Organizer
Gadget news
Honor Magic 7 Pro review: the Android endurance king
1:38 pm | January 17, 2025
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Honor Phones Phones | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Two-minute review

Honor's Magic 6 Pro made a splash last year, debuting at the Mobile World Congress (MWC) expo in February with a massive battery, a unique camera system, and some novel software features. Now, the brand is back with its flagship offering for 2025, and it's hoping to one-up itself in every department.

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has adopted a more boxy design for 2025, as is the trend, and it now has flat side rails and subtle symmetrical ‘micro curves’ at the edge of its display. The camera bump is less outlandish, too, and the ‘squircle’ bezel has been toned down to make less of a statement. Overall, I think it's an improvement.

The camera hardware is mostly the same, but the telephoto has a few more megapixels and can now get you even closer to distant subjects. These cameras can take fantastic photos, but the image processing is a little inconsistent, and I got more blurry images than usual. Hopefully, this will be tweaked in future firmware updates. The Studio Harcourt portrait mode, developed in collaboration with the legendary Paris photography studio, never failed to impress, at least.

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)

The battery on this model is even larger than the one in the Magic 6 Pro, and this is easily one of the longest-lasting flagship phones I’ve tested. You can get two days on a full charge without trying particularly hard, and when it's time to charge you can get topped up in a flash, with the Magic 7 Pro supporting up to 100W charging with a cable and 80W with the right wireless charger.

Performance is exceptional. You get the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, plus a suite of software enhancements and an NPU (neural processing unit) co-processor to keep games running smoothly. Honor's Magic OS 9 adds some useful features like Magic Portal, as well as relatively new AI features that have already become familiar favorites, like Circle to Search and Google Gemini.

Overall, this is a superb phone, with a great balance of specs and features that make it a pleasure to use. The software won't be to everyone's taste, and the camera could use some tweaking, but otherwise, this is easily one of the finest flagship phones available today.

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Price and availability

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Costs £1,099.99
  • Available in the UK and Europe, but not the US or Australia

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is available to order now in most regions. As usual, though, the list excludes the US and Australia, so our stateside readers will need to import if they want to get in on the action.

The Magic 7 Pro costs £1,099 in the UK, the exact same price as its predecessor. This means it's more expensive than the Oppo Find X8 Pro and Apple iPhone 16 Pro, but a little cheaper than the Pro Max or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. That said, the latter phone can currently be purchased for the same price, as it’s been on the market for a while.

Given such premium pricing, Honor will need to impress on all fronts if it’s to remain competitive, and thanks to a pretty stacked spec sheet it could well justify that lofty sum. Plus, Honor always has bundle offers on its devices, so nabbing a few freebies could make the price more palatable.

  • Value score: 3 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Specs

Here's a look at the Honor Magic 7 Pro's key specs:

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Design

Image 1 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Velvety-feeling matte glass back
  • Breeze Blue, Black, and Lunar Shadow Grey options
  • IP68/IP69 dust- and water-resistant

The Honor Magic 7 Pro follows the recent design trend that we've seen with devices like the Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro. It ditches the lateral curves of its predecessor in favor of a boxier design. The side rails are completely flat, with beveled edges, while the front and back are mostly flat, with symmetrical ‘micro curves’ on all sides.

The result is a phone that feels a little thicker than Magic 6 Pro, but at the same time it feels premium and confidence-inspiring. It's a similar size to its predecessor, just less curvy, and if you've used any other recent Android flagship, you'll feel right at home.

The global version is available in three colorways: Breeze Blue, Black and Lunar Shadow Grey. There are no vegan leather variants this time around, with all options featuring a velvety-feeling matte glass rear. The Lunar Shadow Grey option is the most striking in my opinion, with a marble-like texture running across the back panel that becomes more visible as the light catches it.

Image 1 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)

There's still a large circular and centrally-placed camera island, and it's still surrounded by a ‘squircle’-shaped bezel. However, this time the bezel is decidedly more circular, and it looks a little less outlandish than the Magic 6 Pro did.

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is rated IP68/IP69 for dust and water resistance, which means that as well as being able to handle submersion in freshwater, it can also withstand jets of hot water up to 176F / 80C. I'm not sure when that would ever come in useful, but hey, if you want to scroll Instagram in the shower, your phone should survive it.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Display

Image 1 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • 6.8-inch quad-curved 120Hz OLED display
  • 4320Hz PWM dimming
  • 5000 nits peak brightness

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a 6.8-inch display with a dynamic refresh rate that can shift from 1Hz to 120Hz as needed. It's a mostly flat panel, and the curves only start around the bezels of the display. The result is a screen that resembles an over-filled glass of water.

I’ve never been a huge fan of curved screens – they can invite accidental touches, and cause odd reflections and color shifts at the edges. There's no denying that they feel nice under your fingertips when using gesture controls, though. These new ‘micro curve’ displays offer the best of both worlds, as you get the smooth feel of a curved display without the usual drawbacks. I'm a convert.

The display is covered with Honor's NanoCrystal Shield glass, and after spending months with the Honor Magic 6 RSR (that’s the Porsche Design version of the Magic 6 Pro) last year, I'm confident in saying it's one of the most scratch-resistant coatings in the business. It's also supposedly 10 times more drop-resistant than traditional glass screens, and while I haven't tested that, it's good to know, especially as there's no case included in the box.

A new addition to this model is a layer of circular polarization, which makes the screen slightly less reflective and is easier on the eyes. In theory, according to Honor, it can reduce eye fatigue by up to 16%.

When it comes to brightness, the Honor Magic 7 Pro has lumens to spare. It can peak at a whopping 5000 nits in certain conditions, which means HDR content looks exceptional, and you'll never have trouble seeing it.

As usual, the brand has put plenty of effort into eye-care features. The PWM (pulse-width modulation) dimming rate is one of the highest I've ever seen, topping out at 4320Hz. You'll never have to worry about flicker on this panel, and if that's not enough you can activate eye comfort and low-blue-light modes to keep your peepers feeling fresh.

There's a 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor under the display, and a pill-shaped camera cutout housing a 3D face unlock camera. Apparently, this is the first phone to come with both, and it's very convenient. I especially like being able to log into banking apps using my face, and for me that's worth the slightly larger camera cutout.

  • Display score: 5 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Cameras

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • 50MP main (f/1.4-2.0)
  • 200MP 3x telephoto (f/2.6)
  • 50MP ultra-wide (f/2.0)

Most of the cameras on the Magic 7 Pro share their specifications with its predecessors’. The main camera still has a 50MP 1/1.3-inch sensor, and a mechanically adjustable aperture that shifts between f/1.4 and f/2. The ultra-wide and selfie cameras seem to be unchanged, too. Both have a 50MP resolution and a f/2 lens.

The telephoto, however, has changed more significantly. The Magic 6 Pro had a 180MP 2.5x optical zoom telephoto snapper, while the Magic 7 Pro upgrades that to a 200MP unit with a 3x lens. It's one of the largest telephoto sensors on the market at 1/1.4-inch, and it's also one of the fastest telephoto cameras, with an f/2.6 aperture.

These days I find myself using the telephoto camera on my smartphone as often, if not more, than the main camera, so I'm pleased to see telephoto specs that come close to matching those of the primary snapper.

I'm still not fully convinced that we need so many megapixels, though. The idea is that you can digitally zoom further with less of a drop in quality, as the high pixel count makes up the difference. In reality, though, it doesn't seem to work so well.

I said the same thing about the Honor Magic 6 Pro, and while this model is an improvement (due to the longer optical focal length) zooming past 10x or so delivers middling and inconsistent results.

Honor's solution to this is something called AI SuperZoom, and it kicks in beyond 30x zoom to clean up your images. At times the results can be quite impressive, but the downsides are plain to see. Images tend to have that watercolor-like effect to them, and sometimes details that don't exist in reality are added in.

I've recently been shooting with the Oppo Find X8 Pro, which has an almost identical feature, but it seems to work a little better than Honor's attempt. In fairness, Honor says this feature is in its infancy, and it will mature and improve over time. It's also worth noting that it requires an internet connection to function, while Oppo's equivalent is processed on-device.

Another new feature in the camera department is the addition of the Studio Harcourt portrait styles that we first saw on the Honor 200 Pro. If you like taking portraits, this is a serious upgrade. The color tuning and blur effects are just as stunning here, and they're only enhanced further by the higher-fidelity optics. The only downside is that, as on the 200 Pro, the feature is restricted to the main and telephoto cameras, so you can't use these effects on your selfies.

All in all, this is a very capable camera system, and it can deliver outstanding shots in all lighting conditions. When it hits, it's among the best camera systems on the market, but it's not the most consistent.

Maybe it's just the pre-release software on the phone I’ve been testing, but I got a lot more blurry shots than I'm used to, and the image processing often pushed the sharpening too far, while blues and greens became over-exaggerated, even when using the Natural picture style.

These problems are all fixable, and I hope we see them addressed in future firmware updates. As it stands, the hardware is impeccable, but the inconsistent processing sometimes leaves you guessing as to how your photos will turn out.

  • Cameras score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Camera samples

Image 1 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 9 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 10 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 11 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 12 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 13 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 14 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 15 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 16 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 17 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 18 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 19 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 20 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 21 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 22 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 23 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 24 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 25 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 26 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 27 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 28 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 29 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 30 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 31 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 32 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 33 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 34 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 35 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 36 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 37 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Performance and software

Image 1 of 3

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
  • 12GB RAM and 512GB storage
  • Magic OS 9, based on Android 15

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is powered by Qualcomm's most powerful chipset, the Snapdragon 8 Elite, so you would expect impressive performance. There's only one configuration available on the global market, which comes with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, which should be more than enough to satisfy most users.

Honor has taken things a step further with this phone by utilizing the power of its onboard NPU to further improve performance. The phone has something called an AI Predictive Scheduling Engine, and exactly what that does is a little above my comprehension level, but I think it's a bit like DLSS on a gaming PC.

All you need to know is that, with the aid of some new features in the game overlay, you can achieve better image fidelity and higher framerates without adding additional load to the GPU. This means that you can game at higher settings, with less battery drain and lower temperatures.

In practice, it seems to work exactly as advertised. I played Genshin Impact at maximum settings for a couple of hours, and the phone had no trouble maintaining a solid 60fps. It remained shockingly cool under the pressure – cooler to the touch than even the gaming-specific ROG Phone 9 Pro, in fact.

The gaming experience is also enhanced by a very capable set of speakers. They might be the most bassy speakers ever to grace a smartphone, thanks to an integrated subwoofer and ultra-large sound cavity design, and they really add some oomph to in-game sound effects.

Image 1 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)

The Magic 7 Pro runs Magic OS 9, a highly customized version of Android 15, and it's a bit divisive. Personally, I've become quite fond of Magic OS, but it's a very different experience from stock Android. The notifications shade and quick settings menu are split, like they are on iOS, and navigating the system can be a little challenging if you're coming from a phone that offers a more traditional Android experience, like a Google Pixel.

Aside from the layout changes, Honor has heaped on plenty of extra functionality. My personal favorite is Magic Portal, which allows you to select text or an image on your screen and drag it into another app for quick sharing or searching. This feature is now even easier to access, as you can circle things with your knuckle to quickly select them.

You also get plenty of AI-powered features, of course. There's nothing too novel here, but it's all pretty useful. There's an AI translator, the ability to format and transcribe notes with AI, and an array of AI-powered image-editing tools. At some point soon the phone will also use AI to automatically protect you from deepfake video chats – I can't say I've ever received one, but the extra peace of mind is always nice.

Also new this year is the inclusion of Circle to Search and Google Gemini as the default voice assistant. It's getting to the point where most Android phones come with these features, but they’re still worth mentioning because they're great, and I very much miss them when they're not there.

  • Performance score: 5 / 5
  • Software score: 3 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Battery

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • 5,850mAh silicon-carbon battery
  • 100W wired charging
  • 80W wireless charging

There's a lot to love about the Honor Magic 7 Pro, but for me, the best thing might be the battery life. I tested this phone after spending lots of time with the Vivo X200 Pro, which has a mammoth 6,000mAh battery, so I wasn't expecting to be amazed by this slightly smaller 5,850mAh unit – but I was.

Honor has clearly optimized its software very well, and I was able to manage two days on a full charge without even trying. And I managed that more than once, and that's with lots of screen time, navigating maps, shooting lots of photos, and streaming content. It’s just brilliant.

We’ve seen some Chinese manufacturers dial back their charging speeds for this generation, but not Honor. Here you get an impressive 100W wired charging rate, and a staggering 80W with Honor's Wireless SuperCharger.

Unfortunately, there's no charger in the box, but I happened to have the right kit to charge at max speed, and it makes living with this phone extremely convenient. If you have the requisite charger, a wired charge from flat to full takes less than 35 minutes, while a wireless charge can be achieved in less than 45 minutes.

  • Battery score: 5 / 5

Should you buy the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

Buy it if...

You want flagship power and long battery life
With most phones, you have to decide between long battery life and raw power, but not with the Magic 7 Pro. It's supremely powerful and can still last two days between charges.

You love taking portrait shots
The Studio Harcourt portrait mode is among the most impressive that I've tried. I loved it when it first debuted with the Honor 200 Pro, and it's just as good here.

You love a nice display
The Honor Magic 7 Pro has easily one of the nicest screens in the business. It's bright, vibrant, extremely scratch-resistant, and has more eye-care features than most.

Don't buy it if...

You love generative AI
Honor has been steadily adding more AI features to its operating system, but they're a little basic compared to some of the competition.

You're looking for the classic Android experience
Magic OS makes so many tweaks and adjustments to Android 15 that it almost feels like a completely different operating system. I quite like it, but fans of stock Android might have a hard time adjusting.

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Also consider

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is an excellent all-rounder with a brilliant camera, but the competition is fierce. If you're not sure this is the handset for you, it's worth checking out these competitors.

Oppo Find X8 Pro

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is a similarly feature-stacked Android flagship with a heavy focus on cameras. It offers an extra telephoto lens, a dedicated camera button and has better consistency with its photos. It has an even bigger battery, but in my experience, the Honor still lasts longer.

Read our Oppo Find X8 Pro review

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Android flagships may have Apple beat when it comes to camera specifications, but for video shooting, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reigns supreme. It has amazing stabilization, ProRes recording, and can shoot 4K slow motion at 120fps. The new Camera Control button is fun to play around with, too.

Read our iPhone 16 Pro Max review

How I tested the Honor Magic 7 Pro

  • Review test period: two weeks
  • Testing included: everyday use including web browsing, social media, photography, video calling, gaming, streaming video, music playback
  • Tools used: Geekbench 6, 3DMark, GFXBench, native Android stats, Honor 100W charger, and wireless SuperCharge stand

I put my SIM card into the Honor Magic 7 Pro and lived with it as my main phone for around two weeks before reaching any conclusions. I used it exactly as I would any other phone, taking lots of photos, gaming, messaging, working, streaming video, and navigating with Google Maps and Waze.

I also compared the experience of playing graphically challenging games like Zenless Zone Zero, Genshin Impact, and PUBG Mobile to my experience with other Android flagships like the Oppo Find X8 Pro, Vivo X200 Pro, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. I also ran multiple benchmarks on the handset using 3DMark, GFXbench, and Geekbench.

I assessed the battery performance based on my real-world usage and charging times were measured using an official Honor 100W wall adapter and cable. I also tested the wireless charging capabilities with Honor’s Wireless 100W SuperCharge stand.

Read more about how we test

First tested January 2024

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: the Android endurance king
1:38 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Honor Phones Phones | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Two-minute review

Honor's Magic 6 Pro made a splash last year, debuting at the Mobile World Congress (MWC) expo in February with a massive battery, a unique camera system, and some novel software features. Now, the brand is back with its flagship offering for 2025, and it's hoping to one-up itself in every department.

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has adopted a more boxy design for 2025, as is the trend, and it now has flat side rails and subtle symmetrical ‘micro curves’ at the edge of its display. The camera bump is less outlandish, too, and the ‘squircle’ bezel has been toned down to make less of a statement. Overall, I think it's an improvement.

The camera hardware is mostly the same, but the telephoto has a few more megapixels and can now get you even closer to distant subjects. These cameras can take fantastic photos, but the image processing is a little inconsistent, and I got more blurry images than usual. Hopefully, this will be tweaked in future firmware updates. The Studio Harcourt portrait mode, developed in collaboration with the legendary Paris photography studio, never failed to impress, at least.

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)

The battery on this model is even larger than the one in the Magic 6 Pro, and this is easily one of the longest-lasting flagship phones I’ve tested. You can get two days on a full charge without trying particularly hard, and when it's time to charge you can get topped up in a flash, with the Magic 7 Pro supporting up to 100W charging with a cable and 80W with the right wireless charger.

Performance is exceptional. You get the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, plus a suite of software enhancements and an NPU (neural processing unit) co-processor to keep games running smoothly. Honor's Magic OS 9 adds some useful features like Magic Portal, as well as relatively new AI features that have already become familiar favorites, like Circle to Search and Google Gemini.

Overall, this is a superb phone, with a great balance of specs and features that make it a pleasure to use. The software won't be to everyone's taste, and the camera could use some tweaking, but otherwise, this is easily one of the finest flagship phones available today.

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Price and availability

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Costs £1,099.99
  • Available in the UK and Europe, but not the US or Australia

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is available to order now in most regions. As usual, though, the list excludes the US and Australia, so our stateside readers will need to import if they want to get in on the action.

The Magic 7 Pro costs £1,099 in the UK, the exact same price as its predecessor. This means it's more expensive than the Oppo Find X8 Pro and Apple iPhone 16 Pro, but a little cheaper than the Pro Max or Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. That said, the latter phone can currently be purchased for the same price, as it’s been on the market for a while.

Given such premium pricing, Honor will need to impress on all fronts if it’s to remain competitive, and thanks to a pretty stacked spec sheet it could well justify that lofty sum. Plus, Honor always has bundle offers on its devices, so nabbing a few freebies could make the price more palatable.

  • Value score: 3 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Specs

Here's a look at the Honor Magic 7 Pro's key specs:

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Design

Image 1 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Velvety-feeling matte glass back
  • Breeze Blue, Black, and Lunar Shadow Grey options
  • IP68/IP69 dust- and water-resistant

The Honor Magic 7 Pro follows the recent design trend that we've seen with devices like the Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro. It ditches the lateral curves of its predecessor in favor of a boxier design. The side rails are completely flat, with beveled edges, while the front and back are mostly flat, with symmetrical ‘micro curves’ on all sides.

The result is a phone that feels a little thicker than Magic 6 Pro, but at the same time it feels premium and confidence-inspiring. It's a similar size to its predecessor, just less curvy, and if you've used any other recent Android flagship, you'll feel right at home.

The global version is available in three colorways: Breeze Blue, Black and Lunar Shadow Grey. There are no vegan leather variants this time around, with all options featuring a velvety-feeling matte glass rear. The Lunar Shadow Grey option is the most striking in my opinion, with a marble-like texture running across the back panel that becomes more visible as the light catches it.

Image 1 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)

There's still a large circular and centrally-placed camera island, and it's still surrounded by a ‘squircle’-shaped bezel. However, this time the bezel is decidedly more circular, and it looks a little less outlandish than the Magic 6 Pro did.

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is rated IP68/IP69 for dust and water resistance, which means that as well as being able to handle submersion in freshwater, it can also withstand jets of hot water up to 176F / 80C. I'm not sure when that would ever come in useful, but hey, if you want to scroll Instagram in the shower, your phone should survive it.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Display

Image 1 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • 6.8-inch quad-curved 120Hz OLED display
  • 4320Hz PWM dimming
  • 5000 nits peak brightness

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a 6.8-inch display with a dynamic refresh rate that can shift from 1Hz to 120Hz as needed. It's a mostly flat panel, and the curves only start around the bezels of the display. The result is a screen that resembles an over-filled glass of water.

I’ve never been a huge fan of curved screens – they can invite accidental touches, and cause odd reflections and color shifts at the edges. There's no denying that they feel nice under your fingertips when using gesture controls, though. These new ‘micro curve’ displays offer the best of both worlds, as you get the smooth feel of a curved display without the usual drawbacks. I'm a convert.

The display is covered with Honor's NanoCrystal Shield glass, and after spending months with the Honor Magic 6 RSR (that’s the Porsche Design version of the Magic 6 Pro) last year, I'm confident in saying it's one of the most scratch-resistant coatings in the business. It's also supposedly 10 times more drop-resistant than traditional glass screens, and while I haven't tested that, it's good to know, especially as there's no case included in the box.

A new addition to this model is a layer of circular polarization, which makes the screen slightly less reflective and is easier on the eyes. In theory, according to Honor, it can reduce eye fatigue by up to 16%.

When it comes to brightness, the Honor Magic 7 Pro has lumens to spare. It can peak at a whopping 5000 nits in certain conditions, which means HDR content looks exceptional, and you'll never have trouble seeing it.

As usual, the brand has put plenty of effort into eye-care features. The PWM (pulse-width modulation) dimming rate is one of the highest I've ever seen, topping out at 4320Hz. You'll never have to worry about flicker on this panel, and if that's not enough you can activate eye comfort and low-blue-light modes to keep your peepers feeling fresh.

There's a 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor under the display, and a pill-shaped camera cutout housing a 3D face unlock camera. Apparently, this is the first phone to come with both, and it's very convenient. I especially like being able to log into banking apps using my face, and for me that's worth the slightly larger camera cutout.

  • Display score: 5 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Cameras

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • 50MP main (f/1.4-2.0)
  • 200MP 3x telephoto (f/2.6)
  • 50MP ultra-wide (f/2.0)

Most of the cameras on the Magic 7 Pro share their specifications with its predecessors’. The main camera still has a 50MP 1/1.3-inch sensor, and a mechanically adjustable aperture that shifts between f/1.4 and f/2. The ultra-wide and selfie cameras seem to be unchanged, too. Both have a 50MP resolution and a f/2 lens.

The telephoto, however, has changed more significantly. The Magic 6 Pro had a 180MP 2.5x optical zoom telephoto snapper, while the Magic 7 Pro upgrades that to a 200MP unit with a 3x lens. It's one of the largest telephoto sensors on the market at 1/1.4-inch, and it's also one of the fastest telephoto cameras, with an f/2.6 aperture.

These days I find myself using the telephoto camera on my smartphone as often, if not more, than the main camera, so I'm pleased to see telephoto specs that come close to matching those of the primary snapper.

I'm still not fully convinced that we need so many megapixels, though. The idea is that you can digitally zoom further with less of a drop in quality, as the high pixel count makes up the difference. In reality, though, it doesn't seem to work so well.

I said the same thing about the Honor Magic 6 Pro, and while this model is an improvement (due to the longer optical focal length) zooming past 10x or so delivers middling and inconsistent results.

Honor's solution to this is something called AI SuperZoom, and it kicks in beyond 30x zoom to clean up your images. At times the results can be quite impressive, but the downsides are plain to see. Images tend to have that watercolor-like effect to them, and sometimes details that don't exist in reality are added in.

I've recently been shooting with the Oppo Find X8 Pro, which has an almost identical feature, but it seems to work a little better than Honor's attempt. In fairness, Honor says this feature is in its infancy, and it will mature and improve over time. It's also worth noting that it requires an internet connection to function, while Oppo's equivalent is processed on-device.

Another new feature in the camera department is the addition of the Studio Harcourt portrait styles that we first saw on the Honor 200 Pro. If you like taking portraits, this is a serious upgrade. The color tuning and blur effects are just as stunning here, and they're only enhanced further by the higher-fidelity optics. The only downside is that, as on the 200 Pro, the feature is restricted to the main and telephoto cameras, so you can't use these effects on your selfies.

All in all, this is a very capable camera system, and it can deliver outstanding shots in all lighting conditions. When it hits, it's among the best camera systems on the market, but it's not the most consistent.

Maybe it's just the pre-release software on the phone I’ve been testing, but I got a lot more blurry shots than I'm used to, and the image processing often pushed the sharpening too far, while blues and greens became over-exaggerated, even when using the Natural picture style.

These problems are all fixable, and I hope we see them addressed in future firmware updates. As it stands, the hardware is impeccable, but the inconsistent processing sometimes leaves you guessing as to how your photos will turn out.

  • Cameras score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Camera samples

Image 1 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 9 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 10 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 11 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 12 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 13 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 14 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 15 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 16 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 17 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 18 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 19 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 20 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 21 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 22 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 23 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 24 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 25 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 26 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 27 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 28 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 29 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 30 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 31 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 32 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 33 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 34 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 35 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 36 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)
Image 37 of 37

Honor Magic 7 Pro camera samples

(Image credit: Future)

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Performance and software

Image 1 of 3

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
  • 12GB RAM and 512GB storage
  • Magic OS 9, based on Android 15

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is powered by Qualcomm's most powerful chipset, the Snapdragon 8 Elite, so you would expect impressive performance. There's only one configuration available on the global market, which comes with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, which should be more than enough to satisfy most users.

Honor has taken things a step further with this phone by utilizing the power of its onboard NPU to further improve performance. The phone has something called an AI Predictive Scheduling Engine, and exactly what that does is a little above my comprehension level, but I think it's a bit like DLSS on a gaming PC.

All you need to know is that, with the aid of some new features in the game overlay, you can achieve better image fidelity and higher framerates without adding additional load to the GPU. This means that you can game at higher settings, with less battery drain and lower temperatures.

In practice, it seems to work exactly as advertised. I played Genshin Impact at maximum settings for a couple of hours, and the phone had no trouble maintaining a solid 60fps. It remained shockingly cool under the pressure – cooler to the touch than even the gaming-specific ROG Phone 9 Pro, in fact.

The gaming experience is also enhanced by a very capable set of speakers. They might be the most bassy speakers ever to grace a smartphone, thanks to an integrated subwoofer and ultra-large sound cavity design, and they really add some oomph to in-game sound effects.

Image 1 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 4

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)

The Magic 7 Pro runs Magic OS 9, a highly customized version of Android 15, and it's a bit divisive. Personally, I've become quite fond of Magic OS, but it's a very different experience from stock Android. The notifications shade and quick settings menu are split, like they are on iOS, and navigating the system can be a little challenging if you're coming from a phone that offers a more traditional Android experience, like a Google Pixel.

Aside from the layout changes, Honor has heaped on plenty of extra functionality. My personal favorite is Magic Portal, which allows you to select text or an image on your screen and drag it into another app for quick sharing or searching. This feature is now even easier to access, as you can circle things with your knuckle to quickly select them.

You also get plenty of AI-powered features, of course. There's nothing too novel here, but it's all pretty useful. There's an AI translator, the ability to format and transcribe notes with AI, and an array of AI-powered image-editing tools. At some point soon the phone will also use AI to automatically protect you from deepfake video chats – I can't say I've ever received one, but the extra peace of mind is always nice.

Also new this year is the inclusion of Circle to Search and Google Gemini as the default voice assistant. It's getting to the point where most Android phones come with these features, but they’re still worth mentioning because they're great, and I very much miss them when they're not there.

  • Performance score: 5 / 5
  • Software score: 3 / 5

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Battery

Honor Magic 7 Pro review

(Image credit: Future)
  • 5,850mAh silicon-carbon battery
  • 100W wired charging
  • 80W wireless charging

There's a lot to love about the Honor Magic 7 Pro, but for me, the best thing might be the battery life. I tested this phone after spending lots of time with the Vivo X200 Pro, which has a mammoth 6,000mAh battery, so I wasn't expecting to be amazed by this slightly smaller 5,850mAh unit – but I was.

Honor has clearly optimized its software very well, and I was able to manage two days on a full charge without even trying. And I managed that more than once, and that's with lots of screen time, navigating maps, shooting lots of photos, and streaming content. It’s just brilliant.

We’ve seen some Chinese manufacturers dial back their charging speeds for this generation, but not Honor. Here you get an impressive 100W wired charging rate, and a staggering 80W with Honor's Wireless SuperCharger.

Unfortunately, there's no charger in the box, but I happened to have the right kit to charge at max speed, and it makes living with this phone extremely convenient. If you have the requisite charger, a wired charge from flat to full takes less than 35 minutes, while a wireless charge can be achieved in less than 45 minutes.

  • Battery score: 5 / 5

Should you buy the Honor Magic 7 Pro?

Buy it if...

You want flagship power and long battery life
With most phones, you have to decide between long battery life and raw power, but not with the Magic 7 Pro. It's supremely powerful and can still last two days between charges.

You love taking portrait shots
The Studio Harcourt portrait mode is among the most impressive that I've tried. I loved it when it first debuted with the Honor 200 Pro, and it's just as good here.

You love a nice display
The Honor Magic 7 Pro has easily one of the nicest screens in the business. It's bright, vibrant, extremely scratch-resistant, and has more eye-care features than most.

Don't buy it if...

You love generative AI
Honor has been steadily adding more AI features to its operating system, but they're a little basic compared to some of the competition.

You're looking for the classic Android experience
Magic OS makes so many tweaks and adjustments to Android 15 that it almost feels like a completely different operating system. I quite like it, but fans of stock Android might have a hard time adjusting.

Honor Magic 7 Pro review: Also consider

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is an excellent all-rounder with a brilliant camera, but the competition is fierce. If you're not sure this is the handset for you, it's worth checking out these competitors.

Oppo Find X8 Pro

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is a similarly feature-stacked Android flagship with a heavy focus on cameras. It offers an extra telephoto lens, a dedicated camera button and has better consistency with its photos. It has an even bigger battery, but in my experience, the Honor still lasts longer.

Read our Oppo Find X8 Pro review

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Android flagships may have Apple beat when it comes to camera specifications, but for video shooting, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reigns supreme. It has amazing stabilization, ProRes recording, and can shoot 4K slow motion at 120fps. The new Camera Control button is fun to play around with, too.

Read our iPhone 16 Pro Max review

How I tested the Honor Magic 7 Pro

  • Review test period: two weeks
  • Testing included: everyday use including web browsing, social media, photography, video calling, gaming, streaming video, music playback
  • Tools used: Geekbench 6, 3DMark, GFXBench, native Android stats, Honor 100W charger, and wireless SuperCharge stand

I put my SIM card into the Honor Magic 7 Pro and lived with it as my main phone for around two weeks before reaching any conclusions. I used it exactly as I would any other phone, taking lots of photos, gaming, messaging, working, streaming video, and navigating with Google Maps and Waze.

I also compared the experience of playing graphically challenging games like Zenless Zone Zero, Genshin Impact, and PUBG Mobile to my experience with other Android flagships like the Oppo Find X8 Pro, Vivo X200 Pro, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. I also ran multiple benchmarks on the handset using 3DMark, GFXbench, and Geekbench.

I assessed the battery performance based on my real-world usage and charging times were measured using an official Honor 100W wall adapter and cable. I also tested the wireless charging capabilities with Honor’s Wireless 100W SuperCharge stand.

Read more about how we test

First tested January 2024

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: a Great Dane tablet that thinks it’s a lap dog
8:50 pm | January 16, 2025
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Tablets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: One-minute review

Maybe a giant tablet like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra seems wild to some, but to me it makes a lot of sense. I love a huge screen; the bigger the better. I want a tablet that can be a work surface, a drawing space, a tabloid newspaper, and a television stand-in when I’m moving to a new house and my TV is packed. Like all of Samsung’s ‘Ultra’ devices, the Tab S10 Ultra is all I need and much more.

How much more? There’s the S Pen, of course, which clings loosely to the back of the Tab S10 Ultra, so you’ll definitely want to buy Samsung’s Smart Book Cover case, at least.

Also, the Tab S10 Ultra is water resistant enough to take a dunk, which may seem superfluous for a tablet that would never possibly fit in a toilet, but it speaks to the Tab's durability. You can use it in the bath tub, or the pool, or in a wet environment, then wash it in the sink. That’s pretty amazing for a tablet this size.

There’s also… um, actually that’s kind of all there is? Okay, there’s Galaxy AI, of course, but nobody should buy a premium Android tablet for features like Sketch to Image or Circle to Search. Maybe someday AI will be a ‘system seller,’ as the gamers say, but for now it’s barely a bonus feature.

Otherwise, this is almost exactly the same as last year's Tab S9 Ultra, which is both good news and bad. The good news is that last year’s tablet was great! I reviewed the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra and I thought it was a powerhouse for productivity, and you actually get a lot of technology, even though the price is high.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing browser on left half of display with TechRadar.com and Calendar on right half. of display

You can easily see two full windows side-by-side on the Tab S10 Ultra (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is so close to last year’s model that all of the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra accessories work with this tablet. But a warning: if you want a keyboard, don’t buy Samsung’s offering. I wouldn’t usually knock accessories so hard, but this is an important component of a laptop replacement tablet. Samsung needs a much better keyboard for the Tab S series. Samsung’s keyboard is flimsy and unpleasant.

The Tab S10 Ultra version has an AI key... awesome. For the same price (even less!), Apple owners get a Magic Keyboard that's rigid and premium. You can lift the iPad by the lip of the keyboard, but don’t try that with Samsung’s QWERTY.

The good news is that all the third-party cases and covers for the Tab S9 Ultra fit the S10 Ultra. Cool, there are some good options on Amazon, at least. But that means this tablet is basically unchanged from last year, on the outside at least.

Usually, when a product doesn’t change much year-over-year, there's either a big upgrade under the hood, or there is a price drop for new buyers. Unfortunately, neither of those things happened.

The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is the same price as the Tab S9 Ultra in the US and UK, and it’s $50 more in Australia. Inside, you get a… hold on, [checks notes] MediaTek Dimensity 9300. Wait, seriously?! Samsung is using a MediaTek processor? Instead of Qualcomm? Instead of Samsung Semiconductor!?

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

Not much has changed from this Tab S9 Ultra to the Tab S10 Ultra (Image credit: Future / Philip Berne)

Oooooookay. Well, the results are what you’d expect. It’s a good brain for a tablet, but it isn’t a Snapdragon. Last year’s Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra came with the same Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chipset found in the Galaxy S23 family. This year’s Galaxy S24 uses a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The MediaTek 9300 can mostly keep up with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and once in a while beat it, but not always.

Why is there a MediaTek chip in this flagship Samsung tablet? MediaTek makes a respectable, less expensive chip that focuses more on graphics performance than overall raw power. The Tab S10 Ultra does have slightly better graphics capabilities than a Galaxy S24 phone, but this is supposed to be Samsung’s best tablet. Why is it only slightly better?

Apple is loading its comparably priced iPad Pro with an Apple M4 chip, which is more powerful than most Windows laptops. Samsung gives you a lot more display on the Tab S10 Ultra, but at the cost of so much performance that it knocks the Ultra back into a lower category. This is a gigantic mid-range tablet, not a premium flagship.

If you want to run pro-level software, you should buy Apple’s tablet. If you want the biggest, best display to run all of your Android apps and games and watch your favorite content, the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is a great choice, with a screen that will knock your socks off. But we all know it should be a few hundred bucks cheaper.

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: price and availability

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra app drawer, with keyboard attached

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Starts at $1,1199 / £1,199 / AU$2,049 for 12GB RAM and 256GB storage
  • A 5G version is available, but not in the US

The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is Samsung’s biggest and most expensive tablet, and it costs a bit less than the iPad Pro 13-inch, which is a point in its favor, considering Samsung gives you a humongous 14.6-inch display. That’s not a small difference: the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra display offers 65% more screen area than the iPad Pro 11-inch.

Besides the big screen, does the Tab S10 Ultra justify its price tag? Let’s consider features that you won’t find anywhere else. The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is water resistant, like all of Samsung’s recent Galaxy Tab S tablets (including the Galaxy Tab S9 FE, if you need a cheaper, water-resistant tablet). If you’re going to use your tablet in the rain, or in the pool, or if you just want to doomscroll in the bathtub, the Galaxy Tab S is your only choice.

Otherwise, Samsung’s key advantage is, surprisingly, software. Samsung does a much better job with tablet software than Apple. It’s easier to multi-task, open multiple windows, and use your tablet with an external monitor and keyboard. Samsung even does a great job integrating its tablet with your Samsung phone and Galaxy Book laptop, if you have recent Samsung devices.

Image 1 of 3

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra drawing a Cybertruck on the screen with the S Pen

Drawing a truck with Sketch to Image (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 2 of 3

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra a water color rendering of the Cybertruck I drew using Sketch to Image

Here is Galaxy AI's watercolor version of my truck (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Image 3 of 3

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing Galaxy AI settings

The robust Galaxy AI settings menu (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

All of Samsung’s tablets are good at multitasking, you don’t need to spend $1,1199.99 / £1,199 / AU$2,049 to get this software experience. Even the Tab Ultra’s display isn’t the advantage it was in the past. Apple’s latest iPad Pro tablets pack the most advanced OLED I’ve ever seen on a tablet. It’s thinner, brighter, and sharper looking than Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, even if it’s smaller.

Samsung gives you an S Pen with the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, while Apple makes you pay $129 / £129 / AU$219 for an Apple Pencil. That’s a nice bonus, but it doesn’t justify Samsung’s high price.

Apple gives you a desktop-class chip, while Samsung includes a MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset that is… not bad? It’s good at gaming, but not as powerful as Apple’s M4 in the iPad Pro, and it doesn’t even top the Apple M2 in the iPad Air, except in a few graphics benchmarks.

Apple gives you a better, more advanced display, a thinner tablet, and incredible power. Unless you need a water-resistant tablet, or if your games are only available on Android, it’s hard to justify the price tag for the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. The Tab S9 FE is a much better buy for those benefits.

  • Value: 3/5

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: specs

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra close up showing S Pen connection to tablet and speaker grill on side

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

It was a shocking move for Samsung to include a MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ chipset in its Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. The last Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra used the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, which was the same processor used in the Galaxy S23 Ultra phone, launched the same year. This year’s Galaxy S24 Ultra phone uses a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, and that’s what I expected on the premiere tablet.

the MediaTek Dimensity 9300... falls short on processing performance compared to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon

Why use MediaTek instead of Qualcomm or a Samsung Exynos chip? My guess is that Samsung wants to diversify its chip supply, and the Tab S10 Ultra is a safe place to stick the first processor from a new partnership. [Full disclosure: I worked on Samsung’s PR team from 2011 to 2017 and was never involved in chip decisions, I only know what other technology journalists know.]

Samsung will tell you that the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 is exceptional at gaming, and it wanted this tablet to appeal to gamers. While MediaTek does win some benchmark races on the graphics side of Future Labs testing, it falls short on processing performance compared to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon, and it’s generations behind Apple’s M4 chipset when it comes to processing power.

I’ll talk about whether the MediaTek 9300 delivered on that gaming promise below in the Performance section (spoiler: it did, but it’s still a mobile chipset).

Otherwise, the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra has an impressive list of specs. It comes with plenty of RAM to start, 12GB, and you can boost that to 16GB if you buy an upgraded storage model.

The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra also uses Wi-Fi 7, which the iPad Pro still lacks. If you have the latest networking equipment installed and you want to take advantage, the Galaxy Tab is ready.

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: display

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing home screen with new AI generated wallpaper

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Massive 14.6-inch screen is a new level of tablet bigness
  • Samsung thankfully sticks with Wacom tech for the S Pen

You can’t find a bigger, better display on a tablet than the huge 14.6-inch OLED screen on the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. If you are considering a tablet as a laptop replacement, the Tab S10 Ultra gives you more screen space than a 14-inch Macbook Pro, though finding the right keyboard could be tricky.

Samsung’s Galaxy Tab gives you much more screen real-estate than a similarly-priced iPad, but is it still a better display? The latest iPad Pro uses an OLED screen that is more sharp, with 264 pixel-per-inch density, compared to 239 ppi on Samsung’s display. Is that enough to notice? Not really, but bragging rights are important at this price.

Apple’s latest iPad Pro is also much brighter than the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, which makes a difference if you work outside, though the iPad Pro can’t handle a rain storm like the Galaxy Tab.

Samsung still refuses to support Dolby Vision on its displays, and you can spot the difference side-by-side if you compare, say, Netflix movies on an iPad Pro and the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. There is HDR10+ support, but not the Dolby HDR video standard.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing S Pen tools on home screen

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

I’m happy to see Samsung keeps using Wacom’s electromagnetic resonance (EMR) technology for its S Pen. I’ve seen a few mobile manufacturers switch to their own technology recently. That usually means a battery and an added expense. Samsung’s S Pen has a battery, but it’s for additional features like Bluetooth and the motion sensor; the pen still works without a charge if you just want to draw.

  • Display: 5/5

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: design

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra close, showing cameras and S Pen

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Water resistant design is unique among premium tablets
  • Same size and shape as Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

With a tablet this big, the design should get out of the way of the screen and the viewing experience, so I’m not expecting much. The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra has some design highlights but nothing special. I like the cool, tech-y antenna lines on the back that give it a futuristic sheen, but otherwise it’s just a big slab.

There are four speakers hidden around the edges of the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, so things get loud when you hold the tablet in landscape mode for movie watching. The camera is also centered for landscape viewing, as it should be.

The only buttons on the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra are the power and volume buttons, and Samsung has managed to screw up the volume keys. You’ll need to remember which side is up, because the Galaxy Tab won’t help.

Here’s what I mean: an Apple iPad is smart enough to know that however you are holding the tablet, pressing the volume rocker button on top should turn up the volume. If you hold the iPad upside down, it flips the orientation of the volume keys.

The Galaxy Tab has fixed Up and Down volume keys, and if you hold the tablet upside down, you need to press down to turn the volume Up. If this seems hard to explain, it’s even worse to use in real life.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra close up from angle showing S Pen tip

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

If you plan on using the S Pen and not losing the S Pen, I highly recommend buying Samsung’s back cover. It has a nice garage that holds the S Pen in the right spot to charge wirelessly against the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. I wish there was a proper silo like there is on the Galaxy S24 Ultra phone, but that would mean a much smaller S Pen, so I’ll accept the trade off.

I don’t recommend Samsung’s keyboard case, and I’m not sure there is a great option to turn the Galaxy S10 Ultra into a proper laptop replacement, which is a huge miss on Samsung’s part. Apple’s Magic Keyboard, which costs less than Samsung’s Keyboard Cover with a trackpad, is a much more premium accessory. You can lift the iPad Pro by grasping the front of the Magic Keyboard, while Samsung’s expensive keyboard cover feels cheap and flimsy, with keys that are too shallow.

  • Design: 4/5

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: software

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing. all the apps Samsung adds to the tablet under a Samsung folder

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Still the best tablet software for multitasking
  • No significant enhancements for gaming

Samsung’s One UI software, running on top of Android 14, is packed with features, and maybe overstuffed for a smaller smartphone screen, but on a big tablet Samsung lets you cut loose. You can run up to four windows on screen at once, and it’s easy to tile and arrange windows by dragging them where you want them. You can open apps or conversations in pop-up bubbles, and we haven’t even got to the pop-up note taking and screen writing with the S Pen.

While Apple pays lip service to multitasking on the iPad Pro, Samsung really makes it easy to do two or more things at once. I could research on the web while taking notes in Google Docs, or chat on a webcam meeting on one side, play a game on the other, and doomscroll in a floating window.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra with two side-by-side windows and a pop-up window playing Star Wars Skeleton Crew

Taking notes (left) while surfing the web (right) while watching Skeleton Crew (bottom left) all at once (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

While Samsung’s operating system is great, I’m worried that a big, expensive tablet like this is let down by the Android ecosystem. What are the premium apps that require so much screen size and power? Well, maybe not power, since the MediaTek processor isn’t exactly a powerhouse. But it's pretty good at gaming, and Samsung has said this tablet is aimed at gaming enthusiasts.

So, where is the gaming software? When you buy an Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro, our best gaming phone, you don’t just get top performance. You get a suite of software tools to help you control your game, tweak your system settings, and stream your sessions over your favorite social network. That’s what it takes to call your device a gaming device. The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra was great for playing games, but it’s not an excellent gaming device.

  • Software: 4/5

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: performance

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra playing Vampire Survivors with an Xbox controller

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Good enough for Android, but not competitive with the iPad Pro
  • There better be a Snapdragon 8 Elite in the next Tab Ultra

It’s a very weird time for Samsung to release a Galaxy Tab Ultra with a relatively underpowered MediaTek chipset. Apple offers the iPad Pro tablet with an Apple M4 chip that's more powerful than most Windows laptop computers. The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra doesn’t come close to that level of performance.

Then we have Qualcomm, which followed up one of its best chips in memory, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with a chipset that could truly be a revolutionary step forward, the upcoming Snapdragon 8 Elite. The latter wasn’t available in time for the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra launch, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has been the most powerful chip in smartphones over the past year. Samsung should know, that’s the chip inside the Galaxy S24.

For the same price, you can have an Apple M4-powered iPad Pro. Heck, you could buy a Samsung Galaxy Book 4 360 laptop with a Snapdragon X processor inside and you’d get more in just about every way for the same price. Why pay for a big, mid-range Android tablet when you can have a premium convertible laptop or professional-strength iPad?

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra multi window dragging an app to one half of the display

Multi-window is as easy as dragging an app to where you want it (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

If the answer is Android games, then the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra will satisfy hardcore gamers with its performance, but I wonder if a gigantic tablet is what the mobile gaming world wants.

Many games won’t work with a joystick. Genshin Impact, for instance, works with a joystick on the iPad, but not on Android tablets. That means I need to hold the huge tablet and manipulate the controls that were meant for a mobile phone.

There are quite a few games like this, and while I enjoyed playing games with my Xbox controller connected, I had a hard time manipulating onscreen controls while holding the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra. Don’t get me wrong, I love the huge size of this tablet, but for some tasks it simply might be too big.

  • Performance: 3/5

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra review: battery

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing USB C port

(Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
  • Less battery life than last generation
  • Much less battery time than an iPad Pro

Battery life on the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra was, frankly, unacceptable. While the tablet lasted through most of a work day, I usually kept it plugged in or charging when I was working at a desk because the big display can chug through battery time.

Our Future Labs tests report the same. The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra performed worse on our battery tests than the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra. Both tablets came in behind Apple’s iPad Pro, but the Tab S9 Ultra lasted around 9.5 hours and the Tab S10 lasted just over 9 hours. A small difference, but battery life should never, ever go down year over year.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra showing battery Settings panel

Four days?! Not likely (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)

In comparison, an iPad Pro 13-inch will give you almost 15 hours in the same test. That’s a huge loss for Samsung, and battery life needs to be a priority on the next generation of Galaxy Tab S devices.

I have to imagine that a Tab S10 Ultra with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 would have offered better battery life, based on tests I’ve seen comparing the Gen 2 and Gen 3 platforms. Too bad Samsung didn’t use that chipset here.

  • Battery: 2/5

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra?

Buy it if…

You play a lot of Android games
If you’re playing a lot of games on your Android tablet, the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra offers impressive gaming performance and the best big screen for gaming.View Deal

You want a big office tablet that’s easy to use
An Android tablet is much simpler than a Windows tablet, and you have your work accounts loaded, just like with your phone. Go ahead, work on the Tab.View Deal

You want to draw and play and have fun
The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is a big tablet for fun, indoors and outdoors, for doodling and gaming and playing with AI. Don’t take it too seriously.View Deal

Don’t buy it if…

You need a serious productivity tool
If you need real power and performance, and real desktop apps, you might need an iPad Pro or iPad Air.View Deal

You can get a deal on the Tab S9 Ultra
This is almost the same tablet as last year, so if you find the Tab S9 Ultra for much cheaper, just buy it instead.View Deal

You want a laptop replacement
The Tab S10 Ultra doesn’t have any great keyboard options to help you replace a laptop, though you can use any desktop keyboard and mouse instead of Samsung’s accessories.View Deal

Also consider

Not convinced by the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra? Here are a few other options to consider:

Apple iPad Pro 13-inch
It costs a bit more, but Apple’s iPad Pro 13-inch is more powerful, much thinner and lighter, and even brighter than Samsung’s Tab S10 Ultra.

Read our full iPad Pro 13-inch review

Apple iPad Air 13-inch
The Air is Apple’s mid-range iPad, but it is still more powerful than Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, and it lasts longer on a charge.

Read our full Apple iPad Air 13-inch review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
If you really just want a big Samsung display that’s water resistant and packed with OneUI features, the Tab S9 FE might be enough, and it’s battery life can’t be beat.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus review

How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Plus

I have been using and reviewing tablets since the very first Samsung Galaxy Tab 7-inch tablet and the original Apple iPad, and I use tablets every day in my personal life and work environment. I carry two or more tablets when I travel for work and personal business, and I travel every month, often every few weeks.

I used the Galaxy Tab 10 Ultra for two months as my primary work tablet, using it when I traveled for business and as a second screen at my office when I was working. I loaded it with my work accounts and apps, including Slack, Google Meet, Airtable, and Vampire Survivors.

I tested the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra’s durability by dunking it in my sink filled with water and rinsing it repeatedly. I used the Tab S10 Ultra with Samsung’s keyboard with trackpad cover, as well as with my own SteelSeries USB-C keyboard, and a Bluetooth mouse. I also connected the Tab Ultra to my Dell monitor.

I played many games on the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, mostly using an Xbox controller with Bluetooth. I played Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile, Vampire Survivors, and games from my Xbox Series X console over Wi-Fi.

The Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra was also tested and benchmarked in Future Labs independently. Future Labs uses benchmark software like Geekbench and Crossmark, as well as proprietary tests for color gamut and battery rundown times. Future Labs runs the same tests on every tablet to compare them equally.

Why you can trust TechRadar

☑️ 100s of smartphones reviewed
☑️ 15 years of product testing
☑️ Over 16,000 products reviewed in total
☑️ Nearly 200,000 hours testing tech

First reviewed January 2025

Polar Vantage M3 review: Feature-packed but flawed
8:32 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Tags: | Comments: Off

Polar Vantage M3: One minute review

Polar has long been a trusted name in the fitness world, known for its accurate heart rate monitors, its best running watches and fitness tracking gear aimed at athletes and fitness enthusiasts. The Vantage M3 aims to deliver on that reputation, combining a stunningly bright and vibrant AMOLED display, accurate dual-band GPS and advanced health metrics like wrist-based ECG and skin temperature tracking. It’s packed with tools to help you train smarter and recover better — all for a mid-range price. Along with the Vantage V3 and the Polar Grit X2 Pro, Polar is fully embracing the transition from duller memory-in-pixel displays towards AMOLED screens.

While the Vantage M3 gets a lot right, it’s not without its faults. The setup process was painfully slow and glitchy during my testing, and the companion app, Polar Flow, feels like it’s stuck in the past despite offering lots of detailed metrics. Add to that the lack of third-party app support, and the M3 starts to feel a bit limited compared to more versatile competitors.

That said, for fitness-first users who don’t mind skipping smartwatch extras, the Vantage M3 performs generally well. The clear and sharp AMOLED display makes stats easy to read even during sunny outdoor runs. And features like Recovery Pro and Training Load Pro add meaningful insights, while dual-band GPS ensures accurate route tracking in most conditions.

While the Polar Vantage M3 is a good option for those who prioritize health and fitness tracking, it’s not the most versatile wearable out there. Its smartwatch functionality is rather lacking, as there’s no app store, voice assistant or NFC for payments. Garmin, which also offers a stripped-back training experience, at least as the Connect IQ store. In 2025, this limited functionality feels outdated, especially compared to other smartwatch options on the market right now.

Nevertheless, it’s dependable for serious fitness fans, especially for outdoor workouts which require GPS, and is packed with useful tools for training and recovery. Just don’t expect it to deliver the kind of all-in-one experience you’d get from more feature-rich alternatives like the Apple Watch or Garmin’s top-end models. If you can overlook these shortcomings and focus purely on its fitness chops, the Vantage M3 still has plenty to offer.

Polar Vantage M3: Price and availability

Polar Vantage M3 smartwatch worn on wrist

(Image credit: Future / Lee Bell)
  • Price: £349 / $399 / $599AU
  • Release date: October 2024
  • Colors: Night Black and Greige Sand

The Polar Vantage M3 hit shelves in October 2024, priced at $399 / £349 / AU$599, placing it in the mid-range fitness watch category. It’s available in two understated colors, Night Black and Greige Sand, which should appeal to those who prefer a minimal look.

While it’s not the cheapest option on the market, it does offer solid value when compared to Polar’s higher-end models like the Vantage V3 (£519 / $599.95 / $899AU) and Grit X2 Pro ($749.95 / £649.99 / AU$1,099.99). For its price, you get premium features like dual-band GPS, offline maps and advanced health tracking — all without stretching into the luxury price tier.

  • Value score: 3.5 / 5

Polar Vantage M3: Design

Polar Vantage M3 smartwatch worn on wrist

(Image credit: Future / Lee Bell)
  • Lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear
  • Stunning AMOLED display with crisp resolution
  • Silicone strap is a little stiff and thus tricky to readjust

When it comes to design, the Polar Vantage M3 balances both style and practicality rather well. At just 53g including the strap, the 44mm case is lightweight enough that you’ll barely notice it’s there, whether you’re hitting the gym or dashing out to run errands. Its slim casing size means it sits snugly on your wrist, staying put even during more intense movements, so you don’t have to worry about it shifting around or coming loose mid-workout.

The stainless-steel bezel is a nice touch that gives it a more sophisticated and hard-wearing edge, and the subtle studs act as a helpful guide when you’re swiping through the touchscreen. However, the plastic body does slightly detract from the premium feel, especially compared to rivals that use more robust materials, like Garmin’s more premium models. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it does leave you wishing for a little extra polish.

Next, let’s talk about the watch’s display, which comes in a 1.28-inch AMOLED variety — easily one of the Vantage M3’s standout features. With its crisp 416x416 resolution and a peak brightness of 1,500 nits, it’s vibrant and sharp — which will be why I found it made your stats easy to read in just about any lighting conditions. That said, it is slightly smaller in size compared to some of Polar’s pricier models, which can make some data screens feel a little cramped, especially when you’re mid-workout and glancing at metrics on the go.

The display’s Gorilla Glass 3 coating also offers scratch protection, which held up well during my testing. The five physical buttons are a welcome addition alongside the touchscreen, offering an easy way to navigate menus during sweaty or gloved activities. However, they could be more tactile; Garmin’s chunkier controls, for example, feel more satisfying to use.

Nevertheless, the silicone strap is soft and comfortable overall. Its buckle-and-loop system can be fiddly at times, often needing more patience than it should to fasten securely. But on the bright side, the 22mm standard size means you can easily swap it for an alternative that better suits your needs.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Polar Vantage M3: Features

Polar Vantage M3 smartwatch worn on wrist

(Image credit: Future / Lee Bell)
  • Packed with fitness and recovery tools
  • Limited smartwatch functionality leaves you wanting more

The Polar Vantage M3 is built for fitness enthusiasts, and its suite of features backs this up. From wrist-based ECG and SpO2 tracking to detailed recovery metrics like SleepWise and Training Load Pro, it’s clear to see that health and performance tracking are this watch’s primary focus. It boasts tools for just about every aspect of your fitness journey — features that work really together and delivering insights that can genuinely help you train smarter and recover better.

While the watch’s fitness features deliver, its smartwatch functionality falls short. Sure, you can read notifications and control your music, but that’s about it. There’s no app store for adding third-party tools, no voice assistant to help you navigate tasks hands-free and no NFC for payments support.

It’s surprising, especially in 2025, where even budget wearables offer more comprehensive options. And so, for anyone hoping for a more versatile device that blends fitness and day-to-day convenience, the Vantage M3 feels like it’s missing the mark somewhat.

However, the essentials are solid. Syncing the watch to the Polar Flow app allows you to view all your training metrics in one place. While the app itself isn’t the most intuitive or visually pleasing, it does get the job done — albeit with a bit of patience.

  • Features score: 3 / 5

Polar Vantage M3: Performance

  • Dual-band GPS is accurate but not flawless
  • Metrics not quite as precise as expected
  • Around five days battery life with mixed use

The Vantage M3’s dual-band GPS is a solid performer most of the time. It connects quickly and provides accurate data during runs, bike rides and hikes. However, it’s not flawless. In dense urban areas surrounded by tall buildings, the GPS can wobble slightly, deviating from your true route. It’s not a disaster by any means, but when you’re comparing it to premium models like the Garmin Fenix 8 series, for instance, the difference is quite noticeable.

Heart rate monitoring is another area where the M3 performs well, though it’s not perfect. The optical sensor offers consistent readings during steady-state workouts, but it struggles to keep up during sudden bursts of activity, such as sprints or high-intensity intervals. If you’re someone who relies heavily on accurate heart rate data for training, this might be a minor frustration. Step tracking, meanwhile, was less impressive. It often overcounted my steps by a few hundred compared to other devices I tested, which could annoy anyone who considers precise metrics as paramount.

As for battery life, it’s decent but not groundbreaking. With moderate use, Polar says you’ll get five to six days out of it, or about 24 hours in GPS mode. I found that with mixed use - tracking a workout once a day with GPS, general step counting and sleep tracking - it was just short of that, at about five days. It’s enough for most casual users, but endurance athletes might find themselves charging more often than they’d like. On the plus side, charging is relatively quick and painless, thanks to the USB-A proprietary cable included in the box.

Essentially, the Polar Vantage M3 excels as a training tool. Its recovery features, like Training Load Pro, are genuinely useful for improving your workouts, and the clear and sharp AMOLED display makes interacting with the watch nothing but a pleasure. Whether you’re mid-run in the sun or checking your progress under some intense floodlights, I found the screen performs brilliantly overall. But when you consider the price tag, it’s hard to ignore the areas where it falls short. For £349 / $399 / $599AU, you’d expect a more high-end experience, particularly when it comes to its smartwatch features. Still, if you’re looking for a fitness-first device, it’s a trustworthy option, but it’s not the standout it could have been.

  • Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Polar Vantage M3: Scorecard

Polar Vantage M3 smartwatch worn on wrist

(Image credit: Future / Lee Bell)

Polar Vantage M3: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You want detailed training insights

Polar’s tools like Recovery Pro and Training Load Pro offer genuinely useful, detailed feedback.View Deal

You love vibrant displays

The AMOLED screen is sharp, colorful and easy to read in most lighting.View Deal

You’re after a lightweight, comfortable design

It’s great for all-day wear, even during intense workouts.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You need robust smartwatch features

There’s no app store, voice assistant or payment support.View Deal

You hate clunky apps

Polar Flow isn’t the most user-friendly companion app.View Deal

You’re a sucker for tracking accuracy

Step counts can be overly generous, which might bother data purists.View Deal

Also consider

Garmin Forerunner 255 (£299)

This cheaper option from Garmin is known for its excellent GPS and training tools, plus there’s a stronger focus on smartwatch features like NFC payments as well as app support.

Check out our full Garmin Forerunner 255 reviewView Deal

COROS Pace 3 (£199)

An affordable alternative with great battery life, reliable tracking and a focus on performance. While it lacks an AMOLED screen, it excels in durability and value for money.

Check out our full COROS Pace 3 reviewView Deal

Apple Watch SE 2 (£269)

For those iPhone users who want a better balance between fitness tracking and smartwatch functionality. While it doesn’t have advanced recovery tools, its sleek design and app ecosystem make it a top choice that won’t break the bank.

Check out our full Apple Watch SE 2 reviewView Deal

How I tested

I wore the Polar Vantage M3 daily for over two weeks, testing its features during various activities, including running, cycling and yoga. I used its dual-band GPS for outdoor workouts and tracked recovery metrics with Polar’s app tools. I also evaluated its smartwatch functionality by syncing it to a smartphone, using it for notifications and assessing app integration. To test durability, I wore it during both high-intensity workouts and casual everyday use, paying attention to comfort and battery performance.

First reviewed: January 2025

Intel Arc B570 review: great value, but overshadowed by the far superior Arc B580
5:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Computing Components Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Intel Arc B570: Two-minute review

The Intel Arc B570 is the kind of graphics card I desperately want to love, but my tech-addled PC gaming heart belongs to another.

I'm not talking about the recently-announced Nvidia RTX 50 series GPUs (though we'll see about those in due time). No, I've fallen for the Intel Arc B580, easily one of the best graphics cards on the market thanks to its fantastic 1440p and 1080p gaming performance. And, unfortunately, its price is so good that it's hard to really recommend the Arc B570 in good conscience.

To be fair, the Intel Arc B570's $219 / £219 (around AU$350) MSRP arguably makes it the best cheap graphics card going right now simply by default. The next cheapest current-gen GPU (as of January 2025) from AMD (the Radeon RX 7600) and Nvidia (the GeForce RTX 4060) are roughly 20% to 25% more expensive, and it's still $30 / £30 (about AU$90) cheaper than the Arc B580.

But the problem is that despite some impressive specs for a card this cheap, and solid 1080p performance, for just a little bit more you can get a far more future-proofed GPU that will let you game without compromise at a higher 1440p resolution if you go for the Arc B580. Of course, that's assuming you can get that card at its normal retail price and not the jacked-up prices being charged online by profiteering retailers and third-party sellers.

An Intel Arc B570 seen from the back

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

But looking at the Arc B570 strictly on its merits, ignoring any external factors that are subject to change, and it's undeniable that the Arc B570 is one of the best 1080p graphics cards you can buy, especially considering its price.

At this price price point, you really have to compare the Arc B570 against cards that are several years old, like the Nvidia GeForce RTX 1060 to really put things in perspective. For example, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 had a launch price $30 higher than the Arc B570, and even though I no longer have that card to compare Intel's latest against in a head-to-head matchup like I'd like, it really wasn't that good of a card to justify its price. Say what you will about the Arc B570, but in no universe can you say that you're not getting your money's worth with this GPU.

The heartbreak, then, is just that this card is simply overshadowed by its slightly more expensive sibling. If the Intel Arc B570 was priced at $199, it would be walking away with a definitive budget win. Hell, it still is, but with so little separating the B570 and the B580, pretty much every potential buyer is better off borrowing that extra bit of cash from a friend, sibling, parent, or even a stranger, and picking up the more powerful B580.

Intel Arc B570: Price & availability

An Intel Arc B570 on top of its retail packaging

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
  • How much is it? Starting at $219 / £219 (around AU$350)
  • When can you get it? You can get it from January 16, 2025
  • Where is it available? You can get it in the US, UK, and Australia

The Intel Arc B570 goes on sale in the US, UK, and Australia on January 16, 2025, for $219 / £219 (around AU$350).

This puts it at just $30 / £30 (about AU$90) cheaper than the Intel Arc B580 released in December 2024. That said, it is a good deal cheaper than the competing AMD Radeon RX 7600 and Nvidia RTX 4060, both of which run at least 20% more expensive for roughly the same performance.

I'll dig into the performance-per-dollar of this card in a bit, but I can tell you now that it's one of the best you find on a modern GPU, but it still comes in a distant second to the Intel Arc B580, making it hard card to recommend unless you are seriously strapped for cash or the B580 is being scalped at too high a price.

  • Value: 4.5 / 5

Intel Arc B570: Specs

The top trim of an Intel Arc B570

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
  • 10GB VRAM is a nice-to-have feature
  • Decently-sized memory bus
  • Specs: 4 / 5

Intel Arc B570: Performance

An Intel Arc B570 running on an open test bench

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
  • Great 1080p performance
  • Doable 1440p (within reason)
  • Arc B580 is way better for not a whole lot more money

Ultimately, what matters is performance, and the top-line numbers for the Intel Arc B570 are impressive for a card at its price point, but it is almost exclusively a 1080p graphics card unless you make a lot of compromises for 1440p resolution that frankly aren't going to be worth it in the end.

In terms of creative workloads or AI, this isn't the card for you. I'd simply go for the RTX 4060 if you're really strapped for cash but need something more than a basic cheap gaming GPU.

It also has to be noted that its 1080p gaming performance isn't going to match its more expensive competition on a lot of games, so if you're looking for a graphics card that consistently gets you 60fps at 1080p on max settings without question, you might be better off with some of this card's more expensive competitors.

That said, on average across the several games in my testing suite, including titles like Cyberpunk 2077, F1 2024, Total War: Warhammer III, and others, this card did manage an average 1080p fps of 60. with an average minimum fps of 34.

Of course, it played better on some games more than others, and some games you won't be able to play at max settings for a playable frame rate (like Black Myth Wukong), but over the course of all the titles I played, it's more than passable for 1080p, with the occasionally playable 1440p experience.

For its price, it's genuinely excellent, especially for getting you a card capable of ray-traced gameplay, but for just a little bit more, you can get a lot better with the B580.

  • Performance: 3.5 / 5

Should you buy the Intel Arc B570?

An Intel Arc B570 being held by a masculine hand

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

Buy the Intel Arc B570 if...

You are on a very tight budget
There aren't a lot of current-gen GPUs available at this price point, and even then, this is the cheapest so far.View Deal

You only care about basic 1080p gaming
If you are only looking for a cheap 1080p GPU with some modern extras like ray tracing, this card could be a compelling value at MSRP. View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You want to game at 1440p
Despite its extra VRAM and decent memory bus, it just doesn't have the specs for consistent 1440p gaming without some serious compromises.View Deal

You have some wiggle room in your budget
If you are even slightly flexible in your budget, the Arc B580 is a much, much better option for not a whole lot more money.View Deal

Also consider

Intel Arc B580
OK, so I'm going to be honest, the only other card you should be considering is the Arc B580. If you have any room in your budget, get this card instead. It's so much better for just a little more of an investment.

Read the full Intel Arc B580 review

How I tested the Intel Arc B570

  • I spent about a week with the Intel Arc B570
  • I used it primarily as a gaming GPU with some light creative work
  • I ran the Arc B570 thgouh my revamped testing suite

I tested the Intel Arc B570 using my newly revamped testing suite, including the latest 3DMark tests like Steel Nomad and Solar Bay, as well as the newest gaming benchmarks like Black Myth Wukong and F1 2024.

I used the Arc B570 as my primary GPU on my work PC, using it for basic productivity, creative, and moderate gaming in the office.

I've been testing GPUs for TechRadar for more than two years now, and have extensively benchmarked all of the latest GPUs several times over, so I am well aware of where this card's performance sits amongst its competition as well as how good of a value it is at its price point.

  • Originally reviewed January 2025
Insta360 Flow 2 Pro review: the best small iPhone gimbal gets an update
4:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: Two-Minute Review

Not even a year since Insta360’s original Flow Pro smartphone stabilizer arrived on the market, and it already has a successor in the shape of the Flow 2 Pro. The new gimbal (perhaps unsurprisingly given the timeframe) doesn’t represent a huge leap forward, however – merely a logical progression in a few key areas.

This is another compact handheld gimbal for keeping an attached smartphone level and its movements smooth, enabling the user to capture more stable and professional-looking video footage while on foot or, with the gimbal perched on a flat surface thanks to its integrated tripod, use their phone like an automated camera operator, moving around while the gimbal uses its software to track and follow their movements, keeping them in the frame.

All the key advantages of the original model either remain untouched or improved upon, thankfully. The lightweight folding design, for instance, makes the Flow 2 Pro one of the most portable smartphone stabilizers around, just like the Flow Pro. And, like the Flow Pro, it features a magnetic clamping system that makes mounting your phone and deploying the gimbal and a refreshingly quick and painless process. The clamp grips securely to the sides of your phone, accommodating devices between 64mm and 84mm wide, and then simply sticks to the gimbal arm via its strong magnet, fixing into place with a satisfying ‘thunk’.

Image 1 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

I think the design is even better this time around, though, because the Flow 2 Pro’s construction is tougher and more durable than that of its predecessor, even down to the built-in tripod legs being less awkward to pull out and providing a more stable platform for hands-free stabilization.

In its folded state the Flow 2 Pro is impressively small. I was even able to lug it around in my coat pocket, which isn’t something I could say for many of the other best smartphone gimbals. The basic bundle comes with a soft cloth drawstring bag for storage in such situations, but Insta360 also sells an optional hard-sided carry case with snug cut-outs for the gimbal, magnetic clamp and (also optional) fill light. This case, which comes with a removable shoulder strap and netted compartment space inside the lid for storing cables and other small accessories, is the ideal way to store the Flow 2 Pro when not in use, and I’d have liked it included in the basic package – but I suppose keeping it as an optional upgrade does hold the overall cost down for those who want to get in at the lowest price point.

Image 1 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

As for the smartphone stabilization itself, I have no significant complaints at all – it all works brilliantly, and the Flow 2 Pro feels much more comfortable in my hand than the original Flow Pro. The three-axis gimbal can support handsets up to 300g in weight, stabilizing them using one of three modes: Follow (which follows both the pan and tilt movements of the user but keeps the roll axis fixed); Pan Follow (similar, but keeps both the tilt and roll axes fixed); and FPV (which follows the user’s movement on all three axes).

There’s also an Auto mode, which follows tilt and pan movements and adapts its sensitivity automatically in real-time, plus the option to fix all axes in place at any time by holding down the trigger on the handle. The sixth and final mode is Active Plus, which adds extra sensitivity and responsiveness to the above modes and is engaged by tapping, then holding down the trigger.

You can also manually move the gimbal using the on-handle controls, with the thumb stick supporting tilt and pan motion and, in FPV mode, the jog wheel controlling roll axis movement. Single tapping the trigger turns subject tracking on and off, double tapping resets the phone to a level central position and triple tapping spins the phone through 180º so that it faces the opposite direction to its current facing.

The minimalist circular control setup is similar to the Flow Pro’s, albeit with a few tweaks to aid ergonomics. It’s now slightly more tactile and the four mode lights for Auto, Follow, Pan Follow and FPV are situated at 12, 3, 6 and 9 o’clock on the circle rather than in a row at the top. The green indicator light, which pops on to tell you that tracking is in progress, is retained from the Flow Pro, as is the NFC tap point above it, which can be used for first-time one-tap pairing for both Android and Apple phones.

Image 1 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The 21cm extension stick, which expands out from the handle to create extra distance between the user and the phone, is retained from the previous model but a new Free Tilt option expands the Flow 2 Pro’s repertoire of motion. It moves the arm out of the way, which allowed me to capture upwards and downwards tilting shots I wouldn’t otherwise have been able to get.

On the software side of things, the Flow 2 Pro retains its Apple DockKit support, which means it can track subjects in over 200 iPhone camera apps, including the likes of BlackMagic Camera, TikTok and the iPhone’s own native camera app. Obviously this leaves Android users feeling a little short-changed in comparison, as the only way they can track on the Flow 2 Pro is via the Insta360 app.

However, the app is great – and I think delivers by far a smoother, smarter and more responsive tracking experience than any apps that use the DockKit integration. New tracking features added for the Flow 2 Pro include the ability to track groups of people, track while zoomed up to 15x and the Pro Framing Grid, which can modify tracking to keep the subject off-center in the frame for a more pleasing ‘golden ratio’ composition.

The app also includes support for Dolby Vision and Apple ProRes video recording, a new teleprompter option to help content creators stick to the script and support for remote control of the gimbal via a second smartphone or an Apple Watch. I like the idea of a remote control but having to pull out a second smartphone isn’t really ideal – so hopefully Insta360 will take inspiration from the Hohem iSteady M7’s integrated remote control for future stabilizers.

I did get the opportunity to try out a couple of the optional accessories such as the MagSafe mount, which is a much more elegant and slick mounting option than the spring-loaded magnetic grip and the LED fill light, which slots directly onto the gimbal arm’s USB-C output (which can also be used to top up your phone’s battery) and provides either warm, neutral or cool light in one of three intensities. It’s not as flexible as the LED that comes included on the Hohem M7, but it’s powerful enough to enable night-time vlogging, and can face both forwards and backwards.

With up to 10 hours of battery life, the Flow 2 Pro delivers roughly the same amount of use on a full charge as the original model. By the standards of small stabilizers, it’s good – and significantly longer than the 6.5 hours offered by the DJI Osmo 6 Mobile, its closest rival.

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: Price and Availability

The Insta360 Flow 2 Pro is available to order from its launch day, 16 January 2025, in two bundles and two color finishes: Stone Grey and Summit White.

The Standard Bundle costs $159.99 / £144.99 / AU$239.99, and includes the Flow 2 Pro itself plus a magnetic clamp, USB-A to USB-C charging cable and soft storage back. The Creator Bundle costs $189.99 / £169.99 / AU$289.99, and includes all of the above plus a USB-C to USB-C charging cable, a magnetic phone mount for MagSafe iPhones and the Spotlight, a small fill light that clips directly to the gimbal arm.

This launch price is slightly higher than the launch price of original Flow Pro (which arrived in July 2024); taking into account inflation, however, I’d consider it roughly the same – although I would expect the original Flow Pro to fall in price now that its successor has arrived – the Flow 2 Pro’s most established rival, the DJI Osmo 6 Mobile, has already.

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: specs

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: Also Consider

DJI Osmo Mobile 6
We think DJI’s small folding gimbal feels nicer in the hand than the Flow 2 Pro, but in other areas the Insta360 has it beat thanks to longer battery life and, for Apple users at least, that all-important ability to track using third-party camera apps. We’d expect the upcoming Osmo Mobile 7 (or equivalent) to up its game sharply, however.

Read our DJI Osmo Mobile 6 review

Hohem iSteady M7
While significantly pricier and bulkier than the Flow 2 Pro, the M7’s impeccable stabilization can balance phones up to 500g in weight. Even better, it comes with app-agnostic tracking via an AI camera module that doubles as a fully customizable fill light, plus a touchscreen module that works as a remote control.

*Our Hohem iSteady M7 review is in progress

Should I buy the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro?

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Buy it if...

You want the best small gimbal for iPhone
The Flow 2 Pro’s Apple DockKit support grants it far more utility for iPhone users than its folding, compact competitors, allowing human subject tracking for over 200 iOS camera apps.

You travel light
With its folding, lightweight build, which also manages to be reassuringly sturdy, the Flow 2 Pro is the perfect stabilizer with which to document your day trips and weekend breaks. It works as a power bank, selfie stick and tripod too!

Don't buy it if...

You want the best all-round tracking gimbal
Larger, pricier stabilizers like the Hohem iSteady M7 and Zhiyun Smooth 5A AI feature AI tracking modules that allow them to track human subjects with any app for both Android and iPhone.

You already own the original Flow Pro
The improvements here are notable, but not so valuable that it’s worth ditching your nearly new Flow Pro for the upgrade. If you own the original, our advice would be to wait until the Flow 3 Pro (or equivalent) comes along.

How I tested the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro

  • One week of use
  • Tested with iPhone 13 and various iOS apps
  • Used inside and outdoors both on tripod and in hand

I used the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro in and around my home for a week, using it to record footage both on the move and with it fixed it place via its built-in tripod. I tested it with my Apple iPhone 13 and a variety of camera apps – including the Insta360 app, BlackMagic Camera and the iPhone’s own native camera – to record b-roll and vlog-style videos.

First reviewed January 2025

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro review: the best small iPhone gimbal gets an update
4:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone Accessories Phones | Comments: Off

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: Two-Minute Review

Not even a year since Insta360’s original Flow Pro smartphone stabilizer arrived on the market, and it already has a successor in the shape of the Flow 2 Pro. The new gimbal (perhaps unsurprisingly given the timeframe) doesn’t represent a huge leap forward, however – merely a logical progression in a few key areas.

This is another compact handheld gimbal for keeping an attached smartphone level and its movements smooth, enabling the user to capture more stable and professional-looking video footage while on foot or, with the gimbal perched on a flat surface thanks to its integrated tripod, use their phone like an automated camera operator, moving around while the gimbal uses its software to track and follow their movements, keeping them in the frame.

All the key advantages of the original model either remain untouched or improved upon, thankfully. The lightweight folding design, for instance, makes the Flow 2 Pro one of the most portable smartphone stabilizers around, just like the Flow Pro. And, like the Flow Pro, it features a magnetic clamping system that makes mounting your phone and deploying the gimbal and a refreshingly quick and painless process. The clamp grips securely to the sides of your phone, accommodating devices between 64mm and 84mm wide, and then simply sticks to the gimbal arm via its strong magnet, fixing into place with a satisfying ‘thunk’.

Image 1 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 4

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

I think the design is even better this time around, though, because the Flow 2 Pro’s construction is tougher and more durable than that of its predecessor, even down to the built-in tripod legs being less awkward to pull out and providing a more stable platform for hands-free stabilization.

In its folded state the Flow 2 Pro is impressively small. I was even able to lug it around in my coat pocket, which isn’t something I could say for many of the other best smartphone gimbals. The basic bundle comes with a soft cloth drawstring bag for storage in such situations, but Insta360 also sells an optional hard-sided carry case with snug cut-outs for the gimbal, magnetic clamp and (also optional) fill light. This case, which comes with a removable shoulder strap and netted compartment space inside the lid for storing cables and other small accessories, is the ideal way to store the Flow 2 Pro when not in use, and I’d have liked it included in the basic package – but I suppose keeping it as an optional upgrade does hold the overall cost down for those who want to get in at the lowest price point.

Image 1 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

As for the smartphone stabilization itself, I have no significant complaints at all – it all works brilliantly, and the Flow 2 Pro feels much more comfortable in my hand than the original Flow Pro. The three-axis gimbal can support handsets up to 300g in weight, stabilizing them using one of three modes: Follow (which follows both the pan and tilt movements of the user but keeps the roll axis fixed); Pan Follow (similar, but keeps both the tilt and roll axes fixed); and FPV (which follows the user’s movement on all three axes).

There’s also an Auto mode, which follows tilt and pan movements and adapts its sensitivity automatically in real-time, plus the option to fix all axes in place at any time by holding down the trigger on the handle. The sixth and final mode is Active Plus, which adds extra sensitivity and responsiveness to the above modes and is engaged by tapping, then holding down the trigger.

You can also manually move the gimbal using the on-handle controls, with the thumb stick supporting tilt and pan motion and, in FPV mode, the jog wheel controlling roll axis movement. Single tapping the trigger turns subject tracking on and off, double tapping resets the phone to a level central position and triple tapping spins the phone through 180º so that it faces the opposite direction to its current facing.

The minimalist circular control setup is similar to the Flow Pro’s, albeit with a few tweaks to aid ergonomics. It’s now slightly more tactile and the four mode lights for Auto, Follow, Pan Follow and FPV are situated at 12, 3, 6 and 9 o’clock on the circle rather than in a row at the top. The green indicator light, which pops on to tell you that tracking is in progress, is retained from the Flow Pro, as is the NFC tap point above it, which can be used for first-time one-tap pairing for both Android and Apple phones.

Image 1 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The 21cm extension stick, which expands out from the handle to create extra distance between the user and the phone, is retained from the previous model but a new Free Tilt option expands the Flow 2 Pro’s repertoire of motion. It moves the arm out of the way, which allowed me to capture upwards and downwards tilting shots I wouldn’t otherwise have been able to get.

On the software side of things, the Flow 2 Pro retains its Apple DockKit support, which means it can track subjects in over 200 iPhone camera apps, including the likes of BlackMagic Camera, TikTok and the iPhone’s own native camera app. Obviously this leaves Android users feeling a little short-changed in comparison, as the only way they can track on the Flow 2 Pro is via the Insta360 app.

However, the app is great – and I think delivers by far a smoother, smarter and more responsive tracking experience than any apps that use the DockKit integration. New tracking features added for the Flow 2 Pro include the ability to track groups of people, track while zoomed up to 15x and the Pro Framing Grid, which can modify tracking to keep the subject off-center in the frame for a more pleasing ‘golden ratio’ composition.

The app also includes support for Dolby Vision and Apple ProRes video recording, a new teleprompter option to help content creators stick to the script and support for remote control of the gimbal via a second smartphone or an Apple Watch. I like the idea of a remote control but having to pull out a second smartphone isn’t really ideal – so hopefully Insta360 will take inspiration from the Hohem iSteady M7’s integrated remote control for future stabilizers.

I did get the opportunity to try out a couple of the optional accessories such as the MagSafe mount, which is a much more elegant and slick mounting option than the spring-loaded magnetic grip and the LED fill light, which slots directly onto the gimbal arm’s USB-C output (which can also be used to top up your phone’s battery) and provides either warm, neutral or cool light in one of three intensities. It’s not as flexible as the LED that comes included on the Hohem M7, but it’s powerful enough to enable night-time vlogging, and can face both forwards and backwards.

With up to 10 hours of battery life, the Flow 2 Pro delivers roughly the same amount of use on a full charge as the original model. By the standards of small stabilizers, it’s good – and significantly longer than the 6.5 hours offered by the DJI Osmo 6 Mobile, its closest rival.

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: Price and Availability

The Insta360 Flow 2 Pro is available to order from its launch day, 16 January 2025, in two bundles and two color finishes: Stone Grey and Summit White.

The Standard Bundle costs $159.99 / £144.99 / AU$239.99, and includes the Flow 2 Pro itself plus a magnetic clamp, USB-A to USB-C charging cable and soft storage back. The Creator Bundle costs $189.99 / £169.99 / AU$289.99, and includes all of the above plus a USB-C to USB-C charging cable, a magnetic phone mount for MagSafe iPhones and the Spotlight, a small fill light that clips directly to the gimbal arm.

This launch price is slightly higher than the launch price of original Flow Pro (which arrived in July 2024); taking into account inflation, however, I’d consider it roughly the same – although I would expect the original Flow Pro to fall in price now that its successor has arrived – the Flow 2 Pro’s most established rival, the DJI Osmo 6 Mobile, has already.

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: specs

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro: Also Consider

DJI Osmo Mobile 6
We think DJI’s small folding gimbal feels nicer in the hand than the Flow 2 Pro, but in other areas the Insta360 has it beat thanks to longer battery life and, for Apple users at least, that all-important ability to track using third-party camera apps. We’d expect the upcoming Osmo Mobile 7 (or equivalent) to up its game sharply, however.

Read our DJI Osmo Mobile 6 review

Hohem iSteady M7
While significantly pricier and bulkier than the Flow 2 Pro, the M7’s impeccable stabilization can balance phones up to 500g in weight. Even better, it comes with app-agnostic tracking via an AI camera module that doubles as a fully customizable fill light, plus a touchscreen module that works as a remote control.

*Our Hohem iSteady M7 review is in progress

Should I buy the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro?

Insta360 Flow 2 Pro smartphone stabilizer

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Buy it if...

You want the best small gimbal for iPhone
The Flow 2 Pro’s Apple DockKit support grants it far more utility for iPhone users than its folding, compact competitors, allowing human subject tracking for over 200 iOS camera apps.

You travel light
With its folding, lightweight build, which also manages to be reassuringly sturdy, the Flow 2 Pro is the perfect stabilizer with which to document your day trips and weekend breaks. It works as a power bank, selfie stick and tripod too!

Don't buy it if...

You want the best all-round tracking gimbal
Larger, pricier stabilizers like the Hohem iSteady M7 and Zhiyun Smooth 5A AI feature AI tracking modules that allow them to track human subjects with any app for both Android and iPhone.

You already own the original Flow Pro
The improvements here are notable, but not so valuable that it’s worth ditching your nearly new Flow Pro for the upgrade. If you own the original, our advice would be to wait until the Flow 3 Pro (or equivalent) comes along.

How I tested the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro

  • One week of use
  • Tested with iPhone 13 and various iOS apps
  • Used inside and outdoors both on tripod and in hand

I used the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro in and around my home for a week, using it to record footage both on the move and with it fixed it place via its built-in tripod. I tested it with my Apple iPhone 13 and a variety of camera apps – including the Insta360 app, BlackMagic Camera and the iPhone’s own native camera – to record b-roll and vlog-style videos.

First reviewed January 2025

FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera review: superb design and performance, somewhat modest camera experience
12:00 pm |
Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera: one-minute review

If you're new to bird feeder cameras and want an easy and affordable starting point, the FeatherSnap Scout is just the ticket. It's easy to set up, and offers a robust design, reliable Wi-Fi connectivity, durable battery performance with solar charging, plus a straightforward app through which you can enjoy watching your garden visitors. These attributes combine to great effect, and made this review both easy to write and highly enjoyable, while assuring me that the FeatherSnap Scout is one of the best bird feeder cameras available.

I live in the countryside in the UK, and we get plenty of feathered visitors in the garden. I already have regular bird feeders set up in various spots, so why not swap one out for a feeder with a camera? Doing so enabled me to get a closer look at the birds I otherwise only see from a distance, from the comfort of my home, and has been a wonderful experience.

In fact, while writing this review at TechRadar's offices, many miles from home, I've been able to keep the FeatherSnap Scout's live feed active on my phone to see (and hear) which birds are stopping by – a welcome distraction that puts a smile on my face.

Setting up the FeatherSnap Scout is simple. Having pinpointed the best spots to position the bird feeder, it took me a matter of minutes to unbox the camera, head into the garden and fix it to my chosen tree using the supplied strap. I've tried placing it in a couple of spots, and once I've established the best position I'll screw it in place more securely.

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

With the FeatherSnap Scout in place and filled with feed, I connected it to my home Wi-Fi network via FeatherSnap's free app (available for iOS and Android) – I was able to get connected promptly, despite there being a large distance between the camera and my home router.

The app is easy to navigate, though you'll want the paid-for subscription to get the very best features – for me the video downloads proved the real highlight. Still, without the subscription you can still receive pictures that the camera takes when it detects movement, plus enjoy the live feed, complete with audio.

Image quality is what I'd expect from a basic camera with ultra-wide angle lens; color depth and resolution are limited. However, the same can be said of all bird feeder cameras, and the detail here is pretty sharp. Over the weeks using the FeatherSnap Scout I've learnt that it's a breeze to get started, reliable, offers decent battery life, and comes in at a highly competitive price point. Top stuff.

FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera: price and availability

  • $179.99 / £159.99 / AU$TBC
  • App subscription plan $59.99 / £49.99 per year or $6.99 / £5.99 per month

Compared to a premium option such as the 5 star-rated Birdfy Feeder 2 Duo, the FeatherSnap Scout is a snip at just $179.99 / £159.99 (availability and pricing for Australia is TBC), especially when you consider that it features two built-in solar panels. That said, to get the most out of the camera features, you'll want the paid-for Unlimited Plan, which costs $59.99 / £49.99 per year, or $6.99 / £5.99 per month. Without it you can't access some of the best features, which for me means video downloads, although personally I can take or leave the bird identification features, which didn't always prove to be accurate. At the time of writing, the best price can be found on the FeatherSnap website and Amazon – for the latter make sure to select FeatherSnap as the seller to get the prices above.

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera: specs

FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera: design

  • Motion detection camera with ultra-wide lens and stable 2.4Ghz Wi-Fi connection
  • Strap or screw-in mount
  • Potentially unlimited battery life thanks to twin solar panels

The FeatherSnap Scout arrives fully assembled, with no construction needed, complete with twin solar panels built into its roof. The camera unit is packaged separately and snaps securely into place, attached through its USB-C port which connects it to the solar panels for continuous power.

The fiddliest part of setting the feeder up was strapping it to a tree. For a tree with thinner trunk I wrapped the strap around twice, and it feeds through a lock that's completely secure and stable. For another, larger tree, I wrapped the strap once and the setup was equally secure. I wouldn't be against attaching the camera to a tree using screws, once I know I'm fully happy with its position for year-round coverage, and if I can do that without damaging the tree.

My review period took place over the winter months in the UK, which means cold weather, short days and limited sunlight. The rugged device has withstood inclement weather, including a category 2 storm, and countless visitors (although I'm lucky that the squirrels haven't discovered it yet), and all remains well.

Image 1 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 7

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Initial pairing to my home Wi-Fi network took no time at all through FeatherSnap's app, and I was impressed with the stability of the connection considering the distance between my router and the device. In one position the app showed a strong connection with a distance of around 50ft / 15m, while from another side of the house, as much as 82ft / 25m, the connection was weaker but still worked.

A large battery unit is supplied, and this has a USB-C port built into it for direct wired charging. In one of the locations where I set the feeder up it was almost entirely in the shade and daylight hours were few, with the weather hovering around 32F / 0C, plus the camera was regularly active snapping visitors, and the battery was losing about 15% of its charge each day, so that's good for about a week of use.

I repositioned the camera where it would get more sunlight on sunny days, and the battery life increased. By my reckoning, provided the camera has reasonable exposure to daylight, it'll maintain its charge thanks to the twin solar panels, and most people will seldom if ever need to charge the battery.

Image 1 of 4

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera strapped around a tree with bamboo backdrop

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

FeatherSnap says the bird feeder camera has a -20F to 130°F / -29C to 54.4C operating temperature. Such extremes have never been recorded where I live, but the device has worked flawlessly in freezing temperatures. It's also proved durable, in the wind and rain, and I have little doubt that it'll be up and running in my garden for a long time to come.

I will caveat any notes about durability by saying the feeder has only had feathered visitors during my review period, the largest of which was a curious magpie. Squirrels could be a different matter – they have tormented other bird feeder camera reviewers for TechRadar, damaging the likes of the otherwise-stylish Netvue Birdfy Bamboo. The FeatherSnap Scout's open trays mean that squirrels aren't likely to root around too much and damage it, and from what I can tell the extendable perch is the most likely weak point.

Something the FeatherSnap Scout lacks, which can be found in some other premium bird feeder cameras from the likes of Bird Buddy, is a speaker to project sounds, which is typically used to deter and scare away unwanted visitors. That's not been an issue in my case, but it could be for you if you get a lot of squirrels.

FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera: performance

  • 4MP photos are sharp enough, though color depth and dynamic range is limited
  • Full HD videos of up to 15 seconds in length taken from photo gallery in app
  • Excellent Wi-Fi performance and stable connection for a live feed, complete with sound

The FeatherSnap Scout relies on a single camera with an ultra-wide field of view. It's motion sensitive, and it snaps into action when visitors come, capturing 15-second video clips distilled into a set of three photos in the 'Snaps' gallery. Should you like any of those photos, which you can view in a chronological feed in the app, you can download them at an image size of 4MB.

That image size is pretty modest, but so far as bird feeder cameras go, it's respectable. As someone who's spoilt by using the best professional cameras, however, I've been underwhelmed by the image quality of the FeatherSnap Scout. Color depth and dynamic range is very limited, with little latitude for bringing back highlight details during sunny days or adding punch on cloudy days, to the JPEG-only files.

I'll qualify those disappointments by saying that the same is true from all bird feeder cameras that I've seen – don't get your hopes up regarding image quality. In its defense, the FeatherSnap Scout's images look pretty sharp, especially if you're mainly viewing them on a smartphone.

Image 1 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

One of my more exotic visitors – a great spotted woodpecker (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 9 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 10 of 10

Garden bird on a bird feeder, taken with the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

In addition to photo downloads, you can request the video captured by the camera. These Full HD 1920 x 1080 pixel sequences are 15 seconds in length, and can be viewed at 1x or 5x slow motion, but you can't download the latter. Video downloads are only available with the paid-for subscription. The camera's live feed is another way to enjoy feeder's visitors in real time.

During my review, I've accumulated hundreds of videos / image sequences, and these are stored / viewed in the app. You can request a download of those images, and they'll remain in the app for up to 72 hours (with the free plan) or 10 days (with the paid-for subscription) before being wiped from the gallery.

I'd love an easier way to manage all of those files, especially considering that 95% of the content in my gallery is of the same five bird species. There are bird identification functions in the app – which by the way incorrectly identified a rare visit of a great spotted woodpecker to be that of a great tit – so I'd assume there's potential for AI to play its part in managing files.

It would be nice to get a highlights of the day reel, or have a method of selecting which birds are snapped and which ones are ignored – say based on your own Bird Book (which is used to log your sitings in the app). Perhaps that's too complicated an ask, and in fairness the present setup of wiping the gallery after 72 hours / 10 days is a sensible and simple approach.

Should you buy the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera?

Buy it if...

You want a close-up view of your feathered visitors
Bird feeder cameras remain one of the more affordable bits of gear for getting a close-up view of the wildlife around you, and for me the live feed provided welcome entertainment / distraction.

You're after a gift that keeps on giving
The FeatherSnap Scout is relatively affordable, and could make a great gift for a nature-loving family member.

You're looking for your first bird feeder camera
The FeatherSnap Scout is super-easy to get started with, and performs flawlessly thanks to a stable wireless connection and stellar battery life. View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You're expecting award-winning garden wildlife images
Bird feeder cameras in general are better seen as viewing and documenting devices – their basic cameras can't match the quality of even your smartphone's.

You don't want to be tied down to a paid-for subscription
The FeatherSnap Scout can be used completely for free through the app, but to get its best features – namely video downloads – you'll need the premium package.

You'll likely need to deter unwanted visitors

Unlike the best bird feeder cameras from the likes of Bird Buddy, FeatherSnap Scout lacks features designed to deter squirrels.

How I tested the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera

  • Mounted to a couple of different trees and connected to my home Wi-Fi
  • Operated through cold winter months, with little daylight / sunlight
  • I monitored the visiting birds daily using the FeatherSnap app, with the paid-for subscription unlocking premium features

I set up the FeatherSnap Scout by strapping it to two different trees over the course of several weeks. Screwing the feeder into place is another option, provided you take the necessary steps to avoid damaging the tree.

My test was conducted in the UK over cold winter months, when days were short and sunlight limited. I was able to connect the FeatherSnap Bird Feeder camera to my home Wi-Fi and monitor any visitors the camera detected via the live feed, and the pictures stored in the gallery.

I used the paid version of the app to unlock all the premium features, including video downloads and bird identification.

  • First reviewed January 2025
Onyx Boox Go 6 review: bugs and performance woes undermine a promising entry-level ereader
8:35 am |
Author: admin | Category: Computers eReaders Gadgets Tablets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Onyx Boox Go 6: Two-minute review

The Go series is Onyx’s latest Boox range of ereaders and e-paper writing tablets, with the Boox Go 6 being the newest – and smallest – member. It was released a couple of months after the first two Go series devices, giving Onyx time to fix the software issues I had highlighted in my Boox Go Color 7 review. And given how much I like the Boox Go 10.3 as a writing tablet, I had high expectations from this 6-inch entry-level ereader.

Its design doesn’t disappoint at all, with a slim, compact and lightweight body that makes it very portable indeed. Despite this light build, it still manages to feel quite robust. It also uses the latest E Ink Carta 1300 screen that makes reading a far superior experience over the Amazon Kindle (2024), and can easily hold its own against the Kobo Clara BW and the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024), both of which use the same display. Plus, having a microSD card tray to expand the 32GB internal storage if you need more space is a bonus. And that’s where the positives end for me.

While it’s adequate as an ereader, Onyx hasn’t quite taken full advantage of that fabulous display because ghosting is still a problem on Boox devices, even though Amazon has seemingly found a way to completely eliminate this issue in its 2024 Kindles.

A book cover displayed on the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Then there are the software and performance woes. To be fair to Onyx, my issue with the unlinked Fonts folder has been rectified – you no longer need to manually create a separate folder within the Storage tab to make third-party fonts work – but I ran into other issues instead.

For starters, while I can connect to my Google Drive account, during my testing, files couldn’t be transferred wirelessly as it wouldn't give me access to anything other than the existing Onyx folder from previous Boox devices. As a Mac user, I couldn’t even use a wired connection to move ebooks onto the Go 6 as only Windows machines register the Boox tablets as external devices and, despite OTG (USB on-the-go) support and the device reading my external hard drive, I still couldn’t move my files. Thank goodness for BooxDrop!

I will admit that the Boox Go 6 powers on or wakes up much quicker than any Kindle or Kobo I have tested (even the latest ones), but page turns are rather slow. I found that pages with images on them can take over a second to flip over. While most users won’t necessarily be reading graphic novels, comics or history books with image plates, it’s still sluggish compared to the competition. Even battery life is disappointing here.

I’m also quite miffed that Onyx has chosen to use Android 11 as the Go 6’s operating system when the other devices in this series run on Android 12. And while not really a deal breaker, there’s no waterproofing here either.

As much as I admire Onyx for churning out ereaders and writing tablets every few months, I think the company ought to slow down to perfect the performance of its ereaders. It seems to be able to do that for its writing tablets, so why not its basic reading devices too?

Cartoon swans and an elephant on the start-up screen of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Onyx Boox Go 6 review: price & availability

  • Announced August 2024
  • List price: $149.99 / €169.99 / AU$279
  • Available now directly from the Boox Shop and select third-party retailers

Compared to Kindle or Kobo, Boox devices have always been a little on the expensive side. The Boox Go 6 is no exception, listed for $149.99 / €169.99 (about £143) / AU$279 at the time of writing. That’s significantly more than the equivalent Kindle or Kobo.

The Amazon Kindle (2024) costs $129.99 / £104.99 / AU$199 sans ads on the lock screen, although you only get 16GB of storage (half that of the Boox Go 6) and it uses the older E Ink Carta 1200 screen. On the other hand, the Kobo Clara BW – which also only comes with 16GB of storage – will set you back $129.99 / £119.99 / AU$239.95 at full price, but it boasts the E Ink Carta 1300 display and is IPX8-certified waterproof, which the Go 6 isn't. It also happens to be repairable.

In fact, the Boox Go 6 is only marginally cheaper than the 7-inch Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024), which costs $179.99 / £159.99 / AU$299 for the version without ads and 16GB of storage, but you get waterproofing and a larger Carta 1300 screen that has no performance issues.

• Value score: 3 / 5

A cartoon drawing of a sleeping rabbit on the sleep screen of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Onyx Boox Go 6 review: specs

Onyx Boox Go 6 review: Design & display

  • Very sharp and clear 6-inch E Ink Carta 1300 display
  • Robust build quality with microSD card tray
  • Lacks waterproofing

The one thing I’ve always been impressed by is the design of the Boox devices – they all look premium, and the Boox Go 6 is no exception. Despite being made from plastic, the black chassis appears metallic on the front – something Amazon and Kobo ought to learn to do – and, despite being the same thickness as the 2024 base Kindle, it feels a lot more solid in the hand… and much more secure too. That doesn’t imply the rear panel is textured – it’s a matte finish compared to the shiny front, but it attracts every single fingerprint, far more than any other ereader I've had the joy of using. Thankfully Onyx makes an optional sleepcover (identical to the one used with the Onyx Boox Poke 5) to keep the body smudge-free.

The only embellishment on the Go 6 is the Boox branding on the front and rear. The former is in grey printed on the large lower bezel, while the latter is embossed black on black. The power button is on the right corner of the top edge, and you’ll find the USB-C port, microphone and microSD card tray on the bottom edge. There are no speakers here, like you’ll find on some other Boox devices and that’s a good thing – I’ve never found the sound to be nice enough to use anyway.

While it looks very much like the Boox Poke 5, it’s lighter at 146g compared to 160g, which also makes it a touch lighter than the latest edition of the base Kindle (158g) and the Kobo Clara BW (174g).

Image 1 of 2

The USB-C port, mic and card tray on the lower edge of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

The power button on the top of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

This lightweight body houses what is arguably the best e-paper screen that E Ink (the company that supplies the displays to ereader makers) has made. And it makes reading a lovely experience. Everything is displayed sharp and clear, with very good contrast. However, compared to the Kindles released in 2024, ghosting remains a major problem on Boox devices, which tells me optimization isn't...well, optimal.

Like all current Boox devices, the frontlight is adjustable for both brightness and temperature. This makes the display comfortable to use in any environment, whether indoors or out, and even at night when yellow light can reduce eye strain.

Also like the Boox Poke 5, the Go 6 also misses out on any kind of waterproofing, which is a shame as it’s more expensive than the Kobo Clara BW, which does get you some security from accidental dunks in the kitchen sink, bath or pool. That said, waterproofing doesn’t seem to be too important to Onyx as even the Go Color 7 is listed as being just “splashproof” (with no rating provided).

• Design & display score: 4 / 5

Rear panel with embossed Boox branding on the Onyx Boox Go 6

The rear panel looks good but it's a smudge magnet (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Onyx Boox Go 6 review: Software

  • Runs Android 11 – other Go series devices run on Android 12
  • Slightly more streamlined UI than older Boox devices
  • AI Assistant app is superfluous

I have to hand it to Onyx for trying to simplify the user interface on the Boox Go 6. There are fewer customization options in Settings as compared to older Boox ereaders, which makes it a little easier to use. Despite that, if you’ve never used a Boox device before, you’ll likely still need a little time to wrap your head around some of the settings. Other important ones, though, like for the library, are still hidden away.

The initial setup is also annoyingly complicated when it really doesn’t need to be. While you just have to follow the on-screen instructions, there are too many pop-ups, and being asked to set up Gestures even before you log in is unnecessary. You’ll also need to accept Onyx’s user agreement and privacy policy twice before you can connect to your Wi-Fi network – surely once would do. I was even presented with the keyboard audio recording pop-up before the full setup was complete, not when I needed to use the keyboard for the first time. These little bits and bobs are useful, I understand, but can be set up later rather than at the startup process.

Image 1 of 2

The gesture settings on the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

The System Display settings on the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

One thing I’m really pleased about is Onyx fixing one of the software issues that has plagued Boox devices from the start – having to create a new fonts folder within Storage to make third-party sideloaded fonts work. The existing Fonts folder has now been linked correctly and that extra step is no longer needed.

However, I’m surprised the company chose to use Android 11 as the OS, rather than the newer Android 12 that’s running on the other two Go series devices. Admittedly it’s a perfectly acceptable choice for an ereader's operating system, but disappointing nonetheless.

As with all Onyx devices, you can choose any of the five tabs as your home screen via System Display in the Settings tab: Library, Store, Storage, Apps or Settings. These are accessible at the bottom of the screen. Personally, I prefer Apps or Settings as my home screen as I find the library can tend to look a little messy, but that’s just me.

Apps is where you will find all the native applications, including a browser, the Google Play Store and the AI Assistant. While I find most of the apps useful, the last one is rather superfluous. You can use the built-in AI to write a short story or start a simple conversation, but I really found no need to use it on a basic ereader. In fact, I thought it was gimmicky on the Boox Go Color 7 too and I didn't take any advantage of it on the Go 10.3 either.

Image 1 of 2

The folders within the Storage tab of the Onyx Boox Go 6

Onyx has fixed the issue with the fonts folder in Storage... (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

The Bookerly font within the Fonts folder of the Onyx Boox Go 6

..which is now correctly linked for third-party fonts (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

The bookstore isn’t going to be much use to most readers as all you can find are classics and titles available in the public domain. However, you can purchase content via the browser or by installing the Kindle or Kobo apps, but then you will need to use the respective apps to read or listen to the content you purchase. These will not be added to the device’s library.

You will need to sideload titles if you want to use the native library application. Transferring files to the Go 6, in theory, can be done both wirelessly and via a USB-C cable plugged into your computer, although I ran into trouble in both cases. I’ve previously linked my Google Drive account to transfer files to the other Boox devices I've tested but, this time, although I could access Drive, it only presented me with my existing Onyx folder that had notes and files from older devices, nothing else. Even after moving my ebooks folder to within my existing Onyx subfolder within Drive, I was still unable to see it. Multiple restarts of the device didn't help, neither did a full factory reset. Which meant I couldn’t download any ebooks I had stored on the cloud. As a MacBook user, I’ve found that no Boox ereader gets registered, so there’s no way for me to use a wired connection either.

Applications within the Apps tab of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

There is OTG support here, which allows you to plug an external storage device directly into the Go 6 to access files. In my case, I tried both the Samsung T5 portable SSD and the T7 – while they registered as USB-C connected devices on the Go 6 and I can view the files, I was unable to transfer any of them, as has been the case previously on all other Boox tablets I've used.

I had to rely on Onyx’s own BooxDrop application, which allows me to use a web-based platform to ‘push’ files onto the ereaders for a wireless transfer. It’s not a bad way to do things, but when there are easier options, I’m saddened that bugs and software glitches don’t allow them to work as expected.

• Software score: 3 / 5

Ebook tiles within the library tab of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Onyx Boox Go 6 review: User experience

  • Easier to use but unnecessarily complicated setup process
  • Screen could be better optimized
  • Can have issues with wired and cloud transfers

With software bugs still plaguing Boox ereaders, the user experience, for me personally, is far from smooth, even though reading on it is wonderful. As I’ve already mentioned, the lackluster user experience begins right at the start, thanks to an unnecessarily complicated setup process that could throw off first-time users. Both Amazon and Kobo do a much smoother job of getting users set up on their new devices, so I don’t know why Onyx can’t adopt a similar approach.

File transfers also shouldn’t be as difficult as I found them to be. Sure, BooxDrop works a charm, but using a wired connection can be quick. And with no Windows machine at my disposal to use a cable to transfer files, or with OTG never having worked for me on any Boox device with support, I was hoping to use Google Drive. While that has worked for me previously, I'm not sure what happened this time round. It could be an isolated issue, but a full factory reset didn't help, so I can't be so sure.

Image 1 of 3

Book tiles displayed in the library tab of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 3

Onyx's Floating Toolbar in the libary app of the Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 3

A page of an ebook displayed on the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Fixing the fonts folder problem was fabulous, but then I had to restart the Go 6 three times to get the sideloaded Bookerly font to work. These are little things, but they do clock up for a user.

That said, I can't emphasize how good the display is for reading. I think it's better than the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024), which uses the same screen. I compared them both side by side, with the same Bookerly font for the same page on the same page – the smaller screen with a tighter pixel density definitely works in the Go 6's favor. I even compared it right beside the Amazon Kindle (2024 release), with both books covers and text looking darker and sharper. However, it doesn't offer as much joy reading as the overall user experience isn't as good.

While the user interface isn’t as complicated as it used to be on older Boox devices, a learning curve is still required if you’ve never used one of Onyx’s ereaders before. More so because many important settings, like those for the library (NeoReader) app, are hidden away. They’ll require a tap or two more on the top of the screen when the app is in use to bring them up, and it’s not particularly intuitive. What I really like about the Boox library app is the Floating Toolbar that can be customized for functions you use the most.

Image 1 of 2

The same book cover displayed on the Onyx Boox Go 6 (left) and the 2024 Amazon Kindle (right)

The Boox Go 6 (left) has a better, higher contrast display than the 2024 Amazon Kindle (right) (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

The same page of a book displayed on the Onyx Boox Go 6 (left) and the 2024 Amazon Kindle Paperwhite

The Boox Go 6 (left) displays the same page of the same ebook just as well as the 2024 Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (right) (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Onyx really has the makings of a good ereader in the Boox Go 6, but until its user experience is refined and simplified, plus the software issues ironed out, it will be hard to recommend over a Kindle or a Kobo ereader.

• User experience score: 3 / 5

Onyx Boox Go 6 review: Performance

  • Ghosting is still a problem
  • Sluggish page turns
  • Middling battery life

When it comes to overall performance, the other two Go series devices are better devices than the Boox Go 6. I was critical about the Go Color 7 and loved the Go 10.3, but sadly the Go 6 disappoints in comparison and I’m struggling to find anything positive to say here.

Settings options within the native library app of the Onyx Boox Go 6

Some important library settings are hidden away behind 2 taps on the screen (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Where the other two Go series tablets use the 2.4GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 processor, the Go 6 has an older 2GHz octa-core CPU. That shouldn’t have been an issue on an ereader, as it really doesn’t need too much processing power, but is seems to have had an effect here.

Page turns are sluggish even when only a single title is open in the library app (the library can have several tabs open). During my testing, I found that ebooks with images are particularly slow, sometimes taking up to a second to load the next page. Those with only text, though, are quicker, although at an average of 500ms per turn, they are a touch slower than what I’ve experienced on the 2024 Kindles and Kobos.

Image 1 of 2

Evidence of ghosting on an image displayed on the Onyx Boox Go 6

Images on the Boox Go 6 invariably have a ghosting problem... (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

Evidence of ghosting on an image displayed on the Onyx Boox Go 6

..with a light overlay of the previous page still visible (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Pages with images also suffer from significant ghosting, where a dim overlay of the previous page is visible. In fact, I encountered ghosting even when trying to sign into Google Drive when setting up the device. In comparison, the Go Color 7 was more impressive with a lot less ghosting, although this has been a major issue with other Boox devices I’ve tried.

In use, I’ve found third-party apps can crash often. Both the Kindle and the Kobo apps, while quick to open, can crash immediately after, or while in the middle of loading a title. That said, other apps like CPU X, which I have used on all three Go series tablets to determine certain specs, have worked just fine.

A hand holding the Onyx Boox Go 6 showing a page with image displayed

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Another disappointment is the battery life. While it uses the same 1,500mAh capacity as the Boox Poke 5, the drain on the Go 6 is a lot more than the former. I found that the battery level drops 1% every couple of minutes when the display is on, but not being used (meaning, no titles are being read or any apps in use), which does seem excessive. And this is with the screen light set at low levels. When in use, the drain on the battery increases slightly, with about 3% to 4% dropping every couple of minutes.

That means I got no more than 2 weeks of use, reading for about 30 minutes per day with the brightness set to a low level and the system’s refresh rate set to per 5 taps. Wi-Fi, though, was always on, as was Bluetooth. Switching them off didn’t make too much of a difference during my testing. As a point of comparison, the Kobo Clara BW also uses a 1,500mAh battery and gave me about 4 weeks of use on a single charge, as did the Boox Poke 5.

Top-up time for the battery, however, is quick. Connected to a 67W wall charger via a good quality USB-C to C cable raised battery levels from 4% to 56% in 45 minutes. It was fully topped up in 1 hour and 30 minutes. Of course, charging time will be much longer if you use your computer or one of the best power banks to top up the Go 6, but if that isn’t much of an issue, I’d say the battery charging times of this ereader is the best I've encountered.

• Performance score: 3 / 5

The Boox branding on the lower bezel of the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Should I buy the Onyx Boox Go 6?

Buy it if...

You want a very portable ereader indeed
As one of the lightest ereaders I’ve tested, the 6-inch Boox Go 6 will pop into a jacket pocket easily enough or slip into any bag.

You want plenty of storage
If you’re an avid reader, the 32GB onboard storage will serve you well. And if even that is too little, you can always use a microSD card to expand it further. While Onyx hasn’t specified the maximum storage capacity for the card tray, previous Boox devices have been able to manage up to 1TB.

You have an existing library of ebooks and audiobooks
Given the built-in bookstore isn’t ideal, the best use case for Boox ereaders would be to sideload your own existing library you’ve purchased from elsewhere. Or you use the Kindle or Kobo apps on the device. And given the amount of storage you can get, you can carry around thousands of titles with you everywhere.

Don't buy it if...

You want an easy-to-use basic ereader
It’s not bad, but given the user interface isn’t the most intuitive there is, first-time users might have a hard time getting to grips with the Go 6, or any other Boox ereader. If it’s a simple reading device you want, consider a 6-inch Kindle or Kobo and they’ll be cheaper too.

You need top performance
There are too many little software issues and performance problems with the Go 6. If you want a smoother reading experience, you’d be better off looking at Amazon's ereaders or a Kobo.

You’re already part of the Amazon or Kobo ecosystems
If you’ve used either a Kindle or Kobo ereader before and are looking for an upgrade, you might be better off sticking to your already-chosen brand, particularly if you’ve got subscriptions to Kindle Unlimited or Kobo Plus.

Also consider

I’d be very surprised if you’d consider opting for the Boox Go 6 after reading my review, but if you are keen on a new ereader, the three options listed below would serve you better. I’ve also included another Boox device that I think is worth considering if you want don't want to get caught up within either Amazon's or Kobo's ecosystems.

Kobo Clara BW
Arguably the best 6-inch entry-level ereader on the market, the Kobo Clara BW not only takes full advantage of the E Ink Carta 1300 display, but has no performance issues at all. And, unlike other entry-level ereaders, it’s actually got IPX8 waterproofing.
Read my full Kobo Clara BW review to learn more

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)
For a little extra cash, you'll get a much smoother user experience, the same screen but larger at 7 inches, and a bookstore that will keep you reading lifelong and still not let you finish scratching the surface.
Read my in-depth Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review

Onyx Boox Page
It might still have a relatively complicated user interface, but if you want a Boox ereader specifically, I'd recommend the Page. With physical page-turn buttons, it's ergonomic. It's also got far fewer software issues – at least it did when I tested it – than the Go 6. It's the older Carta 1200 screen but it's 7 inches, but these advantages will cost you more.
Learn more in my full Onyx Boox Page review

How I tested the Onyx Boox Go 6

  • Used as a daily ereader for about 6 weeks
  • Sideloaded books, music, image files and more via BooxDrop
  • Changed settings to test battery life for different scenarios
  • Downloaded different third-party apps via the Play Store
Image 1 of 2

The Onyx Boox Go 6 with its open sleep case

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2

Onyx branding on the startup screen on the Onyx Boox Go 6

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

While I usually sign into my existing Onyx account to sync files across devices, I took a different tack with the Boox Go 6. I set it up as a new device first, then signed into my Google account to access Drive and the Play Store. While I could use both, the former only gave me access to my Onyx folder that had notes and PDF files from other Boox writing tablets, but wouldn’t allow me access to any other folder I had (like my ebooks), and that’s despite moving my book collection into the Onyx folder. Instead, I used BooxDrop to transfer ebooks, music files and some photos to the Go 6.

As for third-party apps, I downloaded CPU X to determine what hardware was under the hood of the Go 6, as well as the Kindle and Kobo apps to access my existing library on the respective platforms.

I used NeoLibrary to read the sideloaded ebooks, used the native music player to listen to the audio files and, out of curiosity, opened the photos I had transferred in the Gallery application to see what they looked like.

I read on the Go 6 for about 30 minutes to an hour each day during the trial period, although there were a few days when I exceeded 2 hours of reading. I kept an eye on the battery life as I use it, and also altered brightness settings to see how it affected battery drain.

While I didn’t use the AI Assistant app on the Go 6, my previous experience on the Go Color 7 wasn’t particularly good enough for me to want to try it again. Moreover, I found no need to use an AI for anything while I was reading, especially since the Go 6 is more an entry-level ereader rather than an advanced one like the Boox Note series.

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed January 2025]

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: a strong contender for the portable projector crown
3:34 am |
Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Theater Projectors Televisions | Comments: Off

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: Two-minute review

Chinese electronics brand XGIMI is on a continued mission to be the brand of choice when searching for a projector, hoping to lure you away from the likes of Samsung, BenQ or LG in the process. The MoGo 3 Pro, released alongside the much higher-end Aura 2 4K UST projector towards the end of 2024, certainly has a resumé to suggest it’s in with a fair shot of becoming one of the best portable projectors: full HD resolution, 450 ISO lumens brightness, Google TV and Netflix onboard and, of course, a portable design. And yes, I recognize XGIMI has diverted away from the design of the previous two MoGo projectors and has instead adopted something akin to Samsung’s The Freestyle projector.

Admittedly, the new XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro’s new look does make it a lot more portable and it has added practical benefits. The cylindrical design allows the projector lens to remain covered up when it’s not in use and it can be tilted through a 130º angle. XGIMI claims this allows the projector to beam onto the ceiling but, in my use, I wasn’t able to do so without physically angling the whole projector unit itself. A full 180º of tilt would allow it to perform better in this regard, if that’s what you’re looking for in a projector.

Images projected onto a wall using the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro are of excellent quality, although you will want to dive into the picture settings to make some adjustments for the best results. Out of the box, images could look washed out and overexposed, but after diving into the albeit limited picture settings and making a few adjustments, I found that the projected images were able to deliver good color and contrast. I was impressed with its ability to combat some bright ambient light filtering into my testing room, too. Naturally, when the lights went down, the images projected onto my wall became much clearer.

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector viewed from the side, with the unit angled at 90 degrees

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

Because the MoGo 3 Pro is a portable projector it needs to rely on its built-in speakers for sound, which is where things get less positive. The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro has 2 x 5W Harman Kardon speakers built in which, sadly, fail to deliver anywhere near a cinematic experience, despite XGIMI's claims. Dolby Audio and Dolby Digital Plus are both supported formats, but it adds little to what is an overall unengaging sound. For casual viewing with friends, family or even by yourself, it can pass, but if you’re planning on movie nights when you’re away camping or on holiday, for example, then you’ll likely be disappointed. You can connect a Bluetooth speaker to help boost things on the audio front, and a Mini HDMI connection is onboard with ARC support, meaning you can connect a soundbar, for example, using a Mini HDMI-to-HDMI cable. But if you’ve taken the MoGo 3 Pro away on a camping trip, you’re unlikely to have access to a full-fat external audio system.

The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro also doesn’t have a built-in battery, which naturally can also affect its portability. If you know you’re going to want to take it somewhere where a power outlet won’t be accessible, then you can connect a USB-C power bank with a minimum power output of 65W, or you can buy the optional PowerBase stand, which not only raises the projector off the ground or a small table, but has its own built-in battery to keep it powered. XGIMI says the stand allows you to “continuously play a full-length movie without interruption,” although I found that would be the case only if said movie is 2.5 hours or less.

The other disappointing aspect I found when using the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro was that it could be slow in use. Volume adjustments using the remote control took a few seconds to register; navigating around the main home page regularly suffered from lag and I even found when trying to watch a particularly fast moving scene from The Incredibles on Disney+ that the projector just completely crashed. I should stress that this was an isolated incident that I couldn’t repeat with other fast-motion content such as sports.

The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector is, ultimately, a good option for anyone who wants big-screen thrills when on the go or perhaps as an option for a second bedroom at home in place of installing a TV. Keep in mind when comparing projectors, the 450 ISO lumens from the MoGo 3 Pro is about equivalent to 500 ANSI lumens. It does well against its main competition, Samsung’s The Freestyle projector, particularly when it comes to brightness. But, if your budget can stretch, you’ll find greater performance from the likes of the 4K RGB Laser equipped LG CineBeam Q.

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: Price & availability

  • Launched on September 6, 2024
  • List price of $449 / £429 / AU$1,099
  • Optional accessories cost extra

The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro was announced and officially launched at IFA Berlin on September 6, 2024, alongside the Aura 2 4K UST projector. It’s available to buy now for $449 / £429 / AU$1,099 for the standalone projector. You can buy it bundled with the PowerBase stand for $499 / £499 / AU$1,199

You can also pick up an optional carry case for the MoGo 3 Pro projector, which is only available in green, for $69 / £59 / AU$99.

The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro portable projector’s list price is significantly less than the Samsung The Freestyle projector in the US, UK and Australia. However, Samsung’s projector does have greater HDR support, with HDR10+ available. The MoGo 3 Pro maxes out at ‘standard’ HDR10, although as we said in our Samsung The Freestyle projector review, “I didn’t see much of a picture quality difference when viewing in HDR from standard HD format”, so the MoGo 3 Pro’s lack of extended support isn’t necessarily a mark against it.

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: Specs

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: Design & features

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector being held in a hand

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Google TV interface
  • Can double up as a Bluetooth speaker

The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro sports a cylindrical form factor and is finished in an anodized silver aluminum color. It’s lightweight at just over one kilogram, making it a breeze to not only move around your home, but to throw into a bag to take on the road with you. The main projector unit itself features an integrated stand, which also houses the built-in speaker system.

When connected to power, the MoGo 3 Pro turns on as soon as you lift it up to separate it from its stand. You can then tilt it through 130º to project an image onto a wall or screen. Alternatively, when you lift the projector from its integrated stand to power it on, you can leave it in this position, where it will light up in one of three selectable colors. In this mode, you can use it as a nightlight or you can stream music to it via Bluetooth, and you can select an option that will see the light pulse – this is more of a flickering of the light rather than it moving in time with the music.

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector remote control

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

A remote control comes supplied with the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro and two AAA batteries to power it. The remote feels good to hold, although I wasn’t enamored with the layout of the buttons. I found it required a bit of a learning process: the home button is in the bottom right for example and I’m used to it being more central on the majority of other remote controls I’ve used. I also occasionally pressed the Google Assistant button when I actually wanted to select ‘settings’. The remote control isn’t backlit, which can make things even trickier. Fortunately, the volume button is in an obvious and hard-to-miss place at the bottom, although I found the projector took a short while to register whenever I wanted to turn the volume up. Alternatively, because the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro uses the Google TV operating system, you’re able to use your phone as a remote control via the Google Home app.

The single-chip DLP projector uses an LED light source, which XGIMI says is good for 25,000 hours of use. The company’s ISA 2.0 technology is onboard, which gives access to a number of especially useful setup tools, including automatic keystone correction, autofocus, obstacle avoidance, screen alignment and eye protection. Automatic screen adjustments are just a click away via a button on the remote control and you’re free to manually adjust settings further if you wish. I found autofocus to be the most successful of all the settings, while auto keystone correction delivered mixed results. The idea of this setting is that it will automatically realign the screen if you move the projector around. In most instances it worked fine, but I was occasionally forced to dive into the manual settings to get the screen aligned properly.

Image 1 of 2

Close up of XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector speaker and power input

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Image 2 of 2

Close up of XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector output connections

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

A small selection of accessories is available for the MoGo 3 Pro, including a PowerBase stand which has a built-in 20,000mAh battery for keeping the projector running when a power outlet isn’t accessible. XGIMI says it’s good for 2.5 hours of playback time when the projector’s brightness setting is set to Eco mode, which is just enough for movies such as Deadpool vs Wolverine, but too short for recent releases such as Wicked. When using the MoGo 3 Pro with just the PowerBase stand, the projector defaults to Eco mode. It can be changed, but it will impact battery life significantly.

A carry case is also available to keep it better protected during transport and a Creative Optical Filter can be placed over the MoGo 3 Pro’s lens to project a much larger image onto a wall. It’s intended to be used with the XGIMI Wall app to project underwater seascapes or immersive starry night sky images.

While the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro features a Mini HDMI input for connecting to either an external sound system or a media streaming device, for the most part, you’ll likely be using the built-in apps to access content. In this regard, it’s good news as the MoGo 3 Pro uses Google TV, which provides access to a huge selection of apps and services. Perhaps most crucially, Netflix is supported. The ubiquitous streaming service doesn’t always play nicely with projector systems – a third-party app is required to access it on XGIMI's own Aura 2 for example, which uses the Android TV OS instead – so it’s great to see it front and center here. In a similar vein to the Samsung Freestyle projector, the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro uses the older Wi-Fi 5 standard, which is more than capable enough to handle streaming, and didn’t cause any issues during my use.

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector on PowerBase stand

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

As a predominantly streaming-focused projector, connections on the MoGo 3 Pro are limited to micro HDMI. It would have been great to have received a cable or adaptor in the box, but alas, you’ll need to buy one if you want to connect an external gaming console, Blu-ray player, or other HDMI source. The micro HDMI connection does support HDMI-ARC, which allows you to connect it to a soundbar or other audio system, but there isn’t a 3.5mm audio output. You can also stream music to the projector via Bluetooth, or from the projector to a Bluetooth speaker thanks to dual Bluetooth support. I connected the projector to a Beats Pill to test this feature and experienced no obvious signs of audio delay. Android users can stream wirelessly via Google Cast, and AirPlay is supported too. XGIMI says in the support menus that you need to download the MagiCast app from the Google Play Store, but I searched for it and had no luck. I eventually found another app called AirMirror that allowed me to mirror the screen of my iPhone and stream music via AirPlay.

  • Design & features score: 4 / 5

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: Picture & sound quality

Scene from Toy Story projected onto a wall by the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
  • Decent brightness even in ambient light conditions
  • Impressive picture quality after some adjustments
  • Sound is poor unless you turn it up to maximum

I went into my review of the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro with limited expectations about the picture quality it would be able to produce, given its size and limited specs. I’d previously reviewed the XGIMI Aura 2 which produced a gorgeous and bright image, but this was expected since it has a 2300 ISO lumens rating. The MoGo 3 Pro’s 450 ISO lumens rating, therefore, suggested to me it would only really function at its best in the dark.

The XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro supports the HDR10 HDR format, which did provide some benefit to contrast in movie scenes with dark and bright elements. The company claims the projector supports 90% of the DCI-P3 color gamut. With Game mode activated, XGIMI says the MoGo 3 Pro has input lag of ≈ 27ms with auto keystone correction turned off and ≈ 60ms with it turned on.

I was pleasantly surprised to find that it held up well in a brighter room, with ambient sunlight coming in through a small opening. With the overhead lights turned on, it was totally unusable, but with just some sunlight creeping in, I was able to watch the projected image without too much fuss. You are able to project an image up to 200 inches in size, but XGIMI says that for best results you’ll want to stay within a boundary of 60 to 120 inches. For reference, the size of the image I was able to project onto my wall was around 80 inches, with the projector positioned around 200cm (80 inches) from the wall. XGIMI says the throw ratio of the MoGo 3 Pro is 1.2:1.

There are slightly different picture presets depending on whether you’re watching HDR or SDR content. The majority of my testing used HDR content, which presented Standard, Sport and Game presets. I left it on Standard most of the time as I felt this offered the best overall picture. I was surprised to not find a ‘Movie’ picture preset, especially given the fact this will likely be the projector’s main use.

Google TV home screen projected onto a wall by the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

There are also three different brightness settings hidden within the menus: Standard, Eco and Performance. Again, I left the standard option selected the majority of the time. Eco mode limits brightness to 40% to help prolong battery life, and in darker rooms is perfectly fine to watch. If you’re watching in a brighter room, however, it doesn’t do as good a job.

Performance mode, meanwhile, introduces a blue tint to the image, which was a little peculiar... I was expecting this mode to ramp up the brightness further, but it seemed to have the opposite effect. When this mode is selected, the built-in cooling fan also gets turned up to 11 to the point where it’s clearly audible. It’s also worth noting that the performance brightness mode can only be enabled when the official power adapter is plugged directly into the projector unit. It won’t work with other power adapters or when connected to a power bank or the PowerBase stand.

A scene from Toy Story projected onto a wall by the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector

Enabling Performance brightness mode introduced a blue/green tint to the image. (Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

A stream of Alien: Romulus provided a good test of darker content for the MoGo 3 Pro and, considering its size, specs and price, I was pleased with the results when watching in a dimly lit room. It was able to unearth details in shadowy areas of a scene, while brighter areas such as lights had a satisfying pop.

I switched over to Toy Story on Disney Plus for its color-rich palette and generally bright scenes. The various reds, yellows, greens and blues were prominent, although not quite as vibrant as I’ve seen on TVs and higher-specced projectors. Nevertheless, it was still an enjoyable watch.

Seeing as though the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro is designed to be taken out of the home with you, I set it up in my courtyard to see how it fared when being used outside. I will preface by saying I was projecting onto a dark grey wall, but it was also at night and so, despite the color of the wall coming through, I was still able to watch without trouble. I have no doubts that if you project onto a white wall, a sheet or even a portable projection screen, you will have no issues when watching movies on the road.

Scene from Toy Story projected onto an outdoor wall by the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

I also watched my favorite clip from The Incredibles and came across an issue with a fast-moving scene about two-thirds into the movie. When Dash is running through the forest away from Syndrome’s goons, the projector seemed to just crash and stopped playing the movie. Pressing the home button returned me to the main home page, but the same thing happened again when I attempted to watch the scene again. I wasn’t able to replicate this again with any other content, so it could be a one-off, isolated incident or due to a bug that can be fixed via a future firmware update.

The projector’s built-in speaker system is more difficult to be excited about. At full volume it does produce a spacious sound that will ultimately pass for whatever you’re watching. At lesser volumes however, it’s too quiet to do any real service and it lacks any real impact. Connecting a Bluetooth speaker is a fuss-free experience and can work wonders to boost the overall sound output, especially as I didn’t experience any signs of audio lag.

  • Picture & sound quality score: 4 / 5

XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro review: Value

  • Cheaper than its closest competitor
  • Great features and performance
  • Portable power options cost extra

Dark scene from Alien: Romulus projected onto a wall by the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro projector

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

With a list price of $499 / £449 / AU$1,099, the MoGo 3 Pro offers enough to make it worth recommending. Its most obvious competitor, the Samsung The Freestyle, costs more in most markets yet has a similar specs list. Samsung’s offering doesn’t go quite as bright, but it does use the excellent Tizen operating system and it supports cloud gaming. Like the MoGo 3 Pro, there’s no built-in battery, but an optional base is available to make it truly portable.

To this end, I think the XGIMI's optional battery-powered base is the better choice as it’s also a tripod. Samsung’s option only raises the projector a few extra inches, so you may still need a table to put it on for optimal results. XGIMI's MoGo 3 Pro also has the added benefit of keeping the lens protected when it’s not in use. You will need to consider spending extra on the PowerBase stand (which is more cost effective to buy as a bundle with the projector) or a power bank that meets the required criteria.

If you can spend more and your only need for a portable projector is to use it in your garden, then almost any projector will do the job when plugged into an extension cord.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro?

Buy it if...

You want a well-specced portable projector
The MoGo 3 Pro is especially portable thanks to a compact design and lightweight build. A lightweight battery-powered tripod base, or power from an external power bank, allows it to be used practically anywhere.

You plan to watch in dark conditions
The MoGo 3 Pro does well to combat ambient lighting in rooms, but when the sun goes down, it really comes into its own.

Don't buy it if...

You want 4K picture
The MoGo 3 Pro only supports up to full HD 1080p, which does mean picture quality can diminish if you supersize your projected image

You like to game at odd angles
27ms of input lag with auto keystone turned off is pretty decent, but this does mean you have to have the projector set up to directly face your projection surface.

Also consider

Samsung The Freestyle 2nd Gen
It’s been mentioned throughout this review for good reason, Samsung’s portable projector looks incredibly similar and has a similar spec sheet. It fares better in the gaming arena, but its picture isn’t quite as bright. But it costs quite a bit more than the XGIMI, and rarely receives discounts.
Read our in-depth Samsung The Freestyle 2nd Gen review.

LG CineBeam Q
LG’s portable projector rocks a funky retro design and supports 4K content with HDR. Color performance is excellent and brightness levels are good for a portable model. It does cost a lot more, but you also get a lot more in return compared to the MoGo 3 Pro.
Read our full LG CineBeam Q review.

How I tested the Xgimi MoGo 3 Pro

  • I used the projector in a range of light conditions
  • Set it up inside and outside to test portability
  • Watched a variety of dark and bright content

I tested the XGIMI MoGo 3 Pro at home over a period of about a month so I could experience it during various daytime living conditions. This meant multiple light sources, be it natural daylight or overhead lightbulbs, came into my testing room, at which point I rated the picture to see how well it performed.

The projector was tested against a white wall for the duration of my review, but also on a dark grey wall outside to assess its portable credentials. Both performed well and I could see noticeable differences before and after calibration.

I used a variety of content, including HDR and SDR content from a variety of streaming services.

My testing evaluates the projector's performance against other reviews my colleagues at TechRadar have conducted. I have been writing about and reviewing displays for five years.

Read more about how we test

[First published January 2025]

« Previous Page — Next Page »