Audio - Organizer

‘Some of my least favorite headphones to test’: I used the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 for a month, and one issue makes them very hard to recommend

5:30 pm | March 23, 2026

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4: Two-minute review

When I sat down and first started listening to the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4, sitting at my desk at home, I was mildly pleased with their audio performance. But when I started using them out and about in the world, not in my cosy chair, these quickly became some of my least favorite headphones to test in recent months. Some of the best earbuds around for the cash-savvy buyer? Sadly, no.

That’s a surprise; I gave the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro an almost-perfect review score, and expected these affordable alternatives to fare just as well. But I have been loathe to use them during the testing period, for one simple reason.

These earbuds just wouldn’t stay in my ears. When I was sitting still at home, they’d more or less work fine – although they’d often slip from their default position so the drivers were further from my ears than they should be. If this was the entirety of my testing, I’d give them a perfectly fine review, but life’s not just about sitting still.

When I went on walks with the buds, they’d slip constantly, and I’d have to readjust them several times each minute to push them back in. I like to walk, and went on multiple hour-long rambles during the testing time. Imagine how long I had my hands in my ears, fidgeting and fixing slippage.

They also fared incredibly poorly on public transport (too shaky), when I was in bed (too angled) and even sometimes when I’d rotated my swivelling office chair. I didn't dare take them to the gym or on a run.

Even if the things weren’t flung from my ears multiple times per song, they have a truly awful battery life; with ANC and other features turned on, I’d get about three hours per charge. And that's before I even mention the meagre ANC performance – because of the poor fit, the active noise cancellation algorithm here has absolutely zero chance of stopping you hearing the sounds around you.

There are some elements of the Galaxy Buds 4 that you might like: they offer really high-quality music, and do look classy. And if you’re lucky enough to have ears like vices, you might not have the same fit issues I did – but I’ve never had issues quite like this in other similar buds, and know Samsung’s earbuds have a reputation for poor fit, so I really don’t think it’s a me problem.

A quick Google search shows that users had the same issue with the Buds 3. It's easy to find reports of them slipping out of the ears, so it's clear that this is a recurring issue which the company hasn't fixed. I try to avoid reading coverage of products I'm testing, but I've already seen reports of Buds 4 users having the same issue.

If you’ve got the money and a Samsung phone, the easier fix is to splash out a little more on the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, with their ear-tips offering a more secure fit (though not a perfect one). But honestly, there are countless great wireless earbuds for this much or less, that won’t jump from your ear at every opportunity.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Price and release date

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 case in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

Announced in February 2026, released March
Sells for $179 / £159 / AU$299
No price change from past models

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 were announced at Galaxy Unpacked on February 25, and have been available to buy from March 11, just like the Pro model and the Samsung Galaxy S26 series.

The retail price of the buds is $179 / £159 / AU$299, which is a mid-range price for earbuds like these, though they seem affordable when compared to the $249 / £219 / AU$399 Buds 4 Pro. There’s been no price hike over the Galaxy Buds 3, which is always good to see.

I know what you’re wondering: ‘how does that compare to Apple?’. The AirPods 4 with ANC cost $179 / £179 / AU$299, a very similar price point: the same in the US and Australia, but pricier in the UK. But if you don’t need ANC, the standard AirPods 4 cost $129 / £129 / AU$219, so they’re cheaper.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Specs

Drivers	11mm woofer
Active noise cancellation	Yes
Battery life (ANC off)	6 hours buds, 30 hours case
Weight	4.6g buds, 45.1g case
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.1
Frequency response	Not specified
Waterproofing	IP54

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Features

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 earbuds in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

Buds last about 3 hours per charge
ANC has limited effectiveness
Range of handy features

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 technically do have noise cancellation, but due to their open-fit design (think Apple EarPods), they don’t plug up your ear to stop outside noise leaking in. So practically, they reduce very little noise. I could notice some noise cancellation when turning the feature off and on, but only a marginal amount.

Sometimes when I had the buds in but wasn't listening to music, I could hear them try to compensate for loud noises by pumping out what sounded like white noise. Not only did it fail to stop the background noise, it added a little extra layer of annoyance. Don’t buy these if you need good ANC.

Don’t buy them if you need a long-lasting battery either; their play time is abysmal. With ANC turned off you’re only looking at 6 hours of listening; Samsung’s official figure puts ANC-on listening at five hours but in my own testing, with features like SSC (Samsung Seamless Codec) turned on, I was barely scraping three.

You can get about five recharges from the case, which isn’t amazing, but didn’t affect me too much during my testing weeks. Just remember to plug them in regularly.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 earbuds on a ledge, next to a Samsung phone showing the buds app. — (Image credit: Future)

But now we can move onto the other features, and there’s a lot more to like there. The buds support Bluetooth 6.1, with support for codecs like SSC, AAC, SBC and LC3 (no LDAC). I had a few Bluetooth dropouts during my time with the buds, but not so many that it couldn’t have been environmental.

The buds offer a range of tools like call sharpening profiles, spatial audio with head tracking, a nine-band equalizer with presets, volume normalization, adaptive sound to cater for how you wear your earbuds (i.e., at what stage of falling out they’re at) and so on. You can even use the buds to tap into nearby audio broadcasts.

The only major omission is multipoint connection, but that’s not even a feature I’d consider mandatory in earbuds. There’s also no listening test, like in the Pro, but I didn’t find it wholly useful in those buds so again, no (further) marks docked.

Features score: 3.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Design

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 earbuds in their case on a ledge. — (Image credit: Future)

Swanky 'Blade' look
Charging case is small and light
Buds aren't designed for sticking in ear

I’ve got to say, I really like the Samsung Galaxy Bud 4’s charging case. It’s a lightweight, see-through square box, that the buds easily slot into. It weighs just 45.1g and measures 51 x 51 x 28.3mm, and really disappeared into my pocket.

The buds themselves look pretty good too, with their refined ‘Blade’ designed from the Buds 3 stripping out the lights and much of the fuss. The polished silver metal band on the white buds I tested looks great, but there’s also a black model you can pick up.

Unfortunately, that’s basically all I can praise about the Buds 4’s design, because for the three weeks I tested the buds, their build was the bane of my existence.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 earbud in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

I’ve already spent much of the introduction to this article moaning about the Galaxy Buds 4’s fit, but in case you skipped that: these things just don’t stay still in your ears. If they’re not outright falling out, they’re moving around so that the drivers are pointing any which way, making music sound worse.

This'll no doubt be worst for people with big ears, but a few design decisions ensure that they won't be a good fit for anyone. The lack of a tip means you can’t just wedge the Buds 4 in your ears and hope for the best, and the material of the body is so smooth and friction-free that it fails to keep them anchored in ears.

It feels like the weighting of the buds is wrong too, so their own heft causes them to list and then fall from the ears. They’re not heavy, at just 4.6g, but the amount of ear-pirouettes they managed suggests the center of gravity is off in some way.

On the Buds 4’s stem, there’s a touch control: swipe up or down for volume, or pinch to play and pause your music. I quickly discovered that swiping was just another way for me to fling the buds out of my ears, but pinching is great: a light click lets you know that your demand was registered.

Design score: 2.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Sound quality

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 earbuds in a man's hand, with the case behind. — (Image credit: Future)

Single driver per bud
High-quality streamed music
Detailed sound

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 have a single driver per ear; it’s one of the big downgrades from the Pro, with the bass-focused woofer absent. It’s a shame, because extra bass oomph is needed: it might go some way in mitigating how quickly you lose it when the earbuds start to slip…

Generally speaking, and when you’re sitting still with the Buds 4 angled perfectly, they sound about as good as you’d expect for the price. They’re bright and detailed; the acoustic guitars in Only the Good Die Young by Billy Joel sparkle and the keys in the piano introduction to Tiny Dancer by Elton John had just as much personality as the rocket man’s own voice did.

The lack of a dedicated woofer hurts, when comparing these to the Buds 4 Pro. Bass isn’t as scooping and defined as I’d like, instead sounding muddy indistinct. If you listen to Phosphorscent’s C’est La Vie No.2 by Phosphorescent or The Rocketeer by Foxy Shazam, the bass just melts into the band and loses its edge.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 earbuds on a ledge. — (Image credit: Future)

Detail and quality really is the name of the game here, as for all their strengths and weaknesses, you’re hearing it all… at least, if you’re using a Samsung phone, which allows for the SSC-UHQ codec. This allows for 24-bit/96kHz transmission, and makes an audible difference over listening on other devices.

So the Galaxy Buds 4 aren’t the best earbuds I’ve tested, even at the price, but they’re decent. But remember everything I said about the fit? Yeah – between the slow slipping and leaking background sound, I very rarely got the best from the buds. When I used them while walking, or on public transport, the bass vanished pretty quickly and often the mids were drowned out by noise, leaving only some hi-hats and vocals to enjoy.

The buds have a fairly high max volume, but I noticed something odd: the bass would audibly drop from the mix as I got near the top. Every time I pressed ‘volume up’ from five steps off max, every instrument would get louder, except for the bass which would step back. It meant two or three presses of my volume keys would result in a drastically different sound mix, and it was much tinnier-sounding at the top than I’d expect.

Sound quality: 4/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Value

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 buds and case on a ledge. — (Image credit: Future)

Mid-range price for buds
Other options get you more for your money

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 aren’t cheap, and honestly, you’re within your rights to expect a little more from your earbuds.

A single driver? A sub-movie-length battery life? A design that doesn’t seem well thought out? If these were budget buds I’d understand, but $179 / £159 / AU$299 is far from cheap in the varied world of wireless earbuds.

There are other similar-priced options out there which offer you a lot more for your money, or give a similar package to the Buds 4 but at a fraction of the cost.

Value: 3/5

Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4?

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 buds and case in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 score card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	The ANC struggles and the battery life is woeful, but a few other features claw back points.	3.5/5
Design	They're not designed to stick in your ear, even if they look good.	2.5/5
Sound quality	The Buds 4 offer high-quality music with a bright, detailed sound.	4/5
Value	They're not expensive per se, but you can get a lot more for your money.	3/5

Buy them if…

You need office work buds
If you're going to be listening to these while sitting still at a desk, some of their biggest issues won't affect you.

You own a Samsung phone
The SSC-UHQ codec is really something else, but it's only available for owners of modern Samsung smartphones.View Deal

You need a wireless charging case
Wireless charging still isn't commonplace in earbud cases, but the Buds 4 offer this convenient feature.View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You need long-lasting buds
Few earbuds I've tested have a worse battery life than the Buds 4. Not for travellers, or those who like a long listening stint.

You need exercise buds
I won't beat this dead horse any longer, but these buds just don't survive if your head is moving: bobbing as you walk or reclining at the gym.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Also consider

	Samsung Galaxy Buds 4	Apple AirPods 4 with ANC	Status Audio Pro X
Drivers	11mm	'Custom high-excursion' Apple driver	12mm
Active noise cancellation	Yes	Yes	No
Battery life (ANC on)	6 hours (buds) 30 hours (case)	5 hours (buds) 20 hours (case)	7 hours (buds) 25 hours (case)
Weight	4.6g (buds) 45.1g (case)	4.3g (buds) 32.3g (case)	4.5g (buds) 50g (case)
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.1	Bluetooth 5.3	Bluetooth 5.3
Waterproofing	IP54	IP57	IP54

AirPods 4 with ANC
The natural competitor, these earbuds come at a similar price and with a comparable feature set, though you need an iPhone to be able to use them.
Read our full AirPods 4 with ANC review

Denon AH-C500W
Want tip-less earbuds for a lot less, and from a Samsung sub-brand? These Denon models fit me much better, though they don't quite sound as good and offer a thinner list of features.
Read our full Denon Ah-C500W

How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

Tested for a month
Tested at home, on walks and on public transport

I tested the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 immediately after the Pro model, so they were a natural comparison. I used them paired to a Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra phone for the duration of the testing process, and listened to audio on Spotify, internal storage, various streaming services and games.

The test process for the buds was around three weeks, though I used them occasionally for a week prior when I received them at the same time as the Pro.

I've been reviewing gadgets at TechRadar for about 8 years now, including plenty of earbuds and Samsung gadgets (including the Buds 3 Pro too).

First reviewed in March 2026

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

I tested Bose’s smallest Bluetooth speaker and although I enjoyed its balanced audio, its high price feels hard to justify

4:30 pm | March 22, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Speakers Wireless & Bluetooth Speakers | Comments: Off

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2: review

The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is the sequel to the audio specialist’s 2017-issue mini Bluetooth speaker. And according to Bose, this palm-sized follow-up brings a fair few enhancements to the table: ‘improved audio performance’, ‘enhanced features’, and ‘extended battery life’. But is it actually worth buying? Here are my thoughts after several weeks of testing.

First of all, it has to be said that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is a significant improvement over its predecessor — as you’d probably hope given that they were released eight years apart. Now, you get USB-C charging, and up to 12 hours of battery life, which is nothing special, but comparable to some similar-sized rivals from JBL and Ultimate Ears.

On top of that, its new and improved fabric strap is fantastic — it’s so easy to sling around shower heads, bikes, bags… you name it. Pair that with a still-great IP67 dust and waterproof rating — which enables the SoundLink Micro Gen 2 to survive being dunked under a meter of water for 30 minutes — and you’ve got a speaker that can go literally anywhere with you. Combine this with its small size and lightness of build, and Bose’s bijou audio companion is more practical than just about any model out there — even those listed in our best Bluetooth speakers guide.

Something else that has been improved is audio quality. And in fairness, the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is a pretty solid-sounding model given its small size — but that’s not to say it’s perfect.

Man holding the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 — (Image credit: Future)

Bose has gone for a relatively balanced sound profile on the SoundLink Gen 2. Bass is pretty punchy, but never boomy or overstated. Mids are clean, but not the sole star. And treble is energetic, but not tinny — unless you’re listening at top volumes, but that’s something I’ll get onto later.

Anyway, when listening to Black Eye by Allie X, I was impressed by the tonality of vocals, and the way that the speaker replicated their almost breathy quality. The attack of violins in the intro wasn’t the most dynamic I’d heard, but it was certainly clean and distortion-free at mid volume levels. And after bumping bass up by a level on the Bose app, the pumping low end came through with decent impact too. Was I wowed by excellent instrument separation, pounding low-end performance, and top-tier detailing? No. But that’s to be expected on a speaker this small.

While we’re on this topic, it’s worth noting that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 has a fair few sonic limitations, as a direct result of its compact form. You won’t get the bass thump that larger models — like the Bose SoundLink Plus, or even the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 — can muster. And if you push volume all the way to the maximum, you’re going to get pretty thin-sounding audio, with very noticeable compression and slightly shrill treble. But in this model’s defense, this is fairly standard for mini Bluetooth speakers — trust me, I’ve tested tons of them!

But still, this model did perform well, all things considered. In Felini by Venerus and Marco Castello, the precision of fingerpicking guitars and airy sound effects was commendable, and the two vocalists' harmonies intertwined neatly.

Deeper tracks, like M-High’s Never Would don’t sound amazing on the SoundLink Flex Gen 2, as it struggles to handle the darkest parts of the frequency range. Still, standing upright, the speaker managed decently agile bass, and matched the track’s aggressive treble to good effect. Rivals like the Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4 can produce a more weighty performance, but if you’re not listening to the heaviest tunes, that shouldn’t be a problem for you.

I’ll finish talking about sound by mentioning that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 has strong codec support, with SBC, AAC, and even aptX Adaptive — if you’ve got a compatible device that is. There aren’t any wired playback options, though I suspect most users will be fine with using Bluetooth 5.4 connectivity.

So, the SoundLink Micro Gen 2 sounds pretty solid overall, but how does it perform elsewhere? Let’s step on over to the features domain.

This model isn’t doing anything out of the ordinary by Bose 's standards. It has multi-point connectivity, fast-pairing, and a shortcut button for Spotify or linking with another Bose speaker. And you can link with various other Bose speakers, luckily, including another SoundLink Micro Gen 2 for stereo, or models like the Bose SoundLink Max for generally bigger sound.

However, you can also rename the speaker in the Bose app (mine’s called Bite Size Party), enable or disable voice prompts, and alter EQ. As we’ve seen with many Bose products, the EQ settings are a little basic, with presets to boost or dampen bass or treble, and a three-band equalizer to adjust the bass, mids, and treble. However, this still works decently well.

I would’ve liked to have seen some more interesting features, like a personalized EQ test for more tailored audio, or hands-free calling, seen on the original SoundLink Micro (which had a built-in mic), but this model still has a good feature-set all in all.

Perhaps my favorite thing about this speaker, though, is its design. I’ve already mentioned its excellent fabric strap, which I’ve been using to attach the speaker to my shower, but there’s more. It has well-sized, responsive button controls, a rubber body that’s drop-resistant, and a classy range of color options. I used the Black version, but I’m partial to the Blue Dusk, Petal Pink, and Sandstone alternatives. Ultimately, this is a great-looking, compact, and waterproof speaker that really can go anywhere with you.

Man pressing play button on the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 — (Image credit: Future)

Still, there’s one thing that holds me back from recommending the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 outright: its price. This model comes in at $129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95, which is a lot for a speaker of this size. For reference, you can get our pick for the best Bluetooth speaker overall, the JBL Flip 7, for $149 / £129 / AU$179 at full price. And that model is considerably more powerful, offers far superior audio with awesome bass, and has more features to explore too. It’s also regularly discounted, and although it's a little larger, remains highly portable.

Even if you wanted something as small as the Micro Gen 2, you could go for the JBL Clip 5, which retails for $79.95 / £59.99 / AU$89.95, or the bass-heavy Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4 for only $99.99 / £89.99 / AU$149. I’m not convinced that the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 offers sound that’s good enough to warrant the extra cost. All of these other models are highly waterproof, sound strong, and look great to boot. So, even if Bose’s speaker performs fairly well across the board, it feels like a slightly tough sell.

And there you have it. The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is a very solid upgrade on its predecessor, and I was satisfied by its thoughtful design and improved sound quality. Ultimately, though, it doesn’t feel exceptional enough — either sonically or in terms of features — to earn its steep price-tag, meaning that I’d only recommend this above rivals — from the likes of JBL and UE — if you can get it on sale.

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 sat on table — (Image credit: Future)

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 review: price & release date

List price of $129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95
Released in August 2025

The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 released in August 2025, eight years after its predecessor, the Bose SoundLink Micro. It comes in with a list price of $129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95, which represents a $10 / £20 / AU$30 increase over the original, at their respective launch points. However, there are a lot of improvements on this second model which make it the better pick over its ancestor. The SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is available in Black, Blue Dusk, Petal Pink, Sandstone, or Twilight Blue.

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 review: specs

Weight	0.7lbs / 0.3kg
Dimensions	1.7 x 4.1 x 4.1 inches / 43 x 104 x 104mm
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.4
Battery life	12 hours
Speaker drivers	1x dynamic driver, 2x passive radiators
Waterproofing	IP67

USB-C cable inserted into the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2?

Attribute	Notes	Score
Features	All the essentials are here, battery life is OK, but no mic and underwhelming EQ options.	3.5/5
Sound quality	Clear audio, with good codec support, but noticeable compression at higher volumes and size-related limitations hold it back.	4/5
Design	Durable yet stylish, with great waterproofing and a practical fabric strap.	4.5/5
Value	High price for its size, and rivals offer far better bang for your buck.	2.5/5

Buy it if…

You want a speaker that you can take absolutely anywhere
The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is small, lightweight, highly waterproof, and comes with a handy fabric strap. You really can take it anywhere with ease, and that’s one of its greatest qualities.

You’ve got more of Bose’s recently released models
If you have speakers like the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2, the Bose SoundLink Plus, and the Bose SoundLink Max, then you can easily pair this model with one of those. You can also pair the SoundLink Micro Gen 2 with an identical unit for stereo sound.

Don’t buy it if…

You want the best sound quality
Look, the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 sounds good for a speaker of its size, but it didn’t blow me away. And if you want better sound quality, you could go for a similarly-priced model like the JBL Flip 7, which produces phenomenal all-round audio with far better bass.

You’re looking for the best value option
Off the back of that last point, I’d argue that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 isn’t a great value-for-money option. Small models like the JBL Clip 5 and UE Wonderboom 4, which I’ve listed below, would get my recommendation. I’d also say that the JBL Grip is worth checking out, if you want something with lighting and a super-sleek look.

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 review: also consider

	Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2	JBL Clip 5	Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4
Price	$129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95	$79.95 / £59.99 / AU$89.95	$99.99 / £89.99 / AU$149
Weight	0.7lbs / 0.3kg	0.6lbs / 0.3kg	0.9lbs / 0.4kg
Dimensions	1.7 x 4.1 x 4.1 inches / 43 x 104 x 104mm	3.4 x 5.3 x 1.8 inches / 86 x 134.5 x 46 mm	4.1 x 3.8 x 3.8 inches / 104 x 95.3 x 95.3mm
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.4	Bluetooth 5.3	Bluetooth 5.2
Battery life	12 hours	12 hours	14 hours
Speaker drivers	1x dynamic driver, 2x passive radiators	1x 45mm full-range driver, 1x passive radiator	2x 40mm active drivers, 2x passive radiators
Waterproofing	IP67	IP67	IP67

JBL Clip 5
The JBL Clip 5 is a cheap, small, yet great Bluetooth speaker. It has the same IP67 rating as Bose’s mini model, the same battery life, and similar dimensions. It sounds surprisingly good, has a few EQ modes, and can clip onto anything, from bikes through to hooks. Read our full JBL Clip 5 review.

Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4
The UE Wonderboom 4 is easily one of my favorite small Bluetooth speakers, and one that punches well above its weight. You get far punchier bass than its Bose rival can muster, and generally clean audio all round. Pair that with a striking design, excellent waterproofing, and a solid 14-hour battery life, and you’re looking at a great option. Read our full Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4 review.

How I tested the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2

Man adjusting strap on the reverse side of the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 — (Image credit: Future)

Tested over the course of multiple weeks
Used in our music testing space and while showering
Mainly tested using Tidal

I spent multiple weeks testing the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2, and spent hours listening in our music testing space at Future Labs, at home, and in the shower.

Most of the time, I listened to tunes via Tidal, on either my Samsung phone or the Nothing Phone (4a). To begin with, I ran through the TechRadar testing playlist, which features tunes from a wide range of genres, but I also made sure to bump tracks from my personal library. I also tried using party mode, by connecting the speaker to my Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2.

More generally, I’ve tested more than 40 Bluetooth speakers here at TechRadar, and personally curated our guide to the best Bluetooth speakers. I’ve reviewed all sorts of models, from premium Bose units, through to budget-friendly alternatives like the Tribit PocketGo. As a result, I have a strong understanding of the segment, and know exactly what it takes to stand out in a highly convoluted market.

Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
First reviewed: March 2026

‘A serious Apple AirPods Pro rival’: five sweet stars prove Huawei’s new FreeBuds Pro 5 are the real deal

11:00 am | March 20, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones Wireless Headphones | Tags: ANC, UK | Comments: Off

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5: Two-minute review

Let’s be clear from the start. For everyday listening, the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 are the best earbuds you can get without spending significantly more. They tick every box, deliver across the board and make a compelling case that there’s life beyond Apple for those who have been reluctant to shop around.

They’re the fifth generation of Huawei’s FreeBuds Pro line, which has been around since 2020 and we’ve always rated them well. In fact, I tested the FreeBuds Pro 2 back in 2022. The FreeBuds Pro 4 landed in November 2024 and scored four stars in our review. They were strong but not quite there. The Pro 5 are different and good enough to go head-to-head with the best at this level, including the Apple AirPods Pro 3.

The FreeBuds Pro 5 look and feel more premium than their price suggests, and so does the charging case. They’re smaller and lighter than the Pro 4 at 5.5g per bud, which is noticeable. Build quality is excellent, the stems have a high-shine finish and the case has a satiny coating that feels upscale.

Most importantly, the design translates into a supremely comfortable wear. As someone with small, particular ears who put these through gym sessions, runs and full working days, I can tell you the fit is impressive.

The feature set is extensive. There’s smooth multipoint connectivity, customisable gesture controls that are responsive and the Huawei Audio Connect app is one of my favourites at this level. Battery life reaches around 8.5 hours with ANC off and nearly 6 with it on, with 38 hours total from the case. That’s not as good as rivals for ANC listening time, but the amount of power the case holds is great.

ANC is one of the headline upgrades here. The FreeBuds Pro 5 use a dual-driver system and they work together as noise-cancelling engines, paired with an AI sensing model. In practice, it’s close to silence but without that airless, pressurized quality that heavy ANC can sometimes produce. Call quality benefits from the same tech, I found it to be clear and natural, even in busy environments.

Then there’s sound, which is very good indeed. The dual-driver acoustic system delivers a wide, rich soundstage with strong low-end response, excellent instrument separation and detail that holds up across genres, from driving rock to expansive orchestral soundtracks. I think you’d have to spend significantly more or go wired to do meaningfully better.

Our audio editor Becky Scarrott called these “hands-down Huawei’s best buds yet” after five days of early testing at launch. After several weeks with them, I wholeheartedly agree. They earn their five stars because they’re excellent value, genuinely well-made and perform at a level that earbuds costing more would be proud of.

Now, are they perfect? Not quite. Lossless audio requires a Huawei device, which many don’t have. The design is fractionally chunkier than some rivals at this price too and you don't get foam tips in the box like you did with the Pro 4. But if those are the only cons (and they are), they’re doing well. I’d bet none of these would register on the radar of most everyday listeners.

That’s precisely who I think these buds are for. Not the audiophile chasing the absolutely best sound or the dedicated athlete who needs purpose built workout buds. But the everyday listener who wants the best all-rounders. They've got wide appeal, strong value and no meaningful ecosystem restrictions.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Price and release date

The huawei FreeBus Pro 5 pictured on a stone surface in their charging case — (Image credit: Future)

Released globally in February 2026
Sells for £179.99 in the UK
No price hike from past models

The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 were released in February 2026 in many markets across the UK, Europe and Asia. Though there are still ongoing trade restrictions between Huawei and the US.

The buds cost £179.99 in the UK. But it's worth noting that, at the time of writing, the official Huawei website is offering a £30 off coupon for the FreeBuds Pro 5. This may not last long, but it makes an already great value pair of buds even easier to recommend.

Whether you find them for £179.99 or get the £149.99 deal, they're a good price for earbuds designed to compete with high-end rivals.

Let's put that into context. The latest AirPods Pro cost $249 / £219 / AU$429. So they're undercutting those while being a very solid alternative, particularly for Android users. Similarly, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, which are going to be seen as the top AirPods Pro alternative for Androids users, sell for $249 / £219 / AU$399.

They're pricier than some of our favorite mid-range picks, like the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 at $149 / £119 and the Nothing Ear (a) at $99 / £99. But I'd say they're positioned as a step above both of those options, so that would make sense here.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Specs

Drivers	11mm dynamic woofer and micro-planar tweeter
Active noise cancellation	Yes
Battery life (ANC off)	9 hours buds, 38 hours case
Weight	5.5g per bud, 43g case
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6
Frequency response	10 Hz to 48 kHz
Waterproofing	IP57 buds, IP54 case

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Features

Someone holding one of the huawei freebuds pro 5 buds close to the camera — (Image credit: Future)

9/38-hour battery life, less with ANC or features
Plenty of useful features in the easy-to-use app
Fantastic ANC

The FreeBuds Pro 5 are packed with features, and almost all of them live inside the Huawei Audio Connect app, which is one of the cleanest companion apps I’ve tested. Everything is easy to find and nothing is buried in sub-menus.

Huawei claims the FreeBuds Pro 5 are the world’s first dual-driver ANC earbuds, meaning both the dynamic driver and the micro planar diaphragm unit work together to tackle noise. The low-frequency driver targeting rumble and bass-heavy interference, the high-frequency driver handling sharper sounds. This hardware is then paired with a real-time AI sensing model that samples ambient noise 400,000 times per second (yes, you read that right!), which means it’s continuously adapting to whatever environment you’re in.

In practice, it’s incredibly effective. I tried them in all sorts of environments and low rumbles, like traffic, air conditioning, the hum of a commute, are all handled incredibly well. The overall effect is close to silence without tipping into the slightly pressurized, airless quality some ANC can produce. I know some people do prefer that, but what Huawei does here is my preference. There’s also a good passive isolation baseline here thanks to the secure fit.

There are four ANC models to pick. Dual-Engine, which adapts automatically to your surroundings. Cozy, which is for quieter environments. General for everyday noise and Ultra for loud environments. With Ultra you might notice more of a pressure sensation, which is worth knowing if you’re sensitive to that feeling, but it does do a good job at eliminating almost all ambient sound.

There’s a good Awareness mode here, which has a bunch of options within it. Standard, Voice Awareness, which filters in voices while suppressing other noises, and Adaptive Awareness, which adjusts dynamically.

Conversation Awareness is also on board. When you start speaking, the buds automatically switch from ANC to Awareness mode and lower the volume, then gradually fade back after around ten seconds once you stop. I found I could hold a natural conversation without touching the buds at all, and the transition back was gradual and smooth rather than jarring. Sony’s Speak to Chat works similarly.

The FreeBuds Pro 5 move up to Bluetooth 6.0 from the Pro 4’s 5.2, and multipoint pairing of two devices is supported. Switching between my laptop and phone during testing was smooth with no lag. There’s also Find My Earbuds, which emits a round from whichever bud you’ve lost. I used it several times when one slipped under my desk, it’s one of those features you’ll be more grateful for than you’d expect.

A new internal antenna promises a 38% improvement in Bluetooth range alongside better interference rejection. I had no dropouts during testing across gym sessions and on the move.

A close up of the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 in their charging case with the green light on — (Image credit: Future)

On the codec side, iPhone users get AAC, Android users get LDAC and Huawei devices get access to lossless audio via L2HC 4.0 at 2.3Mbps. So that lossless tier is firmly Huawei ecosystem only. For the rest of us though, LDAC and AAC are still solid options and the good news is very few other features here are gated behind a Huawei device.

Control across the stems are tap, pinch and swipe, which is a good range for buds. You can customize these in the app and I really liked that they registered with a satisfying, audible little click. Head gesture controls let you answer or reject calls with a nod or a shake, which worked well most of the time. Wear detection pauses playback when you remove a single bud, and you can listen with ANC active in just one earbud, which I liked. There’s also a low-latency mode here for gamers.

Huawei says the FreeBuds Pro 5 last 9 hours with ANC off and around 6 hours with it on, with 38 hours in total from the charging case. During testing, I got just over 8.5 hours with ANC off at 50% volume. I then got nearly 6 hours with ANC on. So that’s close to the claimed figure, though it is worth bearing in mind that these real-world results with ANC active do tend to vary based on environment and mode – I had the Dual-engine setting on for testing.

For context, the AirPods Pro 3 offer 8 hours with ANC on and 10 hours with it off, with 24 hours in total from the case. The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro come in at 6 hours with ANC on and 7 hours with it off, and 30 hours from the case.

So the FreeBuds Pro 5 don’t beat those figures, but do hold up fairly well. Though the case’s 38 hour total is an advantage over the AirPods. Worth knowing if you travel a lot and know you may have to rely solely on the case for a few days.

One final point worth making when it comes to the battery is that thanks to the solid fit and passive isolation, you won’t always need ANC. I found that for lower noise environments, running on ANC off really extended my listening time without a sacrifice.

Features score: 4.5/5

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Design

The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 earbuds next to their charging case — (Image credit: Future)

Design is smaller, lighter and more comfortable than ever
IP57-rated buds make them genuinely workout-friendly
Lovely case with strong magnets and a handy ring light

The FreeBuds Pro 5 are a clear evolution of the Pro line, and that’s a good thing. As long as you’re on board with stems. They work particularly well for smaller ears and make gesture controls far more reliable than tap-based alternatives. That said, stem-free designs might suit some ear shapes better, so this is a subjective thing.

Huawei says the FreeBuds Pro 5 are 10% smaller and 6% lighter than previous buds and at 5.5g per bud, you can feel it. I do think they’re a fraction chunkier than say the AirPods Pro 3 and a few rivals at this level, but once they’re in the comfort level is genuinely impressive.

I wore them for around three hours straight one morning and for a further four in the afternoon without any ache or fatigue, and this is coming from someone with smaller ears who can be sensitive to heavier buds.

Huawei says it used more than 10,000 ear profiles to inform the fit here, and it shows. Four silicone tip sizes are included, and I found the medium worked well for me, despite usually needing to reach for the smallest pair.

The one minor gripe here on comfort is the absence of foam tips, which have come with some previous FreeBuds Pro models and are still mentioned in the app, which suggests they may arrive later. Most people seem to prefer silicone anyway, but foam can add passive isolation and a slightly more immersive ANC effect. Though this omission isn’t a dealbreaker by any means.

The stems themselves have shifted from rectangular to a flat oval profile, with a high-shine front panel and metallic detailing round the edges that reads as genuinely premium. I tested the sand/gold shade, which adds to the premium feel, though white, silver and a blue option with a vegan leather case are also available too.

The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 charging case, shown closed on a stone surface — (Image credit: Future)

The new IP57 rating on the buds is a real highlight. That covers sweat, splashes and brief submersion, making them as workout-friendly as an everyday pair of buds gets. I took them out on several runs and to the gym throughout testing and they stayed secure throughout.

The charging case is nicely designed too. At 43g it’s light and pocket-friendly with a smooth, rounded shape and soft film coating that feels premium when you gold it. Strong magnets snap it shut and a hidden hinge keeps the lines clean.

On the front, the halo ring light glows in different colors to indicate battery and pairing status, which is both practical and a nice-looking design touch. The case is IP54-rated now as well, offering solid splash and rain resistance.

All in all, there’s very little to fault where design is concerned. If you want stems, these are among the best-looking and best-built options at this price.

Design score: 5/5

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Sound quality

The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 buds pictured from above in their charging case with the light on — (Image credit: Future)

New dual-driver acoustic system.
Dynamic and energetic sound
Huawei phone needed for lossless audio

The big hardware news for the FreeBuds Pro 5 is a new dual-driver acoustic system, combining a low-frequency dynamic driver with a high-frequency micro planar diaphragm driver.

The low-end response is strong and present from the get-go, with the buds leaning into bass-forward tuning that feels deliberate and punchy. There’s also a bass boosting mode available if you want to push that even further. Impressively, even with that boost applied, the low-end stays controlled. No muddiness or bloat, just a lot of energy and power.

Crucially, they’re not bass-heavy though, a lot of detail survives alongside it. That dual-driver setup handles separation well across the whole frequency range, which keeps mids and highs really clean even when the low-end is doing a lot of work. So the overall character is dynamic and energetic, nothing feels lost in the mix here.

Listening to Queens of the Stone Age’s No One Knows, that dynamic quality is front and centre. Josh Homme’s vocals have a real presence, they’re bright and cutting, but the guitars still drive hard underneath without crowding them out of the picture. Instrument separation is confident here too, and there’s this pleasing sense that the track is opening up at higher volumes rather than compressing. It’s the kind of rock mix that rewards earbuds with genuine low-end grunt, and the FreeBuds Pro 5 deliver that in spades.

But I also loved listening to anything orchestral with them too. Hans Zimmer’s Dune soundtrack is a demanding test, spanning whispered, layered vocals, sweeping strings, dark percussion and heaps of bass, and the Freebuds Pro 5 handle it without flinching.

The Bene Gesserit chants land with an appropriately unsettling, layered depth, while Ripples in the Sand opens into a wide, rich soundstage where every element holds its place. Strings, percussion, and those haunting high vocals all occupy their place in the mix. The soundstage here is genuinely impressive for earbuds at this price, with no detectable distortion even pushed to higher volumes.

The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 buds pictured on a stone surface next to their charging case — (Image credit: Future)

All of the above was tested on default settings, but there’s plenty of room to customize the sound. Eight EQ presets are available, each developed in partnership with the Beijing Central Conservatory of Music. Balanced is the default, which is the most accurate and natural-sounding. That’s the one I kept returning to despite trying and enjoying many of the rest.

Voice brightens things up for vocals. Classical adds a concert hall quality that worked particularly well with those big movie soundtracks, and Bass does exactly what it promises. There are also some purpose built presets for movies, podcasts and games. If none of these work for you, there’s also a 10-band custom EQ that gives you full control.

Spatial Audio with head-tracking is also on-board here and it doesn’t require Dolby Atmos tracks, it works with whatever you’re playing. It’s not usually my preference for music, but paired with the movie preset it added a genuinely immersive quality to films and TV. Worth knowing too that you don’t need a Huawei device to access it.

Call quality is also worth noting here. In a quiet space it’s clean and natural. In a busy market with chatter, loud sounds and low-level rumbling of vans and traffic nearby, some background noise crept in. But my voice remained clear and isolated, which I still found impressive given the conditions. Wind interference caused some wobble on a really blustery day, though I was still perfectly audible. As a serial voice note leaver, these passed that test too.

Between the new hardware, tuning options and the spatial audio, the FreeBuds Pro 5 make a strong case across almost any genre or use case you throw at them.

Sound quality: 4.5/5

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Value

Someone holding the huawei freebuds pro 5 in their charging case — (Image credit: Future)

Great value for money
Undercuts rivals
Already promotions on the official Huawei website

It's a bold claim, but I think the FreeBuds Pro 5 are the strongest all-round option at this price right now for everyday listening.

If you have a very specific priority, such as dedicated workout buds or audiophile-grade lossless sound, you may find better value elsewhere. And if you're one of the few people who think the weaknesses are dealbreakers, like no Huawei phone for lossless audio or a preference for tiny, stemless designs, then it's worth factoring that in.

But everyone else who wants great sound, strong ANC and a comfortable, premium-feeling design with all the essential features, then these deliver a lot.

They're even easier to recommend because they're priced lower than most of their rivals at launch. In fact, Huawei is already offering a discount code on them at the time of writing if you head to their official site, which makes them even harder to argue with on value. Can I give them 5.5 stars out of 5 for this section? No? Fine.

Value: 5/5

Should I buy the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5?

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 score card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	An excellent suite of features, upgraded driver system and lovely app. Battery life with ANC playback is good but is bested by high-end rivals.	4.5/5
Design	Smaller and lighter than predecessors. They fit very well, look more premium than they should and gestures work are nice with that stem.	5/5
Sound quality	They sound great, call quality is improved and there's a lot of customisation. You only get lossless with Huawei phones, though.	4.5/5
Value	Everything you need is here at a price that undercuts most rivals.	5/5

Buy them if…

You want an AirPods Pro alternative
Maybe you’re on Android, want a cheaper option or just don’t gel with the sound signature of the AirPods. Whatever the reason for wanting to ditch Apple, these are a solid alternative pick.

You want all-rounders for everyday listening
If you really care about audio, workouts or ANC you can find high-end options that specialize in those things, sure. But for an everyday listening experience that ticks all of the boxes, they’re really hard to beat.View Deal

You want premium sound, looks and build at a good price
They really do look, feel and sound more premium than they should. And while we wouldn’t describe them as affordable, they’re certainly excellent value for the price. View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You don’t like the stem design
They have long stems, there’s no getting away from it. Some people love how they look, fit and work with gestures. But if you’re not a fan, you might prefer a more compact look, like the Technics EAH-AZ100.

You want lossless
If you have a Huawei phone these are a no-brainer, have at it. If you don’t and you’d really like lossless sound, you won’t find it here. Try the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 instead.

You already own the FreeBuds Pro 4
There are upgrades here, so if only the best ANC, transparency and calls are a priority for you, it’s worth it. For everyone else, you shouldn’t rush to upgrade.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Also consider

	Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5	Apple AirPods Pro 3	Technics EAH-AZ100
Drivers	11mm dynamic woofer and micro-planar tweeter	'Custom high-excursion' Apple driver	10mm free-edge dynamic
Active noise cancellation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Battery life (ANC on)	6 hours (buds) 25 hours (case)	8 hours (buds) 24 hours (case)	10 hours (buds) 28 hours (case)
Weight	5.5g (buds) 43g (case)	5.6g (buds) 44g (case)	5.9g (buds) 42g (case)
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6	Bluetooth 5.3	Bluetooth 5.3
Waterproofing	IP57	IP57	IPX4

AirPods Pro 3
The Freebuds Pro 5 give them a run for their money. But Apple's AirPods Pro are still some of the best wireless earbuds for iPhone owners, with great ANC, unique features and slightly better battery life with ANC playback.
Read our full AirPods Pro 3 review

Technics EAH-AZ100
Not many earbuds will beat the FreeBuds Pro 5 for sound, but these Technics are the best. They also don't have a stem-like design, which some of you may prefer. Though they are considerably more expensive.
Read our full Technics EAH-AZ100 review

How I tested the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5

Tested for three weeks
Tested at home, on walks, on public transport in a city, working in a cafe and a co-working space, while running and at the gym

I tested the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 for just over three weeks to write this review. I mostly had them paired with an iPhone 16 Pro, but I also used them with a MacBook Pro.

I used a range of different music and film apps to test the buds. They played music from Spotify, Qobuz and tunes from internal storage, as well as videos from YouTube, Prime Video and Mubi.

I’ve tested many headphones and earbuds over the past 13 years as a tech journalist. Including devices from top audio brands, like Bose, Sony, Sennheiser, as well as cheaper buds from the likes of JLab, Nothing, Skullcandy and more. I’m interested in tech that prioritises comfort and ease of use.

First reviewed in March 2026

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Immersive sound, awesome battery life, and karaoke functionality for good measure — Marshall just scored a second hit with its latest party speaker

4:41 pm | March 17, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Wireless & Bluetooth Speakers | Tags: LG | Comments: Off

Marshall Bromley 450: two-minute review

The Marshall Bromley 450 is the second party speaker that the audio specialist has released. It’s a smaller variant of its older sibling, but aims to condense everything we like about that model into a less costly, more mobile unit. But just how well can it do that?

Well, at first glance, the similarities between the Marshall Bromley 450 and its sibling are striking. It has a very similar amp-inspired build, it's got those classic tactical knobs for controlling volume, bass, and treble levels, and it's adorned with the golden Marshall logo. But the similarities don’t stop there.

Its older sibling sits in our guide to the best Bluetooth speakers around, so unsurprisingly, the sound signature here is actually quite similar. You get agile and punchy, yet warm bass, which really feels like the star of the show. But you also get controller, expressive highs, paired with decently-detailed mids. Like the Marshall Bromley 750 before it, this is a great-sounding speaker, and has the raw power required to offer awesome audio outdoors as well as indoors.

My criticisms of the Bromley 450’s sound are very few and far between. It doesn’t offer the most rippling sub-bass, and I needed to adjust EQ now and then to get vocals to sound their best in particular tracks. But these are pretty minor qualms, and this is still an impressive performer — especially when you account for this model’s excellent soundstage, stereo sound capabilities, and ‘true’ 360-degree stereophonic sound tech.

Something else I highly rate is the Bromley 450’s design. Its premium construction — with faux-leather casing, a metal grille, and golden details — is as stunning as it was before. Meanwhile, the included handle makes it relatively easy to transport, even if this is a hefty model overall. The Bromley 750's wheels and suitcase-esque handle are gone here though, which makes this a little tougher to carry over longer distances.

Still, you get better protection against the elements compared to the Bromley 750, with this smaller alternative packing an IP55 rating. This means that the speaker is dust-protected, and can withstand multi-directional water jets, making it a good fit for outdoor use.

You will make a few sacrifices when choosing the Bromley 450 over Marshall’s larger party speaker, though. You get less power, and thus slightly less omnipresence through the deep bass registers — understandable given that the Bromley 450 covers a little less of the frequency range. But you also lose the sound character control feature, which enables you to find the right balance between ‘dynamic’ or ‘loud’ audio output.

But still, you do get quite strong functionality from the Bromley 450, all things considered. It has a whole host of connectivity options, including XLR/6.35mm slots for karaoke and instruments. It supports Auracast for multi-speaker pairing with another Bromley unit or other Marshall speakers — like the Marshall Middleton II or Marshall Kilburn III. And it has a replaceable battery which packs an incredible 40 hours of playtime, and can be used as a portable charger.

And if all of this wasn’t enough, you also get classy stage-inspired lighting, with three dynamic options for different vibes. You can also turn these off if you want to conserve more battery life.

If there’s one flaw that sticks out to me, it's the Marshall app. It feels underbaked, lacking EQ controls or the ability to adjust effects like delay and reverb. I wish you had more ways to remotely control this unit, especially if you’re further away from it and want to make a quick adjustment to the bass, for instance.

But overall, there’s a whole lot to love about the Marshall Bromley 450. It does a great job at shrinking the 750’s talents down and replicating them, and it's a luxurious party speaker in just about every way imaginable.

Yes, it comes at quite the cost, and those on a tighter budget may favor a rival from the JBL PartyBox line. But the Marshall Bromley 450 is almost a different proposition entirely — it’s masterfully constructed, built to be a true centerpiece, and brings an air of retro-style classiness that its RGB-laden contemporaries fail to deliver.

Knobs on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: price and release date

List price of $799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079
Available now via the Marshall website
And available from other select retailers from March 31, 2026

The Marshall Bromley 450 launched in March 2026 for $799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079. It’s available now via Marshall’s digital store, but select retailers will also begin to sell the speaker from March 31, 2026. It’s available in a single colorway — Black & Brass.

The Bromley 450 is the younger sibling of the Marshall Bromley 750 — Marshall’s first party speaker which is larger, more powerful, and in turn, a lot pricier. The Bromley 750 comes in at $1,299 / £899 / AU$1,799, placing it in competition with speakers such as the JBL PartyBox 720.

Marshall Bromley 450 review: specs

Weight	26.9lbs / 12.2kg
Dimensions	19.4 x 14.2 x 10.3 inches / 492 x 359.9 x 260.9mm
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm, USB-C, RCA, 2x XLR/6.35mm combo jacks
Battery life	40 hours
Speaker drivers	2x 6.5-inch 40W woofers, 4x 2-inch 6W full-ranges
Waterproofing	IP55

Ports on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: features

Excellent connectivity options, including XLR/6.35mm slots for karaoke / instruments
Phenomenal 40-hour battery life
Sound character control left out, app is underwhelming

The Marshall Bromley 450 follows in its larger sibling’s footsteps with an incredibly similar feature suite. So that means you’re getting the basics, like multi-point connectivity, fast-pairing, and companion app support, although there’s a decent amount more to uncover.

First of all, this thing has a whole host of connectivity options. You’ve got Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm wired, USB-C, and even RCA inputs. If you’d like to use this unit as a karaoke machine, then no problem either. There are two XLR / 6.35mm combo jacks on the top side of the speaker, which you can use. Again, there are effects you can add, including reverb and delay if you wanna spice things up a bit.

Another thing I love about the Marshall Bromley 450 is its battery life. 40 hours of playtime is absolutely fantastic for a speaker of this size, blowing most of the competition out of the water. But there’s more. This is actually the same battery used on the Marshall Bromley 750, meaning you can interchange them if you own both units. This also highlights Marshall’s heightened efforts in the sustainability field again — it's issuing components that can be used across multiple units, and are fully replaceable.

The battery can also be used as a power bank to charge up external devices, such as the best wireless earbuds and best noise-cancelling headphones.

One more feature I appreciated on the Marshall Bromley 450 was its Auracast capabilities. Although more traditional multi-speaker pairing is not available, you can connect a bunch of compatible Marshall devices together using Auracast for even more powerful and immersive sound. I tried linking the Bromley 450 up with the Marshall Kilburn III and it worked without a hitch. I also tried linking it with a second Bromley 450 unit — something I’ll discuss at length in the ‘Sound quality’ section.

This is all great stuff so far, but I do have a few qualms with the Bromley 450’s feature-set. First of all, I have to say that the Marshall companion app feels a bit bare. Although there are some neat physical EQ options on the speaker itself — which let you adjust bass and treble levels — there’s no way of altering this remotely. The same goes for the reverb and delay effects.

Yes, the app provides a way to tap into Auracast broadcasts, and some simple customization options for the ‘M’ button, but that’s about it. Given that Marshall has rolled out a more complete app for its home theater tech — like the Marshall Heston 120 and Heston 60 — I’d expect a few more controls for the Bromley 450.

On top of this, it was a bit of a shame to see the sound character controls from the Bromley 750 get dropped on this new model. This worked really well on that model, and enabled listeners to tailor audio towards a ‘dynamic’ or ‘loud’ style. I get it, this is a smaller, cheaper model, but it would’ve been nice to see again here.

But I want to be clear: the Marshall Bromley 450 still has a very capable set of features. I haven’t even mentioned my favorite yet, the integrated stage lights. There are three presets: the first is ambient, suited to an occasion like a dinner party or solo listening session; the second is representative of actual stage lights, with bold and dynamic patterns that sync to your music; and the final preset is high-energy and flashy, intended to create more of a party atmosphere.

All of the presets work well, and the white lighting is tasteful and classy — something that I can’t say about the swathe of party speakers with loud RGB lighting. The second is my favorite, simply for its authenticity and dynamism, but I was glad to see an option to disable lights for the moments where you want to conserve battery life.

Features score: 4/5

Person taking battery out of the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: sound quality

Energetic sound that rocks indoor and outdoor spaces
Excellent soundstage and no real sweet spot
Powerful bass overall, although the darkest depths could hit harder

I was a big fan of how the Marshall Bromley 750 sounded, so I had pretty high hopes for its lil’ bro. But did it deliver? Yes, yes it did.

Let me begin by stating the obvious: this is a seriously powerful model. The Bromley 450 harnesses the power of two 6.5-inch 40W woofers, four 2-inch 6W full-ranges, and a couple of passive radiators to make that bass feel even heftier. The result is powerful, regimented sound that travels brilliantly, no matter whether you’re listening indoors or outdoors.

When tuning into Timeless by Shinchiro Yokota, I was wowed by the impact of mid-bass, as well as the snappiness of higher-pitched percussion. The speaker’s sense of rhythm and handling of dynamics also remained impressive, whether I was listening at low volumes or cranking things up towards max loudness.

In Morning Wonders – Leo Pol Remix by Kolter, a track with pretty aggressive drums in the treble range, the Bromley 450 replicated highs with confidence. There was a snappy responsiveness and satisfying tone to percussion, even while the tune’s intent-filled bass consumed our music testing space.

As the Bromley 750’s smaller sibling, you are of course going to make a few sacrifices in terms of sound. Most noticeably, the Bromley 450 is less powerful — but it's also less adept at handling the darkest sounds in the frequency range. For instance, tracks with rippling low bass, like Max Dean’s Fascinator, didn’t quite have that full-sounding rumble that mightier models can muster. Sub-bass is audible in tracks, don't get me wrong, and the Bromley 450 can still reach down to a solid 42Hz, just don’t expect the most palpable deep bass ever.

One minor thing I noticed is that there’s also a bit of compression at absolute peak volumes. This is pretty common for Bluetooth speakers, but the Bromley 750 barely showed any hints of compression — in part thanks to its sound character control function, which helped the speaker sound ultra-clean in ‘Dynamic’ mode.

My complaints run out there though. Sure, vocals could sound a little subdued at times when I listened to voice-led tunes indoors. But two things: the onboard EQ options totally solved this issue — I just had to turn the bass down two notches; and this speaker is designed for parties rather than the most detailed, high-fidelity listening.

Overall, the Marshall Bromley 450 is a very strong performer in the audio department. Its punchy bass, direct-sound, and vibrant treble are great of course. But the inclusion of Marshall’s 360-degree ‘true stereophonic’ audio tech also helps this unit to stand out among the crowd.

This thing genuinely sounds awesome from every angle. It doesn’t matter if you’re in front, behind, near, or far away from the speaker, it doesn’t have any real acoustic sweet spot. This tech impressed me on smaller speakers like the Marshall Kilburn III, but it was even more striking on a hulking model like the Bromley 450.

In a product briefing, Marshall also explained how the speaker’s full-range drivers are mounted on the four sides of the speaker (two on the left, two on the right) which keeps stereo channels well separated for a more immersive listening experience.

One more note on sound: this thing can reach new heights if you pair it with a second unit via Auracast. I was lucky enough to be testing the Bromley 450 at the same time as my Future colleague, Nikita, and we decided to combine our two units outside, via an Auracast broadcast from my phone. And the results were exceptional.

In Felini by Venerus and Marco Castello, I was astonished by how absorbing the trickle of flowing waters and strumming of natural acoustic guitars sounded. It really felt as if I was standing front and center at a gig. And with deeper tracks like Chris Stussy’s Breather, I was enveloped in pumping, euphoric bass. Of course, you’ll get awesome power with multiple units as well — when positioning the speaker on the far side of a parking lot, I could still hear that rich bass from the other side. Impressive stuff.

Sound quality score: 4.5/5

Knobs being turned on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: design

Classy Marshall aesthetic is as satisfying as ever
Tasteful lights and premium physical controls
Very hefty, and the wheels are no more

Every time that I review a Marshall product, I feel like I’m repeating myself. But that’s simply because I’m always full of praise for the captivating retro-style design that the company brings to each and every product. And the Marshall Bromley 450 is no different.

Everything from the faux-leather casing, through to its metal grille and golden details is a joy to behold — just as it was on the Bromley 750. This is a pricey model, but you do feel like the luxurious looks, high quality materials, and tasteful stage lights help to make your investment feel worthwhile.

The golden control panel on top of the speaker is also laid out beautifully, and is incredibly easy to use. Red LEDs symbolize which connectivity option you’re using, and tactical knobs are available to alter volume, bass and treble levels, and more. The mic and instrument ports are also located on top of the speaker this time, making it even easier to get a guitar performance or karaoke session underway.

Something that Marshall Bromley 450 actually improves on compared to its pricier sibling is its protection against the elements. You’re getting an IP55 rating here, which means that the speaker is dust-protected, and can withstand multi-directional water jets. In practice, this essentially means that the Bromley 450 is perfect for taking into outdoor spaces, and will be able to handle a spot of rain without issue. As the Bromley 450 is smaller than its older sibling, and easier to take outdoors, this feels like a very smart design decision indeed.

But what else is different from the Bromley 750? Well, the most noticeable difference is the removal of wheels. Yep, this is a wheelless Party Speaker, and you’ll have to lug it around using the handle on the side of the unit. Now don’t get me wrong: the handle is well-made, but if you’re transporting this thing over long distances, a word of warning.

This speaker is honestly pretty hefty, coming in at 26.9lbs / 12.2kg. Sure, the 750 was essentially double the weight, but its suitcase-style handle and wheels made it fairly painless to lug about. If you’re keeping your speaker in one place, or only moving it over short distances, the handle will certainly suffice, but its weight is worth keeping in mind.

Design score: 4.5/5

Person holding handle on the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Marshall Bromley 450 review: value

It’s by no means cheap
But quality is undeniably high, even compared to rivals
Repairability makes the speaker feel like a worthwhile investment

Let’s not beat around the bush here. The Marshall Bromley 450 is an expensive model, even when you consider its output power and sonic talents. But a high price doesn’t mean a speaker can’t be good value for money.

And I do think you get bang for your buck overall with this model. At $799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079, the Bromley 450 is costlier than similarly powered rivals, like the JBL PartyBox Stage 320, for instance. But, in turn, you’re getting considerably better battery life, improved dust and waterproofing, a more luxurious build, and a larger array of speaker drivers.

Is that going to be worth it? It depends. For some, the lower price and specs of the JBL speaker will be plenty good enough. But if you’re looking for a premium quality, long-lasting option, then the Marshall may be more attractive.

On top of this, the Bromley 450 is repairable, with Marshall offering maintenance and parts via its website. That helps the speaker to feel like a worthwhile investment for years to come rather than a short-term audio solution.

Value score: 4/5

Reverse side of the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Marshall Bromley 450?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Brilliant battery life, connectivity options, and stage lights – but the companion app is underequipped.	4/5
Sound quality	Powerful, spacious sound, with no real drop off in listening angles, deep bass could be a little more full sounding.	4.5/5
Design	Stellar, luxurious looks with IP55 dust and waterproofing, but pretty hefty and no wheels this time.	4.5/5
Value	It’s pricey, but you get a luxury build and great sound, with top-tier battery life.	4/5

Buy it if...

You enjoy hosting parties
If you regularly host parties or gatherings, the Marshall Bromley 450 is the ideal speaker. It has great sound that can handle intimate indoor occasions or high-energy outdoor events, different light settings for different moods, ports if you want to hook up guitars or mics, and waterproofing for outdoor use.

You want a speaker that oozes style
The Bromley 450 is truly luxurious looking, and I love its combination of faux-leather casing, golden details, and a premium metal grille. It's far sleeker and sexier than the JBL PartyBox line, and makes your investment feel even more worthwhile.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget
If you want the most cost-efficient option, the Marshall Bromley 450 isn’t going to be your best bet. Yes, it offers a good bang for your buck with great build quality and sound, but that doesn’t change the fact it’s pricey. The aforementioned JBL speakers can deliver powerful audio for less, and if you don’t need earth-shaking sound, you could even consider the LG option I’ve listed in the ‘Also consider’ section.

You want the most powerful sound around
Yes, the Bromley 450 is mighty, and it will have more than enough power for small-to-medium-sized parties and gatherings. But if you’re hosting a larger event, it might be worth checking out the larger Marshall Bromley 750, or a speaker with higher peak volume and stronger deep bass replication.

Marshall Bromley 450 review: also consider

	Marshall Bromley 450	JBL PartyBox Stage 320	LG xboom Stage 301
Price	$799.99 / £549.99 / AU$1,079	$629.95 / £449.99 / AU$749.95	$299.99 / £299.99 / AU$449
Weight	26.9lbs / 12.2kg	36.4lbs / 16.5kg	14.7lbs / 6.7kg
Dimensions	19.4 x 14.2 x 10.3 inches / 492 x 359.9 x 260.9mm	13.3 x 26.3 x 15.2 inches / 335 x 670 x 385mm	12.3 x 12.2 x 11.1 inches / 312 x 311 x 282mm
Connectivity	Bluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm, USB-C, RCA, 2x XLR / 6.35mm combo jacks	Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm, 2x XLR / 6.35mm combo jacks	Bluetooth 5.4, 3.5mm, 6.3mm (mic/guitar) USB (MP3 playback)
Battery life	40 hours	18 hours	12 hours
Speaker drivers	2x 6.5-inch 40W woofers, 4x 2-inch 6W full-ranges, 2x passive radiators	2 x 6.5-inch woofers, 2 x 1-inch dome tweeters	2x 2.5-inch mid-range drivers; 1x 6.5-inch woofer
Waterproofing	IP55	IPX4	IPX4

JBL PartyBox Stage 320
Marshall is gunning for JBL with its move into party speakers, and perhaps the most comparable model to the Bromley 450 is the PartyBox Stage 320. This unit is a little cheaper than its Marshall rival, but it isn’t as well-protected against the elements, has a shorter battery life, and has a less comprehensive set of drivers. I’m yet to test this one, so I can’t speak to its sound quality, but with flashy RGB lights and plenty of connectivity options, it’s certainly ready to party.

LG xboom Stage 301
This one’s a little different, but it’s still great for smaller parties or gatherings. The LG xboom Stage 301 is a wedge-shaped stage-style speaker that’s packed with fun features, clean audio, and flashy lighting. It’s not as powerful or luxurious looking as Marshall’s speaker, sure, but it’s considerably cheaper, and still has a bunch of connectivity options — including support for mics and guitars. Read my full LG xboom Stage 301 review.

How I tested the Marshall Bromley 450

Battery of the Marshall Bromley 450 — (Image credit: Future)

Spent hours listening to music both indoors and outdoors
Used alone and while paired with a second unit via Auracast
Predominantly tested using Tidal

I spent hours listening to music on the Marshall Bromley 450, during which time I exhausted its various features and tried it both indoors and outdoors.

When listening to tunes, I made sure to try out a wide variety of genres, and run through tracks in the TechRadar testing playlist. For the most part, I used Tidal to blast my tunes, but I also dipped into Spotify now and then. I used the Bromley 450 on its own to begin with, but I also had the opportunity to pair it with a second unit, and connected the two together via Auracast.

More generally, I’m an experienced audio gear reviewer, and have spent the last two years testing everything from premium headphones — like the Sony WH-1000XM6 — through to some of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars, including the LG Sound Suite Immersive Suite 7 Pro. I also reviewed the Marshall Bromley 750 myself, so I’m intimately familiar with Marshall’s quality in the party speaker domain.

First reviewed: March 2026
Read more about how we test

It ain’t heavy, but Sony’s new budget Bluetooth turntable is still a winner eight days a week

7:30 pm | March 16, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Turntables | Comments: Off

Sony PS-LX5BT: Two-minute review

The idea of a turntable that connects wirelessly via Bluetooth is not a new one — Sony itself has had a lot of success with products like this.

Its latest wireless record player, this PS-LX5BT, is exhaustively specified and priced aggressively — which, it would seem, is the very least that’s required to succeed in this area of the market. Sony obviously knows what’s required, though. The PS-LX5BT features Bluetooth transmission via the aptX Adaptive codec, so if your receiver is similarly specified then lossy 48kHz wireless streams are available.

The company has fitted a defeatable phono stage, too, so the turntable can hard-wire in to pretty much any system you care to mention — and if you’re using its phono stage, there are a trio of gain settings available. It’s pre-fitted and pre-adjusted a moving magnet cartridge. And then Sony's made the whole thing automatic where playback is concerned.

In practice, it all works splendidly. The PS-LX5BT is a flyweight (just 3.6kg with its dust cover in place), which doesn’t bode especially well, but as well as a stable wireless connection, the Sony delivers robust, energetic and thoroughly entertaining sound. It manages to do so without losing sight of detail or flattening dynamics either, and it has a proper facility with rhythmic expression.

It’s not the most robust at the top of the frequency range, and is slightly-but-noticeably tilted towards the low end when it comes to frequency response, but on the whole it’s reasonably well balanced and most certainly gives a good account of itself where low-frequency control and variation in particular are concerned. Which means the PS-LX5BT picks up where the PS-LX310BT left off — as one of the very best pound-for-pound turntables around with Bluetooth to boot.

Sony PS-LX510BT turntable on a brown wood hi-fi rack, with closeups — (Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Price & release date

Unveiled January 22, 2026
Priced $499 / £399 / AU$599

The Sony PS-LX5BT is on sale now, and in the United Kingdom it costs £399. In the United States it’s priced at $499, and in Australia it sells for AU$599.

And not only will the PS-LX5BT have to justify that premium fee over its more affordable (but equally new) PS-LX3BT sibling, it will also have to see off the challenge from brands like Audio Technica and TEAC (to name just a couple) too.

To clarify, the excellent older Sony PS-LX310BT regularly sells for $199 / £179 / AU$395 and while Sony has listed various gains over that 2019 model in this more expensive deck (of the two new models listed), cash-strapped vinyl fans might question how much better it can possibly be, to warrant the extra spend. So let's see, shall we…

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Features

Bluetooth wireless connectivity with aptX Adaptive compatibility
Integrated phono stage with three-stage gain control
Pre-fitted, pre-adjusted moving magnet cartridge

There’s just no arguing with the way Sony has specified the PS-LX5BT. By prevailing turntable standards, it’s about as thoroughly tricked out as these things ever get.

For instance, you get plenty of connectivity options. There are stereo RCA connections at the rear of the plinth for connecting the player to an amplifier — and next to them there’s a switch to turn the integrated phono stage on or off.

So as well as an amplifier with or without a phono stage of its own, the Sony can also connect to a powered speaker or what-have-you — anything at all, in fact, that has a line-level analogue input. The appearance of a three-stage gain control means you’ll always get a decent level of volume when connected with the player’s phono stage switched on. Or you may prefer to connect wirelessly using the PS-LX5BT’s abilities as a Bluetooth transmitter — it’s compatible with SBC, aptX and aptX Adaptive codecs, so as long as the receiver is also compatible it’s possible to stream wirelessly at a lossy 48kHz resolution.

This is a belt-drive design that can operate at either 33.3 or 45rpm, and its straight aluminium tonearm is pre-fitted with an unbranded moving magnet cartridge. It’s also pre-adjusted, although while Sony suggests it has been calibrated to provide a tracking weight of 2.0g (+/- 0.5g) my review sample tracks at a hefty-but-not-fatal 3.13g. Sony is adamant that my sample is an outlier in this respect, and is very keen to get its hands back on it to find out what’s going on — but given that there’s no counterweight for the end user to adjust, you very much get what you’re given in this respect.

Features score: 5 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Sound quality

Energy and drive to spare
Great facility with rhythmic and dynamic expression
Slightly tilted where tonality and frequency response are concerned

It’s nice to be able to report that the Sony PS-LX5BT doesn’t alter its fundamental sonic characteristics no matter if you’re connecting wirelessly or using its integrated phono stage. In either circumstance, this turntable is a vibrant, energetic and determinedly front-foot listen, one that puts ‘entertainment’ at the centre of everything it does.

Streaming a copy of Fusa Riot by Bobby Hughes Experience via aptX Adaptive-enabled Bluetooth, the vigorous and attacking nature of the Sony’s sound is obvious. Its low-frequency response is, ultimately, slightly overstated — but it’s neither musclebound nor unsubtle at the bottom of the frequency range. Bass sounds are nicely shaped, carefully controlled (so rhythmic expression is very decent) and carry plenty of detail regarding texture and timbre — so there’s plenty of variation to go along with the overt punch.

The transition into the midrange is smooth, and here too there’s plenty of information available — you’ll never be in any doubt as to what motivates a voice, nor be unaware of its character or technique. As with the lower frequencies, the tonal balance is quite carefully natural neutral, and it makes for a convincing listen.At the top end, the Sony changes its tune just a little. There’s a slight lack of substance to treble sounds, a mild skinniness that can make the top of the frequency range sound just fractionally splashy. There’s still plenty of detail and variation made apparent, you understand — it just lacks some of the robustness the PS-LX5BT is so capable of generating elsewhere.

Soundstaging is confidently approached, and the Sony creates quite a large and well-laid-out stage that has plenty of space on it even if a recording is notably complex or involved. It also has a very respectable amount of dynamic headroom available, so if a recording really kicks off the turntable is able to make the upshift in intensity readily apparent.

Switch to the Sony’s integrated phono stage, and with the gain control in the ‘mid’ position the wired sound of the PS-LX5BT is closely related to the wireless equivalent. If anything, the lack of substance at the top of the frequency range is even more pronounced, and the low frequencies gain a little extra confidence (like they needed any) — but on the most basic levels the Sony doesn’t shift its characteristics in the slightest. Which can really only be a good thing.

Sound quality score: 4.5 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Design

117 x 430 x 366mm (HxWxD)
Diecast aluminium platter
Supplied with a clear Perspex dust cover

For a turntable with a weighty specification, the Sony PS-LX5BT doesn’t weigh very much. With its clear Perspex dust cover fitted and diecast aluminium platter in place, it tips the scales at just 3.6kg — which, if you’re the one who lifts it from its packaging and positions it on its shelf, doesn’t inspire a huge amount of confidence. Especially where the rejection of resonance caused by its own operation is concerned.

Still, there’s no arguing with the standard of construction or finish here. It may be priced aggressively, but there have been no corners cut when it comes to the way Sony has put the PS-LX5BT together.

Design score: 4 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Usability & setup

Fully automatic operation
Swift and stable wireless pairing
Will play 7in or 12in discs at 33.3 or 45rpm

There’s really very little to it. If you want to connect wirelessly, press the ‘pairing’ button on the plinth — the Sony locates and connects to your waiting Bluetooth receiver quickly.

If you prefer a hard connection to your amp, speaker or what-have-you, plug in the supplied RCA cables and select output at either ‘line’ or ‘phono’ level — if it’s the latter, you’ll be able to decide which of the three gain settings is most appropriate as soon as you hear the turntable in action.

After that it’s just a question of using the dials on the plinth to tell the PS-LX5BT if you want to play a 7in or a 12in disc, and if it should turn at 33.3 or 45rpm. Some automatic turntables are dogmatic inasmuch as they insist ‘33.3rpm = 12in disc’ and ‘45rpm = 7in disc’, but the Sony has heard of 12-in singles and will happily play them without any intervention on your part. Then press ‘start’ and away you go — when it reaches the end of the side the PS-LX5BT will automatically return the tonearm to its rest and stop the platter turning, but there’s a ‘stop’ button if you want to take charge. A button marked ‘up/down’ lets you lift or lower the tonearm without causing the platter to stop turning.

Usability & setup score: 5 / 5

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Value

Doesn't feel physically weighty enough to deliver huge value
…but put that out of your mind, let the music play and there's plenty

No, it doesn’t feel like the weightiest or most robust record player this sort of money will buy you — but in every other respect the Sony PS-LX5BT represents prodigious value for money.

Not only does it have a stack of features, but each and every one of them is beautifully realised and effective — and on top of that it has an energetic and upfront sound that doesn’t forgo detail or subtlety while it’s entertaining you.

Value score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Sony PS-LX5BT?

Sony PS-LX5BT scorecard
Attribute	Notes	Score
Features	There's no arguing with Sony's specifications here	5 / 5
Sound quality	Energy, rhythmic drive and entertainment to spare, only ever-so-marginally (and occasionally) marred by a tendency towards over-egging the bass	4.5 / 5
Design	Doesn't feel as robust as pricier players, but it's all here	4 / 5
Setup & usability	There's really very little to it — a top choice for those new to vinyl	5 / 5
Value	It ain't heavy, but it's still great value	4.5 / 5

Buy it if…

The idea of wireless connectivity for your vinyl appeals
And not any old wireless connectivity, either — aptX Adaptive, for a lossy 48kHz stream

You aren’t always ready to spring out of your seat
The turntable will take care of taking the stylus off the record when it’s finished - you relax yourself

You appreciate a vigorous and driving account of your music
‘Upfront’ is as good a word as any to describe the Sony’s fundamental sonic character

Don’t buy it if…

You’re after ultimate sonic fidelity
It’s difficult to come by for £399, to be honest — but you can get closer than this if you’re prepared to sacrifice most of the Sony’s functionality

You equate weight with quality
To be fair, there are solid acoustic reasons why a turntable should, ideally, be heavier than this

You’re not especially houseproud
The Sony has a clear Perpsex dust cover — and you’d be amazed at how much dust it keeps off your deck

Sony PS-LX5BT review: Also consider

TechRadar is a big fan of the Audio-Technica AT-LP70XBT — it’s a bit of a bargain when you consider its specification and the plus-points of its sonic performance.

The PS-LX5BT has put its shortcomings into quite sharp relief, though, even if it is a fair chunk more expensive.

Spend a little more money though and the just-add-speakers Pro-Ject Juke Box E1 can be yours — it’s slightly different to the Sony in its approach, and it’s slightly different where its sound-quality priorities are concerned, too. But it could be just the ticket…

How I tested the Sony PS-LX5BT

I connected the PS-LX5BT to an Eversolo DAC-Z10 pre-amp using its aptX Adaptive Bluetooth functionality, and also using its integrated pre-amp via the RCA cables Sony supplies. This allowed me to check the speed, solidity and effectiveness of the wireless connection, as well as the quality of the phono stage and the usefulness of its three-stage gain control.

The preamp was connected to a Cambridge Edge W power amp using QED XLR cables, and the power amp was connected to a pair of Bowers & Wilkins 705 Signature loudspeakers, using QED speaker cable.

Read TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee
First reviewed: March 2026

‘Looks far more expensive than it is’ — FiiO’s an automatic turntable has several bright ideas to light up your vinyl-loving life

4:15 pm | March 12, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Turntables | Tags: AAC | Comments: Off

FiiO TT13 review: two minute review

The FiiO TT13 is an impressive and attractive belt-driven turntable with fully automatic operation to take the fear out of playing your records. It's made from aluminium alloy, comes in a choice of black or silver, features integrated LED lighting, and comes with an Audio-Technica AT3600LA cartridge.

What else does the TT13 offer, to recommend it as one of the best turntables we've tested? It has Bluetooth with SBC/aptX/aptX LL/aptX HD but not AAC and it has its own integrated preamp — although unlike similar turntables the preamp can't be switched off. It supports both AC and DC power supplies.

This is a distinctly modern turntable with good clarity and warmth and a bright sonic signature; to my ears it was a little light at the very low end but bass was still clear and well defined.

One thing to note: FiiO's TT13 turntable is clearly aimed at vinyl beginners and is great value for money, but if you're a turntable tinkerer this isn't one for you: the tonearm is designed specifically for Audio-Technica cartridges and lacks balance adjustment to support alternatives.

FiiO TT13 review: price and release date

FiiO TT13 turntable shot from above with green illumination — The integrated lighting is seamless, with a choice of 7 colors and 3 brightness levels (Image credit: Future)

Released October 2024
Priced $249 / £239 / AU$249

The FiiO TT13 was announced in May 2024 and released in October 2024. The turntable's list price was $249.99 / £239.99 / AU$248, and in the US there was also a non-Bluetooth model for $239.99. The version sold in the UK and most US retailers is the Bluetooth model but make sure you check the specs when buying; I haven't seen any non-Bluetooth ones in the usual retailers but it's worth confirming that you're buying the Bluetooth one.

As usual with FiiO this is a very competitively priced product: it's coming in at slightly more than the Audio-Technica AT-LP3XBTBK and slightly less than the Sony PS-LX310BT, both of which are also automatic turntables with Bluetooth.

FiiO TT13 review: features

FiiO TT13 turntable rear view showing connections — Things are simple round the back: two line outs (but no phono outs) plus support for both AC and DC power. There's also a balance adjuster and a ground, as well as a record size switch. (Image credit: Future)

Fully automatic operation
Integrated preamp delivering up to 800mV at 1kHz
Two op-amps for warmth and low noise

The FiiO is fully automatic and electronically switchable between 33 and 1/3 and 45 RPM, and it comes with a Audio-Technica AT3600LA cartridge.

The TT13 features a built-in phono preamp that can put out up to 800mV at 1kHz, which is more than double the output of some rivals, and that enables you to connect your turntable directly to a pair of active speakers without requiring a separate phono stage. The pre-amp is built around two JRC5532 op-amps that deliver warmth and low noise.

The Bluetooth module here is more advanced than many affordable Bluetooth turntables that stick to the familiar SBC/AAC codecs. The TT13 uses Qualcomm's Bluetooth module for SBC plus aptX, aptX Low Latency and aptX HD.

While this is primarily an entry-level turntable, the TT13 can also use an external power supply for more audiophile setups. It supports both AC (100-240V) and DC (12V-1A). If both are connected, AC takes precedence.

The platter can be illuminated in a choice of 7 colors and in a nice touch the status lights and FiiO logo take the same color.

Features score: 4 / 5

FiiO TT13 review: sound quality

close-up of the controls on the FiiO TT13 turntable — Controls are simple. The power button doubles as a toggle for the illumination system, and the status lights match your chosen color. (Image credit: Future)

Clear, warm and entertaining sound
A little light at the very low end
Bluetooth doesn't include AAC

The TT13 is an excellent-sounding turntable that delivers the kind of sound we've come to expect from FiiO: clear, detailed and entertaining. It's perhaps a little light at the very low end, especially with older rock and indie LPs, and if you're going to be listening over Bluetooth you'll probably want to boost the bass a little bit.

As with other turntables using the same Audio-Technica cartridge it's a good all-rounder balancing clarity with entertainment. While the AT cartridge isn't the brightest in the high frequencies the TT13 is still airy at the top end, and it's particularly entertaining on acoustic and sparsely arranged instruments: while I listened to various artists and genres I had the most fun listening to Talk Talk, mandolin-era REM and Taylor Swift's folky albums. With more rocky and electronic material I found the low end slightly lacking, although nothing a brief EQ tweak couldn't fix and definitely not a deal-breaker.

The Bluetooth module here doesn't support AAC, so you won't get the best sound quality on Apple headphones or earbuds. For other headphones, earbuds and active speakers the TT13 will try to use the best codec available, but that choice isn't controllable from the turntable itself and there's no indication of what codec you're using.

Sound quality: 4 / 5

FiiO TT13 review: design

FiiO TT13 turntable illuminated logo close up in blue

The illuminated FiiO logo doubles as a Bluetooth status light and a repeat play indicator. (Image credit: Future)

Solid metal construction looks particularly good in silver
Integrated lighting is lots of fun
Some unusual decisions round the back

As someone who grew up in a house of silver separates, I love the look of this turntable in its silver variant (black is also available). FiiO loves a bit of aluminium, and here it's used to great effect with flush-mounted buttons on the top surface and polished metal everywhere. The use of metal means it's a solid device — it weighs a hefty 4kg — and it helps reduce vibration and unwanted noise too.

The most dramatic bit of design is the integrated lighting that illuminates the platter with a choice of 7 different lighting colours. You can adjust the brightness via the supplied remote control and turn it off altogether if you wish. The FiiO logo at the top left of the unit lights up too, doubling as a status light for your Bluetooth connection and for when repeat play is enabled.

There are six buttons on the front top of the plinth: power, speed and pairing on the left, and start/stop, repeat and up/down on the right.

Round the back you'll find a switch to select between 7 and 12-inch records; RCA line outputs; a ground connector; and both DC and AC power sockets. There's also an adjustable potentiometer to adjust the left-right channel balance if it's not quite right — an odd thing to have in a turntable seemingly aimed at vinyl beginners.

Design score: 4 / 5

FiiO TT13 review: ease of use and setup

Don't connect it to your phono inputs
"Plug and go" design; easy to get started
Fully automatic but don't forget the record size switch

Setting up the turntable is simple, and in a nice touch the belt is already wrapped around the platter and has a little paper pull tag that you use to drag the belt over the spindle. The only irritation I encountered was too-strong adhesive on the two "remove this before use" stickers, which required getting the Goo Gone out to remove the sticker residue.

The TT13 comes with a power cable, an RCA cable and a remote control, and the RCA cable also includes a ground wire for your amp. Unusually for a turntable with an integrated phono stage there isn't a bypass switch so you can't turn the preamp off and connect the TT13 to the phono inputs on your amplifier: you'll need to use line level inputs instead. Don't connect it to your amplifier's phono inputs, which are designed for much lower voltages.

Automatic turntables are the easiest turntables to use as they move the tonearm into position and gently lower it into place. The buttons to do that are clear, easy to identify and nicely tactile, and the remote control is simple. Bluetooth pairing is easy too: just press and hold the Pairing button, set your headphones or earbuds to pair and that's all you need to do.

Changing the lighting is simple too. You can cycle through the colours by pressing the power button, and the remote has a brightness button that steps through the three brightness stages and also turns the illumination off. In addition to the lighting under the platter there's an illuminated FiiO logo that doubles as a pairing status indicator, flashing while it seeks your headphones or active speakers.

Although there's an electronic speed toggle on the front to switch between 33 and 45 RPM, there's also a record size selector switch. That's round the back.

Usability and setup score: 5 / 5

FiiO TT13 review: value

Competitively priced and solidly made
Limited upgradability
Lighting makes a nice talking point

This is a really tempting buy for vinyl beginners: it looks great, the red illumination option is a perfect match for IKEA's Kallax fabric boxes and it works nicely with Bluetooth headphones and speakers. It's not the cheapest turntable featuring this Audio-Technica cartridge by any means but it's competitively priced, solidly built and very enjoyable.

Value score: 4 / 5

Should I buy the FiiO TT13?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Fully automatic, good Bluetooth options and a useful remote control.	4/5
Design	Looks more expensive than it is and feels very solid. It's very easy to use.	5/5
Sound quality	Clear, warm and entertaining but slightly light at the low end.	4/5
Value	Competitively priced and the lighting is a big plus, but limited upgradeability.	4/5

Buy it if...

You love a bit of metal
The TT13 looks and feels much more expensive thanks to the extensive use of metal.

You want to light up your life
The integrated LED lighting is entertaining without being garishly over the top.

You like to take it easy
This is a fully automatic turntable and its remote control means you don't even need to get up from the sofa.

Don't buy it if...

You have an amazing preamp
The preamp in the FiiO TT13 isn't switchable: it's FiiO's way or the highway. It's a nice-sounding pre-amp, but if you've already got something better this probably isn't the turntable for you.

You want to change things
This is a plug-in-and-go turntable without adjustable tonearm balance, anti-skate or tracking adjustment.View Deal

You've got a stack of 78s
Like many modern turntables the TT13 is for 45 and 33 and 1/3 records only.View Deal

FiiO TT13 review: Also consider

The $179 / £149 / AU$289 Audio-Technica AT-LP60XUSB is even more affordable than the TT13, but it doesn't look as premium or offer integrated lighting. It's fully automatic with Bluetooth 5.0, and when we reviewed the AT-LP60BT variant we liked it a lot: it's a great starter turntable.

Another key rival here is Sony's $199 / £199 / AU$399 PS-LX310BT, which is another fine starter turntable. The Bluetooth module is quite old, though, with Bluetooth 4.2 rather than the TT13's 5.2.

How I tested the FiiO TT13

Onkyo amp with wired open and closed back headphones and B&W bookshelf speakers
Bluetooth via iFi GO Blu Air

I tested the FiiO TT13 over three weeks across a range of genres and eras. On headphones I used an iFi GO Blu Air Bluetooth adapter and Sennheiser DT 990 Pro open-back / DT 770 closed-back headphones; on speakers I listened via my Onkyo A-9010 amplifier and Bowers & Wilkins 607 S2 speakers.

First reviewed: March 2026
Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

I tested Sennheiser’s new USB-C wired earbuds and was wowed by their stellar sound, luxurious looks, and legendary low price

2:00 pm | March 10, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Earbuds & Airpods Gadgets Headphones | Comments: Off

Sennheiser CX 80U: review

Recently, one of my esteemed colleagues shared a brand new term with me: “friction-maxxing”. The term – coined by columnist Kathryn Jezer-Morton – concerns the practice of rejecting modern digital conveniences, and building tolerance for discomfort while resisting the temptations of technological ease. I assure you, all of this is relevant to my verdict on the retro-feel Sennheiser CX-80U wired earbuds — just stay with me a little longer.So, all of this friction-maxxing talk got me thinking about tech and its role in our lives. Previously, we’d head to a Blockbuster or a local library to hunt down a movie we want to see, whereas we now bear witness to an unending wall of films on Netflix. Once we would have gone to a record store or entertainment outlet, and purchased a new vinyl pressing or CD, but now we just stream tunes via Spotify. And we used to queue up outside video game stores eagerly awaiting a new release, while now, you can pre-order a title from a digital store instantaneously.We’ve taken so many inconveniences away, but has it come at the expense of the human experiences that stick with us forever? Maybe. But all is not lost. We can still bring some friction back into our lives. For instance, Sennheiser is here, and it’s plugging the wires back into your earbuds, and transporting you away from the ultra-convenient Bluetooth earbuds that dominate today’s market. Yes, I present to you, the Sennheiser CX 80U – a budget-friendly pair of USB-C in-ear headphones, aiming to compete with the best wired earbuds in their price bracket.The Sennheiser CX 80U are a USB-C adaption of 2021’s Sennheiser CX 80S – essentially the same buds, but ones that use a 3.5mm connector. Like the CX 80S, Sennheiser’s new earbuds use 9.7mm dynamic drivers, with a frequency range of 17Hz-20kHz. The result? Clear full range sound, with powerful bass, clean mids, and vibrant treble. Given that they’re on sale for less than $40 / £35, I was really impressed with the sonic capabilities of these buds and, after two weeks of testing, I’d argue that they’re among the best I’ve tried in the budget category.When I tuned into Timeless by Shinchiro Yokota, I was treated to full-sounding, impactful bass and exciting yet controlled percussion in the treble range. Piano and vocal chops came through with plenty of clarity in the mids too, and as the track built, the individual layers never got muddied or convoluted. I was especially pleased with the sense of space that treble sounds have. Highs often sound as if they’re operating in a well-defined pocket, giving them plenty of room to express themselves. For me, this created a great sense of immersion in my tunes, something that many budget rivals fail to offer. Even at peak volumes, the CX 80U’s treble never sounded harsh or tinny, and solid dynamics were maintained at all times.As a regular user of the Sennheiser IE 200, I like the way that Sennheiser approaches the low-end on its more budget-friendly products. It never feels like bass is bloated or over-emphasized for an attention grabbing, but unbalanced sound. Instead, products like the IE 200 favor an agile, clear interpretation of low-end sounds – a punchy sound, rather than an untamed one. And it’s a very similar story on the CX 80U.These wired buds offer responsive, clean bass that grabs your attention without spoiling the party for sounds in the mid and treble ranges. For instance, when I tuned into Fascinator by Max Dean, although the sub-bass was a little subdued, mid-bass sounds were rapid and full-sounding, never sounding lethargic or ‘boomy’. It would be rude not to give the mids a bit of airtime too, so let’s discuss them for a bit. Now, I’ll be upfront, I don’t think you’re getting the most nuanced or detail-oriented mids around with these earbuds. However, they certainly sound clear, and well balanced and very robust for buds in this price-range.For instance, when I listened to Ventura Highway by America, acoustic guitars in the intro came through with beautiful tonal accuracy, and sounded surprisingly expressive too. But as vocals entered the mix, I couldn’t help but realize that they didn’t sound perfectly separated from those guitars, and lacked the definition in the mix supplied by pricier rivals. This really is a nitpick, though. These budget-friendly buds sound absolutely fantastic, and I’d never expect them to compete with $100 / £100 models.

Sennheiser CX 80U earbuds with different-sized eartips — (Image credit: Future)

I’ve spoken about sound pretty extensively now, so let’s talk about something else that will affect your enjoyment of these buds – their comfort. Now, I have to say that I found the CX 80U to feel very pleasant in-ear. I happily engaged in multi-hour listening sessions, and never experienced discomfort or irritation. For reference, I used the medium-sized eartips, although small and large alternatives are included in the box, helping you to find your perfect fit.And getting that ideal seal will be pretty important if you want to enjoy the CX 80U at their best. With the right fit, I didn’t only unlock high-level comfort, but surprisingly strong passive noise isolation. When people were chattering away in my office, I genuinely couldn’t hear a word they were saying at around 70% listening volume. On top of that, typing sounds and doors closing barely broke through at all.That’s pretty amazing when you consider that the CX 80U don’t use fancy foam eartips or any particularly advanced technologies to keep noise out. Sure, they won’t stop you from hearing surrounding traffic or the rumble of a jet engine if you’re taking a flight, but they’ll still dampen surrounding clamors nicely, and that in itself is a major plus.Sennheiser’s in-ears are well designed in just about every other way too. For instance, I love their classy look, which is marked by rounded buds, attractive silver details, and slim wires. There’s an in-line controller here too, which isn’t too close to the face or too far down, and is attached to the right bud, so you know which side is which.But unfortunately, the controller seems to house just about every issue I have with the Sennheiser CX 80U – even though my critiques are few and far between. First of all, I was puzzled by the lack of volume controls. There’s a single button that can be used to pause or play tracks or take calls, but that’s all. That meant that whenever I wanted to change volume, I had to pull my phone out – not ideal when you’re on the go.My second point of criticism – which is admittedly pretty minor – concerns the controller’s built-in mic. I tried recording a voice note, and realized that there was noticeable background static in the recording throughout. My voice was decently clear, in fairness, and the mic isn’t bad overall, but it won’t provide the best call quality around.But that’s about where my complaints end. Sure, it would be nice if the CX 80U had an IPX4 rating for some protection against raindrops, for instance, but it’s pretty common for buds in this price range to leave waterproofing out. Otherwise, I have nothing but good things to say about the Sennheiser CX 80U. They sound spectacular for their sub-$40 / £35 price-tag, they’ve got a classy look, and their adoption of USB-C makes them a great fit for modern smartphones and laptops. If you want to bring some friction back into your life with a budget-friendly pair of wired buds, the CX 80U would be my top recommendation.

Sennheiser CX 80U earbuds — (Image credit: Future)

Sennheiser CX 80U review: price and release date

$39.95 / £34.99 (about AU$57)
Launched in January 2026

The Sennheiser CX 80U were announced in January 2026, alongside the Sennheiser HD 400U USB-C wired headphones. They have a list price of $39.95 / £34.99 (about AU$57), planting them firmly in the budget category. They’re available in a single black and silver colorway.

Sennheiser CX 80U review: specs

Drivers	9.7mm dynamic
Weight	0.5oz / 15g
Frequency range	17Hz-20kHz
Waterproofing	Not stated
Connectivity	USB-C

Controller on the Sennheiser CX 80U — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Sennheiser CX 80U?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	Surprisingly good noise isolation, mic is just OK, and controller could use volume buttons.	3.5/5
Sound quality	Clean, agile bass, clear mids, expressive treble – very solid detail for the price.	4.5/5
Design	Classy look, impressive build quality, no waterproofing.	4.5/5
Value	Very cheap and sound more premium than you’d expect – you can’t ask for much more.	5/5

Buy them if...

You want good sound at a low cost
The Sennheiser CX 80U are some of the best-sounding wired earbuds I’ve tested in their price category, offering powerful bass, clear mids, and expressive treble. For less than $40 / £35, they really are worth every penny.

You’ve got an eye (and an ear) for detail
For the price you pay, the Sennheiser CX 80U look seriously classy. Their metallic details and rounded buds make them very easy on the eye, and their comfortable fit ensures that they’re strong performers in the design category.

Don't buy them if...

You want ultimate convenience
As much as I loved using the Sennheiser CX 80U, I wouldn’t say they were the most convenient buds I’ve tested. The main reason for that was their lack of volume adjustment buttons on the controller. This would have made using them on the go a lot easier, as I had to take my phone from my pocket to crank the volume up (or dial it down) every time.

You need your buds to be waterproof
There’s no mention of a waterproof rating for these wired buds, which is pretty common for Sennheiser audio gear. If you want splash-resistant in-ears, I’d recommend trying out the Skullcandy Set USB-C.

Sennheiser CX 80U review: also consider

	Sennheiser CX 80U	SoundMagic E80D	Apple EarPods USB-C
Price	$39.95 / £34.99 (about AU$57)	$44 / £39.98 / AU$66	$19 / £19 / AU$29
Drivers	9.7mm dynamic	10mm dynamic	Dynamic
Weight	0.5oz / 15g	0.6oz / 16g	1.1oz / 30g
Frequency range	17Hz-20kHz	15Hz-22kHz	20Hz-20kHz
Connectivity	USB-C	USB-C	USB-C

SoundMagic E80D
SoundMagic may not be quite the household name Sennheiser is (unless you're an audiophile on a budget), but the company produces a lot of great quality affordable audio gear, including the SoundMagic E80D USB-C earbuds. With detailed audio, impressive noise isolation and a genuinely comfortable fit, these buds have a lot going for them. Read our full SoundMagic E80D review.

Apple EarPods USB-C
Here’s a super-cheap pair of wired earbuds that you’ve probably come across before: the Apple EarPods USB-C. These buds have a more open design, leaving out the in-ear seal of the CX 80U and SoundMagic E80D. They’re sleek, well-made, and have a solid built-in mic too. They sound OK for the price, with solid low-end weight, but you won’t get the detail or nuance of Sennheiser’s buds. Read our full Apple EarPods USB-C review.

How I tested the Sennheiser CX 80U

USB-C connector on the Sennheiser CX 80U — (Image credit: Future)

Tested for two weeks
Used in the office and while out and about
Predominantly tested using Tidal

I spent two weeks testing the Sennheiser CX 80U, and took them with me just about everywhere I went. I tested them at home, at the office, and even on walks, to really grasp their noise isolation capabilities.Although I used them for streaming the odd bit of video, I predominantly used the CX 80U for music listening. When playing tunes, I predominantly used Tidal, and had them connected up to the Nothing Phone (4a). To begin with, I made sure to run through our TechRadar testing playlist, which features tunes from a wide array of genres. However, I also made sure to tap into some tracks from my personal library.More generally, I’ve spent two years reviewing gadgets here at TechRadar, and audio gear is a key focus of mine. I’ve reviewed a lot of wired earbuds like the Master & Dynamic ME05 and the JBL Tune 310C, but I’ve also tested IEMs, like the Sennheiser IE 200 and IE 600. On top of that, I’ve gone hands on with some of the best noise cancelling headphones, like the Sony WH-1000XM6, Dolby Atmos soundbars such as the Samsung HW-Q800F, and Bluetooth speakers like the Marshall Kilburn III.

Read more about how we test
First reviewed: March 2026

‘Bass-heads need not apply’: I tested a polished-sounding wireless speaker with an impeccable sense of space — it’s just a shame that it flubs the sub

4:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Hi-Fi Multi-Room Wireless & Bluetooth Speakers | Comments: Off

Bluesound Pulse Flex: two-minute review

The Bluesound Pulse Flex is a reboot of the brand’s 2018 wireless speaker. Capable of hi-res playback and being part of a multi-room setup, its most obvious rival is the Sonos Era 100. But is it capable of squaring up to Sonos’s entry level option?First off, it deftly handles the separation of various elements in the mix. Listening to Nervous Tics by Maribou State, I was impressed with how judiciously it balanced each instrument, with the guitar and the arpeggiated synth given plenty of room. Vocals especially always felt like they were given their due deference, sounding fantastically clear and soaring above the rest of the mix.A big part of this is that the Pulse Flex dedicates plenty of space in the mix for the mids to express themselves, rather than boosting bass and treble as a cheap way of adding punch. Playing Cirrus by Bonobo, I was immediately struck by how energetic the Kalimba sounded and the satisfying resonance and reverb to the chimes. Honestly, its performance in this frequency range is as good as I’ve heard from any of the best wireless speakers in this price range.That’s not to say it doesn’t have any sonic shortcomings though. For example, as it doesn’t have stereo drivers, it’s only capable of mono playback unless you pair it with another Bluesound speaker, meaning you’re not going to get as satisfying a soundstage as you might otherwise. The speaker’s also surprisingly quiet – I rarely need to run most speakers at more than 50% volume, whereas I had to crank the Pulse Flex at around 65% just to get a similar level of loudness out of it.There are also some areas of the mix it handles less well than the mids. For example, when playing Us (Pola & Bryson Remix) by Alchemist, I was immediately struck by how subdued the sub felt, particularly compared to a more bass-heavy wireless speaker like the Sonos Era 100. On occasion, transients like hi-hats can also feel like they’re lacking in crispness and bite, suggesting the treble is a little muted.Of course, this is where many speakers would fall back on their EQ settings as a defence, reasoning that at least you can compensate for their audio weaknesses here, should you wish. Unfortunately for the Pulse Flex, its EQ settings are seriously limited, only allowing you to boost or reduce bass or treble. It also doesn’t have any form of built-in room calibration, meaning it won’t compensate for unfavorable placement.But while it’s a little lacking in audio features, it makes up for it in terms of connectivity options. Wireless options are impressive enough, with integrated streaming apps, AirPlay 2 and Bluetooth aptX HD. However, it’s the variety of wired inputs that really impressed me – it offers a staggering range for a speaker of this price, including a 3.5mm analog jack, optical in, USB for connecting external drives and USB-C for running a digital input from your PC or laptop.This smart physical design is echoed elsewhere throughout the Pulse Flex’s build. I’m a big fan of its styling, with its flattened front face and attractive colorways helping it to stand out from the crowd of interchangeable wireless speakers. Meanwhile, the acoustically transparent fabric of its grille and matte plastic of its body feel wonderfully tactile. I only wish that its buttons were slightly less fine, as they’re not as pleasant to press as circular buttons would be.All things considered, the Bluesound Pulse Flex is an effective speaker for its $349 / £279 price. It offers excellent resolution and handles crowded mixes pretty deftly, as well as making vocals and other mid-range elements shine. Unfortunately, it does lack where sub is concerned and offers too few sound-tweaking features though, so if you’re into a bassier sound or just like tailoring audio to suit your preferences, you might be better off with one of the best wireless speakers instead.

A closeup of the buttons on the top of the Bluesound Pulse Flex, showing the skip forward, skip forward, play / pause, volume up and down and three shortcut buttons. — (Image credit: Future)

Bluesound Pulse Flex review: price and availability

Launched on December 16, 2025
List price: $349 / £279

Having launched on December 16, 2025, the Bluesound Pulse Flex is available direct from Bluesound, as well as from third-party sellers such as Amazon. Its list price is $349 / £279, making it a shade more expensive than the Sonos Era 100, which originally had a list price of $249 / £249 before dropping down to $219 / £199.For that price, you get your choice of three colorways: Black / Charcoal, White / Pebble Grey and the stunning looking White / Tan finish. Each speaker is mono though, so if you’re dead set on having a stereo, you’ll want to budget for two units, not just one.

A closeup of the Bluesound Pulse Flex's ports, showing its power and Ethernet ports. — (Image credit: Future)

Bluesound Pulse Flex review: specs

Speaker drivers	1 x 0.75-inch tweeter 1 x 4-inch woofer
Amplification	Smart DSP amplifier
Dimensions	5.15 x 7.73 x 4.37 inches / 131 x 196 x 111mm
Connectivity	Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.3 aptX HD, 3.5mm optical / analog combo, USB-C, USB-A, Ethernet
Streaming support	BluOS app, Apple AirPlay 2, Spotify Connect, Tidal Connect, Qobuz Connect, Roon Ready
Other features	Multi-room groups, loudness optimization, tone controls, replay gain, mono / left / right settings, volume limits

The Bluesound Pulse Flex from behind tipped up at an angle so you can see its ports. — (Image credit: Future)

Bluesound Pulse Flex review: features

Great range of connectivity options
Basic EQ settings
No room calibration tools

Setting up the Bluesound Pulse Flex is pretty simple. Like many other wireless speakers, you simply need to connect to its built-in Wi-Fi using your device’s settings, then authorize it to use your chosen Wi-Fi network. Admittedly, this process failed the first time I tried it but the second time it connected with minimal drama, so I’ll give it a pass here.The Bluesound app is easy to use overall and offers decent functionality. It allows you to manage your streaming services – including Amazon Music, Deezer, Spotify and Tidal – and group or ungroup all of your Bluesound speakers into a multi-room system. Additionally, it allows you to create presets for its three preset buttons, for example triggering your fave playlist on Tidal at a single tap.Unfortunately, there are some areas that are much more limited, particularly when it comes to sound-tweaking features. The EQ settings are the most rudimentary you’re likely to get in a wireless speaker, literally only allowing you to boost or duck treble or bass by 6dB either way. There’s no six- or nine-band EQ available here, let alone the innovative parametric EQ offered by Wiim’s speakers, which really limits how much you can rebalance and refine its sound profile. There’s also no room calibration here. The "flexible placement options" I originally hoped would refer to algorithmic calibration just mean it can be placed on a table, wall or stand-mount. Meanwhile, Bluesound says that its Front Row feature "shares several traits with the equalization principle of loudness compensation". I’m assuming this milquetoast statement means that it is essentially loudness compensation, but your guess is as good as mine here.

A closeup of the Bluesound Pulse Flex's ports, showing its Ethernet, USB-A port, USB-C port and optical / analog in. — (Image credit: Future)

One area I will absolutely give the Pulse Flex its dues though is when it comes to connectivity. For a speaker at this price point, it offers an absolutely chasmic range of connectivity options. Not only do you get multiroom connectivity and hi-res audio at up to 24-bit/192kHz over Wi-Fi but it also offers Bluetooth aptX HD, meaning you can still stream in near lossless quality from devices that don’t offer AirPlay 2. But, perhaps even more impressive, it offers a whole load of physical ports. Its optical and 3.5mm inputs allow you to hook up digital and analog sources with ease, while its USB-A port lets you play content from an external drive and its USB-C connection means you can stream digital audio straight from your laptop or PC. In comparison, the slightly cheaper Sonos Era 100 only offers a single USB-C port and even then you’ll need the sold-separately Sonos Line-In Adapter to plug anything into it.All in all, the Pulse Flex has some strong features for its price. But it really is far behind the competition when it comes to sound polishing functionality – these days, I’d expect more granular options than just bass or treble boost and reduction.

Features score: 3.5 / 5

The Bluesound Pulse Flex at a 3/4 angle on a stone effect counter in front of a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

Bluesound Pulse Flex review: sound quality

Well-rounded mids and decent treble
Effective instrument separation
Lacking in the low-end
Quite quiet compared to other speakers

Of course, lackingcomprehensive EQ settings is less of an issue if a speaker nails its sound in the first place. The Bluesound Pulse Flex performs reasonably well on this front, although it is lacking in one or two significant areas.On first playing the Bluesound Pulse Flex, I was impressed with how gorgeously well-rounded the mid-range frequencies were. Playing No Skin by Frameworks, I loved how clearly expressed and resonant those mallet noises were, while the vocals soared clear of the mix. There’s a real warmth and presence to these frequencies that suggest the Pulse Flex doesn’t scrimp in the lower-mid range, a real pet peeve of mine.When it comes to bass though, it’s immediately apparent that something is lacking. Spinning Us (Pola & Bryson Remix) by Alchemist, I was pleased to hear that the torn edges of its distorted bassline had a real sense of definition when they ripped right up into the lower mids. But there’s often a palpable void where the sub would be, making you keenly aware you’re hearing a reproduction of the recording, rather than a perfect facsimile. A little more emphasis on the low end here would just help ground everything a little better and place it on a firmer footing.The treble is much less problematic, at least on first impression. Few songs are as good at diagnosing a flaky high end as Go Your Own Way by Fleetwood Mac and certainly it didn’t betray any unnecessary sharpness or limiting. Again the vocals sounded fantastically well-defined, although this did come slightly at the expense of the guitars – these usually sound as taut as piano wire, so it does feel like the treble is occasionally sacrificed on the altar of that expressive mid-range.Generally, I found the Bluesound Pulse Flex was pretty tolerant of lower quality recordings, which is a real plus if you’re likely to use it in Bluetooth mode – especially if your device doesn’t have Bluetooth aptX HD. Yes, I could detect a bit of downsampling on elements like hats and cymbals and it could be a little less dynamic than I’d like but it honestly wasn’t that different to some of the Bluetooth speakers I’ve tested.

A closeup of the Bluesound logo on the front of the Bluesound Pulse Flex; its LED indicator is lit up in green.

(Image credit: Future)

Give it a slice of hi-res audio and it really shines though. Playing Wasting My Young Years by London Grammar on Tidal’s hi-res tier, it really communicated the gorgeously honeyed timbre of the vocals and yet didn’t crush the piano or guitar too much, allowing both elements to interplay with the long reverberant tail of the vocals. It’s a spacious sound that really allows instruments plenty of room to express themselves.It is worth noting though that this speaker is mono, unlike rivals like the Sonos Era 100 – as a result, its soundstage is naturally very one dimensional. That’s a shame as the extra width could really help carve out a distinct space for each element. And yes, you could pair two into a stereo pair but that means spending twice the price, which really changes the value you’re getting out of the speaker.One other minor criticism I have of the Pulse Flex is it’s a bit of a shrinking violet. While some affordable wireless speakers can be overconfident in terms of their output levels, the Pulse Flex seemed a little on the quiet side to me. While I rarely ever play the Sonos Era 100 louder than about 50% volume, I had to boost the Bluesound’s speaker up to 65% - 70% just to get the same subjective volume. Yet if I cranked it up a few more notches to 80% volume, it quickly started to sound harsh and a bit squeezed, even if it wasn’t quite actively limiting yet.All in all, the Pulse Flex’s sound quality is good. Don’t get me wrong: my socks remained unblown when it came to either bass or volume but it’s performance in the mid-range is surprisingly capable and I liked how deftly it handled the dynamic separation of different instruments. Vocals in particular sound fantastic for a mid-price speaker, so if you’re not as bass-obsessed as I am, you’ll likely find it serves you well.

Sound quality score: 4 / 5

The Bluesound Pulse Flex from an overhead angle on a stone effect counter in front of a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

Bluesound Pulse Flex review: design

Unique design
Chic colorways
Buttons not the most comfortable

Unboxing the Bluesound Pulse Flex, I found its look to be pretty refreshing. In the main part, I think that’s because it eschews the basic cylinder shape that’s become almost ubiquitous in wireless speakers at this price point. Instead, it has a flattened front face – from above, its cross-section gave me gumdrop vibes – making it perfect for nestling into a corner and projecting its sound into the room.And this flexibility is supported by its Lilliputian size. At 5.15 x 7.73 x 4.37 inches / 131 x 196 x 111 mm, it’s more the size of the Sonos Era 100 than a beast like the Wiim Sound. And weighing in at just 3.55lbs / 1.61kg, it’s not particularly heavy either – not only is that less than the Era 100 at 4.45 lbs / 2.02kg, it was light enough I could easily pick it up and reposition it with one hand.Elsewhere, its design is a little less adventurous, but still appealing. Both its top and bottom are fashioned out of tactile matt plastic, while its drivers are covered with a fine, acoustically transparent fabric grille – Bluesound’s data sheet alleges this is removable but honestly I couldn’t work out how and felt like I was going to break it every time I tried.

I’m a big fan of the colorways on offer though. Black / Charcoal looks a little basic to me but the White / Pebble Grey version I tested here is stylish enough. And I flat out love the White / Tan finish, as it would be easy to match with a warm decor.Along the top surface, the Bluesound Pulse Flex has the standard array of buttons, covering increasing and decreasing volume, skipping forward and backward and play / pause. There are also three shortcut buttons, which work nicely – using the app, I set one to launch our testing playlist in Tidal and it worked pretty seamlessly. But while the buttons themselves are pretty responsive, giving nice clicky feedback, I’m not totally sold on the shape of them, with their slim lines feeling a little too angular under your fingertips.The good news is those buttons aren’t your only option for controlling the Pulse Flex. It’s also compatible with the Bluesound RC1 Remote Control, meaning you can operate it from the comfort of your couch. The bad news? It’s sold separately so you’ll have to spend an additional $69 / £49 if you want to get your mitts on it.

Design score: 4 / 5

The Bluesound Pulse Flex from behind on a stone effect counter in front of a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Bluesound Pulse Flex?

Attribute	Notes	Score
Features	Excellent connectivity like Bluetooth aptX HD, analog / optical in and USB-C. But EQ settings are very basic and there’s no room tuning.	3.5 / 5
Sound quality	Offers hi-res, dynamic sound with well-rounded mids. Bass is a little lacking though and it’s quieter than most speakers.	4 / 5
Design	Lightweight, attractive design with some gorgeous colorways on offer. Buttons work well, although feel less tactile than they could be.	4 / 5
Value	Fairly reasonable price for its quality, although it’s more expensive than the Sonos Era 100, while not offering substantially better sound.	3.5 / 5

Buy it if…

You want polished sound
Not only is the Pulse Flex capable of hi-res playback but it has a pretty polished mid-range, making many instruments and vocals in particular shine.

You want to connect a lot of sources
The Pulse Flex offers a seriously broad range of connectivity options on top of its wireless connectivity, including a 3.5mm jack, optical in, and USB-A and USB-C ports.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re a bass fanatic
The Pulse Flex is a little lacking in the low end. So if you’ve got a soft spot for sub-bass frequencies, it’s probably not going to scratch that itch.

You want advanced sound features
Not only does the Pulse Flex swerve any room calibration tech, but its EQ settings are really quite basic, only allowing you to boost or reduce bass or treble.

Bluesound Pulse Flex review: also consider

	Bluesound Pulse Flex	Sonos Era 100	JBL Authentics 200
Speaker drivers	1 x 0.75-inch tweeter 1 x 4-inch woofer	2x tweeters, 1x midwoofer	2 x 25mm tweeters, 5-inch full-range woofer, 6-inch passive radiator
Amplification	Smart DSP amplifier	3x Class D amps
Dimensions	5.15 x 7.73 x 4.37 inches / 131 x 196 x 111mm	4.72 x 7.18 x 5.14 inches / 120 x 183 x 131mm	10.48 x 6.76 x 6.59 inches / 266.3 x 171.7 x 167.4mm
Connectivity	Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.3 aptX HD, 3.5mm optical / analog combo, USB-C, USB-A, Ethernet	Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0, USB-C (3.5mm line-in and Ethernet via adapter)	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C, Ethernet, aux-in
Streaming support	BluOS app, Apple AirPlay 2, Spotify Connect, Tidal Connect, Qobuz Connect, Roon Ready	Sonos app, Apple AirPlay 2	JBL One App
Other features	Multi-room groups, loudness optimization, tone controls, replay gain, mono / left / right settings, volume limits	Sonos multi-room control, Sonos home theater option, stereo pair option	Multi-room playback, auto self-tuning

Sonos Era 100
Not only is the Sonos Era 100 marginally more affordable than the Pulse Flex, it also serves up substantial bass and a lively, dynamic sound. While not quite as spacious-sounding as the Flex, it does offer more presence, not to mention stereo sound, making it a good choice if your priority is hefty sounding music with a substantial soundstage. Read our full Sonos Era 100 review.

JBL Authentics 200
There’s a reason we’ve rated the JBL Authentics 200 as our best wireless speaker overall. Not only is it pretty keenly priced but it offers rich detailed sound that’s sure to impress. It also has fun, retro styling like physical knobs – remember those? – and vintage detailing. Read our full JBL Authentics 200 review.

A woman's hand presses the skip forward button on the Bluesound Pulse Flex. — (Image credit: Future)

How I tested the Bluesound Pulse Flex

Tested over a week
Played a wide variety of genres
Tried out a range of connectivity options

I tested the Bluesound Pulse Flex over the course of a week. To put it through its paces, I played a diverse range of music across many genres, including pop, classic rock, melodic techno and drum and bass. This helped me assess its performance in different frequency bands and ascertain how well it conveyed sparser and busier mixes.To really get a picture of how it handled different quality recordings, I played music at a range of qualities, from Tidal's hi-res tier to basic AAC files. I also made sure to try out a range of connectivity options, whether that was integrated streaming apps, AirPlay 2 or via Bluetooth.In terms of my experience, I've been testing speakers for around six years. On top of this, I use a wide range audio gadgets on a daily basis at home. I also produce music as a hobby, giving me a keen understanding for assessing the balance of frequencies and weighing up the expression of various elements of a recording.

First reviewed: March 2026
Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee

‘Fantastic, and a disappointment’: I love the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, but they don’t fix the problems of the past

8:31 pm | March 9, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones Wireless Headphones | Tags: ANC, Samsung Galaxy Buds | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro: Two-minute review

Can earbuds be fantastic, and a disappointment, at the same time? Apparently so: the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro are some of the best earbuds I’ve ever tested, but the company has failed to address any of the issues which put buyers (myself included) off the Buds 3 Pro.The latest AirPods Pro rivals from Samsung were released alongside the Galaxy S26 Ultra and co., including a cheaper Galaxy Buds 4 with a few choice downgrades. The Korean company doesn’t just upgrade its audio line-up annually, seemingly waiting for tech to move on enough to justify a newer model. And the good news is, there’s no doubt that these 2026 earbuds prove themselves against their predecessors.The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro sit among the best-sounding earbuds I’ve ever tested, with a driver upgrade letting them stack up against audiophile-designed premium options I’ve tried like the triple-driver Status Pro X and slightly-more-affordable Creative Aurvana Ace 3. You’re going to have to pay a lot to get better in-ear sounds, or opt for a wired pair.The upgrade is in the woofer, designed for bass, which Samsung says is 20% bigger than before. This allows for meaty but controlled bass, allowing the buds to retain the warm sound of past models but without overshadowing mids and trebles. You can also get incredibly high-quality sound thanks to Samsung’s own SSC Bluetooth standard, but only if you’re using a Galaxy phone. The fact that you need a handset from the company to unlock all the features is something we complained about in the past buds, and it’s just one of several issues from older models that hasn’t been addressed. As TechRadar's audio editor wrote recently, if Samsung revived Milk Music so we never had to leave the Galaxy ecosystem, it might be a different story, in the way that Apple Music is the irrefutable bridge between Apple's AirPods and its iPhone, but that isn't the case (so I do still have to mention it). And that's not the only issue that's been carried over. Take, for example, the proprietary ear-tip locking system which saw the Buds 3 Pro delayed. It’s still here! Removing and replacing them is much more fiddly than it needs to be, and yanking them off runs the risk of tearing your tip in two – you also can’t use the vast majority of ‘standard’ ear-tips here, so if you’ve got a selection you’ve bought or leftovers from past earbuds you’ve owned, they’re basically landfill now. Please cough up more cash for Samsung-approved ones.Compounding the problem is the fit: the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro didn’t stay in my ear especially well, and I know this is a problem that plagued 3 Pro users too. The tip material doesn’t offer enough friction to keep the buds in there when you’re on the go, and there’s a lack of any other stabilizing design features like a fin or balanced weighting, which could go some way in rectifying the problem.Many of my Galaxy Buds 4 Pro gripes are smaller pain points that you’ll easily get used to, but the fit problem is a real shame: it was a complained-about point a year and a half ago on the older model, and it’s something that doesn’t get better over time. Know this: I struggled with whether to list the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro with a 4-star or 4.5-star review rating, but I keep coming back to the excellent sound quality and ANC efficacy. If you've got a Samsung phone, you know they'll fit OK, you're good at charging your buds regularly and you're not fussed about switching the ear-tips, they're a 4.5-star product all day long. For the rest of the music-loving market? They're a solid 4…

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Price and release date

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in their case. — (Image credit: Future)

Announced in February 2026, released March
Sells for $249 / £219 / AU$399
No price hike from past models

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro were unveiled on February 25, 2026, and put on sale on March 11. That’s the same as the phones they were announced alongside: the Galaxy S26 series.To buy the new buds, you’ll have to shell out $249 / £219 / AU$399. That’s certainly a high price for earbuds in today's market, signalling them as premium options, though it’s worth noting that the previous model also launched at this price. Let’s put that in context: the latest AirPods Pro cost $249 / £219 / AU$429 so it’s a similar price in most places, but Samsung undercuts Apple in Australia. The standard Galaxy Buds 4 go for $179 / £159 / AU$299 so they’re naturally cheaper, but you’re getting an open-style bud for that price (think Apple's AirPods 4).

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Specs

Drivers	11mm woofer + 5.5mm planar tweeter
Active noise cancellation	Yes
Battery life (ANC off)	7 hours buds, 30 hours case
Weight	5.1g buds, 44.3g case
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.1
Frequency response	Not specified
Waterproofing	IP57

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Features

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro being placed in a case. — (Image credit: Future)

7/30-hour battery life, less with ANC or features
Fantastic ANC, and intelligent ambient mode
Plenty of useful features in app

Samsung doesn’t make as much of a song and dance about its ANC capabilities as, say, Bose (literally calling its headphones ‘QuietComfort’), but the good news is, these are still incredible at reducing background noise. I spent hours of testing near busy roads, while work was being done on my neighbors’ home, and on flights, and found them some of the most adept noise-removers I’ve used.Even better, they have an ambient mode that’s actually good. It does what these modes should do: dampens your surroundings, but retains speech and other important nearby noises. It could be stronger in the noise cancellation department, letting in a little more than I’d always like, but it’s still much better than the vast majority of alternatives.Battery life here is unchanged from the past models: 7 hours of ANC-off listening, with the case granting extra up to 30 hours. That’s not a particularly competitive battery life today, especially when you consider that the listening time is even less with ANC turned on: expect about 4-5 hours in the buds if you try to remove background noise, and even less if you use all the features on offer.Using your smartphone, you can get a few more features from the Buds 4 Pro. You can change noise cancellation modes, toggle what the touch controls do, enable head gestures (nod or shake your head for incoming calls or to Bixby), and setup an on-bud assistant.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in their case, beside a Galaxy S26 Ultra. — (Image credit: Future)

There’s also a nine-band equalizer with a custom mode or several presets, and several ways to customize your sound including 360 audio, loudness normalisation, adaptive listening and a hearing test. This latter is simpler than the alternatives offered by many rivals, and didn’t have an audible impact on music. I’m not convinced by this one.Two other neat features are the ability to set up bespoke per-app settings that automatically apply, and the ability to tap into audio streams around you or broadcast them yourself (including to hearing aids). I can see business or accessibility benefits to both of these, and neither are perks I’m used to seeing in earbuds apps generally.There’s a small handful of extra modes I would’ve liked to see, most glaringly any kind of low-latency mode to make gaming on a phone better. I also couldn’t find a way to enable multipoint pairing.The earbuds use Bluetooth 6.1 for connectivity, which I don’t recall seeing in any earbuds before now. This is apparently meant to offer unparalleled connectivity, although I had a small handful of Bluetooth drop-outs in my testing time.

Features score: 4/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Design

Both Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

Redesigned buds are sleek and light
Case sees new look; improvement in a few ways
Eartips are hard to remove and don't stick in ear well

There’s no denying that Galaxy Buds Pro are AirPods Pro-alikes, but with each successive generation Samsung blazes its own trail a little more, and that’s evident in the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro with their reimagined ‘blade’ look.The buds now have a brushed-metal edge, which looks lovely and understated in the white model I tested, and pretty good in the black or pink versions too. Gone are the colorful light strips of the past-gen models, as well as the color coding so you know which bud goes in which side of the case.What hasn’t gone, sadly, is Samsung’s proprietary ear-tip tech – this was a problem in the Buds 3 Pro, and it rears its ugly head here. The issues with this are twofold.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro on a table, with the tip removed. — (Image credit: Future)

Firstly, it makes switching ear-tips a real pain, due to the company using its own locking mechanism. It’s hard to remove them without tearing them, something I avoided only by past mistakes (ripping the Buds 3 Pro’s tips), and reattaching them is incredibly fiddly. I imagine the third-party tip market is also greatly reduced thanks to the company eschewing the standard.The second issue is the one that plagued my time with the Buds 4 Pro: they just didn’t stay in my ears very well. They’d slip now and then during testing, requiring readjusting, but the problem was worst when I went running: the things just wouldn’t stay in. This was despite testing the different in-box tip sizes, and at a guess I’d say the papery tip material just isn’t providing enough friction or purchase in the ear. I’d suggest buying replacements, but good luck finding them with the locking mechanisms – manufacturers actually sold clip-on ear fins for the Buds 3 Pro, and if equivalents are released for the new model, that’d be your best bet to stop these things getting jettisoned at every bump.Other than those issues, the buds were comfortable to wear, even for long periods of time. They weigh about 5g each, which is about average for earbuds like these. One of the buds’ features also compensates the sound if you wear them wrong (ie, at bonkers angles like vertically or horizontally).

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro's case, without buds in it. — (Image credit: Future)

The buds have on-stem controls: slide up or down to control volume, pinch once or hold for various other options. You need to grip a little harder than on some alternative options I’ve used, so it took some getting used to, but eventually I found controlling the buds on-ear pretty effective.One other element of the buds package that’s seen a change is the charging case, which now uses a clamshell-style look with a see-through case so you can peer at your buds (and check they’re in there, if you frequently forget to return them to the case. It was much easier to return the buds to this case than the last one, with less fiddling about to insert them into a small gap. Wireless charging is back too.The case was a little blocky though, and not as ergonomic as the Buds 3 Pro’s, so felt a little more prominent in my pocket. The transparent section also shows scratches and fingerprints

Design score: 4/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Sound quality

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

Tweeter and woofer, each with own amplifier
Well-defined bass, bustling with energy
Samsung phone needed for highest-res audio

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro offer two drivers: a tweeter and woofer, and each has its own amplifier. This all means that high- and low- pitch sounds get their own TLC, and Samsung’s big selling point on these new buds is that the woofer is bigger than anything it’s used before, allowing for better control over bass.There’s no denying that the Samsungs provide absolutely fantastic audio quality. The sound is energetic, with crackling mids and powerful treble. Pop songs like the conveniently-released Automatic Glow by The Hoosiers or Dharma Baby by Brett Dennen benefit from the unrivalled clarity and timbre the buds provide, especially songs with plenty of instruments that’d otherwise blur into one giant mush.I personally spent most of my listening time in with the Dynamic EQ preset on, because I found it to exacerbate the Buds 4 Pro’s strengths and reduce their weakness, at least compared to the default preset.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro buds on a table, next to their case. — (Image credit: Future)

The bass doesn’t overwhelm, as I initially feared when hearing about the upgrade, and instead it’s just better formed: it’s scooping, well-defined and better balanced with the rest of the sound. Even in bassy songs, like Proleter’s April Showers, bass walks arm-in-arm with the other instruments instead of overriding them, and in DENM’s Life’s 2 Short it succeeds in creating a real harmonising bass, as opposed to some deep rumble that sits alongside the rest of the song.There’s a lovely sense of expanse through the soundstage here too, even if you don’t turn on the Spatial Audio setting, which I personally kept off for most of the testing. And the maximum volume is way higher than you’d ever need to go, which is another plus.There’s one giant catch here: the incredible quality is only available on Samsung phones, thanks to their support for the company’s SSC codec (which has to be enabled in the buds’ settings). This allows for a sample rate of up to 24-bit/96kHz, which means it'll handle lossless playback with ease, but means that non-Samsung users might not be able to enjoy the highest quality music they otherwise would. I spent a week of the testing period using a non-Samsung Android, and while the buds still sound great, they’re certainly better on a Galaxy.

Sound quality: 4.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Value

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro in their case, atop a Galaxy S26 Ultra. — (Image credit: Future)

They ain't cheap!
You can save a lot of money if you want
Good for certain Samsung-owning audiophiles

The Achilles’ Heel of any top-tier pair of earbuds like the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, is that there’s no way they offer you superb value for money. You can get decent earbuds for literally a fraction of the price; I have options I love which cost a quarter of what these earbuds will set you back. Sure, they don’t sound or look as good, and miss out loads of the Samsung features, but you’re saving money – and getting options which will stay in your ears!For music lovers who can’t quite afford ‘true’ audiophile options, and have a Samsung phone, perhaps there’s a world in which these are good-value options (compared to the four-figure alternatives). But at the very best, you’re getting what you pay for: this ain’t no bargain.

Value: 3.5/5

Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro?

Fairphone Fairbuds XL (2025) score card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	The battery life lets down an otherwise-impeccable suite of tools.	4/5
Design	The upgraded look gives them a distinct appearance, but the devil's in the detail (and ear-tip).	4/5
Sound quality	These sound wonderful, especially if used alongside a Samsung phone.	4.5/5
Value	These are top-end options, you can't expect total value for money.	3.5/5

Buy them if…

You own a Samsung phone
One of my biggest 'cons' doesn't affect you: pick these things up straight away and turn on the high-def audio transmission in the buds' app.

You need top-tier ANC
These things are great at wiping out background sounds, and they show some rival buds I've tested recently just how it's done.View Deal

You like responsive touch controls
I grew fond of how responsive the Buds 4 Pro's on-stem pinch controls work, as you get a lovely click to tell you your input was successful.View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You need workout buds
The unreliable fit make these a poor choice for runners, and they weren't the best at the gym either.

You listen for long stints
With all the top-tier features enabled, the Buds 4 Pro will only go about half a working day on a single charge. Like a lot of music? Other buds last longer.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro review: Also consider

	Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro	Apple AirPods Pro 3	Status Audio Pro X
Drivers	11mm woofer + 5.5mm planar tweeter	'Custom high-excursion' Apple driver	12mm driver + 2x Knowles balanced armature drivers
Active noise cancellation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Battery life (ANC on)	7 hours (buds) 30 hours (case)	8 hours (buds) 24 hours (case)	8 hours (buds) 24 hours (case)
Weight	5.1g (buds) 44.3g (case)	5.6g (buds) 44g (case)	5g (buds) 48g (case)
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.1	Bluetooth 5.3	Bluetooth 5.4
Waterproofing	IPX4	IP57	IP55

AirPods Pro 3
Apple's AirPods Pro are still some of the best wireless earbuds for iPhone owners, with fantastic ANC and a few unique features.
Read our full AirPods Pro 3 review

Status Audio Pro X
If you want great-sounding earbuds and have money to burn, these Status options are another worthy pick, that'll work equally well on any phone.
Read our full Status Audio Pro X review

How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro

Tested for a month
Tested at home, on walks, on public transport, on travels, while running and at the gym

I used the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro for just under three weeks to write this review. For the most part, they were paired with a Galaxy S26 Ultra, but I also used them briefly with a Galaxy S25 Plus, and for a while before that a OnePlus 15R. For a little while I also connected them to a cheap MP3 player.I used a range of apps to test the buds. They played music from Spotify, Qobuz and internal storage, videos from YouTube, Now and Prime Video, and games from a pretty huge range of mobile titles. I also used them quite a bit just for their noise cancellation, with nothing playing.The Buds 4 Pro are just the latest in a long line of earbuds I’ve used, including the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro and options from Samsung’s sub-brands like AKG, JBL, Bowers & Wilkins and Denon. I’ve also handled loads of phones and tablets from the company, as part of my 7+ years of testing gadgets.

First reviewed in March 2026

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

I’ve been using these cheap headphones for a month, and I’d recommend them to anyone who needs an affordable pair

1:30 am | March 8, 2026

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones Wireless Headphones | Tags: EQ, LDAC | Comments: Off

Soundpeats Cove Pro: Two-minute review

If you’re here because you’re interested in buying the best cheap headphones, let’s skip to the chase: these are now going to be the go-to pair I recommend for the foreseeable future. They’re not perfect, which is why there’s still over 1,000 words to this Soundpeats Cove Pro review, but for the money they're outstanding.

Soundpeats is constantly impressing me with its great-value audio offerings, like the indelible in-ear Soundpeats H3, or the reliable open Soundpeats Clip1, and so I’m not overly surprised that I’m giving out another glowing review to something from the company. It’s less versed in over-ears than other kinds of headphone, though, so there was always the chance of something going wrong.

The Cove Pro are fantastic headphones for people who just need any old pair of cans that’ll do the job, so you’ve got a way of listening to music when at home or on the go – they nail all of quality-of-life features you’ll want.

For example, the battery life is fantastic: 95 hours, or nearly four days straight. These aren’t going to give up the ghost during a long-haul flight, that’s for sure.

They’re also some of the most comfortable on-ears I’ve used recently, as the padding in the cups and headband is soft, and they’re not too heavy or pinchy over the crown of your noggin. What I'm saying is, you can leave them on your head for long periods of time without getting aches.

Audiophiles (or people who aren't sure of the title but are picky about their sound) might not be as impressed. The ANC is quite light-touch; the Cove Pro reduce sound more than ‘cancel’ it, and the audio isn’t as good as some other budget options I’ve tested. It’s a bit too warm and veers towards muddy, with a lower-end that isn’t as well-defined as on some alternatives. I wasn’t blown away, but bass-heads might still be happy.

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Price and release date

The Soundpeats Cove Pro hanging up, and with the inside of each cup facing outwards. — (Image credit: Future)

Released in January 2025
Sells for $69.99 / £69.99 (around AU$140)
Cheap, but not cheap cheap in today's market

Soundpeats announced the Cove Pro in January 2026, following the rush of headphones that followed CES at the beginning of the year.

You can buy the Cove Pro for $69.99 / £69.99 (around AU$140), so they're fairly affordable cans – best suited for people who want decent headphones that'll last a long time, but don't need the highest quality or audio or premium features.

They’re not the very cheapest headphones that are worth considering – I recently tested the OneOdio Focus A1 Pro which sell for $34.99 / £43.99 (about AU$85), and there are a few other super-budget options worth buying like the Sony WH-CH520. But they’re still certainly a budget option compared to the big names on the block.

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Specs

Drivers	40mm
Active noise cancellation	Yes
Battery life (ANC off)	95 hours
Weight	251g
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.0
Frequency response	20 Hz - 40,000 Hz
Waterproofing	IPX4

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Features

The Soundpeats Cove Pro's array of buttons. — (Image credit: Future)

95-hour battery life
The ANC is very light-touch
Nice perks like Bluetooth 6.0, listening test and LDAC

Possibly the most eye-catching spec of the Soundpeats Cove Pro is the battery life: up to 95 hours of ANC-off listening. Very few headphones crack the 100-hour barrier, and anything close like this deserves props.

The endurance drops quite a bit if you turn ANC on: down to 58 hours. That's quite a sacrifice to remove some sound, though in the grand scheme of things ~60 hours is still decent.

The ANC isn't very powerful here; it'll strip out the worst of background noises rather than remove them in any meaningful way. There's also an ambient mode, but I couldn't hear a difference between this and Normal (ANC off).

The Soundpeats Cove Pro's headband. — (Image credit: Future)

The Soundpeats app is the Cove Pro’s all-but-mandatory smartphone app. It's worth downloading, even though it forces you to create an account, because it offers a few features unusual in lower-cost headphones.

The app offers an equalizer (presets or 10-band custom mode), find my headphones function, spatial audio, bass booster and even a custom listening test which builds you a bespoke EQ mix. It’s clearly in a very early state – the pictures and text refers to earbuds, and one menu was in Mandarin, but it did a decent job of tweaking my audio and wasn’t too hard to use.

Unlike many budget music-blowers, the SoundPeats supports a few higher-res Bluetooth codecs, including LDAC, SBC and AAC. It connects via Bluetooth 6.0, and in my testing it didn't stop out at all – there was one brief stutter, and that was it.

Features score: 4/5

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Design

The Soundpeats Cove Pro's outer shell. — (Image credit: Future)

Light and comfortable to wear
Useful on-cup controls, but no 3.5mm
Bog-standard looks

When I pulled the Soundpeats Cove Pro from the box, I thought they were dead ringers for my old Sony WH-1000XM3s. Sure, there isn't a huge scope for variety in the world of headphone aesthetics, especially the budget market, but the design language is there.

These cans weigh 250g, with an IPX4 rating indicating that they’re splash-roof. The right cup has an ANC button, power button and volume rocker on it, and they're flush enough that I sometimes thought I'd missed pressing them until I got used to the feel of it. The exception is the power button, which has a little indent so you can easily differentiate it by feel.

The one thing I’d like to see is a 3.5mm port. As it stands, you can’t use an AUX cord to connect these to your music player.

I found the Cove Pro surprisingly comfortable; you can't always rely on the budget headphones for a good fit, but these felt great. The soft cups settle gently on the ears, and a large pad on the band keeps them nestled on your cranium. I could listen for long periods without any kind of strain or ache.

The headphones also feel surprisingly premium in terms of build quality. The plastic material feels a little more durable than the squeaky cheap stuff some rivals are made out of, and other traits of budget cans like rattly joins and a hollow-feeling body were all absent.

You can fold the Cove Pro in on itself to make it more portable, and they swivel and extend a fair amount to suit different sized heads.

Design score: 4.5/5

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Sound quality

The Soundpeats Cove Pro on a man's head. — (Image credit: Future)

40mm driver
Messy low-end handling
EQ can fix some issues

Like most budget headphones – actually, most cans at any budget – the Cove Pro have 40mm drivers. Soundpeats' website goes into detail on titanium-coated diaphragms, patterned dome drivers and magnets, all giving the impression of a thoughtful approach to audio – it’s all for naught, though, as they don’t sound any better than your average budget cans

Music is warm, sometimes too much – as I write this I’m listening to Old Ties and Companions by Watchhouse, and the timbre that should be created by the various acoustic instruments feels lacking because of the sound profile. Bass can sometimes blow out other parts of a song, especially with rock music, which can often see the bass guitar override guitars.

It’ll appeal to bass-heads for sure, and people who go to gigs so often that they don’t realize you’re not always supposed to hear and feel the bass above everything else. But I found it a bit too much – and using the Bass Reduction EQ preset sometimes wasn’t even enough.

Get through the bass, and you’ll find fairly detailed audio, though the lack of support for wired listening means these aren’t budget audiophile cans by any means. There’s a pronounced soundstage though, something you can’t always say about options at this price point, giving a little bit of extra sparkle to songs like T-Shirt Weather by Circa Waves and Such Great Heights by the Postal Service, which have bassless introductions so you can enjoy the atmosphere.

Sound quality: 3.5/5

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Value

The Soundpeats Cove Pro in a man's hand. — (Image credit: Future)

At best, exceeds expectations for price
At worst, matches expectations for price

The Soundpeats Cove Pro aren't quite the cheapest headphones on the market – or that have wowed TechRadar’s team recently – but they're not far off. And they offer top value for money.

The build quality here is better than I've come to see expect from budget cans, even if the looks won't win any awards for originality. And the feature set is better than many same-price rivals, with tools that you'd normally find in cans twice as pricey.

In its weaker departments, the Cove Pro still deliver at the level you'd expect for this price; they sound no worse than the average budget headset, and deliver enough ANC to trump rivals which don't offer the feature.

Value: 4/5

Should I buy the Soundpeats Cove Pro?

Fairphone Fairbuds XL (2025) score card
Attributes	Notes	Rating
Features	The battery life is great, and there are some solid features, but the ANC isn't anything to write home about.	4/5
Design	They're basic to look at, but lightweight and comfy.	4.5/5
Sound quality	They sound muddy, but there's detail and a reasonably wide soundstage.	3.5/5
Value	Set your expectations for the budget and you won't be disappointed.	4/5

Buy them if…

You need a really solid battery
If you don't get around to charging your headphones often, the 95 hours offered here will be great for you.

You don't want uncomfortable headphones
If you often find over-ear headphones a little uncomfortable, you might find these a bit more tolerable.View Deal

You don't want to spend much money
Don't use your headphones enough to justify an expensive purchase? These will be great alternatives that'll serve you find.View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

Audio quality is your most important factor
The best parts of the Cove Pro are their features and build, and budget audiophiles will find better picks below.

You need top-tier noise cancellation
If you live somewhere noisy and need to find peace, these are fine picks, but there are better buys (see below for these).

Soundpeats Cove Pro review: Also consider

	Soundpeats Cove Pro	OneOdio Focus A6	Earfun Wave Life
Drivers	40mm	40mm	40mm
Active noise cancellation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Battery life (ANC on)	95 hours	75 hours	60 hours
Weight	251g	240g	264g
Connectivity	Bluetooth 6.0	Bluetooth 6.0	Bluetooth 5.4
Waterproofing	IPX4	None	None

OneOdio Focus A6
These top-rated headphones sound great, and undercut the Cove Pro. If audio quality is your main interest, these are the alternatives to consider.
Read our full OneOdio Focus A6 review

Earfun Wave Life
These picks are also more affordable than the Soundpeats, and are also very comfortable to wear (plus we liked the ANC) though the battery life isn't comparable.
Read our full Earfun Wave Life review

How I tested the Soundpeats Cove Pro

Tested for a month
Tested at home, on walks, on public transport and the gym

I used the Soundpeats Cove Pro for just over a month to write this review, immediately following a few of their big rivals.

I used the cans paired alongside my Android phone, listening on a variety of services. This included in a range of indoor and outdoor settings including, most challengingly, on a train ride home after a high-end audio show.

For TechRadar, I've already tested a wide range of budget headphones, including over-ear alternatives and other picks from Soundpeats.

First reviewed in March 2026

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee