Organizer
Gadget news
Kuo: iPhone 15 Pro Max demand is outpacing last year’s 14 Pro Max
11:07 am | September 18, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The iPhone 15 series went on pre-order in the first wave of countries last Friday and we now have some our first set of estimates on how well things are going for it. Noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, suggests the iPhone 15 Pro Max is garnering most of the consumer attention and is outpacing initial demand for last year’s iPhone 14 Pro Max. Demand for the entry level iPhone 15 and 15 Plus is on par with last year’s iPhone 14 and 14 Plus. Looking over at the iPhone 15 Pro, Kuo suggest demand is lower this year as more users are looking for the updated camera experience on the larger Pro...

Moto Tab G84 appears in leaked images
9:51 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Motorola launched the Moto G84 smartphone and is reportedly working on a tablet with the same name. The Moto Tab G84 device appeared in leaked renders, and while there are no specs accompanying the images, we can make out some features from them. The new tablet will have an 8 MP camera and will have support for a stylus and a magnetic keyboard. There are also 2x2 JBL-tuned speakers with support for Dolby Audio. The pogo pins on the bottom are for a magnetic keyboard and cover. At the same time, the stylus will be magnetically attach to the back, where a small cutout indicates the...

OnePlus Bullets Wireless Z2 ANC review
4:41 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

It's been a hot minute since we have had a neckband-style wireless headset around these parts. That is rather unfortunate, as in many ways they were superior to the currently popular TWS earbuds, with longer battery life, physical controls, and better connectivity performance. The last model we tested with this design was incidentally the OnePlus Bullets Wireless Z2 and now we have the updated version with ANC or active noise cancellation. At INR 2299, the India-exclusive Bullets Wireless Z2 ANC are only slightly more expensive than the Z2. That still makes them one of the cheapest...

Nokia G42 5G review: great intentions, not so great execution
3:30 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Nokia G42 two-minute review

The Nokia G42 5G sees the nostalgic phone brand continue on its quest to bring sustainable, repairable phones to the masses. This time around (following the previous release of the also-repairable G22) Nokia has further pinned its hopes on consumers’ penchant to stand out by making it oh So Purple. Don’t worry if you prefer to blend in, you can get it in So Grey, too. 

Overall, it’s a largely inoffensive device that does everything you’d want a phone to do just fine. But remember this is an entry-level to mid-range device, with a price tag and performance to match. If you’re looking for the bells and whistles exhibited by the best phones, then you’ll be disappointed. Its performance is perfectly acceptable for daily use, but an ageing processor means you’ll want to steer clear of anything too graphically intensive. 

On paper, it’s closely matched with the Motorola Moto G53 5G. Motorola is so often the king of budget phones and indeed when comparing its wallet-friendly device with Nokia’s, there really is little to separate them. If anything, the Motorola wins, for its 120Hz display and even more affordable price tag. The Nokia gains a depth sensor camera and repairability, but just how useful these will be to you in reality is subject of debate.

The display is HD only, with a maximum resolution of 720p. The Nokia G42 isn’t alone in offering this amongst a sea of wallet-friendly devices, but the fact is there are devices that exist for similar money that do offer full HD 1080p displays. I feel Nokia has missed the mark in this regard. The display also only offers up to 90Hz refresh rate. Again, this will be fine for most people under regular use, but given competitor devices support up to 120Hz for smoother scrolling and navigation, it’s a mark against the G42. The differences will be negligible, it’s just a little confusing as to why Nokia hasn’t included these features by default. 

With the Nokia G42 5G’s selling point being that it’s repairable, it would have been nice to have made the phone really worth holding onto. Nokia expects you to keep the G42 5G for many years to come, but with its specs being outdated at launch, I can only see customers becoming even more envious of those with more up-to-date mid-range devices in the future. 

Easy-to-source parts and tools from iFixit mean you can replace the battery, charging port and even the screen at a small cost. And, while I didn’t get to carry out the repair process myself to see if the claims of it being easy were true, I have been able to watch videos online. The process does look simple, which I would expect from the involvement of iFixit, but I do have to question how many people will realistically want to repair a budget phone. Nokia’s claims of people wanting to be more frugal in the current financial climate are certainly valid, but I feel the repairable nature would make more sense combined with a more flagship-like device. 

Ultimately, the cost of the Nokia G42 5G in comparison to its specs and with the Motorola Moto G53 5G looming in the background makes it hard to recommend. If you’re looking to spend as little as possible on a phone, then you admittedly need to understand there will be compromises to make. Considering you need to make similar compromises for both the Nokia and the Motorola, then the Moto G53 5G would be the one to get.

Nokia G42 5G review: Price and availability

  • On sale in the UK and Australia from August 10th, 2023
  • US availability TBC
  • 6GB RAM / 128GB storage in UK/AU - select EU markets 4GB/128GB

Nokia launched the G42 5G in the UK and Australia on August 10th, 2023. At the time of writing, there is no sign of it being available in the US. In the UK it costs £179 – it’s launch price was £199 but there appears to be a regular £20 discount – and in Australia it retails for AU$449. Both markets get the version with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. Select European markets also have a 4GB / 128GB version to choose from. 

In comparison, the Motorola Moto G53 5G launched in the UK and Australia for £190 / AU$329, undercutting the Nokia's launch price by some margin. On paper, the two are closely matched, with the camera being virtually the only point of difference. While the Nokia's launch price can still be considered affordable, there are even more affordable phones out there that won't require you to scrimp on specs. 

  • Value score: 3 / 5

Nokia G42 5G review: Specs

Nokia G42 5G review: Design

Nokia G42 rear panel

(Image credit: Future)
  • So Purple colour is eye-catching
  • 3.5mm headphone jack will please some users
  • Finish makes it seem more premium than it is

The Nokia G42 5G follows a familiar design language as other phones that don’t cost the earth. It employs a plastic build and is available in either So Purple or So Grey color options. I had the So Purple on loan and I have to say it’s certainly different to the majority of grey and black (and occasionally white) slabs you see when walking down the street. 

The rear panel has a shine effect to it which I like, and in the hand, the phone certainly feels slightly more premium than its price tag would suggest. On the right you’ll find a volume rocker and the power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner. On the left there’s the SIM card and microSD card tray and on the bottom is the USB-C charging input and a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is certainly a rare sight to see in the phone world. 

There are noticeable bezels around the display, particularly at the bottom, but the surround around the central front-facing camera is kept to a minimum to avoid taking up as much screen real estate space as possible. 

The G42 only gets an IP52 rating, which protects it against dust and "direct sprays of water." You'll want to keep it away from sinks, pools and puddles, but it should be ok if you get caught in the rain. 

It’s not exactly a revolutionary design and the familiarity will likely please most customers. While I haven’t seen the So Grey in the flesh, I would say if you are thinking about getting the G42 5G, the purple model would be the one to get. 

  • Design score: 3.5/5

Nokia G42 5G review: Display

Nokia G42 display

(Image credit: Future)
  • 6.5-inch display only HD+
  • Brightness is impressive
  • Colors not the best when streaming video content

Nokia has gone large for the G42 5G, gracing it with a 6.5-inch display, making it great for viewing plenty of content in one hit, such as this review. But the good news doesn’t really continue much further. This is only an HD+ 720p display with 90Hz refresh rate and 720 x 1612 resolution, which for the price of the phone, is a bit disappointing. The Motorola Moto G53 5G, which retails for around £190 / AU$290, also uses a 720p display but has a 120Hz refresh rate for slightly smoother navigation and motion. 

Compromising on display quality is certainly part and parcel of a more budget-orientated phone and had Nokia given the G42 5G 120Hz support, or a full HD 1080p display with 90Hz refresh rate, it would have been slightly more positive. But the omittance of both is certainly surprising in 2023. 

That doesn’t mean the display is totally unusable, that would be doing the Nokia G42 5G a disservice. Nokia’s own wallpapers – I left the default purple system wallpaper active for my review duration – have vibrance and clarity to them. But change these for your own images or load up content from third-party apps such as Netflix and flaws start to show. Watching Detective Pikachu, a movie with plenty of dark scenes and bright colors (Pikachu’s yellow fur, for example) proves tricky for the Nokia G42. 

It struggles to find the finer details in darker areas such as shadows and images overall lack any real depth. This is despite it serving up acceptable brightness levels. I found whatever I was looking at on screen could hold up well outside in strong sunlight. Nokia claims a typical brightness of 450 nits and a maximum of 560 nits using brightness boost, 

The display is also one of the four parts that can be replaced should anything untoward happen to it. You can pick up the complete repair kit including the display and necessary tools directly from iFixit. It would have been great if it was possible to replace the display with a full HD 1080p one, but I assume other internal circuitry prevents this from happening. 

  • Display score: 2.5/5

Nokia G42 5G review: Cameras

Nokia G42 5G camera module

(Image credit: Future)
  • 50MP main camera functions well in good light
  • Night mode more impressive than you might think
  • Macro lens performs better than rivals

Where the Nokia G42 5G trumps some rivals – on paper at least – is in the camera department. Alongside the 50 megapixel main camera you get a 2MP depth sensor. There’s also a 2MP macro camera with a dedicated macro shooting mode to accompany it, enabling you to get up close with your subject. 

As we’ve said numerous times here at TechRadar, more megapixels doesn’t always equal better quality images. But in this instance, the Nokia G42 does take nice pictures when compared with its closest competitors. In good lighting, colors are punchy and vibrant, and there's even a decent amount of detail if you choose to zoom in. 

There is also a Night Mode you can enable to help improve images taken in low light, and I was pleasantly surprised by the results. The image taken in a bar in the gallery below is a dimly lit space; the kind where virtually all customers need to get their phone light out to see the menu. I expected the shot I took to come out either looking over-exposed or blurry, but the result is quite the opposite. It’s not one you’d want to zoom in on or enlarge, as outright detail does get lost, but when viewed on the phone it’s more than acceptable. 

Image 1 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

The Nokia G42 camera struggles with fast-moving objects, such as this waterfall feature. (Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

A good amount of detail is retained in this macro image (Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 8

Image taken using Nokia G42 camera

(Image credit: Future)

The macro camera does a better job of close-up shots compared to the Moto G53 5G too, but just how useful this feature will be in practice remains to be seen. I feel an ultra-wide sensor would have been more beneficial.

The front-facing camera does little to instil confidence in your looks. In good lighting, I looked white as a ghost. I almost didn’t want to include an example image here, but for the purposes of the review, I have. Taking a selfie using the rear camera generates more positive results, but the portrait mode – which creates a bokeh effect – nearly nails it. In the gallery image above, you'll notice a smudged line around the top of my hair. The computational software was clearly unable to properly distinguish where the background ended and my hair began. 

And since the G42 5G runs on Android 13, it benefits from Google’s photo processing magic, including Blur and Magic Eraser, although they are locked behind a paywall and require a Google One membership. 

  • Camera score: 4/5

Nokia G42 5G review: Performance

  • General navigation is smooth
  • Wake-up can be fast
  • Not the best for graphic intensive games

The Nokia G42 5G is powered by the Snapdragon 480+ chipset. This is a pretty dated processor and one with not a lot of power, but it does, crucially, allow for 5G connectivity. Booting the phone up takes some time, but once it’s on, I found waking it up and unlocking via the fingerprint sensor to be pleasingly quick (so long as the sensor was clean and could recognize my fingerprint). 

On Geekbench, the Nokia G42 returned a single-core score of 725 and a multi-core score of 1819. These are both higher than the Moto G53’s Geekbench scores, although not by much. I also ran 3DMark’s Wild Life and returned an overall score of 978. The Moto G53 5G scored 979 in the same test, which isn’t all that surprising considering it uses the same processor. Nokia's score does place it well above the Samsung A23 (which costs similar money to the G42) so it’s not totally bad news. 

I did find web pages took a while to load throughout my review period, and on more than one occasion, pages didn’t load at all, despite being connected to a fast Wi-Fi connection. General navigation is perfectly acceptable, but you will want to steer clear of any graphically intensive games.

Audio playback is an area that scores well for the Nokia, however. The G42 employs OZO Playback, which claims to create a wider stereo image from the speaker. While I wouldn't agree with the full claims made – such as creating an "exceptional listening experience" – I can attest to the volume created by the single speaker. Vocals when playing music from Apple Music are crystal clear and there are at least some signs of bass. 

If you're after some added bass, you'll want to connect a pair of headphones. And, fortunately, that can include a wired set of headphones here, as the Nokia includes a 3.5mm headphone jack. 

  • Performance score: 3.5/5

Nokia G42 5G review: Battery life

Nokia G42 5G charging port

(Image credit: Future)
  • Will easily get more than a day of use
  • Battery one of the four replaceable parts
  • Charging time is slow

Battery life is something the Nokia G42 5G can shout about. It has a 5,000mAh unit (which can be replaced) which will comfortably get you more than a day of use. Nokia actually claims you can get up to three days of use from it, based on regular usage for five hours a day, for three days. 

To put those claims to the test, I loaded up a 12-hour YouTube video and set screen brightness to 50%, turned adaptive brightness off, and left it playing on my dining room table during the day at home. Once the video had finished playing, there was still 25 percent battery left, which the phone reckoned was good for another 10 hours of use. This was after the battery had been used, both to play the YouTube video and while the phone was idle, for 1 day and six hours. 

I can barely make it through a full day using my iPhone 13 Pro these days, and that’s with general web surfing, messaging and checking social media feeds. So in this regard, the Nokia is certainly a winner if longevity is important for you. Recharging the battery from empty to full took one hour and 54 minutes, just shy of the two or so hours needed for the Moto G53 5G to fully recharge. This isn’t the most impressive figure ever, as other competitor devices such as the Motorola Moto G82 and Samsung A54 can recharge to full in around an hour.

  • Battery score: 4/5

Should I buy the Nokia G42 5G?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider...

Top 10 trending phones of week 37
1:31 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

It was inevitable - with the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max leading our trending chart before it was even announced it's hardly surprising that it tops it now that it's official. And it's now joined by the rest of the newly unveiled lineup - The 15 Pro is in second, while the vanilla 15 rounds up the podium. The 15 Plus ended up the least popular of the new quartet, taking fourth. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is the only non-Apple phone in the top six as it retained its fifth position, while the iPhone 14 Pro Max slid behind it as people contemplating a pre-order are comparing it to the new...

Week 37 in review: Apple brings out the iPhone 15 series with USB-C
10:21 pm | September 17, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

This week was Apple's iPhone 15 event so naturally most of the top stories were related to that. Apple announced four new iPhones in the same configuration as last year - two vanilla models - the 15 and 15 Plus - and two Pro models - the 15 Pro and 15 Pro Max. The biggest upgrade is that all new iPhones now have USB-C ports! Heck, even the AirPods got upgraded to USB-C. The iPhone 15 and 15 Plus got bumped up to the A16 Bionic chip, have new 48MP main cameras, and now have a Dynamic Island, instead of a notch. The iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max have the world's first 3nm chip in the A17...

Moto G84 in for review
7:21 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Moto G84 just went live across Europe this week and now it's at our doorstep. The phone is available for €299 in a comfortable 12/256GB configuration and in three colors - the subdued Marshmallow Blue and Midnight Blue, and this Viva Magenta we have the pleasure of showing you. This is easily one of the prettiest phones you can get at this price point. It comes well equipped too, with a case, USB cable, and a 33W charger. In keeping with Motorola's recent design language, the Moto G84 has a vegan leather back that feels great to the touch. The PANTONE color of the year 2023 Viva...

Weekly deals: the best smartphone deals from the US, Germany, the UK and India
4:15 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

The long-awaited iPhone launch was this week and the newest models are already on pre-order – for the first time with USB-C. Other firsts include Apple’s first periscope (on the iPhone 15 Pro Max) and the first vanilla models with a Dynamic Island. But there are no deals to be had on the new models, Apple isn’t feeling the pressure to offer pre-order goodies. That said, it’s worth having a look at the older models as some got price cuts, others got discontinued entirely (but are still available through third-party sellers). There are a couple of new Android launches this week too. As...

HoverAir X1 review: More fun than you can shake a selfie stick at
3:45 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Two-minute review

It’s always exciting to try something different, and with Zero Zero Robotics' HoverAir X1, you get an easy-to-use drone that many people aptly describe as a flying selfie stick. Selfie sticks have themselves become a source of ridicule in the photography world, but don’t let that description of the X1 put you off, because it’s incredibly simple to get-going, safe and, best of all, it’s a whole lot of fun. What’s more, it performs incredibly well when it comes to tracking subjects autonomously.

Most drones follow a similar trajectory in terms of features, functionality and use cases, so it’s refreshing to see a drone that breaks from the norm to beat a distinctive path in an increasingly crowded market. So much so, that I’d confidently recommend the HoverAir X1 as being one of the best beginner drones available. It may be far from being one of the best drones in terms of manual flight capabilities, which we’ll cover later, but for capturing tracking shots of static and moving subjects using a variety of intelligent flight paths, it’s an astonishingly able performer.

The HoverAir X1 is available in both black and white. It’s available Device Only, which includes one battery, a USB-C cable for charging and a soft drawstring bag for storage and transportation for $349 / £345 / €388, while the better-value Combo kit includes all of the above, plus a two-battery charging hub and a second battery for $399 / £395 / €448. 

With flight times typically coming in at 9-10 minutes per battery, as opposed to the 11 minutes stated, it makes sense to opt for the Combo kit. The X1 certainly isn’t inexpensive, and at the time of writing it’s only shipping to the United States, United Kingdom and Germany; but it should be available on Amazon in late September/early October 2023.

HoverAir X1 Combo kit laid out on wood

(Image credit: James Abbott)

This palm-sized drone is extremely compact and lightweight thanks to a folding design that takes it from 5 x 3.4 x 1.2 inches/ 127 x 86 x 31mm when folded, to 5 x 5.7 x 1.2 inches / 127 x 145 x 30mm when unfolded for flight. And with a weight of just 4.4oz / 125g including a battery, you can take the X1 anywhere without even noticing that you’re carrying it. Plus, the propellers are encased in permanent propeller guards, which alongside the small size and low weight make it incredibly safe to fly around people and indoors. So, along with its flight modes, the X1 is also unique in its design.

The control layout on the drone airframe comprises just two buttons; one power button that also doubles up as a start/take-off button, and a second that’s used to select the desired intelligent flight path. Activate the HoverAir X1 from within the app, and you can use the drone without the app for quick setup and easy captures, where the video footage and/or stills can be downloaded from the 32GB of onboard storage to your smartphone once the X1 and app are connected via Wi-Fi. Photos and videos can then be shared via the HoverAir X1 app and its community, shared directly to social media, or downloaded to a computer for editing and sharing.

With a drone that’s mostly aimed at autonomous flight, the X1 provides plenty of intelligent flight paths that make capturing stabilised video a breeze. These include Orbit, Follow, Reveal, Overhead, Hover, Custom and Manual Control. Custom paths include Dolly Track, where the X1 faces you and flies backwards in front of you, and Snapshot, where the X1 flies in front of you and takes a photo.

All the intelligent flight paths work exceptionally well thanks to the VIO (Visual Inertial Odometry) positioning system. This is an effective system, but it isn't collision avoidance as we know it, so you still have to take care around obstacles such as trees – although, during testing, the X1 navigated some pretty tricky environments exceptionally well. The intelligent flight paths and VIO positioning system, combined with the small size, light weight, simplicity and speed of setup, are something that would be amazing to see in DJI Mini-series drones.

Image 1 of 6

HoverAir X1 unfolded on a piece of wood

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 6

HoverAir X1 from above on wood

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 6

HoverAir X1 folded on its side

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 6

HoverAir X1 close-up of on-drone controls

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 6

HoverAir X1 camera and gimbal close-up

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 6 of 6

HoverAir X1 battery charging hub on wood

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Moving back to the intelligent flight paths, some parameters can be changed with the paths, such as subject distance and height, which keeps things simple; but there’s no scope for more in-depth customisation. Custom modes have to be set within the app, and the last-used Custom path remains active within the Custom option on the drone until it’s changed.

Manual Control, and downloading photos and videos, require the app to connect to the X1’s Wi-Fi. This takes only around five seconds and, during testing, we didn't experience any issues with the connection when flying manually or downloading photos and videos to my Samsung Galaxy 23 Ultra. As you’d expect, the app is available for both Android and iOS, and it’s incredibly simple to navigate, with even tips and tutorial videos in the Modes section.

HoverAir X1 smartphone app

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Manual Control within the app is adequate at best, mainly due to the awkward layout of the controls in upright format, where the camera view is at the top and the two on-screen controls sit vertically. This makes it difficult to combine some commands. For instance, the X1 can be flown forward and rolled left or right at the same time, but it would be much better if the camera view was full-screen horizontally, with the controls overlaid as they are in first-person smartphone games.

Manual flight can only be achieved for 30 seconds when flying forwards or backwards, and the X1 appears to fly at a speed of 1m/s, which fits with the maximum transmission range of 30m. In terms of altitude, the X1 can fly up to 15m. The wind resistance is 17.7mph, and even in winds around this speed, the combination of the 2-axis gimbal (tilt axis) and Electronic Image Stabilisation work well to capture smooth video. However, Jello (wobble) can appear in videos when shooting in higher winds.

HoverAir X1 video sample

The video above is 2.7K 30fps

Image quality for both photos and videos is best in brighter light, which isn't surprising given the camera's small sensor. There are no adjustable settings available for photos, except for Standard (single shot) and Burst, which are captured in 4,000 x 3,000/12-megapixel JPEG format. Photo processing is heavy and visible in even what should be low ISO images, and since the ISO is increased by the automatic camera, processing becomes noticeably heavier. It isn't the end of the world, though, because the X1 is best for video-tracking shots, which is where it excels.

Video quality is generally better than photos, although in lower-light conditions, noise is evident in footage. Camera control remains limited here, too, with it only available across three presets: 2.7K at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps and 1080p (HDR) at 30fps. To be completely fair, though, this drone isn't aimed at professional use, although it could be fantastic for content creators and YouTubers, and many people will undoubtedly find the X1 a huge amount of fun.

HoverAir X1 photo samples

Image 1 of 5

Basic landscape photo taken with the HoverAir X1

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 5

Basic landscape photo taken with the HoverAir X1

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 5

Basic landscape photo taken with the HoverAir X1

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 5

Basic landscape photo taken with the HoverAir X1

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 5

Basic landscape photo taken with the HoverAir X1

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Should I buy the HoverAir X1?

HoverAir X1 in the palm of a hand

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the HoverAir X1

The HoverAir X1 was tested over several days of flying in a range of locations to test all of the intelligent flight paths, as well as manual flight control through the Hover X1 app. This not only allowed me to test flight and feature performance, but I could also asses image quality of photos and videos in bright and low-light conditions. All testing was conducted in a way that meets local aviation laws and restrictions to ensure that all flights were safe and legal.

With nearly 30 years of photographic experience and 15 years working as a photography journalist, I’ve been covering drones in terms of shooting and editing techniques, alongside writing drone reviews for many years. As well as flying most consumer and prosumer models, I’ve previously held a PfCO (Permission for Commercial Operations) issued by the Civil Aviation Authority in the UK, and now fly under an A2 CofC (A2 Certificate of Competency).

First reviewed August 2023

Bose showed me the QuietComfort Headphones Ultra and the ANC blew me away
3:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: Price and release date

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

(Image credit: Future)

When they hit the market, the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones will cost £449.95 in the UK, $429 in the US and AU$649.95 in Australia, which puts them in line with the more premium options among the best headphones

Due to conversion rates and what is probably down to cheaper import costs, the headphones will cost $125 / £100 / AU$195 cheaper if bought in the States than in the UK. In Australia, it’s only a difference of about $10 / £8 / AU$15.

The Ultra cans will be available to buy in just two pretty boring colorways of black and 'white smoke' from early October, according to Bose. If you’re worried about missing out, you can pre-order them now from the brand’s official website.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: Sound quality

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

(Image credit: Future)

While the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones might not have left me awestruck with their design refresh, it's in audio innovation where Bose truly shines.

The introduction of the firm’s Immersive Audio tech is what really sets this product apart. Bringing spatial audio to your ears, this feature creates a more expansive, multi-dimensional soundstage and in doing so offers a more rounded and realistic overall sound – almost like whatever you’re listening to is being played live in the room with you. The other great thing is that this works for any device you’re using, and doesn’t require any additional specific tech or subscriptions. 

It works so well that I can imagine this release will redefine the way audio companies make headphones. Mark my words: expect more spatial sound tech baked into other major audio companies’ headphones in the very near future. 

What's particularly impressive is the flexibility this immersive sound tech offers, with two modes to cater to different scenarios. Within the app, you can toggle the Immersive Audio from off to  'Still' mode, which keeps the soundstage fixed in front of you even when turning your head, to 'Motion' mode, which dynamically adapts to your movements so the soundstage follows you while on the go.

My overall first impressions of audio quality were that the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones didn't boast the same heavy, booming bass that Bose is renowned for. Instead, the music sounded remarkably clean, nicely balanced, and – thanks to that new audio tech – incredibly immersive. 

The headphones’ active noise cancelling (ANC) tech has also been given an upgrade in the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones over-ears and works seamlessly with the Immersive Audio tech to deliver an even richer listening experience with minimal interference. This comes in an all-new noise cancellation mode: Immersion, which Bose says is its most powerful ANC ever.

I was able to test just how good this ANC really is at blocking out external sounds during my hands-on time, where I pitted the headphones against various loud noises. In a demo, Bose blasted out loud recordings of everyday occurrences, such as train noises and the like while I listened to various tracks on an iPhone. The results were impressive: I couldn’t hear any of the external sounds over what I was listening to. Saying that, I would like to try this test again in the real world, outside an environment controlled by Bose, to see how well this new Immersion mode really performs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: Battery life

When it comes to battery life, the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones promise up to 24 hours of power per charge while Bose Immersive Audio is turned off, and up to 18 hours when it’s switched on.

Since I was only able to get a short amount of time with the headphones at the launch event, I obviously wasn’t able to test these claims during my demo, but this will be something I can test thoroughly in a full-length review.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: Design

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones

(Image credit: Future)

The QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are a completely reimagined version of their predecessor, the Noise Cancelling Headphones 700, which are ancient as far as gadgets go at over four years old. As you’d expect, the Ultras bring a slew of new design features, including refreshed proprietary signal processing, a new robust chipset, some advanced microphones and a whole new look.

While Bose maintains its trademark build quality, offering sturdy and visually appealing headphones with a sleek, minimalist aesthetic, I do think they’re missing that premium flair you’d expect from a pair of cans in this price range. They also feel a little chunkier compared to their predecessor, foregoing that sleek curved band shape that many loved about the 700s. Don’t get me wrong, they’re still minimal in appearance, they just don’t have that luxe appeal I was hoping for.

Another niggle that I noticed – during my hands-on time – is that the headphones were prone to retaining fingerprints, with every touch leaving unsightly visible smudge marks. Not a great look.

So how do they feel on? The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are certainly comfort by name, comfort by nature. They’re a great fit, sliding over your ears to fully envelop them while leaving enough space to breathe. I can imagine you’ll be able to wear these over-ears for long periods of time without feeling like they’re clinging to your head too hard or causing a case of sweaty lugs like some headphones can.

The Ultras have also been given an improved set of physical controls, with Bose removing most of the capacitive touch controls found on the Noise Cancelling Headphones 700. In this model, the right ear cup touts a power/Bluetooth pairing button, a one-off capacitive touch strip for volume control and shortcuts, and a multifunction button for managing listening modes, calls, and playback. 

On the opposite side, the left ear cup houses an LED indicator, a 2.5 mm jack, and a USB-C charging port, rounding out the functionality. Everything seemed to work well in my tests, responding to commands rapidly and feeling intuitive to the touch.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones: Early verdict

Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones next to phone

(Image credit: Future)

It's still early days, and we'll need more in-depth testing to truly gauge how impressive these headphones are, but one thing is sure – Bose has seriously stepped up its audio game with the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones. 

Bose was once all about excellent noise cancellation. And it still is. But now, it seems, there’s an additional focus: a level of immersive sound that makes any audio source come alive with more detail and realism. 

Bose certainly continues its tradition of innovation with the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, and I can’t wait to hear how my favourite music sounds on them.

« Previous PageNext Page »