Organizer
Gadget news
I was blown away by the zoom on the Panasonic HC-X1200 – it almost makes the case for a full camcorder comeback
4:00 pm | November 29, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Video Cameras | Tags: | Comments: Off

Panasonic HC-X1200: two-minute review

I’ve been testing camcorders for over five years, to which you might respond, "Aren’t camcorders a relic from a former era?" And in some ways you'd be right. But there's still plenty of life in the product category, and filmmakers who like the traditional handling and built-in zoom of a camcorder will find much to enjoy in Panasonic's HC-X1200.

Even for a seasoned reviewer like myself, though, the HC-X1200's appeal isn't immediately clear. This relatively new and lightweight Panasonic model targets the serious creator or event videographer who needs rock-solid reliability and modern specs without jumping into the $2,000 / £1,500 price bracket.

There are few real video 'features', apart from basic face tracking. And without mod cons like Wi-Fi, this isn't the tool for fast-paced content creators. I like a simple workflow, and the HC-X1200 is certainly easy to pick up and use in full auto mode, with the option to work in manual for more advanced users.

A core strength here is, thankfully, image quality. I was fairly impressed that the camcorder offers 4K recording at 60 frames per second (4K/60p) with 10-bit internal recording, especially since similarly-priced models max out at 4K 30p.

This combination smooths out action footage with enough color latitude for grading later on, although it's nothing like as fast as you'll get from a top-tier action camera.

The main draw of camcorders, as I say, is their built-in zoom range. Sure enough, the HC-X1200’s built-in 24x optical zoom is something you won't get from a mirrorless camera without spending a fortune on lenses that are likely very heavy, too.

It's also worth noting that the HC-X1200's rivals max out at 20x zoom. If you’re an event or documentary shooter, or a wildlife enthusiast as I am, this is the best video camera for zooming in exceedingly far with clarity, stability, and speed. In 35mm terms, it's the equivalent of having lenses ranging from a 25mm wide-angle all the way to a 600mm telephoto in your bag.

The Panasonic HC-X1200 camcorder held by a female photographer against an orange autumnal backdrop

(Image credit: Future)

The HC-X1200's design also incorporates three steps of built-in ND filter, and the excellent 5-axis Hybrid OIS. is impressive for static handheld shots and walking scenes.

I didn't get the chance to shoot a wedding during my review loan period with the camcorder. Still, I think I’d be happy to use it for long events like weddings or conferences without worrying about the battery dying or the unit overheating, not least since the heat-dissipating design kept it totally cool while shooting long testing clips.

The HC-X1200 is a relatively affordable camcorder, and that’s because it makes some obvious compromises. Without a proper electronic viewfinder (EVF), it’s not always easy to see settings and frame up scenes in bright sunlight, especially since a lot of data on the screen is printed in tiny writing.

Good video requires good audio, but there are no professional XLR audio inputs. Instead, there’s one 3.5mm mic jack, which means relying on external recorders or less high-end microphones if you’re working on projects where audio is critical. If you're shooting primarily for home or family videos, though, the audio is just fine.

The HC-X1200 is a good-value portable camcorder. Whether you’re new to filmmaking and want something with a long zoom, or you like the traditional handling, the HC-X1200 is a reliable option for long-form capture. Just be prepared to manage audio externally, and work primarily in well-lit conditions.

The Panasonic HC-X1200 camcorder being taken out of the box

(Image credit: Future)

Panasonic HC-X1200: price and availability

  • Priced at $1,299.99 / £1,099 / AU$2,399
  • Lens hood included
  • Announced in January 2025

The Panasonic HC-X1200 was announced in January 2025 alongside two new 4K camcorders, the HC-X1600 and HC-X2100. It costs around $1,299.99 / £1,099 / AU$2,399.

The HC-X1200 is the entry-level model among these three Panasonic camcorders, without a viewfinder, handle unit, or XLR mic ports. It also lacks Wi-Fi, which feels like a misstep given that this comes as standard on cheaper rival camcorders and creator video cameras.

By my maths, the HC-X1200 is one of the most affordable camcorders for shooting 4K at 60 frames per second. The built-in ND filters also add a lot of flexibility for controlling exposure in bright light. Competing models priced near or below it (the Canon HF G70 or Sony AX43) are typically limited to 4K/30p, and both of those max out at 20x optical zoom power.

Panasonic HC-X1200 specs

Panasonic HC-X1200 specs

Sensor:

1/2.5-type (inch) MOS

Effective pixels:

8.29MP

Optical zoom:

24x

F Value:

f/1.8-f/4

Stabilization:

5-axis hybrid OIS

Memory card:

SDHC/SDXC (Up to 512GB)

Recording formats:

MP4, AVCHD

Maximum recording quality:

100 Mbps for 4K 59.94p/50p

Dimensions:

3.7 x 5.1 x 8.2 inches / 893 x 129 x 209mm (H x W x D)

Weight:

1.76lbs / 800g

Panasonic HC-X1200: Design

  • Light at just 800g, but not ultra-compact
  • Heat-dispersing design for continual recording
  • Two manual control rings

The Panasonic HC-X1200’s form resembles a classic camcorder. Made from matte black plastic, the body is long and barrel-shaped, and there’s an adjustable padded strap to aid stable handheld use (right-handed functionality only, though), with a pull-out, articulating LCD screen on the left of the body.

The HC-X1200 looks and feels similar to the Panasonic HC-X1500, which I’ve also tested, but comes in at a lighter weight of 1.76lbs / 800g. Some of the HC-X1500’s added weight comes from the viewfinder and eyecup, and the HC-X1200 is designed as a compact, body-only model, doing without the XLR-equipped handle unit found on its siblings (the HC-X1600 and X2100).

Panasonic calls it a “lightweight 4K 60p palm-style" camcorder, and while isn’t heavy, it might feel cumbersome to use at first if you’ve come from a vlogging-style camera. You’ll need a long padded bag to carry it, too. But the benefit of a camcorder like this is that everything is in the one unit, so you can forget carrying (and swapping out) extra lenses.

On the top is a chunky raised zoom rocker, which I found responsive, but not as naturally placed as on some camcorders. My index and middle fingers had to curve around slightly to reach it, but your mileage may vary.

The HC-X1200 is aimed at prosumers rather than total beginners, so there’s a good array of physical buttons on the camcorder body. There are no fewer than five customizable user buttons on the top, too, which can be set via the menu for controlling functions like face detection and enabling image stabilization.

Several of these are already preset, making them optional, but it’s a good thing to be able to customize the handling for your own preferences, especially since it’s harder to find these buttons in low light.

Before you even pull out the LCD screen, there are more buttons underneath on the left-hand side, including for the menu, iris, gain, shutter, and a toggle to switch between auto and manual exposure mode. The Menu button is the one you’ll likely use the most, and I would have liked to have felt it raised more than the others to make it easier to find without looking. Small things, though.

Fold out the LCD and there’s the on/off button (presumably positioned as such to stop you pressing it accidentally when the LCD is stowed away), a playback button, a toggle for displaying more or less info on the screen, and, as with most camcorders around this price point, dual memory card slots covered by a slide across a plastic window. A light illuminates to indicate which of the two SD cards is actively recording, which is a nice touch.

The 3.5-inch touch-sensitive LCD monitor is bright, detailed, and fully articulated, which means you can shoot pieces to camera or at low angles easily. As a more compact model, the Panasonic HC-X1200 notably skips an electronic viewfinder, but for this class of camera the generous touchscreen compensates.

My main complaint is the responsiveness of said screen and the layout of the menus, which at times felt slow, confusing, and outdated to a modern user. It’s a shame Panasonic couldn't spend time coming up with a more user-friendly experience, but it’s not a dealbreaker.

At the rear of the camcorder is the raised recording button (easy to find without looking), plus a full HDMI port, USB-C power port, and single 3.5mm stereo mini jack for external audio input. In some ways, it’s a shame that professional XLR inputs are reserved for the X1600/X2100 handle. However, for a camcorder of this size, it keeps the profile sleek. Underneath, there’s also a standard tripod thread, and it’s a great bonus to be able to check the battery’s capacity with a quick press of the “check button”.

The highlight for me when using the HC-X1200 were the dual manual rings on the lens barrel, which are both smooth and very tactile to use, thanks to the notched markings all the way around them. The ring closest to the lens controls focus, and the other zooms, meaning you can precisely pull focus through a shot, or just get up-close subjects really sharp.

I found it easy to make smooth and on-the-fly adjustments without taking my eye off the action, and the manual rings are also in a more natural place for your hands than the zoom rocker. Just behind the closest ring is a dedicated three-stage ND filter switch (Clear, 1/4, 1/16, 1/64) placed right where my fingers expected it, and I found this essential for managing exposure in bright outdoor settings, even though I’ve not really used this function on other camcorders.

Close-up of Panasonic HC-X1200 camcorder showing lens

(Image credit: Future)

A big lens hood is supplied with the camcorder, both to protect the lens and shelter it from bright, direct sunlight. There’s a physical toggle to open and close the lens hood, which mirrorless users might take a while to get used to. I do wonder if modern mirrorless users will, like I did a few times, even with years of testing, forget to close the opening once you’ve finished shooting.

The HC-X1200’s design doesn’t try anything new, but that’s okay. It took me a few days to really get to grips with everything – both metaphorically and literally, since the strap needs tightening often – but it balances portability with some core manual controls. It’s an effective, comfortable choice for filmmakers who don’t want to carry around a colossal camcorder.

Panasonic HC-X1200: Performance

  • Mediocre low-light performance from the small sensor
  • Impressively shake-free footage even at the full 24x zoom
  • Versatile f/1.8-f/4 iris opening allows some bokeh

The XC-H1200 is a good video all-rounder, without any of the fancy AI features or autofocus options often marketed at content creators to make filming 'easy'. If you’re looking for a fully automatic workflow, though, the XC-H1200 delivers generally well-exposed and balanced 4K footage.

The 24x zoom range is quite incredible, and you can see in the sample clips how close I was able to get to a grey heron from the other side of a large pond. The zoom action is very smooth, and I like that it can be fine-tuned using the lens rings – great for up-close scenes, or if you want some creative pull-focus shots.

There aren’t any metering modes to choose from, though, and I often found that the exposure, while good overall, would overexpose very bright areas, such as the white feathers of a bird, at the mid-to-far end of the zoom. However, the camcorder’s built-in ND filters became exceptionally helpful on sunny days, as well as a creative tool if I wanted a darker look.

I found white balance to be very accurate on frosty mornings and sunny days, but in artificial light I ended up setting the tone manually. This is Panasonic's prosumer camcorder, so the fact that it lacks color grading isn’t a surprise, and there aren’t options to match colors with other cameras – a feature I’ve previously used with the Canon lineup.

Colors are well rendered, if a little on the dull side, but I found some leeway to boost the vibrancy in post-production without scenes looking artificial or losing detail. With 10-bit color depth set I didn’t notice any banding in bright skies either, as I have with cheaper camcorders and action cameras.

There are several video options to choose from, but only once you’ve stumbled upon the right place in the confusing, unintuitive menu. You can shoot in either UHD 4K or 1080p resolution, and two frequency modes (59.94 Hz for NTSC regions and 50.00 Hz for PAL regions) dictate the available frame rates, all at a maximum bitrate of 200Mbps.

Various encoding options will help those with more experience balance file size and quality, but if you’re new to moviemaking Panasonic doesn’t helpfully explain any of the options, so a bit of research might be needed in order to get the most from them.

Although it isn’t obvious, the HC-X1200 has the option for smooth slow-motion capture at up to 120fps, but only in HD (1920 x 1080). The idea is to help keep fast-moving subjects in focus, but while the results are definitely usable, the autofocus is the more limiting factor for ultra-fast and erratic subjects. In short, don’t buy this camera expecting to shoot a lot of crisp action.

The HC-X1200’s autofocus isn’t mind-blowing, and Panasonic doesn’t give a lot of detail regarding the mechanics of how it works. There’s nothing like the eye-detection precision of my Canon EOS R6 Mark II, but that’s to be expected at this price point.

Face tracking is easily turned on or off with a button on the body. It’s great for keeping you sharp during vlogging pieces to camera or documentary work, since the camcorder also adjusts the exposure automatically to keep the main face balanced in changing light. If you’re in shifting lighting conditions, this process takes a few seconds to recalibrate, but for interviews in a continuous or evenly lit room, it will cope well.

I was worried about low-light performance, due to the size of the camcorder’s sensor (1/2.5-inch) – usually a recipe for grainy, muddy footage. Out of the camera, the footage I shot at night was a little noisy, but far more usable than other camcorders I’ve tested with the same sensor size. The best results come from shooting at the camcorder’s highest bit rate, and then eking out the mileage with some creative grading.

If you work with dark footage rather than trying to brighten the shadows, the low-light footage is surprisingly usable. Setting the f/1.8 maximum aperture manually also helps. The HC-X1200 is also capable of capturing the invisible infrared spectrum for nighttime footage, but you need to buy an external infrared light source for this, so I didn’t test it.

With the dual SD card slots, you can set up two cards for relay recording (using one as an overflow when the first fills up), or simultaneous recording, so you have a backup. I only used one fast SD card when testing, but I often found the camera would be writing and processing footage for a long time after hitting the button to end recording. On a few random occasions, the camcorder froze, and I had to leave it alone for five minutes or so before, which isn’t ideal if you’ve got limited time with a subject or need to capture a particular moment.

On the plus side, it’s fully possible to record footage for as long as either your memory card(s) or the battery allows, since the heat-dissipating design genuinely delivers unlimited recording times, as Panasonic promises. I accidentally left the camcorder recording in my bag one day, and found I had several hours before the battery had run out.

Panasonic says you’ll get five hours of battery when recording 4K at 30p, and I got at least four and a half hours from one full charge, making this an excellent all-day companion if you have a few spare batteries in your arsenal.

Obviously, image quality is only half of the equation with video, and the HC-X1200’s audio quality falls somewhat short. If you’re a few steps from the camcorder, and ideally facing towards it in a wind or traffic-free zone, your voice is picked up clearly. Outside this ideal scenario – for example, if you’re walking and talking, or near a road – the built-in mic is less capable at picking out individual audio sources.

There are no clever AI algorithms working in the background to help suppress wind noise, as found on action cameras like the DJI Osmo Nano. So the onus is on you as the user to carefully choose the shooting location – in a sheltered spot away from the wind – or add an external mic with a furry wind shield using the 3.5mm jack input.

Should you buy the Panasonic HC-X1200?

Buy it if...

You mostly shoot in controlled or good lighting

The HC-X1200 isn't great at adapting to changing light in auto mode, and tends to get grainy in low light.

You don't need XLR inputs

There's a standard 3.5mm stereo mic input. You may need an external audio recorder for pro-grade quality.

Don't buy it if...

You want the flexibility of Wi-Fi

Without built-in Wi-Fi, you can't use a phone or tablet for remote control or livestreaming.

You like using an electronic viewfinder (EVF)

You've only got the LCD for changing settings and framing scenes. The screen is generous, but it can be hard to view in bright sunlight.

Also consider

A female photographer holding the Panasonic HC-X1200 in an autumnal scene

(Image credit: Future)

How I tested the Panasonic HC-X1200

  • I tested it for two weeks
  • I shot in full Manual and Auto mode
  • I used it for video, day and night

Panasonic loaned me the HC-X1200 for two weeks, and although it was raining almost the whole time (welcome to winter in the UK), I did take it with me on a few outdoor adventures, dog walks, and day trips, and I used it as an everyday companion for mainly handheld shooting.

I made direct comparisons with many other camcorders I've tested, as well as video on my now similarly-priced Canon EOS R6 DSLR and iPhone 15 Pro.

I shot videos using different iris settings and zoom lengths, in both fully automatic and manual modes, to compare the ease of use and quality of results from both.

  • First reviewed November 2025
Rode NT1 5th Generation review – the studio gold standard
8:22 pm | March 14, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Redefining a classic signature look and feel of any tried-and-true studio microphone can be tough. Enter the Rode NT1 5th Generation, which adds a few new tricks to a well-established microphone to compete in all digital world. Through the inclusion of USB and XLR, it stands as one of the best options for game streamers, podcasters and broadcasters provided that they've got a setup that accommodates for its sensitivity and power. 

Price and Availability

The Rode NT1 5th Generation is now available worldwide after launching in February 2023. You can pick it up in the US, the UK, and the company’s native Australia for $249 / £249 / AU$399. There’s the choice between silver and black, and you can either buy from online outlets, such as Amazon, or directly from Rode.  

Design and Features

Rode NT1 5th Generation

(Image credit: Future)

At first glance, there’s nothing that immediately sets the Rode NT1 5th Generation apart from its older variants. The microphone line, the first ever developed by the manufacturer back in 1991, has a timeless studio look about it, with little on the surface changing in 30 years. If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it, as you’ve got a side-address cardioid (meaning you use it vertically) complete with a dedicated pop shield and shock mount. These are all key staples of what you hope to find in a proper broadcasting microphone for the studio. 

The included Rode NTSM6 Suspension Mount goes a long way to showcase the premium nature of the Rode NT1 5th Generation. The combined pop filter and shock mount are seriously high quality and made of durable plastic and elasticated material for a floating support that completely protects against any unwanted bumps or vibrations. Given how sensitive studio microphones like this one are, it’s an essential inclusion, so it’s good that you’re getting proper support in the full package. There’s also a 10-year warranty here so it’ll last you a very long time. 

Where the Rode NT1 5th Generation sets itself apparent from the older models is in its dual connectivity as you can plug it in via XLR and USB-C. It’s not just the multiple output methods that helps this microphone stand out, though, as there’s also a 32-bit float optimized for audio interfaces for digital recording. Through this inclusion, Rode has claimed this is the “unclippable” microphone which means that no matter how loud or how sensitive the sound inputs get, you’ll still have useable audio tracks when all is said and done. 

The box includes a lengthy red XLR lead and a durable USB-C to USB-C cable for both connection methods. You’ll need to invest in a stand or boom arm for a setup like this, as you don’t get one included. From my time with Rode’s microphones, there’s no better option than the excellent PSA1+ boom arm, which is built with the brand’s suspension mounts in mind and offers a level of versatility needed for streaming and podcasting with how many angles you can get. 

Performance

Having used my fair share of studio gear before, I can confidently say that the Rode NT1 5th Generation is the best-sounding microphone I’ve ever used through its native XLR input. Whether you’re running this condenser mic through a dedicated audio interface and mixing board such as the Rode Procaster II or something more humble like the Razer Audio Mixer, the sound quality you’re getting is second to none. That’s not surprising given the 4dBA sensitivity, as the manufacturer claims it’s “the world’s quietest studio condenser microphone”. Everything from the softest whisper to a regular speaking voice and screaming comes across crystal clear. 

You have sampling rates of 48, 96, 192 KHz giving you more precise control over the levels of representation. It’s standard for 48 KHz to be used by your average microphone and more than acceptable in most circumstances, but you can push beyond if you need that extra headroom. As this is a modern Rode microphone with USB connectivity, you’ve also got the option of going plug and play with the company’s line of software, including the classic Rode Connect and the recently launched Rode Unify, the latter of which is more targeted towards gamers and streamers. 

You can adjust just how the DSP (digital signal processing) sounds with the Rode NT1 5th Generation through these programs. The included Aphex processing means you’ve got options for a brighter sound with various effects to tweak the microphone's sound to your liking. I’ve found that the USB connectivity isn’t the full package that it could be compared to the brand’s dedicated USB broadcasting microphone, the recently released Rode X XDM-100. 

Rode NT1 5th Generation

(Image credit: Future)

That’s because the Rode NT1 5th Generation doesn’t feature any on-body controls for tweaking audio and also lacks any gain or monitoring options, as you’ll find with the Rode X XDM-100, which produces a near-identical sound through USB-C. If you’re considering getting the latest NT1 microphone purely for digital sound recording through USB and into audio interfaces, you may be better going with the dedicated USB microphone instead for the plug-and-play nature. It feels like a secondary addition to an already all-star mic that’s more nice than an essential inclusion.

I had to play around a lot more with recording levels and different software, such as Cockos Reaper and several different plugins before I was completely happy with how the Rode NT1 5th Generation sounded through USB. If you’ve got an audio interface with a decent pickup in it and know a little about how to get a crisp and clear sound for your gaming streaming or podcasting setup.

Remember that the Rode NT1 5th Generation is as sensitive as many studio microphones are. I found that the sensitivity, while impressive in the pickup, did tend to pick up the whirling fans of my gaming laptop on my desk and the even the case fans on the gaming PC across the room. The level of sound dampening isn’t quite as thorough as the Rode X XDM-100, which is aimed at gamers and streamers with its noise reduction.

If you’re after a truly top-of-the-line broadcasting option, then the iconic status of the NT1’s latest revision is hard to argue against when plugged into a proper audio interface. As a definitive all-in-one solution, there’s a lot to love here, with a few small caveats that shouldn’t bother the seasoned recording veteran.

Should I buy the Rode NT1 5th Generation?

Buy it if…  

You want a high-end microphone at a competitive rate

You’re getting a lot of microphone for the sticker price, and the 10-year warranty means your investment will last a long time.

You want the freedom of XLR and USB connectivity

Few flagship microphones offer both XLR and USB so competently and offer features through software to make the most of the warm sound profile.  

Don't buy it if... 

You want to record in loud environments

Rode made the Rode NT1 5th Generation for use in whisper-quiet studio settings, so don’t invest in this microphone if your home setup can get noisy. 

You just want a USB microphone

If you don’t own an audio interface and just want to go through USB-C then you’re better served by the Rode X XDM-100 which is built around the connection method with quality of life inclusions that the NT1 5th Generation lacks. 

Razer Audio Mixer review – Control at too great a cost
6:16 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

The Razer Audio Mixer is part of the boutique brand’s continued ventures into the streaming world. Aimed primarily at streamers, it sets out to be a solution for balancing sound levels when broadcasting gameplay. While it achieves what it sets out to do, the asking price is so steep that only those firmly invested in the ecosystem are going to get the most out of this. 

Price and availability

You can pick up the Razer Audio Mixer in the US, the UK, and Australia from any big box online retailer or from Razer directly for $249.99 / £249.99 / AU$414. It’s been available for around a year, originally launching in March 2022. While Razer products certainly carry a premium, the price of this compact XLR audio interface and mixing board is steep. 

That’s because for around half the cost you can get the TC Helicon GoXLR Mini which retails for around $177 / £150 / $AU313. Now, Razer is a brand known for its premium price tags that go along with the lifestyle aesthetic of the products, so the markup isn’t too surprising here, but the sticker price is worth bearing in mind. 

Design and Features

Razer Audio Mixer sliders

(Image credit: Future)

The Razer Audio Mixer is certainly eye-catching. In true brand fashion, it’s jet black but adorned with the brand’s Chroma RGB software which illuminates everything in a spectrum of color. There are four channel sliders with corresponding mute buttons, a censor / SFX button, and mute. Ports-wise, there’s a single XLR input with the corresponding 48v Phantom Power, line in and out, and optical. 

There are also two 3.5mm jacks for wired headphones and headset mics. Conveniently, a single USB-C cable that can run straight into the USB-C port on your desktop or gaming laptop powers the entire unit. Curiously, there was no input for any of Razer’s USB microphones through the mixer itself as there’s no USB-A port for the likes of the Razer Seiren V2 X or the Razer Seiren Emote here.

Given the high price tag on the Razer Audio Mixer, I’m disappointed the four fader sliders aren’t motorized. While they don’t feel unpleasant to use and have satisfying sliding action, I expected more from the overall build. Though sturdy, something feels incomplete to me about a high-end intimate gallery experience that’s lacking from what could have been great with motorized and programmable channels. The sub-$350 / £350 / AU$420 GoXLR Mini does it, so why can’t Razer?

Inside the Razer Audio Mixer, you’ve got a pre-amp that helps to bring out the best of the XLR microphones you plug into it. Naturally, you do the biggest tweaking through Razer Synapse on PC will, as is the case with every peripheral and accessory put out by the brand. Inside the software, you can manually configure levels for the four channels and apply various effects. It all comes together for a user experience that’s certainly competent but comes across as more style over substance. 

Performance

Razer Audio Mixer controls

(Image credit: Future)

The Razer Audio Mixer does what it sets out to do. I tested this compact XLR with several microphones, including the Rode PodMic and the Rode NT1 5th Generation. These are some of the better-sounding microphones that I own, and the board handles them well I got a nice and clear level when recording my voice and setting up streams. 

Getting set up in the Synapse software was also a good way to make more fine-tuned tweaking than relying purely on manually moving the sliders. I particularly appreciate how you can fine-tune the different channels for the gameplay coming through a broadcast alongside how loud the microphones sound. I will say that the censor button isn’t something I got any real use out of. It’s a fun novelty, but not something I feel should have taken up space on an already small unit when an extra USB-A port or XLR could have fit into that gap. 

Overall, the Razer Audio Mixer hasn’t won me over. It’s just too expensive for the limited functionality that it offers, considering you can get essentially the same product for roughly half the price. Moreover, as an audio interface, many cheap alternatives feature preamps and multiple XLR inputs for less. You can get the Behringer U-PHORIA UMC202HD for $99 / £77 / $AU139 which has two microphone inputs, multiple gain knobs, and direct monitoring. 

If you want viable alternatives dedicated purely to game streaming, then you’ve got the choices of either the Elgato Stream Deck+ or the Elgato Wave XLR, which both come in cheaper at $199 / £199 / AU$358 and $159 / £159 / AU$149. You’re better served from a price-to-performance perspective with what these streaming solutions can do considerably cheaper than the Razer Audio Mixer. 

Should I buy the Razer Audio Mixer?

Rear of the Razer Audio Mixer

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if…  

You’re already invested in Razer’s ecosystem

If your streaming setup primarily consists of Razer products, then the Audio Mixer will fit perfectly in and perform well for what it is

You’re considering going from a USB to an XLR microphone setup

The Razer Audio Mixer doesn’t take up much space and only requires a USB-C cable for power making it a good jumping off point for an XLR microphone.  

Don’t buy it if…  

You want good value for money

There’s no getting over the fact that the Razer Audio Mixer is overpriced for what it is.