Computers - Organizer

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ review: a sleek business laptop with all-day battery life

7:12 am | March 18, 2026

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Two-minute review

The MSI Prestige 14 AI+ is a sleek business-focused laptop with a premium design that manages an interesting and useful mix of the features and performance you need, but skips a lot of the bloat.

As the name suggests, it’s a 14-inch laptop, and it’s aimed at users on the go who need a thin and light machine that still offers decent performance and battery life. The Prestige 14 measures in at 31.6 x 22.2 x 1.2 - 1.4cm (12.4 x 8.7 x 0.47 - 0.55 inches) and weighs 1.32kg (2.91 lbs) — an excellent size for portability without being too small. Compared to the non-Windows competition, it’s chunkier than a MacBook Air, but is slimmer and lighter than a MacBook Pro.

The Prestige 14 AI+ D3M configuration I tested uses the Intel Core Ultra 7 355 CPU with 32GB of onboard LPDDR5x memory and a 1TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD — a popular spec in laptops launched in 2026. You can also get the Prestige 14 AI+ in the same spec but with a 512GB SSD, or with a more powerful Intel Core Ultra X7 358H CPU.

While the Prestige 14 AI+ is a classic clamshell laptop, there’s also a similar 2-in-1 model. If that’s more your style, check out our MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ review.

On the left side, the Prestige 14 AI+ has two USB-C / Thunderbolt 4 ports (both supporting DisplayPort and 100W charging), plus an HDMI 2.1 output. The right side features dual USB-A ports and a 3.5mm headset jack.

The pair of Thunderbolt 4 ports makes it easy to connect the laptop up to a dock or monitor, and if also using HDMI, you can drive 3 external displays. I generally like having one USB-C port on each side, but the dual left ports plus HDMI setup does make it neat on a desk.

The 14-inch OLED display has a resolution of 1920 x 1200 (a pleasing 16:10 aspect ratio) with excellent 100% DCI-P3 color. MSI doesn't quote a specific NIT figure on the local spec sheet, but in use the glossy OLED panel is bright enough to overcome reflections in slightly glary office environments but struggles a little outdoors.

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ with screen folded back — The Prestige 14 AI+ screen can fold back through 180 degrees (Image credit: Future)

Handily, the screen folds back through a full 180 degrees, which is great for sharing content across a table or using the laptop in a vertical stand. The 1920 x 1200 resolution is perfectly fine at this size but not quite as sharp as I prefer and you will need to look at the larger 16-inch Prestige 16 AI+ if you want a higher res screen, like 2880x1800.

The IR FHD webcam gives decent quality video when well-lit and is still acceptable in tougher lower-light conditions. It supports facial recognition unlocks, plus has a physical shutter for privacy. Speaker quality is better than expected, though as is normal in a thin laptop, the sound gets a little muddy at higher volumes.

The backlit keyboard has deep key travel, very little bounce and no distracting light bleed from under the keys. The large touchpad is nice and accurate and supports gestures, though its non-haptic click mechanism has unusually deep travel, especially on right click, and can feel a little awkward at times.

The new Intel Series 3 Core Ultra 7 355 CPU is a good fit for this kind of thin-and-light machine. In daily use the Prestige 14 AI+ feels very responsive for typical office work, photo editing and even heavier multitasking. This is thanks in part to the snappy CPU, but also due to the 32GB of RAM and fast SSD. The integrated graphics are a step down from Intel Arc iGPUs but performance is plenty for accelerating lighter creative work and even some casual gaming.

The battery has an 81Wh capacity — decently large for this class of machine — and the laptop lasted an excellent 14 hours and 42 minutes unplugged when doing office tasks. Video playback is even better at 16 hours and 21 minutes in testing, meaning the Prestige will happily make it through a day unplugged.

All in all, the combination of snappy everyday performance and excellent battery life in a stylish portable laptop makes the MSI Prestige 14 AI+ easy to recommend.

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ close up of screen and keyboard — (Image credit: Future)

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Price & availability

How much does it cost? $1,699 / £1,449 / AU$2,599
When is it available? Available now
Where is it available? Available in the US, UK and Australia

The MSI Prestige 14 AI+ is very new, so at the time of writing availability is not yet widespread and in the US, only the Ultra X7 385H variant is for sale.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 355 variant tested costs around £1,449 in the UK and AU$2,599 in Australia, though some retailers already have it a little cheaper. You can also save a little by opting for the 512GB SSD spec.

The pricing places the MSI Prestige 14 AI+ firmly in premium ultrabook territory rather than the more budget-friendly business-laptop space, but the spec and features do help justify the higher asking price — especially as the latest generation of laptops has experienced noticeable price rises compared to 2025 models. Still, I hope to see the price come down over time to help keep it competitive.

The Intel Ultra X7 358H variant is also sold in Australia and the UK with up to a 2TB SSD and is only slightly more expensive — so it’s well worth checking out if you need more storage or higher performance.

Value score: 4 / 5

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ half closed on a coffee table — The Prestige 14 AI+ has a sleek and premium design (Image credit: Future)

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Specs

The Prestige 14 AI+ family includes several variants, but the configuration tested here is straightforward: an Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 32GB of onboard LPDDR5x memory, a 1TB SSD and a 14-inch 1920 x 1200 OLED display.

The other common option is a model with a more powerful Intel Core Ultra X7 358H CPU and up to a 2TB SSD.

	MSI Prestige 14 AI+ (as tested)	MSI Prestige 14 AI+ (top spec)
Price	£1,449 / AU$2,599	£1,549 / AU$2,799
CPU	Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 8 cores (4 P-cores + 4 Low Power E-cores), 8 threads, up to 4.7GHz, 12MB cache, up to 49 NPU TOPS	Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16 cores (4 P-cores + 8 E-cores + 4 Low Power E-cores), 16 threads, up to 4.8GHz, 18MB cache, up to 50 NPU TOPS
GPU	Intel Graphics	Intel Arc B390 GPU
Screen	14-inch, 16:10, 1920 x 1200, OLED, glossy, non-touch	14-inch, 16:10, 1920 x 1200, OLED, glossy, non-touch
RAM	32GB / 64GB LPDDR5x	32GB / 64GB LPDDR5x
Storage	512GB - 2TB NVMe SSD	Up to 2TB NVMe SSD
Ports	Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4 USB-C with DisplayPort and 100W charging, HDMI 2.1 Right side: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen2, 3.5mm headset jack	Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4 USB-C with DisplayPort and 100W charging, HDMI 2.1 Right side: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen2, 3.5mm headset jack
Wireless	Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1775, Bluetooth 6	Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1775, Bluetooth 6
Camera	IR FHD (1080p) webcam with HDR, 3DNR+, 3-mic array	IR FHD (1080p) webcam with HDR, 3DNR+, 3-mic array
Weight	1.32 kg (2.91 lbs)	1.32 kg (2.91 lbs)
Dimensions	31.6 x 22.2 x 1.2–1.4cm (12.4 x 8.7 x 0.47–0.55 inches)	31.6 x 22.2 x 1.2–1.4cm (12.4 x 8.7 x 0.47–0.55 inches)

Specs score: 4 / 5

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ close up of left side ports — On the left — dual USB-C Thunderbolt 4 and HDMI 2.1Future

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ close up of right hand side ports — On the left — dual USB-C Thunderbolt 4 and HDMI 2.1Future

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Design

180-degree fold-flat screen
Dual Thunderbolt 4
16:10 OLED display

The Prestige 14 AI+ looks and feels like a proper premium laptop compared to MSI's more budget-friendly office machines, and it has a sleek, understated design that easily rivals the best from other brands.

The Prestige 14 measures in at 31.6 x 22.2 x 1.2–1.4cm (12.4 x 8.7 x 0.47–0.55 inches), and its 1.32kg (2.91 lbs) weight makes it a very manageable laptop to carry around every day. The curved edges of the aluminum alloy design make it feel pleasantly slim in hand (or when slipping it into a bag) but it’s strong enough to use without any undue flexing.

The port fitout and left/right split is pretty standard on laptops these days and has everything needed for most users. It would be nice to see little extras like an SD card reader, or another USB-C port on the right, but that’s increasingly rare.

MSI says the laptop can be equipped with 64GB of RAM, but for now I have only seen 32GB variants for sale. The RAM is soldered so can’t be upgraded, but the SSD uses a M.2 slot so can be swapped out in the future if you need more space.

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ closed on a coffee table — Future

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ right hand side closed on a coffee table — Future

The keyboard is above average, with comfortable sizing (even for my large hands), deep travel and very little bounce during a vigorous deadline-induced writing session.

The trackpad is large and accurate to use and supports gestures like adjusting volume or brightness, and has a handy shortcut to the calculator and the MSI Center S management software. You do need to turn the gestures on manually and once you get used to them they work pretty well, and they aren't easy to accidentally trigger. You can also set up your own custom actions for gestures, like activating specific hotkeys or launching apps.

Overall I found the trackpad to be above average and my only complaint during my use was that right-clicking in the lower corner felt oddly deep, despite it working just fine.

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ trackpad close up — The right click on the touchpad works fine but has very deep travelFuture

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ close up of keyboard — The right click on the touchpad works fine but has very deep travelFuture

The 16:10 display gives that little bit of extra screen real estate that you only realize is so helpful if ever going back to a 16:9 laptop. The 1920 x 1200 resolution is lower than I usually like, but considering the 14-inch footprint, it's quite sharp and usable day to day. That’s helped by the OLED panel with an excellent 100% DCI-P3 color rating, and while there’s no listed brightness, it’s good enough even in bright office environments, but the glossy surface shows a lot of reflections if outdoors at a cafe.

If you want a higher resolution display, then look at the larger Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG lineup. The spec is very similar overall, but you get a 16-inch 2880x1800 OLED display and the price is only slightly higher. Or for touchscreen support, the Prestige 14 Flip machines offer a comparable laptop but with a 2-in-1 design.

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ open in a vertical stand — The fold back screen means the Prestige 14 works well in a vertical standFuture

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ screen folded back — The fold back screen means the Prestige 14 works well in a vertical standFuture

My favorite feature though is that the screen uses a hinge that allows it to fold back through 180 degrees. That is very useful for using the laptop in a vertical stand next to external monitors — in my testing I had it upright and flat next to dual vertically mounted 4K 27” panels, letting me use the laptop screen as an extra workspace for things like a Slack chat. The fold-back screen also makes it easy to share content across a table, and works well in one-on-one meetings.

The Prestige 14 AI+ includes an IR webcam and fingerprint reader, so secure logins are fast and easy. Many laptops only have one or the other, but having both means you can use whatever method you prefer, or turn off facial logins if needed without resorting to using a pin or password.

Design score: 4 / 5

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Performance

Great everyday performance
Very quiet in normal use
Fast 1TB SSD

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Benchmarks

Here's how the MSI Prestige 14 AI+ performed in the TechRadar suite of benchmark tests:

PCMark 10: 7,827

CrossMark: Overall 1,873

Geekbench 6 CPU: Single-core 2,745; Multi-core 11,494

Geekbench AI: Single precision 2,140; Half precision 1,083; Quantized 4,449

Cinebench 2024: CPU multi: 497 pts; CPU single: 109 pts

CrystalDiskMark: Read: 6,960.75 MB/s; Write: 6,334.84 MB/s

Blender Benchmark: Monster 63.35; Junkshop 39.15; Classroom 26.94

3DMark suite: Time Spy 3,296; Time Spy Extreme 1,511; Steel Nomad 616; Steel Nomad Light 2,496; Night Raid 28,914; Fire Strike 6,502; Fire Strike Ultra 1,597, Solar Bay 12,295; Solar Bay Extreme 1,792; Wild Life 21,587; Wild Life Extreme 5,729

Battery: Work battery 14 hours 42 minutes; Video battery 16 hours 21 minutes

The MSI Prestige 14 AI+ feels snappy in typical use, with top-notch single-core performance plus fast RAM and storage. The Intel Core Ultra 7 355 is aimed at being an efficient chip for thin and light laptops, so multicore performance is lower than you get with more powerful CPUs.

It’s still plenty for most tasks, but for anyone who runs more demanding apps, the Prestige 14 with the more powerful Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is well worth the slightly higher price. For most users though, the Ultra 7 355 is a good mix of performance and efficiency.

MSI has equipped the Prestige 14 with a very fast SSD that can approach the limits of the PCIe 4.0 interface. In my tests the drive managed 6,961 MB/s read and 6,335 MB/s writes in CrystalDiskMark, which helps ensure the laptop feels fast when launching apps and multitasking.

Of course, decent performance in a thin form factor means some fan noise is expected under heavy load. Like most laptops these days, MSI uses vapor chamber cooling and during normal office work the Prestige 14 AI+ is mostly inaudible, or very quiet when the fans do spool up a little.

It gets that characteristic laptop fan whine under heavy loads, but does ramp down quickly once the CPU isn’t working as hard. The chassis does get noticeably warm if you push the laptop for an extended period, but the keyboard, touchpad and underside never became uncomfortably hot in my testing.

Graphics performance is naturally limited by the integrated GPU, but it is still respectable for a thin business laptop. The Prestige 14 AI+ scored 3,296 in 3DMark Time Spy and 6,502 in Fire Strike, which is a bit less than last gen CPUs like the Intel Ultra 7 258V, but enough for lighter GPU work and some casual play with older or less demanding games.

If you need a laptop that can compete with low-end discrete graphics, then opting for the Prestige 14 with the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H CPU is a good call, as it has a much more powerful Intel Arc B390 iGPU, which offers over 50% higher performance.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 355 includes an NPU with up to 49 TOPs performance, but we are still in that awkward phase where it’s underutilized most of the time. Still, it’s only going to get more useful, and already offers advantages such as efficiently handling webcam backgrounds and video effects in otherwise notorious resource-hogging apps like Teams.

If your workload consists of typical office tasks — writing, handling spreadsheets, multitasking across apps, image editing and other general productivity, the Prestige 14 AI+ has more than enough performance.

If you need to handle more creator-style workloads, then it’s definitely worth looking at other models, such as the MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3M.

Performance score: 4 / 5

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ close up of included 65W charger next to laptop — The included 65W charger is fairly compact (Image credit: Future)

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Battery life

14 hours and 42 minutes work when unplugged
16 hours and 21 minutes of video playback

The Prestige 14 AI+ has an 81Wh battery — decently large considering the light weight and thin design meaning battery life is one of its key strengths. Connected to Wi-Fi, I managed 14 hours and 42 minutes of lighter office-style work (like writing reviews) on battery, which is more than enough to get through a long day.

If you add in some more demanding tasks like a lot of image editing, then battery life slips. But even then the CPU is efficient enough that you need to be working it pretty hard before you can’t make it through a day unplugged.

The Prestige 14 AI+ charges over USB-C using its included 65W adapter (though it supports 100W), and you can quickly add back 50% of charge in about 30 minutes, or be fully topped off in about 1.5 hours. The charger is not too bulky and you can change the AC end of the cable if going overseas.

For less demanding tasks such as video playback, the laptop lasts even longer. With Wi-Fi on and the screen at 50% brightness, it lasted 16 hours and 21 minutes.

Overall the Prestige 14 combines the large battery and efficient CPU well and is a solid choice if you need to get work done when on the go.

Battery life score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the MSI Prestige 14 AI+?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Value	Higher end pricing, but still competitive against alternative options.	4 / 5
Specs	Well-rounded for productivity, plugged in or on the go.	4 / 5
Design	Sleek and lightweight, but without any problematic compromises.	4 / 5
Performance	Quite good for a slim laptop, and it has a more powerful CPU option available	4 / 5
Battery	Excellent endurance overall and happily lasts a day unplugged	4.5 / 5
Overall	A polished productivity focused laptop with the features you need but no extra bloat	4 / 5

Buy it if...

You want long battery life
With 14 hours and 42 minutes of office productivity runtime, the Prestige 14 AI+ can comfortably get through a full workday when on the go.

You need a capable yet efficient travel workhorse
The Core Ultra 7 355, 32GB of RAM and fast SSD make it a good fit for multitasking, office work and lighter creative tasks.

You connect to external displays
Dual Thunderbolt 4 ports with DisplayPort, plus HDMI 2.1, make the Prestige 14 AI+ easy to slot into a multi-monitor setup

Don't buy it if...

You love a high resolution display
The 1920 x 1200 OLED panel looks pretty good in the 14-inch frame, but if you want 2880 x 1800 or better you need to look at other models.

You are fussy about touchpads
The touchpad is large and is accurate, but its deep physical click feels a touch awkward at times.

You want 64GB of RAM
At the time of writing the variants with more RAM are not yet available.

MSI Prestige 14 AI+: Also consider

If my MSI Prestige 14 AI+ review has you considering other options, here are three alternatives to consider...

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+
Want a more flexible take on the Prestige formula? The Prestige 14 Flip AI+ is a very similar laptop but uses a convertible 2-in-1 design and has a touchscreen and pen.

Check out our full MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ review

HP OmniBook 7 Aero
The OmniBook 7 Aero is a great option if you are after a low weight laptop, and it offers a good balance of performance and portability.

Check out our full HP OmniBook 7 Aero review

Acer TravelMate P6 14 AI
Another business laptop with portability in mind, the TravelMate P6 14 AI is worth a look for anyone on the go a lot.

Check out our full Acer TravelMate P6 14 AI laptop review

How I tested the MSI Prestige 14 AI+

I tested the MSI Prestige 14 AI+ for two weeks
I used it both at a desk and when working on the go
I tested it with benchmarking tools, battery testing and everyday workloads

I ran the MSI Prestige 14 AI+ through the usual comprehensive array of TechRadar benchmarks, as well as using it for actual day-to-day work.

I used it for office tasks, media playback, multitasking and general productivity work, while also checking battery life, thermals, noise and charging times.

Zygo Z2: One minute review

The Zygo Z2 are part of a very small world of headphones, namely bone conduction models made for being used in the water. Yet even in this small space, they are unique. They’re not the only swimming headphones that you should consider, but they are the only ones that use a radio transmitter for listening to music in the water. There's no onboard MP3 player, so they're the only pair that you don’t need to sit down with in front of your computer, to manually load the headphones with music before heading to the pool.

And while that’s the big selling point you’ll see when you come across them on their website or on Amazon, the Z2s also offer a deep ecosystem within the downloadable app including a whole assortment of classes, along with features like a walkie talkie and lap counting, hidden behind an additional but low subscription fee. This makes the Zygo Z2 function like a Peloton for the pool. I’m not sure I’ve seen anything like that before.

Of course, they do come at a hefty price (and that’s before the aforementioned subscription fee), and the sound quality is not going to compete with the best wireless earbuds. But that’s to be expected with headphones that first, use bone conduction, and second, use radio transmission.

If you have a smartphone (and I’m going to assume you do), you might be aware that phones connect to devices via WiFi, data, and Bluetooth, not radio waves (even if you’re streaming a radio station through your phone, it’s coming to you digitally). Because of that little omission, the Zygo Z2 needs more than just a pair of headphones to function.

Enter the biggest headphones charging case I’ve ever seen in my life. This big black square measures a little under seven inches across and under three inches deep. There’s a flip lid hiding the headphones and earplugs, as well as the USB-C charging port, LED indicator, and the power / connectivity button. Most unique here though is the shark fin on the back that needs to be flipped up during use, like an antenna. Without it, there are no radio waves.

The headphones inside have an IPX8 rating, use bone conduction for sound, and come in the same imposing matte black as the charging case. On the back of the headphones, the volume up (also power) and down sit on either side of the Zygo logo.

Be aware when ordering the Zygo Z2 that they come in two sizes: Standard and Large. If you go by the size guide and choose wisely, you’ll end up with a snug fit. They never fell off, adjusted, or really moved at all. And despite their tight fit, I found them comfortable to wear.

I can get up to three hours’ of battery life during use, which is a bit lower than the competition (but likely to be more than enough for a single session), though using a completely different technology (the radio transmission) might have something to do with that. The charging case does at least have seven charges in it, so its overall battery life (when including the charging case) is about the same as other bone conduction headphones that have a charging case, and far more than those that don’t. For reference, many of the better bone conduction headphones last around nine to ten hours.

I feel obligated to share our "how do bone conduction headphones work?" article as this type of sound reproduction is such a niche within headphones. They’re really only popular when searching specifically for the best waterproof headphones or best running headphones, with a possible exception for office work. In essence, they sit on the bones in front of your ear, circumventing the outer ear, which make them great for use in the water.

It’s also why the Zygo Z2 (and most other swim-focused headphones) come with a pair of earplugs. They, like the charging case and headphones, come in a fetching Darth Vader black. They’re necessary for hearing the headphones, allowing you to focus on the audio vibrating through your cheek bones (It’s less weird than it sounds).

If you’re wondering how “Eye of the Tiger” gets from your phone to your ears, it starts with a smartphone using the Zygo app, which is then paired to the charging case (a simple Bluetooth pairing process) in turn automatically connected to the headphones via radio waves. The Zygo app showcases the full breadth of the Z2’s features. I can use the app to communicate with someone else wearing the headphones. It is one-way though, so the wearer can’t talk back (only really useful if you have a swimming coach).

Zygo Z2 bone conduction swimming headphones — (Image credit: Future)

To use this feature, you need to get the five-dollar-a-month subscription, which also includes lap counting and a large assortment of on-demand classes consisting of audio workout guidance. Having listened to a few, I found them easy to follow and understand as well as well-paced. I think this ecosystem of classes are also what separates the Zygo Z2 from other swimming headphones.

Unfortunately, the audio quality leaves a bit to be desired. Now it’s not bad and having the audio coming through radio waves does provide a completely uninterrupted signal – something Bluetooth just can’t do in water.

When wearing the earplugs and submerged in water, the high end sounded clear with a good amount of detail and the mids were present, if a bit recessed. However, whether I’m listening to rock or hip hop (or anything really), the bass is just too quiet. It’s there, but quiet enough to really impact the listening experience. If you turn up the volume on a song with a lot of low end, the headphones also have a tendency to distort. However,the highs and mids sound pretty decent, especially underwater, so if you care less about the music and more about using it with a coach or with classes, then you’ll hear everything clearly.

Using the headphones to access the classes in the water is such a novel and helpful experience, even if it seems like someone would have done it by now, that the price and my issues with the audio quality feel unimportant, not to mention that the fact that you can stream whatever you want in real time (well, there’s a three second delay intentionally built in) instead of loading MP3’s in advance as needed with any other decent pair of swimming headphones.

Zygo Z2: Specifications

Drivers	Bone conduction
Active noise cancellation	No
Battery life	Up to 3 hours (21 with charging case)
Weight	57.7g (standard size)
Connectivity	Radio transmitter
Frequency range	150–20KHz
Waterproofing	IPX8
Other features	App (exercise programs, one-way walkie-talkie, lapt counting)

Zygo Z2: Price and availability

How much does it cost? $329 (about £250 / AU$480)
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US

While those abroad will have to find a way to smuggle the Zygo Z2 out of the US to get it, those in the US can get it directly from the company for $329 (about £250 / AU$480). If you’re in Alaska, Hawaii, or Puerto Rico, you’ll have to also cover the cost of shipping (listed at $40 at the time of writing). They’re not available outside the US right now.

That’s a pretty hefty price tag considering that both the Shokz OpenSwim Pro and the H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport cost much less, with the Shokz going for $179.95 / £169 / AU$299 and the H2O Audio going for $199.99 / £155.68 (about AU$310). Since those two headphones use built-in MP3 players for audio while in the water, they do sound a little better.

But that’s a little unfair to the Zygo Z2 as it offers a lot more than just a pair of headphones to use in the water. As I’ve mentioned, these are basically the Peloton of the pool. Yes, most of the features are locked behind a subscription, but that subscription is $4.99 a month for access to all the pool-focused exercises (including some weight training for the pool ones) as well as the walkie-talkie and lap counting features. No other swimming headphones do that, so the expense is worth it if you’re serious about swimming but want a little help.

Price: 4 / 5

Zygo Z2: Scorecard

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Value	The Zygo Z2 are expensive and have a lot of features locked behind a paywall. But these headphones also have a lot to offer.	4 / 5
Design	A tight fit and decent battery life (once you include all the additional charges of the charging case), along with a unique type of connectivity make these ideal for the pool.	4.5 / 5
Performance	While I wish there was more bass in terms of audio quality, it does sound clear. Plus, the app’s features from lap counting and the walkie talkie to all the classes really make set the Z2 apart.	4 / 5
Average rating	These swimming headphones are pricey, but the unique radio transmission and Peloton-like ecosystem make it an easy recommendation for swimmers looking to step up their game.	4 / 5

Zygo Z2: Should I buy?

Zygo swimming app — (Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

You want access to the Peloton of the Pool

Having all those classes at one’s fingertips is such a help for anyone serious (or wanting to get serious) about swimming, s, just like a Peloton is more than just an exercise bike.

You don’t want to deal with MP3s

In the age of streaming, it’s a pain loading MP3s as required with other swimming headphones. The Zygo Z2 skip all that with their ability to use radio transmission.

Don't buy it if...

Audio Quality is your number one concern

The lack of bass is unfortunate, but not surprising since radio waves tend to compress audio. Still, if you care most about audio quality and not so much about loading MP3s or the classes, there are other swimming headphones that sound a little better.

You’re on a budget

Not only are the headphones almost double the price of even other other premium swimming headphones, but a lot of the features are locked behind a (admittedly affordable) subscription.

Also consider

Shokz Openswim Pro

The Shokz Openswim Pro are waterproof with a comfortable and tight fit, and come with a good nine hours of battery life. Just be prepared to get some MP3s to put on it as you won’t be turning to Spotify while in the water.

Read our full Shokz Openswim Pro review

H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport

The H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport are not cheap (though they’re cheaper than the Z2), but they have a strong battery life, complete waterproofing, and onboard storage as well as a special Playlist+ feature that untethers you from your phone during a run or swim.

Read our full H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport review

How I tested the Zygo Z2

Tested over a couple weeks
Listened to different genres of music
Tested all the different features

I spent a couple weeks testing the Zygo Z2 including a couple laps in an Olympic size pool as well as just hanging out underwater to listen to them. While using them, I listened to all sorts of genres from electronic and hip-hop to rock and acoustic music to get an idea of how they sound. I also tested the various features, including the exercises and walkie-talkie.

After testing, it’s clear that these are ideal for serious swimmers, especially those who need a workout program to get the most out of their time in the pool. If you’re curious about how bone conduction headphones work, check out the linked article for more details on how headphones like these work.

I’ve spent the last few years reviewing audio equipment and have spent even longer using my critical ear as a listener and musician to understand what does and doesn’t sound good.

First reviewed December 2025

Zygo Z2 review: more than swimming headphones — they’re the Peloton of the pool

8:58 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Fitness Headphones Gadgets Health & Fitness | Comments: Off

Zygo Z2: One minute review

Zygo Z2: Specifications

Drivers	Bone conduction
Active noise cancellation	No
Battery life	Up to 3 hours (21 with charging case)
Weight	57.7g (standard size)
Connectivity	Radio transmitter
Frequency range	150–20KHz
Waterproofing	IPX8
Other features	App (exercise programs, one-way walkie-talkie, lapt counting)

Zygo Z2: Price and availability

How much does it cost? $329 (about £250 / AU$480)
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US

Price: 4 / 5

Zygo Z2: Scorecard

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Value	The Zygo Z2 are expensive and have a lot of features locked behind a paywall. But these headphones also have a lot to offer.	4 / 5
Design	A tight fit and decent battery life (once you include all the additional charges of the charging case), along with a unique type of connectivity make these ideal for the pool.	4.5 / 5
Performance	While I wish there was more bass in terms of audio quality, it does sound clear. Plus, the app’s features from lap counting and the walkie talkie to all the classes really make set the Z2 apart.	4 / 5
Average rating	These swimming headphones are pricey, but the unique radio transmission and Peloton-like ecosystem make it an easy recommendation for swimmers looking to step up their game.	4 / 5

Zygo Z2: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

You want access to the Peloton of the Pool

Having all those classes at one’s fingertips is such a help for anyone serious (or wanting to get serious) about swimming, s, just like a Peloton is more than just an exercise bike.

You don’t want to deal with MP3s

In the age of streaming, it’s a pain loading MP3s as required with other swimming headphones. The Zygo Z2 skip all that with their ability to use radio transmission.

Don't buy it if...

Audio Quality is your number one concern

You’re on a budget

Not only are the headphones almost double the price of even other other premium swimming headphones, but a lot of the features are locked behind a (admittedly affordable) subscription.

Also consider

Shokz Openswim Pro

Read our full Shokz Openswim Pro review

H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport

Read our full H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport review

How I tested the Zygo Z2

Tested over a couple weeks
Listened to different genres of music
Tested all the different features

I’ve spent the last few years reviewing audio equipment and have spent even longer using my critical ear as a listener and musician to understand what does and doesn’t sound good.

First reviewed December 2025

Immersive sound, awesome battery life, and karaoke functionality for good measure — Marshall just scored a second hit with its latest party speaker

4:41 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Wireless & Bluetooth Speakers | Tags: LG | Comments: Off

Marshall Bromley 450: two-minute review

The Marshall Bromley 450 is the second party speaker that the audio specialist has released. It’s a smaller variant of its older sibling, but aims to condense everything we like about that model into a less costly, more mobile unit. But just how well can it do that?

Well, at first glance, the similarities between the Marshall Bromley 450 and its sibling are striking. It has a very similar amp-inspired build, it's got those classic tactical knobs for controlling volume, bass, and treble levels, and it's adorned with the golden Marshall logo. But the similarities don’t stop there.

Its older sibling sits in our guide to the best Bluetooth speakers around, so unsurprisingly, the sound signature here is actually quite similar. You get agile and punchy, yet warm bass, which really feels like the star of the show. But you also get controller, expressive highs, paired with decently-detailed mids. Like the Marshall Bromley 750 before it, this is a great-sounding speaker, and has the raw power required to offer awesome audio outdoors as well as indoors.

My criticisms of the Bromley 450’s sound are very few and far between. It doesn’t offer the most rippling sub-bass, and I needed to adjust EQ now and then to get vocals to sound their best in particular tracks. But these are pretty minor qualms, and this is still an impressive performer — especially when you account for this model’s excellent soundstage, stereo sound capabilities, and ‘true’ 360-degree stereophonic sound tech.

Something else I highly rate is the Bromley 450’s design. Its premium construction — with faux-leather casing, a metal grille, and golden details — is as stunning as it was before. Meanwhile, the included handle makes it relatively easy to transport, even if this is a hefty model overall. The Bromley 750's wheels and suitcase-esque handle are gone here though, which makes this a little tougher to carry over longer distances.

Still, you get better protection against the elements compared to the Bromley 750, with this smaller alternative packing an IP55 rating. This means that the speaker is dust-protected, and can withstand multi-directional water jets, making it a good fit for outdoor use.

You will make a few sacrifices when choosing the Bromley 450 over Marshall’s larger party speaker, though. You get less power, and thus slightly less omnipresence through the deep bass registers — understandable given that the Bromley 450 covers a little less of the frequency range. But you also lose the sound character control feature, which enables you to find the right balance between ‘dynamic’ or ‘loud’ audio output.

But still, you do get quite strong functionality from the Bromley 450, all things considered. It has a whole host of connectivity options, including XLR/6.35mm slots for karaoke and instruments. It supports Auracast for multi-speaker pairing with another Bromley unit or other Marshall speakers — like the Marshall Middleton II or Marshall Kilburn III. And it has a replaceable battery which packs an incredible 40 hours of playtime, and can be used as a portable charger.

And if all of this wasn’t enough, you also get classy stage-inspired lighting, with three dynamic options for different vibes. You can also turn these off if you want to conserve more battery life.

If there’s one flaw that sticks out to me, it's the Marshall app. It feels underbaked, lacking EQ controls or the ability to adjust effects like delay and reverb. I wish you had more ways to remotely control this unit, especially if you’re further away from it and want to make a quick adjustment to the bass, for instance.

But overall, there’s a whole lot to love about the Marshall Bromley 450. It does a great job at shrinking the 750’s talents down and replicating them, and it's a luxurious party speaker in just about every way imaginable.

Yes, it comes at quite the cost, and those on a tighter budget may favor a rival from the JBL PartyBox line. But the Marshall Bromley 450 is almost a different proposition entirely — it’s masterfully constructed, built to be a true centerpiece, and brings an air of retro-style classiness that its RGB-laden contemporaries fail to deliver.

Knobs on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: price and release date

List price of $799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079
Available now via the Marshall website
And available from other select retailers from March 31, 2026

The Marshall Bromley 450 launched in March 2026 for $799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079. It’s available now via Marshall’s digital store, but select retailers will also begin to sell the speaker from March 31, 2026. It’s available in a single colorway — Black & Brass.

The Bromley 450 is the younger sibling of the Marshall Bromley 750 — Marshall’s first party speaker which is larger, more powerful, and in turn, a lot pricier. The Bromley 750 comes in at $1,299 / £899 / AU$1,799, placing it in competition with speakers such as the JBL PartyBox 720.

Marshall Bromley 450 review: specs

Weight	26.9lbs / 12.2kg
Dimensions	19.4 x 14.2 x 10.3 inches / 492 x 359.9 x 260.9mm
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm, USB-C, RCA, 2x XLR/6.35mm combo jacks
Battery life	40 hours
Speaker drivers	2x 6.5-inch 40W woofers, 4x 2-inch 6W full-ranges
Waterproofing	IP55

Ports on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: features

Excellent connectivity options, including XLR/6.35mm slots for karaoke / instruments
Phenomenal 40-hour battery life
Sound character control left out, app is underwhelming

The Marshall Bromley 450 follows in its larger sibling’s footsteps with an incredibly similar feature suite. So that means you’re getting the basics, like multi-point connectivity, fast-pairing, and companion app support, although there’s a decent amount more to uncover.

First of all, this thing has a whole host of connectivity options. You’ve got Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm wired, USB-C, and even RCA inputs. If you’d like to use this unit as a karaoke machine, then no problem either. There are two XLR / 6.35mm combo jacks on the top side of the speaker, which you can use. Again, there are effects you can add, including reverb and delay if you wanna spice things up a bit.

Another thing I love about the Marshall Bromley 450 is its battery life. 40 hours of playtime is absolutely fantastic for a speaker of this size, blowing most of the competition out of the water. But there’s more. This is actually the same battery used on the Marshall Bromley 750, meaning you can interchange them if you own both units. This also highlights Marshall’s heightened efforts in the sustainability field again — it's issuing components that can be used across multiple units, and are fully replaceable.

The battery can also be used as a power bank to charge up external devices, such as the best wireless earbuds and best noise-cancelling headphones.

One more feature I appreciated on the Marshall Bromley 450 was its Auracast capabilities. Although more traditional multi-speaker pairing is not available, you can connect a bunch of compatible Marshall devices together using Auracast for even more powerful and immersive sound. I tried linking the Bromley 450 up with the Marshall Kilburn III and it worked without a hitch. I also tried linking it with a second Bromley 450 unit — something I’ll discuss at length in the ‘Sound quality’ section.

This is all great stuff so far, but I do have a few qualms with the Bromley 450’s feature-set. First of all, I have to say that the Marshall companion app feels a bit bare. Although there are some neat physical EQ options on the speaker itself — which let you adjust bass and treble levels — there’s no way of altering this remotely. The same goes for the reverb and delay effects.

Yes, the app provides a way to tap into Auracast broadcasts, and some simple customization options for the ‘M’ button, but that’s about it. Given that Marshall has rolled out a more complete app for its home theater tech — like the Marshall Heston 120 and Heston 60 — I’d expect a few more controls for the Bromley 450.

On top of this, it was a bit of a shame to see the sound character controls from the Bromley 750 get dropped on this new model. This worked really well on that model, and enabled listeners to tailor audio towards a ‘dynamic’ or ‘loud’ style. I get it, this is a smaller, cheaper model, but it would’ve been nice to see again here.

But I want to be clear: the Marshall Bromley 450 still has a very capable set of features. I haven’t even mentioned my favorite yet, the integrated stage lights. There are three presets: the first is ambient, suited to an occasion like a dinner party or solo listening session; the second is representative of actual stage lights, with bold and dynamic patterns that sync to your music; and the final preset is high-energy and flashy, intended to create more of a party atmosphere.

All of the presets work well, and the white lighting is tasteful and classy — something that I can’t say about the swathe of party speakers with loud RGB lighting. The second is my favorite, simply for its authenticity and dynamism, but I was glad to see an option to disable lights for the moments where you want to conserve battery life.

Features score: 4/5

Person taking battery out of the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: sound quality

Energetic sound that rocks indoor and outdoor spaces
Excellent soundstage and no real sweet spot
Powerful bass overall, although the darkest depths could hit harder

I was a big fan of how the Marshall Bromley 750 sounded, so I had pretty high hopes for its lil’ bro. But did it deliver? Yes, yes it did.

Let me begin by stating the obvious: this is a seriously powerful model. The Bromley 450 harnesses the power of two 6.5-inch 40W woofers, four 2-inch 6W full-ranges, and a couple of passive radiators to make that bass feel even heftier. The result is powerful, regimented sound that travels brilliantly, no matter whether you’re listening indoors or outdoors.

When tuning into Timeless by Shinchiro Yokota, I was wowed by the impact of mid-bass, as well as the snappiness of higher-pitched percussion. The speaker’s sense of rhythm and handling of dynamics also remained impressive, whether I was listening at low volumes or cranking things up towards max loudness.

In Morning Wonders – Leo Pol Remix by Kolter, a track with pretty aggressive drums in the treble range, the Bromley 450 replicated highs with confidence. There was a snappy responsiveness and satisfying tone to percussion, even while the tune’s intent-filled bass consumed our music testing space.

As the Bromley 750’s smaller sibling, you are of course going to make a few sacrifices in terms of sound. Most noticeably, the Bromley 450 is less powerful — but it's also less adept at handling the darkest sounds in the frequency range. For instance, tracks with rippling low bass, like Max Dean’s Fascinator, didn’t quite have that full-sounding rumble that mightier models can muster. Sub-bass is audible in tracks, don't get me wrong, and the Bromley 450 can still reach down to a solid 42Hz, just don’t expect the most palpable deep bass ever.

One minor thing I noticed is that there’s also a bit of compression at absolute peak volumes. This is pretty common for Bluetooth speakers, but the Bromley 750 barely showed any hints of compression — in part thanks to its sound character control function, which helped the speaker sound ultra-clean in ‘Dynamic’ mode.

My complaints run out there though. Sure, vocals could sound a little subdued at times when I listened to voice-led tunes indoors. But two things: the onboard EQ options totally solved this issue — I just had to turn the bass down two notches; and this speaker is designed for parties rather than the most detailed, high-fidelity listening.

Overall, the Marshall Bromley 450 is a very strong performer in the audio department. Its punchy bass, direct-sound, and vibrant treble are great of course. But the inclusion of Marshall’s 360-degree ‘true stereophonic’ audio tech also helps this unit to stand out among the crowd.

This thing genuinely sounds awesome from every angle. It doesn’t matter if you’re in front, behind, near, or far away from the speaker, it doesn’t have any real acoustic sweet spot. This tech impressed me on smaller speakers like the Marshall Kilburn III, but it was even more striking on a hulking model like the Bromley 450.

In a product briefing, Marshall also explained how the speaker’s full-range drivers are mounted on the four sides of the speaker (two on the left, two on the right) which keeps stereo channels well separated for a more immersive listening experience.

One more note on sound: this thing can reach new heights if you pair it with a second unit via Auracast. I was lucky enough to be testing the Bromley 450 at the same time as my Future colleague, Nikita, and we decided to combine our two units outside, via an Auracast broadcast from my phone. And the results were exceptional.

In Felini by Venerus and Marco Castello, I was astonished by how absorbing the trickle of flowing waters and strumming of natural acoustic guitars sounded. It really felt as if I was standing front and center at a gig. And with deeper tracks like Chris Stussy’s Breather, I was enveloped in pumping, euphoric bass. Of course, you’ll get awesome power with multiple units as well — when positioning the speaker on the far side of a parking lot, I could still hear that rich bass from the other side. Impressive stuff.

Sound quality score: 4.5/5

Knobs being turned on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: design

Classy Marshall aesthetic is as satisfying as ever
Tasteful lights and premium physical controls
Very hefty, and the wheels are no more

Every time that I review a Marshall product, I feel like I’m repeating myself. But that’s simply because I’m always full of praise for the captivating retro-style design that the company brings to each and every product. And the Marshall Bromley 450 is no different.

Everything from the faux-leather casing, through to its metal grille and golden details is a joy to behold — just as it was on the Bromley 750. This is a pricey model, but you do feel like the luxurious looks, high quality materials, and tasteful stage lights help to make your investment feel worthwhile.

The golden control panel on top of the speaker is also laid out beautifully, and is incredibly easy to use. Red LEDs symbolize which connectivity option you’re using, and tactical knobs are available to alter volume, bass and treble levels, and more. The mic and instrument ports are also located on top of the speaker this time, making it even easier to get a guitar performance or karaoke session underway.

Something that Marshall Bromley 450 actually improves on compared to its pricier sibling is its protection against the elements. You’re getting an IP55 rating here, which means that the speaker is dust-protected, and can withstand multi-directional water jets. In practice, this essentially means that the Bromley 450 is perfect for taking into outdoor spaces, and will be able to handle a spot of rain without issue. As the Bromley 450 is smaller than its older sibling, and easier to take outdoors, this feels like a very smart design decision indeed.

But what else is different from the Bromley 750? Well, the most noticeable difference is the removal of wheels. Yep, this is a wheelless Party Speaker, and you’ll have to lug it around using the handle on the side of the unit. Now don’t get me wrong: the handle is well-made, but if you’re transporting this thing over long distances, a word of warning.

This speaker is honestly pretty hefty, coming in at 26.9lbs / 12.2kg. Sure, the 750 was essentially double the weight, but its suitcase-style handle and wheels made it fairly painless to lug about. If you’re keeping your speaker in one place, or only moving it over short distances, the handle will certainly suffice, but its weight is worth keeping in mind.

Design score: 4.5/5

Person holding handle on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: value

It’s by no means cheap
But quality is undeniably high, even compared to rivals
Repairability makes the speaker feel like a worthwhile investment

Let’s not beat around the bush here. The Marshall Bromley 450 is an expensive model, even when you consider its output power and sonic talents. But a high price doesn’t mean a speaker can’t be good value for money.

And I do think you get bang for your buck overall with this model. At $799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079, the Bromley 450 is costlier than similarly powered rivals, like the JBL PartyBox Stage 320, for instance. But, in turn, you’re getting considerably better battery life, improved dust and waterproofing, a more luxurious build, and a larger array of speaker drivers.

Is that going to be worth it? It depends. For some, the lower price and specs of the JBL speaker will be plenty good enough. But if you’re looking for a premium quality, long-lasting option, then the Marshall may be more attractive.

On top of this, the Bromley 450 is repairable, with Marshall offering maintenance and parts via its website. That helps the speaker to feel like a worthwhile investment for years to come rather than a short-term audio solution.

Value score: 4/5

Reverse side of the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Marshall Bromley 450?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Brilliant battery life, connectivity options, and stage lights – but the companion app is underequipped.	4/5
Sound quality	Powerful, spacious sound, with no real drop off in listening angles, deep bass could be a little more full sounding.	4.5/5
Design	Stellar, luxurious looks with IP55 dust and waterproofing, but pretty hefty and no wheels this time.	4.5/5
Value	It’s pricey, but you get a luxury build and great sound, with top-tier battery life.	4/5

Buy it if...

You enjoy hosting parties
If you regularly host parties or gatherings, the Marshall Bromley 450 is the ideal speaker. It has great sound that can handle intimate indoor occasions or high-energy outdoor events, different light settings for different moods, ports if you want to hook up guitars or mics, and waterproofing for outdoor use.

You want a speaker that oozes style
The Bromley 450 is truly luxurious looking, and I love its combination of faux-leather casing, golden details, and a premium metal grille. It's far sleeker and sexier than the JBL PartyBox line, and makes your investment feel even more worthwhile.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget
If you want the most cost-efficient option, the Marshall Bromley 450 isn’t going to be your best bet. Yes, it offers a good bang for your buck with great build quality and sound, but that doesn’t change the fact it’s pricey. The aforementioned JBL speakers can deliver powerful audio for less, and if you don’t need earth-shaking sound, you could even consider the LG option I’ve listed in the ‘Also consider’ section.

You want the most powerful sound around
Yes, the Bromley 450 is mighty, and it will have more than enough power for small-to-medium-sized parties and gatherings. But if you’re hosting a larger event, it might be worth checking out the larger Marshall Bromley 750, or a speaker with higher peak volume and stronger deep bass replication.

Marshall Bromley 450 review: also consider

	Marshall Bromley 450	JBL PartyBox Stage 320	LG xboom Stage 301
Price	$799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079	$629.95 / £449.99 / AU$749.95	$299.99 / £299.99 / AU$449
Weight	26.9lbs / 12.2kg	36.4lbs / 16.5kg	14.7lbs / 6.7kg
Dimensions	19.4 x 14.2 x 10.3 inches / 492 x 359.9 x 260.9mm	13.3 x 26.3 x 15.2 inches / 335 x 670 x 385mm	12.3 x 12.2 x 11.1 inches / 312 x 311 x 282mm
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm, USB-C, RCA, 2x XLR / 6.35mm combo jacks	Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm, 2x XLR / 6.35mm combo jacks	Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm, 6.3mm (mic/guitar) USB (MP3 playback)
Battery life	40 hours	18 hours	12 hours
Speaker drivers	2x 6.5-inch 40W woofers, 4x 2-inch 6W full-ranges, 2x passive radiators	2 x 6.5-inch woofers, 2 x 1-inch dome tweeters	2x 2.5-inch mid-range drivers; 1x 6.5-inch woofer
Waterproofing	IP55	IPX4	IPX4

JBL PartyBox Stage 320
Marshall is gunning for JBL with its move into party speakers, and perhaps the most comparable model to the Bromley 450 is the PartyBox Stage 320. This unit is a little cheaper than its Marshall rival, but it isn’t as well-protected against the elements, has a shorter battery life, and has a less comprehensive set of drivers. I’m yet to test this one, so I can’t speak to its sound quality, but with flashy RGB lights and plenty of connectivity options, it’s certainly ready to party.

LG xboom Stage 301
This one’s a little different, but it’s still great for smaller parties or gatherings. The LG xboom Stage 301 is a wedge-shaped stage-style speaker that’s packed with fun features, clean audio, and flashy lighting. It’s not as powerful or luxurious looking as Marshall’s speaker, sure, but it’s considerably cheaper, and still has a bunch of connectivity options — including support for mics and guitars. Read my full LG xboom Stage 301 review.

How I tested the Marshall Bromley 450

Battery of the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Spent hours listening to music both indoors and outdoors
Used alone and while paired with a second unit via Auracast
Predominantly tested using Tidal

I spent hours listening to music on the Marshall Bromley 450, during which time I exhausted its various features and tried it both indoors and outdoors.

When listening to tunes, I made sure to try out a wide variety of genres, and run through tracks in the TechRadar testing playlist. For the most part, I used Tidal to blast my tunes, but I also dipped into Spotify now and then. I used the Bromley 450 on its own to begin with, but I also had the opportunity to pair it with a second unit, and connected the two together via Auracast.

More generally, I’m an experienced audio gear reviewer, and have spent the last two years testing everything from premium headphones — like the Sony WH-1000XM6 — through to some of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars, including the LG Sound Suite Immersive Suite 7 Pro. I also reviewed the Marshall Bromley 750 myself, so I’m intimately familiar with Marshall’s quality in the party speaker domain.

First reviewed: March 2026
Read more about how we test

My testing of the Oukitel WP61 Plus revealed that while it’s not a daily driver, this rugged walkie-talkie phone could be perfect for operating off-grid

2:05 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Phone & Communications Pro | Tags: CPU, GPU, RAM, SIM | Comments: Off

Oukitel WP61 Plus: 30-second review

Unveiled at IFA 2025 in Berlin, the Oukitel WP61 Plus is the brand's flagship all-in-one rugged smartphone, featuring a 20,000 mAh battery, an integrated 2W DMR walkie-talkie, and a high-powered camping flashlight.

But what is likely to confuse people is that the WP60 and WP62 have been available for some time, but Oukitel held the WP61 Plus back.

Built for outdoor professionals, search-and-rescue workers, or those who routinely find themselves in the great outdoors, the WP61 Plus is entering a highly competitive market.

There are four versions of the WP61 that all share the same SoC, memory, and storage model but differ in the special features included. There is a base model, the Plus model reviewed here, that has a 2W DMR walkie-talkie, the WP61 Ultra with thermal imaging, and the WP61 Ti with NTN Skylo Satellite communications.

All of them use the Dimensity 7025 processor, have 12GB of RAM, 512GB of storage and the same 108MP primary camera.

The large 6.8-inch FHD+ display runs at 120Hz, which is a welcome touch for a rugged device, and Android 16 puts it on the cutting edge for that platform

Where the WP61 Plus truly distinguishes itself, however, is in its extended utility features. The built-in DMR (Digital Mobile Radio) walkie-talkie operates at 2W and is designed to maintain group communications in areas where cellular coverage fails.

Oukitel quotes a range of 5.5km (3.4 miles) for DMR communications, but this will work without any cell service.

Combined with the camping light and the ability to act as a power bank for smaller devices, this phone is positioned less as a smartphone and more as a portable field communications and survival tool.

The only significant downside of this design is its physical scale; at over 650g, this isn’t a small or lightweight design, and with the walkie-talkie antenna attached, it becomes even more unwieldy.

The WP61 Plus might not break into our best rugged smartphone selection, but if you are looking for a general-purpose rugged phone for an adventure trek, then it could be an option.

Oukitel WP61 Plus Rugged Smartphone — (Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Oukitel WP61 Plus: price and availability

How much does it cost? $370/£280/€323
When is it out? Available soon
Where can you get it? You can get it directly from Oukitel or via online retailers such as Amazon.

Direct from Oukitel, the asking price for the WP61 Plus is $369.99/£279.99/€322.68, which is a good deal if you accept the view that this is a discount from $499.99/£378.37/€436.06, a price at which this product has never been sold.

You read that correctly. At the time of writing, while Oukitel are promoting this product, it remains out of stock. Also, it’s not available via online retailers, but that’s probably right around the corner.

The Plus model is $50 more than the base model, but $60 less than the Ultra option. There is no price yet for the Satellite model.

There are lots of phones that use the same or similar SoCs, like the Blackview Oscal Tank 1, RugOne Xever 7 Pro, Doogee S200 and Oukitel WP300. All these are cheaper, but lack the DMR walkie-talkie technology.

Blackview has the Xplore 1 Walkie Talkie that sells for €383.95 direct from the makers, a good amount more than the WP61 Plus.

The Unihertz Atom XL is a much smaller phone with the same DMR technology, priced at $289.99 at the official Unihertz outlet. However, I’d avoid this phone because there are no US or Global models.

A better choice is the Armour 26 Ultra Walkie-Talkie, but its base price is $649.99, making it substantially more expensive.

For a DMR-capable phone, the WP61 Plus is reasonably priced, though it might seem a little expensive for the platform specification.

Value score: 4/5

Oukitel WP61 Plus: Specs

Item	Spec
CPU:	MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)
GPU:	IMG BXM-8-256
NPU:	MediaTek's APU 780
RAM:	12GB
Storage:	512GB
Screen:	6.8-inch FHD+ LCD
Resolution:	1080 x 2460 pixels 650nits
SIM:	2x Nano SIM + TF (one shared position)
Weight:	651.6 grams
Dimensions:	179.5 x 85 x 27.5 mm
Rugged Spec:	IP68 IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes), MIL-STD-810H Certification
Rear cameras:	108MP Camera + 8MP Night vision +2MP macro
Front camera:	32MP Sony IMX616
Networking:	5G bands, WiFi 5, Bluetooth 5.2
Audio:	130 dB 5W speaker
OS:	Android 16
Battery:	20000 mAh (45W wired, 5W reverse charge)
Colours:	Black

Item

Spec

CPU:

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)

GPU:

IMG BXM-8-256

NPU:

MediaTek's APU 780

RAM:

12GB

Storage:

512GB

Screen:

6.8-inch FHD+ LCD

Resolution:

1080 x 2460 pixels 650nits

SIM:

2x Nano SIM + TF (one shared position)

Weight:

651.6 grams

Dimensions:

179.5 x 85 x 27.5 mm

Rugged Spec:

IP68 IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes), MIL-STD-810H Certification

Rear cameras:

108MP Camera + 8MP Night vision +2MP macro

Front camera:

32MP Sony IMX616

Networking:

5G bands, WiFi 5, Bluetooth 5.2

Audio:

130 dB 5W speaker

OS:

Android 16

Battery:

20000 mAh (45W wired, 5W reverse charge)

Colours:

Black

Oukitel WP61 Plus: design

Built for the field, not the pocket
DMR Antenna
Standard layout

The WP61 Plus makes no apologies for its bulk. At 179.5 x 85 x 27.5 mm, it is a substantial device, and one that is clearly engineered to accommodate its enormous 20,000mAh battery alongside the walkie-talkie antenna hardware and camping light module. The extra 27.5 mm of depth alone sets it apart as a very different prospect from a standard smartphone, and not one you can easily fit in a pocket.

What can make this design even more challenging to store is that in the box is a 92mm antenna for the DMR walkie-talkie that screws into the top right of the phone. You can choose not to attach that, but I presume that will impact the ability to communicate using that functionality.

The Oukitel WP series devices have traditionally used a combination of reinforced polycarbonate and aluminium alloy framing, and the WP61 doesn’t deviate from that, making it a device that can withstand heavy abuse.

The device supports a 'seat charger', a docking cradle that allows the phone to be mounted and charged in a fixed location, such as a vehicle dashboard or on a desk. This is a thoughtful addition for fleet operators or those who need their device always charged and ready. The dock isn’t included as standard, and its arrival date and price haven't been released yet.

In terms of the general aesthetics and layout, there isn’t anything especially surprising about the WP61 Plus. The button arrangement is the one most rugged phones use, with the power (doubling as a fingerprint reader) and volume buttons on the right, the custom button on the left, where the SIM tray is also placed.

The buttons are all metal, and the sides of the chassis are all machined aluminium, making this phone feel both comfortable to hold and seemingly indestructible.

Both the top and bottom edges feature a waterproof plug: one for the antenna on the top and another covering the USB port on the bottom. Both of these are held in place with screws, suggesting they could be replaced when they wear out if Oukitel makes replacements available.

To avoid wearing out the USB-C cover, the dock has four metal contact points on its bottom face, allowing it to be charged without inserting a cable.

The rear has three noticeable features: a camping light, a 5W speaker, and the camera cluster. The 1200-lumen camping light is obscured by a reference sticker that contains important information you don’t want to misplace by peeling it off and throwing it away, annoyingly.

According to Oukitel, the speaker is rated at 130 dB, which would undoubtedly damage your hearing if you held it against your ear while it was making noise. The top-centre placement of that speaker also pushes the three rear camera lenses to the phone's outer edge, which isn’t ideal.

While I’ve seen worse, the WP61 Plus seems to try to be many things at once and has slightly compromised some of its features in the process.

Design score: 3.5/5

Oukitel WP61 Plus: hardware

MediaTek Dimensity 7025
20000 mAh battery
Walkie-talkie

This is the third phone I’ve covered that uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, and I haven’t changed my opinion of it.

Instead of this being a new and exciting SoC, it’s a renaming of the older Dimensity 930, a chip from May 2022. If you research this silicon, you will find that the Dimensity 7025 was launched in 2024, but the underlying chip is at least two years older.

That explains why all the 70XX SoCs are made using a 6nm process, whereas all the 73XX and 74XX chips use the new and superior 4nm process.

Ironically, that’s not the biggest issue with this platform, since, as SoCs go, the Dimensity 7025 is an effective power-efficient system that delivers a good user experience for the most part.

A bigger problem is that the CPU is coupled with the IMG BXM-8-256 GPU, one of those PowerVR IMG designs that is poor by modern standards. It drives the Android 16 interface reasonably, but it's not a game-friendly GPU. Critically, it lacks some of the OpenGL and Vulkan functionality that interactive graphics apps often use.

For the WP61 Plus's intended use cases, it is a sensible and efficient choice, but more modern MediaTek designs, such as the Dimensity 7300 and 7400, offer far more potential.

In large, rugged phones, a 20000 mAh battery isn’t exceptional, but this device helps because it supports a 45W charger, which is included. That enables the phone to charge from zero to full capacity in about four hours, and get more than half of a charge in ninety minutes.

This is dramatically better than the WP60 offered with the same battery capacity, as that phone could only charge at 33W. Though, as I recall, the WP60 did reverse charge at 7W, where the WP61 Plus only puts out 5W.

You can get a similar platform and battery in a wide range of rugged phones, but the final feature I’ll talk about here is something that is in relatively few: a DMR (Digital Mobile Radio) walkie-talkie.

The radio in the WP61 Plus transmits at 2W, which is a meaningful output for direct device-to-device communication. DMR is a professional-grade digital radio standard, typically used in construction, security, and emergency services, making this a genuine productivity tool rather than a novelty. And, the hardware here can also work with Analogue technologies, alongside DMR-capable handsets.

As I only have one WP61 Plus, I wasn’t able to test the assertion that communication of over 5.5km was possible, but the technology is capable of that, so I don’t doubt it could work at that range in theory. The beauty of this technology is that it doesn't rely on any other infrastructure to operate, though the practical range may be limited by terrain.

For those working together off the grid or at a building site, the range seems enough to be practical, even if it won’t work if you travel beyond the potential range, or put a mountain between those talking.

The custom button opens the DMR app to initiate a call, and you can select a channel to communicate over. While you can add custom channels, the app includes the standard DMR-approved channels for a range of countries, including Europe, the USA, Australia, and Taiwan. Iran, Korea, Malaysia, Russia, Japan and China.

As a matter of interest, I researched the DMR frequencies for various countries, and discovered that for some, like India, for higher power transmitters like this one, using 5W and with better range, a WPC license is required. So if you are not in any of the countries I previously listed, it might be worth researching which DMR channels you can use and any other clearances required before purchasing.

Even with those potential caveats, the DMR part of this device is undoubtedly the best aspect, should you have more than one of these or other DMR handsets to hand.

Hardware score: 4/5

Oukitel WP61 Plus: cameras

108MP, 8MP night vision and 2MP Macro on the rear
32MP on the front
Four cameras in total

The Oukitel WP61 Plus has four cameras:

Rear camera: 108MP Samsung ISOCELL HM6 (S5KHM6), 8MP SK Hynix Hi-846 night vision IR sensor, 2MP BYD BF2257CS Macro
Front camera: 32MP Sony IMX616 Sensor

Oddly, this camera arrangement is remarkably similar to a range of phones I’ve recently reviewed, except that many of them use a GalaxyCore sensor for the 2MP macro function, whereas the WP61 Plus uses the BYD BF2257CS for the same job.

The combination of the 108MP Samsung ISOCELL HM6 (S5KHM6) and the 8MP SK Hynix Hi-846 night-vision IR sensor was seen on the Oukitel WP60 Pro. But that phone didn’t use the Sony IMX616 front-facing sensor, and it used a GalaxyCore GC02M1 for the Macro.

The Sony IMX616 is better than the 32MP GalaxyCore GC32E1, but the 2MP Macro sensors don’t make a huge difference to the close-up shooting you can do.

The weakness of this layout is that the 108MP Samsung ISOCELL HM6 (S5KHM6) is used to avoid the need for zoom optics by providing a high-resolution sensor that can be cropped or pixel-binned. It offers a range of zoom settings from 1.0x to 4.0x. But it’s still not as good as having actual zoom optics, as the zoom jumps between settings, and the results for some digital zoom factors are better than for others.

The SK Hynix Hi-846 night vision sensor delivers impressive results in complete darkness, although it captures only in monochrome. And the Macro sensor is exceptionally grainy and requires excessive amounts of light to produce passable results.

Probably the biggest disappointment of this camera is that the primary Samsung ISOCELL has a resolution of 108MP, and you can shoot at that full resolution, but incredibly, the best video resolution available is only 1440p. That this phone, with a 108MP sensor, can’t offer 4K video is embarrassing.

The hardware is rated for 8K at 24 frames per second (fps) and 4K at 120fps, so the video resolution is down to the choices Oukitel made about the SoC and the Android camera application.

This camera can take some excellent still images, but if I were to drag a phone this big and heavy about the wilderness, I would at least expect it to shoot 4K video.

Oukitel WP61 Plus Camera samples

Oukitel WP61 Plus camera examples — Mark Pickavance

Camera score: 3/5

Oukitel WP61 Plus: performance

Older 6nm SoC
GPU issues with OpenGL 3.1 and Vulkan 1.3
Great battery life

Phone		Oukitel WP61 Plus	Blackview Oscal Tank 1
SoC		MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 7050
GPU		IMG BXM-8-256	Mali‑G68 MC4
NPU		MediaTek's APU 780	MediaTek NPU 550
Memory		12GB/512GB	12GB/256GB
Weight		656g	640g
Battery		20000	20000
Geekbench	Single	959	920
	Multi	2362	2466
	OpenCL	failed	2471
	Vulkan	failed	3036
PCMark	3.0 Score	13080	11684
	Battery	40h 9m Est.	33h 57m Est.
Charge 30	%	28	13
Passmark	Score	6620	6861
	CPU	5284	5285
3DMark	Slingshot OGL	3741	5293
	Slingshot Ex. OGL	3738	4150
	Slingshot Ex. Vulkan	2614	3940
	Wildlife	Failed	2232
	Nomad Lite	Failed	266

Phone

Oukitel WP61 Plus

Blackview Oscal Tank 1

SoC

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

GPU

IMG BXM-8-256

Mali‑G68 MC4

NPU

MediaTek's APU 780

MediaTek NPU 550

Memory

12GB/512GB

12GB/256GB

Weight

656g

640g

Battery

20000

Geekbench

Single

959

920

Multi

2362

2466

OpenCL

failed

2471

Vulkan

failed

3036

PCMark

3.0 Score

13080

11684

Battery

40h 9m Est.

33h 57m Est.

Charge 30

Passmark

Score

6620

6861

CPU

5284

5285

3DMark

Slingshot OGL

3741

5293

Slingshot Ex. OGL

3738

4150

Slingshot Ex. Vulkan

2614

3940

Wildlife

Failed

2232

Nomad Lite

Failed

266

Rather than putting the WP61 Plus against another phone with the same SoC, I thought it might be appropriate to compare it with a marginally better chip, so I chose the Blackview Oscal Tank 1. It uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7050, slightly better than the 7025.

Both of these phones have the same battery capacity and RAM, which makes them closer to each other than many other rugged phones. size

What these results show is that the Dimensity 7025 is modestly slower than the 7050 used in the Tank 1, until you test it with a graphics benchmark. The IMG BXM-8-256 GPU can’t run the OpenGL and Vulkan APIs used by GeekBench and is required for 3DMark Wildlife and Nomad Lite.

But the upside of poor GPU performance is that the battery lasts much longer, with the WP61 Plus running for more than 40 hours. However, that result is a predicted endpoint because, like the Oscal Tank 1, the WP61 Plus crashed PCMark before exhausting the battery. Not sure if this is an issue with the benchmark or how both these phone makers are managing their batteries.

The overall performance of the WP61 Plus is fine for most uses, but it's not a phone that gamers or anyone who uses VR will embrace. However, with curation, the battery could easily last six days or more, which could be useful off-grid.

Performance score: 4/5

Oukitel WP61 Plus: Final verdict

The Oukitel WP61 Plus is a device that sets out to do something genuinely different in a crowded market. Rather than competing solely on processing power or camera resolution, it bundles a professional-grade walkie-talkie, an enormous battery, and a camping light into a package that could plausibly replace multiple pieces of equipment for an outdoor professional or expedition team.

The Dimensity 7025 is not the most exciting chipset, and the physical dimensions mean this is not a device you will comfortably carry in a trouser pocket. But if your priorities are extended endurance, off-grid communications, and resilience in harsh environments, the WP61 Plus presents a compelling case at the asking price.

How useful DMR technology is to you will depend on whether you already use it or intend to buy multiple phones for walkie-talkie use. If it’s not something you'll use immediately, you could save yourself $50 by buying the base model, since it has everything else I’ve mentioned here.

Should I buy a Oukitel WP61 Plus?

Oukitel WP61 Plus Score Card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Value	Reasonable cost for a well-made device	4/5
Design	Substantial but purpose-built for outdoor use	3.5/5
Hardware	Unique walkie-talkie, 20,000mAh battery and mid-range SoC	4/5
Camera	Good for still images, but the lack of 4K video is poor	3/5
Performance	Great battery life, but sub-par GPU performance	4/5
Overall	Good price, excellent battery life and DMR	4/5

Buy it if...

You need off-grid communications
The built-in DMR walkie-talkie provides professional-grade radio communications without requiring a separate device, making it ideal for outdoor teams, construction sites, and expeditions.

You need extended battery life
Few smartphones can match a 20,000mAh battery for sheer staying power. If you're spending days or weeks away from mains power, the WP61 Plus could be your best option.

Don't buy it if...

You need a daily driver
The large frame is not practical for everyday pocket carry. If you need a rugged phone for general daily use rather than field deployment, a more compact option would serve better.

You need a top-tier SoC
The Dimensity 7025 is a mid-range chip. Competitors such as the Blackview Xplore 2 Satellite offer the more powerful Dimensity 8300 if raw performance is a priority.View Deal

Also Consider

Ulefone Armour Mini 20 Pro
A practical, 5G rugged design with an inbuilt camping light, night vision camera, but with less battery than the Oukitel WP61 Plus. This makes the phone easily pocketable and usable like a normal phone.

Read our full Ulefone Armor Mini 20 Pro review

Blackview Xplore 2 Satellite
Offers satellite communications via Skylo, the more powerful Dimensity 8300 SoC, and a 20,000mAh battery with 120W fast charging. Lacks the DMR walkie-talkie but adds genuine satellite connectivity.

Read our full Blackview Xplore 2 Satellite review View Deal

For more ruggedized devices, we've reviewed the best rugged tablets, the best rugged laptops, and the best rugged hard drives

Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake is beautiful, but some of its biggest changes introduce new rough edges

2:30 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Comments: Off

Just how much should you change when remaking a beloved cult classic? It’s a difficult question, as any approach comes with its own drawbacks. Simply sprucing up the visuals and little else risks you winding up with a game that feels dated and simplistic, while sprinkling in new additions could improve the experience for newcomers but upset your most dedicated long-term fans.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: March 12, 2026

Developer Koei Tecmo has clearly taken the latter route with its latest Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly remake, which has a mostly successful mix of the old and the new. The game was always visually impressive, with the 2003 PlayStation 2 original boasting some incredible fidelity for the time, but this latest remake takes that excellence to another level in its detailed, atmospheric environments and wonderfully stylized yet still believably realistic character models.

The trademark camera-based combat, a sticking point in most entries in the series, has been totally overhauled, too, with the addition of a new dodge mechanic that makes it easier to avoid damage and helps you remain in control in even the most intense encounters. Unfortunately, other alterations are much less successful and prevent this new rendition of one of the best survival horror games from living up to its full potential.

Hand in hand

A short FATAL FRAME II: Crimson Butterfly REMAKE gif showing protagonist Mio encountering a ghost. — (Image credit: Koei Tecmo Games Co., LTD.)

It all hits the fan at a record clip when twin sisters Mio and Mayu return to the mysterious forest where they used to play as children. Now set to be flooded thanks to the construction of a massive dam, it was once the site of an accident that left Mayu walking with a limp, and Mio wracked with guilt for leaving her behind. You hardly have time to get your bearings before you spot Mayu wandering off into the forest in pursuit of a magical crimson butterfly. Following your sister, you’re soon drawn into the dark world of Minakami Village - a haunted town trapped in eternal night after a sinister ritual gone awry.

Each of the nine chapters takes place entirely within its walls, with all the intricate level design that you would expect from the survival horror genre. In addition to elaborate puzzles that block your way, every location that you explore, be it the inside of the many labyrinthine houses or the village’s winding streets, is overflowing with resources to scavenge including rare prayer beads that can be spent improving your character’s stats and equipment in a modest, but impactful, upgrade menu.

The creepy ‘ghost grab’ mechanic from later entry Maiden in Black Water has also been implemented and feels like a natural inclusion. Rather than immediately adding items on the ground or inside containers to your inventory, you reach towards them slowly with a slim chance that a ghostly enemy will grab your hand and inflict some instant damage.

You can pull away to avoid it if you’re fast enough, but the mere threat of this occurring adds a fantastic level of tension to the otherwise simple action of acquiring items. It only actually happens a couple of times too, stopping the scare from feeling cheap or overused.

A short FATAL FRAME II: Crimson Butterfly REMAKE gif showing combat gameplay. Ghosts swing at the player as they aim their camera. — (Image credit: Koei Tecmo Games Co., LTD.)

The original Fatal Frame 2 was never a particularly long experience, but it was easy to set yourself back hours trying to work out exactly what you need to do in order to progress. Signposting was clearly a key concern for Koei Tecmo with this remake, and there are multiple quality-of-life changes geared towards leading you down the correct path. Whether it’s following distant sounds, spotting a spectre walking into a previously locked room, the appearance of a crimson butterfly, or simply heading to a newly marked location on the detailed world map, there was never a moment when I wasn’t sure exactly where I needed to go.

In fact, I would argue that it holds your hand a little too much at times. An example of this are the moments when you encounter the two indestructible enemies that occasionally show up and force you to flee. They pretty much only appear at one end of very linear corridors with clearly signposted hiding spots that you can use to escape, or obvious alternate routes to avoid them. I’m sure this clear design prevents frustrating game-overs, but knowing that my safety is guaranteed also removes a great deal of tension.

Duck and weave

A short FATAL FRAME II: Crimson Butterfly REMAKE gif showing the protagonist opening a door to reveal a ghost. — (Image credit: Koei Tecmo Games Co., LTD.)

The changes to the combat system are a mixed bag too. I know that series fans are divided over the addition of a dodge mechanic, with plenty of posts on the Fatal Frame subreddit and horror game forums arguing that it strays too far from the established formula, but for my money, it's a very positive change. Centred around snapping pictures of ghosts through a first-person viewfinder, combat in Fatal Frame has always had a steep learning curve with enemies that can shred your health bar if you happen to stand in the wrong place.

The dodge gives you a very reliable way to get out of harm's way, making your survival more predictable and consistent. It took a while for the muscle memory that I developed with the recent Mask of the Lunar Eclipse remaster to fade, but once it did I would say this new system is a dramatic improvement and, importantly, makes this infamously obtuse franchise more approachable than ever.

Best bit

A Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake screenshot showing — (Image credit: Koei Tecmo Games Co., LTD.)

One of Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake’s new features is the ability to hold your sister’s hand while you explore together. It’s a great way of illustrating their bond and has some practical uses too, allowing you to quickly regenerate health, presumably with the power of sisterly love.

In contrast, I simply can’t understand why the developer found it necessary to add a new red form for enemy ghosts. Now, when you defeat one, there’s a pretty significant likelihood that they will transform into a red variant, regenerating all of their health and doling out much more damage. Aside from a few scripted boss fights this happening is, as far as I can tell, down to random chance, and it leads to ridiculous difficulty spikes early on. There were multiple occasions where I escaped a fight by the skin of my teeth using all of my film supplies and health consumables only to have my adversary transform without warning and kill me in a few hits.

The intended countermeasure? Seemingly just reloading your save (via the mercifully generous smattering of checkpoints or reliable autosave system) and trying again, hoping that it won’t happen the second time around. It’s a bizarre change that should have been reserved for new game plus or simply removed entirely, and, to make matters worse, a launch day patch has tried to remedy it by completely obliterating the balance of the standard difficulty mode. Red enemies are no longer a major problem, but that’s because every threat has been rendered completely trivial, and even the final boss now dies in just a few hits.

This is a huge shame and needs to be fixed, as it cheapens the otherwise incredibly impactful narrative. Exploring the sisters’ strained relationship and the horrific history of the village, it’s a beautiful journey of sacrifice and loss - provided the message isn’t being undercut by the newfound ability to blast through it like a Call of Duty campaign. You get a real sense of the pair’s relationship, elevated by the wonderful background music and stand-out performances by lead voice actors Erica Mendez and Xanthe Huynh.

Despite this I'm optimistic that better thought out future patches will be able to address most of my biggest complaints and, with three of the six endings under my belt, I’m still looking forward to going back to Minakami Village to uncover even more of its secrets.

Should I play Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake?

Play it if...

You’re new to Fatal Frame
The changes to the combat mechanics make this remake the most approachable Fatal Frame game to date. It’s the one to start with if you’ve been meaning to get into the series, but have been put off by its reputation.

You’re craving a beautiful survival horror game
Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake looks superb, and its memorable story is elevated by strong production values, not to mention brilliant voice acting.

Don't play it if...

You’re a Fatal Frame 2 purist
If you’re a huge fan of the original game, then you might be upset with some of the changes in this remake - particularly the additional hand-holding and more approachable combat.

Accessibility features

Despite the lack of a dedicated menu, Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake has a few accessibility features in its settings menu. Like other Koei Tecmo ports, keyboard support is very poor on PC, with awkward bindings and mismatched icons, so a controller is highly recommended.

There are three control types to choose from, plus the option to select which thumbstick moves your character. Controller vibration can also be disabled. Subtitles are enabled throughout the game by default, though there does not seem to be a way to change their style or appearance.

A short FATAL FRAME II: Crimson Butterfly REMAKE gif showing — (Image credit: Koei Tecmo Games Co., LTD.)

How I reviewed Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake

I played close to twenty hours of Fatal Frame 2: Crimson Butterfly Remake on PC using a DualSense Wireless Controller. My machine is a 5070 Ti-powered model from retailer Scan.

It has a compact Corsair 2000d RGB Airflow case, Asus ROG Strix B860-I motherboard, Intel Core Ultra 7 265K processor, a 2TB WD Black SN770 SSD, 32GB of DDR5 Corsair Vengeance RAM, and an Asus Nvidia 5070 Ti graphics card, which all allowed me to play the game smoothly on the recommended graphics preset on my 1080p Lenovo monitor. For audio, I relied on my trusty Astro A20 X wireless gaming headset.

During my time with the game, I frequently compared my experience to my playthroughs of other entries in the Fatal Frame series, most recently Maiden of Black Water and Mask of the Lunar Eclipse, in addition to other survival horror games.

First reviewed March 2026

Garmin Forerunner 970 review: Testing Garmin’s top-flight running watch over nine months

2:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Health & Fitness | Tags: Garmin Forerunner | Comments: Off

Garmin Forerunner 970: One minute review

I trained with the Forerunner for more than nine months - long enough to really put it through its paces. It came with me on weekly 5Ks, tempo sessions, interval workouts, long half-marathon training runs and even a sweaty 10K trail race last summer. It’s a powerful, performance-driven piece of tech, and perfect for training and analyzing your stats — even if it is one of the priciest running watches on the market right now.

In terms of core features, the 970 delivers everything you’d expect from one of the best Garmin watches. I tried the multiple running modes including track, trail and intervals - plus you’ll also find excellent GPS accuracy, VO2 max estimates, Body Battery and sleep tracking, along with detailed heart rate data.

The design, while chunkier than Garmin’s lifestyle-oriented Venu or Vivoactive lines, has a sporty look, but at 56g it’s surprisingly lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear. The bright AMOLED touchscreen, titanium bezel and scratch-resistant sapphire lens give it a premium feel.

I started wearing the watch two months before a half-marathon, and the new Running Tolerance feature helped curb my tendency to overtrain by setting a weekly maximum mileage based on my impact load and training history. Instead of ramping up too quickly and risking injury (a mistake I’ve made before), I built volume gradually and more sustainably. The projected race-time predictor and PacePro also added structure, helping me fine-tune my pacing strategies ahead of race day.

Mapping has had an upgrade, too, which was helpful during a trail run in rural Wales. While data accuracy felt strong across the board, it was particularly good during interval sessions where heart rate spikes and recovery data were spot on. Unlike some other Garmin models, I didn’t love wearing it overnight, as it felt a little chunky for sleep.

Garmin Forerunner 970: Specifications

Component	Garmin Forerunner 970
Price	$749.99/ £629.99/ AU$1,399
Dimensions	47 x 47 x 12.9mm
Weight	56g
Case/bezel	Fiber-reinforced polymer / Titanium
Display	AMOLED, 454 x 454px
GPS	GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, SatIQ
Battery life	Up to 15 days (smartwatch), up to 26 hours (GPS)
Connection	Bluetooth, ANT+
Water resistant	10ATM

Garmin Forerunner 970: Price and availability

Price: From £629.99 / $749.99 / AU$1,399
Colors: Multiple colourways and can be customized

The Garmin Forerunner 970 launched in May 2025 and is available directly from Garmin as well as most major retailers. It’s an upgrade from the Forerunner 965, which came out in March 2023, and the 970 is priced at around $100 / £100 AU$200 more than its predecessor. There's no denying these watches are getting expensive.

However, with the running feature upgrades, design tweaks and slightly improved battery life, the 970 is definitely value for money.

Value score: 5 / 5

Garmin Forerunner 970: Design

Chunky sporty design
Lightweight
Scratch-resistant glass

I’ve definitely gravitated towards Garmin’s more lifestyle-leaning watches in the past, such as the Venu and Vivoactive ranges. They’re slimmer, more streamlined, and I can wear them in the gym, but also out in the evening.

So when I first strapped on the 970, I immediately noticed the difference. The watch face is thicker, and it does give more ‘serious runner’ vibes, rather than ‘I’m just counting my steps’. It felt slightly chunky at first, but it’s actually surprisingly light - at 56g, it never felt too heavy.

Looks-wise, it’s actually really smart. I tried the soft gold titanium with a French grey/translucent indigo band, which strikes a nice balance between sporty and stylish, but there are other colourways - and you can customize it if you want something more sporty or bolder.

Bright and crisp, with an AMOLED touchscreen set into a 1.4-inch sapphire lens and a titanium bezel - an upgrade from the Garmin Forerunner 965, which used Corning Gorilla Glass 3 DX. My only bugbear was lagging time; sometimes it took a while to catch up with my scrolling.

I’ve scratched previous smartwatches before (usually mid-gym session, clanking dumbbells around), so I was relieved that this watch was scratch-resistant. Nine months in, after plenty of sweaty runs and weight sessions, it still looks box-fresh.

Design score: 4/5

Garmin Forerunner 970: Features

Evening report added
Slightly longer battery life
Triathlon coaching

The watch comes loaded with all the features you’d expect from a Garmin Forerunner. There’s a huge library of workouts to track, including up to eight different running modes, alongside cycling, swimming and strength sessions. As ever with Garmin, the GPS is impressively accurate, even in built-up areas, and the health metrics are comprehensive: sleep tracking, step count, Body Battery, VO2 max and detailed heart rate data are all easy to access and analyze in the app.

There are a few upgrades, too. There’s now a built-in LED flashlight, which I found useful on winter runs, plus a speaker and microphone so you can take calls directly from your wrist. I wasn’t completely impressed by this, though, as the volume was very low when I did use it for calls.

One new feature I particularly liked was the new Evening Report. When reviewing the Garmin Vivoactive 6 last year, I’d found the Morning Reports really useful, so I hoped for the same effect. After long runs, it gave me a really insightful, helpful summary of my day’s exertion and prompted me to start winding down at the right time, with tailored recommendations for the following day’s training. For anyone balancing structured training with a busy schedule, I found it to be a really good addition.

New running features include tracking your running economy, which is the efficiency of your run and your step speed loss; however, these both require you to also be wearing Garmin's HRM 600. I’m not a triathlete, but those who are will appreciate the new Triathlon Coach feature. It allows you to build a full training plan across swim, bike and run – helping to keep you accountable and on track in the lead-up to race day.

Battery life is also slightly improved compared to its predecessor. During comparison testing, the Garmin Forerunner 965 lasted around two hours less than the 970 when in GPS mode. That said, during particularly heavy training weeks, I found myself charging it more frequently than Garmin suggests.

Features score: 4.5 / 5

Performance

Garmin Forerunner 970: Performance

More detailed, colorful maps on the watch
Running Tolerance feature helped me to avoid injury
App was detailed, but glitchy when pairing the watch

I trained with the Forerunner for more than nine months – long enough to really put it through its paces.

During half-marathon training, the new Running Tolerance feature changed how I approached my mileage. I’m someone who tends to get a bit overexcited, ramp things up too quickly and end up injured. This time, the 970 analysed my impact load and training history and gave me a weekly maximum mileage to stick to. Having that ceiling forced me to build gradually. It took the guesswork (and ego) out of the equation, and I could actually see how respecting those limits kept my training more consistent week to week.

The mapping upgrades also came into their own on a trail run in the depths of the Welsh countryside. The clearer, more detailed route maps meant I could see exactly what elevation was coming up and stay confident I was on track. Even though I was racing alongside others, there’s something reassuring about knowing that if your phone dies, you’re not stranded in the middle of nowhere, hoping you’ve taken the right turn.

I didn’t rely on the Garmin Connect app as much as I have with other smartwatches, mainly because so much data is accessible directly on the watch itself. When I did use the app, the data was comprehensive and clearly presented, although I’ll admit it took me a few attempts to pair my Forerunner with the app. The Garmin Connect app also comes in handy to implement Gear Tracking and build training plans, which you can then export to the watch.

If you like to train with targets, it’s easy to set pace or time goals before you head out, and PacePro is straightforward to configure. I also found the new projected race time predictor quite motivating - it gave me realistic target times and pacing guidance based on my training, which helped shape my weekly park runs – and achieve some PBs.

Unlike other Garmin watches I’ve worn, I didn’t sleep in this one. I found it a bit too chunky overnight, so I stuck with my Whoop for sleep tracking – as it has that barely-there feel I prefer at night.

Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Garmin Forerunner 970: Scorecard

Category	Comment	Score
Value	High price, but the value proposition is good.	5 / 5
Design	Chunky and durable, looks good – but not a dress watch.	4 / 5
Features	Stuffed with fitness credentials.	4.5 / 5
Performance	After nine months, this watch earned its stripes.	4.5 / 5

Garmin Forerunner 970: Should I buy?

Buy it if…

You’re training for a running race or triathlon
Want detailed stats or guidance during your training block? This is the watch to get.

You want more recovery knowledge
Know how you’re training and when you should be resting, so you don’t get injured.

You want to leave your phone at home
Download music and rely on the watch's maps.

Don’t buy it if..

You want a lightweight watch to track your sleep goals
Haters of chunky watches are better off looking at the Venu and Vivoactive lines.

You're on a budget
This running watch comes at a hefty price.

Also consider

Garmin Venu 4

Our best Garmin for most people.

Read our full Garmin Venu 4 review

Coros Pace 4

At half the price of the Garmin Forerunner, you’ll appreciate the virtual pacer and its 1.2-inch AMOLED display.

Read our full Coros Pace 4 review

You're on a budget
This running watch comes at a hefty price.

How I tested

I tested the watch over nine months, wearing it for my weekly 5K runs, as well as my weekly longer run and some interval training. I also tested it on the trails and used it for half-marathon training, as well as on race day itself. I compared the running features, app and data against other Garmin watches and running smartwatches.

It ain’t heavy, but Sony’s new budget Bluetooth turntable is still a winner eight days a week

7:30 pm | March 16, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Turntables | Comments: Off

Sony PS-LX5BT: Two-minute review

The idea of a turntable that connects wirelessly via Bluetooth is not a new one — Sony itself has had a lot of success with products like this.

Its latest wireless record player, this PS-LX5BT, is exhaustively specified and priced aggressively — which, it would seem, is the very least that’s required to succeed in this area of the market. Sony obviously knows what’s required, though. The PS-LX5BT features Bluetooth transmission via the aptX Adaptive codec, so if your receiver is similarly specified then lossy 48kHz wireless streams are available.

The company has fitted a defeatable phono stage, too, so the turntable can hard-wire in to pretty much any system you care to mention — and if you’re using its phono stage, there are a trio of gain settings available. It’s pre-fitted and pre-adjusted a moving magnet cartridge. And then Sony's made the whole thing automatic where playback is concerned.

In practice, it all works splendidly. The PS-LX5BT is a flyweight (just 3.6kg with its dust cover in place), which doesn’t bode especially well, but as well as a stable wireless connection, the Sony delivers robust, energetic and thoroughly entertaining sound. It manages to do so without losing sight of detail or flattening dynamics either, and it has a proper facility with rhythmic expression.

It’s not the most robust at the top of the frequency range, and is slightly-but-noticeably tilted towards the low end when it comes to frequency response, but on the whole it’s reasonably well balanced and most certainly gives a good account of itself where low-frequency control and variation in particular are concerned. Which means the PS-LX5BT picks up where the PS-LX310BT left off — as one of the very best pound-for-pound turntables around with Bluetooth to boot.

Sony PS-LX510BT turntable on a brown wood hi-fi rack, with closeups — (Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Price & release date

Unveiled January 22, 2026
Priced $499 / £399 / AU$599

The Sony PS-LX5BT is on sale now, and in the United Kingdom it costs £399. In the United States it’s priced at $499, and in Australia it sells for AU$599.

And not only will the PS-LX5BT have to justify that premium fee over its more affordable (but equally new) PS-LX3BT sibling, it will also have to see off the challenge from brands like Audio Technica and TEAC (to name just a couple) too.

To clarify, the excellent older Sony PS-LX310BT regularly sells for $199 / £179 / AU$395 and while Sony has listed various gains over that 2019 model in this more expensive deck (of the two new models listed), cash-strapped vinyl fans might question how much better it can possibly be, to warrant the extra spend. So let's see, shall we…

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Features

Bluetooth wireless connectivity with aptX Adaptive compatibility
Integrated phono stage with three-stage gain control
Pre-fitted, pre-adjusted moving magnet cartridge

There’s just no arguing with the way Sony has specified the PS-LX5BT. By prevailing turntable standards, it’s about as thoroughly tricked out as these things ever get.

For instance, you get plenty of connectivity options. There are stereo RCA connections at the rear of the plinth for connecting the player to an amplifier — and next to them there’s a switch to turn the integrated phono stage on or off.

So as well as an amplifier with or without a phono stage of its own, the Sony can also connect to a powered speaker or what-have-you — anything at all, in fact, that has a line-level analogue input. The appearance of a three-stage gain control means you’ll always get a decent level of volume when connected with the player’s phono stage switched on. Or you may prefer to connect wirelessly using the PS-LX5BT’s abilities as a Bluetooth transmitter — it’s compatible with SBC, aptX and aptX Adaptive codecs, so as long as the receiver is also compatible it’s possible to stream wirelessly at a lossy 48kHz resolution.

This is a belt-drive design that can operate at either 33.3 or 45rpm, and its straight aluminium tonearm is pre-fitted with an unbranded moving magnet cartridge. It’s also pre-adjusted, although while Sony suggests it has been calibrated to provide a tracking weight of 2.0g (+/- 0.5g) my review sample tracks at a hefty-but-not-fatal 3.13g. Sony is adamant that my sample is an outlier in this respect, and is very keen to get its hands back on it to find out what’s going on — but given that there’s no counterweight for the end user to adjust, you very much get what you’re given in this respect.

Features score: 5 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Sound quality

Energy and drive to spare
Great facility with rhythmic and dynamic expression
Slightly tilted where tonality and frequency response are concerned

It’s nice to be able to report that the Sony PS-LX5BT doesn’t alter its fundamental sonic characteristics no matter if you’re connecting wirelessly or using its integrated phono stage. In either circumstance, this turntable is a vibrant, energetic and determinedly front-foot listen, one that puts ‘entertainment’ at the centre of everything it does.

Streaming a copy of Fusa Riot by Bobby Hughes Experience via aptX Adaptive-enabled Bluetooth, the vigorous and attacking nature of the Sony’s sound is obvious. Its low-frequency response is, ultimately, slightly overstated — but it’s neither musclebound nor unsubtle at the bottom of the frequency range. Bass sounds are nicely shaped, carefully controlled (so rhythmic expression is very decent) and carry plenty of detail regarding texture and timbre — so there’s plenty of variation to go along with the overt punch.

The transition into the midrange is smooth, and here too there’s plenty of information available — you’ll never be in any doubt as to what motivates a voice, nor be unaware of its character or technique. As with the lower frequencies, the tonal balance is quite carefully natural neutral, and it makes for a convincing listen.At the top end, the Sony changes its tune just a little. There’s a slight lack of substance to treble sounds, a mild skinniness that can make the top of the frequency range sound just fractionally splashy. There’s still plenty of detail and variation made apparent, you understand — it just lacks some of the robustness the PS-LX5BT is so capable of generating elsewhere.

Soundstaging is confidently approached, and the Sony creates quite a large and well-laid-out stage that has plenty of space on it even if a recording is notably complex or involved. It also has a very respectable amount of dynamic headroom available, so if a recording really kicks off the turntable is able to make the upshift in intensity readily apparent.

Switch to the Sony’s integrated phono stage, and with the gain control in the ‘mid’ position the wired sound of the PS-LX5BT is closely related to the wireless equivalent. If anything, the lack of substance at the top of the frequency range is even more pronounced, and the low frequencies gain a little extra confidence (like they needed any) — but on the most basic levels the Sony doesn’t shift its characteristics in the slightest. Which can really only be a good thing.

Sound quality score: 4.5 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Design

117 x 430 x 366mm (HxWxD)
Diecast aluminium platter
Supplied with a clear Perspex dust cover

For a turntable with a weighty specification, the Sony PS-LX5BT doesn’t weigh very much. With its clear Perspex dust cover fitted and diecast aluminium platter in place, it tips the scales at just 3.6kg — which, if you’re the one who lifts it from its packaging and positions it on its shelf, doesn’t inspire a huge amount of confidence. Especially where the rejection of resonance caused by its own operation is concerned.

Still, there’s no arguing with the standard of construction or finish here. It may be priced aggressively, but there have been no corners cut when it comes to the way Sony has put the PS-LX5BT together.

Design score: 4 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Usability & setup

Fully automatic operation
Swift and stable wireless pairing
Will play 7in or 12in discs at 33.3 or 45rpm

There’s really very little to it. If you want to connect wirelessly, press the ‘pairing’ button on the plinth — the Sony locates and connects to your waiting Bluetooth receiver quickly.

If you prefer a hard connection to your amp, speaker or what-have-you, plug in the supplied RCA cables and select output at either ‘line’ or ‘phono’ level — if it’s the latter, you’ll be able to decide which of the three gain settings is most appropriate as soon as you hear the turntable in action.

After that it’s just a question of using the dials on the plinth to tell the PS-LX5BT if you want to play a 7in or a 12in disc, and if it should turn at 33.3 or 45rpm. Some automatic turntables are dogmatic inasmuch as they insist ‘33.3rpm = 12in disc’ and ‘45rpm = 7in disc’, but the Sony has heard of 12-in singles and will happily play them without any intervention on your part. Then press ‘start’ and away you go — when it reaches the end of the side the PS-LX5BT will automatically return the tonearm to its rest and stop the platter turning, but there’s a ‘stop’ button if you want to take charge. A button marked ‘up/down’ lets you lift or lower the tonearm without causing the platter to stop turning.

Usability & setup score: 5 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Value

Doesn't feel physically weighty enough to deliver huge value
…but put that out of your mind, let the music play and there's plenty

No, it doesn’t feel like the weightiest or most robust record player this sort of money will buy you — but in every other respect the Sony PS-LX5BT represents prodigious value for money.

Not only does it have a stack of features, but each and every one of them is beautifully realised and effective — and on top of that it has an energetic and upfront sound that doesn’t forgo detail or subtlety while it’s entertaining you.

Value score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Sony PS-LX5BT?

Sony PS-LX5BT scorecard
Attribute	Notes	Score
Features	There's no arguing with Sony's specifications here	5 / 5
Sound quality	Energy, rhythmic drive and entertainment to spare, only ever-so-marginally (and occasionally) marred by a tendency towards over-egging the bass	4.5 / 5
Design	Doesn't feel as robust as pricier players, but it's all here	4 / 5
Setup & usability	There's really very little to it — a top choice for those new to vinyl	5 / 5
Value	It ain't heavy, but it's still great value	4.5 / 5

Buy it if…

The idea of wireless connectivity for your vinyl appeals
And not any old wireless connectivity, either — aptX Adaptive, for a lossy 48kHz stream

You aren’t always ready to spring out of your seat
The turntable will take care of taking the stylus off the record when it’s finished - you relax yourself

You appreciate a vigorous and driving account of your music
‘Upfront’ is as good a word as any to describe the Sony’s fundamental sonic character

Don’t buy it if…

You’re after ultimate sonic fidelity
It’s difficult to come by for £399, to be honest — but you can get closer than this if you’re prepared to sacrifice most of the Sony’s functionality

You equate weight with quality
To be fair, there are solid acoustic reasons why a turntable should, ideally, be heavier than this

You’re not especially houseproud
The Sony has a clear Perpsex dust cover — and you’d be amazed at how much dust it keeps off your deck

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Also consider

TechRadar is a big fan of the Audio-Technica AT-LP70XBT — it’s a bit of a bargain when you consider its specification and the plus-points of its sonic performance.

The PS-LX5BT has put its shortcomings into quite sharp relief, though, even if it is a fair chunk more expensive.

Spend a little more money though and the just-add-speakers Pro-Ject Juke Box E1 can be yours — it’s slightly different to the Sony in its approach, and it’s slightly different where its sound-quality priorities are concerned, too. But it could be just the ticket…

How I tested the Sony PS-LX5BT

I connected the PS-LX5BT to an Eversolo DAC-Z10 pre-amp using its aptX Adaptive Bluetooth functionality, and also using its integrated pre-amp via the RCA cables Sony supplies. This allowed me to check the speed, solidity and effectiveness of the wireless connection, as well as the quality of the phono stage and the usefulness of its three-stage gain control.

The preamp was connected to a Cambridge Edge W power amp using QED XLR cables, and the power amp was connected to a pair of Bowers & Wilkins 705 Signature loudspeakers, using QED speaker cable.

Read TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee
First reviewed: March 2026

I watched the first 6 episodes of Invincible season 4 on Prime Video — and it ‘continues to prove it’s the best R-rated animated show around’

5:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Amazon Prime Video Computers Gadgets Streaming | Comments: Off

Mild spoilers follow for Invincible season 4 episodes 1 to 6.

Few Amazon TV Originals can claim to be as consistently excellent from season to season as Invincible.

Indeed, few shows can match the level of acclaim it's received since it first season, which holds a 98% approval rating on review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes (RT), arrived in March 2021. Seasons 2 and 3's critically perfect ratings of 100% further prove the high level at which it continually operates compared to its Prime Video peers, too.

As the saying goes, though, the bigger they are, the harder they fall. Thankfully, Invincible season 4 delays any potential fall from grace for another year, with the series' latest chapter arguably its most intense and epic installment so far.

Hello darkness, my new friend

A pensive Mark flying with his arms and left leg covered in protective armor in Invincible season 4 — Mark is in full-on survival mode after last season's finale (Image credit: Prime Video)

Picking up almost immediately after the Invincible season 3 finale, the popular show's latest entry reunites us with the eponymous hero — aka Mark Grayson (Steven Yeun) — as he struggles to deal with the fallout of the Invincible War and his death-defying duel with Conquest (Jeffrey Dean Morgan).

Given the personality-altering impact that the aforementioned near-deadly exchange has had on Mark, it's not surprising that season 4 marks yet another tonal shift for the series. Tangible from the get-go with its premiere's gloomy cold open, Invincible 4 cuts a more pessimistic figure than prior installments as it sets out its stall to be the program's darkest entry so far.

Invincible 4 cuts a more pessimistic figure than prior installments

That's not to say previous chapters weren't melancholic in their makeup but, off the back of last season's ending, Invincible's latest eight-part installment dials up the somberness and moral ambiguity to 11 — themes perfectly personified by a heavy-hearted and oft-times self-destructive Mark.

As a connoisseur of multifaceted heroes, I devilishly reveled in seeing Mark wrestle with his newly-established worldview — that being, permanently erase anyone who threatens him or his family — and the idealistic superhuman he still identifies as at his core.

Mark Grayson fighting Dinosaurus in Invincible season 4 — Dinoasaurus (right) is one of many new villains we see this season (Image credit: Prime Video)

Whether it's the telling shift in the dynamic between our progressively cynical protagonist and his now-teen half-brother Oliver (Christian Convery), the increasingly negative public perception of him following the Invincible War, and death-dealing and near-lethal actions he takes in season 4's opening half, even as a superfan of the show's comic book namesake, I was fascinated and struck by Mark's slow unraveling.

Even as a superfan of the comics, I was fascinated and struck by Mark's slow unraveling

Here's an individual who's spent the last two seasons trying to evade the suggestion that, as the son of Nolan Grayson/Omni-Man (J.K. Simmons) — more on him later — he'll eventually become as bloodthirsty and uncompromising as his dad. Seeing that play out in real time is easily one of season 4's earliest highlights.

Mark and Eve cupping each other's face and smiling in Invincible season 4 — Mark and Eve's relationship keeps the former grounded and sane (Image credit: Prime Video)

As in past seasons, the only thing anchoring Mark amid the internal chaos raging within him — mother Debbie (Sandra Oh) and half-brother Oliver notwithstanding — is his girlfriend and fellow superhuman Eve Wilkins/Atom Eve (Gillian Jacobs).

Even here, though, the pair's now-established romance isn't immune to turbulence. Indeed, the malfunctioning of Eve's molecular transmutation abilities — and the resultant root cause — provides the requisite melodrama we've come to expect from their dynamic, which is as fertile as ever.

Mark Grayson and Damien Darkblood falling into a dark pit in Invincible season 4 — Episode 4 introduces a brand-new subplot for Invincible fans to lap up (Image credit: Prime Video)

It's demon detective/immortal warrior Damien Darkblood (Clancy Brown), rather than Eve, who empowers Mark to snap out of his self-imposed funk, though.

Indeed, this season's fourth episode — one centered on a side story not present in the comics — sees Mark literally dragged to Hell to help Darkblood and the latter's allies tackle the seemingly unkillable Volcanikka (Indira Varma) and her goons. It's an intriguing and funny, albeit occasionally banal, chapter that allows Invincible co-creator Robert Kirkman realize his vision for a subplot he couldn't work into the show's literary namesake, and I enjoyed seeing more of Darkblood and the contemplative nature of this episode's tale.

Sins of the father

Mark looking sad with his arms crossed as Nolan looks at him in Invincible season 4 — "We need to talk again, Mark..." (Image credit: Prime Video)

Mark's circumstances aren't aided by the reappearance of Nolan Grayson/Omni-Man (J.K. Simmons) who, alongside the ever-likeable Allen (Seth Rogen), who return to Earth to recruit the titular hero for the Coalition of Planets' forthcoming war against the Viltrum Empire.

The increased screen time afforded to Invincible's fan-favorite bromance... is much needed

The increased screen time afforded to Invincible's fan-favorite bromance after their bit-part roles in seasons 2 and 3 is not only much needed, but also long overdue.

Sure, given how the story plays out in the source material, it was inevitable that we'd see more of Nolan and Allen as they embark on a quest to seek out new allies to join the fight. Nonetheless, it's pleasing to see their roles expanded, with this season's second episode — a near-full detour from the primary plot to focus on said ally-locating mission — serving as proof.

Allen the Alien smiling and putting his arm around Omni-Man in Invincible season 4 — Nolan and Allen have much more to do in season 4 (Image credit: Prime Video)

Even as someone who's read the comics and knew we'd spend more time with them, I was delighted all the same. Nolan and Allen's partnership is one of the series' best selling points, and its humor- and action-filled second chapter is a welcome distraction from the lugubrious nature of the Mark-centric storyline.

Nolan and Allen's partnership is one of the series' best selling points

That's not to say it's a total joke fest with these two. Allen deals with the occasional emotionally devastating incident, while Nolan's redemption arc continues apace as Mark's remorseful dad attempts to reconcile with the loved ones that he wronged.

Nolan, Mark, and Oliver all looking at each other with annoyed faces in Invincible season 4 — Families, amirite? (Image credit: Prime Video)

Indeed, one of this season's most incredibly moving scenes — and, in my opinion, one of Invincible's most well-acted sequences to date — sees Nolan try and fail to make peace with Debbie. Their first encounter since season 1, it's an intensely painful scene to watch play out and, thanks to Oh and Simmons' vocal performances, is far more impactful than its literary counterpart.

Nolan experiences similarly strained relationships with his sons, especially Oliver, whose trademark teen traits and abandonment issues imbue their father-son dynamic with understandable angst. However, events that occur in the final throes of episode 5, as well as the bulk of its follow-up chapter, provide hope that this estrangement won't be a permanent and thematically hackneyed fixture moving forward.

The empire strikes back

Grand Regent Thragg flying through space in Invincible season 4 — Season 4 finally introduces Invincible's primary villain in the form of Thragg (Image credit: Prime Video)

The Coalition of Planets needs synergy, too, because of the universal threat posed by the Viltrum Empire.

After three seasons of slowly pulling back the veil on this extraordinarily powerful race, Invincible's latest arc once again highlights their uncompromising and barbaric culture. By way of an extensive flashback sequence in episode 2, we also learn the full truth behind their desire to rule all, and the near-extinction-level event that may briefly strike a compassionate chord with some viewers.

Invincible's latest arc once again highlights the Viltrum Empire's uncompromising and barbaric culture

And I say "briefly" because of what comes next. Led by the Prime Video series' Big Bad in Grand Regent Thragg, who's played with real menace and villainous stoicism by Lee Pace, the Viltrum Empire is, despite its vulnerable state, still a force to be reckoned with. That much is clear when, like a cornered and wounded animal, it hits back — and hard — at the Coalition of Planets in one of Invincible's now-customary intense, frenetic, and catastrophic action set pieces.

Tech Jacket firing his weapons in space in Invincible season 4 — Tech Jacket made their animated debut via a brief cameo in season 3 episode 7 (Image credit: Prime Video)

Away from its primary narrative, Invincible also continues to maintain a highly satisfying balance between the old and the new.

The introduction of ominous new villains including Universa (Danai Gurira), Dinoasaurus (Matthew Rhys), and Volcanikka spice things up in the rogues gallery department, and ensure that the raft of recurring villains never fall into the overused category. Meanwhile, fresh heroes in legendary cosmic nomad Space Racer and the idealistic Tech Jacket — I won't ruin who voices these characters because, well, spoilers — add some welcome humor, theatrics, and suspense to the equation.

Atom Eev punching Universa in Invincible season 4 — Universa (left) is another of this season's secondary antagonists (Image credit: Prime Video)

I did have a couple of gripes with Invincible season 4. For one, some entries feel a little long for the section of the main story and the subplots they cover. I oftentimes beat the drum for episodes to have more substantial runtimes but, in this instance, I think a few minutes could have been shaved off one or two of its chapters.

Taking some key players off the board and relegating others to the sidelines was also a tad irksome. Okay, the removal of some characters from the playing field, plus the downgraded screen time afforded to others, is dictated by the narrative Invincible season 4 tells.

I'm a proponent of adapting any form of literature as accurately as possible but, for a show that's done a stellar job of expanding on its source material, and updating outdated aspects of the graphic novel's plot and characters, I could've lived with the odd change here or there.

My verdict

Its last two episodes notwithstanding, Invincible continues to prove it's the best R-rated animated show around with its most emotionally heightened and ferocious season yet. The way its story evolves, and the curveballs it throws, and which will shock fans of the show and comic books, make it second to none in the genre space.

If the final pair of episodes are as strong as its other six, season 4 will further cement its position as top dog. And, should it draw to a close in the way I think it will, the already-announced Invincible season 5 will have a huge job on its hands to similarly surpass its forebears — but I have every confidence that it will.

Invincible season 4 launches with a three-episode premiere on Wednesday, March 18. New chapters air weekly until the finale on April 22. For more ahead of its arrival, find out everything we know so far about Invincible season 4.

I tested the Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer — a premium appliance with looks to match

2:46 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Air Fryers Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Tags: Australia, UK, US | Comments: Off

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer: 30-second review

The Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer is an accomplished, premium air fryer which provides solid cooking performance in a space-saving design.

It finds itself in a currently small sub-market of air fryers, with only a handful of rivals also offering the dual-stack baskets on offer here. The leader, and our current best air fryer, is the similarly priced Ninja Double Stack XL.

Both of these models offer a large cooking capacity (across two baskets), without the wider footprint you get with the traditional, side-by-side baskets design.

Philips 4000 Series Airfryer on kitchen counter — (Image credit: Future)

The Philips beats the Ninja in a couple of key ways. First up, its baskets have windows and a light, allowing you to keep an eye on the food you’re cooking without having to open the basket to check.

Secondly, the controls on the Philips 4000 Series are easier to see, and more intuitive to use, taking the hassle out of working out functions, temperatures and cooking times.

What’s not quite as good though are the quick start instructions when you take the air fryer out of the box for the first time, and the full manual is only accessible via a smartphone app.

Philips 4000 Series Airfryer on kitchen counter with bottom drawer open — (Image credit: Future)

It’s also only available in one colorway; black and gold. It’s a bold choice and it does look smart — although it won’t be to everyone’s taste, nor will it sit as well in traditionally-styled kitchens.

Cooking performance is solid though, and it was able to handle the various meat, vegetables and sweet treats I threw at it.

For those looking for a stylish, statement air fryer that also delivers versatility and practicality, and are willing to pay a bit more for the privilege, I would recommend the Philips 4000 Series.

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer: price and availability

£269.99 / AU$449 list price makes it one of the most expensive air fryers
But it’s regularly discounted by around £100 / AU$100
Available in the UK and Australia, but not in the US

With a list price of £269.99 / AU$449 (about $360), the Philips 4000 Series Dual Stack is one of the most expensive air fryers on the market, but do keep an eye out for discounts.

I've seen it reduced to £169.99 at Amazon UK, Currys and John Lewis in the past, and AU$349 at Amazon Australia, making this double drawer air fryer a far more tempting proposition for families looking for a large capacity cooker.

That’s the same list price as the excellent Ninja Double Stack XL which we gave five stars to, but considerably more expensive than the £149.99 Tower Vortx XL Dual Stack.

This model is available in Europe and Australia, but is not on sale in the US.

Value score: 4/5

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer: specifications

Review Model	NA462/79
Number of baskets	2
Number of cooking programs	6
Cooking programs	Frozen potato based snacks, steak, fish, vegetables, chicken, reheat
Extra functions	Shake reminder
Smart control	No
Wattage	2750W
Capacity	10L
Temperature range	40-200 degrees C
Time range	1-60 minutes
Dimensions (H x W x D)	15.7 x 9 x 18.5 inches / 40 x 23 x 47cm
Dishwasher-safe	Yes
Weight	20lbs / 9.1kg

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer: design

Vertically stacked baskets offers space-efficient design
Premium build with a bold black and gold finish
Clear, intuitive controls, although touch-sensitive panel won’t be for everyone

Ninja laid the foundations for the double stack air fryer back in 2024, and it’s no surprise other manufacturers have jumped on the trend, offering large cooking capacity with a narrower, space-saving footprint.

The Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket brings a premium black and gold aesthetic to challenge Ninja’s market-leading air fryer. It’s a striking look, and one that might divide opinion. It’ll look great in a modern kitchen that uses one of the two colors. With my white countertops and blue cabinets, it certainly stands out on the work surface. The glossy, reflective front of the fryer is also a bit of a dust- and fingerprint-magnet, and needs regular wiping to keep it looking fresh.

I was pleased to see both 5L baskets and their base plates were dishwasher safe, making cleaning up after cooking much easier (although the handles of the baskets do collect water). A damp cloth is all that’s needed for the exterior of the machine, and a soft brush to gently clean the heating element.

Philips 4000 Series Airfryer with both baskets removed — Future

Philips 4000 Series Airfryer with person's hand opening bottom drawer — Future

Another nice touch, and something the Ninja doesn’t provide, is a cooking window on each basket, and an interior light, allowing you to keep an eye on the food inside. I much prefer air fryers with windows, as it helps me gauge when I need to shake or turn food.

It’s especially useful to see what’s going on without opening the baskets and pausing the cooking when you're first getting used to new air fryer, and starting to understand cooking times. It’s not an exact science and each air fryer is different, so the windows are a great visual aid.

There aren’t any accessories included in the box, unlike the Ninja Double Stack, which comes with a pair of stainless steel racks, doubling the usable space in its baskets.

You’ll want to be mindful of what food you’re cooking too, as both baskets have holes on their rear wall for air circulation. That means anything particularly wet could ooze out of the back and into the machine.

Philips 4000 Series Airfryer control panel — Future

What didn’t impress was the setup instructions, or lack thereof. You get an IKEA-style, printed pictorial guide in the box that covers the absolute bare minimum, but stops short of providing any explanations, details or cooking tips. Even IKEA instructions are better than these.

For the full details you are forced to download Philips’ free HomeID app, where you can register your air fryer and then access the full manual, along with cooking guides and recipes. The tips and tricks articles, along with the recipes are nicely presented and easy to follow.

It’s disappointing the same care hasn’t been given to the manual, which is just a PDF file requiring much scrolling and zooming on a phone to be able to read it. A printed copy would be far more useful, or even a digitized version with page-turning and a search feature.

Philips 4000 Series Airfryer side vents — (Image credit: Future)

A quirk of this particular air fryer design sees the air exhaust located on the left of the appliance, and you are warned not to position this side of the air fryer within six inches / 15cm of a wall to prevent overheating, or close to any food products. You’ll need to have a quick think about where you’ll be placing the Philips 4000 Series before committing to the purchase.

Thankfully, once plugged in the air fryer is easy to use. The touch-sensitive controls come to life with rear illumination on the large, glossy black section above the baskets. The layout and labelling are clear, making for an intuitive experience — unlike some air fryers I’ve used where the buttons aren’t always so self explanatory.

Design score: 4.5/5

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer: performance

Sync and copy functions make using both baskets together easier
Six preset cooking programs, but temperature and time can easily be adjusted

The Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer does well to provide a premium cooking experience.

You get six preset modes — frozen potato-based snacks, steak, fish, vegetables, chicken, and reheat — which give you a set time and temperature. You can fine tune these, and you'll probably find yourself adjusting these the more you use the air fryer and get an understanding of how long, and at what temperature, different foods require.

Copy and sync are both handy functions. Copy allows you to match the temperature and time settings for one basket, to the other. This saves you having to go through the setup process a second time, and it’s a handy time-saver if you’re cooking an extra large portion of fries for the whole family.

Uncooked fries inside Philips 4000 Series Airfryer — Future

Fries cooking inside Philips 4000 Series Airfryer — Future

Sync is my personal favorite though, allowing me to set each basket to a different duration and temperature, but have them both finish at the same time. It’s easy to set up, and works very well.

There’s a shake reminder too, which has the machine beep during through cooking to have you slide out a basket and give the contents a toss to ensure even frying. For longer cook times, you’ll get multiple shake reminders. You can turn off this reminder though, which is useful when you’re using the air fryer for baking.

Another nice touch is the fact Philips says you don’t need to preheat the air fryer, meaning you can toss food into the baskets right away and get cooking.

Uncooked muffins in Philips 4000 Series Airfryer drawer — Future

Cooked muffins in Philips 4000 Series Airfryer drawer — Future

Using the frozen potato-based snacks program, I loaded a basket with 18oz / 500g and set it going, at 390 Fahrenheit / 200 Celsius for 26 minutes. I was prompted to shake the basket twice, with 13 and seven minutes remaining.

The fries cooked well enough, with a crispy exterior and fluffy middle, but they didn’t brown as much as I’d like. Adding a few more minutes to the cooking time will get you a darker color and crispier finish.

I also tried cooking fresh fries in the air fryer. The manual (accessible via the app) suggests chopping potatoes into fries and then soaking them in water for 10 minutes. Once I had gently patted the excess water from the fries I added a splash of oil and popped them into the basket.

Uncooked cake inside Philips 4000 Series Airfryer drawer — Future

Cake cooked using Philips 4000 Series Airfryer in drawer — Future

Results were similar to the frozen fries — they could have done with a few more minutes to gain color and extra crispiness, but they cooked well overall.

I was impressed with the baking prowess of the Philips 4000 Series as I used both baskets to cook chocolate muffins and a blueberry loaf simultaneously. Both bakes rose nicely, and produced a bouncy sponge.

Similarly to the fries, the muffins stayed quite light in color, as they missed the darkening you’d get in a conventional oven.

I put the dual-basket setup to the test once again when I cooked sausages and vegetables, which needed different cook durations. Thankfully, the time sync feature worked well here, with both baskets completing cooking at the same time, allowing me to focus on the mash and gravy.

Uncooked sausages in Philips 4000 Series Airfryer drawer — Future

Broccoli, carrots, and sausages cooked using Philips 4000 Series Airfryer on plate — Future

The sausages were evenly cooked, while the broccoli had a delightful crunch to it. I par-boiled the carrots for a few minutes before adding them to the basket with the broccoli, to allow them to cook at the same rate.

A quick word of warning, the top of the Philips 4000 Series gets the warmest while cooking, and I measured temperatures of over 140 Fahrenheit / 60 Celsius during operation. Make sure you don’t leave anything sitting on top of the air fryer, and for those of you who have low-hanging wall units in your kitchen, be mindful of having enough space between them and the top of this air fryer.

Performance score: 4.5/5

Should you buy the Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer?

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer report card
Attribute	Notes	Rating
Value	It’s one of the most expensive on the market, but you get a premium air fryer with a space-saving design and slick looks.	4/5
Design	This is an air fryer that makes a statement and looks the part on the counter top. Plus, its stacked baskets means it takes up less valuable prep space.	4.5/5
Performance	Performance across cooking programs is solid, though you will need to experiment to get optimal results for some foods.	4.5/5

Buy it if

You want capacity, but don’t have much workspace

The clever stacked design of this Philips 4000 Series air fryer means it takes up less counter space than most of its rivals, leaving you more room for prep and plating.

You want a stylish air fryer

The Philips 4000 Series has a bold design. The black and gold finish might not be to everyone’s taste, but it makes a statement and looks good on the countertop..

You want to keep an eye on your food

I love the basket windows and lights here, as they let you keep track of how your food is getting on without interrupting the process by pulling out a basket.

Don’t buy it if

You want to cook large items

While the overall capacity of the Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer is 10L, it’s split into two 5L baskets. That makes it great for cooking two different foods simultaneously, but you’re not fitting a whole chicken or a pizza into this air fryer.View Deal

You’re after an affordable air fryer

This is one of the most expensive air fryers on the market, and while it has the premium looks and clever stacked design, its cooking performance isn’t light years ahead of more affordable models.View Deal

You prefer paper manuals

The fact the bundled quick start guide is a poorly implemented IKEA knock-off doesn’t get things off to a great start, with a phone app required to access the full manual.View Deal

Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer: also consider

Ninja Double Stack XL

While the Ninja doesn’t have basket windows, its sleek matt design, additional Max Crisp feature, and bundled cooking racks to increase cooking surface in the baskets means it’s still the best stacked air fryer around.

For more information, check out our full Ninja Double Stack XL review

Russell Hobbs Satisfry Dual Basket Air Fryer

If you like the idea of two baskets and have the counter space for a side-by-side design, this Russell Hobbs air fryer outperforms more expensive premium competitors with ease.

For more information, check out our full Russell Hobbs Satisfry Dual Basket Air Fryer review

How I tested the Philips 4000 Series Stacked Dual Basket Air Fryer

I used the Philips 4000 Series for two weeks at home in my kitchen
I cooked a wide variety of food with it, including fries, cakes, vegetables and meat
I tested the different cooking functions, and the cleaning process

I spent two weeks using the Philips 4000 Series at home to cook a variety of food. I tried out the preset programs, and also freestyle the settings from time to time.

I air fried meat, baked cakes, and roasted vegetables during my testing, and used a temperature probe to record how hot the exterior of the machine got during use. I evaluated how each food item cooked in the two baskets, and assessed how the finished results were to eat.

I also followed the setup instructions and cleaning process, to understand how easy the machine is to get going and maintain. For more details, see how we test, review, and rate products on TechRadar.

« Previous Page — Next Page »