NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition: One-minute review
The NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition is a brand-new variant of CRKD’s Neo S controller. Functionally, the controller is the exact same as the regular one, but this specific variant comes bundled with a 5-fret attachment designed for Fortnite Festival and other rhythm games like Guitar Hero and Rock Band.
The fret attachment slots into the bottom of the controller via the headphone jack, and from there it’s good to go. The obvious comparison is that of the Guitar Hero: On Tour series of games, which featured a similar attachment for the Nintendo DS. However, the issues that plagued that release over a decade and a half ago still persist here.
The fret buttons are small with very little spacing in comparison to a regular guitar controller, and holding the controller in the guitar form can become quite uncomfortable – especially with bigger hands. I’ve tested the NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret for three months or so now and found it difficult to play for over a couple of hours.
The biggest issue is that there’s no good way to strum in guitar-led rhythm games. The default option is to tap the RB button, which is useless when you have to strum in quick succession; meanwhile, mapping it to the stick works slightly better, but it’s still no substitute. If you’re looking for a way to play rhythm games casually, then it’s more than serviceable. But anyone looking to seriously delve into the genre is better off looking for a more suitable controller like the PDP Riffmaster.
The controller features an Xbox layout and has Bluetooth connectivity, making it great for the PC. However, it doesn’t connect to Xbox consoles (although this is promised in a future update). It does connect to the Nintendo Switch – but it’s awkward to play due to the buttons being swapped around from the usual Nintendo layout.
(Image credit: Future)
NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition: Price and availability
List price:$59.99 / £59.99 / AU$119.95
Available in the US via the CRKD website
Available in the UK via Argos and Amazon
The NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition launched back in November 2024 and costs $59.99 / £59.99 / AU$119.95 – making it $10 / £10 / AU$20 more expensive than the regular NEO S controller. However, it’s currently the only way to get the five-fret attachment for the controller. It’s compatible with Nintendo Switch, PC, smart TVs, and mobile devices at the moment, with Xbox support promised to arrive later down the line.
NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition: Specs
NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition: Design and features
Guitar attachment designed for rhythm gaming
Bespoke Fortnite Festival design inspired by the game
Programmable back buttons and fret buttons
One of the Neo S controller’s main gimmicks is the litany of custom designs available, such as one inspired by the Nintendo Famicom color scheme, 90’s-style translucent variants, and collabs with the likes of Rocket League and Hellboy.
The Fortnite Festival edition is a purple variant with a wavy design that features different shades of purple, while the d-pad, shoulder, and back buttons are bright pink. Meanwhile, the back of the controller is a solid purple shell. It’s a lovely-looking controller until you notice the gaudy Fortnite Festival logo slap-bang in the middle. A more subtle Fortnite design or emblem would’ve been preferable.
This design isn’t extended to the guitar attachment, which is also just a solid purple – although the lighter pink does appear at the fringe of each button. When the attachment isn’t on the controller, it does feel a bit flimsy, like the plastic could snap very easily.
This doesn’t help when getting it onto the controller can feel quite fiddly. You need to pop it on at an angle before pushing the top into the ridges, but lining the bottom up can be a bit cumbersome. This attachment comes with a Velcro strap, which you pop in between the controller and guitar, making it easier to hold like a standard guitar neck.
(Image credit: Future)
The Guitar attachment features five buttons to emulate the classic Guitar Hero formula; these buttons are automatically mapped to the buttons used for each lane in Fortnite Festival.
The controller comes with three modes: one for Easy, Medium, and Hard modes in-game, another for Expert, and another for Pro mode (which is the one designed for guitar controllers). You can swap through all three of these modes by holding down all five frets, with the LED on the attachment changing color to represent another mode. You can also rebind these buttons to be used in regular games, although the position of them may not make this the most optimal.
Unfortunately, I found the NEO S Fortnite Festival Edition quite uncomfortable to hold after long sessions – more so than the discomfort of a regular guitar controller. However, it’s far more comfortable in wireless mode, as the USB-C port at the top of the controller gets in the way otherwise.
NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition: Performance
Solid battery life
Easy to set up
Custom button mapping requires using a mobile app
The NEO S works straight out of the box with a USB-C cable connection to PC, or by holding the CRKD button and left on the d-pad to enable Bluetooth connection for PC or mobile. For the Nintendo Switch, it’s as simple as holding the CRKD button while on the controller connect screen. The NEO S Fortnite Festival Edition’s battery life lasted around eight hours from my testing. I didn’t notice much difference in battery drain when using the guitar attachment.
The controller is fully remappable; however, if you’re looking to remap the buttons, you’ll need to do so in the CRKD app. This extends to the Guitar attachment too, which can be mapped to any button on the controller and works even outside of Fortnite Festival. However, there’s no way to actually select and enter a song in Fortnite Festival without using the regular controller.
(Image credit: Future)
The default mapping for the strum bar is the bumper buttons, which is fine for casual play, but the issues become apparent once you’re faced with fast-moving songs like Metallica’s Battery. While a strum bar would allow you to alternate directions for faster moments, tapping one button makes this tiresome, or near-impossible in some cases. You can remap the control stick to work as a strum bar, which feels like the ideal solution, however, I couldn’t get this to work in Fortnite, but it does work in fan games like Clone Hero.
CRKD was founded by former RedOctane staff – who created the original Guitar Hero controllers – meaning that these buttons feel in line with the original series (namely the DS Guitar Grip). However, if you want to play this style of music game seriously, I’d recommend investing in a proper guitar controller.
Should I buy the NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition?
(Image credit: Future)
Buy it if...
You want a way to play Fortnite Festival Pro Mode or other guitar games At the end of the day this controller is made with this in mind. It works for playing these modes casually and allows players the chance to experience the classic genre without forking out a lot for a guitar controller.
You’re getting a NEO S and like Fortnite Festival For only $10 / £10 / AU$20 more I don’t see much reason not to pick this version up compared to the regular NEO S if you have even a passing interest in Fortnite Festival. Considering this is the only way to get the guitar attachment currently, I’d say it’s worth the upgrade.
Don't buy it if...
You plan on playing guitar games seriously While it’s definitely possible for someone to tear it up with the NEO S Fortnite Festival Edition, the setbacks make this hard. If you were playing the likes of Metallica or Slayer on Guitar Hero, I’d invest in a regular guitar controller.
You have big hands or fingers The NEO S is quite snug as a controller and the guitar attachment follows that form. The buttons on the guitar attachment do the job, but are very small and don’t have much space between them, making it easy to double-fret.
Also consider...
Still not sold on the CKRD NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition? Here’s how it compares to the other Guitar Controller on the market and a more regular pad for reference.
PDP Riffmaster This is a great alternative because the PDP Riffmaster is the only proper guitar controller on sale right now. PDP was responsible for the last batch of Rock Band 4 guitars, so these are almost exactly alike.
GameSir Nova If you’re looking for a good Nintendo Switch and PC controller with stats comparable to the NEO S at a cheaper price point then the GameSir Nova may be up your alley. However, this obviously doesn’t support the Fortnite Festival guitar controller addon, but you are still able to play the mode with a regular controller!
How I tested the NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition
Tested for around 15-20 hours
Used it to play Fortnite Festival and Clone Hero on PC
Used it as a regular controller on Nintendo Switch
I’ve been using the NEO S Purple Wave 5-Fret Fortnite Festival Edition on PC and Nintendo Switch since mid-December 2024 (so just under two months). During this time I’ve played a bunch of Fortnite Festival, but my true love affair has been with Clone Hero. I tested the controller in a variety of different musical situations: acoustic tunes that rely on strumming patterns with multiple notes, thrash tunes that require a ton of fast-paced strumming, and songs with wailing guitar solos (yes, I did play Free Bird).
In my experience, it worked best in slower songs and songs with a lot of hammer-ons and pull-offs due to my issue with the strum bar. The highlight of this experience was playing a custom chart of the full Flood album by They Might Be Giants, which featured a lot of piano (among other instruments) charted to Guitar Hero’s clear notes, which didn’t require me to strum.
The real highlight of the JBL Quantum Stream Talk are its design and feature set, which punch above its budget-friendly price point.
It’s super compact and very stylish, with a robust stand that incorporates metal elements to look and feel premium. It’s incredibly easy to adjust and position too, thanks to a small, foam-footed base and a smart swivel mechanism that allows the microphone to be rotated by a full 360 degrees.
The prominent LED ring indicator is a smart inclusion and something that you wouldn’t necessarily expect at this price point, providing a convenient and easy way to check whether the microphone is muted and even adjust some basic settings on the fly.
That said, the recording quality is a let-down out of the box. Its default configuration sounds very jagged and does a poor job of cutting out background noise. Luckily, the compatible JBL Quantum Engine software gives you everything that you need for better recordings. With a few settings tweaked, namely the EQ profile and noise reduction level, it’s perfect for chatting with friends or dialing into meetings - but still not clear enough to rank among the best microphones for streaming.
If you're interested in picking up a streaming microphone on a budget, there are options out there that look and feel substantially worse, but sound noticeably better such as the AKG Ara. If you can wait for a sale, you can regularly find old favorites like the Blue Snowball for not that much more than the price of the JBL Quantum Stream Talk which offers far more bang for your buck.
(Image credit: Future)
JBL Quantum Stream Talk: Price and availability
Costs $49.95 / £39.99
Available via Amazon and JBL
Easy to find in the US and UK
The JBL Quantum Stream Talk is readily available from both Amazon and JBL in the US and UK. It costs $49.95 / £39.99, making this the cheapest entry in the JBL Quantum Stream line right now. At this price, it’s a good value option overall for general use, especially if you’re looking for a more affordable choice that doesn't take up a lot of space on your desk.
That said, those seeking a microphone for content creation would be better off waiting for a sale and spending a little more on something like the HyperX DuoCast - which routinely drops down to around the $60 / £40 mark and offers higher quality recordings.
JBL Quantum Stream Talk: Specs
JBL Quantum Stream Talk: Design and features
Stylish and compact
Feels premium
Good set of features
The JBL Quantum Stream Talk is very stylish for a microphone of its price. It’s compact, with a circular plastic base complete with a small foam ring to help keep it in place on your desk.
It has a simple stalk-like design, with a cylindrical metal column and a small plastic capsule connected by a ball joint that allows it to be rotated a full 360 degrees. Also joining the column and capsule is a short wire with an orange and black braided that introduces subtle splash of color.
At the end of the capsule is a translucent ring illuminated by an LED. This is a bright green by default, turning red when the microphone is muted. The option to dim or even turn off this light would be appreciated, but it’s not particularly intrusive either way.
On the base, you will find a gray JBL logo and an adjustment dial. It's a good size and can be used to adjust the monitoring headphone volume when you’re connected to a 3.5mm headphone jack on the rear. It can also be pressed down to quickly mute the microphone, or held for a few seconds to adjust the microphone gain - indicated by the mic’s LED turning purple. It’s all very intuitive and one of the biggest reasons to consider the JBL Quantum Stream Talk.
While the microphone itself is a single unit, there is a removable USB-C cable. This is a good 6ft length and feels high-quality, matching the orange and black aesthetic of the wire found on the mic.
While I very much like the integrated stand setup, you should bear in mind that this microphone cannot be mounted to a boom arm unlike other budget picks, so is not suitable if that’s your preferred setup.
(Image credit: Future)
JBL Quantum Stream Talk: Performance
Audio quality isn’t great out of the box
Sounds much better when you tweak the EQ
Noise reduction also helps
When you first plug the JBL Quantum Stream Talk into a computer, a popup automatically appears asking whether you would install the compatible JBL Quantum Engine Software - a convenient feature that saves you from having to dig around on a support website to find it. I would highly recommend installing it, as I found that tweaking the microphone’s settings is almost essential.
Out of the box, I was unimpressed with its performance - recordings sounded choppy with a flat, almost nasal quality to them. Booting up Discord for a quick call, background noise was very noticeable, as was any movement of the surface on which the mic was placed. This is a little strange, as the JBL Quantum Stream Talk uses a super-cardioid pickup pattern that should, in theory, really help it hone in on just your voice.
Still, you can achieve decent sound with the JBL Quantum Engine Software in hand. For me, the sweet spot was enabling the “Bright” EQ profile, which bumps up the level of almost every frequency, and turning up both the noise gate and noise reduction settings to medium. Listening back to recordings made with Audacity, my voice sounded a little sharp but otherwise more than ideal for casual chatting. With a few more tweaks, I am sure I could get it to sound even better.
(Image credit: JBL)
JBL notes that the microphone is compatible with the PlayStation and Nintendo Switch too. Plugging it into my PS5, it provided significantly better sound than the integrated microphone of the DualSense Wireless Controller but is not up to par with any of the mics on the best PS5 headsets. Still, the option to use this model with your console is appreciated and increases its utility somewhat.
That said, this is also marketed as a streaming microphone and I am hesitant to recommend it for that purpose. If you’re able to spend a little more, you can find models that sound better out of the box.
This is doubly true if you’re shopping over a sale period, where the likes of the iconic Blue Snowball routinely have their prices slashed to just $20 / £20 or so more. Still, if your budget really can’t extend beyond the $49.95 / £39.99 mark and you just need something quick, this should just about suffice until you’re able to upgrade.
Should I buy the JBL Quantum Stream Talk?
Buy it if...
You want a small microphone The JBL Quantum Stream Talk is a good option if you’re looking for something compact - its small size makes it easy to fit on your desk and it’s very stylish overall.
You want a good set of features Its LED indicators, useful mute button, and decent set of options in the JBL Quantum Engine software all help the JBL Quantum Stream Talk punch above its modest price tag.
Don't buy it if...
You’re a content creator able to spend more If you’re keen to get into streaming, then I would recommend spending a little bit more on a model that sounds better out of the box. Alternatively, wait for the sale and pick up a favorite like the Blue Snowball for cheap.
Also consider...
Want to weigh up your options? Here are two gaming microphones to consider alongside the JBL Quantum Stream Talk.
AKG Ara The AKG Ara is a decent alternative at a similar price. It sounds better out of the box but lacks the gain control, looks worse, and feels cheaper in the hands.
HyperX DuoCast The HyperX DuoCast is frequently available on sale for only slightly more than the JBL Quantum Stream Talk. This entry-level streamer mic offers better sound, two distinct polar patterns, and pleasant RGB lighting if you’re able to stretch the budget.
I used the JBL Quantum Stream Talk as my daily driver for over a week. During that time I tested it with both PC and console with a range of tasks including making calls to friends, recording audio files locally, and attending virtual meetings for work. I made sure to thoroughly test the compatible JBL Quantum Engine software, experimenting with its features to find the best setup.
Throughout my time with the microphone, I compared my experience with my hands-on testing of other models all across the price spectrum ranging from the likes of the Blue Snowball to the Blue Yeti and SteelSeries Alias.
The Bose Smart Soundbar is a great way to elevate your TV experience in the bedroom or other small room. It’s not up to the task of a home theater setup, especially without a subwoofer, but that’s not its purpose. if you’re looking to bring Dolby Atmos sound to a smaller setup, it’s one of the best soundbars you can buy.
The Bose Smart Soundbar’s lack of low-end will frustrate action and superhero movie fans and its narrow soundstage keeps it from truly elevating the audio experience, especially when listening to music. However, it still is one of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars, with two upward-firing speakers that provide a sense of space and immersion that somewhat offsets that narrow soundstage. In a smaller setup, it almost completely masks it.
Just as important, this soundbar is stacked with features. There’s an A.I. dialogue mode, Alexa and Chromecast support, plus a whole lot more. My favorite feature lets you use specific Bose earbuds as the rear speakers in a surround sound setup for a unique experience. Unfortunately, those are sold separately. And, of course, the Smart Soundbar has the typical Bose markup, so this is not necessarily a great deal, though I wouldn’t call it overpriced either.
If you’re looking to upgrade your TV experience in a smaller space like a bedroom or small apartment, the Bose Smart Soundbar is an ideal option, especially with all the features on hand. Just be willing to shell out some extra cash and be aware of its shortcomings.
The Bose Smart Soundbar comes with everything you need to quickly get up and running (earbuds cost extra) (Image credit: Future)
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Price & release date
Price: $499.00 / £499.95 / AU$799.95
First available: September 2024
Available in the US, UK, and Australia
Having been released in September of 2024, the Bose Smart Soundbar is the newest addition to the company’s soundbar lineup. And at $499.00 / £499.95 / AU$799.95, its price tag is about what one would expect from Bose since you’re paying a little bit for the name. You might get more in terms of features or even a subwoofer and surround speakers for that price if you go with models from other companies, but you might be trading off some quality for those extras.
We reported around the time of release that the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds can work as rear speakers for this soundbar. And while that is certifiably a very appreciated feature, you won’t get a pair for free when purchasing the soundbar but will have to pay an extra $299 / £299 / AU$449.95 for the earbuds.
The Bose Smart Soundbar and Bose Ultra Open Earbuds are available in the US, UK, and Australia.
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Specs
Power and mic control buttons are located on the soundbar's top surface (Image credit: Future)
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Features
Personal Surround Sound (requires optional Bose earbuds)
App is easy to navigate and use
Wi-Fi and Voice assistant support
My favorite feature of the feature-filled Bose Smart Soundbar is Personal Surround Sound, which uses Bose’s Ultra Open Earbuds as rear speakers so you can get an actual surround sound experience without needing to use rear speakers. Plus, you can adjust how subtle or strong the effect is in the app as well as boost different settings like center channel level for those with issues hearing dialogue. This feature requires you to purchase Bose Ultra Open Earbuds, however, and they’re not exactly cheap.
I particularly liked this feature for gaming. I used Personal Surround Sound while playing Star Wars: Jedi Survivor and found it created a fairly integrated soundscape for the main character to run around in – half the time I couldn’t tell if what I was hearing was coming from the soundbar or the earbuds.
In a way, Personal Surround Sound is even better than a traditional surround sound system since you don’t have to be locked into a specific seat to hear all the audio elements in the soundtrack at the proper distance. On the other hand, this feature only works for anyone wearing the earbuds – not exactly great for group viewing.
The app, which is easy to navigate and use, has plenty of other features on tap. Of course, there are some basic EQ settings. While there’s no parametric EQ, you can adjust the treble, bass, center channel, and height effect, aka spatial audio. You can even toggle on a Wall EQ setting to adjust for when the soundbar is installed against a wall.
Speaking of spatial audio, this soundbar does support Dolby Atmos, and physically reproduces it via those upward-firing speakers. Some soundbars support Dolby Atmos but don’t have any upward-firing speakers, instead using virtual trickery to give a sense of spaciousness. The difference is noticeable.
Bose TrueSpace also takes advantage of those upward-firing speakers, upscaling sound so that you’re getting a spatial audio experience even when the source isn’t Dolby Atmos encoded. (It’s like listening to mono audio on a stereo set of speakers.) As far as I could hear, it’s the same audio going upwards as out whereas Dolby Atmos audio has specific elements that are designated height effects.
If you’re hard of hearing or just find the modern mixes of movies to be hard to understand, the AI dialogue mode might be the feature for you. It’s supposed to automatically adjust dialogue for clarity’s sake. When testing – I watched the beginning of The Dark Knight for this feature – I found that dialogue was clearer since there was a subtle boost to the midrange where voices typically sit. It wasn’t obnoxious the way some dialog boosting modes are, but it still boosted sounds that sit in a similar frequency range that weren’t voices. It’s not perfectly executed, but still is done well.
Lastly, the Bose Smart Soundbar has Alexa support as well as both Chromecast built-in and AirPlay. With Alexa, you can talk to the soundbar the way you would an Amazon Echo, even asking what the weather is or setting a timer. I did find that I had to articulate the wake word a little more for the soundbar to hear me, but that’s not all that big of a deal.
During testing, I found the built-in Chromecast and AirPlay to work seamlessly, which is something I always worry about as in the past I’ve had connectivity issues with Wi-Fi streaming on some devices.
Features score: 4.5 / 5
The Bose Smart soundbar features two upward-firing speakers for Dolby Atmos height effects (Image credit: Future)
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Performance
Light on bass
Balanced mids and crisp highs
Somewhat narrow soundstage
The Bose Smart Soundbar sounds about as good as a soundbar can. You have to remember that these types of audio devices exist mostly for convenience’s sake.
With that in mind, let’s discuss its audio limitations. First up is the bass. While I could turn up the bass level in the app, the low-range boost affects the mid-range frequencies. Since there are just some bass ports on the back and no actual subwoofer-specific drivers, not to mention that the drivers are necessarily compact, the lack of a strong bass response is unsurprising.
There was no rumble on hand when I tested it with The Batman, The Dark Knight, and Deadpool & Wolverine (400 Blows doesn’t lend itself to testing soundbars). Whenever there are big fights in these kinds of movies, there’s always a lot of very punchy low-end information. But here, all that information is very muted if not gone. At least, there’s a subwoofer output to correct that by adding an external subwoofer, and Bose also offers wireless subs (and surround speakers) that can be paired with the Smart Soundbar.
The other parts of the frequency range fare better. The mid-range is not quite rich and full, but it is well-balanced. I generally didn’t need the A.I. dialogue mode, for instance, as the dialogue was consistently intelligible. It also helped that I could boost the center channel level in the app to help with that.
The high-end is nice and crisp on the Smart Soundbar. Whether it was the string arrangement in movie scores or even dialogue when I tested it, everything had a nice clarity as opposed to being overly pronounced or even painful to listen to.
This soundbar's soundstage is inherently limited by its form factor. That said, the sound did feel like it has more width than other similarly sized soundbars I’ve tested and used. This was helped quite a bit by the spatial audio capabilities, as everything sounded a little bigger and wider, even though I didn’t hear as much left-to-right movement as I expected.
Performance score: 4 / 5
The Bose Smart Soundbar's main connections are HDMI eARC and optical digital audio, along with a line output for a subwoofer (Image credit: Future)
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Design
Upward-firing speakers
On-unit controls just for voice assistant
No alphanumeric LED display
Bose is not breaking the mold design-wise with the look or color of the Bose Smart Soundbar. This is a long rectangular, matte black soundbar with a grill that covers the front and wraps around the side to cover the center tweeter and the racetrack transducers on each end. There’s a grill on the top of the unit as well where the two upward-firing transducers are.
Speaking of all those speakers, despite it being technically a 3.0.2 system (the left, right and center speakers along with the two upward-firing ones), the audio decodes at 5.1.4. There are some ports on the back to help with bass but there aren’t any drivers dedicated to the low end.
The on-unit controls are fairly limited as just two buttons are sitting on top of the left side for voice assistant support. There’s a microphone button to turn the internal mic on or off and an Alexa action button to interact with Alexa in a few different ways including stopping the feature.
Most of the physical controls are available through the remote. You have the usual ones like power, mute, and volume controls as well as three source buttons (TV, Bluetooth, App) and a play/pause button. Nothing too crazy. The remote itself is fairly small and light, which is nice, though its small size makes it the kind of remote that’s very easy to lose.
As far as ports go, it has the necessary optical and HDMI ports as well as a subwoofer out, an IR port, and a USB
There’s no front panel alphanumeric LED display – something I always wish I had when it’s missing – just an LED light when the soundbar turns on or is listening when listening to a voice assistant command. While I did miss it, I didn’t miss it all that much.
Design score: 4 / 5
The Smart Soundbar's control app gives you access to a wide range of EQ settings (Image credit: Future)
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Setup & usability
HDMI eARC connection to TV
Easy, app-based setup
One-remote use with Roku TVs
Setup of the Bose Smart Soundbar is very straightforward, even if it takes just a little longer from beginning to end. If you just want to get to it and don’t care about all the features, connecting the soundbar to either your TV’s optical or HDMI eARC port is most of the work. Put some AAA batteries into the remote (unfortunately not included) and you’re good to go.
There are a few more steps if you want to get the full experience. After downloading the Bose app, you pair it to the soundbar (and the Ultra Open earbuds if you have them) and then set up Wi-Fi on the soundbar for AirPlay, Chromecast Built-in and Alexa.
The Bose Smart Soundbar is made to pair seamlessly with Roku TVs. Luckily, I have one so I was able to go through the process – just follow the onscreen instructions – which allowed me to use my TV remote for basic functionality. On that note, once Alexa was set up, I was able to manipulate the soundbar just by using the wake word and speaking to it.
Setup & usability score: 5 / 5
Using the Smart Soundbar's Personal Surround Sound feature requires the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds (not included) (Image credit: Future)
Bose Smart Soundbar review: Value
Features boost value
Can get more advanced systems for same price
Cheaper standalone soundbars available
If you’re looking at features, the Bose Smart Soundbar has a lot going for it with the Personal Surround Sound feature (which, again, requires a separate purchase), A.I. dialogue mode, and app support.
For a similar price, however, you can get a 5.1-channel system like the maxed-out version of the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus, which also gives you a subwoofer and rear speakers for true surround sound. As nice as Bose’s personalized surround sound feature is, only one person can use the earbuds at a time. Amazon’s system is lacking features and doesn’t have voice assistant support – not even Alexa. Its audio quality is not quite as crisp, nor does it have the upward-firing speakers of the Bose soundbar. Of course, if you’re on a budget, you can skip the subwoofer and rear speakers and just get the standalone Amazon Soundbar Plus soundbar for $249.99 / £249.99 (about AU$400).
Another option is to spend $349 / £299 (originally $499 / £449 / AU$695) to get the Sony HT-S2000, a 3.1-channel standalone soundbar that includes virtual spatial audio and good bass response. It costs a little less for something that gets you 80% of the way there. But again, you’re giving up a lot as it doesn’t have voice assistant support, the personalized surround sound that’s unique to this Bose soundbar, or one of the many other features on hand.
Value score: 4 / 5
The Bose Smart Soundbar and Ultra Open Earbuds (Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Bose Smart Soundbar?
Buy it if...
You need all the features The Bose Smart Soundbar is about as feature-filled as it gets, from Alexa and Chromecast built-in to a personal surround sound feature accessible if you have a pair of Bose Ultra Open Earbuds.
You’re looking for great sound in a single soundbar This soundbar has the typical Bose audio quality one expects. While a bit light in the bass, it has good clarity and dynamics.
You want true Dolby Atmos Thanks to the inclusion of two upward-firing speakers, this soundbar offers a real spatial audio experience. On top of that, it can upscale non-Dolby Atmos tracks into faux spatial audio.
Don't buy it if...
You want a full surround sound system While you can use the Bose Ultra Open Earbuds for a great surround sound experience, it’s just for one person. If you want a full surround sound experience, especially with guests, look elsewhere.
You’re on a budget For a single soundbar, you’re paying quite a premium here. There are decent soundbars, albeit with less features and lower-quality sound, at a fraction of the price.View Deal
Bose Smart Soundbar: Also consider
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus system costs about the same as the Bose Smart Soundbar. And while it’s not nearly as feature-packed, it does come with a subwoofer and surround speakers for a more immersive experience (discounting the Bose’s personal surround sound feature).
Sony HT-S2000 While its Dolby Atmos is virtual, this soundbar still punches above its weight thanks to its impressive sound. There’s no voice assistant support or Wi-Fi streaming, but its price has dropped a bit from when it was released.
Hisense AX5125H Hisense's soundbar system offers 5.1.2 channels in a compact package with wireless surround speakers and a subwoofer. It also has an alphanumeric front panel LED display and costs less than Bose's soundbar.
The Nakamichi Dragon with its two subs in my home. (Image credit: Future)
I used the Bose Smart Soundbar for a couple of weeks
Tested with TV, movies, games, and music
I used the Bose Smart Soundbar regularly for a couple of weeks. I watched movies, shows, gamed and listened to music with it. I tested all the various features, especially the Personal Surround Sound feature to see what it could do.
After having tested the Bose Smart Soundbar, it still surprises me all that this soundbar has to offer. It’s that feature-packed. This is an ideal soundbar for someone with a smaller, not-quite home theater setup, but who still wants a premium experience, and not just because of the name.
I’ve tested a lot of tech gear over the years from laptops to keyboards and speakers, and so have been able to use my expertise towards giving an honest and fair opinion, not to mention a critical eye, to any product I test.
Earlier today OnePlus made the Watch 3 official without much fanfare. It builds upon the seeming success of the OnePlus Watch 2 and OnePlus Watch 2R with an even bigger battery that should last for up to five days for normal use and even up to three days with intensive use.
There's also support for ECG readings, but there's a catch regarding this function. Namely, it's not going to be available in the US and Canada because OnePlus didn't receive official certification from the FDA for the Watch 3's ECG capabilities.
Thus, the ECG Analyzer feature won't be available in those...
The Elegoo Centauri Carbon is one of the new wave of CoreXY fully enclosed machines that I've reviewed this year, although this one is aimed directly at the entry-level market. Elegoo already has a decent history with this level of printer, with their Neptune printers being some of the most reliable on the market—if not the most well-known.
The main reasons for making the switch from the traditional bed slinger to the CoreXY machines is that they ensure high speed and accurate prints, and it's nice to see a printer of this type and quality come from Elegoo.
After removing the printer from the box, it only took around 10 minutes to get it set up and started with the first print. What really impressed me was the fact that it was so easy to use. It actually compared really well against the new Creality and Anycubic machines and, again, was just extremely fast and ran through its various self-checks faster than those competing machines.
While an initial check through the specifications showed that this is a slower printer than the new Creality K2 Plus or the S1 from Anycubic, when it came to general print speeds away from the standard test models, the Centauri Carbon actually outpaced them.
As I've seen with many of the best 3D printers, there's a lot of self-checking that goes on, so the auto bed levelling, strain gauge system, and other fail-safes all help to avoid misprints. It's nice to see a printer of this type coming out with its own integrated camera as a standard part of the machine, rather than an optional extra—the main thing here is that it will also print Carbon fill straight from the box, again without any additions.
The enclosed design enables plenty of material support, and through the test, I used PLA, PETG, as well as TPU and carbon fill, just to give the printer a full run of materials. With more advanced materials, having that enclosed build area does help with print quality, and when it comes to materials such as PLA, you can always pop the top of the machine to increase airflow.
Overall, while there's nothing groundbreaking about the Centauri Carbon, other than the amount of printer that you get for the price. When it comes to build quality, design, and ease of use, I have to say I've been extremely impressed. Although it remains a closed system, as an out-of-the-box and easy-to-use solution, the Elegoo Centauri Carbon is just a really well-thought-out and solid machine.
Elegoo Centauri Carbon: Price and Availability
The Elegoo Centauri Carbon can be purchased directly from the official Elegoo website as well as through major online retailers.
US: $299.99 UK: £299.99 EU: €329.99 CA: $449.99
Price and Availability: 5/5
Elegoo Centauri Carbon: Design
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The first thing I noticed when I lifted the Centauri Carbon out of the box was just how heavy it was for such a relatively small machine. The reason for this is that it has a completely integrated chassis, which helps boost stability, and certainly, for a machine of this type, it feels really solid. That solid build is carried across the entire design of this 3D printer, and it all feels really high-quality, with reinforced aluminium alloy pillars and stainless steel side panels. They all add weight but, again, add to that rigidity, which is needed for a CoreXY machine.
Looking over the machine, the overall build is good and solid, with a high-quality glass door at the front and a touchscreen for easy navigation and control of the machine. One of the pitfalls of this type of machine is that a door or top needs to be removed or opened when printing filaments such as PLA, and that's certainly a case here—some of the latest machines have started to incorporate other manual or automatic vent systems. Considering the price, the build and design is very high, so to not featuring a vent at this level isn't an issue. For a machine of this type, the display is just about standard at 4.3 inches, offering a full-colour screen that is nice and bright and extremely responsive.
Inside, due to the design of the machine, everything is neatly packed away, so it looks like a really refined 3D printer. It would have been considered premium had it been released a year ago, but now it sits just at the upper end of the entry-level price point. From the outset, it just seems like superb value for money, considering the quality and the number of features that you get.
There's a lot here that is reminiscent of the old bed-slinger Cartesian printers, so we have the large 256 × 256 × 256 mm print area, and as standard, there is a flexible magnetic build plate. This enables easy model removal when needed.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
On the outside of the machine, you have your USB port so that you can transfer files offline to and from the machine, and the right-hand side of the machine features the filament holder, which is pretty standard and not enclosed. These days, it's more common to put your filament into a dry box of some type, and the design of this machine actually makes that next to impossible, so if a dry box is added, it will be an external module.
When it comes to the nozzle, there is a standard 0.4 mm option fitted by default, and as is now standard, this can be swapped and changed for a range of other diameter nozzles depending on the type of work you're doing. When it comes to the maximum temperature, this can reach up to 320°C—perfect for specialist materials—and there is plenty of flexibility over the adjustment of the temperature when needed. This is the Carbon model, so you guessed it, as standard out of the box, it's Carbon ready. Likewise, the bed temperature can also rise up to 110°C, again ideal for specialist materials.
Design: 4.5/5
Elegoo Centauri Carbon: Features
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Specs
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Build Volume: 256 × 256 × 256 mm Nozzle Diameter: 0.4 mm (default) Max Nozzle Temperature: 320°C Max Bed Temperature: 110°C Filament Compatibility: PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, ASA, PLA-CF, etc. Printing Speed: ≤500 mm/s Acceleration: 20,000 mm/s² Slicing Software: ELEGOO Slicer, supports third-party slicers Connectivity: USB, Wi-Fi Display: 4.3-inch full-color touch screen Power: 1100 W @ 220 V, 350 W @ 110 V
This is Elegoo's first CoreXY motion machine, and if we look at the quality of their previous 3D printers, this first launch sets a pretty good standard when it comes to entry-level machines of this type for others to follow.
Starting out with the build area, at 256 × 256 × 256 mm, this is big all things considered and will give you plenty of flexibility over the type of model that you print. When it comes to the actual size and weight of this machine, it measures 398 × 404 × 490 mm, which again really isn't that large for a machine of this type and build area. When you compare that with the traditional bed slinger, it actually takes up a lot less space. However, when it comes to weight, these machines are in a different league compared with the older bed-slinging Cartesian models and has a weight of 17.5 kg. So, despite that relatively small footprint, with the strength and quality of the construction, the weight of this machine is far greater.
Just taking a quick run-through of the tool head, and it's fitted with a 0.4 mm nozzle diameter, and this can be swapped out and changed for others. It's heated by a 60 W heater, which is quite powerful, meaning that the hot end will heat up quickly. Inside the tool head there's that filament cutter, which helps to avoid filament clogs but also lends to the belief that this is going to be a multifilament machine in the not-too-distant future, and as standard, it takes 1.75 mm filament—so good standards all around.
The build plate is a double-sided flexible magnetic plate, which again is pretty standard, and it can reach temperatures up to 110°C. Along with the nozzle's maximum temperature and the enclosed design of the machine, that will enable plenty of flexibility over the type of materials that you print.
The CoreXY kinematics enable several advantages over the previous Cartesian design. Primarily, they are a lot faster and also more accurate. When it comes to speed, it has a maximum tool head speed of 500 mm/s, which is impressive, and a maximum tool head acceleration of 20 m/s²—again, exceptionally fast. But as I've come to realise, speed isn't everything, and whilst it might not match up to the likes of the Creality K2 Plus or the Anycubic S1 with those speeds, the speed at which it does its self-checks and heats the hot end could make all the difference.
As we've seen with the likes of the Bambu Lab P1P and many other machines on the market, cooling is as important to print quality as heating, and Elegoo has really tackled this with a high-speed 5020 cooling fan, an internal enclosure cooling system, and an auxiliary cooling fan—all to help with the efficient cooling of models as they're being printed. In addition to cooling, there is also a filtration system, so if you are using toxic filament such as ABS, then the built-in nano mineral crystals should help to reduce the odours and particles coming out of the machine.
One of the touches that I really like is the built-in camera, which enables timelapse recording as well as monitoring. While this is possible on most modern machines, it isn't always the case that the camera is included as a standard part when you buy the kit, so it's great to see that it's standard for the Elegoo Centauri Carbon.
Features: 4.5/5
Elegoo Centauri Carbon: Performance
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Setting up the Elegoo Centauri Carbon took me around 10 minutes, with the most effort being lifting the 3D printer out of the box. The reason for this was that, while it looked small, it was actually surprisingly heavy, and I wasn't quite prepared for that weight. At 17.5 kg, it is about average for a CoreXY machine, but with its slightly smaller footprint than most, it was still a bit of a surprise.
Placing the printer onto a work surface, and it all looks extremely neat with assembly essentially consisting of plugging in the small LCD and removing all the packaging.
Switching it on, the printer ran through its setup process and auto-levelling, with all checks running through relatively quickly and smoothly. Feeding in the filament and following the load instructions, and all was complete.
Starting out, I ran a few of the test prints from Elegoo, and the machine quickly proved just how efficient and fast it could be. While this isn't the fastest 3D printer on paper, when it actually came to use, it seemed to be incredibly quick. Using the example 3DBenchy, it produced this in a little over 15 minutes, and to be honest, the quality of that print was really good.
As the test went on and I produced more prints, I became increasingly impressed with the precision and speed that the Elegoo Centauri Carbon was capable of when printing with a variety of different materials. One thing that really struck me was that, because of its size and quality of the physical machine's construction, there was very little vibration. Although it caused a little bit more noise than some, the speed at which it printed and the consistency and reliability it was capable of were really impressive.
Again, when it came to checking over those prints for print quality, there was little to fault. The test models showed that it handled negative space, overhangs, bridging, and dimensional accuracy exceedingly well.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
This is the fourth 3D printer that I have looked at in as many weeks that shows complete separation between the older Cartesian printers that I was reviewing a year ago and this new wave of CoreXY machines. The main thing here is that the Elegoo Centauri Carbon is far cheaper than many of its rivals.
When reviewing this machine, you can't help but make comparisons with the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon, which sits side by side with it on the workbench. The Elegoo Carbon actually takes the lead, mainly due to the time it takes to do its safety checks and the speed at which the nozzle gets up to temperature. Otherwise, when it comes to actual print quality, both are actually very similar. I would say that while they compete, the X1 Carbon is still a more premium machine and, in the long run, is the better machine, but considering the price of the Centauri Carbon, it gives the X1 Carbon a run for it's money.
Performance: 4.5 / 5
Elegoo Centauri Carbon: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
It's incredible how far things can come in a year, with the Elegoo Centauri Carbon really being a competitor against the far more expensive Bambu Lab X1 Carbon. The print size is exactly the same, but with the Elegoo Centauri Carbon, you have those faster speeds due to the fact that the nozzle gets up to temperature really quickly, spends less time doing safety checks, and, ultimately—no doubt due to the rigid, high-quality build—it seems to be incredibly reliable.
The more I used the Centauri Carbon, the more I could see how this design has developed. What Elegoo has done is focus on the quality of the print and the hardware of the machine to ensure that it's able to compete in an increasingly competitive and advanced market.
I recently looked at the Anycubic S1, and that machine was capable of producing some of the most accurate prints that I've ever seen from a 3D printer of its type and price range. While printing some specialist materials, the S1 does require a nozzle upgrade. The Elegoo Centauri Carbon, however, comes ready and equipped to print with carbon fibre materials straight out of the box, and there is no other machine at present in this price range that can do that.
Its main competitor is really the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon, but with that model costing over £1,000, there's a huge difference in price. So if you are looking to print with carbon fibre materials, whereas a few weeks ago I would have recommended the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon without a doubt, now you're spoilt for choice with the X1 Carbon, Original PRUSA Core One or now this ultra-cheap entry-level Elegoo Centauri Carbon.
Should you buy the Elegoo Centauri Carbon?
Buy it if...
You want an outstanding printer
This smallish CoreXY machine pitches itself at a level that is well beyond it's price point. The build is outstanding, and the quality of prints and speed absolutely excels.
You want outstanding prints
While speed is the core of these new machines, dial down the pace and the print quality, utilising a huge variety of prints, including carbon, is outstanding.
Don't buy it if...
You need multifilament now
Although it looks like eveything is in place for multifilament printing, at launch this is a single filament machine.
You want to print at scale
While the build area is pretty good, there are plenty of machines that are now offering 300mmx300mmx300mm build areas.
If you’re after an all-in-one robot vacuum cleaner – one that vacuums, mops, and then cleans itself by also washing and drying its mop pads – you’re typically looking at a rather premium price point. The Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni offers you all of that, but without that high cost. And it doesn’t necessarily make too many sacrifices on features either, which really highlights how much bang for your hard-earned buck it can offer.
Depending on where you live, there might be two versions of the T30 Omni available – a white Pro model and the black non-Pro edition that’s reviewed here and is available in the UK and Australia. Strangely, neither model is currently listed on the US Ecovacs website. The only difference between the two, other than their color, is the Pro model gets three additional features: Ecovacs’ Yiko voice assistant, a dirt-detection deep-mopping mode and an onboard camera. I missed none of these during my time testing the standard T30 Omni, although some users might find the deep-mop function useful.
The first thing that got my attention was just how compact – or rather squat – it is compared to other all-in-one robot vacuums that come with two water tanks in the cleaning station. Ecovacs says the T30 Omni (and its Pro version) will fit under any kitchen or bathroom counter – while my under-counter cabinets weren't designed for such a scenario, measurements indicate that if I were to make small changes to how they're structured, it would take minimal carpentry to get the robot vacuum and its dock stowed away neatly. The rest of the design is also very well considered and I think it’s one of the better-looking full-featured robot vacuums I’ve seen.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
It doesn’t disappoint in its performance either. With four suction levels and four water-flow rates, there are a lot of custom routines you can set up for the T30 Omni. What I appreciate even more is that even at its highest suction setting, the robot isn’t as loud as I’ve previously encountered with other similar models, even those from Ecovacs. The maximum suction here is 11,000Pa, which isn’t as much as other premium models available on the market, but it’s more than enough for most homes. However, if you have carpets that are particularly dirty with tangled hair or fur, it will have trouble sucking those up in their entirety. What hair and fur it manages to clean thankfully doesn’t get entangled around the main bar brush, making ongoing maintenance easy.
Also aiding in making the user lazy is how well it washes its mop pads after each cleaning session. You can choose how often you want the pads to be washed and how long you want to set the hot-air drying for. And that’s a good thing because those mops can get dirty – during my testing, I found the mopping to be so effective that the pads would get brown within minutes! I had no idea how much dust my hard floors could pick up! Better yet, the extendable mop pads ensure even the edges of my rooms were cleaned well, although the occasional corner can be missed.
The tanks are remarkably easy to refill or clean out, and so is the base tray that the mop pads are washed on. And while you can always bend down to press a button in a pinch to start or stop the T30 Omni, it will also respond to a light kick to the bumper.
All in all, I think this is a really good all-in-one robot vacuum cleaner, able to give even more expensive models a run for their money, making this a really great-value investment if you want to stop spending time on vacuuming and mopping your floors. Where there’s scope for improvement is with the Ecovacs Home smartphone app, but only marginally.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: Price & availability
Available since 2024 in UK and Australia; not sold in the US
List price: £799 / AU$1,749
Often discounted during major sales
Announced in May 2024 for most major markets, the Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni is now listed for purchase in European countries, including the UK, and in Australia. Strangely, it’s no longer listed on the official Ecovacs website in the US, although it was announced for the American market.
At full price, the T30 Omni will set you back £799 / AU$1,749 but it’s often discounted to a much lower price, which makes this a truly worthwhile investment given its power and feature set. For instance, at the time of writing, it’s available for £699 directly from Ecovacs UK, while it’s dropped as low as AU$1,199 in Australia.
Other similar models can cost you around the £1,000 / AU$2,200 mark: for example, the Dreame L40 Ultra available in the US and the UK with the same 11,000Pa suction has a list price of $1,499.99 / £999 (unavailable in Australia), but take it up a notch and the 12,000Pa Dreame X40 Ultra with detachable mop pads will set you back a whopping $1,899 / £1,299 / AU$2,799. Similarly, the Eufy Omni S1 Pro, with its interesting slimline design but with a maximum of 8,000Pa of suction costs $1,499 / £1,499 / AU$2,699.
There are, of course, cheaper robot vacuums but, given how well the T30 Omni balances power, performance and price, it represents very good value for money even at full price.
• Value score: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: Specs
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: Design
Standard T30 Omni model only available in black; white is the Pro model
Not as tall and heavy as other all-in-one robot vacuums
Extendable mop pads that automatically rise to avoid carpets
Whether you opt for the standard T30 Omni in black or the white T30 Pro Omni version, the only physical difference between the two is the color – everything else is identical from a design perspective. Neither, however, come with any additional replacement parts, which is a glaring omission on Ecovacs’ part as you are immediately faced with having to purchase additional dust bags at the very least. Thankfully you won’t find the need to replace the mop pads too soon as the washing mechanism is fantastic, although keep an eye on them as, like any fabric, they will begin to show signs of wear and tear.
(Image credit: Amanda Westberg)
Lack of some replacement parts aside, the entire appliance, despite its plastic build, is quite solidly made. You’ll find no need for the user manual to set up the various parts of the robot vacuum’s dock – it’s all very intuitive and just slots into place. Once assembled, it doesn’t look like most other all-in-one robovacs – it’s shorter and looks more compact, although it has a similar footprint to other models. This compactness in height is what allows the T30 Omni to slot under a counter if you are able to fit it in.
Unlike other such all-in-one robot vacuums, the water tanks – clean and dirty – aren’t placed inside the clean station, but are an essential part of the dock, sitting atop the enclosure housing the 3.5L replaceable dust bag. From an aesthetic standpoint, I like that the translucent clean-water tank sits in the front, and it means you can see when a refill is needed. Both tanks have a 4L capacity, meaning they’ll last a few cleaning sessions before you need to manually do anything… although I don’t like having any dirty water in the tank for more than a day, so I’ve always just cleaned it out, but that’s just me. And I’m also appreciative of the fact that the dirty water tank is opaque and sits at the back of the machine.
Ecovacs has even put some serious thought into the design of the washing tray that the actual robot sits on to charge and have its mop pads washed. It reminds me of old ribbed washboards from the 1800s, with raised ridges that ensure the mop pads get a good scrubbing after (or during) each mop run. The tray is also very easy to remove and clean out.
Overall, I’m a big fan of the slightly voluptuous-looking clean station and how easy it is to get to any part of it to refill, clean or replace, although I can also see why some people may not like the look compared to the straight lines of other models.
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 4 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The robot itself isn’t very different from the familiar round droid we see from most brands. There’s the usual lidar turret on the top to house Ecovacs’ proprietary TrueMapping 2.0 technology, while the top panel has three function buttons: zone cleaning, start/pause and exit/return to base. Combination presses of these three buttons can also be used but, from my experience, the only time you’ll really need any of them is at the initial setup process.
The top panel of the robot also simply lifts off to reveal the 300ml rectangular dust bin inside. You won’t, however, see the water reservoir, which is hidden under the opaque plastic.
On the front of the robot you can clearly see the obstacle avoidance system – called TrueDetect 3D 3.0 – on either side of which are distance sensors. Two contact points for charging are also visible on the rear of the robot, as well as the water inlet for filling the reservoir and the hatch to self-empty its dust bin. The front bumper is also sensitive to a light kick, which tells it to either start or pause wherever it is.
The underside of the robot has four anti-fall sensors along the rim, and there’s also a sensor that detects carpets. There’s one side brush, while the main bar brush has been redesigned to offer zero tangles when hair and fur is being vacuumed. I have to admit, I was rather skeptical about the ZeroTangle brush, but I’m quite impressed with how well it manages to remain free of all entanglements. The two rotating mop pads are affixed to the removable plastic supports via some seriously strong Velcro but, unlike more premium machines from Samsung and Dreame, the mop pads don’t automatically drop if you set the robot up for just a vacuum run. They do, however, extend outward to wash room edges and can rise up to 9mm to avoid carpets and rugs.
• Design score: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Amanda Westberg)
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: Features
Up to 80% more suction power compared to the T20 Omni
Spot cleaning improvements based on user feedback
Foot-touch start/pause functionality
You’d think that, to keep costs down, the T30 Omni would be missing key features, but Ecovacs has managed to pack it full of the things you really need and left out anything that you wouldn’t necessarily miss – like voice control. The one thing that I do wish I could have tried is the deep-clean mopping mode that the Pro model has but, honestly, I didn’t necessarily feel any FOMO while testing the standard T30 Omni.
One feature I’m a massive fan of, and it’s actually a rather superfluous one, is the foot-touch start/stop functionality. What that means is giving the robot a light kick on the bumper makes it start or, if it’s already moving, stop where it is. I admit to being lazy and this makes my need to bend or reach for my phone unnecessary when I just need it to stop for a minute or two when I have to step in its path for whatever reason. I hands-down agree that it’s a novelty, but it’s the kind of fun feature I love.
Importantly for a robot vacuum, Ecovacs has upped the ante where suction is concerned. Compared to the Ecovacs Deebot T20 Omni’s 6,000Pa suction power, the T30 Omni now boasts a much better 11,000Pa. For its price point, this is a fantastic upgrade.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Another feature worth mentioning here is the reimagined spot-clean functionality that is now also available on other top-tier Ecovacs robovacs. At the press of the spot-clean button on the top of the robot, the T30 Omni will know to clean a 1.5m x 1.5m square area around wherever it’s located at the time. If it’s at the dock, it will clean around the dock; you can pick it up and place it anywhere in your home and it will begin the spot clean there. It’s a handy feature to have for those quick spills that need immediate attention.
One useful feature that’s not quite unique to the T30 Omni, but is effective nonetheless, is extendable mopping. This allows the mop pads to either remain extended at all times or automatically pull out when the robot senses a wall or furniture close by. This works so well that even thin furniture legs are identified and the mops can clean right alongside them and, where possible, move a full circle around them.
Other features include Bluetooth connectivity for easier setup and the Ecovacs Home app widget for iPhones and Apple Watches for getting a whole-house clean going instantly.
• Features score: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: App control
Cleaner app than before but still scope for improvement
A number of custom ‘Scenarios’ can be set up
Editable map, but adding furniture is fiddly
I’ve reviewed quite a few Deebots over the last few years, some of which have been discontinued. So it’s fair to say I’ve seen the evolution of the Ecovacs Home app to its current form, which is arguably the best it’s ever been. It’s a lot cleaner and easier to use, although I still see scope for improvement. That said, in the few months that I’ve been testing the T30 Omni, I’ve not had a single app-related problem.
The Ecovacs Home app has everything you need to set up the T30 Omni if it’s your first Deebot, including giving it a name. In my case, I called the robot vacuum Dirt Vader. To get started, you can set the robot to do a mapping run which doesn’t take too long. It quite literally rolls through your home in a slightly random manner and picks up where the walls and doors are to create a basic map. This you can then edit in the app, adding names to the various rooms and even furniture. While it’s really easy to partition rooms, adding furniture is annoying as placements are not necessarily going to work on a flat 2D space.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The app displays all the cleaning options clearly, including the various combinations of vacuum and mopping, and how often of both you want the bot to do. You can choose the suction power and the water-flow rate.
You can set up what Ecovacs calls Scenarios – different cleaning runs to suit different needs. For example, I have one called Daily Clean, which is a single vacuum run throughout my home at the highest suction. Another one that I call Deep Clean is two vacuum runs in the carpeted bedroom, followed by two mop-after-vacuum sessions in the rest of the house with hard floors. I have another called Quick Clean, which is a single vacuum-and-mop run on only the hard floors (so it skips the bedroom). The options are plenty, giving you a lot of control over your floor-cleaning routine.
The app also lets you change the volume of the voice prompts of the robot which, by default, is really rather loud. You get the usual cleaning logs and you can also keep track of when you need to replace parts like brushes, mops or the dust bag. Setting up schedules is also there.
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
You’ll get voice prompts and an app notification if the wash tray needs cleaning in the middle of a session – that’s because the mop can be set to be cleaned at regular intervals. I had mine set to every 15 minutes, so Dirt Vader would go back to the dock a couple of times during most cleaning sessions to wash the mops. I really do not like brown streaks on my light-grey tiles.
My only issue with the app is with the Scenarios tab: only two Scenarios are visible on most phone screens, but the Manage option gets in the way of the second listing. It’s also not immediately clear that you just need to slide to view all the different Scenarios. I’d also like the map to be a bit more detailed, but that’s not really a complaint, but an observation.
• App control score: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: Performance
Hardly ever misses mopping a room edge or along furniture legs
Excellent vacuuming prowess on hard floors
Can struggle on excessively dirty carpets
We have quite a few Deebot reviews on TechRadar, and one thing they all have in common is their good performance. And that’s again the case here. In fact, I was rather impressed by how quickly, and accurately, the T30 Omni mapped out my apartment – it took just six minutes to do so and all walls, doors and floor types were correct even though it seemed to move rather randomly. It doesn’t account for furniture, but you can see the vague shapes in the basic map. Subsequently, I didn’t have a single issue with navigation either – Dirt Vader always moved in a clear pattern within each zone, hardly ever missing a spot.
Whether it’s just vacuuming, just mopping or both together, the T30 Omni does a very fine job indeed. During testing, I sprinkled some talcum powder on the floor to see how it would cope with such fine particles and, set to do a spot clean with vacuum and mop together, I was pleased that I couldn’t see white powder when I ran my fingers over the area.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
While the side brush did scatter some grains of rice while vacuuming, a second run cleared those up as well. A few scattered grains that went into a corner did get left behind though, but I can’t blame Dirt Vader for a shoddy job – even my Dyson V15s Detect Submarine would have a hard time getting at those grains with the Fluffy Optic or the Digital Motorbar. I’d have to use the Crevice Tool for that. Perhaps the Dyson 360 Vis Nav, with its protruding tongue, might have picked up the stray grains… Or for situations like that, Ecovacs has another solution in the form of the Deebot T30S Combo, which packs a handheld cordless vacuum along with the robot.
Dirt Vader’s vacuum prowess is also quite good on carpets and rugs… provided the carpets aren’t already too dirty. Only the bedroom in my apartment has wall-to-wall carpeting and, over the duration of a week, my hair gets all over it. If there’s too much hair, I found that the T30 Omni set at max suction over two consecutive runs can struggle to do a deep clean. There were always some strands still visible, but it was along edges where it truly struggled to gather tangled hair. However, my medium-pile rug in the living room, which doesn’t get too dirty, always looked refreshed after a single vacuum run at max suction. On hard floors, reducing the suction to Standard or Strong is more than enough for a good clean.
Image 1 of 2
The brand-new ZeroTangle bar brush on the Deebot T30 Omni... (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2
..and the same brush after three months of use. (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Mopping is where the T30 Omni shines. When Ecovacs says ‘edge mopping’, it’s truly the case here. The extendable mop pads are effective at cleaning right along the 90º angle of a wall and where furniture legs meet the floor. No matter how thick or thin a leg might be, I saw Dirt Vader go a full 360º around the vertical axis where the height under furniture allowed it to go.
During my testing, I tried various water-flow rates and, for the kind of tiles I have in my apartment, the High setting was the best for a regular clean, so that is what I set it to for every Scenario. This saw all dusty footprints disappear in one mop session, as did a splatter of hot sauce on the kitchen floor. However, a thick, dried-up blob of mayonnaise took a couple of goes before it was cleaned up.
Getting the bin to auto-empty at the Extra setting meant that it was fully emptied, with only the barest film of dust along the plastic sides still visible, which can be washed out if you prefer, but I found no need to do so. The self-washing of the mop pads is also fantastic. After nearly three months of using Dirt Vader, the mop pads didn't look too worse for wear.
Image 1 of 2
The brand-new mop pads under the Deebot T30 Omni... (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2
..and the same mop pads after three months of use (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
What I love even more than its ability to clean is how quietly it goes about its business of cleaning. Given I’ve regularly used it at its maximum suction, I’ve never really needed to increase the volume on my TV while it was doing its thing. And my TV is in the bedroom where it’s cleaning only carpets, so the suction is always on. Ecovacs says it hits a maximum sound level of 65dB, but that’s only when it’s auto-emptying. That’s still relatively quiet compared to other self-emptying models. While vacuuming at maximum suction, it’s only ever hit 57dB for me, measured using a smartphone app, so do take that number with a pinch of salt. Still, it’s one of the quieter robot vacuums I’ve tested.
• Performance score: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni review: Battery life
Uses a 5,200mAh capacity lithium-ion battery
Rated for up to 290 minutes on a single charge
Can take up to 6.5 hours to top up an empty battery
Ecovacs has always endeavored to provide good battery life for its robot vacuums and, again, the T30 Omni delivers. Even with max suction and high water-flow rates set up for two mop-after-vacuum runs, Dirt Vader always had an average of 35% battery life still left after covering an area 74sqm. That isn’t bad at all.
It’s also intelligent enough to know how much battery it needs to finish an incomplete cleaning session if it does ever run out of power. This happened during one session, when I started my Deep Clean scenario (two vacuum sessions in the bedroom, plus two mop-after-vacuum runs in the rest of the apartment) when the battery was at 82% when it began. Instead of waiting till it was a full 100%, Dirt Vader charged till about 55% and finished the job it was meant to.
That meant I didn’t have to wait the full six hours for it to top up to 100%, which is how long Ecovacs says it can take the T30 Omni to fully charge up from empty. However, I can’t really vouch for that as I’ve not had an opportunity to see it fully drained after completing a cleaning run (even the one time mentioned above, where it charged just enough to finish an incomplete Scenario).
• Battery score: 5 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Should I buy the Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni?
Buy it if...
You want a relatively inexpensive all-in-one robot vacuum
I won’t call it ‘cheap’ but it’s definitely more affordable than some of its competitors. And given how well it balances its performance, features and price, I’d say this really is good value, especially when discounted.
You’re keen on getting room edges cleaned well
While the side brush helps a little to clean along the edges of a room, it’s the extendable mop pads that do the actual cleaning along skirting boards and furniture. And the software running the T30 Omni knows when it needs to do a full 360º too.
You want an all-in-one robot vacuum that can be hidden away
If you have the open under-counter space, the T30 Omni is short enough to be tucked away under your kitchen bench or island, or even under the bathroom sink – depending on how your home is set up. Your cabinets, of course, shouldn't be raised.
Don't buy it if...
You have wall-to-wall carpets that can get dirty quickly
Not only will the T30 Omni struggle to clean overly dirty carpets, it also won’t be good value as you won’t be taking advantage of its mopping capabilities.
You’re on a tight budget
While it might offer good value for money, the T30 Omni isn’t exactly cheap. If you want a more affordable option, you will have to consider foregoing some features that you'll find in most all-in-one models.
You don’t want any ongoing costs
All self-emptying robot vacuums will incur an ongoing cost of at least the dust bags, if nothing else. If that’s a deterrent, you could consider a self-emptying cordless vacuum cleaner like the Shark Cordless Detect Pro with Auto-empty System, which empties into a box rather than a dust bag, but then you will have to do the vacuuming yourself and it doesn’t come with a mop attachment.
Also consider
Eufy X10 Pro Omni
Currently sitting at the top of our best robot vacuum list, the Eufy X10 Pro Omni has 8,000Pa suction power and manages to deliver good vacuuming and mopping performance on hard floors. The app is intuitive, with good mapping and navigation too. However, the docking station is quite large. Read our full Eufy X10 Pro Omni review
Dreame L40 Ultra/X40 Ultra
If you have the money to spare and want one of the best premium robot vacuums that can handle pretty much anything, then consider the top-of-the-range Dreame L40/X40 Ultra. The L model is available in the US and the UK, but the X is available in Australia. Both offer excellent suction and mopping capabilities, with plenty of smart features that make them the most hands-off robovacs we’ve tested. The app is arguably the biggest disappointment here and they’re both large too. Read our full Dreame L40 Ultra review Read our full Dreame X40 Ultra review
Ecovacs Deebot T30S Combo
For a higher price than the Deebot T30 Omni, you can get an Ecovacs robot vacuum that also packs a handheld cordless unit alongside it. It’s arguably the epitome of an all-in-one, taking care of stairs, the quick clean-ups and the regular big jobs too thanks to that extra cordless vacuum. Housing the handheld unit, though, means the docking station has a larger footprint than most other robot vacuums. Read our full Ecovacs Deebot T30S Combo review
How I tested the Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni
Used in my own home for about three months
Tried various settings and created different cleaning routines
Scattered various common grains, powders and liquids to test cleaning
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
While I've had the Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni for a few months for testing, there was a period of 4 weeks where it was switched off from the mains while I was overseas. Unlike some other connected devices that may need repairing to your smartphone after such a long time of inactivity, the T30 Omni remained paired and started up as if it wasn't lying dormant at all.
During the three months of actual testing, I used the T30 Omni in my one-bedroom inner-city apartment at least once a week, trying out various permutations and combinations of vacuum and mop. Given I have a mix of both carpets (in the bedroom) and tiles (rest of the apartment), it was easy to test the T30 Omni's cleaning prowess. I scattered powders, grains and sauces on the floor to see how it performed, plus I made a note of dusty footprints on the living room floor that came from a rather dirty balcony.
I kept tabs on how well the mop pads were washed and dried after each clean, and checked the dust box inside the robot to ascertain the docking station's suction. Practically every feature of the robot vacuum was tested for this review, including the foot-touch start/pause function.
I have previously tested several other Ecovacs Deebot models, as well as robot vacuums from other brands, putting me in a great position to compare the T30 Omni's performance and features.
DeepSeek is the latest hot name in AI, with Huawei, Honor, Microsoft and even some auto makers already using the R1 model in its products and services. The Chinese-made platform quickly gained popularity in the United States, achieving the top position in the App Store almost overnight.
Arm CEO Rene Haas shared his concerns about the service's future with Financial Times, stating it may be forced to shut down “due to foreign policy" implications stemming from its status as a Chinese company.
Haas noted that his forecast reflects the developments of recent weeks regarding TikTok. The...
T-Mobile used one of the biggest events of the year, the Super Bowl, to announce that it is opening up its T-Mobile Starlink beta service to everyone in the US. No, seriously, everyone can sign up.
First off, what is T-Mobile Starlink? It’s a service created in partnership with SpaceX’s Starlink service (and it uses their satellites) to bring cell coverage to 500,000 square miles in the US that are currently not covered by any cell tower. You don’t need a phone with satellite connectivity, the phone you have right now will probably work just fine. And you don’t need to do anything to use...
If you're going to call a smartphone ‘ultra’, it needs to embody that adjective. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a top-tier camera system. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has mind-boggling charging speeds and a chic textured look. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a stylus (and lots more besides).
Throughout my testing of the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra, I couldn't quite put my finger on what made it worthy of the 'ultra' designation. It’s undoubtedly a highly capable premium Android phone, but in the competitive mobile market, ‘good’ just isn’t good enough.
The latest entry in Asus’ one-per-year line of flagship Zenfone mobiles, the Zenfone 12 Ultra is another top-spec handset that costs a blisteringly large amount of money. On paper, it's a stablemate of the best Android phones and best iPhones – and it certainly competes with those devices in some areas.
Indeed, if you look at the specs sheet below, you’ll see that the Zenfone 12 Ultra bears all the hallmarks of a premium smartphone. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite processor provides a huge amount of processing power, and its giant 6.78-inch display is great for gaming or streaming movies. The phone's three-lens rear camera array also gives shutterbugs much to delight in.
Certainly, from a specs perspective, there's nothing to dispute the Zenfone 12 Ultra's status as an 'ultra' phone. But that's no longer enough.
All of those aforementioned ‘ultra’ phones go that extra mile to justify the suffix, offering unique features or specs that make their hefty price tags seem almost reasonable. I don’t see any such selling point in the Zenfone 12 Ultra. It’s not ‘ultra’, it just is. Ironically, the lack of a non-ultra Zenfone 12 seems to underline this fact.
If you were to ask Asus, the company would likely say that the killer additions here are the phone's AI features. Most new phones nowadays tout a long list of ‘AI features’, a buzzword given to what we’d otherwise call ‘new software tools’ or, less forgivingly, ‘unnecessary software extras’ – but you need to call everything ‘AI’ in today's tech landscape.
Among the Zenfone 12 Ultra’s AI features are an article summary tool, call translation, a feature that creates AI-generated wallpapers, and plenty of AI-powered camera tools. Now, regardless of the usefulness of many of these features (how many people actually phone someone else who doesn't have a language in common?) and the unproven interest of normal tech buyers in AI features, they don’t allow the Zenfone 12 Ultra to collect the 'ultra' suffix for one simple reason – so few of them are actually new. Honestly, the Zenfone 11 Ultra had most of them.
Speaking of the Zenfone 11 Ultra, the 12 Ultra barely brings any upgrades over it to the table. A newer chipset and some minor tweaks to the camera lenses are the only improvements I could discern. I checked the price of the now-year-old Zenfone 11 Ultra one week prior to the 12 Ultra’s release, and it was going for over a third off from Asus itself. So, you’d be saving loads of money on a pretty similar mobile.
What's more, the Zenfone 12 Ultra has even more similarities to the recent Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro. Their appearances are near-identical, as are their specs, with the scant differences being the 12 Ultra's smaller battery and a refresh rate that doesn’t go quite as high, and the ROG Phone's trigger sensors and LED back panel.
Okay, let's take a breath. I may sound down on the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra in this review, but it's undoubtedly a good phone. It provides a top-tier experience across the board and I enjoyed using it throughout my testing process.
That said, Asus loaned me the device for review purposes, meaning I didn’t have to part with a scary amount of my salary to buy it. When you factor in the phone's high price, it’s hard to see why you should opt for the Zenfone 12 Ultra over its equally expensive rivals – or, for that matter, mid-range rivals that offer similar specs for a dramatically lower price.
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: price and availability
(Image credit: Future)
Released in February 2024
Costs €1,099.99 in European markets
US, UK, and Australian availability unconfirmed for now
The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra was launched in early February 2024, a year on from its predecessor, and with nary a standard or Pro sibling to speak of.
At the time of writing, it's only available in European markets for a price of €1,099.99, which will net you 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. "As for pricing and availability in the US, UK, and Australia", Asus told TechRadar, "we have yet to get a clear date or price at this moment." That said, we expect the Zenfone 12 Ultra to launch in at least some of these regions soon.
For a little bit of context, the Zenfone 11 Ultra started at $899.99 / £869.99 (around AU$1,450) for its 12GB/256GB starter model. There was also a 16GB/512GB model, which offers a better price comparison to the Zenfone 12 Ultra, but it was only on sale in the UK (for £949.99). The Asus Rog Phone 9 Pro, meanwhile, is available globally for $1,199.99 / £1,099.99 / AU$1,999.99.
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: specs
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: design
(Image credit: Future)
Blocky phone that looks like predecessor
Still has a 3.5mm jack
IP68 protection
There’s no getting around it: the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra is a blocky phone. I won’t quite call it ‘ugly’, not when the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra lays claim to that term with such an iron rule, but it’s a little on the boring side.
It looks almost identical to the Zenfone 11 Ultra, and pretty similar to the ROG Phone 9 Pro, but without the lines pattern of the former and the ‘gamer chic’ of the latter.
It’s a big phone, measuring 183.8 x 77 x 8.9 mm and weighing 220g, so if you remember how Asus used to cater to the small-phone market with its Zenfones, you’ll be disappointed. It stretched my hands out and I’ve got fairly average-sized mitts, and it was a pretty big burden in the pocket too.
The right edge of the mobile has the power button – pretty easy to reach, despite the phone’s big size – and the volume rocker, which was a little harder to stretch to. There’s also an in-screen fingerprint sensor, positioned higher up than on other phones, which took a little getting used to.
Talking of acclimatizing, the USB-C charging port on the phone’s bottom edge isn’t right in the middle. Instead, it’s to the left – as far as I’m aware, Asus is the only company that uses this design quirk. There’s nothing wrong with it, once you get through the first few days of jamming your charger into the wrong place. There’s another novelty here too, in the form of a 3.5mm headphone jack. How many mobiles cater to wired headphone users these days?! Props to Asus for that.
I mostly used the Zenfone 12 Ultra in a protective case (provided) but even when I didn’t, it took drops and bumps like a champ. It has an IP68 rating, so it can withstand dust ingress, as well as brief drops in the tub or pool.
Design score: 3.5 / 5
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: display
(Image credit: Future)
6.78 inches, 1080 x 2400resolution
144Hz refresh rate max, though usually at 120Hz
A few display customization features
The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra has a nice big display: it’s 6.78 inches diagonally, which explains how much of a hand-stretch the mobile itself is.
The screen’s resolution is FHD+ or 1080 x 2400 — that’s pretty standard for most smartphones, although you’d be forgiven for wanting a little more at this price range.
Mind you, the phone's refresh rate is super fast at 144Hz (good luck finding many games to utilize that spec, though) and the max brightness is nice and high at 2500 nits. In typical use, you can expect a buttery smooth 120Hz refresh rate.
There's another feature here I love to see in smartphones: a color temperature and balance mode for adjusting the way the screen looks. Max saturation with the warmest possible temperature? Don't mind if I do!
Display score: 4 / 5
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: software
(Image credit: Future)
Android 15 with optional Asus overlay
Only two years of OS updates
AI features aren't very useful
In a pretty unusual move for an Android phone, you actually have your pick between two software systems when you first boot up the Zenfone 12 Ultra. Both are technically Android 15, but you can choose between stock Android and Asus’ reskinned version. The differences are minimal but it's nice to be given the choice.
Stock Android is, if you don’t know, the standard Google-made version of the Android operating system, and it’s popular for being quite clean-looking. However, it misses many custom features that certain other versions of Android have. Asus doesn’t add any of these features in its own version, mind; it’s just a redesign for how menus and icons look.
Whether you pick stock or Asus Android, you’re getting software that’s quite minimal, which is a good thing; there are few pre-installed apps (beyond lots of Google ones) and a smartly laid-out quick-settings menu with big icons that are easy to press.
Asus has only promised two years of software updates for the Zenfone 12 Ultra, which isn’t a particularly ‘ultra’ commitment given how many years of updates rivals offer. That doesn’t mean it’ll stop working after two years, but you won’t get new features added after that point.
As mentioned in the introduction to this review, a few AI features on the Zenfone 12 Ultra seem to be its main selling point, but I wasn’t hugely impressed by any of them. The option to use them is often buried in menus (to use the AI article summarizer, for instance, you need to go into the browser’s ‘share’ menu to share it with the summary tool) and they were often pretty slow to work. In fact, for summarizing articles online, I found it quicker to literally just read the article than to wait for the summary tool to work.
You have to download extra kits for most of the AI features, too, and they’re pretty big, often several GB each. I can see these tools eating up a fair amount of storage space.
I’m always a little cynical of AI features on phones, with most of them seemingly designed to fix problems that no one actually has, and offered in lieu of actual improvements to a given device. Suffice to say, I never used these AI features on the Zenfone 12 Ultra beyond my obligatory testing of them.
Software score: 3.5 / 5
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: cameras
(Image credit: Future)
50MP main, 13MP ultra-wide and 32MP telephoto lenses
32MP selfie snapper
Scene optimization comes in clutch
The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra may not offer the megapixel overload of its rivals, but it covers its bases.
On the back of the phone is a 50MP main camera, which is joined by a 13MP ultra-wide and a 32MP telephoto, the latter of which can reach 3x optical zoom.
All three combine to give you a decent level of versatility and control over the shots you take (as long as you don't want to go above the 30x digital zoom cap), and there's largely a consistency between image quality at these ranges
Coming in clutch is the image optimization and HDR, which was quick to punch up the contrast and saturation of pictures to improve their vibrancy without making them look unnatural. Look at the curry bowl or football field images below as cases in point; neither looked as bright in real life as they do on camera.
These improvements increase the Zenfone's camera grade from 'fine' to 'good', even if the phone misses the extra lenses, sensitive sensors, and super-high-res MP counts of its competitors. That said, the latter would have been preferable for situations in which the AI optimization didn't step in, like in the pizza pic below.
Another thing to note is that photos often took longer to capture than I'd expect; I'd often press the shutter button and assume the photo had been taken, only to move the phone and end up with a blurry end image. My advice to owners would be to hold the Zenfone 12 Ultra in place for a few seconds longer than you think you need to, or else you'll end up with a long list of camera reel mistakes.
(Image credit: Future)
The selfie camera hits 32MP, and its result is largely similar to the rear ones: it has the potential to make some bright and bold pictures, and succeeds most of the time, thanks to software.
The phone can record video in 8K/30fps, 4K/60fps, or down to HD/480fps in the slow-mo realm.
The Zenfone 12 Ultra also has a small selection of extra modes. Some, like Night and Portrait, work well; the latter was great at balancing contrast and exposure, as you can see in the photo below, and Portrait was fantastic at adding a natural-looking bokeh and also balancing the colors and tones of a shot.
There are a few modes being touted as 'AI' ones too, despite the fact that almost all camera software features use artificial intelligence in some way or another. These include AI Panning, which creates a "dynamic focus effect" on a moving object, and in effect, this is very similar to Portrait mode. The other is AI Tracking, which lets you record a video of something moving and it'll output a zoomed-in photo that keeps the moving subject framed center. I can see this being situationally very useful, although I only ever found myself using it for testing's sake.
Camera score: 4 / 5
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra camera samples
Image 1 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 7
(Image credit: Future)
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra: performance and audio
(Image credit: Future)
Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
Fast for gaming and everyday use (mostly)
Range of audio options
The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra really embodies the ‘ultra’ in its name when it comes to performance: it’s a certifiable beast.
The processor at work here is Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, which is the chipset you'll find inside many of the current best Android phones (at the time of writing, at least) and it tells. It’s paired with 16GB RAM and 512GB storage.
Games were snappy to play, and could easily handle the highest graphical settings; they didn’t lag or stutter once and, in the most noticeable improvement (in my mind) over a lesser chipset, they were really quick to open too.
In a Geekbench 6 multi-core test, the Zenfone 12 Ultra returned a score of 9,818, putting it in the higher echelons of phones we’ve tested. For context, Geekbench’s own rankings mark the iPhone 16 Pro at a score of 8,528 (though no recent 8 Elite-toting phones are listed).
The speed is mostly noticeable in other parts of the phone, too, for example when you’re trying to edit a big photo. However, I noticed that the AI features could cause the phone to slow down noticeably. This isn't a deal-breaker, especially given that most of the features take only a second to use, but the minor slowdown was still noticeable.
The Zenfone 12 Ultra has stereo speakers and, in a surprisingly retro turn, a 3.5mm headphone jack. As a result, audio fans have a choice as to how they’d like to listen to content on this phone, which is a rarity in this day and age.
Performance score: 5 / 5
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: battery life
(Image credit: Future)
Pretty big 5,500mAh battery
Lasts for over a day of use
65W charging, 15W wireless
The Zenfone 12 Ultra packs a 5,500mAh battery — that's pretty big, but it’s also necessary for a phone of this size and power.
When I used the Zenfone as a normal mobile (i.e. not as a gaming phone) it could reliably coast through a single day of use and reach mid-way into the second day without trouble, but I wouldn’t go quite so far as to say it’s got two-day battery life.
When I did go heavier on the gaming side of things, I was happy with how well the Zenfone 12 Ultra could handle a few hours of gaming without losing too much battery — it’s hard to be scientific when talking about experiential battery use, but the phone lost charge slower than lots of other handsets I’ve tested recently.
Charging is a little slow. That feels silly to say for a phone with 'fast charging', but it’s at 65W, which is slower than lots of its rivals. There’s also 15W wireless charging.
Battery score: 3.5 / 5
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: value
(Image credit: Future)
The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra is an undeniably pricey premium phone. While an argument could be made that no phones in this price range really offer value for money, it's doubly the case with the Asus.
I say this because it doesn't really offer any killer features, either over its predecessor or comparatively priced rivals, that make it a must-buy. When you cost this much, specs alone will only get you so far.
If you can find the Zenfone 12 Ultra at a meaty discount, it's potentially more deserving of your money, but I'm talking a 25% discount as a minimum for that to be the case.
Value score: 2.5 / 5
Should you buy the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra?
Buy it if...
You need lots of processing power The Zenfone 12 Ultra is one of the most powerful phones on the market right now, and it'll stay a contender for years to come.
You're a wired audio fan Few Android phones come with headphone jacks these days, especially towards the premium end of the market.
You play 144Hz games Very select mobile games can play at 144 fps, but for the ones that do, it's hard to find mobiles that support this high refresh rate. The Zenfone 12 Ultra is one of them.
Don't buy it if...
You don't like big phones The Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra will stretch smaller hands; don't buy it thinking it's one of the compact Zenfones of old.
You find the Zenfone 11 Ultra discounted The Zenfone 12 Ultra doesn't offer that many upgrades over its predecessor, and that older phone is now poised for sizeable sales.
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra review: Also consider
If you want other 'ultra' smartphones to compare the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra to, here are some other similar-priced picks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra The natural rival, this Android powerhouse has a wider array of cameras, a bigger and higher-res display, and a stylus. However, its chipset is the same as the one in the Asus, its battery is smaller, and it charges slower. Read our full Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review
iPhone 16 Pro The other natural rival, the iPhone 16 Pro, costs roughly the same as the Asus. It has a smaller screen, a weaker battery, and, if the benchmarks are anything to go by, a lesser chipset. But I'd be remiss not to mention the Apple rival at a phone this costly.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Another ultra-branded Android phone, this Xiaomi has an unbeatable camera array, a better display, and faster charging, but last year's chipset and software.
To properly test the Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra, I used it daily for two weeks; this doesn't include a short period beforehand when I set it up, took the review photos, and played a few games on it.
The testing of the handset occurred in two parts. The first saw me run benchmark tests, take sample photos, and run down the battery. The other was more experiential; I used the handset for personal things like music and video streaming, social media scrolling, mobile game-playing, and other everyday tasks.
At the time of this review's publication, I've been writing reviews for TechRadar for exactly 6 years (happy anniversary, me!). I've reviewed countless smartphones in that time, including multiple Asus models as well as headphones, smartwatches, and tablets.
The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is a solid soundbar at a decent, but not exceptional, price. While that’s a non-controversial and fairly vanilla statement, it’s a strange situation for Amazon since the company typically subsidizes its products, especially ones like Echo speakers and Fire TV branded TVs, to beat the market. It’s hard to ignore that there are plenty of cheaper options, whether you’re considering a basic all-in-one soundbar or a 5.1-channel soundbar system.
While I’m surprised that the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is not as discounted as most Amazon products compared to the competition, it is one of the best soundbars I’ve experienced when it comes to ease of setup – everything is already paired and you just have to plug it all in.
The performance is, as expected at this price point, good but not great. The surround sound is immersive and the audio quality is what you’d expect at this price point. The sound doesn’t have quite the clarity of more premium options, but only fussy listeners will notice.
The only big issue I had with the audio quality is that the stereo image is not as wide as it should be from the soundbar, which I’ll get into below. And while the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is advertised as having Dolby Atmos, it doesn’t actually have the physical speakers for spatial audio, so you won’t find it on any list for the best Dolby Atmos soundbars.
That said, you could do a lot worse for a soundbar system at its price point, whether you’re looking at the most basic configuration or the 5.1-channel one, especially if you see it discounted (as Amazon is wont to regularly do with its products).
The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus comes with all the accessories you need, including an HDMI cable and wall-mount brackets (Image credit: Future)
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Price & release date
First available: December 2025
Price: Starting at $249.99 / £249.99 (about AU$400)
Available in the US and UK
The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is priced at $249.99 / £249.99 (about AU$400), and is just a standalone soundbar (along with a power cable, HDMI cable, remote, remote batteries, and mounting kit). The next level up comes with a wireless subwoofer and is priced at $374.99 (about £300 / AU$590). The maxed-out configuration (reviewed here) adds surround speakers along with the subwoofer for a 5.1-channel setup and costs $489.99 (about £390 / AU$770).
Surprisingly, this is more mid-range than budget pricing, bucking Amazon’s typical model of subsidizing its hardware for either market share or branding, especially when it comes to either smart home devices or Fire TV ones.
As far as availability goes, those in the US have access to all three configurations while only the most basic configuration is available in the UK. The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is not sold in Australia.
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Specs
A basic set of control buttons is located on the soundbar's top surface (Image credit: Future)
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Features
Surprisingly stripped down feature set
Some EQ and audio modes available through the remote
Virtual Dolby Atmos
Considering the branding, I was surprised to see how barebones the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is. It doesn’t have built-in streaming the way Roku soundbars do, and it doesn’t have any Alexa-related functionality. There’s no app either, so you’re not going to be able to do any EQ fine-tuning (with an exception that I’ll mention below).
All EQ settings are available via the remote. There are four audio modes: Movie, Music, Sports, and Night. I preferred the Movie mode most since it seemed the least affected. However, Night mode is a nice addition as it keeps any peaks in the audio from getting too loud while simultaneously making everything easy to hear at low volume.
There are also individual bass and treble controls as well as surround sound volume on the remote. A dialogue function boosts the volume of dialogue to make it easier to hear – a great option for those with hearing loss, even if it’s a somewhat subtle effect.
There’s no physical Dolby Atmos on hand – the advertised Dolby Atmos is virtual, meaning you don’t get a true spatial audio experience. You get a full surround sound experience with the rear speakers at least, so there is a lateral 360-degree soundstage, just not the vertical one that spatial audio provides.
Besides the usual HDMI and optical digital connections, the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus also comes with Bluetooth, so streaming a Spotify playlist from a phone is straightforward.
The one area where the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is unique is that, when paired with certain Amazon Fire TVs, you can fine-tune the audio on a deeper level in the TV’s settings.
Features score: 3.5 / 5
Subwoofer level can be adjusted using the bass settings on the remote (Image credit: Future)
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Performance
Sounds good but not the best resolution
Stereo image is a bit narrow
Surround sound is immersive
The sound quality of the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is pretty good. You might not be impressed if you’ve used hi-fi equipment or premium soundbars, but if you’re looking for your first home theater surround sound system, you should be pretty happy.
Specifically, the high-end is just a tiny bit lacking so the audio doesn’t quite have the best clarity and resolution. This was especially apparent when playing music I’m familiar with, which just didn’t quite have the same sparkle it usually does. However, this is a nitpick.
The mids are fairly well balanced so that they sound full without being compressed or distorted. And there’s lots of bass available from the subwoofer so you get that rumble when watching movies.
You can adjust the subwoofer via the bass settings on the remote to be less impactful (or more) if you want. The treble, as mentioned before, is also adjustable via the remote, though I found the various levels to be a little too subtle.
When it comes to the soundstage, the left and right channels are a little closer together than I would like. This is because, even though the soundbar has left, center, and right channel speakers, the drivers and tweeters for the left and right channels (each channel has a mid-bass driver and tweeter) both face straight ahead. Even though the soundbar is 37 inches wide, this is not enough separation when you’re sitting beyond a 1.5-meter distance from the TV.
Yes, everything that’s supposed to be on the left sounds like it’s on the left and everything that’s supposed to be on the right is there as well. But, the stereo image is still a bit too narrow.
The surround sound, on the other hand, is a pleasure to listen to. The surround speakers offer a 360-degree experience, even when it’s just the atmosphere of a video game like It Takes Two or random background characters talking such as I experienced when watching Fool’s Paradise. I also tested the surround speakers with 5.1-channel audio mixes on YouTube, and it was enlightening to experience the spaciousness these speakers deliver while also confirming that you don’t really need to listen to Bob Marley in anything other than stereo.
It’s worth noting again that, though this soundbar supports Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, this is purely virtual as there are no physical upward-firing speakers. And I didn’t notice anything resembling that vertical sense of space when watching movies and TV with Dolby Atmos soundtracks.
Performance score: 4 / 5
A minimal set of inputs, including HDMI ARC, optical digital and USB-A, is located on the soundbar's back panel (Image credit: Future)
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Design
Basic aesthetics and design
LED indicator lights instead of alphanumeric display
Most fine tuning done through the remote
Aesthetically, the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus can best be described as utilitarian. All the units come in a matte black. The units are also all pretty boxy, and you would only know that they were made by Amazon because each piece has the Fire TV logo imprinted in shiny black somewhere on it. The various units don’t call too much attention themselves, other than the fact that the sound bar is 37 inches wide so you’ll need a wide enough surface to install it if you’re not wall-mounting.
The ports on the back are surprisingly limited to HDMI, optical digital, and USB. While the HDMI port is ARC-enabled, I would have appreciated a second HDMI passthrough port. This is an issue I frequently find with cheaper sound bars.
Another limitation is that there’s no alphanumeric display on the front, just five LED indicator lights that shine through the front grill cloth to reflect what the volume or various settings are up to.
The controls on top of the soundbar are a bit more limited than on the remote, but the necessary ones are here, namely: power, source, Bluetooth, volume up, and volume down.
All fine-tuning is done on the remote. Luckily, it’s easy to use and has separate bass and treble buttons to cycle through levels as well as a button to turn on/off surround sound, which has its own volume up and down. There are also EQ preset and dialogue buttons.
Design score: 4 / 5
The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus system's surround speakers make an instant wireless link to the soundbar when plugged in (Image credit: Future)
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Setup & usability
Already paired out of the box
Easy to use
No real display for current settings
Setting up the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus couldn’t be easier. Everything comes in one big box – all the packaging seems to be materials that can be recycled – and just needs to be removed and plugged in.
The soundbar, subwoofer, and rear speakers are already paired so that once everything is plugged in and powered on, the soundbar will register the other units. A wall-mounting kit is also included, though it’s just for the soundbar. The hardest part (unless you’re planning on mounting) is putting the batteries in the remote.
As far as using the soundbar, it’s also just as straightforward. The buttons on the sound bar itself are a bit basic so you need to keep track of the remote to get most of the functionality. But switching sources and adjusting the audio to taste within its limitations is fairly foolproof.
I do wish there was a front panel alphanumeric display for feedback when making changes. Instead, you have to rely on the indicator LEDs and listen to a voice prompt to know what setting you’ve changed. And if you’re not paying close attention, you have to adjust again to find out what it was on.
Setup & usability score: 4.5 / 5
With no app or Alexa control, EQ and sound adjustments on the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus are all carried out using the included remote (Image credit: Future)
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Value
Good, but not great, deal for a surround sound soundbar system
Can find cheaper, though lesser, 5.1-channel sound bar options
Same money can get better-sounding options, but with fewer channels
I may sound a little confused when discussing the price of the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus by saying it’s at once affordable and overpriced. At $489.99 (about £390 / AU$770) for the surround sound configuration, it’s a good mid-tier system for the price that comes with a large soundbar, subwoofer, and two rear speakers. Yet, it’s priced higher than one would expect from the likes of Amazon, especially considering how light on features it is.
This is particularly highlighted when considering the Ultimea Poseidon D50, a 5.1-channel sound bar system that goes for a paltry $119.99 / £149.99 (about AU$180). Sure, the Ultimea comes with many more compromises with slightly worse audio and build quality, but it’s also much, much cheaper.
Of course, you can spend the same amount on something that’s not quite considered premium and get a much smaller package. Consider the Sony HT-S2000, a 3.1-channel system that counts virtual Dolby Atmos as a main attraction. It does have generally better audio quality. Still, you have to pay $499 / £449 / AU$695 for it.
Value score: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus?
Buy it if...
You want the easiest setup possible All you have to do to set up the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is to power up the various units. It doesn’t get easier than that.
You don’t want to spend too much for a surround sound system While it’s not the cheapest out there, the price is pretty good, especially if you go for the configuration with the surround speakers and subwoofer.
You want a straightforward soundbar Not only is this soundbar system easy to set up, but it’s easy to operate. If you find that too many bells and whistles get in the way, then this might be the one for you.
Don't buy it if...
sound-enabledYou want a lot of features The Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus is surprisingly stripped down, especially for a surround sound- enabled setup. Sure, there’s virtual Dolby Atmos, but it’s not the real deal.
You want crystal-clear audio The sound quality is good, but if you’re fussy, you’re going to wish you spent a little more on something with better clarity and resolution.View Deal
Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus review: Also consider
Ultimea Poseidon D50 The Ultimea Poseidon D50 is proof you can go really cheap and still get a 5.1-channel system. Yes, there are compromises, such as the lack of any kind of Dolby Atmos support, and it’s also a bit cheap-looking. But, it mostly sounds good, and is easy to set up.
Sony HT-S2000 If surround sound is not a top priority, but you still want something beyond stereo and have $500 / £500 to burn, the all-in-one Sony HT-S2000’s overall sound quality is impressive and its virtual Dolby Atmos is actually spacious-sounding.
Hisense AX5125H Hisense's soundbar system offers 5.1.2 channels in a compact package with wireless surround speakers and subwoofer. It also has an alphanumeric front panel LED display and costs less than Amazon's system.
The Nakamichi Dragon with its two subs in my home. (Image credit: Future)
I used the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus for a couple weeks
Tested with both TV, movies, and music
I used the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus system regularly for a week. I used it with TV shows, movies, and music. I tested the various EQ options and audio modes as well as played around with all the other settings available, such as the dialogue mode.
After testing, the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus seems to be a decently priced 5.1-channel system that leans a bit on the Fire TV brand, offering mostly convenience and the surround sound experience, and not much else.
I’ve tested a lot of tech gear over the years from laptops to keyboards and speakers, and so have been able to use my expertise towards giving an honest and fair opinion, not to mention a critical eye, to any product I test.
