AAA - Organizer

Apple iMac 24-inch M4 (2024) review: the best, and most colorful, all-in-one computer levels up

5:09 pm | November 7, 2024

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Two-minute review

The iMac has been the all-in-one computer to beat since the jump to Apple silicon and a well-received redesign. MacOS teamed with an Apple-made processor make for an excellent experience, and with an iMac you get everything you need to get off to the races in the box.

The 2024 iMac doesn’t majorly depart from this working formula – but three changes, err four, if you’re willing to spend a bit more, make one of the best gadgets around even better. First, Apple has dropped the price by $100 / £100 / AU$200, setting it at $1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999. For that, you get an M4 chip, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage – that’s better specs than the M3 version, so you're getting good value here.

The design is identical to the previous model from a year ago and the M1 iMac, which arrived in 2021. It’s an excellent-looking machine that can fit in almost any space – be it a proper desk, a kitchen counter, or even a shelf. It still only comes in one size – 24-inch – which might be a deal-breaker for some, but it appears that Apple wants those folks to get a Mac mini and pair it with a display.

Apple’s only big change with the design is new colors, and I love them. These new shades are more vibrant and match Apple’s other products better, and the finishes can vary depending on how the light hits them. You can get the M4 iMac in Purple, Blue, Green, Orange, Yellow, or Silver, and you’ll get color-matched peripherals – a Magic Keyboard with a Magic Mouse or Magic Trackpad – which all finally feature USB-C ports. However, Apple didn’t see fit to redesign the Magic Mouse; the port is still on the bottom.

Under the hood, the M4 chip outpaces the M3, and delivers noticeable improvements over the M1-powered or previous Intel-powered iMacs. Applications open swiftly with no noticeable lag, and you can do much more on this iMac than on an iMac from years ago. MacOS Sequoia, complete with some early Apple Intelligence features, is preloaded.

The built-in FaceTime camera has also been upgraded with a higher megapixel count and Center Stage functionality to automatically keep you in the frame during video calls – you'll still be in the shot if you like to circle while talking.

So between a lower price for the entry model, the arrival of the M4 chip, and a swap in FaceTime cameras, there is a whole lot to like here, especially if you’re after a Mac – or a computer in general – that's ready to go out of the box. Further, though, if you want to ensure that you can use the screen in any lighting conditions, and plan to place it in a room where you can’t really control the lighting, the new nano-texture option does an impressive job of blocking reflections.

Between the new colors and the improved performance, the latest iMac is again the best all-in-one computer, and the complete package. If you have an M3 iMac or even an M1, I don’t think you need to run out and upgrade, unless you’re hitting a performance roadblock (which is unlikely); but if you have an older model you’ll be in for a treat. And, again, the colors are a delight.

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Pricing and Availability

How much does it cost? Starts at $1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999
When is it available? Up for order now, with shipping from November 8

Along with the new Mac mini, 14-inch MacBook Pro, and 16-inch MacBook Pro, the iMac with M4 is up for order now, and begins shipping on November 8. The M4 iMac isn't only a better-specced machine than the M3; it's also cheaper. For $1,299 / £1,299 / AU$1,999, you get the 24-inch M4 iMac with an M4 chip (8-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine), 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. You also get your pick of color, and you no longer need to spend more to get the shade you want.

The step-up model gives you a better M4 chip with a 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine for $1,499 / £1,499 / AU$2,399. That is paired with 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, and a gigabit ethernet port. The top-of-the-line iMac, which we tested, costs $2,699 / £2,699 / AU$4,199 and comes with 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage. You can opt for the nano-texture display for an extra $200.

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Specs

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Design

Apple's 24-inch iMac M4 in Purple. — (Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)

The same design as the previous two models
New colors look great
Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse finally get USB-C

When Apple likes a design, it tends to stick with it, and it's done so here. The new iMac with the M4 chip looks nearly identical to the M3 iMac, and even the M1 model that ushered in the all-new look in 2021.

Aside from an ever-so-thin build that will take up minimal space on a desk (it weighs in at under 10lbs / 4.5kg), the main feature here is the 24-inch Retina 5K display. I’ll touch on this a bit more below, but for now know that it’s a vibrant and visually rich viewing experience.

The screen offers a 4480 x 5250 resolution with 218 pixels per inch, and maxes out at 500 nits of brightness. Perhaps the most meaningful addition here is a new Nano Texture option, a coating that enables you to place the iMac in almost any space and be able to see the screen clearly – including a room with massive windows throwing sunlight directly on it. Yes, it’s an extra expense, but it adds to an already rich Retina viewing experience, with support for the Wide Color P3 gamut and Apple’s True Tone technology, which adjusts the brightness to make viewing the screen easy on your eyes.

As on the M3 and M1 models, the 24-inch screen is wrapped in a white border all the way around. On a potentially very colorful all-in-one, this is a sensibly neutral choice that allows you to focus on the screen. Tucked above the display is the most welcome addition, a new 12-megapixel ultrawide camera with support for Center Stage. This not only provides better visual for calls or photos but also offers a wide shot, and thanks to some smart software it will automatically keep you in the frame. That means if you squat down, it pans down, or if you jump up, it pans up, and if another person walks into the shot it will center you both. Very handy.

The new iMac still has a chin on the bottom, but I don’t think most folks will mind, especially since it’s color-matched to whatever shade you choose. And it's no longer the case that you might need to pay more to get the color you want, as all seven shades are available in any configuration of the iMac. I’ve been testing the new iMac in Purple, which perfectly matches the latest iPad mini and new AirPods Max – a lovely, light, and airy hue, with a lilac feel on the front and a deeper purple on the back and the accompanying stand. Apple also offers the iMac in Pink – the pink of your dreams, it looks stunning – Green, Blue, Yellow, Orange, and Silver.

As with previous models, a Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse or a Magic Keyboard and Magic Trackpad color-matched to the iMac are included in the box. The colors are most visible on the keyboard, where the white keys are set on top of the colored aluminum and on the Touch ID rim.

The other big change is that Apple’s accessories have finally switched to USB-C. So we can finally say bye-bye to Lightning, at least for the Magic Keyboard, Magic Trackpad, and Magic Mouse. With the latter, you might assume that Apple also swapped the port, but it did not. The USB-C port still lives on the bottom of the Magic Mouse, just as with the previous Lightning port, so when it comes time to charge your mouse, once you've plugged it in you won't be able use the mouse until it’s charged. Maybe next year. A positive is that you get a color-matched braided USB-C to USB-C cable in the box.

Like the M3 iMac and the M1-powered edition, the higher-end iMac I reviewed has four Thunderbolt 4/USB-C ports on the rear right when looking at it from the front. These are great spots to connect peripherals, and the power button is on the other side. The base $1,299 iMac comes with two Thunderbolt 4/USB-C ports, and both models feature a headphone jack on the left-hand side.

If you opt for the iMac to have a gigabit Ethernet port, it’s found on the power brick. You’ll connect the iMac to the power center on the back with a proprietary circular connector.

To keep the design here so thin, there isn’t much room for other ports. Many of the actual components live in that chin on the bottom of the iMac. The stand is quite small at just 5.8 inches but it supports the iMac well, and thanks to some articulation you can tilt the display vertically up or down for the perfect viewing angle. The overall dimensions and weight are the same as the previous version as well – 54.7 x 46.1 x 14.7cm (21.5 x 18.1 x 5.8 inches) and 9.74lbs / 4.42kg, or 9.79lbs / 4.44 kg for the more expensive models. Even so, four USB-C ports, even on the base $1,299 configuration, would have been a welcome addition.

While you won’t physically see them, Apple has also built in a six-speaker system with force-canceling woofers that support Spatial Audio, and a three-microphone array – both are unchanged year on year, and audio playback for music and videos sounds rich. I also found the onboard speakers great for video calls, ensuring clear audio and blocking out any reverb when speaking.

As a whole, Apple’s iMac is still the best-looking all-in-one on the market. While it’s similar to two previous editions, the new colors – especially the more vibrant shades – ensure it provides a refreshing experience in use. It also looks simply stunning in any space.

Design score: 4.5/5

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Display

24 inches is plenty of room for multitasking
Display gets vibrant, but is only 60Hz
Nano texture option is impressive at blocking reflections

Just like the new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro with M4 or the iPad Pro with M4, the iMac now comes with the option of a Nano-texture glass finish. It costs an extra $200, but it drastically reduces visible reflections from light or other sources. Apple includes a special ‘polishing cloth’ for the finish in the box.

My apartment’s living room has a lot of windows, and gets direct sunlight for almost the entire day, so it was the perfect spot to put the Nano-texture to the test – I frequently have to move around when using a MacBook Air or Pro to reduce reflections. Thanks to the special coating I was able to keep the iMac on my kitchen counter and sit on a barstool, regardless of whether the light, whether natural or artificial, was reflecting on it. Yes, if it’s super bright you’ll notice it to a degree, but it usually diffuses quite naturally and lets you work in very bright environments.

Basically, it can cut down most glare, be it from natural or environmental sources, and if you’re already investing in a new iMac it will make it that bit more versatile. Regardless of whether you opt for Nano-texture, you still get a Retina 4.5K display with a 4480 x 5250 resolution aat 218 pixels per inch. It’s still only a 60Hz display, which is a bit disappointing, but if you’re not coming from a display with a higher refresh rate I think you’ll be right at home.

The display is excellent for daily web browsing, FaceTime calls, and other productivity use cases. I noticed inky blacks and crisp letters while writing this review and with emails. Streaming movies or TV shows on the display is a real treat, and might be a true use case if you use this in a family room or as the main device in an apartment. I could also easily edit photos in Photos, Pixelmator, or Photoshop, and even tackle video edits in Final Cut Pro.

While not as rich and with fewer contrast points, the iMac can be used to game comfortably compared to a MacBook Pro. The M4 chip does support dynamic caching and ray tracing, so titles like Resident Evil 2 were enjoyable here.

The one issuse I could see carried over from the previous models, and for new folks, is that the iMac only comes in one size – 24 inches. There are no longer 21.5-inch and 27-inch options, as there were when Apple offered Intel iMacs. I recommend getting a Mac mini and the display of your choice if you want a bigger or smaller screen.

Display score: 4/5

@techradar
♬ original sound - TechRadar

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Performance

M4 chip provides plenty of power
The iMac can handle work and play, including AAA gaming titles
Apple Intelligence features – like Writing Tools and Image Playground – run well here

There are two main configurations of the iMac with M4, depending on the type of M4 chip you want. The entry-level model should be just fine for most folks, thanks to Apple upping the base RAM to 16GB. That configuration includes an M4 chip with an 8-core CPU, 8-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine. You can pay a bit more, starting at $1,499, for an M4 Chip with a 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and a 16-core Neural Engine – the price will get higher as you up RAM and storage. The base configuration tops out at 24GB of RAM and 1TB of storage, while the higher-end versions go up to 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage.

I’ve been testing the iMac with the 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, and 16-core Neural Engine M4, and 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage. Out of the box the new iMacs come with macOS Sequoia 15.1, and with it you're getting the first Apple Intelligence features like Writing Tools, a redesigned Siri with a rainbow glow, Clean Up in Photos, and Notifications in summaries, as well as general OS improvements like iPhone Mirroring, which is both super-handy and a little addictive.

In my daily testing, I could have Safari and Google Chrome both open with upwards of 20 tabs, as well as Slack, Messages, Pixelmator, Preview, Calendar, a couple more apps, and iPhone Mirroring open without the iMac losing speed. This was on the top configuration for the iMac, so your mileage might vary a bit, but as with most Apple silicon Macs should should find the iMac zippy, and be hard-pressed to get the onboard fan to kick in.

Benchmarks

Here's how the iMac with M4 (2024) performed in our TechRadar and Future Labs benchmarks:

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core: 3,646

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core: 14,724

With so much power packed inside a modern, sleek build, this is a versatile machine that will be at home in a range of setups. It might be ideal for a shared computer amongst a family – macOS supports multiple profiles, and you’ll find parental controls. It has more than enough horsepower for casual mail and web browsing, and plenty of power for word processing or creating a PowerPoint. Similarly, it could be used for businesses that can load massive, thousand-row spreadsheets in Excel or Numbers and other more specific applications. You can also power through creative tasks like a large Logic file with several dozens of tracks and AI session players.

Even with AI or ML tasks, the iMac did quite well – I could ask for a summary of a lengthy and messy meeting recap in Notes, see a list of bullets in just a few seconds, and remove unwanted people from a group photo in seconds. I could perform a super-resolution boost to up the quality in Pixelmator Pro, and easily make automatic edits in LightRoom, all without a long wait time.

I also spent a few hours with the latest beta of macOS Sequoia 15.2 and its Apple Intelligence tools on the iMac with M4. Making custom visuals in Image Playground or my creative emojis in Genmoji is a lot of fun on this all-in-one. We can expect these features, alongside other new Apple Intelligence ones, to arrive before the end of 2024.

The iMac with M4 doesn’t disappoint on performance, and while the scores aren’t dramatically better than the M3 variant, those with an M1, especially if it's Intel-powered, will be ripe for an upgrade, and will reap the benefits in terms of speed. And considering the price drop of $100 / £100 / AU$200, it's kind of a steal for a brand-new Apple product.

Performance score: 4.5/5

Should you buy the Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024)?

Buy it if...

You want the best all-in-one computer

With tremendous performance, a vibrant screen, and a modern build, the M4 iMac stands out from other all-in-one computers – and it's cheaper than the previous model.View Deal

You want a colorful and sleek desktop computer

With a sleek and impressively thin build, the iMac has long looked the part, and with the M4 chip inside it offers plenty of power. And the new colors are delightful. View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You want the most powerful Mac

With the Mac mini and MacBook Pro supporting up to M4 Pro and M4 Max chips, you'll want to look to those for maximum power.View Deal

You want a bigger screen

24 inches might not be enough real estate for your needs, and if so you might want to get a Mac mini and pair it with a larger screen.View Deal

How I tested

After receiving the new iMac from Apple for testing, I unboxed it and then set it up as a new machine. I used the M4-powered iMac for seven days as my daily driver for work, general productivity, and play. I ran through all of my daily tasks in myriad applications like Safari, Google Chrome, Slack, and Pixelmator Pro, among others, and I also edited photos and videos, and played some AAA titles.

First reviewed November 2024

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: one of the best Pro laptops around just got better

5:05 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Laptops Macbooks | Tags: AAA | Comments: Off

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) : Two-minute review

Apple's MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 is the full package, a near-perfect blend of price, performance, and utility. The M4 is the base edition of the newest and most powerful generation of Apple silicon (it's the same chip that's already running in the iPad Pro 13-inch) but it's still bursting with power, and more than capable of doing most of the heavy-lifting you want from a pro-level portable machine, as ready to edit raw photos and 4K video as it is to stand in as an able gaming console.

I've long been a fan of the MacBook Pro design, especially since Apple refined it by removing the Touch Bar, a neat innovation that never reached its full potential. My M4 Pro review unit, supplied by Apple, is a sleek-looking Space Black that's both elegant and wonderfully functional. The Magic Keyboard is still a typing gem, and I love the massive trackpad and all that space for resting my hands. And the stereo speakers that straddle the keyboard deliver powerful, crisp, and clear audio that could provide the soundtrack for your party in a pinch.

When I think about the reasons why you'd buy an M4 14-inch Mac Pro over the cheaper M3-running MacBook Air, the list is smaller than when I've compared the Pro and Air options previously, but there are a handful of standout features that make this MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) a near-perfect choice.

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) REVIEW — (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

For starters, you have the ports. Where the Air tops out at a Thunderbolt 3 port, you get a trio of speedy Thunderbolt 4 ports with the MacBook Pro (you'll need to upgrade to the M4 Pro model for Thunderbolt 5). You also gain the SD card slot, an instant bonus for photo and video professionals. The larger body and ever-efficient 3-nanometer system-on-a-chip (SoC) means a promised 24 hours of battery life – for a Pro-level system, that's unheard of. Naturally, real-world usage times varied widely in my testing based on activity (AAA gaming can quickly eat up battery).

The biggest difference between Air and Pro might be the display. This Liquid Retina XDR is an inch larger than the MacBook Air's, and it offers a nano-texture option (an extra $150 / £150 / AU$230), something I highly recommend for cutting down on reflections in almost any situation.

With the MacBook Pro 14-inch M4, Apple has created a pro-grade portable that impresses in every respect. It joins Apple's pantheon of outstanding laptops, and is set to take a well-deserved place at or near the top of our best laptops rankings.

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Price and availability

Starts at $1,599 / £2,149 / AU$3,199
Nano-texture (which you want) will run you another $150 / £150 / AU$230

Apple unveiled the M4 MacBook Pro 14-inch on October 30, along with the new MacBook Pro 16-inch, Mac mini, and iMac. All these new Macs are running variations of Apple's M4 silicon.

Pricing for the M4 MacBook Pro 14-inch starts at $1,599 / £1,599 / AU$2,499 for the base configuration, which comes with the standard M4 chip and 16GB of unified memory. If you want the M4 Pro chip, pricing starts at $1,999 / £1,999 / AU$3,299, while the M4 Max model starts at $2,399 / £2,399 / AU$3,999.

My Space Black review unit is the base model (10-core M4, 16GB of RAM, and 512GB of storage) but with one key enhancement: the aforementioned nano-texture Liquid Retina XDR display coating, which costs an extra $150 / £150 / AU$230.

Value score: 4/5

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Specs

The MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) comes in three main configurations: our test unit, the base M4; a pair featuring the M4 Pro chip with options of 16- or 20-core GPU and up to 1TB storage; and at the high end, the M4 Max model, which offers one configuration with a 14-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 32GB of unified memory, and 1TB of SSD.

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Design

Virtually the same design as the previous model
All the key ports you need
Fantastic screen

Over the last few years I've become an unabashed fan of Apple's increasingly iconic laptop design. Where competitors often try different and sometimes odd design flourishes, Apple carefully peeled away all but what matters, leaving a MacBook Pro that looks and feels as if it was carved from a couple of pieces of 100% recycled black aluminum. Nothing feels like, or works like, it was left to chance. That impression starts when you put your finger under the lip of the display and flip open the clamshell to reveal the screen and keyboard. That hinge is as sure as it gets, offering the perfect blend of tension and smooth movement.

At 3.4lbs / 1.55kg. the MacBook Pro 14 M4 is not the lightest laptop or even the lightest MacBook. The excellent MacBook Air holds that distinction, and if you prize portability over power you might be reading the wrong review. On the other hand, the MacBook Pro 14 is by no means heavy (the 16-inch MacBook Pro, by contrast, weighs nearly 5lbs / 2.27kg).

Folded close, the MacBook Pro 14 is just 0.61 inches tall, 12.3 inches wide, and 8.71 inches deep. It slips into my backpack and, even though I'm used to carrying the M3 MacBook Air, I mostly forget it's there.

Image 1 of 8

Image 2 of 8

Image 3 of 8

Image 4 of 8

Image 5 of 8

Image 6 of 8

Image 7 of 8

Image 8 of 8

Apple hasn't adjusted the ports since the M2 MacBook Pro, which is fine with me. We still have the HDMI-out port if you want to extend your display to a giant, high-resolution screen. Next to that is one of the three Thunderbolt 4 ports and an SD card slot, which I used to transfer some raw images from my DSLR. On the opposite side is the MagSafe charge port, two Thunderbolt 4 (40Gb/s) ports, and the 3.5mm headphone, although I generally connect my AirPods Pros 2 for audio. If you need Thunderbolt 5's 120Gb/s throughput speeds you'll want to upgrade to an M4 Pro chip.

The full-sized backlit Magic Keyboard is a pleasure to use (I'm composing this review on it), with ample travel and a satisfying typing feel. It includes the arrow keys and a full line of function keys. On the right side of that is the Touch ID power and sleep button. During setup, it took me a few moments to register my index finger which I now use to unlock the laptop and log into some online services. Below the keyboard is the massive, nearly 6-inch diagonal, and very responsive Forcetouch trackpad.

One of the benefits of a larger laptop is that Apple can fit a pair of speaker grilles on either side of the keyboard. They provide fantastic sound, especially when playing spatial audio (try Territory on Netflix).

The system features a pair of four-inch vents, one on each side. You usually won't hear the fan until you play AAA games or run benchmarks.

Design score: 5/5

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Display

It's gorgeous
Better brightness for SDR
The coating you want

While it might look like Apple left the Liquid Retina XDR display from the M2 MacBook Pro untouched, there are a couple of noteworthy differences. But let's start with what's the same.

It's still the same mini-LED technology offering a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio and one billion colors with a P3 wide color and ProMotion with up to 120Hz refresh rate. The resolution is still nearly 4K at 3096 x 1964 pixels. However, Apple has boosted the brightness a bit, with SDR content now getting up to 1,000 nits. HDR still gets a peak brightness of 1600. These numbers primarily matter outdoors, where you might be battling back the sunshine, and I found that the display was quite effective at remaining viewable and usable in direct sunlight. I attribute this, however, only in part to the heightened SDR nit capabilities.

Image 1 of 3

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

My screen came with the optional nano-texture coating. This adds a fine texture across the entire screen that's meant to diffuse direct sunlight (the MacBook Pro comes with a special cloth for cleaning the screen). It costs an extra $150 / £150 / AU$230, but it's transformative technology. Not only does it effectively kill outdoor reflections, it also transforms how streaming and gaming content looks on the display. No more desk and overhead lamp bulbs peaking into the frame. No more window light killing your gaming groove. I honestly wonder why all laptops, Macs and otherwise, do not come with this texture. It's a game-changer.

Image 1 of 2

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 nano texture — The nano texture helps make the screen viewable in direct sunlight. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Image 2 of 2

The 14.2-inch screen is big enough for lots of side-by-side app work. It's the perfect canvas for photo editing in Adobe Lightroom and video work in FinalCut Pro. but is also well suited to lighter productivity (like my efforts to write this review), email, and web browsing. It's not a touch screen because Apple refuses to bring that technology to Macs, even as the touch-friendly iPad Pro becomes more and more Mac-like. The trackpad is large enough that I don't miss touching a screen (as I did for years for Microsoft Surface Pro) but I can't help but wonder how a MacBook Pro with a touch, and Apple Pencil-friendly, display would alter the way we use this laptop.

The other display change relates less to what you'll see on the Liquid Retina XDR panel and more to how others will see you through it. Apple has upgraded the FaceTime camera, which sits at the top of the display in a cutout notch, with a 12MP ultrawide that supports its Center Stage technology. Center Stage takes the full 12MP ultrawide frame and narrows the viewport so that you are always centered in the frame. It doesn't matter if you lean left or right or get up and walk around the room, Center Stage will follow. It's a useful feature in FaceTime – I tested it on a call with my wife who wondered why I kept moving around – and also on Zoom, where it worked well but was not useful in a broadcast video situation, so I turned it off. Center Stage did not work for me in Google Meet, where I conduct most of my video meetings.

Display score: 4.5/5

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Performance

M4 has the Pro power most need
macOS Sequoia is flexible and easy to use
AAA gaming on a Mac is real

Benchmarks

Here’s how the MacBook Pro 14-inch (2024) performed in our suite of TechRadar and Future Labs benchmark tests:

Cinebench R23 CPU: Single-Core: 2,180 Multi-Core: 13773
Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core: 3,845; Multi-Core: 15,136
Geekbench AI: Single: 4,764 Half Precision: 7,837 ; Quantized Score: 6.357

PugentBench Photoshop: 10,542
PugentBench Premier Pro: 4,618
Blender: Monster: 115.8; Junkshop: 73.17; Classroom: 188.1
Battery Life (web site surfing rundown): 18 hours and 31 minutes

The last time we reviewed a 14-inch MacBook Pro, it was running an M2 Pro. The base M4 inside my test unit has similar but not equal specs. It's still a 10-core CPU, but where the M2 Pro had a 16-core GPU, the M4 starts with 10 cores. However the M2 chips were all built on a 5-nanometer process, and the M4 line is on the more efficient three nanometers, which could lead to a better combination of power and efficiency.

The Neural Engine, which handles a lot of onboard machine learning and AI tasks, still has the same 16 cores.

Image 1 of 2

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 FPS test — The FPS ranged from low 40s to mid 60s on Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 2

Apple is now backing all of its new Macs with at least 16GB of RAM. This pays dividends in AI (Apple Intelligence is on board) and graphically intense operations like ray tracing, which helps make games like Lies of P look incredible on the MacBook Pro 14.

In benchmark testing, I found the numbers in line with the M4 performance I saw from the iPad Pro 13 inch. Geekbench 6.3 numbers measurably exceed those of the M3 in my MacBook Air.

When I played Shadow of the Tomb Radar, Steam's internal frames per second counter showed I got anywhere between 42fps and 62fps. To my eyes, there was no tearing or dropped frames.

Image 1 of 3

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

Numbers only tell you so much, and what matters most is real-world experience. I did do a fair amount of gaming on this MacBook Pro. As I noted above, the nano-texture screen makes games look amazing. In my Lies of P sessions (I connected an X Box controller via Bluetooth), I took note of the rich atmospherics, from rain to fire, and the level of detail that never descended into unwatchable blurs. Gaming on the MacBook Pro benefits from macOS Sequoia's Game Mode, which prioritizes gaming tasks for truly smooth and responsive performance.

In FinalCut Pro, I edited four 4K 30fps streams at once, which played back smoothly in full-screen preview. However, when I tried the same thing with four 4K 120fps video clips shot on the iPhone 16 Pro Max, full-screen playback started dropping frames – an on-screen message confirmed this. It was one of the rare times I found the limits of Apple silicon.

Editing raw photos in Adobe Lightroom is a breeze. It's also worth noting that I rarely shut down other apps while I performed these operations, and as I noted earlier, the only times I heard the fans were during console-grade gameplay and Cinebench 23 benchmarking.

Keep in mind that my tests were all with the base M4 Apple silicon; imagine what you can expect from the M4 Pro and M4 Max.

Connectivity is mostly what you would expect, with support for Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 6E. I am a bit disappointed, though, that Apple didn't future-proof the laptop a bit with Wi-Fi 7 support.

Performance score: 5/5

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Software

macOS 15.1
Some Apple Intelligence

Image 1 of 2

Image 2 of 2

macOS Sequoia (macOS 15.1) has a lot to offer. There's the new Passwords app, which gives you a full-blown application for managing your passwords, and there's the updated Notes, which can now transcribe recordings. It's not as good as the transcription in Voice Recorder on Android (it doesn't identify multiple speakers) but it's still useful.

There are now Highlights in Safari that can take a 3,000-word-plus New Yorker article and boil it down to a one-paragraph summary. I worry that loses the nuance of such a piece, but if you're in a hurry...

There's also iPhone Mirroring, which lets you access and control your iPhone from the MacBook Pro. It's supposed to be useful when you don't have access to your iPhone (maybe it's just in another room), and I found it easy to connect an iPhone 16 Pro and then have a virtual version of the iPhone on my MacBook Pro 14 desktop. What's even wilder is how I can control the phone from the desktop system. I can message, browse the web, and even drag and drop between the desktop and the iPhone interface. I did notice that while I can open the iPhone camera, I cannot use the MacBook Pro 14 to take a picture with the phone.

Apple Intelligence is here within macOS 15.1, in the form of a redesigned Siri that supports Type to Siri and which can be dragged around the desktop. I found that I could ask Siri how to do things with the MacBook Pro, like find my Wi-Fi settings and opening an app like Notes.

Apple Intelligence puts email summaries at the top of email, and the writing tools are embedded throughout the system. In Notes, I asked the Writing Tools to rewrite my lengthy meeting notes. It did a really good job of boiling it all down to a concise bullet list, which I could also easily undo. This could be very useful.

This is not all of Apple Intelligence. There's no Image Playground for instance, but that will show up with macOS 15.2, possibly by early December.

A taste of AI

During my testing, I did install the macOS 15.2 Developer Beta so that I could get a sample of this MacBook Pro 14 M4's Apple Intelligence capabilities. Because this update is not intended for the public, my thoughts on this dev beta were not considered as part of my final software, performance and overall review score.

First, I was excited to see Clean Up now inside of the Photos app. It works just as it does in iOS 18 on the iPhone, and was useful for removing some unwanted items from my photos.

Image 1 of 4

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) Apple Intelligence — (Image credit: Lance Ulanoff)

Image 2 of 4

Image 3 of 4

Image 4 of 4

ChatGPT's Siri integration, which I had to enable, is quite smooth, and looks and works as if it's a part of Siri. I used it in the Type to Siri mode, entering my prompt about how to create a goods presentation. The answer I got from ChatGPT through Siri was solid.

Image 1 of 3

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) ChatGPT Siri integration. — (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

Image Playground, the generative AI image tool which lives in an adorable kitty app icon in the Dock, is also part of this beta, but it's still gated by an invite and, as I write this, I still await mine.

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Battery life

Rated for 24-hour video streaming
Lasted more than 18 hours in our tests
Battery life is dependent on activity

The MacBook Pro 14 M4 is, according to Apple's promises, perhaps the first truly all-day laptop, rated to last up to 24 hours on a charge. Naturally, that's if you do nothing but stream seasons 1 through 3 of Stranger Things. Once you start adding in activities like web browsing, and emailing, Slack, gaming, and photo and video editing, those numbers change.

In our Future Labs tests, we found that we could get 18.5 hours of web browsing, which is two hours more than Apple is promising. Once I started gaming, though, battery life took a fast tumble; the system is clearly hard at work rendering the exquisite detail in Lies of P. I heard the fans going full-blast, and noticed the bottom of the laptop got quite warm. My advice is if you want to use the MacBook Pro 14 M4 as a gaming rig, keep the included 70W charger and woven USB-C to MagSafe cable close by.

Speaking of that charger; when I drained the system to zero, I was able to use it to recharge the MacBook Pro 14 M4 to 43% in 30 minutes. That's a bit less than the 50% I was expecting. To fully recharge, it took more than an hour.

I've had incredible battery experiences with the MacBook Air and its M3 chip. I can already see that, in normal use, the MacBook Pro 14 M4 is a sun-up-to-sun-down kind of system. That's impressive, and a big win for Pro fans.

Battery score: 4.5 / 5

Should you buy the Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024)?

Buy it if...

You want portable power without breaking the bank
The MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) is a good blend of performance, portability, and reasonable price.

You want sunrise-to-sunset battery life
You can easily get a day of activity with the power-sipping system

You’re Team Apple
There are great benefits to adding a MacBook when you already have an iPhone and an Apple account.

Don't buy it if...

You want the ultimate performance
This is a baseline M4, but the new MacBook Pro comes in M4 flavors that run up to the new M4 Max and a 16-inch display.

You need a touch screen
No MacBook offers it. Try an iPad or a Surface Pro.

You have a 2024 MacBook Pro
Apple hasn't redesigned the MacBook Pro, and the M2 and M4 performance numbers are not that far apart.

MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Also consider

If our Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024) review leaves you considering other options, here are two laptops to consider...

Apple MacBook Air (M3, 2022)
The follow-up to one of the best laptops ever released, the 2022 MacBook Air is svelte and sleek, with a larger screen and the same outstanding battery life. If you want a MacBook, but don't need the power of the MacBook Pro 14-inch, this is the one to get.

Check out our Apple MacBook Air (M2, 2022) review

Dell XPS 13 Plus
Its sleek and slim design, combined with a gorgeous OLED screen, great sound quality, and lattice-free keyboard embodies the luxury inherent of an Ultrabook. However, it’s also prone to overheating, and the touch bar is annoyingly inaccessible.

Read more: Dell XPS 13 Plus review

How I tested the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024)

I spent more than a week with the MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024)
I used it as an everyday productivity, creativity, and entertainment device
I ran benchmarks

Apple provided me with the base MacBook Pro 14 M4 system, and I used it every day to test and help craft this review. I set it up as a work system, and as one for production and play. I used it indoors and outdoors.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed November 2024

Slitterhead review: a refreshing curiosity that’s not without its hurdles

2:01 pm | November 4, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: AAA | Comments: Off

Review info

Platform reviewed: PlayStation 5
Available on: PS5, PS4, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: November 8, 2024

Slitterhead is a weird horror game. The combat is a bit stiff, it reuses environments (and sometimes missions), and lacks voice acting outside of the occasional fully-voiced scene. Yet it’s probably the most refreshing game I’ve played in a while, and is far more than the sum of its parts. Behind that veneer of rust and dirt is a compelling storyline that uses its horror elements to craft a brilliant mystery that had me rethinking the entire story constantly.

You play as Hyoki: a lost spirit in the fictitious town of Kowlong with the ability to possess human beings (as well as the occasional dog). However, Kowlong is plagued with Slitterheads: monsters who assume the form of human beings in order to feed on them. Among these humans are Rarities, beings who have a unique connection with the spirit and are able to retain their consciousness while possessed, while having their own combat abilities to boot.

Visions of an impending apocalypse lead Hyoki to team up with a young woman named Julee and a mysterious man named Alex to destroy the Slitterhead populace to change their fate. However, the spirit discovers it is able to go back in time while retaining memories; however, this reveals another layer, as each time they go back, things aren’t as they once were. One aspect I loved about this tale is that it tackles the hypocrisy of a spirit that takes over the consciousness of people, battling evil beings that take over the consciousness of people. This led to me getting invested in the lives of those on both sides of the story.

Head like a haunted house

A main character facing down an enemy in Slitterhead — (Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

Despite being directed by horror royalty Keiichiro Toyama (creator of Silent Hill and Siren), horror is more of a backdrop in Slitterhead, as the game plays out like a detective story. You’ll be trying to figure out just what is happening in Kowlong while simultaneously figuring out who in the crowded city is secretly a monster. The main gameplay loop is heading into a mission, investigating, before running into a Slitterhead who you’ll need to take out.

As the adventure progresses, you’ll run into more and more Rarities who join your cause. Between missions, you’ll be able to chat with them a la Persona’s social links and learn more about each of them. These range from people of all walks of life, doctors, a high school student, the homeless, and even an elderly woman. Despite some having more screen time than others (the story is mainly focused on Julee and Alex), I loved learning about the characters I was taking into battle.

The regular humans have a club and two unique skills (as well as two slots for your rarities bonus skills), while you can bring two Rarities out on a mission with you, who have their own unique skill sets based on their personalities. Edo – who lived as a boxer before being forced to live on the streets – is a fast-paced, hard-hitting character with a moveset designed around getting in the opponent's face and wearing them down. Meanwhile, Julee – who is compassionate and has reservations over human lives being used by Hyoki in service of Slitterhead destruction, has abilities to avoid damaging non-player characters (NPCs) and reviving a number at once.

Combat isn’t the most in-depth in terms of combos. You have a standard combo and a heavy attack alongside four unique skills depending on which Rarity combo you take into the field. But where the combat really shines is in the possession mechanic; switching about from host to host is near-mandatory and adds an extra layer of strategy to what could’ve been a barebones beat 'em up. This is complemented by a For Honor-esque parry system, which can send you into a slow-mo state to really while on your enemies.

Who can it be now?

A close up of a character in Slitterhead — (Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

The biggest issue the game faces is also in part due to the time loop mechanic. The missions mostly take place in the same few city blocks, which can lead to a bit of repetition, and while the mandatory mission replays will have new tricks, you are still replaying parts. This becomes an issue later in the game as you’ll play the same two missions multiple times in a row to progress the story.

The other problem is that sometimes the objective of the game is unclear. It’s easy to get lost in the city, and without a map system, it’s a bit of a pain to navigate when there are no waypoint markers. This gets especially rough at a point in the middle where you need to find two hidden Rarities to progress, where I combed through the same missions a few times before cracking it.

Best bit

A crouching character sneaking around a level in Slitterhead — (Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

One of Slitterhead’s most investing moments is investigating the Echoes of Love Society. While these missions are slower-paced, this storyline opens up some interesting questions about the nature of Slitterheads and the ethical issues surrounding your mission.

Visually, the game is a bit of a mixed bag; the neon-soaked streets of Kowlong are gorgeous, and the character models for the main characters look great, but the human fodder characters is a bit less polished, which really stands out if you take them into a cutscene. Meanwhile, the creature design from Siren designer Miki Takahashi is nothing short of phenomenal. The different breeds of Slitterhead are disgusting and impressive bits of body horror to boot. While the game isn’t too scary, these monsters are unsettling, especially when you see them transform.

Slitterhead also reunites Toyama with Silent Hill composer Akira Yamaoka – which is all I should need to tell you to let you know the music and sound design are fantastic. The soundtrack ranges from the oppressive industrial sounds Yamaoka is famed for to some nice lo-fi beats that make the menus a joy to navigate. And the titular monsters sound just as gross as they look.

Still, Slitterhead is not without its problems, but these are mostly relegated to the gameplay. While the combat is fun and engaging, it could do with a bit more combo variety. Meanwhile, the reused missions and environments don’t necessarily feel like padding, but they can be grating at certain points. However, it’s more than worth moving past those flaws to find one of the most unique and interesting horror experiences in a long time.

A character in Slitterhead in front of a neon sign — (Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

Should you play Slitterhead?

Play it if...

You’re after a unique experience from a horror legend
Slitterhead does take inspiration from Toyama’s previous games, like Siren’s Sightjacking mechanic. But Slitterhead is a unique beast that’s more about detective work and intense combat than straight-up horror. Plus, the time loop mechanic adds an extra layer to an already interesting story.

You like strategically focused combat encounters
Slitterhead’s possession mechanic is a cool thing in many ways, from traversal to just seeing who and what you can take control of. However, it adds an extra layer to combat as you’ll be constantly switching between hosts to flank enemies, while careful consideration of what rarities is a must.

Don't play it if...

You’re after a highly polished AAA game
I rarely encountered glitches in Slitterhead, but it’s not as polished as your usual AAA affair. While the Rarities, cutscenes, and environments look lush, NPC character models are a bit lackluster, and the awkward use of voice acting is an unfortunate flaw.

You can’t stomach body horror
Slitterhead’s grotesque horror is tough to stomach; you’ll constantly see human heads explode into viscera as their Slitterhead forms burst out. This is even worse for the bosses, as you see the transformation even slower and in more detail as their necks extend and contort.

Accessibility

The accessibility features in Slitterhead need some work. While the option to fully rebind your controls is a welcome addition, outside of multiple language options, subtitles (without closed captioning), and difficulty options, there’s not much else to talk about here unfortunately.

A running character in Slitterhead — (Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

How I reviewed Slitterhead

I played Slitterhead for around 18 hours completing the game’s main storyline (including the true ending) and unlocking all of the rarities and a majority of the costumes. In my playthrough, I played on Hard difficulty for the majority before switching to Medium when the level replays were introduced.

I played the game on my PlayStation 5 Slim on a DualSense wireless controller (although it felt wrong to play with the Astro Bot Controller). For my screen, I used a Samsung Q65T 50-inch QLED 4K TV, and for my audio, I switched between the PlayStation Pulse 3D Wireless headset and a Samsung HW-T450 Soundbar.

First review November 2024

Steam Deck OLED review: a decent upgrade, but left me wanting more

3:21 pm | August 30, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: AAA, Super Mario Odyssey, Tokyo | Comments: Off

Steam Deck OLED: Two-minute review

If all you want to know is whether the Steam Deck OLED is better than the original Steam Deck, then the answer is a definitive yes. This is easily the best Steam Deck model and one of the best handheld games consoles on the market right now thanks to an abundance of improvements that lead to a more comfortable and polished play experience.

The most significant of these is the new 7.4-inch OLED display. This is slightly bigger than the 7-inch LCD panel on the original model but offers a considerably more vivid picture with brighter contrast, better viewing angles, and much richer colors. It’s a huge leap and something that is immediately noticeable when you place a Steam Deck OLED side by side with the original model. The bright primary hues of titles like Hades 2 or Cult of the Lamb have simply never looked better.

An image showing the bright screen of the Steam Deck OLED. — (Image credit: Future)

Other changes here are more subtle. The Steam Deck OLED is slightly lighter and has been fitted with a larger fan for better thermal performance. It also features Wi-Fi 6E, paving the way for faster downloads and more responsive online play for those who own a compatible router. The Steam Deck OLED benefits from more battery life too, with official figures boasting a “30-50%” boost. In practice, however, I soon found that this was still not enough and I had to frequently contend with the handheld completely running out of charge while I was away from a socket.

There have been no noticeable improvements to in-game performance compared to the original model either. The Steam Deck first launched back in February 2022 and could just about run many of the biggest titles of that year, be that Elden Ring, Ghostwire: Tokyo, or Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands. Things are a little different in 2024, however, as the Steam Deck OLED now struggles to maintain decent frame rates in major games.

This wouldn’t necessarily be a problem - there are countless amazing indie titles to experience after all - but I found Valve’s own ‘Deck Verified’ system to be extremely disappointing. In theory, ‘Deck Verified’ games are those that will run decently right out of the box. Fully ‘Deck Verified’ games display a prominent green tick on their store pages, while those that are considered ‘Playable’ but not perfect are marked with an orange exclamation mark.

It’s a great idea on paper, but I quickly learned that many ‘Deck Verified’ games do not run at an acceptable standard. Take Deathloop, for example, which has been awarded the big green tick. It plays at a jittery 15 frames per second (fps) in its default configuration, with huge drops whenever literally anything happens on screen. You can get it to run at a solid 30fps, and look quite good, but it requires a lot of awkward fiddling around with different graphical options. Not quite the seamless, console-like experience that many would want.

Still, if you’re not afraid to tinker, the Steam Deck OLED is a formidable system that helps you experience your existing Steam library in a whole new light.

A photo showing the right hand side of the Steam Deck OLED. — (Image credit: Future)

Steam Deck OLED: Price and availability

Starts at $549 / £479
512GB and 1TB models
Cheaper LCD model still available

The Steam Deck OLED starts at $549 / £479 and is available directly from Valve via Steam. This will get you the 512GB model, which comes bundled with a basic carrying case. For $649 / £569, you can pick up the 1TB model that comes with an upgraded carrying case.

This upgraded case features a removable liner, which can be used as a more compact and soft way to keep it protected. You also get some digital bonuses in the form of a Steam profile bundle, an exclusive Steam Deck OLED startup movie, and an exclusive virtual keyboard theme - these are nice to have, but shouldn’t really sway your purchasing decision.

Which edition you get will mainly come down to your storage needs. Those with lots of larger games should consider the 1TB model, while those likely to install smaller indie titles or only a few games at a time would be perfectly well served by 512GB. Just note that no matter which model you pick, if you have the technical know-how you can upgrade the internal SSD yourself at a later date.

For $399 / £349, you can also pick up the older LCD model in its 256GB configuration. While this storage capacity would restrict the kinds and number of games that you can keep installed at any one time, this could still be a decent option for those on a particularly tight budget.

Steam Deck OLED: Specs

Steam Deck OLED: Design

Feels good in the hands
Few changes compared to original model
Plenty of customization options

There are very few major differences between the original Steam Deck and the Steam Deck OLED in pure design terms. The most noticeable difference is the larger 7.4-inch screen of the Steam Deck OLED, which has a slightly smaller bezel than the 7-inch display of the original. The handheld has the same overall form factor and sleek black colorway, though the power button, which is located on top of the system, is now a bright orange which lends it a neat contrasting look next to the plain volume controls and a headphone jack.

On the left-hand grip, you will find the d-pad, which is a very pleasant shiny plastic and a comfortable slightly concave shape, positioned next to the left thumbstick. There’s also a small square trackpad similar to those found on most laptops. This is in addition to a small ‘View’ button (effectively just the ‘Select’ button of a standard controller) and the ‘Steam’ button - which works like a ‘home’ button.

The right-hand grip is a similar story, with a thumbstick and trackpad in the same position. The d-pad is replaced with a set of face buttons, with the same ABXY layout as a standard Xbox Wireless Controller. Although not mechanical, they’re very pleasantly tactile and respond well to rapid inputs. There is also the ‘Menu’ (or start) button and a ‘Quick Access’ that calls up a small quick settings menu.

Image 1 of 3

The left-hand side of the Steam Deck OLED. — (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 3

The back of the Steam Deck OLED. — (Image credit: Future)

Image 3 of 3

The top and bright orange power button of the Steam Deck OLED. — (Image credit: Future)

The flat surface on the top of each thumbstick is actually also its own input, detecting when there is a finger placed on it. While almost no software takes advantage of this, it is a surprisingly practical addition that is sure to delight those who spend a lot of time creating their own custom input bindings. In a first-person shooter like Doom, you can set this thumbstick sensor to activate the Steam Deck OLED’s gyroscope for precise aiming which is delightfully intuitive.

Flipping the Steam Deck OLED over will give you a good look at the triggers and shoulder buttons, which are both highly ergonomic and a great size, plus the four remappable rear inputs. These can be customized to your liking with the suite of tools offered by the Steam Deck OLED’s operating system.

It’s a fantastic design overall and feels incredibly sturdy and comfortable in the hands. My only real complaint is the sheer size of the Steam Deck OLED. At 11.73in / 298mm long, the Steam Deck OLED is absolutely massive and not portable-friendly. I struggled to fit it in my small rucksack in addition to the 14” Acer Chromebook Vero 514 that I take to work, leaving me almost wishing that I had a compact gaming laptop rather than a dedicated handheld.

Steam Deck OLED: Performance

Great for indie games
Solid performance in older AAA titles
Struggles with new AAA releases

If you’ve ever used a Steam Deck, then you will know exactly what to expect from the performance of the Steam Deck OLED. It has not been improved in any noticeable way, so a good number of games will run decently, but not flawlessly. Older titles are absolutely the way to go here, with the likes of Control Ultimate Edition maintaining an impressively solid 60fps at medium settings. God of War is also a highlight, looking brilliant and easily hitting 30fps at high settings

Hellblade Senua’s Sacrifice is simply flawless, with a rock-solid cinematic 45 frames per second (fps) that just never dips no matter what you throw at it. Even some newer games, such as Shin Megami Tensei 5 Vengeance and Persona 5 Tactica are phenomenal, at a buttery smooth 90fps. The bright red hues and smooth animations of the latter in particular are breathtaking on the OLED display. Indie games are also great on the system. Even in early access, Hades 2 is almost always 60fps with only a few small dips down into the 50s. Fields of Mistria and Double Dragon Gaiden: Rise of the Dragons are playable at 60fps with zero issues at all.

The Steam Deck OLED on a desk playing Hellblade. — (Image credit: Future)

That said, there are a few older ‘Deck Verified’ titles that are inexplicably poor. Detroit Become Human is a laggy mess, frequently dropping into the 15fps range, and Fallout 4 has some noticeable dips in built-up areas.

Newer games are even more hit-and-miss. Despite being a ‘Deck Verified’ title, Deathloop is flat-out unplayable in its default configuration. It can be wrangled into an unstable 40fps, but it was a struggle that took up almost my entire hour-long commute. The framerate in Redfall was also atrocious, barely scraping the 20s, while Hitman 3 ran okay at about 40fps but looked disappointingly blurry thanks to some rather aggressive upscaling.

Given the number of powerful handheld PCs like the Asus ROG Ally and Lenovo Legion Go that are now on the market, it’s a shame that Valve hasn’t taken the opportunity to give even a small boost to the CPU or GPU of the Steam Deck. This will still be acceptable performance for most players, provided they don't expect to play the latest games, but I’m really hoping that an overhauled, more powerful model is on the horizon.

Steam Deck OLED: Battery life

Improved compared to Steam Deck
Still expect just a few hours
Better battery performance with indie games

The battery life of the Steam Deck OLED has been improved compared to the Steam Deck, but it’s still not particularly impressive. I found that I could squeeze just over two hours of use out of the system while playing intensive games such as God of War, Deathloop, and Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice with the brightness set to its middle level which is about one and a half times what you would get on the Steam Deck. This number decreased to just over an hour with some other titles downloading in the background, though this is to be expected.

This was just about enough to occupy a train journey but would not be sufficient if you want to take your Steam Deck OLED on a long flight. You could always bring a separate battery pack with you but adding on the sheer size and weight of the Steam Deck OLED would make this a massive pain.

Thankfully, the battery life increases significantly when you’re playing simpler titles, especially 2D games. I was able to enjoy over five hours of Hades 2 without any major interruptions on the same settings, with similarly great figures for the delightful indie farming sim Fields of Mistria and detective adventure role-playing game (RPG) Disco Elysium. I’m sure this number could go even higher if you reduced the brightness or imposed a strict frame rate limit in the ‘Performance’ section of the Quick Settings.

If you’re just after a new way to play your existing library of indie games, then this battery life should be more than sufficient.

Should I buy the Steam Deck OLED?

Buy it if...

You want a new way to play your Steam games
Like the Steam Deck, the Steam Deck OLED is a good way to experience your Steam library on the go. If you want a handheld console that can play your existing games, this is a great choice.

You mainly play indie titles
The Steam Deck OLED might struggle to run many of the most recent AAA releases, but it’s an absolute dream when it comes to indie games. It’s perfect if you’re looking for a way to play the likes of Hades 2, Balatro, or Fields of Mistria out and about.

Don't buy it if...

You need better battery life
The Steam Deck OLED offers improved battery life, but it’s still one of its biggest weaknesses. If you need to play for more than a few hours at a time, consider other handheld systems like the Nintendo Switch OLED instead.

You want the best performance
The Steam Deck OLED does not perform as well as other handheld PCs, namely the ROG Ally. They are more expensive than the Steam Deck OLED but are good alternatives if you crave better framerates.

Also consider

If you’re not keen on the Steam Deck OLED, then consider these two formidable alternatives.

Steam Deck
You can still buy the original Steam Deck from Valve in its 256GB configuration. It’s also readily available secondhand. You miss out on an upgraded screen, but the lower asking price could make it a better choice for those on a tighter budget and it still offers great value.

Read our full Steam Deck review

Nintendo Switch OLED
The Nintendo Switch OLED is the definitive version of Nintendo’s latest console. It can be found in fantastic value bundles and comes in much more compact and therefore more portable than the Steam Deck OLED. It also boasts a brilliant library of exclusive games such as Animal Crossing: New Horizons and Super Mario Odyssey.

Read our full Nintendo Switch OLED review

The Steam Deck OLED on a desk in its included carrying case playing Hellblade. — (Image credit: Future)

How I tested the Steam Deck OLED

Tested for over three months
Played a wide variety of games
Tested in both handheld mode and with a dock

I tested the Steam Deck OLED for well over three months, taking it out and about with me whenever possible and enjoying plenty of gaming time at the office or at home plus on a range of public transport. I experienced a wide variety of games including plenty of AAA releases and indie titles. Some of the favorites that I didn’t mention in this review included Shenmue 3, Like a Dragon Gaiden: The Man Who Erased His Name, Dishonored 2, Grounded, Lego 2K Drive, Asterigos Curse of the Stars, and much more.

Throughout my time with the Steam Deck OLED, I compared the play experience to my hands-on testing of other handheld systems. I used the Final VR500 and SteelSeries Tusq earbuds for audio while I was taking the console out and about.

I also experimented with a few accessories, including the Xbox Wireless Controller for when I wanted to play on a bigger screen. For this purpose, I used a standard laptop dock with an HDMI output and my Lenovo Q24i-20 monitor. Although the bump to a 1080p resolution certainly didn't help performance in AAA games, I found this to be a suitable solution for less intensive indie titles.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed August 2024

AAA games for iPhones and iPads aren’t very popular

2:45 am | June 30, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: AAA | Comments: Off

According to data gathered by Appfigures, AAA titles for iPhones and iPads aren't as big of a success as Apple may have hoped for. Currently, Resident Evil Village and Assassin's Creed Mirage are available for iOS and iPadOS as these games were used to promote the iPhone 15 Pro series' hardware prowess. But the data doesn't show promising results. In fact, Appfigures argues that these titles are actually a flop. For instance, Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed Mirage has more than 123,000 downloads since its release on June 6, but less than 3,000 users paid for the full game, costing $49. And...

Majority Oakington review: a DAB radio, CD player and Bluetooth speaker audio package

4:22 pm | November 29, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Wireless & Bluetooth Speakers | Tags: AAA, DAB, EQ | Comments: Off

Majority Oakington: Two-minute review

The term ‘all-in-one audio system’ gets bandied about a lot to refer to a speaker that has multiple uses but Majority has taken the term to heart with the Oakington as there’s very little it can’t do – or play.

The Majority Oakington lets you play from CDs, tune into FM, DAB or DAB+ radio, plug in a device via an aux cord or USB cable, and connect via Bluetooth to stream music. This Swiss army knife of a music machine is only missing Wi-Fi streaming and it’d fill out the bingo card of all the modern ways of listening to music (sorry, vinyl fans, but I said ‘modern’).

This range of features is impressive enough when you consider its £159 ($200 / AU$300) price tag – that’s a great price for a device this versatile, especially with the Oakington boasting the design flair of a designer speaker of 10x that price.

Perfect it is not, however. There’s no one massive flaw with the Majority Oakington, but I did butt up a few little quirks and kinks that stop this being an otherwise glowing review.

The Oakington is a little complicated to set up and use, which admittedly only means that it’s harder to use than a simple press-and-play speaker, but I did have to spend some time poring over the instruction manual when using the device.

That is to say, people who are technophobic might find the Oakington a little overwhelming. I've tested countless audio devices for TechRadar, including some of the best DAB radios and best Bluetooth speakers, and I'm slightly ashamed to admit that a large number of problems I had with the device were solved by randomly hitting different buttons until something worked.

Jumping between all of the Oakington's audio inputs did raise another annoying issue, and that's that volumes varied quite a bit between them. I'd barely be able to hear Bluetooth music and then deafen myself when jumping to DAB. Am I being dramatic? A little, and I don't want to seem to accentuate the negatives, because overall this is a handy multi-functional device with just a few teething problems.

Majority Oakington: Price and release date

The Majority Oakington's remote by its volume dial — While you can connect your phone to the Oakington to stream music, it also comes with a handy remote. (Image credit: Future)

Released in 2018
Originally priced at £159 ($175 / AU$265)

The Oakington was first released in 2018 and it’s remained a popular entry in Majority’s line-up of digital radios ever since.

The device originally cost £159 ($200 / AU$300). But five years after its release, it’s generally sold for £139 ($175 / AU$265), which is the price that every online retailer sells it for at the time of writing and so we’ve reviewed it with this lower price in mind. Just note that Majority mainly ships its products in the UK, and while it does offer a few products in the US, we couldn’t find the Oakington on sale there.

That’s a fair price for this speaker given that it doubles as a radio and a Bluetooth speaker. For context, our top-rated DAB radio, the Roberts Revival RD70, currently goes for £179 (roughly $225 / AU$340). While you can of course get any old DAB for a fraction of the price, this all-in-one audio tool justifies its price when you consider it’s also a Bluetooth speaker, CD player and so on.

However, if you’re interested in the Oakington, you might also want to check out Majority’s Homerton 2, which costs the same amount and has Wi-Fi for extra connectivity like Spotify Connect and other Wi-Fi streaming apps.

Majority Oakington review: Specs

Majority Oakington review: Features

The rear ports and buttons of the Majority Oakington — The Oakington has a vintage look and comes in two color choices: (yes, you guessed it) oak or walnut. (Image credit: Future)

Long list of connectivity types
Mains connection but AAA batteries for remote
Tricky set up process

As previously mentioned, the Majority Oakington has a long list of ways to listen to audio. You can connect it to your phone for Bluetooth, extend the antennae to catch some FM, DAB or DAB+ channels (the latter ensures that it’s future proof), plug in either an aux or USB cable to listen to tunes or simply pop in a CD. Such a wide swathe of listening options puts the Oakington in good stead for people who like variety.

As you’d expect, audio quality varies by input, as does volume – more so than you’d expect for such a device. When I first set up the DAB channels I’d just been listening to Bluetooth by streaming music and had to crank up the volume pretty high to hear anything streamed that way. Suffice to say, turning the radio on resulted in a really huge volume increase. This continued through the testing period when changing inputs, which means you’ll have to have your finger on the volume rocker on the remote or ready to spin the dial on the machine itself if you like to change input a lot. It’s easy to switch input thanks to the remote, though. Depending on what you’re switching to, the Oakington will sometimes take a few moments to get its act together to actually switch over.

Being a mains-powered speaker, you don’t need to worry about battery life here… except for the remote, which takes two AAA batteries. You get two with the radio, but once those run out you’ll need to pick up some more.

There are more features on offer here too. You can use the Oakington to charge your phone or another device via its USB port, which is particularly handy if you’re streaming music from the device. There’s an alarm function that turns on your music at a certain time, perfect for people who like to wake up to the radio. There’s also a headphone port that you can use if you want to listen quietly – however, there’s a catch on this last one. You can’t use headphones that have a built-in microphone which, in this day and age, is the vast majority of them. In fact, I don’t own a single pair of headphones that don’t have a microphone (and I test audio; I’ve got many), which limits this functionality somewhat.

Given the broad range of features, the Majority was a little finicky to set up. As I’ve already mentioned, I spent lots of the testing time glued to the manual, especially when setting it up and using the extra tools like switching to the aux input. This stops becoming an issue the more you use the speaker, but it’s worth pointing out if you’re not a tech-head.

Case in point, that has cropped up as I’m writing this – the remote has a few easy-to-press buttons to play from CD, Bluetooth, radio or USB, but to listen from the aux cable, you have to press the button on a different row of the remote simply titled ‘audio’. Or, like me, you can simply start pressing random buttons on the device until the aux-in starts working.

One feature missing from the Oakington is any kind of voice assistant, which is far from a deal-breaker but is worth flagging given how commonplace they are in Bluetooth speakers. If you want Alexa or Google to tee up your next song, you’re going to have to forget it.

Features score: 4.5/5

Majority Oakington review: Design

The Majority Oakington's volume dial. — You can use both the dial on the Oakington itself or the remote to adjust volume. (Image credit: Future)

Classy wooden design in two colorways
Not too big, but has top-mounted dials
Remote works most, but not all, of the time

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but in my eyes, the Oakington is a good-looking device – definitely more so than lots of its rivals. It comes in two color options, light or dark brown, with both using a wooden look to fit naturally into lots of home decor.

The front of the device offers two speakers, a small LED screen, eight buttons and a CD slot. The top of it has a dial that you can rotate to change the volume or press in as the device’s ‘select’ button, and the back has the power port and switch and four separate input or output jacks (more on these later).

Despite what pictures suggest, it’s not too big, measuring 40 x 20 x 13 cm and weighing just shy of 4kg. It’s not a portable device per se – nothing with a power cable really is – but it won’t take up too much space in your home. We wouldn’t recommend stacking other things on top of it though, not if you want to be able to change the volume without the remote.

Onto that remote: it gives you all the functions you need, with more functions than on the body of the Oakington, but I’d say it’s possibly too big and complicated for the device it controls. In the testing time, I was frequently having to consult the manual to work out how to enable simple tasks.

Some other reviewers have called the remote’s connectivity spotty, and this was the case for our review sample too – I’d sometimes have to press a button twice to have it pick up the signal. Saying that, I didn’t find it too much worse than most remotes that come packaged with TVs or similar devices.

A more annoying issue was that the Oakington has 32 volume levels, and as I’ll get into later, the volume varied a lot by input, so I found myself changing it a lot. On the remote, this can mean lots of hammering at the volume up or volume down button to have an audible difference – in these circumstances, I’d end up eschewing the remote and utilizing the rotating dial on the device since it was much quicker. It just involved standing up!

Design score: 3.5/5

Majority Oakington review: Sound quality

A good rather than great listen
CDs or Bluetooth streaming lacked bass
EQ presets offer minor tuning adjustment

The front of the Majority Oakington — (Image credit: Future)

The Majority Oakington provides good audio, but it falls short of ‘great’ for a few reasons. It doesn’t quite stack up to many Bluetooth speakers on the market, but if you’re only planning to use it for, say, FM radio functions, then that won’t matter to you.

When listening to a CD or Bluetooth streamed music, the lack of bass is palpable – if you want thumping bass then you might have to look elsewhere. You can adjust the EQ with a control on the remote, but this didn’t seem to have a huge impact in tests. There’s an EQ button as well that cycles through presets: normal, class (which we presume is meant to be classical), pop, rock and jazz, but the changes between each sounded pretty minor.

As mentioned before, I had trouble with the wildly variable volumes of different inputs, and for some the max volume was too low. Bluetooth music maxed out at such a low volume that I couldn’t make out the song at the other end of the same room, and couldn’t hear songs from one room over. To reiterate, that’s at maximum volume, so this is only good news for your neighbors.

The lopsided balance is easy to criticize but it’s not a deal-breaker here, and I can see some users finding the sound of the Oakington just fine. That’s particularly true thanks to the sound stage which, bass aside, provides a lot of depth.

Sound quality: 3.5/5

Majority Oakington review: Value

The front of the Majority Oakington at an angle — The Majority Oakington offers good value for its all-in-one solution and price point. (Image credit: Future)

Given that you're getting about five devices all packaged into one with the Majority Oakington, it's pretty easy to recommend as a good-value audio device.

Of course, you could get each of those five devices separately for a much lower price, but Majority crams them all into one body and at a price lower than all of them combined. I'd call it a good value device for the features and audio props you get.

Value score: 4/5

Should I buy the Majority Oakington?

Buy it if…

Don’t buy it if…

Majority Oakington review: Also consider

How I tested the Majority Oakington

Tested for two weeks
Tested with a range of audio inputs

I used the Majority Oakington for two weeks prior to writing this review. This was mainly split between Bluetooth streaming and DAB radio (as you can see from the images in this review!) but I made sure to spend time testing the other inputs too.

A lot of the testing time was spent scratching my head while staring at the manual. I should also flag that I moved the Majority about in my flat quite a bit, partly to test its signal and audio power in different locations, but mainly just to find a spot where I could play Bluetooth music and actually hear it.

I joined the TechRadar team in 2019 and spent several years testing just about every kind of tech under the sun (though my primary role was in the phones team). Since leaving to join TR's sister site What to Watch in late 2022, I've continued to provide tech reviews for TechRadar including headphones, running earbuds, portable speakers, smartphones, robot vacuums and more.

First reviewed in November 2023

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M3 Max (2023) review: the Mac gaming rig is here

5:00 pm | November 6, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Laptops Macbooks | Tags: AAA, CPU, RAM, Tomb Raider | Comments: Off

Two-minute review

Spec Sheet

Here is the MacBook Pro (M3 Max, 2023) configuration sent to TechRadar for review:

CPU: Apple M3 Max (16-core)
Graphics: Integrated 40-core GPU
RAM: 64GB [Unified LPDDR5]
Screen: 14.2-inch, 3024 x 1964 Liquid Retina XDR display 600 nits (1,600 peak nits with HDR content) brightness, wide color P3 gamut
Storage: 2TB SSD
Ports: 3x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C), 3.5mm headphone jack, MagSafe 3 charging port, SDXC, HDMI
Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6e, Bluetooth 5.3
Camera: 1080p FaceTime HD webcam
Weight: 3.6 pounds / 1.24kg
Size: 12.31 x 8.71 x 0.61 inches / 31.26 x 22.12 x 1.55cm; W x D x H)

The story of the new MacBook Pro 14 is less about a new laptop on the block than it is about Apple showcasing the raw power of Apple's newest silicon, the M3 chip. Stuffed inside my brooding Space Black portable is Apple's apex M3 processor, the M3 Max. I tell you this so that you don't mistakenly expect that your $1,599 / £1,699 / AU$2,699 MacBook Pro 14 with an M3 chip will provide the same performance as what's cooking on my $4,299 / £4,399 / AU$7,249 review unit.

The base-model M3 will still support hardware-based ray tracing and mesh shading. It'll still have that blazing-fast neural network. But you'll have many fewer CPU and GPU cores, and much less memory; the M3 Max model has 64GB. You're buying a casually powerful Pro system. The M3 Max MacBook Pro came to play hard and work hard (it's tough to say which it'll go at harder).

MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max (2023) REVIEW — (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

From the impressive design and materials (aluminum chassis with a brand-new anodizing technique for the Space Black finish that finally cuts down on fingerprints) to the expressive keyboard that is now my favorite MacBook typing experience, to a versatile macOS Sonoma platform that supports every activity from entertainment and gaming to email, web browsing, and intense photo and video work, there is not one hint of performance disappointment in this system.

It's without a doubt the best MacBook I've ever used, and I think it stands a chance of giving some of the best gaming laptops a real run for their money.

This is not, by any stretch of the imagination, an affordable laptop, and if you're looking for thin, light, relatively budget-friendly, and are not working on massive CAD files, 4K video streams, or playing the latest AAA games, then perhaps the still-stellar MacBook Air M2 (no M3 yet) is more your style, or even the MacBook Pro 14 with M3. As mentioned, that model starts at $1,599 / £1,699 / AU$2,699 – that's $100 cheaper than the 14-inch MacBook Pro with M2 in the US, but is also a reminder that there's no $1,299 tier in MacBook Pro space.

There's little doubt in my mind that the complete lineup of MacBook Pro 14 M3 machines, from the base M3 to the M3 Pro and this M3 Max, will take their places among the best laptops money can buy. And, yes, the MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max could also snare a spot on our best gaming laptops list.

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Price and availability

M3 range starts at $1,599 / £1,699 / AU$2,699
Tested model costs $4,299 / £4,399 / AU$7,249
No 13-inch option (which would have cost less)

Apple announced the new MacBook Pro 14-inch range at its October 30 Scary Fast event, alongside new 16-inch MacBook Pros. The 14-inch MacBook Pro now comes with a choice of M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max chips, the latest generation of Apple's own silicon. Meanwhile, the 16-inch MacBook Pro is only available with the higher-end (and more expensive) M3 Pro and M3 Max. There's also a new iMac 24 running on the base M3 SoC.

Preorders are live now, and the new M3 and M3 Pro MacBooks will go on sale and ship from November 7, while the M3 Max models will begin shipping later in November.

The MacBook Pro 14-inch M3 range starts at $1,599 / £1,699 / AU$2,699 (it's worth noting that Apple has discontinued the 13-inch MacBook Pro). As configured, our Space Black MacBook Pro 14-inch with an M3 Max SoC, 64GB of RAM and a 2TB hard drive has a list price of $4,299 / £4,399 / AU$7,249.

Price score: 4/5

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Design

Same design
More power squeezed into the same space and weight
An awesome new color option

Apple has changed virtually nothing about the MacBook Pro design from the 14-inch model it launched earlier this year with an M2 chip. The dimensions are the same, with a thickness of 0.61 inches / 1.55cm, a width of 12.31 inches / 31.26cm, and a depth of 8.71 inches / 22.12cm.

The weight is roughly the same, though the M3 Max 14-inch MacBook Pro is, at 3.6lbs / 1.24kg, the heaviest of the 14-inch bunch.

The screen size is the same, and on the M3 Max and M3 Pro 14-inch MacBooks the port placement is unchanged from the previous generation, as are the number and types of ports. You get three USB-C Thunderbolt 4 ports, a 3.5mm headphone jack, an HDMI port, an SD card slot, and a MagSafe charge port (if you opt for the base M3 model you only get two Thunderbolt ports)

If you stack the MacBook Air 13-inch M2 on top of the MacBook Pro 14-inch M3 Max, the latter doesn't look that much larger, but it is substantially thicker and heavier. When I opened it up to reveal that familiar Liquid Retina XDR display and backlit Magic Keyboard, I noted that the keyboard and trackpad are, from a size perspective, exactly the same as on the MacBook Air. Apple uses the extra chassis space on the Pro to accommodate a six-speaker system that's split to sit on either side of the keyboard; the larger chassis also provides just a bit more space to rest your palms.

Image 1 of 7

Image 2 of 7

Image 3 of 7

Image 4 of 7

Image 5 of 7

Image 6 of 7

Image 7 of 7

As with the previous 14-inch MacBook Pro, the matte keyboard feels as good as it looks. It's expansive, and there's enough key travel to make every touch sure and satisfying; it's a pleasure to type on. The power button still doubles as a Touch ID biometric scanner, which I use to unlock the laptop and sign into various online services. I still hope for the day that Apple introduces Face ID to the FaceTime camera notch that sits at the top of the display.

But enough about everything that's the same. I want to talk about the new Space Black finish. Sure, Apple has done colorful and even inspired finishes before, but I'd argue there's never been anything quite like the new Space Black finish on this new MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max (the 14-inch M3 Pro and M3 Max MacBooks are available in Space Black or silver, while the M3 model comes in Space Grey or silver).

It's not just black – it's a light-swallowing black. I noticed this when trying to photograph the new laptop, and watched as it basically devoured my studio lighting. The surface is just shy of being matte black, and that low reflectivity really stops the light from bouncing back at you. The new color gives the laptop a bold, aggressive, and no-nonsense look. I think any gamer would be proud to cart this laptop into their next tournament.

Apple has developed a new anodizing process for the Space Black color to create a fingerprint-resistant surface, and I can report that it did repel most of my handprints. That said, I have dry hands, and I did note that the sweatier the palm, the more visible the marks left on the laptop's surface, although even those fingerprints were faint. Just remember that this is a fingerprint-resistant MacBook Pro, not a fingerprint-proof one.

Design score: 5/5

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Display

Same resolution
Still excellent
It's brighter! (With standard imagery)

In typical fashion, Apple has managed to not change anything about its MacBook Pro Liquid Retina XDR display, but has still managed to squeeze some extra performance out of it thanks to the new and more efficient 3-nanometer M3 Max chip.

The screen has the exact same resolution as the last display panel (3024 x 1964), and the same one million-to-1 contrast ratio. Even the same peak brightness of 1,600 nits with HDR content is unchanged, although for day-to-day brightness with standard content we now get 600 nits, as opposed to the 500 nits on the last MacBook Pro.

MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max (2023) in use — (Image credit: Future)

In real-world use, I found that the MacBook Pro 14-inch with M3 Max is quite capable of beating back even direct sunlight; I'm convinced I could work pretty much anywhere on this laptop.

Overall, this is a beautiful screen. Thanks to bright colors and inky blacks, everything on it gets a premium look. Do I mind the FaceTime camera notch? Not really. Video usually plays in letterbox format and well below it, and it doesn't interfere with the business part of apps and web browsing. Even when I played games – and I played a lot of them – I didn't notice it.

Display score: 4.5/5

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Performance

Apple silicon at its finest
Good luck finding a task it can't handle
AAA gaming can chew through battery life

Benchmarks

Here’s how the MacBook Pro (M3 Max, 2023) performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

Cinebench R24CPU: Single-core: 140; Multi-core: 1,588, GPU: 12791; MP Ratio: 10.94
Geekbench 6 Single-core: 3,160; Multi-core: 21,236; GPU Metal: 158,215; OpenCL: 92,159
Battery life: 10 to 12 hours with mixed use

I really like the way Apple makes its chip series more powerful. It uses a standardized architecture, and then wraps more and more cores around it. The benefit is that all systems running the base 3-nanometer process M3 SoC share the same impressive features, but some perform faster than others.

While the bare-bones M3 in the base-model MacBook Pro 14-inch (with one fewer Thunderbolt ports) has an 8-core CPU (four efficiency cores and four performance cores), and a 10-core GPU, the M3 Max chip in the machine I tested has a 16-core CPU and a 40-core GPU. According to Geekbench 6, the system is running a 4.1GHz (single-core) and an estimated 3.3GHz (multi-core).

I ran a lot of benchmarks for raw performance scores, because that's what you do. Unsurprisingly, the GeekBench 6 numbers were startling, and while Apple has taken pains to compare the base M3 to the three-year-old M1 performance, comparing my MacBook Air M2 to the M3 Max was a real eye-opener. Granted, the M3 Max and the base M2 are not really directly comparable, but I think these figures do give you a sense of why you might pay so much for an M3 Max system stuffed with, in my case, 64GB of unified memory (you can, by the way, get a more expensive system with up to 128GB of unified memory and 8TB of storage).

MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max Geekbench Benchmarks (Image credit: Future)

It's easy to forget that Apple silicon is running on the ARM-64 platform, and that not all MacOS apps run natively on it. The reason I often forget this? Everything works. There's never been a moment in my three years of experience with Apple silicon where the MacBook throws up its digital hands and says, "Sorry, I can't run this app." Part of this is down to the rapid adoption of Apple silicon by Apple partners, and also because the Rosetta 2 system (which can translate between x86 code and Apple silicon) runs quietly in the background, managing all apps that are still looking for an x86 platform.

Okay, the MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max is not perfect on the compatibility front. The x86-compatible Steam, which I used for most of my games, did crash. But weirdly, so did iMovie, repeatedly, and that's an ARM native, and later the ARM-friendly Adobe Photoshop 2024. At least the system as a whole never crashes, and doesn't even know the meaning of a blue screen.

Since we're mostly not thinking about compatibility, we can just focus on performance, and the M3 Max is stunning. To be clear, I'm not a professional video editor or doctor analyzing 3D MRI scans, but I did my best to press this system and found it shrugged off all tasks. I opened 40 or so browser tabs on both Safari and Chrome (normally a soul-crushing task for any system), launched Apple TV+, installed Steam, and then played Tomb Raider Legacy. I might as well have been composing something in Notes (oh, wait, I was doing that, too). I loaded up FinalCut Pro with 4K 30fps video as well as some 4K 24fps ProRes HDR content, and edited and manipulated them with ease.

While not visually evident, I think it's also safe to assume that some of the system's speed and ease with all these apps – often running concurrently – is the new Dynamic Caching technology. This is essentially a more efficient way of using available memory. Instead of X number of registers always being used for the same task, the system only applies the memory needed for each, explicit task. The result is a lot less wasted memory and more left over for managing other critical tasks.

Apple spent considerable time during its Scary Fast event telling us how it engineered the new M3 SoC with features specifically designed to handle graphics-intensive tasks like, obviously, AAA games. Hardware-based ray tracing and mesh shading might improve how some of your most expensive apps look, but we all know that it's really all about gaming.

Image 1 of 6

Image 2 of 6

Image 3 of 6

Image 4 of 6

Image 5 of 6

Image 6 of 6

Naturally, I played some games. First, a few hours of the engaging Rise of Tomb Raider, which I will note is not that easy when you're using the keyboard. The eight-year-old game looked good, and gameplay was smooth and immersive. I usually wore my AirPods Pro (they connected instantly) so as to not annoy people around me.

Next, I installed Lies of P, a brand-new game seemingly inspired by Pinocchio, that is at home on all major consoles and now, thanks to Steam, the MacBook Pro, too.

It's a beautiful and quietly atmospheric game that starts in an old, deserted train station. Everything is rendered in such exquisite detail and, thanks to all the M3 Max's onboard graphics power, every surface looked about as real as they can in a game of this nature.

The system seemed to keep up with the action quite well (I played this game with a Bluetooth-connected PlayStation 5 controller; the system supports Bluetooth 5.3, which has just 100ms of latency). I used Terminal for a real-time view of Frame rates and found that, depending on the action, they bounced between 30 and 60fps. Action generally looked smooth in most sequences, including fast-paced puppet-on-puppet battles.

l also played Shadow of the Tomb Raider at the highest possible resolution of 3024 x 1964, and with every atmospheric element turned to the absolute highest. At times, the fans were so loud that they drowned out the game sounds, but the gameplay and graphics were all at their cinematic best, and in the game's benchmarks I could achieve 108fps at 1920 x 1200 mode and 56fps at the highest, native resolution settings. Pretty impressive.

When I cranked all of Total WarHammer III settings to, where possible, ultra, (with 1920 x 1220 resolution), the fan churned on high, and there was some object (or sprite) flickering in the benchmark test. But the detail was all there, and the system reported an average frame rate of 56.1. Then I reran the test at the MacBook Pro's highest native resolution. The gameplay looked even better, naturally, though, the fps dropped to 33.8.

I won't claim to be a hardcore gamer, but it's clear to me that game developers are now thinking about the Mac as a viable platform, using the Game Porting Toolkit Apple released at WWDC 2023 to bring AAA games to the platform on the same date they arrive on your best console. It's not just that the games arrive on the Mac; it's that they're as playable and as immersive as anything on a Windows 11 gaming rig.

Overall, a quick look at all the benchmarks comparing the M1 Max to this M3 Max system shows a quantum leap across every aspect of performance. And, yes, the single number that is lower, AI Turn Time in Civilization VI, is also an improvement, as it shows the system taking less time than before to make that turn.

MacBook Pro 14 M3 max benchmarks — (Image credit: Future)

Performance score: 5/5

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Audio and video

Thanks to the larger system chassis, Apple fits three speakers on either side of the keyboard that can produce loud, clear sound. I played a wide variety of music, video, and gaming content through them. It all sounded great, with voices sharp and high notes clear as a bell. What this sound system lacks, though, is any discernable bass. Now, I wouldn't really expect the MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max's relatively tiny speakers to provide chest-thumping sound. Still, when I played White Stripes Seven Nation Army and Eminem's Lose Yourself I was struck by how flat some of the drums and backbeats sounded. It's not completely devoid of the richness necessary to deliver a nice drum solo, but I found the base side a bit hollow, robbing the tunes of their head-banging essence.

Remarkably, the MacBook Pro 14 still ships with a 3.5mm headphone jack. I'm sure audio and video professionals use it in their work, but for most people, the support you'll find for your best AirPods Pros (especially the head-tracking spatial audio) will be more than enough in-ear audio support.

The MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max comes equipped with the same 1080 FaceTime camera as its predecessor. I can tell you that it gives your callers a nice clear view of you and, thanks to the new native Sonoma webcam features, I can use gestures to set off fireworks, drop confetti, pop up thumbs-up emojis, and release balloons during any video call. My wife wasn't as amused as I thought she'd be.

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Battery life

Rated for 18 hours
Lasted in our tests over 12 hours with varied use
Charges quickly

You may have read some reports that the new MacBook Pro can manage up to 22 hours of battery life. That's the promise for the 14-inch M3 model; however, for my more powerful and more power-hungry M3 Max 14-inch MacBook Pro, the maximum I can expect is 18 hours, and that's only if I do nothing but, say, stream virtually all episodes of Ted Lasso. The number drops down to 12 hours if I'm browsing the web over Wi-Fi. And, in my experience, the duration truly plummets if you play a AAA game like Lies of P or even Tomb Raider Legacy on battery power.

When I started playing the latter game I had about 73% battery life left. Within a couple of hours, it was below 20%. It's clear that the MacBook Pro 14 M3 Max will give you all the gaming power you want and need (I usually played in High Power mode), but there's probably also an assumption that you're playing while plugged in.

My average battery life has been roughly 12 hours of mixed use, which is a little bit less than I was expecting from this more efficient 3-nanometer SoC.

I do have some good news. Fast charging works as promised, and I topped off to 50% in 30 minutes using the included 96W charge adapter and the woven black USB-C-to-MagSafe cable that strikes a discordant note when plugged into the perfectly white adapter (I'm not sure why Apple didn't make that Space Black too).

Battery life score: 4/5

Should you buy the MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023)?

Buy it if…

Don’t buy it if…

First reviewed November 2023

Also consider...

If our Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M3 Max (2023) review has you considering other options, here are three more laptops to consider...

Testing scorecard

How we test

I've spent decades reviewing Apple products, including many of its laptops and desktop systems (I've used Macs on and off since 1985).

For this review, I spent many hours with Apple's newest MacBook Pro and what it says is the most powerful silicon it has ever produced. I did my best to run it through a variety of tasks and played multiple games on it. I also ran a battery of benchmark tests to assess raw performance. We pride ourselves on our independence and our rigorous review-testing process, offering up long-term attention to the products we review and making sure our reviews are updated and maintained, regardless of when a device was released, if you can still buy it, it's on our radar.

Read more about how we test

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023) review: a purposefully improved update

4:30 pm | October 14, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Laptops | Tags: AAA, Forza Horizon | Comments: Off

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Two-minute review

The Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023) was praised for its outstanding performance power within a chassis that was only a bit above five pounds in our review last year. There were a few compromises made in making this one of the best gaming laptops available. For the latest iteration of the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i, there are some adequate updates in both power and performance with some caveats including the uncomfortably huge packed-in power brick. Meanwhile, the gaming laptop manages to even weigh a bit lighter than its predecessor as well at a little under five pounds.

Though the Legion Slim 7i may struggle with native 4K resolutions, it shines exceptionally in the 1440p range. This means graphically intensive games ranging from Cyberpunk 2077, Starfield and the likes run wonderfully. Be mindful that those types of power pushing tasks will have the cooling system fans run noticeably louder than they already do at menial tasks like web browsing. Battery life is slightly above average and won’t last more than 7 hours which is good for a coastal trip. It also means that the gaming laptop won’t survive playing games with higher visual fidelity without the power supply.

Packed into this year’s Legion Slim 7i is a 14 core 13th gen Intel i9, 16GB DDR5 RAM, Nvidia RTX 4070 and 1TB SSD storage. There’s also an impressive audio/visual package thanks to the beautiful 16-inch 2560 X 1600 display offering a 240Hz refresh rate and great Harman speakers as well. Other carryovers from the previous version include an individually per-key lit RGB keyboard alongside generous port selection. Packed in apps like Lenovo Vantage are totally fine for customizing one’s experience but other apps like Legion Arena and WebAdviser feel like unnecessary bloatware.

Not much has improved significantly with the latest Legion Slim 7i and that’s totally fine. What has changed is that it’s incrementally more powerful and lighter which means more than anything. Simply put, this is one of the best thin and light gaming laptops released this year.

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Price & availability

How much does it cost? Starting at $1,499.99 / £1,820 / AU$2,719
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

Depending on the territory one is in, there are going to be various pricing options for the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023). In the United States, there are three configurations available alongside the ability to customizable a build. The review spec version I receive will run potential buyers around $1,749.

There are more affordable options around $1,499 that includes a 13th gen Intel i7, Nvidia RTX 4060, 16GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD storage with ability to bump that down to 512GB SSD for around $50 less. At the highest $2,211 tier, the customizable build includes everything in the review build alongside the ability to push the RAM up to 32GB and a better 3200 x 2000 display with 165Hz refresh rate.

In the UK, there’s a £1,980 pre-build that features a 13th Gen Intel i9, 32GB RAM, Nvidia RTX 4070, 1TB SSD storage and the 3200 x 2000 display. The other customizable configurations are split between £1,820.00 - £2,300.00 with the two similar Intel CPU, RAM, storage, GPU and display options similar to the U.S. Regardless of which of the $2,719 singular pre-built or two customizable builds between $3,089 and $3,799, they all come with the 3200 x 2000 display at 165Hz refresh rate. The pre-build comes with Intel i7, 32GB, Nvidia RTX 4060 and 1TB SSD.

The Legion Slim 7i is definitely less expensive than Razer Blade 14 or MSI Stealth GS66 while offering similar power. Within the realm of slim form gaming laptops, it’s safe to call it one of the most approachable when it comes to price.

Price score: 4.5 / 5

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Specs

My review configuration of the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023) sits in the middle price wise at $1749 and features a Intel i9 CPU, NVIDIA RTX 4070 GPU, 16GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD storage and 16-inch WQXGA display with a 240Hz refresh rate.

The cheapest configuration Intel i7 CPU, NVIDIA RTX 4060 GPU, 16GB DDR5 RAM, 512GB SSD storage and same 16-inch display that comes in the review configuration. Potential buyers with a bit more expendable cash can look toward a customizable version that’ll cost around $2,211. This comes with everything in the review configuration in addition to 32GB DDR RAM and 16-inch 3.2K display at a 165Hz refresh rate.

Outside of different choices in CPU, GPU, RAM and SSD storage, one of the most notable difference is the ability to choose between two different 16-inch displays. One being the standard WQXGA (2560 x 1600 resolution) pumping out 240Hz refresh rates and 3.2K (3200 x 2000 resolution) at a refresh rate of 165Hz. Legion has a configuration tool to create the best set-up for buyers as well.

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Design

More lightweight than ever notwithstanding power increase
Adequate port selection
Awesome RGB keyboard that’s beautifully lit

Like its predecessor, the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023) balances both form and function when it comes to overall design. When closed, it’s really easy to appreciate the all-metal chassis made from sandblasted aluminum and magnesium. The Legion Slim 7i provides a quality finish that doesn’t smudge yet feels like it’s noticeably tough when it comes to chassis build.

Port placement has changed slightly but feels overall familiar compared to last year’s model. In the lower rear is an HDMI port and three USB-A ports. There’s also a power port that connects to a large power brick that’s still a bit unwieldy and feels heavier than the laptop itself. For added measure, the rear ports feature light-up icons on the top of the laptop’s bottom as the display itself is offset about an inch from them. Some of the smaller changes to the port layout take place on the side, the audio jack is on the left side near the dual USB-C ports. On the left side is the SD slot for content creators and camera shutter for privacy. When closed it’s about less than an inch as well.

When opened, the Legion Slim 7i still features the power button/fingerprint scanner sitting in the middle of the Harmen speakers. The audio quality of the speakers sounds good when listening to music, gaming or watching video content. However, playing graphically intensive games will ensure the cooling fans are running at full blast. This means it’ll probably be best to have a pair of headphones handy.

The display itself is a joy to look at with beautifully bold colors, deep blacks and respectable brightness. On top of the display is a 1080p webcam that also features dual microphones as well which is solid for video conferencing and probably streaming with the right backlighting. Below that is the wonderfully lit per-key RGB keyboard that feels comfortable to use when typing documents or gaming. The trackpad below feels smooth to the touch when moving the cursor around and offers a nice tactile click when pressed in.

All of this comes in a slim package that fits well in even a backpack or briefcase. If anything, the power brick really hurts portability. Laying down or on the lap, the Legion Slim 7i doesn’t feel uncomfortable to use for long periods of time.

Design score: 4 / 5

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Performance

Can run most AAA games at native 1440p range with max settings well
Runs well with creative based software
Don’t expect to make total use of the 240Hz on visually intensive games
Cooling fans are incredibly loud

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Laptop benchmarks

Here's how the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i: Benchmarks performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

3DMark: Night Raid: 61244 ; Fire Strike: 25797; Time Spy: 12202
GeekBench 6: 2653 (single-core); 2653 (multi-core)
Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition (1080p, Extreme): 49.11 fps; (1080p, High): 93.73 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, Ultra): 88.23fps; (1080p, Low): 125.12fps
Dirt 5 (1920x1200, Ultra): 103.90fps; (1920x1200, Low): 213.00fps
25GB File Copy: 2006.553812
Handbrake 1.6: 4:28
CrossMark: Overall: 1948 Productivity: 1908 Creativity: 2044 Responsiveness: 1794
Web Surfing (Battery Informant): 7 hours 01 minute
PCMark 10 Gaming Battery Life: 59 hours

As mentioned previously, the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023) manages to pack more performance power in an even smaller case compared to the previous version. When it comes to general computing tasks, this gaming laptop can handle dozens of Google Chrome tabs without any slow down or stuttering and can open apps from Tidal to the Xbox app instantly. Watching 4K video and listening to hi-fi quality audio wasn’t a problem either. Considering the component specs of the Legion Slim 7i, it’s interesting how loud the cooling fans can get even while running applications that take significantly less processing power than performance pushing games.

When it comes to games, the lightweight gaming laptop can pretty much play all of the best AAA games at native 1440p with admirable frame rates. Cyberpunk 2077 managed to get 88 frames-per-second on average during benchmark tests. Adding ray-tracing into the mix bumped that down around ten which still put it above 60fps. Though Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition could only get 49fps, it’s still above 30fps which makes it still playable. Providing the highest frame rate was Dirt 5 which pushed out 103 fps at Ultra settings.

The good thing about these frame rates is that they can be improved through the use of Nvidia’s Deep Learning Super Sampling which is compatible with the games mentioned. Despite the serviceable performance, don’t expect to utilize the 240Hz refresh rate either. The only game that got in that ballpark was Dirt 5 at low settings.

Adobe Creative Suite software users will have much to celebrate with the Legion Slim 7i between gaming sessions. Photoshop didn’t run slow when playing around with 4K resolution photos and added layers. On the other side, exports on Premier Pro were pretty instant with a minute video taking somewhere in the ballpark of less than one minute.

Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Battery

General battery life is around 7 hours
Charging to full battery takes a bit over an hour

Expectations for battery life on these types of gaming focused laptops aren’t necessarily high as most games usually top out after around an hour and similar results come with Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023).

During the PCMark 10 Gaming Battery Life test, the gaming laptop only lasted around 59 minutes. However, general battery life is fairly average for better or worse. The web surfing had the Legion Slim 7i top out at 7 hours which is good enough for a bi-coastal trip. Though it’s not ideal, it’s still better than competing lightweight gaming laptops.

Charging takes a little over an hour to get to full battery life and there are two ways to juice up the gaming laptop. The most obvious is through the port in the back that connects to the big power brick. It can also use the USB-C to recharge up to 140W which means users could use a Macbook charger but that may affect performance.

Battery score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023)?

Buy it if...

You want a gaming laptop that doesn’t weigh a lot
Large power brick aside, the Legion Slim 7i design weighs under five pounds and less than the size of a quarter when closed.

You require significant performance power
Size be damned as the gaming laptop has a powerful combo of a Intel i9, 16GB DDR5 RAM and Nvidia RTX 4070 that allows great performance across the many visually impressive AAA games.

Don't buy it if...

You want a laptop that is quieter
Even when using web browsers or music streaming apps, the cooling fans can get extremely loud.

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Also consider

If the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023) has you considering other options, here are two more laptops to consider...

How I tested the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023)

I tested this over three weeks
It was used for general and creative tasks alongside gaming
Games played include Cyberpunk 2077, Starfield, Hi-Fi Rush and Forza Horizon 5

During my three weeks with the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i, most of the time was split between using Google Chrome for various tasks, gaming and using creative software. I used the laptop at both home and in office spaces. Most of the time, the Legion Slim 7i was plugged in outside of a few occasions.

To witness how far the gaming laptop could go performance wise, I tested some of the biggest demanding games on it including Forza Horizon 5, Cyberpunk 2077, Starfield and Hi-Fi Rush. I used both Adobe Photoshop and Premier to try out how well it would work for creatives.

I have spent the past several years writing dozens of features on PC Gaming for TechRadar. Pieces ranging from reviews on various components and hardware alongside editorials exploring PC Gaming culture at large.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed September 2023

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Two-minute review

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Pricing and Availability

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Specs

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Design

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Display

Apple iMac 24-inch (M4) Review: Performance

Should you buy the Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024)?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) : Two-minute review

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Price and availability

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Specs

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Design

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Display

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Performance

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Software

A taste of AI

Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Battery life

Should you buy the Apple MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024)?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

MacBook Pro 14-inch M4 (2024) review: Also consider

How I tested the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M4 (2024)

Head like a haunted house

Who can it be now?

Should you play Slitterhead?

Play it if...

Don't play it if...

Accessibility

How I reviewed Slitterhead

Steam Deck OLED: Two-minute review

Steam Deck OLED: Price and availability

Steam Deck OLED: Specs

Steam Deck OLED: Design

Steam Deck OLED: Performance

Steam Deck OLED: Battery life

Should I buy the Steam Deck OLED?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested the Steam Deck OLED

Majority Oakington: Two-minute review

Majority Oakington: Price and release date

Majority Oakington review: Specs

Majority Oakington review: Features

Majority Oakington review: Design

Majority Oakington review: Sound quality

Majority Oakington review: Value

Should I buy the Majority Oakington?

Buy it if…

Don’t buy it if…

Majority Oakington review: Also consider

How I tested the Majority Oakington

Two-minute review

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Price and availability

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Design

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Display

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Performance

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Audio and video

MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023) review: Battery life

Should you buy the MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Max, 2023)?

Buy it if…

Don’t buy it if…

Also consider...

Testing scorecard

How we test

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Two-minute review

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Price & availability

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Specs

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Design

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Performance

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Battery

Should you buy the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023)?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023): Also consider

How I tested the Lenovo Legion Slim 7i (2023)

Recent Posts

Archives