Organizer
Gadget news
I tested the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) and it performs better than its price suggests – but there’s one big sacrifice you’ll have to make
5:18 am | August 29, 2025
Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Gaming Computers Gaming Laptops | Tags: , | Comments: Off

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025): Two-minute review

The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is a gaming laptop that promises top-tier performance at an affordable price. It doesn’t exactly convey its power visually, looking rather muted compared to others in this class. However, it does exude a fair amount of elegance, which belies its budget price tag.

It’s surprisingly thin and free from bulk, although it’s still quite heavy. The lid hinges are pleasingly small, and the bezel around the screen is very minimal – in fact you’ll struggle to find a more slender frame on even the best gaming laptop models.

Build quality is also respectable, although the keyboard doesn’t look the most premium. Thankfully, the keys themselves feel great, offering sufficient dampening, travel, and feedback, which makes them a joy to use when gaming.

And, on that front, the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) acquits itself very well. The RTX 5050 in my unit performed remarkably well, achieving very high frame rates with demanding graphics settings selected, although Cyberpunk 2077 labored considerably on the highest preset, with disruptive stutters, lag, and visual glitches. But dropping the settings down slightly improved the experience greatly, while maintaining plenty of visual fidelity.

Close-up of keyboard on ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025)

(Image credit: Future)

More bothersome, however, was the noise the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) generated, which is distractingly loud and pretty much rules out playing without headphones. At least the unit stays relatively cool for the most part, with any heat steering clear from any touchable surface.

The large 16-inch, 1920 x 1200 display of the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is certainly good enough to represent AAA games faithfully, but it’s not the best in class, guilty of looking a little washed out at times. It also lacks the high brightness levels of its rivals, and is a little too reflective.

As mentioned, the keys feel great to use when gaming, but the cramped layout – owing to the inclusion of a number pad – can make typing awkward, at least for someone as ham-fisted as me.

This isn’t too big a gripe, though, and if you’re willing to put up with the incessant noise and can settle for gaming at close-to maximum settings, the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is a respectable performer that won’t break the bank – at least not to the extent other gaming laptops will.

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) review: Price & Availability

  • $1,449.99 / £1,399.99 / AU$2,499
  • Available now
  • Well-priced for the spec

The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) starts from $1,449.99 / £1,399.99 / AU$2,499 and is available now. In the US, we couldn't find a model equipped with an RTX 5050; the base model here appears to start with a 5060 instead.

This is a decent price for a 16-inch laptop with an RTX 5000 series GPU. There are few compromises, too, with the 1920 x 1200 resolution being the main concession. But the overall design and build quality of the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) aren’t what you’d call cheap.

However, the Acer Nitro 16 AMD is cheaper by a significant amount. This has a less impressive spec, though: the base Nitro 16 AMD gets an RTX 4050 GPU, an AMD Ryzen 5 CPU, and only 512GB of storage. It’s also quite bulky and doesn’t exactly look premium. We were very pleased with its 1080p performance, though, and we also liked its keyboard.

  • Value: 4 / 5

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) review: Specs

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) Base Config

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) Maximum Config

Price

$1,449.99 / £1,399.99 / AU$2,499

$1,699.99 / £1,699.99

CPU

AMD Ryzen 7 260 Processor 3.8GHz (24MB Cache, up to 5.1 GHz, 8 cores, 16 Threads)

AMD Ryzen 9 270 Processor 4.0GHz (24MB Cache, up to 5.2GHz, 8 cores, 16 Threads)

GPU

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, 8GB

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, 8GB

RAM

8GB DDR5

32GB DDR5

Storage

1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD

1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD

Display

16-inch, FHD+ 16:10 (1920 x 1200, WUXGA), 165Hz, IPS, Anti-glare display, G-Sync

16-inch, FHD+ 16:10 (1920 x 1200, WUXGA), 165Hz, IPS, Anti-glare display, G-Sync

Ports and Connectivity

1x 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x USB-A (1x USB 2.0 and 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2), 2x USB-C (1x USB 3.2 Gen2 and 1x USB 4), 1x RJ45, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3

1x 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x USB-A (1x USB 2.0 and 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2), 2x USB-C (1x USB 3.2 Gen2 and 1x USB 4), 1x RJ45, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3

Battery

90WHrs

90WHrs

Dimensions

13.94 x 10.59 x 0.70 inches (354 x 269 x 17.9mm)

13.94 x 10.59 x 0.70 inches (354 x 269 x 17.9mm)

Weight

4.85lbs (2.20kg)

4.85lbs (2.20kg)

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) review: Design

Close-up of trackpad on ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) on desk

(Image credit: Future)
  • Surprisingly thin
  • Very thin screen bezel
  • Good-feeling keyboard

To my personal delight, ASUS hasn’t done much to gamify the appearance of the TUF Gaming A16 (2025). It has a minimal aesthetic and the whole unit looks surprisingly elegant for a gaming machine.

It isn’t saddled with the typical gaming laptop bulk, either. The chassis is pleasingly thin and the rear protrusion is comparatively small. While it's still quite weighty, again it’s not as heavy as some of its rivals.

The lid hinges look rather smart, and are easy to operate yet provide plenty of stability, while the bezel around the display is very small, allowing almost all of the allotted space to be used.

There are a few missteps in the design, though: the corners of the base are a little too sharp, and the keyboard looks a little cheap. A number pad is also included, which unfortunately makes the whole layout a little more cramped than it otherwise would be. Still, I did appreciate the translucent WASD keys, which distinguishes them from the others.

Underneath the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) are four rubber feet and plastic strips that raise the unit from the surface by a fair amount, which helps to improve airflow.

You’ll find the usual selection of ports on the TUF Gaming A16 (2025), with most of them located on the left side. They’re sensibly ordered, too; I particularly appreciated the headset jack being at the front and the power port at the back.

Along with an ethernet port and an HDMI port, you’ll also find two USB-C ports on the left – one is 3.2 Gen 2 and the other 4, but both support external display connections. On the right are two USB-A ports, which are again logically located, since it makes them amenable to connecting peripherals such as mice.

  • Design: 4 / 5

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) review: Performance

Close-up of webcam on ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025), with pink background

(Image credit: Future)
  • Impressive AAA performance
  • Quite loud
  • Display not the most vibrant

I was impressed by the overall performance of the TUF Gaming A16 (2025). When I played Cyberpunk 2077 on the Ray Tracing: Low preset – which the game selected by default – I was getting roughly between 175-200fps, depending on the in-game environment.

Turning the preset to Ray Tracing: Ultra naturally resulted in a decrease, but I was still in the respectable region of 115-150fps. Ray Tracing: Overdrive caused a further dip, down to 70-100fps, but with the added bane of significant stuttering and input lag, as well as some strange visual artefacts and pop-in effects. Suffice to say this isn’t a setting I can recommend playing on.

Nonetheless, the above demonstrates a laudable effort on the part of the TUF Gaming A16 (2025). However, the price is paid in noise – a loud one. Under load it’s a veritable cacophony, as the fans whir away with considerable force. Needless to say this can be quite disruptive, requiring one of the best PC gaming headsets with strong noise cancellation to drown it out.

At least the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) stays relatively cool. Any heat generated is confined to reasonable temperatures, and concentrated mainly at the very back of the unit – although this can spread to the underside, so if you are using the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) on your lap, your legs might get a little toasty. Mercifully, though, the heat doesn’t encroach on the keyboard or the sides of the chassis, so there’s no chance of scorching your fingers.

The 1920 x 1200 display on my unit provided sufficient sharpness, even at 16 inches, and proved to be very bit as smooth and responsive as you’d expect from its 165Hz refresh rate. Colors appear vibrant enough, but they can look a little washed out at times. What’s more, the maximum brightness level isn’t that high, and reflections can rear their ugly heads under certain lighting conditions.

Close-up of left side ports on ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025), open on desk with pink background

(Image credit: Future)

The keys are tactile and well damped, and have more travel and resistance than those on your typical laptop, which makes them easy and satisfying to use when gaming. I also appreciated the prominent nub on the W key, making it easy to locate.

While the keys also feel good to type on, the aforementioned cramped layout can hamper the A16's productivity credentials. I never fully got used to it, and what’s more the large trackpad does encroach on your hand placement, so you need to take care in not pressing down too hard.

The trackpad is smooth and makes for effortless swipes and gestures, but it can be inconsistent in registering taps, sometimes requiring a harder hit than normal. This might be a moot point for many gamers, though, since they’ll likely be pairing the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) with one of the best gaming mice.

Typical of many Asus products, there are a few annoying pop-ups from Armory Crate, as well as some bizarre notifications from Nvidia about display mode changes, which usually appear when booting up a game; for some unknown reason the system frequently thought two displays were connected.

Thankfully, this didn’t seem to affect performance in any way, and Windows at least makes it easy to change projection settings with the Win+P shortcut. Aside from these niggles, the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) provides a pretty seamless experience overall, as you might expect given the power on tap.

  • Performance: 4 / 5

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) review: Battery Life

Back of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025), open on desk with pink background

(Image credit: Future)

The battery life of the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is pretty impressive. It managed to last two hours and ten minutes in the PCMark gaming battery test, which is close to the time achieved by the Acer Nitro 16 AMD.

In our movie playback test, where we ran a short film on a continuous loop, it lasted an impressive 12 hours and 18 minutes. What’s more, the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is also quick to charge, taking just under two hours to fully replenish.

  • Battery Life: 4 / 5

Should I buy the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025)?

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

The TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is priced very competitively considering the spec. The relatively low resolution is about the only sacrifice.

4 / 5

Design

It’s surprisingly thin and elegant for a gaming laptop, and it also appears built to a high standard

4 / 5

Performance

The TUF Gaming A16 (2025) delivers high frame rates in AAA titles with demanding settings, although it won’t handle max presets all that well, and the noise is bothersome.

4 / 5

Battery Life

It performed well in our series of battery benchmarks, and it's fast to charge, too.

4 / 5

Total

The TUF Gaming A16 (2025) seems to have achieved its aim of delivering high performance at a relatively low price point, which makes it a tempting proposition for those on a budget – if they can put up with the noise.

4 / 5

Buy the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) if...

You want a sleek design
For a large powerhouse, the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) does remarkably well to keep the bulk to a minimum, and the build quality seems reasonably solid, too.

You’re on a budget
The TUF Gaming A16 (2025) is very well priced, especially considering its powerful spec. The 1920 x 1200 resolution is about the only major cutback.

Don't buy it if...

You want the best display
While it’s perfectly good enough for gaming, the colors can look a little washed out, and it’s prone to irksome reflections, too.

You want peace and quiet
The sound of the fans when gaming, even at moderate settings, is persistent and distracting, so a good pair of headphones are a must.

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) review: Also Consider

Acer Nitro 16 AMD
Our current pick as the best affordable gaming laptop, the Nitro 16 AMD does most of the important things right. The 1080p performance impressed us, while the 165Hz refresh rate is very welcome at this price point, especially since it’s cheaper than the TUF Gaming A16 (2025). Read our full Acer Nitro 16 AMD review.

MSI Katana 15 (2023)
If you’re willing to go with a model a few years old, the MSI Katana 15 (2023) is another capable gaming laptop at a relatively low cost. This again has solid 1080p performance and a fast refresh rate, although it’s let down somewhat by the middling battery life and poor trackpad. Thankfully, these areas are where compromises are some of the least egregious. Read our full MSI Katana 15 (2023) review.

How I tested the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025)

  • Tested for a few days
  • Used for gaming and everyday tasks
  • Plentiful PC gaming hardware experience

I tested the TUF Gaming A16 (2025) for a couple of days, during which time I used it for gaming and everyday tasks such as typing and browsing.

I played various games, including Cyberpunk 2077, which is a demanding test for systems and remains a cutting-edge AAA experience. I also ran our series of benchmark tests, designed to assess the gaming, creative, and productivity credentials of PCs, as well as storage speeds and battery life.

I’ve been PC gaming for over a decade, and during that time I’ve experienced plenty of systems and hardware. I’ve also reviewed a number of laptops, from gaming machines to those designed for productivity and general use.

Web.com review
5:55 pm | August 28, 2025
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro Website Hosting | Comments: Off

Web.com was founded in 1999 and worked its way to become one of the leading web hosting technology companies, as well as one of the largest providers of online marketing services in the USA. It was a part of the Web.com Group which also owned a whole portfolio of brands including Network Solutions and Register.com. Their main aim was (or so they claim) to “help customers of all sizes build an online presence that delivers results”.

In 2021 web.com merged with Endurance Web Presence resulting in a new company Newfold Digital. Then, in 2025 web.com was absorbed by Network Solutions.

Plans and pricing

Web.com services aim to cover all the bases when it comes to hosting, website design and the problem of security. Besides shared hosting, they provide domain registration (and transfer) services, their own website builder and WordPress-optimized hosting (managed and unmanaged).

At first, the pricing seems cheap and cheerful, but if you decide to dig a bit deeper you’ll reveal that the displayed price is valid for the first month only. From the second month onward, the price will be more than doubled and if you haven’t read everything through and through, you might feel like you’ve been played for a fool. For instance, the cheapest hosting package (labeled as “Essential Hosting”) is priced at $5.95 per month, yet this goes for the first month only and the second one is going to cost you $14.95, which is a broad daylight robbery in comparison. Well, at least you should get a “free” domain name registration with every package in addition to their beginner-friendly website builder.

As for supported payment methods, they accept all major credit/debit cards and PayPal. If you are wondering about their refund policy, they are rather rigorous about not providing any, although you can cancel their services at any time.

Website Builder

Web.com gives you access to a website builder and even an online store (Image credit: Web.com)

Ease of use

To kick off your website, you’ll first have to decide which is the right hosting solution for you and whether you want to build your website by yourself (there are several ways to do so) or you would rather put it in the hands of experts (by opting for the “Build It For Me” option). If the latter is the one you want, you should schedule a call with Web.com’s team to get a consultation on the matter (at no cost).

Anyhow (sooner or later), you’ll have to pick out a plan and, since they are well presented, this should be as easy as anything. If you are new to all this, the FAQ section below might be of some help. After adding this plan to the cart, you’ll be asked (as expected) to register a new domain (all of them are free for a year, except for “.co”) or use the one you possess. However, keep in mind that after the renewal period your domain can cost you up to $38 per year, which is a handsome sum of money. There, you can apply a promotional code (if you are lucky to have one), enter your name,e-mail address and password and proceed to create your Web.com’s account.

With all shared hosting packages, Web.com provides its users with an access to cPanel, which is great news. Thanks to its intuitive and beginner friendly interface and one-click installer (for about 25 open-source applications), your website will be on fire in a heartbeat. If you haven’t had much experience with coding and yet you want to develop your website by yourself, Web.com offers a newbie-friendly drag-and-drop website builder which should do the trick.

Web.com

We used GTmetrix to measure the uptime and response time of our Web.com site (Image credit: GTmetrix)

Speed and experience

Although Web.com is quite keen on presenting itself in the best possible light, it (curiously) doesn’t emphasize blazing speed performance as one of its greatest assets. Nevertheless, after putting Web.com’s main website to the test, we learned that they have nothing to worry about concerning this. After taking into account all of the vital web metrics, GTmetrix (our speed testing tool) rated speed performance of Web.com’s website with a B (95%), which is a pretty good result.

Web.com promises an industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. However, after consistent monitoring of Web.com’s main website for a month we got a less favorable outcome resulting in 99.83%. There were four instances of downtime and together they lasted for 67 minutes, the longest one persisting for 28 minutes straight. Although this is not the most dreadful performance we’ve seen, it’s needless to say that we were hoping for better results.

Support

Web.com has an extensive Online Help Center that offers similar functionality to a knowledgebase (Image credit: Web.com)

Support

If you find yourself in need of help, proceed to Web.com‘s “Online Help Center'', which has familiar functionality of a knowledgebase. There, the articles are sorted out into eight fitting categories and each of them is rated by a system involving stars, from one to five. Most of these are beginner-oriented and offer solutions to various potential problems described in great detail, more often with pictures than without. Using the search box should get you a good deal of hits, although a number of them might be rather loosely connected to the actual problem.

As an addition, there is a FAQ section on Web.com‘s site for each product type presented and it provides some helpful insight for all the newcomers.

As a more human-centered alternative, you can reach out to Web.com's technical team via telephone, ticket and live chat, all of which should be available day-and-night. Other than that, you can get in touch with them via text messages on Facebook and Twitter, which is a nice touch for all the users out there.

The competition

As children of the same parent company, Network Solutions and Web.com are somewhat similar. Both try to be accessible to new users and offer some affordable hosting solutions without the need for compromising the quality. That being said, Web.com gives its users an access to cPanel (probably the user-friendliest solution of its kind out there), while Network Solutions doesn’t, so the choice might be up to that.

Both Bluehost and Web.com have packages aimed at new users in particular, and pretty good ones to boot.  Nevertheless, if you’re looking to save some bucks, Bluehost is a better choice, since its entry-level plan goes for $2.95 per month, while it is $5.95 with Web.com. However, if you fail to read about the renewal rates after the promotional period, both hosts might make you jump out of your skin.

While both HostGator and Web.com are more than able to cover everything needed to launch a small business, HostGator can do the same for medium-sized businesses as well. In addition to shared hosting, it provides several options for reseller, VPS and dedicated servers, which is a must-have for a growing business.

WestHost is a fellow US-based web hosting provider with more than two decades of experience in the industry. The smallest plans with both of them are beyond budget-friendly at start (especially WestHost’s entry-level plan which is going for $0.99 at the moment), but they will raise the price after the promotional period to its fullest capacity. Even so, Web.com’s starter plan (which comes as no surprise) puts less restriction on its features and throws in a free domain registration to even the odds.  

Final verdict

At the end of the day, Web.com is pleasantly honest in not trying to be something more than it actually is. Their hosting solutions are primarily aimed at newcomers, which they try to supply with everything it takes so they can quickly kickstart their website across the virtual web highway. Hence, if you consider yourself one of them, Web.com’s hosting packages might provide you with a good value for money.

However, if you have bigger plans for your website (or are determined to save some money for the rainy days), your dream website might find a forever home with more celebrated companies like Hostgator, Bluehost or GoDaddy.

I tested Auvik, and found it offers solid network monitoring for IT teams
1:41 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Tags: | Comments: Off

Auvik positions itself as a comprehensive network management solution designed specifically for modern IT teams and managed service providers. The platform automatically discovers and maps your entire network infrastructure, providing real-time visibility into device health, traffic patterns, and performance metrics.

Techradar reviewers spend several weeks researching each major IT platform in the market, testing core functionality and evaluating real-world performance. We found that for the most part, Auvik delivers on its promise of simplified network management through automation.

While LogicMonitor remains our pick for the best network monitoring tool of 2025 thanks to its AI-powered IT workflows, Auvik offers compelling advantages for teams seeking straightforward deployment and management.

Auvik: Features

Auvik delivers a feature-rich platform that's particularly well-suited for IT teams and MSPs managing multiple network environments. It excels in automated discovery, real-time monitoring, and data visualization, with over 64 pre-configured alerts out of the box.

While the feature execution is generally solid, we noticed gaps in advanced customization options that competitors like SolarWinds NPM offer. The device-based pricing model justifies the cost for smaller networks, but larger deployments may find better value elsewhere.

Network mapping

Auvik's automated topology mapping stands out as one of its strongest features. The platform uses automated discovery protocols to map your entire network infrastructure, creating visual representations that update in real-time as devices connect or disconnect. You can track traffic flow between devices, even across VLANs and subnets, and investigate issues with interactive maps that provide instant access to device details.

Performance monitoring

The platform provides comprehensive real-time monitoring across all network devices. You get instant bandwidth monitoring with intuitive charts, active alert tracking, and detailed insights into top applications and traffic flows. Monitoring extends beyond basic metrics to include geo data analysis and application performance tracking.

Configuration management

Auvik automatically backs up device configurations and tracks changes over time. This feature is invaluable for maintaining business continuity and conducting audits. You can compare configurations side-by-side to spot unauthorized changes and restore previous configurations when needed.

Traffic analysis

Using NetFlow data, Auvik delivers detailed insights into traffic patterns and application usage. You can identify bandwidth-consuming applications, detect potential congestion points, and plan capacity upgrades based on real usage data. This helps optimize network performance and justify infrastructure investments.

Remote management

Auvik includes three key remote management features: an in-app terminal, remote tunneling, and a remote browser. These tools allow you to SSH or Telnet into devices, access web interfaces remotely, and establish secure tunnels for any network protocol. This reduces the need for on-site visits and enables faster issue resolution.

Auvik 2

(Image credit: Auvik)

Auvik: Ease of use

Auvik prioritizes user experience with an intuitive interface that requires minimal training. New users consistently praise how quickly they can get up and running, the platform scans networks automatically and populates dashboards without extensive configuration. The learning curve remains gentle even for less experienced IT staff, though some advanced features require deeper networking knowledge to fully utilize.

The platform's design philosophy centers on reducing complexity through automation. Interactive network maps provide hover-over details for quick troubleshooting, while pre-configured alerts eliminate weeks of manual setup. However, some users report that the interface can feel restrictive when trying to customize views or create complex monitoring scenarios that deviate from standard implementations.

Auvik: Pricing

Plan

Starting price (paid annually)

What's included

Essentials

$15/device/month

Basic monitoring, network discovery, alerting, configuration backup

Performance

$25/device/month

Advanced monitoring, traffic analysis, NetFlow data, performance insights

Auvik's device-based pricing model offers transparency but can become expensive as networks grow. The five-device minimum means you'll pay at least $175 monthly for the Essentials plan, even with fewer devices.

While the pricing includes unlimited users and sites, larger organizations often find the costs escalating quickly compared to competitors that offer flat-rate enterprise pricing.

Auvik: Customer support

Auvik provides support through multiple channels including live chat, email, and a comprehensive knowledge base. Support hours run from 4 AM to 10 PM ET, Monday through Friday, with response times varying by severity level. Critical issues (Severity 1) receive responses within two business hours, while lower-priority requests may take up to 24 hours.

The support team demonstrates strong technical expertise, particularly helpful given Auvik's focus on complex network environments. However, the limited weekend coverage could pose challenges for organizations requiring 24/7 support. Educational institutions and non-profits can access discounted pricing, though specific support tier differences aren't clearly documented.

Auvik: Alternatives

Auvik occupies a strong position in the mid-market network monitoring space, competing primarily with Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds NPM, and NinjaOne. The platform appeals most to IT teams and MSPs who value automated discovery and simplified management over extensive customization options. Its cloud-based architecture makes it particularly attractive for organizations managing distributed networks.

Key competitors include Paessler PRTG for Windows-focused environments, LogicMonitor for AI-driven insights, and SolarWinds for enterprise-scale deployments. While Auvik excels in ease of deployment and automated mapping, larger enterprises might find more value in platforms offering advanced analytics, custom reporting, or integrated IT service management capabilities.

Auvik: Final verdict

Auvik delivers exactly what it promises: simplified network monitoring that works well out of the box. The automated discovery and mapping capabilities save significant time during deployment, while the intuitive interface ensures teams can become productive quickly. For IT teams and MSPs managing multiple client networks, these advantages often outweigh the platform's limitations.

However, the device-based pricing model and limited customization options may not suit all organizations. Larger enterprises or teams requiring custom monitoring scenarios might find better value with more flexible alternatives. Despite these constraints, Auvik remains a solid choice for organizations prioritizing ease of use and automated network visibility.

FAQs

What types of devices does Auvik monitor?

Auvik monitors network infrastructure devices like routers, switches, firewalls, and wireless controllers as billable devices. Non-billable devices including servers, workstations, access points, and printers are monitored for free, providing comprehensive network visibility without additional per-device costs.

How long does Auvik take to set up?

Initial setup typically takes just a few hours, with the platform automatically discovering and mapping your network infrastructure. Most users report having full visibility within their first day of deployment, thanks to Auvik's automated discovery protocols and pre-configured monitoring templates.

Can Auvik integrate with other IT management tools?

Yes, Auvik offers API access and various integrations to connect with existing IT workflows. The platform supports integration with ticketing systems, documentation tools, and other network management platforms, though the specific integration catalog isn't as extensive as some enterprise-focused competitors.

Does Auvik offer on-premises deployment options?

Auvik operates as a cloud-based SaaS solution, with on-premises collectors that securely relay network data to the cloud platform. This provides the benefits of cloud management while keeping sensitive network data collection local to your environment.

What's included in Auvik's free trial?

Auvik offers a 14-day free trial with full access to all platform features. No credit card is required for the trial, and you can monitor your entire network infrastructure during the evaluation period to assess the platform's fit for your specific requirements.

We list the best website monitoring software.

The small and mighty DJI Mic 3 is a major improvement on its predecessor in almost every way
1:27 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

DJI Mic 3: one-minute review

The DJI Mic 3 is the latest premium release in the company’s popular wearable wireless microphone range, supplanting the DJI Mic 2. The Mic 2 was only released around 18 months ago, and has topped TechRadar’s best wireless microphone guide for some time, so I was a little skeptical about the need for a new model.

After receiving my review sample of the DJI Mic 3, though, it only took me a few seconds to see why people might want to upgrade from the Mic 2. The Mic 3’s transmitter component, or TX, is far more compact and lightweight than that of its predecessor, making it easier to wear on clothing.

And – praise be! – it’s now possible to fit not only two TX units and the receiver (RX) in the charging case, but accessories like clips, magnets, windscreens and even a 3.5mm-to-3.5mm cable. One of the irritations I’ve had with my own DJI Mic 2 over the past year is that the furry windscreens, which are all but mandatory when recording audio outside, don’t fit inside its charging case. To see that fixed here (as it was on the DJI Mic Mini) is wonderful.

Delving deeper over the course of testing the Mic 3, I found that DJI has made improvements elsewhere: there are now two levels of active noise cancellation rather than one; it’s possible to transmit lossless 24-bit audio from the TX to the RX; and there are three new voice presets to add instant color to vocal recording. All of these features are easy to use and add instant, tangible impact to recordings.

DJI Mic 3 alongside DJI Mic Mini and DJI Mic 2 wireless microphones on a red background

The DJI Mic 3 (center) alongside the DJI Mic Mini (left) and DJI Mic 2 (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Another new feature is the dual-mode Adaptive Gain Control, designed to deliver balanced audio in trickier recording conditions. The Automatic setting is used to prevent audio clipping during unexpected rises in volume (I found it worked well when recording in unpredictable outdoor environments, such as walking around town where traffic noise can jump up at any second), while Dynamic is more situational, being designed for two-person recordings using a single TX unit in a more controlled environment like a studio.

And, while I wasn’t able to personally test this (having just the standard setup of two TX units and one RX in my possession), DJI says the Mic 3 is able to capture clear voices from larger gatherings of people thanks to 4TX+8RX group recording. It also adds support for timecode, which wasn’t on the Mic 2. So, the Mic 3’s professional production credentials are definitely a bit more impressive than the Mic 2’s.

The wireless transmission range has been increased from 250m to 400m, and battery life also gets a major bump, up from 18 hours (with the charging case and two TXes) on the Mic 2 to 28 hours (although it can’t come close to the Mic Mini’s imperious 48 hours). Oh, and the on-board storage space on the TX units has been increased fourfold, from 8GB to 32GB.

DJI Mic 3 wireless microphone RX unit mounted on top of a Panasonic Lumix mirrorless camera

The RX unit now features a locking TRS output, but is otherwise little changed from the Mic 2's (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

All of these are compelling reasons to make the upgrade from the Mic 2, and there’s very little missing feature-wise. The TX units no longer have a 3.5mm input for a separate lavalier mic, which might be an issue for users who want to hide it when filming, and the Safety Track recording mode has been dropped, but that’s about it.

In terms of general sound quality the Mic 3 is excellent, and similar to the Mic 2. With 32-bit float on board for those who need the extra level of safety and control, and 24-bit for everyday use, I think very few content creators will have issues with the audio side of things here.

With the Mic 3, DJI has managed to combine the best bits of its Mic 2 and Mic Mini into a single brilliant wireless mic – and one that, remarkably, is cheaper than the Mic 2 was at its launch. In fact, when compared to competitors’ pricing, it’s very hard to see how I couldn't recommend it to anyone on the hunt for a new premium wireless mic.

DJI Mic 3 wireless microphone

The charging case is a major improvement on the DJI Mic 2's, with much more efficient use of space (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

DJI Mic 3: price and release date

  • Available to order now priced from £169 / AU$369
  • Components available individually or in bundles
  • No official US availability at the time of writing

The DJI Mic 3 is available to order from its launch date of August 28 2025, and the company is offering a range of bundles. For a complete package comprising two TX units, one RX, a charging case, cables, magnets and windscreens, the price is £259 / AU$569; for a simple one TX and one RX package, it’s £169 / AU$369. Buyers can also purchase individual components like the TX, RX, charging case, and new accessories available at launch include a Lightning adapter and alternate color windscreens.

I think the price is extremely reasonable given the Mic 3’s capabilities and specs, and I’m a big fan of the company selling individual components separately, as it gives consumers the opportunity to start small and upgrade over time.

DJI Mic 3 wireless microphone bundle on wooden table

The complete kit includes the charging case, two transmitters, one receiver and a USB-C connector for the receiver. There are also two clips, two magnets, four windshields, a 3.5mm to 3.5mm TRS cable and a USB-C charging cable in the box, plus a zip-up case to hold it all (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

There’s bad news for US-based readers hoping to get their hands on a Mic 3, however. As with other recently announced DJI products, the company isn’t officially launching in the US, in an apparent response to uncertainty surrounding tariffs. A company spokesperson told me the following:

“DJI Mic 3 is not in stock in the US upon the global launch. DJI remains committed to the US market and making our products and services available to our US-based customers. However, we’ve recently had to adjust our market strategies for certain products in light of evolving market conditions. While we do not have a timeline for when we can introduce the product to the U.S. market, we are closely monitoring the situation and actively exploring every possible solution.”

US-based consumers may be able to obtain the Mic 3 through third-party stockists, however, so it may be worth checking camera stores such as B&H.

DJI Mic 3: specs

Dimensions

28.8 x 28.3 x 16.4mm (TX, with magnet)

Weight

16g (TX, with magnet)

Range

400m

Connectivity

Receiver: USB-C / Lightning, 3.5mm jack

Bluetooth

Yes

Battery

10 hours (TX), 8 hours (RX), up to 28 hours with fully charged case

Noise cancelling

Two-level active

DJI Mic 3: Design

  • TX unit weighs just 16g with magnet
  • RX has 1.1-inch AMOLED touchscreen
  • Charging case now accommodates more components

I’ve already mentioned the smaller, lighter build of the TX units, but there are other clever design touches worth noting too. When using the clips, for instance, you can now rotate the TX orientation to ensure that the mic grille is pointing towards the sound source. The TX units are also now magnetized themselves, allowing them to be attached securely to metal surfaces.

The design of the receiver (RX), meanwhile, seems fundamentally unchanged from the Mic 2’s. There’s a bright, crisp 1.1-inch AMOLED touchscreen on the front, plus a rotating and pressable dial to help select and change settings. The design allows for a USB-C adapter to be attached (or Lightning, but that’s an optional extra), and the 3.5mm output now supports a locking screw to keep it in place.

DJI Mic 3 wireless microphone

The Mic 3's transmitter (or TX) units are almost as small and lightweight as those of the Mic Mini, but offer far more flexibility for mounting thanks to an integrated magnet (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The charging case, despite being smaller than the Mic 2’s, is a lot better. As I mentioned in the section above, it makes much more efficient use of its space, and can now accommodate not only two TX and one RX but attached windscreens and clips, with room for magnets and the 3.5mm to 3.5mm TRS cable in the lid.

Also included in the larger bundle are extra windshields (so two black and two grey in total), as well as a zip-up fabric bag for storing everything, including the charging cable.

DJI Mic 3: Performance

  • Two-level active noise cancelling and voice tone presets
  • Supports OsmoAudio direct connection
  • Omnidirectional audio and up to 400m range

The Mic 3 seems to be built on similar audio bones to the Mic 2. That’s no bad thing, as it means users get access to 32-bit float recording (large file sizes, but ideal for users who want to ensure their audio doesn’t clip) as well as standard 24-bit recording with adjustable gain. Having used it extensively indoors and outdoors in a variety of conditions, I've found the Mic 3 to be a highly reliable recording partner, no matter what it’s paired with.

And it can be paired with a lot. The RX can hook up to cameras, computers, tablets and smartphones via its USB or 3.5mm outputs (or the Lightning adapter, should you buy it), and it’s also possible to connect the TX directly to recording devices via Bluetooth.

The TX is also compatible with DJI’s OsmoAudio ecosystem products, supporting 24-bit audio and even 32-bit float (which will be recorded as a separate, second file stored directly on the TX’s memory). I used it with the DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro, and was highly impressed with both the ease of use and audio quality; it’s possible to control gain and other settings through the cameras’ menu screens, and the Mic 3 represents a massive improvement on those cameras' built-in microphones.

Noise cancelling manages to be highly effective without distorting voice recordings too much. You can hear for yourself in the embedded video above, which also demonstrates the new built-in voice tone presets and general audio quality straight from the mic.

As with the Mic 2, the Mic 3's TX units can also record on their own, acting as a completely independent mic thanks to 32GB of internal storage space.

Should I buy the DJI Mic 3?

Buy it if…

You want the most versatile wireless mic

The Mic 3 can connect to a wide variety of products either through its RX unit or via direct wireless connection. The TX even works as a solo recorder with a massive 32GB of internal storage space.

You want a discreet but powerful mic

The DJI Mic 2 is a bit bulky; the Mic 3 is about half the size while delivering even better performance and features. I'm not sure how DJI has pulled this off.

You want flexible buying choice

As with its other microphones, DJI is selling the Mic 3 as a complete kit, a half kit, or as individual components, so you don't need to buy what you won't use.

Don’t buy it if…

You want a budget option

While good value for money, the Mic 3 is still a premium option. If you're just getting started with wireless mics, something like the DJI Mic Mini or Boya Mini is a better bet.

You only shoot with a phone

Smartphone-first creators should consider something with a smaller RX unit, as the Mic 3's can add a little too much bulk to your handset's profile.

DJI Mic 3: also consider

Saramonic Ultra

Previously our top pick for a cheaper but similarly professional-quality alternative to the Mic 2, the Saramonic Ultra offers 32-bit float and flexible connectivity. The Mic 3 comes in at a similar price, though – which makes the Ultra's main USP no longer so compelling.

Read our in-depth Saramonic Ultra review

DJI Mic Mini

Ultra-affordable and ultra-compact, the Mic Mini remains a great budget choice that offers excellent 24-bit audio and incredible battery life. A perfect budget-friendly alternative to the Mic 3.

Read our in-depth DJI Mic Mini review

DJI Mic 3 wireless microphone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

How I tested the DJI Mic 3

  • I used it for several weeks
  • I paired it with cameras, computer and smartphone
  • Running firmware 01.01.02.10

DJI sent me a review sample of the Mic 3 a couple of months ahead of its launch date, giving me the chance to spend a few weeks testing it in a range of environments and conditions. I connected to a range of devices: my Panasonic Lumix GH6 mirrorless camera, the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro and DJI Osmo 360 action cameras, my MacBook Air laptop and my iPhone 13 smartphone. This meant I was able to test both its direct connection and receiver connection methods.

The firmware was updated to the newest available version at the time (v01.01.02.10) prior to the writing of this review, but manufacturers often release updates to coincide with the public launch – so please note that DJI may have tweaked performance slightly since this review was published.

I’ve watched all of My Life with the Walter Boys season 2, and this harmless teen romance is still a total mess
10:01 am |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Netflix Streaming | Comments: Off

As you can probably tell from my star rating, I'm completely split on My Life with the Walter Boys season 2. I've been around the block with this type of cozy TV show before – I'm a self-proclaimed Virgin River expert, Emily in Paris is my guilty pleasure, and I've even been sucked into watching Prime Video's The Summer I Turned Pretty season 3 this year. But if I think about these type of cozy dramas in a broader capacity, My Life with the Walter Boys season 2 would be flour if it was a spice.

Let me explain. Our core concept is a very simple one: privileged New York teen Jackie Howard (Nikki Rodriguez) moves to a ranch in rural Colorado to live with her mother's best friend, Katherine Walter (Sarah Rafferty), and her large family after a family tragedy. Based on the book series of the same name, we then follow the ups and downs of Jackie's new life as she settles in, dissecting all the complicated relationships forged along the way. It should be a recipe for Netflix success, but there's something missing here.

The Rotten Tomatoes score for My Life with the Walter Boys season 1 should give you an idea about its existing division. Critics like myself have absolutely slammed it, while 'normies' (that's a compliment, I promise) largely enjoy it, even though the fan score is still lower than rival shows. Why? I think the answer is because its quality across the board isn't up to muster, and that's also the case in season 2.

My Life with the Walter Boys season 2 does the job, but that's not exactly positive

I don't wish to be a massive negative Nelly here. I completely believe TV shows like My Life with the Walter Boys season 2 serve a purpose, and their easy-going spirit and ethos is exactly what we need to tune out an increasingly difficult world. I typically use my mum as a gauge for the genre – if she watches a show without ironing at the same time, binges more than 2 episodes in one go and remembers its name, the show is a hit with its core demographic. Season 2 ticked all of these boxes, and she's already foaming at the mouth (metaphorically, sorry mum) for the green lit season 3.

In short, this means the people actively seeking out the mess that comes with trashy teen romance are getting exactly what they signed up for. But if you don't fit the bill, or you've had enough of the Netflix series hitting the same beats over and over again, season 2 doesn't do much to win you around. Jackie has inevitably arrived back in Colorado after returning to New York at the end of season 1, and her relationship issues have picked up right there they left off.

It goes without saying that romance and family remain at the core of My Life with the Walter Boys season 2, but this time, Jackie is almost acting like Belly (Lola Tung) in The Summer I Turned Pretty. Given how chaotic season 3 of the Prime Video show is going, that's a huge insult. The parallels between the two shows are now closer than ever (you can see this from the trailer above), but rest assured that Jackie isn't quite as bad... yet.

A knock-off The Summer I Turned Pretty isn't what we need this month

Jackie stands in a doorway looking serious

Jackie Howard (Nikki Rodriguez) in My Life with the Walter Boys. (Image credit: Netflix)

Now we've got my main grievances out of the way, let's dig a little deeper into the show's craft. Compared to rival shows, My Life with the Walter Boys season 2 looks slightly cheaper, which is probably a major part of why season 3 was renewed so early on. That wouldn't be an issue if the performances and execution of the storylines weren't so poorly done, at points feeling more like a high schooler's documentary film than a production on one of the best streaming services in the world.

We feel like we're going around in circles when it comes to Jackie's relationship with Alex (Ashby Gentry) and Cole (Noah LaLonde), with Danny (Connor Stanhope) and Erin's (Alisha Newton) only make our heads spin even further. We've even got a separate triangle going thanks to Zach (Carson MacCormac), Skylar (Jaylan Evans) and Nathan (Corey Fogelmanis), and that's all before we even get to George's (Marc Blucas) future plans for the ranch.

It does feel as though you need to study up before diving into season 2, and it can feel mind-boggling to keep up with all the changes, which simultaneously move incredibly slowly and like time is flashing past you at the speed of light. But by the time we get to the final few episodes, you know exactly what's going to happen. Without giving it away, My Life with the Walter Boys season 2 ends on a cataclysmic cliffhanger, but I could tell exactly what was going to happen about two episodes earlier. Still, it's a major shock to see it unfold, and will hopefully shift season 3 in a better direction. I'm sorry, Melanie Halsall, but a better direction is something that My Life with the Walter Boys sorely needs.

You might also like

I tested some of the cheapest noise cancelling earbuds and now I’ll never spend more than $40
11:30 pm | August 27, 2025
Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Tags: | Comments: Off

JLab Go Pods ANC: Two-minute review

I’ll admit that it was with reticence that I agreed to test earbuds clearly angling for the title of ‘cheapest ANC buds’ but let me dispel any similar cynicism you may have: the JLab Go Pods ANC are, for their price, excellent.

Perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised, because these new cheap earbuds come from esteemed affordable audio brand JLab, which has a lot of experience with affordable audio options. But anyone who’s tried to save a buck by buying lower-cost tech knows that you can’t take anything for granted, even with legacy brands.

Let’s first address the selling point in the headline: are these the best noise-cancelling earbuds on the market? No, but if you add 'cheap' to that question, quite possibly. They are cheap, they do have noise cancellation, and they certainly are earbuds. Plus, they’re really good at what they do, and so I can give them a tick there. But are they the cheapest buds with ANC?

I was expecting to be able to find plenty of cheap Amazon rivals with ANC, but I was wrong; one or two ANC-toting options from unnamed brands sit at the same price as the JLabs here, but there’s not much on offer for less that also has ANC. So from the right angle, the Go Pods ANC tick that box too.

What same-price rivals probably don’t offer is decent audio quality. For budget earbuds these sound really good, with (depending on how you set up the equalizer) crystal-clear treble, hearty mids or scooping bass, and a broad soundstage that you don’t often get in buds twice the price.

The ANC itself also works well, plastering over background sounds with little tact but with heart. That said, the transparency mode is a nightmare which will cause you to hear every little thing going on around you with frightening accuracy.

Like all good earbuds, the JLabs are also nice and lightweight, so you can wear them for ages without getting earache. Similar can be said of the tiny plastic carry case, which completely disappears into a trouser pocket.

I can’t pretend that these earbuds are perfect, and they do have a few things which annoyed me during testing. For one, JLab has replaced a charging port with a charging cable, so you plug the case into something, rather than plugging something into the case, to power it up. Good in theory, but functionally I found it less useful than the standard option which every other company uses, of simply letting you plug a cable into the case.

The in-box ear tips also didn’t offer much in the way of grip, so when I walked or ran in the buds they had a habit of falling out pretty quickly. This is a problem you can solve with the added expense of third-party eartips (or using ones you have left over from your last earbuds).

But even as earbud shortcomings go those aren’t the biggest I’ve ever faced, or even a huge issue at all in the case of the first one. Know this: these are fantastic-value earbuds.

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Price and release date

The JLab Go Pods ANC on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Released in summer 2025
  • Costs $36.99 / £29.99 (roughly AU$60)

The JLab Go Pods ANC were announced in May 2025 and put on sale in the months after. It took them barely any time to go on offer, but more on that in a moment.

The default retail price for these buds is $36.99 / £29.99 (roughly AU$60), so they’re some of the most affordable noise cancelling earbuds you can find, and the few alternatives I can find at this price tag almost all come from unknown brands on Amazon.

I say ‘default price’ because only a few months after release, the Go Pods ANC can easily be found for a discount. In the US I found them for $29.99 and in the UK they’re at £24.99, making these super-cheap buds even cheaper. And that’s before Black Friday.

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Specs

Drivers

10mm

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Battery life (ANC off)

7.5 hours (buds) 26 hours (case)

Weight

4.2g (buds) 27.6g (case)

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.4

Waterproofing

IP55

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Features

The JLab Go Pods ANC on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Battery life of just 5 hours with ANC on
  • Good ANC but iffy transparency
  • JLab app brings a few useful extras

During my testing time, I didn’t once have any kind of connection issue with the JLab Go Pods ANC, so you don’t need to worry about them having an unreliable Bluetooth link.

The buds have some extra features via the JLab app, though it’s mostly just some customization and tweaks rather than anything truly novel.

It took my while to get my head around the Noise Control Modes tool, which lists ANC on, off and Be Aware mode, but with toggles by all of them, so it’s easy to turn two or all three of them on at the same time… right? That’s what I thought, until I realized that toggling these selects whether you can switch to them via the buds via touch controls. The real way to switch ANC modes is to physically select the mode you want, not toggle its slider.

Another option via the app is an equalizer, which comes with three unnamed presets and a custom mode. It’s a 10-band equalizer so it’s pretty advanced, and audiophiles will be able to get a lot of depth in how they customize their tunes.

Three screenshots from the JLab Go Pods ANC app.

(Image credit: Future)

Running down its list, the app also lets you set a max volume limit for safety, change what touch controls do, switch between a Music Mode and Movie Mode (which seems to increase the sound spread but decrease quality) and… set up a workout interval timer? That’s not exactly a standard headphone feature but it might prove useful to a few people.

The battery life of the Go Pods sits at 7.5 hours, according to JLab – that’s with ANC turned off and, from my testing, you’re looking at about 7.5 hours with it turned off which isn’t exactly a competitive figure. The company puts the extended play time offered by the charging case at 26 hours.

One final thing we probably need to touch on is the ANC itself – is it any good in these cheap buds? Surprisingly, it really is. It hushes your surroundings pretty substantially, and while it obviously doesn’t reach the heights of rivals in the market – a light background hum always got through, and sharper noises weren’t dimmed as much – it’s a lot better than JLab could have got away with for the money.

I wasn’t as impressed, though, with Be Aware mode (JLab’s take on Transparency). While using it I was too aware – not only did it not cancel noise, it seemed to amplify every little thing that occurred around me in a jarring experience overall.

  • Features score: 4/5

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Design

The JLab Go Pods ANC on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)
  • Both buds and case are super lightweight
  • Case has a built-in charging cable
  • Ear tips don't offer much grip

The JLab Go Pods ANC have one small design difference that sets them apart from the vast majority of other samey wireless earbuds, and it’s built into the case.

The buds’ charging case is a 4.52 x 6 x 2.61cm pebble which opens lengthwise along the side; it’s made of plastic so it only weighs 27.6g (for context, most buds I test have cases double that weight). This is all to say that it’s quite small and very light.

While most charging cases are nondescript save for perhaps a logo and a USB-C charging port, JLab does away with the latter and replaces it with its own USB-C cable; you can plug this into a port to easily power up the buds.

In theory I get why JLab would use this instead of a simple port: it means you can power it up via your phone or laptop without needing an extra cable. In practice though I found it annoying, as it meant I couldn’t use the standard USB-C charger I bring for my other gadgets. I couldn’t power up the case from my phone if I was also charging said phone, and I couldn’t plug it into wall outlets on public transport or adaptors at my home (all of which use standard USB).

Onto the buds: these weigh 4.2g each so they continue the Go Pods style of being lighter than the competition. They’re stem-style buds, consisting of a large body, tips angled slightly downwards and a flat stem bearing JLab’s logo.

The JLab Go Pods ANC on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)

There are touch controls on each of said logos, which worked reasonably well although there were a few mis-touches when I was readjusting the buds or times when one press would be picked up as two. Also the default controls are a little odd so I’d recommend jumping into the app to customize them yourself.

I really appreciate low-weight buds like the Go Pods as they were easy to use for long periods of time without feeling any ache or wear. That was only the case if I was sitting still though.

The in-box eartips seem to offer so little friction that they may as well be made out of WD40: as soon as I went for a walk, or heaven forbid a run, the earbuds began slipping from my ears (yes, I tried all three options included in the box). Even putting in or removing the buds normally, you can feel how little they’re inclined to stay in the ear – not great for active people.

While the case doesn’t have any official protection, the buds have an IP55. This means they’re mostly protected against dust ingress and can withstand low-press jets of water (including rain and sweat) but aren’t suitable for swimming.

The JLab Go Pods ANC come in three color versions: black, lilac and green, and as you can tell I tested the former.

  • Design score: 3.5/5

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Sound quality

  • Single 10mm driver
  • Can handle regimented bass and clear treble
  • High max volume

The JLab Go Pods ANC on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)

I’m going to wager that your expectations for the JLab Go Pods ANC’s audio chops probably match what mine were going into the testing: you see the price and shudder at the thought of those cheap buds you bought on Amazon once and know what to expect. But banish the thought.

The JLab Go Pods ANC actually sound pretty good; I’m not sure I’d pick them over something like the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro but for the price, they’re surprisingly capable.

By default (that is, with the JLab Signature equalizer mode), music sounds bright with defined treble and mids, and a laudable breadth of soundstage so you can hear different passages and harmonies in the music surrounding you.

There’s clearly a little distortion crackling away when too many different instruments are playing at once, or when the hi-hat gets going, but only in mixes that can trouble much pricer buds too.

I’ll admit that I largely listened with some heavy equalizer tweaks, but I was surprised by how much bass the Go Pods were capable of when asked. There’s scope for hearty, scooping bass with the right song and right EQ set-up. But even without this set-up, lower-register lines felt well-defined.

The buds’ max volume is really high – higher than you’d ever normally need, unless you accidentally held down the ‘volume up’ button on your phone like me – and doesn’t distort as much at louder settings as many other buds do.

  • Sound quality: 4/5

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Value

The JLab Go Pods ANC on a window sill.

(Image credit: Future)

The JLab Go Pods ANC are basically the cheapest noise-cancelling earbuds that are actually worth buying.

Because of their feature set and audio quality, these aren’t just ‘good for the price’; they’re good full stop. JLab didn’t need to offer them for such a low price but in doing so, it’s made them a fearsome value proposition.

  • Value: 4.5/5

Should I buy the JLab Go Pods ANC?

JLab Go Pods ANC score card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

The ANC is good, as is the general feature set, though the battery life is poor.

4/5

Design

The buds are lovely and lightweight, but the eartips don't stick well and I'd have preferred a charging port.

3.5/5

Sound quality

For the price, the JLabs sound really good: cheap and cheerful.

4/5

Value

These offer fantastic value for money given how cheap they are.

4.5/5

Buy them if…

You're on a (low) budget
If you've set yourself a budget for earbuds and it isn't a big one, then there are going to be very few alternatives to the Go Pods ANC.

You want noise cancellation
Noise cancellation is a feature which is common on expensive earbuds but not so much on cheap ones. That's not the case with the JLabs though.

You want to charge from your phone
The charging case's cable attachment lets you power up your buds from your phone, great if you rarely have access to a power point.View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You're not willing to provide your own eartips
I didn't rate the in-box ear tips, so I'd recommend the buds mostly to people who would be willing to buy their own (or, more likely, have leftovers from your last buds).

You need a long-lasting battery
If you're listening with noise cancellation, you're only getting five hours of listening time, which isn't a competitive figure.

JLab Go Pods ANC review: Also consider

JLab Go Pods ANC

JLab Go Pop ANC

Earfun Air 2

JBL Wave Beam

Drivers

10mm

10mm

10mm

8mm

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Yes

No

No

Battery life

7.5 hours (buds); 26 hours (case)

7 hours (buds); 24 hours (case)

9 hours (earbuds), 40 hours (total)

8 hours (buds) 24 hours (case)

Weight

4.2g (buds) 27.6g (case)

4.1g (buds); 22g (case)

4.5g (buds) 45g (case)

8.8g (buds) 39.5g (case)

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.4

Bluetooth 5.4

Bluetooth 5.3

Bluetooth 5.2

Waterproofing

IP55

IP55

IPX7

IP54

JLab Go Pop ANC

Forgive the incredibly similar name. These buds cost just less than, or the same as, the Pods depending on where you live, and have a similar feature set with the design being the biggest difference.

See our full JLab Go Pop ANC review

Earfun Air 2

These buds have a similar design to the JBLs but miss noise cancellation. They're cheap, but not quite as affordable as the Go Pods.

See our full Earfun Air 2 review

JBL Wave Beam

Another low-cost option that has a similar stem-toting design is the JBL Wave Beam. This has a smaller driver and no noise cancellation but it won't break the bank and has a fairly good battery life.View Deal

How I tested the JLab Go Pods ANC

  • Tested for four weeks
  • Tested at home, in the office, working out and on walks

I tested the JLab Go Pods ANC for about four weeks, which is longer than the standard TechRadar testing process, but is a testament to their audio chops.

I used the buds while they were connected to my Android phone, mainly for Spotify but also for streaming movies, games and listening to voice notes. I used them while at home, at the gym, on runs and on walks around my neighborhood.

I've been testing gadgets for TechRadar for over five years now and in that time have used other JLab products as well as some of their biggest competitions.

  • First reviewed in August 2025
I tested an air purifier that can follow you around with clean air, and that’s just one of its special tricks
10:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Air Quality Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Tags: | Comments: Off

Dreame AirPursue PM20: two-minute review

The Dreame AirPursue PM20 is an air purifier with a whole load of tricks up its sleeve. The USP is the 'Follow' mode, whereby the large, cup-shaped head will swivel to follow you wherever you go in a room, blasting purified air in your direction. In practice, it's very impressive to watch. There's also 'AI Purify' – an Auto mode by another name – whereby the AirPursue will monitor for five specific pollutants and adjust settings to clear them when they're detected.

Aside from these and two more special modes, and a variety of manual control options, the appliance can also heat or cool the air as required. So it's positioned to rival not only the best air purifiers on the market, but the best fans, too. Not bad for the brand's first ever purifier.

When it comes to air purifiers, I'm often left wondering how I'm meant to know if they're actually doing anything. Not so with the AirPursue PM20, which offers real time pollutant readings within the Dreame companion app, so you can watch at any moment as it cleans the air in your living room or bedroom. It's able to sense and remove 14 different pollutants (although that doesn't include CO2), and gives each one a rating so you can tell how good or bad the air quality is.

All that functionality comes at a bit of a price, and replacement filters aren't especially cheap either (deals are appearing already, and I think it's decent value for what you're getting). While the design is sleek and modern, there's no getting around the fact it's really rather large, although Dreame has helpfully added wheels to make it easy to maneuver from one room to another,

The PM20 is geared towards use in medium or large rooms, with a CADR to match (400 m³/h). If you have a smaller space you'd be better off with the PM10 sister model, which has a has a CADR of 300 m³/h.

Keep reading to see how well the Dreame AirPursue PM20 cleaned the air in my historic home and gave me more peace of mind.

Dreame AirPursue PM20

(Image credit: Future)

Dreame AirPursue PM20 review: price & availability

  • List price: US$999.99
  • Launch date: June 2025
  • Availability: US and Canada

The AirPursue PM20 is Dreame's first ever air purifier, and launched in June 2025. It's available to buy direct from Dreame or via Amazon in the US and Canada, with a list price of $999.99. (The smaller AirPursue PM10 costs $899.99 at list price.)

You can take that list price with a pinch of salt, because at time of writing this review the PM20 had only been out a month and was already attracting significant discounts on Amazon (it dropped to $769.99 during the Prime Day Sale). Even with that discount it's still a premium purchase, though.

The only additional cost associated with this air purifier are the replacements for the carbon filter and the high efficiency composite filter, which are $59.99 and $99.99 respectively. They have to be replaced between 6 and 24 months, depending on how hard they're put to work.

Considering that this air purifier has multiple modes, speeds, heating capabilities, app and voice integration, and AI settings, I'd say the price tag is reasonable. In fact, I've seen more expensive air purifiers that have fewer features. However, it's still a decent investment, so if you're on a tighter budget there are plenty more affordable options about.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Dreame AirPursue PM20 specs

CADR:

400 m³/h

Size:

14.9 x 14.9 x 33.4 in

Control:

Buttons, remote, app, voice control

Filters:

HEPA-13, carbon

Modes:

1-10, AI Purify (Auto), Pet Purify, Comfort, Cooling, Heating (77-104F)

Contaminants detected:

PM1, PM2.5, PM10, HCHO, TVOC

Other readings:

Overall air quality status, temperature, humidity

Oscillation:

45, 90, 180 degrees, or 'AI follow'

Timer:

12 hours

Heating:

78-104F

Dreame AirPursue PM20 review: design

  • Large air purifier that can also operate as a fan or heater
  • Smart capabilities, AI detection, and app integration
  • Provides specific information about pollutant levels

The Dreame AirPursue PM20 arrived assembled, allowing me to plug it in and immediately start purifying the air within my home. The only setup required of me was connecting the air purifier to the Dreame app and tap a button in the app to authorize the voice command function.

In terms of appearance, the Dreame AirPursue PM20 reminds me of a mini R2-D2, with its bulbous head, cylindrical body, and the wheels placed on the bottom. I was so glad for the wheels as I could move the air purifier around the house without having to pick it up – as I may have mentioned, it's not small. In the air purifier world, it also bears a striking resemblance to the Dyson Big+Quiet.

Dreame AirPursue PM20

(Image credit: Future)

The head has a small, square LCD screen that displays air pollution levels via colored graphs. Buttons on the head allow you to turn the purifier on and off and cycle through information on the LCD screen like air pollutant, temperature, and humidity readings, and the filter life.

Inside, the PM20 is outfitted with two filters. First, a high efficiency composite filter (HEPA-13 grade) which removes indoor pollen, dust mites, haze, bacteria, viruses, and other fine materials, and which must be replaced every 16-24 months (the app notifies you). Second, a carbon filter, which is used to remove indoor kitchen fumes, pet odor, TVOC, formaldehyde and other harmful gases. The replacement time for the carbon filter is every 6-12 months.

There more going on with this air purifier's design that can't be seen. It's outfitted with dual-flow modulation technology, which means the air flows in and out of the head and the body. It can apparently project air forward up to 10 meters.

The airflow fan speed can be adjusted between 1 and 10 and the wind direction can be set on 45, 90, or 180 degrees. You can also utilize various special modes:

  • AI follow – directs pure air at whoever is in the room
  • AI purify / Auto – monitors for 5 pollutants and switches on when detected
  • Pet purify – enhanced airflow specifically geared towards pet hair and odors
  • Comfort – quiet, long-range air projection
  • Cooling
  • Heating – set between 78 and 104 degrees Fahrenheit

The most exciting of those is AI follow, where the purifier head will follow you as you move within a room. If there is more than one person in the room, the purifier will toggle between the two people's positions.

Because I tested the AirPursue in the summer, I usually used the Cooling mode, but I was also pleased to learn it would earn its space in winter by doubling up as a heater. I found Comfort mode was a great option when sleeping at night because it lowered the fan speed so the noise wasn't bothersome.

Dreame AirPursue PM20

(Image credit: Future)

Speaking of which, noise-wise, the air purifier is not that loud. On the lowest fan speed, it has a dB rating of 54. I measured the highest speed at 67 dB.

With the remote, you can adjust the direction of the fan, change the fan speed, turn on the heating function, and choose between the different modes. I preferred managing the settings in the app or with voice commands.

  • Design score: 5 out of 5

Dreame AirPursue PM20 review: performance

  • Detects and clears pollutants quickly
  • Can cool or heats spaces while purifying them
  • App makes it easy to control purifier and monitor pollutants

My house was built over 100 years ago, and as a historic building it produces a lot of dust and allergens. Not to mention, it was probably updated at various times when pollutants weren't necessarily monitored or regulated. As someone who has asthma and allergies, I'm always looking for ways to make my home – where I work, sleep, and live – healthier. After testing the Dreame AirPursue PM20, I feel a lot more confident and comfortable breathing in my own house.

To speak plainly, I love the Dreame AirPursue PM20. It was easy to move it between rooms with the wheels. Once I connected it to the app, I dove in. I was glad to discover that the air quality of my house is better than I thought. I gleaned this information from the overall air quality score. However, thanks to the Dreame sensors, I was able to see the exact levels of harmful pollutants – PM1, PM2.5, PM10, HCHO, and TVOC – present in my home.

I didn't know what these pollutants meant, but the app provided definitions of each one. For instance, I learned that HCHO is a “common indoor pollutant, the release period of formaldehyde from furniture, paint, and adhesives lasting for years". Not only that, but the Dreame app tracked the pollutant reading and provided a value range for each pollutant, and then labelled the reading as either excellent, good, moderate, or poor. I was able to track the pollutant readings at any moment and even by days and weeks within the app.

Dreame AirPursue PR20 in reviewer's home

Click to enlarge (Image credit: Dreame / Future)

To see how well the Dreame AirPursue PM20 detects pollutants and clears them, I ran a test with dry shampoo. I began by screenshotting the readings (prior to spraying the dry shampoo) to gain an air quality baseline. Then I sprayed dry shampoo about two feet in front of the air purifier. Within the app, I saw the air purifier recognize the pollutants from the dry shampoo within about 10 seconds.

From there, I monitored the air purifier, noting the initial increase in pollutant readings. The purifier cleaned the room within about 11 minutes. The TVOC reading was the only pollutant that didn't quite reach the original reading after 11 minutes (it was 2 points higher). In fact, the TVOC reading fluctuated over the next few hours within one to two points of the original reading. At least it remained well within the 'excellent' air quality range.

Dreame AirPursue PM20

(Image credit: Future)

Most of the time, I set the Dreame AirPursue PM20 on a fan speed of 10, and the wind direction at 180 degrees. Sometimes, I used the AI Follow feature which means the head of the purifier followed me around the room, literally purifying the air around me. This feature was cool to see in action, and reliably well on test.

I don't have pets, so I didn't need the Pet Purify mode, but I know that it could be helpful for those who do share their home with four-legged friends, especially in removing odors (the purifier cleared kitchen odors within my house in minutes). The Comfort mode was great to use at night; it was quieter than my ceiling fan.

Like a few Dyson fans, the Dreame AirPursue can also be used as a fan or heater. Because I was testing in Texas in July, I mostly used the Cooling more, but the Heating option will be ultra-helpful in winter (it lets you adjust the temperature between 78 and 104 degrees Fahrenheit. The 12-hour timer was nice, but for the most part, I turned the purifier on and off at my own will.

Dreame AirPursue PM20

(Image credit: Future)

I didn't have any issues with this air purifier. The only thing to keep in mind is that when the fan speed is set to 10 (or the highest speed), you must raise your voice and move near the air purifier to use the voice command. That wasn't a big deal to me, because I usually used the app on my phone to adjust the settings as I always forgot the voice commands and would have to look them up in the app anyways (helpfully, Dreame lists the voice commands here for reference).

Overall, I think the Dreame AirPursue PM20 does what it says it will do and brought me a lot more peace of mind. I feel better knowing that I'm breathing cleaner air in my home day or night.

  • Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Should you buy the Dreame AirPursue PM20?

Attribute

Notes

Rating

Value

A premium air purifier occasionally discounted but well priced considering the control and features. Filters represent and ongoing cost.

4/5

Design

Large but stylish. Can operate as a fan or heater as well as a purifier. Manual control or a selection of special modes – including one where the pure air follows you around. Easy to read, real-time pollution readings. Control via app, voice or remote.

5/5

Performance

Detects and cleans pollutants efficiently. The app makes it easy to monitor pollutants, understand how clean your air is, and adjust the settings.

4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want to monitor and understand the air quality in your home

The Dreame AirPursue PM20 senses 14 different pollutants, and you can watch it clean in real time by monitoring the pollutant readings in the app. This also offers in-depth explanations and notes where the readings fall within the safe and unsafe ranges.

You want an air purifier that heats or cools in different directions

Air purifiers emit bursts of air. Dreame capitalized on this feature by adding some cooling and heating features to the PM20. Adjust the fan speed between 1-10 or let your air purifier push out heated air (between 78-104 degrees) in the winter. You can even adjust the direction of the airflow between 45-180 degrees or set the purifier to follow you as you move in the room.

You want multiple control options

Control the Dreame AirPursue PM20 with a button, voice command, app, or remote. Or simply set it on AI purify and let the purifier automatically adjust the settings to keep your home clean.

Don't buy it if...

You just want something simple

The Dreame AirPursue PM20 has plenty of tricks up its sleeve, but if you don't fancy all those special features then there are plenty of cheaper, still effective purifiers to choose from.

You live in an apartment or small space

The Dreame AirPursue PM20 is geared towards use in bigger spaces (although it does have a sibling model for smaller rooms). Standing at nearly 3 feet tall and over a foot wide, it's also too large to tuck out of the way.

You want a purifier that reads and scrubs CO2

The one thing that the Dreame AirPursue PM20 can't do is read CO₂ levels. Some air purifiers can sense CO₂ and even scrub it, though you'll likely pay more for them.

How I tested the Dreame AirPursue PM20

I used the Dreame AirPursue PM20 for a few weeks in July in my 105-year-old home in Texas. I used the purifier in various rooms to get a variety of readings, as well as testing each of the windspeed settings and special modes. To get a more objective view of how efficiently it cleared air, I also sprayed dry shampoo a few feet from the purifier to see how quickly the purifier detected it and cleared it from the room.

Read more about how we test

  • First reviewed July 2025
After a week reviewing the Pixel 10 Pro XL, I wouldn’t give it up for all the iPhones in the world
8:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Google Pixel Phones Phones | Tags: | Comments: Off

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: Two-minute review

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is the Pixel phone to buy this year. The Pixel 10 Pro can match the Pro XL on the most important features, but the benefits of the larger display, along with a couple of features that are simply better on the XL device, make the Pixel 10 Pro XL my favorite of the new Pixel family, and the phone I would recommend first, but not last.

I feel confident recommending the Pixel 10 Pro XL above the rest – and above any other Android phone you can buy right now – because I spent the last year using the Pixel 9 Pro as my primary work phone. That means I know exactly why the Pixel is a great phone for being productive, but I also know that I wish I’d had a bigger screen than the 9 Pro's. The Pro XL will be my primary device this year, for sure.

If you haven’t checked out a Pixel phone in a while, you really should head to a store and get your hands on one. The latest Pixel 10 Pro XL is polished and well-built, with a refined look and gorgeous materials and color combinations. It’s a much nicer-looking phone than the latest iPhone 16 Pro Max, and it delivers on a number of features Apple hasn’t been able to match.

Google’s AI features are the most advanced on any smartphone, and often the most unobtrusive. The newest AI features, like Magic Cue and the live translation, don’t feel pushy or overblown, and they don’t produce embarrassing or useless results. Google is pushing AI into the background as a silent helper, where it should be.

Of course, all of the new Pixel 10 series phones have Google’s advanced new AI features, like the live translator that not only converts your language into another tongue, it also speaks with a voice that sounds remarkably like yours. That may sound alarming from a privacy viewpoint, but Google says this processing happens on the Pixel 10 Pro XL, and not on a distant cloud computer, so your conversations – and your voice – should be safe.

So what makes the Pixel 10 Pro XL so special, the best of the Pixel 10 bunch? First of all, Google’s Pixel displays – so-called Super Actua displays – are among the best you’ll see on any smartphone. These screens are bright and colorful and very sharp. When the screen is this good, I want as much screen as I can get, so I prefer having the larger XL display. At 6.8 inches, it’s 0.5 inches bigger diagonally than the Pixel 10's display, and that equals 13 square centimeters of extra screen space.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL also has the largest battery of all the new Pixel phones, and that equates to the longest battery life, both in my real-world testing and in our Future Labs battery rundown tests. It wasn’t a massive difference – the Pixel 10 Pro XL only lasted an hour longer than the Pixel 10. Still, every bit helps.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL also charges faster than any other Pixel 10 device, whether you’re charging wirelessly or with a USB-C cord. If you have a 45W charger, the Pixel 10 Pro XL can charge that fast, compared to the 30W charging on the other two Pixel 10 phones. The Pixel 10 Pro XL can also use faster wireless charging. Again, it’s not a huge difference, but every bit yada yada yada.

The biggest benefit for me is the combination of Google’s winning Super Actua display with the Pixel 10 Pro XL cameras. If I’m taking serious photos, I want the biggest viewfinder possible to get the right shot. The extra screen space on the Pro XL phone felt like a big advantage, and if photography is important to you, I’d recommend the Pro XL phone first. The Pixel 10 Pro has the exact same camera specs, but having the bigger Pro XL display helped me take better shots.

Are there other benefits to the Pro XL? Well… not really. It isn’t any faster than the Pixel 10 Pro… or even than the Pixel 10. In our benchmark tests, the extra RAM in the Pro models didn’t seem to make much difference. Pixel phones still disappoint if you only care about the numbers.

I don’t rely on benchmarks, though, and the Pixel 10 Pro XL was satisfying and quick in almost every task. There was some lag on the camera, but most other features – including the latest AI helpers – ran smoothly with no delays.

Google has another winner with the Pixel 10 Pro XL – and the whole Pixel 10 family. Between the premium design, the excellent software, and the advanced AI features, this is a phone that iPhone fans should seriously consider, and Galaxy owners should envy. I’ll be keeping this phone close by – snapped to my MagSafe charging stand – until an even better Pixel comes along.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Price & availability

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Starts at $1,199 / £1,199 / AU $1,999 for 256GB of storage and 16GB RAM
  • Costs more than last year, but starts with more storage than the rest

I remember the days when a new phone would cost the same but come with more storage and RAM than last year's model because component costs had decreased. This year’s Pixel 10 Pro XL is more expensive than before, and it comes with 256GB of storage, but I’m not awarding Google any medals for giving the phone enough space. This phone should be cheaper.

To be fair, 256GB of storage is the right amount, unless you play a ton of games or you shoot video with your phone at high-resolution. There’s a 1TB model available, but only serious enthusiasts need apply – and you know who you are.

The color options this year are a bit drab. I like the Moonstone color and the Jade, but they aren’t very exciting. My review unit is the Porcelain white, which looks classy but a bit bland. Google also sent along a silicone case with magnets built in that matches the hone perfectly. If you want the 1TB storage option, it’s only available in the black Obsidian.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL pricing

Storage

US Price

UK Price

AU Price

256GB

$1,199

£1,199

AU $1,999

512GB

$1,319

£1,319

AU $2,199

1TB

$1,549

£1,549

AU $2,549

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Specifications

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has nearly the same spec sheet as the Pixel 10 Pro, with a few key differences. The display is larger, with more pixels (no pun intended), but it isn’t quite as sharp. You won’t notice, though, and both displays use LTPO tech for the best always-on display with low power drain.

There’s a bigger battery in the Pixel 10 Pro XL as well, and that meant longer battery life in my tests. I also found the 45W charging made a difference, with the Pixel 10 Pro XL charging faster than the other Pixel 10 phones.

Google Pixel 10 Pro specifications

Dimensions:

162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5mm

Weight:

232g

Display:

6.8-inch Actua display

Resolution:

1344 x 2992 pixels

Refresh rate:

1-120Hz

Peak brightness:

3,300 nits

Chipset:

Google Tensor G5

RAM:

16GB

Storage:

256GB / 512GB / 1TB

OS:

Android 16

Main cameras

50MP wide; 48MP ultra-wide; 48MP telephoto (5x zoom)

Selfie camera:

42MP

Battery:

5,200mAh

Charging:

45W wired; 25W Qi2 wireless (magnetic)

Colors:

Obsidian, Porcelain, Jade, Moonstone

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Design

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Sleek and solid, with great materials and matching color options
  • Mostly the same as last year’s model, which is fine with me

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is the Pixel 10 Pro all blown up. It doesn’t add any extra buttons or physical details; the two phones look identical, just at a different scale. That’s a good thing because the Pixel 10 Pro is a great-looking phone, and it keeps the same exact design as the Pixel 9 Pro that was my favorite phone of last year. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

I like the Pixel 10 Pro XL design even more than the latest iPhone 16 Pro Max. It feels just as refined as Apple’s phone, with fewer unnecessary buttons to get in the way. Does anyone actually use the Camera Control? I know I don’t. To be fair, I don’t use the temperature sensor on the back of the Pixel 10 Pro XL, but I can ignore that easier than a button.

The color options are a bit 'professional' and bland, but closer inspections shows more attention to detail than I would have expected from Google. The Jade color of my Pro review sample, for instance, was matched with a light gold frame that looks barely gilded. It’s a gorgeous match.

The speaker grilles on the bottom of the phone are new, and color-matched to the frame you choose. It’s a nice touch that most people won’t ever notice.

I have no complaints about the Pixel 10 Pro XL design, except that I’d like to see more interesting color options. Google at least matches its phones perfectly with its silicone case colors, and like the Pixel 10 phones, the latest cases have magnets inside that secure a very strong connection to any Pixelsnap (or MagSafe) accessories you might buy.

  • Design score: 5 / 5

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Display

Google Pixel 10 Pro in Jade with checkered tile backsplash background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • One of the absolute best smartphone displays
  • Super-sharp and very bright in all situations

Wow… I was expecting to be pleased with the Pixel 10 Pro XL’s display, but this phone somehow looks even better than I anticipated. Google’s Super Actua displays are among the best you’ll find on any smartphone. For the past few years, Google’s new Pixel displays have been dominant, topped only by Samsung’s best Ultra screen, and this year hasn’t been disappointing at all.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL is a joy to use in any situation. It’s great in outdoor light, even for shooting photos or reading my social feeds. It’s perfect for navigating in the car or on the street. It’s a great phone for reading in the dark late at night, or as a bedside lamp with the Pixelsnap screen savers.

In fact, I like this display so much that I think it justifies paying more to have more of it. The Pro XL is the Pixel to buy not just because it has a bigger screen, but because the screen is so enjoyable that I want to have as much of it as possible.

Whether I’m watching videos, taking photos, or playing games, the Pixel 10 Pro XL display is my favorite on any smartphone I own.

  • Display score: 5 / 5

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Software

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Material 3 Expressive looks fantastic and adapts nicely to themes
  • AI features are most useful when you barely notice them

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL highlights Google’s clean and well-designed interface. I love the Material 3 Expressive interface design, as Google calls its Pixel version of Android. It’s friendly without feeling cartoonish, and it packs plenty of useful widgets and tools that are easy to manage and don’t hog my attention.

With so much screen space, it was a joy to create AI wallpapers and populate my home screen with Google’s slick widgets. I let the phone set all of my icon and widget colors to match my wallpaper, creating a unified theme, and the phone darkened the colors as the day went on, finally flipping to dark mode after sunset.

That’s the best of Pixel – a well-designed interface filled with just enough useful features to make the phone a tool you always want in your pocket. The Pixel 10 Pro XL will definitely remain my primary work phone after this review is published. It gives me simple customizations and shortcuts that remove the clutter of apps from my home screen and surface just the information I need. I wish iOS was better at this.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL also has some of the most useful AI features you’ll find on a phone, and I’m a big fan of Google’s call-screening tools. I can let Google AI answer when an unknown number calls, and it will give me a text transcript of whatever my caller says. Then I can decide whether to answer the call or not. This feature is only available on Pro Pixel models, and it’s worth the upgrade if you take a lot of calls.

There are plenty of new AI features as well, and I’ve talked in depth about the new Magic Cue in my Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro reviews. I think it could be an important addition to Android in the long run, but it still doesn’t work consistently. It offers useful links and buttons to info as you need it, and it doesn’t get in the way or seem pushy, like other AI features, so I have high hopes for it.

Otherwise, there are many smaller improvements that I’ve found scattered throughout the interface and which bring Google’s experience closer to the holistic, thoughtful design I expect from iOS more than Android.

Apple lets you make a contact card for yourself that will accompany your phone number when you share your details. Google lets you make the contact card for your contacts, instead of making them do the work. That seems like a better solution, since not everybody owns an iPhone, and Apple’s contact cards don’t work across platforms.

Even Google’s Daily Hub is more useful than other attempts I’ve seen. Samsung, Motorola, and now Google all offer a home page for your personal information, gathered and summarized by AI. On my Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Now Brief page has been useless at best, and oddly flippant at worst. On the Pixel 10 Pro XL, the Daily Hub offers more useful information, links I actually enjoy, and easy access to more information.

There are still some odd and off-putting AI features, usually generative AI tools. The Recorder app for some odd reason offers to generate a musical background for your recordings; I don’t really need a pop-metal soundtrack for my business interviews, thanks. Still, it’s easy to ignore these oddities, and Google mostly doesn’t shove its AI in your face.

  • Software score: 5 / 5

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Cameras

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • The best Pixel to buy for photography
  • Excellent low-light photos and unique AI zoom capabilities

The Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Pixel 10 Pro have identical camera lenses and sensors, but I’m calling the Pro XL the better camera phone because of the larger display and longer battery life. Both of those attributes are features that camera buyers look for, and they make a difference when shooting with the Pixels.

The photos I got from the Pixel 10 Pro XL were fantastic, perhaps the best I’ve seen on any camera phone (and I compile the Best Camera Phones list for TechRadar). I’ll need to test the cameras in more situations, and head-to-head against more competitors, but in my week with the Pro XL it took pics that matched or beat my iPhone 16 Pro Max in most conditions.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL took photos with very accurate colors and plenty of detail at every focal range. For night photography, it was no contest. The Pro XL took pics that looked like I had a professional flashgun attached, while the iPhone shots looked much darker and lacked focus.

You can see plenty of AI help in the photos, but usually the results don’t look fake or off-putting. It’s a trade-off. I took a picture of a snowy egret from far away with my iPhone and the Pixel 10 Pro XL. The iPhone photo was grainy and fuzzy, but you could see the bird’s reflection rippling in the water. The Pixel created a smoother, more recognizable image, but the AI removed the ripples from the end result.

The only downside to Pixel photography is Google’s Camera app. It’s a nightmare. It’s hard to use, with settings that seem to conflict with each other. Adjust one setting, like changing from 12MP to 50MP resolution, and a handful of other settings suddenly go dark without warning.

I also tested the new Camera Coach feature, and you can read more about it in my Pixel 10 review. I think it helps more on the base-model phone, while the Pro XL Pixel takes photos that are good enough that you may not want an AI coach to get in the way.

  • Camera score: 5 / 5

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Camera samples

Image 1 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 2 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 3 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 4 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 5 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 6 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 7 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 8 of 8

Camera image samples taken with the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro XL

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: Performance

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Tensor G5 performance lags all but the cheapest bargain phones
  • Camera stalls after taking a high-res photo

The Pixel 10 Pro XL’s performance is the phone’s only real letdown, and even though it didn’t make a difference most of the time, at key moments the phone struggled to keep up. The gap between Pixel performance and the rest of the smartphone world isn’t shrinking – it’s getting bigger and uglier every year.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL had no trouble navigating the Android menus and launching apps as quick as can be, but not every feature was so smooth. I had trouble in the Camera app, especially when I changed to the higher 50MP resolution. The camera sometimes stalled after I hit the shutter button, and made me wait for a few moments until I could snap my next shot.

That’s a huge disappointment, and I don’t know any other phone outside cheap bargain options that fails to perform basic tasks this manifestly. I can press the shutter button on my OnePlus 13 as fast as my finger can fly and it never misses a beat – likely thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset inside.

Qualcomm has a superior platform this year, and phone makers who don’t use the latest Elite option are being left behind in more ways than one (see my battery complaints below). I no longer think the Tensor G5 is good enough for the Pixel 10 Pro XL. It isn’t. It can’t keep up with the latest Android software and features, and it’s time for Google to rethink its platform strategy.

  • Performance score: 3 / 5

Google Pixel 10 Pro review: Battery

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL in Porcelain against a blue background with a green neon Android figurine in the background

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Mediocre battery life – is the Tensor G5 to blame?
  • Magnetic chargers make up the shortfall

The Pixel 10 Pro XL has the best battery life of any Pixel 10 phone so far (we haven’t tested the Pixel 10 Pro Fold yet), but that isn’t saying much. The Pro XL lasted through a full day with little trouble, but I was still nervous when the battery hit single digits before bed time, which was often.

I alleviated my stress with the MagSafe chargers I have littered throughout my house and office space. Like the Pixelsnap charger, MagSafe is convenient for fast charging when I have 15 minutes to let my phone sit on a stand. A couple of those charge breaks every day made sure I had enough battery to last as long as I needed.

This mediocre battery life is especially disappointing because I’ve seen massive gains in the rest of the Android world. Phone makers like Samsung and OnePlus – using the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite platform – are offering new phones that get hours more battery life than last year’s models.

The Pixel 10 Pro XL lasted 15 minutes longer in our Future Labs battery tests than last year’s Pixel 9 Pro XL. That’s pathetic.

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra achieved two hours more battery life than the Galaxy S24 Ultra, even though it uses a battery that's the same size, thanks to the newer Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset. If Google can’t offer similar improvements year over year, it’s time to change platforms or it will be time to stop recommending the Pixel.

  • Battery score: 3 / 5

Should you buy the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL?

Google Pixel 10 Pro scorecard

Value

The most expensive Pixel, but also the best. The bigger display, longer battery life, faster charging and larger storage capacity justify the higher price tag.

4/5

Design

Mostly unchanged from the Pixel 9 Pro XL, and that’s a good thing. This is one of the most refined and polished phones you’ll see, and it’s even more durable than before.

4/5

Display

You won’t see a better display on a smartphone than the Pixel 10 Pro XL’s Super Actua screen. It’s incredibly bright and perfectly sharp, even in bright sunshine.

5/5

Software

The latest Pixel interface is one of Google’s best, and it makes the Pixel appealing and easy to use. New AI features can be useful, but if you hate them they won’t bother you much.

5/5

Cameras

Image quality is excellent, especially night photography, which is easily the best you’ll find on any smartphone. This might be the best camera phone you can buy. Camera Coach is a fun feature, but is it replacing real experts? Best editing tools, now helped by useful AI instructions.

5/5

Performance

Frankly unacceptable performance from such an expensive phone. It can’t even run the Camera app properly, and benchmarks are lower than any phone that isn’t cheap. Google needs to take this seriously, or next year won’t be so fun.

3/5

Battery

Battery life suffers under the yoke of the Tensor G5 chipset. While Qualcomm-powered phones see massive battery gains, the Pixel 10 Pro XL can’t last longer than last year’s phone, and even with its faster charging it doesn’t charge as fast as the competition. Get magnetic chargers to keep your phone topped up – you’ll thank me for it.

3/5

Buy it if...

You want the best Pixel phone yet
The Pixel 10 Pro XL is the Pixel to buy this year. The screen is fantastic, and everything is improved by the larger size and enhanced capabilities.View Deal

You take a lot of photos at night The Pixel 10 Pro XL is one of the best camera phones, but it really shines at night. Low-light photos were mind-boggling in clarity and color.View Deal

You're switching from an iPhone and have a bunch of magnets
I’m an unabashed fan of magnetic charging, so I welcome the Pixel 10 Pro XL to my household filled with charging stands and accessories galore.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You need a gaming powerhouse to win
The Pixel 10 Pro XL should be great for gaming, thanks to its incredible display, but performance is a letdown, especially for gamers.View Deal

You want a phone that lasts all day, and you hate magnets
Battery life on the Pixel 10 Pro XL could be better, and my MagSafe chargers saved the day. If you won’t be charging periodically, get a phone that lasts longer.View Deal

You want great cameras but wear tight pants
The Pixel 10 Pro has the same amazing cameras as the Pixel 10 Pro XL, so you don’t need to buy a big phone to get the same capabilities.View Deal

Also consider...

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
The biggest iPhone gives you all of Apple’s great iOS 26 features on a big display, making it easier to share, shoot videos, and play games with iPhone friends.

Read our in-depth Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max reviewView Deal

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
It’s a bit more expensive, but the S25 Ultra is jam-packed with features, including the S Pen stylus and a fourth camera lens for more zoom options. It’s also super-fast.

Read our in-depth Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra reviewView Deal

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Price

$1,199 / £1,199 / AU $1,999

$1,199 / £1,199 / AU $2,149

$1,249 / £1,249 / AU $2,349

Display

6.8-inch Super Actua display

6.9-inch Super Retina display

6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display

Processor

Google Tensor G5

Apple A18 Pro

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy

Battery Results (HH:MM:SS)

14:20:57

17:35:30

18:35:39

How I tested the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

I tested the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL for a week, alongside the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro. I used the Pixel 10 Pro XL as a work phone with my high-security work accounts. I loaded the phone with more than a hundred apps, and multiple Google accounts.

I used the Pixel 10 Pro XL as a camera, testing every camera feature. I used AI features to ask questions and generate sample images. I connected Magic Cue to all of my personal Google account information, and I fed the Pixel 10 Pro XL a regular diet of screenshots of my personal dealings for the Screenshots app.

I connected the Pixel 10 Pro XL to my Pixel Watch 3, my Pixel Buds Pro, and many other Bluetooth headsets and devices. I used Android Auto in my Kia and my friends’ Acura and Subaru cars, and connected to Bluetooth in an older BMW.

I've been testing phones for more than 20 years, since the days of BlackBerry and Palm OS smartphones and Samsung flip phones. I have tested hundreds of devices myself, and our Future Labs experts have tested hundreds more. I even did a brief stint as the internal phone reviewer for Samsung Mobile, testing products before launch in order to predict review scores and reception.

Future Labs tests phones using a mix of third-party benchmark software and proprietary, real-world tests. We use Geekbench, CrossMark, JetStream, WebXPRT and Mobile XPRT, and 3DMark for performance testing. We test a phone's performance on video editing tasks using Adobe Premiere Rush. We also measure display color output and brightness.

For battery testing, we have proprietary rundown tests that are the same for every phone, which we use to determine how long it takes for the battery to run down.

First reviewed August 2025

Darren Aronofsky’s Caught Stealing turns Austin Butler’s cat-sitting gig into a chaotic crime caper that’s a white-knuckle ride
4:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Entertainment Gadgets Streaming | Tags: | Comments: Off

Caught Stealing is a nostalgic slice of '90s New York City life that comes out swinging. Set in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, Darren Aronofsky’s new movie captures the nostalgic atmosphere of the time in this cat-and-mouse crime caper chase.

Austin Butler (Elvis; Eddington) plays Henry Thompson, a former baseball player turned bartender with a drinking habit, who insists on being called Hank. Tormented by a car accident that ended his promising sports career, the San Francisco Giants fan has been lifted straight from the pages of Charlie Huston’s novels that the movie is based on.

Hank gets caught up in a case of mistaken identity when his neighbor Russ, played by Matt Smith (The Crown; Doctor Who) – who looks like a punk-rocker that just stepped out of Camden in London (mohawk, studded leather jacket, piercings – the full uniform's here) – asks him to look after his Maine Coon cat named Bud (who you might recognize from Pet Sematary), setting in motion a chaotic chase with a growing group of eclectic goons across underpasses, subways and basements through East Village.

Austin Butler sits next to a cat

Caught Stealing is a chaotic crime caper crashing into the summer box office (Image credit: Columbia Pictures; Protozoa Pictures)

You wouldn’t expect that cat-care could get you killed, but that’s exactly the catalyst that drives the next 107 minutes of the white-knuckle drama. The bone-splitting violence splattered throughout does not hold back, letting you hear every crunch and snap against the backdrop of a soundtrack composed by Rob Simonsen (The Whale; Deadpool & Wolverine).

What starts with Russian mafia, played by Yuri Kolokolnikov (Tenet; The White Lotus) and Nikita Kukushkin (Attraction), beating up Hank (Kukushkin's mobster has a signature headbutt move) quickly snowballs as more players become involved to look for a mysterious key that they all believe Hank is hiding.

This hunt has got the attention of not just the Russian mobsters but a Puerto Rican gangster, played by Benito Martínez Ocasio aka Bad Bunny (Bullet Train; Happy Gilmore 2), and two extremely ruthless Orthodox Jewish brothers.

These last two might be the most threatening characters of the movie, but who also happen to have the most comedic lines. That's largely down to menacing performances from Liev Schreiber (Spotlight; X-Men Origins: Wolverine) and Vincent D'Onofrio (Full Metal Jacket; Men in Black) that make for a humorous contrast when you find them slurping soup or refusing to drive during Shabbat.

Austin Butler walks down a street with Liev Schreiber and Vincent D'Onofrio as Orthodox jews

Liev Schreiber and Vincent D'Onofrio provide some of the best laughs in the film (Image credit: Columbia Pictures; Protozoa Pictures)

There may not be any baseball in this film (apart from the brief opening scene) but funnily enough, it's the more violent scenes where it really comes out as we watch Hank sprinting past pedestrians like he's on a home run and swinging a baseball bat at his assailants as if he's a deadly batter.

The sport offers a bridge between the violence and Hank's soft nature. After all, Hank's not a fighter – a fact we're reminded of throughout by police detective Roman, played by Regina King (If Beale Street Could Talk; Ray), as well as by his relationships with people (and creatures) around him, from his mother to the homeless man on the street outside of his apartment that he helps out.

Zoë Kravitz’s (The Batman; Blink Twice) Yvonne, Hank’s girlfriend, is a welcome respite from all the violence, breaking up the gut punches and shootouts with a softer charm that shares the heart of the film with the weight of a drink driving accident from when Hank was younger.

Bad Bunny stands next to Yuri Kolokolnikov and Nikita Kukushkin in Caught Stealing

Bad Bunny joins Russian mobsters played by Yuri Kolokolnikov and Nikita Kukushkin. (Image credit: Columbia Pictures; Protozoa Pictures)

The biggest highlight of the movie is the nostalgic set created by production designer Mark Friedberg (Joker; Noah) that immerses the characters in the gritty streets of East Village in 1998 during its transformation into the trendy art scene it is today. This is complemented by a soundtrack that includes '90s hits such as Bitch by Meredith Brooks and Wandering Star by Portishead.

However, unlike the secrets of Bud’s litter tray, Caught Stealing isn’t too mysterious, relying on action movie ideas you've seen many times before. From the reluctant hero to the classic revenge storyline, it goes exactly where your brain naturally expect it to go based on the familiar elements – despite it coming from an interesting an unpredictable filmmaker in Darren Aronofsky.

It also lacks the intensity that his movies are known for, and can feel disjointed at times as it transitions from scene to scene, sometimes brushing over key moments. For instance, a lingering shot of a chameleon seems like it could be a reference to Hank's resourcefulness, but this idea isn't hinted at again, making it feel like a stray musing rather than an interesting theme.

Caught Stealing is not a deep psychological character study like Aronofsky's The Whale or Black Swan, it's an action-packed adventure centered around a self-destructive protagonist that's trying to turn the corner.

Indeed, the sunny grasses of California where Hank is originally from are in real contrast to the grimy streets of the Lower East Side, where he now finds himself, is not the subtle backstory that we're used to seeing from the filmmaker. They say stealing third base is a high risk, low reward play in baseball; unfortunately, I think that phrase captures the end result of Aronofsky's push into a new genre.

You might also like

Kirby and The Forgotten Land’s Star-Crossed World expansion is a Nintendo Switch 2 upgrade that’s well worth the money
3:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Consoles & PC Gadgets Gaming Nintendo | Tags: | Comments: Off

It’s fair to say that Nintendo’s slate of Nintendo Switch 2 Editions has been a mixed bag, both in terms of what the company offers in each, how much it’s charging, and how the reception has been.

Review information

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch 2
Available on: Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: August 18, 2025

The Switch's Zelda titles getting a frame rate and resolution boost for a few bucks each was very welcome but many were left decidedly out of the party mood when it came to Super Mario Party Jamboree’s Jamboree TV add-on.

In many ways, that makes the hilariously titled Kirby and the Forgotten Land - Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World an outlier, and not just because it’s got possibly the longest name on the platform.

It meshes a modest visual improvement with additional content that’s easy to recommend, and takes a fantastic platformer to new heights, not unlike its protagonist floating on the breeze. It’s not perfect, but it’s still a great stand-in as the wait for a new open-world Mario game goes on.

Rescue mission

Kirby and the Forgotten Land – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

It sounds odd, but I’ve always likened Kirby and the Forgotten Land to the early Astro Bot games, before Sony’s cute mascot went and became a platforming megastar. Its levels feel diorama-like - they’re 3D, but with minimal camera panning, and you’re tasked with searching in every nook and cranny to find a Waddle Dee.

Best bit

Kirby and the Forgotten Land – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

The best part of Star-Crossed World is how it expands on areas from the base game in surprising new ways, with one highlight being a new ‘train track’ style area that begins at ground level before climbing ever higher, with the original level stretched out below it.

If you’re coming to this new version, wondering if anything has changed in that regard, the answer is yes, but only insofar as you’ll be hunting down Starries this time around. While I must admit I had been expecting a separate menu icon a la Jamboree TV Switch 2 upgrade, or even Super Mario 3D World + Bowser’s Fury, I was surprised to jump into my old save and see that everything happens in the same world map.

Star-Crossed World's story is as simple as a mystery meteor landing and turning various older areas into more colorful, crystal-tinted versions, while even giving some of Kirby’s (admittedly adorable) foes a crystalline makeover, too.

Your pink blob’s mission is simple: rescue Starries in each level, while also ticking off some side objectives that might require a little more exploration.

What’s old is new

Kirby and the Forgotten Land – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

While there’s an argument that for around $20 / £16.99, fans should be able to expect wholly new levels, that’s not what’s happened here. In fact, it’s much cleverer than that. Kirby is tasked with reclaiming Starries (not as cute as Waddle Dees, for my money) by finding them in existing levels, but each becomes a much more expansive quest.

As an example, one area sees Kirby travel through an existing level, only to essentially part the sea midway through and explore a whole new region under what would have been the water. In another (and a personal favorite), our puffy pink protagonist hits the gem to open a new path, only for it to begin a railway track or rollercoaster of sorts that they need to fight and platform their way along.

Given a big differentiator of the base game from the rest of Kirby canon was having our hero wander through a sort of post-apocalyptic, recognizable world, some took umbrage with the more restrictive creativity brought upon by a new setting. That’s almost entirely jettisoned here, like Nintendo is letting its hair down somewhat.

In fact, if you’re jumping in for the first time, the meteor hits right after the first set of levels is completed, so you don’t have to reach the end credits to experience everything new.

All you can eat

Kirby and the Forgotten Land – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

The Mouthful mode returns in Star-Crossed World, and the same criticisms from the original TechRadar Gaming review apply - namely that, as funny as it is to see Kirby become a vending machine or a traffic cone, its implementation is all very linear.

This time around, there’s a Spring for jumping high and crashing down on foes, as well as a Sign that turns Kirby into a sort of flat shape for downhill sliding sections. The highlight, however, is the Gear Mouth, which allows Kirby to roll around on floors, walls, and ceilings, adding a literal new dimension to platforming.

That brings us to the platforming, and while it’s mechanically great to play, it’s just lacking the challenge of, say, a Super Mario Odyssey or even some of Donkey Kong Bananza’s trickier sections. I should stress that this doesn’t make all of the game’s imaginative ideas moot, but it does mean it’s easier to blow through in a weekend than some of its genre peers.

Another holdover from the base game is that boss fights are a little formulaic. While I appreciate that there are usually a handful of approaches to take with a few different upgrades available before the start of each skirmish, it does tend to devolve into dodging as much as you can and then spamming whichever attack you have to hand.

There’s a new Ultimate Cup Z EX boss rush that’s been added to the Coliseum for those looking for more of a challenge, though, which is a nice touch and helps scratch that trickier itch similarly to the Forgo areas of the 2022 original.

Not quite 4K(irby)

Kirby and the Forgotten Land – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Although the original game was hardly a slouch in terms of visuals, the bump in resolution on Nintendo Switch 2 is welcome.

Both The Forgotten Land and its Star-Crossed World additions run at what appears to be 1440p while docked, meaning it’s not quite as sharp as the Switch 2 upgrades of Tears of the Kingdom or Breath of the Wild, but it does run at a crisp 1080p in handheld.

The real relief is that it’s now running at 60fps across the board, which makes replaying even old levels feel just a little fresher thanks to the smoothness on offer. Load times have been improved, too.

Still, I do feel like Nintendo could have divorced the new content and the visual upgrade when it comes to what’s on offer.

Kirby and the Forgotten Land – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Is the company really going to be any worse off for giving away the visual upgrade for free and charging just for the extra content? It’s hard to say, but if you’ve been waiting to play Kirby and the Forgotten Land on Switch 2, you won’t get any visual improvements without paying.

All in all, then, Kirby and the Forgotten Land - Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World is one of the easiest ‘upgrade packs’ to recommend at the time of writing for Nintendo’s nascent console.

While I wish the visual upgrade had been free to anyone with a Switch 2 and a copy of the base game, the added areas in Star Crossed World are some of the best yet, and I’d wager playing the game without them would now make the game feel incomplete in some ways.

Should you play Kirby and the Forgotten Land Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World

Play it if...

You want a meaty adventure
There’s so much here to keep you busy, from finding Waddle-Dees and Starries to completing additional objectives across new and older areas alike, that you could be playing for a while to earn 100%.

You’re looking for a platformer post-Donkey Kong
Bananza’s destruction-based platforming wasn’t for everyone, and if you’re looking for something more traditional, Kirby and the Forgotten Land + Star Crossed World will fill that gap.

You want a Switch 2 upgrade that’s actually worth the money
While Super Mario Party Jamboree’s Switch 2 upgrade pack was less comprehensive, it’s hard to argue that what’s on offer in this Switch 2 upgrade is worth the money, between the visual improvements and additional content.View Deal

Don't play it if...

You’re looking for a challenge
While the new content is a tad more challenging than the base game, it’s a low bar to clear. It’s simply not the game for anyone looking for a real challenge, but that does make it pretty approachable for almost everyone.

Accessibility

Sadly, there aren’t a huge number of accessibility features here. There are two difficulty modes, Wild Mode and Spring-Breeze Mode, which offer additional difficulty for more coins, or additional health, respectively.

There’s no button remapping outside of swapping between a pair of preset options, either.

How I reviewed Kirby and the Forgotten Land Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Star-Crossed World

I spent the last couple of weeks playing the new content, immediately after replaying the entirety of the base game to give me a better perspective on how things differ and what’s new.

I played both in docked and handheld, with the former being on a Sky Glass TV while the latter made use of AirPods Max for listening to those oh-so-satisfying sound effects that had me itching to play Super Smash Bros. Ultimate again.

First reviewed August 2025

« Previous Page — Next Page »