Organizer
Gadget news
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: The foldable leader holds steady
2:14 pm | July 26, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Two-minute review

I'm pleased with virtually everything Samsung has done to its premiere foldable – the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 – to make it a better mobile productivity companion than its predecessor.

A flat-folding phone that is noticeably thinner and lighter than Galaxy Z Fold 4 is the kind of change we want in foldable development. Sure, the Google Pixel Fold (not to mention a handful of the other best foldable phones out there) beat it to the punch, but at least the Z Fold 5 is 30 grams lighter than its chief adversary.

We wanted faster and we got it, with the 'Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Mobile Platform for Samsung', the best chip Samsung is using across all of its new top-tier phones.

On the other hand, what frustrates me are the omissions and tough, but probably necessary, design decisions. Samsung left the camera hardware from the Z Fold 4 untouched. Even that lackluster 4MP under-display camera on the main display is still there. I understand that the main camera array is an above-average collection of sensors, but they're now falling behind the competition, because that competition is primarily from the Google Pixel Fold. I don't understand why Samsung didn't just take the powerful rear camera array from the Galaxy S23 Ultra and slap it on here. Okay, okay, I probably do know. That 10x periscopic optical zoom camera would almost certainly have increased the thickness of one side of this folding handset, just as Samsung managed to slim it down.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Samsung is charging $1,799.99 / £1,749 / AU$2,599 for the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and will tout its ability to work with the custom (and now thinner) S Pen, but the pen is not included in that substantial price. That, as far as I'm concerned, is a mistake.

Finally, as much as I love the flexible 7.6-inch display and appreciated the widening of the cover screen with the Galaxy Z Fold 4, I'm realizing that the narrow 6.2-inch display on the Galaxy Z Fold 5 is insufficient for real-world productivity. Again, I came to this realization after using the Google Pixel Fold's much wider-aspect ratio 5.8-inch cover display. Samsung considered making the Z Fold 5 wider but ultimately did nothing to the screen aspect ratio or display technology between generations.

I don't discount this screen as a camera viewfinder, a content browser, and social media reader, but typing on it is not good. The keys are too cramped and I often mistyped. Worse, in some apps the keyboard sits right on top of the on-screen home button, and more than once I popped out of an app because I hit that instead of a key.

Despite all this, I'm still a Galaxy Z Fold 5 fan. It is fun to hold and use, takes nice, if over-vibrant photos, and is about as peppy as a handset can get. If this is your first Fold, it's a winning choice; if you already own a Galaxy Z Fold 4, hold onto it and wait for the Z Fold 6.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Price and availability

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
  • Starts at $1,799.99 / £1,749 / AU$2,599
  • No price increase in the US
  • Shame the price doesn't include the compatible S Pen
  • A narrow smartphone and mini tablet for the price of one device

Samsung launched the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5, along with the Galaxy Z Flip 5, Galaxy Watch 6, Watch 6 Classic, and a collection of Galaxy Tab S9 tablets, on July 26 during its South Korea-based Samsung Unpacked event. It's available for pre-order now, and ships August 11. You'll find the best prices and offers in our Galaxy Z Fold 5 deals roundup. 

At $1,799.99 / £1,749 / AU$2,599, the Galaxy Z Fold 5 is among the most expensive smartphones on the market. Even a 1TB iPhone 14 Pro Max will cost you less at $1,599 / £1,740 / AU$2,769. But then that's just one phone with one excellent screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 5 is a two-in-one device, with a lovely 6.2-inch screen on the outside and a precision-engineered 7.6-inch flexible screen on the inside. If that doesn't scream "premium" to you, then maybe its five cameras will convince you. 

If that US price sounds familiar to US readers, it's because it's the same as last year, and that's good news. This is not the exact same phone; it's flatter and faster. It's essentially a free upgrade.

It's a shame that Samsung can't manage to bundle the compatible S Pen into that price though. It's a lot of fun to use on the Z Fold 5's main display and elevates the utility, so why not show people what they're missing by making it part of the price?

In any case, those prices will ultimately be only a suggestion; there are deals and trade-ins that cut the price by as much as half. Essentially, no one should be paying full price for this smartphone.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Design

  • Thinner and noticeably lighter
  • No gap, folds flat
  • Quality materials
  • A good size mini-tablet when open but too narrow a phone when closed

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 design has all the earmarks of an iterative update. At a glance, it looks quite similar to the Galaxy Z Fold 4 but there are important and, to my mind, welcome differences. 

This is a much lighter phone, dropping roughly 11 grams over the previous model. It's also (at 252 grams) 30 grams lighter than the hefty but excellent Google Pixel Fold (282 grams). More importantly, the polished aluminum and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (reportedly 25% strong than the Fold 4's Victus Plus) glass-covered frame now folds flat. That, in combination with the millimeter of thickness Samsung carved off the body gives you – when folded – a much thinner and lighter device. It is a pleasure to hold.

To make the tighter fold possible, Samsung reengineered the hinge and how the flexible display is curved inside it when you close the phone. The hinge mechanism's sweeping technology introduced a few years ago to keep out dust and crumbs is still there, though.

That new hinge appears to have made the flexible display crease ever-so-slightly less noticeable. You can still see and feel it but I'd swear it's a bit less pronounced.

Button and port placement are mostly the same. There are speaker grills on the top and bottom edge of the phone that are slightly smaller than they were on the Z Fold 4, and a USB-C port on the bottom next to a microphone port. On the top are a pair of microphones and one air vent. There's a physical SIM slot on the left edge (if the handset is open with the Main screen facing you), and power/fingerprint reader and volume rocker buttons on the right.

The fingerprint reader, by the way, is one of a pair of effective biometric security options. You can register your face to unlock or use the fingerprint reader. I had no trouble registering a digit and my face to unlock the phone.

Image 1 of 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 4 of 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 5 of 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 6 of 6

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Even though the cameras – all five of them – are unchanged in terms of hardware from the Z Fold 4, there is a subtle visual tweak to the rear camera array. It looks like Samsung shaved off some metal from the aluminum island surrounding the three rear lenses. In addition, they've moved the LED flash out of the island and placed it next to the lens array.

Otherwise, everything is the same. I liked the last design and appreciated that Samsung managed to make the cover screen slightly wider without enlarging the phone chassis, compared to the Fold 3. But that was before I used the Google Pixel Fold. Even though Google also has a 7.6-inch flexible main screen, when opened flat, it's wider than it is tall. As a result, the Pixel Fold's 5.8-inch cover screen adopts a far more squat aspect ratio compared to the Fold's, which is is arguably far more functional and better suited to modern smartphone apps and interface design.

However, when I open up the Z Fold 5, I quickly notice the edge-to-edge screen. It seems larger than what I find on the Pixel Fold, where Google chose to leave a significant bezel to accommodate its internal front-facing camera. Samsung's main camera is craftily hidden underneath the main folding display and only appears as a cut-out when you use it.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

Time to take a dip. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Samsung's overall flexible screen protection appears better thought out than Google's. On the Pixel, there's a noticeable space between the protective cover and the flat, black plastic edge surrounding the flexible display. Samsung keeps that dust-catcher tighter and also includes a raised black plastic edge around the screen, plus a couple of rubber bumpers to prevent you from slamming the phone shut and damaging the display.

As for the hinge function, it's smooth and solid. I opened and closed the phone hundreds of times and it felt just as sure at the start as it does now, while I write this review. This is a well-built Android phone. In fact, having seen how Samsung builds its Galaxy products first-hand, I can say they are meticulous and do not suffer imperfections gladly.

From an aesthetic perspective, this is an attractive device, no question; the polished color-matched frame evoking the clasp of a designer handbag or briefcase. I have the Icy Blue colorway (my favorite and the signature finish of the Fold 5) but you can also get it in Phantom Black, Cream (from Samsung.com only), Gray, and Blue. When it's folded closed, you're looking at sandwiched, polished aluminum, colored glass on the rear, and a tall cover screen. It feels solid but not overbearing and fits neatly in almost any pocket, despite the addition thickness over a conventional candy bar smartphone.

It's also one of the more durable foldables, with its IPX8-certification meaning taking a drop in water for 30 minutes isn't a death sentence. But that's just for fresh water and not beach-side salt water. It's also not particularly dust resistant, so if you do take it to the beach, try not to drop it in the sand, those moving parts won't appreciate that.

While I didn't fully submerge the phone, I did subject my Galaxy Z Fold 5 to the faucet. I dried it off and found it completely unharmed.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Sustainability

Small bits and pieces of the Z Fold 5 are made of recycled and recovered ocean plastic (even the box is largely recycled), and the glass includes some recycled material too. This is all part of Samsung's sustainability drive.

It's good to know, but until one of Samsung's phones is 50% or more recycled, it probably won't move the needle. To be fair, Samsung is doing as much as, and maybe more than, many competitors, but no one has yet figured out how to make an entire device out of 45 recycled tin cans and a few plastic bottles.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 hands on

(Image credit: Future)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Displays

  • If you liked the Z Fold 4's displays, you'll like these
  • No change to the resolution, refresh rate or screen size
  • Removal of gap may have lessened the severity of the crease
  • Wide variable refresh rate on primary screen. Cover screen slightly more limited

Once you get past the flatter fold and slightly trimmer body, you're confronted with two Dynamic AMOLED 2X displays, that haven't changed since the last Z Fold. 

On the outside is the 6.2-inch AMOLED (2316 x 904) display, which features a punch-hole selfie camera. It's sharp, bright, and responsive. Like its predecessor, this cover screen offers a variable refresh rate of 48-120Hz. The listed screen size can be a bit misleading. Yes, it measures 6.2 inches diagonally, which is more than the 6.12-inch display on my iPhone 14 Pro, but this is a narrow display. Both the Pixel Fold and my iPhone 14 Pro are considerably (nearly half an inch) wider.

The benefit of the narrow cover screen is that despite this phone being twice as thick (when folded) as your average iPhone, it is still comfortable to hold. The problem, though is that it often feels cramped in use when compared to standard smartphones and, in particular, the spacious Google Pixel Fold cover screen. 

It's not that I truly dislike the Z Fold 5's cover screen, but the Pixel Fold showed me what's possible and now I can't live with thumb typing on the too-narrow display. And this matters because as much as this is a dual-screen device with ample potential for productivity, I spent a lot of time on the go with it folded closed. The cover screen must be just as usable as the main screen – as it is on the Pixel Fold – and it simply isn't, not by comparison.

All that said, this is a good display for scrolling through websites, checking email, and scanning social media.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Cover display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Cover display (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Unfold the phone and you're presented with a lovely 7.6-inch mini tablet display. It has all the right specs and resolution: a Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a 2176 x 1812 resolution (374ppi) and 1-120Hz adaptive refresh rate. You will notice the flexible screen crease (even if it seems slightly less pronounced), but I promise that when you're using the display to play games, watch Netflix, take photos (with it serving as your big-screen viewfinder), and manage multiple apps at once, you won't notice it.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Main display (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

This screen is more than equal to that of the Pixel Fold, even though it has a slightly lower resolution and pixel density (the Pixel Fold sports a 2208x1840 OLED at 380ppi). I prefer the way the Z Fold 5's screen reaches from edge to edge and how, instead of using a thicker bezel for the internal front-facing camera, Samsung keeps it hidden under a small collection of pixels that it can turn off when in use. Why Samsung kept that 4MP camera instead of upgrading to a higher resolution sensor (as what you'll find on the Pixel Fold) is beyond me, but at least the 7.6-inch flexible display is top-notch.

I often used the primary screen outside and found that the display's claimed 1,750nit peak brightness (our lab tests reached 1,350nits in HDR mode) were more than capable of beating back direct sunlight.

Obviously, both of the phone's displays are touchscreens but the folding display has the added benefit of supporting pen input with Samsung's S Pen stylus. Since the phone doesn't ship with one, Samsung supplied the new $99 / £99 Galaxy Z Fold 5 Slim S Pen case, which, itself, is a pretty nifty piece of engineering. There's a little S Pen release that sits just above the stylus. To release it, I simply press the button down and the S Pen pops out of the case.

Image 1 of 3

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 S Pen use

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 S Pen use (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 3

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 S Pen use

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 S Pen use (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 3

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 S Pen use

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 S Pen use (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

If I'm being honest, this latest S Pen is a little too thin for my tastes. That said, I did enjoy using it on the main display. It's great for quick note-taking and even drawing with apps like Sketchbook. If you're thinking about buying a case for your new Z Fold 5, I don't think there's a better choice than one that includes this pen.

Overall, everything looks good on the big primary display. It's perfect for watching videos on the train and just right for my Asphalt 9: Legends obsession. It's also versatile, thanks to its flexibility.

A tablet-sized screen means multi-tasking is on the menu. I had no trouble opening up to three apps by dragging and dropping them into position. In the center of my triad of apps is an ellipses I can tap to rotate the apps through the three positions. You might wish you could open more apps at once, but for readability and utility, I think three is enough. It's also easy to drag and drop things between these two screens. In this instance, it makes sense to have one app on one side and another on the other (say, mail on the left and images you want to drop in on the right).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

Using Google Maps on the Galaxy Z Fold 5 (Image credit: Future )

Soon after I got my review unit from Samsung, I decided to walk from a restaurant back to my hotel in Seoul with only the Galaxy Z Fold 5 to guide me. I unfolded the phone, opened Google Maps on the 7.6-inch display, and then search for my hotel. Maps found it and could locate me and my direction of travel with a little blue dot. That was helpful because Maps couldn't generate walking directions in South Korea. But all I had to do was walk and keep my eye on my blue dot on the big screen. In 15 minutes, I was back in my hotel room.

If I fold the screen 90 degrees, I can set the phone on the table and watch movies on one half of the display, scroll through my photos and videos, or use it in Flex Mode to take photos by simply waving at the screen. The Z Fold 5 also acts as its own tripod. I would place it on a chair, table, or other surface and point the rear cameras at my subject (people, the sky, the stars) and then use the on-screen controls to take the photo either immediately, or if I didn't want to risk moving the phone, on a timer. This is great for capturing hyperlapses of stars moving across the night sky and crowds of people walking by.

Unlike the Pixel Fold, there's no "Tent Mode" here that would allow you to partially unfold the handset and play content horizontally on Cover screen. Considering how narrow that display is, this probably makes sense.

  • Display score: 4.5 / 5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Cameras

  • Same camera hardware as the Z Fold 4
  • Rear cameras capture lovely (if slightly over-saturated) imagery
  • Samsung should've upgraded the 4MP under-display camera

While it's unusual for a phone manufacturer like Samsung to leave an entire collection of cameras untouched from one model to the next, I understand the strategy with the Z Fold 5. Not many people have foldable phones or bought the Z Fold 4. Look around, do you see many people on the train or in the park with them? Exactly.

Samsung rightly believes the Galaxy Z Fold 5 (or its sexier counterpart the Galaxy Z Flip 5) may be consumers' first encounter with foldable phones. The camera collection (with one exception) on the Z Fold 4 was quite good. It's unlikely you will be dissatisfied with what Samsung has on offer here.

Here’s the full list of cameras:

  • Cover display camera: 10MP selfie camera f/2.2, pixel size: 1.22μm, FOV: 85 degrees 
  • Folding display camera: 4MP under-display f/1.8, pixel size: 2.0μm, FOV: 80 degrees 
  • Rear camera: 12MP ultra-wide f/2.2, pixel size: 1.12μm, FOV: 123 degrees
  • Rear camera: 50MP wide-angle with dual-pixel AF and OIS, f/1.8, pixel size: 1.0μm, FOV: 85 degrees 
  • Rear camera: 10MP telephoto f/2.4, OIS, pixel size: 1.0μm, FOV: 36 degrees, 3x optical zoom 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 rear camera array

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 rear camera array (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Naturally, there is a risk here, in that foldable phone choices are growing by the minute. Since I last reviewed the Z Fold 4, Google released the Pixel Fold and it does, in some ways, beat the Z Fold 5's camera capabilities, and don't even get me started on the wealth of foldable options available to consumers in the UK and Europe (entries from Oppo, Honor and Huawei all spring to mind). 

In particular, Google beats Samsung on optical zoom, offering 5x over Samsung's 3x magnification. Samsung will tout its impressive 30x space zoom capabilities, but photos taken with that digitally-enhanced feature don't hold up that well under close scrutiny. Plus, some of the imagery is a combination of real imagery and what AI understands of your subject. That, for me, is not real photography.

Even so, I really enjoyed using the Z Fold 5's cameras. The photos and portrait mode shots are, in some cases, breathtaking. Samsung's habit of punching up the colors works mostly in its favor. I do love a more brilliantly blue sky and even more purple flowers. Verisimilitude is, perhaps, not Samsung's strong suit but I bet everyone will love your Galaxy Z Fold 5 snaps.

Even though Samsung didn't change the sensors, they're all backed by a much more powerful chispet; the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 brings better image processing, which I saw on display in the excellent low-light night photography. Whether it was in a restaurant capturing a 20-course Korean dinner, or the beautiful Seoul skyline, the photos look quite good.

The camera is also fast, even with portrait mode shots. I took some photos of people learning to juggle and was stunned at not only how well the main 50MP camera caught the jugglers in action, but the way it also identified the balls in flight and put them in focus along with my subject.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 using cover screen as the viewfinder

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 using cover screen as the viewfinder (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

My point is, if you have a good lens and sensor, sometimes all you need is to update the silicon for better speed and image processing.

Most of my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 photography was taken while the phone was closed, using one of the three lenses on the back and the cover screen as my viewfinder. I could open the phone up and use the main screen, but it's a bit unwieldy. For a selfie, I could use the 10MP cover display camera (recommended), the 4MP folding display camera (not recommended but it's fine for video conferencing), or the best cameras on the phone.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 cover control

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 cover control (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

To do so, I unfolded the phone and selected the "Cover Preview Screen" icon in the upper right-hand corner of the camera app. This let me use the cover screen as my viewfinder, while the rear camera array was facing me. I could even have full control over all photography features by sliding the lock symbol on the cover screen to the left or right.

The reason for this is that it allows you to shoot with the phone's best camera array whether you're taking standard shots or selfies. It's a nice feature but I generally didn't like shooting with the phone unfolded because I worried I might drop it.

I also shot some video, right up to 8K 30fps, and was pleased to find that there was zero stutter during shooting or playback, though I do think the 60fps 4K video is a bit more buttery smooth on playback. Either way, you can shoot some high-quality videos with this phone. For the auteurs among us, you can shoot using Pro video mode, which gives you custom control over everything from focus point to speed and microphone (omni vs just the front or rear mics, or even an external one).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

In general, Samsung's Camera app is richer than Apple's, though Samsung tends to hide a lot under the "More" menu. For manual control, you can switch to "Pro" (under More). There's also the free Samsung Expert Raw app, which lets you switch between shooting 12MP stills (combining four pixels at a time) and 50MP raw images. It also lets you control all your camera's manual settings. I still don't understand why Expert Raw isn't pre-loaded on these phones, but at least it's accessible.

Samsung generally gives you more control over camera features than Apple. Hyperlapse – an analog to Apple's Timelapse – offers six different settings and explains how you might use each one (300x is good for tracking the stars, for example).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 star tracking sample

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
  • Camera score: 4 / 5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Camera samples

Image 1 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

I started with the ultra-wide lens. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 2 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

The switched to the main wide lens. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 3 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

And finally used the 3x optical zoom. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 4 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

Samsung's telephoto camera did a nice job with the colors here. this, by the way, is not a Portrait mode shot. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 5 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

Same scene with the 50MP main camera. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 6 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

I started with the 12MP ultrawide, which has a 123-degree FOV. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 7 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

Then switched to the telephoto camera. Note the windmill dead center. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 8 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

This is with the 30x Space Zoom. It looks good at a glance, but a closer look reveals that it has a distinctly impressionistic look. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 9 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

The main camera did a nice job of capturing a double rainbow and the oddly orange sky. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 10 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

(Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 11 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

On the road in South Korea, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 proved adept at the fast snapshot, (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 12 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

A night shot. There were too many clouds in the sky for much star-gazing. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 13 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

This is a moon image, not a photo. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 14 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

I relaly like the quality of these flower shots. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 15 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

The roses are not quite that vibrant red. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 16 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

One of my favorite photos. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 17 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

A nice shot with the main camera. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 18 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

The ultra-wide brings in the whole skyscraper. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
Image 19 of 19

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Review Camera Samples

Portrait mode photography is now excellent and quite smart. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Performance and specs

  • Samsung pulls its foldables into alignment with the S23 line
  • The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 'for Galaxy' is peppy
  • 12GB of RAM and starts at 256GB of storage 

Samsung may not have done much to the cameras or other Galaxy Z Fold 5 components, but it swapped out what matters. There's the still-fresh Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 'for Galaxy' SoC, the slightly over-clocked version of the chip now also found on the entire Galaxy S23 line. That's backed by 12GB of (LPDDR5X) RAM. In tandem they made for a smooth and effortless user experience. 

By the numbers, Qualcomm's silicon beats the Tensor G2 chip in the Google Pixel Fold in single-core performance on our Geekbench 6 tests (2050 vs 1179) and on multi-core (5302 for the Z Fold 5 compared to 3759 for the Pixel Fold). On one of our OpenGL tests, which looks at graphical performance, the Z Fold 5 outperformed the Pixel Fold by nearly double. The reality, though, is that most top-tier mobile chipsets are plenty fast for virtually anything you could think to do with a smartphone. Put another way, the Z Fold 5 and Google Pixel Fold felt equally fast in most day-to-day and more intensive video and photo-editing tasks, it's long-term use where the additional overhead afforded to the Samsung stands out.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 playing Call of Duty

I did not win this Call of Duty round. (Image credit: Future)

I played Call of Duty Warzone Mobile at the highest image quality and framerate, without any tearing or stuttering and raced through the streets of San Francisco with Asphalt 9: Legends. I also edited multiple 4K video streams at once in PowerDirector (I find that most mobile video editors cannot edit the 8K video). This foldable is ready for pretty much anything.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 playing Asphalt 9

This Asphalt 9 gameplay results in a First Place finish. (Image credit: Future)

Naturally, this is a 5G phone and, where I had good coverage, I had solid connections and speedy downloads. There is support for both a physical SIM and eSIM. The Wi-Fi 6e support meant excellent office and home performance and means respectable future-proofing.

  • Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Software

  • Android 13 w/ One UI 5.1.1
  • Much of the software feels expressly designed for a foldable
  • Great for multitasking
  • Smart use of Flex Mode

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 multitasking

Easy multitasking (Image credit: Future)

Samsung's foldable runs One UI 5.1.1 atop Android 13. It's a mostly pleasing blend of Google's core Android apps and a handful of Samsung's custom utilities, like Photos, Calendar, and Contacts. As is my habit, I mainly relied on Google tools like Chrome (the default browser in the US is Samsung's own but not everywhere), and Google Calendar.

Samsung has worked closely with Google, though, to build a foldable-friendly platform; one that can effortlessly switch from operations on the smaller cover screen to ones on the larger, flexible screen. When I used Maps in South Korea, I started with the 6.2-inch display but quickly unfolded Z Fold 5 for the more expansive main screen view.

In tablet mode, the taskbar is a perfect companion for opening apps either by tapping or dragging and dropping them into position.

Whether you're on the cover or main folding screen, there's a customizable quick slide-out tray sitting just off-screen on the righthand side. A quick sweep brings it in and you can access often-used apps or tap the grid icon to open a larger app window. It's useful but I admit to usually forgetting it exists.

Samsung hides some features under Labs in settings, because not all apps are designed for multi-app (split-screen use). Similarly, you'll have to dig for the Flex Mode panel controls that let you add on-screen controls when watching videos in Flex Mode (phone bent at around 90 degrees and set on the table). Even after you turn it on, you'll need to select the apps where it appears (it can work, apparently for everything from games to video editors). I honestly don't get the point of hiding useful features like this, even if they don't work perfectly for all apps.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Flex Mode

This Flex Mode with on-screen controls is nifty, too bad it's hidden under Labs. (Image credit: Future / Lance Ulanoff)
  • Software score: 4.5 / 5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Battery life

  • 4,400mAh battery (same as Z Fold 4)
  • Lasted all day
  • Supply your own power adapter

Samsung kept battery capacity unchanged from the Z Fold 4 to the Z Fold 5. 4,400mAh is smaller than what you'll find on the Pixel Fold, which carries a 4,727mAh battery (and 30 more grams than the Z Fold 5).

Samsung promises all-day battery life, and that's what I consistently got. Most days it was 15 hours of use or more. 

The phone supports Samsung's take on 'Super Fast charging', refueling 50% in 30 minutes. In our tests, we recharged to 56% in 30 minutes using a 65W power adapter. There's no charging adapter in the box, however (just the USB-C cable), so if you want the fastest charging speeds, you'll want to pick up one of those compatible 65W or 45W adapters.

I was also able to charge on a variety of Qi wireless chargers. The phone also supports wireless PowerShare, which means – when enabled in Settings – you can place one Samsung phone on top of the other to transfer battery power from one phone to the other (or to earbuds or a supported smartwatch).

  • Battery score: 4 / 5

Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: also consider

Motorola Razr Plus 
The Motorola Razr Plus / Razr 40 Ultra is a major evolutionary step for smartphones, going beyond what any previous flip or foldable phone has offered.


Read our full Motorola Razr Plus

Google Pixel Fold
The Google Pixel Fold is an excellent, multidimensional handset that feels equally at home as a beefy smartphone or a pint-sized tablet, and it marries that versatility with strong performance and stellar photography. If you think of the Pixel Fold as two devices in one, the high price almost makes sense.
Read our full Google Pixel Fold review

How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5

I started testing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 in South Korea, taking it on company headquarters and factory tours, basically using the effective camera collection to document everything. I used it for communication with family and friends, as well as work, running Slack and email on it.

I did my best to make it my main phone throughout a week of testing.

A significant part of my testing involved content consumption (movies, websites, podcasts) and even some creation. I drew on it and edited social video.

As I mentioned above, I also used it to help keep me from getting lost in Seoul, South Korea.

I ran benchmarks, as did TechRadar's Mobile Team, and Future labs which combined for my Performance section.

Read more about how we test

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 hands-on review: an excellent watch, but an iterative update
2:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: One minute review

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 is on track to be another stellar smartwatch from the Korean brand. We can see that after just an hour of playing with it. The fast screen refresh rate and response time for the apps we were able to use mean the overall experience is butter-smooth, and the design is nice – both externally and internally, thanks to Wear OS 4 and Samsung’s One UI 5 Watch interface. We can clearly see the potential for it to knock the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 off the top of our best smartwatches list. 

It’s packing some nifty new features. Notably, the processing power and RAM have been boosted, Samsung Wallet has expanded to be able to include documents other than cards, such as airline tickets. 

A new Custom Workout option allows you to put together multi-stage workouts, and a redesigned Sleep app experience makes it, in Samsung’s words, “the best device on the market for monitoring your sleep” which is a big claim. Using the watch as a photo viewfinder is also a lot of fun, and will certainly attract some ‘ooohs’ at family gatherings.  

However, we’ve not yet tested this watch’s longevity, which is going to be the real kicker. The battery life may have been improved by the more efficient processor, but if the watch won’t last two days it’s going to be extremely frustrating to use for that best-in-class nightly sleep monitoring. Otherwise, little else has changed over its predecessor, which makes the Watch 6 an excellent device in isolation, but a largely iterative update.    

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Price and availability

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

(Image credit: Future / Matt Evans)
  • 40mm model in the US starts from $299
  • Starts from £289 in the UK
  • Starts from AU$599 in Australia

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 was announced at Samsung’s July 26 Unpacked event in Seoul, alongside the Watch 6 Classic, Galaxy Z Flip 5, Galaxy Z Fold 5, and Galaxy Tab S9 series. 

The Galaxy Watch 6 comes in four different varieties, and that’s before you consider the alternative Classic model – see our hands-on Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic review for our early impressions of that device. You have the 40mm and 44mm sizes, each coming in Bluetooth-only and LTE models, the latter of which grants you internet access away from your phone.

In the US, the 40mm models start from $299 for Bluetooth-only, while the 44mm models are $329.99 for Bluetooth-only.

In the UK, prices start from £289 for the 40mm Bluetooth model and £339 for the 40mm LTE option, and from £319 and £369 for the 44mm Bluetooth-only and 44mm LTE models, respectively. 

In Australia, the 40mm watches go for AU$549 (Bluetooth) and AU$649 (LTE), with the 44mm models going for AU$599 (Bluetooth) and AU$699 (LTE). 

These prices put the various Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 in roughly the same ballpark as corresponding Apple Watches and Google Pixel Watches, obviously dependent on sizes, models and deals available. Considering that the Watch 5 started at £269 / $279.99 / AU$499 for a 40mm Bluetooth-only model, a small price increase since last year is to be expected. 

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Design and screen

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

(Image credit: Future / Matt Evans)
  • New Exynos W930 processor
  • Redesigned strap-swapping functionality
  • Butter-smooth super AMOLED screen

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 sports a slightly thinner bezel than the Watch 5, which has also necessitated a slight tweak to the case. However, the screen sizes and button functionalities remain identical, so the watch does look very similar to its predecessor. This is no bad thing: the Samsung Galaxy line are good-looking watches with the right face choice, and the super AMOLED screen is excellent, with smooth transitions and a high refresh rate. 

The watch’s screen remains a high point, from the little workout animations available on previous Samsung Galaxy Watches to using the Watch as a viewfinder to take selfies and group shots when your phone is propped up on a table or other surface. Not only can you use the watch as a remote shutter button, but you can see a tiny picture of what the camera sees to ensure the composition is as you want. It’s a neat trick, and I was surprised how good the picture-in-picture camera view looked on the watch when I tried it with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5. Swapping between apps was seamless and pretty responsive, although the main cloud of apps typical of Wear OS watches is looking rather tired, withApple having switched its best Apple Watch models to displaying the widget stack for its most-used features. 

The Exynos W930 processor is said to offer an 18% faster clock speed, and the Watch is packing 2GB of RAM compared to 1.5GB in the Watch 5. I’m hoping to see the watch operate faster and more efficiently on a day-to-day basis thanks to the increased processing power, hopefully putting less strain on the battery, the size of which is still only slightly increased at 425mAh for the 44mm model and 300mAh for the 40mm model. It’s not a small battery, but Samsung’s watches, like Apple’s and Google’s, are really quite inefficient compared to Fitbits and the best Garmin watches, which you’ll get a week of wear from at a minimum. At least the Galaxy Watch 6 has WPC-based fast charging. 

The strap-swapping functionality is easier than ever, provided you have decent thumbnails for pressing down and releasing the strap. It makes it extremely simple to swap straps on the fly from, for example, daywear leather (which looks great) to the silicone sport band. With two sizes, a range of colors and a variety of straps, there are ample options for having your Galaxy Watch, your way. I loved the black leather strap with the black 44mm watch: the word ‘executive’ came to mind when I slipped it on, and I’d consider wearing my Galaxy Watch with this strap in a formal setting, which isn’t something I can say for most smartwatches. 

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Features

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

(Image credit: Future)
  • Lots of new health and fitness features
  • Redesigned on-watch sleep app
  • An early issue with the body comp feature

The Watch is stuffed to the brim with features, most of which I wasn’t able to test during my hands-on session; after all, I wasn’t going to have a nap or go for a run when I had such limited time with the device. Sleep coaching remains similar in functionality to what you get on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and 5 Pro, and on those devices it’s excellent: after sleeping with your Watch for several weeks you’ll be assigned a ‘sleep animal’ or chronotype, and get sleep-coaching tips based on that analysis. 

Changes on the Watch 6 mean that you’ll see your Sleep Scores, Sleep Animal, coaching and more on the watch directly rather than having to dive into the app on your phone, so you can access more of your sleep stuff on the watch immediately after waking. It doesn’t sound too dissimilar to Garmin’s Morning Report feature, and I’d be excited to see something like that implemented here. 

On the fitness side, Custom Workouts allows you to create multi-stage workouts that you can flick through with a press of a button to move yourself onto the next stage, perfect for triathletes. High-heart-rate alerts and mid-workout heart rate zone notifications are both new, although I was unable to try them. 

I was able to try the body composition feature, which uses the same bioelectric impedance analysis process as a smart scale to gauge your skeletal muscle and fat percentages on your body. I tested the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro against a leading smart scale last year and found it to be pretty accurate, and it looks set to be so again. I did, however, have a little trouble getting it to work on the smaller 40mm watch, as I was continuously prompted to move the watch further up my wrist; it was halfway up my forearm before it triggered, a problem I didn’t have on the 44mm.  

Otherwise, the watch is stacked with possibilities thanks to Google Play integration, so you can download all your favorite Wear OS apps, giving the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 an awful lot of possibilities. WhatsApp, for example, can be used independently of your phone. When synced to a Samsung watch and the Samsung Health app, it’s going to really shine with seamless transference of data. However, it looks like your Samsung watch still won’t automatically share your data with Google Fit again, which was a disappointment last year. 

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6: Early Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

(Image credit: Future / Matt Evans)

Based on my brief and restricted hands-on time, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 is on track to be another solid 4/5 device. It’s a well-designed, attractive-looking, easy-to-use Wear OS watch for existing Samsung users looking to manage their health, fitness, sleep and delve into on-wrist communication. It takes the brilliance of the existing line and builds upon it nicely, although at this early stage it doesn’t look like it’s fixed enough of the Watch 5’s few flaws to merit that elusive five stars. 

The Xreal Beam starts shipping in the US and Japan
7:04 pm | July 25, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , | Comments: Off

The Xreal Beam starts shipping today in the US and Japan. The Beam is an alternative way to connect AR headsets like the Xreal Air to your PC, console or phone. Normally, you need a wired USB C-to-C connection between the headset and your device. With the Beam, however, you can go wireless. It still needs a USB connection to the glasses, but it’s a small device that you can slip in your pocket (doable with a phone, not so much with a PC or even a Nintendo Switch). The Beam also acts like a power bank and can run the Air for up to 3.5 hours. Additionally, there are two USB-C ports...

The Xreal Beam starts shipping in the US and Japan
7:04 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , | Comments: Off

The Xreal Beam starts shipping today in the US and Japan. The Beam is an alternative way to connect AR headsets like the Xreal Air to your PC, console or phone. Normally, you need a wired USB C-to-C connection between the headset and your device. With the Beam, however, you can go wireless. It still needs a USB connection to the glasses, but it’s a small device that you can slip in your pocket (doable with a phone, not so much with a PC or even a Nintendo Switch). The Beam also acts like a power bank and can run the Air for up to 3.5 hours. Additionally, there are two USB-C ports...

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro smartwatch review: Premium feel, average features
4:13 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro: One minute review

If you dabble in multi-sports and are looking for an attractive watch, which gives your basic stats for an array of sports and exercises this watch could be a great choice. With over 100 exercises to track its inclusive, while it even has a separate running app, but its statistics are very basic and won’t beat its competition. 

The look of the watch is smart, with a choice between a black rubber strap or brown leather and a sapphire glass watch face with 1.47" AMOLED screen – it’s beaming with colorful apps, which are clear and easy to navigate. However, it's a chunky watch, with its watch face really standing out on the wrist. 

The S1 Pro app, called Mi Fitness, is easy to set up but doesn’t offer much more than the watch itself, while it still has some features which need personalization. 

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro: Specifications

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro: Price and availability

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro on wrist

(Image credit: Sarah Finley)
  • $330 in the US
  • £300 in the UK
  • AU$391 in Australia

The Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro was launched in China in August 2022, but was released officially around the world this February 2023. Its UK price is £299.99, with prices starting in the US at $330 and in Australia at AU$391. 

The price is surprisingly high for what you get, especially compared to its contemporaries. It looks and feels premium, but doesn’t hold a huge amount of value unless you’re a die-hard Xiaomi fan. 

  • Value score: 3/5

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro: Design and screen

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro on wrist

(Image credit: Sarah Finley)
  • Large watch face for a smartwatch
  • Quality AMOLED touchscreen
  • A heavy and chunky model

The first thing you notice about this watch is its size; it’s huge, and sat on my dainty wrist looking quite chunky indeed. If you want a discreet watch, this is not it. The main reason for its size is its large watch face, all sapphire glass, paired with a stainless steel case. It's certainly attractive, looking more like a standard watch than a smartwatch.  

Like its predecessors, the Xiaomi Mi and Xiaomi S1, you can choose from a brown leather strap or a black silicone strap – I liked that the brown strap worked as a more formal accessory, and I was able to pair it with not just gym wear, but smarter outfits too. With two buttons on the right-hand side of the watch, the top button is more prominent, and the dual use of buttons and touchscreen was effective. 

The quality of the screen, 1.47" AMOLED, is one of its best features, gliding through the apps and features effortlessly. It’s a colorful display, which looks more attractive than some of its competitors’ offerings. There were no niggles as I tried to open any of the features and we appreciated the quality,of the display, especially when I was out on a run . I also used the watch for hiking on a bright day and it really held its own - never letting me down when I wanted to check out stats as I hiked. 

It’s an expensive watch and really does look the part, but we’d love to see a more lightweight version, as at times this felt quite heavy on the wrist. There are no smaller size options in the same way there are in the best Apple Watch or Samsung Galaxy model lines

  • Design score: 3.5/5

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro: Features

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro on wrist

(Image credit: Sarah Finley)
  • Easy to set up
  • Needs more personalisation 
  • Lacking sleep details

Setting up the S1 Pro’s adjoining app, Mi Fitness, is really easy and it only takes you a few minutes. The install process takes you through a variety of features, helping you sync your device and add in personal goals, from the number of calories you want to burn while you are exercising to the number of steps you want to achieve every day. This is something I personally think is important for any smartwatch – it has to be tailored around your own activity goals and personal life.

As well as giving you data on the watch itself, you can delve into the app for the details of your workouts, with the app tracking your exercise over the week: illustrating your calories, steps and moving time via a colourful rainbow design, similar to the Apple watch's circle design.

Clicking into the details of the workout, however, each tracked performance seemed to have some randomized values attached to it, which didn't give it a personal feeling - perhaps a bug they need to fix in the app. The Sleep section of the app didn’t provide much detail either, just giving me a score from ‘poor’ to ‘good’ without any details on how to improve or what those scores meant. All of the best sleep trackers and sleep tracking apps break your sleep down into light, deep and REM cycles, and offer actionable advice for getting better sleep. Fitbit, Samsung and even Pokémon Sleep offer chronotype-based sleep profiles, so this is a huge content hole for Xiaomi. 

We like the ‘competition’ element of the app which allows you to add friends, who also have the watch, and compare your exercise routines. A feature which could rouse up some motivation between your group of friends, or cause an argument – providing you all have the S1 Pro. 

  •  Features score: 3.5 /5  

Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro: Performance

Mi Fitness app showing workout mode

(Image credit: Sarah Finley)
  • Some inaccurate statistics 
  • Easy to navigate 
  • Basic features, with phone pairing

I used the watch for a couple of months, putting it through its paces on various runs, hikes and at various fitness classes. I also tested it against my everyday smartwatch (a Fitbit Versa), to see if it tracked the same amount of calories and output.

As a runner, I loved the separate app on the watch for different running activities, with everything from a timed basic walk or run to advanced intervals. I mostly used the watch as I sweated through spinning classes and it was great to see real-time statistics, however, it didn’t provide me with anything different to the competition. Tracking was also off compared to Fitbit, and registering a higher calorie burn on the S1 Pro and a lower anaerobic threshold.

At least the watch is easy to navigate day-to-day. Clicking the large button takes you to the home screen, then it changes into a touchscreen, as the home screen gives you shortcuts to tracking your chosen exercise, heart rate, sleep metrics and many other options. We particularly liked the extras, which we haven’t found on other smartwatches, such as skin temperature, a compass and even a flashlight, so you no longer have to rely solely on your phone. 

The home screen also has apps to sync your calendar, your contactless cards and your music, providing you have an Android 6.0 or higher or iOS 11 or above. Personally, I’m not keen on syncing emails or phone calls to a smartwatch, as I primarily use them for fitness motivation, but it’s nice to have the choice. 

After tracking a couple of hikes, the app gave me a detailed breakdown of my cardio output, with speed, cadence and elevation tracked, but no information or further breakdown on these individual metrics. It claims to have a 14-day battery life, but if you’re using it regularly you will only get around a week out of it based on our tests. Remember to take your charger with you if you’re going on holiday. 

However, charging is quick and just 10 minutes will give you two days. It’s a good watch, but to beat its competitors such as the Apple Watch and the Samsung Galaxy watches it will need to have more accurate stats and more stand-up features – especially for just under £300.  

  •  Performance score: 3.5/5 

Should I buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested

Our writer wore the Xiaomi Watch S1 Pro for over a month and used it during a variety of workouts, including runs and spin classes. She compared its workout statistics to a contemporary Fitbit for accuracy, wore it overnight to test its sleep tracking capabilities, and hiked with it to examine its GPS credentials.  

First reviewed: June 2023

Weekly deals: the best smartphone deals from Germany, the UK, the US and India
4:27 pm | July 23, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

With the craziness of Prime Day over, things have settled down but there are still plenty of good deals to be had, especially as makers start discounting older devices to clear out their inventory. We also found deals on new devices too, some of which launched earlier this month. Germany The UK USA India Germany The new Zenfone 10 brings upgrades like a more powerful chipset and wireless charging, but many think that it’s on the pricey side. The older Asus Zenfone 9 can be picked up for under €700 for an 8/256GB unit. As mentioned, it uses an older chip but...

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: a powerful but expensive robot vacuum cleaner
2:44 am | July 20, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Dyson 360 Vis Nav: Two-minute review

The Dyson 360 Vis Nav – I’ll call it just the Vis Nav going forward – has been seven years in the making, according to the engineers involved in the project. It’s not Dyson’s first robovac, although it is for Australia, where the cleaning machine has been released before heading to other markets.

When I saw the robot vacuum cleaner being demonstrated at its launch event in Sydney in May 2023, I thought those seven years were well spent. The Vis Nav sure can utilize its entire 65 air watts of suction in Boost mode, with the evidence of its prowess quite clear when the dust canister is emptied. It’s also the only robot vacuum cleaner I’ve tested that’s capable of doing a decent job of room edges and around furniture legs thanks to an automatically extending side duct.

After having used the Vis Nav for a few weeks now, I’m rethinking my assessment of those seven years of work put towards the Dyson 360 Vis Nav – I’m not as impressed any more. Firstly, its navigation leaves me confused – it tends to stop in the middle of a room while cleaning, get its bearings, then start again. That’s not to say it misses spots, but the stopping can be disconcerting until you get used to it. It will clean an entire section or room, then head to the edges, before moving on to another room.

Another thing that has me scratching my head after every single cleaning run is the dust map that’s displayed in the MyDyson app. According to that, the dirtiest places in my test space are the ones that I’ve already vacuumed with the Dyson V15 Detect (sometimes in Boost mode) minutes before the Vis Nav.

I’m also not really sold on its battery life either. While it manages to run for 47 minutes in Auto mode on a full charge, it barely gave me 15 minutes on Boost, which isn’t enough to finish a decently-sized bedroom.

If you mostly plan to use it in Auto mode, though, the Dyson 360 Vis Nav is arguably the best robot vacuum cleaner I’ve tested in terms of dirt pick-up. It’s very simple to use, has a clear touchscreen and the dust canister is supremely easy to empty. It won’t mop, its D-shaped body won’t really go into corners, and there are no plans to offer the Vis Nav with an auto-empty station. While I love its suction, I really can’t justify its premium price point.

Dyson 360 Vis Nav moving away from its dock

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: price and availability

  • Announced May 2023
  • Currently only available in Australia; US and UK availability TBC
  • Retail price of AU$2,399; US and UK price TBC

It seems Dyson is releasing specific products in specific markets to test the waters. Like the Dyson AirStrait hair straightener, which has only been released in the US, the 360 Vis Nav is currently only available in Australia. There’s no confirmation on when the robovac will roll into other markets, but we’ll keep you updated as soon as we know.

We also don’t have pricing information outside of Australia, where the Vis Nav costs AU$2,399 (converting to around $1,635 / £1,250 at the time of writing). While it’s easy to brush off that price with the excuse that’s “it’s a Dyson”, that really is a lot of spare change you’ll need to dig up, particularly considering you can get a more versatile robot vacuum cleaner for that kind of money.

The Roborock S8 Pro Ultra in comparison costs $1,599 / AU$2,699 (not available in the UK), but you can justify that price tag as it’s a self-emptying and self-cleaning (aka it’s mop gets cleaned and dried too) robot vacuum cleaner. Take the Ecovacs Deebot Omni X1 as another example, which also has similar capabilities to the Roborock, and which sets you back $1,549 / £1,499 / AU$2,499. Both have more logical navigation pathways and, while they don’t necessarily have a dedicated Boost mode, they do have very powerful suction.

Value score: 2.5/5

Dyson 360 Vis Nav on a rug

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav: Specs

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: Design

  • D-shaped body
  • Full-width bar brush and an automatically extending side duct
  • No side brushes to scatter dirt

The moment you lay your eyes on the 360 Vis Nav, you’ll be able to identify it as a Dyson machine. Whether it’s the blue body or the distinctive radial cyclones you can see on the top of the bin canister… I really can’t put my finger on it. What’s really interesting about the Vis Nav, however, is its shape. It’s the first robot vacuum that I know of to feature a D-shaped body that looks like it can get into corners but doesn’t manage it anyway.

Another major design change from anything else out there is the lack of the rotating side brushes you see on other robovacs because, according to Dyson and I agree, they tend to scatter dirt more than push them towards the bar brush under the vacuum. 

Speaking of which, that too has been specifically designed for the Vis Nav. Firstly, the bar brush spans the entire length of the vacuum’s body, meaning it can cover more floor than other droids. And second, it’s a fully redesigned combo of some of Dyson’s existing cordless vacuum cleaner brushes – there are hard bristles to tease dust out of carpet fibers, a soft roller for hard floors, and anti-static carbonfiber filaments to make sure dust doesn't stick to the brush or hard floors as it moves along, creating static energy. It’s also thick enough to ensure hair doesn’t tangle. It’s washable too.

The switch to open the bin of the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

As impressive as the bar brush is, I’m in love with the side duct. This little red tongue sticks out automatically when the Vis Nav gets close to a room’s edge or senses furniture legs, then retracts when it’s not needed. It will even stick out when there are large boxes in the way to make sure the edges along said boxes are cleaned.

The top of the Vis Nav is a 360º camera to allow for visual navigation as opposed to the lidar sensors most other robovacs use. When it’s in a dimly-lit room or under a bed, a light comes on to help it make its way around a home without bumping into anything. That said, it does have a tendency to bump into slightly reflective objects, like a large green glass vase I had on the floor of my test space.

Then there’s a touchscreen which, thanks to being a high contrast display, is easy to read in any kind of lighting. Well, touchscreen is a little misleading as I found that I had to press the screen, which also happens to be a button, to get the vacuum to do its thing. You can use it to start the machine, choose the mode, pause a clean and watch it tell you when the robovac is doing an edge clean or is mapping. It will even let you know it’s charging, how much of the battery is filling up (diagrammatically) and when it’s detected that you’ve taken something (brush, filter or bin) out. When not in use, the screen goes dark with a dim crescent moon and stars displayed to indicate it’s hibernating on its dock after charging up.

The touchscreen is basically a button you can press on the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Beside the screen is the filter. Just press the silver top to release its housing and you can take it out to give it a wash. Just make sure it’s fully dry before putting it back in again.

Arguably the best design element is the dust canister. It features the distinctive radial cyclones we’re used to seeing on the cordless handsticks, just smaller, and a red semicircular button releases it from its spot. The handle is usually folded down when fixed to the bot and houses the release button to open the bottom – similar to how the larger bins on the V series vacuums operate. The grill within is fully exposed, which is a good thing as long strands of hair get tangled around it and need to be cleaned out manually – it’s not all that hygienic as Dyson makes it out to be.

The dock, which comes in two pieces, is a small charging station with cable management on the rear.

• Design score: 4/5

A light comes on when the Dyson 360 Vis Nav is in dark rooms and spaces

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: Performance

  • Great cleaning prowess
  • Dynamic suction
  • Confusing navigation

The Dyson 360 Vis Nav comes with a decent 65AW of suction and a motor that spins at 110,000rpm. This combination is quite powerful, so much so that I was shocked the first time I emptied the bin – it was full! And that was just in Auto mode! 

There are a total of four modes here – Auto, Boost, Quiet and Quick. I’d recommend leaving the Vis Nav on Auto as it does well on this mode. And as soon as it’s finished the interior of a room, it will pop out its side duct to suck up dirt and small debris along the room edges. As mentioned, it will do this even when it senses large pieces of furniture or boxes on your floor – basically anything that creates a decently large ‘edge’ to warrant a clean.

Does this side duct or tongue actually do a decent job? Yes, for the most part. I did have hair and visible bits of dust along some skirting board edges and they all got sucked up, but I also saw it miss some spots. The way I see it, there is no other robot vacuum cleaner that will come as close to the edges of rooms and furniture as this one. So that’s a big tick in my books.

Emptying the bin canister of the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

In Boost mode, it’s really quite powerful, easily filling up its dust canister when running over a carpeted floor. As with any Dyson cordless vacuum cleaner, there’s just not enough battery life on the Boost mode to actually finish a large-ish room in one go. If your rooms are big, it will return to its dock to recharge after 13-15 minutes and return later to finish the job. I found it performs admirably well in Auto mode itself – it does, after all, adjust suction dynamically anyway and you’ll see the evidence of its suction power when you empty its bin.

The evidence of its cleaning prowess can also be heard when the volume of its usual hum goes up a little during this automatic adjusting. While Dyson was keen to point out that the Vis Nav is a relatively quiet robovac, it’s actually on par with most other new models out there. It averages about 62dB in Auto mode and can hit 64dB when dynamically adjusting suction power. The maximum I’ve recorded is 68dB in Auto mode. It hit 78dB in Boost. In comparison, I found during my Dyson Gen5detect review that the handstick got as low as 60dB in Eco mode, hits 64.5dB in Auto and is as loud as 75dB in Boost. There is a Quiet mode on board the Vis Nav which, Dyson says, is quiet enough for you to watch telly while it's working, but I’ll have to disagree. It recorded a low of 55dB during my testing in Quiet mode and I still had to increase the volume on my TV a little.

The side duct for edge cleaning on the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Its navigation performance also leaves something to be desired. Where models from iRobot, Roborock and Ecovacs move in a logical manner, the Vis Nav has seemingly been directed to start from the middle of a room and move outward – at least going by the images on the Dyson website. While that’s mostly the case in Auto mode when set to clean the whole home, I have occasionally seen it go wayward, although it doesn’t seem to miss any spots from what I can tell. It has a tendency to start and stop in this mode, where it reduces its power, stops seemingly to get its bearings and then continues with the job at hand. This start-stop routine was disconcerting initially as I kept wondering if it was in trouble.

It’s a completely different story if you set it to clean a specific zone. While it doesn’t do its usual start-stop for a small section, it absolutely does not move logically during zone cleaning, inadvertently missing spots. It also bumps into things, like furniture, in this mode which it doesn’t do when asked to vacuum the whole home.

Dyson 360 Vis Nav cleaning along the edge of a chest of drawers

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Unintelligent navigation isn’t something I expected from Dyson, but it’s not really a deal breaker as it’s possible to get fixed via over-the-air firmware updates.

Dyson has mentioned that it’s best to register the device so these updates can be rolled out automatically, making the app a necessity. To ensure older people who aren’t comfortable with phone apps also get support, Dyson Australia has set up a service where customers can call in and ask for a flash drive to be posted to them – plugging this into the USB port on the bot (yes, there is one) will begin the update process. I imagine this service will be available in other markets when the robovac appears on shelves elsewhere.

• Performance score: 3.5/5

The different modes displayed on the Dyson 360 Vis Nav touchscreen

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: App

  • Neatly designed app
  • Easy to use
  • Confusing dust map

You don’t necessarily need the MyDyson app to control the 360 Vis Nav, but it will help as there are more features in there that could prove useful. For example, you can schedule cleaning runs, say, three times a week while you’re away, create a new map or remap a home, and give your machine a name. I called mine Dyson Fury. You can also use the app to link other Dyson devices you might be using and find handy tutorials for them.

Screenshots of the MyDyson app for the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

It’s a nice app – clean interface and simple navigation. What I didn’t realize when I first let Dyson Fury run loose in my test space was that a map is not created automatically. You need to go into the app, and find the map creation bit under Settings for the robovac. What it will do on its first run is create a rough outline of your home that it uses as a dust map to indicate which parts of you home are dirtiest.

The dust map looks very much like a heat map, with the brightest bits indicating where the most dirt is. However, it doesn’t seem to match up with the bot’s performance. For example, in the dust map below, where I made it clean a fully-carpeted bedroom in Boost mode, it’s supposedly really dirty. And yet the amount of dirt and hair returned in the bin was very little – in fact, it sucked up far more than that on an Auto run just a few days prior to that specific zone clean.

Dyson 360 Vis Nav dust map and bin collection comparison

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

To test out a theory, I decided to first vacuum a section of the test space with the Dyson V15 Detect – in Boost mode, mind – then run the Vis Nav on Auto in the same space. It still showed me areas that were apparently very dirty and they weren’t even the edges. Go figure!

• App score: 3.5/5

Examples of the Dyson 360 Vis Nav's dust map in the MyDyson app

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: Battery life

  • Up to 50 minutes 
  • 2.5 hours to top up
  • No more than 15 minutes on Boost mode

While Dyson doesn’t specify what battery capacity is housed inside the Vis Nav, the company does claim you’ll get up to 50 minutes out of it on a full charge. I will have to agree with that number as I managed to get 47 minutes on Auto mode before it headed back to its dock for some time at the mains.

There is absolutely no loss of suction as the battery drains, which is typical of any Dyson cordless handstick as well. 

While 50 minutes might be enough to clean a small one-bedroom apartment, anything larger will require multiple runs. In comparison, far cheaper models from Roborock and Ecovacs offer much better battery life for about the same kind of performance (bar the edge cleaning, of course).

In Boost mode, I got 15 minutes out of a full charge on one test run and 13 minutes on another. That may not be enough to clean a full room, particularly if it’s a big one.

The light on the machine doesn’t seem to affect its battery life from what I can tell – even when running it on a dimly-lit space, it gave me the same amount of cleaning time. And, from going by the battery icon on the display, it looks like the bot only heads back to its dock after it’s just short of being fully drained. There’s no percentage indication on the display or the app, but it looks like it could be running till it goes under the 10% mark before needing to spend some time at the mains. Only once during my five weeks with the bot did it stop just centimeters away from its dock because it could go no further.

• Battery score: 3.5/5

Dyson 360 Vis Nav on its dock beside a low table

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Should I buy the Dyson 360 Vis Nav?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

The Dyson 360 Vis Nav is a powerful robot vacuum cleaner, but how does it compare to other robovacs out there? If you'd like some options, take a look at the alternatives below.

How I tested the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

  • Used in own home for five weeks
  • Tested on hard floors (tile) and carpet

Dyson 360 Vis Nav on a colorful rug

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

For this review, I ran the 360 Vis Nav a few times a week for five weeks, mostly on Auto mode doing a full-home clean. The test space consists of a home office, which also doubles up as storage space, a small hallway, open-plan living/dining/kitchen, plus a single bedroom. All rooms have hard floors, with the bedroom alone being fully carpeted. As a quick comparison with another robot vacuum cleaner, I ran the TP-Link Tapo RV30 Plus (which I happen to have at the same time) once in that five-week duration.

To test every feature possible on the Vis Nav, I ran it on the other three modes – Boost, Quick and Quiet – a couple of times each. To see how accurate the dust map was, I also did a clean with the Dyson V15 Detect once, before running the Vis Nav over the same space immediately after.

While I had to empty the dust canister after every run anyway, I’ve also taken out the filter and bar brush to see how easy they are to clean for ongoing maintenance of the device itself. 

Before each cleaning run, I always made sure to check rooms for stray socks or charging cables on the floor that could cause Dyson Fury to get furious. I doubt that took me more than a minute to do a quick check.

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed July 2023]

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: a powerful but expensive robot vacuum cleaner
10:04 am | July 19, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Dyson 360 Vis Nav: Two-minute review

The Dyson 360 Vis Nav – I’ll call it just the Vis Nav going forward – has been seven years in the making, according to the engineers involved in the project. It’s not Dyson’s first robovac, although it is for Australia, where the cleaning machine has been released before heading to other markets.

When I saw the robot vacuum cleaner being demonstrated at its launch event in Sydney in May 2023, I thought those seven years were well spent. The Vis Nav sure can utilize its entire 65 air watts of suction in Boost mode, with the evidence of its prowess quite clear when the dust canister is emptied. It’s also the only robot vacuum cleaner I’ve tested that’s capable of doing a decent job of room edges and around furniture legs thanks to an automatically extending side duct.

After having used the Vis Nav for a few weeks now, I’m rethinking my assessment of those seven years of work put towards the Dyson 360 Vis Nav – I’m not as impressed any more. Firstly, its navigation leaves me confused – it tends to stop in the middle of a room while cleaning, get its bearings, then start again. That’s not to say it misses spots, but the stopping can be disconcerting until you get used to it. It will clean an entire section or room, then head to the edges, before moving on to another room.

Another thing that has me scratching my head after every single cleaning run is the dust map that’s displayed in the MyDyson app. According to that, the dirtiest places in my test space are the ones that I’ve already vacuumed with the Dyson V15 Detect (sometimes in Boost mode) minutes before the Vis Nav.

I’m also not really sold on its battery life either. While it manages to run for 47 minutes in Auto mode on a full charge, it barely gave me 15 minutes on Boost, which isn’t enough to finish a decently-sized bedroom.

If you mostly plan to use it in Auto mode, though, the Dyson 360 Vis Nav is arguably the best robot vacuum cleaner I’ve tested in terms of dirt pick-up. It’s very simple to use, has a clear touchscreen and the dust canister is supremely easy to empty. It won’t mop, its D-shaped body won’t really go into corners, and there are no plans to offer the Vis Nav with an auto-empty station. While I love its suction, I really can’t justify its premium price point.

Dyson 360 Vis Nav moving away from its dock

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: price and availability

  • Announced May 2023
  • Currently only available in Australia; US and UK availability TBC
  • Retail price of AU$2,399; US and UK price TBC

It seems Dyson is releasing specific products in specific markets to test the waters. Like the Dyson AirStrait hair straightener, which has only been released in the US, the 360 Vis Nav is currently only available in Australia. There’s no confirmation on when the robovac will roll into other markets, but we’ll keep you updated as soon as we know.

We also don’t have pricing information outside of Australia, where the Vis Nav costs AU$2,399 (converting to around $1,635 / £1,250 at the time of writing). While it’s easy to brush off that price with the excuse that’s “it’s a Dyson”, that really is a lot of spare change you’ll need to dig up, particularly considering you can get a more versatile robot vacuum cleaner for that kind of money.

The Roborock S8 Pro Ultra in comparison costs $1,599 / AU$2,699 (not available in the UK), but you can justify that price tag as it’s a self-emptying and self-cleaning (aka it’s mop gets cleaned and dried too) robot vacuum cleaner. Take the Ecovacs Deebot Omni X1 as another example, which also has similar capabilities to the Roborock, and which sets you back $1,549 / £1,499 / AU$2,499. Both have more logical navigation pathways and, while they don’t necessarily have a dedicated Boost mode, they do have very powerful suction.

Value score: 2.5/5

Dyson 360 Vis Nav on a rug

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav: Specs

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: Design

  • D-shaped body
  • Full-width bar brush and an automatically extending side duct
  • No side brushes to scatter dirt

The moment you lay your eyes on the 360 Vis Nav, you’ll be able to identify it as a Dyson machine. Whether it’s the blue body or the distinctive radial cyclones you can see on the top of the bin canister… I really can’t put my finger on it. What’s really interesting about the Vis Nav, however, is its shape. It’s the first robot vacuum that I know of to feature a D-shaped body that looks like it can get into corners but doesn’t manage it anyway.

Another major design change from anything else out there is the lack of the rotating side brushes you see on other robovacs because, according to Dyson and I agree, they tend to scatter dirt more than push them towards the bar brush under the vacuum. 

Speaking of which, that too has been specifically designed for the Vis Nav. Firstly, the bar brush spans the entire length of the vacuum’s body, meaning it can cover more floor than other droids. And second, it’s a fully redesigned combo of some of Dyson’s existing cordless vacuum cleaner brushes – there are hard bristles to tease dust out of carpet fibers, a soft roller for hard floors, and anti-static carbonfiber filaments to make sure dust doesn't stick to the brush or hard floors as it moves along, creating static energy. It’s also thick enough to ensure hair doesn’t tangle. It’s washable too.

The switch to open the bin of the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

As impressive as the bar brush is, I’m in love with the side duct. This little red tongue sticks out automatically when the Vis Nav gets close to a room’s edge or senses furniture legs, then retracts when it’s not needed. It will even stick out when there are large boxes in the way to make sure the edges along said boxes are cleaned.

The top of the Vis Nav is a 360º camera to allow for visual navigation as opposed to the lidar sensors most other robovacs use. When it’s in a dimly-lit room or under a bed, a light comes on to help it make its way around a home without bumping into anything. That said, it does have a tendency to bump into slightly reflective objects, like a large green glass vase I had on the floor of my test space.

Then there’s a touchscreen which, thanks to being a high contrast display, is easy to read in any kind of lighting. Well, touchscreen is a little misleading as I found that I had to press the screen, which also happens to be a button, to get the vacuum to do its thing. You can use it to start the machine, choose the mode, pause a clean and watch it tell you when the robovac is doing an edge clean or is mapping. It will even let you know it’s charging, how much of the battery is filling up (diagrammatically) and when it’s detected that you’ve taken something (brush, filter or bin) out. When not in use, the screen goes dark with a dim crescent moon and stars displayed to indicate it’s hibernating on its dock after charging up.

The touchscreen is basically a button you can press on the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Beside the screen is the filter. Just press the silver top to release its housing and you can take it out to give it a wash. Just make sure it’s fully dry before putting it back in again.

Arguably the best design element is the dust canister. It features the distinctive radial cyclones we’re used to seeing on the cordless handsticks, just smaller, and a red semicircular button releases it from its spot. The handle is usually folded down when fixed to the bot and houses the release button to open the bottom – similar to how the larger bins on the V series vacuums operate. The grill within is fully exposed, which is a good thing as long strands of hair get tangled around it and need to be cleaned out manually – it’s not all that hygienic as Dyson makes it out to be.

The dock, which comes in two pieces, is a small charging station with cable management on the rear.

• Design score: 4/5

A light comes on when the Dyson 360 Vis Nav is in dark rooms and spaces

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: Performance

  • Great cleaning prowess
  • Dynamic suction
  • Confusing navigation

The Dyson 360 Vis Nav comes with a decent 65AW of suction and a motor that spins at 110,000rpm. This combination is quite powerful, so much so that I was shocked the first time I emptied the bin – it was full! And that was just in Auto mode! 

There are a total of four modes here – Auto, Boost, Quiet and Quick. I’d recommend leaving the Vis Nav on Auto as it does well on this mode. And as soon as it’s finished the interior of a room, it will pop out its side duct to suck up dirt and small debris along the room edges. As mentioned, it will do this even when it senses large pieces of furniture or boxes on your floor – basically anything that creates a decently large ‘edge’ to warrant a clean.

Does this side duct or tongue actually do a decent job? Yes, for the most part. I did have hair and visible bits of dust along some skirting board edges and they all got sucked up, but I also saw it miss some spots. The way I see it, there is no other robot vacuum cleaner that will come as close to the edges of rooms and furniture as this one. So that’s a big tick in my books.

Emptying the bin canister of the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

In Boost mode, it’s really quite powerful, easily filling up its dust canister when running over a carpeted floor. As with any Dyson cordless vacuum cleaner, there’s just not enough battery life on the Boost mode to actually finish a large-ish room in one go. If your rooms are big, it will return to its dock to recharge after 13-15 minutes and return later to finish the job. I found it performs admirably well in Auto mode itself – it does, after all, adjust suction dynamically anyway and you’ll see the evidence of its suction power when you empty its bin.

The evidence of its cleaning prowess can also be heard when the volume of its usual hum goes up a little during this automatic adjusting. While Dyson was keen to point out that the Vis Nav is a relatively quiet robovac, it’s actually on par with most other new models out there. It averages about 62dB in Auto mode and can hit 64dB when dynamically adjusting suction power. The maximum I’ve recorded is 68dB in Auto mode. It hit 78dB in Boost. In comparison, I found during my Dyson Gen5detect review that the handstick got as low as 60dB in Eco mode, hits 64.5dB in Auto and is as loud as 75dB in Boost. There is a Quiet mode on board the Vis Nav which, Dyson says, is quiet enough for you to watch telly while it's working, but I’ll have to disagree. It recorded a low of 55dB during my testing in Quiet mode and I still had to increase the volume on my TV a little.

The side duct for edge cleaning on the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Its navigation performance also leaves something to be desired. Where models from iRobot, Roborock and Ecovacs move in a logical manner, the Vis Nav has seemingly been directed to start from the middle of a room and move outward – at least going by the images on the Dyson website. While that’s mostly the case in Auto mode when set to clean the whole home, I have occasionally seen it go wayward, although it doesn’t seem to miss any spots from what I can tell. It has a tendency to start and stop in this mode, where it reduces its power, stops seemingly to get its bearings and then continues with the job at hand. This start-stop routine was disconcerting initially as I kept wondering if it was in trouble.

It’s a completely different story if you set it to clean a specific zone. While it doesn’t do its usual start-stop for a small section, it absolutely does not move logically during zone cleaning, inadvertently missing spots. It also bumps into things, like furniture, in this mode which it doesn’t do when asked to vacuum the whole home.

Dyson 360 Vis Nav cleaning along the edge of a chest of drawers

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Unintelligent navigation isn’t something I expected from Dyson, but it’s not really a deal breaker as it’s possible to get fixed via over-the-air firmware updates.

Dyson has mentioned that it’s best to register the device so these updates can be rolled out automatically, making the app a necessity. To ensure older people who aren’t comfortable with phone apps also get support, Dyson Australia has set up a service where customers can call in and ask for a flash drive to be posted to them – plugging this into the USB port on the bot (yes, there is one) will begin the update process. I imagine this service will be available in other markets when the robovac appears on shelves elsewhere.

• Performance score: 3.5/5

The different modes displayed on the Dyson 360 Vis Nav touchscreen

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: App

  • Neatly designed app
  • Easy to use
  • Confusing dust map

You don’t necessarily need the MyDyson app to control the 360 Vis Nav, but it will help as there are more features in there that could prove useful. For example, you can schedule cleaning runs, say, three times a week while you’re away, create a new map or remap a home, and give your machine a name. I called mine Dyson Fury. You can also use the app to link other Dyson devices you might be using and find handy tutorials for them.

Screenshots of the MyDyson app for the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

It’s a nice app – clean interface and simple navigation. What I didn’t realize when I first let Dyson Fury run loose in my test space was that a map is not created automatically. You need to go into the app, and find the map creation bit under Settings for the robovac. What it will do on its first run is create a rough outline of your home that it uses as a dust map to indicate which parts of you home are dirtiest.

The dust map looks very much like a heat map, with the brightest bits indicating where the most dirt is. However, it doesn’t seem to match up with the bot’s performance. For example, in the dust map below, where I made it clean a fully-carpeted bedroom in Boost mode, it’s supposedly really dirty. And yet the amount of dirt and hair returned in the bin was very little – in fact, it sucked up far more than that on an Auto run just a few days prior to that specific zone clean.

Dyson 360 Vis Nav dust map and bin collection comparison

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

To test out a theory, I decided to first vacuum a section of the test space with the Dyson V15 Detect – in Boost mode, mind – then run the Vis Nav on Auto in the same space. It still showed me areas that were apparently very dirty and they weren’t even the edges. Go figure!

• App score: 3.5/5

Examples of the Dyson 360 Vis Nav's dust map in the MyDyson app

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Dyson 360 Vis Nav review: Battery life

  • Up to 50 minutes 
  • 2.5 hours to top up
  • No more than 15 minutes on Boost mode

While Dyson doesn’t specify what battery capacity is housed inside the Vis Nav, the company does claim you’ll get up to 50 minutes out of it on a full charge. I will have to agree with that number as I managed to get 47 minutes on Auto mode before it headed back to its dock for some time at the mains.

There is absolutely no loss of suction as the battery drains, which is typical of any Dyson cordless handstick as well. 

While 50 minutes might be enough to clean a small one-bedroom apartment, anything larger will require multiple runs. In comparison, far cheaper models from Roborock and Ecovacs offer much better battery life for about the same kind of performance (bar the edge cleaning, of course).

In Boost mode, I got 15 minutes out of a full charge on one test run and 13 minutes on another. That may not be enough to clean a full room, particularly if it’s a big one.

The light on the machine doesn’t seem to affect its battery life from what I can tell – even when running it on a dimly-lit space, it gave me the same amount of cleaning time. And, from going by the battery icon on the display, it looks like the bot only heads back to its dock after it’s just short of being fully drained. There’s no percentage indication on the display or the app, but it looks like it could be running till it goes under the 10% mark before needing to spend some time at the mains. Only once during my five weeks with the bot did it stop just centimeters away from its dock because it could go no further.

• Battery score: 3.5/5

Dyson 360 Vis Nav on its dock beside a low table

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Should I buy the Dyson 360 Vis Nav?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

The Dyson 360 Vis Nav is a powerful robot vacuum cleaner, but how does it compare to other robovacs out there? If you'd like some options, take a look at the alternatives below.

How I tested the Dyson 360 Vis Nav

  • Used in own home for five weeks
  • Tested on hard floors (tile) and carpet

Dyson 360 Vis Nav on a colorful rug

(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

For this review, I ran the 360 Vis Nav a few times a week for five weeks, mostly on Auto mode doing a full-home clean. The test space consists of a home office, which also doubles up as storage space, a small hallway, open-plan living/dining/kitchen, plus a single bedroom. All rooms have hard floors, with the bedroom alone being fully carpeted. As a quick comparison with another robot vacuum cleaner, I ran the TP-Link Tapo RV30 Plus (which I happen to have at the same time) once in that five-week duration.

To test every feature possible on the Vis Nav, I ran it on the other three modes – Boost, Quick and Quiet – a couple of times each. To see how accurate the dust map was, I also did a clean with the Dyson V15 Detect once, before running the Vis Nav over the same space immediately after.

While I had to empty the dust canister after every run anyway, I’ve also taken out the filter and bar brush to see how easy they are to clean for ongoing maintenance of the device itself. 

Before each cleaning run, I always made sure to check rooms for stray socks or charging cables on the floor that could cause Dyson Fury to get furious. I doubt that took me more than a minute to do a quick check.

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed July 2023]

On Cloudboom Echo 3 review: On’s race-day shoe keeps pace with Nike and ASICS
12:10 pm | July 18, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

On Cloudboom Echo 3: One minute review

The On Cloudboom Echo 3 is the Swiss running brand’s third attempt at making a running shoe to rival the ones that are typically seen on the feet of the fastest runners. The best running shoes for racing are typically the Nike ZoomX Vaporfly Next% 2 , Adidas Adizero Adio Pro 3, or the Asics Metaspeed Sky+, and On wants the Cloudboom Echo 3 on that list.

Whether you're looking to run a faster marathon on a specific course or you're hoping for a shoe for whenever speed is a priority, making some quite significant changes from its first two Cloudboom shoes.

The first generation Cloudboom was a miss from On, while the Cloudboom Echo felt like a step in the right direction for its pricey racing option. Now with a new midsole setup and a lighter design in play, the Cloudboom Echo 3 is the super shoe we’ve been waiting for from On.

On Cloudboom Echo 3: Specifications

On Cloudboom Echo 3: Price and availability

On Cloudboom Echo 3

(Image credit: Michael Sawh)
  • $289.99 in the US
  • £260 in the UK
  • AU$390 in Australia

The On Cloudboom Echo 3 launched on 29th June 2023, priced at $289.99 / £260 / AU$390. 

That’s a step up in price from the Cloudboom Echo and does make it more expensive than picking up shoes that the Echo 3 is going up against. 

The Nike Vaporfly 3 costs $250 / £234.95 /  AU$330.00 for example, while the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 is also cheaper at £220 / $250 / AU$359.99. 

  • Value score: 3.5/5

On Cloudboom Echo 3: Design

On Cloudboom Echo 3

(Image credit: Michael Sawh)
  • Microfiber upper
  • Helion Hyper Foam
  • Carbon Speedboard

We’ll start by saying that when it comes to making beautiful-looking running shoes, few do that better than On. The Cloudboom Echo 3 in its white and mint colourway and low-profile look feels every bit a racing shoe.

It’s very light, with our UK size 8 weighing in at 221g, though one side weighed in closer to the claimed 215g weight. Either way, it’s shaved off some grams from the already pretty lightweight Cloudboom Echo, though it’s still not quite as light as Nike’s Vaporfly 3, which weighs in less than 200g.

On sticks to the same 9mm drop as the Echo, though stack heights have changed at the heel and the forefoot, jumping to 37mm at the heel (previously 35mm) and 28mm at the forefoot (up from 27mm). 

It had a good upper on the Echo, but On’s decided to switch things up swapping recycled polyester mesh for microfiber, which is still almost papery thin in feel and does make this narrow shoe feel a bit more spacious up front in the toes, which is ideal when you need that extra room as you up the distance in them.

Below that is a midsole, which marks a new direction for On’s shoes. Its Cloudtec cushioning tech is still there, but it’s definitely been scaled back and less prominent than it was on the first two Cloudboom shoes. There’s now On’s Helion Hyper Foam, which is a Pebax-based foam and sees On join Nike, Saucony, New Balance and Hoka in embracing a Pebax-based super foam. It’s a light foam and one designed to deliver more energy back into your running time, particularly to benefit those longer distance runs in it.

That new foam is joined by a full length carbon plate or Speedboard as On calls it, along with a rockered design, which collectively aims to deliver a propulsive feeling that aims to get you through those running transitions in a quicker fashion.

The outsole doesn’t look hugely different from the one used on the Cloudboom Echo, with the larger of the grippier sections at the forefoot now reaching a bit further back to the middle of the shoe with key areas at the heel covered to make sure you get that traction from the key areas without adding extra weight.

  • Design score: 5/5 

On Cloudboom Echo 3: Performance

On Cloudboom Echo 3

(Image credit: Michael Sawh)
  • Pretty stable racing shoe
  • Smooth and propulsive ride
  • Still a touch firmer than other racing shoes

We’ll start with the fit and the Echo 3 is a bit on the narrow side, which was fine for our skinny feet, but might be more of a squeeze for wider feet with no wide fit option available. Unlike some carbon racing shoes we’ve tested it does feel like you need to work a bit harder to get a secure lockdown here, with very long laces and a skinny tongue for those laces to sit on top requiring some toying around to make sure it’s not slipping around at the heel.

Once you do get things locked in place, the feel of running in the Echo 3 is more in line with those top-tier racing shoes. This isn’t one you can amble around in and you won’t find it comfortable to do slow, easy runs in, but that’s simply not what they’re built for. Everything here is designed to give you that faster feel and it does that well. As we said, On’s Cloudtec takes a bit of a backseat and that’s not a bad thing at all. The new midsole is not as super soft and bouncy as rival shoes, but it’s certainly not as firm feeling as previous Cloudbooms and the combination of the new foam, rockered design, and that carbon Speedboard creates a smooth, energetic, and punchy ride. 

In our first run, a quicker 5k, on a pretty flat route, it felt like an enjoyable shoe to run in at around our typical 5k race speed. It handled an interval track session well and didn’t cause any issues during or post-run. In a 10k race test on a hilly LeeValley VeloPark course, the Echo 3 running at quicker than marathon pace with the combination of the hills made it tough going, but when we could and needed to coast at a more settled pace, it felt good to do so.

When we upped the distance and settled closer to our marathon pace, that good feeling remained and it feels like a shoe you can really roll in. That being said, it does still feel like a race shoe that’s primed for those running sub-3 hour times (we run at a 3-hour, 20-minute pace) who will benefit most from what On has to offer here. That’s no real surprise here, though we’d definitely say there are shoes that the Cloudboom Echo 3 is competing against that feels more accessible and more comfortable outside running those sort of elite times. 

From an outsole point of view, it was good on the Cloudboom Echo and it’s more of the same on the Echo 3. We didn’t get to use them in rainy conditions, but on flat roads, pavements and hillier climbs it gripped well and handled cornering with no issues either. We’ve put 50 km of running into it and we are starting to see some wear at the heel of the shoe, which tells us that the durability is likely to fall in line with other carbon racers and it’s one you will want to reserve for your fastest runs and races.

  • Performance score: 4.5/5

On Cloudboom Echo 3: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

On Cloudboom Echo 3: Don’t buy it if…

Also consider

First reviewed: July 2023

(Credit: Thanks to RunThrough for the race entry used to test the On Cloudboom Echo 3) 

Motorola Edge 40 review: Clean Android and long-lasting battery make for a Pixel 7 killer
7:33 pm | July 17, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Motorola Edge 40: Two-minute review

The Motorola Edge 40 is an elegant Android phone that I’ve thoroughly enjoyed using for the duration of the review period, offering a svelte design, competent cameras, a long-lasting battery, and fast charging at a competitive price.

If the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is going up against the flagships of the smartphone world, the Edge 40 faces off against their more modestly-equipped siblings. It’s smaller than the Motorola Edge 40 Plus, has less powerful components and a less impressive set of cameras, but at £529 (approximately $690 / AU$1,015) compared with the Edge 40 Pro’s £799 (approximately $1,045 / AU$1,535) it’s a compelling package.

Certainly, you don't get all the bells and whistles of a much more expensive flagship phone thrown in here – there’s no there’s no dedicated zoom camera, variable refresh rate display, or 12GB of RAM, for example. but you do get an experience that’s mostly fast, fluid and reliable. Alongside the Edge 40 Pro, the Edge 40 is certainly one of the best Motorola phones you can buy.

The Motorola Edge 40 with the screen turned off.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

It does have its flaws. Expect a smaller accessory market compared to the likes of the Google Pixel 7a, a weaker camera than the iPhone 14, and fewer regular updates than the Galaxy S23. But if none of these are overly important to you, then its considerable strengths and affordability may just seal the deal.

The target audience for the Motorola Edge 40 are those for whom value for money is a driving factor, who prefer a phone that’s relatively light and slim, and not as bulky as many of the best smartphones tend to be, and who aren’t concerned about not having the newest version of Android the moment it’s released.

Motorola Edge 40: price and availability

  • Priced at £529.99 in the UK (about $690 / AU$1,015)
  • Unconfirmed for the US, though may appear as the Motorola Edge (2023) 
  • Available as of May 4, 2023

The Motorola Edge 40 is on sale now in the UK for £529. This is much lower than the £700-ish asking price of the OnePlus 11, Galaxy S23, and other members of the best Android phones family, so worth considering for those looking for a premium experience on a tighter budget.

However, just because it's more affordable doesn't mean it undercuts equivalent rivals by a significant margin. At the time of writing, Google sells the Pixel 7 for £549 in the UK, just £20 shy of the Edge 40. Though this is a time-limited deal, you even can grab the Pixel 7 and other powerful flagship phones for less than £500, if you keep an eye on Amazon or refurbished phone markets.

Other phones you can purchase new for around the £529 price point include: the Google Pixel 7a at £449, the Nothing Phone 1 at £499, and the iPhone 13 mini at £599, going by the prices of popular UK retailers.

All these phones are perfectly good in their own right, although the Motorola Edge 40 offers better battery life and faster charging than the Pixel 7a, and snappier performance than the Nothing Phone 1 (and looks more stylish in my opinion); while you’ll prefer it over the iPhone 13 mini if you like your phones to be of a more conventional size.

The Motorola Edge 40 is also being sold through carriers. This is a substantial improvement over the Edge 40 Pro, which Motorola has confirmed to us is only available for purchase unlocked direct from their store. You can grab the phone from Three and Vodafone, in the UK.

  • Value score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 40 review: specs

The Motorola Edge 40 propped up against a stand

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

Motorola Edge 40 review: design

The rear of the Eclipse Black Motorola Edge 40.

The vegan leather material is grippy. (Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)
  • 'Endless Edge' design
  • Curved edges
  • Matte acrylic or vegan leather rear

The Motorola Edge 40 is available in a choice of colors and finishes. You can get the phone with a vegan leather rear in Eclipse Black (pictured) or Nebula Green, or with a matte acrylic glass rear in Lunar Blue; that model weighs 168g, while the vegan leather phones are a little heavier at 171g. All models are IP68-rated against dust and water ingress.

Though glass phones have their issues – with some offering all the grip of a bar of soap – vegan leather isn't perfect either; more on that below. The model tested for this review was vegan leather in Eclipse Black. 

The vegan leather material feels nice to hold, and it's grippy. Motorola provides a case in the box too, which you may appreciate; particularly if you get the glass-backed Lunar Blue model. Treasure it, as you may not find many on Amazon – the accessory market for phones not made by Apple, Samsung, or Google remains challengingly-thin.

While I put the phone in its case, I noticed that it still somehow tended to get a little dirty, and when it came to cleaning, the vegan leather material also proved to be a little bit of a hindrance. Where a glass or plastic phone would have been good with a wipe or two, the vegan leather of the Edge 40 was a little harder to clean – though I got there eventually. If you like to keep your phone spotless, the Lunar Blue model may be more your thing.

Overall, the Motorola’s Edge 40 design is aesthetically pleasing and well balanced, but you might want to give some thought to your choice of material, which in turn will dictate your choice of colors.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 40 review: display

The Motorola Edge 40's Peek Display.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)
  •  6.55-inch Full HD+ (2400 x 1080) pOLED 
  • Up to 144Hz refresh rate
  • Curved-edge display

The Motorola Edge 40’s display measures 6.55 inches and it’s a Full HD pOLED panel with a 144Hz refresh rate, plus a small punch-hole selfie camera.

The display is great for reading ebooks, watching movies, and scrolling social media. Viewing angles were great during testing and the display resisted color distortion, even at more extreme viewing angles. Even bright sunshine didn’t render the display unviewable – which isn’t surprising given that Motorola says it can go up to 1200 nits. It’s also features a (kind of) always-on display mode called Peek Display, which means you can see your notifications and the clock if you just touch the screen or otherwise move the phone. This is a little less convenient than the true always-on-displays that you’ll find on other top-level phones, but it serves its purpose.

It’s worth noting that the Motorola Edge 40 has a similar curved-edged display as the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. While many Android phones have slightly curved displays, I had a bit of an issue adjusting to this one in particular. Whether it’s because of the phone’s slightly thinner frame compared to larger phones, my fairly big hands, or the fact that I'm used to using much larger phones than the Edge 40, I found that the curved display edges made typing or gaming a little awkward, although if you have smaller hands, or don't hop between phones as often as I do, then this may not be an issue for you.

To sum up, the Motorola Edge 40 has a good display, but its curved edges may not be for everyone.

  • Display score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 40 review: software

The Motorola Edge 40's clean Android software.

Android 13 on the Motorola Edge 40 looks a lot like Google's.  (Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)
  • Android 13 at launch
  • Clean take on Android
  • Three of years OS updates + four years security updates

The Motorola Edge 40 runs Motorola's MYUX software, powered by Android 13. It's a very Pixel-like OS that's clean and unobtrusive.

As ‘Pixel-like’ implies, the look and feature set of Motorola’s software doesn’t differ from the simplicity of Google’s all that much to the same extent as overlays from the likes of Samsung or Oppo. However, the company does add some customization features (or retains the pre-Android 12 theme options Google used to offer, depending on how you want to look at it). There’s also the Motorola Ready For feature – a tool that’s similar to Samsung’s Dex, and is designed to let you use your phone as a desktop computing experience in a pinch, when paired with a dock. It’s useful in theory, but most people who might need such a feature already have laptops so it feels redundant to me. Perhaps it’ll find its audience, but otherwise, it’s a cool party trick you’ll use once and forget about. 

Motorola promises three years of OS updates for the Motorola Edge 40 and 40 Pro – so not as generous as the four years some other Android phone makers (namely Samsung) offer. The company has also committed to four years of security updates, which is still a bit short (Samsung and Google both promise five, for example), but long enough to cover the likely lifetime of the phone – you'll still have two years of coverage left if you buy an Edge 40 in 2025, for example.

Motorola's issue with software remains the timeliness of updates, with the Edge 30 series being among the last Android phones to get Android 13. In contrast, the likes of Samsung and Oppo release updates rapidly after Google rolls them out to its Pixels. If rapid software updates are something you care about, you should look elsewhere. On the other hand, considering the dwindling excitement around Android updates – as evidenced by the Google IO 2023 – it may not be much of an issue.

  • Software score: 3.5 / 5

Motorola Edge 40 review: cameras

The Motorola Edge 40's camera

The camera view from the Motorola Edge 40. (Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)
  • Dual rear camera layout (50MP + 13MP)
  • 32MP selfie camera
  • Raw support

Motorola has equipped the Edge 40 with a dual-camera setup comprising a 50-megapixel main camera and a 13MP ultra-wide camera. They aren’t as good as the cameras on the much better-specced Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but they aren’t bad either. They're just fairly average. The Motorola Edge 40 is not the best camera phone; it’s not even the best one you can get from Motorola, nor is it second best, with the Edge 30 Ultra still on sale.

When it comes to using the camera, the experience is fine. The cameras are quick to capture photos in good light, but you may need to hold the phone steady in low light to get a decent image. Motorola phones also have a night mode, but it was hit or miss during testing. The colors can sometimes shift between captures without any external light source changes, and the images are a lot softer. That aside, photos are pleasing to the eye when viewed on the phone, but they don’t hold up to scrutiny when reviewed on a larger screen. Even so, they’re easily good enough for sharing on Instagram or Snapchat, with the usual suite of editing options available to you too.

If you're expecting anything more spectacular in the imaging department, it’s worth keeping in mind that this is not a Pixel, an iPhone, or a Galaxy. It’s a Motorola. You can get good-to-great photos with this phone, but its strengths are elsewhere – like its slender body, slick software and faster charging.

Motorola Edge 40 camera samples

Image 1 of 6

Testing the Motorola Edge's camera.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

The images from the phone's main sensor are decent...

Image 2 of 6

Testing the Motorola Edge's camera.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

...just don't view them on a larger screen.

Image 3 of 6

Testing the Motorola Edge's camera.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

The ultra-wide camera fits a lot in.

Image 4 of 6

Testing the Motorola Edge's camera.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

And the selfie camera is good for quick Instagram photos.

Image 5 of 6

Testing the Motorola Edge's camera.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

Motorola lets you capture portraits with three focal lengths, but there's a poor degree of consistency between them, especially when switching sensors.

Image 6 of 6

Testing the Motorola Edge's camera.

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)

The night mode works, but it doesn't 'wow'.

  • Camera score: 3 / 5

Motorola Edge 40 review: performance

  • MediaTek Dimensity 8020 chipset
  • 6GB RAM (LPDDR4X)
  • 256GB of storage (UFS 3.1)

While the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is powered by Qualcomm’s latest and most powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, the Motorola Edge 40 gets the MediaTek Dimensity 8020 instead: a new mid-level processor that would compete with a top-end Snapdragon processor of a year or two ago. So it’s not the most powerful chip, but then this isn’t Motorola’s top-end handset – if you want more oomph you’ll need to step up to the Edge 40 Pro.

In my time testing the phone, it was fast and responsive, with no lag. Whatever I was doing, I never once thought, "Hmm, this is annoying, I need more power." The Dimensity 8020 didn't call attention to itself at all – it just quietly got on with the tasks at hand without protest, and I consider that an admirable quality.

The other specs here are decent, but reflective of the lower price of this phone compared to the Edge 40 Pro. There's 8GB RAM and 256GB of storage, but it’s LPDDR4 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage, so a bit older, slower and less power efficient than what you’ll find in the Edge 40 Pro. It’s the same story elsewhere: the USB-C is 2.0 and not 3.2, Bluetooth is 5.2 and not 5.3, and so on. The dual speakers for audio are tuned with Dolby Atmos and sound great, but get some of the best cheap wireless earbuds if you want to use it outside.

Once again, if you want top-of-the-line excellence, be prepared to shell out for the Edge 40 Pro. While all aspects of the Edge 40’s performance are sufficient, you’re ultimately getting what you pay for.

  • Performance score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 40 review: battery

  • 4,400mAh battery
  • Supports 68W TurboPower charging
  • All-day battery life

When I reviewed the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, I found it to have excellent battery life, and while the Motorola Edge 40 has a very good battery life, it’s doesn't quite measure up to its Pro-branded sibling. This slight difference in performance can perhaps be attributed to the MediaTek chip, which is less efficient than the Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. This is not a knock on MediaTek, however, the 8 Gen 2 is absolutely brilliant, and phones which are powered by it – such as the Galaxy S23, the OnePlus 11, and the Edge 40 Pro – offer fantastic battery life, but all cost more too.

While you won't be going multiple days without a charger if you use your phone intensively, you can get two to three days of light usage (think an hour or two of screen on time per day), or a comfortable full day of heavy usage, with a fast top-up to extend that to the next day.

Speaking of top-ups, charging is pretty fast, and the 68W fast charger bundled in the box gets the job done in roughly half an hour. Motorola continues the tradition of Android phone makers putting the charger back in the box, after a couple of years of removing it for cost-savings reasons (and charitably, to reduce e-waste). It's also great that this is happening alongside the push towards ultra-fast charging on Android phones, so you're saving both time and money.

  • Battery score: 4.5 / 5

Should you buy the Motorola Edge 40?

Buy it if...

You want a clean, stock Android phone
There are only a few phones which offer software that's (close to) Google's take on Android. Motorola's Edge 40 is one of the best of them.

You want a thin and light phone with a sleek design
The Edge 40 is very thin and very light. Your wrist will thank you for this purchase.

You want a fast-charging phone that lasts all day
Motorola's 68W fast charging can get you up and running for the day in 20 minutes.

Don't buy it if...

You want the best cameras for this price range  
Motorola does deliver good hardware, but you'll find cheaper options from Google, Oppo, and even Xiaomi that do much better, photographically speaking.

Timely and consistent updates are important to you 
Motorola is not that company, when it comes to delivering OS and security updates in a timely fashion.

Motorola Edge 40: Also consider

If Motorola's Edge 40 sounds appealing but isn't quite your speed, there are some options that may scratch the same itch but tilt a little further in one direction or the other.

Google Pixel 7
Google’s Pixel 7 flagship is already here, and costs just a bit more than the Edge 40. You gain faster updates and Google’s excellent cameras. You lose the svelte design and speedy charging of the Motorola, however.

Google Pixel 7a
The Pixel 7a offers much the same as the Pixel 7, albeit it’s now sold for £449 in the UK. You lose out on a larger screen compared to the Pixel 7 and Edge 40, but a compact Pixel phone has an audience.

How I tested the Motorola Edge 40

Motorola Edge 40 lockscreen

(Image credit: Michael Allison / Future)
  • Review test period = 3 weeks
  • Testing included = Everyday usage, web browsing, social media, photography, video calling, gaming
  • Tools used = Geekbench 6, GFXBench, native Android stats

I used the Motorola Edge 40 as my main phone for three weeks. During this time, I had my SIM in it and I used it to do a lot of reading and watched a few shows on Amazon Prime, as well as YouTube videos, took pictures in a variety of lighting conditions, shot fun videos for friends, and more or less used it as a typical mid-twenties male in London would.

Other than integrating it into my daily life as my main phone over the testing period, I also ran benchmarking apps to compare the Edge 40’s performance to other top Android phones. This included Geekbench 6, in which the Edge 40 landed an average single-core score of 1109 and an average multi-core score of 3578, as well as GFX bench.

As for my personal experience of reviewing phones, I've been writing about and reviewing mobile technology since 2014. Prior to joining TechRadar, I worked at Digital Trends in the mobile section, and before that I was at Android Central, writing about Android phones on a daily basis.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed June 2023

« Previous PageNext Page »