CPU: AMD Ryzen™ 9 7940HS Processor, 8 Cores/16 Threads (16M Cache, up to 5.2 GHz) Graphics: AMD Radeon 780M RAM: DDR5 Dual channel 32GB installed (SODIMM Slots×2, Up to 5600MHz, Max 64GB) Storage: M.2 2280 PCIe4.0 SSD ×2 Slots, 1TB Installed Rear Ports: RJ45 2.5G Ethernet Port×1, USB3.2 Gen2 Type-A Port ×4, HDMI 2.1 ×2 Front Ports: USB 4 x2, 3.5mm Headphone Connectivity: M.2 2230 WIFI Support (Wi-Fi 6E, BlueTooth 5.3) Audio: HDMI 2.1 ×2, Audio Jack ×1 Camera: (Not specified) Size: 130mmx126mmx52.3mm OS installed: Windows 11 Pro Accessories: DC 19V(Adapter Included)
The Minisforum UM790 Pro impresses with its compact size and impressive performance. While its design is simple and somewhat boring, the setup is easy and efficient, and the ports and connectors are all where you would want them to be for pure practicality.
The machine shines in gaming and 4K video editing tasks, making it an ideal choice for creative professionals. Marketed as a desktop replacement, it delivers exceptional power for its size and will appeal to anyone looking for versatility and performance, so ideal for creators. Despite its slightly mundane design, its capabilities as a compact power PC and its focus on gaming and content creation set it apart as an attractive choice and make it one of our choices for the best mini PCs.
Price and Availablity
The Minisforum UM790 Pro is priced in the midrange for a high-end mini PC, so any way you look, it's one of the best PC purchases out there. Considering its impressive specifications and desktop-level processing power, this price point makes it a budget-friendly option for anyone needing high performance in a compact form.
While the UM790 Pro offers powerful performance akin to a desktop PC, its limited upgradability should be considered. However, external GPUs and Hard drives can be attached, so it's not a huge issue when considering the RAM and internal storage option upgrades. The midrange price tag and simple design make this a strong and sensible choice.
Score: 5/5
Design
The Minisforum UM790 Pro is everything a compact Mini PC should be and offers a simple space-saving solution ideal for desktop and creative setups. While its exterior design appears fairly standard, its true capabilities lie inside. The machine is built with an emphasis on practicality, allowing it to easily mount to the back of a monitor, thereby maximising desk space. Its integrated metal body enhances durability while ensuring that it stays cool under intensive workloads.
While the UM790 Pro might not be as upgradable as traditional desktops, its dual-channel DDR5 memory slots allow for a maximum of 64GB RAM, catering to multitasking needs. Moreover, dual PCIe 4.0 SSD slots empower users to expand storage capacity and enhance data performance through RAID0 and RAID1 configurations.
Design: 4.5/5
Features
The Minisforum UM790 Pro employs cutting-edge technologies, housing an AMD Ryzen™ 9 7940HS processor with up to 5.2 GHz boost and an AMD Radeon™ 780M GPU, delivering remarkable performance for gaming and intensive tasks.
The UM790 Pro's AMD Ryzen™ 9 7940HS processor boasts 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Radeon™ 780M graphics card ensures smooth visuals and seamless gaming, as well as sufficient for video and image editing tasks.
Backing up the processing is dual-channel DDR5 memory slots and support for frequencies up to 5600MHz; the UM790 Pro offers fast data access, a major consideration for content creators dealing with large files.
Those large files are perfectly catered for by the M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 SSD slots, of which there are two, although only one is filled off the shelf.
Ensuring connection options, there's a good range of ports, including USB3.2 Gen2 Type-A and USB4 ports and supporting high-resolution displays, there's HDMI 2.1 and USB4 video outputs.
Measuring 130mm x 126mm x 52.3mm, the UM790 Pro's compact size makes it suitable for limited desk spaces, and it's compatible with VESA mounting, which is a nice touch, especially in studios where you want the surface to be clear of cables and machines.
Regarding the network connections, there's a 2.5G Ethernet port and Killer™ AX1675 Wi-Fi 6E network card; in the test, this all seemed more than fast and reliable enough for most workshop and studio tasks and gaming.
The Minisforum UM790 Pro proves to be a solid performer through our series of benchmark tests, translating into outstanding real-world performance when used with Premiere Pro and Photoshop. Its AMD Ryzen™ 9 7940HS processor, coupled with the AMD Radeon™ 780M GPU handled games, images and video with relative ease.
In 3DMark Wild Life, the UM790 Pro achieved a Graphics Score of 15402, reflecting the gaming performance. Fire Strike yielded a Graphics Score of 7351, with additional scores highlighting its CPU and combined performance.
Time Spy recorded a Graphics Score of 2674 and a CPU Score of 10862, illustrating its multifaceted capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the machine showcased a Multi-Core Score of 15874, affirming its computational strength and this was again reflected in the video editing.
GeekBench 5 reflected the other results with a Multi-Core and Single-Core Scores of 12387 and 2714, respectively. CrystalDiskMark revealed read and write speeds of 3905.29 MB/s and 1970.44 MB/s, demonstrating a decent but not remarkable transfer speed.
PCMark 10 returned a Score of 7110, reinforcing the well-rounded performance which was topped off with a Windows Experience Index with a score of 8.2.
Performance: 4.5/5
Should you buy a Minisforum UM790 Pro
The Minisforum UM790 Pro presents a powerful solution in a compact form. With exceptional performance that outshines its peers in this price range, it proves itself as a reliable and mini PC and desktop replacememnt. Its unassuming design might lack flair, but it's a testament to functionality, easily fitting into any professional environment.
From solid gaming capabilities to smooth video editing, the UM790 Pro delivers on multiple fronts. While it might not be the choice for those seeking a design that pops or offers a multi coloured light show, its performance-focused approach and simplicity make it a great option.
Value: Priced affordably for its capabilities, providing desktop-level power. (5/5) Design: Simple and practical, but lacking visual flair. (3/5) Features: Cutting-edge technologies, versatile CPU, GPU, RAM, and storage options. (4.5/5) Performance: Impressive benchmark scores translate to exceptional real-world performance. (4.5/5) Total: A solid mini PC with powerful performance and practical design, suited for various tasks. (4/5)
CPU: AMD Ryzen™ 5 5500U, 2.1-4.0GHz Graphics: AMD Radeon™ Graphics 7 RAM: 16GB DDR4 Storage: 512GB M.2 NVME 2280 SSD Rear Ports: 1 x Type-C, - 1 x DP Port, - 1 x HDMI, 2 x USB 3.0, 2 x USB 2.0, 1 x Audio Jack, 2 x RJ45 2.5G Front Ports: N/A Connectivity: WiFi6 -802.11AX, Bluetooth BT5.2, LAN Support RJ45 2.5Gx2 Audio: Not specified Camera: Not specified Size: Product Size (L x W x H): 16.2 x 16.2 x 19.8cm OS installed: Windows 11 Home Accessories: 1x Power Adapter, 1x SATA Cable, 1x User Manual
The T-BAO MiniPC + NAS R3 stands out from many of the best mini PCs by being an extremely versatile option that has been tailored for the needs of day-to-day use. Less boxy and more Air Purifier by design T-Bao has deliberately focused on seamless integration into home aesthetics, as well as computing functionality.
Crafted to cater to everyday computing demands, the T-BAO MiniPC + NAS R3 presents a cheap and easy-to-use solution for anyone wanting something other than pure gaming performance. Its compact form and stylish if slightly plasticy design means it looks equally in place on your desk or living room.
The big selling point of the T-BAO MiniPC + NAS R3 is its integrated NAS system. This integration isn't an afterthought but a fundamental design of the machine. It's only an entry-level NAS but still, in a machine of this size, it's impressive with the capacity for two 3.5-inch HDDs. Essentially with two drives installed, this machine transforms a compact daily computer into a hub for all your multimedia and files which is why we consider it one of the top mini PCs in its class.
Powering the system is an AMD Ryzen 5 5500U processor which is an excellent balance between price and performance for this style of machine.
Price and Availablity
The T-BAO MiniPC + NAS R3 arrives at an affordable price and is designed to cater to a wide range of users. The machine is positioned for day-to-day use with a specification and design that will cater to most word processing, web browsing, multimedia and the occasional use for games.
One of the most enticing aspects of the T-BAO MiniPC + NAS R3 is its budget-friendly price point. If you're looking for a cost-effective option, this machine really does pack in quite a bit for the price and with features such as the NAS and Network hub that aren't that common at this level.
While the machine primarily focuses on day-to-day tasks, its design seamlessly slots into your home design with a far more aesthetic look than the small box design of most other mini PCs. Its compact dimensions ensure it doesn't occupy too much space.
The T-Bao MiniPC + NAS is available for a reasonable amount and the versatile design and the inclusion of a simplified NAS system make it a compelling option if you're looking for an all-in-one solution that caters to day-to-day computing, multimedia enjoyment, and mass storage.
Score: 4/5
Design
The T-BAO MiniPC + NAS R3 impresses with a design that seamlessly blends functionality and aesthetics. Its small footprint makes it an unobtrusive addition to any workspace. The standout feature for this small machine is the provision for two 3.5-inch HDDs, enabling easy storage expansion without compromising on elegance. In this test I popped in two inexpensive 500GB WD Green Drives effectively quadrupling the storage size in a little under two minutes without the need for any tools.
The through-type cooling design, supported by a generously-sized base fan, ensures excellent heat dissipation for consistent performance while maintaining nice quiet operation even when some of the task such as basic video editing push the resources of the machine.
The MiniPC + NAS R3 also excels in connectivity, offering a range of connection options including USB, HDMI, DP, and more, making peripheral integration simple. The distinctive design is reminiscent of an air purifier which may appeal to some people, it also makes it more at home when trying to blend it into a living area rather than a home office.
While the overall design is good the quality of the materials does let it down and some flexing of the outer case was initially required to align all ports correctly. The other issue is the caddy loading system for the two 3.5-inch HDDs, while a great idea the caddies are a little fiddly and cheap feeling, however, they;re simple to use.
Design: 3/5
Features
The T-bao R3 Mini PC brings together a collection of features that elevate both performance and convenience. At its core, the device is powered by an AMD Ryzen 5 5500U processor and AMD Radeon Graphics 7. This combination ensures solid performance for most day-to-day tasks, including multimedia.
The standout feature is its built-in NAS functionality, which transforms the Mini PC into a centralized storage hub. The NAS system is designed to accommodate two 3.5-inch hard drives, allowing you to quickly expand your storage beyond the basic 512GB that comes preinstalled.
This makes the machine an ideal solution if you're seeking to store an extensive collection of media libraries, files, and more. What truly stands out is its ease of use; even someone with no prior experience can navigate this simple NAS functionality, especially with the support of the Windows Storage Spaces application.
The T-bao R3 Mini PC boasts fast network connectivity, powered by WiFi 6 and two 2.5G Ethernet ports. In terms of other connections, a bank of connectors adorns the rear, including USB 2.0, USB 3.0, HDMI, DP, and Type-C ports.
The T-Bao MiniPC + NAS R3 strikes a balance between performance and practicality. While it might not be a powerhouse, it proves itself as a versatile day-to-day performer.
In 3DMark Wild Life, the graphics score of 6903 showcases the machine's capability to handle multimedia tasks and casual gaming without any issue. It comfortably accommodates everyday graphic demands and even ventures into light gaming territory with decent visuals.
The Fire Strike benchmark yielded a graphics score of 3491, with the physics score hitting 14818 and the combined score reaching 1131. These scores underline the machine's ability to handle various tasks, from graphics-heavy applications to multitasking, albeit within reasonable boundaries.
The Time Spy benchmark presented a graphics score of 1006 and a CPU score of 4519, reflecting the MiniPC + NAS R3's aptitude for multimedia playback, productivity, and light content creation. It performs well in various scenarios, such as photo and video editing, offering smooth multitasking capabilities.
Cinebench R23 showcased a multi-core score of 3270 and a single-core score of 1152, reaffirming the machine's suitability for handling multiple tasks simultaneously and its efficiency in single-threaded processes. Editing video in Premiere Pro showed it sailed through 1080p edits but started to stuggle with more demanding 4K.
GeekBench 5 revealed a multi-core score of 5820 and a single-core score of 1479 again a middle-of-the-road score.
CrystalDiskMark demonstrated a read speed of 2078.72MB/s and a write speed of 1665.39MB/s, showing the device's storage speed, which aligns well with its intended use as a day-to-day computing solution. While this speed is slower than some, for almost all tasks this is still an impressive result.
Finally with a PCMark 10 score of 4948 and a Windows Experience Index score of 8.1 this all comes together to further emphasise the device's practicality for everyday work, multimedia and a bit of gaming.
Should you buy a T-Bao MiniPC + NAS R3
The T-Bao MiniPC + NAS R3 offers a great blend of convenience and functionality. Designed with day-to-day users in mind, its sleek form seamlessly integrates into home setups with a design that's more air purifier than PC.
The MiniPC + NAS R3 is a versatile multimedia hub, thanks to its AMD Ryzen 5 5500U processor, ample RAM, and expandable storage. The built-in NAS functionality, while simple, is the standout feature, streamlining file storage. However, the device may not suffice for demanding gamers or graphics-intensive tasks. Affordably priced, this mini PC presents an attractive solution if you're looking for a compact, stylish computing solution with storage versatility.
Value: A versatile hybrid at an attractive price point. (4/5) Design: Compact and efficient, but average build quality. (3/5) Features: Impressive NAS integration and storage potential. (4/5) Performance: Moderate processing and graphics capabilities. (3/5) Total: A well-rounded choice for multitaskers and storage enthusiasts. (4/5)
AceMagician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9: 30-second review
ACE MAGICIAN AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 Specs
CPU: AMD Ryzen™ 9 6900HX Graphics: AMD Radeon™ 680M RAM: 16GB DDR5*2 (Maximum Support: 64GB) Storage: M.2*1 PCIE NVME 512GB (Maximum Support: 2TB) Rear Ports: 1 x Audio-in/out, 4 x USB3.2 Type-A, 7 x TYPE-C, 2 x HDMI 2.0 Type A, 1 x RJ45 Front Ports: Not specified Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2 Audio: Not specified Camera: Not specified Size: 149 x 78 x 188mm OS installed: Windows 11 Pro Accessories: Mini PC, Power Adapter, HDMI Cable, User Manual
The AceMagician AM08 Pro offers a compact size with impressive connectivity and expandability options. Its straightforward setup and effective cooling system make it user-friendly. The design is instantly eye catching and reflecting the gaming market that it's intended for there's an array of coloured lights that adorn the front.
While excelling in intensive day-to-day tasks and offering mid-range gaming performance, some games with all effects at high resolutions will stutter. However, the system's excellent cooling ensures stable operation during all intensive tasks and gaming sessions.
The small machine also offers triple 4K display support further enhancing its appeal as one of the best mini PCs for gamers and creatives. Though not the most affordable option, it's a decent and fun choice.
Price and Availablity
The AceMagician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 comes at a slightly higher price point than some of its competitors, but it brings with it a distinct gamer-style design, efficient cooling solutions, and convenient memory and storage upgradability.
This added investment affords users the benefit of a machine that not only handles day-to-day tasks efficiently but also offers enhanced capabilities for more intensive gaming and creative applications like using 4K video editing software. While it might require a bit more financial commitment, the AM08 Pro stands out for its cooling efficiency, design aesthetics, and user-friendly upgrade options, making it a solid choice for those seeking both performance and flexibility.
Score 3.5/5
Design
The design of the mini PC is a blend of elements that might not be universally appealing, yet manages to cater to a specific audience. Personally, the design didn't strike a chord with me, feeling slightly quirky with its triangular shape and prominent power button at the top the unit. However, the dynamic RGB lights and upright stance give it a distinct gamer aesthetic that can undoubtedly attract enthusiasts.
What truly stands out about the design is its practicality. The placement of main ports on both the front and back enables easy connectivity, while the unique triangular form provides stability and enables that effective cooling. This layout makes accessing ports easier, ensuring that plugging in peripherals or monitors is a hassle-free.
Design: 3/5
Features
The AM08 Pro packs in features that make this machine suitable for both gamers and creatives. Featuring a relatively compact form factor of 149 x 77 x 188.47mm, it fits neatly on the desk. Inside is a relatively powerful AMD Ryzen™ 9 6900HX processor, boasting 8 cores and 16 threads, while not at the top end it does provide decent multitasking capabilities and robust performance across applications.
Backing the CPU is the AMD Radeon™ 680M GPU, again this will ensure decent graphics rendering for both gaming and creative tasks. backing up the processing is 16GB DDR5 RAM, with an option to upgrade to 64GB, this amount of RAM would be ideal for gaming, but I would recommend a boost to 32GB for smoother gaming.
Storage options are equally impressive, offering a 512GB M.2 PCIe NVME SSD with expandability up to a generous 2TB. The fitting of both RAM and storage upgrade is simple in both cases.
The AM08 Pro also features a good array of connectivity options with Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2, enabling the wireless communication. Furthermore, USB 3.2 Type-A ports and other interfaces, including HDMI and Type-C, enhance the machine's adaptability for various peripherals as well display options.
The machine comes with Windows 11 Pro pre-installed, the AM08 Pro which is a nice touch, although the boot times are slightly longer than machine running the home edition.
Features: 4/5
Performance
The AMD Ryzen 9-powered machine proved itself as a capable workhorse with solid performance across various benchmarks and real-world usage scenarios. Its specifications and benchmark results offer insight into its efficiency and suitability for different tasks.
In 3DMark Wild Life, the graphics score reached a commendable 15500, showing the machine's graphics abilities. This result indicates its capability to handle graphically demanding tasks, making it suitable for gaming and multimedia.
In the Fire Strike benchmark, the graphics score settled at 6523, while the physics score impressively hit 7057, and the combined score reached an impressive 25045. These results further demonstrate the AM08 Pro's well-rounded performance, particularly in graphics-intensive applications and multitasking scenarios.
Moving to Time Spy, the graphics score reached 2435, and the CPU score achieved a solid 9448, highlighting the machine's versatility for both graphics processing and computational tasks.
Cinebench R23 unveiled a multi-core score of 12478, showcasing the AM08 Pro's proficiency in handling multitasking and resource-intensive applications. The single-core score came in at 1602.
In GeekBench 5, the multi-core score impressed at 10532, while the single-core score reached 2184. Again these results are good putting the machine in the midrange for this level of machine.
CrystalDiskMark demonstrated impressive read and write speeds, with a read speed of 2800.72 MB/s and a write speed of 2423.33 MB/s. These speeds are again mid-range, fast but by means the fastest for this size and price of the machine.
The all-important PCMark 10 benchmark test showed that the AM08 Pro produced a score of 6740, again on the midrange for this machine level.
Finally, the Windows Experience Index score of 8.2 reflects an overall solid but mid-range result for the machine.
The AceMagician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 is a great option for gamers and users doing more intensive day-to-day tasks such as video editing who are looking for a quirky yet efficient mini PC. Its gaming aesthetics, including LED lights and an upright stance, immerse you in the gaming culture. The machine's expandability is well thought through, allowing easy memory and storage upgrades for future-proofing.
Despite being slightly pricier and lacking the sturdiness of metal-cased alternatives, the AM08 Pro offers robust build quality. While its performance is solid but not cutting-edge, the cooling system and abundant connectivity options make it an excellent choice for versatile day-to-day use and multimedia enjoyment.
Report Card
Value: A bit pricier than some, but offers gaming aesthetics and expandability. (3.5/5)
Design: Unique design with gaming flair, easy access, and versatile connectivity. (4/5)
The OnePlus 12 is expected to launch in January, a year after the OnePlus 11. We've already had not one, but two rounds of leaked specs for the upcoming device, and today it's time for round three.
According to the usually very reliable Digital Chat Station on Weibo, the OnePlus 12 will be a spec monster. It will employ a curved screen manufactured by a Chinese company, which will support high frequency pulse width modulation dimming and is apparently built on a new substrate tech.
At the helm will sit the upcoming Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC, paired with either 16GB or a whopping 24GB...
Infinix's GT 10 Pro launched not long ago as the affordable brand's first serious gaming-targeted smartphone, but there's more to come apparently. According to our anonymous source, Infinix is currently gearing up to launch the Zero 30 5G.
This will be the latest member in the ever-expanding Zero family, and you can see it in the exclusive images below.
Infinix Zero 30 5G exclusive leaked images
The Infinix Zero 30 5G will apparently have a big focus on bringing a premium camera experience to an affordable price point, and the 50 MP front-facing camera will be (excuse the...
Storage: SN770 500GB NVMe PCIe4, 1 x M.2 NVMe, 1 x SATA, III, 1 x M.2 SATA III
Expansion: 23 General Purpose 5V I/Os
Display: 1 x HDMI 2.1, 1 x eDP 1.4a, 2 x DP 1.4b (TB4)
Networking: 2 x 2.5GbE, 1 x WiFi6e, Bluetooth 5
Ports: 2 x TB4, 2 x USB3.2, 2 x USB2.0, 1 x HDMI, 1 x 3.5mm audio, 1 x SATA3
Weight: 438g
Dimensions: 10.2cm x 14.6cm x 2.7cm
Power Consumption: 7W nominal, headless
The LattePanda Sigma is one of the most powerful single-board computers money can buy right now. Equipped with a state-of-the-art 13th Gen Intel CPU, 16GB LPDDR5 of RAM, 500GB NVMe storage, two 2.5Gb Ethernet ports, and LattePanda’s low-speed connector, this offering is not only ideal for interfacing with Arduino-compatible modules but also in systems requiring heavy CPU processing.
The PCB is twice as big as a Raspberry Pi 4 but should offer more than four times the computing power. The Sigma shines by providing copious amounts of storage and display ports. It is perfect for a high-end multimedia station supporting transcoding or as a high-performance gaming emulation platform. LattePanda has included a WiFi 6E module which gives twice the throughput of a 1Gb Ethernet connection. The Sigma platform should stay relevant for the next decade.
LattePanda has many similar single-board computers in stock, ranging from its lowly first generation built around a Z8350 CPU to the mighty Sigma. The least expensive board has an MSRP of $105, while a full-fledge Sigma costs $648. This is the embedded board to get if you need a speedy CPU with plenty of high-speed interfaces, storage, and a 32-bit microcontroller.
LattePanda Sigma: Design
The LattePanda Sigma ships in a sturdy cardboard box which perfectly shields the board’s components during shipping. Accessories include a 19V 90.1W universal power adapter with international power cords, a small hardware bag containing spare screws and spacers, two flexible WiFi antennas, and a spare heat pad to place on a second NVMe SSD. The embedded board measures 10.2cm x 14.6cm x 2.7cm for 438g. An active heatsink and a metal backplate that doubles as an SSD heatsink enclose the PCB entirely except for connectors.
Powering the Sigma can be done in several ways. The most convenient is through the Thunderbolt 4 port with the help of a docking station and a power supply capable of at least 100W. The JST PH 2.0 8-pin connector next to the DC jack allows integration into systems that supply their own 12V power.
The Sigma uses a 13th-generation Intel Core i5-1340P CPU powered by 12 cores. The processor can boost its frequency up to 4.6GHz, yielding performance similar to desktop PCs while consuming a fraction of energy. The built-in graphic unit sports an Intel Iris Xe accelerator and gives acceptable gaming framerates. The dual-channel soldered 16GB LPDDR5 memory has a bandwidth of 102GB/s, and two NVMe M.2 slots support PCIe Gen 4 and Gen 3. Peripherals connected through two USB 2.0 Type-A, two USB 3.2 Type-A, and two Thunderbolt 4 Type-C provides 100GB/s of bandwidth.
Thanks to a high-performance processor, the Sigma is more than adequate for office applications or watching 4K videos. It is an excellent embedded development platform, the onboard ATmega32U4 8-bit microcontroller giving direct access to thousands of Arduino libraries and projects through 23 5V-compatible input/output ports. The SBC has an RS232/485 port and a DC barrel socket supporting 12V to 20V.
LattePanda Sigma: In Use
The Sigma comes to life by pressing the side push button. The system, which can also turn on automatically when power is applied, takes less than thirty seconds to boot Windows 11 from the NVMe storage. A silent fan cools the 28W CPU while the bottom metal plate, which holds the motherboard, doubles as a heat dissipator for SSDs.
The user can readily jump into developing embedded projects thanks to a preinstalled IDE that supports the onboard Arduino Leonardo. The microcontroller connects to the main CPU through a dedicated serial port, which acts as a programming and debugging port. A large connector brings various microcontroller pins to the external world. Labels for each pin are printed on the side, making troubleshooting a stubborn circuit a breeze.
One application that suits the mini-computer well is a gaming emulator. This is precisely what the MAME open-source project does. The onboard Arduino microcontroller interfaces joypads and other gaming accessories to the MAME application, thus drastically reducing the number of external parts needed. The Intel CPU can easily emulate 64-bit platforms like the N64 close to full speed.
Evaluating the raw performance of the CPU consists of running Geekbench6 for Windows. The benchmark’s engine runs applications similar to those found in an office setting. The Sigma earns a score of 2259 in single-core application and 9293 in multi-core. The stock WD Black SN770 NVMe storage yields about 3.4GB/s and 3.6GB/s for write and read operations, respectively, using CrystalDiskMark.
LattePanda Sigma: The competition
Single-board computers that are both affordable and powerful are rare. Using an x86 CPU like the i5-1340P found in the Sigma opens the door to popular and well-supported applications and software libraries. Users can get answers to issues right away on web forums, while support for drivers is far better than on other platforms. The drawbacks are higher energy consumption and a hefty price tag.
For a fraction of the price of the Sigma, the Odroid H3+ has an Intel Pentium Silver N6005 processor. This Quad-core chip is no match for the Core CPU found on the Sigma, scoring an index of 600 on Geekbench 6, compared to 1800 for the i5-1340P. The H3+ comes without memory and storage, giving an underwhelming out-of-box experience compared to the Sigma. Finally, there is no Arduino co-processor on the H3+, which makes interfacing with embedded modules more complicated.
LattePanda Sigma: Final verdict
The LattePanda Sigma brings a CPU that packs 12 powerful cores in a package slightly bigger than two decks of cards. With interfaces such as Thunderbolt 4, NVMe, 2.5GbE, and WiFi 6e, the Sigma immediately turns into a platform that oozes performance and versatility. The active fan does an excellent job cooling the slim heatsink while entirely silent. A metal backplate serves as a heatsink for the NVMe storage. One of the main selling points is the built-in Arduino sub-system, which is, without a doubt, very easy to use.
Even though the board is compact, it could have been a tad smaller. The lack of enclosure to protect sensitive electronics is also a letdown. Using a memory-down approach for the DDR5 has benefits, such as lowering costs, but it ultimately prevents memory upgrades compared to having SODIMM sockets.
The iPhone 15 series is expected to arrive next month, potentially on September 12 or 13. As far as we know, only the Pro models (iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max) will use the new Apple A17 Bionic chipset, while the non-Pro models will still rely on the A16. As per a previous insider tip, the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max were apparently still going to rock 6GB of RAM. Potentially of the faster LPDDR5 variety, supplied by Micron or Samsung, but 6GB nonetheless.
Update: It appears that both 8GB and 6GB RAM configurations for A17 were in testing at one point, currently unclear why or which of these...
The PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5 RAM kit might not be the most eye-catching memory I've slotted into the test bench, but boy howdy does it get the job done, especially if you're looking for some more affordable options for upgrading your rig.
To be clear, this isn't the best RAM on the market if what you're looking for is the fastest raw performance. There are kits with much higher OC speeds that can honestly run circles around it, but with higher memory speeds comes power and stability issues, especially if you're going to dig in and fiddle with the timing profile of the modules.
If what you're looking for though is a great plug-and-play kit with a respectable OC performance at the click of a BIOS button, then the XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5-6000 kit is impossible not to recommend.
This is all the more impressive given that the PNY kit holds its own against probably the venerable Corsair Dominator Platinum running at a higher memory speed, and goes toe to toe with the best G.Skill DDR5 RAM kit, the Trident Z5 Neo, running at the same speed.
And while the Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR5-6600 I had in the lab is the better bet for DDR5 RAM in terms of raw performance, you're paying a massive 54% premium ($184.99, about £140/AU$270) for a 32GB (2 x 16GB) kit, compared to the XLR8 Gaming Mako 32GB (2 x 16GB) kit, which sells for $119.99 (about £95/AU$175).
For that price, you're getting about 93% of the performance of the Corsair kit with only about 9.4% higher latency when running with Intel XMP at the module's max-rated speeds.
These differences aren't nothing, but you do need to ask yourself if that marginally better performance is worth the extra money, because that extra money's not nothing either. The PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5-6000 32GB kit has an average performance-per-dollar score of 253.28, compared to the Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5-6600's 148.06 – a 47.5% better showing for the PNY kit.
The baseline 4,800MHz speeds for the two kits equalized things considerably, with the PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako kit actually coming in a bit faster than the Corsair kit. The timings on the two kits are also pretty much even (38-40-40-78 for the Corsair kit and 40-40-40-77 for the PNY modules).
On the other side of the ledger, you have the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo, one of the most popular RAM kits out there, which comes in at the same price as the PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5 for a 32GB, two-stick, 6,000MHz kit.
Pitting these two against each other, they beat each other to an effective draw on every measure, though the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo technically wins on points, while neither can keep up with the fully overclocked Dominator kit, which is expected given the Dominator kit is 600MHz faster.
Given that the two 6,000MHz kits perform identically and cost the same, if you can't get your hands on a G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo kit, the PNY kit is an ideal substitute (and vice versa).
All told then, the PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5 is some seriously good RAM, especially at this price. Unless you're looking to break records on your PC or need extremely fast RAM for specific memory-intensive workloads, this RAM kit is really all you'll need.
PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5: Price & availability
How much does it cost? $119.99 (about £95/AU$175)
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK and Australia availability forthcoming
The PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5-6000 is available now, with an MSRP of $119.99 (about £95/AU$175) for a two-stick 32GB kit (2 x 16GB).
In the US, you can get a 32GB kit right now through PNY's website as well as other retailers, and while PNY's site shows a single module option for this RAM, clicking it doesn't give you an option to buy or even a price, so it's likely only going to be available in a two-stick kit for the time being.
The price puts it on par with the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo kit at the same speed, module config, and capacity, while also matching its price. As noted before, the XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5-6000 is substantially cheaper than the Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5 kits around the same speeds, with the 6,000MHz CL36 Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB (2 x 16GB) kit going for $159.99 – about 33% more expensive than the PNY kit at the same speed and CAS Latency.
This is the best value of any RAM we've tested above 6,000MHz, though there are better-performing options that cost more, there are diminishing performance returns. Meanwhile, there are much cheaper RAM kits, but they're slower and not that much cheaper, so the PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5-6000 kit really occupies something of a memory sweet spot for those looking for a good balance of performance and affordability.
PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5: Specs
Should you buy PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5?
Buy it if...
You're concerned about price and performance
This RAM kit has a great balance of price and performance without getting stuck too much in the middle of better performing or lower priced options.
You want RAM without a lot of flash While the aluminum heat spreader on the RAM modules has some interesting design details, this is a non-RGB kit, so it'll pop into your PC without drawing too much attention to itself.
Don't buy it if...
You want the fastest RAM around
While this RAM kit is great, there are faster kits out there.
You want the cheapest RAM around
You do have to pay the going rate for the performance you get with this RAM kit, and there are better values out there if you aren't as concerned about high performance RAM.
PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5: Also consider
How I tested PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5
I spent about a week testing the PNY XLR8 Gaming Mako DDR5
I used it for productivity work, gaming, and creative content work
I used our standard suite of benchmarking tools like Passmark and AIDA64
In addition to using this RAM in my personal gaming PC for about a week playing Diablo 4 and other titles, I really put this RAM to the test with creative content work like Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, where I worked with many layers at once with several large files open, which has a noticeable impact on memory usage.
I also formally benchmarked the RAM kit using Passmark PerformanceTest and AIDA64's memory benchmarks. I tested the kit at its default factory speed as well as its maximum overclock speed, both as a single module and as a pair, for four rounds of testing. In addition, I tested competing RAM at or around the same speed, price, and capacity to see how it stacks up against its competition.
I've been working with PCs for many years now, as well as spending years studying computer science at an undergraduate and graduate level, so I know the ins and outs of memory microarchitecture as well as how RAM can impact actual real world performance.
We pride ourselves on our independence and our rigorous review-testing process, offering up long-term attention to the products we review and making sure our reviews are updated and maintained - regardless of when a device was released, if you can still buy it, it's on our radar.
I'm pleased with virtually everything Samsung has done to its premiere foldable – the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 – to make it a better mobile productivity companion than its predecessor.
A flat-folding phone that is noticeably thinner and lighter than Galaxy Z Fold 4 is the kind of change we want in foldable development. Sure, the Google Pixel Fold (not to mention a handful of the other best foldable phones out there) beat it to the punch, but at least the Z Fold 5 is 30 grams lighter than its chief adversary.
We wanted faster and we got it, with the 'Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Mobile Platform for Samsung', the best chip Samsung is using across all of its new top-tier phones.
On the other hand, what frustrates me are the omissions and tough, but probably necessary, design decisions. Samsung left the camera hardware from the Z Fold 4 untouched. Even that lackluster 4MP under-display camera on the main display is still there. I understand that the main camera array is an above-average collection of sensors, but they're now falling behind the competition, because that competition is primarily from the Google Pixel Fold. I don't understand why Samsung didn't just take the powerful rear camera array from the Galaxy S23 Ultra and slap it on here. Okay, okay, I probably do know. That 10x periscopic optical zoom camera would almost certainly have increased the thickness of one side of this folding handset, just as Samsung managed to slim it down.
Samsung is charging $1,799.99 / £1,749 / AU$2,599 for the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and will tout its ability to work with the custom (and now thinner) S Pen, but the pen is not included in that substantial price. That, as far as I'm concerned, is a mistake.
Finally, as much as I love the flexible 7.6-inch display and appreciated the widening of the cover screen with the Galaxy Z Fold 4, I'm realizing that the narrow 6.2-inch display on the Galaxy Z Fold 5 is insufficient for real-world productivity. Again, I came to this realization after using the Google Pixel Fold's much wider-aspect ratio 5.8-inch cover display. Samsung considered making the Z Fold 5 wider but ultimately did nothing to the screen aspect ratio or display technology between generations.
I don't discount this screen as a camera viewfinder, a content browser, and social media reader, but typing on it is not good. The keys are too cramped and I often mistyped. Worse, in some apps the keyboard sits right on top of the on-screen home button, and more than once I popped out of an app because I hit that instead of a key.
Despite all this, I'm still a Galaxy Z Fold 5 fan. It is fun to hold and use, takes nice, if over-vibrant photos, and is about as peppy as a handset can get. If this is your first Fold, it's a winning choice; if you already own a Galaxy Z Fold 4, hold onto it and wait for the Z Fold 6.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Price and availability
Starts at $1,799.99 / £1,749 / AU$2,599
No price increase in the US
Shame the price doesn't include the compatible S Pen
A narrow smartphone and mini tablet for the price of one device
At $1,799.99 / £1,749 / AU$2,599, the Galaxy Z Fold 5 is among the most expensive smartphones on the market. Even a 1TB iPhone 14 Pro Max will cost you less at $1,599 / £1,740 / AU$2,769. But then that's just one phone with one excellent screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 5 is a two-in-one device, with a lovely 6.2-inch screen on the outside and a precision-engineered 7.6-inch flexible screen on the inside. If that doesn't scream "premium" to you, then maybe its five cameras will convince you.
If that US price sounds familiar to US readers, it's because it's the same as last year, and that's good news. This is not the exact same phone; it's flatter and faster. It's essentially a free upgrade.
It's a shame that Samsung can't manage to bundle the compatible S Pen into that price though. It's a lot of fun to use on the Z Fold 5's main display and elevates the utility, so why not show people what they're missing by making it part of the price?
In any case, those prices will ultimately be only a suggestion; there are deals and trade-ins that cut the price by as much as half. Essentially, no one should be paying full price for this smartphone.
Value score: 4 / 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Design
Thinner and noticeably lighter
No gap, folds flat
Quality materials
A good size mini-tablet when open but too narrow a phone when closed
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 design has all the earmarks of an iterative update. At a glance, it looks quite similar to the Galaxy Z Fold 4 but there are important and, to my mind, welcome differences.
This is a much lighter phone, dropping roughly 11 grams over the previous model. It's also (at 252 grams) 30 grams lighter than the hefty but excellent Google Pixel Fold (282 grams). More importantly, the polished aluminum and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (reportedly 25% strong than the Fold 4's Victus Plus) glass-covered frame now folds flat. That, in combination with the millimeter of thickness Samsung carved off the body gives you – when folded – a much thinner and lighter device. It is a pleasure to hold.
To make the tighter fold possible, Samsung reengineered the hinge and how the flexible display is curved inside it when you close the phone. The hinge mechanism's sweeping technology introduced a few years ago to keep out dust and crumbs is still there, though.
That new hinge appears to have made the flexible display crease ever-so-slightly less noticeable. You can still see and feel it but I'd swear it's a bit less pronounced.
Button and port placement are mostly the same. There are speaker grills on the top and bottom edge of the phone that are slightly smaller than they were on the Z Fold 4, and a USB-C port on the bottom next to a microphone port. On the top are a pair of microphones and one air vent. There's a physical SIM slot on the left edge (if the handset is open with the Main screen facing you), and power/fingerprint reader and volume rocker buttons on the right.
The fingerprint reader, by the way, is one of a pair of effective biometric security options. You can register your face to unlock or use the fingerprint reader. I had no trouble registering a digit and my face to unlock the phone.
Image 1 of 6
Image 2 of 6
Image 3 of 6
Image 4 of 6
Image 5 of 6
Image 6 of 6
Even though the cameras – all five of them – are unchanged in terms of hardware from the Z Fold 4, there is a subtle visual tweak to the rear camera array. It looks like Samsung shaved off some metal from the aluminum island surrounding the three rear lenses. In addition, they've moved the LED flash out of the island and placed it next to the lens array.
Otherwise, everything is the same. I liked the last design and appreciated that Samsung managed to make the cover screen slightly wider without enlarging the phone chassis, compared to the Fold 3. But that was before I used the Google Pixel Fold. Even though Google also has a 7.6-inch flexible main screen, when opened flat, it's wider than it is tall. As a result, the Pixel Fold's 5.8-inch cover screen adopts a far more squat aspect ratio compared to the Fold's, which is is arguably far more functional and better suited to modern smartphone apps and interface design.
However, when I open up the Z Fold 5, I quickly notice the edge-to-edge screen. It seems larger than what I find on the Pixel Fold, where Google chose to leave a significant bezel to accommodate its internal front-facing camera. Samsung's main camera is craftily hidden underneath the main folding display and only appears as a cut-out when you use it.
Samsung's overall flexible screen protection appears better thought out than Google's. On the Pixel, there's a noticeable space between the protective cover and the flat, black plastic edge surrounding the flexible display. Samsung keeps that dust-catcher tighter and also includes a raised black plastic edge around the screen, plus a couple of rubber bumpers to prevent you from slamming the phone shut and damaging the display.
As for the hinge function, it's smooth and solid. I opened and closed the phone hundreds of times and it felt just as sure at the start as it does now, while I write this review. This is a well-built Android phone. In fact, having seen how Samsung builds its Galaxy products first-hand, I can say they are meticulous and do not suffer imperfections gladly.
From an aesthetic perspective, this is an attractive device, no question; the polished color-matched frame evoking the clasp of a designer handbag or briefcase. I have the Icy Blue colorway (my favorite and the signature finish of the Fold 5) but you can also get it in Phantom Black, Cream (from Samsung.com only), Gray, and Blue. When it's folded closed, you're looking at sandwiched, polished aluminum, colored glass on the rear, and a tall cover screen. It feels solid but not overbearing and fits neatly in almost any pocket, despite the addition thickness over a conventional candy bar smartphone.
It's also one of the more durable foldables, with its IPX8-certification meaning taking a drop in water for 30 minutes isn't a death sentence. But that's just for fresh water and not beach-side salt water. It's also not particularly dust resistant, so if you do take it to the beach, try not to drop it in the sand, those moving parts won't appreciate that.
While I didn't fully submerge the phone, I did subject my Galaxy Z Fold 5 to the faucet. I dried it off and found it completely unharmed.
Design score: 4 / 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Sustainability
Small bits and pieces of the Z Fold 5 are made of recycled and recovered ocean plastic (even the box is largely recycled), and the glass includes some recycled material too. This is all part of Samsung's sustainability drive.
It's good to know, but until one of Samsung's phones is 50% or more recycled, it probably won't move the needle. To be fair, Samsung is doing as much as, and maybe more than, many competitors, but no one has yet figured out how to make an entire device out of 45 recycled tin cans and a few plastic bottles.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Displays
If you liked the Z Fold 4's displays, you'll like these
No change to the resolution, refresh rate or screen size
Removal of gap may have lessened the severity of the crease
Wide variable refresh rate on primary screen. Cover screen slightly more limited
Once you get past the flatter fold and slightly trimmer body, you're confronted with two Dynamic AMOLED 2X displays, that haven't changed since the last Z Fold.
On the outside is the 6.2-inch AMOLED (2316 x 904) display, which features a punch-hole selfie camera. It's sharp, bright, and responsive. Like its predecessor, this cover screen offers a variable refresh rate of 48-120Hz. The listed screen size can be a bit misleading. Yes, it measures 6.2 inches diagonally, which is more than the 6.12-inch display on my iPhone 14 Pro, but this is a narrow display. Both the Pixel Fold and my iPhone 14 Pro are considerably (nearly half an inch) wider.
The benefit of the narrow cover screen is that despite this phone being twice as thick (when folded) as your average iPhone, it is still comfortable to hold. The problem, though is that it often feels cramped in use when compared to standard smartphones and, in particular, the spacious Google Pixel Fold cover screen.
It's not that I truly dislike the Z Fold 5's cover screen, but the Pixel Fold showed me what's possible and now I can't live with thumb typing on the too-narrow display. And this matters because as much as this is a dual-screen device with ample potential for productivity, I spent a lot of time on the go with it folded closed. The cover screen must be just as usable as the main screen – as it is on the Pixel Fold – and it simply isn't, not by comparison.
All that said, this is a good display for scrolling through websites, checking email, and scanning social media.
Unfold the phone and you're presented with a lovely 7.6-inch mini tablet display. It has all the right specs and resolution: a Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a 2176 x 1812 resolution (374ppi) and 1-120Hz adaptive refresh rate. You will notice the flexible screen crease (even if it seems slightly less pronounced), but I promise that when you're using the display to play games, watch Netflix, take photos (with it serving as your big-screen viewfinder), and manage multiple apps at once, you won't notice it.
This screen is more than equal to that of the Pixel Fold, even though it has a slightly lower resolution and pixel density (the Pixel Fold sports a 2208x1840 OLED at 380ppi). I prefer the way the Z Fold 5's screen reaches from edge to edge and how, instead of using a thicker bezel for the internal front-facing camera, Samsung keeps it hidden under a small collection of pixels that it can turn off when in use. Why Samsung kept that 4MP camera instead of upgrading to a higher resolution sensor (as what you'll find on the Pixel Fold) is beyond me, but at least the 7.6-inch flexible display is top-notch.
I often used the primary screen outside and found that the display's claimed 1,750nit peak brightness (our lab tests reached 1,350nits in HDR mode) were more than capable of beating back direct sunlight.
Obviously, both of the phone's displays are touchscreens but the folding display has the added benefit of supporting pen input with Samsung's S Pen stylus. Since the phone doesn't ship with one, Samsung supplied the new $99 / £99 Galaxy Z Fold 5 Slim S Pen case, which, itself, is a pretty nifty piece of engineering. There's a little S Pen release that sits just above the stylus. To release it, I simply press the button down and the S Pen pops out of the case.
Image 1 of 3
Image 2 of 3
Image 3 of 3
If I'm being honest, this latest S Pen is a little too thin for my tastes. That said, I did enjoy using it on the main display. It's great for quick note-taking and even drawing with apps like Sketchbook. If you're thinking about buying a case for your new Z Fold 5, I don't think there's a better choice than one that includes this pen.
Overall, everything looks good on the big primary display. It's perfect for watching videos on the train and just right for my Asphalt 9: Legends obsession. It's also versatile, thanks to its flexibility.
A tablet-sized screen means multi-tasking is on the menu. I had no trouble opening up to three apps by dragging and dropping them into position. In the center of my triad of apps is an ellipses I can tap to rotate the apps through the three positions. You might wish you could open more apps at once, but for readability and utility, I think three is enough. It's also easy to drag and drop things between these two screens. In this instance, it makes sense to have one app on one side and another on the other (say, mail on the left and images you want to drop in on the right).
Soon after I got my review unit from Samsung, I decided to walk from a restaurant back to my hotel in Seoul with only the Galaxy Z Fold 5 to guide me. I unfolded the phone, opened Google Maps on the 7.6-inch display, and then search for my hotel. Maps found it and could locate me and my direction of travel with a little blue dot. That was helpful because Maps couldn't generate walking directions in South Korea. But all I had to do was walk and keep my eye on my blue dot on the big screen. In 15 minutes, I was back in my hotel room.
If I fold the screen 90 degrees, I can set the phone on the table and watch movies on one half of the display, scroll through my photos and videos, or use it in Flex Mode to take photos by simply waving at the screen. The Z Fold 5 also acts as its own tripod. I would place it on a chair, table, or other surface and point the rear cameras at my subject (people, the sky, the stars) and then use the on-screen controls to take the photo either immediately, or if I didn't want to risk moving the phone, on a timer. This is great for capturing hyperlapses of stars moving across the night sky and crowds of people walking by.
Unlike the Pixel Fold, there's no "Tent Mode" here that would allow you to partially unfold the handset and play content horizontally on Cover screen. Considering how narrow that display is, this probably makes sense.
Samsung should've upgraded the 4MP under-display camera
While it's unusual for a phone manufacturer like Samsung to leave an entire collection of cameras untouched from one model to the next, I understand the strategy with the Z Fold 5. Not many people have foldable phones or bought the Z Fold 4. Look around, do you see many people on the train or in the park with them? Exactly.
Samsung rightly believes the Galaxy Z Fold 5 (or its sexier counterpart the Galaxy Z Flip 5) may be consumers' first encounter with foldable phones. The camera collection (with one exception) on the Z Fold 4 was quite good. It's unlikely you will be dissatisfied with what Samsung has on offer here.
Naturally, there is a risk here, in that foldable phone choices are growing by the minute. Since I last reviewed the Z Fold 4, Google released the Pixel Fold and it does, in some ways, beat the Z Fold 5's camera capabilities, and don't even get me started on the wealth of foldable options available to consumers in the UK and Europe (entries from Oppo, Honor and Huawei all spring to mind).
In particular, Google beats Samsung on optical zoom, offering 5x over Samsung's 3x magnification. Samsung will tout its impressive 30x space zoom capabilities, but photos taken with that digitally-enhanced feature don't hold up that well under close scrutiny. Plus, some of the imagery is a combination of real imagery and what AI understands of your subject. That, for me, is not real photography.
Even so, I really enjoyed using the Z Fold 5's cameras. The photos and portrait mode shots are, in some cases, breathtaking. Samsung's habit of punching up the colors works mostly in its favor. I do love a more brilliantly blue sky and even more purple flowers. Verisimilitude is, perhaps, not Samsung's strong suit but I bet everyone will love your Galaxy Z Fold 5 snaps.
Even though Samsung didn't change the sensors, they're all backed by a much more powerful chispet; the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 brings better image processing, which I saw on display in the excellent low-light night photography. Whether it was in a restaurant capturing a 20-course Korean dinner, or the beautiful Seoul skyline, the photos look quite good.
The camera is also fast, even with portrait mode shots. I took some photos of people learning to juggle and was stunned at not only how well the main 50MP camera caught the jugglers in action, but the way it also identified the balls in flight and put them in focus along with my subject.
My point is, if you have a good lens and sensor, sometimes all you need is to update the silicon for better speed and image processing.
Most of my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 photography was taken while the phone was closed, using one of the three lenses on the back and the cover screen as my viewfinder. I could open the phone up and use the main screen, but it's a bit unwieldy. For a selfie, I could use the 10MP cover display camera (recommended), the 4MP folding display camera (not recommended but it's fine for video conferencing), or the best cameras on the phone.
To do so, I unfolded the phone and selected the "Cover Preview Screen" icon in the upper right-hand corner of the camera app. This let me use the cover screen as my viewfinder, while the rear camera array was facing me. I could even have full control over all photography features by sliding the lock symbol on the cover screen to the left or right.
The reason for this is that it allows you to shoot with the phone's best camera array whether you're taking standard shots or selfies. It's a nice feature but I generally didn't like shooting with the phone unfolded because I worried I might drop it.
I also shot some video, right up to 8K 30fps, and was pleased to find that there was zero stutter during shooting or playback, though I do think the 60fps 4K video is a bit more buttery smooth on playback. Either way, you can shoot some high-quality videos with this phone. For the auteurs among us, you can shoot using Pro video mode, which gives you custom control over everything from focus point to speed and microphone (omni vs just the front or rear mics, or even an external one).
In general, Samsung's Camera app is richer than Apple's, though Samsung tends to hide a lot under the "More" menu. For manual control, you can switch to "Pro" (under More). There's also the free Samsung Expert Raw app, which lets you switch between shooting 12MP stills (combining four pixels at a time) and 50MP raw images. It also lets you control all your camera's manual settings. I still don't understand why Expert Raw isn't pre-loaded on these phones, but at least it's accessible.
Samsung generally gives you more control over camera features than Apple. Hyperlapse – an analog to Apple's Timelapse – offers six different settings and explains how you might use each one (300x is good for tracking the stars, for example).
Camera score: 4 / 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Camera samples
Image 1 of 19
Image 2 of 19
Image 3 of 19
Image 4 of 19
Image 5 of 19
Image 6 of 19
Image 7 of 19
Image 8 of 19
Image 9 of 19
Image 10 of 19
Image 11 of 19
Image 12 of 19
Image 13 of 19
Image 14 of 19
Image 15 of 19
Image 16 of 19
Image 17 of 19
Image 18 of 19
Image 19 of 19
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Performance and specs
Samsung pulls its foldables into alignment with the S23 line
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 'for Galaxy' is peppy
12GB of RAM and starts at 256GB of storage
Samsung may not have done much to the cameras or other Galaxy Z Fold 5 components, but it swapped out what matters. There's the still-fresh Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 'for Galaxy' SoC, the slightly over-clocked version of the chip now also found on the entire Galaxy S23 line. That's backed by 12GB of (LPDDR5X) RAM. In tandem they made for a smooth and effortless user experience.
By the numbers, Qualcomm's silicon beats the Tensor G2 chip in the Google Pixel Fold in single-core performance on our Geekbench 6 tests (2050 vs 1179) and on multi-core (5302 for the Z Fold 5 compared to 3759 for the Pixel Fold). On one of our OpenGL tests, which looks at graphical performance, the Z Fold 5 outperformed the Pixel Fold by nearly double. The reality, though, is that most top-tier mobile chipsets are plenty fast for virtually anything you could think to do with a smartphone. Put another way, the Z Fold 5 and Google Pixel Fold felt equally fast in most day-to-day and more intensive video and photo-editing tasks, it's long-term use where the additional overhead afforded to the Samsung stands out.
I played Call of Duty Warzone Mobile at the highest image quality and framerate, without any tearing or stuttering and raced through the streets of San Francisco with Asphalt 9: Legends. I also edited multiple 4K video streams at once in PowerDirector (I find that most mobile video editors cannot edit the 8K video). This foldable is ready for pretty much anything.
Naturally, this is a 5G phone and, where I had good coverage, I had solid connections and speedy downloads. There is support for both a physical SIM and eSIM. The Wi-Fi 6e support meant excellent office and home performance and means respectable future-proofing.
Performance score: 4.5 / 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Software
Android 13 w/ One UI 5.1.1
Much of the software feels expressly designed for a foldable
Great for multitasking
Smart use of Flex Mode
Samsung's foldable runs One UI 5.1.1 atop Android 13. It's a mostly pleasing blend of Google's core Android apps and a handful of Samsung's custom utilities, like Photos, Calendar, and Contacts. As is my habit, I mainly relied on Google tools like Chrome (the default browser in the US is Samsung's own but not everywhere), and Google Calendar.
Samsung has worked closely with Google, though, to build a foldable-friendly platform; one that can effortlessly switch from operations on the smaller cover screen to ones on the larger, flexible screen. When I used Maps in South Korea, I started with the 6.2-inch display but quickly unfolded Z Fold 5 for the more expansive main screen view.
In tablet mode, the taskbar is a perfect companion for opening apps either by tapping or dragging and dropping them into position.
Whether you're on the cover or main folding screen, there's a customizable quick slide-out tray sitting just off-screen on the righthand side. A quick sweep brings it in and you can access often-used apps or tap the grid icon to open a larger app window. It's useful but I admit to usually forgetting it exists.
Samsung hides some features under Labs in settings, because not all apps are designed for multi-app (split-screen use). Similarly, you'll have to dig for the Flex Mode panel controls that let you add on-screen controls when watching videos in Flex Mode (phone bent at around 90 degrees and set on the table). Even after you turn it on, you'll need to select the apps where it appears (it can work, apparently for everything from games to video editors). I honestly don't get the point of hiding useful features like this, even if they don't work perfectly for all apps.
Software score: 4.5 / 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: Battery life
4,400mAh battery (same as Z Fold 4)
Lasted all day
Supply your own power adapter
Samsung kept battery capacity unchanged from the Z Fold 4 to the Z Fold 5. 4,400mAh is smaller than what you'll find on the Pixel Fold, which carries a 4,727mAh battery (and 30 more grams than the Z Fold 5).
Samsung promises all-day battery life, and that's what I consistently got. Most days it was 15 hours of use or more.
The phone supports Samsung's take on 'Super Fast charging', refueling 50% in 30 minutes. In our tests, we recharged to 56% in 30 minutes using a 65W power adapter. There's no charging adapter in the box, however (just the USB-C cable), so if you want the fastest charging speeds, you'll want to pick up one of those compatible 65W or 45W adapters.
I was also able to charge on a variety of Qi wireless chargers. The phone also supports wireless PowerShare, which means – when enabled in Settings – you can place one Samsung phone on top of the other to transfer battery power from one phone to the other (or to earbuds or a supported smartwatch).
Battery score: 4 / 5
Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5?
Buy it if...
Don't buy it if...
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 review: also consider
Motorola Razr Plus The Motorola Razr Plus / Razr 40 Ultra is a major evolutionary step for smartphones, going beyond what any previous flip or foldable phone has offered.
Google Pixel Fold The Google Pixel Fold is an excellent, multidimensional handset that feels equally at home as a beefy smartphone or a pint-sized tablet, and it marries that versatility with strong performance and stellar photography. If you think of the Pixel Fold as two devices in one, the high price almost makes sense. Read our full Google Pixel Fold review
How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
I started testing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 in South Korea, taking it on company headquarters and factory tours, basically using the effective camera collection to document everything. I used it for communication with family and friends, as well as work, running Slack and email on it.
I did my best to make it my main phone throughout a week of testing.
A significant part of my testing involved content consumption (movies, websites, podcasts) and even some creation. I drew on it and edited social video.
As I mentioned above, I also used it to help keep me from getting lost in Seoul, South Korea.
I ran benchmarks, as did TechRadar's Mobile Team, and Future labs which combined for my Performance section.
The PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto graphics card marks the arrival of a true budget graphics card for this generation, and it's one the market desperately needs.
The PNY RTX 4060 Verto lacks some of the frills and razzle-dazzle of many of the best graphics cards from other third-party manufacturers – or even PNY's XLR8 Epic-X RGB branded cards – but this lightweight and downright svelte GPU is the best cheap graphics card for budget builders looking for a more compact card without sacrificing too much in terms of power.
The PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto is available now for $299/£299 (about AU$450), which is the same price as Nvidia’s MSRP. That doesn’t mean that the card doesn’t have some nice extras that the Nvidia Founders Edition (if it existed) might not have had.
Looking at the card, the actual PCB underneath the fan shroud is fairly small, which means the heat sink for the GPU actually overextends the circuit board. This allows for some improved airflow to help keep the GPU cool under load.
Pulling down just 115W, the RTX 4060 sips power judiciously, and that translates directly into better thermal performance. In terms of heat, the PNY RTX 4060 Verto typically runs about 5°C cooler than the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC Edition I tested for my Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 review back in June 2023, but given that the Asus card ran at higher clocks, you should expect it to run hotter.
Speaking of OC, the PNY RTX 4060 Verto is not an OC card, so it doesn't ship from the factory with higher base/boost clock speeds than Nvidia's reference design, but PNY’s VelocityX software tool does allow for some modest software overclocking and optimizations.
The PNY RTX 4060 Verto is a genuine dual-slot card, as opposed to the chonkier 2.5-slot Asus Dual RTX 4060 OC, making the PNY card much easier to squeeze into a case. It only requires a single 8-pin power connector, so no need to worry about adapter cables, and the card is light enough that you can almost certainly get by without needing to use a support bracket, though having one handy never hurts.
The PNY RTX 4060 Verto card has identical specs to the Nvidia reference design, which unfortunately includes 8GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 128-bit memory bus, supplemented by an expanded 24MB L2 cache. This, in theory, should allow the PNY RTX 4060 Verto to get better memory performance with a tighter bus and VRAM pool, but in practice, this isn’t really noticeable. Everyone would have been better off with 12GB VRAM or a wider memory bus (preferably both).
In terms of performance, there isn’t much difference between the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC Edition and the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto cards. The Asus card pulls ahead by about 1% - to - 2% on average thanks to its faster clock speeds, but in practice, this translates into a difference of 102 fps in a game with the Asus Dual versus 100 fps in a game with the PNY Verto.
For the most part, you can take all the performance numbers I pulled together for my RTX 4060 review and divide any given score or fps by 1.015 and you’ll pretty much land on the PNY Verto’s performance numbers (without using PNY VelocityX software overclocking), give or take a few points on either end.
This means that like the Asus Dual RTX 4060, the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto does just OK at 1440p (the best 1440p graphics card, this is not) and absolutely tanks when attempting serious 4K gaming with ray tracing turned on (even with DLSS 3). No, this is strictly a 1080p graphics card, but for what it sets out to do, it does better than any other 1080p GPU at this price.
Where the PNY RTX 4060 Verto has the advantage over the Asus Dual though is twofold. First, in terms of thermals, the better airflow over the heat sink really makes a difference here. While the Asus Dual maxed out at about 70°C, with a minimum of 54°C, the PNY RTX 4060 Verto topped out at around 65°C with a lower minimum of 47°C.
In terms of power draw, the PNY RTX 4060 Verto never drew more than 116.285W, while the Asus Dual RTX 4060 pulled in a maximum of 120.498W. Certainly not the biggest difference, and you’re not likely to notice it unless you’re looking through HWiNFO64 data on GPU temperatures and power draw.
Ultimately, the appeal of the PNY RTX 4060 Verto is its tight form factor and lightweight design, helped out by its low power draw and better heat dissipation. The problems with the RTX 4060 Verto are actually problems with the RTX 4060 itself, namely the tighter memory bus and VRAM pool, so there’s really nothing that PNY can do about that.
If you absolutely must have control over fan and GPU clock speeds and the like, you can do that to an extent through VelocityX, but, in the end, this is the budgeteer’s RTX 4060, and of the RTX 4060s I’ve seen thus far, the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto is arguably the best 1080p graphics card you’re going to find at this price.
PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto: Price & availability
How much does it cost? $299/£299 (about AU$450)
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia
The PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto is available now for $299/£299 (about AU$450) through PNY’s website in the US, as well as other US retailers, and with various retailers in the UK and Australia. Since the card isn’t available directly from PNY in those regions, the price you’ll pay for the PNY RTX 4060 Verto will vary by ±10% of these base prices.
PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto: Specs
Should you buy the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto?
Buy it if...
You want one of the best 1080p graphics cards around While this card won't be great for 1440p or 4K gaming, it's fantastic for 1080p, which is where a lot of gamers are and will likely remain for some time.
You’re not worried about fancy RGB or overclocking While this card can look a bit spartan, for many out there, that is exactly what they want.
Don't buy it if...
You plan on playing a lot of 1440p or 4K games
Some 1440p games you'll be able to sneak past this card's 8GB VRAM (especially with DLSS 3 and Frame Generation), but Cyberpunk 2077 absolutely wrecks this card at 4K.
You want a graphics card with some flash to it This card is all business. If you're looking for something that will be a showpiece for a case, look elsewhere. This card is a workhorse, not a showhorse.
PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto: Also consider
How I tested the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto
I spent about a week and a half testing the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto
I tested it using our standard benchmarking tools
I used the card to play PC games and produce creative content
Test system specs
This is the system we used to test the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU Cooler: Cougar Poseidon GT 360 AIO RAM: 32GB G.Skillz Trident Neo Z5 DDR5-6600MHz Motherboard: Asus Prime X670E Pro Wifi SSD: Samsung 990 Pro 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD Power Supply: Corsair AX1000 Case: Praxis Wetbench
I spent about a week and a half with the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto on a dedicated basis, using it as my primary GPU for both work and PC gaming at home.
I also used it to produce a lot of creative content, mostly through Photoshop, as well as running our standard benchmark suite. I did not test the PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto as extensively as I would have if I had not already tested an RTX 4060 and collected its performance data. But I tested the PNY RTX 4060 Verto enough to confirm that its performance was in line with the RTX 4060 performance data I already had on hand.
I’ve been a tech journalist for several years now and a PC gamer for even longer, so I know how gaming hardware should perform for the price you’re paying for it, and I continuously test gaming hardware to make sure that my numbers are validated and up to date with any driver updates and changes.
We pride ourselves on our independence and our rigorous review-testing process, offering up long-term attention to the products we review and making sure our reviews are updated and maintained - regardless of when a device was released. If you can still buy it, it's on our radar.