HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: two-minute review

When I got the chance to try the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0, I was ecstatic. It looked plush and had a rocker design, known to alleviate pain and stress in feet and ankles. This sounded like a shoe I needed to test: two years ago, I was dealing with constant pain in my toes, upper foot, and hips when I ran, so often that I had to stop running for weeks at a time. Finally, I found the HOKA Stinson 7, a trail running shoe that was plusher and relieved my pain when nothing else (stretching, doctor visits, etc.) would. That said, most of the time I run on the road, and that trail running shoe was heavier and bulkier than I liked. HOKA may have started out with a trail running shoe, but since then, they’ve been putting out impressive road running shoes year after year and regularly feature in our best running shoes roundup. The HOKA Cielo X1 2.0 launched in February 2025, the second iteration of the Cielo X1 which launched a year before in February 2024. The Cielo X1 2.0 has a more breathable upper made of engineered jacquard mesh – so breathable and clear that I could see my socked toes and feel the wind and some light rain when I ran on a drizzly day.

HOKA also enhanced the forefoot cushioning and improved the outsole traction. During my testing period, it was particularly rainy in Texas and so I had to run on light rain days or after the rain had stopped. I always felt secure and never slipped, not even when I had to run over slick brick roads in my city’s historic downtown.

The biggest improvement to the Cielo X1 2.0 has to be in the weight and more aggressive rocker profile. Where the Cielo X1 is 9.3 ounces, the Cielo X1 2.0 has dropped to 8.10 ounces. For those who race, an extra 1.2 ounces can go a long way. To achieve the weight reduction, HOKA utilized significant cutouts on the bottom of the shoe.

Perhaps the most noticeable change is the more pronounced rocker design. Running shoes used to be flat with a slight uptilt near the toe, but rocker shoes changed the game when they came on the scene. They get their name from the pronounced curve on the underside of the shoe, which looks like a rocking chair base. The idea behind the design is that once the runner’s foot hits the ground, they’ll naturally and effortlessly rock forward, resulting in more speed. They’re not only designed to make you run faster and without your feet or legs having to do much work, but rocker shoes may alleviate toe, forefoot, and Achilles heel pain, and reduce stress on your ankles and calves.

I had never tried a rocker shoe before, so I felt like a newborn wobbly colt the first time I stood while wearing the Hoka Cielo X1 2.0. That wobbly feeling disappears when you start to run in the shoes.

I initially found the shoe to be springy and quite plush. HOKA notes that this shoe has a “low profile cushion bed that keeps your foot closer to the ground,” but I have to disagree. It doesn’t feel low profile, especially considering that the thickest part of the footbed is two inches; this shoe is lower in profile compared to HOKA’s other – notoriously – thick shoes.

My feet are not narrow by any means but they’re not quite ‘wide-wide’ either. I was able to comfortably run in these shoes, but I can see the toebox being a problem for wide-footed runners who might feel more comfortable with more space.

From the very first run, I really enjoyed the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0. The instability I felt when I first put them on almost immediately disappeared when I started to run. Right away, I felt stable and confident, and I noticed that I was moving faster than normal but without the usual strain or heavy weight of my previous running shoes. I didn’t have to put much effort into running faster, because my ankle and foot worked seamlessly with the rocker profile to propel me forward. There’s a bounce and springiness to the shoe that felt nice on my stride.

To be fair, my ankles felt a bit shaky during the first few runs. I think this had to do with the cutouts on the bottom of the shoe and how I naturally pronate with one foot and supinate with the other. I’ve rolled my ankles so many times in my life that I’ve lost count, so I don’t have the strongest ankles to begin with, but because the cutouts near the arch are prominent, I could feel my ankles trying to prevent my foot from pronating too much and the other from supinating. It was awkward at first, but after each run, I noticed that my ankles felt stronger, and my feet were pronating and supinating far less than before.

The way I ran also shifted during testing. I realized that with my previous running shoe, I had been effectively “clomping,” and striking with my midfoot and forefoot as I ran. With the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0, more often than not, I struck with my heel or midfoot and then rocked forward on my toes. This new running style felt more natural and resulted in less strain on my feet and legs. If you naturally strike with your forefoot, you can absolutely run in these shoes, but I think you might be missing out on the benefits of the rocker design.

This is definitely a shoe for long-distance runners who run a variety of distances (especially those training for marathons), as it offers a low-effort and speedy running experience. Sure, there may be an adjustment period with the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0, but it’s well worth it in the long run (pun not intended).

HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: price & availability

• $275/£250/AU$399
• Available in Frost/Black

The Hoka Cielo X1 2.0 is not cheap by any means. At $275/£250/AU$399, they’re on the pricier end for rocker running shoes, though this isn’t surprising for a brand like HOKA that aims to provide the best type of running shoe for marathon runners. Currently, the Cielo X1 2.0 is only available in a single color option – Frost/Black – and is sold through HOKA and running stores like Road Runner Sports, Marathon Sports, and Paragon Sports. HOKA offers free delivery and free 30-day returns.

HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: specifications

HOKA Cielo X1 2.0: scorecard

Should I buy the HOKA Cielo X1 2.0?

Buy if it...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested

I tested the Cielo X1 2.0 over the course of a week and a half, by running a variety of distances on the road, paved trails, and on an indoor track. During the testing period, I was able to gauge the shoe’s effectiveness in various weather conditions – sunny, dry days, and during light rain – and how well they did in terms of comfort and foot and joint relief. Everything from the shoe’s weight to the materials and design were considered during testing.

First reviewed: February 2025

Specialized Vado SL2: One minute review

When I first jumped on the Specialized Vado SL2 Carbon, it instantly reminded me of my time with the Tenways CGO600 Pro. It had something to do with the form factor and sleek design but above all, it was the smooth ride and effortless power delivery that never left you wanting.

I used the Vado SL2 Carbon on a variety of different routes, including to travel between home and work, which itself includes city streets and rural roads. I found that it performed admirably and is most definitely worthy of consideration as one of the best e-bikes around.

It’s been a while since we reviewed the first iteration of this e-bike, the Vado SL, but suffice it to say, Specialized has made it better in almost every way. That includes the design, performance, and battery life.

Few e-bikes deliver this premium level of quality, but with great results comes a pretty hefty price tag. As a result, the Vado SL2 Carbon is only for elite commuters who have more money than they really know what to do with.

Specialized Vado SL2: Price and availability

• $6,500 USD, £5,500 UK / $9,900 AUS
• Available in black or red paint finishes

At $6,500 USD, £5,500 UK / $9,900 AUS, the Specialized Vado SL2 Carbon Equipped is, hands down, the most expensive e-bike I’ve ever had the pleasure of riding. Second to it would be the Brompton Electric P Line Urban, which retails at $4,750 / £3,695 and is a positive steal in comparison. The Vado SL2 Carbon is available in either black or red paint finishes.

• Value score: 3.5/5

Specialized Vado SL2: Design

• Carbon frame
• Non-detachable battery
• Excellent handlebar screen

The smooth and sleek design means you’ll look the part as you commute between home and work and back again. Compared to the previous iteration of this e-bike, Specialized has opted for a much smoother and streamlined aesthetic. I know I’m not alone in thinking this but they have absolutely nailed it. It shouts premium from every single angle.

The frame and other components are made of carbon, which results in one seriously light e-bike. Now I’m no weightlifter, but I had no problems lifting the whole thing with just one hand. At 17.9kg / 39.7 lbs you’ll be hard-pressed to find a lighter e-bike of the same size. Despite not being foldable and therefore not suitable for car trunks, the minimal weight will make it easy to throw up onto a bike rack.

The weight and ergonomic positioning of the seat and handlebars make for an effortless telepathic handling experience. With some e-bikes, it feels like you’re shifting a truck around but not so with the Vado SL2. Turning round corners and making quick adjustments is as easy as it could be. Overall, the e-bike delivers a surprising level of balance considering it has a heavy battery built into it. This isn’t the case for many e-bikes but during the more challenging inclines, I was even able to stand up and ride.

Thanks to Future Shock 3.2, Specialized has produced an e-bike that effortlessly cushions any uneven bike track or potholed road surface. Every ride is therefore super smooth, an ideal experience for commuters who want to turn up to work without feeling like they’ve done a workout.

I tested the EQ (equipped) version, which includes a range of extra features that are not available in the base package. These include a rear rack with lights, cage mounts, fenders, and a kickstand. I was glad to have these extra parts, especially while cycling through the British winter, which is known for being wet, muddy, and dark!

The e-bike also has one of the best handlebar screens that I’ve ever come across, with a well-designed interface that provides sufficient data, including speed, distance traveled, and battery life left. There is a Specialized app that takes this to a whole new level but I opted to stick with the e-bike’s built-in screen on account of not wanting to have to mount my phone each time I went for a ride.

• Design Score: 4.5/5

Specialized Vado SL2: Performance

• Smooth power delivery
• Responsive handling
• Effective shockproof technology

The Specialized Vado SL2 Carbon is a powerhouse of performance. Having tested the e-bike on a range of surfaces over a period of several weeks, I never found myself wanting. This is rarely the case when I’m testing e-bikes with either the torque, handling, or motor sensitivity falling short of what I want. Not so with the Vado SL2 Carbon.

Formidable power and high torque are delivered from Specialized’s bespoke SL 1.2 motor. As soon as I had clocked up my first kilometer of riding, I knew this was one special e-bike. I was particularly impressed with both the responsiveness and smooth power delivery that this bike provides. With no delay between turning the pedals and power delivery, I knew I could trust the SL2 to give me exactly what I needed when accelerating from a stationary position.

With the motor up and running, I loved how it smoothly went through the motions all the way up to top speed, even when traveling up medium inclines. As is the case with most e-bikes the SL2 struggled to provide the power required for steeper hills. I don’t mind getting the muscles burning at this stage but if this is a problem for you, then you might want to explore other options.

Due to the seriously lightweight carbon frame, I was a little concerned that handling was going to be twitchy and unreliable but all my concerns were unfounded. Rather, handling was beautifully telepathic thanks to the ergonomic layout of the handlebars and seat. If anything, the reduced weight meant strain on my arms was limited

The 12-speed rear derailleur provides a superb range of gears but was unfortunately a little clunky during gear changes. I was able to access all gears but moving between gears was slower than I would have expected for an e-bike at this price point. While we’re on the subject of things that could be improved, I found the effectiveness of the disc brakes meant I wasn’t able to stop as quickly as I would have expected.

More positively, I loved the Future Shock 3.2 technology, which effortlessly dealt with any uneven surfaces that I cycled on. This was particularly noticeable when traveling over pothole-laden roads around where I live.

I was also sure to test the e-bike at night to see how the lights performed. Both front and rear lights are powered by the battery but only the rear is integrated into the frame. Both provide adequate light levels to be seen by others but the front lacks the strength to light up country roads that don’t have street lighting. I therefore found myself requiring a secondary front light to do this for me.

Overall, the Vado SL2 Carbon is one of the highest-performing e-bikes I’ve ever had the pleasure of riding. It’s powerful, smooth, and delivers fantastic handling.

• Performance score: 4.5/5

Specialized Vado SL2: Battery life

• Up to five hours range
• Specialized SL2-520
• Fully integrated

Specialized is strangely silent on how many miles or kilometres the e-bike will manage but it does commit to a range of five hours. This is likely to be at the lowest level of pedal assist, minimal rider weight, and no headwind.

During my test rides, I found that I achieved around 35 miles per full charge, which equated to around two and a half hours. These rides included a range of terrains and weather conditions that would have made the e-bike work harder than usual.

If range is likely to be a concern for you, then you could always buy a Specialized range extender battery, which is likely to give you an additional 1 hour of range. This is likely to be less in real-world tests and is nowhere near the same as buying a second battery. The extender does have the benefit of being super portable, though.

The battery is integrated within the frame, which means you’ll have to be able to charge it where you store the e-bike. This is far from ideal for me and I much prefer batteries that I can take indoors overnight.

• Battery life score: 3.5/5

Specialized Vado SL2: Scorecard

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested the Specialized Vado SL2

As soon as the e-bike dropped onto my doorstep, I cracked straight on with getting it built. It didn’t take long, thanks to the way it was packaged and mostly pre-setup. With the rest of the setup completed, I proceeded to use the e-bike for all my rides across a six-week period. This included my daily 7-mile commute through the country, along heavily congested roads, and through city streets. My testing period was during the winter season so I was able to test the e-bike during a range of weather conditions, including rain and ice.

First reviewed: February 2025

Nike Zegama 2: two-minute review

The Nike Zegama 2 is a high-mileage trail shoe designed to handle pretty much anything you can throw at it. Nike put nearly two years of testing into the model, which is designed to offer supreme comfort and support over uneven, changing terrain.

Launched alongside the Pegasus Trail 5, it stands out against the latter as a more dedicated trail shoe rather than a road-to-trail offering.

While the first Zegama was cool, it fell down because of its limited grip. The Zegama 2 offers more traction, plenty of cushioning, and a really responsive ride. After a few weeks with it I've been really impressed. I'm not a trail runner by trade and find most trail shoes look a little too much like walking shoes. The Zegama 2 got me out on the trail and looked brilliant in the process.

Out of the box, the Zegama Trail 2 features a really striking design. Its large heel stack complete with shelf gives the shoe an imposing silhouette reflective of its rugged durability and exceptional support.

This is the Khaki/Hyper Crimson/Burgundy Crush/White option, a special design inspired by the Donghai Yunding trail in China. In all honesty, I love the design. The lighter jade color is also a real head-turner, as is the special Two Bays Trail blue version. Essentially, it's impossible to find a dull or disappointing colorway.

Not that you'll be keeping these clean, the Zegama Trail 2 is one of the best running shoes for the great outdoors. At its heart, Nike has adopted the extremely responsive and cushioned ZoomX foam midsole. In trials across tarmac, concrete, grass, and dirt trails I found the Zegama 2 to be very comfortable.

You wouldn't buy the Zegama 2 for road running, but we all need to get to the trail before the fun begins. These trainers will deliver you to your trail in style and won't put paid to your feet on the way. The ZoomX midsole felt responsive and springy, combined with a pronounced rocker motion that really helps propel you along.

Once you get to the rugged stuff and the bumps, jumps, ridges, and roots, the Zegama 2 brushes them all off with ease as you navigate your way along uneven terrain. I've never been much of a trail runner but the Zegama 2 instills a real sense of confidence and almost challenges you to seek out more treacherous and adverse terrain. I've no doubt these would also easily double as a durable hiking shoe, thanks to their extremely forgiving underfoot experience.

Stability is another big plus here, and crucial to the trail shoe experience. With uneven terrain all around, the last thing you want is movement and rotation. The fit of the entire upper is very comfortable. I found there was plenty of room upfront in the toe box, although I've seen a couple of complaints about the vertical space being more limited in this year's model. The snug upper combines with the ankle gaiter to give a supremely secure fit that also limits ingress of the great outdoors into your shoe.

Across all manner of uneven ground that I tried, there was never any sense of rolling an ankle or losing my balance.

The original Zegamas lost out big time because of its poor traction. For the Zegama 2, Nike has added the Vibram Megagrip and the effect is obvious. Living in Scotland I do all my running in the wet, and I couldn't believe how much traction the Zegama 2 delivered on wet grass, mud, and slippery concrete. Of course, the Megagrip does cake up with mud pretty quickly, so there's a little bit of slip-and-slide when the going gets really soft, but that's to be expected of any shoe in the conditions. By and large, the traction is excellent, and generally, this is regarded as the biggest upgrade Nike has made to the Zegama 2.

The Zegama 2 displays extremely good build quality and exudes durability. I have absolutely no concerns that this is a shoe built to last, with its chunkier features and rugged design lending themselves to hundreds of miles getting battered by the great outdoors.

If you like a more neutral feel to your run, then this might not be the shoe for you. Generally the Zegama 2 is excellent, and gives you a sense of being nudged along as you travel, which I really appreciated.

While there are a couple of overlays on the toes for extra durability, these shoes aren't waterproof. If you land yourself in a large enough puddle, your feet will get wet. If you do want a waterproof trail shoe, options from the likes of Saucony available.

Across my testing and research, the other drawbacks I've come across are few. They are on the heavier side, so if you want a lighter trail shoe you might want to look elsewhere. There are some concerns about how hot the shoe runs given how substantial it is. Again, as a resident of Scotland I'd chalk this up as a bonus, but it's definitely true and something to watch out for if you run in warmer climes.

Nike Zegama 2: price & availability

• $180/£165/AU$250
• Men's and women's options, 11 total colors

The Nike Zegama 2 is available from Nike.com and the usual array of third-party resellers. Its hefty and rugged build means it's a little pricier than your average running shoe at $180/£165/$250 AUD, although we have seen it discounted, including on Nike's website.

There are versions for men and women, with five or six colors respectively.

Nike Zegama 2: specifications

Nike Zegama 2: scorecard

Should I buy the Nike Zegama 2?

Buy if it...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested

I used the Nike Zegama 2 across a multitude of terrain including concrete, grass, mud, as well as incline and declines during a series of runs.

First reviewed: February 2025

Shot Scope V5: One minute review

If money is no object and you want one of the best golf watches at any price, then there are technically better options out there than the Shot Scope V5. However, if you aren’t looking to spend upwards of $500/£500/AU$900 on a watch that you only plan on wearing for golf, the V5 is a great option as it offers some features that you wouldn’t usually get in the mid-price range it falls in.

As well as providing the basic front, middle, and back yardage numbers, the V5 offers some other useful functions too, such as accurate distances to hazards, layups, and doglegs. It comes with 36,000 preloaded courses worldwide and you also get full maps of each hole so you can see what lies ahead as you prepare your strategy on the tee.

The V5 is button-operated rather than touchscreen, rather like some of the best running watches, which might seem a little outdated but it’s arguably more practical and efficient during activities. Many golfers find touchscreens can be a little erratic, especially in the rain or while wearing gloves. The button system is simple to use once you become familiar with it, making it easy to scroll through the hazards and record your score on each hole.

Where the V5 really stands out though is in the post-round shot tracking and the analytics on offer. It comes with 16 individual club tags which attach to the butt of a club’s grip and record data from each shot. After the round, you have access to all manner of useful data that allows you to hone the areas you need to improve. Other brands offer this too, but usually, you have to pay for the tags and/or a yearly subscription to access the data. Shot Scope offers all of this at a very reasonable single price point.

Shot Scope V5: Specifications

Shot Scope V5: Price and availability

• £239.99/$249.99/AU$429.99
• One price and color
• Cheaper than many rivals

The Shot Scope V5 costs £239.99/$249.99/AU$429.99 and is widely available from numerous online retailers. There is only one color choice (black) and there are no alternative strap color options either.

If you do want alternative color options then the very similar Shot Scope X5 might fit the bill, as it does offer a slightly more premium look and has a choice of five straps, but in terms of features and functionality, there’s very little between the V5 and the X5. In fact, almost all of the features are the same – but the V5 is button-operated whereas the X5 uses a touchscreen.

The V5 is £40 cheaper as a result of that, but many people will actually prefer the buttons, which makes the price very attractive. It’s also worth mentioning that touchscreens can often suffer in rainy conditions and buttons are certainly more reliable in the wet. The V5 has a longer battery life too, so in our view, it’s the better option, especially at this lower price point.

• Value score: 5/5

Shot Scope V5: Design

• Simple, clean design
• Comfortable and lightweight
• Doesn't intrude on swing

The V5 probably isn’t a watch that many will choose to wear away from the golf course but personally, I’d have no qualms about doing so. It’s a simple, black design and looks nice on the wrist. It’s very comfortable and lightweight too (weighing just 50g), so on the course it’s not intrusive or distracting during the swing. The dust-resistant silicone strap is nice and flexible and sits snugly on the wrist. In fact, it’s actually one of the more comfortable golf watches I’ve tested.

In terms of construction, the V5 has a 1.2” daylight-readable color display made from hardened mineral glass. While I’ve mentioned already that for the watch itself, there are no color options other than black, in terms of the display you have five colors to choose from. Four buttons (two on each side) are used to operate the watch, but the buttons are quite discreet and certainly don’t stand out too much or detract from the aesthetics.

• Design score: 4/5

Shot Scope V5: Features

• 36,000 preloaded courses
• Shot tracking
• In depth stats

The V5 comes preloaded with 36,000 golf courses and you get the standard front, middle, and back yardages. However if you can see where the pin is on the green and want a more specific number, there is a function that allows you to move the pin around on the screen to the right location. This will provide more accurate yardage, but I had no interest in using this feature, to be honest; scrolling through the options to find the pin and then continually clicking the button to move the flag around to the desired spot can be irritating. Frankly, I don’t need a number to be that accurate, as I’m not that good of a player to know, to the exact yard, how far I’m likely to hit my approach shot. A ballpark figure is more than sufficient for me, but the option is there for those who want it.

You do have access to excellent shot tracking information if you use the tags that come with this watch. They attach to the grip of your club and will record each shot you hit which then gives you access to very detailed information on your performance. If you’re into that, then this is an excellent feature. It’s very similar to services provided by Garmin and Arccos, but the difference is that you have to pay a yearly subscription fee for those whereas Shot Scope provides this free of charge.

I could talk all day about how in-depth this is as there are statistics available for everything you can think of, as well as plenty that you probably can’t! As well as being able to get ‘shots gained’ data, there are other interesting things available, such as how well you historically play particular golf courses or even specific holes. If you’re a golf nerd, this is something that will really appeal to you, and given that you don’t have to pay for any of it once you have made the initial purchase of the watch, for me this is the main selling point of the Shot Scope V5.

• Features score: 4/5

Shot Scope V5: Performance

• Unlock button can be annoying
• Shot tracking not automatic
• Very easy to use

Upon arrival at the course, I found that the V5 identified the course fairly quickly. It isn’t always the same speed though. The first time I used it I found it was very quick, probably less than 10 seconds. Other times it has taken a little longer and on one occasion it was around a full minute. I find that to be normal though, and I’ve tested premium Garmin watches that have taken longer to locate the course than the V5 does, so from that perspective, I was quite impressed.

The trickiest thing for me, to begin with, was getting used to pressing the unlock button before attempting to access any of the functions. Without pressing the unlock button (the bottom left button), nothing else works, and initially, it was quite frustrating simply because I normally use a watch where I don’t need to do that. By the time I got to the back nine, I was generally okay with it, although I would occasionally still forget. After that first round, though, it became second nature.

That being said, having to press the unlock button first does make it slightly more of a pain to access some of the functions I like to use, such as the hazard map and distances, but this isn’t a premium watch – so there will naturally be some compromises to be made.

The watch does not automatically track individual shots on the course, but you can activate the track option after hitting a shot. Again, this is not ideal for me personally, as I often forget to do it, especially if I’m chatting with playing partners or feeling rushed due to a group behind me.

Some more expensive watches, such as the Garmin Approach S62 (my current watch of choice) or the newer Garmin Approach S70, track shots automatically and you don’t have to do anything. You hit your shot, start walking and the watch will immediately begin counting the yards until you reach your ball. This is a feature I use all the time, not specifically so I can see how far I’ve hit it, but more because it makes finding a ball that has strayed from the fairway a lot easier. For instance, if like me you know you usually carry your drive 200 yards, then it really narrows your search area considerably if the watch is telling you where exactly 200 yards is and you’re having to just guess. Having used the Garmin Approach S62 for a few years I’ve come to completely rely on that feature, and because it does it automatically it is hard to then get into the habit of doing it manually.

So when testing the V5 I kept forgetting to activate it and it was very frustrating, but that’s more of a me problem than a failing of the watch. Automatic tracking would be nice, but at the price point the V5 comes in at, it would be unreasonable to expect it.

There’s a lot to like about the V5 though. The app is excellent and simple to use; it’s just a case of downloading to your smartphone, creating an account, and then adding your device (in this case the V5, but there are other Shot Scope products you can add too).

It was straightforward enough to set up the tags too. They are pre-marked so there’s very little to do other than screw them into the specific club. Then, in the app, you can make up your bag by adding in your specific clubs. There are 16 tags so you can have spare clubs, which is handy if, for example, you occasionally switch out a hybrid for an extra wedge or vice versa.

In terms of the charger, the cable is extremely secure. Perhaps too secure, as I had to be quite forceful to remove it and that makes me nervous. I’ve had enough iPhones over the years to know how easily charging ports can be damaged when you’re too heavy-handed with them.

• Performance score: 4/5

Shot Scope V5: Scorecard

Shot Scope V5: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested the Shot Scope V5

I have played two full rounds and a further nine holes using the Shot Scope V5. Weather conditions were varied and on one occasion the rain was quite heavy for a time. To find out how accurate the GPS numbers were I compared the numbers to that of my Garmin Approach S62 and also used a laser for a more exact yardage. The Shot Scope V5 was always within two yards of the laser and was usually bringing up the same numbers as the Garmin.

First reviewed: February 2025

Nike Pegasus 41: Two-Minute review

The Nike Pegasus 41 isn't the best running shoe in nearly any of the specialist categories you can think of, and for that reason, it's probably the best shoe for nearly everyone.

The Pegasus 41 is a mainstay, your only dance move, ol' reliable. There's a reason this shoe has been around since 1982. It doesn't have a carbon plate or a super light upper, it's not a race-day shoe or a high-mileage hero with more foam than a mattress. Quite simply, it's the one running shoe that I'd recommend for almost everyone in nearly every situation.

Of course, if you're an experienced runner with multiple shoes in rotation and a bandolier full of Kendal Mint cake, the Pegasus 41 might not be on your radar. Even still, I'd argue it's a brilliant middle-distance everyday trainer and a perfect starting point for beginners and enthusiasts looking to return to running. There's a running shoe for every distance and discipline these days, but if you only ever buy one, I'd probably make it the Pegasus 41.

I've had the Nike Pegasus 39 for a number of years, variously used for running, the gym, grocery shopping, and beyond. I couldn't quite believe just how much the Pegasus had improved when I first laced on the Pegasus 41.

New for the latest Pegasus is a full-length foam midsole made from Nike's ReactX foam (the first Pegasus to feature it). My 39s definitely feel pretty squashed and battered, so it's great to see Nike boosting overall durability and responsiveness, an upgrade that is immediately evident underfoot.

At any pace, there's a lot more cushioning than I expected with the Pegasus 41. It's not going to offer the ultra-plush ride of the Nike Invincible 3 or the upcoming Vomero 18, but I was pleasantly surprised nonetheless.

The cushioning is loaded towards the heel, as you can probably tell from the profile of the shoe, and this is definitely a shoe engineered more for heel strikers. The heel stack clocks in at 37mm, 4mm more than the previous trainer, a good indicator of how much more cushioning Nike has added.

If you fall somewhere in the middle you should be fine, but anyone running on the forefoot might find the sensation a little strange because there's not much cushioning up front. You do get a forefoot (and heel) Air Zoom unit, but I found this leads to a pretty firm feel at the front. At the back, it works much better.

The entire upper of the Pegasus 41 is really very comfortable. There's a more breathable mesh compared to previous versions, and something Nike calls the Dynamic Midfoot Fit system. The laces are tied to an internal midfoot band that wraps around your entire foot. The shoe feels really snug and secure from heel to toe and comes laced, out of the box, so you can get running without doing any rewiring.

I also think the Pegasus 41 is unbelievably stylish. I normally wouldn't go for a black colorway, but even the dark option I was sent is a head-turner in my opinion. There are a ton of colorways including the stunning Blueprint and the electric Racer Blue, which is new for 2025.

You'll find that the Pegasus is a little heavier than other everyday shoes like the Saucony Ride 17, but it's not clunky or cumbersome.

As mentioned, this isn't really a specialist shoe. If you're a runner looking for the softest, plushest ride possible, then there are far squishier and more pliable options on the market. Likewise, if you want something with a bit more rock and responsiveness underfoot, you'll definitely find zippier shoes out there. For races and speedwork, any speed shoe or carbon-plated alternative will give you the edge, and the Pegasus 41 isn't a shoe for lighting up the timesheets.

During my runs I found the Pegasus 41 to be extremely neutral. The ride is very inoffensive and pretty comfortable, but it doesn't give you a sense of being propelled along the ground. There's certainly a bit more response compared to my Pegasus 39s, and the rocker motion is also a lot more noticeable than that older shoe. Nike has definitely improved the formula relative to that model, though it's still modest compared to the wider market.

It's also noticeably more stable than my previous Pegasus. I found very little lateral movement inside the shoe, and even over bumpier or uneven ground, stability felt very solid.

I'd say for longer distances the Pegasus 41 will probably start to fall off; that firm and thin forefoot just doesn't offer enough cushioning. However, I think it's excellent as a short and middle-distance shoe. While it can't match the best gym shoes on the market, it's also perfectly good for your warmup and stretching, and even a bit of strength and agility work.

The shoe is snug but pretty spacious, I have fairly large feet and didn't feel any cramping in the toe box or any discomfort.

Nike Pegasus 41: price & availability

• $140/£129/$200 AUD 
• Men's and women's options, myriad of colors
• Frequently discounted

The Nike Pegasus 41 is available from Nike.com and a plethora of third-party retailers. Its list price sits at $140 / £129 / AU$200 but even a cursory glance around the web will score you a pretty hefty discount.

There's a huge range of colors, these vary depending on whether you're picking men's, women's, or juniors. There's also an Extra Wide variant for the larger-footed among you. The Pegasus 41 runs true to size, so no need to size up or down.

Nike Pegasus 41: specifications

Nike Pegasus 41: Scorecard

Should I buy the Nike Pegasus 41?

Buy if it...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested

I used the Nike Pegasus 41 for a series of longer and shorter runs, including some interval training, over several days.

First reviewed: February 2025