Gadgets - Organizer

I tested Marshall’s new mini Dolby Atmos soundbar and I adore its crystal-clear dialogue, expansive sound, and classy design

9:00 pm | November 9, 2025

Marshall Heston 60: two-minute review

The Marshall Heston 60 is a small Dolby Atmos soundbar that aims to deliver immersive sound for movies and music alike – something that’s proven to be quite the challenge for a number of rivals in this size-class.

But luckily, the Heston 60 has risen to that challenge. Sure, it may be limited in size, but its performance would suggest otherwise. It nails the basics, with ultra-clear dialogue and a nice variety of sound modes to suit whatever content you’re consuming. But it also gets those tricker elements right too.

For instance, the level of expansiveness on offer makes the Heston 60 one of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars in its weight class, I’d argue. It isn’t going to wow you with the incredible width of the Marshall Heston 120 or other larger rivals, but the Heston 60 still creates an impressive sense of height while watching Atmos movies, and the width of the soundstage is strong given the bar’s physical confines.

Like its larger sibling, the Heston 60 is also musically astute. It separates out instruments and positions them beautifully in the Atmos format, and takes a relatively impactful, nuanced approach to stereo.

Something that a lot of smaller soundbars struggle to do, is muster up weighty, hard-hitting low-end output, but the Heston 60 certainly bucks that trend. I was taken aback by the rumble of jet engines and roar of explosions when watching movies, and pumping bass in my favorite tracks.

You won’t get the same room-swallowing bass the Heston 120 serves up, and you may want to add the Marshall Heston 200 or a separate sub for enhanced low end, but for a model of this size, it sure packs a punch.

If you want to adapt the Heston 60’s sound, you can do so via the Marshall app. This opens up a range of features, like EQ adjustment, sound mode alteration, room calibration, and so on. I did encounter a few issues with setup, with a few bugs rearing their head from time to time. But for the most part, the app felt intuitive and easy to use – pretty important, given the omission of a physical remote.

Person holding the Marshall Heston 60 — (Image credit: Future)

Something that really makes the Heston 60 stand out is its design. Like the Heston 120, this has a gorgeous, amp-inspired aesthetic with frets and stunning golden details. However, the Marshall logo and control panel are now magnetic, meaning you can optimize the look of this model for wall-mounted use. Parts are also repairable, making this bar worth investing in for the long-haul.

And I don’t use the term ‘invest’ lightly here – this is a pretty pricey option. The Heston 60 comes in at just under $700 / £500 / AU$1,000. In the US, that’s quite a bit more than its clear competitor, the Sonos Beam Gen 2, but you do get DTS:X compatibility, a far more premium look, and a wider range of connectivity options.

It’s worth noting that you could get a strong multi-box soundbar at a similar cost to the Heston 60 – including models that support HDMI passthrough (unlike Marshall’s smaller soundbar).

But if you’re a little tight on space or using a smaller-sized TV, then the Marshall Heston 60 is one of the best soundbars in its class. It delivers on Dolby Atmos and punchy audio, it’s a classy looker, and it's built to last. Combine all of that, and the Heston 60 is easy to recommend.

Marshall Heston 60 soundbar on table with TV beside Marshall Heston Sub 200 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Heston 60 review: price & release date

$699.99 / £499.99 / AU$999
Launched in September 2025

The Marshall Heston 60 released in September 2025, about three months after the Marshall Heston 120, upon which I bestowed the elusive five star rating. It's a smaller version of its larger sibling, but has a largely similar design and also uses the revamped Marshall app.

You can purchase the Heston 60 in either black or cream, and it costs $699.99 / £499.99 / AU$999. That’s pretty competitive against its main rival, the Sonos Beam Gen 2, which has a list price of $499 / £499 / $799.

Ports on the reverse side of the Marshall Heston 60 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Heston 60 review: specs

Dimensions	28.7 x 4.9 x 2.7 inches / 730 x 124 x 68mm
Speaker channels	5.1
Connections	HDMI eARC, RCA Mono (sub out), USB-C, 3.5mm, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi
Dolby Atmos / DTS:X	Yes / Yes
Sub included	No
Rear speakers included	No

Marshall Heston 60 review: features

5.1 speaker configuration with seven active drivers
Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support
App opens up strong set of features

The Marshall Heston 60 has a 5.1 speaker configuration, but is powered by seven active drivers. There are two 25W and five 5W class D amplifiers on board, and the soundbar is capable of a 56W maximum power output.

This is an all-in-one offering from Marshall, you won’t get a subwoofer or rears included from the off. However, you are now able to purchase the Heston Sub 200 – a wireless sub that I tried pairing to the Heston 60, and this can give you some extension below the 45Hz mark – the lowest the soundbar can go.

Even as a one-box option, the Heston 60 aims to create spacious, immersive audio with the inclusion of Dolby Atmos, as well as DTS:X. That latter format is missing on the Sonos Beam Gen 2, making the Heston 60 an attractive option for cinephiles.

On top of that, there are a number of ways to connect up to the Heston 60. Of course, there’s HDMI eARC, which I used for the majority of my testing time. However, you can also connect via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, as well as USB-C and 3.5mm, plus RCA – which can be used to add a third-party subwoofer.

Unfortunately, there’s no HDMI passthrough here, something that was included on the larger Heston 120. This would be a nice touch for those who want to unlock extra space for an HDMI-reliant device like a PS5 or Nintendo Switch 2, though it is pretty common for smaller models to leave this out.

If you head on over to the Marshall app, you’ll also discover that there’s Auracast compatibility – a type of Bluetooth technology that enables you to tune into an audio broadcast transmitted from a phone, TV or similar device without any pairing.

But there’s more! Marshall has once again integrated a wide range of music services, such as: Google Cast; Spotify Connect; Internet Radio; Tidal Connect; and Apple AirPlay 2. If you’re going to return to Internet Radio or Spotify on the reg, you can set the ‘Prog’ button to a specific service and gain easy access.

Let’s talk a little more about the Marshall app – this is revamped, but separate to the software used for Bluetooth speakers including the Marshall Kilburn III and Marshall Bromley 750. It supplies a five-band equalizer, AV sync to adjust audio delays, and Room correction, which cycles through an array of sounds to optimize performance for your listening space. It also lets you change between the Movie, Music, Voice, and Night modes – all of which are very well differentiated.

I’ll speak more about my experience with the app in the ‘Setup & usability’ section, but I will say that it was a little buggy. When it got into gear, I was very pleased with the options on offer, though.

As we saw with the Heston 120, there’s no physical remote control lumped in the box – you’re going to be using the app only. The app lets you adjust volume, manually switch between different sound modes or sources, and view whether Atmos or DTS:X are in-use or not. If you’re connected to the soundbar via HDMI eARC, you can also use your standard remote to ramp up or dampen volume too.

Features score: 4.5/5

Person pressing button on the Marshall Heston 60 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Heston 60 review: performance

Fantastic vocal clarity
Impressive bass for a small soundbar
Fairly expansive too

The Marshall Heston 60 performs pretty admirably for such a small soundbar. Of course, there are a few limitations due to its small size and moderate maximum power output of 56W. Still, the power the Heston 60 does have is used to great effect.

Let’s start by talking about dialogue quality, an area I always expect significant improvement over plain TV audio. And I was very impressed by the clarity and definition of vocals in the mix while using the Heston 60. While watching a 4K UHD Blu-Ray of Top Gun: Maverick, I was struck by the separation of voices in a large open space, as well as the natural replication of echo and breathy details.

Even when layered with a grand score and booming sound effects, voices remained clear-cut throughout the movie’s runtime, making for a great viewing experience.

Another area the Heston 60 held its own, was in the bass department. For such a lil’ guy, this soundbar can produce pretty imposing low-end sound. Sticking with Top Gun: Maverick, and the roar of jet engines firing up was both impactful and attention-grabbing.

Sure, it wasn’t that room-swallowing bass that the Heston 120 offers, and when I paired up the Heston Sub 200, rumble was considerably enhanced. But for its size, the Heston 60 performs pretty well in the bass department. For instance, when watching The Batman, an explosion during a chase scene erupted with intent, despite the soundbar’s confined physical form.

I was really hoping the Heston 60 would deliver on the Dolby Atmos front, especially as a lot of small models either struggle here or skip on it entirely. Luckily, Marshall has done a good job here once more, and the soundbar whipped up a very solid spatial impression.

With The Batman, I flicked to a scene with bats flying towards me, and the sense that they soared over my shoulder was captured with commendable accuracy. Back to Maverick, and the classic scene of the jet flying overhead came through effectively, and provided more vertical extension than you’d expect from such a compact product.

In The Boy and the Heron on Netflix Premium, the Atmos effects were pretty convincing too, with the flight of the Heron mapped fairly well. The Heston 60 didn’t have the pinpoint accuracy of its larger sibling – but I was still well immersed in the on-screen action.

Let’s also take a moment to speak about music – something that Marshall’s audio engineers paid close attention to on the Heston 120. Performance is very good in this area, again, and I enjoyed a range of my favorite tracks in both the Dolby Atmos and standard stereo format.

Let’s start with Atmos, and although I don’t always love these mixes, a few tracks impressed me on the Heston 60. For instance, in Song for my Father by Horace Silver, I was satisfied with the positioning and separation of various instruments, with percussion playing rhythmically on the right side, while keys panned across the left side of the bar.

In I'm Gonna Love You Just a Little More Baby by Barry White, I enjoyed deft keys and well-balanced percussion, as smooth vocals oozed from the center. Guitars weren’t as prominent in the mix as I’d like, and didn’t have the expansive quality I experienced with the 120. Bass was perhaps a touch overeager too, though luckily EQ options can be accessed in the app to tailor audio to your taste.

Moving over to the stereo format, I was instantly hit by pumping bass in Never Would by M-High, although lighter electronic elements were a touch overshadowed. The soundbar produced controlled audio, however, even at higher volumes. On tracks where sub-bass came into the equation, those ultra-low notes didn’t come through with all too much force. Of course, if you pair the soundbar with the Heston Sub 200, you’ll get the low-end extension required for that, but the soundbar still sounded strong overall.

Sound quality score: 4.5/5

Top of the Marshall Heston 60 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Heston 60 review: design

Gorgeous fret-infused aesthetic
Simple yet effective button controls
Magnetic features for wall mounting

If you read my Marshall Heston 120 review, it won’t surprise you to find that I love the look of this soundbar too. The Heston 60 is, in essence, the same as its sibling, just smaller. I’m a huge fan of the amp-inspired look and eye-catching golden details, and it's nice to see the option to grab this in cream – a nice break from the homogeneous swathe of plain black competitors.

One key difference on the Heston 60, though, is that the tactile control knobs from the Heston 120 have been ditched. This time around, there are simple button controls. These are easy to use and effective, and although they’re not as satisfying to use as the Heston 120’s physical controls, they're less prone to catching reflections from the TV.

Another is the inclusion of a magnetic Marshall logo and control panel. This enables you to optimize the look of the soundbar for a wall-mounted configuration,which is highly practical and considered. Wall mount grommets are also included in the box, which I was glad to see, as rivals will often sell these separately.

Unlike its larger cousin, the Heston 60 is a lightweight, highly compact option. It’s just 28.7 inches / 730mm wide and 6.1lbs / 2.8kg in weight, making it easy to install and slot beneath smaller-sized TVs. All in all, it's an ideal pick for those working with limited space, or if you’re not looking for a full-length behemoth.

One more thing – I also liked the inclusion of a panel on the reverse side, which protects the various ports and enables improved cable management. It’s an all-round great effort from Marshall, and I’ve never tried a small soundbar with so much style and care injected into its design.

Design score: 5/5

Person lifting magnetic Marshall Logo up on the Marshall Heston 60

(Image credit: Future)

Marshall Heston 60 review: setup & usability

Plug and play setup
Companion app could be improved
Wide variety of connectivity options

The initial part of the setup process here was as easy as it comes. I simply plugged the Heston 60 into the power, and connected an HDMI lead from the soundbar to a TV. Using the HDMI eARC connectivity option, you’ll be able to use your standard TV remote to alter the soundbar’s volume, which is very convenient.

Unfortunately, I did experience a few issues when pairing the soundbar to the Marshall app, though. I wasn’t getting a pairing request on my phone, and neither the wireless or Bluetooth methods functioned at first. After trying again the following day, these woes were resolved, and I was able to proceed with room correction, play around with EQ options and more, but I did encounter a few other small bugs and loading issues with the app.

For the majority of my testing time, everything worked just fine, thankfully. And when the app behaves itself, it’s a fantastic tool, filled with plenty of personalization settings, and integrated services.

This soundbar has a range of connectivity options too, and it's very easy to stream songs over Wi-Fi, connect to a phone over Bluetooth, or hook up devices using RCA or an analogue method.

Setup & usability score: 3.5/5

Cable cover on the reverse side of the Marshall Heston 60 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Heston 60 review: value

Priced competitively against Sonos – albeit less so for US buyers
Though you can still get a great multi-box option at a similar cost
Repairability ensures long-term return on investment

I suspect that the sticking point a lot of people will have with the Marshall Heston 60 is its price, which – for a small model like this – is undoubtedly high. It comes in at $699.99 / £499.99 / AU$999, so US buyers are proportionally splashing out a fair bit more, although I still think there’s plenty of value here.

Firstly, this soundbar is priced competitively against the Sonos Beam Gen 2 – the Heston 60’s clear and obvious competition. The Beam Gen 2 comes in with a list price of $499 / £499 / $799, and although it has a higher peak power output, it doesn’t support DTS:X, Bluetooth connectivity, plus we felt that the height of its Atmos effects were lacking.

Meanwhile, the Heston 60 still has plenty of power and effective Dolby Atmos effects, but it also supports DTS:X and Bluetooth. In my view, it also has a more premium design, and many will appreciate its RCA sub out port.

Marshall’s ramped-up sustainability efforts are also being demonstrated with the Heston 60, which is largely repairable. Head over to the manufacturer’s site, and you can access repair services and get spare parts, including frets, end-caps, and drivers. This gives additional longevity to the soundbar, which will make your investment more worthwhile in the long run.

Despite all of this, it’s still worth pointing to the fact that the $700 / £500 / AU$1,000 you spend on the Heston 60 could equally be spent on a very capable multi-box option. In the US and Australia, the same sum of money can net you the Samsung HW-QS700F, which comes with a full length bar, as well as a dual-driver sub.

If we’re talking about soundbars in this weight class, though, few can compete with the Heston 60. Its surprisingly good Atmos performance, imposing bass, and ultra-clear dialogue make it a real standout. Pair that with a pretty exterior and admirable repairability, and I’d still argue it's a good value pick.

Value score: 4/5

Person altering position of control panel on Marshall Heston 60 — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Marshall Heston 60?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Atmos and DTS:X, feature-rich companion app, good connectivity options but no HDMI passthrough.	4.5/5
Sound quality	Clear dialogue, larger bass than you’d expect, fairly expansive Atmos effects.	4.5/5
Design	Beautiful appearance, effective controls, compact build.	5/5
Setup & usability	Easy to install, app is feature-rich but has a few bugs.	3.5/5
Value	It’s undoubtedly pricey, but still competitive against the Beam Gen 2 and feels worth the investment long-term.	4/5

Buy it if…

You want great performance but you’re tight on space
If you’ve got a smaller TV or you’re tight on space, you don’t have to sacrifice on quality. And the Heston 60 proves that. It offers surprisingly immersive Dolby Atmos effects, impactful bass, and ultra-clear dialogue in a single, highly compact model.

You want your soundbar to be a statement piece
Sure, the Heston 60 sounds good, but it looks even better! This thing is just as much a statement piece as it is a soundbar, boasting a gorgeous amp-inspired design and golden details. The magnetic logo and control panel also ensure it looks top-class while wall mounted too.

Don’t buy it if…

You want the true surround sound experience
So, if you’re looking for an enveloping surround sound experience, the Heston 60 might not quite do it for you. Sure, it does well with Atmos for movies and music alike, but there’s no sub or rear speakers for that true wraparound sound. If that’s what you’re after, I’d highly recommend the Samsung HW-Q990F.

You’re expecting thunderous power
Similarly, the Heston 60’s physical restrictions mean that it can’t quite blast out the roaring power some may well crave. I’d suggest grabbing an option that pairs a sub, or maybe even spending a bit more to get the Heston Sub 200.

Marshall Heston 60 review: also consider

	Marshall Heston 60	Sonos Beam Gen 2	Samsung HW-QS700F
Price	$699.99 / £499.99 / AU$999	$449 / £449 / $699	$699.99 / £749 / AU$999
Dimensions	28.7 x 4.9 x 2.7 inches / 730 x 124 x 68mm	25.6 x 2.7 x 3.9 inches / 651 x 68 x 100mm	Main soundbar: 43.7 x 2.4 x 4.7 inches / 1110.7 x 60.4 x 120mm; subwoofer: 8.3 x 15.9 x 15.9 inches / 210 x 403 x 403mm
Speaker channels	5.1	5.0	5.1.2
Connections	HDMI eARC, RCA Mono (sub out), USB-C, 3.5mm, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi	HDMI eARC, Ethernet, Wi-Fi	HDMI eARC, HDMI input, digital optical, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.2
Dolby Atmos / DTS:X	Yes / Yes	Yes / No	Yes / Yes
Sub included	No	No	Yes
Rear speakers included	No	No	No

Sonos Beam Gen 2
It’s four years old now, but the Sonos Beam Gen 2 is still a great option for anyone seeking out cinematic audio in a condensed package. With decent Dolby Atmos effects, a surprisingly wide soundstage, and a classy build, it’s still easy to recommend.

Read our full Sonos Beam Gen 2 review.

Samsung HW-QS700F
Looking for a little more power? Then the Samsung HW-QS700F is a top choice. In the US and Australia, you can get this for the same as the Heston 60, even though it adds a dual-driver sub and the bar itself is full-sized. I’d also recommend checking for the Samsung HW-Q800D if you can find it on sale, although I omitted it due to low stock in a lot of territories. Read our full Samsung HW-QS700F review.

How I tested the Marshall Heston 60

Marshall Heston 60 under a TV on table — (Image credit: Future)

Tested across a week-long period
Used in our TV testing space at Future Labs
Sometimes tried in conjunction with Marshall Heston 200 sub

During my time testing the Marshall Heston 60, I had it connected to the TCL C6K mini-LED TV via HDMI eARC.

In my time with the Heston 60, the soundbar was placed beneath the display at our TV testing space at Future Labs. I watched – and indeed listened – to a variety of content during an intensive testing period. This included a number of movies on both Netflix Premium and on 4K UHD Blu-Ray via the Panasonic DP-UB820. I also listened to music via Tidal Connect in both Dolby Atmos and stereo formats.

I also made extensive use of each listening mode: Movie; Music; Voice; and Night. Of course, I also exhausted the soundbar’s additional settings through the Marshall app, ensuring each feature functioned as advertised.

More generally, I've tested tons of soundbars here at TechRadar – everything from ultra-cheap options like the Hisense HS214 through to pricier models like the Samsung HW-Q800D. I also reviewed the Marshall Heston 120, which released earlier this year, and have interviewed audio engineers at Marshall on its home cinema tech, so have a strong understanding of the product.

First reviewed: November 2025
Read more about how we test

Logitech MX Master 4 review: the master returns

4:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Mice Peripherals & Accessories | Comments: Off

Logitech MX Master 4: Two-minute review

The Logitech MX Master 4 mouse against a blue background. — (Image credit: Future)

Logitech’s MX Master is one of the best-known mice in the business, and the last iteration – the MX Master 3S – has long been seen as one of the best mice you can buy. That means the new MX Master 4 has big shoes to fill – and it doesn’t disappoint.

The main new addition is a haptic touch panel for your thumb, and this provides physical bumps when it’s activated and in use. While I’m happy to see it here, it’s actually far from the mouse’s best feature. That accolade goes to the MagSpeed scroll wheel, which automatically adjusts between precise clicks and freewheeling spinning. It’s a brilliant inclusion.

Elsewhere, the gesture button is a helpful, customizable tool that can be adapted to your needs, as can many of the other buttons, with a range of presets and programmable adjustments that help you make the mouse your own. And it’s on this software side where the MX Master 4 really excels, with the superb Logitech Flow making it a breeze to use the mouse across multiple computers and the Options+ app serving as your customization hub.

This is not a perfect mouse, though. It’s weighty and bulky, meaning it’s not ideal for travel or for gaming, while the thumb wheel doesn’t feel anywhere near as responsive or premium as the MagSpeed wheel. Those points aside, though, there’s very little else to be dissatisfied with.

Logitech MX Master 4: Price & availability

How much does it cost? $119.99 / £119.99 / AU$199.95
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available globally

The Logitech MX Master 4 is not a cheap mouse, either in terms of its price or its quality. Its cost is on the high side for a mouse, but it comes with a raft of top tools and touches that enhance both your productivity and your overall computing experience. It’s not for everyone (especially gamers and those who want a lightweight mouse), but if you find yourself in its target audience, you’ll likely be very happy with it.

Logitech MX Master 4: Design

Image 1 of 3

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

This mouse comes with the familiar sculpted design used by previous MX Master mice. That includes a wide, arched body and a cut-out thumb area with a curved lip for your digit to rest on. The mouse fits snugly in your hand and should be suitable for all grip types, particularly palm and claw.

That large form factor contributes to the mouse’s weight, which clocked in at 152g on my scales. It’s noticeably heavy, and whether that’s a good or bad thing really depends on your preferences. I’m used to featherweight mice (the 60g Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 is my daily driver), so the MX Master 4 took a bit of getting used to, and even after almost two weeks of usage, it felt a touch imprecise due to its heft. That might not be ideal if you’re a frequent gamer and want something fast and light.

On the top are two large left- and right-click buttons. These come with incredibly soft, quiet clicks, which are both satisfying to use and subtle enough not to annoy your coworkers. While the mouse’s other buttons are by no means loud, it’s a shame that they aren’t quite so noiseless.

Nestled between the two main buttons is Logitech’s renowned MagSpeed scroll wheel. This ratchets when turned slowly and spins freely if you flick it with a bit more force. It’s a brilliant way to skim through websites and spreadsheets, and as small as it sounds, it’s one of the mouse’s best features.

The switching is automatic, but you can settle for one mode or the other using the button located just behind the wheel. Also note that you can click the scroll wheel in, but there are no side-to-side clicks of the type that you might find on rival devices.

The MX Master 4’s real power features are mostly assigned to your thumb. First up is the horizontal scroll wheel, which is handy if you need to pan side-to-side in an app like Microsoft Excel or when viewing a large image. Unfortunately, it lacks the ratchet/free spin abilities of the MagSpeed wheel, and it’s quite heavy and imprecise in use. It’s also loud and scratchy when turned, making it feel much cheaper than the rest of the mouse.

Below this wheel are three thumb buttons. The first two are grouped together, while the third stands a short distance away. The buttons aren’t particularly well defined – there’s no gap between the first two – which makes them a little tricky to separate by touch alone. The third is Logitech’s gesture button, which we’ll cover in the Performance section, but note that all three can be customized to perform different functions.

The main part of the thumb rest is occupied by a dimpled gesture button, which is a new addition to the MX Master 4. This is large and spacious, taking up nearly the entire thumb rest area, and its textured surface makes it easy to grip. Pushing it in brings up Logitech’s Actions Ring, and there’s a haptic bump every time you mouse over one of the ring’s icons. We’ll get to its features in more depth further down, but it’s a useful and thoughtful way to add more functionality to this section of the mouse.

On the underside is a quick-switch button for moving between connected PCs, allowing the MX Master 4 to pair with up to three computers at once (including Windows, macOS and Linux machines). There are also three black pads to help the mouse glide smoothly over surfaces.

Logitech MX Master 4: Performance

The first thing I want to cover in terms of performance is the mouse’s battery life, which is absolutely phenomenal. The Logi Options+ app only measures battery in 5% increments, but even so, it took over 20 hours before I saw the first drop from 100% to 95%. After close to 35 hours the mouse was still sitting pretty at 95%. Logitech rates it for 70 hours on one charge, but it felt like it could go on for decades.

The MX Master 4 is not a gaming mouse, but plenty of people are likely to blend work and play throughout their daily usage. Unfortunately, its substantial weight means it’s not well optimized for fast-paced shooters like Call of Duty or other titles where agility and speed are required. Slower games like Baldur’s Gate 3 or Stardew Valley didn’t present many problems, although I still prefer a lighter mouse for gaming regardless.

You get the same 8K polling rate as the MX Master 3S, which might be attractive for top-end pros looking for high sensitivity, but is probably lower down the list of priorities for average users. What is likely to be more applicable to regular folk is the mouse’s ability to work on a variety of tabletops – Logitech says it’ll track properly on “any surface,” and while I can’t 100% guarantee it’ll stand up to anything it encounters, it at least performed admirably on every surface material I tested it on (including a mouse mat, wood, paper, fabric and glass).

One of the MX Master 4’s key strengths is its customizability, and most of this is achieved through the Logi Options+ app. Here, you can change the functionality of seven of the mouse’s physical features, including five buttons and both wheels. It’s quick and intuitive to assign new functions or create your own.

Image 1 of 3

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

The adjustability doesn’t end there. You can also tweak the strength of the new haptic feedback feature, the press sensitivity of the thumb button, mouse pointer speed, scroll force and direction, and more. Don’t like how slowly the thumb wheel moves or how hard the haptic engine taps? You can change it all up in the software.

Options+ is also where you set up Logi Flow, which lets you use one mouse and software pointer for multiple computers and copy and paste files between them. It even works between Windows and macOS. Moving the mouse from a Microsoft PC onto a Mac and back again feels both wondrous and surreal, and it’s a fantastic weapon in your arsenal if you use more than one computer at once. It’s a little clunky – there’s a slight bit of lag when going from one computer to another, you can’t drag files directly across platforms, and copying and pasting items was hit and miss – but the MX Master 4 is better for its inclusion.

Tucked away near your thumb’s resting spot is a small gesture button. The idea here is that you hold it down, then move the mouse left, right, forward or back to activate various gestures. By default, holding it and moving your mouse forward opens the Start menu in Windows, for example. These actions are customizable, with various presets available to try. It’s a handy feature and can save you time, particularly if you set it up in a way that suits your workflow.

Press in the dimpled thumb button and an “Actions Ring” appears, with eight buttons arranged in a wheel around your mouse pointer. These serve as quick shortcuts – change the volume, lock your PC, and more – and can be customized in the Logi Options+ app. Mouse over each one and you feel a solid haptic bump, although you can change the force in Logitech’s app.

The thumb button is a bit clunky and heavy to press, and the Actions Ring can be laggy – I found that it didn’t always appear when I pressed the thumb button, for example. It also ended up having limited utility during my time with the mouse, perhaps because I’m so ingrained in my ways of working. But if you’re tired of keyboard shortcuts and want a fast way of working solely with your mouse, it might be a tempting feature.

Should you buy the Logitech MX Master 4?

Image 1 of 2

Image 2 of 2

Value	This is a pricey mouse, but its value is well earned thanks to its plethora of top-quality features. You definitely get what you pay for.	5/5
Design	The MX Master 4 uses Logitech’s familiar design that comfortably fits your hand. It’s heavy, though, which won’t be for everyone.	4/5
Performance	Lots of premium features and extensive customization options. Just don’t expect it to be a performer when it comes to gaming.	4/5
Average rating	Logitech shows why its MX Master is the mouse to beat, with the latest entry picking up where the MX Master 3S left off and taking it to new heights.	4.5/5

Buy the Logitech MX Master 4 if…

You want a mouse loaded with productivity tools

From its MagSpeed scroll wheel to its gesture button and Actions Ring, the Logitech MX Master 4 is tailor-made for productivity.View Deal

Battery life is important to you

The battery in this mouse goes on and on and on, making it ideal whether you’re a frequent traveler or just hate reaching for the charging cable.View Deal

You use multiple computers and operating systems

With Logitech Flow compatibility, the mouse can be used to control several computers at once – including Windows, macOS and Linux varieties – without needing to switch mice.View Deal

Don’t buy it if…

You prefer lightweight mice

Weighing in at 152g, the MX Master 4 is a bulky, heavy device.View Deal

You’re on a tight budget

It’s far from the world’s most expensive mouse, but the MX Master 4 is pricey enough to provide pause for thought.View Deal

You’re left-handed

There’s only one orientation of the MX Master 4 and it’s built for right-handers. Southpaw users will need to look elsewhere.View Deal

Logitech MX Master 4: Also consider

Razer Pro Click

Razer is best known for its gaming peripherals, but its Pro Click mouse is all about business. Like the MX Master 4, it looks gorgeous and is supremely comfortable thanks to its premium ergonomics, and it throws in multi-device compatibility and programmable buttons to boot. It lacks a gesture button and Logitech’s MagSpeed wheel but trades them for superior gaming performance. Read our full Razer Pro Click reviewView Deal

Apple Magic Mouse 2

Apple’s Magic Mouse 2 is far from perfect, but it has one advantage that very few rivals can match: its entire top surface works as a gesture pad, letting you perform the same swipes that you’d use on one of Apple’s trackpads. It’s macOS-only, but if you want something that offers even better gesture control than the MX Master 4, it’s worth a look. View Deal

How I tested the Logitech MX Master 4

I spent just under a fortnight using the Logitech MX Master 4, putting it through its paces both during and after work hours. That involved writing articles, browsing the web and playing games. I tested it on both Windows and macOS and tried it out on a variety of surfaces.

First reviewed November 2025

PNY’s microSD Express Card is one of the fastest Nintendo Switch 2 cards I’ve tested, and it costs the same as the competition – but there’s one big catch

3:30 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Consoles & PC Gadgets Gaming Nintendo | Tags: Nintendo Switch | Comments: Off

PNY microSD Express Card: review

The PNY microSD Express Card is one of the fastest Nintendo Switch 2 cards that I’ve tested.

In my benchmarks, the 256GB model achieved a staggering 712.42MB/s write speed - blowing past the competition and coming impressively close to the manufacturer’s claimed 750MB/s performance.

It also excels when it comes to read speed, actually achieving above the claimed 890MB/s with 893.74MB/s in my testing. This difference is likely all down to different conditions and equipment, but it’s safe to say that this card is quick. Its read speed is practically neck and neck with the licensed SanDisk microSD Express Card for Nintendo Switch 2 - a model that’s officially endorsed by Nintendo.

What does this all mean in practical terms? Well, the PNY MicroSD Express Card is fantastic to use with a Nintendo Switch 2. Internet providing, games download quickly and everything runs smoothly while you play. I tested the likes of Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate Edition and Hitman World of Assassination - Signature Edition, two very demanding Nintendo Switch 2 games, and didn’t observe any noticeable performance decrease in either - be that missed frames, slow-to-load models, or increased load times.

Best of all, the 256GB PNY MicroSD Express Card is practically the same price as its major competition. At $59.99 / £59.99 / around AU$100, the leading write speed is a good reason to pick this card over the alternatives. This is the case for the warranty too, with PNY offering a five year or “limited lifetime warranty” in some regions.

This refers to the lifetime of the card (not you) and doesn’t cover you if PNY stops making them, but should otherwise see you through the life of the Nintendo Switch 2 at least - just make sure that you hang on to your proof of purchase and retail packaging in case you need to claim it.

PNY is also one of the few manufacturers offering a cheaper 128GB model, which goes for $44.99 / £39.99 (or even less in sales), allowing players with very modest storage needs to avoid paying more for storage that they don’t need.

There is a catch when you start looking at variants above 256GB, though. There’s a recently released 512GB model on the market that comes in at $119.99 / around £150, but seems to be very hard to find outside of the US right now. There’s no 1TB model yet either, leaving those with massive libraries better off with the competing Lexar Play Pro microSD Express Card instead.

PNY microSD Express Card: Price and specs

Price	$59.99 / £59.99 / around AU$100 (256GB)
Capacity	128GB / 256GB
Quoted read speed	890MB/s
Quoted write speed	750MB/s
Benchmarked read speed	893.74MB/s
Benchmarked write speed	713.42MB/s

Should I buy the PNY microSD Express Card?

Buy it if...

You want high-end performance
The PNY microSD Express Card has the fastest write speed of any Nintendo Switch 2 card that I’ve tested. This is backed up by an excellent read speed, making it a good choice for those after a high performance card.

You’re after peace of mind
With its “lifetime” warranty, the PNY microSD Express Card should comfortably last you the entire life of the Nintendo Switch 2. This could be the first and last microSD Express Card that you buy.

Don't buy it if...

You need bigger storage capacities
The 512GB model appears to be quite hard to find outside of the US, and there’s no 1TB version yet. With this in mind, there are better options for those with big game libraries.

Also consider

Here’s how the PNY microSD Express Card stacks up against two major competitors.

	PNY microSD Express Card	Lexar Play Pro microSD Express Card	SanDisk microSD Express Card for Nintendo Switch 2
Price	$59.99 / £59.99 / around AU$100 (256GB)	$58.98 / £59.45 / AU$119.34 (256GB)	$59.99 / £49.99 / AU$79.95
Capacity	128GB / 256GB / 512GB	256GB / 512GB / 1TB	256GB
Quoted read speed	890MB/s	900MB/s	880MB/s
Quoted write speed	750MB/s	600MB/s	650MB/s
Benchmarked read speed	893.74MB/s	831.97MB/s	894.4MB/s
Benchmarked write speed	713.42MB/s	310.03MB/s	674.1MB/s

SanDisk microSD Express Card for Nintendo Switch 2
The SanDisk microSD Express Card is the model to choose if you want something that’s been officially endorsed by Nintendo. It has a slower write speed, but a marginally faster read speed to make up for it.

Read our full SanDisk microSD Express Card for Nintendo Switch 2 review

Lexar Play Pro microSD Express Card
Lexar is the current king of you’re after a 1TB microSD Express Card. The brand was one of the first to bring a 1TB model to the market and should be at the top of your list if that’s what you’re after.

Read our full Lexar Play Pro microSD Express Card review

How I tested the PNY microSD Express Card

Tested over a period of multiple weeks
Compared to other microSD Express cards
Measured using standardized benchmark tests

I tested the PNY microSD Express Card alongside multiple other microSD Express units over a period of multiple weeks. During that time I used the card with my personal Nintendo Switch 2, evaluating its performance across a range of the best Nintendo Switch 2 games.

To obtain comparison data, I benchmarked the card against the competition in a series of standardized tests. I measured the sequential read and write speed of each card using a standardized benchmark via CrystalDiskMark in its default flash memory settings.

To do this, I relied on the Lexar Play Pro MicroSD Express Card Reader, which has an active cooling fan.

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED: Two-minute review

Resident Evil 4 running on Philips Evnia super ultrawide — (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

I was specifically drawn towards the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 in hopes that its Ambilight RGB feature would enhance my gaming experience, and I'm quite happy to report that it did, with color shifts that made my favorite games like Resident Evil 4 remake and Cyberpunk 2077 blossom even more – but not without some downsides. As I mentioned in a previous feature, my love for super-ultrawide monitors hasn't faded, but I've felt I needed a break from them.

Issues with desk space and games not supporting the 32:9 aspect ratio are one thing, but the 49-inch display size made the Auto Brightness Limiter (ABL) far more noticeable than it would be on a smaller display, as I realized when testing on other OLED ultrawide monitors like the Alienware AW3423DWF OLED ultrawide.

In my experience, I couldn't fully enjoy the Ambilight feature as much as I thought I would, considering the length of the display (which can serve as a compliment to how immersive it is), and yes, I tried it without another monitor mounted on top of it, and came to the same conclusion. It's also worth noting that the Ambilight feature can sometimes fail at representing accurate colors.

That doesn't mean it's bad by any means, but it made me realize that I likely would have enjoyed the feature far more on the 34-inch 1440p or 42-inch 4K Philips Evnia models. It just gets to a point where you wonder if the 32:9 aspect ratio is a little bit too much, but ultimately, if those aren't dealbreakers for you, you'll absolutely love this display.

Side image of Philips Evnia monitor — (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

On a more positive note, though, gaming in titles like Call of Duty or Battlefield 6 on this display gives you an extra edge and lets you take advantage of a 240Hz refresh rate. If you have the hardware capable of pushing high frame rates, you'll reap the benefits with smooth gameplay and a 0.03ms Grey-to-Grey (GtG) response time, minimizing ghosting and blur as pixels transition.

It's not just multiplayer FPS shooters where this shines, as this is an exceptional display in narrative-driven action games, and truly makes you feel like you're at the center of the action. The increased point of view you get with super ultrawide displays, as such, should not be understated, providing a cinematic experience to get lost in, and I felt that across the numerous single-player games I tested on this display.

The 49M2C8900 is another display that highlights how much better OLED is when compared to regular LED or even mini-LED monitors. Sure, mini-LED displays can provide better, more consistent brightness levels, notably because there's no frustration with ABL. However, OLED is simply undefeated when it comes to deep black levels, and you can see that in my Wallpaper Engine screenshots below – truly fascinating.

Image 1 of 2

Wallpaper Engine running on desktop screen — Now imagine that deep black level accuracy in a horror game... (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

Image 2 of 2

Showcase of Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED monitor — Now imagine that deep black level accuracy in a horror game... (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

Just to highlight, if you're a big fan of horror games that take full advantage of dark environments or even those with constant color changes like Cronos The New Dawn, then there's plenty of fun to be had with this display. The images don't do it enough justice, and some might even suggest there's major bloom or over exposure, but that isn't the case at all with this display.

It gets even better when Ambilight is working at its best, blending in perfectly with jumpscares or sequences in games where colors shift rapidly on screen, lending extra ammunition to an immersive visual experience. I can definitely see this being loved by those who aren't particularly enthused by Ambilight when buying this monitor, as opposed to me, who was underwhelmed with its inconsistencies.

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED: Price & Availability

How much does it cost? $1,500 (retail) / £799 / AU$1,799
When is it available? Available now (first released in 2023)
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

The Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 is a pricey super ultrawide monitor, retailing at $1,500 and around £1,649.99 in the UK, which would have been an instant dealbreaker for me and many others. Still, it's been available since 2023, so pricing has inevitably plummeted, meaning you can find it at much lower prices – specifically £799 (around $1,050) – with more active sales seeing it drop even further.

Is it worth the retail price it was at previously? No, and that's no shade on the display's quality, because $1,500 is a tough ask for any gaming monitor. However, at its current pricing, I can easily recommend this for anyone who's adamant to dive into the QD-OLED super ultrawide gaming experience, with the added productivity benefits.

However, it's worth noting that if you do plan on getting this display, it's best to act fast, as it can be quite difficult to find it at various online stores. It doesn't appear to be discontinued yet, but new Philips Evnia monitors are likely on the horizon to take the limelight.

Ambilight LEDs on Philips Evnia monitor — (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED: Specs

Screen Size	49-inch
Aspect Ratio	32:9
Resolution	5120x1440
Brightness	1000 nits (Max)
Contrast Ratio	1,500,000:1
Refresh Rate	240 Hz
Color Gamut	10-bit / DCI-P3
Speakers	7.5 W x 4, DTS
HDR	DisplayHDR True Black 400 certified
Weight	13.96 kg (with stand) \| 10.82kg (without stand)
Wall Mountable (VESA)	100 x 100 mm
FreeSync Premium technology	Premium Pro
Power Delivery	Up to 90 W
Panel Type	QD-OLED
Connections	HDMI 2.1 x 2 USB-C x 1 (PD) DP 1.4 x 1 USB 3.2 x 5 (incl upstream) Audio Out

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED: Performance & Design

Again, on a more consistent basis, I was left happy using the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900, as it gave me what I needed for almost all of my games (excluding those that don't support the 32:9 aspect ratio).

It's simple, really: if immersion is your top priority and you've never used a display like this, I have no doubt this will be right up your alley. I must admit that I'm an ultrawide enthusiast, so I do have an element of bias towards these displays. Still, if anything, that ultimately makes me more critical of them with nitpicks – but aside from the issues with Ambilight and ABL, there are hardly any complaints from me with this display.

When ABL isn't an issue, you really notice just how great high brightness is for gaming, and thanks to the QD-OLED panel, I had no problems with any form of ghosting or smearing, which is something you might find with a VA mini-LED monitor, like the Mobile Pixels 34-inch ultrawide monitor I reviewed.

Image of Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 — (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

It's also worth noting that while this monitor is FreeSync Premium Pro certified, it supports G-Sync, so both AMD and Nvidia GPU users will be able to enjoy screen-tearing-free gameplay.

Speaking of GPUs, it would be worth investing in a beefy GPU; to give you an idea, I was using the Asus TUF RTX 4080 Super OC GPU (the second GPU behind the RTX 4090), and the 5120x1440 display resolution gives it a run for its money, knocking Cyberpunk 2077's frame rate down to its knees around 50 to 60fps with ray tracing enabled and Frame Generation disabled.

In terms of design, there's a lot to love regarding the Ambilight feature when it's functioning without glitches, and, excusing my personal issues with the width of these super ultrawide monitors, I believe many others will appreciate color shifts and effects even more than I do.

I didn't get to use a monitor mount, and the stand that comes with it is serviceable, but I would recommend buying a desk mount as the stand's base takes up a decent amount of space on the desk – and the screen itself is already wide enough, taking up a majority of the room available.

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED: Productivity & OSD

Image of Philips Evnia On Screen Display — (Image credit: Future / Isaiah Williams)

It isn't just gaming where it shines, though, as productivity was a highlight while testing this display. If you thought that the 32:9 aspect ratio would serve as a detriment to your work-from-home duties, think again, because I was left very pleased with what the 49M2C8900 had to offer.

I tend to multitask a lot when working, with multiple browser tabs left open, and perhaps some videos playing in the background, and this is the monitor built just for that. Yes, there are readability issues, as you'll find with a wide variety of OLED displays with fringing around text, but this has never been a major issue for me, and it wasn't the case with this display either.

While my review unit didn't come with a remote control, the addition of one is a godsend, and another aspect I don't see nearly enough monitor manufacturers considering. I haven't got my hands on the remote control at all, but I don't need it, as I know that anything other than constantly reaching for the power button and OSD control behind the display is significantly more convenient.

The OSD itself is serviceable with numerous tabs on settings for Ambilight (in the Ambiglow tab), SmartImage, and other input and audio options. Besides the option of a remote control or the OSD control on the monitor rear, the Philips Evnia Precision Center software works wonders as a replacement, allowing you to change settings via mouse and keyboard.

Should you buy the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED?

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED Scorecard
Value	While the initial retail price would have knocked some points off here, the price drop makes all the features across the board much better.	4 / 5
Design	The Ambilight (or Ambiglow) feature can be frustrating to use sometimes with a some glitches and inconsistencies in color accuracy, but for the most part, it gets the job done and is great for a boost in immersion	4 / 5
Performance	The 49M2C8900 is easily one of the best gaming monitors on the market, providing exceptional quality with its 240Hz refresh rate, 32:9 aspect ratio, and a 1,500,000:1 contrast ratio, thanks to the QD-OLED panel.	4.5 / 5
Productivity	With a 32:9 aspect ratio at 49 inches, there is so much that can be simultaneously with this monitor, despite any case of text smearing.	4 / 5
Final Score	It's not perfect, specifically due to issues with brightness limitations under certain conditions, and some Ambilight inconsistences, but there's hardly any major issues to be had, and it certainly provides an experience many will love.	4 / 5

Buy the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED if...

Like many similar super ultrawide monitors, the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 fits the bill for a widened, immersive gaming experience, and it excels with its QD-OLED panel.

There aren't many gaming monitors on the market that use this feature, but the Philips Evnia's Ambilight feature takes game entertainment a step up, by syncing RGB LEDs with colors on screen.

Don't buy it if...

If ABL was a reason you moved away from another OLED monitor, you're not going to find it any less frustrating here.

The 49M2C8900 will take up most of your desk space if your desk isn't big enough, so if you're unwilling to upgrade on desk space, you'll have trouble making room for other components alongside the display.

Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED: also consider

The LG Ultragear GX9 45GX950A-B is a very expensive gaming monitor, but its price is close to the 49M2C8900's retail price, and it is possibly the best gaming monitor you can buy right now. It's a 45-inch display with an 800R curve, running at 5120x2160 resolution, which many would label a '4K ultrawide'.

Read the full LG Ultragear GX9 45GX960A-B review

How I tested the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED

I used the Philips Evnia 49M2C8900 QD-OLED for just over a month, for both work and play, testing numerous games and movies to grasp the performance of the screen and the Ambilight color capabilities.

This is a 32:9 display, so multiplayer shooters like Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 were tested to take full advantage of the screen estate and enhanced perspective of action on screen. It's incredibly ideal for games that rely on instant reactions and better views of peripherals, and it's one of the highlights that I noticed consistently.

After using a handful of displays now (particularly QD-OLED), I've been able to differentiate the pros and cons of these displays compared to regular LEDs or mini-LED, which is why I'm certain that this is among the best you'll ever find on the market.

Tired of espresso machines you have to micromanage for great results? I tested one that satisfies coffee snobs with minimal effort

6:30 pm | November 8, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Coffee Machines Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Comments: Off

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro: one-minute review

The Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro is a manual espresso machine that allows you to channel your inner barista. Naturally won’t get automatic bean grinding or one-touch drinks brewing; this is a machine designed for those who like to get hands-on when crafting their coffee.

As espresso machines go, the E24 Evo Pro is a bit of a beast. This isn’t going to slip discreetly among your kitchen appliances; it'll dominate your worktop and, honestly, I’m not the biggest fan of its boxy, industrial design. On the flipside though, this bulky frame makes room for one of most capacious water tanks we’ve ever tested, at a whopping 2.2qt / 2.1 litres.

One element of its design I’m less forgiving of though is Gaggia’s stinginess when it comes to providing accessories. Packaged with the E24 Evo Pro you’ll get three filter baskets – a single-shot filter, a double shot filter, and a dual-walled filter – a steam wand with no elbow joint, and a pretty flimsy plastic tamp. That’s it: there’s no milk jug, no cleaning kit – none of the extras you might expect from an espresso machine that costs this much.

Given these design gripes, why have I rated the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro so highly? Because it makes it possible to consistently pour quality shots of coffee like many of the best espresso machines without needing to fuss too much over the details. Once I’d finely ground some beans and tamped the puck with medium pressure, the Gaggia expressed a beautiful double espresso for me without having to endlessly tweak the variables to achieve the right pressure. And it wasn’t just beginner's luck: lightning struck twice with my second shot, which was just as rich and smooth as the first.

I also found the steam wand easy enough to use, although it perhaps isn’t quite as forgiving as the rest of the machine. Finding the right angle was harder than it tends to be with an elbow joint, but once I’d got the optimum orientation and depth, I was able to foam up a beautiful dairy cloud to add to my coffee. Watch your fingers though: the steam wand doesn’t have a cold-touch design, so it gets seriously hot during operation.

While the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro isn’t exactly a budget banger – its list price of $549 / £549 / AU$999 puts it firmly in the mid-market category – its performance definitely makes it good value for money. Even without professional barista skills, I was able to pull shot after shot of consistently great coffee, and didn’t need to endlessly tweak variables to get the perfect espresso. Yes, I feel that at this price, Gaggia could afford to be less stingy with its accessories but, all in all you’ll get a very reliable coffee companion with the E24 Evo Pro.

A closeup of the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro's On, Espresso and Steam buttons. — (Image credit: Future)

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: price and availability

List price: $549 / £549 / AU$999

The Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro is available now and it has a list price of $549 / £549 / AU$999. For your spend, you get a wide variety of choice: the E24 Evo Pro comes in a wide range of colorways, whether it’s Polar White, Cherry Red or Sunshine Yellow. Unfortunately, what you don’t get is a lot of accessories: it’s missing a milk jug, backflush disc or any kind of cleaning kit, which all feels a bit stingy.

Still though, when it comes to value, the above pricing puts the Gaggia somewhere in the middle of the pack. It’s neither a budget brewer like the surprisingly capable De'Longhi Dedica Duo nor is it as ludicrously luxe as something like the Smeg Mini Pro Espresso Coffee Machine. But for what you’re paying, it’s a pretty sound investment, despite the dearth of accessories – I found it easy to create consistently delectable coffee in a way even many of its mid-market rivals struggle to manage.

Value score: 4 / 5

A closeup of the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro's empty water tank, with two lenghts of plastic hosing clearly visible — (Image credit: Future)

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: specs

Name	Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro
Type	Manual espresso machine
Dimensions (H x W x D)	9 x 15 x 9.4 inches / 230 x 380 x 240mm
Weight	17.6lbs / 8kg
Water tank capacity	2.2qt / 2.1 liters
Steam wand	Yes, manual
Max pressure	15 bar

A closeup of the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro's steam wand. — (Image credit: Future)

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: design

Large-capacity water tank
Froths milk effectively
Missing some key accessories

The design of the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro is a little brutalist for my taste. At 9 x 15 x 9.4 inches (230 x 380 x 240mm) it’s not the smallest machine, and I’d say I prefer the sleeker shape of Breville or De’Longhi machines personally. But I appreciate that for some people the solidity and presence of the Gaggia will be part of its charm, and at least it comes in a wide variety of colorways, from Lobster Red to Jungle Green.

At 2.2qt / 2.1 litres, the Gaggia’s water tank is substantial, offering a capacity that even outstrips many of the candidates on our list of the best espresso machines. Its drip tray is also pretty capacious, allowing it to catch quite a lot of spilled coffee, but its depth does cause some issues. It’s tall enough that it was genuinely difficult for me to squeeze even relatively squat mugs under the portafilter, and there’s no way to adjust its height, meaning a lot of the time you’re going to want to extract straight into espresso cups.

The range of accessories supplied with Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro is pretty weak, with a few items conspicuous by their absence. Three filter baskets cater to most eventualities, with single-shot and double shot filters, while the ‘perfect crema’ filter makes it easy to pull easy shots even with coffee pods or coarser grinds. There’s also a tamper included, but no milk jug, so this is something to factor into your budget.

A closeup of the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro's accessories, including a plastic tamp, a scoop and removeable drain pipe. — (Image credit: Future)

Frankly, the tamper that comes with the Gaggia is pretty flimsy and plasticky. Personally, I want a tamper with some substance and heft behind it to make it easier to get an even tamp on your grounds. While it’s possible to get the job done with the tamper that comes in the box, I think you’ll likely want to upgrade to a better-quality option pretty soon after purchase.

The steam wand is a little better built, and its dual-steam-outlet design frothed the milk pretty effectively. It did take me a little while to find the right angle, as the arm merely swivels rather than using a ball-joint system, but once I did I was able to whip up a frothy cloud of foam fairly easily. One thing to watch out for though is that there’s no cool-touch design here. If you’re careless – which I am – it’s easy to catch your bare skin on the hot wand, which I did.

As an espresso machine, the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro naturally doesn’t come with quite as many features as some of its bean-to-cup rivals. It’s focused on pulling spot-on shots and foaming consistently frothy milk, not automated drinks dispensing and custom profiles, so you won’t be getting those kinds of innovative capabilities here. Aimed squarely at caffeine addicts who like to tinker with their grind and tamping to achieve the perfect extraction, it also doesn’t offer an integrated grinder, so be prepared to pick one up if you don’t already have one to hand.

Design score: 3.5 / 5

placeholder image — (Image credit: Future)

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: performance

Easy to pour really consistent coffee
Pretty quiet running
Drips a little after pump switches off

I’d been forewarned about the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro's leisurely warm up cycle, which is almost zen-like in its unhurriedness. But it’s not quite as long as some people make out. It took around 60 seconds to hit its target temperature when I first started using it – admittedly that’s slower than many machines, including my home machine, the Breville Bambino Plus, but not quite as bad as the five or 10 minutes I’d heard bandied around. And it takes less than 10 seconds on subsequent shots, which really isn’t that bad.

Once the Gaggia was up to temperature, I blitzed some beans to a fine espresso ground, tamped it with a medium firmness and stuck the filled portafilter in the machine. I honestly wondered if there might be some trial and error required to get used to the machine’s pressure and temperature. But right out the gate it expressed pretty evenly, with the espresso neither rushing out incontinently nor dribbling out in fits and starts.

I also tested how load its pump was using a sound level meter, clocking it at 66dB, which is seriously quiet. By way of context, the Smeg BCC13 is Quiet Mark certified and tops out at 67dB max. Admittedly our testing environment might not be quite as rigorous Smeg’s, but still the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro is quieter when running than many competing espresso machines.

The espresso itself was spot-on. It came out with a sturdy, persistent crema that was the perfect buff tone with the odd hint of caramel running through it. And the taste was genuinely pretty impressive: even on that first pull, I was able to produce something rich and refined, with just the right balance of bitterness and acidity, while there was none of the astringency you’d get from an over-expressed shot.

Wanting to be sure that I hadn’t just lucked out on my first cup, I ran it again, using the same fineness of grind and trying to tamp and run the machine at the same temperature as I had the first time. The second espresso was identical to the first, meaning you should be able to achieve fairly consistent results with this machine.

This time I did notice there was a little dribbling from the machine after the pump clicked off. It wasn’t immediately clear if it was just dripping from a slightly overtamped, waterlogged puck, so I ran the Gaggia again without the portafilter in place and it still seemed to drool when switched off. This only lasted for a few seconds, so it isn't a huge issue, but it does imply the Gaggia doesn’t have perfect control over its pump.

Scrubbing down the machine after use was more straightforward than I was expecting. Cleaning the steam wand requires you to give it a firm wipe down with a cloth and unscrew the tip before washing it under running water. Meanwhile, to clean the mesh screen, all I had to do was run the machine without a portafilter then wipe it down. Once you’ve switched off the machine, you can then wash out the water tank and wipe down the rest of the machine. All in all, while it sounds like a lot of steps, getting the machine spotless doesn’t take much of an investment.

Performance score: 4.5 / 5

The top of the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro with a spotty blue and white mug on it. — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro?

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro score card
Attribute	Notes	Score
Value	While it’s not exactly budget priced, having tasted the coffee it produces I’m surprised it doesn’t cost a fair bit more.	4/5
Design	It has a slightly utilitarian design and few automated features, but its steam wand works reasonably well and it has some useful accessories, although also it's missing a few.	3.5/5
Performance	Takes a while to warm up but once it does, you can pull consistently excellent shots without much tinkering required.	4.5/5

Buy it if…

You want rich, refined coffee every time
Rather than having to tweak pressure, grind and tamping endlessly, it’s really easy to pull quality, consistent decent shots with the Gaggia without too much fuss.

You want a machine that’s nice and quiet
Not every coffee machine has to sound like a diving compressor. If you want caffeine on the QT, the relatively quiet 66dB Gaggia has got your back.

Don’t buy it if..

You want loads of automatic features
As this isn’t a bean-to-cup machine, you won’t get loads of fancy automatic drinks settings and customizable profiles. Instead it’s designed to help you craft your own coffee like a pro.

You want your caffeine hit quick
Given it takes 60 seconds to heat up and you’ll need to grind your beans yourself, the Gaggia might not be the best choice if you don’t want your latte to be late.

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: also consider

	Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro	Breville Bambino Plus	Smeg BCC13
Type	Manual espresso machine	Manual espresso machine	Automatic espresso machine
Dimensions (H x W x D)	9 x 15 x 9.4 inches / 230 x 380 x 240mm	7.6 x 14.3 x 12 inches / 194 x 362 x 304mm	336 x 180 x 433mm
Weight	17.6lbs / 8kg	10.8lbs ‎/ 4.9kg	19.8lbs / 9kg
Water tank capacity	2.2qt / 2.1 liters	2qt / 1.9 liters	1.5qt / 1.4 liters
Steam wand	Yes, manual	Yes, hands free	No, automatic
Max pressure	15 bar	15 bar	19 bar

Breville Bambino Plus
If you want an espresso machine that’s more economical in terms of both space and cash, yet offers just as sophisticated shot-pulling, Breville’s diminutive machine is a worthy alternative. Despite costing just $499.95 / £399.95 / AU$649, it makes great espresso while offering plenty of customization options with different milk temperature and textures. Read our full Breville Bambino Plus review.

Smeg BCC13
Should grinding beans, tamping grounds and frothing cow squeezings all feel like a little too much hassle, this bean-to-cup machine brews wonderfully consistent coffee and foams deliciously thick milk for cappuccinos and lattes. It’s not quite as adept at steaming non-dairy milks, and it does cost a fair bit more at $1,200 / £799.95 / AU$1,199. But as our full Smeg BCC13 review explains, it offers "perfectly brewed coffee and sweet, creamy foamed milk" every time.

How I tested the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro

I spent several days testing it
I poured multiple coffees in a row to see how consistent it was
I used the steam wand to foam multiple batches of milk

I used the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro regularly over a period of several days. To test the quality and consistency of its coffee, I poured multiple double espressos in succession, so I could assess how well the machine maintained its quality from drink to drink. I also used the steam wand to foam milk on several occasions, to test how well the boiler maintained its heat and how effectively the steam wand worked.

I also made sure I timed how long it took the Gaggia’s boiler to heat up initially and on subsequent runs, as well as using a sound-level meter to check how much noise it generated. Once I was done with testing, I also ran through the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro’s daily and long-term cleaning routines, to see how easy it was to clean and maintain.

When it comes to my own personal experience, not only have I spent years testing and writing about gadgets, I’ve been making and drinking coffee from espresso machines daily for more than two decades. I'm really only a fan of drinking coffee made of freshly ground beans – I'm not a pod person.

For more details, see how we test, review, and rate products at TechRadar.
First reviewed: October 2025

Tired of espresso machines you have to micromanage for great results? I tested one that satisfies coffee snobs with minimal effort

6:30 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Coffee Machines Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Comments: Off

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro: one-minute review

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: price and availability

List price: $549 / £549 / AU$999

Value score: 4 / 5

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: specs

Name	Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro
Type	Manual espresso machine
Dimensions (H x W x D)	9 x 15 x 9.4 inches / 230 x 380 x 240mm
Weight	17.6lbs / 8kg
Water tank capacity	2.2qt / 2.1 liters
Steam wand	Yes, manual
Max pressure	15 bar

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: design

Large-capacity water tank
Froths milk effectively
Missing some key accessories

Design score: 3.5 / 5

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: performance

Easy to pour really consistent coffee
Pretty quiet running
Drips a little after pump switches off

Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro?

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro score card
Attribute	Notes	Score
Value	While it’s not exactly budget priced, having tasted the coffee it produces I’m surprised it doesn’t cost a fair bit more.	4/5
Design	It has a slightly utilitarian design and few automated features, but its steam wand works reasonably well and it has some useful accessories, although also it's missing a few.	3.5/5
Performance	Takes a while to warm up but once it does, you can pull consistently excellent shots without much tinkering required.	4.5/5

Buy it if…

You want a machine that’s nice and quiet
Not every coffee machine has to sound like a diving compressor. If you want caffeine on the QT, the relatively quiet 66dB Gaggia has got your back.

Don’t buy it if..

Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro review: also consider

	Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro	Breville Bambino Plus	Smeg BCC13
Type	Manual espresso machine	Manual espresso machine	Automatic espresso machine
Dimensions (H x W x D)	9 x 15 x 9.4 inches / 230 x 380 x 240mm	7.6 x 14.3 x 12 inches / 194 x 362 x 304mm	336 x 180 x 433mm
Weight	17.6lbs / 8kg	10.8lbs ‎/ 4.9kg	19.8lbs / 9kg
Water tank capacity	2.2qt / 2.1 liters	2qt / 1.9 liters	1.5qt / 1.4 liters
Steam wand	Yes, manual	Yes, hands free	No, automatic
Max pressure	15 bar	15 bar	19 bar

How I tested the Gaggia Classic E24 Evo Pro

I spent several days testing it
I poured multiple coffees in a row to see how consistent it was
I used the steam wand to foam multiple batches of milk

For more details, see how we test, review, and rate products at TechRadar.
First reviewed: October 2025

I tested the Hisense U75QG mini-LED TV, and it’s the best value Hisense TV

3:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Televisions | Tags: Dolby Vision, HDR, TV, VA | Comments: Off

Hisense U75QG: Two-minute review

The Hisense U75QG is a solid performer that packs a lot of features in for the price. Typically, flagship TVs are the ones that get the most attention, but people usually aren’t buying the best of the best from any brand. Instead, buying considerations usually fall to midrange TVs like this one.

The Hisense U75QG is a mini-LED display that delivers brightness we generally don’t see from TVs in this price range – I measured over 3,000 nits in HDR Filmmaker Mode, a level that exceeds many of the best TVs from most manufacturers. That makes the U7 an excellent choice for bright spaces where ambient light is difficult to control, such as a living room with large picture windows.

Accuracy with SDR sources is impressive, so while watching broadcast TV or non-HDR streamed shows, the U75QG will deliver nice, accurate colors. HDR has a few issues in color temperature and accuracy, but they’re not drastic enough to distract and pull you out of the viewing experience. They can also be mostly corrected with a professional calibration, if you’re up for spending extra for that.

The U75QG’s Google TV OS is, as expected, quick to use and easy to navigate. Google has been the top built-in smart TV platform for a few years now, and Hisense uses it well. Picture adjustments are easy to find and change, especially with a Settings button on the backlit remote, and the Google Store offers hundreds of apps for download, including all the major streamers and smaller ones as well. And for those that want over-the-air broadcasts, the U75QG includes a built-in ATSC 3.0 tuner.

The Hisense has great gaming support, with the ability for high refresh rate up to 165Hz on all four HDMI 2.1 ports, with VRR and AMD FreeSync Premium, Dolby Vision gaming, and a game bar to easily access gaming settings. There are some issues with image smearing when using VRR that can detract a little, but casual gamers should be more than happy with the features and performance.

Hisense TVs always see an almost immediate dip in pricing after release, and the same has happened with the U75QG. Those discounts make it an even better value, and it stacks up well against the TCL QM7K – its primary competitor. When everything is taken into account, the Hisense U75QG stands as one of the best value midrange TVs I’ve seen in 2025.

Hisense U75QG review: Price and release date

Hisense U75QG showing image of Acapulco Apple TV+ ad — The Hisense U75QG's picture is bright enough to even watch in well-lit rooms (Image credit: Future)

Release date: May 2025
55-inch: $1,300
65-inch: $1,500
75-inch: $1,999
85-inch: $2,499
100-inch: $4,999
116-inch: $21,999

The U75QG is Hisense’s midrange mini-LED TV, falling between the Hisense U8QG and U65QF (a model that uses the Amazon Fire TV OS) in its lineup. The series ranges in size from a 55-inch to a massive 116-inch model – the largest Hisense mini-LED TV available. As is typical for Hisense TVs, prices for all models, apart from the 116-inch, have fallen significantly since the series was released in May. The 55-inch TV can now be found for as little as $698, with prices ranging to just under $3,000 for the 100-inch.

The U75QG pricing is similar to the TCL QM7K, the midrange competitor from that manufacturer. Although the Hisense is currently $100 to $700 more expensive than the TCL, depending on screen size.

Hisense U75QG review: Specs

Screen type:	QLED with mini-LED
Refresh rate:	Up to 144Hz
HDR support:	Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR10+ Adaptive, HLG
Audio support:	Dolby Atmos, DTS Virtual:X
Smart TV:	Google TV
HDMI ports:	4 x HDMI 2.1
Built-in tuner:	ATSC 3.0

Hisense U75QG review: Benchmark results

Hisense U75QG review: Features

Image 1 of 2

Hisense U75QG rear panel ports — The U75QG's ports are split between side-mounted and rear-mounted input sections (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 2

Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support
Hi-View AI Engine Pro processor
VA panel with good anti-reflection

The U75QG is a mini-LED TV with an anti-reflection VA panel, which does a great job handling ambient room light reflections. The VA panel does not provide it with wide viewing angles, however, with desaturated colors and raised black levels easily visible starting at around 30 degrees off-center.

Hisense upgraded last year’s Hi-View Engine Pro found in the U7N to the Hi-View AI Engine Pro, which is the same processor the company is using in its step-up U8QG model. Hisense claims improved performance over the previous chip with a 1.6x faster CPU, 2.2x faster GPU, and 1.5x faster NPU, all to deliver a better optimized image.

The Hisense U75QG includes wide-ranging HDR support, including both Dolby Vision and HDR10+ dynamic formats. Dolby Vision IQ and HDR10+ Adaptive modes use the TV’s processing power to automatically adjust the picture based on the ambient light viewing conditions in your room. Dolby Vision Gaming is included, and, of course, the TV supports HDR10 and HLG.

Console and PC gamers will be happy with the included features on the U75QG. All four HDMI 2.1 ports support a refresh rate up to 165Hz with a Game Booster 288Hz (at 1080p), VRR, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, Hisense Game Bar, and the aforementioned HDR gaming modes. Although, as we’ll get into below, there are some minor clarity issues with gaming on the U75QG.

The U75QG runs the Google TV OS, which allows access to thousands of streaming apps. It also has an ATSC 3.0 tuner for those in areas that are broadcasting NextGen TV signals.

Features Score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Picture quality

Hisense U75QG showing image of dramatic sunset — The U75QG's picture displays good color accuracy (Image credit: Future)

Incredibly bright for a midrange TV
Impressive SDR color accuracy
HDR benefits from a pro calibration

Hisense has been a leader over the past few years in pushing display brightness to its limits, so there’s no surprise that the U75QG gets nice and bright, especially for a midrange TV. With local dimming and peak brightness set to High, and using Portrait Displays’ Calman color calibration software, in Filmmaker Mode from a 10% window, the Hisense blasts out 3,126 nits. That’s more than double what its predecessor, the Hisense U7N, was capable of, and more than the flagship Sony Bravia 9 mini-LED TV. A fullscreen white measurement tops out at 780 nits.

With local dimming on, the Hisense also delivers deep blacks even when there are some bright images on screen. During starfield shots — the opening of Star Wars: The Last Jedi or many scenes in Gravity — there’s excellent separation between the stars, especially for a mid-tier mini-LED TV, and there isn’t a significant amount of blooming along the edges of the Shuttle Explorer against the darkness of space. When bright objects are moving, the blooming is exacerbated a little bit, but overall performance is still great for the price of the TV.

Measurements in Filmmaker Mode out of the box show the U75QG tracks the target EOTF (gamma for HDR) beautifully, so the TV isn’t overbrightening the midtones at all. HDR color accuracy also leaves a little to be desired, with things like grass being a little yellow and skin tones slightly undersaturated. None of this takes away from the overall enjoyment of a movie or TV show, though.

The U75QG excels with SDR content. Grayscale tracks D65 across the range incredibly well, with an average dE of 0.8 and 2.4 gamma. Colors are also impressively accurate for a midrange TV, with skin tones in particular looking exactly as they should.

It’s possible to get similar performance with HDR content. The U75QG has an autocal feature in Calman, the software TechRadar uses to measure TVs, so the TV can be easily calibrated within just a few minutes by a TV calibration professional. And after calibration, the TV’s accuracy is significantly better. Some color temperature issues remain in brighter grays, but if you’re able to make it happen, a calibration is worth it to get the most out of the U75QG.

Picture quality score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Sound quality

Hisense U75QG rear panel subwoofer — A rear-mounted subwoofer adds some low-end heft to the U75QG's sound (Image credit: Future)

2.1.2-channel speaker system
Clear dialogue
Would benefit from a soundbar

The back of the U75QG features an oval subwoofer, part of the TV’s 2.1.2-channel speaker system. Along its edges are speakers to handle the left and right channels, as well as two up-firing speakers for height. In my room, I didn’t find that the up-firing speakers accomplished much, and there isn’t a room calibration system to make them work better.

Overall sound performance is above average for a TV. There’s a decent amount of bass and vocal clarity is good, but it’s still worth pairing the TV with one of the best soundbars for a more immersive experience.

Sound quality score: 3.5/5

Hisense U75QG review: Design

Hisense U75QG close up of stand — The U75QG's "pedestal stand" is actually two support feet with a plastic plate mounted on top (Image credit: Future)

Center pedestal is really two feet with a plastic plate
High enough lift for soundbar
Backlit remote control

The Hisense U75QG has a slightly redesigned stand over last year’s U7N. It still utilizes a center pedestal, but instead of a trapezoidal design, the U75QG consists of two feet that are covered by a rectangular plastic plate. The TV feels sturdy on its stand, although the plastic cover is a bit flimsy – which is honestly to be expected at this price point.

While the stand lifts the TV a little over three inches to accommodate a soundbar, the front sticks out a bit, so some extra space on your credenza or table will be needed to put the soundbar in front of it. The 100- and 116-inch models use two separated legs instead of the pedestal base.

The TV is a bit on the thick side, and more so than the comparable TCL QM7K by about half an inch. Connections are split between two panels. The majority are side-facing — including four 165Hz-capable HDMI 2.1 ports (one eARC), the ATSC 3.0 coax inputs, a USB 3.0 port, a 3.5 mm audio out, and an AV in (which requires an adapter). An additional USB 2.0 port, optical digital audio out, and Ethernet port are in a rear-facing cutout. If you plan to use wired Ethernet and wall-mount the TV, this could cause some mounting issues and require the TV to be slightly out from the wall to keep the Ethernet cable from bending and putting stress on the connection. The U75QG supports a Wi-Fi 6E wireless connection as well.

The remote is the same as the one that was introduced with 2024 Hisense TVs. It’s a long silver handset with backlit buttons, which include settings and input buttons (these are sadly absent from some competitors’ remotes). Because of its length, reaching all the buttons – at least for my average-sized hand – required some jostling of the remote, but overall the design is comfortable and easy to use.

Design score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Smart TV and menus

Hisense U75QG showing Google TV interface on screen — The U75QG's Google TV smart interface (Image credit: Future)

Google TV OS
Loads of streaming apps available
Some ads on the home page

Google TV is the OS of choice for the U7 series, and it runs well on the TV. The OS is one of the best built-in options when it comes to the combination of usability and streaming app support. On the U75QG, home page navigation is quick, and menus are intuitive. There are thousands of apps available for download – including the major streaming ones such as Netflix, Prime Video, and Apple TV – as well as more niche options not included on all platforms, like F1 TV and Dropout.

The gear button on the remote pulls up the menus for adjusting any TV settings. There’s a selection of quick access menus for things like Picture and Sound, or you can call up the full settings menu. It’s pretty easy to navigate and find what you’re looking for — different settings are sensibly placed instead of hidden under a multitude of submenus.

Smart TV & menus score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Gaming

Hisense U8QG showing game image with game menu onscreen — Hisense's Game Bar onscreen menu (Image credit: Future)

Four HDMI 2.1 ports with 165Hz support
9.8ms input lag time
FreeSync Premium Pro

The TV has lots of features meant to satisfy gamers, and for the most part, gamers will be happy with the U75QG. The four HDMI 2.1 inputs accept high refresh rate signals up to 165Hz from a computer in 4K, and Game Booster allows for 1080p/288Hz gaming. Consoles will be able to play games at 120Hz with VRR (including HDMI Forum VRR, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, and G-Sync compatibility) and Dolby Vision gaming.

The U75QG has the Hisense Game Bar, where adjustments can quickly be made to settings like Dark Detail, Brightness, the Game Genre, and for adding a crosshair for aiming. It also displays your current frame rate, HDR, VRR, and ALLM status.

When in Game/PC picture mode, the input lag on the U75QG with a 4K 60Hz signal is a very low 9.8ms. It’s excellent for gamers who regularly play against others, or for reaction-based games. I played a good amount of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, which requires some button timing for dodges and parries, and didn’t feel any lag.

While I found gaming on the U75QG to be an overall good experience, there’s some smearing when VRR is on, particularly with bright objects across a darker background, that can be a bit distracting. I saw this more when using my PC (from an RTX 4070 Ti Super) than on console, so if you’re a PC gamer, you might also see this more.

Gaming score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Value

Hisense U8QG remote control held in hand — The U75QG's backlit remote control (Image credit: Future)

Excellent picture quality for the price
Really needs a soundbar for best experience
Four HDMI 2.1 ports and backlit remote

Hisense has been delivering significant value from its televisions for years now, and that continues with the U75QG, which might deliver the best performance-to-price ratio of any Hisense TV. Hisense historically lowers its TV pricing after release by a good bit, and the TVs are always on sale during shopping events, so that increases its value proposition even further.

The midrange TV market is fierce, though. The U75QG’s primary competitor is the TCL QM7K, another solid performer with high value. It’s not nearly as bright as the Hisense, and it also has some HDR inaccuracies (overly blue grayscale and some color issues) out of the box. Only two of the TCL’s HDMI ports are version 2.1, as well, although I prefer its overall design.

It gets interesting when we compare against the next tier up. The TCL QM8K has had some deep discounts recently, putting it within a couple of hundred dollars of the Hisense. At that price, the TCL is an absolute steal. Not only is it a much better TV than both the U75QG and QM7K, I think it's one of the best TCL TVs ever made – although the TCL QM9K likely takes that title.

Value score: 4.5/5

Should I buy the Hisense U75QG?

Hisense U75QG showing Hulu app interface — (Image credit: Future)

Hisense U75QG
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Good HDR support and gaming features	4/5
Picture quality	Excellent brightness and great overall picture quality for the price	4/5
Sound quality	2.1.2-channel speakers deliver clear dialogue but limited height effects with Atmos soundtracks	3.5/5
Design	Good overall design with backlit remote and plentiful connections	4/5
Smart TV and menus	Google TV is a solid smart interface with plenty of apps	4/5
Gaming	Four HDMI 2.1 ports with 4K 165Hz support but some picture smearing with VRR, particularly with PCs	4/5
Value	A great overall value given the TV's picture quality and features	4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want a good all-around TV
While the U75QG isn’t without flaws, its overall performance is impressive for the price.

Your TV room is bathed in ambient light
Brightness output from the Hisense is more than other comparable TVs and stands up well against uncontrollable ambient light.

You have multiple gaming consoles/PCs
The Hisense U75QG has four HDMI 2.1 165Hz-compatible inputs, while its main competitor, the TCL QM7K, only has two. If you have multiple consoles and a PC to connect, the U75QG is the pick.

Don't buy it if…

You’re looking for top-tier gaming performance
The U75QG has decent gaming performance and a nice game bar option, but its VRR performance doesn’t match competitors.

You want amazing sound from a TV
The sound performance is okay, but you’ll really want to add a soundbar for a better sonic experience.

You watch events with big groups
Picture quality degrades pretty quickly as you move from off from center screen, so any friends that are over and have to sit to the side will see a lower-quality image.

Also consider...

	Hisense U75QG	TCL QM7K	Hisense U8QG	Samsung QN90F
Price (65-inch)	$1,500	$1,499	$2,199	$2,499
Screen type	mini-LED w/ QLED	mini-LED w/ QLED	mini-LED w/ QLED	mini-LED w/ QLED
Refresh rate	Up to 165Hz	Up to 144Hz	Up to 165Hz	165Hz
HDR support	Dolby Vision IQ//HDR10+ Adaptive/HLG	Dolby Vision IQ/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG	Dolby Vision IQ/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG	HDR10+/HDR10/HLG
Smart TV	Google TV	Google TV	Google TV	Tizen
HDMI ports	4 HDMI 2.1	4 (2x HDMI 2.1)	3x HDMI 2.1	4x HDMI 2.1

TCL QM7K
The TCL QM7K is another great mid-range mini-LED TV with an affordable price tag. It has a better design than the Hisense, but its picture isn't as powerfully bright and its gaming flexibility is limited by having only two HDMI 2.1 ports.

Read our full TCL QM7K review

Hisense U8QG
The Hisense U8QG has a similar feature set to the U75QG but a better overall design with a sturdy aluminum pedestal stand. Its picture brightness is about the same, although the U8QG's 4.1.2-channel speaker array provides more immersive sound. It's a bit more expensive than the U75QG but not by much.

Read our full Hisense U8QG review

Samsung QN90F
The Samsung QN90F is the best mini-LED TV on the market when you take into account picture quality, design, and gaming features and performance. It's notably more expensive than the Hisense U75QG but has much better off-axis picture uniformity and is also available in a wide range of sizes, including 43- and 98-inch models.

Read our full Samsung QN90F review

Samsung QN900D showing test pattern — (Image credit: Future)

How I tested the Hisense U75QG

The U75QG was my main TV for a couple weeks
Tested with Calman color calibration software
Used a variety of test material from streaming and discs

I watched a wide range of content on the Hisense U75QG, including movies and TV shows streaming from the built-in Google TV OS on Disney+, HBO Max, and Hulu. I also used a Kaleidescape Strato V for high-quality movies, along with 4K UHD Blu-ray discs played on an Oppo UDP-203 disc player. Games were played on an Xbox Series X.

For grayscale and color accuracy testing, I used a Portrait Displays C6 HDR5000 colorimeter profiled to an X-rite i1 Pro 3 spectrophotometer, Murideo Seven-G 8K pattern generator, Konica Minolta LS-100 luminance meter, and Calman calibration software by Portrait Displays. I used a Leo Bodnar 4K lag tester to check input lag.

I’ve been testing TVs, monitors, and projectors for a few decades, and am an ISF Level III certified calibrator.

You can read an in-depth overview of how we test TVs at TechRadar at that link.

First reviewed: November 2025
Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

I tested the Hisense U75QG mini-LED TV, and it’s the best value Hisense TV

3:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Televisions | Tags: Dolby Vision, HDR, TV, VA | Comments: Off

Hisense U75QG: Two-minute review

Hisense U75QG review: Price and release date

Release date: May 2025
55-inch: $1,300
65-inch: $1,500
75-inch: $1,999
85-inch: $2,499
100-inch: $4,999
116-inch: $21,999

The U75QG pricing is similar to the TCL QM7K, the midrange competitor from that manufacturer. Although the Hisense is currently $100 to $700 more expensive than the TCL, depending on screen size.

Hisense U75QG review: Specs

Screen type:	QLED with mini-LED
Refresh rate:	Up to 144Hz
HDR support:	Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR10+ Adaptive, HLG
Audio support:	Dolby Atmos, DTS Virtual:X
Smart TV:	Google TV
HDMI ports:	4 x HDMI 2.1
Built-in tuner:	ATSC 3.0

Hisense U75QG review: Benchmark results

Hisense U75QG review: Features

Image 1 of 2

Image 2 of 2

Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support
Hi-View AI Engine Pro processor
VA panel with good anti-reflection

The U75QG runs the Google TV OS, which allows access to thousands of streaming apps. It also has an ATSC 3.0 tuner for those in areas that are broadcasting NextGen TV signals.

Features Score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Picture quality

Incredibly bright for a midrange TV
Impressive SDR color accuracy
HDR benefits from a pro calibration

Picture quality score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Sound quality

2.1.2-channel speaker system
Clear dialogue
Would benefit from a soundbar

Sound quality score: 3.5/5

Hisense U75QG review: Design

Center pedestal is really two feet with a plastic plate
High enough lift for soundbar
Backlit remote control

Design score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Smart TV and menus

Google TV OS
Loads of streaming apps available
Some ads on the home page

Smart TV & menus score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Gaming

Four HDMI 2.1 ports with 165Hz support
9.8ms input lag time
FreeSync Premium Pro

Gaming score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Value

Excellent picture quality for the price
Really needs a soundbar for best experience
Four HDMI 2.1 ports and backlit remote

Value score: 4.5/5

Should I buy the Hisense U75QG?

Hisense U75QG
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Good HDR support and gaming features	4/5
Picture quality	Excellent brightness and great overall picture quality for the price	4/5
Sound quality	2.1.2-channel speakers deliver clear dialogue but limited height effects with Atmos soundtracks	3.5/5
Design	Good overall design with backlit remote and plentiful connections	4/5
Smart TV and menus	Google TV is a solid smart interface with plenty of apps	4/5
Gaming	Four HDMI 2.1 ports with 4K 165Hz support but some picture smearing with VRR, particularly with PCs	4/5
Value	A great overall value given the TV's picture quality and features	4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want a good all-around TV
While the U75QG isn’t without flaws, its overall performance is impressive for the price.

Your TV room is bathed in ambient light
Brightness output from the Hisense is more than other comparable TVs and stands up well against uncontrollable ambient light.

Don't buy it if…

You’re looking for top-tier gaming performance
The U75QG has decent gaming performance and a nice game bar option, but its VRR performance doesn’t match competitors.

You want amazing sound from a TV
The sound performance is okay, but you’ll really want to add a soundbar for a better sonic experience.

Also consider...

	Hisense U75QG	TCL QM7K	Hisense U8QG	Samsung QN90F
Price (65-inch)	$1,500	$1,499	$2,199	$2,499
Screen type	mini-LED w/ QLED	mini-LED w/ QLED	mini-LED w/ QLED	mini-LED w/ QLED
Refresh rate	Up to 165Hz	Up to 144Hz	Up to 165Hz	165Hz
HDR support	Dolby Vision IQ//HDR10+ Adaptive/HLG	Dolby Vision IQ/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG	Dolby Vision IQ/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG	HDR10+/HDR10/HLG
Smart TV	Google TV	Google TV	Google TV	Tizen
HDMI ports	4 HDMI 2.1	4 (2x HDMI 2.1)	3x HDMI 2.1	4x HDMI 2.1

Read our full Hisense U8QG review

Read our full Samsung QN90F review

How I tested the Hisense U75QG

The U75QG was my main TV for a couple weeks
Tested with Calman color calibration software
Used a variety of test material from streaming and discs

I’ve been testing TVs, monitors, and projectors for a few decades, and am an ISF Level III certified calibrator.

You can read an in-depth overview of how we test TVs at TechRadar at that link.

First reviewed: November 2025
Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Topping’s new DAC, headphone amp and preamp just toppled a few key players to sit with the top of the class

1:30 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi | Tags: DAC, LDAC | Comments: Off

Topping DX5 II: Two-minute review

The DX5 II is the product that Chinese specialist Topping hopes is going to force its name into the ‘affordable desktop audio’ conversation – and so it’s specified it accordingly and then priced it in the most aggressive manner imaginable.

A selection of digital inputs and a wider selection of balanced and unbalanced outputs mean the DX5 II can function as a DAC and headphone amp, like many of the best portable DACs we recommend can, but it can also become a preamp for use with a traditional stereo system or a pair of powered speakers – which your average portable DAC definitely can't do. So, this is new ground for many a headphone amp-owner.

ESS Sabre digital-to-analogue conversion with a native resolution of 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 means the DX5 II is as high-resolution a device as these things ever get. A variety of finishes, each one tidily realised and each one complementing an impeccable standard of build and finish, means the DX5 II won’t lower the visual tone of your system or your desktop. A selection of desktop Topping technologies designed to maximise sonic performance act as the cherry on top.

And no matter if you use it as a DAC, a preamp or a headphone amp, the DX5 II has an awful lot to recommend it where sound quality is concerned. It creates a big, open soundstage and organises it carefully. It’s detailed and dynamic in equal measure, and it controls low-frequency information to the point that rhythms are delivered with real positivity. It’s eloquent through the midrange, and its top-to-bottom frequency response is smooth too. In fact, there’s only a suggestion of overly bright treble response that represents a tiny fly in a great big vat of sonic ointment.

Topping DX5 II review: Price and release date

The Topping DX5 II on a light-wood table, showing the VU meter, ports and just-seen remote — (Image credit: Future)

Launched on June 10, 2025
Priced $299 / £299 / AU$499

The Topping DX5 II is on sale now, and in the UK it goes for £299. Those numbers apply in the United States too, where it sells for $299 (subject to tariff fluctuations) while in Australia it will set you back AU$499.

A quick comparison then: it's a fair amount of product for the money. FiiO's pocketable BTR17 portable Bluetooth DAC/headphone amplifier sells for just a little less, at around $219 / £179 / AU$329 – but it's a portable little beast rather than a 'desktop' option.

The USB DAC iFi GO Bar Kensei is more, at $499 / £449 / AU$769, while the five-star iFi hip-dac 3 is less, at $199 / £199 / AU$349. All of which is a roundabout way of saying, there's certainly a market for the Topping DX5 II at this price, if it can take care of business.

Topping DX5 II review: Features

ESS Sabre 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 DACs
Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX Adaptive and LDAC compatibility
Balanced and unbalanced outputs

If Topping has attempted to build the DX5 II down to a price, it’s in no way obvious from the way the device is specified. There are similar products costing a fair bit more than Topping is asking that don’t tick as many spec boxes.

Consider the array of inputs and outputs, for instance. The DX5 II can accept digital audio information via coaxial or optical (which both top out at 24bit/192kHz), USB-B (a giddy 32bit/768kHz and DSD512), or Bluetooth 5.1 with SBC, AAC, several aptX standards (up to and including Adaptive) and LDAC. It’s worth mentioning that Windows PC users will need to install a driver to make use of that USB-B socket. Once the digital audio information been converted to the analog equivalent (which I’ll get to in a moment) it can come out again via single-ended stereo RCAs or balanced stereo XLRs (for connection to powered speakers or the amplifier of a traditional stereo system), or via a trio of headphone outputs – balanced XLR, balanced 4.4mm and single-ended 6.3mm.

Conversion to analog from digital is handled by a couple of ESS Sabre ES9038Q2M two-channel DAC chips – one attends to the left channel, the other to the right. They include ESS Sabre’s latest ‘Hyperstream IV’ architecture that’s intended to suppress noise and deliver optimal dynamic range – and their native 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 resolution is about as hi-res as hi-res ever gets out in the real world. To further suppress noise and distortion, Topping has developed a bespoke current-to-voltage conversion module that should also make the DX5 II compatible with a very wide selection of headphones and powered speakers.

And on top of this, Topping has included its own ‘X-Hybrid’ headphone amplification technology. It’s a fully balanced four-channel design with three stages (discrete input, op-amp -based gain stage, discrete output). This optimised circuit topology is designed to offer extended dynamic range, optimum efficiency and low distortion – and it should mean the DX5 II has no problem driving even the most uncooperative and power-hungry headphones.

Now, the free ‘Topping Tune’ software: it was only available for Windows PC at the time of testing, but it’s now also available for Mac OS users and provides access to Topping’s new ‘PEQ’ (parametric equaliser) algorithm that allows control of bandwidth, frequency and gain across ten definable bands. It means multiple audio profiles can be created, saved and uploaded to the DX5 II, target curves can be defined and imported – and different profiles can be applied to specific inputs, so the ultimate sound of headphones or speakers can be individually tuned by the Topping.

Features score: 5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Sound quality

Great sense of space and detail
Dynamic and punchy when required
A hint of top-end brightness

In virtually every respect, the Topping DX5 II does straightforwardly impressive work. So much so, in fact, that I might as well deal with the one aspect where it doesn’t outright excel – which should leave plenty of space for me to explain just what’s so likeable about it.

The top of the frequency range is just a little flimsy and bright when compared to everything else that’s going on underneath it. There’s an overly bright quality to the treble reproduction here, a sort of latent edginess that means the DX5 II is just slightly pickier about partnering equipment than it otherwise would be.

And with that out of the way, let’s get to all the good stuff.

The DX5 II is an open, detailed and considered listen, with the sort of soundstaging ability that makes even a complex recording like The Birth and Death of the Day by Explosions in the Sky easy to follow on a granular level. This recording also allows the DX5 II to demonstrate its considerable dynamic headroom – the distance between the moments of greatest intensity and attack, compared to the quietest and most contemplative moments, is significant.

The Topping is also alert to the dynamics of harmonic variation, too – and, in fact, shows a great facility for detail retrieval in every circumstance. It can identify, reveal and quite carefully contextualise even transient or minor details in a mix. And this goes a long way towards creating the sensation that you’re in full receipt of everything a recording has to offer.

The tonality of the low frequencies and the midrange is tidy and naturalistic, and the frequency response from the very bottom to the very top is smooth and even. Low frequencies are deep and textured, and carry a huge amount of information along with very pleasing tonal variation – and they’re controlled at the point of attack, too, so rhythmic expression is assured. The DX5 II punches into bass sounds, rather than slurring, and it observes the decay of those same sounds very carefully too.

The midrange is equally well-realised. The voice during a 24bit/96kHz FLAC file of Ghostpoet’s Off Peak Dreams is characterful and attitudinal, and there’s a tremendous amount of fine detail regarding technique and tone revealed at the same time as information about intention and emotion. The Topping communicates through the midrange in the most articulate manner, and as a result voices always sound direct and positive.

All of the above is true no matter what you’re asking the DX5 II to do. As long as you take a moment’s care with your choice of headphones, as long as the system you’re introducing it into doesn’t share the same latent treble tendencies, it’s a deft and remarkably accomplished performer.

Sound quality: 4.5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Design

44 x 190 x 155mm (HxWxD)
Black, silver or white finishes
Properly built and finished

It’s become apparent lately that ‘desktop’ is a relative term – but Topping really means it when it describes the DX5 II as a desktop device. At a neat 44 x 190 x 155mm (HxWxD) it isn’t going to get in the way, even if your desktop is as untidy as mine.

The standard of build and finish is exemplary, and the DX5 II even feels good in a matte-finish, square-edged kind of way. The little indent around the rear of the fascia adds a tiny hint of visual interest, and the Topping looks very presentable in any of the black, silver or white finishes that are available.

Design score: 5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Usability and setup

2-in full-colour display
Remote control handset
Legible and sensible on-screen menus

There are some physical controls on the fascia of the DX5 II – they’re grouped to the right of the crisp, full-colour screen that occupies the centre. Three rectangular buttons take care of input selection, accessing set-up menus, and cycling through the various display options for that screen, while a larger turn/press dial takes care of volume and menu navigation.

Options for the screen consist of a ‘spectrum analyser’ (which is sure to remind readers of a certain age of a graphic equaliser from back in the day), a readout of volume level, file format and file resolution, or a virtual VU meter (which is one for readers of an even more certain age). There’s a choice of colour and adjustable brightness, but in every circumstance the display is legible and crisply rendered, so navigating menus is always straightforward.

The Topping is also supplied with a little remote control handset that is, predictably, a lot less visually interesting and a lot less tactile than the control interface on the device itself. And unlike the DX5 II itself, there’s no choice of finish available – it comes in traditional black.

Usability and setup score: 4.5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Value

Judge it on the physical size of the product and the DX5 II can seem quite expensive. Consider it in terms of its specification and it suddenly seems much more realistically priced. And then think about its functionality, its flexibility and the highlights of its performance and the Topping starts to look like a bit of a bargain.

Value score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Topping DX5 II?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Comprehensively specified – it'll even work as a preamp	5/5
Design	Small, svelte and useful enough to slip onto even the untidiest of desks	5/5
Sound quality	Dynamic, punchy and detailed, if just a tad bright on occasion	4.5/5
Value	It would be wrong to argue with the sound-per-pound value here	4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want to up your desktop audio game
The difference the DX5 II can make to the sound of your laptop really needs to be heard

You have a traditional audio system that could do with some digital smarts
High-quality Bluetooth streaming can be yours, no matter how old-school your stereo system

You have some nice headphones that need the best bringing from them
The Topping is ready and able to drive the most demand and/or most high-achieving headphones around

Don't buy it if...

You have headphones that are lively at the top of the frequency range
The resulting sound could easily be interpreted as ‘too much of a good thing’

Topping DX5 II review: Also consider

It’s pretty plain that the iFi Zen DAC 3 is the product the DX5 II needs to topple – or, at the very least, compete hard with if it’s going to be a viable option.

The iFi is a nice-looking, properly built and handily specified device, and it’s capable of extremely clean, confident and full-bodied sound. Which, of course, are all things that equally apply to the Topping machine…

How I tested the Topping DX5 II

I tried a bit of everything, basically – I used the DX5 II on my desktop, connected it to my laptop via USB, and plugged in a pair of high-end IEMs via the balanced 4.4mm headphone output.

I connected it to my reference stereo system using its single-ended RCAs and its balanced XLR outputs – this way I was able to use it as a DAC for my CD player and, with it wirelessly connected to my smartphone, as a Bluetooth receiver. And I tried out these various roles and functions for a working week or more.

First reviewed: November 2025
Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Topping’s new DAC, headphone amp and preamp just toppled a few key players to sit with the top of the class

1:30 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi | Tags: DAC, LDAC | Comments: Off

Topping DX5 II: Two-minute review

Topping DX5 II review: Price and release date

Launched on June 10, 2025
Priced $299 / £299 / AU$499

Topping DX5 II review: Features

ESS Sabre 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 DACs
Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX Adaptive and LDAC compatibility
Balanced and unbalanced outputs

Features score: 5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Sound quality

Great sense of space and detail
Dynamic and punchy when required
A hint of top-end brightness

And with that out of the way, let’s get to all the good stuff.

Sound quality: 4.5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Design

44 x 190 x 155mm (HxWxD)
Black, silver or white finishes
Properly built and finished

Design score: 5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Usability and setup

2-in full-colour display
Remote control handset
Legible and sensible on-screen menus

Usability and setup score: 4.5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Value

Value score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Topping DX5 II?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Comprehensively specified – it'll even work as a preamp	5/5
Design	Small, svelte and useful enough to slip onto even the untidiest of desks	5/5
Sound quality	Dynamic, punchy and detailed, if just a tad bright on occasion	4.5/5
Value	It would be wrong to argue with the sound-per-pound value here	4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want to up your desktop audio game
The difference the DX5 II can make to the sound of your laptop really needs to be heard

You have a traditional audio system that could do with some digital smarts
High-quality Bluetooth streaming can be yours, no matter how old-school your stereo system

You have some nice headphones that need the best bringing from them
The Topping is ready and able to drive the most demand and/or most high-achieving headphones around

Don't buy it if...

You have headphones that are lively at the top of the frequency range
The resulting sound could easily be interpreted as ‘too much of a good thing’

Topping DX5 II review: Also consider

It’s pretty plain that the iFi Zen DAC 3 is the product the DX5 II needs to topple – or, at the very least, compete hard with if it’s going to be a viable option.

How I tested the Topping DX5 II

I tried a bit of everything, basically – I used the DX5 II on my desktop, connected it to my laptop via USB, and plugged in a pair of high-end IEMs via the balanced 4.4mm headphone output.

First reviewed: November 2025
Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

« Previous Page — Next Page »