Computers - Organizer

I tested Samsung’s Dolby Atmos soundbar and sub combo, and it’s still the best mid-range model on the market

3:00 pm | November 23, 2025

Samsung HW-Q800F: two-minute review

The Samsung HW-Q800F is the 2025 edition of Samsung’s yearly Dolby Atmos soundbar-sub combo, and it proves that the South Korean giant maintains a firm grip on the home theater throne.

This 5.1.2 channel soundbar shakes things up a bit by bundling in a far more compact and sleek-looking subwoofer, which is far easier to integrate into your TV setup. Good news though – there’s been no sacrifice on power, with 400W and 11 speakers powering this combo.

And I really felt every ounce of power the Samsung HW-Q800F had to offer. I experienced truly imposing, yet agile and clean bass, which made grandiose movie scores that touch more immersive and booming sound effects even more impactful. This is also one of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars I’ve tested, with precise mapping of on-screen action and expansive imaging, taking my favorite movies to the next level.

Of course, you won't get the full surround sound experience that something like the Samsung HW-Q990F will provide, solely due to that model's inclusion of rear speakers. But the Q800F comes in at a far cheaper price-point, and the option is there to add rears if you'd like. Also, the sound you do get out of the box is already highly impactful, expansive, and engrossing.

Anyway, it's not only movies the Q800F excels with. This soundbar is also fairly gifted in the music department, and supports streaming over Wi-Fi, so you’ll be able to enjoy your favorite tracks via Tidal Connect, Spotify Connect and the like. Bluetooth 5.3 is also available, alongside the regular connectivity methods like HDMI eARC and digital optical.

You’ll find an HDMI input port on the soundbar, which supports passthrough at 4K at 60Hz. As a gamer, I was hoping for this to be raised to 120Hz for 2025, though this is a fairly minor complaint in the grand scheme of things.

Beyond connectivity, there are so many excellent features to uncover on the Q800F. You’ve got some returning characters like Q-Symphony, which can integrate a compatible TV into your soundbar system, as well as SpaceFit Surround Pro for room calibration, and Active Voice Amplification for enhancing dialogue in movies or TV shows.

This time out, Samsung’s added Moderate Bass, though, which disables the sub and lets the main soundbar pick up those low frequency sounds. That’s pretty handy if you’re temporarily short on space, for example.

Combine that with an excellent array of sound modes, a nifty companion app, and support for a range of formats – of course including Dolby Atmos and DTS:X – and the Q800F offers just about everything you could want from a mid-range soundbar.

Design-wise, the real highlight is that new, compact subwoofer, but you’re also getting that typical Samsung quality, with a durable main bar that uses a classy metallic grille and LED display. Sure, the overall package isn’t as flashy as some models, but the smaller sub makes for an upgrade over 2024’s Samsung HW-Q800D (I'm not sure why Samsung skipped over E, but it did).

Set-up is sensationally straightforward – it's plug and play, with no pesky in-app requirements, no awkward pairing issues, and very few wires. The sub instantly connected to the soundbar the moment I hooked it up to the power, I didn’t even have to do anything. And there’s a physical remote included here that is as sleek and easy-to-use as ever.

At the end of it all, the Samsung HW-Q800F is a stellar soundbar that hits just about all of the right notes. It offers wonderful performance for Atmos movies and music, its new sub is a considerable upgrade design-wise and still packs phenomenal low-end output, and there are tons of features to take advantage of. It’s also regularly available at a modest price (more on that below), making it a top value option. As a result, its easily up there with some of the best soundbars around.

Samsung HW-Q800F review: price and release date

Officially priced at $1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099
But unlikely to set you back that far in the real world
Launched in 2025

The Samsung HW-Q800F is the 2025 edition of Samsung’s mid-range combination of a full-length soundbar and an accompanying sub, coming one year after the HW-Q800D, which I also reviewed. It sits a level below the Samsung HW-Q990F, which comes bundled with rear speakers, but as a result, will set you back a bit more.

Initially, the Samsung HW-Q800F launched with a list price of $1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099. That’s $100 / £50 more than last year’s model in the US and UK respectively, but no different in Australia. Having said that, you’re unlikely to pay anywhere near that much now, even though this is a very recent release. I’m seeing it sell for less than $750 / £600 / AU$800 with various reputable online retailers.

Ports underneath the Samsung HW-Q800F — (Image credit: Future)

Samsung HW-Q800F review: specs

Dimensions	Main soundbar: 43.7 x 2.4 x 4.7 inches / 1110.7 x 60.4 x 120mm; subwoofer: 9.8 x 9.9 x 9.8 inches / 249 x 251.8 x 249mm
Speaker channels	5.1.2
Connections	1x HDMI input, 1x HDMI eARC, digital optical, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3
Dolby Atmos / DTS:X	Yes / Yes
Sub included	Yes
Rear speakers included	No

Samsung HW-Q800F review: features

Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support
Q-Symphony available with compatible Samsung TVs
4K passthrough, but still not at 120Hz

There’s a truly exhaustive set of features to uncover on the Samsung HW-Q800F, which builds nicely on what its predecessor had to offer. It again takes up a 5.1.2 speaker configuration, but this time offers 400W of power, as opposed to the Q800D’s 360W. There’s a new, compact sub too, but I’ll speak more about that later.

Of course, there’s full support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, alongside the usual Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby TrueHD, Dolby 5.1 and DTS: HD-Master Audio. You can also connect to the soundbar in a whole host of ways – through the typical HDMI eARC method, but also via digital optical, Bluetooth, or over Wi-Fi.

You’ll discover an HDMI in port on the soundbar as well, which supports 4K passthrough, but as we saw last year, only at 60Hz. Some gamers will be frustrated by the lack of 120Hz support, which can be used for silky 120fps gameplay in titles like Metroid Prime 4: Beyond on Nintendo Switch 2. I hope Samsung upgrades this in 2026, but until then, gamers will have to access 120Hz via a compatible TV’s own HDMI ports.

Admittedly, that’s a pretty small con given the wide range of options available with the Q800F. SpaceFit Surround Pro can effectively calibrate the soundbar and sub combo based on your room’s acoustics, there’s a voice enhancement mode, EQ and sub level adjustments, and a bass enhancement option.

All of last year’s sound modes are back and all work brilliantly too. These include: Standard; Adaptive; Surround; and Game. If you were wondering, adaptive harnesses AI in order to assess on-screen content and deliver tailored audio – I mainly stuck with this throughout my testing time.

Something new for this generation of Samsung soundbars is Moderate Bass, which deactivates the sub and leaves the soundbar to handle lower frequencies on its own. That's useful if you’re short on space.

If you’ve got a compatible Samsung TV from 2022 or later, you’ll be able to access some features a little easier via your TV menu. But you’ll also get access to Q-Symphony, which makes use of your TV’s built-in speakers, and combines them with your soundbar and sub for an even more powerful and expansive listening experience.

Features score: 4.5/5

Person holding phone with SmartThings app beside the Samsung HW-Q800F — (Image credit: Future / Aardman Animations)

Samsung HW-Q800F review: performance

Great Atmos with precise audio positioning
New sub offers exceptional bass output
Ultra-clear dialogue, clean treble, and impressive musicality

Much like its predecessor, the Samsung HW-Q800F is a standout performer in the sound quality department. It harnesses the might of 11 speakers and has a high maximum power output of 400W spread across the soundbar and new compact sub. And that high-power performance was incredibly evident to me, with Samsung’s combo delivering impactful, sometimes even room-shaking sound.

When I threw on The Boy and the Heron, I flicked to a scene in which a horde of fish and frogs shout “JOIN US” at the protagonist, Mahito. Throughout this encounter, there’s meant to be incredibly deep, all-encompassing bass, and the HW-Q800F replicated this to great effect, with a low-end rumble rippling through our testing space.

It was a similar story with a 4K UHD Blu-Ray of Top Gun: Maverick. The sound of jet engines firing up was truly seismic – the bass response was almost sizable enough to make me feel as if I was in the cinema. This movie is also a great test for Atmos, so I continued watching until Tom Cruise flew the jet up and overhead, and the impression of height genuinely impressed me.

Sure, the verticality you’ll get from genuine overhead speakers will take things to another level, but the up-firing speakers onboard undoubtedly performed their role to a high standard.

We recently called in one of my favorite movies of all time, The Mask, in 4K UHD, so naturally I tested that with the HW-Q800F as well. And this soundbar seamlessly nailed every task this chaotic film threw at it. The roar of thunder at the beginning came through with ferocious force, the high-pitched shatter of windows had a real bite to it, but never sounded tinny or uncontrolled, and dialogue between Stanley and Tina was unbelievably clear.

Atmos performance was again impeccable, and the general positioning of speech and other sounds was top-class. When Tina sits down at the back of Stanley’s bank to ‘open an account’, her voice is placed with pin-point precision. When some mob B-rate gangsters play air hockey in the background of a scene, the smack of the puck sounded distant yet well-defined, just as it should be.

So, when it comes to movies, you’re getting awesome performance here, but I was wondering if the same case would apply for music. I started with a couple of tracks using the Atmos format, and was not disappointed. In Dream of Arrakis by Hans Zimmer, the attack of percussion in the intro was full of intent, and swept right across the soundbar.

Deep bass, which is reminiscent of an increasingly racing heartbeat, had some real punch to it, and deeply immersed me into the track. Meanwhile, haunting artifacts weren’t lost at all, and felt well positioned in the backdrop of the track. Percussion was also incredibly well positioned, and distorted vocals had phenomenal width, demonstrating the seriously expansive sound of the HW-Q800F.

Even with basic stereo format music, the soundbar performed very well indeed. 12 O.C Riddim by M-High demonstrated the new subwoofer’s talents in the deep bass department, with agile, low-reaching performance. Even All Along the Watchtower by Jimi Hendrix, I was struck by subtle percussion, tonally accurate and energized electric guitars, and clean, defined vocals. Sure, channel separation won’t compete with some of the best stereo speakers, but I still got a very enjoyable listen here.

Whatever content you’re consuming, the Q800F is well-equipped to deliver optimum quality. The SpaceFit Surround Pro feature optimized the soundbar’s sound for the acoustics of our testing space, while the various sound modes all had a clearly differentiated approach, with Adaptive my general go-to. I was partial to Surround, too, which whips up an even wider soundstage.

Of course, you won’t get the ultimate surround sound experience due to the lack of rear speakers, which would create genuine wrap-around sound. If you want those, you’ll have to splash out a fair amount more on the Samsung HW-Q990F, or separately purchase SWA-9500S speakers. Even without these, though, the Q800F plates up the expansive, deep, and well-rounded performance we’ve come to expect from Samsung’s home theater technology.

Sound quality score: 5/5

Side profile of Samsung HW-Q800F

(Image credit: Future)

Samsung HW-Q800F review: design

Soundbar looks the same, but sub is greatly refined
Not the most aesthetically pleasing model on the market
But build quality is undoubtedly strong

The Samsung HW-Q800D was almost indistinguishable from its predecessor, but this time around, Samsung has endeavoured to make the generational change a lot more apparent.

It's done this by bundling a new, compact subwoofer, which is so much easier to fit into your setup than the previous tall block that was included. You still get that great low-end performance too, so you don’t have to sacrifice substance for style.

The main bar itself has remained the same, and it's fairly standard stuff. It's got a nice metallic grille with an easy-to-read display on the front, but you’re getting the traditional black bar. If you want something with a little more style, the retro-style Marshall Heston 120 or sleeker Sonos Arc Ultra might be better options.

Still, you’re getting strong build quality from this soundbar and sub combo – both units have a sturdy feel and don’t look cheap or plasticky. I’m also a fan of the straightforward physical controls on the soundbar and the slim remote, which is packaged in.

Design score: 4.5/5

Samsung HW-Q800F's new compact subwoofer — (Image credit: Future)

Samsung HW-Q800F review: setup & usability

Simple wireless plug and play setup
Easy-to-use remote and companion app
No sub pairing problems this time out

I was delighted with how easy the Samsung HW-Q800F was to set up and use. I simply plugged the soundbar and sub into the power, and connected the main bar to the Samsung S95F via its HDMI eARC port.

There was no complex pairing process to complete, the sub was pre-paired with the soundbar, and the two worked in tandem right out of the box. I’d had some minor trouble with the Q800D, so it was satisfying to get a hassle-free setup this time out.

Unlike some rivals, Samsung is still packing a physical remote with its soundbars, and the one I received with the Q800F worked as expected, allowing easy control over volume, sound modes, sub level, and more.

I did also use the SmartThings app, though, which grants control over all of that, as well as EQ adjustment, voice amplification, and room calibration, among other things. The app was simply laid out and navigating the various menus never caused me any confusion.

Its also worth flagging that the Q800F has an inbuilt mic that can be used with Amazon Alexa or Google voice assistants – there’s even a handy button to activate or deactivate this on top of the bar.

Setup & usability: 5/5

Person pressing button on the remote control of the Samsung HW-Q800F — (Image credit: Future / Aardman Animations)

Samsung HW-Q800F review: value

Slight price bump over predecessor…
…but widely available on sale for a great price
A whole lot of quality right across the board

Even though the Samsung HW-Q800F has a $100 / £50 (no change in Australia) over its predecessor, I really don’t think it matters very much.

Firstly, you’re getting more power in a more compact, sleek overall package. And crucially, you’re almost certainly not going to meet the list price of $1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099.

Yes, even months after release, I’m already seeing the Q800F sell for less than $750 / £600 / AU$800, with plenty of availability too. And when you consider the fact that you’re getting a fantastic soundbar and sub combo, which packs awesome Atmos, brilliant bass, and a broad feature-set, I think you’re getting a lot of bang for your buck.

Realistically, the HW-Q990F is still going to cost hundreds of dollars and pounds (etc.) more than the Q800F for some time – and although that system is the superior package for surround sound, those seeking a cheaper option will surely be satisfied with the capabilities of the Q800F.

Value score: 4.5/5

Should I buy the Samsung HW-Q800F?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Exhaustive sound enhancement options, Atmos and DTS:X support, HDMI passthrough only at 60Hz.	4.5/5
Sound quality	Fantastic clarity across all frequencies, epic Atmos for movies and music.	5/5
Design	Soundbar itself doesn’t quite ooze style, but the new compact sub is a hit, with a neat remote and physical controls.	4.5/5
Setup & usability	Plug and play setup, seamless soundbar and sub pairing, easy to control.	5/5
Value	Regularly on sale for a very modest price considering the overall quality available here.	4.5/5

Buy it if...

You’re looking for the ultimate value package
Considering this soundbar-sub combo is regularly on sale for a lot less than its official price, I think it's a fantastic value package. You’ll struggle to find a Dolby Atmos soundbar with this much power, this much quality, and this many features for less than $750 / £600 / AU$800.

You want awesome Atmos for movies and music
I was very impressed with the Dolby Atmos effects available through the HW-Q800F. It mapped on-screen action with incredible accuracy, made instruments sound as if they were playing in the corners of our testing room, and generally whipped up pleasingly expansive sound.

Don't buy it if...

You want the ultimate surround sound experience
Due to the lack of rear speakers – at least out of the box – the Samsung HW-Q800F won’t give you the most full surround sound experience out there. If you want the best of the best in this regard, I’d consider spending more on the spectacular Samsung HW-Q990F or purchasing rear speakers separately.

You’re after something with style
Although you get great build quality from the Samsung HW-Q800F, alongside a new compact sub, I’d be lying if I said this bundle was the prettiest thing I’ve seen. The Marshall soundbar below, and even the Sonos Arc Ultra have more going for themselves in the looks department.

Samsung HW-Q800F review: also consider

	Samsung HW-Q800F	Sony Bravia Theater Bar 6	Marshall Heston 120
Price	$1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099	$649 / £449 / AU$899	$999 / £899 / AU$1,799
Dimensions	Main soundbar: 43.7 x 2.4 x 4.7 inches / 1110.7 x 60.4 x 120mm; subwoofer: 9.8 x 9.9 x 9.8 inches / 249 x 251.8 x 249mm	Main soundbar: 37.5 x 2.6 x 4.4 inches / 950 x 64 x 110mm; subwoofer: 8.3 x 15.3 x 15.3 inches / 210 x 388 x 388mm	43.3 x 5.7 x 3.0 inches / 1100 x 145 x 76mm
Speaker channels	5.1.2	3.1.2	5.1.2
Connections	1x HDMI input, 1x HDMI eARC, digital optical, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3	1x HDMI eRAC, digital optical, Bluetooth 5,3	1x HDMI input, 1x HDMI eARC, RCA Stereo, RCA Mono (sub out), USB-C, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3
Dolby Atmos / DTS:X	Yes / Yes	Yes / Yes	Yes / Yes
Sub included	Yes	Yes	No
Rear speakers included	No	No	No

Sony Bravia Theater Bar 6
Although it’s missing Wi-Fi streaming and has a 3.1.2 channel configuration, the Sony Bravia Theater Bar 6 is a great value soundbar and sub combo. It packs in good sound quality, Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support, an easy setup process, and a brilliant companion app. Considering I’ve seen it on sale for less than $500 / £350 / AU$600, that’s a whole lot of bang for your buck. Read our full Sony Bravia Theater Bar 6 review.

Marshall Heston 120
Here’s something different in just about every sense. Marshall’s debut soundbar is an all-in-one model, meaning it doesn’t come with a separate sub, but it sure doesn’t skimp on bass. It puts up a deep, immersive, and expansive audio performance that seriously impressed me, hence the award of a five-star rating. It offers great Dolby Atmos for movies and music, and comes with all the connectivity options you could want. It's quite pricey, especially if you want to add the Heston Sub 200 for additional low-end power, but for the premium look and audio on offer, I think it's still a top option. Read our full Marshall Heston 120 review.

How I tested the Samsung HW-Q800F

Tested intensively across multiple hours
Used in our TV testing space at Future Labs
Trialled Dolby Atmos movies and music among other formats

To test the Samsung HW-Q800F, I spent hours watching movies, listening to music, and exhausting all of its available features at the Future Labs TV testing space. During this time, I had the soundbar hooked up to the sensational Samsung S95F OLED TV, which opened up a bunch of exclusive options, such as Q-Symphony.

I used the various sound modes on offer while watching movies – predominantly in Dolby Atmos via 4K UHD Blu-rays on the Panasonic DP-UB820 – but I did also watch some non-Atmos content to assess quality across the board. On top of that, I made use of Tidal Connect to assess the soundbar’s capabilities with Dolby Atmos and stereo mixes of some tunes I’m deeply familiar with after regularly testing with them.

More generally, I've tested tons of soundbars here at TechRadar – everything from ultra-cheap options like the Hisense HS214 through to pricier models like the Marshall Heston 120. Crucially, I also reviewed and lived with last year’s Samsung HW-Q800D soundbar, so I’ve personally experienced the difference made by upgrading to the 2025 edition of Samsung’s soundbar and sub combo.

Read more about how we test
First reviewed: November 2025

I tested Samsung’s Dolby Atmos soundbar and sub combo, and it’s still the best mid-range model on the market

3:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Soundbars Televisions | Tags: Dolby Atmos, DTS, TV | Comments: Off

Samsung HW-Q800F: two-minute review

The Samsung HW-Q800F is the 2025 edition of Samsung’s yearly Dolby Atmos soundbar-sub combo, and it proves that the South Korean giant maintains a firm grip on the home theater throne.

Samsung HW-Q800F review: price and release date

Officially priced at $1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099
But unlikely to set you back that far in the real world
Launched in 2025

Samsung HW-Q800F review: specs

Dimensions	Main soundbar: 43.7 x 2.4 x 4.7 inches / 1110.7 x 60.4 x 120mm; subwoofer: 9.8 x 9.9 x 9.8 inches / 249 x 251.8 x 249mm
Speaker channels	5.1.2
Connections	1x HDMI input, 1x HDMI eARC, digital optical, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3
Dolby Atmos / DTS:X	Yes / Yes
Sub included	Yes
Rear speakers included	No

Samsung HW-Q800F review: features

Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support
Q-Symphony available with compatible Samsung TVs
4K passthrough, but still not at 120Hz

Features score: 4.5/5

Samsung HW-Q800F review: performance

Great Atmos with precise audio positioning
New sub offers exceptional bass output
Ultra-clear dialogue, clean treble, and impressive musicality

Sure, the verticality you’ll get from genuine overhead speakers will take things to another level, but the up-firing speakers onboard undoubtedly performed their role to a high standard.

Sound quality score: 5/5

Side profile of Samsung HW-Q800F

(Image credit: Future)

Samsung HW-Q800F review: design

Soundbar looks the same, but sub is greatly refined
Not the most aesthetically pleasing model on the market
But build quality is undoubtedly strong

The Samsung HW-Q800D was almost indistinguishable from its predecessor, but this time around, Samsung has endeavoured to make the generational change a lot more apparent.

Design score: 4.5/5

Samsung HW-Q800F review: setup & usability

Simple wireless plug and play setup
Easy-to-use remote and companion app
No sub pairing problems this time out

I was delighted with how easy the Samsung HW-Q800F was to set up and use. I simply plugged the soundbar and sub into the power, and connected the main bar to the Samsung S95F via its HDMI eARC port.

Setup & usability: 5/5

Samsung HW-Q800F review: value

Slight price bump over predecessor…
…but widely available on sale for a great price
A whole lot of quality right across the board

Even though the Samsung HW-Q800F has a $100 / £50 (no change in Australia) over its predecessor, I really don’t think it matters very much.

Firstly, you’re getting more power in a more compact, sleek overall package. And crucially, you’re almost certainly not going to meet the list price of $1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099.

Value score: 4.5/5

Should I buy the Samsung HW-Q800F?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Exhaustive sound enhancement options, Atmos and DTS:X support, HDMI passthrough only at 60Hz.	4.5/5
Sound quality	Fantastic clarity across all frequencies, epic Atmos for movies and music.	5/5
Design	Soundbar itself doesn’t quite ooze style, but the new compact sub is a hit, with a neat remote and physical controls.	4.5/5
Setup & usability	Plug and play setup, seamless soundbar and sub pairing, easy to control.	5/5
Value	Regularly on sale for a very modest price considering the overall quality available here.	4.5/5

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Samsung HW-Q800F review: also consider

	Samsung HW-Q800F	Sony Bravia Theater Bar 6	Marshall Heston 120
Price	$1,099 / £799 / AU$1,099	$649 / £449 / AU$899	$999 / £899 / AU$1,799
Dimensions	Main soundbar: 43.7 x 2.4 x 4.7 inches / 1110.7 x 60.4 x 120mm; subwoofer: 9.8 x 9.9 x 9.8 inches / 249 x 251.8 x 249mm	Main soundbar: 37.5 x 2.6 x 4.4 inches / 950 x 64 x 110mm; subwoofer: 8.3 x 15.3 x 15.3 inches / 210 x 388 x 388mm	43.3 x 5.7 x 3.0 inches / 1100 x 145 x 76mm
Speaker channels	5.1.2	3.1.2	5.1.2
Connections	1x HDMI input, 1x HDMI eARC, digital optical, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3	1x HDMI eRAC, digital optical, Bluetooth 5,3	1x HDMI input, 1x HDMI eARC, RCA Stereo, RCA Mono (sub out), USB-C, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3
Dolby Atmos / DTS:X	Yes / Yes	Yes / Yes	Yes / Yes
Sub included	Yes	Yes	No
Rear speakers included	No	No	No

How I tested the Samsung HW-Q800F

Tested intensively across multiple hours
Used in our TV testing space at Future Labs
Trialled Dolby Atmos movies and music among other formats

Read more about how we test
First reviewed: November 2025

The Shark PowerPro is the best-value vacuum cleaner I’ve tested – and it’s ideal for most households

9:30 am | November 22, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances Vacuums | Tags: AU, UK, US | Comments: Off

Shark PowerPro Cordless vacuum: two-minute review

Product info

There are a few different versions of this vacuum, with different product codes:

US: PowerPro Pet IZ373H; PowerPro Flex Reveal IZ382H

UK: PowerPro IZ380UK; PowerPro Pet IZ380UKFDB

AU: PowerPro IZ377H; PowerPro Flex Reveal IZ380H

For this review, I tested the IZ380UK. There may be minor differences between different countries' models.

The Shark PowerPro Cordless is a capable, no-nonsense stick vacuum that prioritizes consistent performance and everyday value over flashy extras. It’s one of the most affordable cordless models we've tested, yet it comes with very few compromises where it matters. And while its build isn’t premium, it's not a barebones vacuum either: one of the key selling points is automatic surface detection, which adjusts power as you move from carpet to hard flooring. It's a very strong contender for TechRadar's best budget vacuums guide.

Despite the budget price, you also get hallmark Shark touches like an anti-hair wrap brushroll, a flexible wand for reaching under furniture, plus a floorhead with built-in LEDs that illuminate dust and dark corners. Taken together, these features – borrowed from pricier models in Shark’s line-up – make the PowerPro feel like a far more rounded tool than its price might suggest.

That’s not to say it’s flawless. In places, the no-frills build betrays its budget status. It all clicks together with solidity, but there are some plastic components that cheapen the experience – particularly the boost trigger.

The appeal here lies in the PowerPro’s stripped-back convenience. You’re getting a functional, reliable vacuum with a handful of well-executed features that are genuinely useful in everyday use.

The interface is foolproof: there are no modes to select. Instead, the Floor Detect head automatically chooses the right setting based on the surface you’re cleaning. All you have to think about is using the Boost trigger at your fingertips. It won't offer dirt detection or edge detection (as found on the best Shark vacuums in the lineup), but this floor-based adjustment is useful nonetheless.

In use, the PowerPro is balanced and maneuverable. The floorhead moves easily over different surfaces, while the hinged wand unlatches to give you flexible reach beneath beds and sofas. Switch to a handheld configuration and the PowerPro is impressively lightweight. It’s slightly bulky for tackling tighter spaces like car footwells, but the crevice attachments help to hit nooks and crannies.

While not as powerful as the Shark PowerDetect cordless, the PowerPro performed impressively well in my cleaning tests. Suction was strong on carpeted floors, lifting both visible debris and ingrained dust without repeated passes. It also handled fine dust and heavier particles on hard floors, though Boost mode was useful for picking up larger pieces. One caveat is that the brush bar sits inset within the floorhead, which means it can struggle to get right into edges along skirting boards.

Battery life is decent, too. Although there's no battery-maximizing Eco mode, in Auto mode I achieved a very decent 40 minute average when cleaning a combination of carpeted and hard flooring. At around 3 hours, the PowerPro is relatively quick to recharge, too. Because the power plugs directly into the removable battery, you could enlist a backup battery if you wanted to extend runtimes.

The Shark PowerPro isn’t the most stylish or advanced stick vacuum on the market, but it might be the best cordless vacuum for budget-conscious shoppers. But with consistently strong performance, good battery life and a few thoughtful features, it’s a strong choice for households who need a no-fuss solution for busting dust. Robust enough for daily use, the PowerPro offers excellent overall value.

Shark PowerPro IZ380UK on test in a home — (Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Shark PowerPro IZ380UK review: price & availability

List price: $329.99 / £249.99 / AU$399.99
Launch date: 2025
Availability: US, UK, AU

The Shark PowerPro launched in early 2025, and is widely available from Shark and various third-party retailers. At list price, the standard model costs $329.99 in the US, £249.99 in the UK and AU$399.99 in Australia. That puts this model towards the bottom of the mid-range bracket, but at time of writing it's heavily discounted in all territories.

Based on price history, it looks like discounts are fairly common, and you shouldn't have too much trouble picking up the PowerPro for closer to $200 / £180 / AU$300 – which is firmly in TechRadar's budget price bracket, despite it offering several features found on Shark’s pricier models.

There are a few bundle options around with different tools included (for example, the 'Pet' version has a mini motorized cleaner head for furniture), as well as a more advanced 'Flex Reveal' version in some territories. For this review, I tested the IZ380UK version, which ships with crevice and upholstery tools, in addition to the standard floorhead.

Based on the current discounts, the PowerPro is one of the most affordable Shark cordless vacuums, and I think its priced well for what it delivers. As a simple, effective cordless vacuum with a streamlined but useful featureset, it offers excellent value for money in its class.

Value for money score: 4.5 out of 5

Shark PowerPro specs

Weight (handheld unit w/ no attachments):	7.6 lbs / 3.45kg
Weight (with wand and floorhead):	3.7 lbs / 1.7kg
Dimensions (H x L x W):	45 x 12.4 x 10.4in / 114.3 x 31.6 x 26.4cm
Floorhead width:	8.5in / 21.5cm
Onboard bin capacity:	0.7L
LED headlights:	Yes
Max suction:	Not stated
Max runtime:	50 mins advertised, 40 mins on test
Charge time:	3hrs 30 mins

Shark PowerPro Cordless vacuum review: design

No-frills construction feels plasticky but sturdy
Flexible wand and bright floorhead LEDs
No wall mount, but locking floorhead helps it lean steady

The Shark PowerPro follows a practical design philosophy. It doesn’t pretend to be a premium vacuum, but still includes several thoughtful touches that elevate it above basic alternatives. It’s not an ugly unit either, although Shark has focused on functional choices rather than aesthetic refinement.

Out of the box, the PowerPro feels solid enough for daily use. Everything clicks together with a reassuring snap. That said, the construction leans heavily on plastics. Parts like the boost trigger and dustbin release latches feel hollow, while there’s some flex and creak in the casing, giving a clear indication of where costs have been saved. These don’t affect performance, but they do contribute to a less premium impression than pricier Shark models.

The PowerPro follows a familiar cordless stick design. There’s a tidily packaged handheld unit that attaches to a motorized floorhead at the base. Shark’s useful 'MultiFLEX / Flexology' wand is also part of the setup. A latched hinge in the middle allows it to bend, letting you reach more easily beneath furniture without crouching. It’s a feature usually found on Shark’s more expensive cordless models, so it’s a welcome presence at this price point.

Image 1 of 5

Image 2 of 5

Image 3 of 5

Image 4 of 5

Image 5 of 5

The main unit is very lightweight, and while the wand and floorhead is less so, with that attached it still sits at the lighter end of the stick vacuum market.

The simple handle design isn’t exactly ergonomic, but it’s comfortable enough to maneuver in general use, thanks in part to the lightness of the main unit. It’s slightly too bulky for very tight spaces like car footwells, but the included crevice and upholstery tools help to maximize reach. The accessory set included with the classic model is modest, but it covers most essential tasks around the house.

Controls are deliberately minimal. Because the Floor Detect head automatically adjusts suction based on whether you’re tackling carpet or hard floors, there are no settings to toggle through. There’s just a power button and the boost trigger at the tip of your index finger. Three illuminated icons on top of the handheld unit show which mode is active, while three more on the battery show the charge level. This is less accurate than a digital readout, a feature not commonly found at this price.

At ground level, built-in LEDs illuminate dust and debris on darker surfaces. In contrast to more expensive Shark models like the Shark Detect IW4621KT, these headlights aren’t reactive depending on how well-lit the area is. They’re simply on whenever the vacuum is running, which will be perfectly fine for most users.

Image 1 of 5

Image 2 of 5

Image 3 of 5

Image 4 of 5

Image 5 of 5

At 0.7L, the dustbin slightly smaller than average, although it fills less quickly than you’d expect. The design of the dustbin itself is slightly unusual. To empty it, you press a latch to remove the entire bin from the handheld unit, before releasing the bottom door via another button. This adds an extra step compared to vacuums with direct drop-bottom bins, but it does help to reduce accidental spillage.

Charging the PowerPro isn’t as neat as it could be. The position of the charging port on top of the battery pack means that the cable trails up and over the handheld unit. It would be more natural if the port were positioned beneath it, but this is a necessary compromise to make the battery removable. The pay-off is that you can disconnect the cell to charge it, unlocking the option to keep several back-up batteries ready to swap in.

Image 1 of 5

Image 2 of 5

Image 3 of 5

Image 4 of 5

Image 5 of 5

The PowerPro doesn’t include a wall mount or charging dock, which you’d expect to receive with a more expensive model. Instead, you’ll need to lean it up against a wall when you need a pause in cleaning. The unit can’t stand upright on its own at full height, but the floorhead can at least lock at 90 degrees, to stop it rolling away from the wall.

The forward-bending wand also enables you to fold the unit completely in half and lock it that way for more compact storage. These are neat practical touches for a model sold without a stand.

Design score: 4 out of 5

Shark PowerPro IZ380UK review: performance

Solid debris pick-up on carpets and hard floors
Brushroll misses edges
Automatic adjustment based on floor type works well

Performance is where the Shark PowerPro sets itself apart from other budget stick vacuums. On test, it consistently demonstrated effective debris pick-up, removing both surface-level and embedded dirt from carpet with just a single forward-and-back pass.

The Floor Detect head does much of the heavy lifting here. As you move the PowerPro from hard floor to carpet and vice versa, it automatically adjusts the power to suit the surface. The system is quick to respond to changes, with no lag to speak of. Suction is noticeably stronger on carpet, where the floorhead feels like it’s really pulling up dirt.

As a result, the PowerPro performed very well in my carpet tests. Tackling the fine, dry contents of a teabag sprinkled on a medium-pile carpet, the Shark PowerPro collected almost everything in its path with a single pass. The remnants were tidied up on the return sweep. It also dealt well with larger debris. 30g of oats were removed cleanly enough, with little in the way of snow-ploughing or scattering. This is an area where many budget cordless vacuums falter.

The PowerPro didn’t just grab visible debris, either: it also pulled up ingrained dust. After a week of regular use, the bin was still filling with fine grey dust and fluff during my tests, highlighting how effectively the PowerPro can lift deep-set dirt that other vacuums have left behind.

It’s also a strong performer on hard flooring. Fine tea disappeared cleanly from kitchen vinyl, as did drill dust. Standard suction was enough to collect heavier particles like oats, though switching to boost mode did speed things up.

Unlike some vacuums, the PowerPro generally didn’t push debris around or scatter it on hard floors. For the best performance, however, you might want to consider upgrading to a Shark PowerDetect Cordless, which has an extra flap added to the floorhead that specifically enables it to clear large particles on the reverse stroke.

The boost trigger deserves a special mention. While designed as a temporary power uplift rather than an always-on mode, it provides a genuinely significant increase in suction. I found it especially useful for tackling stubborn debris in carpet fibers and lifting heavier crumbs on hard floors. Running in Boost mode does cut battery life considerably, but for targeted use, it’s a welcome addition.

Edge performance is one area where the PowerPro shows some limitations. The brushroll is inset slightly within the floorhead, which means the suction window doesn’t reach right up to the bottom of cabinets and furniture.

When I scattered tea and oats along a skirting board, a thin strip remained even after a high-powered pass. This is a limitation of the head design rather than the power, and it means you’ll need to use the crevice tool for spotless edges.

The Floor Detect head features Shark’s anti-hair wrap head, with built-in rubber fins designed to stop strands from tangling around the brush bar. Over several weeks of running the PowerPro across carpets where longer human hair had been shed naturally, it worked very well.

The brushroll stayed broadly free from tangles and I didn’t need to cut away any wrapped strands, which is something many cheaper sticks struggle with. It’s another feature typically found on Shark’s pricier models that works just as effectively here.

Image 1 of 2

Image 2 of 2

Noise is well-controlled, too. Those rubber fins produce a low rumble on carpet as they whizz around inside the floorhead, while the handheld unit generates a relatively modest whine that only becomes pronounced when Boost mode is active.

To my ears, the PowerPro is quieter than other cordless vacuums I’ve tested. It’s not exactly hushed, but it avoids the harsh, high-pitched tones common among budget sticks. This makes it a better choice for households where noise sensitivity is a factor.

Performance score: 4 out of 5

Shark PowerPro review: battery

No Eco mode, average of 40 mins in Auto
Boost mode reduces battery life to <15 minutes
Battery removable, and can be charged independently

Shark quotes the PowerPro's battery life at 50 minutes. In reality, run-time varies a fair bit based on what and where you vacuum. Cleaning carpets is more power-hungry than hard floors, for example, while liberal use of the boost trigger will put a serious dent in the performance figures.

Unlike other Shark vacuums, the PowerPro doesn’t have an low-powered Eco setting. Because of this, you can’t force it to be more frugal by disabling the Floor Detect mode. Instead, it will always assess the surface it’s running over and adjust power accordingly.

As a result, you’ll get longer battery life if your home has hard floors throughout, versus one that’s clad primarily with carpet. My own home has an even balance of the two, meaning the numbers I achieved in my tests should be fairly representative of real-world performance across different surfaces.

Over several runs, I consistently netted between 35 and 45 minutes from full to flat. Taking the average as 40 minutes, that unsurprisingly comes in lower than the official number. It also puts the PowerPro a step below the best cordless vacuums when it comes to longevity – although do bear in mind that the given runtimes will almost always be for the Eco mode.

For me, 40 minutes felt like a healthy amount of time for a single stint and a competitive number for the price category. It’s certainly enough to cover a single-story home and have some charge left in the tank.

The more modest capacity also gives the PowerPro a shorter charge time than other models. Shark says it takes “approximately 3 hours” to fully charge the IZ380UK, which proved an accurate figure in my experience. While that’s hardly instantaneous, many vacuums take significantly longer.

Using Boost mode does have a considerable effect on battery life. Keeping my finger held on the trigger brought the number down to around 15 minutes. That's actually a strong runtime for a Boost mode – but it still reflects the fact that it’s intended to be used as a brief uplift for tougher debris, rather than an always-on solution for high-powered cleaning.

The PowerPro also benefits from a removable battery. The cell itself can be charged while detached from the vacuum. This means you can extend runtime by keeping a second back-up battery charged, ready to swap in when the first one runs flat.

Battery life score: 4 out of 5

Should you buy the Shark PowerPro Cordless vacuum?

Attribute	Notes	Rating
Value	A budget vacuum that represents excellent value, given its solid performance and surface detection smarts.	4.5 / 5
Design	The no-frills build feels plasticky in places, but it’s sturdy enough. A wall-mount would make charging neater, given the vacuum can’t stand up on its own.	4 / 5
Performance	Strong pickup and surface detection works well, with Boost mode available for tackling more stubborn debris. The brushroll doesn’t get right into corners.	4 / 5
Battery	No Eco mode, but an average of 40 minutes in Auto is very decent, as is the ~15 mins in Boost. Recharge is speedy.	4 / 5

Buy it if...

You want a great-value vacuum
With impressive suction, solid battery life and decent build quality at a competitive price, the Shark PowerPro ticks a lot of boxes for the money.

You prefer a simpler interface
With just two modes, a power button and a Boost trigger to master, the Shark PowerPro is more straightforward than many vacuums on the market.

You want a lightweight vacuum
In handheld mode the PowerPro is impressively light, and even with the (rather chunky) wand attached, it's on the lighter side for a stick vacuum.

Don't buy it if...

You need all the bells and whistles
While it has a Floor Detect head with built-in lights, you don’t get the edge detection smarts or charging dock of premium Shark vacuums.

You want premium build quality
The plastic body is robust enough to shake off bumps around the house, but the boost trigger and bin release latch feel cheaper than rivals.

You expect perfect pick-up
The floorhead does a great job of sucking up dust, it's not as powerful as the PowerDetect, and the brushroll doesn’t get right into corners either.

How I tested the Shark PowerPro Cordless vacuum

Used as my main vacuum cleaner for a month
Tested across hard and carpeted floors at home
Conducted standardized tests for debris pick-up

I tested the Shark PowerPro IZ380UK over a period of several weeks. I used it as my main vacuum cleaner in my own home, which has a mix of both carpeted and hard surfaces. Before running any formal tests, I used the PowerPro for ordinary daily cleaning to get an understanding of its general performance, noise levels, maneuverability and battery life.

I then moved on to running the PowerPro through TechRadar’s standard vacuum testing protocol. To assess fine dust pick-up, I sprinkled the contents of a dry teabag on both carpet and hard flooring, then passed over the area with the PowerPro on its standard setting. For a trial with larger debris, I repeated the process with a bag of oats. I only switched to Boost mode if the floorhead failed to collect everything on the first pass.

To test edge performance, I distributed tea and oats along skirting boards then checked how much was left behind when I ran the floorhead flush along them. I also evaluated hair pick-up by running the anti-hair wrap brushroll over areas of carpet home to longer strands, to see whether any tangled around the brush bar.

I measured battery life first by charging the vacuum to full, then running it continuously across a mix of surfaces until it powered down. I then charged it fully again to confirm the recharge time, before repeating the process to get an accurate average of battery life. I also ran similar trials using boost mode to verify the higher-powered run-time.

Finally, In tested the included crevice and upholstery tools on furniture, stairs and inside a car footwell to evaluate how effectively they picked up dirt, as well as the balance and reach of the unit as a handheld tool. Throughout my tests, I also paid attention to functionality and ease of use, especially when it came to regular actions in real-world situations, like emptying the bin.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed November 2025

Reliving the 90s via the Analogue 3D is definitely nostalgic, but excellent hardware can’t fix an era of video games we should appreciate but never revisit

5:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch Online, TV | Comments: Off

Analogue 3D: Two-minute review

The Analogue 3D is finally here, and it's one of the best retro games consoles available on the market. After multiple delays and what felt like a longer wait than those excruciating Christmas Eve sleeps as a kid, Analogue’s take on the iconic Nintendo 64 is in my hands, and I’ve been testing it thoroughly over the last couple of weeks.

The Analogue 3D is a modern take on the N64, allowing gamers to experience the magic and nostalgia of the home console that launched in 1996. Analogue has made a name for itself as one of, if not the, best retro game preservation company on the planet, and I don’t think it will take long for the 3D to cement itself as the definitive N64 experience, just like the company’s Game Boy hardware emulator, the Analogue Pocket.

Analogue’s approach to hardware is one of true love for nostalgia, allowing gamers to recreate the memories of their youth by playing original cartridges in 4K via an FPGA chip. This means the 3D is for the true enthusiast, someone who has a collection of N64 games and wants to experience their childhood in the best way possible.

Build quality is excellent, as you’d expect from the company that created the Analogue Pocket, and the console works with original N64 controllers as well as 8bitdo’s modern recreation, which has been purposefully built for use with the 3D.

The Analogue 3D is the quintessential Nintendo 64 experience, and is a must-buy for those looking to play the most authentic recreation of the console of their youth on one of the best OLED TVs. That said, it’s still an N64, so if you don’t have a physical collection or don’t have the necessary nostalgia to truly enjoy these often dated games, you may want to opt for a different era of retro gaming instead.

Analogue 3D: Price and availability

List price: $249.99 / £190 / $AU 385
Comes in two colors (white and black)
Currently sold out

The Analogue 3D is now shipping via analogue.co. The 3D first went on preorder in October 2024, and while it’s now available, it is currently sold out on the Analogue website.

You can buy the 3D in Black or White, and in the box you’ll get an HDMI cable, USB-C for power, and a power adaptor. The 3D has no controller in the box, and while you can use any of your old N64 controllers, third-party company 8bitdo’s 64 controller is available for $39.99 / £32 in black and white via Amazon.

There are also no games included in the box, and no ability to play titles from other consoles with cartridge adaptors, so you’ll need to source your own physical N64 cartridges.

Analogue 3D: Specs

Price	$249.99 / £190 / $AU385
Dimensions (H x W x L)	1.9 x 9 x 7in / 49 x 230 x 180mm
Weight	29.5oz / 837g
Compatibility	Nintendo 64
Connection type	USB-A, USB-C, HDMI, SD card
Battery life	N/A
Features	HDMI Out 4K resolution, faithful CRT recreation for modern TVs, 100% compatibility with original N64 cartridges
Software	Native OS

Analogue 3D: Design and features

Plastic but sturdy enclosure
Looks elegant under your TV
The best way to play N64 cartridges

The Analogue 3D is gorgeous, just like the other products in the company's repertoire. It feels like the N64 grew up, and while some people will be waiting patiently for limited edition color offerings, I'm a big fan of the black and white options here. There’s no toy-like plastic, no rattling parts, and no leftover design weirdness from the late 90s.

Instead, Analogue has built a console that feels dense and premium while looking great on a shelf and even better underneath a TV, where it blends in with modern consoles rather than sticking out as a relic - this definitely passes the "Can I put this in the living room?" wife test.

The finish reminds me of high-end audio equipment, with lines that are clean, subtle edges, and a color palette that is understated without losing personality. Even the cartridge slot has a satisfying firmness, and inserting a cartridge has that awesome "thunk" you used to love as a child.

Around the back, you get HDMI out, USB-C for power, two USB-A, and an SD card slot pre-installed with a 16GB card for storing screenshots, firmware, and all the other OS information. On the front are four original N64 controller ports that light up satisfyingly when you connect a Bluetooth controller.

The Analogue 3D provides everything you need for a modern N64 experience without clutter or additional converters. The console plays your original cartridges using FPGA hardware, which means no emulation and no guesswork. What you’re seeing is effectively the real hardware recreated with jaw-dropping accuracy.

The menu interface is simple in the best possible way. With the tap of a button, you can tweak video settings, swap filters, and overclock the performance to try and beat the abysmal framerates of the original N64. It’s clean, responsive and takes seconds to navigate.

It's worth noting, however, that save states are not available yet on the Analogue 3D, and we're not sure when they will be. On my Analogue Pocket, the save state feature is one of my favorite parts of the device, and Analogue even showed the feature on the 3D in its marketing. Hopefully, save states will be available soon, and I'll make sure to update the review as soon as they are.

Support for original controllers is a huge win, and while I didn't test one myself, I can imagine the impracticality of the original thumb stick would add to the charm of the 3D experience. Modern controllers work very well, and pairing them takes seconds. The system automatically detects what’s connected, so you can jump straight into a game, but I'd recommend waiting for 8bitdo's grey variant, which has colored buttons, as the all black N64 controller confused me at times.

Analogue 3D: Performance

Faithful FPGA hardware emulation of N64 games
4K image quality with gorgeous CRT filters
100% cartridge compatibility

This is where the Analogue 3D earns its price tag. Playing N64 games on FPGA hardware is a completely different experience to emulation, and quite honestly the best way to experience your favorite games from the late 90s. Everything responds instantly, with no input lag, and it very much feels like a product made by Nintendo for an adult gamer wanting to relive their youth.

I tested the console on one of the best OLED TVs, 65-inch Samsung S90D OLED, which is about as far from a CRT as you can get. Somehow, the Analogue 3D handled it without exposing every flaw of the era. Colours looked vibrant, edges were cleaner than I’ve ever seen them on original hardware and the system held up beautifully whether I was playing Mario 64, Mario Party 3, GoldenEye 007 or even WCW/NWO Revenge.

But be warned, this isn’t a console that transforms the visuals into something modern. It preserves everything, flaws included, but that's where the charm lies: it's a 4k faithful restoration of the N64 and for people that love the awkward console, the 3D is a must-buy. Combined with Analogue's gorgeous filters which the company calls "a museum-grade restoration of analogue gaming's most beautiful display technology", the 3D truly cements itself as the best way to play N64 on a modern TV.

There were a couple of moments where cartridges needed a second insertion to register properly, and of course, I found myself blowing cartridges (despite the fact that's not recommended). In the box Analogue provides some foam pads to help clean the pins of your N64 cartridges, which is a lovely addition in case you're having compatibility issues.

Image quality on the 3D really shines, but again, if you're expecting to see an N64 game with modern graphics, you'll be disappointed.

Polygon edges look cleaner, the scaling is smooth, and the whole image feels more stable than the original hardware ever managed. My Samsung S90D OLED made colours pop without turning everything into neon, and brightness levels were handled well enough that nothing felt washed out or overly crushed.

Like I mentioned above, Analogue includes a handful of optional filters. Adding light scanlines gave Mario 64 a nostalgic softness, while GoldenEye 007 benefited from a cleaner look without anything layered over the top. You can also adjust aspect ratio, remove overscan, and tweak settings depending on the game.

This is as good as N64 games are ever going to look without completely remaking them, but the hardware can’t hide the fact that some textures are muddy and some 3D models are… well... terrible. That said, the 3D does make these games look sharper, more consistent, and more pleasant to revisit.

Analogue has done an excellent job with compatibility, with the company claiming 100% compatibility for the first time ever. In my testing, everything worked flawlessly, although I don't have the most extensive N64 catalog. Mario 64, Mario Party 3, GoldenEye 007 and WCW/NWO Revenge all worked exactly as I remembered them, quirks and all.

I've seen posts online from other reviewers stating EverDrive support varies depending on model, and it's very unlikely that Analogue will officially endorse flash carts. So if you plan to use a single cartridge for all your games, then I suggest doing your homework before buying a 3D.

After using the 3D for a few weeks, I'm surprised by my experience. As someone who loves retro gaming and really appreciates what the company does for game preservation, I find this product way harder to recommend than, say, the Analogue Pocket or the Modretro Chromatic, for example. That might be because of my own personal nostalgia for the Game Boy era, but I think it's more to do with the fact that the N64 has aged very poorly compared to even older games like those found on the SNES.

The Analogue 3D is a remarkable piece of hardware, but the N64 library itself hasn’t aged well. These games are fun, iconic, and historically important, but the jump from 2D to 3D was messy, and it shows. Textures are blurry, controls can feel floaty, and frame rates dip more than you might remember.

If you don’t have nostalgia for these games, the Analogue 3D won’t magically convert you. It's very much a time machine for people who grew up in the late 90s and still feel emotional watching the boot logo appear on screen.

If that’s you, the console is magic. If not, a SNES or GameCube might be a better retro investment, and I think sticking to the N64 library on Nintendo Switch Online would probably meet your needs.

Should you buy the Analogue 3D

Buy it if...

You want to relive your N64 childhood
If you loved the Nintendo 64 as a child, there will be something magical in reliving the experience via the Analogue 3D. This console truly captures the magic of the N64, faults and all.

You own a large N64 cartridge library
If you've still got all of your old N64 cartridges, then the 3D will give you hours and hours of joy. Some of the greatest games of all time reside on the console, although even the best of them, like Ocarina of Time, have been remastered to provide a better experience on more modern hardware.

You want an N64 for the holidays
I really hope Analogue makes the 3D available for purchase before the end of the Holiday Season, because the N64 thrives as a multiplayer console to be enjoyed with friends and family. If you want to rekindle the magic of playing video games on Christmas morning in the '90s, then pick up a 3D.

Don't buy it if...

You don't own N64 cartridges
If you're thinking of starting an N64 cartridge collection, then ignore this point. But if you don't own any games already, the 3D will quickly become a far more expensive purchase. Some of the most iconic games can be found for relatively cheap, but others, like Conker's Bad Fur Day, can fetch a hefty price tag.

You never played the N64
The N64 was the first true jump into 3D gaming, and it shows. It's quite endearing to see how developers experimented with 3D, but most games have aged pretty badly, and I think someone who doesn't have the nostalgia for the console would quickly become bored with the offering.

Also consider...

If you’re still not entirely sold on the Analogue 3D then check out these excellent similar products for comparison and consideration.

	Analogue 3D	Nintendo Switch 2	Nintendo Switch OLED
Price	$249.99 / £190 / $AU385	$429.99 / £395.99 / $AU699.95	$349.99 / £309.99 / $AU539.95
Dimensions	1.9 x 9 x 7in / 49 x 230 x 180mm	10.7 x 4.5 x 0.6in / 272 x 114 x 15mm	4 x 9.5 x 0.5in / 10 x 2.4 x 1.4cm
Weight	29.5oz / 837g	18.8oz / 535g	14.88oz / 421.84g
Compatibility	Nintendo 64 cartridges	Nintendo Switch 2 / Nintendo Switch / Nintendo Switch Online (N64, SNES, etc)	Nintendo Switch / Nintendo Switch Online (N64, SNES, etc)
Connection type	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI output	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI output (in TV mode)	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI output (in TV mode)
Battery life	N/A	2-5 hours	4.5 to 9 hours, depending on usage
Features	4k output, VRR, Lag free, zero signal degradation, NTSC & PAL Support, museum-quality filter accuracy to recreate CRT	8-inch OLED multi-touch display (1080p resolution), 256GB internal storage, improved stereo speakers, next-gen dock with 4K output and integrated LAN port, reinforced adjustable kickstand	7.0-inch OLED multi-touch screen (1280x720 resolution), 64GB internal storage, stereo speakers, enhanced dock with built-in LAN port, adjustable wide kickstand
Software	Analogue 3Dos, can play official Nintendo 64 cartidges	Runs all Nintendo Switch 2 games, access to Nintendo eShop and online services	Runs all Nintendo Switch games, access to Nintendo eShop and online services

Nintendo Switch OLED
If you're just looking to casually play N64 games on the go, the Nintendo Switch offers a range of games on its Nintendo Switch Online service. Add to that the extensive Nintendo Switch library and a gorgeous OLED display, and this might be the best middle ground for those looking for the perfect all-in-one gaming console.

For more information, check out our full Nintendo Switch OLED review.

Nintendo Switch 2
If you want to play GameCube games alongside N64, as well as experience the latest and greatest games from Nintendo, then the company's latest console, the Switch 2, should be at the top of your list. While it doesn't have an OLED screen in handheld, it looks gorgeous on a large TV.

For more information, check out our full Nintendo Switch 2 review.

How I tested the Analogue 3D

Tested for 2 weeks
Compared it directly to the experience on Nintendo Switch Online
Tested across game types

I’ve used the Analogue 3D for the past few weeks, and it has become my main way to play Nintendo 64 games at home.

I’ve tested the console with all of my original cartridges, including Mario 64, Mario Party 3, GoldenEye 007 and WCW/NWO Revenge.

Every game was played on my Samsung S90D OLED TV, so I could properly judge the image quality and performance on a modern display. I tried all of Analogue's display filters as well as overclocking the hardware via the built-in menu.

Jabees 7Seven headphones: One minute review

The Jabees 7Seven swimming headphones pack some features you don’t even find on their contemporaries at Shokz for around half the price. For many, that’s plenty of reason to buy. The 7Sevens are light as a feather at 28g and packs an ample 32GB of MP3 storage, essential for underwater listening where Bluetooth connectivity is weaker. This storage space outdoes quite a few older bone conduction headphones sets that have retained their price over the years, and puts the 7sevens in the same league as the Nank Runner Diver2 Pro and H20 Audio Tri 2 Pro.

Multipoint connectivity and Bluetooth 6.0 are great quality-of-life upgrades we wouldn’t expect on cheap headphones, allowing you to link to multiple devices and switch between them seamlessly. This is nice to swap between the phone for running and commuting and laptop for work, and works well in practice. Phone calls with the built-in microphone are, unfortunately, a bit tinny: the recipient of my test calls could hear me fine outside on a rainy run, but even at max volume the other person’s voice wasn’t great.

Music fared much better. Regardless of whether it was streamed via Bluetooth or loaded onto the headphones via the MP3 storage feature, quality was good, especially considering these are cheap bone conduction headphones. The transistors do vibrate at higher volumes during bassy tracks, which is especially noticeable above-ground on runs and in the office. However, in the water during swims, the vibrations are greatly reduced.

Jabees 7Seven Swimming headphones — (Image credit: Future)

Controls are simple and intuitive, with volume up and down also allowing you to skip tracks as usual. Everything else is handled by the multifunction power button with a variety of long and short presses, and it’s generally easily remembered, although I kept the manual to refer back to.

Generally speaking, the Jabees 7Seven headphones offer good quality that bely their price, but there are still some niggles here and there that have been ironed out in more expensive offerings. The fit around the ears isn’t adjustable: instead, the 7Sevens are packaged with a “secure fit loop”, a little piece of elastic common in bone conduction headsets that are supposed to tighten the band around the head. The battery only covers five hours of playback time, so they’ll need to be quite frequently charged. And then there are the high vibrations from the transistors at full volume and slight call quality issues.

However, none of these annoyances are enough to reduce the 7Seven’s status as a value-for-money alternative to the likes of Shokz and H20. It’s got some great features, stores a ton of music, and that five-hour playback will be enough for several pool sessions and a run. They won’t last all the way through an ironman event, but if you’re into that, you’re probably opting for the more expensive headphones anyway.

Jabees 7Seven headphones: Price and availability

$59.99 / £47.99 / AU$99
Cheaper than most high-quality swimming headphones
Same 32GB storage as more expensive brands

The Jabees 7Seven bone conduction headphones are available for $59.99 / £47.99 / AU$99, and bundle deals on multiple headphones can be found on the Jabees’ website. Considering some of their competitors are double, sometimes triple the price, you’re getting a lot for your buck with 32GB storage

Jabees 7Seven headphones: Scorecard

Category	Comment	Score
Value	For the price, they are terrific.	4.5/5
Design	Some more attention to the fit and transistor vibration would have been nice-to-haves.	3.5/5
Features	Multipoint connectivity, Bluetooth 6.0, 32GB storage. No notes.	5/5
Performance	Good in the water and on runs, although a couple of niggles.	3.5/5

Jabees 7Seven headphones: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You’re on a budget

At under $60 / £50 / AU$100, these headphones are great value.

You’ve got a big music library

32GB is a lot of space for MP3 storage.

You’re a regular swimmer

As opposed to dedicated runners, these headphones are great for mixed disciplines.

Don't buy it if...

You do long multi-sport events

Five hours of battery isn’t enough for long days on the trail.

You don’t own your own music

Without a library of MP3s to listen to in the pool, these headphones become less attractive.

Also consider

Shokz OpenRun

The best cheap bone conduction headphones for running.

Read our full Shokz OpenRun review

Shokz Openswim Pro

More expensive than the 7Sevens, but the best swimming headphones you can buy.

Read our full Shokz Openswim Pro review

How I tested

I tested the Jabees 7Seven underwater and on various runs. I drained the battery down, tested onboard MP3s and Bluetooth streaming alike, and adjusted the fit using the included secure fit loop.

I’ve spent nearly 50 hours barely surviving in Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl, and its PS5 release is the most fun I’ve had trying not to die in a post-apocalyptic open-world

4:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Consoles & PC Gadgets Gaming Playstation | Comments: Off

The first thing that struck me in Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl – recently released on PlayStation 5 – wasn't the claws of a mutated creature or a bandit's hail of bullets, but the first-person shooter's stunning visual presentation.

Incredibly atmospheric, brimming with absorbing details, and endlessly immersive, GSC Game World's passion project immediately places you in a brutal, believable post-apocalyptic world capable of conjuring a lifetime of nightmares.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5 Pro
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X and Series S, PC
Release date: November 20, 2025 (PS5)

Of course, if you laced up the boots of the titular wasteland wanderer and braved the game's unforgiving open-world when the Ukrainian developer released it on Xbox platforms and PC a year ago, you're well aware of Stalker 2's adept ability to transport you to its fictional take on the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone – the tragic site of 1986's Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster.

That said, while its original release was technically advanced and artistically brilliant, it was also brought down by numerous bugs, graphical and performance glitches, and other annoyances that often made it more frustrating than fun.

Following 12 months of fixes, patches, and additional polish, however, most of those issues have been squashed like an irradiated insect, making the title's PS5 launch leaps and bounds better than what some Xbox and PC players suffered through.

PlayStation 5-powered post-apocalypse

Given that the existing versions of the game also benefit from these same updates and improvements, it's worth noting that Stalker 2 is now in a much better place regardless of what platform you're playing on. Still, thanks to several PS5 – and, especially, PS5 Pro-specific upgrades and features – this latest trip to the Zone is easily the best yet.

For starters, the PS5 version offers both performance (targeting 2K resolution at 60 FPS) and quality modes (targeting 4K resolution at 30 FPS), while the PS5 Pro bumps the former even further, with performance aiming for 4K at 60 FPS. During my testing, playing primarily in performance mode on the PS5 Pro, I enjoyed a consistently fast, fluid experience. Both platforms also crank the immersion with a number of DualSense features, from adaptive trigger and haptic feedback support to clever integration of the controller's built-in speaker and touchpad.

PS5 Pro players also enjoy some additional bells and whistles, including more realistic shadows, lighting, reflections, and volumetric effects that push the graphical presentation to the platform's horsepower-pushing limits. More than mere back-of-the-box bullet points, these PS5 and PS5 Pro improvements combine to deliver tangible, experience-enhancing details and touches that truly make the forbidden Zone come to life…and death.

The DualSense delivers

Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl — (Image credit: GSC Game World)

Prominent displays of the PS5's extra power, like the rumble of a patrolling helicopter being felt through the DualSense – even as the pilots' communications crackle through the controller's speaker – will immediately have you questioning how you played Stalker 2 without Sony's proprietary tech in your hands.

It's truly the best implementation of the DualSense I've experienced since Astro Bot pleased my palms last fall.

But it's often far subtler moments, like unexpectedly wading into a radioactive puddle, that'll have you scooping your jaw from the floor. First, you'll likely spy the incredibly realistic reflections of the surrounding environment on the water, then notice your own shadow staring back at you.

Dare to delve further into the potentially deadly pool, and you'll see it ripple in time with your every footstep. But your cautious movements aren't the only ones stirring up the murky water, as hovering insects create tiny circles on its surface, while falling leaves cause a gentle lilting effect. Short of the DualSense spraying an actual mist in your face, I can't imagine how such moments could be more tangible.

While the culmination of these lulling effects could almost fool you into thinking you're playing a health spa simulator, the rampaging, mutated boar that's about to skewer you with its splintered tusks will quickly snap you back to reality. Stalker 2 is as brutal as it is beautiful, so you'll want to resist pausing too long to soak in its cinema-rivalling presentation.

Expectation-subverting shooter

Landscape screenshot from Stalker 2 Heart of Chornobyl — (Image credit: GSC)

While the game is generally billed as a first-person shooter, it's focused as much on unforgiving, survival horror gameplay as it is clip-emptying action. In fact, its steep difficulty – even on its "normal" setting – makes other post-apocalyptic action games feel like a picnic.

On top of standard survival elements, such as scarce ammo and resources, limited inventory space, and the constant, foreboding sense that your next breath could be your last, Stalker 2 tasks you with managing a number of other hazards. In addition to monitoring your health and stamina, you'll need to keep a close eye on thirst and hunger levels, as well as bleed damage following any encounter that's gone south.

Of course, given that the game takes place in an open world that woke up on the wrong side of a nuclear disaster, there's also the persistent threat of falling victim to radiation poisoning. But not to worry, as the rapid, tension-ratcheting ping of your radiation detector – frantically emitting from the DualSense – will let you know when you're about to become the Zone's next pile of ash. Whether or not you react to the warning fast enough to save your skin is another story.

Best bit

Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl consistently stacks the odds against you, frequently putting you face-to-face with mutated creatures, deadly anomalies, and evil-doing humans that are rarely happy to see you. There's nothing more rewarding than surviving a seemingly unbeatable encounter by the skin of your teeth… then looting the poor saps that tried to end you.

Toss in the fact that the massive map's absolutely brimming with all manner of mutated wildlife, human adversaries, and anomalies that can suddenly turn your seemingly normal surroundings into a death trap devoid of any scientific explanation, and, well, Stalker 2 will never be mistaken for another shooter that makes you feel like a world-saving space marine or super-soldier.

When a perfect storm of these aforementioned threats gets the best of you, the game can even feel a bit unfair and, if you haven't saved in a minute, border on frustrating. On the plus side, a number of rewarding gameplay loops – from upgrading your weapons and gear to progressing the story and piecing together the Zone's puzzle-like mysteries – should keep you engaged, even as the harsh world repeatedly throws you to the figurative – and sometimes literal – wolves.

But these elements, too, bring their own set of stressors. A strict durability system means weapons and gear can break down, while saddling yourself with too many items can lead to your Stalker becoming overencumbered. So even when you’re not under immediate threat, the game isn’t about to let you take a breather.

While Stalker 2 isn't for the faint of heart, its refreshing mix of survival-focused first-person action and an incredibly atmospheric, nerve-fraying open-world allows it to stand out from the post-apocalyptic fragger pack. Its unique take on the genre is further elevated by the PS5's ability to deliver the prettiest, most immersive version of the game yet. If its buggy launch last year kept you from breaching the borders of the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone, now's a great time to strap on the gas mask and give it a go.

Should you play Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl PS5?

Play it if...

You've been waiting for the best version of the game
In addition to the PS5 and PS5 Pro versions of the game benefiting from a year's worth of bug-squashing patches and game-enhancing updates, they also feature noticeably improved graphics and performance. On top of that, the game makes some of the best use of the DualSense the tech has ever seen.

You like your first-person shooters with a bit more meat on them
Stalker 2 is not a run-and-gun, linear shooter, but a survival-focused fragger that drops you in a punishing open-world you could lose 100 hours in. It has much more in common with a sprawling RPG or a survival horror game than an FPS campaign, like you'd find in Call of Duty.

You wanted to play last year, but were put off by the buggy launch
Regardless of all the PS5 perks that come with this latest release of Stalker 2, the game has been continuously updated and patched for the last year. All versions of the game have benefited from these fixes, making it the perfect time to brave the Zone on any platform.

Don't play it if...

You prefer a more directed, fast-paced first-person shooter
Stalker 2 isn't a guided, story-driven game filled with boss encounters and set pieces. While it has a critical narrative path, it's more of a meandering, exploration-rewarding experience that largely allows you to forge your own path at your own pace.

You're not craving a steep challenge
Filled with brutal foes and even harsher environments, Stalker 2 is far from a power fantasy, but rather a deeply challenging, survival-focused game that's most rewarding when you just barely survive encounters by the skin of your teeth.

Accessibility features

Stalker 2 contains a number of standard accessibility features, allowing users to adjust settings like subtitle size and subtitle background opacity. It also includes color blind modes, Protanopia, Deuteranopia, and Tritanopia, as well as the ability to toggle user interface elements, such as object markers, threat indicators, crosshair color, and mission notifications.

An Immersive Mode also allows you to disable the entire HUD for a more cinematic experience. Rookie, Stalker, Veteran, and Master difficulty settings are available to support a variety of skill levels, while an Expedition Mode lets you pair any of those settings with a more rigid save system.

How I reviewed Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl

I spent nearly 50 hours in Stalker 2, splitting my time between main missions, side quests, optional activities, and free-roaming exploration. Having previously played 40 or so hours of the game's Xbox Series X version, I reviewed the PlayStation release on a PS5 Pro. I tested both quality and performance modes and, while I didn't notice a significant difference between the two, I spent the majority of my time in the latter.

I played on a TCL 4K TV, with HDR enabled. I listened to the game through my television's built-in stereo speakers, rather than headphones or earbuds (as I normally would), so I could appreciate the full suite of DualSense features, which includes a good deal of audio effects delivered through the controller's speakers.

First reviewed November 2025

Garmin Vivoactive 6 review: A feature-stuffed pocket rocket

9:04 pm | November 20, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: Garmin Forerunner, Garmin Vivoactive | Comments: Off

Garmin Vivoactive 6: One minute review

The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is a great fitness watch, which isn’t something I was necessarily expecting from Garmin’s slimmer, more budget-friendly offering. It’s stuffed with features such as PacePro, Garmin’s virtual pacing system for runners, which generally belong on more expensive, more specialist watches like Garmin’s Forerunner series.

Still, the Vivoactive series is a lifestyle watch for active people. It shares a lot of DNA with Garmin’s other lifestyle watch, the Venu 4, but it’s cheaper and made from less premium materials. If the Venu 4 is like an Apple Watch, the Vivoactive 6 is more like an Apple Watch SE: there have been some compromises made to lower the price, but it’s still a really effective, comfortable activity watch I enjoyed wearing.

Like the Apple Watch SE 3, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 is very light, weighing in at just 36g with a band, and slim at just 10.9mm thick. This means it’s comfortable for all-day wear, and you can go from the gym to the office and even to bed and basically forget about wearing it. It slipped easily under my shirt cuff during daywear when other Garmin watches would bulge. Any sleep tracker has to be comfortable to wear throughout the night, and this was the case with the Vivoactive more so than the Venu, which is a milimeter or so thicker and much heavier due to its metal construction.

Smart wake alarm, a new feature for Garmin, was long missing from its lineup, and I was pleased yet surprised to see it in the Vivoactive line. It wakes you up with haptic vibrations at the lightest point in your sleep cycle, within a 30-minute window. Having tried it for a few days, I found it a much more pleasant way to wake up than my usual alarm, and I feel anecdotally less groggy in the mornings.

I enjoyed the Auto Activity Start feature too, which I set to start recording after one minute of road running. It really contributes to a seamless, super-light smartwatch experience when you don’t have to toggle around to get to the running settings – just run. It’s a nice-to-have, but it adds to the overall ‘virtual assistant’ experience many smartwatches are now striving for, to anticipate your needs without you having to wade through menus. I do wish the Vivoactive 6 had a microphone and voice assistant, but I can accept shortcomings at this price point.

It’s not necessarily the watch I’d recommend to adventurers or serious runners due to missing features from other Garmin watches, and it’s packing the older Elevate V4 heart rate sensor, which is functional but not as accurate as the upgraded Elevate V5, and my tests against the Polar H10 heart rate monitor corroborate that. But it’s a great fitness tool and the best cheap Garmin watch of 2025.

Garmin Vivoactive 6: Price and availability

Garmin Vivoactive 6 white — (Image credit: Future)

$299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549
Affordably priced compared to other Garmins
Comparable to most smartwatches from Apple and Samsung

The Garmin Vivoactive 6 retails at $299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549, although can be found on sale for slightly less.

That's very comparable with the likes of the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 and Google Pixel Watch 4, and slightly more expensive than the Apple Watch SE 3. Although it's perhaps leaning more towards fitness enthusiasts than those all-rounder watches, I'd say this is a great price for the amount of features on offer.

Garmin Vivoactive 6: Scorecard

Category	Comment	Score
Value	Cheap and most certainly cheerful, stuffed with premium features for the price.	5/5
Design	Two buttons and a touchscreen, nice and light, with a redesigned UI.	4/5
Features	Tons if you like your fitness, but lacking some modern smartwatch amenities like a microphone.	4/5
Performance	Accurate enough, comfortable to wear and lasts ages. I do wish it was packing Garmin’s more accurate HR monitor though.	4/5

Garmin Vivoactive 6: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You want an Apple Watch SE alternative

The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is an excellent value package, with an AMOLED screen and loads of training tools.

You’re a runner

PacePro, automatic run tracking, and Garmin’s advanced suite of fitness and recovery tools make it a comprehensive run tracker ideal for most people.

You struggle with comfort

Bulky, heavy watches are difficult to wear at night. The Vivoactive 6 is practically invisible on-wrist, and ideal for slimmer wrists.

Don't buy it if...

You want an adventure watch

The Garmin Instinct 3 is a little bit more expensive and packs lots of outdoor-focused navigation features.

Accuracy is everything

If you need the latest Elevate V5 heart rate sensor for pinpoint precision rather than an estimate, go for the Venu 4.

Also consider

Garmin Forerunner 570

The best Garmin watch for runners: it’s more expensive, but ideal if you love pounding the pavement.

Read our full Garmin Forerunner 570 review

Apple Watch SE 3

The best Apple Watch for most people, with some smartwatch features the Vivoactive 6 is missing.

Read our full Apple Watch SE 3 reviewView Deal

How I tested

I wore the Garmin Vivoactive 6 for 10 days, performing different kinds of workouts, sleeping with it on, and draining the battery down. I tested its various functions, including the new Smart Wake alarm, and tested its Elevate V4 heart rate sensor against a Polar H10 chest-mounted heart rate monitor.

First reviewed: November 2025

Garmin Vivoactive 6 review: A feature-stuffed pocket rocket

9:04 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: Garmin Forerunner, Garmin Vivoactive | Comments: Off

Garmin Vivoactive 6: One minute review

Garmin Vivoactive 6: Price and availability

$299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549
Affordably priced compared to other Garmins
Comparable to most smartwatches from Apple and Samsung

The Garmin Vivoactive 6 retails at $299.99 / £279.99 / AU$549, although can be found on sale for slightly less.

Garmin Vivoactive 6: Scorecard

Category	Comment	Score
Value	Cheap and most certainly cheerful, stuffed with premium features for the price.	5/5
Design	Two buttons and a touchscreen, nice and light, with a redesigned UI.	4/5
Features	Tons if you like your fitness, but lacking some modern smartwatch amenities like a microphone.	4/5
Performance	Accurate enough, comfortable to wear and lasts ages. I do wish it was packing Garmin’s more accurate HR monitor though.	4/5

Garmin Vivoactive 6: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You want an Apple Watch SE alternative

The Garmin Vivoactive 6 is an excellent value package, with an AMOLED screen and loads of training tools.

You’re a runner

PacePro, automatic run tracking, and Garmin’s advanced suite of fitness and recovery tools make it a comprehensive run tracker ideal for most people.

You struggle with comfort

Bulky, heavy watches are difficult to wear at night. The Vivoactive 6 is practically invisible on-wrist, and ideal for slimmer wrists.

Don't buy it if...

You want an adventure watch

The Garmin Instinct 3 is a little bit more expensive and packs lots of outdoor-focused navigation features.

Accuracy is everything

If you need the latest Elevate V5 heart rate sensor for pinpoint precision rather than an estimate, go for the Venu 4.

Also consider

Garmin Forerunner 570

The best Garmin watch for runners: it’s more expensive, but ideal if you love pounding the pavement.

Read our full Garmin Forerunner 570 review

Apple Watch SE 3

The best Apple Watch for most people, with some smartwatch features the Vivoactive 6 is missing.

Read our full Apple Watch SE 3 reviewView Deal

How I tested

First reviewed: November 2025

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: has Sony’s long-standing Xperia family lost what it takes to compete?

5:25 pm | November 19, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phones Sony Xperia Phones | Tags: AI, HDR, Sony Alpha, Sony Xperia | Comments: Off

Sony Xperia 1 VII: Two-minute review

The Xperia 1 VII is Sony’s top Android phone. It’s simultaneously refreshing among its peers and too conservative to be considered all that interesting or dynamic.

It’s very similar to its predecessor, the Sony Xperia 1 VI, but stands out as one of the few higher-end phones with a headphone jack and microSD expandable storage. These are not expensive features, but do partially come to define the Xperia 1 VII’s appeal against its rivals.

The other side of the phone is a bit more problematic. Aside from using what was at launch the latest, most powerful, Qualcomm chipset, the Xperia 1 series is falling behind in a few areas.

Charging speed, battery capacity, camera slickness, and video modes nowadays feel a little regressive in this class, and some of these areas are more limited than they were in some earlier generations of the Sony Xperia 1 VII’s family.

This would not matter so much were the Sony Xperia 1 VII not extremely expensive, but it costs more than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, which is the more dynamic phone.

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: price and availability

Sony Xperia 1 VII review images — (Image credit: Future)

Starts at £1,399 (roughly $1,870 / AU$2,885)
Launched in June 2025

The Sony Xperia 1 VII was released in June 2025, following an announcement in May.

It costs £1,399 or 1,499 euros, equivalent to around $1,870 / AU$2,885 in a direct currency conversion at the time of writing, but with no current availability in those regions. This is for the model reviewed, which has 12GB RAM and 256GB of storage. There is also a 512GB model in some parts of the world, but this isn't available in the UK.

In any case, that price puts the Sony Xperia 1 VII among the most expensive Android phones to date, short of unusual models encrusted with jewels or gold bling.

Value score: 2 / 5

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: specs

Here's a full specs list for the Sony Xperia 1 VII, so you can see what it has going for it at a glance:

Sony Xperia 1 VII specs

Dimensions:	162 x 74 x 8.2mm
Weight:	197g
Screen:	6.5-inch 19.5:9 FHD+ (1080 x 2340) 120Hz LTPO OLED
Chipset:	Snapdragon 8 Elite
RAM:	12GB
Storage:	256GB
OS:	Android 15
Primary camera:	48MP, f/1.9, 24mm
Ultra-wide camera:	48MP, f/2.0, 16mm
Telephoto camera:	12MP, f/2.3-f/3.5, 3.5x-7.1x zoom (85-170mm)
Front camera:	12MP, f/2.0, 24mm
Audio:	Stereo speakers
Battery:	5,000mAh
Charging:	30W wired, 15W wireless
Colors:	Moss Green, Orchid Purple, Slate Black

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: design

Image 1 of 3

Sony Xperia 1 VII in the hand — (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

Gorilla Glass Victus 2 screen protection
Familiar Sony 'monolith' design
3.5mm headphone jack

Phones these days are often accused of being boring, and in many ways the Sony Xperia 1 VII is also guilty of that. It looks virtually identical to its predecessor, and is part of a design family tree so long it could shame some monarchical dynasties.

The Sony Xperia 1 VII is a metal and glass brick that offers very little in the way of visible outer progress in tech or style. But that’s kind of the point with this series.

Sony offers lots of the bits other manufacturers have long since discarded in the noble pursuit of copying Apple. For example, the Sony Xperia 1 VII has a headphone jack, which I love as someone who actually bought a pair of wired in-ear monitors during testing.

It also has space for a microSD card in its SIM tray, and there’s no notch or punch-hole in the screen, just larger-than-most display borders. And it has a two-stage shutter button for the camera too. I’m not much of a fan of the latter these days, but Sony can make treading water seem valuable because it offers so much that other flagship phones just don’t have anymore.

Most of the build bullet points are largely beyond reproach too. The Sony Xperia 1 VII is a full metal and glass phone, with Corning’s tough Gorilla Glass Victus 2 up front, and aluminum sides. Its rear panel is 'just' Victus rather than its successor, which has better drop resistance, but this still provides a respectable amount of protection.

The back is also textured, with a series of embossed dots, apparent when you look real close. It’s very fingerprint-resistant, and simply gives the Sony Xperia 1 VII a different feel than that of flat glossy glass.

It is basically an identical feel to the Sony Xperia VI, though, especially as the two generations also have a sort-of corrugated effect to the frame.

The rectangular shape makes the Sony Xperia 1 VII feel tough, the sort of phone you could use as a bludgeoning weapon. But in previous generations I’ve found it less than ideal for the finish’s longevity. Eventually the paint will wear off the sharp corners of the frame, showing up as bright, raw aluminum highlights. A couple of weeks in, that wear is already visible on the Sony Xperia 1 VII's camera lens housing.

You can fix that with a case, of course, but the Sony Xperia 1 VII does not include one.

Like other phones in this series, the Xperia 1 VII also has a side-mounted fingerprint sensor rather than an in-screen one. It doesn’t feel as instantaneous as some, and I find it annoyingly picky. As soon as I’ve done a little exercise, just a bit of sweat will cause my finger not to be recognized.

The speaker array deserves a note too. There are front-mounted stereo speakers, with the fairly full-sounding audio I’ve come to expect of top-tier phones. It may not be the loudest stereo pair among flagship phones, but I’ve happily spent many (many) hours listening to podcasts using nothing more than these speakers.

Water resistance is excellent too, as is typical for Sony. The Xperia 1 VII is rated for IP65 and IP68, for protection from immersion in fresh water and being subjected to jets of the stuff. This finish may be easy to scrape, but the phone is difficult to drown.

Design score: 3 / 5

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: display

Bright screen makes good use of HDR
Lower resolution than older Xperia flagships
Colorful and contrasty

This Sony series used to employ some pretty wild display panels, with ultra-tall shapes and ultra-high resolutions. But the Sony Xperia 1 VII has a far more ordinary 1080p screen that measures 6.5 inches across.

There’s no notch, it’s a totally flat panel, and this is a 120Hz OLED screen with OLED staple deep color and flawless contrast.

The Sony Xperia 1 VII’s default color mode has strong saturation, but there’s also a Creator mode that lowers saturation for a more measured appearance. This also kicks in as standard in apps that try to take over the color presentation of the screen, which is great.

It means your photos end up looking as they will on other well-calibrated screens, rather than severely oversaturated.

There’s nothing too special going on here, but the Sony Xperia 1 VII's screen is at least very bright. Legibility in strong direct sunlight is good, and the high peak brightness makes the most of the latest movements in HDR.

And I’m not just talking about HDR video. You’ll notice in Instagram that sometimes the highlights of the picture are brighter than the app’s white border. That’s HDR for you, and it can look great. It’s used when you look at your own photos in the gallery too, most notably bringing out the bright highlights in clouds in a very eye-catching manner.

Let’s not get carried away, though. Phones are currently on an upwards peak brightness trend thanks to the underlying OLED panel tech developing fairly rapidly in the background. Even fairly affordable phones have ridiculously high peak brightness claims — like the 3,000-nit Nothing Phone 3a.

Display score: 3.5 / 5

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: cameras

High-quality primary camera
Could feel more responsive and quick
Zoom is fun to use but disappoints on image quality in 2025

You’d think phones like the Sony Xperia 1 VII would have the best phone cameras in the world. A division of Sony, after all, does make almost all of the camera sensors used by the best phones.

Yet despite that the Sony Xperia 1 VII doesn't quite match the best rivals here, not in all respects anyway. While the Sony Xperia 1 VII has mostly top-tier hardware, the experience of actually using the camera doesn’t have the standard-setting gloss and slickness you might expect.

For example, the shutter doesn’t always feel instantaneous, and there’s sometimes a fractional wait between captures as you shoot single stills. The best-feeling phone cameras appear to operate as fast as your finger will go. The Sony Xperia 1 VII isn’t quite there.

Its preview image isn’t the best either. For example, Samsung provides a solid estimation of what a photo will look like before you even take it, including the effects of its HDR processing. The Sony Xperia 1 VII will sometimes show blown highlights in the preview view, even if it pretty much always fixes those highlights by the time the image hits your gallery.

As we’ve seen across the phone, much of the camera is pretty familiar compared to the last generation. The Sony Xperia 1 VII has a large-sensor 48MP primary camera and a still-unusual genuine optical zoom lens – virtually every other phone zoom has what’s known as a prime lens, where the view is fixed.

The ultra-wide gets a notable upgrade, though. Sensor resolution jumps from 12MP to 48MP, which could be good or bad depending on the sensor used. But this time it’s also a much larger sensor, jumping from 1/2.5-inch in the Xperia VI to 1/1.56-inch here. It’s one of the higher-spec ultra-wide cameras you’ll find.

Sure enough, the ultra-wide takes lovely pictures, giving the Xperia 1 VII an admirable sense of consistency between the wide and ultra-wide lenses. Colors aren’t oversaturated, instead appearing largely natural.

Are these two lenses actually equals? It’s not even close, and that becomes clear at night. The Sony Xperia 1 VII can only take (barely) passable low-light shots with the ultra-wide, lacking the dynamic range and detail of the main camera. Far-away brick work turns to mush, and it also seems the ultra-wide shots don’t get as much low-light processing either.

The main camera’s night shots are good, although Sony perhaps leans slightly less egregiously on computational photography to enhance dynamic range. This can mean photos look more natural than the norm, if also less impressive in some scenes.

The deficiencies of the zoom camera aren’t too hard to find either, even though having what amounts to 16mm-170mm framing versatility is amazing. This camera allows you to shoot at anywhere from 3.5x to 7.1x optical zoom, but when shooting at the further reaches of the zoom in particular, detail integrity and clarity are actually pretty poor considering we are looking at a non digitally-zoomed image.

It’s likely down to a conjunction of two factors that limit the quality of photos we’ll be able to get. There’s the lowly f/3.5 aperture – which is fine in a 'proper' camera but very poor in a mobile phone. And the sensor itself is small. That said, I’ve found that image quality issues can appear in any kind of lighting, from blazing sunshine to night.

That’s not to say the Sony Xperia 1 VII’s extreme zoom images are unusable. They can look good on the surface, but fall apart a bit when approached with a critical eye.

The zoom camera also has a kind of amazing macro mode, which is available at the 120cm focal length. You can focus at up to 4cm away from the camera. It’s enough to reveal the printed dots in a Magic the Gathering card, or the subpixels in a MacBook Air’s display. I’ve used it to identify tiny spiders, and get a closer look at ripening blackberries, but you need a steady hand as the depth of field is extremely shallow. Thankfully the Xperia 1 VII does have a focus peaking option to help out. This is where in-focus elements of the scene are highlighted.

But, stepping back once more, compared to the more conventional pericope designs in phones like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 Ultra, Sony needs to up its game to compete.

For video, the Sony Xperia 1 VII has some solid skills, with some odd missing parts. It can capture 4K video at up to 120fps, and there’s a software-generated 'bokeh' blur video mode and an extra stabilized 'AI' mode.

However, where Sony used to be the master of slow-mo video, the Xperia 1 VII has no real notable skills here. Back when ultra-powered slow-mo modes became a show-off contest, there was often interpolation involved. But it was fun to play around with, and that’s largely absent here.

Around the front, the Sony Xperia 1 VII has a 12MP selfie camera. It’s good, capable of rendering natural-looking skin tones, and has the detail to pick out pores, single facial hairs and so on – when you aren’t obliterating such details with filters.

Camera score: 3.5 / 5

Sony Xperia 1 VII review camera samples

Image 1 of 23

Sony Xperia 1 VII camera samples — (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 23

Image 3 of 23

Image 4 of 23

Image 5 of 23

Image 6 of 23

Image 7 of 23

Image 8 of 23

Image 9 of 23

Image 10 of 23

Image 11 of 23

Image 12 of 23

Image 13 of 23

Image 14 of 23

Image 15 of 23

Image 16 of 23

Image 17 of 23

Image 18 of 23

Image 19 of 23

Image 20 of 23

Image 21 of 23

Image 22 of 23

Image 23 of 23

Image 1 of 7

Image 2 of 7

Image 3 of 7

Image 4 of 7

Image 5 of 7

Image 6 of 7

Image 7 of 7

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: performance

Gradual thermal throttling attempts to manage heat
A high-performing phone
Still gets a little too warm on occasion

The Sony Xperia 1 VII has one of the best chipsets available to Android phones in 2025. This is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. It’s enormously powerful (though now beaten by the new Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5), and here it’s paired with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage.

This will be able to handle any game you throw its way and, the largely non-processor-related camera hitches aside, general performance is great. But that's as it should be, as we have every right to expect one of the best possible processors in the Sony Xperia 1 VII, given how much it costs.

When pressure is applied, Sony takes a highly progressive approach to thermal throttling in the Xperia 1 VII. Where some phones hang on for dear life until the internal temperature sensor reaches a certain level, here the performance scales with temperature in a more fine grain way, chipping down almost from the beginning of a gaming session or benchmark test.

After 20 minutes the Xperia 1 VII ends up at 55% of its peak performance. And as that test was performed on a hot day during the summer, I also slung the phone in a fridge to see what happened with the same test. Once again, there was that very gradual loss of power, ending up with 78.8% of its max after 20 minutes.

I have also noticed that the Xperia 1 VII gets hot on occasion, which is predictably accompanied by faster power drain.

In any case, losing up to 45% of peak power may sound pretty bad, but it’s not uncommon to see up to a 55% loss in phones with these high power chipsets.

Some folks had major reliability issues with the Xperia 1 VII at launch, spurring a response from Sony itself. Thankfully, it’s been mostly smooth sailing day-to-day during testing, though.

Performance score: 4 / 5

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: software

Sticks to the AI basics
Fewer Sony apps than some older phones
Familiar Sony interface style

The Sony Xperia 1 VII runs Android 15 and has Sony’s long-standing custom interface on top. It comes with the promise of four years of operating system version updates and six years of security patches.

There’s nothing too surprising here. It has an app drawer, one that can be arranged either alphabetically or using your own layout. Choose the latter and you can also sort apps into folders.

The only interface niggles we’ve found are that the Wi-Fi switch wasn’t put in the feature toggle drop-down as standard, and that the standby behavior and lock screen layout means it’s easy to accidentally have podcasts or songs skip while the phone is in your pocket.

These are not problems without fixes, but they are annoying.

A while back, Sony went big on its own apps, including multiple camera apps for enthusiasts and the point ’n’ shoot crowd. It made a minor splash at the time, but all that has mostly been scaled back in favor of simplicity.

And, let’s be honest, having to maintain multiple apps for the same job has got to be a pain.

The Sony Xperia 1 VII gets a single camera app, a basic video editor, the Music Pro multi-track recorder app, and what Sony calls the Creators’ App. This is part social network, part a way to bring over the photos taken with your 'proper' Sony camera(s).

Sony’s concept here does kind of make sense, to bring together the other sides of Sony’s wider business to lend the Xperia 1 VII additional credibility. It desperately wants to make phones for creatives, but doesn’t really have a hope in hell of bringing many of them over to its stable, especially as there are alternatives to all of these apps floating around, ones with more workflow-boosting features.

Image 1 of 3

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

This phone also does not have an app pre-installed that lets you use the phone as an external monitor for Sony Alpha mirrorless cameras, despite that feature once being hailed as a photographer’s USP for buying a top-tier Xperia. I did install a Sony app that appeared to do that job, but it also appears to be largely brand-agnostic on the phone side, and I’m primarily a Fuji camera user anyway.

Sony has not gone heavy on AI software in the way other manufacturers have – which may be appealing or a turn-off depending on your tastes. It is here, though. Long-press the side power button and Google Gemini AI appears. There’s just not much in the way of Sony-made AI features, which is probably for the best given how at-risk they’d be of coming across as superfluous and try-hard.

Software score: 3 / 5

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: battery

Bottom rung 'fast' charging
One-day real-world battery life
5,000mAh capacity

The Sony Xperia 1 VII has a 5,000mAh battery, just like its predecessor. I have found that with my use it lasts a solid day and no more.

Is it worse than last year’s model? Perhaps not, or at least not hugely, but Sony has not caught up with one of the new meaningful developments in phone tech of late. This is the silicon-carbon battery, which allows for higher-capacity batteries in the same size of cell.

The Sony Xperia 1 VII lasts a full day with my kind of use, but rarely has much spare to keep it going overnight or into the next day. On a couple of occasions – usually when I’ve watched too much YouTube – it has needed an evening top-up too. And, as noted earlier, there have been moments when it has inexplicably got warmer than it should, indicative of excess power drain.

I think if you are able to get Sony’s claimed two-day use, you’re not using your phone intensively enough to justify one this pricey.

Charging speeds are not particularly impressive either, as 30W is the power ceiling. Sony does not include a power adapter with the phone, but plenty of non-Sony plugs will be able to charge it at max speed, over USB-PD.

A full charge from flat took 88 minutes, while it reached 50% in a much better-sounding 29 minutes. It’s not a real fast charger, and is now also beaten by Samsung – not a fast-charging pioneer either, but at least top phones like the Galaxy S25 Ultra support 45W charging.

The Sony Xperia 1 VII can be charged wirelessly too, but at up to a dismal 15W. Reverse wireless charging is in as well, though, which should come in handy if you have wireless earphones that support Qi charging.

Battery score: 3 / 5

Should you buy the Sony Xperia 1 VII?

Sony Xperia 1 VII score card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Value	The phone costs a fortune. And while it has the raw power expected at this level, and uses great materials, it’s not clear Sony has really done enough to justify asking for this.	2 / 5
Design	It’s that same old Sony design. Largely impeccable materials and great water resistance, but the brick-like shape creates areas that wear down quickly, and Sony doesn’t include a case.	3 / 5
Display	It’s bright and it has OLED color and contrast. But it’s also pretty ordinary considering the panels Sony used to employ. You don’t miss much, other than the sense you’re paying a lot for a screen like this.	3.5 / 5
Software	Sony offers us some creative apps we imagine most buyers will ignore, but the rest of the software is business as usual. Android 15 with a layer of Sony interface pasted on top, and no obvious AI obsession for better or worse.	3 / 5
Camera	A zero-fat camera array like this is what we want to see. And the phone can take beautiful pictures. It could be better on the slickness of the experience, though, and the zoom is falling behind rivals despite sounding great on paper.	3.5 / 5
Performance	Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset is swiftly and progressively throttled in the phone to manage heat. A sensible move, if not one the techy gamers may love.	4 / 5
Battery	We’re in the process of seeing a big leap in phone battery capacities. But Sony isn’t there yet, and this phone doesn’t last more than a day in our experience. Fast charging needs to improve too.	3 / 5

Buy it if...

You want a phone with a headphone jack
Old-school in a great way, the Sony Xperia 1 VII has a high-quality 3.5mm headphone jack, which has been a rarity in all but budget phones for years now.

You are a big Sony Alpha mirrorless camera fan
The phone has software to link up to your 'proper' camera’s photo library, and the screen is a great way to review photos.

You just love Sony’s style
Recognizable from way further than arm’s length to any phone geek, Sony’s phone design hasn’t changed much over the years, and fans may be glad of it.

Don't buy it if...

You want cutting-edge tech
While it has a high-end Snapdragon chipset, other areas of the device do not feel as though they are pushing at the edge of what’s possible in phone tech.

You want a deal
This is one of the most expensive Android phones in existence, and there’s a good argument that Sony doesn’t really justify the outlay fully.

You love fast charging
30W power supply support means the Xperia 1 VII takes almost 90 minutes to charge from flat, which seems a lot in 2025.

Sony Xperia 1 VII review: Also consider

Not sure about the Sony? Here are a few alternative options.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
There are plenty of more aggressive and competitively priced phones at this level. The perhaps most obvious one is the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, which has better zoom skills, costs less and has a larger screen. There’s no headphone jack, of course.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review

Google Pixel 9 Pro
The Google Pixel 9 Pro sticks with a smaller screen, costs loads less and still has a solid 5x camera zoom. It makes much more use of software AI, though whether that’s your bag or not depends on your proclivities.

Read out full Google Pixel 9 Pro review

Xiaomi 15 Ultra
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is an alternative you might not instantly think of. It uses more aggressive camera hardware, and has a larger, faster-charging battery. A more cutting-edge design also fits in a significantly larger screen even though the phone itself is only fractionally wider.

Read our full Xiaomi 15 Ultra review

	Sony Xperia 1 VII	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra	Google Pixel 9 Pro	Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Price (at launch):	£1,399 (roughly $1,870 / AU$2,885)	$1,299 / £1,249 / AU$2,149	$999 / £999 / AU$1,699	£1,299 (roughly $1,740 / AU$2,675)
Dimensions:	162 x 74 x 8.2mm	162.8 x 77.6 x 8.2mm	152.8 x 72 x 8.5mm	161.3 x 75.3 x 9.4mm
Weight:	197g	218g	199g	226g
Displays	6.5-inch OLED, 120Hz	6.9-inch AMOLED, 120Hz	6.3-inch OLED, 120Hz	6.73-inch AMOLED, 120Hz
Cameras	48MP main, 48MP ultra-wide, 12MP telephoto	200MP main, 50MP ultra-wide, 10MP telephoto, 50MP telephoto	50MP main, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto	50MP main, 50MP ultra-wide, 200MP telephoto, 50MP telephoto
Chipset:	Qualcomm Snapdragon Gen 8 Elite	Qualcomm Snapdragon Gen 8 Elite for Galaxy	Google Tensor G4	Qualcomm Snapdragon Gen 8 Elite

How I tested the Sony Xperia 1 VII

Review test period: several weeks
Testing included: everyday use, photography, long days away from a charger, a weekend away
Tools used: Geekbench 6, 3DMark

The Sony Xperia 1 VII was used as my primary phone for several weeks, to get the best idea of how it works. I took hundreds of photos with its cameras, and used it during a weekend away, with long days away from the charger.

Some benchmark performance testing was done too, in order to back up, or potentially challenge, observations I found from my everyday phone use. However, there were not any grand surprises to be found in those benchmarks anyway.

Caira camera: one-minute review

TechRadar AI Week 2025

(Image credit: Future)

This article is part of TechRadar's AI Week 2025. Covering the basics of artificial intelligence, we'll show you how to get the most from the likes of ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, alongside in-depth features, news, and the main talking points in the world of AI.

The Caira snaps onto your iPhone using MagSafe, turns your phone into the control hub, and sets out to merge mirrorless camera-quality with smartphone ease.

The hardware is the real deal: a Micro Four Thirds mount and (Sony) sensor, a CNC’d aluminium chassis. It accepts proper lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, Sigma, and Leica - so this isn’t a toy pretending to be a camera. Its in a similar mold to the open source Alice Camera – a previous project from the makers of Caira.

Inside, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chip and Google’s Edge TPU AI processor run three flagship tricks: voice control, smart styles and generative editing.

With voice control you can say “take a photo” and Caira actually does. Smart Styles are six tasteful AI-trained color profiles that make your footage look deliberate. Generative Editing – the headline feature – uses natural language prompts to restyle photos instantly, no laptop required.

Caira camera on a grid mat — (Image credit: Rashid Ahmad)

Yes, the real party trick is Google’s ‘Nano Banana’ generative AI – which sounds like a smoothie but is actually a powerful on-device editor. You can tell the camera to “turn this daylight shot into night” or “make my blazer burgundy,” and it’ll do it in seconds. It’s astonishing. It’s the first time I’ve seen Lightroom sulk because it’s now redundant.

The result is a camera designed to skip the “import - edit - export - scream” routine. Some will say that skipping that part also skips the soul of photography. I’m not one of them. I’m in favor of anything that lets you spend more time shooting and less time staring at a progress bar – I’ll leave the hand-wringing to other creators.

But before you start packing your MacBook away forever, that magical AI is only available if you pay $7 a month for the ‘Caira Pro’ plan (about £6 / AU$11). Because nothing screams modern camera like a monthly sub.

However, for every tinfoil hat wearing critic out there screaming for the days of old and terrified of AI, go back to shooting on film and paying $35 a month for every roll you develop. My Lightroom subscription costs a lot more than Caira Pro, and I will use it a lot less.

Caira camera: price and availability

Priced at $995 (£760 / AU$1,500 approx)
Available to early crowdfunding backers for $695 (£529 / AU$1,070 approx)
First deliveries expected from January 2026

Caira camera on a grid mat alongside classic cameras — (Image credit: Rashid Ahmad)

Caira is available through Camera Intelligence's Kickstarter campaign, which runs from November 4 to November 30. As always, back crowdfunding campaigns at your own risk!

The campaign lists the camera (body only) price for $995 (around £760 / AU$1,500), while optimistic Super Early Bird backers can bag one for $695 (about £529 / AU$1,070).

According to its makers, the Caira delivery window is January to February 2026, (assuming no global crises intervene).

To get the most out of Caira's AI skills, you'll want the Caira pro subscription, which costs $7 per month. Backers get six months free, nine if funding hits its goals.

Caira camera specs

Caira camera specs
Sensor:	11MP Micro Four Thirds, quad-bayer HDR and dual ISO
Mount:	Micro Four Thirds
Processor:	Qualcomm Snapdragon with 8 - core CPU, GPU, DSP
AI Chip:	Google Edge TPU
Video:	4K 30fps & 1080p 60fps
Battery:	5,000 mAh
Storage:	Internal 64GB + SSD External storage via USB-C, straight onto Apple photos
Connectivity:	iPhone MagSafe connector, WiFi
Dimensions:	112.5mm (W) x 85mm (H) x 21.5mm (D). Handle depth is 42.5mm
Weight:	10.2oz / 290g (w/out lens)

Caira camera: Design

No screen – you MagSafe your iPhone instead
Premium CNC-milled aluminum body
64GB internal memory

Caira camera on a grid mate alongside Alice Camera — Caira alongside the Alice Camera, designed by the same makers (Image credit: Rashid Ahmad)

Imagine if Leica built a GoPro after a long lunch - that’s the Caira. There's Sigma BF vibes, too. A sleek, screen-less slab of CNC-milled metal that looks premium and feels it too.

The design strips away almost all buttons, because the company says creators are “overwhelmed by controls.” Fair. Now you’ll be overwhelmed by menus instead.

The MFT mount opens a vast lens ecosystem, from affordable pancakes to glass that costs more than your phone. And the 5,000 mAh battery means you can actually use it all day.

Best of all, there are no memory cards. You shoot, and the files appear in your iPhone’s Photos app almost instantly. It’s dangerously convenient.

Cair camera: Performance

11MP Four Thirds sensor with dual base ISO
Basic video specs – 4K video up to 30fps
Really effective Nano Banana voice control and generative edits

The Caira behaves like two products; a legitimate camera, and an unashamed AI experiment.

The camera hardware delivers – the 11MP Sony sensor combined with proper MFT glass (I used several of my Lumix lenses, including the 12-60mm f/2.8-4 lens) is an obvious leap from a smartphone, particularly in low light. Depth, sharpness, and texture all feel natural. The AI-tuned colour profile leans a little toward “Instagram - ready,” but never offensively so.

Caira's Smart Styles are surprisingly tasteful presets, that make you look more competent than you are. You can get a feel in the examples in the gallery below.

Image 1 of 3

Caira camera user interface with a photo of a lady in a red dress — An original photo taken with Caira (Image credit: Future / Rashid Ahmad)

Image 2 of 3

Caira camera user interface with a photo of a lady in a red dress, image processing — Turn the dress black (Image credit: Future / Rashid Ahmad)

Image 3 of 3

Caira camera user interface with a photo of a lady in a red dress now changed to lady in a black dress — About 20 seconds later, the new image appears. (Image credit: Future / Rashid Ahmad)

The Caira's show piece is its AI features. Voice Control is genuinely handy when both hands are busy, or sticky with espresso, but Generative Editing is the main event.

Prompts like “make it nighttime” or “change his navy blazer to burgundy” return results in seconds – clean, convincing, a bit spooky.

Generative Editing is the feature that flattens the learning curve and streamlines the creative workflow. It’s powerful, fast, and feels like magic.

To its credit, the company has guardrails in place: no altering skin tone or facial features. I tried. It refused, nicely.

The Caira is a bold step. It’s a bet that the next generation of creators values AI-powered speed and flexibility as much as – or perhaps more than – traditional photographic purity. And based on what I’ve seen, it’s a bet they just might win.

Image 1 of 2

Lady in a red dress — The original photo, using one of the more vibrant color profiles Caira has (Image credit: Future / Rashid Ahmad)

Image 2 of 2

Lady in a black dress, photo taken with the Caira camera — Now with the generative prompt 'turn the dress black', which returned results way quicker than an outfit change. (Image credit: Future / Rashid Ahmad)

The Caira feels like a product born out of collective exhaustion. Someone, somewhere, finally admitted that no one actually enjoys editing - they just enjoy pretending they do. It’s bold, a little absurd, and far more capable than it has any right to be.

It won’t replace your main camera, and it won’t replace your phone either - but it might just replace your willpower to open Lightroom ever again.

It’s the perfect tool for those of us who still like the idea of photography - the ritual, the gear, the illusion of artistry - but who secretly just want the photo to look brilliant the moment we take it.

And truthfully? That’s probably the entire modern photographer.

Should you buy the Caira camera?

Buy it if...

You want a seamless shoot and edit experience, through your smartphone

Other cameras add way too many steps to the shoot - upload - edit - share process. Caira simplifies the whole process.

You want powerful edits in seconds, without the need for expensive editing software

Caira churns out the sorts of edits that used to take way more time with pricey software, and it does so directly on your phone.

Don't buy it if...

You want high-resolution photos

Just 11MP is pretty low by today's standards.

You're unsure about crowdfunding campaigns

To be fair, Caira's makers delivered with a previous project, the Alice Camera, but back at your own risk (or wait).

Caira camera on a grid mat alongside Lumix lenses — Caira accepts Micro Four Thirds lenses, like these two Lumix ones (Image credit: Rashid Ahmad)

How I tested the Caira camera

I tested Caira for two weeks
I paired it with Lumix lenses, including the 12–60mm f/2.8-4 lens
I connected my iPhone and made use of the various Nano Banana features

Camera Intelligence sent me one of just 50 pre-production units for a two week trial. I used it mostly to photograph things that didn’t deserve this much computing power.

It locks to the iPhone via MagSafe and connects over Wi-Fi through the Caira iOS app. Setup takes seconds, and then you’re in. I paired it with a Lumix 12–60mm f/2.8-4 – a brilliant lens that I immediately wasted on photographing coffee cups, pool balls, and other cameras.

First reviewed November 2025

« Previous Page — Next Page »