Organizer
Gadget news
I’ve been testing AnkerWork’s complete M650 wireless mic kit for weeks, and it’s a great value alternative to the DJI Mic 2
5:57 pm | February 14, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

AnkerWork M650: one-minute review

The wireless microphone market is a crowded one. Whether you shoot with one of the best camera phones or a dedicated video camera, content creators are spoilt for choice when it comes to upgrading their voiceover audio. Among the best wireless mics at the moment are the Rode Wireless Micro and the DJI Mic 2, both of which are rated highly for their ease of use and sound quality.

It’s into that busy fray that the AnkerWork M650 steps. A two-mic kit shipped with a touchscreen receiver and packaged in a tidy charging case, the M650 promises high-quality audio recording with cross-platform compatibility. In the box come both Lightning and USB-C connectors for hooking the receiver up to your smartphone. It can also slot into a camera’s hot shoe, with a 3.5mm cable included for connecting to a microphone port.

On paper, the AnkerWork M650 offers a feature-packed setup. It promises dual-channel lossless pickup with optional noise cancelling and on-board storage for up to seven hours of uncompressed audio. Transmission range is a useful 200m, while the receiver has a streamlined touchscreen interface with access to a range of settings, including gain adjustments.

In practise, the AnkerWork M650 delivers on almost all fronts. Pre-paired out of the charging case, the kit is foolproof to use. Open the lid and you’ll find the two mics good to go, with a receiver that comes alive in a blink, instantly displaying audio levels on its bright screen. Key controls can all be accessed with just a few swipes of the icon-based interface.

The transmitters themselves are bigger than those of the Rode Wireless Micro and DJI Mic Mini, but their circular design looks subtle enough. Attaching them is a cinch with the built-in clips, which also double-up as magnetic mounts which can be rotated through 90-degree increments. The transmitters are relatively weighty at 30g apiece, but they hold firm however you wear them.

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

Recording performance impressed me in testing. Dialogue sounds clear and natural by default, with the option to adjust the EQ through the AnkerWork software. Noise reduction is also effective in outdoor environments, although it can be aggressive on its highest setting, giving vocals a processed tone.

Battery life is decent but not exceptional. The transmitters and receiver are rated for six hours on a single charge, with a further nine hours available from the charging case. At a total of 15 hours, the AnkerWork M650 is outgunned by the DJI Mic 2.

Still, with a raft of useful features, I think the AnkerWork M650 strikes an excellent balance of performance and usability. Options such as real-time monitoring will appeal to seasoned creators, while the intuitive setup makes it satisfyingly simple to operate. That includes neat design touches, such as the twist-to-lock smartphone adapters.

There are cheaper, screen-free options available if you only want to record audio to a smartphone. But if you need the flexibility to record quality audio with a range of shooting tools, I think the AnkerWork M650 is a good value alternative to the DJI Mic 2.

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

AnkerWork M650: price and release date

  • $199.99 / £249.99 / AU$199.98 for the complete kit
  • Includes 2x mics, a receiver and a charging case
  • Available now in black and white with swappable back covers

The AnkerWork M650 wireless mic launched in March 2023. It’s available now, priced at $199.99 / £249.99 / AU$199.98. That makes it quite a bit cheaper than the twin-transmitter DJI Mic 2 Combo, which is arguably its closest like-for-like competitor. Unlike the DJI Mic 2, the M650’s component parts can’t be bought separately: it’s only available as a kit. Luckily, it’s a complete one.

The kit includes a pair of transmitters, a receiver and a charging case. You also get USB-C and Lightning smartphone adapters, as well as USB-C and 3.5mm audio cables, reflecting the universal connectivity of the kit. Adding further value to the bundle is a pair of wind shields, a travel sleeve and two swappable transmitter shells.

It’s available in black or white, with the color scheme reflected across the case, transmitters, receiver and smartphone adapters. The black kit comes with one gold and one green replacement back cover for the transmitters. The white kit includes blue and purple shells.

There are simpler wireless mic kits which can be picked up for significantly less than the AnkerWork M650, including the DJI Mic Mini and the Rode Wireless Micro. Taken together, though, I think the contents of the AnkerWork kit make it excellent value for content creators who are likely to use it with both a smartphone and a camera.

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

AnkerWork M650: specs

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

AnkerWork M650: Design

  • Circular transmitters with swappable back plates
  • Built-in clips or magnetic attachment
  • Receiver with levels monitoring and 1.47-inch touchscreen

The AnkerWork M650 follows the same basic formula as most wireless mic kits. You get a pair of transmitters, plus a receiver that connects to your camera or smartphone. These all live inside a charging case. Open it up and everything is automatically paired, ready to go.

There are a few design touches which set the AnkerWork M650 kit apart. Its transmitters are unique among the wireless mics we’ve tested in being circular. Measuring 45.5mm across, they are larger than most and relatively weighty at 30g. Despite their size, the domed shells give them a good dose of subtlety. They look less obviously like microphones than many transmitters. They also have a party trick: the back covers can be swapped for different color shells.

There are two easy ways to attach the transmitters to your clothing. The first is to simply latch them to a hem, collar or lapel using the built-in clip. Alternatively, pull on the clip and you’ll find it’s one half of a magnetic mount: put it under a layer of clothing and it can hold the transmitter in place on the other side. This magnetic setup also allows you to rotate the clip through 90-degree steps, so you can always make sure the pick-up is facing your mouth.

On the transmitter itself is just a single button, which can be used to mute the microphone (turning the indicator light red). This also serves as a way to manually power the transmitter off, in the unlikely event that you don’t have the case handy. Each transmitter also has a port which can be used to connect a lavalier mic. This is the same jack used to fix the optional wind shields in place.

The receiver is just as neat. A tidy little brick with a bright 1.47-inch touchscreen, it’s the hub through which audio is relayed to your devices. It also has just a single physical button, which is used to lock the touchscreen. Everything else is controlled via the intuitive, icon-based interface. There’s very little learning curve here: almost every key setting can be accessed with just a couple of swipes – and even for big fingers, the touchscreen is sized just right.

The main screen features two side-by-side graphics which display info from each transmitter in real time, including battery status, signal strength and audio level. Swiping left or right brings up settings for each transmitter, including gain adjustment, which can be boosted or lowered in 3dB increments. Swiping up lets you control the mics in sync, while swiping down lets you adjust the receiver settings, including the degree of noise reduction.

Connecting the receiver is equally straightforward. Your options here are plentiful. The clip underneath doubles up as a hot shoe mount, with USB-C and 3.5mm audio ports on the side for wiring up to a camera. If you’re pairing it with a smartphone, take a bundled Lightning or USB-C adapter, slot it into the mount on the back of the receiver, then twist to lock it in place. From there, the receiver sticks directly into the port on the bottom of your phone. The fit is firm and the position is a natural one for the receiver’s modest dimensions.

That 3.5mm audio port can also be used for real-time monitoring, which is a feature that more experienced content creators will appreciate. Equally, if you need to capture standalone audio, simply hit the record button on the receiver and it can save up to seven hours of lossless audio to its built-in storage. This can be accessed later by dropping the receiver into the case and connecting it to a PC or Mac using a USB-C cable.

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

AnkerWork M650: Performance

  • Dual-channel pick-up with VoiceShield noise reduction
  • 6 hours battery life (transmitter), 9 extra hours battery life (receiver)
  • Omnidirectional audio and up to 200m range

Each transmitter is equipped with an omnidirectional pick-up that’s capable of capturing 24-bit audio at 48Khz. This isn’t as flexible as the 32-bit float audio support offered by the Mic 2, which can better avoid clipping if volume spikes, but its quality will be more than good enough for most content creators.

It’s worth noting that there’s no equivalent of Rode’s Intelligent GainAssist, which automatically adjusts audio levels to suit the environment. You’ll need to monitor levels using the readout on the receiver and make any necessary gain adjustments manually. In general, though, by keeping the mic a consistent distance from my mouth, I didn’t have any issues with clipping.

Nor did I encounter any problems with pairing, syncing or storing recordings during testing. I didn’t test the claimed 200m transmission range to its limit, but I found the connection stable and reliable even when roaming a fair distance from the receiver.

To assess sound quality, I recorded voiceovers in a range of settings, indoors and out, both quiet and noisy. Overall, I found results clean and natural. Audio captured by the M650 had significantly more clarity and depth than output from the built-in mics on my smartphone and DSLR camera. WAV files saved directly to the receiver were particularly clear.

If your ears are keen enough and you want a slightly warmer tone or more low-end depth to your voiceovers, you can adjust the EQ through the AnkerWork desktop software. That’s also where you can configure the low-pass filter.

Windy conditions are the biggest challenge for any wireless mic and the AnkerWork M650 is no exception. It features two levels of VoiceShield noise reduction which can be enabled using the receiver’s touchscreen. The feature is very effective at isolating vocals, even when there’s a lot of background hubbub. The drawback is that, when the system is battling noise at its highest setting, voices can sound digitally compressed and over-processed.

I found the best balance for recording outdoors was to attach one of the included dead cat wind shields and set the noise reduction level to low. This did allow a little more noise into recordings but not enough to be distracting, while crucially having a less noticeable impact on audio quality.

For content creators who want to upgrade their audio, you can really hear the difference in quality versus a device’s built-in microphone. The lack of Bluetooth connectivity might be a dealbreaker for some, but the added flexibility would likely come at the cost of bit-rate. For most, its reliable 24-bit recording and decent noise-cancelling tech will make the M650 worth the money.

In terms of battery life, the nine-hour boost offered by its charging case is less than some, but you’d need to be using the AnkerWork M650 kit pretty heavily to exhaust its full capacity in a single shoot. In reality, I never once encountered a dead battery. Both the transmitters and the receiver are rated for six hours on a charge, which is plenty. Plus most users are likely have the kit in and out of the case regularly.

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

Should I buy the Ankerwork M650?

Buy it if…

You want a complete wireless mic kit

Shipped with two mics and a receiver in a charging case, the AnkerWork M650 also includes USB-C and Lightning smartphone adapters, 3.5mm audio and USB-C cables, plus windshields and two replacement back covers.

You want a mic that’s easy to use

Pre-paired out of the charging case, the M650 offers plug-and-play simplicity. There’s just one button on each transmitter, while the receiver’s icon-based touchscreen interface is intuitive enough for anyone to navigate.

You want premium audio recording

With dual-channel lossless pick-up, the M650 captures clean, natural voiceovers. You have the option of mono or stereo recording, plus the ability to make granular adjustments to the gain level via the receiver.

Don’t buy it if…

You want the best battery life

On-board battery life is par for the course at six hours per charge, but the case only offers a further nine hours. That pales in comparison to the DJI Mic 2’s case (18 hours).

You want a budget smartphone kit

The AnkerWork M650 represents good value for such a feature-heavy wireless mic kit, but there are more affordable options out there for content creators who only need simple smartphone connectivity without a touchscreen receiver.

You want clean, noiseless audio

VoiceShield noise reduction does an impressive job of cancelling wind noise when shooting on location, but it can make voices sound a little processed. The high setting should only be used as a last resort.

AnkerWork M650: also consider

Rode Wireless Micro

If you mainly create content with your smartphone and you’re happy with a screen-free receiver, the Rode Wireless Micro represents excellent value. It’s a tiny, low-fuss option that’s up and running in seconds.

Read our Rode Wireless Micro review

DJI Mic 2

A pro-grade recording kit which is arguably the M650’s closest competitor, the DJI Mic 2 offers a similarly seamless setup for premium audio. It costs more, but includes support for 32-bit float recording.

Read our DJI Mic 2 in-depth review

AnkerWork M650 wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands / Future)

How I tested the Ankerwork M650

  • Used regularly for several weeks
  • Paired with both cameras and smartphones
  • Tested in a range of recording environments

To fully explore the capabilities of the AnkerWork M650, I tested it regularly over the course of several weeks. I used it to record voiceovers in a range of scenarios, from quiet home environments to noisy outdoor settings.

Paying particular attention to the effectiveness of its noise reduction feature, I used the AnkerWork M650 on a number of windy days. I tested it with VoiceShield switched off, set to low and at its highest setting, both with and without the optional wind shields installed, before comparing the results.

Because the M650 is such a complete kit – and one which content creators are likely to use in a number of different ways – I tested it with both a smartphone and a camera. I attached the receiver to my iPhone 12 via the Lightning adapter. I also used it on the hot shoe of my trusty Nikon D7100, connected via the 3.5mm audio cable. For completeness, I also used the AnkerWork M650 as a standalone solution, recording audio to its on-board storage.

Throughout my tests, I interacted with the wireless mic kit as real users would. That meant monitoring levels in real time on the receiver’s touchscreen and adjusting gain settings. I also tried attaching the transmitters to different items of clothing, used both the clip-on and magnetic solutions, to see how effectively they held.

Mindshift Backlight 26L review: a lightweight outdoor backpack you can depend on
8:18 pm | February 13, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Mindshift Backlight 26L: two-minute review

Finding the right outdoor backpack for landscape and adventure photography isn’t easy. Sure, there are lots of options available which is no bad thing, but the best camera bag for you ultimately depends on what you need to carry and what features you're looking for. For me, the Mindshift Backlight 26L, which is made by Think Tank Photo, has proved to be one of the best non-modular options available.

This backpack has been around for quite a few years now with no updates in design except for the availability of additional colors. Where many camera bag manufacturers constantly produce new versions to entice extra sales, Think Tank Photo has kept the faith in the Backlight 26L's solid design. I picked one up around seven years ago, it's covered many miles, and it is still holding strong, with what I expect to be many years of life left in it.

As the name suggests, this is a 26-liter backpack, with the main section being for camera gear; enough space for a day's shooting in the hills or at the coast; plus the space needed to carry essential outdoor items such as waterproofs, a large bottle of water or two, a laptop and a tablet, if required. There's also a way to attach a tripod, plus a waterproof cover so everything has been considered, not to mention it has a trick or two up its sleeve.

Mindshift Backlight 26L being worn

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Mindshift Backlight 26L: price and availability

  • The Mindshift Backlight 26L costs around $299 / £289 / AU$440
  • It's available in four colors
  • Still available new despite being on sale for many years

The Backlight 26L certainly isn't a new backpack and has been available for somewhere around 10 years. It's not the least expensive bag of its type either, but it's certainly not style over substance like many modern camera backpacks.

The Backlight 26L costs $299 / £289 / AU$440, but this is a bargain when you consider how tough it is and the many years of faithful service it has the potential to provide. There are also four colours available; Charcoal, Slate Black, Woodland Green and Montane Green.

Mindshift Backlight 26L: specs

Mindshift Backlight 26L: design

  • Comfortable to wear
  • Useful features for the outdoors
  • Fixed rather than modular design

Many outdoor backpacks these days are modular with the ability to use different camera inserts, such as Peak Design's Camera Cubes; this is to vary the ratio between photo gear and non-photo gear depending on what you're doing. The Backlight 26L follows a more traditional rear-entry design with a fixed, yet configurable camera section, alongside two additional pockets on the front of the bag.

The main front pocket offers a laptop section for up to 16-inch laptops, a 10-inch tablet section and enough space to pack a waterproof jacket, waterproof pants and other items, while the smaller front pocket is ideal for items such as a flashlight and gloves. The space for non-photographic items is nine litres, which is sufficient, although this is much less than the additional space you can enjoy with some modular outdoor backpacks.

On the sides, there are two large water bottle pockets with cinch cords that can carry 32oz / 1 liter Nalgene water bottles – I own one and they fit perfectly. Plus, the side pockets, in conjunction with the adjustable compression straps, can also be used for carrying a tripod. There is also a tripod carrying system that packs away neatly on the front of the bag.

This is a mid-sized backpack that meets airplane carry-on requirements, but it only weighs 3.9lbs / 1.8kg. It's incredibly comfortable to wear and the padded rear panel has an air channel and a lumbar support. The air channel may help on hot days, but it certainly doesn’t stop your back from becoming hot and sweaty. With all of this in mind, it's clearly a bag that's designed for day hikes and shoots because you can only carry essential additional items for the day rather than overnight camping kit.

Image 1 of 6

Mindshift Backlight 26L on a bench

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 6

Mindshift Backlight 26L padded rear panel

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 6

Mindshift Backlight 26L top pocket

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 6

Mindshift Backlight 26L front pocket logo

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 6

Mindshift Backlight 26L compression strap

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 6 of 6

Mindshift Backlight 26L side pocket

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The manufacturer says that the bag can accommodate up to two mirrorless cameras, 5-7 lenses and a flashgun. From my experience this is true, but it of course depends on the lenses you're carrying and whether or not telephoto lenses need to be laid down in the bag rather than stood up. My standard configuration was a full-frame camera and 16-35mm lens, a second APS-C camera and lens, a 70-200mm f/4, a filter system and accessories, which together filled the camera compartment.

One of my favourite features of the bag is that with the waist belt in use, you can release your arms from the strap and rotate it to your front laid out horizontally. The rear access then allows you to access your kit without putting the bag down, which is fantastic in muddy locations and when standing in water. The back section even has a strap you can hook over the back of your neck to hold the bag open, although you won't often require it.

Image 1 of 4

Mindshift Backlight 26L camera section

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 4

Mindshift Backlight 26L rear panel internal pockets

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 4

Mindshift Backlight 26L front pocket with laptop and tablet compartments

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 4

Mindshift Backlight 26L zip close-up

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Additional features include tough water-repellent material that I can tell you from experience will stand the test of time. The water resistance is absolutely fine for light rain shows, but in heavier downpours you will need to use the included rain cover. There are also loops to carry two ice axes or walking poles alongside daisy chain connection points for attaching other items with karabiners or smaller Molle-compatible bags.

I own the Backlight 26L, but there's also the smaller Backlight 16L and the larger Backlight 36L. All three sizes follow the same design but are, as the names suggest, different capacities; the 36L is deep enough for professional cameras with a built-in or attached vertical grip. However, I think the Backlight 26L is the most useful size because it allows outdoor photographers to be able to carry all of the photographic gear they typically need alongside additional outdoor items.

Should I buy the Mindshift Backlight 26L?

Mindshift Backlight 26L with a tripod attached

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Buy it if...

You'd like a lightweight backpack
At just 3.9lbs / 1.8kg, this is a lightweight backpack that's extremely comfortable to wear thanks to the well-padded rear panel with air channels.

You want a bag you don’t have to put down
Gear can be accessed without fully taking the bag off, which can be invaluable when standing in mud or water. Plus, it's useful for city shooting where the rear entry provides security.

Don't buy it if...

You'd like a modular bag
Modular bags allow you to use different inserts/ cubes within a single bag depending on how much photographic gear you need to carry.

You require more non-photo storage
With nine liters of non-photographic storage, if you require more you may be better off with the Backlight 36L or a modular backpack that uses inserts/ cubes.

How I tested the Mindshift Backlight 26L

  • I'm a long time owner, over 7 years
  • I've tested all its features rigorously and adapted the bag to various use cases
  • It's journeyed with me many miles and for multiple types of locations

Having owned the Mindshift Backlight 26L for around seven years alongside other bags I use for different purposes, I've tested it over an extended period where all of its strengths and weaknesses have been exposed. It has been used in all weather conditions in the hills, mountains, at the coast and in the city, as well as being taken on flights as carry-on luggage.

First reviewed February 2025

I tested the Saramonic Ultra, and it’s a wireless mic with pro audio features that undercuts DJI and Rode
5:24 pm | February 5, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Saramonic Ultra: one-minute review

The Saramonic Ultra is a portable wireless mic system in the same vein as the popular DJI Mic and Mic 2. Aimed primarily at people who need to create audio and video content on the go – vloggers, podcasters and journalists – the Ultra is available as a package containing two wearable transmitters, one receiver and a portable charging case to keep everything together.

This kit allows for single and dual-channel audio, and the receiver can be connected to a variety of devices for adding high-quality 24-bit sound to recordings. Adapters are included for iPhones, iPads, USB-C smartphones and computers, 3.5mm camera inputs and even for Sony’s Multi Interface Shoe, but the transmitters can also record audio on their own thanks to 8GB of on-board space. When recording directly onto this memory, users can even record 32-bit float audio – a data-rich, high dynamic range format prized by audio professionals.

Saramonic’s build quality doesn’t feel quite as rock-solid as some of the alternatives, but the fact that the transmitter is waterproof to IPX5 levels suggests that the company is doing something right. And, despite the noise cancelling being far from the most effective I’ve encountered with wireless mics, the audio quality is generally excellent in a variety of environments.

Saramonic Ultra microphone main components

The whole kit includes two transmitters, one receiver and a charging case (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Saramonic Ultra: Price and release date

  • $249 / £259 / AU$449 for 2-Channel Set with receiver, two transmitters and charging case
  • Also available with lavalier mics included
  • Available now in black and white colour finishes

The Saramonic Ultra is available to purchase in a set that includes two transmitters, one receiver, a charging case, adapters for Lightning, USB-C and Sony Multi Interface, a 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable, two windscreens and a drawstring bag to hold everything. This package is available in a black or white finish and costs around $249 / £259 / AU$449. For a little more money, you can purchase the same package with two cabled lavalier mics included ($299 / £289).

As far as I can see it isn’t possible to buy the individual components separately, or just a transmitter and receiver package (as is available for those who want to save money on a DJI Mic 2, for instance).

That being said, at a price that falls quite a bit below that of premium rivals like the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro, and even below the relatively affordable Sennheiser Profile Wireless, the Saramonic can lay claim to being one of the most affordable higher end wireless mic sets around.

Saramonic Ultra microphone components in open charging case

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Saramonic Ultra: Specs

Saramonic Ultra microphone receiver attached to Apple iPhone 13

The Saramonic Ultra receiver comes with USB-C and Lightning adapters for direct smartphone connection. (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Saramonic Ultra: Design

  • Most elements slot into charging case for transport
  • Entire package weighs 210.5g / 7.4oz
  • Adapters for USB-C, Lightning and Sony Multi Interface Shoe included

Like most wireless mic setups, the Saramonic Ultra is centered around two main elements: a small wearable transmitter and an almost as small wearable receiver. The transmitter (of which two are supplied here) has a clip and a strong magnet allowing it to be attached to clothing, with the magnet being best suited to thin garments like t-shirts. It has a USB-C port for charging and data transfer purposes, and a 3.5mm jack for attaching a wired lavalier mic if desired. The transmitters are IPX5 certified too, making them waterproof against rain – something I’ve not seen with rival mics.

The receiver, which links wirelessly to either one or two transmitters, also has a clip, which doubles as a mounting option for sliding into camera cold shoes. It also comes with adapters for Lightning and USB-C devices, and something I haven’t seen on its competitors: an optional antenna to boost its wireless range to 300m (Saramonic claims the range without the add-on is 250m). The receiver also features an OLED touchscreen accompanied by a pressable dial for adjusting settings and viewing gain levels which, while both are small, I had few problems using. Those of a larger fingered persuasion may find them a tad fiddly, however.

Saramonic Ultra microphone receiver and transmitter in hand

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The supplied charging case has room for both transmitters, the receiver and the Lightning and USB-C adapters for the latter. Unfortunately, there’s no space inside for extras like the transmitter’s windshields or any of the cables. Still, the case, which has a leather-effect texture and a nice light-up logo on top to indicate remaining battery life, is a neat way to carry (and recharge) the core elements of this setup. Its construction is a little creaky compared to that of the DJI Mic 2’s case, but not to the degree I’d be concerned about it falling apart.

Saramonic Ultra microphone receiver with antenna attached to Panasonic GH6 camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Saramonic Ultra: Performance

  • Choice of 16, 24 and 32-bit recording
  • Transmitters can be used solo
  • Noise reduction, Vocal Boost and Low Cut modes

Like the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro, the Saramonic Ultra has an option to record high-quality 32-bit float audio directly onto the 8GB on-board memory of the transmitters. 32-bit float is to standard 16 or 24-bit audio what RAW photographs are to JPEGs – a much larger file size with much more data, allowing for more post-production manipulation of the sound. In my opinion, while it’s a useful option to have, particularly for professional users, the smaller file sizes of the 24-bit audio, and the fact that it can be transmitted wirelessly, means I’d be using 24-bit audio nine times out of ten.

It’s not like the 24-bit audio is bad, either. In fact, it’s nice and crisp, and turning on the Vocal Boost mode lends speech some real heft and body. If you want your voice to sound deeper and more authoritative, it’s probably going to be switched on most of the time. The mic can also be set to record 16-bit audio, which is presumably included as a space-saving option.

Another optional mode is Low Cut, which removes some of the lower frequency noise from recordings, and the three-level noise cancelling mode does reduce background sounds – albeit not to the extent of the highly effective noise cancelling employed by the DJI Mic 2. For example, traffic noise was still very loud in my test recordings, even with Saramonic’s noise cancelling dialled up to its top level.

Saramonic Ultra microphone with windshield attached

The attachable furry windshield is a must for outdoor recordings. (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Wind noise is also noticeable on my outdoor recordings, even in relatively calm conditions, which is why the furry windshields should rarely leave the transmitters if you’re using them outside – they do a good job of reducing it.

Gain can be set manually, with the receiver’s screen providing both a live indication of levels and a means for adjustment, but the Auto Gain setting can also be used in trickier, changeable environments. It’ll adjust gain on the fly to compensate for changes in background noise or subject distance from the mic, so it’s ideal for non-studio settings.

There’s no backup recording mode here, so no protection against signal drops. That being said, with the antenna attached you should get a consistently strong wireless signal. I wouldn’t rely it to work perfectly over the 300m maximum range claimed by Saramonic (and I take all manufacturers’ range claims as best-case scenarios) but for the vast majority of users that’s never going to be put to the test. I had no signal issues myself using the microphone while walking around my home, despite walls and floors potentially getting in the way.

Another pro-friendly feature you’ll find here is timecode support, allowing users of multi-camera shoots to easily sync their mics and cameras in post-production. It’s something few people will use, but very handy to have – and of the recent wireless mic launches, this and the Rode Wireless Pro are the only two models that offer it.

Battery life is decent, with around 6 hours of operating time on each transmitter and the receiver, plus an addition 12 or so hours (or two charging cycles) in the charging case. In theory, you can record for around 18 hours in total before needing to find a power socket to recharge.

Should I buy the Saramonic Ultra?

Buy it if…

You want an affordable pro-friendly wireless mic

The Saramonic Ultra is packed with useful and often premium features, such as 32-bit float recording, despite being one of the more affordable wireless mic packages around.

You need a waterproof solution

With IPX5-rated water resistance, you could use the Saramonic Ultra’s transmitters in a rainstorm (or even during your morning shower) without fear of damage.

Don’t buy it if…

You want to buy the components separately

The Ultra is only available as a two-transmitter kit supplied with a charging case. So if you need just one transmitter and one receiver and are hoping to save money, you’re out of luck.

You often record in very noisy places

With the on-board noise cancellation tech far from the best around, recording in noisy environments like busy roads can be risky.

Saramonic Ultra: also consider

DJI Mic 2
Packed with pro-friendly features like 32-bit float recording and AI-assisted adaptive noise cancelling, DJI’s second-gen wireless mic is well-built, well-designed, easy to use and more than capable of levelling up your vlogs, interviews, podcasts and other recordings. It also plays nicely with DJI’s camera drones, eliminating propeller noise automatically.

Read our DJI Mic 2 review

Sennheiser Profile Wireless
More affordable than the DJI and Rode alternatives and similarly priced to the Saramonic Ultra, Sennheiser’s wireless microphone set is a great (if slightly lacking in features) one-stop solution for improving vlog audio. Its innovative charging bar even doubles as a handheld mic for interviews.

Read our Sennheiser Profile Wireless review

Saramonic Ultra microphone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

How I tested the Saramonic Ultra

  • Used regularly for a week in both quiet and noisy environments
  • Paired with iPhone 13 and Panasonic Lumix GH6

I tested the Saramonic Ultra mic both inside and outdoors, and with its receiver physically connected to devices (my Apple iPhone 13 smartphone and Panasonic Lumix GH6 camera) and in solo mode. I made sure to record in a variety of environments in order to see how the microphone handled different background noises and weather conditions.

Boya Mini review: your super-cheap and super-tiny first wireless mic
11:10 am | February 3, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Boya Mini: one-minute review

Beginner content creators on a shoestring budget who are looking to up their audio quality will struggle to find better value than that offered by the Boya Mini wireless mic. For less than half the price of leading models like the DJI Mic Mini you get a reliable twin-mic kit, and while the 16-bit audio is admittedly modest, it's quality is perfectly acceptable for the likes of TikTok and Youtube Reels.

Naturally, for such a low price, there are a few compromises; build quality is so-so, there's no option for a 3.5mm connection (just USB-C or Lightning, which counts out most dedicated cameras), nor is there audio monitoring of any kind, or manual control over levels. This is a simple plug-and-go mic that, much like the Rode Wireless Micro, is designed for smartphones, laptops, or even the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 – basically any USB-C device. And for such users, the Boya Mini's simplicity works a treat.

The mics are super-tiny and weigh just 5g, so they don't tug on clothing. The receiver is also tiny, which means it doesn't get in the way when connected to your phone's charging port. I've found the mics quick to connect and reliable time and again, while the audio quality for vlogging is perfectly acceptable, and certainly much better than a phone's built-in mic. The fact that noise reduction features is a nice bonus too. If you're looking for a no-frills, reliable and cheap wireless mic, the Boya Mini is an easy recommendation.

Boya Mini wireless mic in person's hand

The Boya Mini is the tiniest wireless mic of them all (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Boya Mini: price and release date

  • Prices start at $45 / £52.99 / AU$83 for kits with charging case
  • Available in kits with USB-C and / or Lightning adaptors
  • Available now, in black or white finishes

The Boya Mini's list price is $45 / £52.99 / AU$83 at Amazon for the twin mic kit with charging case and USB-C connector. The kit is also available with Lightning connector instead, or in some regions for $59.99 / £69.99 with both connectors; or you can save money by opting for just a single mic and receiver kit. Should you click through to the Boya website, then you get redirected to a discount site where the price is even lower.

The mics feature clip-on foam covers, and all the components fit inside the charging case, while a soft case is also included. For the money, you'll struggle to find a better-value wireless mic.

All of the Boya Mini wireless mic kit components laid out on a storage pouch on a wooden surface

Here are all of the Boya Mini components included in the complete kit. In some regions, you can opt for a single mic and receiver, for about half the price. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Boya Mini: specs

Boya Mini wireless mic charging case with mics and receiver inside

I like how the two mics fit in the charging case even when the foam covers are attached (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Boya Mini: Design

  • World's smallest and lightest wireless mic, weighing just 5g
  • Components are available in black or white finishes
  • Tiny receiver, available in USB-C or Lightning versions

'Mini' is doing a slight disservice to the Boya Mini wireless mic kit – It's billed as the world's tiniest wireless microphone, measuring just 31 x 15 x 16.4mm. And given that it weighs just 5g, it might just be the lightest of its kind too.

Such miniscule proportions are handy in two ways; the mics are discreet, and nor do they tug on clothing. The mics are clip-on only, unlike pricier rivals that feature versatile through-clothing magnetic mounting. That means you need to find an edge in clothing, like a collar or pocket or button hole to attach the mic to.

The clip is metal, so if you source your own magnet you could fix the Boya Mini magnetically through clothing. The only reason I can think of why Boya didn't include magnets in the kit is that the mic and its clip are so small that it wouldn't be possible to securely fix it to clothing that way.

Build quality of the Boya Mini's components is so-so, and over the month or so testing the gear I've been conscious to treat it with care, especially the mic's clip, which is small enough to struggle to gain a secure hold on thicker clothing.

I was using the Rode Wireless Micro alongside the Boya Mini, and there's an obvious gulf in build quality – the pricier Rode model looks and feels the business.

As mentioned, you can buy the Boya Mini as a complete kit which comprises two transmitters (mics), a receiver (you choose which type you need – USB-C, Lightning or both) and a charging case.

Boya Mini wireless mic alongside the Rode Wireless Micro on a mahogany side

Here's the Boya Mini alongside the Rode Wireless Micro (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

The mics utilize clip-on foam covers to dampen audio that, handily, can remain in position on the mics and the components will still fit into the charging case. The Rode Wireless Micro comes with clip-on wind muffs, but these don't fit it in the case so, you'll have to find somewhere else to stow them when not in use. Boya has the practical advantage here.

Like the mics, the receiver is super-tiny. It attaches to your phone, laptop or tablet's charging port, and you'll barely notice it's there while filming. You need the receiver for the mics to work because, unlike the DJI Mic Mini, they don't feature Bluetooth connectivity.

If you're a wireless mic first-timer, you'll be up and running with mic'd audio in no time at all. Once you attach the receiver and select the video option in your camera app, you should get a prompt to select the wired mic option in the settings menu (rather than the phone's built-in mic) – that's my experience using a Pixel 8 Pro. Then you're good to go.

The whole process from unboxing to getting started is as easy as can be, and consistently reliable. It might be cheap, but it's certainly worth it.

Boya Mini wireless mic's receiver plugged into a Google Pixel 8 Pro, camera app on display

Here you can see how small the receiver is connected to a Pixel 8 Pro, and the video settings menu where I selected the wired mic option to get sound from the mics instead of my phone's built-in mic (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Boya Mini: Performance

  • Transmission range up to 100m
  • 6 hours operating time, with an additional four charges from the charging case
  • Three-level noise cancellation, plus a gimmicky Human Voice Enhancement mode

Despite its tiny size, battery life is practically on a par with bulkier, pricier alternatives. You get up to six hours record time per mic, and Boya says the charging case with its 260mAh battery provides additional charges that total 30 hours record time. That's enough juice for several days of moderate vlogging.

Transmission range is rated up to 100m in clear sight. I haven't personally tested the limits of the Boya Mini's transmission range, but I can vouch for the stability of the connection when vlogging. Note, you'll get interference at a much closer proximity than 100m if your device and the mic lose line of site, for example if you turn your back to the camera.

Where the Boya Mini most obviously comes up short as a cheap wireless mic is that audio bit-depth maxes out at 16-bit, and output is mono only. Splash out thrice the cash on a leading alternative, and you'll be getting richer 24-bit audio with the option for stereo output. Oh, and there's no low-cut filter, either, so low frequencies such as the hum of an air conditioner aren't filtered out.

Boya Mini wireless mic in person's hand

I had the white version of the mic, but it's also available in black (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

No low-cut filter isn't a big deal, though – the Boya Mini features one-click noise cancellation, activated through the one physical button on the mic. There are three levels of strength, though honestly I didn't notice a huge difference in any of the settings. You'll know when noise cancellation is active because the blue light on the receiver that indicates an active connection turns green.

There's also Boya's version of voice enhancement, which sounds impressive but don't be fooled – it's a gimmick. Think of it as voice distortion – one setting makes your voice deep, one high-pitched, and one normal. It might be a fun feature to play with once or twice for the laughs, but that's the extent of it.

So what do I make of the audio quality of the Boya Mini? I think the maximum possible quality has been squeezed out of its humble hardware.

If you're a casual vlogger, and need clear and crisp vocals across a range of scenarios, you'll get that with the Boya Mini. It lacks the finesse of a 24-bit alternative, but it certainly is a mark-up from your smartphone's mic. In fact, I've been happy enough with the quality that I've mic'd up with the Boya Mini for a few videos that I've shot for TechRadar's TikTok channel.

It's also versatile in that you can use it easily with a camera like the Osmo Pocket 3 (especially given how small the receiver is), with a laptop for work calls, and yes, with your smartphone for shooting Youtube, TikTok and Instagram content.

I'd be remiss not to address the technically-minded, so here are a few of the mics audio specs: it has a 20Hz to 20kHz frequency range, a maximum 120db SPL, and a 80db signal-to-noise ratio. Those are solid specs for such a cheap device.

Should I buy the Boya Mini?

Buy it if…

You want the cheapest possible wireless mic that's worth buying
It might be mega cheap, but the Boya Mini is also the real deal, with decent-quality audio and reliable performance.

You're a beginner smartphone content creator

The Boya Mini is primarily designed for use with smartphones, while its quality and automated audio features are sufficient for beginners.

You want a tiny wireless mic

Billed as the world's smallest and lightest wireless mic, the Boya Mini is positively tiny and discreet, and available in black or white version.

Don’t buy it if…

You'll eventually need a mic for cameras

The Boya Mini lacks a 3.5mm connector, meaning that you wont be able to use it with a dedicated camera, unlike the DJI Mic Mini.

You'll likely want audio-level monitoring and gain control

Its simple and therefore restricted in some ways – you can't easily monitor audio levels while recording for peace of mind, as you can with pricier alternatives like the DJI Mic 2.

You want the best possible audio quality

The Boya Mini punches above its weight, but it's not one for audiophiles, who will prefer the richer audio quality of pricier rivals.

Boya Mini: also consider

Rode Wireless Micro

Our favorite wireless mic primarily designed for smartphones is the Rode Wireless Micro. It's more than twice the price of the Boya Mini and has superior 24-bit audio quality, plus Intelligent Gain Assist for clear vocals, and impressive build quality. However, it doesn't include noise cancellation, and the mics themselves are a little bulkier.

Read our Rode Wireless Micro in-depth review

DJI Mic Mini
A premium and versatile alternative, the Mic Mini features 24-bit audio and Bluetooth connectivity, meaning you can bypass the receiver altogether, plus a 3.5mm connector for use with cameras. You can also dial in audio levels manually using the receiver. However, the Mic Mini feels more designed for both phones and cameras, with a bulkier receiver better designed for cameras.

Read our DJI Mic Mini review

Boya Mini wireless mic clipped to a person's navy sweater

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

How I tested the Boya Mini

  • I had the complete kit with charging case, plus USB-C and Lightning connectors
  • I used it regularly for a variety of vlogs for over a month
  • Tested alongside the rival Rode Wireless Micro
  • Paired primarily with a Google Pixel 8 Pro

With its automated audio recording plus one-click noise reduction and voice enhancement features, there's not a lot to get your head around, and that's the beauty of simple wireless mics like the Boya Mini.

I had the complete kit with charging case, and found the kit to be completely reliable, with the receiver connecting securely to my Pixel 8 Pro phone. I drained the battery of the mic and recharged it through the charging case to test the battery life.

I tested audio quality in a range of scenarios, both indoors and outdoors, and in quiet and noisy environments. I ran comparison tests with the Rode Wireless Micro.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless review: a well-designed DJI alternative
9:00 pm | January 3, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Sennheiser Profile Wireless: one-minute review

With relative upstarts likes DJI, Rode, Hollyland and more all releasing tiny wireless microphones recently, veteran audio manufacturers have started to get in on the action. Sennheiser’s Profile Wireless is an attempt by the company – long famed for its excellent studio mics and headphones – to muscle in on the market, and I’ve found it to be yet another very impressive compact mic, ideal for anyone who wants to elevate their recorded content for vlogs, podcasts, interviews and more.

With a lightweight, compact design (each of the two transmitters weighs just 27g, while the whole package including a charging bar weighs 290g) and a solid 20-ish hours of battery life, the Profile Wireless is easy to carry around all day, and its 24-bit audio quality beats the pants off the internal mics used by smartphones, laptops and cameras – the things you’ll likely be pairing it with when recording content. It can also be used completely independently of other hardware, thanks to each of the transmitters having internal storage space for recordings.

While its lack of so-called ‘premium’ features like Bluetooth recording, 32-bit float and automatic noise cancelling might give would-be completionists and professionals pause, I don’t think there’s much wrong with Sennheiser’s less-is-more approach. By keeping things simple and effective, the Profile Wireless makes for a worthy affordable alternative to the likes of the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone full set including cables, wind shields and charging case

The whole kit includes two transmitters, one receiver and a charging bar (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Sennheiser Profile Wireless: price and release date

  • $299 / £259 / AU$549 for 2-Channel Set with receiver, two transmitters and charging bar
  • Replacement receivers and transmitters sold separately
  • Available now

I think the best way to purchase the Sennheiser Profile Wireless, which is on sale now, is as a complete kit. The 2-Channel Set package includes a receiver, two transmitters, a charging bar/interview mic, three adapters (for mounting the receiver on a camera cold shoe, or on a USB-C or Lightning device), two magnets for attaching the transmitter to clothing, a 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable, a USB-C to USB-C cable, three windscreens (two for transmitters, one for the interview mic) and a soft zip-up carry case to hold everything securely.

The transmitter and receiver components can also be purchased separately, but I’d see that more as an option for replacing damaged or lost components (or buying spares) rather than for building a wireless mic setup.

The Sennheiser Profile Wireless is a bit cheaper than premium rivals like the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro, but more expensive than the compact DJI Mic Mini and Rode Wireless Micro. I think the pricing is about right, as the Profile Wireless can’t match the premium models on features such as 32-bit float recording.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone transmitter in hand

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Sennheiser Profile Wireless: specs

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone receiver attached to iPhone 13

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Sennheiser Profile Wireless: Design

  • All main elements slot into charging bar
  • Entire package weighs 290g
  • Adapters for USB-C, Lightning and cold shoe included

The main two elements of the Sennheiser Profile Wireless package are the transmitter and receiver units. The transmitter is a small and lightweight mic that can be attached to clothing via a built-in clip or a magnet (the latter being suitable for thin fabrics like t-shirts only), and can be used in tandem (for stereo or two-person recording) or solo (for mono recording). It links wirelessly to the receiver, a slightly larger unit that can be attached to smartphones, tablets, laptops or cameras; the receiver takes the audio signal and converts it to digital audio data on a video or audio recording, and also features an OLED touchscreen for adjusting settings and viewing input levels in real-time. The touchscreen is tiny, which can make tweaking things tricky at times, but given one of the key features of the setup is its compact size, I think this is just par for the course.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone charging bar

The charging bar doubles as a handheld broadcast mic, perfect for thrusting into the faces of interviewees (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Both the transmitter and receiver elements are handsome (if not showy or fancy) to look at and constructed well, just as I would expect from a Sennheiser product. They also come with a cleverly designed charging bar, which features space to dock them for storage and recharging, plus room to store adapters and magnets. Its long, narrow shape, and the fact that the transmitters are stored at one end, means it can be repurposed as a traditional handheld microphone, held by the user and pointed towards interviewees – much like you’d see a news reporter wielding for a vox pop or red carpet interview. That’s something I’ve never seen on other wireless mics, and a good reason to consider buying the Profile Wireless if you’re planning on creating that sort of content. The charging bar also has a standard tripod mounting point on one side, so you can attach it to a tripod or mic arm if you wished.

As with most small wireless microphone packages, the Profile Wireless can be attached to various devices. Included in the box are adapters to attach the receiver to Lightning devices, USB-C devices and cameras (the latter using a cold shoe mount). The transmitters can also be used completely independently, thanks to onboard recording controls and 16GB of built-in storage space – enough for about 30 hours of audio. Each also has a 3.5mm input for attaching an optional lavalier mic, and it’s a nice high-quality metal connector too, with a screw fit for firmly securing the lav mic cable. Again, that’s a nice premium touch that I haven’t seen on similar wireless mic systems – the DJI Mic 2 has a lav input, but it’s just plastic with no screw fit.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone receiver attached to an Apple iPhone

The receiver can attach directly to your smartphone, tablet, camera or laptop (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Sennheiser Profile Wireless: Performance

  • 24-bit audio quality
  • Automatic backup recording
  • Wireless range of up to 245m

Like most 2.4GHz wireless mics, the Profile Wireless records audio at 24-bit quality. Some recent mics, like the DJI Mic 2 and Rode Wireless Pro, offer an option to record at a higher 32-bit float quality, but that’s not available here. I don’t think most users will find that a huge loss, as the 24-bit audio sounds great here, and 32-bit float (the files of which take up a lot more space than 24-bit files) is something that’s really designed for professionals and uncompromising perfectionists rather than regular users.

As stated above, I found the Profile Wireless’s audio quality to be excellent, having tested it both in and outdoors in various ambient noise conditions. The lack of active or intelligent noise cancelling means you may want to consider alternative microphones if you’re likely to be consistently recording in loud environments, but as long as you can live with some background noise I don’t think it’s a feature you’ll miss too much. There are removeable furry wind shields included to help reduce noise on blustery days, too.

The 24-bit audio does a fine job of making voices sound clear and weighty, whether you’re recording onto an external device via the receiver or directly onto a transmitter using the on-board controls. There are adjustable gain controls included on the receiver, plus a Safety Channel mode that, when using two transmitters, records a second version of the recording at -6dB in case the main channel clips out due to an unforeseen loud noise.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone adapters inside the charging bar

Adapters for Lightning, USB-C and camera cold shoes are included in the charging bar (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Another feature not included here but present on some rivals is direct Bluetooth recording, where you can pair a transmitter directly with your mobile device to record audio, bypassing the receiver altogether.

One great audio feature Sennheiser has added is Backup Recording Mode, which automatically switches to on-board recording when the wireless signal is weak or drops. The wireless range is good (up to about 250m in clear conditions) but having this as a fallback option in case of connection issues may turn out to be a godsend for some.

Battery life is fairly decent, with around 7 hours of operating time on each transmitter and the receiver, plus an addition 15 or so hours in the charging bar. So you’re looking at an overall recording time of around 21 hours when using a single transmitter at any one time – roughly the same as you’d get from the Rode Wireless Micro.

Should I buy the Sennheiser Profile Wireless?

Buy it if…

You want a no-nonsense way to improve your recordings

With no app required, auto-pairing and everything included in one small package, the Profile Wireless’s simplicity makes it a great one-stop way to get great audio.

You want protection against signal drops

Profile Wireless comes with an automatic backup mode, which kicks in to rescue recordings that might otherwise be lost if the wireless signal becomes weak.

You want to interview people while out and about

The charging bar’s ability to double as a handheld broadcast-style microphone makes it ideal for recording vox pops and similar interviews.

Don’t buy it if…

You need 32-bit float recordings

32-bit float recordings are overkill for most users, but those perfectionists who do want them will need to opt for a pricier alternative such as the DJI Mic 2.

You often record in very noisy places

With no noise cancellation tech included, you’ll be hearing background sounds in the Profile Wireless’s recordings. If recording in noisy environments is commonplace for you, it might not be the best choice.

You want to buy components separately

The Profile Wireless is only available as a two-transmitter kit with the charging bar, with extra transmitters and receivers being sold separately – but only as replacements or backups.

Sennheiser Profile Wireless: also consider

DJI Mic 2
If you're operating at a pro level, want audio quality a cut above the Profile Wireless’s, and are prepared to do a little work in the editing suite, then the pricier Mic 2 is the better bet thanks to its 32-bit float audio option and built-in environment noise cancelling. It is slightly pricier than the Sennheiser, accordingly.

Read our in-depth DJI Mic 2 review

Rode Wireless Micro
If you're keen for a fuss-free mic and only shoot with a smartphone, the tiny Rode Wireless Micro is a sensible choice. However, if you might branch out to vlogging with a camera, or want more flexible buying choice, the Sennheiser Profile Wireless remains a better bet.

Read our in-depth Rode Wireless Micro review

Sennheiser Profile Wireless microphone kit inside soft carry case

The whole kit and caboodle fits into a nice zip-up carrying case (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

How I tested the Sennheiser Profile Wireless

  • Used regularly for two weeks in quiet and noisy environments
  • Paired with iPhone 13 and Panasonic Lumix GH6 II

I tested the Profile Wireless both in and outdoors, both with its receiver physically connected to devices (my Apple iPhone 13 smartphone and Panasonic Lumix GH6 II camera) and in solo mode, making sure to record in a variety of environments, in order to see how it handled different background noises and weather conditions.

Rode Wireless Micro review: DJI-beating audio for smartphone creators?
3:42 pm | December 11, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Rode Wireless Micro: one-minute review

Rode's Wireless Micro is its smallest-ever wireless mic system, designed squarely for smartphone content creators, especially vloggers. It's the audio giant's simplest wireless mic yet: you can be up and running within seconds and recording smartphone-beating audio quality, all the while being cable-free and discreet.

It's a complete kit that includes two mics (also called transmitters) with magnetic attachments, plus one receiver, all of which are stored in a charging case – these components are available in black or white finishes. Additionally, you get two windshields plus a charging cable, though neither of those fit in the case.

Collectively, the mics, receiver and charging case are a featherweight 3.6oz / 102g, with each mic weighing just 0.42oz / 12g and measuring 40 x 20 x 17mm. It's a properly tiny kit, and even though the mic units are physically larger than the rival DJI Mic Mini's, the whole kit is much smaller, and purpose-built for smartphones.

If you're looking for a compact, dedicated wireless mic that'll deliver excellent audio for your smartphone vlogs, the Rode Wireless Micro is hard to beat.

Rode Wireless Micro kit on a wooden table

The Rode Wireless Micro kit is tiny and weighs just 102g all told. (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Rode Wireless Micro: price and release date

  • $149 / £134 / AU$259 for the compete kit with 2x mics, receiver and charging case
  • Receiver available in USB-C and Lightning versions
  • Available now, in black or white finishes

The Rode Wireless Micro's list price is $149 / £134 / AU$259, and for that you get a compact charging case with two transmitters (mics, with magnetic attachments), plus one receiver, all in black or white. Also in the box are two wind shields and the necessary charging cable. You'll need to select which version of the receiver you need, USB-C or Lightning, because the connector is built-in.

Unlike the rival DJI Mic Mini, the components are not available separately, and I think Rode is missing a trick here, because not every user needs two mics. However, probably nine out of 10 users will want the complete kit, and for those the Rode Wireless Micro is excellent value.

Rode Wireless Micro transmitter in the hand, wooden table background

The transmitters (mics) are tiny and pack Rode's patent-pending acoustic chamber, though they don't have internal storage or Bluetooth connectivity (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Rode Wireless Micro: specs

Rode Wireless Micro kit laid out on a wooden table

The Rode Wireless Micro is available as a complete kit only, with charging case, one receiver, two mics, charging cable and windshields (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Rode Wireless Micro: Design

  • The whole kit weighs just 102g and fits in a tiny charging case
  • Components are available in black or white finishes
  • Receiver has a USB-C or Lightning adapter built in

Rode has designed the Wireless Micro to be the most straightforward user experience possible for smartphone content creators, and it's done an excellent job of it – you couldn't hope for an easier-to-use and more reliable wireless mic.

The mics and receiver are automatically paired by virtue of living in the same charging hub. You simply plug the receiver into your phone and then follow the message that flashes up on your phone's screen.

If you have Rode's free app installed (available for iOS and Android) you'll be taken to the app, where you can pair the mics and receiver, and choose to how route the receiver input: split for left and right channels, or merge audio into one channel. You can also update the mic's firmware through the app and check sound levels.

For me, using a Google Pixel 6, I needed to select the wired mic option in my phone's video menu in the camera app (it otherwise automatically selects the phone's built-in mic). But once those options are all sorted, setup is complete and away you go.

You can be up and running in seconds after plugging the receiver into your smartphone's charging port, and armed with a wireless mic system that takes care of all the audio levels for you – Rode says its Intelligent GainAssist technology gets "perfect audio every time".

Rode Wireless Micro attached to phone and Rode's app on display

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

The mics can clip onto clothing, or attach magnetically with a strong hold through thin clothing, and they're available in black or white, so you can choose the finish that's likely to blend in with your clothing better.

The connection type is built in to the receiver, so you need to select the USB-C or Lightning version at the time or purchase, and there's full compatibility with both Android and iPhone models. The DJI Mic Mini, on the other hand, has a slot to fix the USB-C or Lightning connector into place, so you only need one receiver even if you use both connection types (though the Lightning adapter is a separate purchase).

The DJI Mic Mini also features Bluetooth connectivity, and you can therefore bypass the receiver altogether for 16-bit audio (although a receiver provides a stabler connection and, in the Mic Mini's case, 24-bit audio), whereas the Wireless Micro relies on its receiver.

Wind shields are built into the mics as part of Rode's patent-pending acoustic chamber design, plus there are additional furry windshields in the box that clip around the receiver for clearer outdoor recording on breezy days, although these additional windshields won't fit into the charging case.

Rode Wireless Micro transmitter attached to a bright orange jacket

It's been a couple of decades since my hair looked like this (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Rode Wireless Micro: Performance

  • Transmission range is over 100m
  • 7 hours operating time, charging case can provide another two charges
  • No noise reduction, but Intelligent Gain Assist gets you clear vocals

My experience with the Rode Wireless Micro has been as headache-free as I could hope for. Once I had the Rode app installed (though you don't have to use the app to use the mic), I was up and running and capturing high-quality 24-bit audio with my Google Pixel 6 phone in a matter of seconds.

Rode says the Wireless Micro's transmission range is over 100m, which is harder than you might think to fully test in the real world; how often – and indeed, why – would you need to record audio onto a phone camera from over 100m away?

The upshot is that for vlogging, the Wireless Micro provides a stable and reliable connection, with an operating time for each mic being around seven hours.

That operating time can be extended through the charging case, which features a 490mAh battery and can charge a transmitter an additional two times, effectively delivering an overall operating time of 21 hours. In short, with a charged case you'll have enough juice for a weekend of vlogging.

Rode Wireless Micro transmitter in the hand, wooden table background

The Rode Wireless Micro has a patent-pending acoustic chamber design (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

If you want to know a few of the technicals, the Wireless Micro features 24-bit audio, a 20Hz to 20kHz frequency range, a maximum 135db SPL, a 73db signal-to-noise ratio and an A-Weighted equivalent noise of 21dBA. For reference, those specs are roughly similar to those of the Rode Wireless ME, a pricier wireless mic that also works with cameras.

Rode's 'Intelligent GainAssist' tech automatically controls audio levels for well-balanced sound, enhancing vocals, and freeing you to focus on creating. You miss out on noise reduction, but unless you're in particularly loud environments it's not a problem – I've been able to get clear recordings of my voice in a noisy soccer stadium, even if the animated crowd added to the video's feel.

I've recorded vlogs in a range of scenarios; indoors, outdoors, and in noisy environments, and I've been very happy with how crisp my voice sounds. Put simply, if you want better audio without the fuss, this Rode mic is sure to delight.

Should I buy the Rode Wireless Micro?

Buy it if…

You’re looking to up your the audio quality of your smartphone videos
The latest smartphones are delivering better and better audio quality, especially with features such as speech enhancement, but the Wireless Micro will give you next-level audio quality. If you vlog, you need a mic like this.

You want a simple wireless mic for smartphones

The Wireless Micro is as simple as it gets: plug in the receiver, which is auto synced to the mics from the charging case, select the wired mic option, and you're connected. It's a matter of seconds.

You want a discreet wireless mic system

The receiver sits flush against the profile of your phone, completely out of the way, while the mics themselves are small and discreet, and available in two colors to blend in with clothing.

Don’t buy it if…

You need a mic for cameras too

The Wireless Micro is for phones only. If you think you might also use cameras to create content then the DJI Mic Mini, or alternatives, are probably the better bet.

You want some degree of manual control and audio-level monitoring

With its simplicity come restrictions – there's no real way to manually adjust audio levels, while you can't easily monitor levels while recording, as you can with larger receivers that feature an LCD display.

You want to buy components separately

At the time of writing, the Wireless Micro is only available as a kit. If you lose or break one of the mics, or switch between Lightning and USB-C connections, you'll need to buy the whole package again.

Rode Wireless Micro: also consider

DJI Mic Mini
The Wireless Micro's obvious rival is the Mic Mini, which is a more versatile tool in that you can use it with cameras as well as phones, plus it features Bluetooth connectivity, and you you can dial in audio levels manually using the receiver. However, the Mic Mini's receiver is bulkier, and more awkward to keep connected to a phone. The Mic Mini could have more staying power, but the Wireless Micro is superb for those only using their phones.

Read our DJI Mic Mini review

DJI Mic 2

If you're operating at a pro level and want audio quality a cut above the Wireless Micro's, and are prepared to do a little work in the editing suite, then the pricier Mic 2 is the better bet, especially if you're shooting with cameras as much as you are phones. However, if you shoot exclusively with a phone and want a simple option that's ready in seconds, you'll appreciate the simplicity that comes with the Rode Wireless Micro.

Read our DJI Mic 2 in-depth review

Rode Wireless Micro kit on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

How I tested the Rode Wireless Micro

  • Used regularly for over a month in quiet and noisy environments
  • Tested alongside the rival DJI Mic Mini
  • Paired primarily with a Google Pixel 6

There aren't a lot of ways in which you can test the Rode Wireless Micro: it handles audio levels, clipping and vocal enhancement automatically, and that's it appeal for most users. The mics and transmitter are auto-synced through the charging case, you plug the receiver into your phone, and away you go.

I did however make sure to test the audio quality of the Wireless Micro in mixed environments – the quiet indoors, the still outdoors, in wind, and in noisy environments. I was also reviewing the DJI Mic Mini at the same time, and so was able to run comparison tests to see which came out on top.

Almost all tests were done by pairing the Wireless Micro to my Google Pixel 6.

DJI Mic Mini review: the tiny wireless mic to beat for smartphone-first content creators
3:41 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

DJI Mic Mini: one-minute review

You're hardly short of options if you're looking for a new wireless mic. My recent favorite is the DJI Mic 2, which is one of the best wireless mics on the market, boasting pro-quality features such as 32-bit float audio. However, for many content creators, especially those who shoot mostly with a smartphone, the Mic 2 is overkill. That's where the Bluetooth-equipped DJI Mic Mini steps in: it's a smaller, simpler and cheaper alternative, with the same DJI reliability that I've come to appreciate over years of using its devices.

The Mic Mini is positively tiny, weighing just 0.35oz / 10g (without magnet), and it pairs easily with smartphones and cameras for better quality audio on the fly. Oh, and it's half the price of the Mic 2.

Its natural rival is the recently announced Rode Wireless Micro; however Rode's new wireless mic is only for smartphones, whereas the Mic Mini can be used with cameras too, via its 3.5mm jack, which means it's more versatile. It's not a sweeping victory for the Mic Mini, though – if you're only going to shoot with a smartphone, the Rode Wireless Micro might be the better pick because its receiver is tiny and sits flush along the underside of your phone, whereas the Mic Mini's receiver sticks out awkwardly.

Audiophiles will probably prefer the Mic 2 over the Mic Mini too, not just for its pro audio quality with forgiving 32-bit float capability, but because the transmitters feature built-in storage and can be used independently, while you can monitor levels on the receiver's LCD touch display for peace of mind.

Having used all three of the above mics extensively, I would personally go for the Mic Mini. The audio quality from all three is fantastic, but for outright ease of use, value, reliability, and versatility for phones and cameras, it's the one that ticks all the boxes. DJI has created another trustworthy wireless mic; and trust me, reliability is an unsung attribute. I've ditched many other wireless mics for letting me down at crucial moments, leaving me without proper audio. I would have no such concerns with the Mic Mini, and it earns my five-star seal of approval.

DJI Mic Mini transmitter attached to clothing

The Mic Mini transmitters are tiny and discreet, much more so than the DJI Mic 2's. It's also available in white. (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

DJI Mic Mini: price and release date

  • $169 / £145 / AU$245 for the compete kit with 2x mics, receiver and charging case
  • Components available individually
  • Available now

DJI sells the Mic Mini components individually but also as a complete kit, whereas the Rode Wireless Micro is a complete kit only, and you need to select the USB-C or Lightning receiver version.

The Mic Mini transmitters (mics) are available in Infinity Black or Arctic White. One transmitter costs $59 / £49 / AU$69, a transmitter with receiver costs $89 / £79 / $AU125, while the complete kit, which includes two transmitters, a receiver and a charging case, costs $169 / £145 / AU$245. The complete kit is probably your best bet if you're starting from scratch.

The receiver is attached to a phone using a USB-C connector, but if you're using an iPhone with Lightning port you'll need to purchase the adapter separately for $19 / £19 / AU$39. When connecting to a camera, you use a 3.5mm jack instead.

The list price for the kit is similar to that of the Rode Wireless Micro, despite the Mic Mini's greater versatility – it's roughly $15 / £10 / AU$20 more than Rode's offering – while it's around half the price of DJI's Mic 2. I think it's excellent value.

DJI Mic Mini kit inside charging case on a wooden table

The complete kit includes the charging case, two transmitters, one receiver and a USB-C connector for the receiver. There are also windshields and USB-C cable in the box. (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

DJI Mic Mini: specs

DJI Mic Mini transmitter in the hand, wooden table background

Components can be bought separately; the transmitters by themselves, or a single transmitter with receiver (a small charging doc is included in absence of the charging case). (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

DJI Mic Mini: Design

  • Tiny, discreet and available in black or white
  • Easy clip or magnetic attachment
  • Receiver with manual audio levels gain, but no monitoring

The neat thing about DJI's Mic Mini is that there are several ways you can connect to your phone or camera, and several ways to buy; individual components, a mic and receiver kit, or the complete kit which contains two mics (with magnets), one receiver, a charging case, plus wind muffs for the mics.

I had the complete kit for this review with USB-C connector, though technically you only need a single mic to get going with the Mic Mini because it can connect to your phone via Bluetooth. For manual control of audio levels, plus the added stability and richer audio quality, I prefer connecting a phone to the mic through the Mic Mini receiver, rather than relying on Bluetooth.

The mics, also called transmitters, are tiny and easily droppable, but they attach easily to clothing using the built-in clip, or the magnetic mount, one half of which fixes to the back of the clip, with the other half going inside your jacket or similar – DJI knows how to make a powerful magnet with a reliable hold. If you want a discreet mic in your shots, you'll struggle to find a smaller alternative, plus you can buy the mics in black or white to blend in with clothing.

When using a camera, you can slot the receiver into the camera's hotshoe / coldshoe and then connect it using a 3.5mm jack (the cable is provided). The receiver is a good fit for cameras, but it is a little awkward with a phone when attached via the phone's USB-C / Lightning port, because it sticks out a lot and the connection feels a little loose (see image below).

The receiver is a simpler offering compared to the one you get with the Mic 2. It features a power button, pairing button, 3.5mm jack and a ±12db audio level dial. That's it. The Mic 2 receiver features a basic LCD touch display through which you can monitor audio levels for both mics and make more advanced audio adjustments. The bulkier Mic 2 transmitters also feature built-in storage, and can be used independently of your camera of choice, or used as a backup device.

DJI Mic Mini receiver connected to a phone

The receiver is a little clunky when attached to a phone. It's a better fit slotting into the hotshoe / coldshoe of a camera (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

DJI Mic Mini: Performance

  • Two-level noise reduction, and Automatic Limiting to prevent audio clipping
  • 11.5 hours battery life (transmitter), 10.5 hours battery life (receiver)
  • Omnidirectional audio and up to 400m range

Where DJI's wireless mics differ here is that the pricier Mic 2 features 32-bit float audio that can more effectively avoid clipping when your audio suddenly gets loud, and internal storage for direct recording so that you can use it independently of a camera or as a backup, while its receiver features a display to let you monitor audio levels.

The Mic Mini is a much simpler device, with its receiver offering basic manual ±12db audio level control, but otherwise it's really for those who want the mic to capture excellent quality audio with minimal fuss.

I used the Mic Mini complete kit over several weeks and found it to be completely reliable and glitch-free, whatever phone or camera I paired it with. It's transmission range is rated up to 400m (with clear line of sight), which is plenty enough for any conceivable scenario – I've never been even close to that distance from my camera when recording audio wirelessly.

As for audio quality, I've recorded clips using a Bluetooth connection and the receiver in the quiet indoors, outside in the wind, and in noisy environments, and in general the Mic Mini captures clear audio in any of those scenarios. Vocals aren't quite as rich as with the Mic 2, but for 99% of people the difference won't be noticeable. You should also note that audio drops from 24-bit to 16-bit if you connect via Bluetooth, so there's not quite the same richness in vocal quality.

Having such relatively limited control over audio settings was a little disconcerting at first, especially compared to using the Mic 2, but the real plus to the Mic Mini is its sheer simplicity – you can rely on its connectivity and two-level noise reduction to do the job, including the one-touch denoise control when in particularly loud environments.

What I didn't do for this test was pair the Mic Mini kit with a DJI camera, such as the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 – a top-rated vlogging camera – or the Osmo Action 5 Pro. Doing so affords additional benefits courtesy of the DJI ecosystem – for one, the cameras have a built-in receiver, so you only need a transmitter from the Mic Mini kit. I've previously paired the Mic 2 with the Osmo Pocket 3 and found the experience completely seamless, so if you're using a DJI camera it makes sense to opt for a DJI mic over rivals.

DJI Mic Mini kit on a wooden table

The transmitters have just a power and a pair buttons, while the receiver also includes a ±12db audio level control (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Should I buy the DJI Mic Mini?

Buy it if…

You want a simple wireless mic for phones and cameras

DJI has stripped back the design and audio modes from its pro Mic 2 to create a simple wireless mic for phones and cameras that you'll trust, and can generally keep in auto.

You want a discreet mic

I find the DJI Mic 2 mics a little bulky and cumbersome; the Mic Mini mics, which are available in black or white, are much more discreet.

You want flexible buying choice

DJI offers the Mic Mini as a complete kit, a half kit, or the components individually, meaning you don't need to overspend for what you won't use, or if you need to replace just a single item in the future.

Don’t buy it if…

You only shoot with a phone

The Rode Wireless Micro is even simpler and its receiver is purpose-made for use with smartphones, whereas the Mic Mini's receiver is a little bulkier.

You want some form of manual control

The Mic Mini is for those who want an automated mic with minimal fuss, and are happy to rely on its quality without needing peace of mind from features such as audio-level monitoring.

You want the absolute best audio quality

The pricier Mic 2 offers richer sound with more depth, and fully avoids clipping in particularly challenging environments.

DJI Mic Mini: also consider

Rode Wireless Micro

If you're hoping for a fuss-free mic and only shoot with a smartphone, the Rode Wireless Micro is the sensible choice. However, if you might branch out to vlogging with a camera, or want more flexible buying choice, then the Mic Mini is the clear way to go.

Read our Rode Wireless Micro review

DJI Mic 2

If you want audio quality a cut above the Mic Mini's, and are prepared to do a little work in the editing suite, the the pricier Mic 2 is the better bet, especially if you're mainly shooting with pro mirrorless cameras. However, if you shoot more often with a phone, you'll appreciate the simplicity that comes with the Mic Mini.

Read our DJI Mic 2 in-depth review

DJI Mic Mini transmitter attached to clothing

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

How I tested the DJI Mic Mini

  • Used for several months
  • Paired with cameras and smartphones
  • Used Bluetooth and receiver connection methods

I've been using the DJI Mic Mini on and off for months, both with mirrorless cameras like the Panasonic Lumix GH5 and smartphones such as the Google Pixel 6. I've paired the Mic Mini to a phone using Bluetooth and via the receiver attached to my phone. I haven't used the Mic Mini with DJI cameras such as the Osmo Pocket 3 and Osmo Action 5 Pro (though I have used the Mic 2 with them), for which the compatibility is even easier given they both feature a built-in receiver.

I've made sure to test the mic in a range of environments: the quiet of indoors, in still outdoor conditions and in wind, and in noisy places too, with and without denoise applied. I've also been able to compare it directly to the Rode Wireless Micro which I was testing at the same time.

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L review: a versatile backpack that’s great for commuting and outdoor adventures, as well as for stowing camera gear
6:00 pm | November 2, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: two-minute review

Peak Design's Outdoor Backpack range is the latest series of bags from the US-based camera accessory maker. It's available in three colors and in 25L and 45L versions, and is due to hit the market in November 2024 after a successful crowdfunding campaign, with retailers already taking preorders.

I was among the first group of reviewers to receive a review sample, and I've been using the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L, in white, as my primary bag for the last three months ahead of its launch. I've found it to be a highly versatile bag that has rewarded the time I've invested to customize it for my needs.

I'm a photographer, commuter and serial outdoors adventurer, and Peak Design's Outdoor Backpack and has proven itself to be apt companion for all these scenarios, becoming my first-choice bag these last couple of months. It's not a dedicated camera bag per se, but it'll do the trick for a little bit of camera gear, with the right Peak Design accessories.

Image 1 of 3

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L in white, on a rustic bench

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 3

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L in white, on a man's shoulders

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 3

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L in white, on the grass by concrete posts

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: price and availability

  • Two sizes: 25L and 45L
  • Three colors: white, black or dark red
  • Preorders now, global launch due late November

The Peak Design Outdoor Backpack is available in two sizes: 25L and 4L, and in three colors; Cloud (white) Eclipse (dark red) or Black – the white 25L version is pictured throughout this review. The 25L version costs $249.99 / £249.99 and the 45L version is $329.99 / £329.99. The bag is due to go on sale globally in late November.

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: specs

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: design

  • Daisy-chain loops to fasten cords to
  • Weather-resistant exterior but not waterproof
  • Accessories include raincover, hip belt and more

For commuting, I usually pack a 17-inch MacBook Pro laptop, mirrorless camera with lens, a spare change of clothes, as I often run to work, plus a few accessories (in a Peak Design Camera Cube), all of which fit snugly into the 25L version of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack. I slip a water bottle and a travel tripod into the elasticated side pockets and I'm good to go.

There's no dedicated place to store camera gear – the Outdoor Backpack's main compartment is single open space, without the padded dividers you typically get in a dedicated camera bag. If you want to pack you camera and accessories you can pick up one of Peak Design's Camera Cubes, which will slot in nicely to securely hold that pricey gear. You just need to ensure that it's the right-size cube for the size of bag – there's guidance on Peak Design's website, plus new soft-shell Packing Cubes. A decent alternative to a Peak Design Cube is a gear wrap like 3 Legged Thing's Wrapz.

For daily use over months, the Outdoor BackPack 25L has proven itself durable, comfortable, and versatile. Its shoulder straps are well padded, and are fastened to the bag through a loop rather than being stitched on. This excellent design touch removes the stitching stress point (lesser-quality straps can become un-stitched) and should ensure that the straps last for many years of heavy use.

Both of the straps also feature an elasticated pocket that will comfortably fit a large phone – my Pixel handset slotted in comfortably and securely.

Elsewhere on the outside are the aforementioned elasticated side pockets, and what I've seen Peak Design call a 'daisy chain' of loops along most of the bag's seams that you can feed cords through, several of which there are included, to secure larger items such as a travel tripod. The ways to customize the Outdoor Backpack based on what you're carrying feel endless, even if some are a little fiddly.

I have regularly used the bag for short runs (around 6km) from a train station to my workplace, and even with a full load it sits comfortably on my shoulders, especially with the optional hip belt in place for additional lumbar support. However, on my runs, and on hikes in hot weather, I found that got more sweaty than I'd like to; it would be great to have better breathability on the back.

I also found the two zips to the main compartment, when closed together at the top of the bag, came loose during running and on a couple of occasions I had to rescue the contents as they spilled out. Closing the zips towards the bottom of the bag on once side instead avoided this issue.

Image 1 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's shoulder straps

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's shoulder straps with phone inside sleeve

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Closeup of the laptop compartment of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L in white,

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's bungee cords attached to daisy-chain clips

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

There are two ways to access the main compartment: the zips, which open the entire back, or the soft roll-top magnetic-clasped opening. For the former, you lie the bag down on its front to open it up and access the entire contents, while using the latter you can keep everything inside and rummage through the contents via the top opening.

The roll-top pocket is fitted securely inside the bag's weatherproof exterior with a cord, which is released for access via a neat pull-tab. To pack the top away, you pull at the cord to close down the opening (see gallery below). It's a very clever bit of design, and reassuringly robust, locking the cord securely with whatever tension you like. I regularly crammed a sweater or light rain jacket outside the main compartment but inside that adjustable weatherproof exterior, securing it in place with the cord. It's just a shame that there's no obvious place to put that cord when the top is closed off, as it simply dangles and is at risk of snagging.

There are no interior pockets in the main compartment, just a laptop sleeve. Peak Design says the 25L bag can hold a 16-inch laptop, but I found the stretchy sleeve snuggly held my 17-inch MacBook Pro.

There are no dedicated padded dividers, which I understand helps to keep the bag light and customizable. However, even with one of Peak Design's (add-on) Camera Cubes in place to secure gear in its padded dividers, access to gear is slower than I'd like.

Image 1 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's pull cord

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's pull cord

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's roll top

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Close up of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L's open top with Camera Cube

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Speaking as a photographer, I would love quicker access to gear, say through a side-access zipped opening. A few design tweaks like these could realize the Outdoor Backpack as the perfect versatile camera bag.

With a fully loaded bag and a Camera Cube positioned inside at the top, it doesn't take too long to access your gear, but you will have to take the bag off your shoulders.

I wouldn't describe this as a dedicated camera bag, nor would I specifically call it an outdoors bag; but it does a decent job of both, even if there are better alternatives out there that are focused on one or the other. As an all-in-one option, the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack has served my daily needs, photography and otherwise, better than any bag I've used for quite some time.

Should I buy the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L?

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L in white, on a rustic bench

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Buy it if...

You carry just a small amount of camera gear alongside daily items
The 25L Outdoor Backpack can hold a little bit of camera gear, but not a lot.

You demand excellent quality
There's no doubt this is a high-quality backpack, from its premium materials to cleaver design touches.

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for a dedicated camera gear bag
With no padded dividers or quick side access, photographers will find a dedicated bag an easier companion.

You're on a tight budget
The bag is pricey, and so too are the additional accessories needed to optimize your experience.

How I tested the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L

  • Two months of daily use
  • Commuting, outdoor hikes and photography walks
  • Paired with Peak Design Camera Cubes

I used the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L as my primary bag for a few months ahead of its official launch and writing this review. It has been on my shoulders for commuting, running and hiking. I've paired it with Peak Design's Camera Cubes to improve the overall handling of the bag for securely storing camera gear.

First reviewed November 2024

Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod review: party tricks abound in this modern tripod
12:01 pm | June 9, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod W28: two-minute review

Heipi was a totally new brand to me when I was contacted about its versatile travel tripod. (I’m not even sure how to pronounce the name – does it sound like you're greeting a fruity baked dessert?) However, just because it’s a new name, that doesn’t mean Heipi should be dismissed. In fact, the Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod is one of the most relevant travel tripods today, able to transform for multiple tasks and various camera gear in a way that almost all other tripods can’t. 

The average photographer doesn’t use very heavy gear in 2024; the kind of gear that needs an equally robust and heavy support. Mirrorless cameras and lenses are, overall, smaller and lighter. Heck, people shoot with their phones just as much as a 'proper' camera. Heipi’s tripod is for those photographers, the ones using small cameras like a Canon EOS R10 and one of the best cameraphones, who still need a lightweight and versatile support.

Regardless of size, a tripod still needs to provide firm footing, and unless you’re standing on a gusty cliff face, the Heipi tripod will offer shake-free support for moderate-size gear. A max capacity of up to 55lbs / 25kg feels fanciful, but I'd be happy adding an enthusiast-level mirrorless or DSLR camera with a moderate-size zoom lens.

Image 1 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod key specs

Total weight: 3lbs / 1.35kg (including ball head, or 2.35lbs / 1.07 without head)
Max height: 59in / 150cm (with center column fully raised, or 50in / 126cm without)
Legs locks: 4
Packed length: 17.7in / 45cm
Max capacity: Up to 55lbs / 25kg

As a travel tripod that weighs just 3lbs / 1.35kg (with ball head included) and packs away to just 17.7in / 45cm in length, something has to give, and that something is its max reach. It can’t provide the tallest level to work from, just 59in / 150cm with the center column fully raised. 

As its name suggests, this 3-in-1 tripod has many guises. For one it’s a regular, lightweight travel tripod that packs away more compact than most, in its supplied case. That's thanks to its four leg sections, each a smidge smaller than average.

Image 1 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)

I’ve reviewed heaps of tripods over the past fifteen years, yet Heipi's creation has a design feature I’ve never seen in a tripod before, an innovative center column. You can’t really call it a center column but it does perform as one. 

It's effectively a mini tripod that’s folded into the main tripod with its three legs locked vertically as a column. You can then pull it out and lock it off as a column to extend the reach of the main tripod or remove it completely to gain a hefty and stabler-than-most tabletop tripod: the tripod's second guise.

Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod W28 price and availability

The Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod W28 is available now and costs from $399 / £317 on the Heipi website and from $399 on Amazon US. You can buy it with optional accessories such as a QR plate or opt for a different type of ball head in a pricer bundle. 

Tabletop tripods are particularly popular for vlogging, and the Heipi 3-in-1's robust center column-cum-tripod is more than able to support the best vlogging cameras for such purposes. 

It's a party piece that should be enough to make the Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod stand out, but as its name suggests, it has another trick up its sleeve. 

Remove the tripod plate from the ball head and tucked away is a mobile phone clamp that can be pulled out, transforming the tripod into a mobile phone support (see below). 

The clamp extends enough to support large phones like an iPhone 15 Pro Max in horizontal format. Should you need to shoot in vertical format with your tripod-mounted phone, it's fiddly to rotate the ball 90 degrees, but it's doable if you persevere. 

Image 1 of 3

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 3

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 3

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)

Heipi's tripod is impressively versatile and lightweight, but what’s it like to use?

I'll start by reiterating just how compact the tripod packs down, and how light it is. I've been inclined to add it to my camera bag 'just in case', as it really doesn't add much weight to the overall package.

The main legs tuck very tightly together in between the mini tripod's legs. They fold out easily too, although I pinched my fingers several times in the fiddly locks that further open the maximum angle you can spread the legs. You have to repeat the motion many times to get the pain-free hang of it.

I also found the leg section locks unnecessarily long, they can snag during hectic moments on a shoot, and are fiddlier than most to open and close. However, they provide a secure lock and the process of extending all four leg sections and locking them off is speedy.

Image 1 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)

When the tripod is fully extended you get a modest maximum height. And if you need to increase the height by extending the center column, the column is quite sticky. 

Doubling up the center column as a mini tripod is a really clever idea, but in its role as a center column, it's not the slickest operator. 

The tripod comes with a matching ball head, while another type of ball head with a different locking mechanism is available as a pricier bundle. Check the prices above if you missed them. 

In terms of strength, the tripod legs lock off tightly and you get a strong support. Despite the claimed 55lbs / 25kg weight capacity, this is designed for those on the move with enthusiast-level camera gear, not those that need the largest and sturdiest support available for bulky gear. 

Ultimately, the Heipi 3-in1 Travel tripod lives up to its name and comes with the TechRadar recommendation.

Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod W28: Also consider

Peak Design Travel Tripod
For style and design, the Peak Design Travel Tripod is the first rival tripod that comes to mind. Of the two, Heipi's tripod is the more compelling option – its ball head has a panning motion, which Peak Design's tripod doesn't, plus you get those two Heipi party tricks AND it's much cheaper.

Read our Peak Design Travel Tripod review

3 Legged Thing Punks Brian 2.0
We rate the 3 Legged Thing Punks Brian 2.0 as the best travel tripod on the market. The reality is the two tripods are for different kinds of users. The 3 Legged Thing tripod is versatile for regular use – it's easier to use and make fine adjustments, and it has a better max height. Heipi's tripod is arguably better if you need to switch between gear, plus it's smaller and lighter. Both are highly recommended.

Read our 3 Legged Thing Punks Brian 2.0 review

Should I buy the Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod W28?

Heipi 3-in-1 travel tripod outdoors

(Image credit: Future | Tim Coleman)

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod W28

  • Long term use
  • All three facets properly tried out
  • Camera gear of various size and weight

I've had the Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod for some months and it's had moderate use in this time, traveling many miles with me. I still don't feel like I can say I've properly tested its durability – you need years not months to test a tripod properly and be sure it'll last the distance – but so far, it's withstood the rigors of moderate use as a full tripod and tabletop tripod. It's an ideal travel companion. 

First reviewed June 2024

Shimoda Urban Explore 25 backpack review: a feature-packed pack
4:00 pm | June 8, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Shimoda Urban Explore 25: one-minute review

There has clearly been a lot of thought put into the design of the stylish and simple Shimoda Urban Explore 25. The bag's layout is quite conventional, with a top compartment for everyday accessories, a main camera core at the heart of the bag, and various pockets throughout for productive storage.

Whilst there is nothing massively groundbreaking, the small design touches add up: rubber grips on pockets to prevent items from slipping out, handles on three sides of the bag, a cable management pocket, USB power passthrough, a strap loop for a camera clamp, a dedicated Apple Air Tag pocket, and a secret passport pocket.

The padding provides a good balance between comfort, security, and weight, and I found the bag comfortable to wear all day.

We're not looking at perfection: access to the waterproof cover is tricky and there's  no dedicated spot for a USB battery for the passthrough hole. But these are quite trivial points that don't detract from the overall quality of the Shimoda Urban Explore 25 bag.

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

Shimoda Urban Explore 25: design

When worn on the back, the Shimoda Urban Explore 25's minimalist look could fool you into thinking that the bag might be somewhat basic, which is anything but the truth. Beneath the strong, tough Cordura material and stylish leather zip-pulls are discerning features that will appeal to those wanting a photo backpack for that weekend city break. 

Shimoda Urban Explore 25 price and release date

The Shimoda Urban Explore 25 has a list price of $319.95/ £305 and is available in Anthracite or Boa color variants.  There are also 20L and 30L versions of the bag, also available in Anthracite or Boa. The Urban Explore 20 is $279.95/£285, and the Urban Explore 30 is $339.95/£330. 

Obviously, the smaller size will be preferential for those needing less camera kit and using smaller laptops or tablets, while the larger of the three will hold more kit and larger professional laptops. You can find full specifications for each of the bags on the Shimoda website.

The bag layout is quite conventional: there's a main compartment with a removable camera core should you wish to use it as a regular backpack, a top compartment ideal for accessories, plus two pockets one on each side for either a tripod or a drinks bottle. These side pockets are unzipped, with one allowing quick access to the main camera compartment (which can also be zipped closed internally for extra security). In contrast, the other side opens and reveals a pocket and elasticated loops for keeping all those essential cables neat and tidy. Within each of these compartments are plenty of pockets and even hidden spaces, which we will come on to later. 

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

Shimoda Urban Explore 25: performance

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

There is a decent amount of space in the removable camera core. I added a Sony A7 IV with a Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 lens mounted to it. This was easily accessible when I needed access from the side compartment. It is worth adding here that access to the camera core can be zipped shut so that even if the side of the bag is open, it requires an additional 'unzipping' before your kit can be accessed; again, this adds a touch more security from prying hands. If you want quick access, the side access flap can be tucked into the inside flap of the camera bag, which keeps everything neat and tidy.

Image 1 of 3

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

In addition to the camera and mounted lens, I could fit a FE 70-200mm f/4 lens as well as a couple of smaller lenses and a flashgun. In summary it has the space you need for a weekend shooting. The camera core also has a hard metal internal frame on one side to prevent your gear from getting crushed in an overhead plane compartment. There is a second metal frame around the edge of the rear of the bag, again preventing it from being crushed easily but also allowing it to keep the bag shape and sturdy.

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

Getting access to your laptop is easy. The laptop compartment is accessible from the top compartment, and it runs down the front of the bag rather than sitting against your back, which is more common. Instead, it is the tablet compartment that takes up this spot on the back of the backpack, and it is accessed from the main camera compartment.

There is plenty of space in both the laptop and tablet compartments. The laptop compartment measures 25W x 35.5H x 2D cm / 9.8W x 14H x 0.8D in, meaning it should fit a 16-inch laptop with no issues. I used it for my 13-inch MacBook Air, and it was swimming around in there. My laptop also fits in the tablet compartment, so iPad Pro users shouldn't have any issues.

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)


The straps on the bag are nicely padded, offering a comfortable carrying experience. They are also adjustable at the top, allowing the user to get a good fit over the shoulder as well as being able to adjust the length. One of the straps also has a little accessory mount, allowing a camera clip, such as the Peak Design Capture Clip, to be easily attached.  

A chest/sternum strap allows for a snug fit, but sadly, there is no waist strap, although there is a way of adding a third-party one behind the cushioning on the bottom of the rear of the bag. All of that said, this is very much a city bag rather than one you will be taking out on technical hikes, so the lack of a waist strap is completely understandable.

There are some lovely design touches on the bag, including an easy-access Apple Air Tag pocket – it is nice to have a dedicated place for it within the bag.  The passport pocket is tricker to find and access, as it should be; no one will be slipping their hand in your bag and getting your passport out.

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)


For storing accessories, the bag has plenty of space. The top compartment has a zipped mesh pocket, with two individual pockets inside for storing smaller items such as batteries and memory cards. These pockets have a little rubber grip at the top, helping to prevent any items in the pocket from slipping out or shifting around too much; it is a simple touch that adds to the quality feel of the bag. There is also a quick-release loop in this pocket, which could be used for keys or an appropriate accessory.

The top compartment is spacious and can easily hold a pair of headphones and a compact camera; like most top compartments, its location means it is best for things you need quick access to. Interestingly, the entire top compartment can be unzipped. Along with the ability to remove the camera core, this means that the Urban Explore can be used as an everyday backpack when you don't need all your camera gear.

I found the main front compartment to be another useful pocket for easy access to items. The size is perfect for holding a notebook or documents, while the internal plastic pocket is good for smaller general items such as tickets or pens.

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)


Having a dedicated pocket on the side for cables is great and helps to keep everything tidy and easily found. The USB passthrough comes through this pocket, and one of the few criticisms of the bag is that there isn't a dedicated space to put a USB battery, although it is easy enough to put it in the main camera core or even thread a long enough cable through the top compartment; it isn't a big deal but seems something of an oversight when so much great design has been implemented elsewhere.

Besides the camera core, the main compartment is spare, except for a plastic pocket, which is effectively the rear of the top compartment. This pocket isn't the easiest to access, so it is suitable for things that you may need less often—lens and sensor cleaning kits, spare cameras and lens caps, batteries, etc.

The only other thing of note is that the bag's waterproof cover is tucked into a fold at the bottom of the main compartment. While the bag is water resistant, in a really heavy prolonged rain shower, the rain cover isn't the easiest to access when you really need it. And it could potentially mean exposing your camera gear to the elements to retrieve it. Again, the bag is designed for the city, so you should be able to find shelter somewhere; so for the target market, it isn't a deal breaker by any means, but you would have thought there could be a better place for the cover or at least a better way of retrieving it.

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

One thing I liked was the fact that the bag has handles on the side, top, and bottom. You can grab it easily and securely from any angle, which is reassuring when you need to put it in an overhead locker on a plane or generally just move it around.

Carrying a bag with a mid-size tripod was no issue. I just about managed to squeeze all three legs into the side pouch designed for a bottle or tripod legs. Smaller travel tripods will fit comfortably and won't shift around, and for larger tripods, you can just put two legs in and use the straps to tighten everything in place.

Should I buy the Shimoda Urban Explore 25?

A close up shot of the Shimoda Urban Explore camera backpack

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Shimoda Urban Explore 25

  • I used the bag as a daily camera backpack
  • Walk around 5k with the bag on my back
  • Packed it with as much gear as possible

I have tested the Shimoda Urban Explore 25 by using it as an everyday camera bag. I carried my laptop in the backpack and set off to work in a coffee shop, taking all my weekend camera kit with me for some shooting before and after.

While out and about, I used the bag as I normally would, taking items in and out of the compartments and pockets to use them, all the time thinking about the bag's weak points and whether anything could be designed differently to speed up access or make things more secure. 

It is very difficult to design bags that are overtly different. Most backpacks have standardized layouts, so I was looking for small features on the bag that would make a difference in how I would use it. 

First reviewed June 2024

Next Page »