Organizer
Gadget news
The iPhone 15 series is disappointing, says Honor CEO a day ahead of the Honor V Purse launch
5:31 pm | September 18, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Apple has a reputation as a leader in the smartphone industry, but that reputation may be waning – Honor CEO George Zhao criticized Apple in an interview, saying that just bumping up performance and camera quality isn’t enough. “When everyone can expect it before the launch, we feel a little disappointed,” said Zhao. He believes that the iPhone 15 series will enjoy great sales, even though it doesn’t have much in the way of innovation. An Android maker won’t be impressed with USB-C and a periscope, of course. But Zhao is hinting at the form factor as the area where Apple is lacking the...

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro appears on Geekbench with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
4:39 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

Xiaomi is gearing to release its Redmi Note 13 lineup on Thursday in China with at least three entries – Note 13, Note 13 Pro and Note 13 Pro+ and we now have confrimation on the chipset for the Note 13 Pro. The upcoming Xiaomi midranger will debut with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 – Qualcomm’s latest midrange chipset which was announced over the weekend. Redmi Note 13 Pro Geekbench listing The latest 7-series chipset from Qualcomm is fabbed on a 4nm process and features an eight-core CPU with 4 performance cores clocked at 2.4GHz and four efficiency units humming at 1.9GHz. The 7s...

Sonos Move 2 review: big portable sound for a big price
4:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Sonos Move 2 review: Two-minute review

The Sonos Move 2 is the new big, portable speaker from Sonos, designed to be a home speaker than you can just grab and take with you when you feel like it.

The Sonos Move 2 is much bigger and heavier than most of the best Bluetooth speakers, but it packs in a lot more audio tech and battery life than those do – it can last 24 hours (and this holds up in my testing). The downside is that all of this tech comes at a seriously high price of $449 / £449 / AU$799.

The Sonos Move 2 does everything it's supposed to extremely well. It sounds great, with depth, poise and detail to please picky listeners, as well as being fun and loud enough for parties. Its loudness is part of its advantage – where other portable speakers top out and lose control, the Move 2 has tons of headroom.

Given that a mix of Bluetooth and Sonos Wi-Fi connectivity are now also offered by other Sonos speakers – particularly the Sonos Era 100, which sounds the same but is nearly half the price – the new Move 2 has a harder time justifying its price than its predecessor did. If you want the particular mix of power and practicality that it delivers, and you have the budget, then I totally recommend it. It's classy, reliable and flexible.

But for anyone more budget conscious or who doesn't need every feature it offers, you might be better off saving cash and looking at the stationary Sonos Era 100, the cheaper-but-weaker-sounding Sonos Roam, or the less-functional-but-excellent-sounding Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 Gen 2.

Sonos Move 2 close up of the top, showing the control buttons and Sonos logo

The top of the Sonos Move 2 has touch-sensitive buttons for changing tracks and volume. (Image credit: Future)

Sonos Move 2 review: Price and release date

  • Released on September 20, 2023
  • Officially priced at $449 / £449 / AU$799

Released in September 2023, the Sonos Move 2 arrives to a world densely populated by portable speakers, and mostly at a far, far lower price than its $449 / £449 / AU$799 fee. Sonos products don't tend to get much in the way of lifetime discounts either (though the company at least takes part in sales periods more than it used to, these days).

Sonos has always been a premium brand, and the Sonos Move 2 is nearly premium as portable speakers get, with only a few competitors, such as the Bang & Olufsen Beosound A5, daring to go any higher than this.

Sonos has a more affordable alternative, of course, in the form of the Sonos Roam, which is priced (and sized) closer to what people think of from Bluetooth speakers. So the Move 2 is for people who don't want to compromise on the relatively compressed sound of the Roam.

However, it's worth noting that you can get something like the large and truly impressive-sounding Tribit Stormbox Blast for half the price of the Move 2. It's pricey even by hefty speaker standards.

Sonos Move 2 review: Specs

Sonos Move 2 on a white table, next to its charging base

The Sonos Move 2 with its charging cradle. You can also charge it via USB-C directly. (Image credit: Future)

Sonos Move 2 review: Features

  • Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, plus optional line-in
  • 24-hour battery life holds up in tests
  • Touch controls on top work great

The Sonos Move 2 features both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi options for connectivity, just as its predecessor did. Unlike its predecessor, though, this is now a much more common option in Sonos' lineup. Not only do the Move 2 and Roam offer this, but also the Sonos Era 100 and Sonos Era 300

Also like the Era 100 and Era 300, it has a USB-C port that functions as a line-in (including for a 3.5mm jack, if you have Sonos' adapter), and a new arrangement of touch controls on top, including a recessed bar for volume that makes it easy to find. Play/pause and track skipping buttons are here too, along with an indicator for the voice control system – again, a feature it shares with the other speakers, including both Alexa and Sonos Voice Control options.

And just like the Era 100, the Move 2 has a three-driver speaker system, with two angled tweeters pointing left and right (to create stereo, Sonos claims), and one central mid-woofer. It means that more than ever, the distinction between the Move 2 and its closest sibling sonically, the Era 100 in this case, is the battery and tough build.

The battery life Sonos is claiming here is 24 hours, which is double what the original Sonos Move offered, and in my experience, it hits that – at least, with the volume not turned up too high. I found that it lost an average of about 4% per hour with the volume at around 25% playing over Wi-Fi (AirPlay 2), which is easily loud enough to enjoy music while I write this review at my desk. When you have it outside, odds are you'll have it a higher level than this, but I didn't find that the battery drain drastically rose.

I also found that it lost around 20% battery when left for 24 hours. It does have a sleep mode, which it should enter automatically when left alone, that effectively arrests battery drop. Although you can't wake it up from sleep mode remotely, you need to press the power button on the back to kick it back to life. One bonus of the battery this time is that you can charge your phone from it by plugging into the USB-C port. You don't have to do much – just plug it in, and if it doesn't immediately start charging, hit the power button on the back.

As with all Sonos systems, setting it up is easy. The Sonos app will detect it immediately, quickly run through the process of adding it to your Wi-Fi and your Sonos home network, as well as updating it with new software.

You can also enable Auto TruePlay here, which will adjust the sound automatically to your environment, updating every few minutes because the speaker constantly monitors itself. Sonos has told me that this is less effective than the full Trueplay or the Quick Tune option on its newer speakers. I'm not sure it's doing much transformative here, but it's better than nothing. There is also the option of using two Move 2 speakers for a more convincing stereo system, though I don't expect this to be a wildly popular option at this price.

You can set the voice control options from the app, either enabling Amazon Alexa or Sonos Voice Control, which offers pretty much only the ability to select and play music, but with no cloud computing, so it may be preferable for the privacy-minded. A switch on the back disables the mic completely, if you prefer. On the back at the bottom, you'll also find the USB-C port.

Bluetooth pairing is also turned on and off using a button on the back, which you hold briefly. It immediately appeared as an option on my devices after that. You can use the Bluetooth connection or the optional line-in (a separate 3.5mm-to-USB-C adapter can be bought) to connect to the Move 2, and then broadcast that sound around to other Sonos speakers. So, I was able to connect the Move 2 to a Bluetooth source and use the Sonos app to beam that sound to my Sonos Arc. It worked totally seamlessly, through the System view of the Sonos app – hit the square "broadcast" icon by the Move 2 to choose other Sonos speakers to send the audio to.

  • Features score: 4.5/5

Sonos Move 2 sitting on its charging base on a white table

On its charging cradle, the Sonos Move 2 might as well be any other home Wi-Fi speaker. (Image credit: Future)

Sonos Move 2 review: Sound quality

  • Excellent balance and great detail
  • No difference between Bluetooth and Wi-Fi
  • Not really stereo sound

Let's get one quick thing out of the way: I couldn't make out any clear difference in sound quality between Bluetooth and Wi-Fi (via Apple AirPlay 2 or from the Sonos app directly) on the Sonos Move 2. So any judgment of the sound applies equally to all sources.

It may not shock Sonos regulars to know that the Move 2 sounds great. It's capable of great depth at the low end in a way that makes use of its size and weight – a bass line can thrum and vibrate with richness without ever feeling like it's getting loose, while drums hit tightly and sharply. 

Big bass is still fairly common in portable speakers though (partly because low-end frequencies lose volume quickly and are easily disrupted by reflections/wind), but it can often feel overblown: the trick to the Sonos Move 2 is that that it's balanced so expertly, as is usual with Sonos gear. The bass carries well outside, but indoors it still says in line with with the mid-range and treble.

In the mid-range, instruments have enough room to express themselves, and it certainly doesn't feel like a small soundstage – it diffuses nicely while still having the specificity of particular voices or tones. I think it struggles most for clarity here in particular dense tracks. You can also get slightly better precision from something like the HomePod 2, or certainly from the Sonos Era 300 – both of which are the same price or cheaper, but also aren't portable. It doesn't handle things badly at all, I just noticed its limits here.

In treble, it's again crisp and in total control. Little high-end details lift out of the mid-range with no confusion, and again it feels suitable expansive and carries well across the room.

As with the Era 100 and its extremely similar speaker arrangement, I don't think I can really say that it lives up to Sonos' claims of producing stereo sound. If you are sitting directly facing it at an optimal distance, yes, in tracks with major separation, you'll be able to hear it. But that's not really how the Sonos Move is used; when it's outside or across the room, it won't really matter. But I think the angled drivers do help with the wide soundstage, and that's very welcome in a speaker like this.

The question about the Move 2 isn't really whether it sounds good. It really does. It's whether it sounds good enough for the price, which is undoubtedly high. Its sound is incredibly close to the Sonos Era 100 (I compared them directly), as you might expect given their similar audio setups, but you can buy two Era 100s for essentially the same price as one Sonos Move.

I also compared it directly to my favorite Bluetooth speaker, the Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 Gen 2. This is another one that's regularly available for half the price of the Move 2, and though it lacks some of the features (no Wi-Fi, 18 hours of battery life), I was surprised at how close in sound quality they were. The B&O has always impressed me with its balance, and although the bass isn't quite as impactful, and the mid-range is a little less expressive, the different in general music enjoyment between them was slim.

However, the difference in volume headroom was huge. The Move 2 was able to hit the same loudness at 25-30% that the B&O was hitting at 50%. There's simply more headroom from the much larger machine.

  • Sound quality: 4.5/5

Sonos Move 2 rear, showing the handle and some control buttons, on a white table

The rear of the Sonos Move 2 has its handle, along with some of the 'boring' buttons and switches. (Image credit: Future)

Sonos Move 2 review: Design

  • Great-feeling build and materials
  • Sleek design that looks good as a home speaker
  • A real handle would probably be better

The Sonos Move 2 looks incredibly like the original Move, but with a new finish to the plastic, a slightly different curve to its edges, and a new-look top panel – all in line with Sonos' new design language, introduced with the Era 100 and Era 300 speakers. Following this, the black finish is a little different, and in addition to black or white, there's a new Olive color, which is what I had, and I think it's an excellent shade. Neutral without being boring; fashionable but not flashy.

And it doesn't just look like the original, either; it's essentially the same dimensions and weight. Compared to a truly portable speaker, such as a JBL Flip 6 or Sonos' own Roam, it's damn big, there's no question. The 6.6 lb / 3kg weight also pushes the definition of portable a little, depending on what you want to do with it. It's too much to add to a pack for a hike, but carrying it to my garden while I worked on weeding it was no hardship. But then, I'm also a young-ish guy with no physical ailments. I'm not sure my mother would carry it to her tomatoes when she tends to them at this weight, which she might with a lighter speaker.

A factor in the weight is how you carry it. The recessed section in the back is perfectly fine to grip for me, and feels rock solid as a way to carry it – but it means the weight is unbalanced, so again, if someone has any grip or strength issues, they may struggle with it. Having this "invisible" handle makes the Move 2 look good in the home when not in use, but for sheer practicality, a standard over-the-top carry handle would probably be more useful for more people.

The charging dock is the only part that doesn't feel quite as meticulously engineered as the rest. It's not that there's anything wrong with it as such, it's just thin and light. I also found myself nudging it when re-seating the Move 2 for charging, and then having to double-check it was definitely in there right, because it doesn't have the satisfying and secure fit you get when putting something like AirPods Pro 2 back in their charging case.

The speaker is IP56 rated, meaning that it can take being sprayed, and lightly submerged, as well as being able to protect against a fair amount of dust or sand. You'll find that a lot of the best waterproof speakers can best this, but it's fine for what the Move 2 is really designed for – it'll take being rained on if you leave it outside, or sprayed by the kids accidentally.

  • Design score: 4/5

Sonos Move 2 being lifted by its handle

The Sonos Move 2's rear handle isn't hard to grab, but it's not exactly balanced. (Image credit: Future)

Sonos Move 2 review: Value

  • It's expensive compared to other Sonos speakers
  • But it offers a unique flexibility and audio quality combination
  • Ultimately worth it, if you need what it offers

I touched on this topic at the end of the sound quality section, but the issue with the value of the Sonos Move 2 is really what you can get instead. You get a Sonos Era 300, which sounds noticeable better. Or two Sonos Era 100 units, which might mean you don't need the portability. Or one Era 100 and one Sonos Roam, giving you portability and power in separate units.

However, I don't think the Move 2 is bad value, because of the particular mix of stuff it's offering. The battery life is really long compared to other portable speakers, the sound quality is so enjoyable, and it's so flexible with its combo of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth (and the ability to beam Bluetooth sound to other Sonos devices).

So if you want the Move 2, you have to want what it offers in particular. This particular mix of high-quality sound, long battery life and connectivity options, and you're happy not to compromise on budget to get it.

Taken as a whole, the Move 2 is not bad value, but I definitely won't be enthusing about what a bargain it is.

  • Value score: 3/5

Sonos Move 2 on a white table

The Sonos Move 2 is a lovely, lovely speaker, but the price will definitely put some people off. (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Sonos Move 2?

Buy it if…

Don’t buy it if…

Sonos Move 2 review: Also consider

How I tested the Sonos Move 2

The Sonos Move 2 next to the Sonos era 100, showing how much smaller the Era 100 is

The Sonos Move 2 is much larger than the Era 100, despite similar audio and connection tech. (Image credit: Future)
  • Tested for over a week
  • Tested at home and in my yard
  • Used primarily with Apple Music, but also podcasts

I tested the Sonos Move 2 for over a week at my home, using it as my main source of music during that time – while working from home at my desk, indoors at a lower volume; and while working on my garden, with the volume turned up higher to overcome the sounds of the neighborhood.

I mainly used it with Apple Music, tested over Bluetooth, over AirPlay 2, and using the Sonos app at different times, to make sure there were no audio quality differences. I also listened to podcasts on it a little.

I compared it to the Sonos Era 100 directly in a head-to-head test, as well as the B&O Beosound A1 Gen 2. I also had the Sonos Era 300 and Apple HomePod 2 available, so I listened to those for more value comparisons.

Oppo A2x and A2m appear on TENAA with identical specs
3:44 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Oppo released the A2 Pro last week, and is now working on two more devices, part of the A2 family. The Oppo PJU110 and PJS110 popped up on TENAA with key specs and images, and reports are the phones will end up named Oppo A2m and Oppo A2x. Specifications of both devices are identical, but the tipster said this isn't the vanilla A2 5G, which is also in the pipeline. The phone/s are listed with a 6.56” LCD with an HD+ resolution. The chipset is a 2.2 GHz octa-core CPU but TENAA rarely lists the actual name, and this time it wasn't an exception. RAM of the duo is listed as 8/12 GB and...

Honor 100 Pro rumored to launch in November
1:54 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Honor 90 series made its debut in China and then gradually expanded to Europe and India. We are now getting some early specs for one of the next iteration in the series – Honor 100 Pro. Chinese tipster Digital Chat Station confirmed the upcoming flagship is expected to debut in November with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset Honor 90 Pro The device will feature a 1,224 x 2,700 px resolution AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate and 3,840Hz PWM dimming. We also get confirmation for a centered punch-hole cutout housing the front-facing camera which will boast a high-megapixel...

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II review: wide-angle wonder
1:25 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Two-minute review

The 16-35mm focal length zoom, or its equivalent, is one of the most popular lenses in any manufacturer's line-up. Offering the 16mm view popular amongst landscape photographers, it is also versatile for street photography or even some portraits at the 35mm end. This is without mentioning its use for video, where it is the zoom lens many videographers may as well glue to their camera. 

The 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens is the fourth 16-35mm lens in Sony's full-frame E mount, following on from the original Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, which was released around a year after the launch of the original Sony Alpha 7 and 7R cameras. Sony followed this with the f/2.8 G Master version of the lens, which was announced in 2017. That lens is the one you will find in many Sony user's camera bags, with it being one of the most popular lenses in the Sony line-up. Then, last year, Sony announced a new f/4 version, the FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G lens.

With the Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 and 70-200mm f/2.8 GM lenses both now on their second generation, it was only a matter of time before 16-35mm f/2.8 received a similar upgrade; but what exactly is new?

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)

The most obvious starting point is the size and weight of the lens. It is relatively small for an f/2.8 lens. Sony quotes it as the smallest and lightest f/2.8 zoom lens in their FE line-up. The new lens is 121.6 mm long, 10.1mm shorter than the previous version. Thanks to the reduction in length, due to the different optical construction, it weighs in at 547g, some 133g lighter, which marks a 20% reduction in weight. That sounds like a minor deal in absolute terms, but when hiking, every bit of weight saved can pay dividends. 

It is worth noting the filter thread size of the new lens is 82mm, which is the same as its predecessor and the 24-70mm f/2.8 lens G Master II lens. 

It has a closer focus distance of 22cm compared to the previous lens, which had 28cm. This results in a maximum magnification difference of 0.32x compared to 0.19x. This is useful for videographers shooting close-ups or product shots without changing to another lens.

Image 1 of 5

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens stood outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Closeup of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)

All this magic has been achieved with an optical arrangement designed entirely in-house by Sony. In the last few years, it is impressive how exotic lens elements have found themselves in the majority rather than the minority.

The new FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lens consists of 15 elements in 12 groups. Of these lenses, there are 3x XA (Extreme Aspherical) lenses, 1 ED ASPH (Extra Low Dispersion Aspherical) lens, 2x ED (Extra Low Dispersion) lenses, and 1x Super ED lens. Each of these lenses plays a part in ensuring that that lens controls curvilinear distortion, chromatic aberration, ghosting, and flare better than the 2017 lens. And thanks to some of these elements floating, the lens also features internal focusing.

Speaking of focusing, focus breathing is said to have been reduced. In some Sony cameras, such as the FX3, you can compensate for the focus breathing when shooting video electronically.

The lens features all the hallmarks of the current generation of Sony G Master lenses. One significant new addition is the aperture ring, which includes a 'clickless' switch to allow smooth aperture changes when shooting video. There is also an 'Iris Lock' switch to prevent accidental changes in the aperture or away from the 'A' settings.

Closeup of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)

Around the lens barrel are custom buttons that by default are focus buttons, but they can be used for any number of features in the camera menu. As well as for focusing, I found them helpful in switching between full-frame and APS-C crop mode, which can be especially handy when shooting video, and the lens seems like a natural place to add this as a custom button. It is also helpful for things like turning Zebra patterning on and off. 

The lens has a natural familiarity and will be no surprise to Sony shooters regarding its build and handling. 

I can't say that I noticed the weight of the lens - that would only be seen with a side-by-side comparison, but it feels compact for a 16-35mm f/2.8 lens. I was concerned about how it would work on the equally compact body of the A7C II, which is the smallest and lightest full-frame interchangeable-lens digital camera with an optical in-body image stabilization mechanism. In practice, the small zoom lens paired well with the camera, making an excellent travel zoom combination while offering me an f/2.8 aperture to shoot in low light, take shallow depth-of-field shots, and even the odd close-up image.

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II price and release date

The Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens costs $2,300 /£2,400 / AU$3,700 and will be available from September 2023. At launch, the lens is $100 / £100 / AU$200 more than its predecessor, which given inflation and a general increase in the price of some tech, isn't too bad, however, in 2023, this first generation model costs $2,200 / £2,000 / AU$2,700 new and could drop further, which poses an interesting dilemma depending on the region, for those who don't already own a 16-35mm f/2.8 lens and are looking to get one. 

If the F4 aperture is enough for you, there are two other cheaper Sony FE options; the aging VARIO-TESSAR T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, which has a used price of around $750 / £500, or the more recent FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G lens. This compact f/4 lens is excellent for video and travel and costs $1,200 / £839 / AU£1,599. While the image quality may not match this new f/2.8 lens, it again offers good value for those who don't need the f/2.8 aperture, and the PZ (Power Zoom) means it can produce smooth zoom shots when shooting video. 

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens distortion examples

Before I run through some of the image quality findings, it is worth pointing out that at the time of testing, I could not look at the raw images, so any commentary on the image quality is based on looking at HEIC straight out of the camera. 

I tested for chromatic aberration by turning off Chromatic Aberration correction in the Sony A7C Mark II and shooting up through the branches of trees against a bright but overcast sky. At 16mm f/2.8, no significant chromatic aberration is visible in the corners when looking at 33-million-pixel images at 100%. Only when I viewed them on my Macbook at 400% could I see the faintest hint of chromatic aberration, around 1 pixel in size around high-contrast edges. The color of the aberration is not very saturated, and it is amongst the best performance in this regard that I have seen from a wide-angle zoom lens. Turning Chromatic Aberration correction in the camera settings, and no chromatic aberration was visible at 100%, and looking at 400%, you can't see any either, though there is a hint that some removal has occurred. This is pixel peeping to the extreme, and in reality, chromatic aberration isn't an issue.

Screenshot of magnified view of tree leaves, displaying any chromatic aberration of the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens at maximum aperture

Magnified view of tree leaves, displaying any chromatic aberration of the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens at maximum aperture (Image credit: Future)

Brick wall shot at the wide focal length and maximum aperture of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens to show any vignetting or barrel distortion

Brick wall shot at the wide focal length and maximum aperture of Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens to show any vignetting or barrel distortion (Image credit: Future)

Shooting at the 35mm focal length and f/2.8, I couldn't see any chromatic aberration. Turning the correction on made no real difference, as there wasn't any there to begin with. 

It is a similar story with vignetting. With vignetting correction turned off, you can see it when shooting a uniform surface at f/2.4-f/4, but by f/5.6, it isn't noticeable. Switch on the in-camera correction, and it has gone. Again, in 2023, when we all have access to image editing software, vignetting isn't a concern.

Curvilinear distortion is visible with the correction turned off, with barrel distortion at 16mm and a slight pincushion at 35mm. The in-camera correction essentially takes care of both of these, and again, there is no reason not to shoot with these lens corrections turned on. Given the lens design's complexity, the moderate curvilinear distortion level is impressive. We'll have to wait and see what the raw files look like with the profile applied, but once again, the optical design is good enough that the digital correction makes light work of the task. 

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II sample images

Image 1 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of flowers, close up, showing improved minimum focus distance

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of flowers

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of beach huts at golden hour

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of UK streets with fallen bunting

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of shop windoe at night with bright pink neon lights

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of boats on a lake at golden hour

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of boats on a lake at golden hour

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of bunting between quaint UK buildings

(Image credit: Future)
Image 9 of 9

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of boat on a lake

(Image credit: Future)

The sharpness of the lens is excellent in the center of the frame, whether you are at 16mm or 35mm. In shots I made of foliage; images look their sharpest between f/5.6 and f/11. There is a slight drop at f/16, as there is at f/2.8, but the reality is that this is once again only noticeable through extreme pixel peeping and for those with photograph lens charts. In practice, the only time there is a perceivable drop is when shooting at f/22, but even this, I would use at a pinch, especially with some of the sharpening software tools now on the market. Images are full of defined detail that is crisp.

Of course, it is in the corners at 16mm where you would expect to see some softness, but the HEIC files are impressively sharp and detailed at the corners. Yes, at the very corner, they lack the bite in definition in the center, but individual blades of grass and even sand can be made out in some of the images I took. It is excellent. Sadly, I didn't have the original 16-35mm f/2.8 G Master to make a direct comparison, but having used that lens, my instinct is that this lens is perceivably better.

Shooting some close-up shots of flowers showed just how close you can get with the lens. Despite having such a wide field of view, the depth of field is remarkably shallow, so while bokeh looks smooth and great at f/2.8, you may be best opening up a little to f/4 or f/5.6 when wanting to make sure things like flowers are entirely in focus. 

The exotic lens elements and second-generation Nano AR coating did a great job keeping lens flare and ghosting under control. Shooting into a setting sun, the 11 rounded aperture blades of the lens produced a lovely 22-point sun star (see below), while the flare was well controlled and produced exactly what you would expect it to. Besides this extreme situation, I didn't notice any other cases where I had an unwanted flare in the image, and the petal-shaped lens hood did its job, preventing light from coming in at sharp angles. 

Sample image taken with the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II of sunstars, at f/11 aperture

(Image credit: Future)

When it came to focusing, the biggest compliment I can give is that it just worked. With a wide-angle zoom, the lens doesn't have as much work to do shifting elements back and forth as it would say with something like a 100-400mm lens, and the depth of field isn't as shallow as, say, shooting with an 85mm f/1.4 lens. The result is that the lens could keep up with whatever I asked of it, whether shooting photos or video. I used the continuous AF of the A7C II for much of the test and used tracking to lock on to what I wanted in focus, then reframed the composition as I wanted. Limited to 10fps shooting with the A7C II, the lens had no issue keeping Eye-AF on my son as he ran around. I also shot some vlogging-style video footage, and once again, the focus stayed locked onto my face. Sony claims that the lens can keep up with focusing at 4k 120fps. There isn't much more to say other than I could trust it to get the shot.

Should I buy the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens?

Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens outdoors on a rock

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens

I tested the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II lens on a Sony A7C Mark II camera. I tried the lens in several different situations while on holiday, using it as a travel or landscape photographer. This gave me real-life experience of using the lens.

Alongside looking closely at the detail in these images, I photographed a brick wall at minimum and maximum focal lengths, with in-camera distortion corrected turned on and off, to check for curvilinear distortion. I used this same test to check for vignetting in the corners of the frame and photographed looking up at tree branches to check for chromatic aberration. 

During the real-world testing of the lens, I used a variety of different aperture settings and focusing methods to see how the lens performed.

First reviewed September 2023

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE design fully revealed in 360-degree spin
1:01 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE has surfaced yet again, this time it is a short clip offering a 360° view of the device. A previous leak showed the entire color range with black, white, mint and purple options. This clip shows the black one. pic.twitter.com/n6iplmWac4— Evan Blass (@evleaks) September 16, 2023 If you prefer, you can also check out the static renders of the black model from last week. The design of the S23 FE has been confirmed, not just because it matches Samsung’s current design language, but also because we saw it in TENAA photos. Based on TENAA data, the Galaxy S23 FE...

Qualcomm unveils Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 – a 4nm chipset for the midrange
12:06 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Qualcomm released over the weekend the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 – a chipset, built on the 4nm process technology, that is meant to be a solution for phone makers that want a capable platform that can fit within a far lower budget than the Gen 8 chips. The CPU of the 7s is less powerful than any other Snapdragon 7 series chip, the ISP is also not as impressive, indicating a slightly lower positioning overall. Some rumors suggested the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 could arrive with the Redmi Note 13 series, scheduled to launch this month. The name might sound confusing, because there wasn't a...

Qualcomm unveils Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 – a 4nm chipset for the midrange
12:06 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Qualcomm released over the weekend the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 – a chipset, built on the 4nm process technology, that is meant to be a solution for phone makers that want a capable platform that can fit within a far lower budget than the Gen 8 chips. The CPU of the 7s is less powerful than any other Snapdragon 7 series chip, the ISP is also not as impressive, indicating a slightly lower positioning overall. Some rumors suggested the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 could arrive with the Redmi Note 13 series, scheduled to launch this month. The name might sound confusing, because there wasn't a...

Intego Mac Internet Security X9 review
11:50 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

The Jury's back and the threat is real. Malware is a thing, even for Apple Macs. Admittedly most malware is still designed for Windows. Apple also has a number of built-in safeguards for macOS, including their very own virus scanner XProtect, which can scan for and prevent malware while running in the background. The operating system also uses 'Notarization' to scan third-party software for malicious content - if no threats are found, a valid ticket is generated for Apple's Gatekeeper program to say the program's safe.

Still, there are viable exploits for Apple's built-in security tools. Any threat database is also only as good as its last update.

Mindful of these online risks, Intego have been producing security software for both Windows and macOS since 1997. Its development of 'Mac Internet Security X9' has been ongoing since 1997, combining both antivirus and firewall features.

The main website claims Internet Security X9 (hereafter shortened to 'X9') is award-winning and will protect your Mac against 'all types of malware and viruses'. These are strong claims, so we were keen to find out if X9 lived up to the hype. Can it offer among the best endpoint protection software, on top of macOS' built-in security tools? 

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Plans and pricing

(Image credit: Intego)

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Plans and pricing

Intego's licensing for X9 follows a simple licensing format depending on the number of Macs on which you want to install the product. 

The minimum cost for installing X9 on one Mac is $39.99 for one year. The next tier supports installation of X9 on up to three Macs for $54.99 annually (Just over $18 per machine). The final tier allows you to install X9 on up to five Mac and costs $69.99 annually ($14 per machine).

Those willing to pay upfront for a 2-year subscription also benefit from further discounts : for instance, a two-year license for one Mac costs $74.99 (savings of around $5). If you have a Windows machine, you can also opt for 'dual protection' for both devices for an extra $10. 

You can download and test X9 and other Intego products via a free 14-day trial. No payment information is required.  

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Features

(Image credit: Intego)

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Features

Having mentioned Intego's 'dual protection' feature, we should clarify that while we're reviewing the Mac version all Intego's products are universal binaries. In other words, their software is compatible with both Windows and macOS.

The Mac version of X9 is in fact a bundle of two Intego app,though as far as we could see these aren't purchasable as standalone products. The first is 'VirusBarrier'. As the name suggests, this is an antivirus program to protect your machine from Mac and cross-platform malware. Advertised benefits include easy setup and configuration, automatic and scheduled scanning and real-time protection.

The other component of X9 is Intego's "NetBarrier" - an advanced firewall, which provides both outbound and inbound protection. It allows users to set up simple rules and supports basic profiles, like 'Home', 'Work' and 'Public Hotspot' depending on where you're using your Mac.

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Setup

(Image credit: Intego)

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Setup

X9 for Mac enjoys very broad compatibility, supporting all versions of macOS from 10.12 (Sierra) onwards. We were able to confirm this by installing on a 2017 Macbook Air.

After heading to the Intego website to download the trial version of X9, we found the installer weighed in at just under 120MB, so took only seconds to appear in our 'Downloads' folder. Once this was done, we only had to double click the colorful icon to begin installation.

The install wizard confirmed that X9 is exceptionally lightweight, taking up only 200MB of hard drive space on a Mac. As soon as the install was complete, the X9 icon appeared in the menu bar at the top right of the screen. 

Eager to get started, we clicked here and tried to open 'VirusBarrier'. In order to try out the trial version, users only need to enter their name and click the corresponding button. On first launch, Intego cautioned us their system extension needs to be approved in 'Security Preferences' but a helpful wizard explained the steps necessary.

On first launch we were a little perplexed, as though the screen was well laid out, it read both that Real Time scanning was 'on' and that it had 'failed to load'. We're mentioning this here, as during our tests (see below), X9 didn't seem to be able to detect threats in real time. 

At this point we decided to launch X9's 'NetUpdate' feature using the icon at the top right, which informed us that the software was indeed up to date. 

Next, we tried to load NetBarrier. This displayed an alert saying that the firewall's background processes weren't running properly. Luckily it was just a matter of clicking 'Load Processes' to get this going. Once again we entered a name and clicked 'Free Trial', so we could continue with setup.

On first launch NetBarrier asked us to specify the type of network to which we were currently connected : Home, Work or Public Hotspot. These came with helpful explanations - for instance, a work network is considered to be one which you trust but to which many other devices are connected.

When the NetBarrier window itself opened, we were impressed to see a colorful overlay explaining the function of each section. 

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Interface

(Image credit: Intego)

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Interface

We've already mentioned NetBarrier's colorful overlay which provides a helpful way to navigate features. Still, the window itself is extremely simple to navigate. Incoming and outgoing network traffic is displayed via a graphic in the left-hand pane.

On the right of the window is a series of color-coded rocker switches controlling connections, such as 'incoming internet' and 'outgoing local'. Depending on the network type you selected earlier, these will display in different default positions but this can be changed with a simple mouse click.

The 'Application Monitor' also opens in a separate window at the top left of the screen, though it can be dragged elsewhere. This provides a basic list of all applications currently connecting to the internet/network, each with their own icon. You can even double click on an application name to open its source folder. 

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Interface 2

(Image credit: Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Interface )

This is the one feature of X9 we actually found we could have done without, as information on connected apps could easily have been displayed in an expandable list inside the main NetBarrier window itself.

We also found the 'VirusBarrier' interface to be near flawless. Sections are well laid out, with different tabs for 'Scans', 'Quarantine' and 'Trusted Files'. The main scan window allows users to perform a 'Quick Scan', or 'Full Scan' via dedicated buttons. There are also buttons for setting up scheduled scans and checking if 'Safe Browsing' is enabled (Chrome and Safari browsers only).

The preferences pane revealed that VirusBarrier can scan e-mails, external iOS devices like iPhones and external disks (during scans). By default the scanner also detects malware for other operating systems (Linux and Windows) but you can set this to macOS and iOS only if you wish.

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Performance

(Image credit: Intego)

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Performance

When we were playing around with VirusBarrier preferences, we were pleased to see that it's capable of scanning inside archives. This is because our first test was to attempt to download a fake computer virus in compressed (ZIP) format, provided by the good people of EICAR.

After opening Safari on our test machine, we downloaded the fake virus and macOS obligingly unzipped it for us automatically. X9 didn't show any alerts to the virus' presence but when we later ran a 'Quick Scan' it detected and quarantined the file. 

Our next test was to find a new, real computer virus that we'd caught in the wild and attempt to download it to the machine. We made sure this virus was designed to infect macOS specifically.

Once again the file downloaded to our test machine and didn't trigger an alert in X9. However, when we right-clicked the file and chose 'Scan with VirusBarrier', it was detected and sanitized. 

We visited the 'Quarantine' section of the VirusBarrier to check the malware had been detected and chose to delete it from the Mac permanently.

When we were testing VirusBarrier, we needed to install an extra third-party utility to decompress our real computer virus. This gave us a chance to see 'NetBarrier' in action, as during installation the utility tried to access the internet. NetBarrier immediately detected this and asked if we wanted to allow it to make connections. Since there's no need for a decompression utility to go online, we selected 'No'.

Still, we wanted to subject NetBarrier to more sophisticated tests, so decided to open Safari and pay a visit to GRC's "Shields Up". This site is capable of running an extensive battery of tests on devices, to check for any vulnerable ports. A scan of the first 1056 TCP ports revealed that they were what GRC calls 'stealth' mode. In other words the system provided no information on whether they were open or closed. This provides excellent protection against random scans by cybercriminals. 

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Performance

(Image credit: Intego)

Intego Mac Internet Security X9: Final verdict

As we mentioned, during the setup phase it seemed that the 'real-time scanning' wasn't enabled on our test device. This may be the reason why the malware we introduced to the system wasn't detected and quarantined immediately by X9's VirusBarrier. In fairness, as soon as we ran a scan the suspect files were sanitized with impunity.

The X9 NetBarrier firewall on the other hand performed perfectly in our tests. It refuses to respond to probing requests, plus immediately detects when applications try to connect to the internet. We were also very impressed how easily it is to switch between network profiles, as well as to allow/block incoming and outgoing internet/local network connections.  

We feature the best cloud firewall.

« Previous PageNext Page »