Organizer
Gadget news
Adobe Photoshop CC (2024) review: the best photo editor gets even better
12:00 pm | December 8, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Creative Software Gadgets Software | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024: two-minute review

Photoshop has long been our benchmark for what a photo-editing app should be capable of, and that doesn’t change with the 2024 edition. Whether you work with graphics or photographs, it’s a comprehensive solution for manipulating images in pretty much any way you can think of.

As we covered in our in-depth Adobe Photoshop CC 2023 review, the last edition of Photoshop introduced a range of significant AI-powered upgrades. Those included generative features for creating visual assets using simple text prompts, as well as object-selection and removal tools supercharged by AI.

The 2024 version of Photoshop is an evolution of last year’s release. Rather than introducing any groundbreaking features, it builds on the existing toolkit to offer users an even more polished, accessible and powerful editing app.

Adobe sticks with a proven interface, and Photoshop CC 2024 will feel familiar to anyone who's used an older version of the app in recent years. The useful Contextual Task Bar returns, now with enhanced support for the transform, shape and gradient tools. Nothing is dramatically different, and the app is all the better for it.

Chief among the updates is Adobe’s Firefly Image Model 3, which drives the generative AI tools in Photoshop CC 2024. The net gain here is more realistic and consistent AI imagery from text-based prompts. Photoshop’s AI is far from infallible, but its best output is significantly more believable and convincingly integrated when compared to Photoshop CC 2023.

New generative tools help in this regard. Generate Similar allows you to create further variations based on your favorite of three generated images, letting you get closer to a visual that fits. When you find one that does, the Enhance Detail option boosts detail in a generated image for better clarity.

It’s all very effectively executed. You’ll still encounter errant output, sometimes to a laughable degree, and an eagle-eyed inspection will still pick up inconsistencies and smudginess in the best of Photoshop’s efforts. But if you want to incorporate generative AI into your workflow, Photoshop CC 2024 has the most complete set of tools to let you do so.

That includes a new Selection Brush option, which allows you to more easily make selections using a hybrid of the brush and lasso tools, as well as an Adjustment Brush for selectively applying granular tweaks to parts of an image.

Further refining the formula is the Distraction Removal tool, which can automatically detect, select and paint out people and wires from your photos with remarkable effectiveness.

With more updates in the pipeline, including a Generative Workspace that’s currently available in Photoshop Beta, Photoshop continues to set the standard for photo-editing apps in 2024. Adobe’s payment model might not be popular with everyone, but we think a Creative Cloud subscription offers a lot of value.

If you need an all-in-one image-editing solution with the latest generative AI features implemented to genuinely useful effect, Photoshop CC 2024 is the app to beat.

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024: pricing & plans

  • Available as part of an Adobe Creative Cloud subscription
  • From $22.99 / £21.98 / AU$32.99 per month for the Photoshop plan
  • From $19.99 / £9.98 / AU$28.59 per month for the Photography plan

As with all Adobe apps, Photoshop is only available to use via a Creative Cloud subscription. There’s no option to buy a one-off license, so you’ll need to keep paying for this subscription to maintain your access. You can sign up for plans on a monthly or an annual basis, with significant savings offered if you pay for the full year up front.

Photoshop is also available as part of several Creative Cloud plans, including the All Apps bundle. You can also choose to take out a single-app subscription for Photoshop alone, but this isn’t actually the most cost-effective way to access the app. Strangely, you’re better off with the Photography plan, which combines Photoshop and Lightroom, together with 20GB of cloud storage

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024 review: Interface

Screenshot showing the Adobe Photoshop Contextual Toolbar

(Image credit: Future)
  • Interface largely unchanged from Photoshop Creative Cloud 2023
  • Contextual Task Bar supports more shape, transform and gradient settings

Photoshop’s interface has undergone iterative refinements over the years, but it remains fundamentally familiar for anyone who’s used a version of Photoshop – or, indeed, any desktop photo editor – in the past. Tool shortcuts reside in a vertical column down the left-hand side, while panels on the right are where you’ll find layers, image adjustments and color controls. Granular settings for your chosen tool can be found in the options bar along the top of the workspace.

The interface is largely unchanged from Photoshop CC 2023. Seasoned users won’t notice any major changes, which is the kind of consistency that keeps people paying for a Creative Cloud subscription. It does also mean that the same learning curve is present in 2024, with a degree of tuition required to fully get to grips with everything that Photoshop has to offer. It’s not the most beginner-friendly photo editor, but that’s inevitable when you’re dealing with such a capable and comprehensive piece of software.

Returning in Photoshop CC 2024 is the Contextual Task Bar, which floats at the bottom of the workspace. It can also be dragged around, pinned in place or disabled if you don’t need its input. Wherever you place it, the Contextual Task Bar displays shortcuts relevant to your current task or selection, genuinely streamlining editing workflows.

The Contextual Task Bar has been improved for 2024 to support fill and stroke settings for shapes, rotate and flip tools when transforming objects, as well as the ability to change color, opacity, type, and presets when working with gradients. These aren’t groundbreaking additions, but they are genuinely useful refinements that contribute to a slicker user experience.

Screenshot of the Generative Workspace in Adobe Photoshop (Beta)

(Image credit: Adobe)

That user experience is going to evolve in future iterations, and you can get a preview of this by downloading the Photoshop Beta version through Creative Cloud. Choose Generative Workspace from the welcome screen and you’ll find a space where you can create visual assets from text prompts and browse through previously generated elements. You can have several prompts running simultaneously, and everything is saved to a timeline, which allows you to go back and add variables.

Photoshop’s Generative Workspace is not dissimilar to the interface used by some of the best AI image generators. In our experience, it adds a useful cataloging function to Photoshop’s AI toolkit, allowing you to easily generate, manage and build on a library of generated creative assets in real time.

  • Interface score: 4.5/5

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024 review: generative AI features

  • Generative features powered by Firefly Image Model 3 for greater realism
  • New Generate Similar feature lets you create more image variations

One of the most significant additions to Photoshop CC 2023 was its suite of generative tools, which use Adobe’s Firefly Image Model to drive AI-powered image generation. We covered the effectiveness of these features at length in our review of Photoshop 2023, and they return with even greater potential in 2024.

Generative Fill and Generative Expand are now driven by the latest version of Adobe’s Firefly Image Model. The tools themselves still function in the same way: Generative Fill creates AI imagery in a selected area based on a descriptive text prompt, which can include adding and removing objects, while Generative Expand allows you to increase the dimensions of an existing image using generated content.

Screenshot showing an AI-generated peacock in Adobe Photoshop

(Image credit: Future)

What the upgrade means for Photoshop users is more realistic generated imagery, complete with enhanced control over detail and composition. This bears out in practice: while Photoshop’s generative tools aren’t perfect, results in the 2024 edition are consistently more believable. We encountered far fewer uncanny effects, particularly when text prompts included living creatures.

In our review of Photoshop CC 2023, we commented that the unreality of AI-generated imagery could be spotted fairly easily upon closer inspection, particularly when larger objects were added or generative adjustments were made to bigger areas of an image. These issues have been significantly improved in the 2024 version.

We still encountered smudging of detailed textures, as well as warped edges and occasional freakish shapes, particularly in mixed lighting. It also struggles with reflections. Certain prompts simply produce hilarious results, like when we tried to change a blue-sky background for a fiery one over a volcano. On the whole, though, we were very impressed with the realism of generated elements in Photoshop CC 2024.

Screenshot from Adobe Photoshop showing the Generate Similar feature

(Image credit: Future)

What struck us is that when we compared the ‘best’ result from the same prompt in the 2023 and 2024 versions, we had to look much closer in the latest edition before spotting any telltale signs that AI was involved. Everything from shadows and tone to general detail is more consistent – and that’s particularly the case if you hover over the thumbnail of a generated variation in the Properties panel and hit the Enhance Detail icon, which boosts detail further.

The Generate Similar option also allows you to refine generated content by choosing the best variation and generating more iterations from it. Say you prompt Photoshop to create a red truck – it will give you three variations to begin with. Pick the one of these that best fits your vision, click the three dots icon on the Contextual Tool Bar and select Generate Similar. You’ll then get three more images based on that variation, allowing you to steer the AI model towards what’s in your mind’s eye.

  • Generative AI features score: 4.5/5

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024 review: selection

Screenshot of the selection tool in Adobe Photoshop

(Image credit: Future)
  • Selection Brush is a hybrid of Brush and Lasso tools
  • Adjustment Brush applies non-destructive edits selectively

Photoshop already has some of the most powerful selection features of any photo editor, including the AI-driven Object Selection Tool and ‘select subject’ shortcut found on the Contextual Task Bar. While some tidying up is often still required when using these tools to mask off parts of an image, they can significantly accelerate workflow and, depending on the object you’re selecting, can sometimes automate it entirely.

Photoshop CC 2024 doesn’t introduce any groundbreaking selection features, but there are a few new and improved tools which enhance the existing offering. First is the enhanced Selection Brush Tool, which is designed to simplify the selection process for trackpad users. It’s really a combination of masking and lasso tools, executed in a more user-friendly way.

Choose the Selection Brush then simply paint over an area as you would when masking. You can adjust the brush hardness, opacity and color from the toolbar, as well as toggling between add and subtract modes to amend your selection. Switch to another tool and your selection will change from a pink overlay to a classic ‘marching ants’ outline, as if you’ve lassoed your way around the object. Both visually and practically, it’s an effective change that’s genuinely useful.

Screenshot showing the adjustment brush in Adobe Photoshop

(Image credit: Future)

Joining it is the Adjustment Brush tool, which allows you to apply non-destructive edits to specific areas of an image. Select the tool, then use the Contextual Task Bar to select the kind of adjustment you want to make. You can then paint over part of your image or select ‘Apply to object.’ You can change the hardness and size of the brush, as well as subtracting from your selection. You can then make granular changes to that new adjustment layer in the adjustments panel.

Again, this isn’t a groundbreaking feature. Instead, it’s one more way in which Adobe is making Photoshop more intuitive and accessible, through new applications of existing editing mechanics. While seasoned users may prefer to stick with traditional selection and application techniques, we think these brush tools tools will be easier for beginners to grasp. The good thing about Photoshop is that the choice is yours.

  • Selection score: 5/5

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024: Removal tools

Screenshot of the background removal tool in Adobe Photoshop

(Image credit: Future)
  • Distraction Removal automatically takes away distracting elements
  • Generate Background Tool can simulate photorealistic settings

We talked extensively about the effectiveness of the Remove Tool in our review of Photoshop CC 2023. In short, it’s a powerful feature that’s able to make unwanted elements disappear from your images in just a few clicks. Paint over anything in your image that you want gone and Photoshop will replace it with AI-generated pixels which, more often than not, blend effortlessly into the existing scene as if the original element was never there.

This feature returns in Photoshop CC 2024, with added functionality. Rather than manually painting over unwanted wires and people in your image, you can now use the Distraction Removal Tool to detect and remove them with a couple of clicks.

Select the Remove Tool from the sidebar, then select ‘Find distractions’ from the toolbar at the top. Here you can select ‘Wires and cables’ or ‘People’. Choose the former and Photoshop will try to remove all telephone and power lines from a scene. Select the latter and it will highlight all the people it can find, giving you the option to deselect any that you want to keep in the image.

Screenshot showing the Distraction Removal tool in Adobe Photoshop

(Image credit: Future)

When it works, it’s an impressive feature that genuinely saves time. We found it incredibly effective for removing wires and cables, even where these run across different backgrounds. For example, in an image in which multiple cables were running away from the camera, in front of several buildings and the sky, every single wire was seamlessly removed, and it wasn’t possible to trace where they’d been.

People selection is also powerful. Even out-of-focus figures in the background were picked up by the tool, and it was also able to detect people walking side-on to and away from the camera, only once missing someone with their back turned. The effectiveness of the actual removal depends on the given scene, with complex textures resulting in a few floating faces. Nevertheless, it’s a useful and convincing enhancement to Photoshop's object removal arsenal.

Firefly improvements are also evident when using the Generate Background Tool. Background removal was another big introduction in Photoshop CC 2023. After removing a background, the Generate Background tool lets you swap in a completely different setting which matches the position and lighting of the subject. Once again, it isn’t faultless by any means, but in our tests we did find it a particularly effective shortcut for changing the background of product shots and flatlay photography.

  • Removal tools score: 4.5/5

Should you buy Adobe Photoshop CC 2024?

Buy it if...

You want the latest generative AI tools
Powered by Firefly Image Model 3, the generative tools in Photoshop CC 2024 are at the cutting edge of what AI can do, creating realistic visuals from short text prompts.

You want powerful removal tools
Complementing the Remove and Background Removal tools, Photoshop’s new Distraction Removal feature uses AI to instantly and seamlessly remove unnecessary elements from your compositions, as if they were never there.

You want a complete image editor
From adjustment presets to comprehensive layer tools, Photoshop is the most complete image editor available. Whether you’re working with graphics or photographs, Photoshop is the ultimate all-in-one app.

Don't buy it if...

You like to own your apps outright
As with all Creative Cloud apps, Photoshop is only available as part of a subscription, and you’ll need to keep paying to maintain access to the software. If you prefer to pay a one-off fee you’ll need to look elsewhere.

You only need to make basic edits
Photoshop is an incredibly powerful app with a learning curve and price tag to match. If you only want to make simple adjustments to your images, there are cheaper and easier-to-use software options out there.

You don’t have a modern computer
Because of its powerful feature set, Photoshop demands a pretty significant amount of computer processing power. Even some relatively recent models don’t officially meet the spec benchmark specified by Adobe, so do check that your hardware is up to the task.

Adobe Photoshop CC 2024: Also consider

Serif Affinity Photo 2022
It might not have the cutting-edge features of Photoshop, but if you want a solid set of photo-editing features at a very fair price Affinity Photo is a great desktop alternative that’s available for a one-off fee.
Read our Serif Affinity Photo 2022 review.

Corel PaintShop Pro 2023
A comprehensive image editor with a generous set of tools to rival Photoshop's, PaintShop Pro is a reasonably priced option to consider if you don’t need the generative AI features offered by Adobe’s app.
Read our Corel PaintShop Pro 2023 review.

How I tested Adobe Photoshop CC 2024

Screenshot of Adobe Photoshop

(Image credit: Future)
  • I tested it for more than three months
  • I used it as my primary image-editing app
  • I created a range visuals in different styles

As I regularly edit images for work, Photoshop was already an important part of my visual toolkit. Having updated the app to version 26, I continued to use it as my primary editing tool for both photo and graphics work. Because I’m familiar with the software’s interface and capabilities, I was able to focus on the new features and compare these to previous versions.

I spent a lot of time exploring the capabilities of Firefly Image Model 3. This included making adjustments to a range of photos, as well as removing objects, to see how Photoshop’s updated generative tools could streamline my workflow. I also tested these extensively with a wide range of text prompts, to assess how realistically and seamlessly Photoshop was able to integrated generated content into compositions.

First reviewed: December 2024

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: a beautiful pint-sized party speaker with awesome audio
2:00 pm | December 7, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Wireless & Bluetooth Speakers | Comments: Off

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: two-minute review

If you’re looking for a sleek, stylish portable Bluetooth speaker, you’ll struggle to find a better-looking alternative than the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2. This small speaker assumes a compact, curved form with a durable rubber body and attractive metallic-looking grille. But it’s more than just a pretty face.

The Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 plates up impressively powerful audio for its size, with commendable levels of detail and surprisingly good instrument separation. As a result, you get a layered, clear listening experience that will keep you tuned into your favorite tracks for hours on end. Sound quality can get a touch harsh and unstable at top volumes, but for the vast majority of the time, it steers well clear of tinniness and distortion.

Audio in the treble is communicated with delicacy and finesse, with mids also sounding as rich as you’d hope to hear from some of the best Bluetooth speakers in this size and weight class. Bass – although not delivering as much impact as a large-sized party speaker – has solid depth and dynamism too. You can, unlike its original gen predecessor, alter EQ settings on the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2. Just download the Bose app and switch things up to your liking. However, there is a disappointing lack of presets (four that increase or reduce either bass or treble), so you’ll likely need to manually adjust audio with the app’s three-band equaliser.

But you don’t only get a strong audio performance from the SoundLink Flex Gen 2, you also get excellent build quality and durability. This Bluetooth speaker has the IP67 dustproof and waterproof rating, meaning it can survive being dunked under a meter of water for half an hour. Pretty impressive. On top of that, it has a durable exterior, discreet feet that keep it standing and a customizable shortcut button, which I personally used to activate my voice assistant. Design-wise, this really is the full-package.

And even in the features department, the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 has a solid amount to work with. Of course, the Bose app opens up a lot of this, including the aforementioned EQ settings and shortcut button customization. But it also enables you to view devices connected via multi-point, change auto-power off time and even name the speaker from a list of random names (mine was Pint Size Party). And like its first generation ancestor, the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 harnesses PositionIQ tech, which optimizes audio output depending on the speaker’s orientation.

The re-utilization of PositionIQ is welcome, but it does hammer home something undeniable about the SoundLink Flex Gen 2. It’s very similar to the original Bose SoundLink Flex. Not only does it look almost identical, but it also has a like-for-like sound profile. Perhaps most frustratingly, the newer variant has the same battery life – just 12 hours – which is a little underwhelming when you consider recently-released rivals, like the Beats Pill, offer a much longer playtime.

Having said that, the addition of EQ options and a more up-to-date Bluetooth version is a noticeable improvement. Is it worth upgrading for owners of the original SoundLink Flex? Perhaps not. But if you want a new Bluetooth speaker, this certainly stands on its own four feet as a very strong option. So, if you’re new to the SoundLink Flex line and want a great-sounding portable speaker for all environments, I’d recommend this one. Otherwise, you may be better served by an alternative in our guide to the best waterproof speakers.

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 on stone surface

(Image credit: Future)

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: price and release date

  • $149 / £149.95 / AU$249.95
  • Already appeared on sale
  • Launched in September 2024

The Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 is a mid-priced option in the portable Bluetooth speaker market. It’s available in a nice range of colors, including: Alpine Sage (green); Black; Sandstone (brown); and my personal favorite, Blue Dusk.

It has a list price of $149 / £149.95 / AU$249.95, although I’ve already seen it available for $119 / £119 (about AU$180). Given it only launched in September 2024, that’s quite an enticing price – though it still has hot competition. Rivals like the JBL Flip 6, for instance, have been discounted to as little as $79 / £79 on Amazon.

Top of the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 revealing power, Bluetooth, shorcut, volume down and play/pause buttons

(Image credit: Future)

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: specs

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: features

  • Companion app compatibility
  • Speaker pairing for stereo mode
  • PositionIQ tech

Perhaps the biggest upgrade the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 has over its predecessor is that it actually has a companion app. It’s not got a ton of fancy features, but it’s pretty much a must-have for modern Bluetooth speakers in my view – and this is a pretty slick, clean-looking app too.

So, let's start with the most important function – EQ settings. These were absent last time, and although it’s nice to have some customizability, they’re actually pretty disappointing. There’s a grand total of four presets: Bass Boost; Bass Reducer; Treble Boost; and Treble Reducer. Wow, really? Sure, you can manually adjust EQ across three bands (Bass, Mids, Treble), but I would’ve preferred to see more depth here – maybe some genre-specific presets, for instance.

So what else does the app have? Firstly, it has a Source option, to toggle Multi-point – a handy feature – on or off and view connected devices. It also has an option to change the function of the Shortcut button to Speaker Link (to pair Bose speakers), Voice Assistant or Spotify Resume – pretty neat. These are nice additions in my view, making for a decently well-rounded in-app experience – even if EQ options are a bit lacking.

But there’s more: the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 continues the use of PositionIQ. This essentially provides positional compensation, meaning that the speaker can optimize audio output depending on its placement and orientation – pretty cool for a small Bluetooth speaker like this that’s made for use in a range of environments. In addition, you can pair this speaker with another in order to access Stereo audio output – but frustratingly, this is locked to Gen 2 models alone. I can’t help but think that backwards compatibility with the original model would’ve been a real incentive for owners to opt for the upgrade, so this feels like a bit of a missed opportunity.

Although this speaker has a USB-C port, you’re not able to use this for music output. There’s also no 3.5mm port, so it’s going to be wireless play only, guys. For me, this isn’t an issue, but the option would be a nice touch.

Finally, this speaker offers fairly average battery life. It can deliver approximately 12 hours of playtime with music at around 50% volume – the same as its predecessor and similarly-price competitors like the JBL Flip 6. Some may feel that simply matching its predecessor isn’t enough and what’s more, there are a lot of similarly-sized Bluetooth speakers that can offer superior numbers. Just look at the Beats Pill, for instance, which supplies an awesome 24 hours of playtime.

  • Features score: 3.5/5

Top of the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 revealing various button controls

(Image credit: Future)

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: sound quality

  • Balanced, punchy sound
  • Impressive dynamism and instrument separation
  • Bass may be a little thin for some

On the SoundLink Flex Gen 2’s box, Bose says that “you’ve never had a sidekick that sounds this good”. And for many, that may well be true – this speaker does offer balanced, pleasingly nuanced audio. But despite its talents, I would argue that audio isn’t quite S-tier quality.

One reason for this is that music can be a little rough around the edges at high volumes. When tuning into As If Waltz by Geordie Greep, I felt that the track sounded almost compressed at 90%-100%, with treble a touch abrasive and vocals lacking the crisp clarity I heard at lower volume levels. This was an issue we also identified in our review on the SoundLink Flex Gen 2’s predecessor, but like that model, volume can climb surprisingly high for the speaker’s size, so if you’re not maxing out loudness, this likely won’t affect you.

Additionally, some may find that bass isn’t quite as impactful as they’d like, especially for larger rooms or more open spaces. Although bass is responsive and sharp, it can be a touch thin, especially out of the box. You can remedy this, in part, by upping bass levels in the Bose app, just don’t expect the boom of a larger party speaker. When listening to The Boys Are Back in Town by Yung Gravy, I found that the imposing, in-your-face low-end felt a little constricted. A significant factor here is, of course, the SoundLink Flex Gen 2’s size – it’s no beefy Boombox. If your main focus is ground-shaking low-frequency audio, you might want to consider a larger option, like the Earfun UBoom X or Bose SoundLink Max, for instance.

But anyway, that’s enough moaning. I want to be clear, the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 does, in fact, sound very good and it’s going to offer a significant sonic step-up from almost any budget portable speaker. Why? Well there are a few key reasons. First of all, instrument separation is pretty strong. When playing St. Thomas by Sonny Rollins, the warm double bass, forward-sounding sax, sporadic percussion and cool keys all occupied surprisingly separate spaces, combining for a satisfying listen.

On top of that, instrumental and vocal elements sound natural and detailed. For instance, the drum solo in St. Thomas sounded authentic with even the weight of each drum hit sounding discernible and true to life. The rainfall at the start of Rains again by Solji also maintained its intended sound, without coming through like static or a muffled, crackling mess. Vocals also had a breathy, delicate quality that many cheap alternatives miss out on.

I’ll circle back to bass as well. As I mentioned earlier, it’s not exactly thunderous, but it does have solid depth and a respectable bite for a small speaker. I listened to I Want You by Moloko on both the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 and a budget option – the Tribit Stormbox 2 – to identify the key benefits of splashing some extra cash. And bass clarity was one of the key improvements. With the Bose speaker, bass was neatly separated and had a more accurate tone than Tribit’s alternative – which served up a slightly muddied, muffled sound in comparison.

Another song with a lot of low-end emphasis – Black Eye by Allie X – produced similar results. The depth of the drum machine was replicated with far more finesse using Bose’s speakers, with the Tribit offering a more dulled sound. The dynamism of the bass connecting up to the lower mids was also far more impressive with the SoundLink Flex Gen 2, so if you’re willing to spend more on a Bluetooth speaker, you’ll certainly hear the difference, that much is certain.

  • Sound quality score: 4/5

Reverse side of the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2

(Image credit: Future)

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: design

  • IP67 waterproof and dustproof rating
  • Attractive look with classy color options
  • Simple, well-sized button controls

So perhaps unsurprisingly, I’d argue that the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2’s design is actually its standout aspect. It looks very similar – no, almost identical – to its predecessor, but I’m not complaining; it was a very nice-looking model.

This speaker has smooth, curved corners, a rubbery body and beautifully finished speaker grille. It’s available in a really nice set of colors too. These aren’t eye-poppingly vibrant, more-so classy and refined. The unit I reviewed came in Blue Dusk – a really beautiful medium-blue color that is neither boring or overbearing. It’s oriented to sit lengthways too and has four subtle bumps that act as a base for the speaker to stand on.

And that ties into a fantastic aspect of the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 – it’s equally as practical as it is pretty. Firstly, it has a pretty durable design, in part thanks to its rubber outer casing, which means it should be fine to throw around (to an extent) and capable of taking a few falls. It also has the IP67 dustproof and waterproof rating, meaning it won’t succumb to an untimely death, even when submerged under a meter of water for up to 30 minutes. It also has a handy fabric tab that you can use to attach the speaker to a bag or belt.

Finally, the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 has a solid set of onboard controls. You get power, Bluetooth, shortcut, volume up/down and play/pause buttons. All of these are perfectly sized and are super clear – there’s no second-guessing what does what. There is, however, a user manual and tips section in the Bose app, so you’ll be able to get the best out of your speaker. Really, there’s nothing I didn’t like about the SoundLink Flex Gen 2’s design – it’s a true thing of beauty – but it doesn’t skimp on ease-of-use or durability either.

  • Design score: 5/5

Strap attached to the side of the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2

(Image credit: Future)

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: value

  • Not the cheapest speaker out there
  • But already available on sale
  • Clear quality improvement over budget options, too

When it comes to value, the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 finds what I’d call a happy medium. The bottom line is, this isn’t a cheap, budget product – but it’s not a top-of-the range, premium pick either.

And I’d argue that the quality you get here matches that price profile nicely. Audio quality – although not mind-blowing – is very good and skips on the muddy, constricted sound you get from a lot of budget options. But you also get a stunning design and a decent enough feature-set to boot, which really help to justify the price tag.

You can already get this bad boy on sale too. I headed over to Amazon in the US and the UK and spotted this thing on discount, so you won’t have to spend a lot more than $120 / £120 if you’re savvy. That’s really not too bad given the quality on show – and given it’s predecessor was only a touch less. So again, it may not be the ultimate budget-friendly pick, but the SoundLink Flex Gen 2 still earns its keep.

  • Value score: 4/5

Side of the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 revealing USB-C port

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2?

Buy it if...

You want a step-up from budget audio quality
If you’re fed up of the restricted, muddy sound a lot of budget options produce, the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 could be the step-up you’ve been looking for. Audio quality isn’t quite top-of-the-range, but instrument separation is solid, sound is clear and the general balance here is strong.

You’re all about style
This speaker is undoubtedly a sleek, elegant-looking one. Given it also comes in a range of fresh, albeit not so vibrant colors, you’ll likely love what’s on show here. It’s compact and portable too, so you get practicality as well as good looks. Everyone’s a winner, really.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a tight budget
This speaker isn’t ideal if you’re working with a limited budget – it’s been on sale a few times, but it’s still never exactly been cheap. And there are so many quality, low-cost Bluetooth speakers to choose from. For instance, the super-impressive (yet admittedly smaller) JBL Clip 5 has a list price of just $79.95 / £59.99 / AU$89.95, but it’s regularly on-sale for less.

You want ground-shaking bass
If you’re someone that wants incredible low-end power, the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 might not be for you. Sure, bass is clean and output is decently meaty given its size, but if you really want to bring the boom, I’d recommend choosing one of the best party speakers instead. I’d particularly single out the JBL Charge 5, which has great bass and is only a bit larger.

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: also consider

JBL Flip 6
The JBL Flip 6 is a strong mid-range Bluetooth speaker that has a lot in common with the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2. It’s got an IP67 waterproof rating, offers up to 12 hours of battery life and even weighs about the same. What’s more, it has an outdoorsy, rugged design and distinctly powerful bass. There’s no voice assistant and similarly to this Bose speaker, audio can be a touch edgy at top-volumes, but it’s still a great option if you’re in the market for a portable speaker. Read our full JBL Flip 6 review.

Sonos Roam 2
We rate the excellent Sonos Roam 2 as our top overall pick for the best Bluetooth speaker. Why? Well, you get rich, powerful audio, Wi-Fi connectivity alongside Bluetooth 5.3 compatibility and a sleek, highly portable design. You don’t get quite as much battery life as the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 and it’s a touch more expensive – but it may well be worth those sacrifices. Read our full Sonos Roam 2 review.

Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 review: how I tested

USB-C port on the side of the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2

(Image credit: Future)
  • Tested for one week
  • Predominantly used at the Future Labs music testing space
  • Mainly tested using Tidal on FiiO M11S

I spent hours listening to music on the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2, testing it across various EQ modes and volume levels. I predominantly used the speaker in our music testing room at Future Labs to best judge audio quality and validate battery life claims.

When listening to tunes, I predominantly tapped into Tidal on the Fiio M11S hi-res music player. I streamed tracks from our carefully curated TechRadar reference playlist as well as a bunch of songs from my personal library. This included songs with deep bass, high-pitched vocals, and complexly layered mixes, enabling me to hear the speaker’s full range capabilities and dynamism across different frequencies. I also used the Tribit Stormbox 2 to closely assess the improvements this Bose speaker can offer over a more budget model.

  • First reviewed: December 2024
  • Read more about how we test
GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus mini PC review
10:42 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: 30-second review

Every Mini PC is trying to make its mark, and now the focus seems to be on high-powered machines with mass appeal. The GMKtec NUC Box K8 Plus is an interesting option, with a spec sheet that pitches it at the mid to higher end of this style of machine. Inside, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU and AMD Radeon 780M graphics provide ample processing and graphical power to handle day-to-day tasks, as well as a decent level of creative work such as high-resolution photo and video editing. That combination will also see you through mid-level gaming, although a few settings may need slight reductions. 

However, then you come to the build quality. The main metal casing, finished in matte black, initially gives you a good impression of the machine and the high-quality. However, the transparent twist off top adds little to the design, and if anything cheapens and otherwise stylish mini PC. What this design does allow, however, is easy access to the inside in case you need to upgrade the RAM or SSD. 

The outside of the machine is similarly designed with ease of use and functionality at its heart, featuring plenty of ports and even the Oculink PCIe 4.0 on the front, which enables you to plug in an eGPU to boost the graphics processing and overall performance of the machine. This makes the NUC Box K8 Plus a very different proposition from many of the best mini PCs we've reviewed and, at the price, makes it an absolute bargain. What GMKtec has done is balance absolute performance with cost, resulting in a mediocre-looking machine, due to that transparent top, that can actually hold its own against machines almost double its price.

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: Price and availability

  • How much does it cost? $424.97
  • When is it out? Now
  • Where can you get it? Widely available

The GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus is widely available and can be purchased directly from the GMKtec for £424.97

  • Value: 5 / 5

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: Specs

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: Design

The design of the NUC Box K8 Plus is understated, featuring the usual compact, box-like form that makes it easy to position on a desk or take with you when you need something small and portable, that has more ports and expansion options than your average laptop. 

The build quality is solid, with a metal casing that gives the machine a premium feel. The transparent top, which cheapens the design, covers the large Hyper Ice Chamber 2.0 cooling system—essentially a large top and bottom fan with a copper base—that helps to keep heat in check. The transparent top is positioned slightly above the body of the machine to enable airflow. While the dark grey transparency could add to the aesthetics, it seems to lack impact here.

In terms of size, this Mini PC is about average, measuring 127 mm x 132 mm x 58 mm and weighing 640g. This compact size makes it easy to position on your desk or mount using the included VESA mount. Its weight and dimensions also make it perfectly portable for users who need a machine on the go and makes it a great Van life option.

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The rest of the machine is neatly laid out. At the back, you'll find a good range of ports, including 2 x USB 2.0, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1, 2 x RJ45 2.5G, USB4.0 Type-C, and a Kensington Lock for security. Below these ports is additional venting, highlighting GMKtec's focus on effective cooling. More vents appear on either side of the machine, further aiding airflow.

At the front, there's the signature green GMKtec power button, an Oculink PCIe 4.0, USB4.0 Type-C, 2 x USB3.2, and a 3.5mm audio-out for headphones. The most impressive design feature is the inclusion of the Oculink display port. While this might not be the most intuitive display connector out there, the port does offers performance and reliability that few other connectors can match, making it perfect for those working with 4K or 8K video or high end gaming where the connection of a powerful eGPU can be used.

  • Design: 4 / 5

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: Features

Mini PCs have recently leapt forward in performance and features, and again here, the GMKtec NUC Box K8 follows this recent trend with an AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU with 8 cores, 16 threads, 54W TDP, 16MB L3 Cache and 4nm processor tech. This is coupled with AMD Radeon 780M graphics which seems to be the choice for high performance mini PCs. While this mini PC is priced in the mid-range, the performance, components and features all seem to hit well above its weight. The CPU and GPU are joined by PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280 SSD, and a nice feature here is that there are dual slots, which will enable you to maximise the internal storage with the ultrafast SSDs to a maximum of 8TB, 4TB in each. Alongside the ROM is a DDR5 5600MHz SO-DIMM dual channel, which means that you could potentially increase the RAM to 96GB, which is again impressive for a small machine. Our review sample came equipped with a 1TB SSD and 32GB of RAM.

One of the big features of the machine is the ability to connect up to four displays, two from the USB4.0 ports and one each from the HDMI 2.1 and DP (2.1). While this would have been unusual in the past, it's a feature that is becoming progressively more common. Although, it's worth noting that while three of the ports are at the back of the machine, the fourth is the USB4.0 on the front.

Connectivity for the machine is a big feature, with Intel i226V dual 2.5G LAN ports, WiFi 6, and Bluetooth 5.2 offering plenty of connection options for both networks and gaming.

One of the issues with all this power in a small box is inevitably heat, and here is the GMKtec Hyper Ice Chamber 2.0, which is all part of the cooling system. This sees a mini fan at the top which vents air under the twist top and draws heat away from the main components, then under the main board is a larger cooling fan with a heat sink that pulls heat away from the base of the motherboard and the CPU and GPU. This cooling is essential for the smooth running of these compact machines.

When it comes to power draw, the small machine can actually be quite power-hungry in comparison with some of the latest mini PCs. However, you do have the option to adjust the power draw with different performance settings, with the sleep mode consuming 35W, compared with full performance at 70W. This makes it a great solution if you need to manage your power consumption out in the field, and it will enable you to balance computer use with performance.

If you're looking for a machine for gaming or higher-end video work, then the addition of the Oculink port is really exciting. The nature of the port means that it's more complex to use than a standard HDMI, DP or USB4.0, but the quality of the connection, as well as its versatility, is a step up. To make use of the port, however, you will need the correct type of eGPU, and while these are less common than your standard eGPUs, they are generally cheaper and easy enough to set up.

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
  • Features: 5 / 5

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: Performance

Considering this is a mid-range mini PC with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU, the performance of this small machine is outstanding. When the demands on the machine increase, such as rendering 4K video in DaVinci Resolve, you can hear the fans fire up, and things start to slow slightly. However, considering how much this mini PC costs, the performance is exceptionally well-balanced and pretty close to far more expensive models. 

Starting with a few easy tests, the Microsoft Office suite was loaded, and documents from Word and Excel were opened, edited, and saved. The power of this PC is more than enough to handle large multi-sheet spreadsheets with calculations without issue. Likewise, opening large Word documents as well as working on PowerPoint presentations was well within its abilities. The benchmark Windows Experience score of 8.2 mirrors the smooth use of the machine for day-to-day admin.

Digging a bit deeper into the higher-end performance and starting with the SSD: as standard, there's just one SSD installed used for the OS and base storage, and a second SSD can be added. Checking the results of the SSD and CrystalDiskMark results in scores of 5190.23MB/s for read and 4741.77MB/s for write, which demonstrate the speed at which data is accessed from the drives and made available to the applications. In DaVinci Resolve, this presented itself with fast loading times for video within the timeline along with fast render speeds, especially when converting MXF video ready for use within the application. This speed from the SSDs was apparent throughout the test.

Taking a look at the processing power, we noticed that in applications for editing video and images, the machine handled higher-resolution files with relative ease. In Photoshop, the machine didn't have an issue with applying brushes and filters as being able to handling multi-layer files. Likewise, all options in Lightroom ran smoothly. In DaVinci, scrubbing through 4K footage and editing it on the timeline was again surprisingly smooth for edits up to 10 minutes without too many graphics, text, or effects applied. When it came to more complex tasks such as applying effects and rendering videos, the multi-threads worked well, and again, while there is a bit of a wait for renders, the speeds are surprisingly fast considering the pricing of the machine.

Switching to gaming to push the abilities of the GPU, the results were interesting. In Hogwarts Legacy, with the resolution set to 1080p and medium-to-high settings, the gameplay was excellent with steady frame rates, although ray tracing was reduced. In Cyberpunk 2077, this was also playable at 1080p with low-to-medium settings without ray tracing. Finally, in Tekken 8, again at 1080p and high settings, smooth frame rates and excellent gameplay were achieved. Increasing the resolution of these games to 4K showed the system beginning to struggle. Hogwarts Legacy required all settings to be reduced, and the same was true for Cyberpunk 2077 However, both games were still very playable, while Tekken 8 ran without issue!

  • Performance: 5 / 5

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus: Final verdict

GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The performance of the NUC Box K8 Plus for general day-to-day tasks is exceptional, handling Microsoft Office apps effortlessly, as well as browsing the internet and most other office-based applications. Taking a look at applications that require a little more processing power, the compact K8 Plus was able to handle the additional load from creative application with ease. Editing in DaVinci Resolve or Photoshop proved just how powerful this machine is. As long as you're sensible about its abilities, it packs in more than enough power for everyday editing of short-form high-resolution video. However, some render times may take a while.

When used for gaming, the performance is impressive again, with all games tested running well at 1080p and only starting to struggle as the resolution was boosted to 4K and the settings increased.

Overall, considering the price, the NUC Box K8 Plus is an exceptional machine with the bonus that the USB4.0 and Oculink ports enable a huge amount of flexibility when it comes to the upgradability of this machine.

Should I buy a GMKtec Nucbox K8 Plus?

Buy it if...

You want a machine you can upgrade

This is one of a new breed of machines that enables not just the standard upgrades of ROM and RAM but also connected devices such as eGPUs and hard drives, vastly expanding its potential.

You like the idea of Oculink

HDMI or other display ports are more complex, but what you sacrifice in convenience, you more than makeup for in performance.

Don't buy it if...

You're on a restricted budget

While the machine itself is relatively affordable, once you start to look at the upgrade and expansion options, the price will quickly rise. What initially looks like a budget-friendly option might not remain so in the long run.

It would help if you had a tidy machine.

The upgradability and expansion of this machine are key features, but this does mean it will become the heart of a larger system of connected boxes. If you prefer a neat setup, this is for someone else.


Looking for something larger? We've tested the best business PCs around.

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max review
10:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances Vacuums | Comments: Off

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max: two-minute review

Despite the high-end build quality, the 2-in-1 iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max is quite some way behind the competition in terms of mapping, vacuuming, auto bin emptying and mopping. And although its price has dropped from an initial $1,399 / £1,499 to a more reasonable $999.99 / £799, I still consider this bot too expensive for what it offers, especially when compared to the almost sci-fi level of tech that companies like Roborock, Eufy, Dreame and Narwal are fitting to their products.

Although it isn't equipped with an extendable side brush, the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max is very capable at vacuuming hard floors. However, it struggles on carpet, especially if there's a lot of pet hair on it. Its bin-emptying and mopping system, too, are very underwhelming.

In iRobot's defense, the company apparently has some of the best troubleshooting tech support in the business, but then the secret to any good tech is to not require any troubleshooting at all – technology like this should work efficiently, reliably and logically which, sadly, this bot isn't especially good at, at least when compared to the extremely high level of futuristic smarts from the majority of its nearest competitors.

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max review: price & availability

  • List price: $1,399 / £1,499 (regularly discounted to around $999.99 / £799)
  • Launched: July 2024

The iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max was announced in July 2024 and went on sale in the US, UK and elsewhere shortly afterwards. It's available to buy direct from iRobot, or via third party retailers like Walmart or Amazon.

At time of writing, this model sits right at the top of the iRobot Roomba range in terms of price and specs. The official list price is $1,399 / £1,499 – firmly in the premium price bracket, and up there with the most expensive models on the market. However, by the time my UK review unit arrived, the price had dropped to £999. At time of submitting this review it's now it's £799 – a huge drop that suggests that iRobot looked closely at the Chinese competition from Dreame, Roborock, Eufy, Deebot and Narwal and felt they had no option but to bring the price crashing down. In the US the price-drop is less, but not insignificant: it's now $999.99.

That's still in the premium bracket, but lower down. And yet, I still think that even the current, discounted price is too big an ask given how far the vast majority of the competition is ahead of the game.

  • Value for money score: 2.5 out of 5

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max specs

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max review: design

  • Low-profile bot and attractive dock
  • Fixed mop that shifts to sit on top of the bot when not required
  • Loud in operation

There's a fair bit to get into here, so I've split the design section into the robot design and the dock design.

Robot design

With its long history in both industrial and military-use robots, US-based iRobot has been at the forefront of robot vacuum design for over two decades. But like any industry that finds favor with the public on a massive scale, it wasn't too long before a flurry of copycats jumped on the bandwagon with a host of new innovations and improved software design, to the point that today iRobot finds itself competing with around 15 other companies, mostly from China, a world–leader in robotics.

Sadly, on evidence of the company's latest machine, the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max, it seems that the brand everyone went to as a first port of call has begun to lag behind the mainstream, with some reused technology and not many striking new innovations.

Let's start with the robot itself. It's fitted with a twin rubber roller system that should work wonders on carpet by beating deep into the pile to release as much dust and debris as possible.

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max flipped over to show underside

Underneath, you'll find two rubbery brushrolls and a fixed side brush (Image credit: Future)

However, while the rollers seemed perfectly capable on hard floor, they struggled at collecting pet hair from carpet (more on that later). I'm also wondering whether there's a lack of suction power. iRobot is pretty much unique amongst robot vacuum brands in not releasing suction specs, arguing that it's not a good indicator of pickup power. All I have to go on is that the unit offers three suction levels – Quiet, Balanced and High – and that it offers double the 'Standard' pickup power of most of the rest of the iRobot range.

It's a shame iRobot didn't opt for an extendable spinning side brush because this new innovation is very good at stretching into corners where the robot's centrally located brush rollers cannot reach. It's also a shame that iRobot only ever made one robot vac that was D-shaped – the excellent Roomba s9+ – so that even its fixed side brush could reach into any right-angled corner. But then again almost all robot vac manufacturers other than Dyson and Eufy continue with a circular design for their robots, and I know not why.

On the plus side, I'm thrilled to see that this bot is capable of riding over loose hard floor rugs without ruffling them up too much or worse, getting stuck in the middle of a rug mountain.

Mop pad on Roomba Combo 10 Max

This bot has a fixed mop pad rather than rotating one (Image credit: Future)

Where things fall away considerably is in the design of the Combo 10 Max's rear-mounted mopping system, at least by today's standards. When robot vacuum manufacturers originally discovered that they could include a wet pad on the rear to mop a floor while the front end did the vacuuming, they opted for a static wet pad that just dragged along behind as the robot moved around.

Then someone noticed that the wet pad was being dragged across any carpet that the robot needed to traverse en route to its next place of work. Roborock solved this conundrum by fitting a mechanism that raised the rear mop a few centimeters whenever the robot was on carpet. It was a revelatory innovation that others would soon adopt for their own products.

However, iRobot went even further with its earlier Combo j7+ model and instead of just raising the mop a few centimeters – which is plenty enough on all but the deepest of carpet pile – it developed a convoluted system that not only raised the mop but placed it on top of the rear of the machine.

Mop pad on iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max retracting to sit on top of the bot

Rather than simply raising the mop when not in use, this bot repositions it on top of the machine (Image credit: Future)

The very same system is in use on the Combo 10 Max. Which brings me to one of the biggest disappointments with this machine. You guessed, the nature of static mop itself. Anyone who has ever removed a floor stain using their hand and a wet cloth will know that a few tight circular swirls is more efficient than just swiping from one side to the other.

Consequently almost every other manufacturer has already dropped old-fashioned static mops like this for spinning towel-covered dual circular mop pads or, as in the case of Eufy, a cylindrical spinning towel. Moreover, some models like the Dreame L40 Ultra and Roborock Qrevo Curv even use extendable rear mops that pop out the side to run along skirting boards and around chair legs. By stark contrast – for a premium-spec model at least – the Combo 10 Max sticks to the old dyed-in-the-wool method of simply dragging a very thin and watery mop pad around behind it, albeit with some pressure applied by the weight of the robot itself.

While a static mop like this will sweep a floor clean of most light stains, it's no match for a pair of fast-spinning mops. Furthermore, the act of positioning the mop above the bot when it's not in use leaves unsightly splashes of water all over the top of the bot's shiny rear surface.

Water left on top of the Roomba Combo 10 Max after mop pad has shifted off

The retracting mop pad leaves the top of the robot wet (Image credit: Future)

When it comes to navigation around the home, almost all robot vacs these days use LiDAR, a radar-like laser-based range finder that maps an entire home in mere minutes. Like Dyson, iRobot has stuck to SLAM technology using its tried-and-tested RGB camera, LED headlight and sensor system, but this makes it painfully slow to map an entire floor plan.

However, one good thing with this bot is that its front-mounted RGB camera is pretty good at detecting obstacles. It will often pick up obstacles smaller than those detected by most other models, even those fitted with both LiDAR and a camera. Also, having no LiDAR on top of the machine means the bot can venture under low slung furniture and – if it feels like it – punch through sofa and bed valances, which is something LiDAR-based models cannot do.

Close up of camera on iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max

A front-mounted RGB camera is used for object detection (Image credit: Future)

The Combo 10 Max is equipped with all the usual technology to detect obstacles like stairs, drop-offs, walls and, as mentioned above, most small items like shoes and cables. However, as you'll read in my performance chapter, this robovac's obstacle avoidance is no better than the excellent Dreame L40 Ultra, though I would say that it's still a cut above some of its competitors.

The Combo 10 Max is also armed with a feature called ‘Dirt Detective' and according to iRobot, it 'creates a cleaning plan based on how often each room is cleaned and how frequently dirt is detected in each room. Selecting Dirt Detective to start cleaning will enable your robot to automatically prioritize the dirtiest rooms and use the most optimal cleaning settings for each.' To be honest, this function is very difficult to analyze since there are no real signals to suggest when it's in operation. But I'll give iRobot the benefit of doubt in this regard.

The great thing about most robot vacs is that they're pretty quiet while they go about their daily chores. Invariably all you will hear is a low-pitched hum as it passes by. Conversely, this model's sound frequency is higher pitched and, while it measures at an average 62dB, the nature of its higher frequency whine can be annoying when it's in the same room.

Dock design

The Roomba Combo 10 Max's AutoWash Dock gets an immediate star for great aesthetics. In fact, iRobot has consistently provided some of the best looking docking stations since the launch of the J7+. Yes, at 44cm in height, 50cm in depth and 40cm in width, it's a pretty large thing to have in the lounge or hallway, but in its favor the ribbed matt black plastic surround is a lot better looking than most other docks I've seen and, of course, the color black is far less noticeable in a home situation.

Like most contemporary robot vacs, this model's dock charges the robot, empties its small bin and cleans its mop. Although iRobot doesn't state the size of the AutoWash Dock's dust bag, it seems to be about average (around 2.5 liters).

Dust bag inside iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max dock

The bot empties dust into this dock dust bag (Image credit: Future)

Accordingly, it should hold enough debris in a non-pet household for over a month's worth of cleaning before you need to think about discarding it and fitting a new one (a spare bag is provided in the package). However, if you have shedding pets, you can expect to change dust bags much more frequently – possibly every two weeks.

Since this model also mops, it comes with two larger-than-average rectangular water tanks hidden behind a front door, one for clean water (2 liters) and the other for the dirty stuff (about 1.8 liters).

Water tanks inside the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max dock

The dock contains two water tanks hidden behind a door (Image credit: Future)

However, both water tanks have horizontal lids and both tanks are positioned horizontally instead of vertically, which means that the weight of the water forces the back of the containers downward as you pull them out.

If, for instance, the simple clip on the dirty water tank isn't firmly in place and you pull it out without bracing for the weight, the whole contents could easily tip backwards as it leaves the plinth and pour the dirty contents all over the floor. Unlike other models, removing and carrying these tanks to the sink is most certainly a two-handed operation.

Clean water tank from iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max dock

The tanks need to be held flat as they pull out horizontally (Image credit: Future)

The Combo Max 10s also performs a weird mop-cleaning routine whereby the robot moves in and out of its housing to run its mop over a ribbed rubber roller. That's in contrast to the way other systems work, where the cleaning mechanism moves back and forth across the mopping pad or, as is the case with most modern hybrids, a spinning system that scrubs the circular mops. This dock also uses a soft fan to dry the dock area after washing the pad but since the pad itself is positioned face down above the robot unit, the pad itself doesn't benefit from much drying at all.

  • Design score: 3 out of 5

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max review: performance

  • Decent mopping
  • Disappointing suction on carpet
  • Dock suction is poor

Again, there's plenty to discuss here, so I've broken this section up into Navigation performance (below), Obstacle avoidance, Vacuum performance, Mopping performance and Dock performance.

The iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max uses SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) navigation technology, which isn't terrible but also is nowhere near as efficient as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), specifically when it comes to fast and accurate navigation in all levels of light, even complete darkness.

For instance, it took about 30 minutes for the Combo 10 Max to map my open-plan floorspace comprising living room, dining area, kitchen, hallway and passage. A LiDAR-equipped model takes about eight minutes to map the same space.

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max cleaning around a rug in reviewer's home

This bot had real trouble mapping my home (Image credit: Future)

Also, the map it produced was nowhere near as defined as a LiDAR-equipped machine, which produces maps of such accuracy you can see exactly where to select a specific cleaning zone, like a small rug or highlighted section of flooring. LiDAR also allows you to see the robot work in real time and pinpoint its whereabouts using a phone app. Conversely, with this product you may find it tricky to accurately divide one room from another, because it's not particularly clear which bit of the map is which.

To give you some idea how confusing it is to decipher the iRobot map, I endured the following scenario. Firstly, I created a ‘kitchen vac & mop' routine under ‘Favorites' and it mopped the first few feet of kitchen floor, then retracted the mop and vacuumed the kitchen rug. So far so good. However it then completely forgot about the rest of the kitchen (amounting to 70% of the floor space) and went back to its dock to wash the mop. I thought it was just doing a mid-session clean but, no, that was it.

Floor looking extremely wet after mopping by iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max robovac

After mop cleaning, this bot left my floors too wet (Image credit: Future)

Round two. I set it off on the same task and this time it went straight to the kitchen rug to vacuum it. Then it started mopping the same section as before, only this time the amount of water left behind on the floor was unacceptably high due to the mop having just been washed. It then trundled back to the dock as before.

This confused me, so I checked the map which, at a glance looked okay until I examined it more closely and noticed that the bot had never fully mapped the kitchen during the dry mapping run it performed the moment I set it up. I expected it to at least learn about this unmapped space when it was in the kitchen vacuuming and perhaps think ‘oh, here's a new part of the floor plan I didn't see earlier. I'll go ahead and amend the map'.

In the end I resorted to resetting the whole system to get it back to the start and remapped the whole house again. Bizarrely, it mapped the entire home accurately the second time around, albeit with weirdly-shaped walls that still make it hard to work out what's what.

Obstacle avoidance

I then performed some obstacle avoidance tests and the results were varied but not too bad it must be said. For my first two obstacle tests I perhaps placed too many obstacles in the bot's path because it cut short both rug cleaning sessions and scuttled back home. Test three with reduced clutter proved more successful, though the Combo 10 Max did ride over the circular dog chew that has similarly flummoxed every other bot in previous tests. Sadly, it also failed to notice the wayward shoe lace. However, it did avoid the sock and the phone cable.

Image 1 of 3

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max trying to avoid a charge cable

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max trying to avoid obstacles, including a sock and dog toy

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max trying to suck up a shoe after unsuccessfully avoiding it

(Image credit: Future)

Would I rely on it to avoid dog mess? Despite iRobot stating that, like many of its forebears including the j7+ and j9+, the Combo 10 Max will avoid dog waste, I would never trust it to avoid it 100%. But then again, I'd never trust any robot vac to avoid pet waste – it's already happened to me with a previous product and I'm not going down that horrendously smelly toothbrush road again. The moral is – if you have a puppy in the home that hasn't been housetrained yet, do not rely on any robot vac to avoid any messes it makes.

I should finally add that the Combo 10 Max also bumps into walls and furnishings as part of its daily routine and this inevitably adds so many scuffs and scratches to the sides of the unit that it may look 5 years old after just a few weeks of use. However, there is a setting that will reduce this pinball issue at the expense of not performing as thorough a cleaning job along edges and around table legs.

Vacuum performance

I expected much better carpet performance from this machine, especially as it's equipped with twin rubber brush rollers. During my basic rug and living room carpet test, the Combo 10 Max occasionally ruffled up some Labrador hair into long bundled strands that it left behind and, while the robot's small internal bin showed some evidence of hair collection, it turned out that it hadn't collected as much as I expected.

Dog hair rolled on carpet after the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max has failed to pick them up

The Roomba Combo 10 Max occasionally left remnants of Labrador hair bundled on the carpet (Image credit: Future)

To check this, I sent the Roborock Qrevo Curv to the same sections of carpet and its bin contained even more hair than the Combo 10 Max – after it had already been there. If you have a lot of hairy pets, this might not be the best robovac for you (head to TechRadar's best robot vacuum for pet hair guide for bots that can handle pet hair).

Roborock Qrevo Curv bin full of dog hair, after going over the carpet once the Roomba Combo 10 Max had tried to vacuum it once

This what the Roborock Qrevo Curv picked up after the Roomba Combo 10 Max had done a vacuuming cycle on this rug (Image credit: Future)

I then proceeded to embark on some proper pickup tests on both carpet and hard floor using TechRadar's menu of ingredients: raw oats, flour and biscuit crumbs. My Persian-style rug is only about 2.3 x 1.4m but the robot seemed to miss some sections entirely and the areas it did clean – including the specific test area – it didn't do very well. It literally made one speedy pass over the test patch and then started to erratically clean some but not all of the rest of the rug, leaving plenty of flour in its wake. It then went back to base.

Roomba Combo 10 Max trying to vacuum biscuit crumbs, oats and flour from a rug

The Roomba Combo 10 Max made one speedy pass over my purposeful spillage, then proceeded to head off elsewhere (Image credit: Future)

Worse, while doing this test, it also proceeded to smear more rolled strands of pet hair that had clearly been shed since a previous test. After returning, the dock's incredibly loud suction kicked into action to remove the contents of the bot's bin and you can read about the results of this in a chapter below.

My final test included the same ingredients on my kitchen's wooden floor and it collected the vast majority of detritus in the first pass and then went back and forth over the section several times. It also trundled back to base midway through the kitchen session to have its bin emptied and then headed back to finish the task. Good result.

Image 1 of 2

Hard floor with dry debris spillage before cleaning with Roomba Combo 10 Max

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Hard floor with dry debris spillage after cleaning with Roomba Combo 10 Max

(Image credit: Future)

One especially annoying aspect with this system is the level of noise it creates. Firstly, the bot's side brush makes an irritating scuttling noise on hard floor and the high frequency whine of the vacuum section is audible from the other side of a room. By comparison, my Roborock Qrevo Curv is almost as quiet as a church mouse.

Mopping performance

Unlike much of the competition that has already moved over to plush spinning mop pads, the Combo Max 10 sticks to the old-fashioned method of dragging a thin, damp mop around behind it. Yes, the mop lifts completely off the floor and out of the way – but then the few centimeters that other models raise their mops is sufficient to prevent any damage to most carpet, bar, say, the deep pile variety. And anyway, some of the very latest bots with revolving mop heads now simply leave them in the dock if not being used.

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max mopping a wooden floor

The retractible mop pad in mopping mode (Image credit: Future)

To give it its dues, the Combo Max 10's mopping is actually pretty decent, despite the lack of any dirt agitating vibration tech like that fitted to some earlier Roborocks. In my kitchen test, it mopped efficiently enough and no worse than some cheaper models I've tested. I also noticed that it also made a few back-and-forth passes over the stain I created so its SmartScrub system feature seems to work okay. Was it as good as a pair of spinning toweling mops? No, but for light mopping duties it'll do.

Suction inlet on iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max clogged with damp dust and debris after vacuuming and mopping simultaneously

Simultaneous vacuuming and mopping will leave the suction inlet clogged with damp dust and dirt (Image credit: Future)

However, if set to vac and mop at the same time, this bot will still vacuum over areas it has already mopped and this causes extra dampness around the suction intake which will start to look very messy after a few tasks. Many robot vacs do that, but at least some models now provide the option to vac then mop, rather than do both at the same time.

Dock performance

Perhaps one of the most surprising disappointments I've experienced with the Combo Max 10 is the poor level of the AutoWash Dock's suction when emptying the robot's bin. Aside from being much louder than the norm (around 83dB), it has had continuing trouble emptying a full bin's worth of pet hair.

Firstly, it made a racket with a sound of rushing air and no whoomph sound that all robots make when a clump of hair is sucked from the robot's bin into the cleaning station's dust bag. When I removed the robot's bin, I noticed a large semi-circular clump of pet hair sticking out. This can happen with some robot vacs, especially those with poor docking station suction. So I removed the protruding clump and the rest of the contents were eventually sucked into the AutoWash Dock's large dust bag. Or so I thought.

A large clump of hair stuck in the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max's onboard bin

Hair blocked the onboard bin and prevented it from emptying properly (Image credit: Future)

When I checked the robot's bin again, I noticed a lot of large sand-like particles and a few small pieces of gravel. These should have also been sucked into the main dust bag like every other robot vac I've ever reviewed. This very same anomaly occurred after my carpet and hard floor tests using raw oats, flour and crushed biscuits.

Debris left in the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max's onboard bin

I regularly found debris left in the onboard bin after the auto-empty process (Image credit: Future)

As my photos illustrate, the dock simply refused to suck the majority of oat flakes out of the robot's bin. And that's a major fail in my opinion. Put another way, I wouldn't recommend this vac if you live by the seaside or its cleaning station may struggle to remove all traces of beach sand from the bot's bin.

Regarding the dock's mop cleaning ability, I'm not convinced that a robot moving back and forth over a simple ribbed rubber roller is an efficient way to clean a mop. Yes it removes a lot of detritus and most signs of discolor but in no way can this system compete with the competition for cleanliness. Perhaps worse is the fact that, after having been washed, the mop itself is well and truly sodden, which means any subsequent mopping sessions will have it dragging around a soaking mop instead of a dampened one.

Wooden floor soaking wet after mopping with iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max

The mop cleaning process leaves mop pads (and subsequently, my floor) soaking wet (Image credit: Future)

Also, the amount of water the cleaned mop leaves on top of the robot is unacceptable for a product in this price band. Yes there is that drying cycle I mentioned earlier, but all that really does is dry the cleaning area in the dock and not the mop itself. And, as we all know, a damp mop usually leads to mustiness and mold, especially after a few days of non-use.

  • Performance score: 3 out of 5

iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max review: app

  • Decent home screen
  • Basic customization
  • Quite buggy

While there are some elements of the iRobot app that impress – like the instant home page access to pre-programmed favorite routines – I find it mostly confusing to use, clunky and full of bugs. For instance, I've received error messages whenever I tap on a Favorite routine while that particular routine is in operation. It should either allow you into that setting or remain inoperative. Instead you just get an unhelpful error message that says ‘please try again'.

Screenshots of iRobot companion app

The lack of LiDAR means the maps lack detail and accuracy (Image credit: iRobot / Future)

As alluded to above, I also find the floor plan map quite tricky to read because it's nowhere near as detailed as that of a LiDAR-based model. In fact, it's primitive and quite blocky. Take my dining room map, for instance. I have a large dog bed against the window but that area is represented by a slanted wall that makes no sense. This made it tricky to locate a precise area in front of the dog bed so I could create a specific zone-cleaning routine.

As you'd expect, the iRobot app provides options to create room dividers, room labels and – if you can work out the map – cleaning zones. It also lets you adjust various parameters like whether you want the dock to dry the mop pad (it doesn't totally dry it), set a child lock and locate the unit when it's lost by emitting a faint sound. You can also command this model using Alexa and Google.

  • App score: 2.5 out of 5

Should you buy the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max?

Buy it if...

You value aesthetics
This bot has one of the best-looking docks on the market.

You have more hard floor than carpet
The vacuuming is decent on hard floor, and the light mopping is fine too.

You find a really good deal
This robovac is very overpriced at full price, but if you find a good discount, it could be worth considering.

Don't buy it if...

You have pets in the home
The pet hair pickup on this model isn't great, and can easily clog the self-empty mechanism.

You want a no-fuss option
This robot can be hard to control, and the app has a few annoying quirks, too.

You want ultra-quiet operation
Both the robot and cleaning base are noisy in operation.View Deal

How I tested the iRobot Roomba Combo 10 Max

TechRadar has a set testing regime which I followed to a tee. Aside from having it set to perform some daily cleaning routines, I also tested the model's vacuuming ability using oats, crushed biscuits and floor on both hard floor and medium-pile carpet. I also tested its mopping function on engineered hard wood flooring and how well it navigated various obstacles. Finally, I made notes on the cleaning station's performance at bin emptying and mop cleaning, measured the noise levels of both the robot and its docking station and spent a lot of time getting to know the iRobot app.

Read more about how we test robot vacuum cleaners.

  • First reviewed November 2024
DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame : a basic display with an easy-to-use app
12:40 pm | December 6, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Smart Home | Tags: | Comments: Off

DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame two-minute review

Investing in one of the best digital photo frames is a great idea if you have lots of images you want to display, but you don't want the hassle of printing them out. With a digital frame, you can have the latest snaps on display; and such frames even make great gifts for relatives.

The Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro is a decent mid-sized frame, and would suit being placed on a sideboard or similar, where you can hide the power cable away. While Dragon Touch’s marketing materials show it mounted on a wall, bear in mind that you will have to find a way to conceal the power cable, since there’s no battery-powered option available.

Looks-wise, the Classic 15 Pro is fairly simple and straightforward. There are certainly more attractive designs on the market; but it's inoffensive and unobtrusive, allowing your pictures to take centre stage.

The display is Full HD (1920 x 1080) resolution. Photos are a little soft on close examination, but at the distance at which you’re likely to be looking at your images, they appear sharp enough. The frame is bright enough in most conditions, although you might find if positioned in a particularly bright room, then it loses some visibility.

With 32GB of memory built in and Wi-Fi connectivity, you can quickly and easily add (or remove) photos to the frame, while initial setup is super simple, too. If you’re looking for a gift for someone who isn’t particularly tech savvy, then the DragonTouch Classic should be relatively straightforward to use. If you don’t want to send photos via Wi-Fi, there’s a USB port, too.

A word of warning for non-US users, however. Although you can buy this in other territories, it arrives with a fixed plug adapter – as such, you’ll need to buy either a US-World adapter, or a power supply for your own country; just be sure to get the right size to fit the socket.

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame showing two images

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame is ideal for showing off family photos (Image credit: Amy Davies)

DragonTouch Classic15 Pro: Price and Release Date

  • $99 / £80 (roughly)
  • Available in the US; elsewhere via import
  • Look out for deals

At the time of writing, you could pick up the Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro for $89.99 at Amazon; but the usual price is $99.99. While the frame isn't officially available in the UK, you can import it very easily via Amazon or similar.

This makes it one of the cheapest digital photo frames you can buy, even with international shipping charges applied. In fact, it remains reasonably priced even after factoring in the purchase of an extra power cable.

That said, if you’re not in the US, I’d almost certainly advocate buying a frame that's more readily available in your home territory. Any problems will be more easily resolved; you'll get the correct power cable; and you won’t have to feel guilty about shipping goods across the world.

The frame is available to buy now.

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame showing the photos that are stored on it

Internal storage is generous, so you should have plenty of room for all your photos (Image credit: Amy Davies)

DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame review: specs

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame displaying an image at full size

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame works well on a mantelpiece where you can hide the cable from view (Image credit: Amy Davies)

Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame: Design

  • Understated design
  • Touchscreen interface that’s quick to setup
  • Use an app to quickly transfer your shots

With its white border and matte-black frame, the Classic 15 Pro has an understated look; but that isn't necessarily a criticism, since it means it doesn’t distract from your photos. That said, there are some more interesting / stylish frames out there – for example, wood effect – if that’s more your style.

The DragonTouch frame is quite thick, but it can’t stand without support. Instead, a leg is provided that you can insert to prop up the frame. It does detach, though, so you can turn the frame on its side if you want to display images in portrait orientation. Note that if you leave the frame in landscape format, your portrait images will display in portrait, but only in the central part of the screen.

Note that the frame does offer the ability for mounting to the wall, if you wish. However, you'll need to find a way to hide the ugly black power cable that will likely run in full view down the wall. As such, in my view this frame is far better placed on a sideboard, mantelpiece or similar.

Setup is quick and simple. Once you’ve plugged in the DragonTouch Classic and switched it on, use the touchscreen interface to guide you through setup. Connect it to your Wi-Fi and you can use it with the free "VPhoto” (Android and iOS) app to transfer your photos across.

You can transfer up to 50 images at a time in one quick motion. And because uploading images is app-based, you can even get friends and family to install the same app and send their pictures across to the frame, too. In fact, as long as both the frame and the app is connected, you can send photos from anywhere in the world – so if you want to upload the latest snap of your kid to their grandparents' frame, for example, then you could do just that.

With 32GB of built-in storage, the DragonTouch Classic is likely to happily cater to most people's needs. However, if you do find yourself running short of space, the USB port on the rear of the frame means you can always add some more.

A power cable – a corded plug with a barrel connector – is supplied. The review sample arrived with a US plug, but I’m in the UK. As such, I could either buy a US to UK adapter, or buy a new adapter. However, picking up the right size may prove tricky: there are several available and the size of the unit included isn't listed in the manufacturer’s specifications.

I got around this issue by purchasing a plug from Amazon with multiple size adapters; the correct size in this instance is 2.5/0.7mm. However, it would have been better had the frame arrived with a USB power supply, as you could use it with any of your existing power supplies, or at least more easily find the right one to use with it. Note, too, that it's important to make sure you get the correct voltage / amp. This frame uses a 12V/1A power adapter, for example, whereas others in the Dragon Touch range use 5V / 2A or 12V / 3A adapters.

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame in portrait orientation on a mantelpiece

You can display the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame in either horizontal or portrait orientation (Image credit: Amy Davies)

Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame: Performance

  • Full HD (1920 x 1080) display
  • Images look a little soft
  • In bright spaces, maximum brightness could be better

So now that you’ve set up the Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro, how well does it display the images?

Well, the Full HD (1920 x 1080) display is likely good enough for most users. It looks a little soft if you get up quite close to the screen, but since it's likely to be sitting a short distance away on a sideboard or mantelpiece, images will look just fine.

Brightness could be a bit better, though. In low light and standard indoor surroundings, images display fine on the DragonTouch Classic frame; but if positioned near a window in bright daytime settings, the frame could would benefit from being a little brighter than it gets at its maximum brightness setting. In a very bright room, then, images can look a little dull. This is perhaps a relatively minor gripe, but it might be worth thinking about when considering the frame's positioning in your home.

The DragonTouch Classic can be set up to display photos in a slideshow, at different timed intervals and using different transitions, very easily. This gives you superb control over how exactly your pictures will be displayed – you could leave one photo up for hours at a time, or you could have the frame flipping through photos every couple of seconds. Having the flexibility is very handy.

Using the VPhoto app to transfer images to the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame

A simple app lets you transfer images across to the frame – others can also send photos remotely (Image credit: Amy Davies)

Should I buy the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Picture Frame?

Buy it if…

You’re looking for a cheap and cheerful digital photo frame
At under $100, the DragonTouch Classic comes in at a great price. It isn't the brightest nor sharpest on the market, but it looks perfectly fine from normal viewing distances. Whether bought for yourself or as a gift, it’s a good compromise between price and quality.

You want a collaborative digital frame

Images can be shared with family and friends quickly and easily via an app.

You want a frame for a sideboard, where you can hide cables

Place the DragonTouch frame on a sideboard or table and you'll easily be able to hide the cable from view. The frame even comes with a stand allowing it to be positioned in both horizontal and portrait format – which is handy.

Don’t buy it if…

You want a frame to wall-mount or move around the home

While this frame can be mounted on a wall, you'll have to consider how best to conceal the power cable; not impossible, but it could prove tricky. In addition, there's no battery-powered option, so you also can’t use it as a “go anywhere” frame.

You’re not prepared to buy an additional power cable

If you’re in the US, the supplied power cable will be fine. But elsewhere, you’ll likely need to buy an additional unit – and you’ll need to make sure you get the correct size, which can be a bit of trial and error.

You want a super-sharp and bright display

If you're looking for the best display possible, then this isn’t it. And note that to get that, you'll likely need to spend far more money than the DragonTouch will set you back.

DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame review: also consider

Aura Walden
The Aura Walden is a super-attractive premium option, offering a larger 15.6-inch screen and a gorgeous finish to its mount and frame. Its app is easy to use and offers free unlimited cloud storage – which definitely gives it the edge over subscription-based products. It does come in at a much higher price, though, and its lower pixel density does show off some pixelation at close range. Read our full Aura Walden review.

Aeezo Portrait 01
If you’re looking to spend even less than the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro, the $69.99 / £55.99 Aeezo Portrait 01 is likely your best option. It utilizes the Frameo app to allow friends and family to share photos and videos, and offers internal storage or the option to add an SD card / USB stick to give you more space. Unfortunately, it isn't as solid a performer as some others: its 1280 x 800 pixel resolution is much lower and it’s much less bright at 227 nits. Read our full Pexar 11-inch review.

How I tested the Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame

I tested the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo frame over a period of three weeks. I uploaded many different photos to the frame using the VPhoto app, and asked others to do the same.

I uploaded many types of images, including shots in both portrait and landscape orientation, brightly coloured images and black-and-white vintage shots. I changed the position of the frame and also tried it in different places around my home (and even at a family event) to assess how it looked in different lighting conditions.

I'm a professional photographer and journalist of many years and have a good understanding of how images should look on a display. I tried to think of this from the perspective of somebody who is likely to be an amateur photographer at best, and is simply looking for a frame on which to show off family snaps, considering the price point.

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle review: exhilarating old-school action
3:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Consoles & PC Gadgets Gaming Xbox | Tags: | Comments: Off
Review info

Platforms reviewed: Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S
Available on: Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, PC, PS5 (Spring 2025)
Release date: 6 December, 2024

As an adaptation of its source material, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is nothing short of a resounding success. It captures the overall look and tone of the film franchise perfectly, delivering a globe-trotting adventure that will delight even those with just a passing knowledge of it. It’s also just a sheer joy to play thanks to some incredibly well-realised locations that are brimming with enough secrets to occupy you for hours at a time.

I’ve had some reservations about the first-person combat system since the game was originally revealed, but I can confidently say that developer MachineGames has masterfully made the jump from bombastic shooters to a much scrappier melee system. Whacking legions of Nazis has never been more satisfying and the focus on improvisation practically generates memorable moments, especially if you’re not afraid to experiment with all the tools at your disposal.

There are some things that hold Indiana Jones and the Great Circle back, however, namely a noticeable lack of polish. Progress-blocking bugs are common, although these are thankfully never a huge concern due to an extremely effective auto-save system. There’s also the visuals that, while stunning on Xbox Series X, are simply not up to standard on the less powerful Xbox Series S. Patches are almost inevitably going to address this in the weeks and months to come, but it does dampen an otherwise strong launch.

Popcorn flick

The player examines a clue in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

(Image credit: Bethesda)

Set right after the events of the first film in the series, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle tells a self-contained story that, aside from a brief flashback segment and a sprinkling of references, stands on its own two feet. After a hulking man breaks into Marshall College to steal an ancient cat mummy from the university’s archaeology department, Indy is thrust into a race to uncover the secrets of the titular Great Circle, a series of connected ancient sites around the world, and protect it from Nazi archaeologist Emmerich Voss, who wants to harness its power for the expansion of the Third Reich.

The pair have a fantastic dynamic, with a believable and engaging rivalry that easily puts Voss up there with the most memorable villains from the films. A few hours in Indy is joined by Gina Lombardi, a journalist searching for her missing sister. She makes for a great companion, her initial misgivings gradually transforming into a genuine friendship as the plot progresses. The narrative is nothing groundbreaking by any means, but it’s all well-told and conveyed through absolutely stunning cutscenes.

Best bit

Indy enjoys a banana in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

(Image credit: Bethesda)

Indy is an absolute snacker. Every map is filled with unique treats to collect, from exotic fruits to biscotti, which you can wolf down for a quick stamina boost. Stopping to stuff my face before a big encounter was a constant source of amusement.

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle benefits from some of the best motion capture and animation work that I have ever experienced, surpassed only by the truly boundary-pushing cinematics of Senua’s Saga: Hellblade 2. Characters move almost eerily realistically, with sublime faces that make it easy to forget that you’re not seated at the movie theater. Of course, this would mean very little if the voice acting wasn’t also pitch-perfect.

Luckily, the ever-reliable Troy Baker delivers a masterful Indiana Jones and Alessandra Mastronardi seems just as at home dispensing witty retorts as anguished cries at emotional climaxes as Gina. Cutscenes are presented in a near-constant stream, neatly woven between moments of play, and can go on for minutes at a time, but it’s impossible to complain about their hands-off nature when they look and sound this good.

Thinking cap

The player using a camera to get a puzzle hint in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

(Image credit: Bethesda)

The plot guides you through a string of varied locations around the world, from a war-torn Shanghai to a frozen Nazi ship wrecked on top of a mountain in the Himalayas. Each is brilliantly recreated, filled with authentic 1930s details and countless objects to pick up and examine. The choice to accurately represent regional languages and accents is also a great one, really giving each area its own flavor and massively increasing immersion.

While most sections are rather linear, there are three huge open-world areas to sink your teeth into. The first is a stint in Vatican City, where Mussolini's Blackshirts are exploiting the weakness of an ailing Pope to hunt for ancient relics. This is, without hyperbole, one of the greatest environments I have ever explored in a video game.

I spent almost seven hours in it in my first playthrough, plowing through optional objectives and tracking down collectibles, and feel like I barely scratched the surface of what’s on offer. There’s something new to discover every few steps and it’s all interesting and well-designed, rather than just filler. Puzzles are abundant and, for me, perfectly balanced - requiring just the right amount of thought but never becoming frustrating on the moderate difficulty.

The same is true for the ones that you encounter in the story, though these also have an intelligently integrated hint system if you get stuck. Snap a photo of any story puzzle with Indy’s camera for a quick hint or, if you keep going, a detailed explanation of what you need to do. It’s not a system that I needed to use, but I’m glad it’s there for players who would prefer to focus on the action.

Gina and Indiana Jones look at a clue in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

(Image credit: Bethesda)

Unfortunately, the puzzles are also where I experienced a number of frustrating progress-blocking bugs. Sometimes items required to complete them would simply not spawn in, rendering progress impossible. There were also a number of occasions where Indy’s hands would become stuck - unable to interact with the world. One note made reference to a fireplace, so I climbed into it thinking there might be some kind of hidden door only to fall through the floor and die - I guess you could say I was almost right?

All of these problems were solved by reverting to my last autosave, which are mercifully very frequent, but did once require me to go back even further and agonisingly lose almost an hour of play.

Button masher

Indy wields a gun in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

(Image credit: Bethesda)

Puzzles and exploration are only part of the picture, though, as combat is a key pillar of the experience too. There is a basic stealth system here, but I always opted to go in as loud as possible whenever the situation would permit it, an approach that I would thoroughly recommend. Thanks to meaty, satisfying punches and a lightning-fast dodge, the melee system leads to thrilling fights. You also have Indy’s trademark whip, which can be used in a number of ways depending on where you aim it.

A quick strike to the hands will disarm most foes, giving you the chance to sweep in and grab their weapon. Aiming for the leg while will see Indy yank it, perfect if you want to send an unsuspecting guard flying off a ledge. You can also pull enemies towards you, grabbing them for a violent beatdown. Almost any object you find can be used as a weapon and bashing Nazis with everything from feather dusters to frying pans is just as cathartic as it sounds.

Guns are also present, though always represent an engaging balance of risk and reward. They are much quicker than fists, but loud and prompt enemies to draw their own - putting you out of action in just a few hits. It’s a well-thought-out dichotomy that makes them ideal in a pinch but stops running and gunning from ever becoming a consistently viable approach. Factor in the numerous upgrades, which are presented as books hidden throughout stages, and you have a formula that has me eager to dive back in for more even after the credits rolled.

That said, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle can suffer from one inescapable shortcoming depending how you play it: its visuals on Xbox Series S. The game looks phenomenal on Xbox Series X, but is just not up to snuff on Microsoft’s weaker machine. Framerates are smooth, but the muddy textures, blurry resolution, low-detail models, and unpleasant lighting spoil most environments - even with the optional high resolution texture pack installed. It’s not impossible to enjoy like this by any means, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect more from a first-party game given the system’s huge user base.

I have my fingers crossed that some kind of visual overhaul is on the way, as this is really the only thing holding me back from much more unreserved, truly glowing recommendation. If you own an Xbox Series X, a powerful gaming PC, or are able to try the game through an Xbox Game Pass subscription, then there’s no reason not to dive in.

Should I play Indiana Jones and the Great Circle?

Shanghai in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle.

(Image credit: Bethesda)

Play it if…

You want a great Indy Story
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle delivers a fantastic Indiana Jones experience worthy of the big screen. Top-notch voice acting and brilliant cutscenes make every step of the journey a cinematic joy.

You love exploration
Some of the open-world environments in Indiana Jones and the Great Circle are among the best ever implemented, brimming with detail and no shortage of things to do. They’re easy to explore for hours at a time.

Don’t play it if…

You’re craving the most polished experience
The annoying bugs and disappointing visuals on Xbox Series S do make me think Indiana Jones and the Great Circle might be best enjoyed when it has a few meaty patches under its belt.

Accessibility

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle has a good suite of accessibility options. The size of the UI can be increased for added visibility, or swapped between a few color presets.

There are are number of color filter modes, in addition to high contrast effects and customizable high contrast color options for key items, weapons, and more.

This is on top of multiple difficulty levels for both combat and puzzles or exploration.

How I reviewed Indiana Jones and the Great Circle

I played Indiana Jones and the Great Circle for more than 20 hours on both an Xbox Series S 1TB and Xbox Series X.

During that time I completed the entire main story and spent a significant duration exploring each environment. I endeavored to find as much extra content as possible, mastering a number of side quests and optional activities, and plan to dive back in for even more.

On Xbox Series S, I played the game using a 1080p monitor while on Xbox Series X I relied on a 4K Sony TV. In both cases, I used a standard Xbox Wireless Controller. For audio, I brought out my trusty Astro A50 X on Xbox Series S and a SteelSeries Arctis Nova 7 on Xbox Series X.

First reviewed December 2024.

Evie smart ring review: in the year of smart rings, this woman-first health tracker falls short
10:42 pm | December 5, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Tags: | Comments: Off

Evie Ring: One minute review

The Evie smart ring hit the market with a splash in late 2023, promising to address the otherwise underrepresented women’s health tracking market with features like period tracking and symptom journaling, a pulse oximeter that’s been approved by US regulators, and an open-ring design that accounts for fluctuations in women’s finger sizes throughout the day.

So how does it measure up against the best smart rings? It’s unfortunate for Evie that 2024 has been the year of smart rings, because the goal posts have moved significantly with the release of the Samsung Galaxy Ring and Oura Ring 4. When I saw the Evie smart ring in January at CES 2024, it was a plucky upstart ready to shake up the space; just under a year later, it feels outdated. Parent company Movano actually discontinued the product for several months this year to address concerns in early customer feedback, too, it’s been a rocky start for the Evie Ring.

Such is the fate of many woman-first ventures, and in that respect, I can’t blame Movano for the flaws of the Evie Ring compared to its competition. However, it’s just bad luck and timing that many of its major health-tracking competitors have brought features like ovulation tracking and blood temperature sensing up to speed, even if none of those competitors opt for a woman-first design as Evie does.

Still, the Evie Ring is relatively affordable, especially given that there’s no additional subscription fee, and if you want a device more for general health and wellness purposes rather than activity tracking, it’ll cover most bases.

It’s worth highlighting that I tested the device in the UK, where the ring has yet to be released, and I was therefore using a TestFlight version of the app on iOS; however, the experiences I’ve described below are consistent with those of other reviewers and users who’ve tried Evie in the US. And, while Evie also announced the addition of further data insights as of September 2024, I can’t see any users or reviewers online talking about these, nor did they appear in my TestFlight app. As of writing, the Evie Ring works with both iOS devices and the recently-added Android OS 12 and above support.

Evie Ring: Price and availability

  • $269, with UK pricing and release date TBC
  • Released in Spring 2024

The Evie smart ring is fairly affordable at $269, and is available in sizes 5 to 12 in gold, silver, and rose gold. Before purchasing, you can order a ring-sizing kit – I’d recommend using this at the different points of your cycle to ensure that you don’t end up with a slightly gappy ring. While a UK release date of September 2024 had been mooted, at the time of writing we don’t know when it will officially launch in the UK.

Unlike some of its competition, the Evie Ring is entirely subscription-free, making it an attractive offer for those who can’t quite justify the Oura Ring 4’s monthly $5.99 subscription and higher price tag (starting at $349 / £349). It comes with a ring box-style charger, which charges via USB-C. However, it’s a far more limited experience compared to its competition.

  • Value score: 4/5

Evie Ring: Design

Evie smart ring being worn on an index finger

(Image credit: Future)
  • Open design to allow for bloating
  • Kitted with three notched sensors
  • Up to one meter waterproofing

Arguably the standout feature in Evie's toolkit is its design – it’s an open band that can accommodate the micro-fluctuations in finger thickness that occur throughout a woman’s cycle (or even just throughout the day!). It’s a thoughtful inclusion that no other smart ring on the mass market has considered, and especially as I approach my period it’s a godsend.

This does come with a trade-off, in that the ring’s hardware has to be crammed into a smaller area. For my very slim fingers, it’s a little on the thick side, meaning that when I wear it on my index finger and I’m using my phone it can really dig in, and I’m quite aware at all times that I’m wearing it. However, that’s fairly standard across smart rings I’ve worn, and the open design massively improves comfort compared to those. I also find the gap means the ring gets caught in my hair a lot, which can be a little grating, but it’s dense enough that I haven’t noticed it catching and pulling on my clothes, at least.

Evie Smart Ring being held

(Image credit: Future)

My review unit was the gold colorway, which looks just gorgeous; most people didn’t even realize that it was a smart ring, and at least one person thought I’d been proposed to. However, its titanium PVD coating does scratch fairly easily; after just a week of wear, I noticed a small scratch on its surface. It’s a shame, as the ring is waterproof for up to one meter of submersion, meaning you can wear it while showering and doing the dishes, so it’s otherwise pretty hardy.

On the inside of the ring are three notches housing the sensors; a three-axis accelerometer, infrared as well as red and green LEDs used by the PPG sensors, and skin-temperature sensors. It also comes with a ring-box charging case which is a little more plasticky and cheap than I’d ideally like for an otherwise beautiful product.

  • Design score: 4/5

Evie Ring: Features

Two print screens of the Evie app in use on an iPhone

(Image credit: Future / Movano Health)
  • Blood oxygen and heart rate monitoring on-demand
  • Menstrual tracking is limited
  • Workout tracking very basic

The Evie Ring offers a fairly well-rounded feature set, offering vital metrics like heart rate and blood oxygen levels on-demand through its Spot Check feature, as well as constant heart rate monitoring throughout the day. While you sleep it also analyses time spent in different sleeping zones, and in addition to tracking your heart rate and blood oxygen levels it will measure your heart rate variation average, respiration rate average and skin temperature variation average; however, these are presented as static figures rather than graphs you can extrapolate from and explore.

In terms of activity tracking, the Evie Ring can track your steps and workouts. Auto-workout detection is planned for early next year, but for now you have to use the app to tell Evie that you’re about to work out for a set amount of time. However, you can’t specify what kind of workout you’re doing, meaning granular insights into how different forms of exercise affect your vitals aren’t possible. It logs your active minutes and estimated calories burned, informing its algorithms with your menstrual cycle data to give more accurate readings.

Otherwise, the standout feature is the app-based journal feature, which tracks your menstrual cycle and symptoms. In addition to noting your energy levels and mood on a scale of low to high, you can also note your general mood with one of 13 tags, albeit fairly arbitrary ones, as well as your menstrual flow level (from light to heavy), symptoms, vaginal discharge consistency, and any other stressors like alcohol, illness, injury, travel, or stress.

However, there’s lots that Evie doesn’t do, and a few areas where I feel it’s a little misleading; for instance, menstrual cycle tracking. While smart rings like the Samsung Galaxy Ring use skin temperature data to predict your cycles, Evie’s app seems to solely rely on your logging to predict your next period, much like many standardised menstrual tracking apps.

Most frustratingly, while the Evie can measure all of the data points mentioned above, it falls short in the analysis and presentation of the data across the board. Its biggest competitors offer all kinds of learnings off the back of the user’s health data; Evie doesn’t deliver helpful insights or analysis into trends. There’s also no way to log specific events at certain times of the day, and while the sleep stage graph is useful, there’s no suggestion on what it means or how to improve your sleep.

Plus, there’s no inclusion of features like an energy score, and for me this is a huge missed opportunity, given that menstrual symptoms can impact our sleep as well as our readiness for activity, and that some studies have shown hormone and iron levels can, too.

  • Features score: 3/5

Evie Ring: Performance

Evie smart ring

(Image credit: Future)
  • Battery performs as described, but it's short anyway
  • Lack of meaningful data analysis
  • Some metrics lack context

Performance is another mixed bag for the Evie Ring. On the one hand, it does broadly deliver on all the fronts promised by manufacturer Movano; however some of the specs and features aren’t quite on a par with its biggest competitors.

Once you’ve paired and set up your ring, you’ll choose three goals to work towards from five options: steps, workout sessions, mood & symptom tracking, sleep, and active minutes. I chose the latter three, as my main focus right now is general wellness and mental health as opposed to training and fitness.

On the home page of the app you’re greeted by an Apple Fitness-style ring, which is filled as you complete your daily goals. As someone who’s suffered the negative impacts of calorie counting I didn’t love that calories burned was a fixed category here, but broadly speaking I think Evie does very well at sensitively handling the journey towards wellness and celebrating wins. I particularly like the journaling element of the app, and I found it useful to go back and see if I’m regularly particularly anxious or low-energy in the days before my period.

Print screens of the sleep tracking and period tracking features in the Evie app

(Image credit: Future / Movano Health)

There’s a slight delay in data synchronization between the ring and the app, which can be mitigated somewhat by keeping the app open at all times; however, there were a few instances where it didn’t generate my sleep data at all until later in the day. Evie also can’t tell when I’m taking a nap, only logging sleep between 9pm and 10:30am, and there’s no option to force-track sleep, which left my sleep count completely skewed a few times. Similarly, a few times I had disturbed sleep where I awoke for an hour before falling back asleep, and Evie didn’t log the further sleep session.

The data that does register in the app also isn’t always the most useful; sure, I get my nightly temperature variation while I sleep, but it’s an average rather than an hour-by-hour report, and you only get it as part of your sleep metrics. There’s little-to-no analysis provided, whether that’s trends or suggested improvements, which again diminishes the actual impact the ring has on your health and wellness. Still, at least the data does seem to be mostly accurate; I tested the Evie Ring against my Apple Watch Series 5, and both my BPM and sleep stages broadly lined up, though the Evie Ring routinely struggled to identify deep-sleep stages, implying that I got an average of 10% deep sleep per night versus the 20% my Apple Watch registered.

Its battery life is shorter than much of its competition too; Movano advertises this as 4+ days, but generally mine lasted just shy of that unless I had a fairly inactive week. There’s also no integration with other health or menstrual tracking apps, which is a huge missed opportunity given the lack of actionable health insights generated by Evie.

  • Performance score: 3/5

Evie Ring: Scorecard

Evie Ring: Should I buy?

Movano Evie Ring

(Image credit: Movano)

Buy it if...

You’re on a budget

The Evie smart ring is one of the most affordable smart rings available while still offering a decent feature and sensor set - and there’s no subscription cost.

You’re looking to ease in to smart ring tracking

At its relatively low price point and with its simple features, the Evie Ring is a great option for first-timers, and especially if your focus is basic menstrual tracking.

You primarily want to log symptoms

Evie is a very menstrual cycle tracking-first device, and while there’s room for improvement in the analysis and presentation of this data, few health trackers offer this level of focus.

Don't buy it if...

You want fitness-first tracking

While Evie does offer fitness tracking features, this device is primarily geared towards wellness and menstrual tracking.

You want in-depth insights

Evie doesn’t offer the granular data analysis and learnings offered by its competition.

You want the most accurate readings

Sleep tracking data favored light and REM sleep, and certain metrics offer limited tracking.

Also consider

How I tested

I wore the Evie Ring for two months to assess its menstrual tracking features and carry out comprehensive testing. For instance, I drained the battery down completely multiple times and timed recharging, and slept with it on almost every night. In terms of exercise, I did cardio HIIT workouts at home and went on a few runs, and compared all available health metrics to an Apple Watch 5. I used all of the app features such as journaling and goal-setting.

Asustor Nimbustor 4 Gen2 AS5404T review
11:16 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

This review first appeared in issue 358 of PC Pro.

Asustor’s Nimbustor 4 AS5404T is a four-drive NAS enclosure aimed at demanding home users or small offices. It’s a performance-focused NAS thanks to the fairly muscular Intel Celeron N5105 processor and 4GB of RAM. At the back you’ll find two 2.5GbE ports, along with two of the NAS’s three USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 sockets – the other one is easily accessed at the front.

The NAS can mount up to four 3.5in or 2.5in SATA disks in various RAID configurations including RAID5, 6 and 10. Unusually, it also has four NVMe slots. You could configure the AS5404T with a four-SSD RAID5 volume, alongside a slower disk-based storage pool. Alternatively, you could use an SSD cache to accelerate disk performance, or compromise with one or two SSDs on cache duty and others serving as a fast volume.

Full view of the Asustor Nimbustor 4 Gen2 AS5404T

This is a refreshing-looking NAS, especially if you love bright lights (Image credit: Future)

You can upgrade the enclosure’s installed RAM up to 16GB, though you’ll have to remove the 4GB it comes with. If you need to add storage, you can do so with up to three Asustor AS6004U expanders, allowing for a total 16 disks. Asustor says this NAS can hit maximum read and write speeds of 599MB/sec, but you’ll need to be using both network ports for that.

We’re not wild about this unit’s physical setup: there’s tool-less access for 3.5in disks, but the caddies release with a horrific snapping sound that had us checking to confirm we hadn’t broken the catches. The caddy clips are hard to remove, too. You’ll need a screwdriver to open the case and access the NVMe slots, but the SSDs themselves simply clip into place.

We configured the AS5404T with four 1TB hard disks in a RAID5 array and two 1TB WD Black SSDs configured as a separate RAID1 volume. Unusually among modern NAS servers, Asustor’s operating system defaults to the EXT4 file system, though Btrfs is an option. This NAS insists on synchronizing new RAID1 arrays, but at least with our SSDs the process completed within an hour.

Connected via a single 2.5GbE connection, the AS5404T got off to an impressive start.

Close-up of the Asustor Nimbustor 4 Gen2 AS5404T's cooling fan

The Nimbustor 4 provides blistering performance speeds (Image credit: Future)

It performed strongly through the ATTO disk benchmark, recording much quicker data rates than 1GbE competitors. With 16KB and 2MB file operations, it also showed a clean pair of heels to 2.5GbE rivals from QNAP. Things were far less impressive with the PCMark 10 Data Drive benchmark, however, on which the AS5404T was one of a few NAS enclosures we tested to record an inexplicably low score. We always confirm real-world data speeds with simple Windows file copies, however, and here the AS5404T was supreme, managing 85MB/sec when writing 11GB of files.

Performance was consistent when we tested its SSD storage, giving near-identical ATTO results with an SSD volume, and again when using SSD caching. Cached disk write speeds increased slightly in our file-copy test, although read speeds actually went down a little. We also recorded similar performances when we reinstalled this NAS with two Synology 4TB disks.

Desktop screenshot of the easy-to-use ADM operating system integrated into the Asustor Nimbustor 4 Gen2 AS5404T

Asustor’s ADM operating system is certainly comprehensive (Image credit: Future)

Asustor’s ADM operating system is comprehensive and easy to use, though we did spot a couple of oddities in this test. Most significantly, the AS5404T couldn’t be browsed from either a Chromebook or our Windows 11 test PC unless we turned on SMB1, although its shares could be accessed without it – so long as we entered the drive path by name.

One of the Nimbustor’s strongest points is Asustor’s App Central, which at the time of writing offered an incredible 272 apps, spanning networking, surveillance, productivity and entertainment. If you’re chiefly interested in the latter, an HDMI port gives you a way to view multimedia content on an attached screen, but you can organize and serve photos or other media through the likes of Plex.

Don’t let this NAS server’s media talents put you off if you’re buying for business, however. With blistering performance even when configured with two disks, the AS5404T is a solid starting package for a small business with big plans. If your micro office goes macro, you can add more disks, accelerate it with SSDs, beef up the memory, and even connect another enclosure. It’s our Labs Winner.

We've also ranked the best small business servers.

Asustor Flashstor 6 FS6706T review
10:44 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

This review first appeared in issue 358 of PC Pro.

As its name suggests, the Flashstor 6 is an all-flash NAS enclosure, with space for up to six NVMe SSDs. It’s aimed mostly at enthusiast use in the home, so comes with useful multimedia features such as HDMI and S/PDIF audio outputs. It’s well specified elsewhere, too, with a pair of 2.5GbE network ports, two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports and two USB-A 2 ports. The supplied 4GB of memory is upgradable to 16GB.

It doesn’t have any hard disk slots, but you could add bulk storage with up to two Asustor AS6004U expansion units, each accepting up to four 3.5in SATA drives. If six SSDs isn’t enough, for £744 inc VAT (from Amazon) you could choose the 12-slot Flashstor 12, which is otherwise broadly the same.

Most NAS enclosures offer tool-free setup, but you’ll need a screwdriver to pop off the cover here, while each NVMe just clips in. The FS6706T supports the same range of RAID formats you’d expect from any six-bay device, though we tested it using two 1TB WD Black SSDs, arranged in a RAID1 array. Asustor’s ADM software defaults to the EXT4 file system, but you can choose Btrfs.

Rearview of the Asustor Flashstor 6 FS6706T

(Image credit: Future)

It will come as no surprise that the FS6706T performed strongly. We tested it with a single 2.5GbE connection, over which it comfortably outpaced any NAS limited by a 1GbE connection. That said, it didn’t eclipse disk-based 2.5GbE devices, with Asustor’s own Nimbustor 4 Gen2 proving slightly quicker. As with the Nimbustor 4, this NAS was inexplicably slow on the PCMark 10 Data Drive benchmark, but made up for it with quick real-world copy times in Windows 11. It’s worth pointing out that this device might have been even faster if we’d been able to test it with a six-drive RAID5 array.

While you could use this NAS as the hub for a small business, it’s far more likely to see use as a multimedia store and server for demanding home users and gamers. It’s well suited to this role, with Asustor’s App Central offering an amazing 273 apps, spanning everything including content, download and media management, along with productivity, surveillance and streaming.

This NAS has the horsepower to transcode video content without getting bogged down, so it’s even suitable for a household with a few power users. However, its lack of disk support makes it less flexible than the Nimbustor 4 Gen2, which accepts up to four disks and four NVMe SSDs, and proved just as fast in our tests. In most cases, we’d pay the extra £80 for that.

We also rated the best software for small businesses.

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024): a perfectly adequate ereader
2:17 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers eReaders Gadgets Tablets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024): Two-minute review

The Amazon Kindle Paperwhite has been our pick of the best Kindle for a very long time as it's managed to balance price and features quite well. The 12th generation Paperwhite maintains that same ethos to some degree, gaining a brand-new display that leverages the latest E Ink Carta 1300 screen tech.

This not only adds a touch more contrast, which makes the text on the screen darker and thus easier to read, but it also makes page turns a smidge quicker. Honestly, in real-world use, you won't find it all that different from the 11th-generation Kindle Paperwhite, but you will if you have them both side by side and look really carefully. So while I won't say it's a massive upgrade over the 2021 Amazon Kindle Paperwhite, it's definitely worth upgrading if you're using an older Kindle.

I also appreciate the couple of millimeters more of display I get on the 2024 Paperwhite, which is now a 7-inch screen compared to the previous 6.8-inch, but again, it's not really that significant.

What is a little significant is the slight performance boost that Amazon has managed to inject into the 12th-gen Paperwhite. During my testing, I had no issues whatsoever – page turns were near instantaneous, I had absolutely no slowing down even after hours of reading, not a single instance of ghosting and, importantly, the battery life is truly impressive. After three weeks of use, I am yet to charge the Paperwhite for the first time.

A person tapping on the screen of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

My biggest issue is the Paperwhite's design: the rear panel is so darn smooth, that I often feel like it's slipping through my fingers. That means I'm trying to grip it tighter, which means my thumbs are extended further over the display and the number of accidental touches I have are a little annoying. Admittedly a case will solve that problem, but that's an additional cost to tack onto what is already an expensive ereader.

So while it still builds a case for still being the best Kindle, I think the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (2024) might represent better value for some users, offering more storage, some resistance to salt water and the option for wireless charging.

Amazon's penchant for hiking up the price of its Kindles with each new generation is disappointing. While I'm struggling to justify the cost of the base Amazon Kindle 2024, I suppose I can get behind the 12th-gen Paperwhite's price hike over its predecessor, but I'm not entirely convinced it represents good value anymore. This is compounded by the fact that, in some markets (like Australia), none of the 2024 Kindles support Audible playback.

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: price & availability

  • Announced October 2024; available to buy now
  • Launch price of $159.99 (with ads) / £159.99 (with ads) / AU$299
  • A Signature Edition is available for a higher price but double the storage

As I've said above, Amazon keeps increasing the price of its Kindles with each new release and that means at $159.99 / £159.99 / AU$299, the 12th-generation Paperwhite is the most expensive yet and, in my humble opinion, no longer very good value. And that's the price of the ad-supported version in the US and UK (Australia gets only the ad-free model). If you don't want ads on your lock screen, you're shelling out $179.99 / £159.99 in the US and UK respectively.

You could argue that this price is fine for a 7-inch ereader with 16GB of storage, but for a little more money – $219.99 / £219.99 / AU$359.95 to be precise – you can get a color ereader with a screen of the same size, double the storage, a more ergonomic design (with page-turn buttons) and, importantly, writing capabilities with the Kobo Libra Colour. I suppose I might even be inclined to pay $199.99 / £199.99 / AU$329 for the 2024 Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition for the metallic colors, double the storage and wireless charging, as well as performance just as good as the standard Paperwhite.

If you don't want all that, you can save money by opting for the Kobo Clara BW ($129.99 / £119.99 / AU$239.95), which gets you the exact same display, just in 6 inches, and very similar specs as the Paperwhite.

• Value score: 3.5 / 5

A person reading a page of a book on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: Specs

Amazon has stopped listing some specs for its ereaders, so I have no idea what CPU the Paperwhite is using or the battery capacity.

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: Design & display

  • Available in 3 colors in the US and UK, only one in Australia
  • Sharp, crisp 7-inch display
  • Very slim design with no grip

Hey, Amazon, what exactly has Australia done to not deserve the new colorways of the standard Paperwhite? I'm a little annoyed that I get only the black model Down Under (where I am based) and is the version I was sent for this review. It's not a huge complaint, but I do admit to a little FOMO. Other markets can get the Paperwhite in new Jade and Raspberry options.

Nothing else has really changed in terms of design, although the standard Paperwhite is now 7 inches (compared to the 11th generation's 6.8 inches). The body remains plastic which, incidentally, has some recycled materials in it – not as much as Kobo uses, though.

The plastic chassis does make the Paperwhite look cheaper than its price tag, but the real issue for me is the rear panel. It's so smooth that I can feel it slip through my fingers (literally) when the bus or train I'm on brakes suddenly. I love how slim it is, but that too exacerbates the lack of grip, making it far from ergonomic.

To compensate for its slipperiness, I found myself holding the device with my thumb on the screen itself as the side bezels are still very slim. As nice as that looks, it's not ideal for single-hand use and I kept suffering from accidental page turns from my finger on the screen. It's possible this won't affect all users, but it is an annoyance to me.

The power button and USB-C port on the lower edge of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Given how easy it might be to drop the standard Paperwhite, I'm glad it retains its IPX8 waterproof rating, which means it can stay submerged in 2 meters of water for up to an hour. Just don't drop it in the sea as the salt water will corrode the USB-C port first and, if it seeps in, will start eating away at the motherboard too. The Signature Edition, on the other hand, will survive a quick dunk in the sea.

The rounded corners and edges will be familiar to any Kindle user, as will the be power button on the lower edge. This placement of the power button bothers one of my colleagues, but I don't have any issues with it. In fact, I love the little feedback it gives when pressed. Beside the power button, in the center of the bottom edge, is the USB-C port for charging.

The only embellishments on the device are the word 'Kindle' on the lower bezel and the Amazon logo on the rear panel. As with most black ereaders and tablets, the 2024 Paperwhite is a smudge magnet, but I suspect the two colorways will also suffer similarly. The black one, in fact, begins to look very scruffy within days of use – even just leaving it on a table, it will pick up dust and the texture of the plastic is such that it's hard to wipe away.

If that bothers you like it does me, I think a case becomes a must, and it will add a little extra grip too, but it is an additional cost to bear.

The Amazon logo on the scruffed rear panel of the Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

The rear plastic panel is very smooth and is a magnet for smudges and dust (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

The shift to the 7-inch display has allowed Amazon to update the display to the latest E Ink Carta 1300 technology, which adds more contrast to the text on the screen. The resolution remains at 300ppi though, which is standard and plenty for such a device. The screen supports a dark mode, has 16 levels of grayscale and hits a maximum brightness of 94 nits.

Compared to the 2024 entry-level Kindle, the Paperwhite has a naturally warmer hue (much like paper) which, when combined with the amber LED lights, can make the display very yellow indeed. It might look odd to someone who's not used an ereader with adjustable light temperatures, but it helps the eyes from getting strained too much. If you're like me, who reads for four to five hours a day (mostly at night), you'll appreciate the yellower screen. The LEDs do a good job of evenly lighting the entire display – I found no shadows or areas of excessive brightness during my testing.

• Design & display score: 3.5 / 5

The Kindle branding on the broad lower bezel of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: User interface

  • Linux-based operating system
  • 16GB of storage, but only 11.5GB available for use
  • Easy-to-use UX, but home screen can feel cluttered

One theory I have for why the Kindles became so popular so quickly is their user-friendly interface. They've always been simple devices, with not a lot of extraneous options in Settings, and that ethos is still maintained today.

If you're already familiar with a Kindle, you won't find anything new on the 2024 Paperwhite. Even if you've never used a Kindle before, it won't take long to wrap your head around it, with setup being as simple as following the prompts on the screen. Once you've set up your Amazon account and logged in, there are only two tabs to explore – the Home screen and the Library.

I personally find the Kindle Home screen unnecessarily cluttered, constantly pushing me into the Kindle Store. If that doesn't bother you, it's a good starting point for finding your next read. However, keep in mind that once you start getting your content from the Kindle Store, you're stuck within Amazon's walled garden.

Image 1 of 2

The pull-down menu of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

The library view on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

You can sideload books of course, but you will need to jump through some hoops as Amazon no longer allows you to plug in a Kindle to drag-and-drop files via a wired connection. You will need to use the Send To Kindle platform, which allows you to wirelessly add content to your Kindles via cloud sync. The good news is that if you ever change (or upgrade) your Kindle, even your sideloaded titles will remain synced to your Amazon account and you can just tap them individually in the Library app of your new Kindle to download them again.

There's no specific tab for Settings, but swipe downwards from the top of the screen and you'll be presented with a few options, including turning on dark mode, cloud sync, flight mode and, of course, accessing all the Settings options.

The different Settings are simple and quite literally bare bones, although please note that if you are in Australia or any other region where there's no Audible support on the 2024 Kindles, you won't even see Bluetooth as a connectivity option (which is available in the US and UK).

There's decent file support on the Kindle now, although, with MOBI now mostly dead, Amazon has had to relent and allow native EPUB support, which is the format most ebooks come in.

As part of the Amazon ecosystem, Goodreads is available on all Kindles and American users will be able to borrow library books too. The latter option is, however, not available anywhere else.

• User interface score: 4 / 5

Image 1 of 2

The Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) screen set at the warmest yellow light

The warm light setting is good for long hours of reading (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

The brightness and light temperature sliders on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) set at maximum

The warm light setting is good for long hours of reading (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: Performance

  • Marginally faster than previous model
  • Speed enhancement seems mostly software related
  • Excellent battery life, even at higher brightness levels

Ereaders are such simple devices that there's really no benchmarking to run to determine performance. However, as someone who's tested several of the most recent ebook readers, it's fair to say I can judge by doing a comparison with the competition.

The 2024 standard Paperwhite wins in terms of screen responsiveness speed and overall performance over even the Onyx Boox Go series ereaders and the Kobo Clara BW too. The former, incidentally, has a more powerful processor than what Amazon has typically used for its Kindles (although the current CPU has not been revealed) and yet the Paperwhite surpasses the Boox Go 6 (which I have been testing alongside this).

Page turns are near instantaneous and not once did I have issues with ghosting (where a very light impression of the previous page remains on screen after a page turn). Reading graphic novels on its an absolute pleasure, especially since the Frame view also opens instantly when you double-tap.

Like the entry-level 2024 Kindle, I think the performance boost is purely software-based rather than being a new CPU. It could be both, too, but Amazon isn't revealing what chipset it's using under the hood here.

Image 1 of 2

A page of a graphic novel displayed on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

Reading graphic novels on the 2024 Paperwhite is fantastic because... (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

A single frame from a graphic novel page displayed on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

..the Frame View feature expands each individual frame on the page (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

I'm using the massive operating system as the basis of my performance theory here. As with the base 2024 Kindle, the OS on the Paperwhite takes up 4.5GB of the total 16GB storage available on the device – if memory serves, that's 2GB more than on the 11th generation Paperwhite.

While I am miffed about the lower available storage on the Paperwhite (which reduces its per-dollar value), I'm glad for whatever boost Amazon has given the tablet. Typing via the on-screen keyboard when setting up my Wi-Fi network or any other touchscreen functionality was seamless and quick. And by 'quick' I mean it's as good as it's ever gotten on an e-paper screen – don't expect the same performance as your phone or multimedia tablet.

A person at a table reading a page on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

What's probably the most impressive feat is the 2024 Paperwhite's battery life. I've had it for about three weeks now and I started using it immediately out of the box at 72%. Three weeks later it was just at 45%, and that's with about 2-3 hours of reading and the screen brightness level at 8 (warm light level of 4). Admittedly that's a low brightness setting that won't put too much pressure on the battery, but I only charged the Paperwhite once, just to see how quickly it topped up. At this rate, I could eke out at least 10 weeks of use between charges, more if I don't read as much as I usually do.

Amazon claims it will take the 12th-gen Paperwhite under 2.5 hours to go from empty to full when using a 9W power adaptor. That sounds about right to me – plugged into the USB-A port of my 65W charger (which offers up to 22.5W of power) and using a USB-A to C cable, it went from 32% to 50% in about 20 minutes. That might have been a touch faster if I was using a USB-C to C cable, but that was being used on another device at the time of testing. Still, that's not bad numbers at all.

• Performance score: 4.5 / 5

The Library tab on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Should I buy the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)?

Buy it if...

You're upgrading from an old Kindle
If you've been holding on to a very old Kindle that's on its last legs and it's time for an upgrade, the 2024 Paperwhite is a worthy option if you want to stick with Amazon.

You want the best in e-ink technology
The E Ink Carta 1300 on the 2024 Paperwhite is fantastic. Not only is it the best grayscale e-paper display yet, but Amazon has optimized it well and made it snappier than before.

You'd love a lightweight 7-inch ereader
For its size, the Paperwhite feels ridiculously light in the hand, despite being a couple of grams heavier than the previous model (hey, the added millimeters have to go somewhere!). I'm just not quite sold on its ergonomics.

Don't buy it if...

You're already using the 2021 Paperwhite (11th generation)
Yes, the screen is better, but other than that, there's not a whole lot that's different. The older model is still pretty good when it comes to performance and, in real-world use, the slightly faster screen response time of the 2024 edition won't feel very different.

Value for money matters to you
While its price tag can be justified to some extent, you can get much more value from something like the Kobo Libra Colour. And if you happen to live outside the US, the Kindle won't even let you borrow library books and, in some markets, there's no Audible support either.

You'd prefer a color ereader
If you read comics, manga or graphic novels more, then a color ereader might be the better investment. After all, they were meant to be viewed in color. The Frame View feature on a Kindle makes it even better for graphic novel readers, which makes a strong case for the Kindle Colorsoft.

Also consider

Kobo Clara BW
Sporting the same screen tech, just in a 6-inch size, the Kobo Clara BW was previously my pick of the best mid-range ereader because it's not exactly 'cheap'. Other than its screen size, it shares most of the specs of the Paperwhite, which makes it good value even compared to the entry-level Kindle 2024 model and, arguably, is now the best budget ereader.
Read my in-depth Kobo Clara BW review for more details

Kobo Libra Colour
In the 7-inch screen size class, the Kobo Libra Colour is the best ereader overall. It balances price and features remarkably well, plus it's a lot more ergonomic than the Paperwhite. It's also got stylus support if you wish to use the writing features, but you will need to buy that separately. Even then, I still think it represents better value for money than the Paperwhite.
Read my full Kobo Libra Colour review to find out more

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (2024)
Admittedly it's more expensive than the standard Kindle, but the loss of 4.5GB to the OS on it makes me think there's better value in opting for the Signature Edition. Double the storage and the option of wireless charging justifies the higher price tag better, although I will admit the wireless charging is a little superfluous.
Read our full Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (2024) review to learn more

How I tested the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

  • Used daily for three weeks to read
  • Borrowed titles from the Prime Reading service, plus downloaded existing books already available in my Amazon account
  • Tested battery life at various brightness levels

A person perusing the recommendations on the Home screen of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

As soon as I received the 2024 Paperwhite for this review, I logged into my Amazon account, which promptly gave me access to my existing library that was cloud-synced when I sideloaded titles onto an older device. All I had to do was tap on the ebooks I wanted on the Paperwhite (so none of the ones I'd already finished reading) and I was off.

Unfortunately, because I'm based in Australia, I have no Audible access on any of the new Kindles, so I cannot comment on how easy it would be to pair Bluetooth headphones, but I hope it's smooth and once paired, you should be able to listen to audiobooks if you have a subscription.

I read on the Paperwhite daily for the three-week period I set aside for testing, spending about 2-3 hours each day with it. I used the Paperwhite at various light settings to check how that affected the battery drain.

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed December 2024]

« Previous PageNext Page »