Organizer
Gadget news
Frostpunk 2 review: A post-apocalyptic simulator that’s as beautiful as it is brutal
8:00 pm | September 17, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Comments: Off
Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S
Release date: September 21, 2024 

A few hours into my first campaign in city-building survival game Frostpunk 2, I was asked whether I thought parents should be able to accompany their kids into quarantine. A mother had been waiting outside, desperate to sit with their unwell child. Relaxing the law could help my trust with the locals; however, it was a risk nonetheless. Ultimately, I thought it was fair to let them in. Within moments of this decision, I was notified the mother had died of the same disease with a second popup letting me hear the thoughts of their bereaved husband, who ‘wasn’t sure how they could manage without them.’

It was painful, and depressing, a fitting ambiance for the broader context of the world. In Frostpunk 2, empathy can often feel inessential, frequently undermined by the brutal but engaging task at hand. However, despite the overwhelming urge to check that feeling at the door, this complex and moreish city builder wants you to learn from your mistakes, consider the alternatives, and often fail dramatically anyway. But regardless of how it goes, you’ll never be left without a story to tell.  

For those unfamiliar with the series, Frostpunk 2 takes place thirty years after the original game, in an alternative history where a volcanic winter has left society in an eternal state of ice. With limited technological resources and a city of vulnerable souls, your job is to steward the remaining civilization to utopia through excavation and exploration in frosty outer wilds - simple, right? But of course, no. The journey is naturally plagued with problems like disease and trust issues. However, if you brave the many (many) storms, your nurtured society can thrive and live on in this eternal freeze.

A screenshot of chaos breaking out in city-building game Frostpunk 2

(Image credit: 11 bit studios)

My first run at Frostpunk 2 was a chaotic balancing act as I acquainted myself with the cohesive medley of systems needed to survive in the icy post-apocalypse. Thankfully, suppose you are a little rusty like myself or a newcomer to the series. In that case, developer 11 Bit Studios softens the landing with variant difficulty settings and a short but sweet tutorial that wraps up the basics of how to play. Through this opening act, you’ll learn to break the ice (literally) to explore, find, and excavate your resources and manage your society through laws and research upgrades. While the bulk of Frostpunk 2’s mechanics come later - and through harsh lessons - this introductory level was the perfect amuse-bouche to the feast that is the rest of the game.

Best Bit

A screenshot of a law passing in Frostpunk 2

(Image credit: 11 bit studios)

When a law passes, or something (probably damning) happens in your society, a tannoy plays overhead, that's delivered by a warm but sarcastic British voice actor who doesn't hold back with their sass. While almost every statement made me giggle guiltily, a standout came after I passed a law forcing children into apprenticeships where they said, “Don't shield your apprentice from the dangerous aspects of your job; this is how they learn.” It’s a harsh world, and not one aspect of Frostpunk 2 lets you forget it.

Through this introduction, you’ll also get acquainted with Frostpunk 2’s striking visual style, which makes the most of its late-1800s-style setting with burnt orange and copper mechanized industrial buildings and parchment paper script. After spending hours staring into the quiet blue-toned abyss, I found myself leaning towards the warmer parts of my screen almost instinctively to stay snug despite the 26-degree forecast outside. It’s clear that considerable care has been taken with each detail, and I was always pleased to find and inspect the finer notes, like the graffiti details on the drawings that accompany pop-up choices or unique features on character designs.

Get resources or die trying  

A screenshot of a structure showing Frostpunk 2's 1800s-esque design

(Image credit: 11 bit studios)

Frostpunk 2’s story mode is broken into sections that unlock as you achieve specific parameters, like finding alternate fuel sources, to keep the city of New London afloat. Success leads to another goal, and failure, well, that ends in exile. Despite my best efforts, my attention span was constantly drawn away from my pressing larger goals by the more minor but equally urgent issues like food management and rising crime rates due to youth delinquency. That is, in essence, Frostpunk 2’s central ethos, though - holistically managing and considering your ever-present and ever-changing parameters and goals that come with the cost of keeping thousands of people alive.

A screenshot from city-building game Frostpunk 2

(Image credit: 11 bit studios)

As such, there is no easy answer, and I’d often have to sacrifice the quality of life of my workers to maintain the incoming supply of goods to satisfy the consequent demand. It was often a rough decision, especially when my mismanagement got them here in the first place. Soon enough, that would lead to societal discord, which meant appeasement and new regulations to keep them on side. 

Surprisingly, with such harrowing situations and heady topics, I never wanted to disengage from the nightmare, and instead, I fell deeper into the systems, hoping to tunnel my way to success. Where the general ambiance kept me engaged, Frostpunk 2’s off-kilter humor also worked well to lighten the emotional load. Sarcastic tannoys and schadenfreude-filled situations occur often enough that those bitter failures don’t feel so bad, and equally, triumph isn’t to be celebrated too quickly either. 

You can improve your citizens' lives, though, and that’s through innovation. The Idea Tree plays a significant part in your survival throughout Frostpunk 2, and you’ll need to choose avenues to research at a cost of currency and time. There are political factions to consider when bettering your society, too, and no group will agree wholeheartedly. Still, you can invest in projects like Asbestos lining to help keep heating costs down… if you dare.  

It’s not the end of the world  

A screenshot of the idea tree from city-building game Frostpunk 2

(Image credit: 11 bit studios)

Speaking of factions, city management inevitably includes politics, and you’ll have to manage the needs of these various groups to keep things running smoothly. This is done through the lawmaking process, where you broker deals in backrooms with certain factions to get enough votes on your side to get laws passed. As with The Idea Tree, not all factions will agree on the best course forward, and it’s your job to decide which direction will do the least harm. 

As much as it pained me to do so, I often sided with religious zealots because their ideals felt a little less harsh than the other factions and because their numbers, thanks to my tinkering, remained so strong. You can easily negotiate too close to the sun here, too, though, as on more than one occasion, I made too many promises and got myself stuck, humbled, and unable to pass any meaningful laws without compromising my vision.

An ominous soundtrack accompanies your endeavors, blending the world's ferocious howling winds with symphonic sounds. As with the visual flourishes, the score feels appropriately solemn, offering fleeting moments of optimism through its clever orchestration. The intricacy of the music speaks to the detail that extends across Frostpunk 2’s vast pool of systems that I’m barely scratching the surface on, - if you haven’t yet got this impression, it’s definitely a game that is best explored for yourself. 

Despite having so much fun with Frostpunk 2, some recurring issues with inconsistent frame rates did rear their head, muddling my otherwise smooth playthrough. Thankfully, due to the game’s slower nature, none of those issues directly impacted my playthroughs by too much, and I’m optimistic that 11 Bit can solve said issues before launch. 

Once you've tried your hand at the main story aspects of the game, you can also jump over to the Utopia Builder mode, which offers a more sandbox approach to the gameplay, allowing you to pick certain parameters of a playthrough before you dive in. Equally as difficult and just as enjoyable, this mode was a great way to throw caution to the wind and test out some of my theories without feeling too heartbroken when I’d inevitably fail.

Accessibility

In Frostpunk 2, you can access the settings menu from the main title page as well as in-game, and you can toggle most features whilst in-game or before starting a session. Here, you can find a slider to toggle the UI text size, as well as an option to slow down game time when messages appear on the screen. For audio, you can set sliders for SFX and Music. Plus, if you have a specific keyboard setup, you can rebind the keys to your preference.  Requested more here.

Should I play Frostpunk 2?

Play it if...

You want a city builder with a harsh edge
Managing a city is no small task, and when the post-apocalyptic winds and resource scarcity rear their heads, you won’t always come out on top. 

You think you could be a politician
A significant aspect of success in Frostpunk 2 is managing factions and, subsequently, your council's needs and wants. Making backdoor deals and condemning the unruly is part of the challenge, and it takes some clever maneuvers to stay in favor of your citizens.

Don't play it if...

You want a cozy game to relax with
From child labor to frostbite and disease, Frostpunk 2’s solemn world is full of terror that isn’t for the faint of heart.  

How I reviewed Frostpunk 2

I played Frostpunk 2 on PC in both the Story and Utopia Builder Modes for around 25 hours. During this time, I experimented with various difficulty options, researched different skills in The Idea Tree, and supported a variety of the factions we were presented with.

I played Frostpunk 2 on an AOC 27-inch QHD VA 144Hz gaming monitor with a Logitech MX Master 3S mouse and a Logitech G915 TKL keyboard. For sound, I used my external Creative Pebble V2 computer speakers and my Audio Technica ATH-MX50X headphones, which were plugged into a Scarlett 2i2 interface. My gaming PC has an RTX 3080, and an AMD Ryzen 9 3950X.  

Sony WF-C510 review: I’d pick these cheap earbuds over more expensive AirPods 4
2:17 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Sony WF-C510: Two-minute review

Sony is one of the biggest players in the audio market but its focus has always seemed to lean towards the elite, top-quality premium earbuds or over-ears market. The Japanese tech giant doesn’t need to break a sweat to keep on top of the best budget earbuds market though, if the new Sony WF-C510 are anything to go by.

The company’s follow-up to 2021’s Sony WF-C500, and a newer and more affordable alterative to the top-rated WF-C700N, these new earbuds come at a time when there’s more and more competition at the low-end of the market. I’d name some competitors but I don’t really need to – not when Sony’s offerings are this good.

In fact, I think the WF-C510 could draw some fans away from the top-end Sony WF-1000XM5 and the new sans-ANC entry-level AirPods 4. Who needs to pay double, triple or even quadruple the price when cheap and cheery gets you this far?

I really liked the sound of the new Sonys; I prefer sound that prioritizes clean treble over thumping bass, and so the Sony WF-C510 tick all my boxes and then some. Home-brewed Sony algorithms and a reasonably responsive equalizer just add to my enjoyment of the audio.

The design is stellar too – the buds stuck in my ears like the Abba songs they played stayed stuck in my head. Thanks to the nice grippy material used for the tips, and each earpiece weighing less than 5g, never once did a bud fall from my ears. I even cycled confidently with them and completed a full workout at the gym without gravity doing its thing to them.

This lightweight design extends to the case too, which is tiny and can easily disappear into a pocket. Unfortunately this does contribute to one of my gripes: the case only offers 11 hours of extra listening time, which is much less than basically any rival on the market.

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)

That’s extra listening time over what the buds offer by default, but contrarily you can go 11 hours with these without needing to return them to the case. This is a fantastic amount of listening time, and the WF-C510 would be my first port of call over pricier rivals for long trips.

Part of the reason for this long battery life is that the Sonys don’t have ANC (Active Noise Cancellation), which is something I can’t knock the buds for as it’s a feature that’s never guaranteed at this price. Instead, they have an ambient mode which is pretty commonplace in wireless earbuds, but it’s only useful in certain situations so I didn’t use it much.

Noise cancellation isn’t the only feature that the WF-C510s lack: wear detection, low-latency mode, 'find my' locaters and a few other more premium perks don’t rear their heads here. Again, the price justifies this, but it’s something I’d be remiss not to flag – if you’ve got a certain mode or feature you love to use, you’d better check that the Sonys offer it.

Given that this is a two-minute review, I probably don’t have time to go into lots of detail about the other great parts of the Sony WF-C510, but between the responsive and easy-to-use touch buttons, the useful eartip fit test, the range of color options and the audio avoiding all the pitfalls I usually see in budget earbuds, I feel comfortable recommending these over some of the much pricier competitors I’ve tested this year.

Sony WF-C510 review: Price and release date

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Released in September 2024
  • Cost $59.99 / £54.99 / AU$109

The Sony WF-C510 were released in September 2024 as the new entries in Sony’s WF-C line of low-cost earbuds.

You can pick them up for $59.99 / £54.99 / AU$109, and at that price point they’re in contention with our list of the best cheap earbuds. In fact, as of their launch, they’re Sony’s cheapest true wireless earbuds, drastically undercutting the $119 / £89 / AU$199 WF-C700N (which we gave five stars to in our review). The WF-C500 aren’t officially ranged by Sony any more, but they launched for $99 / £89 / AU$149 three years ago, and have seen price cuts from third-party retailers since.

The cheap earbuds market is a competitive one, with fresh competitors hitting the market all the time; in the months before this Sony proposition I've also tested the likes of the Earfun Air Pro 4 and CMF Buds Pro 2 for the same price. And the WF-C510 is my pick of the bunch. 

Sony WF-C510 review: Specs

Sony WF-C510 review: Features

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • In-bud battery life is great – but the case less so
  • No ANC, but there is 'sound control'
  • Headphones app brings some extra features

Something I both love and hate about the Sony WF-C510 is the battery life. 

The buds themselves have a fantastic battery life: 8 hours with sound control on, and 11 hours with it off, makes these Sonys some of the longest-lasting earbuds I’ve tested recently. However, the case itself only offers one extra charge-up, while basically all others on the market give you at least two extra charges. As a result, these buds gave me more battery anxiety on trips than most others I’ve tested.

That 11-hour figure is Sony's. In my testing, with sound control turned off, the right bud lasted for 10 hours and 42 minutes, while the left one was still somehow blasting out music 40 minutes later when my phone ran out of charge. Gaping inconsistency aside, that averages over 11 hours, so I'll concur with Sony's estimate.

Audio fans might be wondering why I’ve referred to ‘sound control’ and not active noise cancellation – this is because the Sonys don’t have ANC, but do offer noise cancellation in the form of an ‘Ambient Sound Control’ mode. This amplifies sounds around you, so you can be aware of what’s going on regardless of how much noise would otherwise be drowned out by your music. It’s a fine mode, with results that are more subtle and nuanced than the similar equivalent that many rival earbuds have, but ambient modes are generally quite situational so I didn’t find myself using it a whole lot.

Of course, ambient noise control isn’t the same as noise cancellation – it’s ANC you may want at home – but the passive noise cancellation offered by the ear-tips was enough to make me happy.

For the rest of the feature set we’re going to have to boot up Sony’s Headphones app, which, while a great addition at this level, has a logo so generic that I kept losing it on my phone’s menu.

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)

Using said Headphones app, you can see the battery life of the earbuds, arrange which devices they’re connected to (up to two – yes, there's multi-point), toggle ambient mode off or on to a variety of intensities, play with an equalizer (including a test to find the best preset for you, and another to detect which eartips are best for you), set up 360 Reality Audio (Sony’s version of spatial audio), change what the buttons do, and enable Spotify Tap which basically makes Spotify play by default.

The equalizer gives you quite a few presets, with the ability to modify them too, and lots of the rest is par for the course. However, I found the EQ test quite confusing – unlike Nothing Ear’s fantastic automatic detection test, you basically have to ‘blind test’ some presets to see which you prefer. I found the difference between many of them inaudible, and sometimes I liked two equally. Ultimately, the mode is fine for people who know the sound they want (or the parts of recordings they usually augment), but for everyone else it’s perhaps not worth bothering with, although it does add value at this level.

Beyond ANC, there are a few features not present in the WF-C510 that some might miss, although I can’t hold these cheap buds to blame given the price. The major one is wear detection, so you have to pause music manually when you remove the buds. There’s also no low-latency mode which is quite common even amongst cheap buds, or any kind of ‘find my buds’ feature.

Another thing I should note, which is a problem I’ve had with other Sony audio products too, is that by default the volume sounds incredibly low – even when it shouldn’t. It’s because there’s a volume slider in the app, separate to your phone’s one, which I’d recommend you immediately raise to near-full intensity and rely on your phone’s volume rocker for control. The first time I used Sony headphones I thought they were incredibly quiet until I noticed this feature – what I should also note is that the in-app volume resets to 50% if you pair the earphones to a different device and then back to your phone, so you’ll need to rectify it manually. This is an irksome feature for people who are unaware, but even for those of us who’ve been using them for years, it’s an unnecessary extra step that most other earbuds don’t require.

  • Features score: 3.5/5

Sony WF-C510 review: Design

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Incredibly lightweight case
  • Buds fit nice and snug – and don't budge
  • Convenient-to-use physical button

The Sony WF-C510 charging case is lovely and svelte – it’s one of my favorite cases for slipping into my pocket or bag. 

A lozenge-shaped slither of plastic, it measures about 6.8 x 2.7 x 3.1 cm (all my measurements – I couldn’t find any on the Sony website) and weighs “approx” 31g (that’s Sony’s exact wording). Vague measurements aside, it’s really slender, with basically enough space for the buds and not much excess (which is probably why it doesn’t provide much charge!). Main points to note here are the USB-C port for charging, a small button for pairing and an LED status indicator. All par for the course, really.

I liked the textured plastic case, but I can see some finding it a bit cheap-feeling, and it does creak a little if you put pressure on it. That’s the trade-off with its light build.

The buds are equally light, weighing 4.6g each. At least Sony has an exact measurement for that! They’re in-ear buds so this particular figure is really important, as heavy in-ear buds (or those that aren't shaped carefully to distribute said weight) sometimes have trouble staying in the ear.

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)

No issue for the Sonys though: they always felt rigid in my testing, never once falling out or even feeling loose. The box includes larger and smaller alternatives, with the app having an ear fit test, if the default tips don’t fit. 

The fact that they fit and stay securely in my ears sounds simple enough, but so many competing options at double the price can't seem to do it. If you want cheap earbuds that don't budge and sound good, the Sony WF-C510 are it. 

There are a few color options for the aspiring fashionistas out there: black and white are pretty standard, but there’s also light blue and light yellow. The latter hue is modelled by me in the pictures.

One feature of note on the WF-C510s is a button on each bud – it’s quite big, and takes up most of the body of each. It’s a physical button, meaning you have to actually depress it to trigger it, but I found it sensitive enough that it was easy to use. The size also ensures that you don’t have to keep jabbing at the bud, and shoving it into your ear, to trigger the function (which is customizable in the app).

In terms of waterproofing, the buds are IPX4 resistant to water, which means they’ll survive splashes from any angle, but not jets. That’s what the rating stands for but in real life the difference between ‘splashes’ and ‘jets’ isn’t always apparent so I’d recommend doing your best to keep these away from anything wetter than rain or sweat.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

Sony WF-C510 review: Sound quality

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Bright sound; some might miss bass
  • High-quality given price
  • DSEE improves compressed music

I really like the sound of the Sony WF-C510s – obviously you have to set your expectations to a certain level with low-cost earbuds, but I found the audio high-quality and also certainly distinct in that Sony, "have this sound, and have it good and clear" way.

This is possibly thanks, at least in part, to Sony’s DSEE, which stands for digital sound enhancement engine – basically it’s tech that restores the range of the compressed audio tracks you’re playing from your chosen streaming service. It gives Sony earbuds, including the WF-C510, an edge over similar alternatives, as long as you remember to turn it on via the app.

The driver itself is a 6mm unit, so not necessarily as big as some similar-priced alternatives, but bigger than the more expensive WF-C700N.

The Sony WF-C510s have a slightly forward sound profile (and I say this as a compliment rather than a shortfall), offering clear and pronounced treble sounds like your guitars, vocals and piano parts. This is great for some genres of music, and I enjoyed listening to songs with prominent and distinct vocal lines that were beamed into my ears.

The flip side is that you can’t feel the bass quite as much in certain genres of music, which might be an issue for people who like their bass thumping to their back teeth. You can rectify it to a degree using the in-app equalizer, but not quite enough to please bass-heads.

I was surprised by the lack of peaking or distortion at normal listening volumes, and I had to really push the buds to a painfully-loud volume to hear any crackling, muddying or artefacts.

  • Sound quality: 4.5/5

Sony WF-C510 review: Value

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Look at the price
  • Seriously, look at it

I’d consider the Sony WF-C510 great value for money even if the audio was only ‘fine’. It’s not, though, and fans of Sony's typical sound profile (that's most of us) will really love what they’re getting here.

If you’re being offered the Sonys as a gift or bundled with another Sony product, you might think you’re just getting some cheap buds thrown in to sweeten the deal, but trust me when I say these are better than their lowly price suggests.

  • Value: 5/5

Should I buy the Sony WF-C510?

Buy them if…

Don’t buy them if…

Sony WF-C510 review: Also consider

How I tested the Sony WF-C510

The Sony WF-C510 on a bronze table.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Tested for two weeks
  • Tested at home, in the office and on trips

The Sony WF-C510 enjoyed two weeks of listening time for this review, and as mentioned earlier I've tested a string of their closest rivals recently, which helped with the comparisons.

I tested the buds while they were paired to my Android smartphone, and I connected them to a different mobile to test multi-point pairing. Mostly I listened to music with Spotify but to fully test the buds I also tried other apps including games and streaming services. Testing was done at home, in the office and on various trips around my city, including walks in the park and gym excursions.

I've been testing gadgets at TechRadar for over five years now, and in that time have used plenty of budget earbuds and other Sony products. Outside of reviewing headphones, my trusty Sony WH-1000XM3 are my go-to headphones so I'm well versed in Sony's audio products and software.

  • First reviewed in September 2024
Avira Free Security review
10:29 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

One of the big concerns about choosing the best free antivirus is what key features the provider might have left out. Avira Free Security tries to deal with this worry by not only offering antivirus, but also adding a reassuringly long list of bonus features: VPN, password manager, PC privacy tools, device cleanup, anti-phishing browser extensions, and more.

There are still plenty of restrictions. Browsing protection is limited to browser add-ons, for instance. The VPN doesn’t allow you to choose your location, and it only offers a tiny 500MB data a month (yes; a month.) But does Avira Free Security really give you enough core protection layers to keep you safe from harm? We ran the suite through our intensive series of security tests to find out.

Avira Free Security install finished

Install and use Avira for free on Windows, Mac, Android and iOS. (Image credit: Future)

Avira Free Security: Desktop and mobile

Avira Free Security earned its first big plus point before we even installed it. Unlike Bitdefender Antivirus Free and many others, you can use it without creating an account, or handing over your email address or any other personal information. Avira prefers that you register, and you’ll get a ‘Register’ icon on the dashboard as a reminder, but that isn’t necessary.

With no account, that means Avira can’t limit the number of devices where you can install its software, and you’re free to use it wherever you like. Avira Free Security is also available for Mac, and mobile devices can use Avira Antivirus Security for Android and Avira Mobile Security for iOS.

We’re focusing on Avira Free Security for Windows in this review, but if you’d like to know more about what other platforms can do, or what extras you get in Avira’s paid products, check out our Avira Prime review for an in-depth look.

Avira Free Security smart scan

(Image credit: Future)

Avira Free Security: Getting started

Avira’s Windows installer did an excellent job of setting up Avira Free Security on our test laptop, walking us through every stage and keeping us informed of what was happening.

When the process was complete, Avira ran its all-in-one Smart Scan, checking for malware, privacy problems, outdated apps, performance issues, network security problems and more. Although it’s covering a lot of ground, the process is surprisingly quick, and Avira displayed a report of our device ‘issues’ in barely a minute.

Along with telling us our device was ‘virus free’, Avira also explained that we had 684 MB of disk clutter we could delete, five apps were slowing our boot time, three ‘outdated apps’ were missing updates, and there were ‘21 privacy settings to fix.’ Although that sounded intriguing, most of these issues were either no big deal, or we couldn’t fix them with the free version, anyway. Avira’s Smart Scan regularly teased us with lists of ‘problems’, but then, when we clicked ‘Fix’, explained we had to pay for an upgrade to resolve them.

Avira Free Security prime trial.

Avira regularly prompted us to install its 60-day free trial. (Image credit: Future)

While that might seem a little annoying, at least initially, it’s no great surprise. You’re getting the app for free; some sort of advertising is inevitable. And there are ways to avoid at least some of these sales pitches.

Once we learned that Smart Scan was mostly about marketing, for example, we dialed down the upselling by running ordinary antivirus scans instead. Quick Scans are just as speedy and focused entirely on the information we needed to know (‘were we malware free?’), without any unnecessary extras: perfect.

Avira Free Security protection results.

Avira scores well in the latest Real-World Protection test. (Image credit: Future)

Avira Free Security: Protection

Avira’s paid products are regularly assessed by the top antivirus labs, giving a useful general idea of how Avira compares to the competition.

Avira’s overall results are a little disappointing right now, with the company ranking 7th out of 10 in our aggregate score chart covering nine top reports. (Avast, Bitdefender and McAfee came equal first; Microsoft, Total AV and Trend Micro were bottom of the list.)

The aggregate score covers many areas, though, including Android effectiveness, performance and more. If you’re only interested in Windows protection, the results are much better. Avira managed an excellent third place in AV-Comparatives’ latest Real-World Protection test, for instance (behind Avast and AVG), blocking 99.8% of threats with zero false positives.

It’s important to remember that these results are measuring the performance of Avira’s paid products. That gives us a good baseline to understand how the company compares to the best of the competition, but as Avira Free Security doesn’t have full web protection, it won’t block as many threats.

We tested this by attempting to access 50 shiny new phishing URLs obtained from experts OpenPhish. The results confirmed that Avira Free Security really doesn’t have any web protection, as the app couldn’t block a single site.

Avira Free Security malware alert.

Avira delivered mid-range results in our malware blocking tests. (Image credit: Future)

Fortunately, Avira has a separate free Browser Safety extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Opera. This is more limited because it only protects the browsers where you install it, while system-level protection covers all your apps, but it’s still a huge improvement. We tested the same phishing URLs with Avira Browser Safety installed, and it blocked 90%, as good as a result as we’d expect to see from any paid antivirus.

Malware detection is more challenging, but again, Avira Browser Safety made a big difference. When we attempted to download 50 malicious files, Browser Safety blocked 36% before we could even access the URLs, and another 54% as the files were saved, for an overall protection rate of 90%.

We’ve seen others score higher - Avast Free Antivirus blocked 94% of our test threats in its last review, Bitdefender Antivirus Free an amazing 100% - but 90% is better than many, and it’s not the end of the story. If you do run a dangerous file, Avira’s behavior monitoring layer detects and blocks most threats.

Avira Free Security VPN.

(Image credit: Future)

Avira Free Security: VPN and other Tools

Although this review is mostly about Avira Free Security’s core antivirus features, there’s a lot more to it, and we’ll quickly run through what’s on offer here. (Take a look at our Avira Prime review for more detail or if you’re interested in the extra functionality offered by the paid apps.)

Avira Free Security includes a free VPN, but beware, it’s about as basic as you’ll see. It automatically connects you to your nearest location, with no ability to change country. There’s no kill switch in the free version (that’s a paid extra), and you’re limited to a tiny 500MB a month. For comparison, Avast One Free gives you 5GB a week.

Still, the VPN works, it’s reasonably fast, easy to use, and might just about do as an emergency backup for two minutes of browsing on public Wi-Fi.

Avira’s Password Manager covers the basics, collecting credentials when you first type them and automatically completing login forms when you revisit sites. Mobile apps and browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, Edge and Opera mean you can use it almost anywhere. It’s limited, with no ability to create identities, save details like addresses and fill in forms, but might be handy if you don’t currently have any password manager at all.

Avira Free Security software updater.

(Image credit: Future)

Avira’s Software Updater and Driver Updater tools scan your PC for missing app and device updates, issues which could leave you with security vulnerabilities. These had a little value for us, finding three app updates and one driver on a new laptop. Although it’s good to know about these, Avira Free can’t install the updates automatically (that’s a paid-only feature), leaving us to find, download and install them ourselves.

Elsewhere, Avira’s File Shredder securely deletes confidential files to ensure they can’t be undeleted. There are far more configurable free tools around which do something similar, but it could be useful if you regularly handle documents with sensitive information.

Avira Free Security: Final verdict

Avira Free Security has more features than just about everyone else, but there are more compromises and limits, too. 500MB of data a month is one of the lowest allowances we’ve seen, and while Avast and Bitdefender’s free apps include system-wide web protection, Avira’s is only available for paying customers. It’s still a good product, and if you’re a fan of Avira then it’s worth a look, but everyone else will get better protection from the likes of Avast One Essential or Bitdefender Antivirus Free.

We've also listed the best cloud antivirus.

Alienware AW2725QF review: Two resolutions, one monitor
11:53 pm | September 16, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Monitors Peripherals & Accessories | Tags: | Comments: Off

Alienware AW2725QF: Two-minute review

Alienware AW2725QF monitor on desk showing Cyberpunk 2077 main screen

(Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

The idea of using pixel doubling to turn a 4K monitor into a native 1080p panel isn't new. But it hasn't been very successful so far. Can the new dual-mode Alienware AW2725QF do anything to change that, or will it prove just another failed attempt at having both high-res visual sizzle and high-refresh speed in a single monitor?

Apart from the dual 4K and 1080p modes, this Alienware panel looks like it has a decent shot of qualifying as one of the best gaming monitors out there. It runs at up to 360Hz and boasts a claimed response time of just 0.5ms. That's seriously fast for an IPS-type LCD monitor.

It also sports HDR 600 certification and both G-Sync and FreeSync support. If there's one area where it's a little lacking, it's connectivity. You do get a USB hub, but there's no USB-C input for single-cable connectivity, which is a pity.

Alienware AW2725QF: Price and availability

Alienware AW2725QF monitor's logo on the front bottom bezel

(Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

How much does it cost? $599 / £599 (estimated) / AU$899 (estimated)

When is it available? Available now

Where can you get it? Available in the US

At $599 in the US, the Alienware AW2725QF is fairly pricey for a 27-inch 4K gaming panel that lacks a mini-LED full array backlight. The larger 32-inch Gigabyte M32UC is actually cheaper. So you're really going to have to want that dual-mode functionality.

Whether it's worth the money is a tricky call. It certainly looks a little better at 1080p than the dual-mode LG UltraGear 32GS95UE. But it's ultimately a bit of a niche feature. The good news is that purely as a high-refresh 4K panel, the Alienware AW2725QF is an absolute zinger and nearly worth the asking price simply on those terms.

For now, pricing in the UK and Australia hasn't firmed up. But we expect the market positioning to be pretty similar. In other words, it'll be more expensive than a regular 4K panel of similar specs minus the dual-more functionality.

Alienware AW2725QF: Specs

Alienware AW2725QF: Design and features

Alienware AW2725QF monitor with Cyberpunk 2077 open

(Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

For a monitor from an out-and-out gaming brand like Alienware, the AW2725QF is pretty restrained. Yes, there are a few RGB flourishes including the power button and logos on the rear (all fully configurable) and hexagonal base design. But for the most part, it's pretty businesslike and sober suited, though the slim bezels do make for a suitably contemporary overall vibe.

Is that a disappointment? Might Alienware customers expect something a little more extroverted? Possibly. But fussier styling tends to date faster, so the restraint Alienware has shown here will probably be welcome for most users, as will the solid build quality and full range of adjustment, including tilt, height, swivel and pivot into portrait mode. 

Side profile of the Alienware AW2725QF monitor, screen tilted at a slight angle

(Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

The OSD menu is similarly comprehensive with settings for pretty much everything you need.

It's a fairly logical menu and makes it very easy to jump between the 4K and 1080p modes. You simply hit the main OSD menu selector button twice to toggle between the two modes. Less impressive is the display's connectivity.

The two HDMI and single DisplayPort inputs all support the full 4K at 180Hz resolution, which is good. There's also a USB hub that includes two USB-A ports at the rear, plus a USB-A and a USB-C on the lower bezel. But there's no USB-C input and thus no single-cable connectivity option for laptops.

Image 1 of 3

Alienware AW2725QF monitor's hexagonal base

Alienware AW2725QF's hexagonal base (Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)
Image 2 of 3

Alienware AW2725QF's on-screen display

Alienware AW2725QF 's on-screen display for swapping resolutions and other settings (Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)
Image 3 of 3

Alienware AW2725QF's port selection

The port selection on the bottom of the Alienware AW2725QF (Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

Some would argue that's fine for a gaming display. Given the limitations of USB-C power supply and the elevated power consumption of a proper gaming laptop, you can't really keep one fully juiced with a USB-C cable.

But it would still make this a more versatile display to offer USB-C upstream connectivity. With a USB-C input, you could share this panel between a gaming desktop and a laptop. And who knows what you might like to do with it in future. With USB-C, you simply have more options and with the price point Alienware has gone for, it's a thoroughly reasonable expectation.

The Alienware AW2725QF also lacks an audio line-out jack, which can be handy for headphones. Again, it's not exactly a deal breaker. But this isn't a cheap display and it's the kind of feature you'd have thought Alienware would throw in just to cover all the bases on a premium monitor.

Alienware AW2725QF: Performance

Alienware AW2725QF monitor resting on a desk

(Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

The Alienware AW2725QF's IPS LCD panel makes a very strong first impression. It's extremely bright and punchy, with up to 450 nits in SDR mode and 600 nits peak for HDR. It's also beautifully calibrated in sRGB mode, with rich but accurate colors.

Of course, in default 4K resolution, the pixel density is super sharp and crispy, so fonts look fab. In-game, there's a crazy amount of detail to go with the visual sizzle. This is a very sweet looking panel.

It's also seriously fast for an IPS display. Alienware claims 0.5ms GTG response for the Extreme setting in the display's Overdrive submenu. That does bring in a tiny bit of overshoot and inverse ghosting. But the two less aggressive options are still very fast and look just great. In fact, this panel is fast enough that pure speed is barely a concern. Or a reason to upgrade to an even more expensive OLED.

Backside view of the  Alienware AW2725QF monitor

(Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

The same can't be said for the HDR performance and more broadly contrast and black levels. This monitor is edge-lit and does not have full-array local dimming. So, there's plenty of light bleed and relatively poor contrast, which goes with the territory with any LCD panel without local dimming. SDR colors also aren't terribly well calibrated in HDR mode, so you'll want to switch between modes depending on content type, which is a bit of a pain.

But what about that secondary 1080p mode achieved via pixel doubling? The idea is that for some game types, such as online shooters, you want more speed not more pixels. So, the 1080p mode offers a boost up to 360Hz refresh and is easy to access.

As for how it looks, well, it doesn't quite look like 1080p on a native 1080p display. It's certainly better than the similar feature on LG's own dual-mode 4K OLED, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B.

That might be thanks to the conventional RGB subpixel layout of this IPS display. The superior pixel density will help, too. Whatever, the results on the desktop are fairly good, though you wouldn't confuse it with true native. Everything looks just a little jagged and pixelated.

In-game, for the most part, the 1080p mode works better and is very playable to the extent that you forget it isn't true native 1080p much of the time. The exception is that just occasionally, certain details can look quite messy and pixelated. One example is fine foliage and grass. When it happens, it can be pretty ugly.

Pixelated foliage on the Alienware AW2725QF's screen

Pixelated in-game foliage on the AW2725QF's 1080p resolution setting (Image credit: Future / Jeremy Laird)

In the end, there will always be shortcomings with pixel doubling, but this display does it better than any yet, including that LG, which looks soft and blurry by comparison.

Should I buy the Alienware AW2725QF?

Buy it if...

You want two monitors in one

The Alienware AW2725Q's dual-mode functionality isn't perfect. But the 1080p mode ups the refresh rate to 360Hz and looks OK in-game most of the time.

You love crispy, speedy visuals

The 4K resolution on a punchy, well-calibrated 27-inch IPS panel looks fabulous, and this is also just about the fastest gaming monitor of its type we've yet tested.

Don't buy it if...

You're expecting a true 1080p native experience

The 1080p pixel doubling mode is the best we've yet seen. But it still doesn't look like a true 1080p panel and adds significant cost to this display...

You love HDR sizzle

The Alienware AW2725Q does have HDR 600 certification. But there's no full-array dimming and it doesn't come close to an OLED panel for HDR or contrast performance.

Also Consider

Gigabyte M32UC

This is a larger 32-inch display, which arguably makes better use of a 4K pixel grid. It's not as fast as the Alienware, but it is a fair bit cheaper and offers better contrast from a VA panel.

 Read our full Gigabyte M32UC review here

Asus TUF Gaming VG289Q

If you want 4K gaming on a very tight budget, you could do a lot worse than the Asus TUF Gaming VG289Q. It's only 60Hz, but has a quality IPS panel and basic HDR support.

Read our full Asus TUF Gaming VG289Q review here

How I tested the Alienware AW2725QF

I rigged up the Alienware AW2725QF as my primary display for a week. The aim was to use it across a wide range of applications to get a really good feel for how it delivers in both 4K and 1080p for everything from daily desktop duties to hardcore gaming sessions.

As a 4K IPS panel, it's actually well suited to precision productivity. But what the Alienware AW2725QF is really built for is gaming, and for the most part it's pretty stellar. I assed everything from color accuracy and response to latency and HDR performance.

It was particularly interesting to see how it stacked up against LG's dual-mode OLED display, not to mention all the other recent OLED monitors, numerous examples of which I've reviewed. Plenty of more conventional 4K gaming panels have passed under my beady gaze, too, so putting the Alienware AW2725QF into context was certainly intriguing.

First reviewed September 2024

Hands-on Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Higher-end features for all
3:20 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation: Two-Minute Review

When they're in the ear, at first glance the Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation might not look much different to the third-generation AirPods. However, the design has been streamlined for a better fit, while the internal hardware has been upgraded, with many of the best features of AirPods Pro 2 trickling down to Apple's new entry-level earbuds, making them a tempting option among the best AirPods.

For one, both styles of AirPods 4 – these and the standard version, which don’t offer noise cancellation – are powered by the Apple-made H2 chip that stretches the battery life, delivers excellent audio playback, and provides enough horsepower for Apple to offer Adaptive Audio on the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation. 

While it doesn't entirely block out the world around you in the way that the best noise cancelling earbuds do – remember these are open-ear earbuds – when paired with music, it can reduce loud rumbles, like a jet engine, down to a drastically reduced sound. 

I think folks who desire the ability to block out the world around them without fully sealing off the ear will find a nice middle ground here. The Transparency mode, as well as how these pick up the user's voice, is very well done and sounds incredibly natural.

You'll also be able to answer or decline calls with a shake of your head and press the stems for easy control, other than for adjusting the volume. Sadly, the ability to swipe to change the volume didn't trickle down from AirPods Pro 2. However, excellent audio quality with a wide soundstage did, and that's paired with support for Personalized Spatial Audio. 

Overall, the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation make a bit more sense over the entry-level for the price and provide some future-proofing, but they also make an impact as powerful open-ear earbuds.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Pricing and Availability

The Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation are priced at $179 / £179 / AU$299. They're available from September 20th, 2024, though are available to order already. 

The $129 / £129 / AU$219 entry-level AirPods 4 do not offer noise cancellation, or, as their pricier siblings do, a Find My-enabled case and a couple of other features, but they still offer excellent audio quality and spatial audio support.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Specs

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Features

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

Much like the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation, AirPods Max, or even the third-generation model that they replace, the AirPods 4 – with or without active noise cancellation – offer several useful features, which make them an excellent choice for anyone with an iPhone, or who’s otherwise invested in Apple’s device ecosystem.

After unboxing, you need to flip the lid open and hold the AirPods 4 near your iPhone to start the pairing process. You’ll see a prompt appear on the bottom half of your screen and can click ‘Connect’ to pair the AirPods 4 with your iPhone and your iCloud account for easy syncing between devices. I found that this process took just a few seconds to complete. 

Fast-pairing and quick switching between devices have long been staples of AirPods, with the former dating back to the first generation, and they perform well here. Right after pairing, I was able to begin listening on my iPhone, and I could quickly switch to listening to audio on a 14-inch MacBook Pro or an iPad. Apple’s various platforms will even automatically switch your AirPods between devices based on what you’re actively using or playing audio on,, but I found this to be a little less helpful. 

One very helpful feature here, though, is the arrival of gesture controls. First announced as an upgrade for the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation at Apple’s WWDC in June, these head gestures launch on day one with AirPods 4, allowing you to easily answer or dismiss a call with a simple head shake. Just in my few days of using the AirPods 4 this has come in handy several times, especially when my hands are full or I’m walking around town. It works for phone calls, FaceTime, and other calling apps that use Apple’s APIs.

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

Aside from nodding your head or saying “yes” or “no”, you can also press the stems, or press and hold, to trigger a few actions. A single press lets you play or pause, while a long press lets you select listening modes. While these open-ear earbuds won’t fully isolate you from your surroundings, the AirPods 4 offer active noise cancellation, transparency, and Adaptive Audio (blending those two) modes. You cannot, however, swipe or down on the stem to adjust the volume – the ability to do this on the AirPods Pro is super-handy, but seemingly, Apple wants to keep that feature for its flagship earbuds.

Apple’s H2 chip – the same chip found in AirPods Pro – powers all of these features, as well as the microphones, custom algorithms, and sensors. As I wrote in my hands-on review, after I tried the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation right after the launch event to quiet down a noisy space, they offer seriously impressive noise cancellation for open-ear earbuds or buds that don’t fully seal off the ear. In that space, with ANC engaged, the sound of the crowded space was muffled, and when music playback began, it was mostly quieted down.

On an airplane, it was much the same experience – you can get some peace and quiet with them, but they won't fully drown out the environmental noise as the AirPods Pro can. Part of this might be due to the fact that your body is feeling vibrations and wants to match them with sound, but I think another factor is that without the full seal and as you move your head, ambient sound has more opportunity to enter your ear. The result is that AirPods 4 block out most sound, but on an airplane – or a train – you’ll still hear the engine roar and even some cabin noise. Still, though, these effectively block out a lot of noise.

I’ve long thought that the AirPods Pro offered the best transparency mode, in which they intelligently let environmental sounds in and lower the decibels so as not to harm your ears. I think the AirPods 4 outpace those, though – with transparency mode enabled here, any sense of roboticness or noise being piped in is pretty much removed; with Conversation Awareness turned on, you can also effectively have conversations with folks quite naturally, at times even forgetting these are in your ears. Your own voice, or in this case my voice, sounds a bit more natural and less processed as well.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Design

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

The AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation don’t stray too far from the working formula of Apple’s other true-wireless earbuds. They opt for short stems like the AirPods Pro or the AirPods 3rd Generation that these directly replace. The curved portion of hard plastic that sits in your ear has been slightly redesigned and is now more curved, to provide a better fit in the ear.

I found the AirPods 4 to be pretty cozy in my ears. I comfortably wore them for over four and a half hours while on a flight and for countless hours with intermittent usage while working. They still just kind of plop in your ear and rest there. I didn’t have them fall out on any occasion, whether on a turbulent flight, while working out, or while walking indoors and outside in a bustling city. 

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

The case is downright tiny given the smaller footprint that the left and right AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation take up. It’s much smaller than the AirPods Pro 2nd Generation case, and even the case for the cheaper AirPods 4, and is shorter than the AirPods 2nd Generation’s case. You still flip it open to take out or put back your AirPods 4, and there’s a multi-purpose indicator light on the front.

There’s no back button on the back case for easy pairing, though. Instead, you’ll double-press the back to trigger pairing for other devices, including non-Apple ones. It’s an easter egg that Apple needs to publicize a bit more.

To charge the AirPods 4, you can plug them in via USB-C, though there’s no longer a charger in the box. If you get the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation, you can also place them on any Qi-wireless charger or Apple Watch charging puck.

In my testing, I found that with active noise cancellation, transparent, or Adaptive Audio enabled, you’ll get around four hours and 15 to 20 minutes of usage. That’s beyond Apple’s promised four hours of playback with a listening mode enabled. With no mode on, you can get about five to five-and-a-half hours of playback, depending on the volume you’re listening at. A quick five minutes of charging in the case also provides at least an hour of listening.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Sound Quality

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

To sum up, the AirPods 4 essentially sound as good as AirPods Pro 2nd Generation, and, as with their predecessors, that’s without the buds providing a true seal of the ear. There’s a clear and rich audio mix with a fairly wide sound stage, but the real chef’s kiss here would be the Spatial Audio support.

Powering the audio experience is Adaptive EQ via the H2 chip, and pushing out sound is a custom high-excursion drive and a high-dynamic range amplifier. It’s also worth noting that there’s a single H2 chip in each bud, with audio sent over Bluetooth 5.3 from the connected device. 

This all comes together to give you a balanced representation of the track you’re listening to, but if you’re listening to something that bops with more oomph the AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation won’t shy away from raising the lower-end or really offering a surprising amount of bass for earbuds of this size. For instance, with Burnin’ Train by Bruce Springsteen, the track starts off with a rising guitar riff that’s quickly joined by drums, piano, and vocals all across the sound spectrum – it sounds sonically here and in lossless via Apple Music I didn’t notice any distortion or dropouts. 

With a pop/EDM track like Apple by Charli XCX, you can see how the AirPods 4 handle layering of sound, with a surprisingly sharp bass track that doesn’t distort with the singer’s vocals on top at higher frequencies, with various electrical beats in between. The AirPods 4 tend to handle almost all genres well, and even without a full seal, deliver a great balanced mix, although at higher volumes you will have some sound leakage. 

Spatial Audio here essentially gets rid of stereo’s left and right channels, with various elements of a track flowing around you. It’s a more immersive listening experience, and Apple’s implementation here is excellent. I particularly like spinning it with a live track, but I think the album version of Down On The Corner by Creedence Clearwater Revival is one of the best examples. Not to mention, it also works with some movies and TV shows to put you right in the middle of the action.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review: Value

AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

(Image credit: Future/Lance Ulanoff)

At $179 / £169 / AU$279 with active noise cancellation or $129 without, AirPods 4 offers a variety of features previously found only on Apple’s most high-end earbuds. The new design language streamlines the AirPods' appearance, as they all look similar. 

If you’re sold on open-ear earbuds or ones that lack silicone tips, AirPods 4 are likely your best bet if you want to be within Apple’s ecosystem. The higher price might only be $70 away from AirPods Pro, but you still get a lot of value for the price: three listening modes, a comfortable open-ear design that doesn’t fall out, solid battery life, and a findable case should they go missing. 

The $129 / £129 edition of AirPods 4 will lose the listening modes and the Find My enabled case, but it still offers a rich, crisp audio experience, all of the handy Apple ecosystem features, and support for Spatial Audio. 

Should I Buy Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation?

Buy them if...

If you want an open-ear fit that works in the Apple ecosystem

Replacing AirPods 2nd and 3rd gen, AirPods 4 are the new open-ear, non-ear sealing earbuds that work extremely well with the iPhone, iPad, Apple TV, and Mac.

Don't buy them if...

If you want the best noise cancellation in an earbud

Considering AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation don't seal off your ear with a silicone ear-tip, these earbuds won't block out all environmental sound. So if you're looking for that consider another pair like AirPods Pro 2nd Gen or one of the best wireless earbuds from elsewhere.

How I tested Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation

For the past several days, I've been living with and using Apple's AirPods 4 and AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation with an iPhone 15 Pro Max, iPad Mini, iPad Pro, 14-inch MacBook Pro, Apple Watch Ultra 2, and Apple TV 4K. 

I tested audio playback, standard, and Spatial Audio tracks in various locations to gauge and track performance and see if there was sound leakage since these are open-ear earbuds. I threw various tracks across genres at AirPods 4, streamed from Apple Music, Spotify, YouTube Music, and Nugs.net. 

I used active noise cancellation, transparency, and "Adaptive Audio" listening modes in various locations, including at home, in an office environment, while walking around a city, on a train, in a car, and on a plane. I tracked and measured how long the battery lasted with these modes on and off and the charging time. 

  • First reviewed September 2024. 
Conductor SEO tool review
2:17 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro Software & Services | Tags: | Comments: Off

If you want a platform that can do your SEO, content optimization, and website monitoring, all from a single tool, Conductor is a solid choice for you. It goes beyond just boosting traffic and offers various features to dominate your website in its niche. For the SEO part, you get a detailed competitor analysis feature where you can use various filters to compare another site head-to-head. Regarding content, Conductor delivers AI-driven recommendations for keyword insights, content attributes, and even your page health. But that’s not all. We’ll cover various powerful features of Conductor in this review and help you find the right way to utilize it.

Conductor: Plans and pricing

Unlike other SEO platforms, Conductor does not have any fixed paid plans for their services. It claims to deliver the perfect plan for its customers by customizing it according to their needs. However, you can expect a bunch of features under their premium plans.

The Intelligence plan comes with best-in-class keyword and audience research, in-depth competitive and content intelligence, and global rank tracking and market share analysis. You can even benefit from automatic performance and ROI reporting, actionable AI-driven suggestions, and seamless direct integrations with platforms like Drupal, Asana, and more.

On the other hand, the Conductor Website Monitoring plan, powered by ContentKing, helps you with continuous website monitoring. Along with that, you get intelligent prioritization of pages and issues, 24/7 dynamic monitoring, and real-time alerting customized with specific rules. It also provides critical technical SEO insights, detailed governance and compliance tracking, and live change tracking with audit trails. So, with these trial plans, you do get an idea of what’s in store for you.

Conductor: Features

Explorer

Conductor Explorer feature

(Image credit: Conductor)

Conductor's Explorer helps you thoroughly research keywords and your target audience. You can study search volume and take advantage of organic search, social media, and demographic data(with age, occupation, and location insights). With a few blinks, you can transform keyword and topic research into content outlines that can easily be shared with task management tools such as Asana, Trello, and Jira.

Furthermore, Explorer keeps an eye on and analyses your competitor's strategies. This involves monitoring the keyword's performance, content’s impact, and the backlinks profiles. Plus, you get assistance in selecting high-volume and low-competition keywords for your paid search campaign as well.

 Pages Report

Conductor Pages report feature

(Image credit: Conductor)

The Keyword Details report from Conductor gives a thorough look at how well your web analytics data is performing in organic marketing. It shows year-over-year data, compares metrics, and gives insights on paid versus organic traffic for your domains and segments. These reports also show the ROI of your marketing strategy by combining multi-channel analytics, search data, and activity tracking into one view.

Plus, you get automatic tracking and reports on how campaigns impact ranking and revenue. Detailed insights on changes to your site, like title tags, meta descriptions, and heading tags, further enhance the useability of these reports.

 Keyword Research

Conductor's Keyword Research boasts over 20 billion keywords. This comes with data on search volume, competition, and trends. You can also choose from thousands of location and device combinations to see data in the most relevant search context for a specific keyword.

What really impresses us is that you can determine the level of competition for your keywords by analyzing the different types of results. This includes featured snippets, videos, or People Also Ask results. While this sounds good, do check all your ranking pages for the same keyword to make sure you’re not cannibalizing your own performance or chances of outperforming your competitors.

Content Guidance

Conductor Content guidance feature

(Image credit: Conductor)

You can create compelling, relevant, and optimized content by analyzing the top-performing content and identifying gaps. Conductor's Content Guidance comes with real-time AI-generated recommendations for keywords, readability, and structure. This makes sure that you follow industry standards and user preferences. For example, you can take a URL and use the tool to understand the shortcomings as well as advantages of your optimization.

Digital Presence

If you want to define and track the visibility of all your digital content across the Google SERP, social media, owned content, press coverage, and earned media, then the Digital Presence Tracking feature will take care of it. By tracking and analyzing your brand's performance, it offers a holistic view of your digital footprint. In addition, you get brand mention tracking and digital presence analysis to enhance brand reputation. Not to forget, Conductor's Website Monitoring is powered by ContentKing, which provides 24/7 real-time monitoring and alerting for optimal performance.

Conductor: Interface and in-use

The Conductor's interface is neat, intuitive, and easy to navigate. Its well-organized dashboard allows you to access important tools and insights. However, if you are new to the software, these features can be daunting.

Despite that, Conductor integrates seamlessly with a wide range of other platforms. For example, you can create, deliver, and optimize content with advanced design and UX capabilities by connecting your account with Adobe. Likewise, SEMrush improves online visibility management across various channels from a single platform, and Yext boosts business visibility with modern, AI-powered search capabilities.

Similarly, Google Analytics helps track organic content performance and provides detailed reports on website traffic. This is an added advantage, especially when using Google Workspace. It offers real-time monitoring and constructive insights into Google search results through Google Search Console.

Conductor even integrates with project management and collaboration tools like Trello, Jira, and Asana, streamlining workflow and productivity. Dragon Metrics improves ranking and automates reporting, while Talkwalker specializes in consumer intelligence for impactful brand analysis. All and all, there are plenty of tools to help you out with your SEO journey with Conductor.

Conductor: Support

Conductor support

(Image credit: Conductor)

Conductor’s strength lies in their exceptional training and assistance. If you are new to the software, there’s a thorough onboarding program called Seamless Startup. It assures expert guidance on account setup and integration to meet your marketing targets. There is a Role-Based Mastery section that offers expert-led training sessions, focusing on equipping you with the essential skills related to the software.

To keep your team up to date, Conductor includes self-paced learning, live training sessions, and a knowledge base. You can also rely on FAQs, how-tos, and 24/7 Assistance from a global team ready to save your day with their in-product chat and email support.

Conductor: The competition

At times, you might need a tool with specific features to meet your marketing needs. So, Ahrefs, Moz Pro, and Semrush are all great options to consider instead of Conductor. They have their own set of special features and functions that cater to different aspects of SEO and digital marketing.

Ahrefs

If you are looking for strong backlink analysis and a detailed site explorer, Ahrefs is knocking at your door. The platform's strength lies in how it crawls the entire web 24/7 and stores petabytes (1PB = 1000TB) of information about live websites. It helps you to identify link-building opportunities and monitor competitor strategies. Ahrefs is also exceptional in keyword research, offering 28.7 billion filtered keywords and 110 billion keywords. It provides accurate search volume data and difficulty scores to assist you. Furthermore, Ahrefs' site audit tool makes it easy to identify and address technical SEO issues to enhance overall site health. You also get Directory listing, Access Management, API features, Pay by invoice, Audit log, Calendar view, Google Data Studio, and more.

Read our full Ahrefs review.

Moz Pro

If you're looking for a tool that is easy to use and focuses on community and education, Moz is the perfect choice. It offers metrics like Domain Authority (DA) and Page Authority (PA) that are commonly used to measure the effectiveness of websites and individual pages. With a 30-day free trial, Moz Pro delivers keyword tracking for Google US and International, Google Mobile, Bing, and Yahoo. It also offers valuable insights into keyword difficulty, SERP analysis, and search volume. On top of it, Moz Pro even has a link explorer to analyze backlink profiles and a Page Optimization Score for your target keywords.

Read our full Moz Pro review.

Semrush

Semrush goes beyond just SEO with tools for PPC, social media, and content marketing. One of its key selling points is its massive database, which boasts over 43 trillion links. This makes it the most up-to-date and extensive resource available. Semrush's keyword research tool is useful for in-depth information on search volume, keyword difficulty, and competitive analysis. That’s not all. Semrush even stands out in areas such as global databases, desktop, and mobile traffic data, search engine volatility by industry, brand mentions for PR, and social media engagement and traffic.

Read our full Semrush review.

Conductor: Final verdict

Conductor won the Gold Medal in the 2023 Search Engine Optimization Data Quadrant by SoftwareReviews. They have been improving their service since 2008, particularly their integration with popular tools like Adobe and Asana. Apart from detailed keyword research and real-time content guidance, their website monitoring feature truly meets the expectations. While Conductor is a top choice, there are other exceptional alternatives like Ahrefs, Moz Pro, and Semrush with better global database and user interface customization. But don’t forget that with free trial options, you can test Conductor anytime and see if it boosts your business.

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 robot vacuum review
9:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Robot Vacuums Smart Home | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 two-minute review

Product info

This model has slightly different names and product codes in different territories:

In the US:

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop with XL HEPA Self-Empty Base RV2610WA

More basic model: Shark Matrix Self-Empty Robot Vacuum RV2310AE


In the UK: 

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum & Mop RV2620WDUK

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Self-Empty Robot Vacuum & Mop RV2620WAUK

For this review, I tested the RV2620WAUK. There may be minor differences between different countries' models.

I’ve been testing robot vacuums for several years and, while I’ve long accepted that no robot will ever allow me to retire from manual vacuuming altogether, I’m forever hopeful one will come close! Shark has an excellent reputation in the vacuuming world, so I was cautiously optimistic when the Shark Matrix Plus Robot 2-in-1 landed on my doorstep.

Some might say the popular tech brand was late to the robot party, at least in the UK. Shark has had success with robot vacuums in the US for a while now, but only added them to its UK lineup in spring 2024. I tested the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Self-Empty, which can vacuum, mop and empty its own bin. Happy days.

As you might expect from Shark, this smart little robot packs plenty of techy features. A major highlight is its 360-degree LiDAR sensors. This light detecting and ranging technology is aimed at quickly and accurately mapping your home and navigating around obstacles and I can confirm the Shark’s works very well. It also has a special air blasting feature, which I haven’t encountered before, that blows out air to push debris away from edges and corners and into the path of the suction channel. Again, I was impressed.

Although it didn’t blow my mind, the mopping results were better than I’ve experienced from a robot in the past. Rather than just dragging a vaguely damp mop pad along the floor, the Shark Matrix Plus Plus’ mop pad oscillates as it goes (100 times a minute, allegedly), to mimic a scrubbing motion. Many people will also love that the bin unit the self-emptying vacuum discharges into doesn’t need to be emptied for 60 days. Unless you have two hairy kids and two hairy dogs that is – I didn't make it past two weeks. 

I tested the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 on the ground floor of my four-bed home for a month. Although it wasn’t perfect and the app wasn’t as slick as I’m used to, I really did rate this robot, especially for those who are tight on money as well as time. I'd have no qualms about giving it a place on our best robot vacuum list. Read on for the full low down on my time testing the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 robot vacuum.

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 specs

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 review: price & availability

  • List price: $699.99 / £449.99 
  • Available: US and UK

The Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 sells in the US for $699.99 on Shark’s own website. At time of writing, there are seven robots in the range, with the Matrix Plus being the third most expensive, behind two PowerDetect models that come with self-refill water reservoirs in the base and cost up to $999.99. The cheapest Shark robot you can get in the US is the Shark ION, which is just $279.99 but unappealingly basic.

There are just three robot models available in the UK, and the Matrix Plus 2-in-1 I tested boasts the most diverse spec. In the world of robot vacuuming, I’d say its £449.99 price tag is more than reasonable (even allowing for exchange rates, it’s a better deal than in the US), but you can save yourself £100 if you empty the bin manually and get the entry-level model that still mops but doesn’t self-empty. Or, if you mostly have carpets so want a robot that’s more focused on vacuuming, invest £50 more and go for the top spec Shark PowerDetect.  

Whichever side of the pond you are shopping for a Shark Matrix Plus, I’d say the brand has priced it very reasonably, especially when you consider most robots that include mopping capabilities, for example iRobot’s Roomba, cost $1k plus. It’s not entirely flawless, but the Matrix Plus 2-in-1 represents excellent value in terms of build quality, features and cleaning prowess.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 review: design

  • Low-key looks
  • Compact base station
  • Tricky mop insert

The Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 won’t blow your mind with its futuristic looks or striking shape, but it won’t scare the horses either. It’s black and round with a neat little base and sat under the table in our hallway just fine. It arrived nicely packaged, with a great deal of cardboard and other eco-friendly packaging and precious little plastic. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

Underneath, the design is also fairly innocuous, but I was a tad worried by the corner brush, which has just one brush arm, instead of the usual three-to-five I am used to seeing. The roller head had rubber fins – which tend to be good on solid floors – as well as carpet-friendly brushes, but there was only one roller, and some of the better robots I have tested have two. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

The base station (which measures H14 x W12 x D9 inches) only caters for dirt; there’s no water reservoir. But the bin capacity is generous and it’s easy to see when it’s getting full due to the vertical strip of transparent Perspex. It also clips in and out easily, as does the filter in the other side of the base station – a large, foam creation that needs cleaning under the tap once a month. I appreciated that the base station has a plastic disc the size of the robot, which is to protect wood floors from getting soggy when the mop attachment is in place.

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

On the top of the Shark Matrix Plus are just two buttons, one to power on/off and the other to start/stop, everything else is done by the app, which I will cover in depth lower down this review. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)
  • Design score: 4 out of 5

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 review: app

  • Good mapping skills
  • Scheduling and spot cleaning
  • No multi-maps 

To get started, I just had to pop on the side brush, plug in the base (then charge the robot for six hours) and download and connect the app. Do make sure you only connect it to a 2.4 GHz wi-fi network, I wasted about half an hour trying to connect it to my 5 GHz but that was my fault for not reading the instructions. In my defense, the instructions that come with the Shark Matrix Plus are not particularly enlightening, but are enough to get you set up (if you read them properly). 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

Compared to other robots I have tested, the SharkClean app is pretty basic and rather annoying. Hopefully there will be upgrades as Shark gets its head around robot life. It is basic in that it doesn’t allow you to schedule specific rooms or more than one clean per day, it doesn’t let you choose how the robot cleans (perimeter-first works best for our pet-filled home), and you can’t change the power levels once it’s working.

The annoyances generally iron out, but they can be frustrating. Mainly I found it slow to connect, which is annoying when you’ve decided to pop a clean going before you jump in the car. The cleaning reports didn’t always record/save, and I found it hard to move between actions. For example, if it was returning to base, I couldn’t get the app to show me the maps so I could plan the next job. Sometimes the map disappeared completely, or the app froze, and once or twice it wouldn’t acknowledge that we had a robot in the house at all! 

The other downer that didn’t bother me, but might you, is that it will only map one floor. I am happy to use my cordless vacuum upstairs (where it lives) and have never been one for carrying robots up and down levels but if you want to use the robot on multiple floors, you’ll only be able to map one of them. 

It's not all bad news though. The actual map the Shark Matrix Plus created was perfect first time and was created really quickly – in less than 10 minutes. I also found it very easy to add rooms, as well as rugs (to prevent wet carpets in mopping mode) and create a schedule for each day (to coincide with the school run). 

  • App score: 3 out of 5

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 review: performance

  • Good at corners and edges
  • Quieter than advertised
  • Mopping a bit basic

Using in vacuum mode

The Shark Matrix Plus comes with the regular vacuum cleaning insert installed, which has a small bin and filter inside and automatically empties its payload back at the mother base. I needn’t have worried about the measly single-arm corner brush, as it did an excellent job of getting dog dander and dust bunnies out from along the skirting boards and corners of cabinets etc. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

Shallow enough to get under all our freestanding furniture, including the sofas and the kitchen kickboards, the Shark Matrix Plus also had no problem climbing onto chunky rugs or over the wooden thresholds between rooms, many of which have thwarted less agile robots.

Being largely open view with level flooring throughout the ground floor, our home is the perfect setup for robotic cleaning. But I was also hugely relieved to discover the Shark Matrix Plus could hoist itself over the legs of the lounge chairs in our kitchen, which have grounded every other robot I’ve ever hosted. This meant I’d have to lift the heavy chairs onto the sofa out of the way or go and rescue the robot and restart it mid-clean. I was delighted the Shark Matrix Plus glided over them with barely a grunt.

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

Another genius benefit of the Shark Matrix Plus is its ‘Matrix’ cleaning system, which essentially means it cleans back and forth and then up and down, in a grid-like pattern. The difference between that and a simple back and forth clean was significant. You can only use Matrix if you’re doing one room, presumably because it takes more time and power, but I liked to use it on the living room because that’s our only carpeted room and the results were much better.

You can also Matrix Clean a 5’ x 5’ area without the app, which is great for random spills. You need to carry the robot to the spot, then press and hold the start button for five-to-seven seconds until it says, ‘starting spot clean’. 

Image 1 of 5

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

I used this spot cleaning function to test the Shark Matrix Plus on an area of flour and oats. As you can see from the photo gallery above, the results were average. It cleared most of the flour, except in the grooves between the wood planks, and left just a few crumbs of oats. I still had to get out my cordless to finish the job, and I only used the low power setting to get the flour out of the grooves, suggesting that my cordless is better than the Shark Matrix Plus, even on its lowest power setting. Annoyingly, there was quite a lot of flour and oats left around the base station when it returned to empty the bin, and I had to get the cordless to clear that up, too. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

As I work from home, I really appreciated how quiet the Shark Matrix Plus was, my decibel meter recorded just 46 dB in the low power mode, which is the one I mostly used on our hard flooring. This is similar to the sound of bird calls or in a library and was much lower than Shark’s official rating, which presumably has to include the bin emptying sound level. Being so quiet meant I could have it running around in the background when working, except during Zoom meetings, without feeling distracted or annoyed. It is indeed much louder when emptying the bin into the base station, but it’s very short-lived.

On the point of bins, I did love having the extra capacity of the base station as my usual robot requires daily emptying. However, it fell far short of the 60-day emptying schedule advertised – I found two weeks was about the longest I could leave it. 

Our carpets and rugs are all low pile (upstairs, too), so I can’t tell you how well the Shark Matrix Plus might manage on a thick pile rug, but it did well on our wool carpet in the living room and the jute rug in the kitchen. I mean, it’s hard to say how deep down the clean was, but I didn’t feel the need to get another vacuum out afterwards. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

Using in mop mode

Before mopping, I first had to add rug zones to my map, so it didn’t soak the rugs or carpets. This was pretty easy to do, until it got to the exploration run, which you’re meant to do to make sure you have got the rug placements right. The Shark Matrix Plus wandered close to where I’d marked the kitchen rug, and then went a bit mad, zig-zagging all over it. I decided I didn’t have the patience to worry about it and sent it back to base.

Shark Matrix Plus testing

(Image credit: Future)

Once the module is in, the Shark Matrix Plus automatically recognizes it is mopping and – this bit is amazing – it will vacuum and mop at the same time. I’ve only tested one robot vacuum that claimed to mop and was disappointed to discover that it really couldn’t. That other model barely made my floors damp, let alone cleaning them, and because it had to go round and vacuum first, it also took a lifetime to do a terrible job.

By contrast, the Shark Matrix Plus did a much more thorough job and you could see trail marks where it had been, which showed decent coverage. The pad oscillates over the surface, which presumably picks up more dirt than just sliding along. The mop pad was reassuringly dirty when it was done, too. As most of our ground floors are real engineered wood flooring, I also appreciated that the Shark Matrix Plus didn’t flood them in water as that would almost certainly damage them. Oh, and it also managed to find, and skip past, the rugs. 

Shark Matrix Plus vacuum test

(Image credit: Future)

In truth, the results didn’t compare with what can be achieved with an actual mop, and it didn’t get very close into the corners or skirtings, but it was good enough for a mid-week freshen up before getting the mop and bucket out on Saturday morning. 

  • Performance score: 4 out of 5

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 review: battery life

  • Plenty of power
  • Charges quickly

The battery life ranges from about 85-110 minutes, depending on what power mode you have it on. This isn't anything to rave about, but it only needed one quick recharge when covering our ground floor in max power, which took around 131 minutes (including charging time) to do all six rooms and the hallway (which the Shark app says is 112sq m worth of cleaning). Once recharged, it would return to the spot it left off and merrily resume cleaning. 

The official Shark stats say the battery takes six hours to fully recharge, but I found it only took about three so perhaps it wasn’t completely empty whenever it went back to base. Either way, I had no complaints about the battery life. 

  • Battery score: 5 out of 5

Should you buy the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1?

Buy it if…

You hate emptying bins

As I own a robot that requires emptying every single day, I can assure you that you need a self-emptying base station.

You have hairy housemates

The roller is anti-hair-trapping and it works well. There were a few hairs around the middle after a month’s testing but nothing like what I’m used to seeing wrapped around my robot’s rollers. It also has proper HEPA dust filtration.

You want zero drama

Of all the robots I have tried, this was the least needy. It never once got stuck or lost, nor sent me a distress message to say it had ‘fallen off a cliff’ (when in reality it was just straddling the doormat). 

Don’t buy it if…

Tech stresses you out

The app is glitchy and unreliable and not terribly informative, either. There may have been swearing…

You want to clean upstairs, too

The mapping currently only covers one floor level, so choose wisely.

You’re OCD about dirt

Like most (possibly all) robots, the suction power isn’t comparable to manually operated vacuum cleaners – use it for daily maintenance cleaning, then do a ‘proper’ vacuum on the weekend. 

Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 review: also consider

Shark AI Ultra 2-in-1

The Shark AI Ultra 2-in-1 and Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 are both powerful robot vacuums with mopping capabilities, but they differ in key areas. The AI Ultra excels in smart navigation and AI-powered obstacle avoidance, while the Matrix Plus offers a better clean thanks to its multi-surface brushroll and Matrix Clean

Read our full Shark AI Ultra 2-in-1 review

Narwal Freo X Ultra

The Narwal Freo X Ultra and Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 both offer advanced vacuuming and mopping, but they've very differently priced. For the extra loot, the Narwal Freo X Ultra offers self-cleaning mop pads and autonomous water management, ideal for hands-free maintenance. 

Read our full Narwal Freo X Ultra review

How I tested the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1

  • I used this vacuum in my own home for a month
  • I vacuumed carpets and vacuumed and mopped hard floors
  • I recorded the sound levels using a Decibel Meter App

I used the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 to clean the ground floor of our four-bed, Victorian family home for a month, using it every day on all our downstairs floors, which include terracotta and porcelain tiles, engineered timber, wool carpet and three rugs. The total area is around 120sq m.

I checked out every feature on the app, and did Spot cleans, Matrix cleans and mopping runs. I liked being able to pick specific rooms, so I could just get the main kitchen and hallway done quickly, but mostly I scheduled the robot to work while I was out of the house, so I could arrive home to nice clean floors throughout.

During testing, I used the decibel meter on my iPhone to monitor noise levels and conducted a test to see how the vacuum coped with flour and oats on hard flooring. 

As part of my job as a journalist specialising in kitchens and bathrooms, I’ve been reviewing vacuum cleaners for publication both online and in print for several years now. I’ve tested lots of robot vacuums, and currently own an Anker by Eufy Hybrid X8, which I like well enough, but I liked the Shark Matrix Plus more. 

Read more about how we test

First reviewed September 2024

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED review: This is the 4K OLED monitor of my dreams
8:18 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Monitors Peripherals & Accessories | Tags: , | Comments: Off

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED: one-minute review

I’ve been waiting a long time for a monitor like the LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED. With a brilliant OLED display and a gorgeous 4K resolution, backed up by an ample 240Hz refresh rate and brilliant picture quality, this LG monitor makes OLED technology a must-have for anybody who plays PC games or bases their home life around their computer desk. 

There’s a noticeable quality difference between OLED and IPS monitors when playing cinematic and competitive games alike on a computer, and with this thing sitting on your desk you’re bound to get bang for your buck on the picture quality front.

But while we can celebrate LG for bringing the cost of an OLED monitor down with the 32GS95UE-B, let’s be honest with ourselves – $1,199 / £1,199 / AU$2,399 is still expensive for a monitor no matter how impressive the tech is. 

Those looking more greater image depth and HDR performance may also want to look elsewhere, as the LG's peak brightness doesn't reach the retina-searing heights of similarly priced Samsung and Alienware models. My biggest bugbear though? Surely we can give peripherals better names than difficult to understand numbers and letters.

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED: price and availability

The LG 32-inch UltraGear OLED

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / Techradar)
  • How much does it cost? $1,199 / £1,199 / AU$2,399
  • When is it available? Available now
  • Where can you get it? LG directly and technology retailers in the US, UK and Australia

It’s tough to find a cheap 32-inch gaming monitor – especially one with an OLED panel (with prices often starting well above $800 / £800 / AU$1,000) – but the LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED offers a sensible price-to-cost ratio for enthusiasts. It’s kind of a rarity, considering that it ditches an ultrawide profile and a curved screen for a more standard design, while most OLED monitors elect to have at least one of the aforementioned traits.

Similar monitors are available from Gigabyte and Alienware with significantly lower costs, with the closest competitor being the Samsung Odyssey G8 OLED G80SD (with a listed price of $1,299 / £1,099 / AU$1,999). 

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED: Design

The LG 32-inch UltraGear OLED

(Image credit: Techradar / Zachariah Kelly)
LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED Key Specs

Screen size: 32-inch
Resolution: 3,840 x 2,160
Brightness: 275 nits full screen, 1,300 nits max HDR
Color coverage: 98.5%
Response time: 0.03ms
Refresh rate: 240Hz (4K) / 480Hz (1080p)
HDR: DisplayHDR True Black400, HDR10
Features: FreeSync Premium Pro, NVIDIA G-Sync, Dual Mode, Pixel Sound, 1 x HDMI, 1 x DisplayPort, 1 x Headphone out, 1 x USB-A upstream, 1 x USB-A downstream

An achilles heel of many gaming displays is the design – thick bezels, beefy stands and a focus on big, obvious branding offen make a monitor look cheap and overdesigned. This is in no way a problem for the LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED.

It’s tempting to head this section off with ‘it’s a big black rectangle with a pentagonal stand’ but we can entertain the monitor more than that. It’s a premium design language that LG and Samsung alike have been leaning into with their high end monitors. 

It’s mature to the point of only having the ‘UltraGear’ and ‘LG’ brand signifier in the front of the pentagon stand, without any branding on the actual display bezels. There’s RGB lighting on the back, allowing you to shine numerous colors onto the wall behind. If you know this feature isn’t for you,  it’s easily turned off through the monitor settings. 

Cables can be fed through the back of the monitor easily thanks to a neat cable management system, and you’re able to raise the panel quite high up off the base.,It would be nice if it could go lower, but we’re being quite picky. The monitor can swivel, tilt and pivot as well if you want to adjust the pitch of the display.

The panel is extremely premium, too. It’s polished with an anti-glare coating that only shows a warped reflection at most in low-light or reflective light situations. This is quite remarkable for an OLED display, as the technology, inherently, can’t go particularly bright. This means it can occasionally suffer in bright rooms, but as I found during testing in my office-bedroom – which is filled with light at all times during the day – I was able to play games with little issue.

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED: Features

The LG 32-inch UltraGear OLED

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / Techradar)

The big sales pitch of the LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED is its ‘dual mode’ functionality. At the press of a hotkey (located conveniently under the monitor), this monitor can switch between 4K 240Hz to 1080p 480hz. The first is more ideal for those after more cinematic, graphically beautiful gameplay, albeit at a lower framerate, while the second is intended for high octane competitive gamers after smooth frames.

We can err on the critical side with this feature and note that 4K 240Hz gameplay, at its height, would be difficult for even the most expensive gaming computers to reach in gorgeous single player games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Star Wars Outlaws. I would even go as far as to say that 240Hz is not just difficult to attain but is also very much overkill – 144Hz will suffice for a story-rich game.

The flipside of the feature makes much more sense to me – 1080p gameplay at 480Hz for fast-paced games where you want to see more frames rendered in a second. I can see the benefit of this in a game like Counter Strike 2 and League of Legends – but those high frame rates may even be seen as unnecessary by a competitive gamer. Leveling with you, dear reader, that’s not me – I prefer a pretty picture to a consistently smooth one (though I do like my frames to be above 60FPS). The monitor has a smart cleaning process for when it doesn’t detect an input, refreshing the pixels to avoid burn-in – a common issue with OLED monitors. 

The monitor also comes with FreeSync Premium Pro and Nvidia G-Sync. It has a Display Port, HDMI, headphone jack, USB (downstream) and USB (upstream) ports, with support for a 100 x 100 mm wall mount. Satisfying me as someone who likes to watch stuff on their computer in bed, the monitor also has built-in speakers and comes with a Displayport and HDMI cable in the box.

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED: performance

The LG 32-inch UltraGear OLED

(Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / Techradar)

The LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED’s display is matte – not glossy like you’d expect from most displays. The extreme blacks and darker shades that the OLED pulls off in use – and when turned off – are so deep that you’ll at most see a rough reflection of yourself, but not enough to ruin the experience. 

That’s an OLED panel’s entire deal and it leads to better performance on every front – deeper blacks equals  better contrast – the difference between the darkest and brightest parts of an image.

And at the 32-inch size, I’ve found this monitor to be the best way to experience a lot of cinematic games. Star Wars Outlaws and Warhammer 40K: Space Marine II both play exceptionally well on the monitor and look much more gorgeous on the OLED screen than my previous 32-inch Gigabyte M32Q monitor. 

TV shows like The Acolyte and The Bear look equally impressive – particularly The Bear for its attractive use of color sharpness in central objects amid a bland palette. The LG 32GS95UE-B aces it on color clarity.

The speakers are pleasantly surprising, too. I was expecting sound that peaks too readily and sounds washed out, but the 32GS95UE-B performs just about as well as any TV without a separate speaker system. This can be chalked up to LG’s ‘Pixel Sound’ feature, which provides a directed sound experience without any external speaker system.

The monitor performs relatively well on brightness and HDR – though both could be better at this pricepoint. The maximum brightness (1300nits) and enhanced darkness clarity doesn’t fare much better for content than just using the display with HDR disabled (275nits standard luminosity).  

And while it doesn’t fit into any other category in Techradar’s review format, I’ve just got to say it – this name, the LG 32GS95UE-B, is just letters and numbers. They have meanings obviously but it’s extremely difficult to communicate to a customer – so much so that LG just calls the display the ‘32" UltraGear OLED Dual Mode 4K UHD’ on its website, and hence why we’ve been naming it interchangeably throughout this review. Less letters and numbers please.

Should I buy an LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED?

Buy it if...

Don't buy if...

Also Consider

LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED: Report Card

How I tested the LG 32-Inch UltraGear OLED

As soon as I received this monitor, I got to work unpacking it and setting it up. Pulling it out of the box was easy, as was the process of putting the stand together (no tools were needed, as everything slots and screws into place by hand). As my main space in my home is my bedroom-office, this monitor was switched on at almost all hours whenever I was home. To avoid burn-in, the panel was often turned off for cleaning when not being used.

The main use of the monitor was for gaming using a separate headset. I played a variety of games, including Caravan SandWitch, Team Fortress 2, What The Car, Star Wars Outlaws, Warhammer 40K: Space Marine 2, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon 5.

I also used the monitor for watching Twitch streams, YouTube videos and lots of TV shows, including The Bear and The Acolyte.

  • First reviewed September 2024
Dell Latitude 7350 business laptop review
8:05 pm | September 15, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Dell has long been a staple in the business workspace, known for delivering reliable, high-performance laptops that cater to the needs of professionals across various industries. The Latitude series, in particular, has been a go-to for companies looking to equip their employees with devices that are both robust and versatile.

Recently, I reviewed the Dell Latitude 7350 Detachable, a powerful 2-in-1 device that impressed with its flexibility and portability. Now, this laptop is the standard Dell Latitude 7350—a more traditional laptop that promises the same level of performance but with the stability and feature set expected from the best business laptops.

Dell Latitude 7350

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Dell Latitude 7350: Unboxing and First impressions

The Dell Latitude 7350 comes in minimalist, professional-looking packaging, and it is clear from the beginning that this is more professional than some of the laptops I look at. That could be because of the simple logo, the color, the form factor, or whatever it may be; it's clear that this laptop is meant for business. Upon unboxing, the first thing that surprised me was how light and sleek the device was. It feels very light and portable, which would be fantastic for those daily commuters or those in and out of physical meetings all day, walking from place to place. The Latitude 7350's build quality feels premium, with a sturdy hinge mechanism and smooth finish. All around, this laptop looks and feels great out of the box.

Dell Latitude 7350

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Dell Latitude 7350: Design and Build Quality

Specs

Processor: Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 135U, vPro® or Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 165U, vPro®  
RAM: 16GB or 32GB LPDDR5x, 6400 MT/s (Onboard)
Storage: 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD  Display: 13.3” FHD+ (1920x1200) IPS, Anti-Glare, No-Touch, 250 nits or 13.3” QHD+ (2880x1920) IPS, Touch, 500 nits  Graphics: Integrated Intel® Graphics, Core™ Ultra 5 or Ultra 7
Battery: 3 Cell, 57 Wh, ExpressCharge™ capable
Ports: 2x Thunderbolt 4.0 with Power Delivery & DisplayPort (USB Type-C), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 with PowerShare, 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x Universal audio jack, Optional: SmartCard reader, uSIM card tray
Connectivity: Intel® BE200 Wi-Fi 7 (2x2), Bluetooth® 5.4 Technology, Optional: 5G or 4G LTE  
Webcam: 1080p at 30 fps
Operating System: Windows 11 Pro  
Dimensions: Ultralight Laptop: 11.77 x 8.38 x 0.69 inches, 2.18 lbs (0.989 kg) or Aluminum 2-in-1: 11.77 x 8.39 x 0.70 inches, 2.86 lbs (1.297 kg)

The Dell Latitude 7350 Business Laptop features some customizations regarding the chassis and LCD panel. The two main chassis options are an ultralight magnesium version in a deep blue and a more durable aluminum variant in a more typical gray. The ultralight model weighs just 2.18 pounds (0.989 kg), making it one of the lightest business laptops on the market. While slightly heavier, the aluminum chassis offers more durability and additional features like a SmartCard reader, which may be a deal breaker for some.

Dell offers multiple display options, including a 13.3-inch FHD+ touch and non-touch, as well as a QHD+ 2-in-1 variant, all with a 16:10 aspect ratio for enhanced productivity. This is in addition to the multiple variants of the Latitude 7350 already, meaning there are plenty of options for this laptop to be customized to your needs.

The keyboard features a mini LED backlight with a Copilot key, enhancing power efficiency and workflow speed. With the Copilot key, Microsoft's AI is a keystroke away, ready to help you with a boost of productivity when used correctly.

Dell Latitude 7350

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Dell Latitude 7350: In use

The Latitude 7450, the non-2-in-1 variant, is powered by Intel’s latest Core Ultra processors. It offers options ranging from the Core Ultra 5 135U to the Core Ultra 7 165U, making it highly capable for most business applications. I've had the opportunity to use this laptop for the last few days as my primary machine to get work done, and I have a lot of thoughts.

The Latitude 7350’s battery life is impressive, with more than 10 hours of use on a single charge and a basic daily workload. By the third day, I stopped worrying about bringing a portable power station because I was confident in my battery life.

Dell Latitude 7350

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

I greatly appreciated the lightweight nature of this little 13-inch computer. It has been easy to grab and go while still being large enough for most of my work. For those things that I wish I had more screen real-estate for, I can easily plug into any of the best business monitors with the available ports and get to work.

These days, with the nature of what I do, most of my meetings are virtual. The Dell Latitude 7350 makes these meetings super easy, especially if those meetings are on Zoom or Microsoft Teams (sadly not Google Meet or others, yet). The Latitude 7350 has a collaboration touchpad, meaning that at the top of the standard touchpad are soft buttons in Zoom and Teams to help with effortless collaboration. These controls help with screen sharing, muting, turning the camera off, and showing or hiding the chat window. The collaboration features are top-notch and help make virtual meetings on this laptop a breeze.

Dell Latitude 7350

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Dell Latitude 7350: Final verdict

The Dell Latitude 7350 is a formidable choice for business users who need a lightweight, powerful, and secure device. A solid alternative to some of the best Lenovo ThinkPad laptops, its high price point is justified by the extensive customization options and premium features, making it a worthwhile investment for those who can afford it.

If you are looking for a quality, lightweight, powerful laptop and happen to have a lot of virtual meetings, this laptop should be on your list of computers to consider.


For more productivity hardware, we've tested the best business computers and the best business tablets.

Sihoo M76A-M101 ergonomic office chair review
5:35 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

The Sihoo M76A-M101 Ergonomic Office Chair is a lightweight, minimalist chair with one standout feature. It has a clean and simple look, making it suitable for almost any working environment. It is designed to accommodate nearly any body size. My primary team member who uses this chair is 5'1", and it fits her perfectly. What's impressive is that I can also sit comfortably in this chair. Unlike some of the best office chairs designed only for taller individuals, this one can appeal to a wide range of people. Whether you’re short or tall, this chair adjusts to fit your body perfectly, providing the comfort and support needed for long hours at the desk.

Sihoo designed this chair to be lightweight for easy maneuvering, and the breathable mesh keeps you cool even during intense work sessions. Sihoo also added a unique coat rack on the back of this chair. Initially, I thought it was a gimmick, but it turned out super helpful, especially here in Central Illinois, United States, where I live, since the seasons are so dramatic. Coats are needed for a good chunk of the year -- winter, spring, and fall.

Sihoo M76A-M101

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Sihoo M76A-M101: Unboxing & first impressions

The Sihoo M76A-M101 comes securely packaged, with all parts neatly organized. The assembly process is straightforward and took about 21 minutes from chair opening to sitting in the chair and adjusting the settings. The chair’s lightweight design is immediately noticeable, making it easy to move even before assembly. Once out of the box, the chair appears modern and sleek, with a design emphasizing functionality over flair. The mesh material feels durable and breathable, and the adjustable components move smoothly. The armrests have a notably cheap feeling; however, they still fulfill their duty. The chair cushion is comfortable, and the backrest is supportive. All around, this is a simple chair. And sometimes, that's precisely what you need — a chair, not a space station.

Sihoo M76A-M101

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Sihoo M76A-M101: Design & build quality

Specs

Material: High-quality mesh, sponge cushion
Color: Grey
Weight:
Dimensions:
Chair Height: 107 - 125 cm / 42.1 - 49.2 in
Chair Back Height: 61 cm / 24 in
Seat Depth (back to front): 48 cm / 18.9 in
Seat Width: 47 cm / 18.5 in
Chair Depth: 69 cm / 27.2 in
Armrest Height: 22 cm / 8.66 in
Seat Height from Ground: 40.5 - 48.5 cm / 15.94 - 19.1 in
Warranty: 3 years

The M76A-M101 chair by Sihoo is designed with ergonomics in mind. It features a sleek, double-jointed headrest that easily adjusts for neck support, and a larger, higher backrest that enhances overall back comfort. The lumbar support is also highly adjustable, ensuring that users can find the right fit for their lower back. This has proven true for taller and shorter users, which is impressive for such a simple chair.

Despite its lightweight nature, the chair feels sturdy. The flip-up armrests are a convenient addition, especially for those who need to fit the chair under a desk or prefer a more open seating space. Although they could drop down and raise like some other popular chairs, flipping them back entirely gets the armrests out of the way, which is helpful in some settings. The breathable mesh used for the backrest and seat ensures that the chair remains cool and comfortable, even during long periods of use. The seat cushion is soft yet supportive, made from a thick sponge wrapped in high-quality mesh.

Sihoo M76A-M101

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Sihoo M76A-M101: In use

The Sihoo M76A-M101 ergonomic office chair has been great to use. As mentioned, my team has been using this chair for nearly two months now. This chair shines in its adjustability. The headrest, armrests, and lumbar support can all be customized to the user’s preference, ensuring a comfortable seating experience. The chair also offers a 120° recline for when you need a quick break and need to kick back.

I briefly mentioned it before, but the most unique part of this chair is the coat rack. Specifically, having a coat rack on the back of your chair has proven helpful if used in an office or a home office. Even in warmer months here in Illinois, the coat rack has come in handy for a rain jacket, and soon, it will come in handy for a winter jacket. This helps keep the jacket off the backrest and, therefore, not have you lean back on the coat, especially if it's wet. It’s a small but thoughtful addition that keeps your workspace tidy by providing a place to hang your jacket or even a hat.

Sihoo M76A-M101

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

While working in this chair, we found the flip-up armrests super helpful. Flipping up these arms while using the chair with some desks has made it easy to slide the chair under the desk.

Sihoo M76A-M101

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future)

Sihoo M76A-M101: Final verdict

The Sihoo M76A-M101 is a well-rounded ergonomic office chair that delivers on comfort, adjustability, and practical features. Its lightweight build and easy assembly make it an attractive option for both home and office use. While the coat rack might not be essential for everyone, it’s a nice touch that adds to the chair’s overall functionality. If you’re looking for a versatile chair that fits a range of heights and needs, the Sihoo M76A-M101 is worth considering.


Looking to brighten up your workspace? We've reviewed the best standing desk and the best office desk models you can get.

« Previous PageNext Page »