PC - Organizer

I tested the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra and this impressive mini PC workstation proved to be a powerful option for AI development and creators

8:28 pm | March 20, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets | Tags: AI, CPU, GPU, PC | Comments: Off

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: 30-second review

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact mini workstation aimed at business professionals who need desktop-grade power but lack the space for a full-sized workstation.

The first thing that struck me as I lifted the MS-02 from the box was that, for such a small machine, it’s incredibly heavy at 3.45kg, which instantly gives you the hint that this is a serious piece of kit rather than your run-of-the-mill mini PC.

The matte black chassis is discreetly designed, with plenty of cooling vents running across the casing. There are also rubber feet on the base and side that let you easily orient the machine in either an upright tower or a flat desktop position. It looks and feels like a miniaturised version of a professional workstation rather than a standard Mini PC, and its full-metal exterior gives it a premium look and feel.

Checking the MS-02 reveals that this machine is the link between the Mini PC and the Desktop. It has the small size of a Mini PC but quite a bit of upgradability, including RAM, ROM, and an expansion slot. All of the upgrade potential can be easily accessed via the slide-out internal chassis.

This chassis is held in place by two thumb screws; once they are undone, the entire internals can be pulled out. You can then remove the internal modules, which do require tools, but once unscrewed and laid out, you have access to the SODIMM slots and M.2 bays. The layout and concept are similar to the old Intel NUC 9 Extreme (Ghost Canyon) Mini PC from a few years back.

The front ports are well laid out with two USB4 V2 Type-C ports running at 80Gbps, taking priority over the traditional pair of USB-A ports, and through the test with the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5, I was impressed with the transfer rates enabling me to use the drive to edit 4K video on a drive that was essentially matching the speeds of the internal SSD.

On the rear of the machine, the ports are a little more sparse, but there are some good networking options alongside the three USB-A 10Gbps ports, HDMI 2.1 FRL, and unique to the 285HX machine that I’m reviewing, the dual 25GbE SFP+ sockets alongside the more standard 10GbE and 2.5GbE RJ45 connections. Essentially, for creatives, photographers and videographers working with high-speed network-attached storage such as the UGreen idx6011 pro, this is a great option.

Performance, even with the integrated Intel graphics, was unsurprisingly good throughout all tests, from Microsoft Apps through to editing 4K video in Premiere Pro. Once again, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX showed just how powerful it is, handling 4K editing in DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro without issue or pause on rough cuts, and then moving on to more in-depth grading.

Unsurprisingly, Lightroom Classic and Photoshop ran smoothly and, more impressively, handled large raw files from both the Canon EOS R5 C and the Hasselblad X2D II 100C with ease.

I did find that without a discrete GPU, the extended timeline rendering when editing video required a bit of patience, especially as you get further into the edit, but for the majority of users, whether you're an office worker looking for a powerful machine, a creative, a photographer or a videographer or a developer looking at the AI potential, there’s plenty on offer here.

The key point is that this machine is the base, and unlike some of the best mini PCs I've tested, it offers plenty of potential for upgrades. Out of the box, this is a very powerful workstation for development and power users handling large-scale data and spreadsheets. Add a GPU, and it becomes a very competent editing suite. Essentially, the machine's design enables you to adapt its configuration to suit your needs.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Price and availability

How much does it cost? From $1159 / £1039
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Directly from Minisforum or Amazon

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is available directly from Minisforum's store, as well as online retailers such as Amazon.com, Newegg, and Amazon.co.uk.

Prices for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX barebone starting at $1159 / £1039. A 32GB RAM and 1TB SSD configuration available at $1599 / £1455.

A fully specified 192GB DDR5 ECC and 2TB SSD variant is £2,679. There are also other versions of the machine available with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX or Ultra 5 235HX models, and these start at $599 / £559. As barebones, though they lack ECC memory, dual 25GbE networking, and the two additional M.2 slots exclusive to the 285HX.

Value: 4.5 / 5

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Specs

CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
GPU: Intel integrated graphics
AI Engine: NPU
Memory: 4x DDR5 SODIMM slots (Up to 256GB, ECC supported (285HX only))
Storage: 2x M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe (up to 8TB each) + 2x M.2 on 25GbE NIC card (PCIe 3.0/4.0) 285HX only; up to 24TB total
Networking: 2x 25GbE SFP+ (Intel E810, 285HX only); 1x 10GbE RJ45; 1x 2.5GbE RJ45; Wi-Fi 7 (Intel BE200); Bluetooth 5.4
Front Ports: 2x USB4 V2 Type-C, USB-A 10Gbps; 3.5mm audio jack
Rear Ports: HDMI 2.1 FRL (8K@60Hz); USB4 Type-C (40Gbps); 3x USB-A 10Gbps, 2x 25GbE SFP+, 10GbE + 2.5GbE RJ45
Internal expansion: 1x PCIe 5.0 x16; 1x PCIe 4.0 x4; 1x PCIe 4.0 x16 (occupied by 25GbE NIC on 285HX)
OS: Windows 11 Pro
Dimensions: 221.5 x 97 x 225mm
Weight: 3.45kg (for the 285HX model)

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Design

The MS-02 Ultra is a serious-looking machine with simple styling and a black matte finish. The machine is larger than your average mini PC; however, it has been designed to be positioned either as a mini tower or laid flat on a desk, with quality rubber feet to support both orientations.

Despite being small, measuring just 221.5 x 97 x 225mm, the 3.45kg weight as I lifted it out of the box immediately signalled that this was something more than a standard consumer mini PC. It’s substantially smaller than a conventional tower workstation but larger than a Mini PC, and it draws on the design of both.

Build quality is excellent throughout. The casing is solid and made entirely of metal, reinforcing its premium aesthetics. It also makes it easy to mount within other furniture and equipment, with the tough metal casing ensuring it will look the part in any stylish office and out in the field if used as an on-site workstation.

The design feature that stood out is the slide-out internal chassis, which is secured in place by two thumb screws. Once these are removed (which takes seconds), the entire internal assembly slides out, giving you easy access to the SODIMM slots, M.2 bays, PCIe slots, and the cooling assembly. This style of access is more familiar to desktop users than to Mini PC owners.

On the front of the machine, there are two USB4 V2 Type-C ports at 80Gbps alongside a single USB-A port and a standard 3.5mm combo jack for a headset. At the rear, there are three additional USB-A ports, all 10Gbps; HDMI 2.1 FRL; a USB4 Type-C port at 40Gbps; and the 285HX's dual 25GbE SFP+.

Then there are the more common 10GbE RJ45 and 2.5GbE RJ45. When it comes to display output options, the choices are a little limited: either HDMI 2.1 or USB4. While this might not meet the demands of gamers in a professional setup, it should meet most people's demands.

Obviously, being a small workstation, heat can build up, and during the test, the fans kick in early to keep things cool. Given their small size, those fans are notably louder than those on a large workstation, which often run near silent.

I was interested to see if the metal casing also worked as a heat sink, but checking the casing surface, the temperatures under sustained load remained pretty cool, and while warm to the touch around the mid and lower sections, the heat from the internals seemed well distributed.

Design: 4.5 / 5

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Features

The feature set of the 285HX model is where the MS-02 Ultra really sets itself apart from what we’d usually expect from a mini PC.

Even compared with the other model in the range, the 285HX with it’s flagship configuration adds ECC DDR5 memory support (error-correcting memory for greater data reliability), dual 25GbE SFP+ networking via an Intel E810 controller (two 25 gigabit Ethernet ports with SFP+ interfaces for advanced networking), and a fourth and fifth M.2 NVMe slot integrated onto the 25GbE NIC card (additional high-speed storage slots built into the network card).

That takes total on-board storage capacity to 24TB across four drives. The lower-spec 275HX and 235HX models share the same chassis but lose all three of these features, making the 285HX a much more capable model for more power-hungry users.

What these upgraded specifications mean in certain fields, such as creative, is an enhancement in workflow reliability, especially with ECC memory.

The storage options for a machine of this size are significant, with four M.2 slots that can be used independently either as separate drives for project, media, cache, and archive, for example, or you can choose to configure in RAID 0, 1, 5, or 10. This means you can potentially have 24TB of fast SSD storage appear as a single drive, and then offload that content to a NAS when ready.

It’s worth noting that the M.2 slots are limited to PCIe 4.0 rather than the newer PCIe 5.0 standard, which limits transfer speeds; however, in real-world creative workloads, this additional speed is rarely noticeable.

On the front, there are two USB4 V2 ports, which I was able to test with a LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5 external storage device, and the uplift in speed was significant, almost double that recorded on older USB 4.0.

Wired connectivity is the big network feature for this machine, but alongside is the Wifi connection. The machine handles Wi-Fi 7 using an Intel BE200 module. In testing against a Fritz! Box 5690 Pro: the raw throughput connection speed to drives connected to the wireless network was higher than on the Wi-Fi 6 network. But the connection's consistency and reliability were noticeably better.

Wired connectivity via the 10GbE port proved fast in studio use, and the fact that the machine also has 25GbE SFP+ ports offers future upgrade potential, especially for studios building high-speed NAS infrastructure, really highlighting that my network is ready for an upgrade.

The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot adds the ability to upgrade the machine and, to a certain degree, will future-proof your investment, with room for a low-profile GPU should the integrated graphics prove insufficient. This might be of particular concern if you have intensive rendering workloads.

The system also supports Intel vPro with BIOS-level KVM on the 285HX, enabling full remote management for 24/7 deployment, which is essential for larger corporations that will have home and remote workers.

Features: 5 / 5

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Performance

Benchmark scores

CrystalDiskMark Read: 6,136.46 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark Write: 5,338.79 MB/s
Geekbench CPU Single: 3,058
Geekbench CPU Multi: 18,366
Geekbench GPU: 19,645
PCMark Overall: 7,983
Cinebench CPU Single: 2,277
Cinebench CPU Multi: 35,080
3DMark Fire Strike Overall: 4,657
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 4,799
3DMark Fire Strike Physics: 49,395
3DMark Fire Strike Combined: 1,806
3DMark Time Spy Overall: 2,315
3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 2,025
3DMark Time Spy CPU: 12,262
3DMark Wild Life Overall: 14,166
3DMark Steel Nomad Overall: 407
Windows Experience Index: 8.2
USB4 V2 External Read (LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5): 6,012.07 MB/s
USB4 V2 External Write (LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5): 4,053.44 MB/s

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is an impressive CPU for a machine of this size, and the benchmark results reflect that. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18,366 and Cinebench multi-core result of 35,080 place this well within workstation territory, and the PCMark overall score of 7,983 confirms that real-world productivity performance is excellent across the board. SSD read speeds of 6,136 MB/s and write speeds of 5,338 MB/s from the installed NVMe drive are excellent for a PCIe 4.0 module, although, as mentioned earlier, it would have been great to have seen at least one PCIe 5.0 option.

In creative applications, the machine is ideal for working in a photography and video studio, being able to fit on a desktop neatly, and the size also makes it ultra portable if it does need to be installed into a movable workstation.

Through the test using Lightroom Classic and the power of the machine, it was able to manage large libraries and complex adjustments from Hasselblad X2D II 100C files without issue, and Photoshop ran large raw files with the same ease.

For video, DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro both handled rough cuts and colour grading of Canon EOS R5 C Log3 4K footage as well as any machine I’ve tried. As expected with integrated graphics only, timeline rendering on longer projects required leaving the machine to sit after each significant editing session, just to enable time for the timeline to render before applying grades and effects, essentially a build-and-render approach, which is common.

Loading several more demanding apps at once showed that multitasking abilities were handled well. Switching between Photoshop and Premiere Pro caused no lag, and running Microsoft Office applications alongside the creative suite also proved well within the machine's abilities. For five- to ten-minute 4K edits, at least the 64GB of ECC RAM in the review unit proved well balanced to the workload.

Another point here on the performance is the speed of the internal SSDs that are able to transfer the large amounts of data needed for video editing. The benchmark results returned a CrystalDiskMark Read speed of 6,136.46 MB/s and Write of 5,338.79 MB/s. What was impressive here was connecting the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5 to the USB4 V2 External port on the front, which registered 6,012.07 MB/s read and 4,053.44 MB/s, showing a significant speed increase over standard USB 4.0.

Video editing can put a huge demand on all components in the machine, and thermal throttling can be a real issue. As I started to push the system, the fans kicked in early to help keep things cool, and while the volume of these remained low, they were noticeable, especially compared directly against my usual video workstation.

What this load did reveal was the performance held up over a five-hour editing session with no signs of throttling. The cooling solution inside, which consists of six heat pipes with phase-change material and a dual-fan chamber, managed the sustained processing loads on the electronics.

The GPU performance from the integrated Intel graphics was OK for all creative tasks during the test, but if you are considering this for any process that relies on a graphics card, then connecting an eGPU is going to be essential. The 3DMark scores with Fire Strike at 4,657 and Time Spy at 2,315 reflect the limits of integrated graphics rather than the CPU falling short. Reassuringly, there is room in the chassis for a dual-slot low-profile GPU, and the 350W internal PSU includes a spare 8-pin connector to power it.

Taking a break from testing, I tried out the game Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, which ran surprisingly well at mid-level settings, and far better than many gaming-focused mini PCs I've reviewed. It shows just how powerful that CPU is without the support of a discrete GPU..

One other note on the test: the dual 25GbE SFP+ ports were not tested during the review period due to the absence of a compatible 25GbE switch. A follow-up test is planned once the network infrastructure is in place.

Performance: 4.5 / 5

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Final verdict

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra and flagship 285HX variant that I’ve looked at in this review offers a substantial feature set for a machine of this size, which will give it wide appeal for businesses looking for a powerful and compact machine at a reasonable price.

Features such as the ECC memory, dual 25GbE networking, four M.2 slots, PCIe 5.0 expansion, and Intel vPro together add up to a platform that can serve as a creative workstation, a compact server node, a home lab host, or all three.

For larger businesses, the inclusion of Intel vPro means that they can manage the machine securely over a remote connection, which will be of definite appeal.

In the creative field and any photographer or videographer working with large-format files, this machine, with the combination of fast internal storage, high-speed USB4 V2 connectivity, and network offload via 10GbE or 25GbE, makes it an interesting choice, especially with the potential to pop in a discreet GPU. The small size of a machine with this power also means that it will be equally at home as a static desk machine or moved between locations.

There are a few downsides to the machine, and while there is a barebones version, even with the ready-to-go review configuration for many, this will just be the base machine. The out-of-the-box storage of 1TB fills quickly in creative workflows, and upgrading to 4TB or more will be essential.

Then there’s the Intel Graphics that actually proved to be pretty powerful through the test; however, if you are working with graphics or anything that requires the GPU for processing, then a card will need to be added.

The 64GB RAM of the review unit was well matched to the workloads I ran through the test, but anyone running this as a server or AI platform, or editing longer projects, will want to boost the RAM to 128GB or higher configurations. Once those upgrades are factored in, the total cost climbs rapidly and starts to have a value closer to a lower-end full-sized workstation.

Essentially, the small size of the machine and the price make it a viable option; it’s just worth keeping in mind that the out-of-the-box configuration is just the start, and what you install for your workload will add cost. However, even at the top end of Mini PC models, there’s nothing to compete with this flexibility, and even the cheapest workstation is going to be significantly larger, which makes this a great solution all round.

Should I buy the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra?

Value	PC, but budget for upgrades should be factored in to unlock full potential.	4.5
Design	Slide-out chassis and full metal casing are robust and look great.	4.5
Features	Unique 285HX feature set and upgrades are unmatched at this form factor	5
Performance	Ultra-fast CPU and performance across the board, with upgrades available if more power is needed. 4/5	4.5
Overall	Work Stations can be phenomenally expensive, this gives you a powerful base at a great price to build on	5

Buy it if...

You need a compact workstation.

The 285HX CPU, ECC memory, and four M.2 slots make this a great desktop replacement for creative and professional workloads.

You're building a high-speed studio or home lab.

The fast network options, including the dual 25GbE networking and PCIe expansion, make this an option as a network node or dev machine.

Don't buy it if...

You need GPU performance.

Without a discrete GPU, sustained rendering and GPU-intensive tasks will be limited; however, a GPU can be added.

You want simplicity

The barebone configuration requires investment and some technical knowledge to configure optimally.

For more options, we've tested and reviewed the best mobile workstations and the best business computers.

The RedMagic 11 Air is no looker, but you won’t find better gaming performance for the money

6:00 pm | March 14, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phones | Tags: OIS, PC, UI | Comments: Off

RedMagic 11 Air: Two-minute review

Like its lightweight predecessor, the RedMagic 10 Air, the RedMagic 11 Air represents a smart piece of repurposing. It takes the RedMagic 10 Pro and slims down the package, losing a few pounds (not to mention some camera capabilities) and resulting in a temptingly approachable gaming phone.

At an asking price of less than $500 / £500, you’re getting a hugely capable performer with a Snapdragon 8 Elite processor and ample memory. It’s not up there with the very fastest phones on the market, thanks to the inclusion of a slightly older chip, but it’s still capable of running the most demanding games at high frame rates.

Thanks to remappable trigger buttons and parent company Nubia’s custom Game Space gaming UI, it’s a well-optimized way to play competitive online games like Call of Duty: Mobile.

RedMagic has improved on its first Air phone in a couple of ways, most notably by reinstating the physical cooling fan for superior sustained performance. You also get a superior 144Hz display and a significantly larger 7,000mAh battery.

The RedMagic 11 Air Standing Upright on a Table With Games in the Background — (Image credit: Future)

You could argue that this is all a case of Nubia strengthening where it was already strong while neglecting the rest of the package. None of our key complaints about the RedMagic 10 Air have been addressed.

RedMagic OS continues to be a messy, clunky Android UI. The camera system, too, continues to underwhelm, with selfies a particular low point. Even at this low price, you can get a much better photographic experience if you’re willing to compromise on gaming output.

Indeed, in certain ways, the RedMagic 11 Air represents a downgrade from its predecessor, with a clumsier design and an inferior ultra-wide camera.

If gaming is a priority, however, you won’t find a more capable device for less than $500 / £500.

There’s ample room for improvement, but this Nubia sub-brand continues to supply the best value gaming phones on the market.

RedMagic 11 Air review: price and availability

The RedMagic 11 Air Being Held at an Angle — (Image credit: Future)

From $499 / £439 / €499
Launched on February 11, 2026

The RedMagic 11 Air hit shelves on February 11, 2026, in a choice of two colors and two memory/storage variants. It’s available from redmagic.gg as well as selected retail partners.

Pricing starts at $499 / £439 / €499 for 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. The model we’re reviewing here, with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, costs $629 / £529 / €599.

While the phone is confirmed to be available in Australia, RedMagic only provides a ‘global’ price of $499 (which works out to about AU$725) for the 256GB model and $599 (about AU$864) for the 512GB model on its website.

There aren’t too many phones at this kind of price offering this level of performance. In the official reviewer’s guide, Nubia itself reveals that it views the Poco F8 Pro as its most direct rival, but even that starts at £549, and isn't available in the US.

Value score: 4.5 / 5

RedMagic 11 Air review: specs

RedMagic 11 Air specs

Dimensions:	163.82 x 76.54 x 7.85mm
Weight:	207g
Display:	6.8-inch AMOLED (2,688 x 1,216) up to 144Hz
Chipset:	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
RAM:	12GB, 16GB
Storage:	256GB, 512GB
OS:	Android 16
Primary camera:	50MP 1/1.55-inch sensor
Ultra-wide camera:	8MP 1/4.0-inch sensor
Front Camera:	16MP 1/2.77-inch sensor
Battery:	7,000mAh
Charging:	80W wired (international)
Colors:	Phantom, Prism

RedMagic 11 Air review: design

The Rear of the RedMagic 11 Air — (Image credit: Future)

Slimmer and lighter than the bulky Pro line
Has regressed from the appealing RedMagic 10 Air design
Cooling fan reinstated

I described the RedMagic 10 Air as “by far the best-looking gaming phone RedMagic has ever made" in my RedMagic 10 Air review. Sadly, I don’t think the RedMagic has managed to keep up the good work.

After last year’s model eased back from the Pro line’s overt gamer aesthetic with a clean etched glass back and subtle branding, the RedMagic 11 Air steps right back on the gas.

There are only two fairly nondescript colors in Phantom (black) and Prism (white), but both have the brand’s signature semi-transparent finish. This allows some fake circuit board details to show through, as well as a sprinkling of RGB lighting around the camera and within the new side vent.

As looks go, it’s not to my taste, nor is it likely to appeal to anyone else above the age of 30. Perhaps that youthful air (pun unintended) is the whole point.

The RedMagic 11 Air Being Held Side-on — (Image credit: Future)

Cheapened looks aside, the truly impressive feat here is that RedMagic has managed to reimplement a mechanical cooling fan (hence the RGB-adorned side vent) without adding any real bulk to the phone.

At 7.85mm thick and 207g, the RedMagic 11 Air is about the same thickness and only 2g heavier than the RedMagic 10 Air before it. What’s more, with dimensions of 163.8 x 76.5mm, the newer phone actually has a smaller footprint than its 164.3 x 76.6mm predecessor.

An IP54 dust and water resistance rating makes a return to the spec sheet, which is far from the best out there. However, an aluminum alloy Frame and Corning Gorilla Glass 7i screen (with Gorilla Glass 5 on the back) provide a suitably tough exterior.

There are a handful of extra gaming-oriented controls on the edges of the phone. On the right edge, flanking the power and volume buttons, are the brand’s signature 520Hz capacitive shoulder buttons. In many games, these can be mapped to key controls – think aim and shoot in Destiny Rising or brake and accelerate in GRID Legends.

On the left edge of the phone, there’s a red Magic Key button dedicated to booting up the Game Space UI, which offers quick access to installed games and individual game settings. It’s still remappable, should you wish to attribute it to a more generic function like a camera or flashlight shortcut, but it’s now a rather bland rectangle instead of the 10 Air’s dimpled circle.

Design score: 3.5 / 5

RedMagic 11 Air review: display

The RedMagic 11 Air in the Display Settings Menu — (Image credit: Future)

6.85-inch AMOLED
2688 x 1216 resolution
144Hz refresh rate
1800-nit peak brightness

If the RedMagic 11 Air’s design represents a disappointing climb down from the good work started in the RedMagic 10 Air, then the phone’s display is a marked improvement.

One of the letdowns with the RedMagic 10 Air was that it followed directly on from the RedMagic 10 Pro with its much-improved display. I’m glad to report that the RedMagic 11 Air adopts the latter’s upgraded panel.

It’s a slightly bigger 6.85-inch OLED than before with a sharper 2688 x 1216 resolution (up from 2,480 x 1,116) and a more fluid 144Hz maximum refresh rate (up from 120Hz). The top brightness of 1,800 nits is an upgrade, too, compared to the RedMagic 10 Air’s 1,600 nits.

All of these improvements have positive ramifications for gaming, though relatively few games are able to output frame rates over 120fps.

In general use, this is a sharp, bright display that outputs vibrant colours by default. These can be toned down using the flexible Color Mode menu in Settings.

Another pro-gaming feature is the implementation of an under-display front camera. This offers a blissfully unbroken view of gaming and indeed video content, though it also has a pretty disastrous impact on selfies.

Display score: 4.5 / 5

RedMagic 11 Air review: cameras

The RedMagic 11 Air Cameras — (Image credit: Future)

50MP main with OIS
8MP ultra-wide
16MP selfie camera
Up to 8K/30fps video

Photographic expectations are always quite low when a new RedMagic phone rolls around. ‘Aggressively priced gaming phone’ is not a description that gets us thinking of excellent snaps.

However, the RedMagic 11 Air’s camera system is a disappointment even by such modest standards. There hasn’t been any positive movement on the photographic front since last year’s RedMagic 10 Air. In fact, there’s been some regression.

While the RedMagic 11 Air packs the same 50MP 1/1.55" f/1.9 main camera sensor as its predecessor, there’s now an inferior 8MP 1/4.0" f/2.2 ultra-wide. The latter is both smaller and less pixel-packed than its predecessor, which isn't the direction of travel we've come to expect.

You still don’t get a third camera sensor either, which means that there’s no dedicated telephoto camera for zoomed shots.

This main sensor isn't a terrible performer. In decent lighting, it can grab reasonably sharp shots with rich (albeit not hugely natural-looking) colours. Night shots, while far from best-in-class, are fairly clear, aided by OIS and strong image processing from the Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC.

That new 8MP ultra-wide doesn’t get anywhere close to the main sensor, though, neither in terms of sharpness nor contrast. The tone can be markedly different, in fact, and can suffer from blown-out highlights.

That lack of a telephoto camera makes for some seriously limited zoomed shots, too. The detail quickly falls away past 2x, with 5x and 10x snaps badly lacking in crispness.

The weakest performance, however, is reserved for the RedMagic 11 Air’s 16MP under-display front camera. As we’ve mentioned, RedMagic has made the decision to prioritize an obstruction-free display in the name of an optimal gaming experience. That’s been achieved at the expense of any kind of quality on selfies. They’re some of the worst you’ll find on any phone, making faces look fuzzy and indistinct. Yuck.

Video recording is pretty good, at least on paper, with support for 8K at 30fps or (more usefully) 4K at 60fps. But really, if you have any serious ambitions to capture the world around you, you'll do yourself a favor and go with a non-gaming phone.

Camera score: 3 / 5

RedMagic 11 Air review: camera samples

Nubia Red Magic 11 Air camera samples — Future

RedMagic 11 Air review: performance

The RedMagic 11 Air Playing a Game — (Image credit: Future)

Snapdragon 8 Elite chip isn’t the latest, but it’s fast
Cooling fan reinstated
12GB or 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM
256GB or 512GB UFS 4.1 storage

RedMagic has fitted its latest Air device with a straight-up generational performance upgrade, via Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite chip.

That’s no longer the latest or most capable chip on the market – you’ll need to go for the slightly more expensive RedMagic 11 Pro if you want the ultimate mobile gaming performance – but it’s still more than fast enough to run advanced games at high settings. Especially if you opt for the higher model with 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM, which is the one I was testing – though the baseline 12GB variant should provide ample performance for most. I was able to run Destiny: Rising and GRID Legends on higher settings with pleasingly smooth frame rates.

CPU and GPU benchmark results, too, are broadly in line with the 2025 flagship phone brigade, which in turn aren’t too far off 2026 phones like the OnePlus 15.

What’s more interesting is how the RedMagic 11 Air performs over sustained periods. Thanks to the return of a dedicated cooling fan (on top of a meaty vapor chamber), the phone yielded consistent results across 3DMark’s high-end stress tests.

A stability score of 95% in the demanding 3DMark Solar Bay Stress Test is better than any modern flagship phone, not to mention the RedMagic 10 Air (which managed 89.8%). This implies that the SoC doesn’t have to throttle back due to high running temperatures, which is what typically happens with non-gaming phones under prolonged GPU load.

It’s not the absolute fastest phone on the market, then, but the RedMagic 11 Air is still a strong performer – and it can stay fast for longer than most.

Performance score: 4.5 / 5

RedMagic 11 Air review: software

The RedMagic 11 Air UI — (Image credit: Future)

RedMagic OS 11 on Android 16
Fluid but ugly UI
Dedicated gaming interface

RedMagic phones have always punched above their weight on raw performance, but the software experience has been universally below par. The RedMagic 11 Air doesn’t do anything to change that dim outlook.

This is the same RedMagic OS 11, layered on top of Android 16, that I wrote about towards the end of 2025 with the RedMagic 11 Pro.

It’s a perfectly functional take on Android, with fluid animations and the usual menus in broadly the right places. But it’s also ugly, with clumsy interface elements (there’s a blank app icon simply marked ‘Unknown’ on my test unit) and a largely redundant widget that serves as a manual control for the fan.

Above this widget can be found More Games and More Apps folders, offering download prompts for poor-quality sponsored apps. Suffice to say, you almost certainly won’t want any of these cluttering up your storage.

Don’t forget those preinstalled TikTok, Facebook, and Booking.com apps, either, nor RedMagic’s own web browser. Inessential, one and all.

Scroll to the left of the Home Screen, and you’ll find not the classic Google Feed, but an unpleasant home-brewed amalgam that includes step-counting and weather widgets, as well as a universal search bar towards the top.

The RedMagic 11 Air and its Google Feed Replacement — (Image credit: Future)

Beneath that, a Recommended apps banner that’s filled with those aforementioned cheap and not-so-cheerful sponsored apps. A little lower down, an extended news pane supplying assorted local stories, very few of which were of any interest to me.

Hopefully, a firmware update will revert this to a Google Feed, as was the case with the RedMagic 11 Pro. As things stand, it's a total waste of screen space.

As always, the high point here is RedMagic’s Game Space UI, which can be accessed through the Magic Key button. This lets you access your games while also adjusting game-related settings.

You can switch between CPU and GPU profiles, letting you either extract more performance or battery life from your gaming session. You can also adjust screen sensitivity and ratios, or – in certain popular games – play with custom plug-ins that automate certain in-game tasks.

During gameplay, you can swipe in from the corner of the screen to access an abbreviated version of this UI, which is also where you can map those shoulder buttons.

RedMagic is committed to providing the 11 Air with just two major OS updates (meaning Android 17 and 18) and five years of security update support. It’s far from the best in this regard, even within the mid-range market.

Software score: 3 / 5

RedMagic 11 Air review: battery life

The RedMagic 11 Air With its Notification Menu Showing — (Image credit: Future)

7,000mAh battery
Multi-day usage
80W wired charging

As we hinted at in the Design section, the RedMagic 11 Air still ranks as a pretty hefty bit of kit compared to non-gaming phones.

On the positive side, this means that the brand hasn’t felt obliged to compromise on battery capacity, unlike genuinely skinny phones like the iPhone Air or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge.

Indeed, RedMagic has actually increased the size of the battery since the RedMagic 10 Air. At 7,000mAh, it’s almost 17% bigger than before, and isn’t too far off the class-leading OnePlus 15.

If you don’t go heavy on media consumption, you can conceivably achieve multi-day battery life on a single charge. That means extending beyond the two-day mark that we would formerly have classed as 'very good'.

Naturally, that’s not what the RedMagic 11 Air is designed for. Rather, the extra battery capacity lets you indulge in an extended session of Dredge (other Lovecraftian fishing games are available) on your commutes to and from work without having to worry about the phone making it to bedtime.

In this international model, there’s support for 80W wired charging. No, it’s not the 120W that China gets, but it’s still pretty decent, and you get that charger in the box.

A full charge for me took a smidgen over an hour, but there is a Turbo charge option in the Battery Settings menu that can speed this up further.

You don’t get the RedMagic 11 Pro’s wireless charging provision. That's a shame, though it isn't particularly surprising given that the feature was only recently introduced to the range, not to mention the budget status of the Air.

Battery score: 5 / 5

Should I buy the RedMagic 11 Air?

RedMagic 11 Air score card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Design	RedMagic’s design has always been somewhat gauche, but it’s disappointing to see the 11 Air taking a backward step from its predecessor on this front.	3.5 / 5
Display	Big, sharp, bright, and fluid, this is an excellent display for the money, and a genuine step up from the RedMagic 10 Air before it.	4.5 / 5
Performance	It’s not the fastest phone on the market, but the RedMagic 11 Air will outperform virtually all of the 2025 Android crowd. Crucially, it stays fast over longer periods.	4.5 / 5
Camera	You don’t expect a good camera system from a gaming phone, but the RedMagic 11 Air’s is even worse than its predecessor, thanks to a downgraded ultra-wide.	3 / 5
Battery	With a meaty 7,000mAh battery, the RedMagic 11 Air will last multiple days of normal usage, and will still get you through a full day of heavy gaming.	5 / 5
Software	RedMagic OS 11 is functional, with some powerful custom gaming flourishes. However, it’s also ugly, with a disappointing level of support.	3 / 5
Value	For just $499 / £439, you’re getting a phone that performs as well as if not better than the 2025 class of flagship phones.	4.5 / 5

Buy it if...

You’re gaming on a budget
You’re getting sustained flagship performance for less than $500 / £450 here. No other phone can quite match that value proposition.

You’re in the anti-notch brigade
If you would do anything to get rid of the display notch, including accepting terrible selfies, then the RedMagic 11 Air has you covered.

You love that nerdy PC gaming aesthetic
With a boxy shape, a faux-transparent case, RGB lighting and a cooling vent, the RedMagic 11 Air aesthetic screams ‘adolescent gamer’.

Don't buy it if...

You want to take decent pictures
The main camera isn’t a write-off, but the 8MP ultra-wide is a downgrade and the 16MP selfie camera is an abomination.

You want the very best gaming phone possible
It’s very capable, but the pricier RedMagic 11 Pro is the phone to get if you want the ultimate mobile gaming performance.

You appreciate software design
This is an ugly custom Android UI, with pointless widgets and ample bloatware.

RedMagic 11 Air review: also consider

The RedMagic 11 Air is a capable mid-range gamer, but it isn't your only option.

Poco F8 Pro
RedMagic itself cites the Poco F8 Pro as a key rival. It’s not quite so hardcore in the gaming stakes, and it costs a little more, but performance is broadly comparable and it’s much nicer to use day to day.

RedMagic 11 Pro
The RedMagic 11 Pro is your step-up model, offering superior performance, a better camera, even better battery life, and wireless charging – albeit at a higher price.

Read our full RedMagic 11 Pro review

How I tested the RedMagic 11 Air

Review test period = 1 week
Testing included = Everyday usage, including web browsing, social media, photography, gaming, streaming video, music playback
Tools used = Geekbench 6, 3DMark, native Android stats, RedMagic 80W power adapter

First reviewed: January 2026

1348 Ex Voto’s stylish sword fighting and strong premise caught my attention, but the game’s awful PC performance tainted the experience

5:00 pm | March 12, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: PC | Comments: Off

When I first heard about 1348 Ex Voto, I was instantly intrigued. A medieval Italian setting, sword fights, a dark and dramatic quest with a knight at the centre of it; and a lady knight at that? Count me in!

Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PS5, PC
Release date: March 12, 2026

In developer Sedleo's third-person action game set during 14th-century Italy, you play as Aeta, a young nobleman's daughter and trained knight-errant, who is dealing with the loss of her father after pestilence swept through her village.

When the rest of her hometown is massacred by unknown forces and Bianca, her closest companion and former household servant, is suddenly kidnapped, it's up to Aeta, armed with her determination and skill with a longsword, to come to the rescue.

A true knight

1348 Ex Voto screenshot showing Aeta pointing her sword at a enemy in the woods — (Image credit: Sedleo)

I'm a sucker for a dark tale that follows a character on a high-stakes quest, so the premise of Ex Voto had my attention immediately from the prologue. It's a classic narrative about whether the end can ever justifies the means, and Aeta's unfailing resolve and heroism, as well as her naivety, make for a compelling character amid a setting filled with lawlessness.

The game consists of nine relatively short chapters that take place across rocky landscapes, lush woodland, the ruins of ancient Rome, and the villas of a medieval Italian countryside. I finished it in roughly seven hours, but it's possible to beat it within one sitting if you don't die too often or spend the extra time scouring every corner looking for hidden treasures.

As childhood companions (and later suggested to be lovers), Aeta, played by Alby Baldwin, has an unwavering devotion to Jennifer English's Bianca, so her vow to track down and rescue her from her captors was a journey I was prepared to fall in love with.

As the playable protagonist, I did like Aeta for the most part. Throughout her quest, she is forced into encounters that test her faith, and you witness how resilient she becomes in not just tracking down Bianca but also finding those responsible for all this destruction.

1348 Ex Voto cinematic close-up screenshot of Bianca — (Image credit: Sedleo)

Heroes like Aeta, who are defined by their selflessness and driven by a strong moral code, are some of my favorite characters in fiction, especially in stories with a woman in the lead role.

Aeta is shaped by the chivalric tales she grew up with, which inspired her to become a knight-errant in the first place, but due to how short the game is, there weren't enough opportunities to dig deeper into her character beyond the vow she made to her god and devotion to Bianca, which felt like a missed opportunity.

Additionally, Ex Voto suffers from too much telling, and not enough showing. The simple premise of the game and Aeta's arduous quest should be strong enough to stand on its own, but her unnecessary commentary just becomes irritating.

I don't typically mind when protagonists have an internal monologue, but it gets to a point. In Ex Voto, instead of simply letting the lovely linear environments tell the story, Aeta often comments on literally everything she sees: whether it be pointing out the obvious, repeating her latest point of interest, or the countless times she proclaims her vow to save Bianca.

The latter is also one of the reasons why I wasn't completely sold on Aeta and Bianca's story. Aside from the short prologue and a few other scenes I won't spoil, the closeness they share just didn't feel real enough to grasp onto. Aeta wants to save Bianca; that's her main goal, but the journey lacks the emotional depth that I expected.

1348 Ex Voto's main character Aeta looking up in the middle of a hall — (Image credit: Sedleo)

Baldwin and English's great voice work does most of the heavy lifting in trying to make their bond believable, but their underdeveloped relationship couldn't make me to care too deeply. It's a shame, because these sorts of love stories are a dime a dozen in video games, and it wasn't helped by the disjointed story beats, particularly mid-game.

Each chapter tasks you with getting from one area to the next, on the trail of Bianca and her captors, followed by a short time skip that begins the proceeding chapter. This is a short, linear experience, so there's not much in terms of exploration; you'll mainly be stocking up on provisions, finding trinkets, treasures, and sword parts, or moving boxes or carts to overcome obstacles. And taking down baddies, of course.

Without spoiling anything, I will admit the final act took me by surprise but, because the exploration of Aeta and Bianca's bond felt so underutilized within the story, the climax rang hollow.

Performance woes

1348 Ex Voto gameplay screenshot showing Aeta fighting an enemy in third-person — (Image credit: Sedleo)

Now let's get the worst of it out of the way. I played 1348 Ex Voto on PC and let's just say I was sorely disappointed in the optimization.

My PC is fitted with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti graphics card, an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-core CPU, and 16GB of RAM, and with this mid-range build, I can typically play some pretty demanding modern games. However, the small indieEx Voto struggled tremendously.

When at high settings at 1440p resolution (though I tried 4K too), locked at 60 frames per second (fps), the game's performance dropped to between 20 and 30fps and stuttering was prevalent, with the same problems persisting even at medium settings.

After fiddling with settings for ages, I eventually resorted to putting the game in low settings and saw a big boost in performance up to 60fps, although the game frequently saw huge dips down to 30fps, especially in areas featuring an overwhelming amount of detail on screen, like in highly detailed woodland or places featuring atmospheric shadows.

Aeta and other characters also suffer the same fate. With all low settings, the realism and emotional weight that are intended to be translated through their models are lost, making them look like puppets, and I would be lying if I didn't say it put me off.

Best Bit

1348 Ex Voto review image — (Image credit: Sedleo)

1348's Ex Voto's strongest facet is its sword-fighting combat system. With two longsword stances on offer, a challenging parry, and a generous selection of upgradable skills, the combat feels the most fine-tuned out of everything the game has to offer.

It's a bummer, because the game's realistic style and appealing, cinematic direction were one of the things that drew me in in the first place. I was essentially forced to sacrifice the gorgeous visuals if I wanted even a crumb of good performance, and even then, it wasn't always perfect.

While less frustrating, I did run into a few annoying bugs, though they weren't game-breaking enough to require me winding back my save. At one point early on, I encountered an awful, yet hilarious issues where a character kept repeating his lines over and over again during a lengthy cutscene. It was so distracting that I couldn't even pay attention to any of the dialogue, and it basically ruined the atmosphere of the entire scene.

Aside from this, and a few other interaction bugs where I couldn't pick up provisions and move a box properly, the main issue revolved around the performance, and I think the game should've been kept in the oven a little longer so Sedleo could smooth out the cracks.

During the review period, I wasn't given the chance to try out the PlayStation 5 version, so I'm really curious if Ex Voto offers a more stable experience than PC.

Stick 'em with the pointy end

1348 Ex Voto's main character Aeta looking up at a huge tree in the middle of the woods — (Image credit: Sedleo)

Ex Voto's saving grace is its sword-fighting combat system. Your sole weapon is your longsword, which gives you a one-handed and two-handed stance. The first lets Aeta attack faster in broad strokes, but strikes deal slightly less damage, while the latter attacks slower, with a shorter range, and deals slightly more damage.

One-on-one battles is definitely the game's strongest suit; sword fights feel stylish and rewarding, particularly when you're able to repeatedly execute perfect parries and stagger an enemy by breaking their guard, leaving them open for a killing blow.

Aeta's longsword can also be upgraded by finding different parts along your journey, each with its own attributes that offer alternative fighting styles. The game's skill tree, which consists of four key categories and can be unlocked by finding scrolls in the world, also features additional ways to upgrade your Health, Guard, and Food gauges (which are vital in longer battles) as well as your two stances.

Trinkets are another special item that, when equipped, will impact gameplay with unique effects. Each trinket has a cost, so you can't equip them all, but they do make or break a fight.

You start with the Toy Knight, a trinket that automatically uses all the food in your inventory to prevent death, but you can find a handful more, including one that lets you heal for double, which comes in handy in the latter part of the game when you're up against numerous enemies at once.

If you don't do a good enough job of collecting provisions, you may get soft-locked into fights if you die

Speaking of, Ex Voto has a good variety of foes, along with three main bosses, across its nine chapters, all with their own weapon types and attack patterns that you'll need to learn how to counter by parrying and spending scrolls on the right skills.

There are points in combat where you are overwhelmed by multiple enemies at once, and, in the late game, additional foes spawn out of nowhere to join the fight making maintaining your gauges an even bigger challenge.

These five-on-one (even sometimes more) fights could sometimes feel finicky due to the game's lock-on mechanic, especially when you are pinned in close quarters. If you don't do a good enough job of collecting provisions, you may get soft-locked into fights when you die because of the autosave function.

While I enjoy combat a lot, there is no power scaling in the game so by the time I reached the final boss fight, I'd become so accustomed to the simple mechanics that I was able to beat them easily.

Just as it got in the way of being able to enjoy the visuals, the game's performance also affects gameplay. Not to the extent where it is unplayable, but stutters and small framerate dips are more noticeable in the aforementioned areas when so much is happening on screen.

Should you play 1348 Ex Voto?

Play it if...

You like dark, medieval stories about a knight on a quest
1348 Ex Voto is set in 14th-century Italy and brings the era to life through realistic graphics and linear areas to explore.

You like swords and fighting baddies
The game's sword-fighting combat system is the game's strongest feature, letting you parry and stagger enemies in challenging battles.

You like shorter games
1348 Ex Voto consists of nine chapters and takes around seven to nine hours to beat, so if you're looking for a short game to get lost in for a while, you might consider this worth your time.

Don't play it if...

You're hoping for an optimized PC performance
PC performance, right now, is awful and doesn't feel as fine-tuned as it could be. So if you don't want to sacrifice the game's pretty visuals by playing on low settings, best to wait for a performance patch

You're looking for a deep storyline
Although 1348 Ex Voto begins with a strong premise, Aeta and Bianca's close relationship lacks the emotional depth I was expecting and hoping to find, resulting in a weaker overall storyline.

Accessibility features

1348 Ex Voto suffers from a lack of accessibility options, only offering general graphics settings for motion blur and subtitles, and multiple language options. There are also no options to customize your keybinds on PC, which was something I struggled with.

How I reviewed 1348 Ex Voto

I spent roughly eight hours playing 1348 Ex Voto on my gaming PC with my Logitech G G715 wireless gaming keyboard and Logitech G703 wireless gaming mouse, completing the main storyline. I used a Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor, and used my Sony WH-CH520 wireless headphones for audio.

The game doesn't offer any additional performance modes to try out, but I compared the game's visuals and performance to other medieval action games, like Kingdom Come: Deliverance.

First reviewed March 2026

EnGenius ECW520 budget Wi-Fi 7 access point review

2:44 pm | March 11, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: CPU, MSRP, PC, RAM | Comments: Off

With a throughput of over 11 Gbps, the EnGenius ECW520 wireless access point delivers excellent Wi-Fi 7 performance in a small footprint.

Specifications

Model: EnGenius ECW520

CPU: 1.5GHz Quad-Core Qualcomm ARM CPU

RAM: 1GB

Storage: 256MB flash

Radios: One 6GHz, one 5GHz and one 2.4GHz

Wireless throughput: Theoretical 11Gbps

Ports: 2.5Gb Ethernet with PoE

Weight: 600g

Dimensions: 15.8 cm x 15.8 cm x 3.9 cm

Power Consumption: 25W maximum consumption

MSRP: $189

It connects to the network via a 2.5Gb PoE port and seamlessly extends the range thanks to its mesh capability. A power consumption of just 25W under worst-case conditions means the case barely heats up when normally used.

The out-of-the-box cloud support makes deploying the ECW520 a breeze. The unit provides several operating modes: AP, mesh, or AP with mesh, and packs three full-duplex radios.

The 6 dBi antennas and 23 dBm RF amplifiers result in an operating range of over 10 meters at 500 Mbps throughput. The ease of installation and use, along with its decent wireless performance, make the ECW520 ideal for small offices or work-from-home setups.

EnGenius ECW520 2 — (Image credit: Future)

EnGenius ECW520: Price and Availability

The access point sells for $189 and includes a mounting wall adapter. The larger ECW526 AP with similar radio performance sports 10Gb ports and costs $299. The ECW536 top-tier AP with 4x4x4 radios supports more simultaneous connections and costs $589.

Engenius access points can only be managed through their cloud services, which start at $50 per device, while the basic free access lacks API support.

EnGenius ECW520 3 — (Image credit: Future)

EnGenius ECW520: Design

The Engenius ECW520 ships in a tiny box, something surprising for a Wi-Fi 7 access point. This gives a sense of the unit's size: the white plastic case measures 15.8 cm x 15.8 cm x 3.9 cm and weighs 600 g. The metal back panel serves as a heatsink and hosts the module’s ports. Two mounting holes secure the unit vertically to a wall using screws. The unit can also clip onto a plastic base, enabling a faster and easier installation than with just screws.

A single multicolor LED on the front panel provides visual cues about the access point's status. When working normally, the LED emits a blue light. For any other case, the LED blinks either green or blue. The metal back panel features a 12V power socket and a 2.5Gb Ethernet port. A small recessed button is also present and requires a paper clip or pen to reset the AP.

The ECW520 hardware is powered by a Qualcomm CPU and radio chipset. The 1.5GHz quad-core ARM processor has 1GB of DDR4 RAM and 256 MB of flash memory. Three radio modules provide duplex data links at 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz, for an aggregate throughput of 11 Gb/s using the 802.11be standard. The device integrates 23 dBm radio amplifiers and 6 dBi high-gain internal antennas to boost the RF signal.

EnGenius ECW520 4 — (Image credit: Future)

EnGenius ECW520: In Use

Setting up the ECW520 requires installing the Engenius Cloud app and signing up on the Engenius website. The procedure is complete after scanning a QR code on the back of the access point, which then creates a new device in the mobile app. The AP gets upgraded at this point if a new firmware is available.

The EnGenius cloud service is essential for remote access to the AP. Users can deploy, monitor, and troubleshoot multiple sites from a single interface, either in a browser or, with reduced functionality, from the Cloud To-Go mobile app. Among its most useful features is the Visualized Topology, which provides an overall health report for the network and all connected appliances.

The ECW520 draws power either from the PoE port or a 12V center-positive socket. The access point's power consumption is around 25W with active Wi-Fi connections and radio amplifiers set to maximum gain. At a range of one meter, the ECW520 performs well, achieving a throughput of 2 gigabits per second on the 6 GHz band. Throughput halves at 5 meters, reaching 600 Mbps at 10 meters.

Extending the ECW520's range is achieved with a second unit. The additional AP can either use an existing Ethernet connection or work in a mesh configuration, with only a power adapter connected to it. A mesh works by sharing bandwidth with other ECW520s via a backhaul channel, thereby reducing throughput but providing extra range.

EnGenius ECW520: Competition

The ECW520 packs three duplex radios with high-gain antennas and amplifiers. The simple design targets 2.5Gb PoE infrastructures with cloud management in mind.

The Zyxel NWA130BE has similar features to the ECW520, but it is twice as large. Moreover, its 4 dBi antennas are 2 dBi lower than those in the ECW520, reducing data rates at greater distances from the access point.

EnGenius ECW520: Final Verdict

The ECW520 is a budget-conscious solution that instantly connects to the cloud and delivers over 11 Gbps of throughput over three radio bands.

Thanks to high-gain antennas, these radios provide adequate range for a small home office, with transfer rates of 500 Mbps or more at 10 meters.

The unit is small and discrete, and comes with one wall-mounting panel as an accessory. Since it supports PoE, only one Ethernet connection is required for installation.

Buy if . . . you already have Engenius products and want to get Wi-Fi 7 speed.

Don’t buy . . . if you want to get the most throughput out of your 10Gb wired installation.

We've listed the best WIFI adapters for PC..

I tried Logitech’s new G325 Lightspeed gaming headset, and it was so comfortable I forgot I was wearing it

5:00 pm | March 6, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: PC, Resident Evil | Comments: Off

Logitech G325 Lightspeed: Two-minute review

Logitech definitely knows the strengths of the G325 Lightspeed, its new budget wireless gaming headset.

Advertised as a model that’s “just as suitable for an OOTD selfie or wearing out and about” as gaming, the impressively lightweight design and unique look make it well worth considering if you're after something more stylish than your standard gamer fare.

This is an incredibly comfortable headset that you should have no trouble wearing for extended periods of time, whether you’re gaming or taking calls at the office. Its memory foam earcups are super soft, and the thin plastic headband is reinforced with some effective padding.

The fact that it’s made almost entirely from thin plastic means that it doesn't feel anywhere near as premium as competitors like HyperX Cloud III or Razer BlackShark V3 X, but this is a reasonable compromise given the high level of comfort the resulting lightness brings.

The Logitech G325 Lightspeed on a white table. — (Image credit: Future)

The microphone represents a similar trade-off. On one hand, I love how streamlined the built-in beamforming microphone is - in fact, it’s almost invisible aside from a tiny little grille on the left earcup. There’s no messing around with a retractable arm or removable parts that you might end up losing.

On the other hand, there’s no denying that those models with dedicated microphone arms sound much better, even if they are a bit more frustrating to use. The mic of the G325 Lightspeed picks up a lot of background noise, despite the best efforts of Logitech’s “AI-powered noise reduction”, and leaves you sounding quite distant and grainy.

It’s perfectly adequate if you’re chatting with friends on a Discord call, but there are gaming headsets with much better microphone performance out there at this price, like those aforementioned alternatives.

This is also a very basic headset when it comes to features. The built-in controls are a volume rocker, Bluetooth pairing button, microphone mute switch, and that’s your lot. The headset is compatible with Logitech’s brilliant G Hub software, but it doesn’t offer much here aside from some EQ options and a couple of extra settings. This is going to be more than enough for most casual gamers.

The sound here is also good for the asking price, but not exceptional. Like other Logitech headsets, it sounds a bit flat out of the box without much bass, but it’s decently detailed and performs well in games.

With all of this in mind, you should already know whether the G325 Lightspeed is for you. If comfort and aesthetics are your priority, it’s an easy recommendation given the relatively low asking price - but those after booming sound or a crystal clear mic are better served with other options.

Logitech G325 Lightspeed: Price and availability

Costs $79.99 / £69.99 / AU$199.95
Three colors available
One of Logitech’s cheapest wireless models

Priced at $79.99 / £69.99 / AU$199.95, the G325 Lightspeed is one of the cheapest wireless gaming headsets Logitech makes right now.

This price point puts it in budget territory and, given the brand’s frequent generous discounts on other products, I wouldn’t be surprised you could scoop it up for around the $50 / £50 / AU$95 mark in the future.

At full price, it still represents quite good value, though, with much of the cost accounted for in the wireless capabilities and attractive design. There are three colorways available: a black with subtle purple accents, white with grey and mint green highlights, and a cute lilac with hints of orange.

Logitech G325 Lightspeed: Specs

	Logitech G325 Lightspeed
Price	$79.99 / £69.99 / AU$199.95
Weight	7.4oz / 212g
Compatibility	PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile
Connection type	Wireless (Lightspeed, Bluetooth 5.2)
Battery life	~24 hours
Features	Beamforming microphone
Software	Logitech G Hub (PC / Mobile)

Logitech G325 Lightspeed: Design and features

Attractive overall look
Very lightweight
Basic set of features

The design of the Logitech G325 Lightspeed eschews the usual gamer aesthetic of most headsets in favor of a more subtle look.

They’re sleek and seem more like a pair of music listening headphones than a gaming headset, which I quite like. You could easily wear these out of the house or in the office without embarrassment, which is certainly one of the biggest reasons to choose this model over others.

At only 7.4oz / 212g, the G325 Lightspeed is impressively lightweight, though it’s easy to see where Logitech has made the biggest sacrifices to achieve this. The headband feels particularly thin and cheap, with lots of flex to it. Importantly, it is still comfortable thanks to generous memory foam padding. The earcups, which can be adjusted up and down by a few inches, are similarly well-padded with memory foam cushioning.

The right earcup is completely plain aside from some subtle G325 branding, with all of this headset’s controls located on the back of the left one. There’s a power switch (situated beneath an LED indicator to denote battery level and charging status), a Bluetooth pairing button, a volume rocker, and a button to mute the microphone with a built-in and flush design on the front of the earcup.

The headset is compatible with the Logitech G Hub app, though it doesn’t give you access to many extra features. You can turn on side tone (which lets you hear yourself as you speak) or enable the microphone’s AI noise reduction features. There are also a number of audio presets to choose from, but the default one is well-balanced and a good fit for most uses.

Logitech G325 Lightspeed: Performance

Decent, balanced sound
As suitable for office work as gaming
Microphone could be better

Like other Logitech gaming headsets, the G325 Lightspeed sounds quite neutral out of the box. There is definitely some bass, but not overemphasized, and the mids and highs are decently presented. Is it the most detailed or breathtaking sound I’ve ever heard? No, but it’s firmly in line with what you should expect at this price.

I’ve been using the Logitech G325 Lightspeed for a few weeks now, and I never found the listening experience unpleasant, even when bobbing along to music as I worked. In games, the sound is more than sufficient for an enjoyable experience for a casual player, and this has been my go-to throughout my recent co-op playthrough of Resident Evil 6 and daily Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 matches.

Although I do have access to much better-sounding models, the ease of use of this one, not to mention the sheer comfort, is hard to argue with. Just plug the USB dongle in, and you’re ready to go.

I even like the built-in microphone despite its obvious flaws, too. This is not a gaming headset that you should use to start your streaming career, but the fact that the microphone is always present and incredibly unobtrusive is a plus. When I’m using the Astro A20 X, for example, I always have to dig the removable microphone out of my drawer and consciously attach it to my headset before I play - often struggling to find it in the process. Here, you just put the headset on, and you’re ready to go.

I do wish it did a better job of picking up your voice, though. I found that I often sounded quite quiet in comparison to other headsets, with a noticeably grainy quality to my voice. It also lets in an awful lot of background noise, with everything from typing to controller button presses picked up. This is easy to remedy with something like the Krisp noise suppression built into Discord, but still a clear area for improvement.

The battery life here isn’t anything special, but it’s good enough. Logitech claims that this headset will last more than 24 hours at 50% volume, and, in normal use, I found that it easily lasted about 20 hours at a time.

Should I buy the Logitech G325 Lightspeed?

Buy it if…

You want a light and comfortable headset
The Logitech G325 Lightspeed is incredibly comfortable thanks to its lightweight and generous memory foam padding. It’s one to choose if you want something that you can wear for hours and hours at a time.

You love the look
This headset also has quite a unique look that’s very different from most gaming models. Pick it up if you want something understated.

Don’t buy it if…

You need better sound
The sound here is good, but you can still get better performers for around the same price from brands like Razer or HyperX - especially if you don’t mind going for a wired alternative.

You want a great mic
The microphone here could do with some work. It gets the job done, but the performance isn’t as good as most models with a microphone arm.

Also consider...

Not sold on the Logitech G325 Lightspeed? See these two alternatives.

	Logitech G325 Lightspeed	Razer BlackShark V3 X	HyperX Cloud III
Price	$79.99 / £69.99 / AU$199.95	$99.99 / £99.99 / around AU$141	$99.99 / about £99.99 / AU$150
Weight	7.4oz / 212g	9.5oz / 270g	10.9oz / 310g
Compatibility	PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile	PC, Xbox Series X/S (Xbox version), Playstation 4/5, (PlayStation version), mobile	PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile
Connection type	Wireless (Lightspeed, Bluetooth 5.2)	2.4 GHz Wireless / Bluetooth / USB Wired	Wired (3.5mm)
Battery life	~24 hours	70 hours	N/A
Features	Beamforming microphone	7.1 virtual surround sound, unidirectional detachable cardioid mic	Detachable 10mm mic, DTS Headphone:X Spatial Audio
Software	Logitech G Hub (PC / Mobile)	Razer Synapse (PC)	HyperX NGENUITY (PC)

Razer BlackShark V3 X
This budget-oriented BlackShark headset from Razer is more expensive and heavier than the G325, but it offers significantly better battery life and much punchier sound, not to mention plenty more features.

For more information, check out our full Razer BlackShark V3 X review

HyperX Cloud III
The HyperX Cloud III might be getting on in years, but it’s still a top contender and regularly on sale for around the same price as the G325. It’s wired, but it comes with a phenomenal microphone.

For more information, check out our full HyperX Cloud III reviewView Deal

How I tested the Logitech G325 Lightspeed

Tested for multiple weeks
Used with PC, PS5, and Xbox
Relied on for both work and play

I tested the Logitech G325 Lightspeed for multiple weeks, using it as my primary wireless gaming headset for both work and play.

I used it with my PC in addition to my PS5 and Xbox Series X consoles, squeezing in plenty of game time with friends to test out the built-in mic. I also wore it daily while working, wearing it for online meetings and while listening to music, and found it to be a worthy companion.

I frequently compared its performance to a range of other models that I’ve tested, including the Logitech G522 Lightspeed, Astro A20 X, and SteelSeries Arctis Nova 5, plus more premium alternatives like the Razer BlackShark V3 Pro and Astro A50 X.

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: 30-second review

I still have questions about the cart-before-horse nature of Thunderbolt 5 docks, where we have so many dock choices when there are virtually no TB5 peripherals, and a tiny percentage of laptops have this port.

Ignoring those salient points, the Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro is yet another slice of Thunderbolt technology for those lucky enough to have a TB5-capable system and can afford a top-tier docking station to go with it.

Straight up, this is easily the nicest Thunderbolt dock I’ve ever seen from Kensington, combining some elegant chamfered corners and a cool-to-the-touch metal exterior.

The front side has a great selection of ports, including card readers for three different standards. And at the back are even more connection options, including a few I’ve never seen on a dock, such as a TOSLINK optical for digital audio.

Having nineteen ports is an important selling point, but this dock can also operate as a Thunderbolt-connected SSD using a provided M.2 PCIe 4.0 slot, if you install an SSD.

However, when you combine this level of build quality with unique features, the first casualty is the budget, and this is one of the more expensive TB5 docks. And that price might easily be doubled if you want one for home and work.

Throw in some Thunderbolt-to-DisplayPort or HDMI adapters, and you might easily exceed $1500 for two docks and a 2TB NVMe drive.

If you need only one dock and have monitors that can accept Thunderbolt directly, then the outlay might be easier to justify. But with TB4 docks hovering around $200, the performance benefits of this dock might need to be documented.

Ignoring the price, this is easily one of the best laptop docking stations I’ve tested with Thunderbolt 5, even if it doesn’t have any direct HDMI or DisplayPort outputs.

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Price & availability

How much does it cost? $279/£223/€260
When is it out? It’s available now
Where can you get it? Direct from WavLink

From what I understand, there are two variants of this dock: K33611NA (standard) and K33612NA (Mac-optimised). That makes little sense, since Thunderbolt 5 is meant to be a standard, and not something that needs to be optimised for on a particular platform. Unless Apple took it on themselves, uncharacteristically, to adopt a piece of technology and then break it?

You can get either directly from Kensington in the USA, but these are oddly missing from the European Kensington websites. The cost of both models directly from the maker is $449.99, which serves as an MSRP for this hardware.

However, it's cheaper via the Kensington outlet on Amazon.com, where it's available for only $404.99. The Newegg price is $435, curiously.

UK pricing via Amazon is only £389.10, and the EU price is around €430.

That $449.99 MSRP price is the single biggest conversation point of this dock, and with good reason. That is roughly double the cost of a well-specified Thunderbolt 4 dock, and it puts the SD7100T5 firmly in the corporate IT procurement bracket rather than the individual buyer market.

The justification for the price is the unique combination of features. As no other TB5 dock at any price currently bundles a PCIe M.2 SSD slot, CompactFlash reader, optical audio, programmable hotkeys, and three Thunderbolt 5 downstream ports into a single unit.

The bottom line is that if you can afford a laptop with TB5, you probably won’t be concerned about the cost of this hardware, and it is easily one of the best docks available.

Value: 4 / 5

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Specs

Feature

Specification

Compatibility

Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, USB4, USB-C (Windows 11 23H2+, macOS 14.5+)

Total Ports

19-in-1

Thunderbolt 5 (upstream)

1x TB5 host port (80Gbps / 120Gbps Bandwidth Boost)

Thunderbolt 5 (downstream)

3x TB5 ports — support up to 140W PD and display output

USB-A ports

4x USB-A 3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps)

USB-C ports

2x USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps); 1x up to 30W charging

Video — Windows

Triple 4K@144Hz or Dual 8K@60Hz

Video — Mac

Dual 6K@60Hz (M-Series Pro/Max required)

Power Delivery

Up to 140W (USB PD 3.1 EPR, 28V/5A)

KonstantCharge

Yes

Storage Slot

1x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD slot (lockable, SSD not included)

Card Readers

CF 4.0, UHS-II SDXC, UHS-II microSDXC

Network

1x 2.5GbE Ethernet

Audio

3.5mm headphone jack, 3.5mm mic jack, 3.5mm speaker jack, TOSLINK optical

Hotkeys

2x programmable (iPhone backup + DND on Mac; custom on Windows)

Mounting

Pre-drilled holes for optional bracket (K34050WW, sold separately)

Security

Kensington lock slot (cable lock sold separately)

Thermal

Passive cooling

Construction

97% post-consumer recycled (PCR) aluminium

Warranty

3-year limited

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Design

Recycled aluminium construction
Lockable M.2 slot
No display outputs

The SD7100T5 represents a design departure for Kensington, moving away from the brand's more conservative corporate aesthetic towards something that looks more at home on a creative's desk.

The marketing presentation declares that the case is constructed from 97% post-consumer recycled aluminium, a genuine sustainability credential if true.

The metal used in this dock is critical to the heat dissipation from the Thunderbolt electronics and the SSD, if you mount one. It did get slightly warm in use, but not too hot to touch, even after several hours of activity.

Due to the SD7100T5's lateral design, it is intended exclusively for horizontal desktop use, and Kensington sells a secure mounting plate accessory that attaches to the threaded holes on the underside.

Without that accessory, which isn’t included in the box, there are two security slots on the left side that work with Kensington's own cable locks, unsurprisingly.

The top panel is removable via a single screw, revealing the M.2 SSD slot beneath. This screw is small and requires a tiny Phillips screwdriver, which Kensington doesn’t include with the dock. With the screw removed, the M.2 slot can be populated with any PCIe 3.0 or 4.0 specification NVMe drive, and made accessible from the computer.

Thermal pads inside the slot thermally connect the drive to the case, but these don’t allow for drives that have attached heatsinks to be used. The counter to that downside is that the slot supports drives of different sizes, with 2232, 2240 and 2260 being supported alongside 2280.

Getting a drive installed and running takes a relatively short amount of time, assuming you have a suitably sized screwdriver.

I’m not going to list all the ports, because it's tedious, but there are some unusual ones that need to be mentioned. I’ve already spoken about TOSLINK Optical Audio, but for those using headphones and a microphone, 3.5mm audio jack inlets are included.

The typical arrangement for Thunderbolt docks is to have a single uplink port to the laptop that carries power and data, with two downlink ports usually on the rear of the dock. That’s not the case here, because there are three downlink ports, with one conveniently on the front.

My only issue with downlink ports is that the maximum power they can deliver is 30W, which makes them less than useful for charging phones. However, this dock does have KonstantCharge, another made-up word for keeping power available to attached hardware when the host system is turned off or disconnected. I like that idea, and I wish more docks had that feature.

There are two programmable hotkeys on the top surface, which some might find useful. On macOS, one handles iPhone photo backup and the other acts as a Do Not Disturb toggle; on Windows, both are customisable via the Kensington Konnect software.

Overall, this is an extremely nice dock with plenty of useful features and a few things that are less than must-have. Of these, the M.2 slot and the three TB downlinks are the ones that customers will probably buy this hardware for.

Design: 3.5 / 5

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Features

TB5 Bandwidth Boost
Built-in M.2 SSD slot
CompactFlash + optical audio

The SD7100T5's feature list is what separates it from every other dock on the market. Starting with the connection: Thunderbolt 5 delivers 80Gbps bidirectional bandwidth as standard, increasing to 120Gbps under Bandwidth Boost when driving video-intensive workloads.

To put that in context, a decent USB-C dock, like the WavLink WL-UG75PD1-DH2, operates on 10Gbps USB-C, which gives the SD7100T5 twelve times the bandwidth available to share across its ports.

The built-in PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD slot is arguably the dock's most distinctive feature. It is lockable (the top panel is secured by a screw rather than friction), making it suitable for shared or office environments where physical security matters.

Often, laptops are given a modest amount of storage, like 1TB, but sometimes even less, and having another 2TB, 4TB or even 8TB of drive space when you connect to the dock could make data-intensive tasks easier to handle.

The SSD is not included and must be purchased separately, but even if it merely provides a means to back up the laptop, it's probably worth the investment.

The card reader selection goes further than any competing dock: CF 4.0 (CompactFlash), UHS-II SDXC, and UHS-II microSDXC. I’ll be honest and admit that I haven't used Compact Flash in at least 14 years, but I also know that some professional photographers still use older high-end DSLRs that require it. If you are one of those, then this might be another reason to invest in this design.

Audio connectivity is similarly comprehensive: separate 3.5mm headphone, mic, and speaker jacks plus a TOSLINK optical output. The optical connection enables lossless audio passthrough to external DACs and high-end audio systems, making it extremely helpful for anyone editing video or audio.

Features like the CF support and TOSLINK are quite unique for a TB5 dock, and while it could easily be argued that they’re somewhat niche, those that need them won’t care.

However, the lack of any direct HDMI or DisplayPort might also put off those looking for a more general-purpose device, since that requires additional budget to add adapters for monitor connectivity.

Features: 4 / 5

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Performance

80Gbps upstream bandwidth
No DisplayLink compression
TB5 Bandwidth Boost for video

The fundamental performance story of the SD7100T5 is the inverse of those docks that use USB-C or even Thunderbolt 4. On those devices, the issue of bandwidth management becomes critical, as they might be trying to service 55Gbps worth of ports (or more) with as little as a 10Gbps uplink.

The SD7100T5 operates on 80Gbps, rising to 120Gbps under Bandwidth Boost. The bandwidth pie is dramatically larger, which means port oversubscription is far less of a practical concern in real-world use. Bandwidth boost, in particular, enables display data not eat into the bandwidth for other devices, which it would on lesser docks.

In USB-C and Thunderbolt 4 docks, this is often mitigated using DisplayLink, which uses CPU-side video compression to minimise the amount of bandwidth required to support displays.

Critically, the SD7100T5 does not use DisplayLink. All video output goes through native Thunderbolt 5 signalling, meaning there is no CPU-side video compression, no software driver requirement for display output, and no compression artefacts or lag on moving content. Triple 4K@144Hz on Windows is native and uncompressed, a capability that is fundamentally impossible on DisplayLink-based solutions.

The proof in this pudding is that it is possible to connect a monitor via a Thunderbolt-to-HDMI or Thunderbolt-to-DisplayPort adapter, have that running, transfer a large file to an NVMe drive installed in the M.2 slot, and still achieve full speed. And critically, there is no impact on the image quality on the display.

The caveat to all this functionality is that the host system must have a Thunderbolt 5 port. Running this dock from a Thunderbolt 4 host rather than TB5 will still work, but the connection will be capped at TB4's 40Gbps, which means the Bandwidth Boost is unavailable and maximum display configurations are reduced.

The dock is fully backwards-compatible; you simply won't be able to access the full specification without a TB5 laptop, and, as a good TB4 dock is half the price, the extra cost of this device was largely pointless.

Performance: 4 / 5

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Final verdict

The Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro is the most comprehensively specified docking station available today. Its combination of three TB5 downstream ports, built-in M.2 SSD slot, CompactFlash reader, optical audio, 140W power delivery, and programmable hotkeys in a single recycled aluminium chassis is, at the time of writing, without direct competition.

If you have a Thunderbolt 5 laptop and can make use of what this dock offers, it is worth the $449.99, even if that’s a significant investment.

The problem, and it’s an awkward one, is that TB5-capable laptops are like hens' teeth. Normally, this is part of the review where I say that this situation will get better when X, Y and Z happen, but I’d be lying in this instance.

Intel's 2026 Panther Lake will not natively support TB5, meaning the total addressable audience remains primarily Apple M4 Pro/Max MacBook users and a relatively small number of Intel Core Ultra 200H/HX Windows users. For everyone else, a Thunderbolt 4 dock at $200-250 will deliver 80% of the practical benefit at half the cost.

For the right user, however, this dock genuinely transforms a single-cable laptop setup into a fully featured workstation. The M.2 SSD slot alone is a workflow improvement that has proven difficult to go back from, once experienced. The three-year warranty and Kensington's established reliability record add further confidence for IT procurement decisions.

If you are lucky enough to have the right platform to attach it to, the Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro is probably the best dock so far, if you can afford one.

Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro: Report card

Value	Expensive but no other dock matches this feature set at any price	4 / 5
Design	Premium recycled aluminium, lockable SSD slot, thoughtful hotkeys	4.5 / 5
Features	Best-in-class: M.2 slot, CompactFlash, optical audio, 3x TB5 downstream, KonstantCharge	4 / 5
Performance	Native TB5 video, no DisplayLink, full PCIe 4.0 SSD speed, consistent throughput	4 / 5
Overall	The most capable dock available, but only for those who genuinely need what it offers	4 / 5

Should I buy a Kensington SD7100T5 EQ Pro?

Buy it if...

You have Thunderbolt 5
Apple M4 Pro/Max MacBook users or Intel Core Ultra 200H/HX Windows users will access the full 80–120Gbps bandwidth and unlock the complete display configuration options.

You need 140W charging
Very few docks deliver USB PD 3.1 EPR at 140W, a power level that’s essential for high-performance mobile workstations that require more than the standard 100W. View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You have Thunderbolt
While this dock might work with a Thunderbolt port if it downgrades to USB 3.2, a much better experience can be had with a Thunderbolt dock. And, they don't cost any more.

Your laptop has Thunderbolt 4 only
The dock is backwards-compatible but caps at 40 Gbps on a TB4 host. A CalDigit TS4 or a similar TB4 dock costs roughly half as much and will serve you better today.

Also consider

Kensington SD5000T5 EQ
More of a hub than a dock, but overall, it is a well-specified dock for those planning to head down the TB5 rabbit hole. However, the lack of machines with this port and peripherals to connect does make it largely overkill at this point. But cheaper than the SD7100T5 EQ Pro.

Check out our Kensington SD5000T5 EQ reviewView Deal

CalDigit Thunderbolt Station 4
The CalDigit Thunderbolt Station 4, or TS4 as it is also known, is a full-featured Thunderbolt dock that works with Thunderbolt 4/3 and USB-C. It is not designed to be a portable dock but specifically to support a laptop user who comes to the office and wants a single cable connection to the network and a host of peripherals. To that objective, it has no less than 18 ports and can deliver up to 98W for charging a connected system. If you don't have TB5, then this is a good alternative.

Check out our CalDigit Thunderbolt Station 4 (TS4) review

GMKtec NucBox K16 mini PC review: A curious mixed bag that doesn’t quite justify the asking price

1:12 pm | March 4, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: CPU, GPU, PC, RAM | Comments: Off

GMKtec NucBox K16: 30-second review

GMKtec has been on something of a roll lately, churning out mini PCs with genuine gusto. Where some of its stablemates have leaned on older or obscure silicon, the NucBox K16 takes a different approach, reaching for the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS. This chip has been quietly powering a decent slice of the mini PC market since 2023, and it also made an appearance in some laptops.

The 7735HS is essentially a Rembrandt Refresh, which is a Zen 3+ architecture part built on TSMC's 6nm node. It is not, let us be clear, a cutting-edge processor. AMD has since moved on to Zen 4 and is now very pleased with itself about Zen 5. Yet the 7735HS remains a competent and well-understood chip, and crucially, one that GMKtec has used before in the K2 model.

Here it's connected to 32GB of DDR5 memory, not its fastest possible option, but enough to feed its Radeon 680M GPU, and dual 2.5GbE LAN ports.

The chassis is a step up from the plasticky boxes that characterised this segment not long ago. A CNC-machined aluminium C-frame with a sandblasted anodised finish gives the K16 a premium, almost Zen-like quality on the desk.

As NUCs go, this one is extremely compact, being 107 x 111 x 56 mm and yet packs an astonishing amount of connectivity into its footprint.

The headline connectivity act is the combination of OcuLink and USB4, both of which can be used to attach external graphics. OcuLink, running at 64 Gbps over PCIe 4.0 x4, is the faster of the two and the better choice for an eGPU enclosure. USB4 at 40 Gbps provides a more broadly compatible, if slightly slower, alternative. The dual 2.5 GbE LAN ports and Wi-Fi 6E round out a networking suite that would embarrass many a budget desktop.

The main caveat, and it is a rather substantial one, is the price. At launch, the K16 starts at $679.99 (£541) for the 32 GB + 512 GB configuration, with the 1 TB variant pushing to $729.99. For a machine built on a Zen 3+ platform, that is an assertive number, particularly when newer Ryzen 8000-series mini PCs are circling at similar or occasionally lower prices. Those later designs, like the 8040, have an integrated NPU, which this chip can’t match.

Due to the age of the hardware and the choice to use regular DDR5 rather than LPDDR5X, this design is not among the best mini PC systems we've tested, but it's perfectly serviceable for less demanding roles.

GMKtec NucBox K16: Price and availability

How much does it cost? From $680/£540/€620
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Direct from GMKtec and via online retailers

The K16 is available direct from the GMKtec website, alongside online retailers like Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.

There are two configurations available, both with 32 GB of soldered DDR5 RAM. The base model ships with a 512 GB SSD at $679.99, whilst the 1 TB variant commands $729.99. Both launched at a discount from their listed MSRPs of $899.99 and $949.99.

Normally, MSRPs should be ignored, but for those buying via Amazon.com, that’s about the price you are expected to pay, worryingly. UK Amazon.co.uk prices are equally outrageous, starting at £809.96.

Because of this discrepancy, I’d recommend buying directly from GMKtec, and there is another reason for doing this. GMKtec is bundling a 8-in-1 USB Hub Dockign station with every purchase, which is a thoughtful touch..

The increased cost of DDR5 memory is impacting all pre-built systems, altering the competitive landscape. This is impacting new products coming to market, like the K16, that must contend with cheaper units built before the recent price hikes for components.

The Bosgame M4 (see my review here) in a comparable 32 GB + 1 TB configuration was available for around $579.99 at launch. Rival mini PCs based on the Ryzen 7 8845HS, a Zen 4 part with meaningfully superior iGPU performance, hover in a similar or only modestly higher bracket. GMKtec's counter-argument is the premium chassis quality and the OcuLink port, which not every competitor offers at this price point.

However, on Amazon.com, I found the Minisforum UM880, which uses the Ryzen 7 8845HS, 32GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage for just $749, and it also has OCuLink.

As in my previous review of the K13, there are questions here about the cost of this equipment and how the rising cost of memory and storage is distorting the pre-built PC market.

Value: 3 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K16 mini PC — (Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

GMKtec NucBox K16: Specs

Item	Spec
CPU	AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (8C/16T, up to 4.75 GHz, Zen 3+)
GPU	AMD Radeon 680M (RDNA 2, 12 CUs, up to 2200 MHz)
NPU	None
RAM	32 GB LPDDR5 6400 MT/s (soldered, non-upgradeable)
Storage	512 GB or 1 TB M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 (default)
M.2 Expansion	1x additional M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 (up to 8 TB per slot; 16 TB total)
Display Outputs	1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x USB4 (DP 1.4) — triple display support
Front Ports	1x OcuLink, 1x USB4 Type-C, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 3.5mm audio, power button
Rear Ports	2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, 2x 2.5 GbE RJ-45, DC power
Networking	Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2, 2x 2.5 GbE LAN
Performance Modes	Silent 35W / Balanced 45W / Performance 50W
OS	Windows 11 Pro (pre-installed); Linux supported
Dimensions	107 x 111 x 56 mm
Weight	Approx. 0.65 kg
Included Accessories	30W USB-C PD adaptor, VESA mount bracket, HDMI cable, power brick, manual

GMKtec NucBox K16: Design

Premium aluminium chassis
Dual-fan active cooling
Easy access

The NucBox K16 marks a notable step forward in build quality from the broader GMKtec catalogue. The CNC-machined aluminium C-frame chassis, finished with a sandblasted anodised treatment, lends the machine a solidity that others lack.

At 4.21 x 4.37 x 2.20 in (107 x 111 x 56 mm), the K16 is compact without veering into the sort of extreme miniaturisation that sacrifices sensible port placement. The front panel is well considered: the OcuLink port and USB4 Type-C sit alongside two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports and the 3.5mm audio jack, with the power button tucked neatly at one end. The logic of placing OcuLink at the front is debatable, but it is a cosmetically minor quibble.

The rear panel is rather busier, accommodating dual 2.5 GbE LAN ports, HDMI, DisplayPort, two more USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports and the DC power input. Hot air exits through the rear vents, which is a tidier thermal arrangement than some competitors that exhaust downwards or sideways across connected cables.

If you didn’t notice, there has been a trade-off here. This machine only has one USB4, with the bandwidth that might have provided another is used for the OCuLink presumably.

Cooling is handled by a dual-fan arrangement with copper heat pipes that’s a more serious thermal solution than the single-fan setups found in cheaper mini PCs. GMKtec has also included three selectable performance modes: Silent at 35W, Balanced at 45W, and Performance at 50W.

These can be toggled via the BIOS or a dedicated utility, which is the kind of user-facing flexibility that working professionals will appreciate when they need to dial back noise during a video call or unleash full performance for a render job.

As with most of GMKtec's recent output, the K16 ships with a VESA mounting bracket, allowing it to be affixed to the rear of a compatible monitor. There is also a Kensington lock slot for environments where the temptation to pocket a small, premium-looking PC might prove too strong for some colleagues.

Access to the inside is extremely easy. The four feet unscrew to release the silver shroud, and then four small screws are revealed that hold a fan bracket in place before you can get to the storage layer.

One of the two M.2 2280 slots is occupied by the provided SSD, leaving the other entirely free. Both slots are PCIe 4.0, enabling up to 7500 MB/s with appropriate drives.

What there isn’t any sign of is the memory, since this is soldered to the other side of the mainboard. That’s one of the disappointments of this design, but in most respects, it's nicely engineered and easy to upgrade.

Design: 4 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K16: Hardware

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
32 GB DDR5 6400 MT/s
Lacks an NPU

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U is a mobile processor featuring eight cores, launched in April 2022 as an offshoot of the Ryzen 6000 series. And, the closest silicon from the core series is the Ryzen 7 6800H, a Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) architecture chip made for Socket FP7.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS requires a little context. It is a mobile processor built on AMD's Zen 3+ architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6nm process node. It debuted in 2022 as part of the Rembrandt Refresh family, and is in most practical respects extremely close to the Ryzen 7 6800H that preceded it. Eight cores, sixteen threads, a base clock of 3.2 GHz and a boost up to 4.75 GHz, entirely respectable numbers for a mini PC that is not attempting to position itself at the extreme budget end of the market.

The integrated graphics are Radeon 680M, based on the RDNA 2 architecture with 12 Compute Units running up to 2200 MHz. AMD's Radeon 680M is well understood at this point: it is meaningfully ahead of the older Vega-based iGPUs, broadly comparable to a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in rasterised tasks.

The issue, as I’ll talk about more in the performance section, is the memory chosen and its configuration. Reading the GMKtec promotional material, it talks about LPDDR5 at 6400 MT/s. But this NUC doesn’t have LPDDR5X, it's just a low-power version of DDR5, and that means less memory bandwidth. LPDDR5X offers up to 33% higher data rates (up to 8,533+ MT/s vs 6,400 MT/s), and roughly 24% better power efficiency, but the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS doesn’t support it.

There is also an issue with the use of memory channels in this design that I’ll discuss in the performance section.

The storage situation is worth examining carefully. The K16 features two M.2 2280 slots, both of which support PCIe 4.0 x4. This is a meaningful specification advantage over mini PCs that top out at PCIe 3.0 on their secondary slot. Combined capacity is rated up to 16 TB with 8 TB per slot, a generous amount even for a creative professional workload.

The default shipped SSD is, however, a PCIe 3.0 drive. This is a slight disconnect: GMKtec has fitted PCIe 4.0-capable slots and then shipped a PCIe 3.0 drive installed, presumably to manage the retail price. Aftermarket upgrades to a PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive are straightforward given the accessible design.

The OcuLink port runs at 64 Gbps via PCIe 4.0 x4, which is the fastest external GPU interface available on a mini PC at this price point. Thunderbolt 4 eGPU connections are limited by the PCIe 3.0 x4 tunnel that Intel imposes; OcuLink sidesteps this entirely. Paired with GMKtec's own AD-GP1 eGPU dock, the K16 can act as a credible light gaming or GPU-compute machine when equipped with a suitable discrete card.

Memory is the one area that gives pause. The 32 GB of LPDDR5 is soldered directly to the motherboard, making it entirely non-upgradeable. For the majority of users, 32 GB will be more than adequate; for those running large language models locally or editing 8K video, it is a ceiling that cannot be raised.

Hardware: 3.5 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K16: Performance

Mini PC		GMKtec NucBox K16	GMKtec NucBox M7 Ultra
CPU		AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
Cores/Threads		8C 16T	8C 16T
RAM		32GB LPDDR5 (2x16GB)	16GB DDR5 (2x8GB)
SSD		1TB TWSC TE3420F1TO NVMe	512GB AirDisk SSD
Graphics		Radeon 680M	Radeon 680M
3DMark	WildLife	10320	9846
	FireStrike	4508	4149
	TimeSpy	1813	1495
	S.Nomad	1634	1420
Cine24	Single	84	90
	Multi	595	401
	Ratio	7.08	4.47
GeekBench 6	Single	1957	2096
	Multi	7170	8582
	OpenCL	24105	22656
	Vulkan	22401	21484
CrystalDisk	Read MB/s	3549	3558
	Write MB/s	2649	2520
PCMark 10	Office	6785	6973
WEI	Score	8.1	8

Mini PC

GMKtec NucBox K16

GMKtec NucBox M7 Ultra

CPU

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U

Cores/Threads

8C 16T

RAM

32GB LPDDR5 (2x16GB)

16GB DDR5 (2x8GB)

SSD

1TB TWSC TE3420F1TO NVMe

512GB AirDisk SSD

Graphics

Radeon 680M

3DMark

WildLife

10320

9846

FireStrike

4508

4149

TimeSpy

1813

1495

S.Nomad

1634

1420

Cine24

Single

Multi

595

401

Ratio

7.08

4.47

GeekBench 6

Single

1957

2096

Multi

7170

8582

OpenCL

24105

22656

Vulkan

22401

21484

CrystalDisk

Read MB/s

3549

3558

Write MB/s

2649

2520

PCMark 10

Office

6785

6973

WEI

Score

8.1

Logically, the system should be compared to the GMKtec K2, since it uses exactly the same AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS. And, I have reviewed that exact hardware.

Unfortunately, I don’t have that machine to hand, and the data I have from it pre-dates the use of the CineBench24 and GeekBench6. But I will come back to the K2, I promise.

What I did have was recent data from the GMKtec NucBox M7 Ultra, which uses the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U. That’s a Zen3+ Ryzen 6000 series chip from 2022, whereas the K16 uses a 2023 Ryzen 7000 CPU that also uses the Zen3+ architecture.

As you can see from the numbers, the results are remarkably close, partly because these chips both have the same number of cores/threads, and the Radeon 680M GPU, and these limiting factors.

However, when I tested this system, something didn’t seem right. Because while I didn’t have much comparison data from the older K2, I did have 3DMark scores, and they told an entirely different story.

The Wildlife score on the K2 was 16647, whereas on the K16 it's only 9846. How?

What made this doubly odd was that, because the K16 uses LPDDR5, it should have slightly more bandwidth than the standard DDR5 used in the K2.

Digging back into my review files, I discovered that the K2 had a DDR5 memory arrangement where it used two SODIMMs of DDR5 4800 MHz, and these were 64-bit modules, used by the system as eight 32-bit channels.

So what has the K16 got? Well, it has two 16GB modules at 6400MHz, but disturbingly, these are just 32-bit LPDDR5.

The K2 with two 64-bit modules could effectively run as quad channel, where the K16 is only dual channel, thus the performance discrepancy between them.

If this arrangement had been quad channel, it would have represented roughly a 33% bandwidth increase over DDR5 4800MT/s, but because it’s only dual channel, that’s not the case.

Another interesting aspect of this system, which I discovered in the CPU-Z analysis, is that this CPU can be run with a 50W TDP, and the TDP limit is confirmed at 45W from the CPU-Z data, with PL1, PL2 and PPT all locked at 50W. Therefore, GMKtec has set this unit running at its maximum performance configuration by default.

Another takeaway from the benchmarking is that this machine has M.2 PCIe 4x4 slots, but GMKtec only used a Gen 3x4 drive, which lowered performance.

Despite these points, for general productivity such as office applications, web browsing, video conferencing, and code compilation, the K16 will feel snappy and capable. The 32 GB of RAM, even in its soldered form, is generous enough to support heavy multitasking without complaint.

Light gaming at 1080p on older titles or less-demanding current games is entirely achievable with the 680M; do not expect to push anything particularly modern at high settings without using that OcuLink port.

The three performance modes are a useful feature. Silent mode at 35W keeps the fans barely audible whilst still delivering perfectly adequate desktop performance. The full 50W mode delivers tangible improvements for sustained workloads, but at the cost of more noticeable fan noise. Balanced mode at 45W will be the sensible default for most users.

For those curious, all my benchmarks were done in Performance mode to show you what the best possible numbers look like.

While not poor, the results from the K16 reveal yet another mini PC that never reached its full potential due to some creative choices made by the makers.

Performance: 3.5 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K16: Final verdict

The GMKtec NucBox K16 is a machine that rewards scrutiny, though not always in the ways its marketing materials might suggest.

On paper, the specification reads impressively: a capable Ryzen 7 7735HS, 32 GB of fast memory, dual PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots, OcuLink, USB4, and dual 2.5 GbE LAN in a premium CNC aluminium chassis. In practice, the way the memory is organised and the use of a PCIe 3.0 SSD don’t make the most of this Ryzen platform.

What the data also confirms is that GMKtec has set the K16's power limits aggressively, with PL1, PL2 and PPT all fixed at 50W. There are no conservative defaults to contend with here; instead, this machine ships running flat out, which will flatter benchmark results whilst also keeping the fans busier than a more gently tuned configuration might.

None of this makes the K16 a bad machine. The connectivity story remains excellent, OcuLink is still a class-leading feature at this price point, and the build quality is genuinely above average for the segment. But the memory specification warrants a footnote in any purchasing decision, particularly at a price point where honesty in the small print matters.

The biggest issue here is undoubtedly the price, and that might be something we’ll need to accept given the huge hole in memory and storage supplies AI has created. But with so many alternatives in the channel made before memory became stupidly expensive, new designs like the K16 might find the competitive market even more of a problem than it typically is.

Should I buy a GMKtec NucBox K16?

Value	Premium price for a Zen 3+ platform	3/5
Design	Excellent CNC aluminium chassis, well-placed ports	4/5
Hardware	OcuLink, USB4, dual 2.5 GbE, PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots	4/5
Performance	Not as quick as it should be on paper	3.5/5
Overalls	A premium mini PC let down by memory choices and its asking price	3.5/5

Buy it if...

You need OcuLink for eGPU expansion
If a discrete GPU is in your future for gaming, video transcoding, or GPU compute workloads, then the K16's OcuLink port provides the fastest external GPU interconnect available at this price point, well ahead of what USB4 or Thunderbolt 4 can typically deliver.View Deal

Dual 2.5 GbE LAN is a priority
For network-attached storage, virtualisation, or environments requiring high-bandwidth networking, the dual 2.5 GbE ports make the K16 a genuinely useful headless server or home lab node in addition to a desktop machine.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

Upgradeable RAM matters to you
The soldered LPDDR5 means you are permanently fixed at 32 GB. For most users, this is fine today, but if you expect your requirements to grow, a machine with socketed SODIMM slots provides more flexibility for the long term.View Deal

You want the latest silicon
Zen 3+ is a solid architecture, but AMD's Zen 4 and Zen 5 derivatives offer meaningfully improved CPU and GPU performance, NPU capabilities, and more modern feature support. At the K16's asking price, alternatives built on newer platforms deserve careful consideration. View Deal

Also consider

GMKtec NucBox K8 Plus
Built on the Ryzen 7 8845HS with Zen 4 architecture and a Radeon 780M GPU, the K8 Plus offers a more modern platform at a comparable price point. It sacrifices OcuLink but gains a more powerful integrated GPU and NPU support.

Check out my GMKtec NucBox K8 Plus review View Deal

GMKtec NucBox K6
The older K6 uses the Ryzen 7 7840HS in a similar form factor to the K16 and is typically available at meaningfully lower prices. A sensible alternative if the K16's premium pricing seems hard to justify for your specific use case.

Check out my GMKtec NucBox K6 review View Deal

I tested the GMKtec NucBox K13 – and this AI mini PC is an excellent example of what Intel does well

4:34 pm | March 3, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: AI, CPU, GPU, PC | Comments: Off

GMKtec NucBox K13: 30-second review

Looking back, the GMKtec NucBox K13 is the first mini PC that I’ve covered that uses the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V I’ve tested. It’s a Lunar Lake-era processor built on TSMC's 3nm process, not on Intel fabs that can’t handle such small track sizes. But it also represents GMKtec's first foray into the new generation of AI-capable, efficiency-first processors, and it makes a rather decent fist of it.

Where other makers adhere to their 4-inch boxes, GMKtec has gone with a shape and size that looks more like a docking station on the K13. The alternative layout offers plenty of room for port placement and extra room inside for an additional M.2 PCIe Gen 4 slot.

By replacing the 512GB or 1TB M.2 NVMe drive supplied with the K13 and utilising the second slot, it is possible to add 16TB of storage to this mini PC. However, while the storage can be enhanced, the memory is fixed at 16GB of LPDDR5X 8533 MT, as this is soldered to the mainboard.

That’s one weakness, and the lack of an OCuLink port is another. Though you can attach an external GPU using USB4, the 40 Gbps bandwidth of that technology is less than the 64 Gbps of an OCuLink configuration.

Overall, this is a powerful, small system with plenty of potential for power users. The only issue for any potential buyer is how much memory you might want, as AI tasks generally need lots, and how this system's price compares with others that might offer 32GB or more.

The lack of upgradability and OCuLink stop the K13 from entering our hallowed best mini PC collection. But it could be perfect for users who don’t need discrete graphics or more than 16GB of RAM.

GMKtec NucBox K13: Price and availability

How much does it cost? From $670/£540/€610
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Direct from GMKtec and via online retailers

The NucBox K13 is available direct from the GMKtec website, as well as online retailers like Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.

Two configurations are available, both with 16 GB of soldered LPDDR5X RAM. The base model has a 512 GB SSD for $669.99, and the 1 TB variant is $719.99. Both are currently offered below their stated MSRPs of $899.99 and $949.99, respectively.

UK pricing is £536 and £580, and the Euro price is €609.99 and €659.99.

Based on the current exchange rates, US prices are about 7% higher on average. Not sure why that would be, but those are the prices GMKtec decides.

Those expecting a bargain on Amazon are likely to be disappointed, since the price on Amazon.com via the GMKtec Store is the MSRP of $949.99 for the 1TB option.

The price on the UK Amazon.co.uk is equally inflated at £788.96, and that’s just for the 512GB option.

Resist the temptation to buy through Amazon unless a significant coupon brings the price in line with the direct store. At MSRP, it represents poor value compared to gmktec.com.

In terms of alternatives to the K13 that use the same platform, there are only two that I’m aware of, and both are made by Acer. The Acer Veriton NUC (VN1502G) and Acer Veriton NUC AI, but both of these options are north of $1000, if you can find them.

In that context, a GMKtec NucBox K13 direct from the maker looks like a bargain. However, other platforms are available at this price point, and some offer more processing power and features that the K13 doesn’t match.

Value: 4 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K13: Specs

Item

Spec

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (8C/8T, up to 4.8 GHz, Lunar Lake, TSMC 3nm)

GPU

Intel Arc 140V (8 Xe2 cores, up to 64 TOPS GPU compute)

NPU

Intel AI Boost, 47 TOPS; Total system AI: 115 TOPS (INT8)

RAM

16 GB LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s (soldered, on-package, non-upgradeable)

Storage

512 GB or 1 TB M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 (pre-installed)

M.2 Expansion

1x additional M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 slot (up to 8 TB per slot; 16 TB total)

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 (4K@120Hz), 2x USB4 (DP 1.4 Alt Mode) — triple 4K support

Front Ports

2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 3.5mm audio jack, power button

Rear Ports

1x HDMI 2.1, 2x USB4 40Gbps (PD 3.0 100W), 1x USB 2.0, 5 GbE RJ-45, 3.5mm audio, DC-in, reset button

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (up to 2.4 Gbps), Bluetooth 5.2, 1x 5 GbE LAN

Power (TDP)

17W–37W configurable

Windows 11 Pro (pre-installed); Linux supported

Dimensions

186 x 88 x 33.2 mm

Weight

523 g

Included Accessories

30W USB-C PD adaptor, 120W DC power brick, VESA mount bracket, HDMI cable, manual

GMKtec NucBox K13: Design

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC — (Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Docking station-inspired chassis
Sophisticated cooling
Easy access

The NucBox K13 makes, in physical terms, quite the statement. At 33.2 mm tall, it is the slimmest mini PC in GMKtec's current catalogue, and it achieves this thinness without resorting to the sort of brutalist cost-cutting that usually accompanies such design ambitions. The chassis is clean and purposeful, with a form factor that would not look out of place mounted behind a monitor or tucked beside a display on a reception desk.

Since Intel declined the opportunity to lead by example in the NUC market, we’ve seen more diversity, and the K13 is a prime example.

With a 186 x 88 mm footprint, the K13 is actually slightly wider than most of GMKtec's cube-format mini PCs, which is a reasonable compromise for the reduced height. The overall volume is modest, and the 523g weight makes it light enough to easily carry.

The front panel is fairly restrained: two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports and a 3.5mm audio jack sit alongside the power button. Including a USB4 port on the front might have been a useful option, but these are both on the back. They aren’t cut-down USB4 variants, as they both support PD 3.0 (100W) and DisplayPort Alt Mode, which, when combined with an HDMI 2.1 port, enables up to three monitors to be connected to the K13.

Also on the back are a 5GbE LAN port, a USB 2.0 port, and a second 3.5mm audio jack. The choice of a single 5GbE port over dual 2.5GbE will delight some customers and horrify others, especially those who might want to segment a LAN. Given that you can add inexpensive 2.5GbE LAN ports to the USB 3.2 Gen 2 or USB4 ports using adapters, that’s something of a non-issue.

Cooling is managed by dual copper heat pipes and a single turbine fan. This configuration has proven effective in the slim NUC form factor, and Intel's own power budget helps considerably.

With a TDP ceiling of 37W, the K13 is not a machine that will heat a room, and in practice, the fan is rarely audible under normal desktop workloads. GMKtec claims the design incorporates a dust-resistant architecture, though the specifics of it aren’t obvious from my internal inspection.

Access inside is probably the easiest I’ve experienced this year, with a single tiny screw holding the entire underside in place with the help of some magnets. With this removed, the two M.2 PCIe 4.0 2280 slots are accessible, along with a 2230 slot for the Wi-Fi adapter and the motherboard clock battery. There is no memory access, because that’s not removable from the mainboard.

The VESA mounting bracket is included as standard, and the K13's slim profile makes it an excellent candidate for monitor mounting. Deployment in this way adds minimal depth to the back of a display and keeps desk surfaces uncluttered.

In some promotional pictures, GMKtec placed the K13 on its end, but I’d strongly advise against doing so. There are no feet on either end, so either way you cut it, you will cut off airflow through the vents on those surfaces, which could lead to overheating.

Overall, this dock-style system seems a successful alternative to the common squashed-cube form factor beloved by many makers.

Design: 4 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K13: Hardware

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (Lunar Lake)
Arc 140V iGPU
47 TOPS NPU

Luna Lake is a notable departure for Intel, as previous Core Ultra generations were straightforward evolutions, whereas Luna Lake is a complete rethink. The on-package memory architecture, borrowed conceptually from Apple's playbook, places LPDDR5X directly alongside the compute die, slashing memory latency and dramatically improving bandwidth efficiency.

The result is a processor that punches well above its 17W–37W power envelope, particularly in graphics and AI workloads.

The Arc 140V iGPU is notably better than the Iris Xe graphics that preceded it, and the 47 TOPS NPU combined with the 64 TOPS GPU compute, the total is 115 TOPS. That is a useful amount of AI processing, and not just a marketing exercise.

The CPU features eight cores arranged in a hybrid layout comprising four Lion Cove performance cores and four Skymont efficiency cores, and none of these cores has hyperthreading.

What I find truly odd about the Luna Lake chips is that prior to this, on both AMD and Intel silicon, it wasn’t uncommon to see cores with hyperthreading performing like those that didn’t have that feature. This was often due to code that tried to weave two parts of a process across different threads, where passing data from one thread to another on the same core caused delays that negated the duality.

That doesn’t happen on this chip, because each core can only handle one thread. But as I’ll talk about in the benchmarks, this processor can, in certain circumstances, appear to operate as if it were only a four-core processor, since some tasks won’t use the efficiency cores.

What I can’t deny is that single-threaded performance is strong, and the 3nm fabrication allows for excellent thermal distribution, enabling the turbo mode to be liberally utilised.

The real story, however, is the memory architecture. Rather than connecting to system RAM across a relatively slow off-package bus, Lunar Lake integrates LPDDR5X memory directly into the package using Intel's Foveros packaging technology.

The K13's 16 GB of LPDDR5X runs at 8533 MT/s, delivering a theoretical peak bandwidth of around 137 GB/s. To put that in context, the Ryzen 7 7735HS (as used in the NucBox K16) achieves approximately 100 GB/s with its LPDDR5X 6400 MT/s configuration. The K13 is approximately 37% faster in raw memory bandwidth, and the Arc 140V iGPU uses every bit of it.

The Arc 140V integrated graphics are built on Intel's Xe2 (Battlemage) architecture, representing a generational leap over the Xe-LP graphics found in 12th- and 13th-generation Core processors. With eight Xe2 Execution Unit clusters, the Arc 140V delivers performance broadly comparable to a GTX 1650 in rasterised gaming.

That’s a significant step up from the Radeon 680M, and a rather humbling improvement over Intel's own previous integrated efforts. Hardware ray tracing is supported, as are XeSS upscaling, AV1 hardware encoding, and the full suite of Intel's media pipeline. Quick Sync, in particular, remains one of the strongest hardware video encode/decode implementations available in integrated silicon.

To be clear, it's not the AMD Radeon 8060S great, but for an integrated GPU, this is as good as it gets for Intel these days.

Another strength of this silicon is its integrated NPU, which can work alongside the CPU and GPU for AI processing. The NPU is 47 TOPS, meeting Microsoft's Copilot+ PC requirement and enabling local inference for AI features, including live captions, Cocreator in Paint, and the suite of Recall-adjacent productivity tools that Microsoft is gradually rolling out for Windows 11.

When the CPU, GPU and NPU are all working in conjunction through AI compute, throughput reaches 115 TOPS. That’s a meaningful figure for anyone running local large language models, AI-assisted code completion or automation workflows. It’s ideal for the Clawdbot agent if you’re feeling confident using that notorious tool.

Another factor in its AI usefulness is the second M.2 slot, making the K13 a credible candidate for a local AI inference workstation where fast NVMe access to model weights is useful.

This platform has seen duty on some expensive laptops, but it's almost unknown in the mini-PC space. Its appearance here hints that Intel is trying to clear existing Luna Lake chip stock before something new is released (Panther Lake), so this might not be the only small system we see it used on.

Hardware: 4.5 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K13: Performance

Mini PC		GMKtec K13	ECS LIVA Z11 Plus
CPU		Intel Core Ultra 7 256V	Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Cores/Threads		8C 8T	14C 14T
RAM		16GB LPDDR5	32GB DDR5 (2x16GB)
Storage		1TB Huawei eKitStor Xtreme 200E	256 GB Phison M8256GCB5ECS-E192
Graphics		Intel Arc Graphics 140V	Intel Arc Graphics 140T
3DMark	WildLife	22653	21370
	FireStrike	7364	7185
	TimeSpy	3413	3879
	Steel Nom Lt.	1914	3160
CineBench24	Single	116	127
	Multi	508	872
	Ratio	4.39	6.87
GeekBench 6	Single	2731	2879
	Multi	9429	14465
	OpenCL	25982	38919
	Vulkan	26274	35463
CrystalDisk	Read MB/s	7132	3526
	Write MB/s	6338	1843
PCMark 10	Office	7781	7404
WEI	Score	8.6	8.3

Mini PC

GMKtec K13

ECS LIVA Z11 Plus

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Cores/Threads

8C 8T

14C 14T

RAM

16GB LPDDR5

32GB DDR5 (2x16GB)

Storage

1TB Huawei eKitStor Xtreme 200E

256 GB Phison M8256GCB5ECS-E192

Graphics

Intel Arc Graphics 140V

Intel Arc Graphics 140T

3DMark

WildLife

22653

21370

FireStrike

7364

7185

TimeSpy

3413

3879

Steel Nom Lt.

1914

3160

CineBench24

Single

116

127

Multi

508

872

Ratio

4.39

6.87

GeekBench 6

Single

2731

2879

Multi

9429

14465

OpenCL

25982

38919

Vulkan

26274

35463

CrystalDisk

Read MB/s

7132

3526

Write MB/s

6338

1843

PCMark 10

Office

7781

7404

WEI

Score

8.6

8.3

As no other machine I’ve seen uses the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V from September 2024, I thought another NUC that utilises a Core Ultra 200-series silicon might provide some interesting insights into the K13 and what makes it different from most small PCs.

The ECS LIVA Z11 Plus uses the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, an Arrow Lake-H chip from early 2025. On paper, the chip in the Z11 has a significant edge on cores, but its memory bandwidth is less, and the base clock speed of the 256V is 2.2GHz, over 2GHz on the 255H.

What the comparison boils down to is that the Arc 140V GPU, with the extra bandwidth of LPDDR5 8533 MT/s, delivers more graphics performance for those tasks.

However, the single-core speed of the 255H is better, and with the extra cores, it wins all the multi-threaded tasks. And, as the graphics tests become tougher, as in Time Spy and Steel Nomad Lite, the 255H has a significant advantage.

One curious diversion is that the ECS LIVA Z11 Plus only had one 2280 M.2 slot, though it was rated for PCIe Gen 4x4 bandwidth like those on the K13. However, ECS only used a Gen 3 drive on that system, which couldn’t hit half the read or a third of the write speed of the one used on the K13.

That choice in the K13 was a major factor in the better PCMark and WEI scores, since SSD speed was what dragged down those results on the Z11.

What I haven’t included results for is AI, since while I have them for the K13, they weren’t collected for the Z11.

What’s worth noting is that the NPU on the 255H is only rated for 13 TOPS, whereas the one in the 256V is 47 TOPS. For those using AI Compute, that’s a big difference, and the 256V is definitely the processor you will want.

Performance: 4 / 5

GMKtec NucBox K13: Final verdict

The GMKtec NucBox K13 is, in the bluntest possible terms, the mini PC that Intel's Lunar Lake deserved from the outset. GMKtec has done due diligence by pairing the chip with the fastest possible memory configuration, designing a chassis that leverages Lunar Lake's efficiency, and adding 5GbE connectivity.

The weaknesses are real but hardly fatal. Sixteen gigabytes of soldered RAM will give some buyers pause, particularly in a machine otherwise configured for demanding workloads. The absence of OcuLink limits eGPU flexibility, but it’s not a port commonly found on cheap NUC models.

The LAN configuration supports 550 MB/s file transfers with the right infrastructure. And with USB adapters, it is still possible to make the K13 useful as a dual-homed firewall.

But if your use case is modern, efficiency-focused desktop computing, perhaps content creation, AI experimentation, clean-desk professional work, or a powerful behind-monitor media machine, then K13 makes a compelling argument.

Its iGPU is the best Intel integrated graphics available in a mini PC at this price, its AI credentials are genuine rather than marketing-department aspirational, and it achieves all of this whilst remaining practically silent under most workloads.

There is plenty to like here, and relatively few reasons to avoid this machine, not least the price.

Should I buy a GMKtec NucBox K13?

GMKtec NucBox K13 Scorecard
Value	Competitive but needs monitoring vs Zen 4/5 rivals	4/5
Design	Strikingly slim; with well-considered rear I/O	4/5
Hardware	Arc 140V, 115 TOPS AI, 5 GbE LAN	4.5/5
Performance	Strong iGPU and AI, but modest multi-core vs AMD rivals	4/5
Overall	A modern, efficient mini PC for the right buyer	4/5

Buy it if...

You want practical AI features
With 115 TOPS of total AI compute and full Copilot+ PC compliance, the K13 is one of very few mini PCs that can run local LLM inference, AI-assisted productivity tools, and NPU-accelerated Windows features without compromise.View Deal

You need a slim, quiet machine for a professional environment
At 33.2mm tall and practically silent under normal loads, the K13 is purpose-built for desk-constrained, noise-sensitive settings. Mounted behind a monitor, it essentially ceases to exist as a physical presence.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

If 16 gigabytes of non-upgradeable RAM concerns you
The on-package memory is fast but fixed in size. If you foresee needing more than 16GB for large VM stacks, memory-hungry AI models, or future-proofing against increasingly bloated software, then a machine with socketed SODIMM slots offers more flexibility.View Deal

You need maximum multi-threaded CPU performance Lunar Lake trades Hyper-Threading for efficiency, and the eight-core/eight-thread configuration trails the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS and similar high-TDP mobile parts in sustained, heavily threaded workloads. If rendering, compilation, or simulation defines your workflow, consider the GMKtec K11 or the EVO-X2 instead.View Deal

I tested the Beelink ME Pro – a neat mini PC and NAS combination, making an ideal mass storage solution for any small business or home office

3:33 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: CPU, NAS, PC, RAM | Comments: Off

Beelink ME Pro: 30-second review

The Beelink ME Pro is a hybrid Mini PC and NAS in one, powered by the lightweight Intel 95 CPU with integrated Intel UHD graphics. Like any mini PC, it features a full version of Windows 11, in this case, the Home edition, so if you want to access it directly and you're familiar with Windows, it's extremely easy to use. If you just want it as a NAS, you can install TrueNAS or similar.

However, once connected to your network, you can then simply connect other Windows, macOS, or Linux devices to access the internal storage in the same way as any normal NAS.

You can also utilise it as your media server, and while it comes pre-installed with Windows 11 Home, the machine is also fully compatible with a range of NAS OS options, such as FNOS, UNRAID, and TrueNAS. You can also run Linux or a virtual machine such as Proxmox (PVE) or ESXi.

During this review, I utilised the pre-installed Windows 11 Home OS and configured network access for my Apple computers, enabling me to use my wired network as a central resource for storing files.

From the outset, it struck me just how versatile the small machine is. With those 3.5-inch bays, you can install large-capacity HDDs, for example, two 4 TB Western Digital Red drives. Then there’s space for three M.2 SSDs, with the machine pre-installed with a 120GB option that includes Windows 11 Home.

During the test, I also installed a couple of blank SSDs, which allowed me to install TrueNAS and test how the machine performed when used as a true streaming server throughout the Home.

One aspect that struck me from the outset was the build quality, just how well thought out this small machine is. Out of the box, it’s quick to get started, but over time, you can expand the storage to a massive 72 TB, which is really impressive for a device of this size.

Used to serve my storage needs in the office, mainly images and video, I was impressed by the speed over the wired network, and after setting up the two WD Reds as shared access for all machines on the network, I was also able to utilise the Plex media server.

However, while the ME Pro works well as a storage device, when used as a day-to-day PC, the power of the N95 CPU is rather limited, as reflected in the benchmarking scores. Even Microsoft Office applications, if pushed, struggled with anything too complex. Then there’s the integrated UHD graphics, which is perfect for video playback but not much more.

As a compliment to one of Beelink’s mini PCs this is a great option, but if you're thinking about buying this because it's a mini PC and NAS in one, then I would suggest you invest in one of the best mini PCs in our guide. Then pair it with the ME Pro as part of the ecosystem on your network rather than a day-to-day mini PC and NAS in one.

Beelink ME Pro: Price and availability

How much does it cost? $369
When is it out? Now
Where can you get it? Widely available

Depending on the configuration and the storage you intend to place inside, the price of the ME Pro can vary greatly. Our review sample is the N95 option with 12 GB of RAM and a 120 GB SSD, which will cost around $369 or £320.

For the more expensive option featuring the Intel N150, 16 GB of LP DDR4 RAM, and a 1 TB SSD, you would likely spend US$529.

At present, the Beelink ME Pro hybrid NAS and mini PC is available directly from the Beelink website, as well as Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.

Value: 4 / 5

Beelink ME Pro: Specs

CPU: Intel N95 / Intel N150
Graphics: Integrated Intel UHD Graphics 
RAM: 12GB LPDDR5 / 16GB LPDDR5 
Storage: Up to 1TB SSD
Ports: USB-A, USB-C (10Gbps), USB 2.0 ports, HDMI 
Connectivity: 5GbE, 2.5GbE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 
Size: 166 x 121 x 112 mm
OS Installed: Windows 11 Home
Accessories: Power adapter, mounting hardware, documentation

Beelink ME Pro: Design

The Beelink ME Pro hybrid NAS mini PC is an innovative design for what is essentially a two-in-one machine. Alongside access to a very capable NAS with both 2.5 and 5 GbE connections, two 3.5-inch bays and three PCIe 3.0 SSD slots, it’s also a Windows Mini PC.

Considering it’s a NAS and Mini PC, it’s extremely small at 166 x 121 x 112 mm and weighs 2.1kg, though that is without the power adapter, any HDDs, or the SSDs installed. This still makes it one of the smallest NAS devices on the market, even for a two-bay model, and the fact that it’s also a fully functional Windows machine makes it even more impressive.

But there’s something more about the Beelink ME Pro that I really like, and that’s the fact that they have made it modular, so whilst at present the only options available are the Intel N95 or the Intel N150 motherboard, the motherboard can actually be withdrawn from the system and replaced with an AMD or ARM option, although at present these aren’t available, but are highlighted as future options on the website.

Installing the drives is simple, with the two bays pulling out, your 3.5-inch HDD sitting inside, and then screwing tightly into the bay, holding it steady. Beelink is keen to highlight that this holder design helps reduce vibration, avoiding any damage that might occur compared with NAS drive bays that hold drives loosely in by small plastic grommets.

The three SSDs are bolted and slotted into the underside, and the machine actually ships with one small 128GB drive pre-installed. I used the other two slots to hold additional storage and an alternate operating system.

Another feature of the device is the amount of cooling that has been incorporated, so through the front and base of the machine, air is drawn in, helping to ensure that the drives , motherboard, CPU and RAM stay as cool as possible, optimising performance.

Another nice design feature is that on the back, there’s a magnetic dust cover that is easily removed so that you can remove dust and ensure the airflow remains consistent. Again, it’s just an extra level of thought in the design.

When it comes to ports, these are well laid out, with two LAN ports on the back, one of which is 2.5GbE, the other 5GbE, and HDMI so you can plug it directly into a monitor, two USB-A ports, and then around the front, there is another USB Type-A.

Through the test, I found this extremely useful, as I had a keyboard and mouse plugged into the two Type-A ports on the back when I was installing the TrueNAS operating system onto a secondary SSD, and I was able to do that using the USB key through the front USB Type-A port without having to reconfigure the rear ports. Obviously, after this, the port, along with the USB-C on the back, can be used to directly transfer files to the ME Pro.

Once everything was installed into the system and plugged in, there was just the usual process of finishing the installation for Windows 11 Home, then configuring the two HDDs into a RAID configuration or Windows equivalent and the SSDs. Since the machine is so small, I was able to position it happily on the shelf behind my monitor and plugged it directly into the router so it could be accessed by other machines on the network as well.

Design: 4.5 / 5

Beelink ME Pro: Features

The ME Pro is an interesting hybrid device, being both a NAS and a mini PC in one, and it balances that job pretty well with two HDD bays for mass storage and three SSDs for faster storage options. In the case of my review unit, I have two HDDs configured in Windows Simple (RAID 0) equivalent and the three SSDs, one installed with Windows 11 Home that ships with the machine, one with TrueNAS, and the other just as a mass storage device, all of which could be accessed easily from other machines on the network.

The machine is also available in other configurations, with the option that I’ve looked at in this review coming with the Intel N95, 12GB of LPDDR5 4800MHz and a 128GB SSD; this chipset is also available in a 512GB SSD option, then you can take the upgrade to the Intel N150 which has 16GB of LPDDR5 4800MHz and a 512GB SSD, and that again is available in a 1TB option.

Whichever option you choose, the HDD bays are up to you in terms of capacity, and each bay can hold up to 30TB. Alongside the SATA 3.5-inch HDDs there are also three M.2 NVMe drive slots, and these take M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0, and each is capable of taking 4TB, so you can get up to 60TB through HDD and a further 12TB through the SSDs, bringing you to a grand total of 72TB, which is one of the highest capacities that I have seen in this size of machine.

Beelink’s small NAS and mini PC in one is impressive, and the engineers have obviously looked very carefully at the cooling. Through the literature, the company is keen to point out just how much innovation has gone into the cooling system. Air is drawn through the front and base of the machine, pushed through the system and out of the back above the motherboard.

One of the things I didn’t realise during the test was just how cool the system ran. It wasn’t too hard to push the system hard because of that N95 processor, copying terabytes of data to the two HDDs and utilising Plex to watch back video. The machine was more than capable of keeping up with the demands, as long as you didn’t expect too much from it on the processing side.

Due to the design of the machine and its hybrid use, you have the option to install many common OSs; as I’ve previously mentioned, it comes with Windows 11 Home installed, but you can also install Linux if you so wish. Alongside either of those operating systems, you could also use it to run a dedicated NAS OS such as FNOS or TrueNAS, and in this review, I ran TrueNAS because it is an open-source option and free. You can also run a virtual machine, such as Proxmox (PVE) or ESXi, so potentially you could have your OS installed on one of the SSDs and another virtual machine on the final SSD, tailoring it to whichever use case you want.

Whilst the N95 is a relatively low-powered CPU, the integrated UHD graphics are great for running Windows. What that does mean is that it runs on extremely low power, so having this NAS sit in the background working will cost you a lot less than many of the larger, more powerful options on the market.

Features: 4 / 5

Beelink ME Pro: Performance

Benchmarks

CrystalDiskMark Read: 212.58
CrystalDiskMark Write: 204.26
Geekbench CPU Multi: 2034
Geekbench CPU Single: 1056
Geekbench GPU: 3190
PCMark Overall: 2786
Cinebench CPU Multi (Threads): 2601
Cinebench CPU Single (Threads): 900
Fire Strike Overall: 1064
Fire Strike Graphics: 1136
Fire Strike Physics: 5822
Fire Strike Combined: 394
Time Spy Overall: 362
Time Spy Graphics: 316
Time Spy CPU: 2261
Wild Life Overall: 2258
Steel Nomad Overall: 0
Windows Experience Overall: 8

Starting out with the Beelink ME Pro is straightforward. Just think of it in the same way that you would any standard mini PC; essentially, you run through the Windows 11 Home set-up process, finish off the last few steps connecting to your network, and essentially you’re set and ready to go. It’s a mini PC, albeit not an especially powerful one, as was proven with the performance tests.

However, if you do want to use it for basic word processing, office work, browsing the internet, and watching videos on YouTube, then it’s more than adequate for that. You can always connect a webcam and use it as an office meeting machine. Whilst the N95 isn’t especially powerful compared to the latest mini PCs on the market, it’s still a well-balanced option, especially for work-focused machines where high-end graphics and processing power aren’t usually required.

However, this is also a NAS, offering network-connected storage, and it comes with Windows 11 Home pre-installed. It just makes the whole process easier, so if you work in a small home office and don’t have much IT experience, this could be an ideal solution for you.

To get started, I simply plugged the Beelink ME Pro into the back of my network hub, then attached the monitor, keyboard, and mouse so I could complete the Windows set-up and install two 4TB HDDs. I used Western Digital Red drives and configured these as the Windows equivalent of RAID 0, essentially a simple storage space. And, of course, you have the option to go for mirror or parity, the RAID 1 or RAID 5 equivalents.

The process is relatively easy: install the drives, then go to System > Storage in the Advanced Storage Settings. Select your storage space, create a new pool, select both HDDs, choose Simple, and you’re essentially done. You then have those 4TB drives as one usable 8TB drive. There’s no redundancy with the Simple configuration, but it does give you the speed. If you do want backup, set the drives as a mirror, which is the RAID 1 equivalent; again, it’s the same process, you just select Mirror rather than Simple.

Used in this way, those 8TB were fast to access, so I used them to back up my image and video files directly to the shared space I created on those drives.

When it came to the rest of the storage options using the SSDs, one of them was obviously taken by Windows 11 Home, and the other two slots I installed two Lexar 512GB SSDs; I installed TrueNAS on one and left the other as straight storage for TrueNas, and again, it was all very easy to do.

The SSD storage was prepared through TrueNas and once formatted it could be accessed directly or through the network. It’s worth pointing out that TrueNAS, needed to be installed from a separate USB key, and here I was really pleased to see that there was a USB Type-A slot on the front of the machine; the two on the rear were already taken up with the keyboard and mouse, and I didn’t want to unplug these or use an adapter.

The TrueNAS set-up was relatively straightforward, taking slightly longer than anticipated to run through the settings and connect the machine to the wired network, but once it was up and running, I was able to stream from Plex and use it again as a mass storage device. One of the issues here is that Simple (RAID 0) storage capacity that I had setup in the Windows install wasn’t accessible from the TrueNAS install. What really stood out here was just how well suited the N95 CPU was, and whilst it’s limited for general day-to-day use as an office machine, it makes perfect sense when used within a NAS.

The other point is that whilst the integrated UHD graphics might not be that impressive for the latest games, when it comes to streaming 4K footage it does surprisingly well and means that here we have an inexpensive solution that’s easy to understand compared with many standard NAS options.

Another point is that it can be left on 24/7; after the test, once it was installed, I literally just left it running in the background. After giving the TrueNAS installation a test, I switched back to Windows 11 Home and left it running as a large-capacity storage solution in the office. Whilst there were limited additional options compared with TrueNAS, it was just easy to connect to and use.

One of the main reasons I installed the Plex Media Server for Windows was to point it to the 8TB internal storage set-up and have Plex running as a background service all the time, directly accessible from all the machines in the house and then office.

By the end of the test, the ME Pro proved to be one of the easiest NAS solutions I’ve come across, offering easy integration, especially for Windows-based set-ups, and it will suit many home offices without IT backup or support.

Performance: 4 / 5

Beelink ME Pro: Final verdict

The concept of the Beelink ME Pro is a great one. It offers a straightforward, easy-to-understand network-attached storage solution, and the fact that it comes pre-installed with Windows 11 Home means that almost anyone can set it up and use it just like another PC in your house or office, it just has more storage potential and the ability to be used as an effective shared network drive.

What I like about it is that you can easily install two large-capacity HDDs, and again, they’re set up using the Windows 11 storage solution which is familiar. The Windows 11 storage solution is just straightforward, and whether you choose to create a single large drive or mirror the drive, the process in the Windows interface is straightforward.

Then, once it has been created, right-click and select the share options so that anyone else on your network can access it. It really couldn’t be simpler.

The fact is, that for most home office workers this system is simple, essentially it’s another small machine with fast network connectivity with the ability to share its contents. Whilst it is a Mini PC, it should really be seen as a NAS or Media Server, the fact that it runs Windows 11 Home just makes it familiar and easy to use.

If you do want to take things a little bit further and turn it into a home media server, then with the installation of Plex you can instantly stream video from that master storage to any machine or smart device that you want, and whilst this does take a little bit more know-how and set-up, it is still relatively straightforward and there are plenty of user guides out there on how to do it.

But what really makes this interesting is the fact that you have those three SSDs on the base, so if you do want to install another operating system or NAS OS, such as I did with TrueNAS, then this again is possible, and you can use it in the home or office as a small home lab for experimentation, or if you turn it completely over to TrueNAS you have a very compact, large-capacity NAS that will offer you all of the usual features.

Whilst my review sample waseasy to use, straightforward, and worked exceptionally well for everything I wanted, many will feel that Windows 11 Home offers fewer features than some of the more involved NAS set-ups, but you can still install those over the Windows 11 installation. And what I really like is the part modular design.

The fact that you can insert so much storage, but also in future updates install an AMD or ARM motherboard all further add to its flexibility. If you are running a home lab and need to experiment with different CPUs and set-ups; this one small machine and the ability to slide the motherboard in and out again makes it extremely interesting.

At the end of this test I will definitely say the Beelink ME Pro is a perfect partner to Beelink’s other mini PCs, but more so to anyone with a mini PC looking for an easy way to boost its network storage without delving into something as complex as standard NAS box, and if you do run a home lab, again this is a great option with plenty of flexibility.

If, however, you’re just looking for a straight NAS with all the features and apps, then maybe something a little more advanced with a bit more processing power would be a better option.

Should I buy a Beelink ME Pro?

Value	Affordable hybrid mass-storage mini PC option that you can expand as your budget allows	4
Design	Extremely premium, compact all-metal build that will fit almost any space	4.5
Features	A great set of features and flexibility, meaning it can be as simple or complex as you need 4/5	4
Performance	Low-power CPU makes it okay for standard office work and being used as a NAS, but nothing too advanced	4
Overalls	Easy-to-use and extremely versatile home office NAS system	4

Buy it if...

You're crafting an office media hub
The ME Pro is ideal if you want a quiet, compact device for backups, Plex streaming, and centralised storage with fast networking.

You're running a small home lab
Got a set-up that needs flexible storage expansion and light virtualisation? This is a top pick without investing in a larger rack-mounted NAS system.

Don't buy it if...

You demand intensive processing
If you're planning to run multiple demanding virtual machines or CPU-intensive workloads, it's likely going to be just too much for the N95 model.

You want a machine for high-end gaming
Integrated graphics are not suitable for modern gaming or GPU-heavy creative applications.

For more essential computing, we've reviewed the best NAS devices.

The GameSir G7 Pro is one of the brand’s most customizable models yet, and it’s fantastic

2:00 am | March 2, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: Final Fantasy, PC | Comments: Off

GameSir G7 Pro: one-minute review

GameSir is a controller brand that’s only gone from strength to strength over the last few years. Reliably offering forward-thinking controllers for Xbox and Switch consoles as well as PC and mobile, they’re (typically) competitively priced and offer more features and longevity than even first-party gamepads.

That trend continues with the GameSir G7 Pro, which has easily entered my top three on the GameSir tier list alongside the GameSir Tarantula Pro and GameSir Kaleid. Many of the features that make those other two pads so desirable are present and accounted for here: Hall effect sticks that prevent drift, as well as fantastic trigger lock and remappable button options.

On top of that, the G7 Pro leans into modularity. Similar to the Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded or Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E., the G7 Pro has swappable d-pad and stick top modules (though the extra stick tops here are identical and act more like spares). You’ve also got the option to swap out the controller’s face and grip plates, though that’s strictly for cosmetic purposes.

Almost everything about the controller exudes quality; I’d use the G7 Pro over the official option any day. The only slight misstep here that prevents it from earning a perfect five stars, for me, is the face buttons. While using tactile micro switch tech like others in the GameSir lineup, these have a strange halfway bump that makes for a pretty lumpy press feel. It’s something you’ll likely get used to over time, but I definitely prefer the cleaner presses found on the GameSir Kaleid and competing pads like the 8BitDo Ultimate 2.

GameSir G7 Pro: Price and availability

List price: $79.99 / £89.99 (around AU$114)
Available to buy now at GameSir’s website, as well as Amazon
Multiple colorways and special editions exist at various price points

The standard GameSir G7 Pro comes in at $79.99 / £89.99 (around AU$114), slightly pricier than most other GameSir models, though this is understandable when taking the additional modularity into account.

Many colorways and special editions are available for the G7 Pro, some based on games developed by teams in China, including Wuchang: Fallen Feathers and Zenless Zone Zero. The latter even includes a layered keychain and is the one I received for this review.

As mentioned, prices vary for these special editions, and you can also pick up compatible face plates and stick tops from the GameSir website if you so desire.

GameSir G7 Pro: specs

Price	$79.99 / £89.99 (around AU$114)
Dimensions	6.9 x 6.8 x 3.7in / 177 x 173 x 94mm
Weight	9.6oz / 272g
Compatibility	Xbox Series X\|S, Xbox One, PC
Connection type	Wireless (2.4GHz, Bluetooth), Wired (USB-C)
Battery life	Around 12 hours

GameSir G7 Pro: design and features

Like many controllers in the ‘Designed for Xbox’ stable, the GameSir G7 Pro bears the approximate silhouette of the Xbox Wireless Controller. It’s a similar size and weight, but there are a number of improvements here that put the G7 Pro lightyears ahead of the official model.

From a pure look and feel perspective, I love this thing. The swappable faceplates add a good bit of personality and put forward a more cost-effective solution than Xbox’s own Design Lab, if you’re into the cosmetics of a controller, of course. The rubberized grips on the rear of the pad are sublime, too; among the sturdiest and most comfortable I’ve ever had the pleasure of testing.

Staying on the rear of the controller for a second, you have a pair of remappable buttons that are strictly optional; you can flick a small switch on either side to fully lock the button, preventing you from pressing it if you’d prefer. You’ll also find the trigger lock toggles back here, as well as a switch for swapping between Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless connectivity options.

The front of the pad is pretty standard stuff. You have an Xbox-like asymmetrical stick layout here, as well as the d-pad, face buttons, and Home and share buttons. A Multifunction button also exists here, as it does on other GameSir controllers.

This is immediately useful if you want to make quick and simple adjustments, such as headset and mic volume adjustment, and remappable button assignment. You can do all this in the GameSir Nexus app on Xbox and PC, too, but having on-device shortcuts in addition to that is a real boon.

GameSir G7 Pro: performance

Once again, GameSir has provided a near-luxurious play experience at a mid-range price with the G7 Pro. Hall effect sticks are pretty standard nowadays (and arguably expected), but they’re here and feel great nonetheless.

One thing that really impressed me about the G7 Pro is its trigger locks. Again, nothing new, but I almost always prefer the tighter press of a digital trigger if given the option. On the G7 Pro, they work flawlessly, and it offers one of the most tactile and responsive digital trigger options in the business.

Immediacy really is the keyword here. The micro switch-powered d-pad, as well as the claw grip bumpers and rear remappable buttons, all offer such clicky and immediate responsiveness that I can highly recommend this controller if you’re a competitive gamer.

The one misstep here has to be the face buttons, though, and it’s a real shame they don’t feel quite as nice as everything else on the G7 Pro. Here, as mentioned above, there’s an awkward half-press that makes the face buttons feel uncomfortably bumpy at first. I got used to it after some time with the controller, but the quality of them here is a noticeable step down from the brand’s other products.

On battery life, I managed roughly 12 hours on a single charge. That’s about average for wireless controllers at this price point, so no real complaints here. The inclusion of a charging dock is a really nice touch, and I found that it charges the controller fairly quickly, going from empty to full in about two hours.

Should I buy the GameSir G7 Pro?

Buy it if...

You want a controller that’s all about responsiveness
Immediacy really is the name of the game here. From the optional digital trigger locks to the d-pad and bumpers, everything about the G7 Pro is so tactile and clicky. It’s one of the most satisfying controller experiences I’ve had in quite a while.

You enjoy controller customization
Swappable face plates are a nice touch with the G7 Pro. GameSir sells a range of designs separately, making it easy to find a style that suits your preferences.

Don't buy it if...

Those face buttons sound annoying to you
Really the only downside of the G7 Pro is its face buttons. They just feel a little awkward and out of place compared to the immediacy and responsiveness of the rest of the pad’s modules. While far from unusable - and certainly not unresponsive - the relatively spongy feel is a letdown here.

Also consider...

If the GameSir G7 Pro isn’t quite what you’re after, here are a couple more recommendations that might fit your preferences a little better.

	GameSir G7 Pro	8BitDo Ultimate 2	GameSir Tarantula Pro
Price	$79.99 / £89.99 (around AU$114)	$59.99 / £49.99 (around AU$90)	$69.99 / £69.99 (around AU$105)
Dimensions	6.9 x 6.8 x 3.7in / 177 x 173 x 94mm	5.7 x 4.1 x 2.4in / 147 x 103 x 61mm	6.2 x 3.9 x 2.4in / 157 x 99 x 61mm
Weight	9.6oz / 272g	8.7oz / 246g	11.52oz / 325g
Compatibility	PC, Nintendo Switch, mobile	PC, Nintendo Switch	PC, Nintendo Switch
Connection type	Xbox Series X\|S, Xbox One, PC	PC, Android (Switch version sold separately)	PC, Switch, Switch 2, Android, iOS
Battery life	Around 12 hours	10-15 hours	Around 12 hours

8BitDo Ultimate 2
Arguably the best controller in 8BitDo’s repertoire, it offers drift-eliminating TMR thumbsticks, improved remappable buttons, eye-catching RGB ring lights, and a sublimely smooth play experience overall. I highly recommend this one if you’re in the market for an affordable yet feature-rich PC controller.

Read our full 8BitDo Ultimate 2 review

GameSir Tarantula Pro
One of my favorite GameSir pads, the Tarantula Pro adopts a symmetrical stick layout like PlayStation’s DualSense Wireless Controller. You’re also getting high-quality TMR sticks here, and the build quality feels wonderfully premium despite the relatively affordable price.

Read our full GameSir Tarantula Pro review

How I tested the GameSir G7 Pro

Tested for two weeks
Primarily tested on PC with both wireless and wired connections
Played a wide variety of single and multiplayer games

My GameSir G7 Pro testing largely took place on PC, using the controller in both wired and wireless capacities. As a fan of the best fighting games, I found the G7 Pro, its circular d-pad, and clicky remappable buttons, to be a wonderful fit for Street Fighter 6 and Tekken 8.

I also got plenty of use out of its digital trigger option, allowing for quick and responsive access to alternate hotbars in Final Fantasy 14 Online.