Organizer
Gadget news
OnePlus Pad price in India revealed through Flipkart
2:56 am | April 20, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

The OnePlus Pad has had a very unique launch - the tablet is official, pre-orders have started, but the price will only be officially revealed on April 25. Well, it should have been - over in India, Flipkart jumped the gun and posted two listings for OnePlus' first tablet before removing them hastily. Even so, cached versions of the pages are still available. So, according to Flipkart, the OnePlus Pad will be available in India in two versions. The base model will have 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, and will retail for INR 37,999 ($461 or €421 converted), while the model with 12GB of RAM...

Xiaomi 13 Ultra already receives its first update
11:59 pm | April 19, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Xiaomi's 13 Ultra was unveiled yesterday for the Chinese market, and it's only expected to go on sale on April 21 - in the meantime, pre-orders are up in the country. And yet, today the phone is already receiving its first software update. This should thus await all buyers once they take the phone out of the box. The new build is MIUI 14.0.8.0 TMACNXM, and it's based on Android 13 of course, like the previous 14.0.7.0 was too. The update brings with it unnamed improvements to the overall user experience, along with a boost of system stability, and increases in camera image...

Asus ROG Phone 7 review
8:27 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones reviews | Comments: Off

Samsung’s Galaxy F54 5G appears on Google Play Console
8:11 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Samsung Galaxy F54 5G has been spoted on the Google Play Console, revealing key parts of its spec sheet and hinting at its imminent release. The listing reveals the design of the phone, as well as its chipset of choice - the Exynos 1380 (codename s5e8835), mated to 8GB of RAM. The screen resolution is a 1080x2400px unit, and the phone is running on Android 13. Samsung Galaxy F54 5G Given the phone's looks and specs, and judging by its model number, m54x, it seems likely that the Galaxy F54 5G is a rebadged Galaxy M54. If that proves legit, then the Galaxy F54 has a 6,000mAh...

Poco F5 Pro surfaces on Geekbench, Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 confirmed
6:53 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

The Poco F5 Pro is yet to be announced, but as per the current rumors, the handset will be a rebranded Redmi K60 that was released in China back in December. The Geekbench listing that just surfaced appears to confirm that, as it shows the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 behind the wheel, which is also powering the vanilla Redmi K60. The listing also confirms the phone runs on Android 13 and the tested unit has 12GB of RAM. The Redmi K60's top-specced version, for example, has a 16GB/512GB memory combo. Alleged Poco F5 Pro Geekbench listing The benchmark result also reveals the 23013PC75G...

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) review: a reliable budget gaming PC
6:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Two-minute review

Lenovo continues to release budget gaming machines, including the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD), for those who want the best PC games while keeping to a reasonable budget. This particular gaming PC features both an AMD CPU and GPU to keep costs down while still offering reliable performance.

This is a no-frills budget gaming PC through and through - among the best budget gaming PCs - so don’t expect a gorgeous chassis or stunning RGB lighting decorating the inside of the case. Despite having a glass panel that lets you peer inside to see all the components, the only way to actually tell if your PC is turned on is through the fan. On the plus side, the case is small and lightweight enough that you can carry it around with relative ease. It weighs about 30 pounds, much lighter than most PCs.

Its port selection is quite good as well, offering everything you could need including several Type-A USB ports, a Type-C USB port, an ethernet port, both HDMI and DVI support, an audio jack, a headphone jack, and a microphone jack. My only complaint is that there should be more Type-C ports. The audio itself is quite good, with a sound quality that doesn’t degrade too much as the volume increases, though you’ll most likely want to use a headset instead.

Performance-wise it’s rather impressive for the kind of CPU and GPU it’s equipped with. Benchmark scores are average, especially compared to other PCs on the market, but reflect the best gaming PC that delivers the kind of gaming experience you’d expect from a budget machine. While you can’t run games like Cyberpunk 2077 on anything higher than low settings (as at best you’ll get 47 fps) or Dirt 5 higher than medium if you want to race a little over 60 fps, it still runs any PC game you have quite smoothly as long as the settings are right.

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Price & availability

black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)
  • How much does it cost? $664.99 / £538 / AU$994
  • When is it available? Available now
  • Where can you get it? Available in the US

The Legion Tower 5 Gen 6, particularly the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G CPU version, is a budget gaming PC through and through. It’s currently priced at $664.99 / £538 / AU$994 through a sale on the Lenovo online store, which sits it right at the low-end market of machines. The AMD version’s original pricing at $989.99 is reasonable enough, but the sale price is practically a steal. 

Meanwhile, there’s an improved version with an AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, as well as more memory and storage. It’s a price jump of about $300 but a solid option if you want to future-proof your PC, and thanks to the sale price, it’s still below $1,000.

Both versions are currently available in the US, though other regions like the UK and Australia were left high and dry in terms of availability. Judging from the pages for the latter two, models in the UK might go back in stock at some point while ones in Australia are permanently unavailable.

  • Price score: 5 / 5

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Specs

black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)

The Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) comes in two configurations, one with an AMD GPU and the other with an Nvidia GPU. 

The one sent to me was: an AMD Ryzen 5 5600G CPU, Radeon RX 6500 XT 4GB GDDR6 GPU, 8GB DDR4 of RAM, and 512GB SSD PCIe Gen4 of storage. The other configuration was an AMD Ryzen 7 5800 CPU, RTX 3060 GPU, 16GB DDR4 of RAM, and 1TB of storage. 

Unfortunately, neither one of these models can be customized, which most likely is what keeps the price down as improved specs often spike the total.

  • Specs score: 4 / 5

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Design

black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)
  • Simple and bland design
  • Small and weighs less than most PCs

The Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD)’s design is a slightly mixed bag. On one hand, it’s efficient at not taking up unnecessary space and very lightweight for a gaming PC. I was easily able to carry it around my office, it was so light. On the other hand, it’s a plain black color with no interesting chassis shape and has a glass side panel with no RGB lighting to see inside, though I realize RGB is purely aesthetic, it’s a handy way to see whether your PC is turned on and I miss the feature. It’s a boring yet practical design and while it may be a little disappointing, your wallet with thank you.

black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)

It does have a nicely varied port selection that includes four USB Type-A 3.2, two USB Type-A 2.0, one USB Type-C, one headphone jack, one microphone jack, one audio jack, one RJ45, one ethernet port, one HDMI port, and one DVI port. Though it could have used another Type-C USB instead of so many Type-As, especially since wireless accessories tend to support the latter.

The ventilation system, despite the PC being so small, is quite good and never overheated once even during extensive gaming and benchmark testing. No fancy liquid cooling system, but the fans do the trick, and well too. Surprising enough, this PC has its own audio built in, Dolby Atmos Gaming Effect 5.1 Channel Surround Sound to be specific. Its audio quality is pretty solid with a nice well-rounded sound that doesn’t lose too much as the volume goes up, though most gamers will want to use their own headset anyway.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Performance

Image 1 of 4

closeup black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 4

closeup black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 4

closeup black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 4

closeup black gaming PC with glass side

(Image credit: Future)
  • Solid but not exceptional performance
  • Can be used as a productivity machine
Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Benchmarks

Here's how the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

3DMark: Night Raid: 39,529; Fire Strike: 13,699; Time Spy: 5,121
Cinebench R23 Multi-core: 10,423
GeekBench 5.5: 1,433 (single-core); 6,126 (multi-core)
Total War: Warhammer III (1080p, Ultra):
48 fps; (1080p, Low): 89 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, Ultra): 23 fps; (1080p, Low): 47 fps
Dirt 5 (1080p, Ultra): 16 fps; (1080p, Low): 171 fps
PC Mark 10 (Home Test): 6,779
Handbrake 1.6: 9.2

Performance-wise, the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) sits comfortably between the likes of the Acer Predator Orion 3000 and the MSI Trident 3 10th, with the former at the higher end and the latter the lower end. This is a consistent PC that delivers the kind of performance that you would expect from a budget machine.

Benchmark scores-wise, the Legion Tower 5 blows past the Trident 3 10th, scoring at some points nearly double of its competitor. However, the Predator Orion 3000 is this, with test scores far higher than Lenovo’s offerings. The positive is that the AMD model of the Legion is almost half the price as well, so if you’re willing to sacrifice on specs a bit, then it’s the better budget option by far.

With heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077, it struggles to even approach 50 fps on average on the lowest setting, though it does manage that same framerate with Total War: Warhammer III on Ultra. And Dirt 5 can be played on Medium settings and hit over 60 fps consistently, though the lack of VRAM could be a problem. With many other PC games that are much less taxing, the Tower 5 runs perfectly well.

It also makes for a great productivity machine, as the 12th Gen CPU can handle plenty of work-related tasks with ease, as well as conference calls. But I wouldn’t bank on it handling any creative or editing projects with the below-average benchmark scores it received on that front.

If you want to play through your full PC game library on Steam without emptying your wallet, you have no problems compromising on settings, and you also want a reliable work machine, then this is a pretty solid budget PC to invest in.

  • Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Should you buy the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD)?

Buy it if...

You need a budget gaming PC

This is a great budget machine that will easily play most PC games well and can even handle plenty of high-end titles as long as you’re willing to adjust the settings a bit.

You want a solid port selection

This PC comes with tons of ports that most gamers and buyers in general, including tons of USB Type-A ones if you’re in need, and even has both HDMI and DVI support.

You want a smaller PC

This PC has a smaller form factor than most, which comes in handy for nearly any desk space both at home and at work.

Don't buy it if...

You want a gorgeous PC

This is a pretty standard-looking PC, barring the single glass side panel, so no wowing your guests with a beautiful RGB setup unless you do it yourself.

Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD): Also consider

If the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) has you considering other options, here are two more gaming PCs to consider...

How I tested the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD)

  • I tested the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) for several weeks
  • I tested it using both benchmark tests and video game benchmarks
  • I stress-tested the PC with productivity and creative testing

First, I tested the general weight of the Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) by lifting it up and around my apartment. After I set it up, I ran several benchmarks to test out both the processor and graphics card, as well as in-game gameplay performance. Finally, I stress-tested it out using titles like Dirt 5 and Cyberpunk 2077 in various settings to see both overall performance and ventilation quality.

The Legion Tower 5 Gen 6 (AMD) is specially made as a gaming PC, which meant the brunt of my testing revolved around checking game performance and looking for any ventilation issues.

I've tested plenty of gaming PCs and laptops, making me more than qualified to understand benchmark test results and how to properly stress test machines to see how well they perform as a work machine.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed April 2023

Polar Ignite 3 review: A mid-range running watch for fitness data nerds
5:38 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Polar Ignite 3: One minute review

The Polar Ignite 3 is a follow up to the hugely impressive Polar Ignite 2, which emerged back in 2021. A couple of years is a long time in the fast-moving world of smartwatch tech, so Polar has revised the already excellent and undeniably attractive Ignite design to reflect as much. 

The good news is that it still delivers the same value appeal, sitting nicely into the mid-range pricing category, which makes it an affordable option for those looking for one of the best running watches on a budget. 

The vibrant AMOLED display is a definite highpoint, but there are also new features including multi-band GPS (which brings it up to par with other mid-range Garmins) and powerful statistics tools like SleepWise, which proves impressive at monitoring your levels of shut-eye. The svelte and very lightweight design means it sits easily on the wrist, even during sleep. 

Unfortunately, the Polar Ignite 3 is also plagued by less than impressive battery life and a touchscreen interface that frequently feels sluggish, verging on buggy. If you can live with its frustrating edge, it can offer pretty good value for money, but there are better options at this price point.

Polar Ignite 3: Specifications

Polar Ignite 3: Price and availability

Polar Ignite 3

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • $329.95 in the US
  • £289 in the UK
  • $428.67 in Australia

The Polar Ignite 3 is available now, directly from Polar itself or via many of the popular online outlets including Amazon. It has a current RRP of $329.95 in the US, £289 in the UK and $428.67 in Australia.  

Polar Ignite 3: Design

  • Bright, bold AMOLED screen
  • Slimline form factor
  • Cool color choices

The Polar Ignite 3 looks very tempting on the box, but it’s not until you take the watch out of its packaging that you realise just how good this slender creation looks. It’s just 9.5mm thick, weighs only 35 grams but still has a spacious touchscreen to enjoy. 

The 1.28-inch display is perhaps the highpoint of this model, which once powered up is gorgeous to look at with crisp, clear and very vibrant colours to enjoy. The edge of the bezel has a neat array of vertical grooves around its edge, although this does look and feel like it could be susceptible to marks and scratches over time.

It can be found in a number of colour options, including Night Black, Purple Dusk, Greige Sand and Brown Copper, so there’s a look that’ll suit just about any taste. Our review example was the Brown Copper model, which came with a spare strap in the box for when wear and tear gets the better of the original. 

Also in the box is a selection of micro manuals for just about any language plus a USB charging cable, which mates to the watch via a magnetic clip on the back. 

Meanwhile, the design of the supporting Polar Flow app is very respectable, with plenty of detailed metrics to get stuck into. It’s got comprehensive historic graphs of all your major data points with no additional subscription fees. It’s not quite as intuitive as it could be: it eschews nice well-rounded Sleep and Readiness scores in favor of complex graphs and data deep-dives, so it’s more for regular runners and data nerds rather than lifestyle and activity. 

Nevertheless, once you’ve figured out where everything lives, it is pretty comprehensive on the data front.

  • Design Score: 4/5

Polar Ignite 3: Features

Polar Ignite 3

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • SleepWise monitors shut-eye closely
  • Customizable widgets work well
  • Polar Flow app is nicely designed

While it’s undoubtedly a good-looking thing, the Polar Ignite is slightly less impressive on the typical smartwatch features front. At first glance, it has most things you need, with notification services for emails and messages, alarms, timers and the ability to control your music all housed inside the interface. Dig a little deeper though and there are omissions. There is no way to make contactless payments, which is increasingly appealing for folks at places like the gym or on a run, who don’t want to carry anything else with them.

Similarly missing is any way of answering calls, and you can’t ping off a text from the watch either, only receive one. In fact, if you want to get any real mileage from the Polar Ignite 3, you’ll most likely end up taking your phone with you, because you’ll need it to tap into your music collection due to limited storage on board the watch itself. 

The GPS system can track your route on a localised run but, again, it feels like the features are a little underwhelming. It’s a shame to have the watch so tethered to your phone, especially when the UX promises so much on your first viewing.

SleepWise analyses your sleep patterns well enough as does Nightly Recharge, which reports back on how your body deals with stress. Polar’s FitSpark service offers up on-demand exercise suggestions should you need them, which also cleverly take into account your training load and recovery needs. For example, on the day after a hard run, it’ll recommend a less strenuous exercise than it might on a day which you’re fully recovered, and you have a better Nightly Recharge score. In-training voice guidance from the watch is another cool add-on. 

Getting to the features and functions is where the frustration creeps in though: we found basic tasks, such as starting a cross-trainer session, erratic and less than user-friendly. People who are exercising want quick and easy access to simple Stop/Start controls, which just doesn’t seem to happen with the Polar Ignite 3. There’s too much fiddling around the watch face itself, not enough immediacy. No-one wants to waste time in the gym. 

  • Features score: 3/5

Polar Ignite 3: Performance

Polar Ignite 3

(Image credit: Rob Clymo)
  • Dual-frequency GPS is solid
  • Latest processor is a step-up
  • Energy source breakdown is neat

While everything initially appears good in both the looks department and the feature setlist, it’s once you start using the Polar Ignite 3 that some holes start to appear. After installing the supporting Polar app, the setup process was okay – but not as seamless as some of its counterparts. The Polar Ignite 3 has subsequently seemed to be less than enthusiastic during syncing too, with often a few tries needed in order to get the process to kick into gear. 

More annoying though is the less-than-simple way this watch works during everyday use. It frequently seems unresponsive, promoting confusion as to whether or not it’s doing anything. That means repeated interaction with the screen, or pressing of the back button on the left-hand side of the bezel. 

This in itself feels quite stiff and unresponsive. It’s understandable to have a button that can’t be inadvertently pressed, thereby avoiding cancellation of workouts and suchlike, but it’s a bit too unforgiving for its own good.

Battery life isn’t too great either. Polar suggests that you’ll get up to five days in watch mode or up to 30 hours of continuous training using the GPS and heart rate monitoring features. That may well be right, but we found the watch battery ebbed away quite quickly during average everyday use, prompting you to feel like you need to charge it more frequently than the official figures suggest. 

Overall, performance and usability shortcomings are perhaps the biggest weakness with the Polar Ignite 3, which is a shame given just how good it looks.

  • Performance score: 3/5

Polar Ignite 3: Buy it if...

Polar Ignite 3: Don't buy it if...

Also consider

First reviewed: April 2023

Honor details Magic5 Pro camera development and testing
5:22 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Honor's Magic5 Pro is one of the leading flagship smartphones launched this year and we were genuinely impressed by its all-around feature set during our review process. Its 50MP triple camera setup provided superb captures in all shooting scenarios during our tests and now the brand is sharing some behind-the-scenes details on the development process of the Magic5 Pro’s camera rig and how it was tested at Honor’s R&D labs. Honor’s dedicated camera lab can test varying shooting scenes including lighting conditions, shutter speed and distance. Honor embarked on an 18-month development...

Samsung Galaxy A24 goes official
4:09 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Samsung Vietnam decided to go ahead and list the long-rumored Galaxy A24 on its website complete with all of its specs and images. The only question mark that remains for the device is its pricing and availability, but we can assume that info will be added shortly. Galaxy A24 in black and green Galaxy A24 features a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with FHD+ resolution and a waterdrop notch for its 13MP front-facing camera. There’s no official confirmation on the screen’s refresh rate, but previous rumors point to a 90Hz panel. The latest Galaxy A-series phone is equipped with...

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp review: a near-excellent strategy revival
4:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Advance Wars, as a series, is a choice pick to resurrect on Nintendo Switch. The console’s portable nature is a perfect fit for its quickfire military strategy. And indeed, WayForward’s Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp is a welcome return for the long-dormant franchise, regardless of the fact it’s a bundled pair of remakes.

For the most part, it’s a solid translation to Nintendo Switch. Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp retains the original’s nail-biting tactical gameplay, where strong enemy AI capitalizes on mistakes as tiny as one of your units being just a single tile out of place. Advance Wars remains refreshingly hard, and hasn’t lost its edge two decades on.

I wish I could say the overall package was a slam dunk. Yet alas, despite being as fun now as it was way back then, Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp is hampered by choppy performance brought on by an unlocked framerate, a questionable 3D makeover that’s bound to prove divisive, and lengthy load times that’re a far cry from the instantaneous action of the GBA originals.

Just about salvaged by a wealth of content, wonderful artwork and a fantastic remixed soundtrack, Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp is still well worth your hard-earned time and money despite its notable setbacks. 

Off to war

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp CO Nell during dialogue scene

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp remains identical to its GBA counterparts. But if you’ve yet to be drafted into the ranks of its various commanding officers, here’s a quick rundown.

Advance Wars pits two (sometimes three or four on the harder maps) armies against each other. And each take turns to position their units around the map, with opportunities to attack if you’re within range of enemy units. Each unit type has its own strengths and weaknesses, so certainly don’t expect to steamroll the competition with a couple of tanks and copters.

Infantry, for example, are understandably weak compared to vehicles. But they’re versatile, able to be transported by APCs, and can spend turns to capture neutral or enemy cities and bases. The mechs are slightly more powerful infantry, able to deal solid damage to vehicles, with the tradeoff of having less movement range.

Tanks are your army’s workhorses. They’re powerful against a range of units and can take a beating in return, but crumble against larger tanks and long-range artillery and missile units. Air-based units, like copters, have huge movement range and can decimate infantry, but are easily wiped off the map by anti-air units.

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp strategy map

(Image credit: Nintendo)

You’ll need to become deeply familiar with each of your unit types to succeed on the default Classic difficulty, as the AI opponents certainly know theirs. You’ll have a different selection of units from map to map, and the game does a great job of familiarizing you with each unit before ramping up the difficulty later in the game.

If things start to get a little much, fret not. The new Casual difficulty dials back the intensity. It’s still no cakewalk, but you’ll be given more leeway and I recommend it for first-time players. The best part is that Re-Boot Camp won’t shame or penalize you for dropping the difficulty, and it can be reverted from the overworld map screen if you so choose.

The difficulty curve is relatively smooth throughout, so expect few jarring spikes...

The glue that holds your army together is your commanding officer (or C.O.). Each C.O. has their own colorful personality, but also a special ability unique to them. Andy, for example, is a great all-rounder, and can apply a map-wide repair to your units. It’s a fantastic crutch that can help you squeeze out a desperate victory. Olaf, meanwhile, can transform the map into a snowfield for a turn. That greatly boosts his own units’ movement range, and significantly nerfs yours. There’s a huge amount of variety with these C.O. abilities, and witnessing each for the first time is a fantastic way the games spice up their campaigns.

Outside of some of the more powerful C.O. abilities, both titles here remain astonishingly well-balanced. Even the most powerful units have hard counters. The difficulty curve is relatively smooth throughout, so expect few jarring spikes (well, so long as fog of war isn’t in play).

Toy soldiers

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp combat screen

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp is unfortunately more of a mixed bag when it comes to presentation and performance. I love the new 2D artwork of the game’s characters, animated slightly to give them a buoyant breath of life. It’s an extremely colorful game, too, looking fabulous on the Nintendo Switch OLED’s vivid display.

However, it doesn’t remain all that pleasing to the eye forever, as the gorgeous 2D art clashes quite starkly with the new 3D models for your units. They’re serviceable, but I feel they lack the charm of the originals’ chibi-like sprites. The models have a bit too much sheen on them, too, making them look like plastic toys. Worse still, on busier maps, the chunky 3D units can blend into one another if you’re not paying attention.

The choice of 3D models here may have even impacted Re-Boot Camp’s performance. At the best of times, the games hold steady at 30fps. However, the framerate is uncapped, meaning it’ll jump around quite often. This is especially noticeable when you transition from the map screen to combat.

It’s not all bad news, though, as Re-Boot Camp’s wonderful soundtrack helps to lift spirits during gameplay. WayForward’s signature high production sound and bassy oomph is present and accounted for here. If you’re familiar with Jake Kaufman’s work with the Shantae and Mighty Switch Force franchises, expect more of that goodness here. Every track has been lovingly remixed; they’re recognizable, yet sound completely fresh and new. 

The long war

Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp C.O. activating his special skill

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Despite its performance issues, Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp certainly brings its A-game when it comes to content. Both the Advance Wars and Advance Wars 2: Black Hole Rising campaigns return in their fullest, and every single bonus map is present. Map mode returns, too, letting players build and share their own levels with an intuitive editor. Throw in unlockable art and music and you have a package that’s filled to the brim with cool unlockable content.

For the most part, Nintendo and WayForward have done an excellent job bringing Advance Wars into the modern day. Its strict-but-fair, fast-paced strategy has proven timeless, and it’s been well worth the wait after weathering multiple delays.

Still, I can’t help but feel Re-Boot Camp could’ve used an extra month or two in development just to polish performance up a little more. I’m hoping a patch or two down the line can help to streamline performance and improve load times. But for now, do expect gameplay to be choppy, especially when you get to the more hectic maps in each campaigns’ latter half.

Overall, though, if you prefer your strategy less fantastical and more grounded in reality, Advance Wars 1+2 Re-Boot Camp is well worth your time. 

« Previous PageNext Page »