Organizer
Gadget news
Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review
3:00 pm | March 3, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Mattresses Sleep | Comments: Off

Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper: two-minute review

The Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper is a three-inch thick, medium-firm topper from this well respected, luxury sleep brand. I slept on a king size topper for two weeks in February to see how it performs in practice, and how it compares to the rest of the best mattress toppers on the market. 

Having written a Saatva Memory Foam Hybrid mattress review recently, and knowing that Saatva is the brand behind TechRadar's #1 best mattress, I was excited to test out this topper option. Saatva positions the Graphite Memory Foam topper as having “advanced cooling technology” and a “body hugging feel.” I found it delivered a cozy sleep experience, no matter which sleep position you prefer. 

In addition to relieving some minor aches and pains, this topper will either improve your existing mattress' motion isolation capabilities, or at the least, maintain them. However, while it may be positioned as a cooling topper, I found it failed in this endeavor, which makes it hard to justify the high price tag.

A 180-night trial and free delivery sounds great, but be warned that you only get a one-year limited warranty and there is a $99 fee if you need to return it. All in all, if you’re more concerned with comfort than cooling properties, the Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper is worth the buy. However, hot sleepers should look elsewhere. Read below to learn more in my full Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review.

The Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper on a bed

(Image credit: Future)

Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review: design & materials

  • 3-inch-tall topper with memory foam infused with graphite
  • Organic cotton cover with antimicrobial treatment
  • Straps at corners hold it in place

The bulk of this Saatva topper design is CertiPUR-US certified memory foam infused with graphite, which provides a supportive feel, pressure relief, and cooling properties. The graphite, combined with an organic cotton cover that wicks away moisture and contributes to breathability, are the main cooling features. Although the topper can only be spot-cleaned, at least it has an antimicrobial treatment to prevent bacteria, mold, and mildew. (It's probably worth adding one of the best mattress protectors to make cleaning easier.)

The corner of the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper on a bed

(Image credit: Future)

This three-inch-thick mattress topper gave my 10-inch mattress some additional height. It blends naturally with my mattress and stays in place with four straps at the corners. 

The Graphite Memory Foam option is one of a number of different toppers available at Saatva – for a run-down of the rest of the range, and who they might suit, head to TechRadar's article exploring 'Which Saatva topper should I buy?'

Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review: price & value for money

  • Premium priced with a one-year limited warranty and 180-night trial
  • Not the most expensive or budget-friendly that Saatva offers
  • Rarely discounted

At $445 for a queen-size, the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper is very much a premium mattress topper. Saatva offers another topper at the same price, two more that are cheaper, and one that’s more expensive. 

Based on the materials, I can understand why it’s priced as a premium topper. However, when it’s touted as a cooling topper and doesn’t succeed in that department, I can’t say confidently that the price matches the quality. Here are the list prices for each size of the mattress.

  • Twin: MSRP $325
  • Twin XL: MSRP $325
  • Full: MSRP $405
  • Queen: MSRP $445
  • King: MSRP $565
  • Split King: MSRP $650
  • Cal King: MSRP $565

While Saatva mattress sales and deals happen pretty much constantly, it's very rare that the toppers will be included. 

On the larger market, it’s in the same price bracket (though slightly cheaper than) the Avocado Organic Latex Mattress Topper ($664 for the queen size). The Tempur-Adapt Topper has nearly the same MSRP, but there are semi-regular 40% off deals that make it much more affordable (head to TechRadar's Tempur-Adapt Topper review for more on that one) . 

A close-up shot of the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper's cover

(Image credit: Future)

Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review: comfort & performance

  • Medium firm and supportive feel for all sleep styles
  • Retains lots of heat
  • Improves edge support and has good motion isolation capabilities

While I have a supportive organic latex mattress (about a 5.5 on the firmness scale), the Saatva topper was slightly firmer. On a 10-point scale, I’d give it a 6.5 firmness rating as it had a cozy, body-hugging feel that was supportive, but not hard by any means. For reference, I’m 5'5" and weigh 170lbs. A friend who is smaller than me slept on the topper and agreed that it has a medium firm feel. She rated it as a 6.

A wine glass on the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper

(Image credit: Future)

While Saatva says that the Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper is best suited to side sleepers, I slept better on my stomach and back. In fact, it wasn’t until the second week that the topper had softened enough for me to sleep comfortably on my side. 

I felt as if the topper reinforced the edges of my mattress, which is good news if you want or need a sturdy edge to help you get up in the morning. In addition, the topper also has great motion isolation capabilities. I tested this by placing a wine glass in the center, and then getting in and out of bed and changing sleep positions near the glass. The glass never wobbled.

A hand pressing down on the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper

(Image credit: Future)

Designed with memory foam infused with graphite and a breathable organic cotton cover, this mattress topper is supposed to offer top-tier temperature regulation. Unfortunately, it trapped so much heat that I slept uncomfortably, even with just a microfiber sheet covering me at night. I tested the topper in February and generally had to sleep with the fan on, especially after I woke up more than one night sweating. When a friend visited, I had her lay down on the topper on my bed and the first thing she said was, “Your bed is really warm.”

Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review: customer experience

  • Free delivery but $99 fee for returns 
  • 180-night trial and 1-year limited warranty
  • Vacuum-packed and rolled for delivery, but box not secure and heavy

While the mattress topper arrived by free delivery in a cardboard box, the box wasn’t secure. One of the cardboard flaps broke free of the paper tape. At least the box and tape were recyclable. The box was pretty heavy, but once I'd got it to my room, it was easy to remove the topper, which was rolled and vacuum sealed in plastic. The topper gained its full shape within a few hours, and yet, I noticed that the memory foam didn’t quite fill up the cover, leaving some wrinkles on the top.

Image 1 of 3

The Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper in its delivery box

The Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper in its delivery box (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

The Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper rolled up in plastic wrap

The topper rolled up in plastic wrap (Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

The Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper on a bed just after being unpacked

... and on a bed just after being unpacked (Image credit: Future)

Upon removing it from its package, the topper had a noticeable woodsy, earthen smell. I don’t consider it an off-gassing or chemical smell, but I smelled the same thing when I previously tested a Saatva mattress. The smell was so overpowering on this topper (and caused my head to ache), that I couldn’t sleep on it for three days. After two weeks, the smell has now faded enough that it doesn’t disrupt my sleep. A friend of mine did not notice the smell after I had been using the topper for a week.

In addition to a 180-night trial, Saatva offers a one-year limited warranty, which is not typical for a premium topper. I’ve seen other luxury brands offer anywhere from three to 10-year warranties on their toppers – and Saatva itself has a forever warranty on its mattresses, so it's odd that its topper warranty is so stingy in comparison. Not to mention, it’s a little disappointing that there is a $99 processing fee to return the topper. I should also note that the brand doesn’t allow for exchanges – if you want to swap for another option, you must return the topper and then order a different one.

Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper review: specs

Should you buy the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper?

Buy it if...

✅ You and your partner have different sleep styles: Neither you nor your partner will sacrifice good sleep as this topper will suit stomach, back, and side sleepers. Side sleepers may need to give their bodies a week to get used to it. 

✅ Your existing mattress is very soft or very firm: This topper sits right in the middle of the firmness scale, which means it’ll firm up a very soft mattress or soften a very firm mattress.

✅ You want to know your mattress topper isn’t breeding mildew, mold, or bacteria: Thanks to an antimicrobial treatment, your topper will be free of mildew, mold, and bacteria – which is good since you can only spot clean this topper.

Don't buy it if...

❌ You sleep hot: For someone who doesn’t get warm or hot when they sleep, there were many nights where I woke up sweating while sleeping on this Saatva topper. The Brooklyn Bedding Microcoil Mattress Topper may offer a cooler night’s rest due to a 0.75-inch layer of micro coils.

 You want a super soft sleep experience: This topper is suited to stomach and back sleepers, so you know it has a medium-firm, supportive feel. The Tempur-Adapt Mattress Topper is known to offer a softer sleep experience.

❌ You’re on a budget: This is not a budget-friendly topper by any means. Save a pretty penny by going with the LinenSpa Gel-Infused Mattress Topper, which may result in a cooler sleep since it’s infused with gel.

How I tested the Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress Topper

I slept on a king-sized Saatva Graphite Memory Foam Mattress for two weeks in February in Texas. There were a mix of cold and warm nights during that time, and while I generally sleep with a comforter and sheet, I had to forgo the comforter to sleep on this topper comfortably. Additionally, I had a friend sleep on the topper one night and provide me feedback.

Read more about how we test

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 review: A promising earbud let down by fit
6:43 pm | February 29, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Fitness Headphones Gadgets Health & Fitness | Tags: | Comments: Off

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: One minute review

The 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 use air conduction technology to get sound to your ears. They don’t sit in your ear canal, like most other true wireless earbuds, or cover your whole ear, like over-ear headphones. Instead they’re designed to hook around your ears, positioning little speakers above your ear canals.

The benefits of this open-ear design is that you can stay more aware of what’s going on around you, which is ideal for outdoor workouts or anyone who doesn’t want to feel cut off from their surroundings. Because no part of the design goes inside your ear, they’re also a good option for people who don’t like the intrusive design of other types of buds.

Other audio brands have been venturing into air conduction tech recently, including Bose, Shokz and JBL. But, as I’ll get to soon, keeping earphones in place when there’s nothing inside your ear is a challenge: the 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 won’t give the best earbuds a run for their money. It’s very difficult to get fantastic sound from this sort of design, but I was pleasantly surprised by their audio: it was clearer than I was expecting with some decent, but not powerful, bass. 

They’re built for workouts with some specs you’d expect from the best workout headphones, like an IPX7 rating, making them sweat-resistant, and an impressive listed 38 hours of battery. I got around 35 hours during testing, so this is quite representative. The 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 may sound like a decent set of earbuds, but they’re sadly let down by their fit: for me, they simply weren’t stable enough. 

It’s easy to see why there’d be a problem with this design as in-ear buds are “anchored” in place when they fit in your ear canal. 1More attempts to solve this problem both with earhooks and small silicone rings, which sit just outside of your ear canal. However, the earhooks didn’t bend enough and were oddly-shaped for my ear. This meant I never got a good fit on my left ear, the bud fell out several times, and although I managed to get a slightly better fit on my right ear, the bud still felt precarious the whole time – not ideal for earbuds built for fitness.

Some of these fit issues could have been down to the size and shape of my ears, but I asked a few other people to test them and several had similar problems. Issues with stability became even more apparent when I was wearing glasses, too, as the earhooks and glasses were competing for the same small space behind my ear.

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: Specifications

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: Price and availability

1More S50

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Cost $149.99 in the US
  • £149.99 in the UK 
  • Around AU$290

The 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 were released internationally in September 2023 and cost $149.99 / £149.99 / around AU$290. At the time of writing, they’ve been reduced on the 1More website to $99.99 / £104.99. We don’t know if this is a permanent discount or part of a limited deal. 

1More also makes the S30, and while these earbuds use the same air conduction tech and have a similar design, they’re cheaper and a step down in terms of specs. They only have an IPX5 water-resistant rating and a 30-hour battery, compared to the S50’s IPX7 rating and 38-hour battery. The S30 cost $69.99 / £69.99 but, like the S50, are currently reduced to $47.99 / £49.99.

To put the S50 into broader context, similar air conduction rivals, like the Shokz OpenFit, are more expensive at $179.95 / £179.99 / AU$289, although I did find the Shokz buds to be generally better and much easier to wear. The S50 are more similar in price to JBL’s air conduction offering, the Soundgear Sense, at $149.99/£129.99/AU$231. 

When comparing the 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 to sports earbuds more generally, you can often expect to pay more for buds at the top of their game, like the Beats Fit Pro at $199 / £199 / AU$299. Then again, plenty of the options in our best workout earbuds guide are much cheaper and perform significantly better than the 1More buds, like the JLab Go Air Sport at only $30 / £29 / AU$69.  

  • Value score: 3.5/5 

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: Design

1More S50

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Earhook design
  • Unstable fit
  • Looks nice and slickly designed

The 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 use air conduction technology to enable you to hear audio, which means there’s nothing in your ear canal. Instead, a speaker is just outside of it. So what keeps these buds in place is an earhook design that fits behind your ear and little silicone rings, which 1More calls “sound loops”, that rest just above the ear canal. There are three different sizes of these loops to choose from to get the best fit. Rival buds have a similar earhook, but we’ve not seen the sound loop-like design anywhere else yet.

I get the thinking behind the sound loops: they’re a way to keep the buds in place without putting anything in your ear, which means you’re still aware of your surroundings. But they defeat the point of open-ear buds a little for me, as they are still using something to block your ear, even if it’s not as intrusive as a bud in your ear canal. I much prefer the design of the Shokz OpenFit. 

But the reason the Shokz OpenFit work well without similar loops is that their earhooks are effective (albeit not perfect). Unfortunately, the 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 have earhooks that are too rigid and not as ergonomic – at least not for my ears. This meant I never achieved a snug or stable fit with the buds, especially in my left ear. This bud fell out even when I was just walking and not working out. 

I played with the earhook, adjusted the positioning, tried out all of the different loop sizes but had no luck. My best guess is that the distance between the bulk of the bud and the top of the earhook was just too big, so it actually fell down over the top of my ear. I did wonder whether this was a quirk of my ears and so enlisted a couple of friends and family members to see if they had similar problems. This was by no means an exhaustive test, but I found women with smaller frames had similar problems, either with one bud or both. 

There was another problem that affected the fit: glasses. Even with my right ear feeling stable, wearing glasses meant the arm of my glasses and the earhook were competing for space behind my ear. I could either lay the earhook down first and put my glasses arm on top, which meant my glasses were unstable and vision ever-so-slightly distorted or the other way around, which meant the buds were even more unstable. 

I opted to wear contact lenses for the rest of my testing, but some people won’t be able to. This also means wearing these buds and sunglasses could be an issue, which feels disappointing considering these are buds designed for outdoor workouts.

Despite these fit issues, these are a nice-looking pair of earbuds with a sleek design. I tested the silver version but, from what I can tell from online press shots, the darker grey shade is a little more appealing. The silver shade is nice, but does look a little cheap and plasticky. The same can be said about the charging case, which has a shiny cheap look about it. The charging case that comes with these buds is also big compared to the cases offered by competitors at 86 × 65 × 29.8 mm and weighing in at 63g (82.5g with the buds in). It could be slipped into a bag or a large pocket, but it’s not ideal for taking out on a run with minimal gear.

  • Design score: 2.5 / 5

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: Features

1More S50

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • IPX7 water-resistant rating
  • Air conduction for ambient awareness
  • Good battery life

These earbuds are durable with an IPX7 sweat-resistant rating. This means they should handle the most sweaty workout sessions, even splashes, light rain and, technically, an accidental dunk in water. However, we wouldn’t advise it – and best keep them out of the shower.

There’s some opportunity to change the audio with 12 EQ presets within the 1More app. It’s good to have this option, but I preferred the way the buds sounded out of the box. You can also use the app to customize some of the touch controls on the buds. These didn’t work well for me as I never got a stable fit, so touching them made it more unstable.

The 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 have what 1More calls its ‘PurePower Driver’ inside. The company says it has a diamond-like DLC diaphragm, which results in a 40% boost in power over conventional models. It’s not clear whether this means whether that’s over previous 1More models or rivals. There are also dual mics on each earbud for calls, and an AI algorithm promises to distinguish voices from background noises, helping block out any ambient sound when you’re on a call. 

In terms of battery, 1More promises up to 11 hours of battery life from the buds and 38 hours of battery life with the charging case. I found these figures to be accurate during testing. 

This is where the S50 really shine, bringing some of the best battery compared to rivals. For example, the Shokz OpenFit offer seven hours of battery life, and 28 hours from the case. And the JLab Go Air Sport (with an in-ear design) bring you eight hours with an additional 32 hours of battery life with the case.

  • Features score: 3.5/5

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: Performance

1More S50

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Decent sound
  • Only some leakage
  • Great for hearing your surroundings

One of the biggest benefits of these open-style buds is that you can hear what’s going on around you, especially traffic, loud conversations and music. I personally found this to be a better experience than simply using the “ambient awareness” or similar modes on ANC headphones and earbuds, which I always find difficult to process.

However, due to the build of these buds – with their positioning and the silicone sound loops – not all sounds were clear in my immediate environment and it was easy to get distracted by the audio. This means you’ll need to be careful, as you definitely can’t hear everything when you’re using them. Especially when the volume is loud, which is worth bearing in mind if you run next to roads.

As you’d expect from an open-ear design, there’s some sound leakage. But not as much as I anticipated, which makes the 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 a versatile proposition for wearing in a range of different environments – assuming you get a decent fit.

The S50 deliver a good but unremarkable sound. The audio is clear and there’s some decent bass and volume here too – again, two things I wasn’t expecting from the open-ear design. Push up the volume high on a bass-heavy track and things do start to sound a little muddied. Due to the style of these buds there’s also no real sense of immersion or an expansive soundstage. But then again, these buds were never going to be the best-sounding out there, you’d need to find a pair of the best ANC buds for a more polished experience. However, for me, the sound is perfect for providing a soundtrack to a walk or workout.  

  •  Performance score: 3.5/5 

Scorecard

1More Fit Open Earbuds S50: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested

I wore the 1More Fit Open Earbuds S50 most days over three weeks, and had the opportunity to test them in a range of different environments.

I used them while walking around the city and by the beach, running through the countryside and rollerblading. I took them to work at several coffee shops and the gym and wore them as I worked at home alone.

I also went on a trip to Rome whilst testing these buds, which gave me a good opportunity to use them in some different situations, like on a plane to listen to movies with my phone and in an airport to listen to podcasts and stay aware of flight announcements.

I paired them with an iPhone 14 Pro and mostly used Apple Music and Spotify streaming services to test them with music, as well as podcasts on Spotify and movies on Mubi.

I’ve tested many different headphones and earbuds over the past 12 years, especially those designed for fitness and active lifestyles. I like to find the devices that prioritize comfort and ease of use and flag up any new tech that feels more style over substance.

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush review: can this keep you and the planet clean?
1:30 pm | February 25, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Tags: | Comments: Off

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush: One minute review

The Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush tells you a lot about what it's aiming for right there in the name. However, there are other attributes to this powerful yet relatively affordable brush, that make it stand out from the many offerings now vying for your mouth space and the title of best electric toothbrush.

Primarily this is a company that prides itself on being sustainable, meaning it uses recyclable plant-based materials for the heads and bristles. But it also is designed with a simple aluminum frame that's made to be taken apart and fixed if necessary.

The company is so confident that you'll be pleased with what it offers that there is also a 100-day money-back guarantee – which applies to both the UK and US.

The brush is a sonic model, meaning it vibrates rather than oscillates. It also, quite uniquely, offers a carry case that features a UV-C light designed to give your brush head a bacteria-killing clean. A nifty feature that helps it compete even against the tech-crammed top-tier toothbrushes like the Oral-B iO Series 10 and the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean 9000.

Plus – and this is a tiny detail but shows the depth of thinking in design here – you get a sticky back magnet to attach to your bathroom mirror or wall, so the metal toothbrush can sit up and out of the way, keeping your sides clear and clean.

 

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush review: Price and availability

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush

(Image credit: Future)
  • Priced at $92 in the US 
  • £75 in the UK 
  • AU$145 in Australia

The Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush might not have been around for long, having launched in 2024, but it has been placed at such an ideal price point it is going to be appealing for a long time – especially if that price drops. It is available in the US, Canada, UK and Europe. It is currently priced at $92 / £75 / AU$145.

However, that is for the brush and charger alone, and if you want the case it will cost you extra. For the brush and UV case, the pricing is $116 / £95 / AU$185. The company says the brush is made to be easily repaired, so you shouldn't need another. Plus, if you do change up, Suri will recycle it all for free.

The heads are sustainable but are still going to wear down so you'll need to factor in replacement costs. A pack of three new heads will cost you $18.45 / £14.40 / AU$28. That includes fast and free shipping as part of the charge.

  • Value score: 4.5 / 5

Suri

(Image credit: Future)

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush review: Specifications

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush review: Design

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush

(Image credit: Future)
  • IP67 waterproof
  • Aluminium body
  • Sustainable, plant-based heads

When it comes to design, this is an area that Suri has worked on from the basics to the finished product with great attention to detail. This is because it had the goal of not only creating a great sonic toothbrush to compete with the big-name brands, but to do it all while remaining eco-conscious.

To do this, Suri used plant-based ingredients for its brush heads, from cornstarch and castor oil. These are shaped into a wave-shaped bristle pattern to take care of interdental cleaning. Plus the company will send these out with a return envelope so you can send them back for recycling.

The brush unit is made from an aluminum frame which lends it a solid and robust feel. The slender shape, thinner in depth than width, feels very comfortable in the hand and makes for a fine balance of weight, both in the hand and when standing up.

I found the included mount simple to set up, with a sticky back and magnetic front, yet it adds so much value. Stick it anywhere and your brush magnetically attaches – keeping your bathroom sides clutter-free and avoiding those black ring marks that most of the other brands leave on your bathroom sides.

The case is also worth shouting about as it not only charges the brush but also features a UV-C light to clean the head, but more on this in the features section. There is also an included puck-style charger base that plugs into a USB-style charging socket.

Suri has spent a lot of time and money refining the design of this toothbrush and it really comes across in the finish. Proof that sustainable and premium can be found in one sleek and sonic electric toothbrush-shaped package.

  • Design score: 5 / 5 

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush review: Features

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush

(Image credit: Future)
  • Impressive 40+ day battery
  • Fast charging
  • UV-C cleaning light

Competing against the already established electric toothbrush competition in the forms of Oral-B and Philips was always going to be a challenge. But one way to really bring it to them is to offer better battery life – something that everyone nowadays appreciates, as one less gadget to charge is a relief. That's why this brush's battery life, which extends to beyond 40 days of use, is a really appealing feature. And, as if that wasn't enough, it also charges to full in just four hours. 

The tricks keep helping this brush punch above the price point though, as that travel case is packing a UV-C light. This is a powerful light when it comes to cleaning as it will kill 99.9% of harmful bacteria in a single minute – a great feature especially when travelling. Plus the case charges the toothbrush, is sleek in its finish, and is minimal enough to take up very little room in a wash bag. 

Of course, that case is part of the higher priced package – but even having the option to leave that, if it's not for you, in favor of saving a bit of money, is a thoughtful option.

The brush head itself features that wave design for superior cleaning, while the back of the head has a rubberized pattern that can make for the now-standard tongue cleaning with just the right amount of abrasion. 

The main body is super minimal with a single button to power on and jump between modes. There are only two of these: Clean or Polish. The lack of modes sounds like a negative, but unless you need a softer mode for sensitive teeth, this can be more than enough. Since this is a sonic setup, it means you can go as gentle or hard as you need, so even the lack of a sensitive setting is probably an intentional choice from Suri.

There is a timer as standard, so you can get that recommended daily two minutes morning and night. This brush also features haptic feedback with vibrations at every 30 seconds so you have that guidance to move between dental zones – all pretty standard and expected of an electric brush at this price.

  • Features score: 4.5 / 5

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush review: Performance

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush

(Image credit: Future)
  • Super quiet operating
  • High-speed sonics at 33,000
  • Brilliant battery

One of the standout features of this toothbrush is just how quietly it runs, at a meagre 54 db. This is barely noticeable. When you compare to oscillating brushes or premium sonic options, this undercuts them quite considerably – ideal for late-night brushing when a partner, roommate or parent is within earshot.

The brushing performance is above average standard. This is thanks to a combination of that brush head with the wave-shaped bristles of varying lengths that get in between teeth, and those sonic vibrations. The brush will vibrate at 33,000 times per minute which is ideal as a way to break down plaque and clean teeth more effectively than a manual brush, although the lack of oscillation does mean it's not as comprehensive as some of the ultra-premium brushes. 

Usefully, when you switch up to Polish mode, you can feel the intensity increase, which allows you to put less pressure on while the brush does more of the work for you. This is useful for those who might struggle to maintain pressure for the full two minutes, or for anyone who wants to achieve a more effective clean without as much pressure on the brushing technique itself. 

That battery life is also worth another mention since it's so effective. A four-hour charge time is fantastic. You can easily pop this on in the morning and you're good to go for your evening brush – or even a lunchtime clean if you're that committed. Then having a solid 40 days of use means you don't need to think about battery life for a good month or more. 

Details like including the recycling packaging, to send heads back to the company, make it a more realistic process for most people, as does designing the brush to be easily repaired. This is potentially the last brush you need to buy for a very, very long time.

  • Performance score: 4/5 

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush: Scorecard

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush

(Image credit: Future)

Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested

I used the Suri Sustainable Sonic Toothbrush for weeks in order to test the effectiveness of the brush itself as well as that battery performance. I also visited the dentist during this time and was complemented on my cleaning efforts - reflecting well on this brush's performance.

I used the case for travel, over-night, as well as making use of the UV-C light cleaning feature. I mounted the magnetic holder to test its usefulness and was left surprised at how helpful this small addition was. 

My brushing was twice daily with that two-minute timer and haptic half-minute guidance vibrations used to get a full and fair brush.

I was also testing other brushes from Oral-B and more which allowed me to see the difference between features like extra modes, oscillations versus sonics, battery life, screes, apps and more.

Emma Premium topper review
11:12 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Mattresses Sleep | Comments: Off

Emma Premium topper: Two-minute review

The Emma Premium Mattress Topper is a chunky, 9cm-deep foam topper that promises to boost in-bed comfort without trapping heat. I slept on this topper for two weeks to see if it could deliver on those claims, as well as to judge how it compares to the rest of the best mattress toppers on the market. We rate Emma to be among the best mattress brands on the market (discover the reasons for this in our Emma mattress review and Emma NextGen Premium review), so I was excited to see how this topper performed in practice. 

Overall, I was impressed. While it isn't the right fit for me specifically, I believe it will be the ideal topper for certain groups of people. The two layers of foam deliver a plush, squashy feel that's great for lightweight people, some side sleepers, and anyone who is already a fan of a soft mattress. It's also thick enough to totally transform the feel of your existing bed. It's less well suited to heavier individuals and back or stomach sleepers, who (like me) might find the feel too soft, and lacking in support. 

Price is another potential sticking point; it's fluctuated quite dramatically while I've been testing and writing this review, although it has remained in the premium price bracket. The quality and the fact it's thick enough to transform your existing mattress go some way to justifying the higher price, but there are plenty of cheaper options for those on a budget. Read on for my full Emma Premium Topper review. 

Emma Premium Topper

(Image credit: Future)

Emma Premium Topper review: Design

  • Thick, 9cm depth topper with two different layers of foams
  • Polyester cover can be removed and washed at 40C
  • No straps or elasticated skirt to keep the topper in place

The Emma Premium Topper has a generous depth of 9cm. Unless your current mattress is pancake thin, it will probably require the purchase of extra-deep sheets. I added it to a 28cm mattress, with the topper taking things to slightly comical heights (I almost had to hop up into bed, and I'm not a short person).  

Inside, you'll find two layers of foam: a thinner top layer of ThermoSync foam and a thicker bottom level of comfort foam. The uppermost foam is infused with graphite, to aid with temperature regulation (it also features in Emma's cooling mattress, which you can read about that in our Emma Luxe Cooling mattress review). 

Emma Premium Topper zipped open to show foams inside

(Image credit: Future)

The cover is made from 98 per cent polyester and 2 per cent elastane, and it can be removed using the zip and washed at 40C – which isn't quite hot enough to kill off dust mites, but still helpful if you're prone to spillages. The cover isn't suitable for tumble drying, bleaching or ironing. I'd still be tempted to add one of the best mattress protectors, for even easier cleaning. 

The base is made from a textured, slightly plasticky material. The topper is described as being flippable, but I'm pretty sure that's an error – I certainly wouldn't want to sleep on that base fabric. Although it's no good for lying on, the textured surface feels nice and durable, and does a good job of keeping the topper in place on the bed. This is good news, since there are no straps or other method of attaching it to your bed.

Emma Premium Topper, pulled up to show grippy base fabric

(Image credit: Future)

During my review, I topped it with a mattress protector with an elasticated skirt, and used a fitted sheet. All that, combined with the grippy base, kept the topper in place effectively. It all felt secure, and I never once had to reposition it during the two-week test period. I'm not sure how well it would fare just with a flat sheet, though. 

The Emma Premium Topper is available in UK single, small double, double, king, and super king sizes. At the time of writing, there's one other topper in the Emma range – the Flip Topper, which is thinner at 6cm and can be flipped to give a softer or firmer feel. It's also very pleasing to say out loud. 

Emma Premium Topper review: Price & value for money

  • Sits in the premium price bracket; price has fluctuated
  • At maximum price, almost as expensive as a full mattress
  • Thickness and quality of materials somewhat justifies higher pricing

Since I started writing this review, the Emma Premium Topper's pricing has changed quite considerably. At time of my original draft, a double cost £330, but by the time I was ready to publish, this had shot up to £419. Our premium price bracket for toppers is anything above £200 for a double, so it's definitely a pricey option. There are regular Emma mattress sales, but the toppers aren't usually discounted.

At time of publishing, here are the RRPs for the main sizes:

  • Single: £289
  • Small double: £349
  • Double: £419
  • King: £459
  • Super king: £509

The topper is thick enough to justify being in that premium bracket; it feels very well made, and it will totally change the feel of your bed. However, I'm not sure it's worth over £400. Some of today's best cheap mattresses cost less than that – in fact, a double Emma Original mattress is only slightly pricier.

Emma Premium Topper review: Comfort & performance

  • Squishy, sink-in, contouring feel
  • Thick, so will make your sleep surface feel unstable 
  • Best for side sleepers and those who love a soft mattress

Emma's Premium Topper has a plush, squishy feel, and that softness is enhanced as a result of its thickness. The Emma brand is known for making some of the best memory foam mattresses around, and you're getting some of that magic here. The foam contours gently around the sleeper's joints, gently cushioning and relieving pressure. 

Although the feel of a topper will be affected by what's beneath it, because this one is so thick, it has a pretty transformative effect. It's chunky enough to mask any lumps and bumps in an existing mattress – and if your bed is far too firm, then it will sort that right out, too. 

Emma Premium Topper with reviewer lying on it

(Image credit: Future)

I'm 5ft 8in tall, of average build, and typically go to sleep on my back but switch to my side in the night. I found this topper too soft to lie on for long periods on my back, as my hips sank too far in and left my back unsupported. It was more comfortable when lying on my side.

That all makes sense: the best mattresses for side sleepers are often a little softer, to prevent pressure from building up in the hip and shoulder while continuing to keep the spine aligned; back and stomach sleepers need something firmer, however, to maintain that neutral spinal position. 

Some memory foams have a "quicksand" feel, where they're slow to respond to changes in pressure. That's not really the case here – if I press on the surface and remove my hand, it springs back quickly, and I'm not left with an outline of a handprint in the surface. However, the softness of the foam layers and the overall thickness of the topper mean that the sleep surface can feel a bit unstable, making it slightly tricky to change position.

Emma Premium Topper with weight resting on it to show sinkage

(Image credit: Future)

I would be wary of recommending this topper to heavier individuals, since I often felt that I wasn't quite supported enough. This lead to aches and pains in the morning – maybe the result of shifting about on that slightly unstable surface, perhaps ending up twisting in a sub-optimal sleep position. However, if you're of lighter body weight, or generally just know you get on well with a softer mattress, then this plush topper may prove perfect for you. 

Note, too, that the softness and thickness of the topper is particularly noticeable around the edges. Many mattresses come with edge reinforcements; that's never really a feature on a topper, with most shallow enough not to matter. If you need a sturdy edge to push up off when rising in the morning, you might get on better with a thinner or firmer topper. 

Close up of cover fabric on Emma Premium Topper

(Image credit: Future)

A common issue with memory foam is that it can cling on to body heat, but I'm pleased to report that I didn't have any problems with the Emma Premium Topper running hot. I found it warmed to a neutral body temperature and stayed that way. I will add the caveat that during testing it was about the coldest overnight temperatures ever seen in my part of England – around -1C, or sometimes colder – so not the best conditions in which to test this properly. Even with that considered, I think the cooling properties of this topper are solid.

Emma Premium Topper review: Customer experience

  • Free delivery and returns, 100-night trial and 10-year guarantee
  • Vacuum-packed and rolled for delivery, but still heavy to move

The Emma Premium Topper arrived rolled and vacuum-packed in plastic, and in a box. I was surprised at how big and heavy it was. Many would be right to assume that a topper will be very portable; but at 9cm thick, it adds up to quite a volume of foam (I tested a double size).

Sometimes, foam bed-in-a-box mattresses give off an odour known as off-gassing when released from their wrappings. While harmless, it can be unpleasant. However, there was no reason for concern here: if I stuck my nose right into it, there was a faint "new mattress" smell, but nothing overpowering. Note that experiences can vary from person to person, even with the same product.

The trial period is generous at 100 nights. That's in line with the shortest full mattress trial periods.

Emma Premium Topper specs

Should I buy the Emma Premium Topper?

Buy it if...

✅ You want your mattress to be much softer: This topper is thick, and plush. You could probably lie it on a concrete floor and happily sleep on it.

You're a lightweight side sleeper: This level of squishiness is best suited to side sleepers and those of light body weight. When lying on your side, the foam contours around your joints and prevents pressure building up in the shoulder. 

You have a bumpy old mattress: At 9cm thick, the Emma Premium Topper is deep enough to mask all manner of ills beneath it. 

Don't buy it if...

You lie on your back or stomach: This topper is likely to be too soft for most back or stomach sleepers, especially if they're on the heavier side. Generally, those positions require a medium-firm or firm feeling bed to keep the spine properly supported. 

❌ You have mobility problems: The depth and plushness of the Emma Premium Topper means it will make your mattress super squishy, as a result making it difficult to change position. It will also make the edges of your bed softer and less supportive, which might be an issue if you like to sit on the edge of the bed or use it to push up off when getting up in the morning. 

You already have a deep mattress: At 9cm thick, this is one deep topper. Add it to an already thick mattress (such as mine) and your bed quickly starts to look ridiculous. You'll need deep sheets to cover both the topper and your mattress – and, depending on how tall you are and the height of your frame, you genuinely might have to end up having to hop into bed each night.

How I tested the Emma Premium Topper

I slept slept on the Emma Premium Topper every night for two weeks. I added it to a Brook + Wilde Elite mattress (firm feel) and used a thin mattress protector and fitted sheet, along with a duvet and cotton bedding. It was winter during my review period, and very cold overnight – temperatures dipped to -1C on occasion. The temperature in my flat was pretty warm, however. 

Read more about how we test

Garmin Forerunner 165 hands-on review: the more affordable Forerunner hits its stride early
3:04 pm | February 20, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Smartwatches | Tags: | Comments: Off

Garmin Forerunner 165: One minute review

The Garmin Forerunner 165 fills a necessary gap in its best running watches line. The very cheap Garmin Forerunner 45 and 55 watches are getting quite old, and the next stage up, the Garmin Forerunner 265 and Garmin Forerunner 965 watches, are much more expensive. So it’s nice to have an option in between those, even though we’d like to see a cheaper Forerunner 65 appear eventually. 

Starting at $299.99 / £249.99 (with Australia pricing TBC), the Forerunner 165 is a middle-ground option that retains a lot of what makes the premium Forerunners really good training companions. It’s got the AMOLED touchscreen, the ace Morning Report feature introduced in last year’s Garmin Forerunner 955, and Nap Detection as introduced in the Garmin Venu 3. 

You can also create Courses in the Garmin Connect app and sync them directly to the watch, and you get race-adaptive training plans, which suggest workouts based on historic exercise and recovery data. The design, meanwhile, is very reminiscent of the Forerunner 265, right down to the profile and the redesigned ‘run’ button. The whole thing is very appealing, especially at a reduced price point, offering genuine value in terms of features. 

In order to achieve this, Garmin has made a few small sacrifices, such as using chemically strengthened glass for the screen instead of the 265’s stronger Gorilla Glass. The battery is a bit smaller than the 265's, and the watch has 4GB of storage instead of 8GB. It’s also missing a few features, such as the very useful Training Readiness score evolution of Garmin’s Body Battery feature, multi-band GPS (a big loss for a running watch) and compatibility with cycling power meters. 

Garmin Forerunner 165: Price and availability

Garmin Forerunner 165

(Image credit: Future)
  • $299.99 / £249.99 / AU$ TBC
  • In comparison, the Forerunner 265 is $449 / £429 / AU$770
  • Music version costs extra

The Garmin Forerunner 165 is available now, priced at $299.99 / £249.99 / AU TBC. It’s good value, considering the 265 is much more expensive at $449 / £429 / AU$770. The older 255 is available for considerably less than the 265 these days, but you don’t get the Training Readiness score, nicer AMOLED screen or redesigned chassis. 

The Garmin Forerunner 165 Music, which allows you to download and store songs and playlists from Spotify, Deezer, and Amazon Music, costs $349.99 / £289.99.

Garmin Forerunner 165: Design

Garmin Forerunner 165

(Image credit: Matt Evans)
  • Similar chassis as the 265
  • Light and attractive 
  • Bright screen

As mentioned, the Garmin Forerunner 165 shares a lot of DNA with the other Forerunners in the range. The classic Garmin five-button configuration is here, with the three buttons on the right-hand side used to navigate up and down, or wake the watch’s screen when its motion detector isn’t active. On the left are two more buttons: a start/stop button (labelled ‘run’ on the Forerunner series) and a back button for cancelling options or manually marking laps during a workout. It’s a tried and tested formula at this point, and Garmin isn't reinventing the wheel here. 

The 1.2-inch AMOLED display is just as vibrant and bright as it is on the premium Epix Pro, which costs more than three times as much. However, Garmins are still training tools first and smartwatches second, and as such the 165 doesn’t have the smooth refresh rate that you might expect from, for example, the best Apple Watches. Nor does it have a more expensive-feeling metal backing: it’s all plastic and silicone, with the exception of the chemically-strengthened glass screen. There's no durable but pricey Gorilla Glass here, which is one of the sacrifices made to keep the Forerunner 165 at a cheaper price point. Still, it’s light and comfortable on my wrist, and it looks and feels good. 

The user experience is the same as with most modern Garmin watches, with their list of widgets which you can easily navigate using either the touchscreen or the five-button system. It’s easily customizable, allowing you to add or reorder widgets as you see fit from Garmin’s library to tailor the watch to your own training style. 

Garmin Connect is also one of the most comprehensive companion apps in the business, with a complex design that does require scratching the surface a little, revealing a wealth of depth and potential to elevate your training. I’ll go into this more in the Features section, but nothing’s changed here: if you liked the way previous Garmin watches operate, you’ll like this watch. 

Garmin Forerunner 165: Features

Garmin Forerunner 165

(Image credit: Future)
  • Wrist-based running power
  • Morning report and Garmin Coach are great additions
  • No multi-band GPS or Training Readiness score

Garmin has added a lot of features here that I wasn’t necessarily expecting at this price point, such as wrist-based running power. ‘Power’ is an alternative method of calculating your effort that represents the total energy you’re able to put out, not just how fast your heart is beating or estimating how many calories you’ve burned. You used to need a specialist runner’s power meter measure this, as you can do for cycling, but Garmin has cracked the ability to show this number from your wrist. 

Other features include the very useful Morning Report, which tells you how well-recovered you are and recommends a workout based on this stat; Course creation; and Garmin Coach, which can generate basic training plans depending on your goals. However, there's no Training Readiness score, which more accurately tells you how well you've recovered from your last workout, and this omission casts initial doubts on the accuracy of the Morning Report. 

Another feature sorely missed here is multi-band GPS, which would have ensured greater accuracy when measuring speed and distance on runs. GPS is Garmin’s great selling point, so not providing the best is a missed opportunity, even at this price point. 

However, at this lower cost, those interested in buying the Forerunner 165 are probably enthusiast runners who don’t care about pinpoint accuracy, and just want a good estimation. If that’s you, the loss of multi-band shouldn’t worry you too much, and the 165 is still shaping up to be a great running watch.

You do have to pay a premium for the Music version, which allows you to listen to your playlists by connecting your headphones to the watch directly, without using your phone. The Music version also offers guided workouts and performance alerts right from your watch to your headphones, which is very useful for adjusting your pace en route. 

Garmin Forerunner 165: Early verdict

Garmin's latest running watch is shaping up to be a good buy. There's not much new here to critique in terms of the metrics Garmin is offering, and it is a little bit light and feels "toyish" thanks to the use of plastic instead of the tougher polymer used on more premium watches. However, it doesn't feel flimsy, and for under $300 / £250, it's a great way to grab a Forerunner at a reasonable price. 

At present, I can see it being outdone by rivals such as the Coros Pace 3, which is also a plastic watch that's full of advanced features at a similar price point, but I can’t wait to dive into testing the GPS, advanced running features and battery life to measure it against that standard.

Leesa Studio mattress review
12:00 pm | February 19, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Mattresses Sleep | Comments: Off

Leesa Studio mattress: two-minute review

Leesa is a major player in online mattress retailers. The Leesa Studio mattress is its most affordable option, and has a simple design: it's 10 inches tall and contains three layers of different foams. I slept on a king size Studio for three weeks, as well as running a series of tests, to see how it compares to the rest of the best mattresses on the market. 

Many customer reviews rate the mattress as a moderately firm feel, and I agree – it's around an 8 out of 10 on firmness. Although the mattress begins with a top layer of memory foam, don't expect to sink in and have your body enveloped in the foam. There is some contouring, but when I press down on the mattress with my hand, the mattress snaps back into form in about a half second. 

Not to say that it's like sleeping on the floor – it's still comfortable – but having tested several mattresses over the years from brands like Purple, GhostBed, Saatva, Brooklyn Bedding and others, this is the firmest mattress I've experienced. I found that sleeping on my side on this mattress led to a build-up of pressure in my shoulder, and I expect that will be the case for most side-sleepers.

However, the firmer feel makes it a great choice for those who sleep on their back and stomach, and it might also work well for those suffering from back pain. For context, I used to be a stomach sleeper, but eventually had to switch to sleeping on my side due to lower back pain. When I laid on my stomach for extended periods of time on the Leesa Studio, I didn't experience any of that familiar pain. For me, it's amongst the best mattresses for back pain.

There are a couple of caveats to that. Because it's fairly thin, it probably won't suit those who weigh over 200lbs, and I also had issues with it running warm. If you're a naturally hot sleeper, the Studio won't work for you. Read on for my full Leesa Studio mattress review. 

Leesa Studio mattress review: price & value for money

  • The cheapest Leesa mattress, and lower mid-range overall
  • Rarely sold at MSRP – expect 25% off
  • Free pillows usually bundled in

The Studio is the cheapest mattress in the Leesa range, but it sits in the lower-mid range price bracket overall. That's based on the regular discounts, because you'll never really pay full MSRP at Leesa. Expect around 25 per cent off, with two free pillows. Here's the pricing for the main sizes when you buy direct from Leesa:

  • Twin size: MSRP $549 (usually sold at $412)
  • Full size: MSRP $699 (usually sold at $524)
  • Queen size: MSRP $799 (usually sold at $599)
  • King size: MSRP $999 (usually sold at $749)

We'd always recommend buying direct from the brand wherever possible, to make customer service easier. However, the Studio is also available via the Leesa Amazon store. Pricing will usually be the same but it's worth double-checking before you buy, to make sure you're not missing a bargain.

All-foam mattresses tend to be the most affordable mattress type, which means there's tough competition in this price bracket. The top two models in our best memory foam mattress ranking both generally cost around $699 for the queen size. Read about those in our Nectar mattress review and Cocoon Chill mattress review

Mattress sales happen all year round, but many brands increase their discounts around national holidays. Particularly good times to shop include the Presidents' Day mattress sales in February, the Memorial Day mattress sales in May, the 4th of July mattress sales, the Labor Day mattress sales in September, and of course the Black Friday mattress deals at the end of November.

Leesa Studio mattress

(Image credit: Leesa)

Leesa Studio mattress review: design & materials

  • 10-inch tall memory foam mattress with three layers of foam 
  • Lightweight for a mattress, king weighs only 83lbs 
  • Cover has a zip but shouldn't be removed; no handles

The design of the Leesa Studio is simple but effective. Inside of the soft, removable mattress cover is three layers of foam. At 10 inches tall, it's on the thinner side, and also pretty lightweight. The king-sized mattress that I tested only weighs 83lbs. For reference, a king-size Purple mattress weighs 120lbs. So, if you ever need to move the mattress from one bedroom to another, or from one home to another, it won't be too heavy to deal with. 

Exploded diagram showing internal layers of Leesa Studio mattress

(Image credit: Leesa)

All three layers of foam are CertiPUR-US certified. This means the foam was tested by a third-party to ensure that no harmful chemicals are present in the foam and that it meets durability standards to last the lifetime of the mattress. Inside of the mattress cover begins with a 1.5 inch layer of memory foam. This layer is designed to provide a sink-in contouring feeling. Below the initial memory foam is another 1.5 inch layer of responsive foam. This is an airy foam designed to help dissipate heat and keep you cool during your sleep. 

Close up of the corner of the Leesa Studio mattress

(Image credit: Future)

Finally, a 4-inch layer of base foam provides the support for the mattress. Essentially this provides firmness and stability, so you don't simply sink through the top layers into the platform, which wouldn't be comfortable at all.

The look of the cover is recognizable, clean, and modern, making it look appealing standing alone on laundry days when it's time to wash bedding. There is a zipper, so you could take the cover off, but Leesa doesn't recommend it. Adding one of the best mattress protectors is always a good idea, anyway. Overall, it's a simple bed design that's lightweight and easy to move around, even though the mattress doesn't have any handles.

  • Design score: 4 out of 5

Leesa Studio mattress review: comfort & support

  • Most comfortable on back or stomach sleeping positions
  • Light sink in, returns back to form in about half a second 
  • May be too firm for side sleepers

When you scroll through the purchased views on Leesa's website, virtually the only complaint about the mattress is that it is more firm than people expected. I can say that's exactly what my wife and I experienced after sleeping on the bed for a few weeks. I would rate the firmness an 8 out of 10. Leesa rates the mattress as a medium/moderately firm mattress, which is about on-par with my assessment, and the assessment of many customers. Compared to the mattress we were previously sleeping on – a pillow-top, spring mattress – the Studio is a much firmer feel, and it took a few nights for our bodies to adjust.

When I placed a 25lb weight and in the middle of the bed, it sank in roughly 1.5-inches. The mattress returns to form about a half second after the weight is removed. I had two others try out the mattress, and they, like me, reported a responsive feel with minimal sink and just a tiny bit of contouring. 

Leesa Studio with weight on it to show sinkage

(Image credit: Future)

I weigh about 155lbs and I used to sleep on my stomach, but with my old mattress, I had to switch to my side because stomach sleeping was causing lower back pain. When I lie on my side for too long on the Leesa Studio, I wake up with a sore shoulder. My wife, who is much smaller than me, has the same issue; both of us have noticed that even if we fall asleep on our sides on this mattress, we end up on our backs by the time we wake up. A third member of my testing panel, who weighs just north of 200lbs, also found the mattress to be too firm, and lacking in pressure relief, especially when they laid on their side.

The best mattresses for side sleepers tend to be a bit softer, and often come with higher levels of contouring, to prevent pressure building up in the shoulder. The Leesa Studio doesn't offer enough contouring for most side sleepers.

Leesa Studio mattress with reviewer sleeping on his side on it

(Image credit: Future)

However, it's pretty well suited to back and stomach sleepers. Generally, these positions require a medium-firm or firm mattress, to keep the sleeper's back supported and prevent the pelvis from dropping too far into the surface and putting strain on the spine. 

Even though I generally try and avoid rolling onto my stomach because of my back, while testing the Leesa Studio mattress I found myself getting comfortable again on my stomach, and without back pain. On my old mattress, when I would lay on my stomach, I could feel my back starting to bark within a couple minutes. On the Leesa Studio, there is plenty of lower back support to keep your lower back/stomach from sinking in and causing pressure that leads to discomfort or pain. (If you like the sound of a sturdy sleep surface and want to see what else is out there, our best firm mattress guide rounds up our favorite options.)

Leesa Studio mattress review: performance

  • Does not dissipate heat well 
  • Negates some motion transfer
  • Slightly more sink on edge compared to center

I slept on the Leesa Studio mattress for three weeks during the coldest month of the year in northern Utah (January), with lows in the teens (Fahrenheit). During this time, I tested the mattress following TechRadar's mattress testing methodology. Read on to find out how this mattress performed.

Temperature regulation

I am a hot sleeper and my wife is a cold sleeper; I go to bed in gym shorts while she is fully clothed in bed. I found, even in the dead of northern Utah's coldest month, that I was getting hot at night. My wife did as well, saying that she didn't feel the need to 'layer up' before she went to bed anymore. 

Leesa Studio mattress with hand resting on it

(Image credit: Future)

In short, this bed is not ideal for heat dissipation. Living in a dry climate that is especially cold right now, it makes me skeptical that I would be comfortable come summertime on this mattress. 

  • Temperature regulation score: 2 out of 5

Motion isolation

One of my biggest complaints about my normal mattress, which is a spring mattress, is motion transfer. Our 50 pound dog sleeps with us (don't judge me), and I can feel every micro-adjustment he makes in the bed. The Leesa Studio all but eliminates that problem. My wife also mentioned she no longer feels when I get up to go to the bathroom in the middle of the night. 

Leesa Studio mattress with weight and cup, showing motion transfer testing

(Image credit: Future)

For an objective idea of how well this mattress isolates motion, I used a travel mug and dropped a 25lb weight from about 6 inches onto the mattress at varying distances away from the mug to measure motion transfer. Once the weight was about 9 inches away from the mug, the mug stopped falling over. 

  • Motion isolation score: 4.5 out of 5

Edge support

Edge support is important for those who have trouble getting in and out of bed. A mattress that doesn't have proper edge support will be more difficult to climb in and out of – you might feel as though the bed is sinking and you're sliding out.

Leesa Studio with weight on it to show edge sinkage

(Image credit: Future)

I placed my 25lb weight on the edge of the bed to measure the sinkage. Remember, the middle of the bed recorded roughly 1.5 inches of sinkage. On the edge of the bed, the sinkage recorded was closer to 2 inches. When I sat on the edges of the bed I felt myself slightly sliding out of the bed. I do still feel supported – the bed isn't collapsing under my weight – but there is definitely a bit more give. When I lay on the edge of the mattress, I don't feel any sensations of rolling off. Edge sleepers shouldn't be concerned about rolling out of bed, and getting in and out of bed wasn't difficult, although there was a little more give than expected. 

  • Edge support score: 3.5 out of 5

Leesa Studio mattress review: customer experience

  • Free standard delivery to doorstep
  • In-home setup and old mattress removal available for a fee
  • Standard 100 day free trial and 10 year limited warranty 

You can request at checkout in-home delivery and old mattress removal. In-home delivery and setup costs an extra $159, while adding old mattress removal bumps it up to $199. All you need to do is ensure the bedding is removed from your old bed and the delivery company will either donate or dispose of the mattress sustainably.

Without those add-ons, the Leesa Studio arrived on my front doorstep rolled up, wrapped in plastic and boxed. Since the king mattress is lightweight and only weighs 83lbs, it was quick and easy for two people to move the mattress to the bed.

Leesa Studio mattress wrapped in plastic, vacuum-packed, on bed frame

(Image credit: Future)

Once the mattress was on the bed, I unrolled several layers of plastic and the mattress started to expand even before all of the plastic was fully removed. The mattress seemed to be fully expanded after only 10 minutes or so. Once fully expanded, there is a slight plastic-like smell, but that smell was mostly masked by the fitted sheet, and completely unnoticeable after a day or two.

Leesa Studio mattress in reviewer's bedroom

(Image credit: Future)

Leesa offers a 100-day trial period and a 10 year limited warranty on the Leesa Studio. This is considered industry standard in terms of trials and warranties (some brands, like Nectar, are more generous, and give you a full year's trial and forever warranty). In order to be eligible for a return, you must have the mattress for at least 30 days, but no longer than 100. Leesa will encourage you to donate the mattress to a charity, but if that is not an option, you can call its return phone number and begin the return process. There are no fees associated with returns unless you live in Alaska or Hawaii, in which a $100 return fee is included.

  • Customer service score: 4 out of 5

Leesa Studio mattress specs

Leesa Studio mattress: other reviews

When it comes to customer reviews, the majority of the people are pleased with the purchase. You'll find a lot of 'best night sleep ever' from a number of user reviews on Amazon or Leesa's website. 

As I alluded to previously, the user reviews on the Leesa website provide an overall 4.2 star rating based on 58 reviews. The main culprit of complaints is the firmness of the mattress. Many users claim that it's firmer than the 'medium firm' rating provided by Leesa. Even users who left positive, four-star ratings leave comments noting the firmness of the mattress. 

At time of writing (Feb 2024), the mattress had received a 4.4 out of 5 star average rating on Amazon. Again, many of the most common complaints are about the firmness of the mattress, or if you are heavier than 200lbs, the mattress may not be supportive enough. I also found other reviews that mentioned the mattress being ideal for users under 200lbs. I did also find a few mentions of users accounting for the mattress sleeping hot. I had a similar experience, as noted above, and it appears other users second those experiences.

Leesa Studio mattress in reviewer's bedroom

(Image credit: Future)

Should you buy the Leesa Studio mattress?

Buy it if...

✅ You're a back / stomach sleeper: The firm (8 out of 10) feel makes this a good choice for those who like to lie on their back or stomach. These positions require a sturdier feel, to keep the pelvis supported and ensure 

You suffer from back pain: While my usual, softer mattress can aggravate my  lower back pain when lying on my stomach, I didn't have that issue when testing out the Leesa Studio. I think that's down to the firmer, more supportive feel. 

You're a cold sleeper: Heat retention is often considered a bad thing with mattresses, but my wife – who is a cold sleeper – found the fact that this mattress retains body heat was a benefit. It meant she didn't need to bundle up at night.

You share a bed: The Studio does a good job of absorbing movements on its surface, which makes it a strong choice for bed-sharers, especially if they're easily disturbed at night. 

Don't buy it if...

❌ You are a hot sleeper: If you're searching for a mattress to help keep you cool at night, the Leesa Studio may not be for you. I found it ran warm at night. TechRadar's best cooling mattress guide has plenty of alternative options – the top rated one is the Purple mattress, which I also tested and was the coolest mattress I've ever slept on. 

You are a heavier (200lbs+) person: There are many user reviews across the web that mention that this bed isn't supportive enough for heavier individuals. Something like the DreamCloud Hybrid mattress might be a better choice, or if you weight 250lbs or more, consider something built especially for bigger bodies – TechRadar's guide to the best mattresses for heavy people has our top picks.  

You are a side sleeper: Everyone who slept on the Studio for this review has issues with pressure building up in their shoulder when lying on their side. Something more contouring, such as the Nectar Memory Foam mattress, will be a better fit for most side sleepers. 

How I tested the Leesa Studio mattress

I slept on the Leesa Studio mattress for three weeks during the coldest month of the year in northern Utah. Utah has a dry climate and during my testing, the lows were in the teens with highs in the 30s (fahrenheit). I used our normal bedding, which for us, consists of a mattress cover and comforter (my wife nor I sleep under a sheet). The bed was occupied every night by me, my wife, and our three-year-old, 50lb Aussiedoodle. 

Standardized testing included sinkage testing, where I placed a 25 pound weight in the middle of the bed and measured how much the mattress sunk. For edge support, I placed the same weight on the edge and end of the bed and measured how much the mattress sunk. For motion transfer, I placed a travel mug on the bed and dropped the 25 pound weight from varying distances to see how well the mattress eliminates motion transfer.

Read more about how we test

  • First reviewed: Feb 2024
Naturepedic Adagio Organic Latex Mattress Topper review
4:00 pm | February 17, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Mattresses Sleep | Comments: Off

Adagio Latex Mattress Topper: two-minute review

The Naturepedic Adagio 2" Organic Latex Mattress Topper is a foam mattress topper that adds softness to your existing mattress. Even a good quality, supportive mattress isn’t always as soft and comfortable as one would like, so a plush mattress topper can add a great deal of comfort. This one isn’t cheap, starting at $499 for a twin size, but I found it to be one of the best mattress toppers you can buy. I had a 'wow' moment the first time I laid down on it.

The Adagio is basically a two-inch thick rectangle of foam encased in fabric that sits on top of a mattress, and it's a fantastic way to turn a too-firm mattress into a softer one, relieve pressure points, and maybe even improve your sleep.

The Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)

I tested it for a week. I sleep primarily on my side, but I also sleep on my back and spend a lot of time reading in bed on my back as well. My husband helped me test this mattress topper, and he’s mostly a stomach sleeper. The Adagio feels plush to the touch, and is designed specifically to relieve pressure points. In my testing, I found that it really does the job.

I’d recommend this for anyone with a medium to firm mattress that wants to add a bit of softness, regardless of sleep position. The latex foam doesn’t trap heat, it just adds gentle, pillowy cushioning to your mattress. Additionally, its materials are certified organic by the Global Organic Textile Standard and are sourced from reputable certified suppliers. This ensures purity, fair labor practices, and support for rubber tree forests.

Naturepedic Adagio Topper review: design & materials

  • Made from organic rubber tree sap latex
  • Cover is made from organic cotton stretch knit fabric
  • No skirt or straps to hold it in place

The Adagio is made from organic latex sourced from rubber tree sap. It has holes throughout that keep it from trapping body heat. This latex is approved by GOTS, the Global Organic Textile Standard, for use in certified organic mattresses. It’s also sourced from reputable certified suppliers, ensuring fair labor practices, product purity, and protection for rubber tree forests.

A hand holding the edge of the Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)

The cover is a soft, stretchy, organic knit cotton fabric. The materials combine to make an extraordinarily soft and comfortable sleeping experience. However, even if you could fit this sizable topper into your washing machine, it is not washable at all. You can only spot clean it.

One thing worth noting is that the Adagio topper simply sits on top of your mattress, without any skirt or straps to hold it in place. While I didn't have any problems with the topper sliding out of place during my review period, it feels likely that over longer periods of time you'll like have to adjust it back into place, particularly if you or your partner tend to move around a lot in the night.

Naturepedic Adagio Topper

(Image credit: Naturepedic)

Naturepedic Adagio Latex Mattress Topper review: price & value for money

  • Premium mattress topper
  • Prices range from $499 (Twin) to $849 (King)
  • Not always discounted

With prices starting at $499 for a twin and going all the way up to $849 for a king size, the Naturepedic Adagio is certainly a premium mattress topper. Here's what it costs at MSRP:

  • Twin: $499
  • Twin XL: $549
  • Full: $649
  • Queen: $749
  • King: $849
  • Cal king: $849

$749 for a queen size topper is a lot of money; you'll pay less than that for some of the best mattresses. Naturepedic often runs 20%-off deals, which means entering a coupon code at the checkout. It's not hugely intuitive and it means you might assume that there's no discount on the Adagio, but I've just checked and it's currently possible to get 20% off, bringing the price of a queen to a more palatable $599.20. 

You can certainly save money choosing a cheaper mattress topper. The Puffy Deluxe Mattress Topper is TechRadar's top pick, and it starts at just $179 for a Twin, which still puts it in the luxury category but it’s substantially cheaper than the Naturepedic Adagio. Our reviewer noted how well it conformed to and cradled her joints in all sleeping positions but noted that it sleeps hot. 

If you’re looking for more options, the Turmerry Latex Mattress Topper comes in three different thicknesses and four levels of firmness. It starts at just $150 for a twin, so it’s a more affordable option. Another alternative is the Avocado Organic Latex Mattress Topper; it's 2.75" deep and comes in firm and plush options, and at MSRP a queen size is $100 cheaper than the Adagio.

Naturepedic Adagio Mattress Topper review: comfort & performance

  • Very soft feel
  • Excellent pressure relief
  • Body heat dissipates easily

The Naturepedic Adagio 2” Organic Latex Mattress Topper is soft, and intended to be used over a medium to firm mattress. It’s not adjustable at all, it just is what it is. My mattress is firm with a pillow top, which is pretty comfortable on its own, but this Adagio adds a whole other level of cloud-like softness and pressure point relief. Neither my husband nor I are big people, we both found that this added a great deal of comfort to our mattress.

A person lying on the Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)

I usually sleep on my side, but sometimes sleep on my back. I also spend a great deal of time reading in bed, on my back. With just a mattress, I often feel some pressure in my hip area in both of those positions. The Adagio topper eliminated that completely. My husband is a stomach sleeper, and he felt supported and quite comfortable as well.

Naturepedic mentions on its website that the Adagio mattress topper 'sleeps cool'. While I didn’t notice any cooling sensation, I didn’t notice it trapping body heat, either. As a woman in midlife, I’m quite sensitive to anything that can trap heat, and I didn’t have any such issues with this topper.

A hand pressing down on the Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)

I found it very comfortable to sleep on, temperature-wise; for me it remained temperature neutral all night long. My husband also tends to sleep hot, and he had no issues either. I used nothing but a microfiber fitted sheet between me and the Adagio topper, plus a flat sheet and light quilt over me. I tested the topper during the winter, with the interior thermostat set on 68 degrees.

Naturepedic Adagio Mattress Topper review: customer experience

  • Free delivery and returns, 100-night trial and 10-year warranty
  • Heavy but otherwise easy to set up
  • No noticeable off-gassing smell

The Adagio topper comes with free shipping in 1-3 business days within the continental US. When mine arrived it was so heavy that I had to enlist the help of another person to bring it into my home and upstairs to my bedroom. The topper was rolled and vacuum-packed with several layers of plastic, and packed in a large box. Once unpacked, it was easy enough to remove the plastic and unroll it onto my mattress. This took just a few minutes but there was quite a bit of cardboard and plastic to dispose of. 

Image 1 of 4

The Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 4

The Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 4

Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 4

Naturepedic Adagio 2

(Image credit: Future)

Once unrolled, it took only a few more minutes for the topper to regain its full shape and thickness. There was no noticeable off-gassing smell, and the topper was ready to use virtually right away.

As well as free delivery, the Naturepedic Adagio topper comes with a 100-night sleep trial, giving you plenty of time to judge whether it's the right addition to your mattress. Naturepedic also offers free returns, and the Adagio comes with a 10-year limited warranty for additional peace of mind.

Naturepedic Adagio Mattress Topper specs

Should you buy the Naturepedic Adagio Topper?

Buy it if...

Your mattress is too firm:  If you’re looking for a plush layer of softness to relieve pressure points, I’d recommend the Naturepedic Adagio for you. Whether you’re a side, stomach, or back sleeper, this topper adds a layer of comfort between you and your mattress.

You sleep hot at night: The Naturepedic Adagio isn't a specifically cooling topper, but it's temperature-neutral and unlike memory foam, its latex won't trap heat and it features holes throughout to enhance airflow.

You want to buy organic: The Adagio's stretch-knit cover is made with organic cotton, while its organic latex is GOTS-approved and sourced from reputable certified suppliers, making this topper a strong ethical choice.

Don't buy it if...

You're on a tight budget: Even with a discount this is an expensive topper, and while many will happily pay for its luxurious feel, there are cheaper options available. The Turmerry Organic Latex topper is more basic but offers a similar feel for a much lower price.

You're a clean freak: If you want the ability to wash your mattress topper, the spot clean-only Adagio isn't for you. Consider instead the Tempur-Adapt mattress topper: a soft and supportive premium topper that's incredibly comfortable and also boast a washable cover.

You move about a lot in the night: Nocturnal wrigglers are likely to find that the Naturepedic Adagio doesn't stay put for very long, because it sits on top of your mattress with nothing to hold it down. The Saatva Foam mattress topper will transform the feel of your bed in a similar way, and features hefty straps to keep it secure.

How I tested the Naturepedic Adagio 2" Organic Latex Mattress Topper

I tested the Naturepedic Adagio 2" Organic Latex Mattress Topper on a firm mattress with a pillow top, over the course of a week in winter, with the thermostat set on 68 degrees Fahrenheit. I slept on it in on my side and on my back, while my husband tested it while sleeping on his stomach.

Circular Ring Slim review: A slender, unspectacular smart ring
8:46 pm | February 12, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Comments: Off

Circular Ring Slim: One minute review

The Circular Ring Slim is a smart ring packed with sensors. It’s designed to be worn 24/7 and collects data about your heart rate, breathing, temperature, SpO2 levels, sleep, steps and more. Unlike other smart rings, it has a vibrate function too, enabling you to set alarms. Think of it as a fitness tracker designed to collect data from your finger, rather than your wrist.

Data collected is presented as scores and charts in the accompanying app. Over time, the app will get to know you better and present information about your health and fitness and also make recommendations, such as the best time to eat and when you should avoid blue light in the evenings. 

Right now, there are several similar devices available, such as the Oura (generation 3) ring and the Ultrahuman Ring Air, which we’ve reviewed in our guide to the best smart rings. The smart ring market is set for a serious shake-up with Samsung’s smart ring, the Samsung Galaxy Ring, officially on its way, and no doubt there will be others. However, they’re not easy devices to make, and in my opinion I don’t believe they’re a suitable option for most people. In fact, I’d recommend sticking with one of the best fitness trackers – at least for now. 

On paper, the Circular Ring Slim offers everything it needs to compete with rival brands. It looks and feels decent, collects a variety of data, and offers genuinely useful insights. But in practice, the Circular Ring Slim needs improving. The exterior scratches easily, battery life is disappointing, and the app is confusing – especially with regards to the journey it takes users on, and the way in which instructions and insights are worded. 

Circular could easily fix some of these problems; indeed, it wouldn’t take much to make the app more user-friendly. Circular is also working on improving the exterior of future versions of the ring, making it more resilient to scratches. However, the battery is a major issue, running out of juice in just two days and, at times, reducing performance as it did. Sure, some might already have become accustomed to charging their wearable devices more regularly – I’m looking at you, Apple Watch – but for a health tracker without a screen that’s designed to be worn 24/7, two days doesn’t feel sufficient.

I applaud Circular's solid effort with the Ring Slim – a more basic and affordable version of the brand’s Ring Pro. However, read on for a more in-depth review of the Circular Ring Slim, and to discover the reasons I think its rivals are ahead, delivering more appealing, wearable devices and an overall better experience.  

CIrcular Ring Slim: Specifications

CIrcular Ring Slim: Price and availability

Circular Ring Slim

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Costs $264 (about £209 / AU$405)
  • Released in early 2024 in batches

The Circular Ring Slim costs $264 (about £209/AU$405) and ships internationally. Released in early 2024, Circular has been taking pre-orders in batches. At the time of writing, it’s out of stock on the Circular website, but the brand promises a new drop soon.

One of the main features that sets the Circular Ring Slim apart from one of its key competitors, the Oura ring, is that the device doesn’t require a subscription. So if you’re looking to test the waters, then this is probably a better option than investing in a model that requires you to pay out on a monthly basis. 

Also competing for your attention in this space is the Ultrahuman Ring Air. Like the Circular Ring Slim, this model doesn’t follow a subscription model either and is therefore a more direct rival to the Circular smart ring. At the time of writing, it costs $349 (about £276 / AU$536). It’s more expensive, then, but it does beat the Ring Slim in almost every way, especially with regards to battery life and app experience – although be aware that it’s just as prone to picking up scratches.

Circular also offers the more expensive Circular Ring Pro, which at $364 (about £288 / AU$559) positions itself against the Ultrahuman Ring Air, but we haven’t had a chance to put that to the test yet. 

Compared to the two of its biggest rivals, the Circular Ring Slim is cheaper then; but this doesn’t necessarily make it better value. It's also worth mentioning that you can collect much of the same data from a more affordable fitness tracker, such as the Fitbit Luxe at only $109.95 / £109.99 / AU$199.95. Sure, the Fitbit form factor might not be as fun or exciting, but as you’ll learn throughout the rest of this review, it’s probably far more reliable and a better option for the majority of people.  

  • Value score: 3.5 / 5

Circular Ring Slim: Design

Circular Ring Slim

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Slim and comfy
  • Scratches easily
  • White logo cheapens the design

Circular says that the Ring Slim is made from aluminium and carbon fibre on the exterior and an unspecified medical-grade, non-allergenic and non-metallic material on the inside. 

With an IPX8 rating, the Ring Slim is water-resistant to a point; it can handle being submerged in 1.5 meters of water for 30 minutes. This means it should be fine for hand washing and showering, but I wouldn’t risk wearing it while swimming, and Circular says it isn’t recommended for wear in the sea, either. While this rating won’t be an issue for most people, given that smart rings are designed for active people and all-day wear, it’s worth bearing in mind for those who swim regularly.

At 2.2mm thick and weighing 2g, the Ring Slim is available in 8 sizes, from US 6 to US 13 – and you can get your hands on a sizing kit to ensure you get the right fit. Circular states on its website that the Ring Slim is the “thinnest” tracker – but its only 0.2mm slimmer than the Ultrahuman Ring Air, and in a side-by-side comparison (see photo below), this isn’t noticeable. Note, too, that while the majority of the ring is super slim, the section where the sensors sit is quite chunky.

Circular Ring Slim

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)

Nevertheless, the Circular Ring Slim is comfortable to wear. I wore it for most of the day over six weeks and didn’t really notice it on my finger. The interior is smooth enough not to irritate or pinch, and the ring is incredibly lightweight. 

However, it doesn’t have the hypoallergenic epoxy resin coating of the Ultrahuman Ring Air; wearing both models together for a week did point to the Ring Air being slightly ahead for comfort. Regardless, considering most will be unlikely to have both to compare, they’ll be more than happy with how the Ring Slim feels on the finger.

The matte black finish looks super slick when you first take the Ring Slim out of the box. However, following just a couple of days of wear, the ring was already showing mild scratching on the surface and around the edges (see the photo below). This isn’t unexpected; I had similar issues with the Ultrahuman Ring Air. However, considering I took many precautions to ensure this wouldn’t happen – namely removing the ring when I had to grip anything at the gym – it’s a shame the ring showed wear and tear so easily. 

I spoke to Circular’s PR team, who said: “They [Circular] are aware that the first batch of rings are a bit more prone to getting scratched, but they have worked on it to improve that for the next batch of Ring Slim.” Let’s hope Circular’s future offerings of the Ring Slim also include different finishes because I think matte black is a tricky finish for this kind of wearable.

The little white Circular logo is an unexpected design choice on the Ring Slim. This presumably ensures you have the ring on the right way round, with the sensors on the inside of your finger to ensure accurate data collection while the logo is positioned on the outside. 

In my opinion, the white logo cheapens the look of the ring – and it’s confusing given that it doesn’t appear on all of the images of the smart ring in Circular’s promo material, either. In fact, when I shared an image of the Circular Ring Slim on my Instagram Stories when it first arrived, I had a concerned customer who had pre-ordered a ring get in touch, who hadn’t seen the white logo before and didn’t like it. Proof that I’m not the only one who thinks the white logo isn’t in keeping with the rest of the Ring Slim’s design.

  • Design score: 3.5 / 5

Circular Ring Slim: Features

Circular Ring Slim

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Real-time measurements
  • Packed with sensors
  • Kira assistant makes smart recommendations

The Circular Ring Slim does come packed with sensors, which it uses to track and collect data about you through the day and night. You can also take real-time readings, including heart rate, heart rate variability, SpO2 and activity intensity. Compared to the Ultrahuman Ring Air and my Apple Watch, I found these to be accurate. 

One unique part of the Circular Ring Slim offering is that it can vibrate. Surprisingly, I didn’t use this feature much during testing, even though I found it quite a cool addition. It makes me wonder whether this sort of tech without a screen should just be “passive”, a set-it-and-forget-it kind of tracker, without all the bells and whistles. Something in-between – a smart ring with vibrations, for example – felt different and unnecessary. Although, I’m aware this is likely to come down to personal preference. Plus, when I did try out the vibrating feature as an alarm to wake me up in the morning, it worked well. 

Another feature that makes the Ring Slim stand out is what Circular calls Kira. This is branded as an “AI assistant” that learns more about you over time to then offer personalized insights. However, this isn’t explained particularly well; you’re simply told that for 14 days the ring is calibrating. 

Of course, I understand the reasons for having a calibration period, but Circular has made this process unnecessarily confusing. Insights were thin on the ground until the 14-day period was over, and during that time, I was expected to answer some very long and convoluted questions. With clearer explanations and simpler questions, it would have felt less like I was trying to solve a riddle.

Importantly, once the calibration period had passed, the insights delivered were genuinely useful. They included suggestions such as the best time to eat dinner each day, and when you should avoid exposing yourself to blue light. 

  • Features score: 3.5 / 5 

Circular Ring Slim: Performance

Circular Ring Slim

(Image credit: Becca Caddy)
  • Confusing app
  • Syncing issues
  • Only 2 days of battery

In terms of data collection, the Circular Ring Slim performed well, collecting information about heart rate, breathing, temperature, SpO2 levels, sleep, steps and plenty more. 

For example, you’ll get a detailed breakdown of your sleep stages, your heart rate overnight and temperature, too. You’ll also get cardio scores when you work out based on your heart rate and VO2 data, but you can’t track specific exercises. Although disappointing, this is standard with smart rings. In addition, considering I was taking the ring off at the gym anyway to avoid it becoming scratched, I didn’t think I missed out. I'd need a separate device for that.

Data collection is mostly accurate and in keeping with other trackers, such as the Ultrahuman Ring Air and the Apple Watch that I wear all the time. This is good to know, since I have been under the impression that smart rings need to be worn quite specifically and don’t collect data accurately; but the Circular Ring Slim did a decent job. 

The one area where it struggled at times was sleep. Over the majority of nights, the data the smart ring collected was accurate and useful. However, any disturbances in the night appeared to throw it off. For example, there have been occasions where I’ve woken up at night around 4am for 15-20 minutes. I usually have some water, read, and ease myself back to sleep, regularly catching at least another couple of hours or so of sleep. However, several times, the Circular Ring Slim assumed I was up for the rest of the day from 4am and didn’t track me returning to sleep. 

Several big issues affected the daily wear and use of the Circular Ring Slim, too. The one that let down the device, and me, most was battery life. Note here that the ring features two battery modes. There’s Eco, which offers infrequent heart rate tracking but no sleep insights. You’ll get just under five days from the Ring Slim in that mode before it will need a top up. Then there’s Performance mode, which tracks everything, including sleep stages. In this mode, the ring lasted only two days before needing a charge.

You might believe that having a choice of two modes is desirable; however, I’m not convinced that anyone who purchases a smart ring for $264 would ever be happy with it running the bare minimum of features. If you are someone who might be satisfied with that, I suggest opting for a cheaper fitness tracker instead. Also consider that rival models are offering significantly longer on a single charge, with the Ultrahuman Ring Air lasting six days and the Oura Ring (Generation 3) lasting up to 7 days.

In my own experience, in Eco I spent a lot of time worrying about the battery life and when exactly I’d charge the ring, which affected my overall experience. Often I’d choose to charge it overnight, but this meant missing out on collecting sleep data. While charging every two days might be standard practice for a tracker with a bright screen like the Apple Watch, for example, I’d want more from a smart ring.

Setting up the ring was relatively easy, but I did experience issues with syncing during testing. This tended to happen in the morning, especially if the battery was low; I experienced two instances where my sleep data didn’t sync and failed to do so for the rest of the day.

The Circular Ring Slim’s app presents you with all of the data the ring collects in circles at the top of the home screen, providing quick access to the stats you might want to see the most, such as sleep analysis and energy analysis – a little like the “readiness” score you get from other trackers. I like how these circles work, but I encountered lots of other issues with the app that made it frustrating to use. It presents a cluttered design, navigation can be clunky, and in some areas the convoluted copy requires an overhaul.

For example, I hit a step goal one day, and the app told me I had won coins. That was accompanied by the question: “What could this possibly mean?” – which already sounds a little strange. Add to this that there was no option to click through nor actually an explanation of what it does mean. On having a decent night’s sleep, the app reported the experience as “correct” – which, again, is a strange way to describe sleep. And I’ve already mentioned the super wordy, long questions asked during the setup process.

These are just a few examples of many that made the app experience poor; hardly the premium wellness experience to compete with the likes of Oura. In fact, on a personal note it would probably dissuade me from looking at my data. Luckily, this could be a relatively easy fix for Circular, with the brand simply paying more attention to understanding the journey users will take through the app and a copy overhaul.

  • Performance score: 3 / 5 

Scorecard

Circular Ring Slim: Should you buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested

I tested the Circular Ring Slim for six weeks with an iPhone 14 Pro. I wore it while walking, working out at the gym, working remotely from a library, and then travelling to Italy for 10 days. This gave me a great opportunity to put it to the test outside my regular routine. 

I’ve also been reviewing tech for more than 12 years, with a particular focus on wearable and fitness tech.

Purple NewDay mattress review: Purple Grid magic, on a budget
5:00 pm | February 4, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness Mattresses Sleep | Tags: | Comments: Off

Purple NewDay mattress mattress review: two-minute review

The Purple NewDay mattress is the brand's most affordable mattress, and delivers comfort and support that more than justifies its upper mid-range price tag. I tested a queen-sized Purple NewDay mattress for three weeks, and as someone who loves a super-supportive mattress, I thoroughly enjoyed sleeping on it. I'd rate it a 7.5 out of 10 on the firmness scale, or medium- firm, and would enthusiastically recommend it to back and stomach sleepers.

A lot of the positive features of this mattress can be attributed to the GelFlex Grid. This layer of GelFlex polymer appears in all of Purple's mattresses, and assists not only with comfort but also temperature regulation and motion isolation capabilities. I've tested a number of mattresses, and this was the first one that made me cold at night, which makes it the ideal buy for hot sleepers. Through motion isolation tests, it was clear that the Purple NewDay absorbs movements very efficiently, too.

The outlines of the grid can be felt through the cover, which gives this mattress an unusual feel, but I didn't find it bothersome in any way. Compared to the original model (which you can read about in detail in our Purple Original Mattress review) you're losing a layer of comfort foam, which does mean this mattress has a lower- than-usual profile, at just eight inches thick.

That shallower design does mean that when I sat near the perimeter of the mattress, I sank to the bedframe. It could also could also have potential drawbacks for those with larger bodies. If either of those things are issues for you, you'll need to stump up for one of the thicker Purple models.

Read on to see the results of my testing and my nightly experience sleeping on the Purple NewDay mattress.

Purple NewDay mattress review: design

  • Eight-inch tall mattress with GelFlex polymer grid layer
  • Base foam layer and foam perimeter to bolster edge support
  • Breathable cover, can be removed but spot-clean only

The Purple NewDay mattress is constructed in the US with hypoallergenic and non-toxic materials that are CertiPUR-US and Clean Air GOLD certified. It's the cheapest and simplest adult mattress in the brand's range – it stands just eight inches tall, which is thin (most mattresses we recommend are a minimum of 10 inches). The other thing to note is that there's a relatively limited range of sizes: just twin, full, queen and king. 

The design starts with a breathable cover that can be removed, but not machine-washed. It's suitable for spot-cleaning with mild detergent only, so you'll likely want to add one of the best mattress protectors

exploded diagram showing internal layers of Purple NewDay mattress

(Image credit: Purple)

The next layer is perhaps the most interesting – a two-inch GelFlex grid. Purple patented this bouncy gridded layer made of GelFlex polymer, and it appears in all of the brand's mattresses. The open structure of the Grid means this layer won't hold on to body heat, keeping you cool at night. The outlines of the grid can be felt through the top cover. Running around the perimeter of the Grid is a foam border, designed to bolster the edge support. 

The last layer is a 6-inch base layer made of polyurethane foam, which maintains the mattress' structural integrity while also providing some support to the GelFlex grid.

Inside the NewDay (left) compared to the Purple Original (center) and Purple Plus (left)

(Left to right) Inside the NewDay, compared to the Purple Original and Purple Plus (Image credit: Purple)

The NewDay is the cheapest of three Essential mattresses at Purple, sitting beneath the Purple Original and Purple Plus. All have a similar design, but as you move up the range, the mattresses get thicker and extra foam layers are added. If you want something more decadent, Purple also has a couple of pricier, fancier ranges: the Restore Hybrid Collection and the Rejuvenate Luxe Collection.

  • Design score: 4 out of 5

Purple NewDay mattress review: Price & value for money

  • Purple's cheapest mattress
  • Upper-mid range at MSRP, sometimes discounted into mid-range
  • Delivers comfort and quality above its price point

The Purple NewDay mattress is the brand's most affordable mattress. Even so, it's an upper mid-range mattress on the wider market, so don't mistake it as a budget mattress by any means. Here are the prices for each size:

  • Twin size: MSRP $695 (sometimes discounted to ~$495)
  • Full size: MSRP $1,199 (sometimes discounted to ~$799)
  • Queen size: MSRP $1,299 (sometimes discounted to ~$999)
  • King size: MSRP $1,599 (sometimes discounted to ~$1,349)

This isn't one of those brands that runs perpetual sales, but if you time it right you can snag a discount – Purple mattress sales run semi-regularly, and can knock up to $400 off, although the discounts tend to vary by size. 

Good times to shop include the Presidents' Day mattress sales in February, the Memorial Day mattress sales in May, the 4th of July mattress sales, the Labor Day mattress sales in September, and of course the Black Friday mattress deals in late November. 

As simple as the design is, I was impressed with the quality of the materials, the feel of the mattress, and how it held up to testing. I think you get what you pay for, if not more, for a decent price when you buy the Purple NewDay.

However, if you're not fixed on the Purple brand's unique feel, then there are plenty of other options in this price bracket, many of which are thicker, with more complex designs and more generous extras. 

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Purple NewDay mattress review: comfort & support

  • Medium-firm sleep surface keeps your body elevated
  • Back and stomach sleepers provided significant support
  • Softens somewhat in the first three weeks

Despite Purple labeling it as 'firm', I think the Purple NewDay mattress is best described as medium-firm and supportive. I'd rate it about a 7.5 out of 10 on the firmness scale, with 10 being rock-solid. Upon first touching the mattress, I was surprised that I could feel the faint outlines of the GelFlex Grid. I could even feel it when lying on the mattress. It did not bother me as I slept.  

The Purple NewDay is a springy mattress that supported my body completely, almost to the point that I felt like I was floating on top of the mattress. Although the NewDay has a medium-firm feel, it is not a hard mattress, and softly contours around my body in a soothing way.

Weight resting on Purple NewDay mattress

(Image credit: Future)

A 15lb dumbbell only sunk half an inch when I placed it in the center. When I removed the weight, the mattress sprung back immediately – don't expect the sink-in feel you'll get with many of the best memory foam mattresses

The Purple NewDay is best suited to back and stomach sleepers. I am 5'5" and 170lbs, and I couldn't sleep on my side the first week that I tested the mattress as my hips didn't sink enough to allow my spine to be aligned (for this reason, the best mattresses for side sleepers tend to be medium or medium-firm). However, over the next two weeks, the mattress softened enough that I could at least fall asleep on my side, though I usually awoke on my back.

Member of testing panel lying on her stomach on Purple NewDay mattress

(Image credit: Future)

A friend who is about 5' 2" and weighs 100lbs also slept on the mattress. She settled onto her back and fell asleep immediately, not waking once in the middle of the night. She also felt the GelFlex Grid and judged the firmness level to be a 7 out of 10. Interestingly, she found sleeping on her side felt equally as comfortable as sleeping on her back. 

Member of testing panel lying on her side on Purple NewDay mattress

(Image credit: Future)

While I believe that the mattress will support some people with larger bodies, I'm inclined to say that because it's only eight inches thick that there might be some who will not find it thick enough to support them completely. See my feedback in the customer reviews section to understand what I mean. 

Purple NewDay mattress review: performance

  • Superb cooling properties that might make you cold
  • Edge support is good but could be better if the mattress was taller
  • Motion isolation exceeds most on the market

To ensure buyers have a full idea of what the Purple NewDay mattress has to offer, I made sure to assess the mattress' temperature regulation, motion isolation capabilities, and the edge support. In addition to running multiple objective tests, I used my own experience sleeping on the mattress, and a friend's feedback, to offer an in-depth overview of what you can expect. Keep reading to learn more about how I got on.

Temperature regulation

I wasn't expecting this mattress to be as cool to the touch as it was. I tested the Purple NewDay in the middle of winter and some nights were so cold that I added more blankets atop the comforter and sheets. I never once got hot. 

Reviewer's hand resting on Purple NewDay mattress

(Image credit: Future)

In fact, the mattress was so cool, I felt it through the sheets, the mattress protector, and my clothes (which were often thick hoodies and sweatpants). This is the only mattress I've tested that has made me cold, and that's likely due to the GelFlex Grid which dissipated my body heat superbly. I'd rate it amongst the best cooling mattresses around.

  • Temperature regulation score: 5 out of 5

Motion isolation

I tested the motion isolation of the Purple NewDay mattress by placing an empty wine glass in the center of the bed. No matter if I dropped a 15lb dumbbell four, 10, or 25 inches away, the wine glass never tipped over. It only wobbled slightly. 

Purple NewDay mattress with weight and wine glass in center

(Image credit: Future)

I also had a friend help with testing by having her get in and out of bed and moving from her stomach to her back. I couldn't feel her move at all. The NewDay will do a fantastic job at isolating motion, no matter how much your partner moves as you sleep.

  • Motion isolation score: 5 out of 5

Edge support

I assumed that the Purple NewDay mattress would have fantastic edge support because the edges are reinforced with support foam. At first, this seemed to be true, – when I placed a 15lb dumbbell along the perimeter, it only sank half an inch. (On most mattresses, it sinks an inch.) However, when I sat on the edges or the end of the mattress, I sank to the bed frame.

Purple NewDay mattress with weight resting on edge

(Image credit: Future)

If the mattress had been thicker – say 10 to 12 inches rather than eight inches tall – that probably would not have happened. Did it make getting in and out of bed more difficult? No. Do I fear slipping off the bed when sleeping? Not at all. But does it knock my opinion of the edge support from perfect to 'good?' Unfortunately, yes.

  • Edge support score: 4 out of 5

Purple NewDay mattress review: customer experience

  • Mattress delivered vacuum-packed, rolled and in a reusable plastic bag
  • Free delivery; no white glove delivery option for this Purple mattress
  • 100-night trial with free returns

All the mattresses I've tested have arrived rolled and vacuum-packed in a cardboard box. The Purple NewDay mattress, however, came in a purple plastic bag with handles. It was raining the day the mattress arrived, so I was glad the mattress wasn't in a cardboard box, as it might have soaked through. I reused the shipping bag by storing my Christmas tree, which I'd just taken down, in the bag.

There are instructions inside the purple bag that inform you exactly which side of the package to place to the right of the foot of your bed, so that when you pull out the mattress, it'll be in the correct position to unfurl. The instructions said to use the provided cutting tool to remove the plastic wrap around the mattress, but my package lacked one.

Use the arrow icons to scroll through the unpacking photos.

Image 1 of 6

Purple NewDay mattress, vacuum-packed and rolled in a reusable plastic bag

The mattress arrived in a reusable plastic bag with handles (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 6

Purple NewDay mattress instructions plus two free sleep masks

I received two free eye masks (Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 6

Purple NewDay mattress unboxing instructions

Purple provides clear unpacking instructions (Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 6

Purple NewDay mattress vacuum-packed and rolled

The vacuum-packed mattress on my frame, ready to release from its wrappings (Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 6

Purple NewDay mattress unrolled on the bed frame

The NewDay unrolled but still vacuum-sealed (Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 6

Corner of the Purple NewDay mattress as it starts to expand

How the NewDay looked when first released from its wrappings (Image credit: Future)

The mattress unfurled without any off-gassing smells. It took about five hours for the mattress to fully expand and fill out the cover at the corners of the bed, but I was still able to sleep on the mattress on the first night after delivery. 

Buyers receive a 100-night free trial and free returns, as long as they sleep on it for 21 days. A typical 10-year warranty comes with the mattress, too. I should add that shipping is free, however, white glove delivery is not available for this particular Purple mattress.

  • Customer service score: 4 out of 5

Purple NewDay mattress specs

Purple NewDay mattress review: Other reviews

  • 3.8 out of 5-star rating from over 40 reviews (January 2024)
  • Praise for comfort and support
  • Complaints that it's too firm and not thick enough

The Purple NewDay mattress has 40 reviews and a 3.8 out of 5-star rating (at the time of writing this review, January 2024). All 40 reviews are in relation to the Purple NewDay mattress and can be searched through by keyword and star rating. Even more impressive, they can be filtered by categories like 'Best For', 'Preferred Sleep Style', 'Body Type', and 'Size'.

All the reviewers agree – whether they praise or dislike the mattress – that the Purple NewDay is a firm mattress. Most people found the firmness level comfortable and supportive, although there were some who prefer a softer mattress than this one.

Member of testing panel sat on Purple NewDay mattress

(Image credit: Future)

Most people wrote general comments about how much they enjoyed the NewDay and slept better on it than their previous mattresses. Some reviewers were specific in their praise, particularly in how cool the mattress was and its motion isolation capabilities.

There were a few complaints that the mattress was not thick enough by people with larger bodies. For instance, someone that weighed over 300lbs mentioned that their body touched the bed frame when they laid on the mattress. That said, when I compared the reviews of people with larger body sizes, I discovered that the reviews were pretty evenly split in terms of those who liked and disliked the mattress. Generally, if you weigh over 250lbs, you might want to consider investing in a specialist model – we have plenty of recommendations in our guide to the best mattresses for bigger bodies.

Should you buy the Purple NewDay mattress?

Buy it if...

✅ You like to sleep on your back or stomach: This medium-firm mattress will support your hips and lower back no matter if you lie face up or down.

You easily get hot at night: The Purple NewDay is not only cool to the touch, but it regulated my temperature even when I wore sweats to bed under three blankets, one comforter, and microfiber sheets.

You don't want anyone to disturb your sleep at night: The Purple NewDay exceeds most mattresses in terms of motion isolation capabilities. Trust me when I say that you're going to enjoy uninterrupted sleep despite your fidgety partner.

Don't buy it if...

❌ You like a softer mattress: Among the Purple Essential Collection of mattresses, the Purple NewDay mattress is the firmest. If you want a soft, cloud-like mattress – for example, if you're a side sleeper and/or light in body weight – this might not be the best choice for you. 

You prefer taller mattresses: At only eight inches tall, the Purple NewDay mattress is a thin mattress. If you don't like sinking to the bed frame when you sit on the edge, go for the 11-inch-tall Purple Plus Mattress.

You usually sleep on your side: Although this mattress did soften over the course of my testing, it wasn't soft enough to make sleeping on my side the most comfortable.

How I tested the Purple NewDay mattress

For three weeks in December and January, I tested a queen-sized Purple NewDay mattress. At the beginning of the testing period, temperatures were in the high 60s and the low 30s Fahrenheit, but by the end, it had gotten much cooler with temperatures between 20- and 55-degrees Fahrenheit. Some nights it was lower than that. Microfiber sheets and a lightweight comforter covered the bed, though on particularly cold nights, I added a few more blankets. My best friend also slept on the mattress one night, so I considered her feedback, on top of my own, and the standardized tests I ran to assess all of the mattress' features including motion isolation, comfort, and edge support.

Read more about how we test

  • First reviewed: January 2024
Strava is still the best training app for runners and cyclists, but it’s getting expensive
4:41 pm | January 31, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Comments: Off

Strava: One-minute review

Did a workout even happen if it's not logged on Strava? We've been using the smartphone app to track weekly miles since it launched in 2009. Yes, there have been periods in my life where I haven't run at all – just before this review, for example. But when I am ready to pound the pavements again, I find it hard to imagine not using Strava.

Strava is part-fitness app and part-social platform. You can record and review activities, then share them with friends for "Kudos" (similar to giving a "like" on other media platforms). Run, Bike, Hike is the app's motto, but there's support for over 50 activities, including kayaking, swimming – great for triathletes – and yoga.

You can track activities using the GPS on your iPhone or Android device and get time, distance, route, estimated calories, and elevation. But using Strava on the best fitness tracker or the best running watches (all the major brands are compatible) elevates the experience, allows you to go phone-free, and can add more metrics for a full picture of your workout intensity. 

The service is brand-agnostic, and I record from my Apple Watch 8, a budget Garmin Forerunner 45, and my iPhone 15 Pro, depending on the context. Each device provides a seamless experience, and the app's interface allows you to set up and start recording in moments.

The Strava app open on an iPhone 15 Pro

The Strava app can effectively turn your smartphone into a cycling or running computer (Image credit: Lauren Scott)

According to Strava's Year In Sport Trend Report, more than 10 billion activities were shared on the app in 2023. There's more to Strava than recording, though; it's about celebrating movement and creating community through your favorite sports. By connecting with friends and colleagues who also use it, I've become part of a small but consistently encouraging group that will cheerlead my activities – even the slow ones.

And there's the metrics element. In the modern world, we usually rely on data to improve performance, and Strava can provide this in spades after a workout. How much you can access depends on your plan; if you just want to log your distances and interact with friends, the free version gives you the basics. 

Strava has come under fire for its huge price hikes in the last year, and it's a shame to see features like maps, routes, and monthly progress stats behind a subscriber paywall. The app has some competition from alternatives like Nike Run Club and Runkeeper (owned by Asics). But are these a better proposition?

I think Strava is still one the best fitness apps for runners, cyclists, and adventurers, with a blend of statistics and a social community that's hard to beat. But is it the best for you? And is the subscription worth it in 2024?

Note: I'm reviewing the Strava iOS app using an iPhone 15 Pro, which is also available on Android. I've used both the Premium and Free plans.

Strava: Specifications

Strava: Price and availability

The features you get with a free or paid version of Strava

As of January 2024, the features you get with a free or subscription version of Strava (Image credit: Strava)
  • Subscription: $11.99/£8.99 per month
  • $79.99/£54.99 billed yearly
  • Free version available

Strava is free to download, and free to use forever if you want to. But you'll get limited features without a subscription. In January 2023, Strava announced that it was moving to consistent subscription pricing by country, and the current cost is $11.99/£8.99 monthly or $79.99/£54.99 annually.

A 30-day try-before-you-buy option gives you full access to training logs, segment competitions, maps, and more. It's easy to cancel the free trial before the month is up if you don't think these are worth paying for.

There's been a lot of negative press about Strava's rising subscription cost, but it's in the same ballpark as the fitness apps Fitbit Premium ($79.99 / £79.99 per year) and Fiit Unlimited ($9.99 / £9.99 per month).

By comparison, Runkeeper charges $39.99 / £39.99 per year or $9.99 / £11.99 per month for its premium features like live tracking, and progress insights over time. That's half the annual price of Strava in the US, but more per month in the UK. As its name suggests, Runkeeper is an app built mainly with runners in mind, and the activity types it supports are more limited than Strava.

Athletes, competitive runners, and cyclists who are serious about planning routes and improving their performance over time will benefit from subscribing to Strava. If you're training for a specific event or goal, I'd recommend paying monthly until you no longer need the extra features.

  • Value score: 4/5

Strava: Design and UX

The maps feature of the Strava app open on an iPhone 15 Pro

(Image credit: Lauren Scott)
  • Clean but utilitarian aesthetic
  • Small text during navigation
  • Route-making fiddly on a phone

On the whole, Strava is intuitive to use and navigate around. At the top, you'll find a plus symbol for adding a post, photo, or manual activity, a search function to find friends or clubs, and messages and notifications icons on the right. So far, so simple. I do find it fiddly to build a route, but you can log into the desktop app to do this with far more control.

The app is made up of shades of white and gray – a clean and minimalist look with orange accents to highlight your tab selection. The UX designers have done a good job at packing a lot of information onto the screen, but at times the text can be very small. Again, rely on the desktop version if you need to dig deep into stats on a big screen.

Before a workout, I don't want anything to put me off going. Thankfully, the Strava interface is easy to navigate, and you can start tracking with just a few taps. To start a session, you go to the record section, choose a sport, and press start. On my Apple Watch 8, I tap on the Strava app and tap Outdoor Run. Both approaches take seconds. 

Once an activity has started recording, the time, average split pace, and distance are big and bold on your phone screen – so you can scan them while you're pacing along. Toggling the map button hides these numbers and brings up your location, which is helpful if you're exploring somewhere you haven't been before. And when you're at the end of your adventure, the big orange stop button is easy to find.

  • Design score: 4/5

Strava: Features

Image 1 of 2

Screenshots from the Strava app

As a subscriber, I get analysis on each activity, and suggested exercise routes (Image credit: Lauren Scott)
Image 2 of 2

Screenshots from the Strava app

Advanced metrics are hidden in the free version of the app (Image credit: Lauren Scott)
  • Training dashboard is insightful
  • Free features are limited
  • Route planning is excellent

Strava is designed for athletes – especially cyclists and runners – to track and analyze their fitness activities. Its main features revolve around recording workouts and giving insights into them to help you improve.

Users can track generic sports such as running, cycling, swimming, and hiking, along with niche exercises like skateboarding, squash, or HIIT sessions. Sports are grouped into further subcategories by genre; under Cycle Sports there's a generic "Ride" option, but also Gravel Bike Ride and E-Bike Ride, among others. The real difference here is how your workout is displayed on the dashboard. For example, "Runs" show Distance, Pace, and Time, but "Trail Runs" are likely to involve mixed terrain and show Distance, Elevation Gain, and Time.

During a workout, Strava gives you an analysis of each activity on the screen, with metrics such as time, distance, speed, elevation gain, heart rate (if you're synced up with compatible devices, like a smartwatch), and power (for cyclists using power meters). This data is also saved afterward with more nuance.

For free users, I'd say there's little data crunching beyond what a smartwatch records. You will be able to see your workout stats as recorded on your smartwatch, but Weekly Intensity is out, as is making a training plan. However, if you're using one of the best Garmin watches or a competitor like Polar, you'll be able to put together training plans in those native apps.

Strava has become well known for its segments; specific sections of routes where you can compete for the fastest time with other users, or track your improvement over time. These are also now subscriber-only, which is a real shame, as they help to foster competition and motivation for users of all levels.

Image 1 of 2

The Strava app on an iPhone 15 Pro

(Image credit: Lauren Scott)
Image 2 of 2

The Strava app on an iPhone 15 Pro

(Image credit: Lauren Scott)

Accountability can be a big factor in whether we choose to exercise or not, and I know that the social nature of Strava has often spurred me on to go further and faster. I already mentioned the ability to give and receive Kudos and leave comments on activities – the networking features let you follow and interact with friends as well as pro athletes. Because who doesn't want to nosey at other people's training plans?

On the flip side of social features, Strava also has plenty of privacy features with safety in mind. It's possible to set the visibility of your whole profile to friends only, to everyone on Strava, or to completely private. You can also change each activity's visibility individually. I love the ability to hide and end the start point of your run (or the entire map), which goes some way to protecting your identity if you often run straight from your front door.

Strava Beacon is a safety feature for subscribers that allows users to share their real-time location with selected contacts during an activity. The aim is to offer peace of mind, especially if you're working out after dark, or in a new area. I've used it a few times when running alone at night.

The biggest and best feature for adventurous runners and cyclists is Strava's Maps tab, which gives you thousands of downloadable routes from other users, plus the ability to draw your own. When I'm stuck for inspiration, firing up the maps tab, setting an ideal distance and following a saved route nearby has given me fresh inspiration and allowed me to run knowing I'll end up finishing where I want to.

  •  Features score: 4/5 

Strava: Performance

  • Excellent fitness tracker integration
  • Challenges and goals
  • Plenty of subscriber metrics

Strava The Strava app open on an Apple Watch 8

(Image credit: Lauren Scott)

Strava is generally well-regarded among athletes and fitness enthusiasts, but it's not perfect. It's also fair to say that the performance aspect of Strava depends on what activities you're tracking, what plan you're on, and what device (if any) you're wearing.

One of the best things about Strava is its integration with popular fitness platforms and services like Garmin Connect, meaning you can sync Strava with these services to upload workouts automatically. For premium users, ahuge range of compatible devices can be used to compete in Live Segments while running or cycling.

Lots of people start Strava on their phones, though. So to be thorough for this review, I recorded the same run on a Garmin Forerunner, Apple Watch, and the Strava app. Distance-wise, they were all within 0.05 miles of each other, which is comforting. 

However, I've found that Strava will more often round down the distance from a Garmin watch, meaning you end up with an annoying 5.99 miles rather than the six miles recorded on your watch screen. This is a phenomenon known as "Strava tax" and has to do with the file that Strava uses. It's hardly a dealbreaker for most users, but competitive runners might see this as a frustration.

The Strava app on an iPhone 15, Garmin Forerunner 45 and Apple Watch 8 Pro

(Image credit: Lauren Scott)

The reports from activities are clear and helpful, but again optimal with a fitness tracker. Elevation, pace, and heart rate are available to free users, while heart rate zones and pace zones are unlocked for premium app users. They're all fed back to you via the analysis section, and incorporated automatically into your Relative Effort score, so you can see whether you performed above or below average. The numbers are crunched and presented in a friendly way, and I've loved seeing my Fitness score increase over the weeks.

Maps and route mapping are other compelling reasons to subscribe to Strava, but are they any good? Definitely, if you're visiting a new area, on holiday, or working away from home, and want to find or plan a new route for exercise. The mapping interface is easy to use; just a few clicks, drags and drops and you've made a circuit. 

The route mapping feature is available on desktop and mobile, but I find it quicker to make new routes on a bigger screen. Strava uses global maps with detailed road and trail data, so when you add two points to a route, there's the option to stick to roads or trails automatically. I mostly run solo, but the ability to share a route with friends or club members makes it easy to organize group rides or runs.

One of the standout aspects of Strava's performance is its emphasis on community and social interaction. The leaderboards, challenges, and the ability to follow and interact with friends and athletes provide real motivation, and I've never found anything but support on the platform.

  • Performance: 4.5/5

Strava: Scorecard

Strava: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also Consider

How we tested

I've used the free version of Strava ever since 2015, and have been a Premium subscriber for around a month at the time of writing this review. I generally track runs between 10-20 miles a week – to complement my workouts with Fiit Unlimited – but I've also been hiking and swimming to test out more of Strava's sports modes. I've used the app on iOS (an Apple iPhone 15 Pro), and have tracked activities on an Apple Watch 8 as well as an older Garmin Forerunner 45. As well as recording and syncing with fitness trackers, I also tried manually uploading activities to Strava on the website to see how easy and effective it was.

« Previous PageNext Page »