US - Organizer - Page 26

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: my new favorite budget-friendly air purifier

10:00 am | January 1, 2025

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i : two-minute review

Blueair offers similar air purifiers under different model names in the US and UK. In the US, this air purifier is known as the Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max, but as I’m located in the south of England, I tested the UK model, Blueair Blue Max 3250i.

The Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max is available to purchase at the Blueair website and Amazon for a list price of $169.99, but can occasionally be on offer for a discounted price. In the UK, the Blueair Blue Max 3250i is priced at £169 at multiple retailers including Very and Amazon, and also sees a price drop now and then.

The large Blueair air purifier sits on its side with the top removed on a wood surface against a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

Despite being compact and impressively light for its capabilities, there’s a lot to love about the Blueair Blue Max 3250i. The two touch buttons make it simple to power on the air purifier and to cycle through auto mode, night mode, and fan speeds one to three. The simple design is composed of the white plastic top section that houses the working parts, and a simple yet efficient base that consists of a lightweight frame within the changeable particle and carbon filter, plus a machine-washable fabric pre-filter outer layer. The neatness of the seam isn’t perfect, but other than this it is a great way to capture dust before it reaches the single-use filter, and is available in a range of colors making it effortless to switch things up if desired.

The Blueair Blue Max 3250i does a great job for the price, rivaling some of the best air purifiers. For the most part, the fan speed remained on the lowest setting when the Blueair Blue Max 3250i was left in auto mode. This came as no surprise to me, but I’ve seen some customer reviews complaining that this air purifier doesn’t do anything. In fact, the Blueair Blue Max 3250i is purifying, and it’s capable of clearing more than just the PM2.5 it detects, such as VOCs when manually operated – it just doesn’t possess the capability to detect these things automatically. That's fine, in my professional opinion, considering the low price.

A close-up of the top of Blueair air purifier on a wood surface against a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

During testing, it took just ten minutes for the contamination from spraying dry shampoo to be detected and cleared by the Blueair Blue Max 3250i. It continued to impress me over the days I tested it, being sensitive enough to detect the drop in air quality when I used hair products in the next room.

In terms of noise levels, I didn’t experience any issues with the Blueair Blue Max 3250i. I found that I could sleep or watch TV with it in the room without it being disruptive.

I’m a big fan of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i, both for its innovative design, and its good performance for a low price, so I can envision it finding its way into our choice of the best air purifiers in the near future. So if you're in the market for a low-cost air purifier that won't shock you with extortionate costs for replacement parts, this is the one for you. If you'd like to learn more, read on for our full review to get all the facts.

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: price & availability

List price: $169.99 / £169
Available: in the US and UK under different product names

The Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max is available to purchase from the Blueair US website for $169.99, and at the time of writing has a Black Friday deal slashing the price down to $119.99 at Amazon US. The comparable UK model, the Blueair Blue Max 3250i, can’t be purchased from the Blueair website but is available at many major UK retailers, including Argos, Very, and Amazon. The list price is £169 for the Blue Max 3250i at Amazon, and a Black Friday deal has knocked the price down to an even more impressive £113.

I was pleasantly surprised that the Blueair Blue Max 3250i performed so well and had such a considered design considering its price tag, making it fantastic value for money. Replacement components won’t break the bank either, with replacement Particle and Carbon filters costing just $29.99 / £35 – this is particularly impressive as Blueair states that these filters can last between six to nine months.

Value for money score: 5/5

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: specs

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: design and features

No display
Simple to use
Machine-washable pre-filter

I became a fan of the design aspects of the Blue range when I reviewed the impressive Blueair Blue Pure Mini Max. The standout design feature is the attractive machine-washable fabric pre-filter covering most of the purifier’s outer. This design proves innovative, as directly behind the pre-filter cover sits the particle and carbon filter (this can be upgraded to Smokeblock or Allergenblock filters if desired), which surrounds a simple plastic frame. This makes the base of the purifier super lightweight for its size, weighing in at 7.5 lbs / 3.4 kg. The Blueair Blue Max 3250i can purify an area of 219 sq ft / 48 sq meters yet still remains fairly compact, measuring 18.9 X 10.6 X 10.6 in / 481 x 269 x 269 mm. I’m very pleased with the reduced amount of materials used on the body of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i, but my concern with this construction is that the exposed filter could be prone to damage.

The sleeve of the large Blueair air purifier is rolled down to reveal the HEPA filter underneath. — (Image credit: Future)

I’ve never seen a design quite like this, as most air purifiers have plastic casing to protect the inner filters whereas the body of the Blueair Blue Pure Mini Max is simply some structural plastic sitting within the particle and carbon filter, covered in the washable pre-filter. This goes to explain its very light weight of 2.5 lb / 3.4kg but could make it vulnerable to damage.

Despite its minor flaws, it’s a nice touch that Blueair made the pre-filter part of the overall aesthetic, which has meant less material and wasted plastic, which we’re always happy to see at TechRadar. It’s also an advantage that they are machine washable and extras can be purchased in a range of colors, just in case you don’t want to wait for one to dry, or want to switch things up occasionally.

Not only is it delightfully light, it’s dinky in size, too. Measuring just 11.4 x 6.8 x 5.9 inches / ‎172 x 172 x 289mm. This cylindrical 360-degree design enables the Blueair Blue Pure Mini Max to be placed in a variety of spaces, as there’s plenty of opportunity for it to pull air in.

The large Blueair air purifier sits with its back turned toward the camera on a wood surface against a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

As was the case with the Mini Max, the seam of the fabric pre-filter could be neater as it is a little puckered and bulges in places, but this is less noticeable on the Blueair Blue Max 3250i as the overlapping seam doesn’t stand out as much over the larger area.

The controls on the top of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i are simple, there are just two touch-operated buttons, a power button, and a fan button that cycles between auto mode, sleep mode, and fan speeds of one to three when pressed. There’s no LED display to view the air quality data; however, there’s a light on the front of the unit that changes color to indicate the air quality score, ranging from Excellent to Very Polluted, and a light below each fan mode to indicate which is currently being used.

Real-time quality levels are easy to view on the Blueair app, but there’s no detailed data to review, simply a colored graph showing the air quality rating over time. I found I was able to use a pinching motion to zoom in and out of the graph, which allowed me to view more detail of the air quality changes over smaller increments of time.

Design score: 4.5 out of 5

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: performance

Quiet operation
Clears PM2.5 contaminations quickly
Detects and reacts to PM2.5 that originates in other rooms

Getting the Blueair Blue Max 3250i set up was quick and simple. The user manual was easy to follow, containing first-time setup instructions including how to connect it to my home Wi-Fi, which proved to be a breeze. It also included instructions on how to remove and wash the fabric pre-filter, which I appreciated. Upon installing the Blueair app, I was given the option to use it without creating an account, but I chose to so I could enter my location and view the outdoor air quality data too.

Connecting the Blueair Blue Max 3250i to the app was blissfully straightforward, taking less than three minutes after switching the air purifier on to view my indoor air quality. As I was using the Blueair Blue Max 3250i in my living room, I selected “Living room” as the product name, but there was an option to add a custom name should I have been using it in an office or nursery, for example.

The HEPA filter from inside the Blueair air purifier sits facing forward on a wood surface against a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

It’s worth noting that although it’s claimed the Blueair Blue Max 3250i’s electrostatic and mechanical filtration captures airborne particles as small as 0.1 microns, it will not detect anything smaller than PM2.5. PM2.5 is particulate matter over 2.5 microns in size, including dust, pollen, mold, and bacteria. Other far more expensive air purifiers, such as the Molekule Air Pro, can monitor and react to VOCs along with PM2.5. These volatile organic compounds can come from paint, furniture, carpets, and cleaning products, and are often the main offenders behind lower air quality, so having an air purifier capable of detecting these contaminants would be advantageous.

However, just because an air purifier doesn’t detect these contaminants doesn’t mean it isn’t tackling them, but it won't be aware of them so won’t initiate higher fan speeds in their presence. Considering the low price of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i though, it’s not surprising that it doesn’t have this capability, but this is something to bear in mind if you want a purifier that you can leave to its own devices to tackle all the common contaminants.

According to the Blueair Blue Max 3250i, the air quality in my living room was considered excellent, so it remained at a low fan speed when I put it into auto mode. To test how sensitive the sensors were to contaminants, and how quickly they reacted to them, I sprayed some dry shampoo roughly three meters away. Within two minutes the Blueair Blue Max 3250i detected the dry shampoo, raising the contamination reading to 56 on the graph within the app over about thirty seconds, which it classed as very polluted. Within three minutes of spraying the dry shampoo, the reading had lowered to 25, classed as good; within six minutes, it returned to excellent.

It was at this moment that my fluffy cats chose to pay a visit, and interestingly, the air quality reduced slightly again, raising the score, so it appeared to detect their fur or dander in the air. Within a minute of them leaving, the score gradually dropped further than before, so it appear that the Blueair Blue Max 3250i’s particle sensors were doing a good job.

I continued to be impressed by how sensitive this air purifier was to changes in air quality over a week of testing. I would be surprised to hear the fan speed ramping up, before realizing I’d used my dry shampoo in the next room. I’ve not encountered a cheap air purifier that possessed this level of sensitivity before.

The inside of the top section of Blueair air purifier on a wood surface against a pink background. — (Image credit: Future)

When it came to viewing the testing data on the air quality graph on the Blueair app, I found that it wasn’t very easy to view data over multiple days. Whenever I viewed the graph, the data was in real time and I would need to scroll along for some while. I could change from hourly readings to readings across a day or month, but when I scrolled back to a previous day and switched to hourly view to see more detail, it returned to the current day and time. This meant that I could only see this level of detail by scrolling all the way back to my chosen day when in hourly view, which wasn't ideal. The air quality graph didn’t give the full picture of how contaminated the air had become after I sprayed the dry shampoo. It communicated the highest score as being 22, despite reaching 56 in reality. This lack of detail isn’t unheard of, though, as I found that the Molekule Air Mini+ also failed to relay all readings if they were cleared quickly.

I found the Blueair Blue Max 3250i to be easy to sleep next to when in sleep mode, and I found that I couldn’t hear it over the TV when operating on fan level 2. Some other air purifiers can prove deafening at higher fan speeds, but this was not the case with the Blueair Blue Max 3250i.

Overall, though, I was very impressed with how sensitive the Blueair Blue Max 3250i was, how quickly it responded to contaminants, and how swiftly it dealt with them. The level and quality of features are great for the price, and this is only the second non-VOC detecting air purifier that I’ve found myself growing a fondness for, with the other being the Blueair Blue Mini Max.

Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Should I buy the Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i?

Buy it if...

You want good results on a budget
I’ve made no secret of the fact that I’m highly impressed with this air purifier. It’s repeatedly proven itself sensitive, responsive, and fast-acting, making it a great performer for the cost.

You need something lightweight
The Blueair Blue Max 3250i isn’t just light for its size; it’s lightweight in general. With barely any body material in its base, it is very easy to pick up and move, making it a good choice for anyone wanting to use it in multiple rooms.

You want something simple
With only two onboard buttons to operate the air purifier and a simple-to-use app, the settings of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i are easy to get a handle on.

Don't buy it if...

You want detailed air quality readings
With a low-cost piece of tech, there’s always going to be an element of compromise. In this case, the contamination detected is limited to PM2.5, and the app doesn’t give any detail on indoor air quality aside from an overall score.

You want something to fight off the nasties on its own accord
As this air purifier can’t detect VOCs, it won’t automatically react to strong odors or finer particles, so settings will need to be altered manually if a higher level of purifying is required.

You want something robust
Despite the advantages of such a lightweight air purifier, there’s no denying that the base design could be at risk of damage should anything make contact with it.

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: Also consider

Levoit Core 300S Smart True HEPA
We rated this little air purifier a commendable four-and-a-half stars thanks to its performance and smart features. It is cheaper than the Blueair Blue Max 3250i, but there were delays in response time, and it doesn’t offer washable pre-filters. For more information, why not check out our full Levoit Core 300S True HEPA air purifier review.

Molekule Air Pro
I know, I know, the cost difference here is vast, however, if you happen to be looking for an option with medical-grade materials, FDA medical device clearance, and fantastic VOC detection, then this is hands down the product to go for. If you'd like to find out more about this air purifier's skill set, take a look at our full Molekule Air Pro review.

How I tested the Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i

I used the Blueair Blue Max 3250i for a week and a half
I tested how much of an impact it had on the surrounding air quality
I tested how easy it was to operate and live with

I checked how easy was to get the Blueair Blue Max 3250i set up, how easy it was to operate, and how portable it was.

I tested it in different rooms in my home, and observed how quiet it was at night time and whether it disturbed my sleep.

I assessed its design and structure, paying close attention to quality and any sustainable elements.

I reviewed the impact it had on the air quality in my environment, and how well it handled cooking smells.

First reviewed: November 2024
Read TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: my new favorite budget-friendly air purifier

10:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Air Quality Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Tags: UK, US | Comments: Off

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i : two-minute review

The straightforward design is composed of the white plastic top section that houses the working parts, and a simple yet efficient base that consists of a lightweight frame within the changeable particle and carbon filter, plus a machine-washable fabric pre-filter outer layer. The neatness of the seam isn’t perfect, but other than this it is a great way to capture dust before it reaches the single-use filter, and is available in a range of colors making it effortless to switch things up if desired.

This came as no surprise to me, but I’ve seen some customer reviews complaining that this air purifier doesn’t do anything. In fact, the Blueair Blue Max 3250i is purifying, and it’s capable of clearing more than just the PM2.5 it detects, such as VOCs when manually operated – it just doesn’t possess the capability to detect these things automatically. That's fine, in my professional opinion, considering the low price.

During testing, it took just 10 minutes for the contamination from spraying dry shampoo to be detected and cleared by the Blueair Blue Max 3250i. It continued to impress me over the days I tested it, being sensitive enough to detect the drop in air quality when I used hair products in the next room.

In terms of noise levels, I didn’t experience any issues with the Blueair Blue Max 3250i. I found that I could sleep or watch TV with it in the room without it being disruptive.

I’m a big fan of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i, both for its innovative design, and its good performance for a low price, so I can envision it finding its way into our choice of the best air purifiers in the near future. So if you're in the market for a low-cost air purifier that won't shock you with extortionate costs for replacement parts, this is the one for you. If you'd like to learn more, read on for our full review to get all the facts.

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: price & availability

List price: $169.99 / £169
Available: in the US and UK under different product names

Value for money score: 5/5

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: specs

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: design and features

No display
Simple to use
Machine-washable pre-filter

Design score: 4.5 out of 5

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: performance

Quiet operation
Clears PM2.5 contaminations quickly
Detects and reacts to PM2.5 that originates in other rooms

Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Should I buy the Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i?

Buy it if...

You want something simple
With only two onboard buttons to operate the air purifier and a simple-to-use app, the settings of the Blueair Blue Max 3250i are easy to get a handle on.

Don't buy it if...

You want something robust
Despite the advantages of such a lightweight air purifier, there’s no denying that the base design could be at risk of damage should anything make contact with it.

Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i review: Also consider

How I tested the Blueair Blue Pure 411i Max / Blue Max 3250i

I used the Blueair Blue Max 3250i for a week and a half
I tested how much of an impact it had on the surrounding air quality
I tested how easy it was to operate and live with

I checked how easy was to get the Blueair Blue Max 3250i set up, how easy it was to operate, and how portable it was.

I tested it in different rooms in my home, and observed how quiet it was at night time and whether it disturbed my sleep.

I assessed its design and structure, paying close attention to quality and any sustainable elements.

I reviewed the impact it had on the air quality in my environment, and how well it handled cooking smells.

First reviewed: November 2024
Read TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee

Oppo Reno 12 FS review: a colorful budget contender

12:00 pm | December 21, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Oppo Phones Phones | Tags: Australia, GPU, US | Comments: Off

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G: Two-minute review

The Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G is a budget phone done the Oppo way – better-than-average specs, a great sense of style, and cost-cutting decisions that mostly land on the side of confusion rather than frustration. This is a phone that, despite its shortcomings, punches well above its weight, most obviously with its great 6.67-inch display. Though far from perfect, this is a capable budget handset that handles 90% of what we use our phones for every day without complaint.

At a fixed price point of £299, the biggest selling point the Reno 12 FS has is its excellent value for money. There are few other models on the market that offer this much utility for so little money, and a combination of 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage is almost unheard of in this price bracket.

The Reno 12 FS continues to impress with its software experience – that is, once you get clear of the awful bloatware the phone ships with. ColorOS 14 is otherwise a swift and snappy experience, with terrific customization, though slowdown can hold the phone back at seemingly random times. It’s clear that the included MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chipset can’t quite keep up with modern demands.

As for cameras, the Reno 12 FS struggles to keep pace with close competitors like the Samsung Galaxy A35, or even the iPhone SE. The main 50MP camera can be coaxed into producing photos that are acceptable, so long as conditions are ideal, but don’t bother with the 8MP ultrawide and 2MP macro camera. It would have been wiser for Oppo to have spent those resources on a better single-camera system.

Overall, the Reno 12 FS 5G will work for a specific type of user, and should appeal far more to media consumers than media producers. If you’re looking for a device to keep you connected, browse the internet, and watch videos, this is a solid choice – but those looking for photography power or totally impressive performance should look elsewhere.

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Price and availability

Costs £299, available in one configuration
Sole model comes with 512GB of storage
Not available in the US or Australia

The Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G marked Oppo’s re-entry to the UK market, and now forms a core part of the brand’s steadily growing phone lineup. It comes in a single model, with 12GB of RAM and a huge 512GB of storage for £299. It’s not available in Australia, where it’s missing from an otherwise fairly robust range of phones, including the base-model Reno 12 for AU$799 (about £400). Oppo doesn't sell its phones in the US, though sister company OnePlus sells very similar models.

Half a terabyte of storage and as much RAM as a Galaxy S24 for under £300 is no small feat, and while the Reno 12 FS doesn’t exactly sport a flagship chipset, it generally packs enough power for day to day use and even some gaming. That’s pretty phenomenal value for money already. Those who want a capable all-rounder for light use and the occasional session of Call of Duty Mobile won't be disappointed.

At the time of writing, the Reno 12 FS 5G sits towards the lower end of the Oppo smartphone lineup – I mention this because the Oppo phones for sale in the UK have changed continually over the last few months as the company establishes its presence once more. It walks the line between budget and mid-range tiers and aims for the best of both – with a great display and fresh design, but a lacking camera system and cheap-feeling construction. It would have benefitted from a simpler, more focused allocation of resources.

Value score: 4 / 5

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Specs

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Design

The rear panel of the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G, showcasing the breathing light feature — The Breathing Light on the Oppo Reno 12 FS (Image credit: Future)

Simple but solid silhouette
Breathing Light LED is a fun addition
Cheap materials that mark easily

For such a simple phone, I do quite like the design of the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G. This is a wide, thin slab that fits a lot of screen onto a relatively efficient form factor, and has no trouble getting around bags and pockets thanks to its slim profile and rounded edges. I especially like the nearly flat camera housing, which is the subtlest I’ve seen on a smartphone this year.

The cameras therein may not be amazing (more on that later), but having a phone that almost lays flat on a table feels like some kind of nostalgia trip, especially compared to the awkwardly rocking iPhone, Samsung, and OnePlus flagships we’ve gotten used to. The ports and buttons are as basic as they come but the Reno 12 FS isn’t trying to be much more than usable, and at this price point that’s all I’d expect.

The circular camera module holds another secret, however. Around this housing lies a ring of LEDs, which Oppo calls the Breathing Light. This refers to the light’s ability to react to different sources of sound and information. It’ll flicker in time with music, for example, and fill up as the phone charges.

The Breathing Light is a surprisingly fun addition that adds a lot to what is otherwise essentially just a thin ingot. It’s not made of the most premium materials, with a rear panel that creates a weird amount of friction in the hand and plastic rails that pick up nicks and dents easily. The creatively titled Black Green color is the only option, and luckily exactly to my taste, but if you’re into other colors you’re out of luck.

The camera module follows the Xiaomi 14T school of thought by giving the flash its own lens-sized ring. I’m not opposed to the symmetry this provides, but it feels slightly like an effort to make the Reno 12 FS 5G seem more premium than it actually is. The same could be said for the phone’s curved bezels, which actually hold up a flat screen. It would be more reassuring to see a simpler design and more investment in performance: nobody is expecting a work of art at this price point anyhow.

Design score: 3.5 / 5

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Display

The Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G displaying its magazine unlock against a river — (Image credit: Future)

1080 x 2400 resolution
120Hz refresh rate
Peak brightness of 2100 nits

The Oppo Reno12 FS 5G comes equipped with an excellent 6.67-inch FHD+ OLED display, with a 120Hz refresh rate. It is easily the phone’s biggest selling point after its bargain price. For the money, this is a beautiful panel that’s ideal for games, watching videos, or simply scrolling through posts and articles.

With a maximum local brightness of 2100 nits, the Reno 12 FS gets plenty bright, and can just about hold its own in direct sunlight. In fact, I’d recommend using it at higher brightness levels most of the time, as colors can lose contrast and saturation towards the darker end of the slider. Colors are noticeably deeper here than on other displays, which will be a knock or a boost depending on taste.

The display feels responsive to use, which pays off during gaming sessions. Oppo is very good at shaving unnecessary milliseconds off of everyday tasks, and this display works in tandem with the smoothness of ColorOS to provide a genuinely nice experience when the hardware can keep up. It even comes fitted with a screen protector! There are panels with richer colors and sharper images, but for £299 this is one of the best you’ll get.

Display score: 4 / 5

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Software

The Oppo Reno 12 FS app drawer, river in the background — (Image credit: Future)

Android 14 with ColorOS 14
Absolutely full of bloatware
Otherwise solid with great customization options

The software experience on the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G makes the most of the phone’s limited hardware. ColorOS is fast becoming my favorite implementation of Android thanks to its swift navigation, easy-to-use settings, and exceptional customization options. However, as with other Oppo phones, what could be an entirely slick experience is marred by an unfortunate amount of bloatware.

Though the Reno 12 FS isn’t exactly a fast phone, ColorOS is generally responsive and loaded with useful options. There is some unpredictable slowdown in the UI, though, which is either down to hardware limitations or poor optimization. The phone comes loaded with Google Gemini, but not Circle to Search, and the pre-installed Oppo apps are fine, though most users will defer to Google’s options instead.

On the topic of apps, the amount of bloatware here really is an issue. Switching on the phone for the first time almost felt like I’d picked up someone else’s handset by mistake, with the pages of the homescreen taken up by apps and games I'd never heard of. The most offensive of these are the ones that are blatant advertisements – this robs the setup experience of its sheen and the user of a sense of proper ownership.

Some of that ownership can be reclaimed with the stellar customization options on the Reno 12 FS. ColorOS has some of the best wallpapers and theme settings of any phone OS I’ve used, Android or no, and they really bring the Reno12 FS to life. There are uniquely generated lock screens, wallpapers that react to your taps, and plenty of font options.

As a side note, The Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G is also the only phone I’ve ever used that has a 300% volume option. Pushing the volume past the normal maximum adds a menacing red “300%” to the top of the bar. The next time someone tells you “it goes up to 11”, you can tell them your phone goes up to 300.

Software score: 3 / 5

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Cameras

The Oppo Reno 12 FS camera module over a river background — (Image credit: Future)

50MP wide camera
8MP ultrawide camera
2MP macro camera

The cameras on the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G are, frankly, not great. Even holding the phone steady in brightly-lit conditions will produce images that range from just serviceable to unimpressive. It’s honestly disappointing that a 50MP main camera could produce pictures that are so lacking in detail – a reminder that resolution isn’t everything.

Using the camera app is no chore as it comes replete with plenty of options and modes, but the viewfinder consistently displays a grainy and unattractive image. The phone can produce decent final images if you give it a lot of light, but even these show a huge disparity from the preview, which leads me to believe there’s some very active post-processing going on. This theory is somewhat confirmed by the blurriness you’ll see in tree branches and grasses.

I don’t want to come down too hard on the Reno 12 FS, because it is firmly a budget phone, but some of the best cheap phones offer more in this department (the Samsung Galaxy A35 comes to mind). The secondary cameras on the Reno 12 FS – an 8MP ultra-wide and 2MP macro camera – are especially rough, to the point that I question why they were even included.

Still, for capturing home photos and videos, scanning documents, and the occasional holiday snap, the Oppo Reno 12 FS will manage. The selfie camera is also fine, but again doesn’t seem to live up to its 32MP resolution, and video recording at 1080p 60fps is serviceable. The Reno 12 FS doesn’t offer an offensively barebones experience, but those who care about photography should definitely look elsewhere.

Camera score: 2 / 5

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G Camera Samples

Image 1 of 5

A pub across a green — (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 5

A basketball hoop — (Image credit: Future)

Image 3 of 5

A wide shot of a river running through a park — (Image credit: Future)

Image 4 of 5

A warm lightbulb over hanging a bouquet mounted on sheet music on an indoor wall — (Image credit: Future)

Image 5 of 5

A sign warning that the reader is about to enter a cricket ground — (Image credit: Future)

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Performance

The Oppo Reno 12 FS playing Crossy Road — (Image credit: Future)

MediaTek Dimensity 6300
GPU: Mali G57 MC2
12GB of RAM

The Oppo Reno 12 FS is something of an oddball performance wise. I’ve managed to get smooth 30fps gameplay from it when booting up Call of Duty Mobile, even in extended sessions, and yet it’ll stutter randomly when swiping into the discover tab or opening YouTube. It's bothersome, but the slowdown isn’t prevalent enough to ruin an otherwise usable device. Calls are clear and messages are delivered without issue.

The Reno12 FS runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chipset and comes equipped with a very healthy 12GB of RAM. That’s a reasonable handful of silicon at this price, and I’m especially impressed by the large amount of memory on offer. It shows in the phone’s surprising capacity for multitasking; I’ve yet to have an app crash on me.

Coming from a premium handset, the Reno 12 FS is noticeably slower to open apps, scroll through web pages, and complete searches. I can quite easily get the phone to stutter while switching between apps, too. From a more neutral perspective, the phone is powerful enough for 90% of what people use their phones for, and again I have to consider the price point. The Reno 12 FS finds a reasonable balance.

Performance score: 3 / 5

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Battery

The underside charging port of the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G — (Image credit: Future)

Excellent battery life with monstrous standby times
Confidently an all-day phone
5,000 mAh capacity

The Oppo Reno12 FS 5G has a truly excellent battery life, bolstered by absolutely ridiculous standby times. I tested the Reno12 FS intermittently over the course of multiple weeks, and was frequently surprised by picking up a still-charged phone after a week or two away. In daily use, the efficient MediaTek chipset sips at the battery, never dropping by an alarming amount when browsing the web or social media. A 5,000 mAh cell powering a 1080p display is bound to last a while, but the Reno 12 FS still manages to impress.

In normal use, the Reno 12 FS offers a reassuring amount of battery, but when put to one side, the Reno 12 FS just refuses to run out of power. I appreciate standby times aren’t always at the front of buyer’s minds, but I’d be remiss to not mention it in this case – the phone seems to take up between 5% and 10% of its charge per day in standby.

When it does eventually come time to top up, the Reno 12 FS isn’t so impressive. The phone charges via USB-C and doesn’t support wireless charging. An official charging speed isn’t listed, but when plugged in to my 80W SUPERVOOC brick the phone says it's charging at 45W - a solid power draw by any measure.

Battery score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G?

Buy it if...

You're on a budget

At £299, there are few phones that offer this much for so little. Not every feature is as refined as the display or operating system, but this is still a very capable phone for the price.

You want something stylish

From the classy Black Green colorway to the fresh new Breathing Light, the Reno 12 FS 5G is pure Oppo style. The software customization is top notch, too.

You want a large display

The 6.67-inch display fitted to the Reno 12 FS 5G is a big and bold green flag, and obvious evidence of the phone's value for money.

Don't buy it if...

You need strong performance

The Reno 12 FS 5G can handle the basics, but is prone to stuttering. It doesn't ruin the experience, but I wouldn't pick it for critical tasks.

You're a shutterbug

Photographers should look elsewhere - our list of the best cheap phones has plenty of options with much better camera systems than the misguided triple-camera setup on the Reno 12 FS 5G.

Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G review: Also consider

Samsung Galaxy A35

The Samsung Galaxy A35 brings similar value for money to the Reno 12 FS 5G, but with a more sophisticated camera system and the power of Samsung's platform. If you prefer to stick with well known brands, then this is a suitable swap.

Read our Samsung Galaxy A35 review

iPhone SE

If you can stretch your budget, the iPhone SE will be more consistent and powerful than the Reno 12 FS at every turn. The camera performance is notably much better than the Reno, and you get the benefit of accessing the Apple ecosystem.

Read our iPhone SE review

How I tested the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G

I used the Oppo Reno 12 FS 5G intermittently over the course of several weeks. Over this time, I used the phone for everyday tasks, as well as more specific tests designed to push the handset’s performance. As mentioned, the phone only comes in one model, and as such my test unit came with 512GB of storage, 12GB of RAM, and the dashing Black Green colorway.

In terms of my everyday usage, I made phone calls, sent messages, and scrolled through articles on Chrome. I watched videos on YouTube and listened to music via Spotify (including testing the quirky 300% volume feature in person). I was able to get a sense of how the Reno 12 FS serves to keep users connected to others and the latest news.

I undertook more specific tests to determine the performance limits of the Reno 12 FS. These included extended play sessions on Call of Duty Mobile, a popular demanding mobile game, and stepping out in various weather conditions to test the phone’s camera system. I also observed battery levels throughout my usage.

After gathering this real-world experience, I applied my in-depth knowledge of smartphone specs and the wider phone market, as well as my journalistic training, to assess the value and performance of the handset, and help you decide whether the Reno 12 FS is for you.

Modretro Chromatic review: a great modern Game Boy

7:51 pm | December 17, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: Game Boy Advance, US | Comments: Off

Modretro Chromatic: Two-minute review

The Modretro Chromatic is a 2024 take on the Game Boy Color and is an excellent portable handheld device that elevates the experience of using Nintendo’s 1998 iconic video game console.

The Chromatic is founded upon nostalgia, it’s a modern device that requires three AA batteries to run, doesn’t have Bluetooth for audio, and perfectly recreates the 160x144 pixels of its spiritual predecessor, improving it with gorgeous backlighting and a very durable sapphire crystal front. The console can run physical Game Boy and Game Boy Color cartridges, but there's no emulation, and it even has a volume wheel. With so many inconveniences, it’s still incredibly fascinating to use and takes you right back to the heyday of trading Pokemon with friends in your backyard through a link cable.

Make no mistake about it, the Chromatic is a product built for those of us who are nostalgic about the 90s, but it’s so well-made that its limitations are almost justifiable. With a supposedly indestructible magnesium alloy shell, a display that’s been built from the ground up to replicate and enhance your favorite childhood games, and excellent mono speakers, Modretro has captured the imaginations of those seeking the coziness of their youth. But in 2024, there are plenty of other devices that offer similar experiences, and the Chromatic’s confidence in what it is and who it’s for means that it’s an incredibly niche product.

I’ve been using the Modretro Chromatic for a month, and as someone who loves retro gaming from the 90s and early 2000s, I’ve got the expertise to assess the Chromatic’s biggest achievements and its shortcomings. This might be one of the most difficult products I’ve ever had to review, purely because its whole reason for existence is nostalgia. And nostalgia, as enjoyable as it can be, isn’t always worth your hard-earned cash.

I love the Modretro Chromatic, it’s a readily available Game Boy Color made in 2024 that’s stocked on shelves in GameStop. If you’d told me last year that I could buy a handheld in stores that plays my Pokemon Gold and Link’s Awakening cartridges from my youth I’d have been overcome with emotions. Ultimately, when it comes to spending $199 / £159 / $AU 316 a product needs to be more than just a time machine back to the past, and rising retro game console prices combined with a stagnant game library (even if Modretro is producing new cartridges based on new IP and old Game Boy titles) means the Chromatic is excellent for those who know exactly what they want from a device like this, but not necessarily for a mainstream audience.

Modretro Chromatic: Price and availability

List price: $199 / £159 / $AU 316
Comes in six colors based on original Game Boy Color options
Widely available in most regions and sold in GameStop stores in the US

The Modretro Chromatic is available now directly from modretro.com, and is also on shelves this holiday season in GameStop stores around the US. Priced at $199 / £159 / AU$316, the Chromatic comes bundled with a newly produced Tetris cartridge as part of Modretro's Chromatic First Edition release. The company hasn't disclosed whether the handheld will be sold without Tetris at a later date, but at the time of writing the only way to purchase a Chromatic is with a copy of the world's best-selling video game.

My review unit came in the Leaf color option, which is a similar green to my first-ever Game Boy Color and it's beautiful. The Chromatic also comes in Inferno, Bubblegum, Volt, Wave, and Midnight. All color options can be purchased with either English or Japanese markings for A, B, Start, and Select buttons.

One of the Chromatic's biggest strengths is how readily available it is. Competitors like the Analogue Pocket are often sold out online, and original Game Boy Colors can't be purchased in-store. Modretro, on the other hand, ships right away online and has teamed up with GameStop to offer the Chromatic to customers shopping in-store in one of nearly 3,000 retail locations.

Cartridge slot of Modretro Chromatic with Pokemon Gold (Image credit: Future)

Modretro Chromatic: Specs

Modretro Chromatic with Modretro-produced cartridges and Zelda: Link's Awakening (Image credit: Future)

Modretro Chromatic: Design and features

Magnesium alloy shell feels incredible in hand
Display built from the ground up with durable sapphire crystal cover
PBT buttons are excellent

Modretro has not cut any corners when it comes to producing the Chromatic. Make no mistake about it, this is a very premium product at an equally premium price point. The design is an ode to the original Game Boy Color with a volume wheel, AA batteries, a tactile sliding switch for power, and even a satisfying "thunk" when you pop in a game cartridge.

The Chromatic feels excellent in hand, with its magnesium alloy shell weighty but not uncomfortable, and its PBT buttons and d-pad every bit as nice to interact with. Modretro has also built a 160x144 pixel modern display with subpixel-level accuracy from the ground up. The company wanted to create the ultimate Game Boy Color screen without straying too far away from the original and they've definitely managed to do so. If you were to imagine a Game Boy Color built in 2024, this would be it.

Modretro Chromatic with Pokemon Gold on the screen (Image credit: Future)

The Chromatic is very tricky to review, on one hand, it does everything it sets out to do in modernizing the Game Boy Color. On the other hand, however, it's so faithful to the original that it fits into a weird space in between the original hardware and the class-leading Analogue Pocket.

I've loved my time playing Pokemon Crystal on the Modretro Chromatic, it has felt like a warm hug every evening in bed as I explore Johto for the thousandth time. But that experience is expensive to recreate, especially considering games like Pokemon Crystal can cost upwards of $100 / £100 on sites like eBay. The Chromatic can't play any titles via emulation, so it relies on a large cartridge library and that could be a deterring factor for many people. While the screen is infinitely better than the original Game Boy Color's one that required direct light to really see it, there's no increase in resolution which feels authentic but limiting.

Modretro sells Modretro-published games for the Chromatic on its website and alongside Tetris there are excellent adaptations of games like Toki Tori as well as new IPs like Tales of Monsterland DX. That said, one of the Chromatic's most limiting elements is the Game Boy and Game Boy Color games library. Taking off my nostalgia glasses for a minute, the lack of Game Boy Advance compatibility really impacts the Chromatic. The Game Boy Advance offers a wide range of some of the best video games of all time, and I found myself yearning for games that can't be played on the Chromatic. While it might not be readily available, the Analogue Pocket can play Game Boy, Game Boy Color, Game Boy Advance cartridges, and so much more at a very similar price point.

If you're looking for a Game Boy Color with a better screen and better build quality then the Modretro Chromatic fits the bill. But for those people who want pure nostalgia, an original Game Boy Color and all its inconveniences is probably more up their street. For people who want a modern Game Boy experience as well as access to a larger game library, it's hard to not pick the Analogue Pocket's 1440p display.

Modretro Chromatic AA batteries (Image credit: Future)

Modretro Chromatic: Performance

Faithful FPGA hardware emulation of Game Boy and Game Boy Color games
Excellent battery life (albeit inconvenient to refill)
Comfortable for long play sessions

In terms of performance, the Modretro Chromatic is excellent at recreating Game Boy and Game Boy Color games and had no issues running any of my cartridges. The display is bright and easy to see in all environments, including direct sunlight and the speaker is much, much better than its spiritual predecessor. The sapphire glass on the front of the display means you don't need to worry at all about scratches, and combined with the durable shell makes for a stress-free gaming experience where you're never worried about damaging the handheld.

Games run excellently from classics like the Game Boy Color's Pokemon Gold to original Game Boy games like Link's Awakening which see the FPGA hardware as a Game Boy Color, adding color palettes and filters just like it would on original hardware.

Modretro has decided to use AA batteries to power the Chromatic, an ode to the past when the inconvenience of swapping out batteries was absolutely not a fun time. Well, over 20 years later and using single-use batteries still sucks. Modretro, there are some nostalgic elements that are worth keeping in the past, and AAs are one of them.

Despite the fact that replacing batteries is very inconvenient, the battery life is stellar and in my time using the handheld I only needed to swap out AAs once. Modretro says it's working on a rechargeable battery pack, but you'd expect this will cost extra once it launches.

Modretro Chromatic (left) next to Analogue Pocket (Image credit: Future)

I want to harken back to the display as aside from availability compared to sourcing second-hand hardware on sites like eBay, that's the real selling point here. The Chromatic's display is genuinely incredible, if you're looking for a faithful Game Boy experience with a little added oomph. The pixel lines from the low resolution are amazingly accurate and capture the joy of being a kid playing a Game Boy perfectly.

There were times during my time with the Modretro Chromatic that I genuinely felt transported back to my childhood, and that's something even products like the Analogue Pocket haven't been able to quite achieve. In that sense, the Chromatic's hardware and performance nails exactly what it's trying to achieve, it's just an excellent Game Boy Color Pro, a mid-console refresh if you will.

Modretro Chromatic display on left compared to Analogue Pocket display on right (Image credit: Future)

Should you buy the Modretro Chromatic

Buy it if...

You want a better Game Boy Color
If you're looking for a Game Boy Color and want a better screen than the original then the Modretro Chromatic is for you. The display is gorgeous, it has excellent build quality, and the buttons are a joy to use. If you only want to play Game Boy and Game Boy Color games, this is the handheld for you.

You own a large Game Boy cartridge library
If you've still got all of your old Game Boy cartridges then the Chromatic will give you hours and hours of joy. The console can play any Game Boy or Game Boy Color cartridge, so dust off your favorites and jump back in where you left off all those years ago.

You want a handheld retro console for the holidays
The fact that GameStop is stocking the Modretro Chromatic is not to be scoffed at. The Analogue Pocket is an excellent competitor, but it's always sold out and can't be found in stores. So if you're looking to pick up a console to play Game Boy cartridges the Modretro Chromatic will be your best bet this holiday season.

Don't buy it if...

You don't own Game Boy cartridges
If you're thinking of starting a Game Boy cartridge collection then ignore this point. But if you don't own any games already, the Chromatic will quickly become a far more expensive purchase. Some Game Boy games go for hundreds of dollars and you need to be ready to invest that into an extinct gaming system. Modretro's cartridges somewhat solve this but they won't be publishing Pokemon and Zelda, so...

You want to play Game Boy Advance games
Only purchase the Chromatic if you love Game Boy and Game Boy Color. I found myself wishing I could play games on other systems like the Game Boy Advance which ultimately meant that I chose to play games on other hardware with more variety.

You want better resolution and flexibility
The Chromatic will replicate Game Boy games in a pixel-accurate 160x144 display. If you're looking for a handheld that enhances Game Boy games for a modern audience with increased resolution, you'll need to look elsewhere.

Also consider...

If you’re still not entirely sold on the Modretro Chromatic then check out these excellent similar products for comparison and consideration.

Analogue Pocket
The Analogue Pocket is a direct competitor to the Modretro Chromatic, offering more game libraries and a larger 1440p screen. The Chromatic feels more premium in hand and has sapphire glass to protect the 144p screen, but Analogue's offering gives you more bang for your buck and fewer restrictions. Do you want a reimagining of the Game Boy Color in the form of an Analogue Pocket or a modernization of it in the form of the Modretro Chromatic?

I've owned the Analogue Pocket for over a year and use it every day. My review of this direct competitor to the Modretro Chromatic is currently in progress and will be added here soon.

Nintendo Switch OLED
If you're just looking to casually play Game Boy and Game Boy Color games on the go, the Nintendo Switch offers a range of games on its Nintendo Switch Online service. Add to that the extensive Nintendo Switch library and a gorgeous OLED display, and this might be the best middle ground for those looking for the perfect handheld gaming console.

For more information, check out our full Nintendo Switch OLED review.

Super Pocket
The Super Pocket packs power, fantastic controls, and a strong selection of built-in games from either Capcom or Taito into an attractive pocket-size package. While it may not be as capable as the other recommended options, for such a low price you really can't go wrong with this handheld device.

For more information, check out our full Super Pocket review.

How I tested the Modretro Chromatic

Tested for a month
Compared it directly to other retro handhelds
Tested across game types and cartridge types

I've used the Modretro Chromatic for a month now, and have used it as my primary retro gaming handheld.

I've tested the console with all of my original Game Boy and Game Boy Color cartridges including Pokemon Gold, Pokemon Crystal, Pokemon Yellow, and Link's Awakening, just to name a few. I also played Modretro-produced games such as Tetris, Toki Tori – Ultimate Edition, and Tales of Monsterland DX.

The Modretro Chromatic has been my main handheld gaming console over the course of the last 30 days and I've made comparisons with my Analogue Pocket.

Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch review

The Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch is an affordable digital photo frame that uses the third-party Frameo app to enable you to easily share your snaps via the frame. Right out of the gate, the first thing you’re likely to notice is that price; while its $149.99 / £169.99 retail price isn’t anything to write home about, during sales season we've been seeing prices around $89.99 / £89.99 – that’s a seriously low price for such a sizeable digital photo frame.

Connecting with the Arzopa Digital Picture Frame is nice and easy. Once you’ve powered it up and connected it to your Wi-Fi, you can scan an on-screen QR code to download the Frameo app. Now, simply press the "Add a Friend" button on the Arzopa’s screen, punch in the code that appears into the Frameo app, and you’re ready to start sharing pics. Even better, you can repeat this step to set up friends and family so they too can share their snaps with your frame.

Not everyone wants to share their photos with the cloud, particularly if they’re security conscious or have young children. If this is you, then the Arzopa’s offline storage will be music to your ears. The frame includes 32GB of internal storage and, should you fill this up, you can easily expand its storage capacity up to 128GB via its SD card port. This does fall short of what some of the best digital photo frames offer, but it still isn't bad, all things considered.

All digital photo frames built on the Frameo app work in the same way and, generally speaking, I’d say this is a positive. The app is easy to use: you can browse your device’s whole image library or just specific albums, adding individual photos or uploading up to 10 at a time. Unfortunately, if you want to upload more than this in one go, you’ll need to upgrade to Frameo+. The cost of this isn't exorbitant at $1.99 / £0.99 a month or $16.99 / £7.99 a year, but you'll need to bear this in mind when calculating if this frame is the right price for you.

As I mentioned in my Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame review, I’m not entirely keen on the way the Frameo app handles cropping images for digital photo frame’s auto-rotate feature. When uploading each image, you’ll set a circular focal area that the frame will ensure remains in frame in either orientation. However, this can still leave some images oddly centered or cropping out details you hadn’t anticipated. I’d rather just have the option to manually set the crop for each image.

The Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch showing a macro image of a bumblebee in front of a muted purple rhododendron. — (Image credit: Future / Josh Russell)

Once your shots are on the Arzopa, its 15.6-inch display definitely delivers your snaps with impact; the frame feels generously sized compared to many of the other affordable frames out there. Since its 1920 x 1080 resolution is shared over that larger screen estate, pixel density does fall somewhat next to rivals such as the Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame at 212ppi. However, images still look pretty crisp; rendering my macro shot of a bumblebee, the Arzopa frame shows off every grain of pollen and every hair of her fuzzy coat in decent detail.

Image 1 of 3

The Arzopa 15.6-inch WiFi Digital Picture Frame showing a macro image of a bumblebee in front of a muted purple rhododendron. — (Image credit: Future / Josh Russell)

Image 2 of 3

A macro image of a bumble bee collecting nectar in a bright pink rhododendron. — (Image credit: Josh Russell)

Image 3 of 3

Bright red maple leaves with hues of scarlet, burgundy and amber. — (Image credit: Josh Russell)

Unfortunately, where things start to come undone is with color. On my iPhone 16 Pro’s screen, a photo I took of a fireworks display reveals a shower of magenta and violet stars in a glowing pink nebula. But when I uploaded it to the Arzopa, the red and pink hues looked washed out, completely robbing the image of any punch. Similarly, floral shots completely underwhelmed, the lack of vibrancy going far beyond slight variations in color profile to looking actively anemic and poorly shot.

The Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch does fare better when it comes to black-and-white photography at least. Thanks to its deep blacks and bright highlights, its display is sufficiently contrasty to deliver monochrome landscape and architectural shots with impressive details. The Arzopa frame definitely shows off HDR photography to a high standard.

However, even this bold contrast was slightly undermined by its screen. Perhaps even more than its muted hues, the lack of a matte finish really damages the Arzopa’s performance in bright light. Without any treatment to diffuse incoming light, my photos were always obscured by hard-edged, geometric reflections of the panel lighting in the TechRadar offices; it was almost impossible to ignore since it made it difficult to make out details in the images. Worse, this reflectiveness means the frame is almost certainly unusable in direct sunlight, further restriction its position in your home.

This tendency toward glossiness extends to other elements of the frame’s design. The Arzopa’s frame feels a little cheap and plasticky, but thanks to its black color, this doesn’t feel so in your face. However, the frame’s bezels are much harder to ignore – despite the fact their beveled edges are designed to make them look more like mounting, the white plastic is so cheap-looking and reflective that it does detract from the overall quality of the frame.

Plus, there are other unusual design choices: the frame’s stand is literally just a plastic stick that screws into one corner of the frame. While it seems to do an okay job of supporting the frame in either horizontal or vertical orientation, I’m not convinced it’s sturdy enough to withstand becoming damaged over time.

Buy it on sale, however, and the Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch is available for an astoundingly good price – and it’s almost certainly better quality than some of the bargain-basement frames you’ll find on Amazon. In terms of crispness of picture, contrast and ease of use, it’s great value for money. However, its muted hues, overly reflective screen and the cheapness of its finish do make my recommendation here equivocal – if you can only find it at a higher price, some of the similarly priced best digital photo frames might make a better choice.

The Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch showing the screen reflecting its immediate surroundings. — (Image credit: Future)

Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch review: price & release date

MSRP of $149.99 / £169.99 but currently reduced to $89.99 / £89.99
Available now in both the US and UK
Frameo app free or $1.99 / £0.99 a month for Frameo+

The Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch is available now in both the US and UK.

Its price varies to quite a degree, which has a huge impact on the value you’re getting. At its full price of $149.99 at Amazon US or £169.99, at Amazon UK, it effectively costs as much as the $159.99 / £149.99 Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame, which I'd argue is a much higher-quality frame, thanks to its anti-glare screen and delivery of bold colors. However, some of the sale prices we’ve seen bring the Arzopa frame down to around $89.99 / £89.99, which makes it a far more appealing option, especially if you can’t stretch to the more expensive Pexar.

One other important consideration here in terms of price is the Frameo app. While the base tier is free, to upload more than 10 photographs at a time or videos longer than 15 seconds, you’ll need to upgrade to Frameo+, which costs $1.99 / £0.99 a month or $16.99 / £7.99 a year. That will allow you to upload 100 images at a time, send two-minute video clips, and manage the content on your Arzopa remotely via the app.

The bottom of Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch showing its ports. — (Image credit: Future)

Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch review: specs

The Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch showing a monochrome image of the Roman Bridge of Córdoba. — (Image credit: Future / Josh Russell)

Should I buy the Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch?

Buy it if…

You want a big, crisp screen
At 15.6-inches, the Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi delivers a lot of screen estate on which to display your snaps. And while pixel density is lower than the 212ppi of the Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame, photos still look crisp and clear.

You can get it on sale
Whether the Arzopa frame delivers good value very much depends on the price you pay for it. Pick it up for the sale price of around $89.99 / £89.99 and you’re getting a very good deal, but you don’t have to spend much more than its MSRP of $149.99 / £169.99 to get a superior product.

Don’t buy it if…

You want your colorful snaps to pop
Vibrant hues aren't the Arzopa frame’s forte – colorful subjects such as flowers and fauna can look muted at best, and downright drab at their worst. Fans of black-and-white photography needn’t worry – but if you want your walls to be a riot of color, other frames might prove a wiser investment.

You want to use it in bright rooms
The Arzopa’s glossy screen means it's entirely unforgiving when it comes to reflections – whether using it during the day or at night, I found natural and artificial sources of light completely overwhelmed the brightness of the screen. Fundamentally, if it's to sit opposite windows or under harsh lighting, you’d be better off looking for a frame with a matte screen.

Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch review: also consider

Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame
The Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame scarcely costs any more than the Arzopa at full price, at $159.99 / £149.99; however, performance is superior. It offers a 2000 x 1200 resolution across its smaller 11-inch screen, delivering higher pixel density, while colors are far more vibrant. Plus, its matte, anti-glare screen keeps reflected light to a minimum. Read our full Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame review.

Aeezo Portrait 01
If you’re unable to stretch to the Arzopa – or can’t find it at a reduced price – the Aeezo Portrait 01 is a bargain alternative that also includes internal storage and costs just $69.99 / £55.99. You’ll get bolder albeit sometimes slightly unnatural, colors; but the sacrifice is resolution at only 1280 x 800, rather than the Arzopa’s 1080p. Read our full Aeezo Portrait 01 review.

How I tested the Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch

I tested the Arzopa Digital Picture Frame WiFi 15.6-inch over several weeks. I uploaded a range of photos to it using the Frameo app and connected multiple other people to enable them to share images with the frame, too.

To test the performance of the frame, I uploaded a wide array of portrait and landscape images and included everything from brightly colored shots of flowers and animals to monochrome architectural shots. Additionally, I positioned the frame in multiple places around my home and the TechRadar office and changed its orientation between portrait and landscape.

I have many years of experience taking photos, both on my Canon DSLR and my iPhone 16 Pro and, over the past 15 years, I’ve taken over 40,000 photos. I’ve also spent many years working in print publishing, doing post-production on photos and preparing images for print. This means I have a lot of experience in making images look as close to their source as possible.

First reviewed November 2024
Read more about how we test

Blink Outdoor 4 review: affordable, beginner-friendly home security that gets the job done

8:19 am | December 12, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Home Security Smart Home | Tags: Australia, UK, US | Comments: Off

Blink Outdoor 4: one-minute review

The Blink Outdoor 4 is an outdoor-intended camera that offers weather resistance and a simple, easily fixed square design that's perfect for placing up in the corner of a roof or sitting on a windowsill. Its best feature is a phenomenal two-year battery life, powered by two easily replaceable AA batteries – though if you really want, the camera can be powered via a USB-C connection.

Available for $99 / £92.24 / AU$149, this outdoor, battery-powered camera may be attractive just for its low cost. Blink is Amazon’s budget home security brand, and unlike its premium brand Ring, Blink is focused on affordability. Still, the camera works quite well and has a worthwhile range of features. With the included Sync Module 2, offline video capture and storage can be facilitated, provided you have a USB-A device connected (below 256GB).

Aside from this offline solution, you may instead wish to subscribe to one of Blink’s paid memberships, which offer additional features like unlimited 60-day cloud storage and photo capture. However, for most of my time with the Blink Outdoor 4, I used the free subscription with the Sync Module 2, and found it to be a perfectly fine experience.

Setting up the Blink Outdoor 4 was extremely easy. Everything happens through the Blink app for Android and Apple handsets, where you’re prompted to set up an account (you can link to your Amazon account in the app). Pairing your Outdoor 4 with your Sync Module comes next – and as long as they’re both on the same Wi-Fi network, everything works seamlessly. You can place the Sync Module 2 anywhere in your home provided it has power.

After setup, I could check-in on the camera at any time through an always-online live feed. This offers decent (if a bit grainy and motion blurry) 1080p stream, along with two-way audio with sound quality that isn’t terrible, but isn’t the clearest either. Motion-triggered notifications are available with all three subscriptions, but motion event recording, live view recording and person detection are restricted to paid subscriptions.

Motion detection is reliable and you are given the option to turn up the sensitivity in the settings (you can even adjust retrigger time between events). Person detection is serviceable and I generally didn’t have any problems with it, testing it both inside and out.

On the hardware side, the Blink Outdoor 4 is easily mounted on the outside of a home with the included bracket, and its IP65 rating gives it a fair amount of resistance to the elements. A basic mounting kit and power adapter is included in the box, but I’ve happily had the Outdoor 4 sitting on my windowsill over the past couple of months with no mount attached.

Adjusting privacy zones in the app is easy, but selection is limited to an array of rectangular zones on the display (privacy zones will be completely greyed out). The same goes for setting activity zones, though you are given slightly more depth of customization with this setting.

In terms of quality, you may be left unimpressed with the Blink Outdoor 4 if you’re after a replacement for a premium outdoor camera from Ring or Eufy. The 1080p resolution is perfectly fine for a first time home camera, but it’s no premium device. Selecting the ‘best picture quality’ setting will resolve some issues with moving object blur, but you may still find it a bit too grainy. Improving the video quality does reduce battery life. It may be unattractive to you if you already have a robust security system, and it's more intended as a first-time device.

Overall, you’ll be impressed with the Blink Outdoor 4 if you’re after a cheap and reliable battery-powered camera for outdoor or indoor use. It’s not the best security camera on the market but it’s a good entry-level pick for a security-minded homebody. Check out our article on the best home security cameras if you’re shopping for an alternative.

Blink Outdoor 4: price and availability

A hand holding the Blink Outdoor 4 wireless security camera — (Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

List price: $99 / £92.24 / AU$149
Availability: US, UK, and Australia
Release date: November 2023 (October 2024 in Australia)

The Blink Outdoor 4 is available at quite a low price when compared to other home security cameras, but it’s designed to be an affordable solution. It's been available in the US and UK since November 2023, but only made its way to Australia (along with the Blink brand) in October 2024.

Directly compared to its predecessor, the Outdoor 3, the Outdoor 4 sports a slightly wider field of view (143 degrees versus 110), upgraded night infrared vision, better motion detection, dual-zone motion alerts and person detection. Additional purchases for things such as mounts may be required depending on where you want to place the Outdoor 4 in your home.

Being able to store all footage locally is a huge plus, but note that you’ll need to use the included Sync Module 2 and your own USB-A storage device (up to 256GB). Stored footage can be viewed through the Blink app.

Value score: 4 / 5

Blink Outdoor 4 subscription offers

A Blink Outdoor 4 wireless security camera sitting on a shelf — (Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

Blink has two subscription tiers to choose from, both offering unlimited recording cloud storage for up to 60 days. Monthly or yearly billing is available.

Blink Basic: $3p/m | £2.50p/m | AU$4.95p/m
Blink Plus: $10p/m | £8p/m | AU$15p/m

Blink Basic includes support for one device, motion event recording, live view recording, automatic local storage backups, instant video access, video sharing, person detection and photo capture. Blink Plus includes all Basic features, along with unlimited device inclusion, moments capture, notification snoozing and 10% off Blink devices.

Blink Outdoor 4: specifications

Blink Outdoor 4: design and features

The Blink Outdoor 4 on brickwork — (Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

Easy setup
No privacy cover
No remote control capabilities

Setup for the Blink Outdoor 4 couldn’t be more simple. After slotting in the batteries, all I had to do was download the app, scan the barcode on the back of the device, and follow the prompted steps. Setup for the Sync Module 2 is similarly simple.

The Blink Outdoor 4 is only available in Black, and though a basic mounting kit is included in the box, you can get by with just sitting the Outdoor 4 on a flat surface. There’s no motorized movement, meaning you’ll need to make any position adjustments by hand.

The basic mounting kit can be screwed into the wall or ceiling, but note that you’ll likely want it to be within easy reach to replace the batteries. There’s no privacy cover and no ability to simply cut recording unless you physically remove the batteries.

Setting privacy zones is easy enough, but you may be left underwhelmed by the lack of customization. Zones can only be created as collections of rectangles, as can activity zones (though activity zones are given slightly smaller rectangles to modify, allowing for greater coverage control). If you so wish, you can disable video recording or disable the audio connection.

Design and features score: 4/5

Blink Outdoor 4: performance

The Blink Outdoor 4 camera in hand — (Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / TechRadar)

Two years of battery life
Some lag and pixelization
Can be positioned almost anywhere

I reviewed the Blink Outdoor 4 in two different positions – sitting atop my lounge room shelves (keeping an eye on the room) and sitting on the windowsill (keeping an eye on my front door/lawn). In these spots, I tried out all the different recording qualities and, predictably, was most satisfied with the highest quality selection. Two years of battery life is quite a long time to begin with, so I’m not too worried about running the device flat too quickly.

Accessing these settings is easy. Go to the app, then tap the three dots displayed in the corner of the camera’s view, then click device settings. If you have multiple devices set up, you may want to tap the settings icon in the bottom right corner, then access Device and System Settings, then tap the ‘System’ you want to edit, followed by ‘All Devices’, then the camera you want to modify.

All of the video quality options are quite acceptable for the price. Graininess and blurred movements are fine at this end of the market, and ultimately the quality was never so insufficient that the camera was unusable. The camera is set to ‘Standard’ mode out of the box, with lower quality ‘Saver’ mode and ‘Best’ also available. Night vision was also sufficiently capable, but it’s not presented in colour, owing to the lack of an LED light on the device.

Screenshots taken from Blink app showing video footage — (Image credit: Zachariah Kelly / Future)

Audio quality was fine and is most comparable to a standard intercom buzzer for an apartment. Back and forth communication is easy with microphones and speakers on both ends (on the camera and on your smartphone), but Ring fans may find it lower quality than what they’re used to. Motion sensitivity was fine, and for the duration of my review, I had it set to the default setting of five. I could turn the sensitivity up if I wished, but I found no need.

It’d be nice if the Blink Outdoor 4 had the option to view footage on a browser or computer, or any device without the smartphone app. Being limited to your small phone screen for your home security is disappointing, so hopefully this is changed at some point.

Finally, obviously the two year battery life is an estimation provided by Amazon. Unfortunately I’m not a time traveller, so I can’t provide a good estimation of my own on this – though over my two months of use, it hasn’t had any battery issues (the battery is still reportedly ‘OK’ in the app with no percentage offered). Most of my use was inside however, so I could have easily gotten by with USB-C delivered power.

Performance score: 3.5/5

Should I buy the Blink Outdoor 4?

Buy it if…

You want a security camera that saves locally

Though you have to bring your own storage device, the included Sync Module 2 allows you to store footage for ready access.View Deal

You want to save money

The Blink Outdoor 4 is built to save you money and you get decent value with what’s on offer.View Deal

You want a long battery life, wireless camera

Two years of battery life with two AA batteries is nothing to balk at!View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You already have a robust home security system

The Blink Outdoor 4 isn’t compatible with anything outside of the Blink ecosystem (apart from access through Alexa). It doesn’t mix with Ring, despite being owned by the same company.View Deal

You want the highest quality footage

Recording at a maximum of 1080p, the Blink Outdoor 4 doesn’t shoot the highest quality footage, and you may find videos grainy and blurry at times.View Deal

You dislike using apps only

Though the Blink camera app is quite well designed, you can’t currently access your camera system through a computer app or browser, meaning you’re limited to a smartphone or tablet display when previewing footage.View Deal

Blink Outdoor 4: also consider

Blink Mini 2

A sibling to the Outdoor 4, the Mini 2 is a wired-only alternative, capable of shooting in the same resolution and sold at a cheaper price point. It might be more attractive if you intend to place the device indoors, but setting it up outside will require extra handiwork. Read our Blink Mini 2 review.View Deal

Arlo Ultra 2

Shooting at up to 4K and offering HDR night vision, the Arlo Ultra 2 is a more premium wireless outdoor camera than the Outdoor 4. That being said, its six month battery life is nothing compared to the Outdoor 4’s two years of charge, and it’s considerably more expensive. Read our Arlo Ultra 2 review.View Deal

How I tested the Blink Outdoor 4

Tested it over two months in my home
Assessed the device on sound and video quality
Set it up in several different spots in several different configurations

From the moment I received the Blink Outdoor 4, I got to work testing it. I put it through its paces as a casual device, not putting it into a hardcore testing environment and instead treating it as something I would use in my own home.

For most of my review period, the Outdoor 4 was positioned at the top of my shelves, looking over my lounge room. It was given a decently lit and sized room to allow for motion and person capture, and I was given the ability to test privacy and activity zoning with a lot of freedom.

I tested audio quality by giving the camera to a friend and going to the next room, allowing us to have a conversation over the two devices. I frequently checked the camera through the app and would use it to make sure I closed my front door.

I assessed the Blink Outdoor 4 as a first time device, as somebody who has never had a home security camera.

DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame two-minute review

Investing in one of the best digital photo frames is a great idea if you have lots of images you want to display, but you don't want the hassle of printing them out. With a digital frame, you can have the latest snaps on display; and such frames even make great gifts for relatives.

The Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro is a decent mid-sized frame, and would suit being placed on a sideboard or similar, where you can hide the power cable away. While Dragon Touch’s marketing materials show it mounted on a wall, bear in mind that you will have to find a way to conceal the power cable, since there’s no battery-powered option available.

Looks-wise, the Classic 15 Pro is fairly simple and straightforward. There are certainly more attractive designs on the market; but it's inoffensive and unobtrusive, allowing your pictures to take centre stage.

The display is Full HD (1920 x 1080) resolution. Photos are a little soft on close examination, but at the distance at which you’re likely to be looking at your images, they appear sharp enough. The frame is bright enough in most conditions, although you might find if positioned in a particularly bright room, then it loses some visibility.

With 32GB of memory built in and Wi-Fi connectivity, you can quickly and easily add (or remove) photos to the frame, while initial setup is super simple, too. If you’re looking for a gift for someone who isn’t particularly tech savvy, then the DragonTouch Classic should be relatively straightforward to use. If you don’t want to send photos via Wi-Fi, there’s a USB port, too.

A word of warning for non-US users, however. Although you can buy this in other territories, it arrives with a fixed plug adapter – as such, you’ll need to buy either a US-World adapter, or a power supply for your own country; just be sure to get the right size to fit the socket.

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame showing two images — The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame is ideal for showing off family photos (Image credit: Amy Davies)

DragonTouch Classic15 Pro: Price and Release Date

$99 / £80 (roughly)
Available in the US; elsewhere via import
Look out for deals

At the time of writing, you could pick up the Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro for $89.99 at Amazon; but the usual price is $99.99. While the frame isn't officially available in the UK, you can import it very easily via Amazon or similar.

This makes it one of the cheapest digital photo frames you can buy, even with international shipping charges applied. In fact, it remains reasonably priced even after factoring in the purchase of an extra power cable.

That said, if you’re not in the US, I’d almost certainly advocate buying a frame that's more readily available in your home territory. Any problems will be more easily resolved; you'll get the correct power cable; and you won’t have to feel guilty about shipping goods across the world.

The frame is available to buy now.

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame showing the photos that are stored on it — Internal storage is generous, so you should have plenty of room for all your photos (Image credit: Amy Davies)

DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame review: specs

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame displaying an image at full size — The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame works well on a mantelpiece where you can hide the cable from view (Image credit: Amy Davies)

Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame: Design

Understated design
Touchscreen interface that’s quick to setup
Use an app to quickly transfer your shots

With its white border and matte-black frame, the Classic 15 Pro has an understated look; but that isn't necessarily a criticism, since it means it doesn’t distract from your photos. That said, there are some more interesting / stylish frames out there – for example, wood effect – if that’s more your style.

The DragonTouch frame is quite thick, but it can’t stand without support. Instead, a leg is provided that you can insert to prop up the frame. It does detach, though, so you can turn the frame on its side if you want to display images in portrait orientation. Note that if you leave the frame in landscape format, your portrait images will display in portrait, but only in the central part of the screen.

Note that the frame does offer the ability for mounting to the wall, if you wish. However, you'll need to find a way to hide the ugly black power cable that will likely run in full view down the wall. As such, in my view this frame is far better placed on a sideboard, mantelpiece or similar.

Setup is quick and simple. Once you’ve plugged in the DragonTouch Classic and switched it on, use the touchscreen interface to guide you through setup. Connect it to your Wi-Fi and you can use it with the free "VPhoto” (Android and iOS) app to transfer your photos across.

You can transfer up to 50 images at a time in one quick motion. And because uploading images is app-based, you can even get friends and family to install the same app and send their pictures across to the frame, too. In fact, as long as both the frame and the app is connected, you can send photos from anywhere in the world – so if you want to upload the latest snap of your kid to their grandparents' frame, for example, then you could do just that.

With 32GB of built-in storage, the DragonTouch Classic is likely to happily cater to most people's needs. However, if you do find yourself running short of space, the USB port on the rear of the frame means you can always add some more.

A power cable – a corded plug with a barrel connector – is supplied. The review sample arrived with a US plug, but I’m in the UK. As such, I could either buy a US to UK adapter, or buy a new adapter. However, picking up the right size may prove tricky: there are several available and the size of the unit included isn't listed in the manufacturer’s specifications.

I got around this issue by purchasing a plug from Amazon with multiple size adapters; the correct size in this instance is 2.5/0.7mm. However, it would have been better had the frame arrived with a USB power supply, as you could use it with any of your existing power supplies, or at least more easily find the right one to use with it. Note, too, that it's important to make sure you get the correct voltage / amp. This frame uses a 12V/1A power adapter, for example, whereas others in the Dragon Touch range use 5V / 2A or 12V / 3A adapters.

The DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame in portrait orientation on a mantelpiece — You can display the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame in either horizontal or portrait orientation (Image credit: Amy Davies)

Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame: Performance

Full HD (1920 x 1080) display
Images look a little soft
In bright spaces, maximum brightness could be better

So now that you’ve set up the Dragon Touch Classic 15 Pro, how well does it display the images?

Well, the Full HD (1920 x 1080) display is likely good enough for most users. It looks a little soft if you get up quite close to the screen, but since it's likely to be sitting a short distance away on a sideboard or mantelpiece, images will look just fine.

Brightness could be a bit better, though. In low light and standard indoor surroundings, images display fine on the DragonTouch Classic frame; but if positioned near a window in bright daytime settings, the frame could would benefit from being a little brighter than it gets at its maximum brightness setting. In a very bright room, then, images can look a little dull. This is perhaps a relatively minor gripe, but it might be worth thinking about when considering the frame's positioning in your home.

The DragonTouch Classic can be set up to display photos in a slideshow, at different timed intervals and using different transitions, very easily. This gives you superb control over how exactly your pictures will be displayed – you could leave one photo up for hours at a time, or you could have the frame flipping through photos every couple of seconds. Having the flexibility is very handy.

Using the VPhoto app to transfer images to the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro digital photo frame — A simple app lets you transfer images across to the frame – others can also send photos remotely (Image credit: Amy Davies)

Should I buy the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Picture Frame?

Buy it if…

You’re looking for a cheap and cheerful digital photo frame
At under $100, the DragonTouch Classic comes in at a great price. It isn't the brightest nor sharpest on the market, but it looks perfectly fine from normal viewing distances. Whether bought for yourself or as a gift, it’s a good compromise between price and quality.

You want a collaborative digital frame

Images can be shared with family and friends quickly and easily via an app.

You want a frame for a sideboard, where you can hide cables

Place the DragonTouch frame on a sideboard or table and you'll easily be able to hide the cable from view. The frame even comes with a stand allowing it to be positioned in both horizontal and portrait format – which is handy.

Don’t buy it if…

You want a frame to wall-mount or move around the home

While this frame can be mounted on a wall, you'll have to consider how best to conceal the power cable; not impossible, but it could prove tricky. In addition, there's no battery-powered option, so you also can’t use it as a “go anywhere” frame.

You’re not prepared to buy an additional power cable

If you’re in the US, the supplied power cable will be fine. But elsewhere, you’ll likely need to buy an additional unit – and you’ll need to make sure you get the correct size, which can be a bit of trial and error.

You want a super-sharp and bright display

If you're looking for the best display possible, then this isn’t it. And note that to get that, you'll likely need to spend far more money than the DragonTouch will set you back.

DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo Frame review: also consider

Aura Walden
The Aura Walden is a super-attractive premium option, offering a larger 15.6-inch screen and a gorgeous finish to its mount and frame. Its app is easy to use and offers free unlimited cloud storage – which definitely gives it the edge over subscription-based products. It does come in at a much higher price, though, and its lower pixel density does show off some pixelation at close range. Read our full Aura Walden review.

Aeezo Portrait 01
If you’re looking to spend even less than the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro, the $69.99 / £55.99 Aeezo Portrait 01 is likely your best option. It utilizes the Frameo app to allow friends and family to share photos and videos, and offers internal storage or the option to add an SD card / USB stick to give you more space. Unfortunately, it isn't as solid a performer as some others: its 1280 x 800 pixel resolution is much lower and it’s much less bright at 227 nits. Read our full Pexar 11-inch review.

How I tested the Pexar 11-inch Digital Picture Frame

I tested the DragonTouch Classic 15 Pro Digital Photo frame over a period of three weeks. I uploaded many different photos to the frame using the VPhoto app, and asked others to do the same.

I uploaded many types of images, including shots in both portrait and landscape orientation, brightly coloured images and black-and-white vintage shots. I changed the position of the frame and also tried it in different places around my home (and even at a family event) to assess how it looked in different lighting conditions.

I'm a professional photographer and journalist of many years and have a good understanding of how images should look on a display. I tried to think of this from the perspective of somebody who is likely to be an amateur photographer at best, and is simply looking for a frame on which to show off family snaps, considering the price point.

First reviewed: November 2024
Read more about how we test

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024): a perfectly adequate ereader

2:17 am | December 5, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers eReaders Gadgets Tablets | Tags: Australia, UK, US | Comments: Off

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024): Two-minute review

The Amazon Kindle Paperwhite has been our pick of the best Kindle for a very long time as it's managed to balance price and features quite well. The 12th generation Paperwhite maintains that same ethos to some degree, gaining a brand-new display that leverages the latest E Ink Carta 1300 screen tech.

This not only adds a touch more contrast, which makes the text on the screen darker and thus easier to read, but it also makes page turns a smidge quicker. Honestly, in real-world use, you won't find it all that different from the 11th-generation Kindle Paperwhite, but you will if you have them both side by side and look really carefully. So while I won't say it's a massive upgrade over the 2021 Amazon Kindle Paperwhite, it's definitely worth upgrading if you're using an older Kindle.

I also appreciate the couple of millimeters more of display I get on the 2024 Paperwhite, which is now a 7-inch screen compared to the previous 6.8-inch, but again, it's not really that significant.

What is a little significant is the slight performance boost that Amazon has managed to inject into the 12th-gen Paperwhite. During my testing, I had no issues whatsoever – page turns were near instantaneous, I had absolutely no slowing down even after hours of reading, not a single instance of ghosting and, importantly, the battery life is truly impressive. After three weeks of use, I am yet to charge the Paperwhite for the first time.

A person tapping on the screen of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

My biggest issue is the Paperwhite's design: the rear panel is so darn smooth, that I often feel like it's slipping through my fingers. That means I'm trying to grip it tighter, which means my thumbs are extended further over the display and the number of accidental touches I have are a little annoying. Admittedly a case will solve that problem, but that's an additional cost to tack onto what is already an expensive ereader.

So while it still builds a case for still being the best Kindle, I think the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (2024) might represent better value for some users, offering more storage, some resistance to salt water and the option for wireless charging.

Amazon's penchant for hiking up the price of its Kindles with each new generation is disappointing. While I'm struggling to justify the cost of the base Amazon Kindle 2024, I suppose I can get behind the 12th-gen Paperwhite's price hike over its predecessor, but I'm not entirely convinced it represents good value anymore. This is compounded by the fact that, in some markets (like Australia), none of the 2024 Kindles support Audible playback.

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: price & availability

Announced October 2024; available to buy now
Launch price of $159.99 (with ads) / £159.99 (with ads) / AU$299
A Signature Edition is available for a higher price but double the storage

As I've said above, Amazon keeps increasing the price of its Kindles with each new release and that means at $159.99 / £159.99 / AU$299, the 12th-generation Paperwhite is the most expensive yet and, in my humble opinion, no longer very good value. And that's the price of the ad-supported version in the US and UK (Australia gets only the ad-free model). If you don't want ads on your lock screen, you're shelling out $179.99 / £159.99 in the US and UK respectively.

You could argue that this price is fine for a 7-inch ereader with 16GB of storage, but for a little more money – $219.99 / £219.99 / AU$359.95 to be precise – you can get a color ereader with a screen of the same size, double the storage, a more ergonomic design (with page-turn buttons) and, importantly, writing capabilities with the Kobo Libra Colour. I suppose I might even be inclined to pay $199.99 / £199.99 / AU$329 for the 2024 Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition for the metallic colors, double the storage and wireless charging, as well as performance just as good as the standard Paperwhite.

If you don't want all that, you can save money by opting for the Kobo Clara BW ($129.99 / £119.99 / AU$239.95), which gets you the exact same display, just in 6 inches, and very similar specs as the Paperwhite.

• Value score: 3.5 / 5

A person reading a page of a book on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: Specs

Amazon has stopped listing some specs for its ereaders, so I have no idea what CPU the Paperwhite is using or the battery capacity.

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: Design & display

Available in 3 colors in the US and UK, only one in Australia
Sharp, crisp 7-inch display
Very slim design with no grip

Hey, Amazon, what exactly has Australia done to not deserve the new colorways of the standard Paperwhite? I'm a little annoyed that I get only the black model Down Under (where I am based) and is the version I was sent for this review. It's not a huge complaint, but I do admit to a little FOMO. Other markets can get the Paperwhite in new Jade and Raspberry options.

Nothing else has really changed in terms of design, although the standard Paperwhite is now 7 inches (compared to the 11th generation's 6.8 inches). The body remains plastic which, incidentally, has some recycled materials in it – not as much as Kobo uses, though.

The plastic chassis does make the Paperwhite look cheaper than its price tag, but the real issue for me is the rear panel. It's so smooth that I can feel it slip through my fingers (literally) when the bus or train I'm on brakes suddenly. I love how slim it is, but that too exacerbates the lack of grip, making it far from ergonomic.

To compensate for its slipperiness, I found myself holding the device with my thumb on the screen itself as the side bezels are still very slim. As nice as that looks, it's not ideal for single-hand use and I kept suffering from accidental page turns from my finger on the screen. It's possible this won't affect all users, but it is an annoyance to me.

The power button and USB-C port on the lower edge of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Given how easy it might be to drop the standard Paperwhite, I'm glad it retains its IPX8 waterproof rating, which means it can stay submerged in 2 meters of water for up to an hour. Just don't drop it in the sea as the salt water will corrode the USB-C port first and, if it seeps in, will start eating away at the motherboard too. The Signature Edition, on the other hand, will survive a quick dunk in the sea.

The rounded corners and edges will be familiar to any Kindle user, as will the be power button on the lower edge. This placement of the power button bothers one of my colleagues, but I don't have any issues with it. In fact, I love the little feedback it gives when pressed. Beside the power button, in the center of the bottom edge, is the USB-C port for charging.

The only embellishments on the device are the word 'Kindle' on the lower bezel and the Amazon logo on the rear panel. As with most black ereaders and tablets, the 2024 Paperwhite is a smudge magnet, but I suspect the two colorways will also suffer similarly. The black one, in fact, begins to look very scruffy within days of use – even just leaving it on a table, it will pick up dust and the texture of the plastic is such that it's hard to wipe away.

If that bothers you like it does me, I think a case becomes a must, and it will add a little extra grip too, but it is an additional cost to bear.

The Amazon logo on the scruffed rear panel of the Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

The rear plastic panel is very smooth and is a magnet for smudges and dust (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

The shift to the 7-inch display has allowed Amazon to update the display to the latest E Ink Carta 1300 technology, which adds more contrast to the text on the screen. The resolution remains at 300ppi though, which is standard and plenty for such a device. The screen supports a dark mode, has 16 levels of grayscale and hits a maximum brightness of 94 nits.

Compared to the 2024 entry-level Kindle, the Paperwhite has a naturally warmer hue (much like paper) which, when combined with the amber LED lights, can make the display very yellow indeed. It might look odd to someone who's not used an ereader with adjustable light temperatures, but it helps the eyes from getting strained too much. If you're like me, who reads for four to five hours a day (mostly at night), you'll appreciate the yellower screen. The LEDs do a good job of evenly lighting the entire display – I found no shadows or areas of excessive brightness during my testing.

• Design & display score: 3.5 / 5

The Kindle branding on the broad lower bezel of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: User interface

Linux-based operating system
16GB of storage, but only 11.5GB available for use
Easy-to-use UX, but home screen can feel cluttered

One theory I have for why the Kindles became so popular so quickly is their user-friendly interface. They've always been simple devices, with not a lot of extraneous options in Settings, and that ethos is still maintained today.

If you're already familiar with a Kindle, you won't find anything new on the 2024 Paperwhite. Even if you've never used a Kindle before, it won't take long to wrap your head around it, with setup being as simple as following the prompts on the screen. Once you've set up your Amazon account and logged in, there are only two tabs to explore – the Home screen and the Library.

I personally find the Kindle Home screen unnecessarily cluttered, constantly pushing me into the Kindle Store. If that doesn't bother you, it's a good starting point for finding your next read. However, keep in mind that once you start getting your content from the Kindle Store, you're stuck within Amazon's walled garden.

Image 1 of 2

The pull-down menu of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Image 2 of 2

The library view on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

You can sideload books of course, but you will need to jump through some hoops as Amazon no longer allows you to plug in a Kindle to drag-and-drop files via a wired connection. You will need to use the Send To Kindle platform, which allows you to wirelessly add content to your Kindles via cloud sync. The good news is that if you ever change (or upgrade) your Kindle, even your sideloaded titles will remain synced to your Amazon account and you can just tap them individually in the Library app of your new Kindle to download them again.

There's no specific tab for Settings, but swipe downwards from the top of the screen and you'll be presented with a few options, including turning on dark mode, cloud sync, flight mode and, of course, accessing all the Settings options.

The different Settings are simple and quite literally bare bones, although please note that if you are in Australia or any other region where there's no Audible support on the 2024 Kindles, you won't even see Bluetooth as a connectivity option (which is available in the US and UK).

There's decent file support on the Kindle now, although, with MOBI now mostly dead, Amazon has had to relent and allow native EPUB support, which is the format most ebooks come in.

As part of the Amazon ecosystem, Goodreads is available on all Kindles and American users will be able to borrow library books too. The latter option is, however, not available anywhere else.

• User interface score: 4 / 5

Image 1 of 2

The Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) screen set at the warmest yellow light — The warm light setting is good for long hours of reading (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Image 2 of 2

The brightness and light temperature sliders on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) set at maximum — The warm light setting is good for long hours of reading (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) review: Performance

Marginally faster than previous model
Speed enhancement seems mostly software related
Excellent battery life, even at higher brightness levels

Ereaders are such simple devices that there's really no benchmarking to run to determine performance. However, as someone who's tested several of the most recent ebook readers, it's fair to say I can judge by doing a comparison with the competition.

The 2024 standard Paperwhite wins in terms of screen responsiveness speed and overall performance over even the Onyx Boox Go series ereaders and the Kobo Clara BW too. The former, incidentally, has a more powerful processor than what Amazon has typically used for its Kindles (although the current CPU has not been revealed) and yet the Paperwhite surpasses the Boox Go 6 (which I have been testing alongside this).

Page turns are near instantaneous and not once did I have issues with ghosting (where a very light impression of the previous page remains on screen after a page turn). Reading graphic novels on its an absolute pleasure, especially since the Frame view also opens instantly when you double-tap.

Like the entry-level 2024 Kindle, I think the performance boost is purely software-based rather than being a new CPU. It could be both, too, but Amazon isn't revealing what chipset it's using under the hood here.

Image 1 of 2

A page of a graphic novel displayed on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — Reading graphic novels on the 2024 Paperwhite is fantastic because... (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Image 2 of 2

A single frame from a graphic novel page displayed on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — ..the Frame View feature expands each individual frame on the page (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

I'm using the massive operating system as the basis of my performance theory here. As with the base 2024 Kindle, the OS on the Paperwhite takes up 4.5GB of the total 16GB storage available on the device – if memory serves, that's 2GB more than on the 11th generation Paperwhite.

While I am miffed about the lower available storage on the Paperwhite (which reduces its per-dollar value), I'm glad for whatever boost Amazon has given the tablet. Typing via the on-screen keyboard when setting up my Wi-Fi network or any other touchscreen functionality was seamless and quick. And by 'quick' I mean it's as good as it's ever gotten on an e-paper screen – don't expect the same performance as your phone or multimedia tablet.

A person at a table reading a page on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

What's probably the most impressive feat is the 2024 Paperwhite's battery life. I've had it for about three weeks now and I started using it immediately out of the box at 72%. Three weeks later it was just at 45%, and that's with about 2-3 hours of reading and the screen brightness level at 8 (warm light level of 4). Admittedly that's a low brightness setting that won't put too much pressure on the battery, but I only charged the Paperwhite once, just to see how quickly it topped up. At this rate, I could eke out at least 10 weeks of use between charges, more if I don't read as much as I usually do.

Amazon claims it will take the 12th-gen Paperwhite under 2.5 hours to go from empty to full when using a 9W power adaptor. That sounds about right to me – plugged into the USB-A port of my 65W charger (which offers up to 22.5W of power) and using a USB-A to C cable, it went from 32% to 50% in about 20 minutes. That might have been a touch faster if I was using a USB-C to C cable, but that was being used on another device at the time of testing. Still, that's not bad numbers at all.

• Performance score: 4.5 / 5

The Library tab on the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

Should I buy the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)?

Buy it if...

You're upgrading from an old Kindle
If you've been holding on to a very old Kindle that's on its last legs and it's time for an upgrade, the 2024 Paperwhite is a worthy option if you want to stick with Amazon.

You want the best in e-ink technology
The E Ink Carta 1300 on the 2024 Paperwhite is fantastic. Not only is it the best grayscale e-paper display yet, but Amazon has optimized it well and made it snappier than before.

You'd love a lightweight 7-inch ereader
For its size, the Paperwhite feels ridiculously light in the hand, despite being a couple of grams heavier than the previous model (hey, the added millimeters have to go somewhere!). I'm just not quite sold on its ergonomics.

Don't buy it if...

You're already using the 2021 Paperwhite (11th generation)
Yes, the screen is better, but other than that, there's not a whole lot that's different. The older model is still pretty good when it comes to performance and, in real-world use, the slightly faster screen response time of the 2024 edition won't feel very different.

Value for money matters to you
While its price tag can be justified to some extent, you can get much more value from something like the Kobo Libra Colour. And if you happen to live outside the US, the Kindle won't even let you borrow library books and, in some markets, there's no Audible support either.

You'd prefer a color ereader
If you read comics, manga or graphic novels more, then a color ereader might be the better investment. After all, they were meant to be viewed in color. The Frame View feature on a Kindle makes it even better for graphic novel readers, which makes a strong case for the Kindle Colorsoft.

Also consider

Kobo Clara BW
Sporting the same screen tech, just in a 6-inch size, the Kobo Clara BW was previously my pick of the best mid-range ereader because it's not exactly 'cheap'. Other than its screen size, it shares most of the specs of the Paperwhite, which makes it good value even compared to the entry-level Kindle 2024 model and, arguably, is now the best budget ereader.
Read my in-depth Kobo Clara BW review for more details

Kobo Libra Colour
In the 7-inch screen size class, the Kobo Libra Colour is the best ereader overall. It balances price and features remarkably well, plus it's a lot more ergonomic than the Paperwhite. It's also got stylus support if you wish to use the writing features, but you will need to buy that separately. Even then, I still think it represents better value for money than the Paperwhite.
Read my full Kobo Libra Colour review to find out more

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (2024)
Admittedly it's more expensive than the standard Kindle, but the loss of 4.5GB to the OS on it makes me think there's better value in opting for the Signature Edition. Double the storage and the option of wireless charging justifies the higher price tag better, although I will admit the wireless charging is a little superfluous.
Read our full Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (2024) review to learn more

How I tested the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024)

Used daily for three weeks to read
Borrowed titles from the Prime Reading service, plus downloaded existing books already available in my Amazon account
Tested battery life at various brightness levels

A person perusing the recommendations on the Home screen of the Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (2024) — (Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)

As soon as I received the 2024 Paperwhite for this review, I logged into my Amazon account, which promptly gave me access to my existing library that was cloud-synced when I sideloaded titles onto an older device. All I had to do was tap on the ebooks I wanted on the Paperwhite (so none of the ones I'd already finished reading) and I was off.

Unfortunately, because I'm based in Australia, I have no Audible access on any of the new Kindles, so I cannot comment on how easy it would be to pair Bluetooth headphones, but I hope it's smooth and once paired, you should be able to listen to audiobooks if you have a subscription.

I read on the Paperwhite daily for the three-week period I set aside for testing, spending about 2-3 hours each day with it. I used the Paperwhite at various light settings to check how that affected the battery drain.

Oppo Find X8 Pro: Two-minute review

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is built on truly excellent hardware. It sports a sleek premium design, a luxurious 6.78-inch display, and the best mobile camera system I’ve ever used. Its snappy performance and innovative UI animations also make it one of the smoothest-feeling phones on the market, and this combination of great hardware and slick software is reflected in the Find X8 Pro's high (but arguably competitive) retail price.

However, the Find X8 Pro has clearly taken one or two (or ten) design cues from the iPhone 16 Pro, and at several points during this review, I found myself asking how much originality counts for. In many ways, the Find X8 Pro blazes past its inspiration, with smoother software, more powerful cameras, and – to my eye – a more interesting design. But Oppo can only take so much credit for a phone so substantially built on another phone maker’s ideas.

Philosophizing aside, the Oppo Find X8 Pro is full to the brim with impressive tech. Its display is sharp, colorful, and immersive, and at 6.78 inches is about as large as I’d want a phone screen to get. The back of the phone is where the real magic happens, though – the quad-camera system on the Oppo Find X8 Pro is truly class-leading, with four 50MP snappers at various levels of optical magnification.

Internally, the phone is just as solid, with a MediaTek Dimensity 9400 chipset and 16GB of RAM. The Find X8 Pro handled everything I threw at it with aplomb. I felt like I was gliding through the ColorOS 15 Android wrapper in day-to-day tasks, and no game or app seemed to vex the system at all. This software experience is unfortunately marred by a large amount of bloatware.

Overall, whether the Find X8 Pro is for you comes down to how much you care about originality. People who want an iPhone will always get an iPhone, and because of that, I'm drawn to the idea that Oppo isn't so much chasing Apple customers as it is interpreting Apple features, which might even be a boost for those who prefer Android to iOS. However you feel about that debate, though, this is a great Android phone loaded with top-flight features; with a specs sheet like this, perhaps an identity crisis is forgivable.

@techradar
♬ original sound - TechRadar

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Price and availability

Costs £1,049, available in one configuration
Not available in the US

The Oppo Find X8 Pro costs £1,049 in the UK. It comes in two colors – Pearl White or Space Black – and ships with a non-configurable 512GB of storage and 16GB of RAM. As with all Oppo phones, it's very unlikely that the Find X8 Pro will launch in the US, though the upcoming OnePlus 13 could offer similar (if not identical) specs.

At this price, the Oppo Find X8 Pro is directly challenging premium flagships like the iPhone 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus, both of which start at £999. Matching these established brands on price is a bold move from Oppo – Chinese manufacturers have traditionally sought to undercut Western competitors on price to compensate for weaker reputation. The Find X8 Pro is full of premium hardware, however, so the value is definitely there.

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Specs

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Design

The Oppo Find X8 Pro side-on against some bushes — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Comes in two colors – Pearl White and Space Black
Rounded frame with new Quick Button – a shutter button for the camera app
Rounded quad-camera housing

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is a strikingly beautiful device. The unit I tested came in Pearl White, which casts a unique pearlescent pattern on each individual handset (there's also a muted Space Black option). It’s subtle in all but the most direct light, which for me strikes the perfect balance between understated and fascinating. Both color options are rated at both IP68 and IP69 for water resistance against both immersion and jets.

The Find X8 Pro is otherwise simple-looking, but keeps things feeling premium with well-chosen materials and attention to detail. The phone is weighty, at 215 grams, but doesn’t feel overly heavy. The camera housing on the Pearl White model is made of polished metal, rather than the glass found on premium OnePlus models, and I have to say, I’m a fan. It gives an industrial contrast to the artsy rear cover and everything on the rear panel a pleasant muted sheen.

The front panel hosts a 6.78-inch screen, curved slightly on each edge. The selfie camera is a reasonably inconspicuous punch-hole design that serves as the midpoint of the software-only Dynamic Cloud – which is, as it sounds, very similar in form and function to Apple’s Dynamic Island.

Ergonomically, the Find X8 finds a nice balance between the ultra-thin curved phones of five or so years ago and the blocky flagships of today. It feels great to hold, but is a little slippery. The phone also seems plenty durable, with weighty buttons and aluminum rails, and comes with a screen protector pre-installed.

On the topic of buttons, the new Quick Button can be found on the lower right-hand side of the frame. The Quick Button is a camera button in all but name, and currently only supports functions and shortcuts directly related to the camera. It’s a nice addition to have and sits flatter than the iPhone’s Camera Control, feeling overall less obtrusive as a result.

Design score: 4 / 5

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Display

The Oppo Find X8 Pro against some buildings, with the display on and lockscreen visible — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

1264 x 2780 resolution (19.8:9 aspect ratio)
120Hz refresh rate
Ludicrous peak brightness of 4500 nits

The display on the Oppo Find X8 Pro is a sharp 1264 x 2780 panel with a 120Hz refresh rate that works in tandem with Oppo’s new animation technology to offer a truly fluid experience. At 6.78 inches, this is as large as I’d want a phone screen to be, and this size lends itself to dual senses of openness and immersion.

The display on the Find X8 Pro isn’t the highest resolution on the market, but it’s certainly enough to make images and video look razor-sharp. There’s plenty of color, and though I’ve definitely seen panels with richer contrast, the Find X8 is well beyond serviceable. The large size and overall sharpness of this panel lends itself well to all types of games, from the landscape shoot-em-up Call of Duty Mobile to charming vertical RPGs like Mousebusters.

The Find X8 Pro’s screen can reach a respectable 800 nits of brightness in typical use, with an absolute maximum of 4500 nits. That is ludicrously bright and far past the realm of actual usefulness. I found the phone to be reasonably bright in normal use, though colors can appear slightly blown out at the higher end of the brightness slider. I never found myself struggling to read the display outside, though the auto-brightness can sometimes make the screen a little too dim indoors.

Display score: 4 / 5

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Software

The Oppo Find X8 home screen — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Android 15 with ColorOS 15
Unacceptable amount of bloatware
Google Gemini-powered AI

ColorOS 15 is one of the smoothest experiences I’ve had with a smartphone operating system, neck-and-neck with OxygenOS 15 – which adds up, considering they’re basically the same thing. AI is provided courtesy of Google Gemini, with support for Circle to Search, writing tools, document summarization, voice memo transcription, and photo editing tools.

Oppo has imbued ColorOS with some of the highest quality animations I've ever seen on a mobile OS. This translates into exceptionally smooth navigation, and in combination with Oppo’s other fantastic UI animations, depth of field effects, and other visual tricks, gives the operating system a playful sense of elasticity and responsiveness I’ve seen nowhere else in the smartphone market, bar maybe the iPhone.

That leads us to an unavoidable fact about ColorOS 15 – the liberal inspiration it's taken from iOS. Everything from the default wallpapers to the way the date and time sit on the lock screen to the layout of the settings app feels like an echo of the iPhone. The Dynamic Cloud, while useful, is barely distinct from the iPhone's Dynamic Island, and the Quick Settings tab is almost a one-for-one recreation of the iOS 18 control center. Oppo is clearly well-versed in making fantastic software that runs like it's being chased, but it’d be nice to see more of the company’s own personality come through.

Another unfortunate mark on an otherwise exceptionally fast software experience is the absolutely unacceptable amount of bloatware the phone ships with; a ridiculous inclusion on a device of this price that regrettably tarnished my first impressions of the phone. I also couldn't get Google Wallet to enable contactless payments – unrelated, but important.

Software score: 3 / 5

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Cameras

The Oppo Find X8 Pro's camera housing — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

50MP wide camera
50MP ultra-wide camera
50MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom
50MP telephoto with 6x optical zoom

The camera system on the Oppo Find X8 Pro is absolutely superb. This is a robust, flexible, and staggeringly powerful camera setup that excels in most situations, particularly with its optical zoom and night photography. While there are a wealth of modes, features, and shooting options built into the Find X8’s camera app, the phone is truly brilliant at offering a fast and reliable point and shoot experience – I never had to consciously consider choosing night mode, or portrait mode, as the default photo tab worked so well. The new Quick Button – a shutter button in all but name – elevates this phone to something closer to a traditional digital camera, and the hardware is certainly there.

Each of the four cameras affixed to the Oppo Find X8 Pro has a 50MP sensor, ensuring consistent quality across its wide optical zoom range. You get an ultra-wide camera, main wide camera, 3x telephoto, and 6x telephoto. All of these cameras feel like powerful tools rather than tacked-on gimmicks, and despite my noted disdain for ultra-wide snappers I must say that this is the best one I’ve come across. Zooming in to the telephoto cameras feels like a natural extension of the main camera, and some excellent software trickery means the transition between lenses when zooming in and out is rarely noticeable.

The Find X8 Pro's optical zoom range of 6x is close to class-leading at this point, now that Samsung no longer fits its phones with 10x lenses. The Find X8 also offers a ludicrous digital zoom range of 120x, which is impressive up to about 40x and then serviceable up to 60x. Past that point, you’re relying on post-processing or an optional AI Telephoto Zoom mode to fill in the gaps and sharpen the blurry original image. The AI zoom isn't great at details, but can guess the outline of shapes and text with decent accuracy.

The camera system’s post-processing is very active overall – some people will prefer a less edited look, but I think it adds a nice amount of color depth, contrast, and sharpness, which directly opposes the brightened style favored by the iPhone and Galaxy flagships. As for video, the phone shoots in 4k at 60fps with the ability to shoot in slow-motion at up to 480fps in 720p.

And, of course, there’s a new way to control the camera system on the Find X8 Pro. The Quick Button appears in the same position and does some of the same things as the iPhone’s Camera Control – it’s seemingly a haptic-sensitive button that supports swiping touch gestures. The Quick Button only does a few things, though – a double press opens the camera app, wherein a single press takes a photo, a long press either takes a burst of photos or a video, and swiping back and forth in landscape mode zooms in and out.

Sure, this isn’t as deep a feature set as Apple’s version, but I still found the Quick Button to be massively effective in reducing the time from thought to photo. The only complaints I have are that the scroll-to-zoom can be a little ‘sticky’ sometimes or occasionally just not work, and that there’s no half-press-to-focus function (Oppo missed an open goal with that one).

Camera score: 4.5 / 5

Oppo Find X8 Pro Camera Samples

Image 1 of 5

The Eiffel Tower, at night, illuminated — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Image 2 of 5

Epping Forest — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Image 3 of 5

Offices along the Seine — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Image 4 of 5

A Parisian street — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Image 5 of 5

The Moon — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Performance

The Oppo Find X8 Pro running Call of Duty Mobile — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

MediaTek Dimensity 9400
GPU: Immortalis G-925
16GB of RAM

Day-to-day, the Find X8 Pro performs admirably, powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 chipset. I encountered no slowdown at all in general usage, and found I could swiftly switch between apps and games with no fuss from the hardware.

The phone also performs well across its array of AI tools, with reasonably fast load times and no real lag or slowdown. The Quick Button lives up to its name in accessing the camera app, which opens near-enough instantly from anywhere in the OS.

The Find X8 Pro comes equipped with 16GB of RAM, a generous allotment that means the phone has plenty of headroom for multitasking and AI. The phone's combination of strong internal specs and a large display also makes it a capable gaming machine, and I had no issues booting up games like Atom RPG or Call of Duty Mobile for sessions on the go, with little noticeable warming.

To put it simply, the Oppo Find X8 Pro just feels efficient. I didn’t notice anything putting more strain on the battery, and the phone seems happy to sustain a variety of concurrent processes. The phone excels in shaving milliseconds off of the hundred-a-day tasks: switching apps, opening files, installing software, and so on. This all adds up and makes using the Oppo Find X8 a fluid and satisfying experience.

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Battery

The USB-C port of the Oppo Find X8 Pro — (Image credit: Future / Jamie Richards)

5,910mAh battery
80W wired charging
50W wireless charging

The Oppo Find X8 Pro sports an all-day battery life, with power to spare. The 5,910mAh silicon-carbon battery gives the Find X8 Pro exceptional longevity. It handles busy days of mixed use with no issue, and doesn’t seem to drain too drastically during gaming sessions or when playing back longer videos.

The real magic comes when it’s time to plug in the Find X8 Pro to recharge – the phone doesn't only come with a charger, which is itself a major win in today’s market, but an 80W charger using Oppo’s own SuperVOOC technology. What that means in practice is blisteringly fast charging speeds and more flexibility for battery top-ups. I almost never saw the Oppo Find X8 Pro run out of battery, as even a cursory 5-minute charge could net me an extra 10% or so of battery life. The phone also supports 50W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging.

When I tested the charging speed of the Oppo Find X8 Pro, I found that the phone reached 50% charge in about 20 minutes and 100% in around 45 minutes. I started the test, as despite my best efforts I couldn't get the phone to completely run out in a reasonable amount of time.

Standby times are also exceptional, and the phone will do everything in its power to prevent this with warnings at 20%, 10%, 5%, and 2%, before launching into Super Power Saving mode at 1%, limiting your usage to just six apps.

Battery score: 5 / 5

Should you buy the Oppo Find X8 Pro?

Buy it if...

You want the best cameras

The Oppo Find X8 Pro has a simply fantastic camera system that rivals any of our present choices for the best camera phones. The new Quick Button adds even more control.

You want a truly premium design

The Find X8 Pro makes some bold choices with its design, but ultimately feels as luxurious as it does aesthetically fresh. It hits a home run with its ergonomics and is clearly built to last.

You want a beautiful display

The Find X8 Pro comes equipped with a beautiful and immersive 6.78-inch display that rarely looks anything less than great. It's large enough to be a serious contender for watching TV shows and movies on, too.

You want impressive battery life

The Oppo Find X8 Pro lasts a full day of mixed use with energy to spare, with a huge 5,910mAh cell that simply refuses to run all the way down. Charging is absolutely rapid, too.

Don't buy it if...

You're on a budget

The Find X8 Pro offers a lot of high-quality hardware, but you'll certainly pay for it. Chinese phone makers can no longer be relied on to undercut Western brands at the top end of their lineups, and Oppo has proved no different.

You value originality

The Oppo Find X8 Pro does some things better than the iPhone 16 Pro, but it's fairly obvious that the phone was designed with some serious Apple inspiration. If you're someone who likes to reward originality, you might want to look elsewhere.

Oppo Find X8 Pro review: Also consider

iPhone 16 Pro Max

The real thing, as it were. Those who want an iPhone probably won't be swayed by the Find X8 Pro, but nevertheless it's worth considering paying a little extra to scratch the Apple itch if it's one you find yourself stuck with.

Read our iPhone 16 Pro Max review

Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus

The Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus takes the premium design, exceptional cameras, and powerful AI tools of the base-model S24 and puts them into a larger frame, with a bigger display and even better battery life. If you want a large Android phone from a more recognizable brand, this is one to consider.

Read our Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus review

iPhone 16

If you're more intrigued by the Find X8 Pro's Quick Button than anything else, it could be worth taking a look at the iPhone 16. Sure, it's got a humbler specs sheet than Oppo's new flagship, but the Camera Control is far more powerful than the Find X8 Pro's shutter button. It helps that it's a fair bit cheaper, too.

Read our iPhone 16 review

How I tested the Oppo Find X8 Pro

My testing of the Oppo Find X8 Pro included several specifically chosen test scenarios as well as more general day-to-day usage over the course of about one week. The model tested came in the Pearl White color option and came with 512GB of storage.

I used the Oppo Find X8 Pro as my everyday smartphone for about a week to test it, using it to chat with friends and family, scroll through websites and social media, watch videos, listen to music, and play games. I went out to test all four of the phone’s cameras in a variety of conditions. I then considered the performance and value proposition of the Find X8 Pro using my knowledge of the smartphone market and journalistic training.

For more on our smartphone test process, be sure to check out our guide to how we test phones for review.

« Previous Page — Next Page »