from 25 billion in the M3, but is still built on the same 3nm process node from TSMC, so a generational leap is out of the question.
In synthetic benchmarks there’s around a 20% increase in CPU performance when using Geekbench 6, though GPU performance upticks are more modest, with between 5% - 14% increases in benchmarks.
(Image credit: Future)
While any increase is always welcome, those kind of numbers mean if you have an M3 Mac mini, you won’t really see any major differences in performance, so upgrading might not be worth it (unless you absolutely have to have the smaller design of the newer Mac mini, which I wouldn’t blame you for).
Where things do get interesting when comparing performance between the M3 and M4 Mac mini is when it comes to AI – both artificial intelligence and Apple Intelligence. With the M4, Apple has included another 16-core Neural Engine dedicated to machine learning and AI tasks, and in AI benchmarks the results are pretty remarkable, with around a 35% increase in performance over the M3. Whether or not Apple Intelligence, or AI in general, will usher in the computing revolution we’ve been promised by many manufacturers has yet to be seen, but at the very least you know that if you buy an M4 Mac mini (or any M4 device), you’ll be in good stead should you wish to use future AI tools.
According to Apple, the M4 chip is capable of 38 TOPS - that's 38,000,000,000,000 operations per second – which is incredibly impressive and means on-device AI tasks should run well. However, the Snapdragon X Elite, like the M4 an ARM-based chip built for Windows 11 devices, offers 45 TOPS. That difference in operations per second isn’t huge, and it might not even be noticeable, especially when comparing Windows 11’s Copilot AI tool to Apple Intelligence, but it’s worth noting.
Apple Intelligence is introduced to Macs in macOS Sequoia 15.1 – and you’ll need to update the new Mac mini to get that version – thankfully, it’s quick and easy process.
The model I review here is the Mac mini with M4 chip, 16GB of unified memory, and a 512GB SSD. For day-to-day tasks, where I used the Mac mini for writing this review, browsing the web and general admin, it worked brilliantly. The operating system – macOS Sequoia – booted quickly, and every app I used loaded speedily and ran smoothly.
We’re now four years on from when Apple made the major move from Intel-based hardware to ARM-based, and that has allowed pretty much every major Mac application to make the move as well. This means it’s now very rare to have to use Apple’s Rosetta 2 tool, which allows apps made for Intel Macs to run on modern Apple Silicon Macs. That tool was essential in the early M1 days, and it meant you could still run your apps with minimal impact to performance.
Now that almost every Mac app, including those from third parties, runs natively on Apple Silicon means they can fully take advantage of the power of the M4 chip (though Steam, the popular store and launcher for PC games, still requires Rosetta to run).
Benchmarks
Here’s how the Mac mini (M4, 2024) performed in our suite of benchmark tests:
One of the best things about Apple’s M-class chips is that the company has made a big commitment to making them as power-efficient as possible, and while this might benefit MacBooks more, as it means they can enjoy longer battery lives, the Mac mini also benefits, as the more efficient M4 chip runs cooler, which allowed Apple to shrink the body of the Mac mini – and it also means the built-in fans that are used to expel hot air when the components are being used rarely kick in. For almost all of my time using the new Mac mini, it was virtually silent. This is great when using it in an office or studio, and it also makes it an ideal mini PC for the front room.
Even when switching to more intensive tasks, such as editing videos in Adobe Premiere Pro, the Mac mini kept pace brilliantly as I added 4K footage and scrolled between scenes. When it comes to gaming, the Mac mini (M4, 2024) was surprisingly good – on high graphical settings, it ran Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 44fps, well above the 30fps I consider to be minimum for a game to be playable, and with a bit of tweaking I think you’d get to 60fps.
Running Total War: Warhammer 3 at Ultra scored just 22.1fps, however. This game is more strenuous on the CPU rather than the GPU, though when I set the visual settings to low it hit 55.4fps. These are modern and ambitious games, so for a compact PC that’s not designed for gaming at this price, that performance is pretty darn great, and you have access to a huge library of Mac games through Steam and other platforms. Throughout playing, the Mac mini remained completely silent.
While the M4 model isn’t going to trouble the PS5 Pro any time soon when it comes to playing games, the fact that such a small device can still give a decent experience is pretty cool, and I assume the M4 Pro model is an even more competent gaming device, though for the price that is a lot steeper than any console - and even many gaming laptops.
Apple has also made a big deal about the M4 chip and its AI abilities, and from my tests it's... fine. Apple Intelligence is in its infancy, so I could not try out all the features that are coming, but I was able to edit a photo in the included Photos app and use the AI-powered Clean Up feature to remove elements from a photo. It worked as well as you might expect these early AI features to perform - it was quick and easy to do, but the background the AI generates in order for the objects you select (by painting over them with a brush) left mistakes and errors that mean it's far from perfect, and you can easily tell AI has been used.
From the AI tools so far, they are interesting yet not essential - bascially the same problem many AI tools have at the moment. For the Mac mini's part, it performed those AI feats all on-device, and they were done quickly and speedily. This is an area where I can see the Mac mini improving.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Mac mini (M4, 2024): Should you buy it?
Buy it if…
You want an affordable Mac This is the cheapest way to get into the Mac ecosystem, and it's worth every cent thanks to excellent performance and a gorgeous design.
You're looking for a mini PC Put simply, if you want a small form factor PC, this is the one to get. No Windows 11 mini PC can come close.
You've been waiting for an Apple console Thanks to its compact size, you can easily fit this below (or behind) a TV, and it does a decent job of playing games, though the M4 Pro model may offer a better experience with modern titles.
Don’t buy it if…
You want a gaming PC While you can play a growing library of Mac-compatible games, if you want to play the latest titles at high definitions and graphical settings whacked up to the max, buy a dedicated gaming PC instead.
You like to tinker and upgrade your PCs Due to the size, and Apple's general disdain for allowing its customers to open up their devices, this is not a PC you can upgrade yourself. A barebones mini PC like a NUC will be much better.
Apple’s new MacBook Pro 16-inch isn’t a revolutionary release like the new, smaller, Mac mini (M4, 2024), and instead is more of a specs refresh for the company’s most powerful laptop.
So, you don’t get any new design tweaks with the new model – but you do get the very latest M4-series chips which represent the pinnacle of Apple’s mobile hardware.
This is good news for people who are looking for an incredibly powerful workstation laptop that offers exceptional build quality and the kind of performance that many desktop PCs would struggle to achieve. For those of us who have been waiting for the M4 chip to show up in a device that can take full advantage of its power (this year’s iPad Pro, which debuted the M4 chip, is limited by running iPadOS, an operating system designed for tablets, with rather basic apps to match), the 16-inch MacBook Pro Apple announced in October 2024 could be just what you’ve been waiting for – though there are caveats.
Both of the new 16-inch and 14-inch MacBook Pros feature, for the first time, the M4 Pro and M4 Max (depending on configuration), which are even more powerful versions of the M4 – which has already proved to be a powerful chip in its own right. The model Apple sent me to review comes with the M4 Pro, a chip with up to a 14-core CPU consisting of up to 10 performance cores and four efficiency cores, and a GPU with up to 20 cores (twice that of the base M4 chip).
While this isn’t the most powerful Apple chip (the M4 Max comes with a CPU with up to 16-cores, featuring 12 performance cores and four efficiency cores, and a GPU with 40 cores), the M4 Pro will likely be more than enough for people who want a laptop that can handle professional tasks such as code compilation, 3D animation and video editing.
For people who just want a laptop for browsing the web, creating documents, and editing home movies and photos, this will be complete overkill. As the core balance of the M4 Pro shows, with more performance cores than efficiency ones, Apple’s focus with the new 16-inch MacBook Pro is all about extreme performance (the chip will switch between cores depending on the kind of task you’re doing – if you want a lot of power, the performance cores are used, for lighter use, the efficiency cores kick in).
(Image credit: Future)
This means unless you’re a creative professional, the 16-inch MacBook Pro (M4 Pro, 2024) really won’t be for you. And, with a starting price of $2,499 / £2,499 / AU$3,999 for the base configuration, which comes with the M4 Pro chip and 24GB of unified memory, this is the kind of investment that you should think very carefully about. That’s even more true of the M4 Max model, which starts at $3,499 / £3,499 / AU$5,699. Sure, you’re getting one of the most powerful laptops in the world for that price, but if you’re not going to need that kind of power, you’ll just be wasting money.
If you’re the kind of person who needs the very latest and most powerful hardware you might also be tempted – but don’t forget that it’s very likely we’ll see an M5 model next year. Should you buy the new MacBook Pro 16-inch, however, you should be confident in the knowledge that you’ll not need to upgrade again for a very long time.
For anyone hoping for a major redesign, then you will be disappointed. One thing I’ll say in Apple’s defense here is that the current design of the MacBook Pro 16-inch is pretty great – there’s not much I’d actually change about it. Even though the screen isn’t OLED (rumors suggest we could see that in 2026), the Liquid Retina XDR screen remains one of the finest you can get in a laptop – and there is at least a new nanotexture coating option that reduces reflections and screen glare, which will be welcome for people looking to use the new MacBook Pro out in daylight, or in brightly lit offices or studios – though this does come at an extra cost.
So, once again Apple has created an absolutely phenomenal laptop… that I can’t really recommend to everyone. If you’re a creative professional who is looking for a portable workstation to chew through some seriously taxing tasks, then this could be an excellent investment that could even save you money in the long run (with projects completing faster, you can take on more clients, and you won't need to buy a new laptop for many, many years).
That said, if you own an M2 Pro or M3 Pro model, the M4 Pro doesn’t offer enough of a performance leap to justify buying a new MacBook Pro just yet. The best move in that case would be to wait a few more years. If the M6 Pro MacBook Pro in 2026 does indeed come with a major redesign, then an upgrade is more justifiable, as the performance improvements should also be more noticeable. This isn’t a knock on the M4 Pro – it’s just that the M2 Pro and M3 Pro are just so good, you really shouldn’t feel like you need to upgrade just yet.
If you don’t need the kind of power that the new MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) offers, then I strongly recommend you look at the 15-inch MacBook Air (M3, 2024) instead, which is far more affordable, offers excellent performance and is all wrapped up in Apple’s iconic build quality and design.
(Image credit: Future)
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) review: Price and availability
Starts at $2,499 / £2,499 / AU$3,999
Same price in US as M3 model
Cheaper in UK and Australia than M3 model
It should come as no surprise that the new MacBook Pro 16-inch is a very expensive laptop. This is a workstation designed for professional use and packed with some of the most powerful and cutting-edge mobile technology you can get, along with a gorgeous and expansive 16-inch screen.
Still, with a starting price of $2,499 / £2,499 / AU$3,999 for the M4 Pro model with 24GB of unified memory, this is one heck of an investment and one that should be carefully considered.
As with previous MacBook Pros, there’s scope to configure the 16-inch MacBook Pro before you buy by adding more memory and a larger SSD (up to 128GB of memory and 8TB of SSD storage with some models), but the price rises exponentially. You can also get a base model with the more powerful M4 Max chip, which starts at $3,499 / £3,499 / AU$5,699, and again you can up the memory and storage.
You can also add a nano-texture display which reduces reflections and screen glare, which may prove very helpful for people who work in industries where graphics are essential (such as photography, digital arts, and filmmaking), but this is also an additional cost – it’ll add $150 / £150 / AU$230 to an already high price tag.
Interestingly, while the base model of the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) remains the same price as the M3 Pro and M2 Pro models launched at in the US ($2,499), in both the UK and Australia the new M4 Pro base model is actually slightly cheaper by £100 and AU$300.
If you want something more affordable, your options are limited. There’s no 16-inch MacBook Pro with the base M4 chip – you’ll have to go for the 14-inch MacBook Pro for that. The smaller model, which starts at $1,599 / £1,599 / AU$2,499 for a configuration with the M4 chip and 16GB of unified memory now occupies the space the now obsolete 13-inch MacBook Pro used to – a more affordable pro device with more modest specifications for people who want more power than a MacBook Air can provide, but without costing the sort of astronomical figures that high-end MacBook Pros demand.
The 14-inch model with M4 Pro starts at $1,999 / £1,999 / AU$3,299, so if you want to save $500 and don’t mind a smaller screen (the rest of the specs are the same as the 16-inch model), then this is worth considering.
Compared to Windows 11 alternatives, there’s the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 8, which costs around $1,000 / £1,000, and offers some decent specs and a solid build quality, and a gorgeous screen – plus it’s a 2-in-1 laptop which you won’t get with any MacBook.
Other Windows 11 workstations offering similar performance are around the MacBook Pro’s price, such as the Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED, which comes with a second screen built above the keyboard (think the Touch Bar, but much larger). While this could also be dismissed as a gimmick, both Asus and Lenovo show that Windows 11 laptops have a far larger variety of form factors and designs.
Value score: 3.5/5
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024): Specs
(Image credit: Future)
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024): Design
No new design
Screen remains one of the best in a laptop
Awkward to use when commuting
Once again, Apple has kept the design of the MacBook Pro unchanged – so from first glance you won’t really notice any difference. It’s still got the rather chunky dimensions of 14.01 x 9.77 x 0.66 inches (356 x 248 x 17mm) and a weight of 4.7 lbs and 2.2kg. While it’s a stylish-looking laptop with that unmistakable Apple aesthetic, this is a large laptop that a lot of people might struggle with.
Whilst writing this review on the MacBook Pro 16-inch, I traveled into London on the train, and the sheer size of the laptop made using it on the drop-down desk quite awkward – it certainly made me miss my 13-inch MacBook Pro.
The size of the MacBook Pro 16-inch is understandable, as there are a lot of powerful components that need plenty of airflow to keep cool, and the large screen also means the overall size of the laptop needs to be on the bigger side. But if you’re looking for a portable laptop you can whip out while commuting, you may be better off looking at the 14-inch model, or going with a MacBook Air.
That said, when walking around with the MacBook Pro in my backpack, it didn’t feel uncomfortably heavy – and the 16-inch screen really is a joy to work on.
Superficially, port selection for the 16-inch MacBook Pro seems the same, with a MagSafe 3 port for attaching the power supply, two USB-C ports, and 3.5mm headphone jack on the left-hand side, and a USB-C port, HDMI and SDXC memory card slot on the right.
This is a decent selection of ports, though not mind-blowing. The memory card slot continues to be a welcome inclusion for photographers and videographers, as you won’t need an adaptor, and the HDMI port makes plugging the 16-inch MacBook Pro into a monitor, TV, or projector incredibly easy. The lack of USB-A ports means if you have older peripherals you’ll need an adapter to use them.
(Image credit: Future)
On the surface the ports may seem the same, but Apple’s made quite a drastic change with the USB-C ports, which are now all Thunderbolt 5 compatible. This offers far faster data transfer speeds (up to 120Gb/s) than the Thunderbolt 4 ports included in the previous model (which offered up to 40Gb/s). While Thunderbolt 5 devices are currently few and far between (and quite expensive), it does set the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) up as a future-proof device – and if you work with very large files, this new standard will be very welcome.
On the other hand, if you’re perfectly happy with the speeds your current USB-C SSD offers, then it’ll work just as well with the new MacBook Pro, and Thunderbolt 5 is backward compatible.
The 16-inch 3456 x 2234 Liquid Retina XDR display remains the same (with mini-LED, 1,000 nits sustained brightness, wide color P3 gamut, ProMotion technology) as previous models. The screen offers a sharp image quality thanks to its 7.7 million pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 254ppi (pixels per inch). However, you can now configure the new MacBook Pro 16-inch to come with a nano-texture surface, which gives the screen a matte quality that minimizes reflections and glare.
The model of MacBook Pro that Apple sent me to test came with that nano-texture surface, and in the bright overhead lights of our London office, the effect was subtle yet pleasant – there was no glare or reflections, and I can imagine outside in direct sunlight the MacBook Pro 16-inch is just as comfortable to use (as it’s October and I’m in the UK, direct sunlight isn’t really a thing).
(Image credit: Future)
Whether or not it’s worth the extra $150/£150/AU$230 will really depend on personal taste and professional needs. While the nano-texture isn’t an upgrade that will immediately wow you, it can be useful if you work in bright environments. You might also feel that when spending the kind of money Apple is asking for the new MacBook, an extra $150 isn’t too egregious – and remember, once you’ve bought the MacBook Pro, you won’t be able to add the nano-texture.
This leads to an ongoing complaint about Apple devices. While there’s no doubt they look great, they are very difficult – if not impossible – to open up and repair. Upgrading components is also out of the question. While the fact that the unified memory is part of the M4 chip, so adding additional memory isn’t possible, it’d be nice to be able to add extra internal storage, for example.
Of course, this has never been the way Apple does things, but when even its competitors like Microsoft are getting better at allowing users to upgrade and fix their devices, Apple is increasingly out of touch – and the difficulty fixing a faulty MacBook Pro sits uneasily with Apple’s eco-friendly messaging in other departments.
There’s one final change to the design of the new MacBook Pro 16-inch that people might miss at first – but it’s a doozy. The webcam has been overhauled with a new 12MP ultra-wide sensor. Using the Center Stage feature, the MacBook Pro crops footage and uses machine learning to keep you centered on the screen – even if you move about. This is the first time Center Stage has been added to a MacBook – in the past the feature has been limited to iPads and the Studio Display monitor.
It works well, and while it’s far from essential if you sit still when on video calls, it’s nice to see it included in a MacBook. Even more impressive is the Desk View feature, which allows you to simultaneously record footage of yourself as normal, while also recording footage of your desk.
(Image credit: Future)
For tutorials, unboxing videos, and more it’s a nice feature and it’s very clever how the webcam captures the footage at the same time using a single camera – usually, you’d need to use two separate cameras for the different angles. This solution is easy and elegant, and while the quality of the footage won’t compare to using two external cameras, it’s a cool feature to have.
Overall the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) design doesn’t contain many surprises, but the ones it does are pretty nifty. If you’re after a more innovative laptop design, however, then you may still be disappointed.
Design score: 4/5
(Image credit: Future)
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) review: Performance
Not a massive leap over M3 Pro
Still very impressive performance
Handles even the most intensive tasks well
Unlike the 14-inch model, there’s no base M4 option with the 16-inch MacBook Pro, making the M4 Pro-toting model the ‘entry level’ choice. It features a 14-core CPU with 10 performance cores four efficiency cores, and a 20-core GPU.
The base model also comes with 24GB of unified memory with a bandwidth of 273GB/s, and you can configure it to come with 48GB (though you’ll need to up the M4 Pro chip to the model with a 16-core CPU).
If you go for the M4 Max, that starts at 36GB of memory and can be configured with 48GB, 64GB, and 128GB. Memory bandwidth is also increased to 410GB/s for the 14-core CPU M4 Max and an absolutely huge 546GB/s bandwidth for the 16-core CPU model.
Putting jargon aside, any model of this year’s MacBook Pro 16-inch is going to offer excellent performance for pretty much any task. According to Apple’s own numbers (which should obviously be taken with a degree of salt), you should see around two to three times the performance of an Intel MacBook and double that of the M1 Pro MacBook. The gap between the M3 Pro and M4 Pro is less pronounced, which considering the M3 Pro only came out last year, is not too surprising.
Benchmarks
Here’s how the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) performed in our suite of benchmark tests:
The model of 16-inch MacBook Pro Apple sent me to review is the version with a 14-core CPU, 20-core GPU, and 48GB memory – so essentially the mid-range model.
In our benchmark tests, the M4 Pro MacBook Pro saw a decent bump in numbers compared to an M3 Max model, such as in Geekbench 6, where the multi-core score was 23,030 compared to the M3 Max’s 21,345. Not a groundbreaking difference, admittedly, but it shows a reliable increase in performance between generations. I certainly wouldn’t recommend anyone with an M3 Pro MacBook Pro – or even an M2 Pro – shelling out to upgrade to the M4 Pro model based on these results.
Of course, synthetic benchmarks only tell a part of the story, and in my time using the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024), I was extremely impressed with the overall performance. macOS Sequoia ran fast and smooth, and there was no sign of lag or slowdown even when I had several apps open at once (including the Chrome web browser with almost 20 tabs open).
The new MacBook Pro 16-inch, as with previous models, is pretty overkill for day-to-day tasks. Still, it’s good to see those essential tasks performed so effortlessly – and there was not a single crash or error during my time using it – something I can’t always say about similarly-priced Windows 11 devices.
Apple’s complete control over both the software and hardware of MacBooks has again paid dividends, and even if you don’t like the way the company does some things, there’s no denying that it often results in extremely polished and dependable products – like the new MacBook Pro.
(Image credit: Future)
For more demanding tasks such as video editing, the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) again barely broke a sweat as I stitched together 4K footage in Premiere Pro. To be honest, to really make use of the power of the M4 Pro – let alone the much more powerful M4 Max – you’re going to need to be a professional filmmaker or 3D animator working on Pixar-quality productions. Everything I threw at it barely gave the new MacBook Pro pause.
Of course, this is a great thing – it’s a workstation laptop that can rival pretty much any desktop PC and can handle even the hardest workloads. But then, there’s always that nagging feeling that you’re not making the most of it. It’s a strange contradiction that in the end is a testament to what Apple continues to achieve with its M-class chips.
Throughout my time, the fans barely kicked in, so while Apple’s focus with the M4 Pro is more about performance than efficiency, this is still a very efficient machine that is virtually silent when in use.
Performance score: 5/5
(Image credit: Future)
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) review: Battery life
Over 21 hours in benchmark test
Slightly shorter than previous model
M4 Pro focuses on performance over efficiency
Ever since switching from Intel chips to its own M-class silicon, Apple’s MacBooks have benefited from industry-leading battery lives. While Windows 11 laptops are slowly catching up (especially ones with the new Snapdragon X Elite chip, which like the M4 Pro is ARM-based), if you want a laptop that can go through an entire workday without charging (and isn’t a basic Chromebook), then modern MacBooks are the way to go—and the new 16-inch MacBook Pro is no exception.
Thanks to a combination of the efficient M4 Pro chip and a larger body that allows Apple to include a bigger battery, the 16-inch MacBook Pro offers one of the longest battery lives of any MacBook or Windows laptop.
In our tests, it lasted a huge 21 hours and 32 minutes – an absolutely incredible result that suggests you could go multiple workdays on a single charge. However, it didn’t quite match the battery life of the M3 Max 16-inch MacBook that I reviewed last year, which lasted for 24 hours and 35 minutes in similar circumstances, but that could be down to the M4 Pro’s emphasis on performance over efficiency.
Still, it’s an incredible result considering the power on offer. I worked on the M4 Pro model for an entire train journey from Bath to London (around an hour and a half – England really is quite a small country), and the battery levels hardly dipped. It’s a workstation laptop that you can feel confident working on without having to search for a power supply, and when on battery power, it doesn’t feel like performance is sacrificed either.
Battery life score: 5/5
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024): Should you buy it?
Buy it if…
You need a powerful workstation for heavy duty creative tasks The MacBook Pro 16-inch with M4 Pro is one of the most powerful laptops out there, and will make short work of even the most demanding tasks.
You haven’t got an Apple Silicon Mac yet If you’ve not experienced Apple’s M-series chips the new 16-inch MacBook Pro with M4 Pro is a brilliant showcase of why Apple Silicon has proved to be so revolutionary for not just MacBooks, but laptops as a whole.
You want a laptop that can go multiple days without charging The battery life of the new MacBook Pro 16-inch can last almost an entire day of constant use - and that means you could work on it for multiple work days on a single charge.
Don’t buy it if…
You don’t need ultra-performance While it can be tempting to go for the highest of the high-end when buying a laptop, the MacBook Pro 16-inch is a big investment - and it offers a level of performance that most people simply won’t need - go for an M3 MacBook Air or the new Mac mini M4 instead.
You want a compact laptop The MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) is a large laptop, and while that has its benefits (bigger battery, nice large screen to work on), it’s a bit too big to work on when commuting or traveling.
You have an M3 Pro or M2 Pro MacBook The M4 Pro is an upgrade over its predecessors, but not enough to make owners of the past two generations of MacBook Pro need to upgrade - they remain excellent laptops that continue to perform brilliantly.
MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro) review: Also consider
If our Apple MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro) review has you considering other options, here are two more laptops to consider...
MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 Pro 16GB If you like the sound of the M4 Pro-powered 16-inch MacBook Pro, but are worried that the screen (and overall size of the laptop) is too large, then check out the 14-inch model, which offers similar performance but in a smaller (and slightly cheaper) package. Check out our MacBook Pro 14-inch (M4 Pro, 2024) review
MacBook Air 15-inch (M3) After a large-screen MacBook but don't need the power, and can't afford, the 16-inch MacBook Pro? Then consider the 15-inch MacBook Air. The M3 chip remains a great performer, and it's a lot less expensive, yet still offers that Apple build quality and design. Check out our MacBook Air 15-inch (M3) review
How I tested the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro)
Spent several days testing and using the MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro)
Ran our suite of benchmark tests
Used it to work while commuting
Ever since I received the new MacBook Pro 16-inch (M4 Pro, 2024), I've been using it as my main laptop for working on. This included day-to-day tasks, such as writing up articles in Microsoft Word and sending emails, as well as browsing the web in both Chrome and Safari (with multiple tabs open) - both at a desk in an office, and on a train travelling between cities.
I’ve been testing MacBooks for many years at TechRadar, including all the previous MacBook Pro 16-inch models, including the Intel-based one, and that experience has helped inform this review.
The Thermal Master NV300 Max is one of a new generation of advanced road detection systems that utilises infrared thermal technology and AI to highlight dangers and obstacles on the road, even in the dark and when weather conditions make it otherwise hard to see.
The system is made up of three separate parts; the camera, which sits on the exterior of the vehicle, the screen, which is linked to the camera by a cable and sits on your dash and the OBD II dongle that plugs into your car's OBD II port. This port is often hidden away under the dash and once plugged in wirelessly links with the rest of the system.
The main unit, which sits on the exterior of the vehicle, features two cameras, one standard and the other IR, and this attaches via a large magnet onto the roof of your car. This unit is relatively large, and there's no way that you can miss it once it's attached; on some vans, such as the Ford Transit Custom, with the unit on the roof it's over 2m in height which could be an issue, especially for height restricted barriers. However, with the magnet attachment system it is quick and easy to remove, as long as you remember.
The other two parts are the OBD II plug, that simply plugs directly into the car, and the screen that magnetically attaches to a fold-up stand, which is stuck permanently with a sticky pad to your dash.
The overall fitting process takes some DIY skill, and how you do it really depends on where your skill level is and your car; essentially, once the camera is in place, the cable can then be fed around the Window Screen and secured. Then, the cable is routed through the engine bay to the interior of the car and into the LCD screen, which is then plugged into the 12V socket for power. The OBD II is then plugged in, and the App downloaded to your phone - that setup process involves a few adjustments to your phone name, which is a bit off, but once done, everything can be switched on and you're ready to go.
In use, the system works well with the dual camera design, giving you a clear view of the road using the standard camera in the day and the IR as soon as dusk falls. On the screen, boxes highlight in red, amber and green the level of the threats, and audio alerts accompany these. All settings and options are controlled through the connected App with a cut down settings menu that can be accessed through the screen.
As an alert system the Thermal Master NV300 Max works incredibly well - it's easy enough to fit although that additional bulk might be an issue for some. Once it is up and running, it is incredibly fast at spotting potential dangers, and the audio alert "hazard" is superb. As a passenger checking out, the screen as it highlights objects and dangers in thermal mode the vivid colours are impressive alongside those audio alerts. If you want the support of a night vision and alert system, then the NV300 Max is a great choice.
Thermal Master NV300 Max: Price and availability
The Thermal Master NV300 MAX is available for $650 directly from the Thermal Master Website by clicking here.
Value: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Thermal Master NV300 Max: Specs
Thermal Master NV300 Max: Design
This night vision system has been designed to attach to the exterior of your vehicle quickly, and while the camera section and the screen are connected by a cable, they can both be disconnected quickly. The connecting cable is essentially fed through the engine bay to the vehicle's inner cabin during the initial setup, but after that, it can be left in place. When it comes to the installation, set aside at least an hour, after which the link cable can be left in place while the camera can be quickly removed.
The overall quality of each part is solid, with both the camera unit and screen being made from metal and having a high-quality feel. The main camera unit that attaches to the vehicles roof measures approximately 153 x 148 x 63mm weighs 630g, and is weatherproofed. This unit has two forms of attachment, either the large magnet that is built in or the large sticky pad, one obviously being more permanent than the other.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The screen is relatively large as well at 167 x 80 x 10mm with a weight of 180g and a resolution of 512×384. This is worth noting as the screen fits to a magnetic stand which can be stuck to your dash, then rather than leaving it in place when you leave the car, it can be quickly removed so it doesn't attract unwanted attention. Its connection to the rest of the system is via a standard USB cable so it is nice and easy.
The last hardware part of the system is the OBD II dongle, which plugs directly into the vehicle - if you are unfamiliar with car maintenance, refer to your car's manual, and its position will be highlighted there.
Other than the hardware, you also have the iOS or Android App, which can be quickly downloaded and installed. This is used for the setup but can also used to monitor the feed from the cameras.
Design: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Thermal Master NV300 Max: Features
As an AI-driven automotive camera, the Thermal Master NV300 Max has quite a list of features that stretch well beyond just being a standard night vision system.
On the front, the main focus of the product is obviously the cameras, both standard and thermal, which enable the unit to work in both day and night conditions. Both cameras also feature a recording function, so all visuals are stored on a MicroSD card that can be inserted into the screen. This means that before you even get started on the object detection, you essentially have a dashboard cam.
The system consists of three parts: the camera, which mounts on the exterior of the vehicle; the screen, which sits on the dash and connects to the camera via a cable; and finally, the OBD dongle that plugs into a port in the car and connects wirelessly. In addition to the hardware, there's also the App that enables you to access and adjust settings, playback footage and receive a live feed from the camera.
Thermal imaging and AI object detection are the main features of the unit, and all options and settings for these can be adjusted through the Thermal Master App, which is available for both Android and iOS mobile devices. Once everything is connected, you can then adjust the settings, including the AI detection distance and IR colour overlays and alerts.
The IR camera, when selected manually or using the systems auto mode will at night, during fog, smog or under the glare of bright headlight, will pick up what's ahead, so while it might be too dark to see using traditional methods, the specialist IR, camera will see all. As standard, the display for this is just black and white; however, with pseudo colours selectable, you can quickly change the display to something far more visually appealing.
With the display set, the AI can then start to work, and any objects that could pose a potential threat are highlighted with a boundary box and highlighted in red, amber, and green, depending on their threat level; it's very clever.
Alongside the visual alerts are audio alerts, which are again handy and, in fact, far more useful when driving than the visual as you can keep your eyes on the road. The AI camera will also alert you if you get too close to the vehicle in front, which is another nice safety feature.
Alongside the safety features are a couple of nice additions, including voice control, which enables you to flick through the different displays, as well as a few other options by just using your voice. Then there's speed display that utilises accurate data from the OBD.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Features: 5 / 5
Thermal Master NV300 Max: Performance
Before you get started with the Thermal Master NV300 Max, the system and all components need to be installed and fitted. The first step is to unscrew the protective camera cover and then plug in the first cable before screwing it back together; there are five screws in total, so nothing complex. Next on the base of the camera unit is a large magnet with a softer surface covering to protect the car; this holds firmly in position and, once in place, doesn't require any additional fixings. If you have a glass roof, then part of the base of the unit features a large 3M sticky pad, which will securely attach the unit, but using this does mean that it will be an almost permanent feature.
After the cameras are positioned, the cable can be fed around the windscreen; there's usually a gap, and then hooked in under the bonnet and through the engine bay so that it can then be fed through to the interior cabin. With electric cars, this is a little more tricky, so it's best to refer to the car's manual to see if there is a way through. Once into the cabin, you can then link up the screen and plug in the 12V plug, tidy the cables, and you're essentially done with this part of the installation.
Next, you plug in the ODB II reader, which is usually found under the dash and can often be covered; the good thing about the design of the dongle is that once it is in place, you can close the ODB II cover, and it's then hidden from site. These ports are essentially a direct data connection to the car's computer and are used by garages mainly for diagnosing faults, but you can also use this port for re-tuning or, in this case, getting a direct live feed of some of the car's statistics, such as speed, RPM and acceleration.
The final step is to download the Thermal Master App. We did this on the iPhone 15 Pro. One quirk for the use of the App is that you need to change the name of the phone to "nv' in order to create a hotspot with the correct name and password, which is hard set in the Thermal Master NV300 MAX and at present can't be updated.
Once that's done, you can switch it on, and it's ready to go. Realistically, once the unit is setup, you only need the App to adjust settings, firmware updates, or view the footage you've captured, so you can change your phone name back to what it was before. If you do need to access settings for the system, then most can accessed by quickly by touching the bottom right-hand corner of the screen.
One of the settings that you'll want to update from the outset is the "Infrared pseudo-color", and there's a good selection of colour options to choose from; as standard, the IR or Thermal display is obviously just in black and white.
As you start to drive, the usefulness of the system quickly becomes apparent, with the small screen alerting you to the audio "Hazzard" every time it detects a car, van, person, or animal. On the screen, you can see the hot spots, and across the top, small icons pop up showing what type of object has been detected; it's all very quick and clever. Another feature of the detection system is that the objects are surrounded by a boundary box, with green showing that they're at a safe distance, amber showing they're getting closer and red being that they could be an imminent threat. The detection system works well, and while you can't really make the most of viewing the screen while driving, the audio alerts are really handy - the visuals, on the other hand, will keep your passenger entertained.
Alongside the thermal imaging, the OBD II reader is also working to transmit Speed, RPM and acceleration information to the display. Essentially, this is much the same as your vehicle's speed dials, just a little more involved with plenty of additional data - at present, this data isn't recorded down, but if it is in future, then this could be handy alongside the dashboard cam footage if you are involved in a crash.
The other handy feature is voice control; this enables you to switch display types, but is most handy for increasing or decreasing the volume or brightness of the screen, with all commands activated with "Hey Max".
Overall, the performance of the NV300 Max is exceptional, alerting you to potential hazards at night and when the conditions mean that visibility is poor. The audio alerts are key, and the visuals are handy. One of the early reservations about the system was the bulk of the unit on the exterior of the vehicle, but actually, as it's secured with the large magnet, removing and replacing the unit only takes a few moments, and the cables can be routed in and left in place, so its really not an issue. You can install it when you need it and remove it when you don't.
Performance: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Thermal Master NV300 Max: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
As an automated night detection system, there's no doubt that the NV300 Max works exceptionally well. Early doubts about the size and bulk on the exterior of the vehicle were quickly dismissed, and even on the van where the height of the vehicle with the addition of the unit would be an issue for barriers, the unit was quick to remove so aside from some slight inconvenience this was a non issue. The only slight stumbling block for some people will be if they have glass or plastic roof sections where the unit would need to be stuck in place, at which point this becomes a more permanent fixture. The App connection to mobile is also a bit of an odd one, requiring you to change the name of the phone in order to make that connection; still, once done, you can always switch back, so again, it's just a small inconvenience rather than a huge issue.
Otherwise, the NV300 Max is fast to fit and remove when needed and works flawlessly in daylight as well as at night and in adverse conditions, highlighting potential dangers. Then there are those additional features that really make this stand out - the fact that it can be used as a dash cam with a MicroSD recording the footage in case you need to review it. Then there's the OBD II data, which is really interesting and could be helpful if you do have a crash or even if you're caught speeding and want to check.
All these features make it a comprehensive safety feature that you can add to your vehicle and is suitable for anyone who hates driving at night, fears hitting something that they cannot see and will be reassured by the presence of a reliable alert system.
The Beelink SER9 HX-370 mini PC is one of a new generation of mini PCs that pack larger desktop performance into a small form factor. This model has been designed around AI applications, with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX-370 processor at its heart with the processor boasting an impressive 12 cores and 24 threads. On paper, this all looks impressive, but it's only when you power up Adobe's Premiere Pro that you start to see just how well-equipped this new technology is for handling heavy computing tasks. The onboard Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics provides plenty of graphics processing for creative work, but even with the heft of the processor, the latest games, while smooth, lack some of the punch and smoothness of visuals that you expect from a larger system.
While small, the SER9 HX-370 still offers plenty of options when it comes to connectivity, including Wi-Fi 6E and a good selection of USB 3.2 ports, although some are a little dated. For both creative and office workers, the fact that it also supports three 4K displays via HDMI 2.1, DP and USB4 makes it a great choice if screen real estate is important.
The CPU and GPU are well specified for a mini PC and the power that the supply is boosted by the inclusion of a new generation AMD XDNA 2 NPU that introduces AI acceleration. This NPU chip can be used by applications designed for use with AI as well as enabling machine learning and deep learning tasks. So if you want to delve into the world of TensorFlow or a similar platform, this could be a great starting point.
The SER9 HX-370 has many appealing features considering its small size; however, the features and performance come at a premium. The price is at the higher end for the best mini PCs we've reviewed, and the form factor will, of course, limit future upgrade options.
Beelink SER9 HX-370: Price and availability
How much does it cost? $1249
When is it out? Now
Where can you get it? Widely available
The Beelink SER9 HX-370 is priced at $999 and $1,249, depending on the choice of internal SSD (500GB or 1TB SSD). It’s available directly from Beelink’s website by clicking here and through online retailers.
Value: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Beelink SER9 HX-370: Specs
Beelink SER9 HX-370: Design
The Beelink SER9 HX-370 measures just 136mm x 136mm x 50mm, and despite its premium build, high-end processor, and features, its sleek, high-quality design is somewhat understated. A close inspection of the exterior reveals that the main all-metal case is elegantly designed, providing an instant premium feel. The weight, at 819g, while not heavy by any standards, is a bit more substantial than your average mini PC.
The casing — front, sides, and top — is made from a single piece of metal, with the base and back constructed from grey plastic, all of which is well finished and gives the impression that the device is robust enough to handle transport without issue. The exterior not only protects the internal components but also integrates with the internal cooling system. With large vents across the back and an aerated base, it's obvious the casing has been engineered to manage the high-performance internal processor and components.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Like many high-performance mini PCs, there are plenty of connectivity options. Across the front of the machine, there's the small power button, CLR CMOS, 3.5mm audio jack, USB Type-C 10Gbps, and a surprising addition: a row of four small holes, which are part of a dedicated microphone array. Around the back, there’s the DC input, USB4 40Gbps, HDMI 2.1 4K 120Hz, 3.5mm audio, USB 2.0 480Mbps, DP 1.4 4K 120Hz, LAN 2.5G, another USB 2.0 480Mbps, and a USB 3.2 10Gbps.
It’s actually a bit surprising for a model that packs in premium features to hold back on some connectivity options, especially with only a single USB4 port, which limits you to a single ultra-fast storage option and as it stands even with this single USB4 port the machine itsefl isn't optimsed for use with an eGPU.
Design: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Beelink SER9 HX-370: Features
While mini PCs are, by their very nature, compact, the number of features they can pack into their small forms is often impressive. Leading the features for the SER9 is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX370 Processor, which uses AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture, with a 12-core, 24-thread setup. What distinguishes this CPU is that it has been optimized for AI-driven tasks and applications. It also features a max boost clock of 5.1 GHz, making it an ideal choice for creative work where intense processing of graphics, images, and video is crucial.
The AI acceleration for the CPU comes via the NPU, a dedicated Neural Processing Unit AMD XDNA 2 NPU, which delivers 80 AI TOPS. For applications able to leverage AI-enhanced workloads, there’s a noticeable boost in performance over more traditional processing, as we've seen with Adobe apps and the advancements in video editing, 3D design, and processing.
As standard, the machine comes with 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, clocked at 7500MHz, which should suffice for most tasks. Unlike most mini PCs, however, this RAM is integrated and cannot be upgraded.
Regarding graphics, the Ryzen CPU is paired with an AMD Radeon 890M, featuring 16 Compute Units and a clock speed of 2900MHz. This GPU is more than sufficient for most creative and high-intensity applications, but gamers may find it a little limiting. While the SER9 does have a USB4 port, it is not optimized for use with an eGPU, so the internal graphics will likely be the best option available.
In terms of storage, this is an area where the SER9 really stands out compared to other mini PCs. While you can attach ultra-fast external SSDs, there are two PCIe 4.0 x4 slots for SSD storage, supporting up to 8TB of internal storage. Our review version included a 1TB Crucial PCIe SSD, which proved to be extremely fast.
As with most high-performance mini PCs, internal cooling is a significant consideration. Beelink has designed the MSC2.0 cooling system, which uses a vapor chamber, a silent fan, and an SSD heatsink to manage the temperatures that can rise under heavy workloads.
When it comes to display options, the SER9 is capable of using one or all three different display port options to support up to three 4K displays. These options are HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, and the USB4 ports. For connectivity, aside from the 2.5Gb wired LAN connection, the system features Wi-Fi 6 (Intel AX200) and Bluetooth 5.2.
On the audio side, there are two 3.5mm audio ports, one on the front and another on the back for headphone or a mic. Interestingly there are also built-in dual speakers which is again an unusual option for this type of mini PC. Another interesting, and quite unique audio feature are the front-facing microphones. These enable AI-powered voice interaction, providing smart audio pickup for voice command recognition for different tasks.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Features: 4.5 / 5
Beelink SER9 HX-370: Performance
The SER9 HX-370 is a high-performance mini PC, and that's evident from the outset, with Microsoft Office apps and using Google Docs through the browser, all running at speed with no slowdown or issues. This machine definitely has processing power, and as you switch between applications, that speed really becomes apparent.
Benchmark results show that the Beelink SER9 HX-370 offers solid all-round performance for office tasks, creative work, and some gaming, thanks to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX370 processor, 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and integrated AMD Radeon 890M graphics.
In everyday tasks, the machine's performance was reflected in the benchmarks, with a Geekbench CPU Single score of 14,728 and a PCMark score of 7,205. These scores reflect well with the real world use of applications such as Microsoft Word, Excel, and Google Docs (Through Chrome).
For creative applications like Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom, the machine easily handled multiple RAW files from the Sony A7 IV and Canon EOS R5 C, with this performance again reflected in the Geekbench Compute score of 42,770. Switching to Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve for some 4K video editing, the machine again impressed with speed, although the 1TB SSD was a little small and a Samsung EVO T5 was used to expand on the capacity through the USB4 port. However, there was also the option to upgrade the internal storage to an impressive 8 TB, which again is quite a unique feature for a machine of this size. The easy handling of video editing was reflected in the Cinebench CPU Multi score of 21,718 and Cinebench CPU Single score of 2,045.
To truly test the performance, a few games were tried, including Hogwarts Legacy, Tekken 8, and Red Dead Redemption 2. Again, the small machine impressed, although it's unfortunate that the system hasn't been optimised for use with an external GPU. Still, with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, performance was impressive, with all games running smoothly, though some slight reductions in quality settings to around medium were necessary. The 3DMark scores (Fire Strike Graphics: 10,256, Time Spy Graphics: 3,666, Fire Strike Overall: 9,384, and Wild Life: 23,206) all reflect the system’s solid gaming performance.
Another point to note on the performance is the speed of the internal SSD. In the benchmark test using CrystalDiskMark, the score showed read/write speeds of 5175.50 MB/s and 4751.30 MB/s. This is extremely fast and ideal for any application that requires high speed disk access.
Overall, the performance of the Beelink SER9 HX-370 is impressive, easily handling office applications and taking on processor-intensive creative tasks. While the machine was able to handle gaming smoothly, the best gameplay was achieved with medium graphic settings, but for a mini PC, this is extremely impressive.
Performance: 5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Beelink SER9 HX-370: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Beelink SER9 HX-370 is a powerful mini PC that combines compact size with desktop-level performance. Ideal for gaming, creative applications, and heavy multitasking, it offers exceptional value for its price. While its gamer-centric design might not appeal to everyone, its performance and versatility make it a standout choice.
The MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED is easily one of the best gaming monitors I've ever used, although it's going to struggle against the best ultrawide monitors for just about all other tasks other than gaming and watching video content.
A clue as to why it's so good for the latter is in the name: OLED. The Samsung QD-OLED panel on this monitor is spectacular to look at, offering a snappy 0.03ms response time and 144Hz refresh at a 5120 x 1440p for ultrafast high-end gaming. The 1800R curve of the panel is also the perfect match for the 32:9 aspect ratio, so you don't lose detail in your peripheral vision.
What's more, at just $1,099 / £1,099 / AU$1,699, you're going to feel like you're getting a much more premium product for your money than its visuals might suggest.
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 ultrawide, for example, offers slightly better specs, but comes with a price tag that's nearly 50% more, making the MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED appear something of a bargain.
However, look under the hood, though, and you'll spot where some compromises have been made.
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
For one, OLED panels are notorious for suffering burn-in, so if you didn't register and activate that copy of Windows you've been using, this monitor will have you found out, even if you eventually do give Microsoft the money it's due.
What's more, in order to prevent burn-in, you'll need to let the monitor run its OLED Care routine after about six hours or so. While you might be able to opt out when the monitor first notifies you that it's time to run the routine, you'll only be delaying the inevitable – and, when you least expect it, the monitor will go ahead and run the routine and you can't stop it (nor should you).
While this will extend the useful life of your monitor, this unpredictability will be a nightmare for, say, Final Fantasy XIV fans who are in the middle of a boss raid. That's because once the routine starts, the monitor effectively shuts off, and you have to wait anywhere from five to thirty minutes for the routine to complete.
Of course, this could also be a benefit, since it does force you to get up and maybe pet your cat or run to the store and get in some exercise; but it will be incredibly frustrating when it happens in the middle of something you'd rather not interrupt.
This isn't an MSI-exclusive problem, of course. All OLED monitors have to deal with such issues, but considering the investment here, it's best that you know what you're in for.
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
In terms of features, you do get a good number of ports, with the USB-C capable of 90W power delivery. There's also a USB hub built-in with a KVM feature, which is handy – although the USB-A ports are limited to USB 2.0.
Note that you don't get any speakers with this monitor, so you'll have to settle for discrete PC speakers or a PC gaming headset, which might be a nuisance for those without either.
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
With regards to the screen itself, the nature of the pixels in the Samsung QD-OLED panel the MSI MPG 491CQP uses also tend to make text and Windows UI elements a bit wonky around the edges. If you're planning to do a lot of non-gaming work on this monitor, then, your experience might not match the price you're paying.
However, let's be clear, this is a gaming monitor through and through – and it's here that the MSI MPG 491CQP really shines. Rated for 0.03ms pixel response and 144Hz max refresh, this monitor will look and feel incredibly fast compared to even the best LCD monitors, and because it's an OLED panel, you'll get fantastic HDR with pure black color and no perceptible screen glow to ruin a scene.
Its color gamut coverage is excellent, too, rated for 98% AdobeRGB, 99% DCI-P3, and 146% sRGB. So, whether you're working or gaming, you'll be on the receiving end of incredibly vibrant colors.
Of course, it's also important to recognize that a monitor such as this will require the best graphics card to really push frame rates high enough to take advantage of what the MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED has to offer.
Anything less than the Nvidia RTX 4070 Super or AMD RX 7900 GRE won't be able to keep up with the texture sizes required for its native resolution, and even entry-level 4K graphics cards such as the RTX 4070 Ti Super or AMD RX 7900 XT won't be able to push frame rates into the hundreds without seriously scaling back the graphics quality. If you want to get the most out of this monitor at 5120 x 1440p, you'll need an RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XTX to get there.
If you're covered on that front then the MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED monitor is a fantastic buy for gamers, so long as you can handle the quirks of using an OLED display. If not, there are plenty of IPS and mini-LED displays out there that will work for you, but you'll be hard-pressed to find any that look this good.
MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED: Price & Availability
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
The MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED is available now in the US, UK, and Australia, with a retail price of $1,099 / £1,099 / AU$1,699, respectively.
This is substantially cheaper than the competing Samsung Odyssey OLED G9, which at $1,599.99 in the US is roughly 45% more expensive.
However, since both monitors have been on the market for several months now, it should be possible to find the models at lower cost – which makes a direct price comparison a bit of a moving target right now, especially during major sales events like Black Friday.
MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED: Specs
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Should you buy the MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED?
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
Buy the MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED if...
The MSI MPG 491CQP looks stunning with sharp contrast, speedy performance, and vivid colors.
While this monitor isn't cheap, for what you get, it's a bargain that offers premium performance at a more affordable price.
Don't buy it if...
If you're used to playing PC games on your day off for several hours or more, be prepared to have the fun interrupted by the very necessary OLED Care feature.
This monitor is a great value for its class, but this is still a premium item.
MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED: also consider
The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 is the premier super-ultrawide OLED monitor, sporting a faster refresh and extra features, but for a more premium price.
I used the MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED for a few months, playing games, working on photo and video content, as well as productivity work.
Since this is a gaming monitor first and foremost, I made sure to play a variety of games, from competitive shooters such as Call of Duty: Warzone as well as more laid-back titles such as Satisfactory. I have a very high-end PC, so I was able to consistently push the monitor's full resolution at 144fps to really challenge the display's performance.
I've been reviewing computer hardware for nearly five years now with TechRadar, including dozens of monitors, so I know what makes for a great gaming display and what will likely disappoint most gamers. I do my best to leverage that knowledge to deliver the best assessment of any products I review.
