Organizer
Gadget news
Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler review: an affordable Dyson Airwrap dupe
4:00 pm | August 15, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Hair Care Home Small Appliances | Comments: Off

Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler two-minute review

The Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Hair Multi-styler is a Dyson Airwrap dupe that’s easy to use and doesn’t weigh heavy on your arm. This will be welcome news to those whose hair features kinks or coils; when your hair is dense, the quicker the blow-dry, the better.

The styler has a sleek look and a thin wand – a popular form factor right now among the best hair dryers – but at a fraction of the price of some of its competitors (the Sharper Image costs $269 vs the Dyson Airwrap’s $499). It has six attachments, including brushes and a detangler for drying, smoothing, and adding body. While barrel brushes aren’t ideal for blowing out coarser hair, the paddle-style brush is perfect for blow-drying and smoothing textured hair. For anyone who’s broken a comb, the detangler is quite sturdy and ready to go on a journey with you. As for the curling attachments, someone with Type 4 hair can volumize fine locks or even give yourself a “bump,” no matter the length - and that’s no easy feat for a more affordable Dyson Airwrap dupe

Using a vortex or “Coanda technology” to wrap and circulate the air through your hair, the Sharper Image Revel dries hair at a pretty quiet 73.8dB. My husband could not hear me using it from downstairs.

All of the attachments are easy to use, and you simply twist the top of the detangler to extend the comb. Note that those with curly hair may still need a separate blow dryer for diffusing, since this styler doesn’t come with one. However, on a low heat setting, you may be able to stretch out your curls somewhat.

In fact, if you’re looking to stretch hair or do a silk press at home with less heat damage, the 6-in-1 styler is a solid choice without the hefty price tag.

Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler specs

Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler review: price & availability

  • Price: $269.99
  • Availability: US only

The Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 can be purchased at Sharper Image stores, and on sites such as Amazon, Walmart, and QVC at an MSRP $269.99. 

Value-wise, the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 comes in at almost half the price of the Dyson Airwrap – the gold standard for multi-stylers – while still offering great performance across a variety of hair types. Also if you shop around you may well be able to get it even cheaper; at the time of writing it's available for just $198 at Amazon and also at Walmart.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler review: design

  • Comfortable to hold
  • Three heat and power settings
  • Surprisingly long

Overall, the Sharper Image Revel styler looks like a curling iron in receipt of a makeover to bring it up to date. An all-rubberized cylinder means you can hold it wherever it’s most comfortable for you. It offers three adjustable heat and power settings, as well as a cold shot. Much like the original Dyson Airwrap, the airflow curlers have a left and right-side option; you have to switch the barrel to change the direction of your curls.

The Revel arrives with six attachments: an airflow curler, hair dryer and detangler, volumizing brush, smoothing brush, and styling brush. Overall, even with the largest attachment, the styler weighs only 1.6lbs – which is wonderfully lightweight and less than the blow dryer that I typically use to diffuse and stretch my hair every so often.

Sharper Image Revel Box

(Image credit: Sharper Image)

At 17.9 inches, the Sharper Image Revel is quite long, but this also makes it well suited to longer hair. Adding the attachments is simple: twist in place, and remove by pushing the button on the back. At the top, you’ll find the on/off and cold shot buttons. At the end of the handle you’ll find an easy-to-read heat symbol and fan symbol to control speed and temperature.

The power cord is extremely long, which is pretty convenient for styling but awkward for storing the tool away.

  • Design score: 4.5 out of 5

Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler review: performance

  • Reasonably fast drying
  • Practice required for best results

I tested the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler on my medium-length, fine Type 4c hair. Before I got started, I divided my hair into four sections and applied a heat protectant. Once I completed styling, I applied a finishing spray. I wasn’t trying to achieve a silk press look, but if I were, I’d need a hair spray that would provide shine and frizziness. Also, it would likely take some practice with the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 to achieve hair that looks like you’ve just stepped out of a blow-dry bar.

I was able to dry my entire head in about 25 minutes, which may seem quite lengthy; but when you consider that it usually takes over an hour to dry and flat-iron my hair, the Sharper Image Revel made good time. Note, though, that my 4c hair is fine, which means it could take someone with more dense, thicker hair longer. Also, my hair did become poofy the second I walked out into the humidity, but on a positive note, the next time I washed and dried my hair, I didn’t notice any heat damage.

The benefit of using a blow dryer and styling system together is that your hair doesn’t have to be 100% dry for you to start to style it. Blow dry it enough to smooth it, then you can allow your hair to dry into a cute spiral or wave. However, I’d advise being gentle with hair to avoid causing damage to your natural curls. I say that as someone who tried to drag the detangler tool through hair without starting with a wide-tooth comb.

Inevitably, I had to take a step back and take my time working my way from the end up to the roots to prepare it for drying. Ultimately I used the detangler attachment as my last step, instead of my first step for detangling, and I will note that it was refreshing that the teeth of the detangler didn’t break like the teeth of many blow dryers and combs I’ve tried in the past.

Attachments for Sharper Image Revel 6-In-1 Hair Dryer & Multi-Styler

(Image credit: Sharper Image)

The success you have with the Sharper Image Revel’s two curling barrels will depend on how straight you’ve managed to get your hair; otherwise, you risk getting them becoming stuck in your hair!

Overall, the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 is a quality product that can save you much time. Styling Type 4 hair of any length can take hours, so any tools that can at least cut down drying time will help. As far as achieving a “straight” look with the Sharper Image Revel, depending on your hair type, one may have to slightly lower their expectations in terms of owning just a single tool that can do it all.

  • Performance score: 4 out of 5

Should you buy the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler?

Buy it if...

You’re looking for flexible styling options without a time commitment

With the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1, stretching hair or giving yourself a blowout doesn’t need to take hours.

You’re just looking to stretch your hair

The Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 is a great stretching tool, offering a lightweight form factor and effective results.

You want a cost-effective multi-styler

At almost half the price of Dyson’s Airwrap, the Revel 6-in-1 offers great value for money.

Don’t buy it if...

You strictly diffuse hair or only blowout hair yearly

The Revel 6-in-1 doesn’t come with a diffuser, so if you regularly or exclusively diffuse hair, it isn’t for you.

You strictly wear braids 

If you only ever have braids or other protective styles, you won’t get much use out of this. Similarly, don’t buy if you strictly get silk presses or blowouts at the salon.

How I tested the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 Multi-Styler

  • I used the Revel for several months on medium-length, fine Type 4c hair
  • I started on freshly washed, detangled hair and removed excess water
  • I separated hair into sections and used a heat protectant spray

I tested the Sharper Image Revel 6-in-1 on my medium-length, fine Type 4c hair for several months, stretching and blow drying hair as I normally would

Having washed and detangled hair, I used a cotton t-shirt to remove excess moisture before sectioning hair and spraying it with heat protectant spray before drying and styling. I used my old faithful blow dryer as a reference point for comparing drying speed and performance.

I’ve been writing about health, wellness and beauty for years, and during that time I’ve tried a variety of products that help to inform my assessment of the performance, design and value of different devices.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed August 2024.

Gtech AirRam 3 cordless upright vacuum cleaner review
9:00 am | August 9, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances Vacuums | Comments: Off

Gtech AirRam 3: two-minute review

Based on the concept of the old fashioned push-and-pull carpet sweeper – you know, like the one your grandma used to have – the Gtech AirRam 3 adopts the same upright design principles of its predecessors but adds a lot more suction power and a revolutionary pair of spinning side brushes that collect every last speck of dust along skirting boards and in the tightest of corners. To my knowledge, there's nothing else like this on the market. While it won't be for everyone, to me it's pretty much the best cordless vacuum around.

I've always been a fan of Gtech's AirRam concept, and for several reasons. First and foremost, all the weight is at ground level and this low center of gravity makes it easy to use for much longer periods than your average stick vac, which has all the weight in the handle area. Secondly, it stands up on its own on a charging plinth, so it's a breeze to just grab and use when the need arises. And thirdly, it has one of the best bin-emptying systems in the business.

It's a pared-back option. There's only one suction mode, although that setting proved very effective, performing well on both hard floors and carpet, and acing all the cleaning tasks I put to it. There's no option to add detail cleaning tools, and you can't turn it into a handheld, either. That doesn't bother me, but might be a downside for someone looking for a vacuum with more versatility. The Gtech AirRam 3 is designed to do one thing – clean your floor – and do it well. 

If you're fed up with grappling with an ungainly stick vac, are perhaps not quite as strong and spritely as you used to be, or have had enough of picking clumps of hair out of a stick vac bin, this svelte and very aesthetically pleasing upright vacuum may revolutionize your carpet and hard floor sweeping days and put a big smile on your face. Read on for my full Gtech AirRam 3 review.

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner in reviewer's home

(Image credit: Future)

Gtech AirRam 3 review: price & availability

  • List price: $449.99 / £399.99 
  • Launched: July 2024 
  • Available: US and UK

If you're shopping in the UK, you can buy the AirRam 3 direct from Gtech, priced at £399.99. It's also now becoming available at third-party retailers like Amazon, Argos and Lakeland. Gtech products aren't widely available in the US but this model is on sale at Amazon, priced $449.99.

At that price, the AirRam 3 sits at the top of TechRadar's mid-range price bracket, moving towards premium. There are plenty of cheap vacuums around for less, and it's pricier than your average Shark or lower-specced Tineco. However, the Gtech AirRAM 3’s build quality and use of high-end materials justify its price to some degree. And although it doesn’t come with any tool attachments, the practicality and convenience of having an upright vac that can be grabbed and used at a moment's notice should not be underestimated.

Shopping events like the Black Friday sales can often be a good time to shop for deals on vacuum cleaners, as well as other home appliances. 

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Gtech AirRam 3 specs

Gtech AirRam 3 review: design

  • Height-adjustable handle
  • Practical upright design with weight low to the ground
  • Spinning edge brushes

It's always a pleasure when you come across a product that trounces much of the opposition by dint of some simple but clever tech and a smorgasbord of sensational design flourishes. That's the Gtech AirRam 3 in a nutshell.

I'm personally a fan of Gtech products in general and have been impressed by all the UK company's previous AirRams, as well as its nifty ProLite handheld vac. Clearly modeled to some degree on the old fashioned mechanical push-and-pull floor sweeper that, believe it or not, some manufacturers still produce, the new Gtech AirRam 3 is a one-of-a-kind cordless vacuum cleaner that stands alone amidst a sea of stick vacs. And yet, when it comes to the nitty gritty of sweeping a floor – whether it's hard or carpeted – it's more than a match for the majority of the competition. 

Close up of floorhead on Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

Most of this vacuum's weight is concentrated close to the ground (Image credit: Future)

One of the very best things about this vac is that its motor housing, battery and bagless dustbin are all located at floor level. Since pretty much all stick vacs, bar the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro, have all their operational bits stacked around the handle, adding a whopping amount of weight and awkward discomfort, it's a wonderful thing to be able to perform the unenviable task of vacuuming without one's arm falling off after 10 minutes on the pile. Moreover, because this model's tangle-free brush bar is set close to the floor, its rotating action actually helps pull the unit in a forward direction.

The AirRam 3's push handle is stupendously comfy and, in a nod to the automotive industry, stitched in faux leather, just like a steering wheel. A similar faux leather-covered carrying handle can be found several inches below. The main shaft, too, is well thought out and perfect for all heights of user, because it can be extended from an eminently storable 85cm right up to 113cm. 

The first part of the extension takes the handle to 104cm, but then it can be extended by just under a centimeter at a time until  it reaches its fullest height. If you were looking to get your kids doing some household chores, this is the model for you. 

Handle on Gtech AirRam 3

The handle extends from 85cm up to 113cm (Image credit: Future)

Admittedly, one of the not so great things about previous AirRam incarnations was their relative inability to steer around tight corners. While the new model can't beat the Dyson V15 Detect for dragonfly-like maneuverability, it's loads better than before and no worse than the majority of stick vacs I've reviewed. 

Moreover, the shaft can be lowered to the floor to reach under any furniture that's more than 10cm above the ground. (Those looking for ultimate comfort in getting under furniture though, should consider a Shark – many of the best Shark vacuums have a wand that can bend forwards to 90-degrees, so you can reach the back of the sofa with the floorhead while standing basically upright.)

The Gtech AirRam 3 doesn't have any suction power controls or fancy dirt-detecting sensors (as per like the likes of the Dyson V15 Detect or Samsung Bespoke Jet AI). Instead, you get one full-blown level of suction, which is just the right level of power so as not to cause the floorhead to feel too resistant when used on deeper carpet. I like this simplicity, but others may prefer to have a little more control. It can be useful, sometimes, to have the option to go for a lower-powered mode that won't sap battery for light cleaning, or a boost mode to dislodge ground-in dirt.

Side view of floorhead on Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

Rotating brushes help tackle the edges of rooms (Image credit: Future)

Before looking at the business end of this model, I should add that you don't get any detail tools whatsoever with this vac and no means to fit any. Again, that's something I consider a bonus because I personally hardly ever use hand tools and, besides, I've never been a fan of products that come with a whole bunch of bolt-on accessories that I know I'll lose or never use. 

If you want to do any detail cleaning, like shelves and down the side of the sofa, most of today's best vacuum cleaners come with some kind tools included, or at least compatible to buy, so you have plenty of other options. Alternatively, you could tackle those tasks with a handheld vacuum, like the Shark Classic Handheld Pet Vacuum (called the UltraCyclone Pet Pro Cordless in the US). 

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner standing on its own

The foot-operated on-off switch (above left wheel) and black battery in the centre (Image credit: Future)

Let’s look at the base of the unit, which contains the brush head, motor, bagless dustbin, battery housing and foot-operated on/off switch. Gtech doesn't advertise any power stats on its website but take it from me that the AirRAM 3's motor is plenty powerful enough for all household cleaning scenarios. And since there are no fancy cyclonic systems between the suction intake and the 0.8-litre bagless dustbin, all dust and debris is sucked directly into the bin, bypassing any elongated routes and extra filters.

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

The dust bin sits in the top of the floorhead (Image credit: Future)

I admit that 0.8 liters doesn't sound like a lot of bin space but, on the plus side, the AirRam 3's suction force does an amazing job of compressing all dust, hair and debris into a tight bundle. Which leads me to one of the best things about the entire AirRam range – their simple but effective bin-emptying systems. 

Many stick vacs occasionally require some finger work to extricate trapped clumps of hair from the bin, but the AirRam 3's dust container is equipped with a sliding latch that automatically opens the end of the unit. To empty, simply grab the leatherette handle on the dust container and pull it off the unit, then slide the latch from one side to the other and everything is ejected in one go. The filter system, too, is a stroke of genius because it is kept clean with regular blasts of air. And anyone who has ever owned a normal bagless stick vac will know how often their filters need to be cleaned and rinsed.

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

A slider on the dustbin sweeps all the debris out in one swift motion (Image credit: Future)

Heading beneath the floor head you'll find a 23cm bristle brush bar with Anti Hair-wrap comb for tangle-free use. This brush does a sterling job of sweeping hard floors and digging down into even the deepest of pile without bogging down. For those darker recesses of the home, this model is equipped with a row of very bright LED headlights.

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

Headlights help illuminate dirt in dingy areas (Image credit: Future)

That's not all – Gtech's R&D department has almost certainly looked at robot vacs and particularly their spinning side brushes that normally do a great job of collecting dust along skirting boards and in corners. As a consequence, this vac comes with two spinning side brushes – one on either side of the front corners – and they work wonders at removing every last speck from the edges and corners of a room. Why no-one thought of adding spinning side brushes before is frankly dumbfounding but you can be sure other manufacturers will gradually follow suit. 

  • Design score: 4.5 out of 5

Gtech AirRam 3 review: performance

  • Excellent cleaning performance
  • Lightweight to use
  • Extremely practical

I've been extremely impressed by this vacuum cleaner's performance on both hard floors and carpet. But then that's been the case with pretty much every iteration in Gtech's AirRam range.

Before I get down to the results of the AirRam 3's sweeping performance, I must reiterate some of the main reasons why many users might prefer this type of model over a conventional stick vac. Because it stands up on its own, there's no need to hunt around for somewhere to rest it while you move pieces of furniture around. In a race from storage area to vacuuming a space, I guarantee that this model would win hands-down. 

Image 1 of 2

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

Before the flour / biscuit crumb test on carpet (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

After the flour / biscuit crumb test on carpet (Image credit: Future)

There's no wrestling with suction tubes and ungainly motor housings; instead, you just grab it using the handle or wheel it to its place of work. And the fact the weight is concentrated at floor level makes a huge difference to how easy it is to push about.

Granted, while the nature of the spinning floor head helps draw the AirRam 3 across hard floors under its own power (Gtech calls it 'Forward Inertia Drive'), it does add some resistance to reverse passes when used on medium to deep pile carpet. But not to the extent that it requires any more energy than your standard stick vac.

Using TechRadar's usual method of assessment, I performed a series of separate tests using flour, crushed digestive biscuits and raw porridge oats. I also added my own cornflake test because, well, some vacs simply don't like them.

Image 1 of 3

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

The flour / biscuit crumb test on hard floors (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

During the flour / crumbs test on hard floor (Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

The oat test on hard floors (Image credit: Future)

Tests one and two involved flour/crumbs and oats on both hard floor and carpet and I'm pleased to say there was absolutely no snow ploughing of ingredients on either flooring – the AirRam 3 dutifully collected everything in a couple of passes, including flour caught between the floorboard's cracks. However, as expected, the spinning side brushes did scatter some pieces to the left and right and this added a little bit of extra work. 

Nevertheless, I don't consider this a strike against it because, in my skirting board test, the side brushes collected up every last crumb (albeit after a couple of sweeps), and they really proved themselves when cleaning the edge of my inherited beige hall carpet, which was looking grubby with dust and pet hair before the AirRam 3 came to the rescue.

Crunchy nut Cornflakes on a hard floor, being vacuumed up by the Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner sucking up frosted corn flakes on a hard wood floor

The AirRam 3 sucked up this notoriously hard-to-vacuum cereal with ease (Image credit: Future)

I then brought the average stick vacs' arch nemesis into the hard floor arena – Crunchy Nut cornflakes (a kind of frosted breakfast cereal, for those not in the know) – and this proved quite amusing because, as I was fiddling with my camera, I accidentally nudged the vac forward a few inches and everything simply disappeared. This flummoxed me because there's a soft rubber flap at the very front of the suction area and I was pretty sure it would cause the vac to snowplough such large, obstreperous ingredients. Of all the vacuum cleaners I've tested, I can't ever remember having had such a successful cornflake test on hard flooring. So I'm giving Gtech a free tag line – ‘Gtech AirRam 3: the best Crunchy Nut sucker in the business!'.

Gtech AirRam 3 vacuum cleaner

The side brushes seem clearly inspired by robot vacuums (Image credit: Future)

Although this vac's sound levels average out at an acceptable 71.3dB at ear level, the higher frequency of its motor makes it sound very shrill. However, I did get used to the noise fairly quickly.

Final thoughts? Aside from some flinging of detritus by the spinning side brushes, I am struggling to find anything truly negative to say about this vac. It collects pet hair like a maestro, doesn't snag on the edges of rugs or bog down in deep pile carpet, and I love the bin-emptying method and filter system that requires no maintenance. I also don't mind the fact that this vac doesn't feature any hand tools because I'm lucky enough to own a Dyson Gen5 Detect and Halo Capsule X. However, I can see how the lack of hand tools may sway some prospective owners towards a standard stick vac.

  • Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Gtech AirRam 3 review: battery

  • Maximum runtime of 30 minutes
  • Charging takes 3 hours
  • Batteries can be swapped

Unlike its predecessors, which required removing their batteries for recharging, this model comes with a slim, unobtrusive docking strip that charges the battery on the unit. It works splendidly well. 

Depending on the power setting, most cordless stick vacs have an operating time of between 15 and 60 minutes. This one carries on cleaning for a shade under 30 minutes which equates to a very decent amount of floorspace. Half an hour is actually about average for a vacuum's 'middle' setting, but competitor models have the benefit of a lower-suction mode that lasts longer. 

The battery, which can be removed, takes about three hours to fully charge. When available, expect to pay around £70 for an extra battery.

  • Battery life score: 4 out of 5

Should you buy the Gtech AirRam 3?

Buy it if…

You want a vac that doesn't make your arm ache
The AirRam 3's low center of gravity makes it less fatiguing to use than most top-heavy stick vacuums, and the cleaning motion helps propel the floorhead forwards, too.

You want deep cleaning of carpets and rugs
This vac performs superbly well, even on deep pile carpet, even with its one-speed option. 

You want genuine to-the-edge cleaning
Spinning side brushes, borrowed from robovacs, ensure proper, thorough edge cleaning. This is the only cordless manual vacuum we've seen to employ this feature.

Don't buy it if…

You need to vacuum shelves and sofas
You get no detail tools with this model, nor is there any you could add if you wanted to, plus it can't convert into a handheld vacuum. So if you need something for getting into furniture or cleaning the car, look elsewhere. 

You want maximum maneuverability
While its steering is flexible, it's still no match for a Dyson's 360-degree pivoting floorheads. And while it can get pretty low to the ground, it can't compete with Shark's forward-bending vacuum wands for cleaning beneath furniture, either.

You only need something for light cleaning
Because there's only one suction mode, if you have hard floors and aren't dealing with ingrained dirt, the lack of a lower-power, battery-extending mode might be a disadvantage. 

How I tested the Gtech AirRam 3

As per usual, I first examined the design of the Gtech AirRam 3, highlighting any USPs and also any concerns. I then noted down the experience of using it – how heavy it felt, how easy it was to use and how practical it was for day-to-day cleaning. I then put it through its paces on different flooring – hardwood, medium pile rug and deep pile bedroom carpet – and made notes on its effectiveness at collecting crumbs, flakes, dust and hair. 

First reviewed: August 2024

Ninja Slushi review: a simple way to make frozen drinks at home
4:09 pm | August 5, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Tags: | Comments: Off

Ninja Slushi: two-minute review

Frozen drink connoisseurs rejoice - the Ninja Slushi is here. Even the best blenders, tend to create watered-down beverages full of ice chunks, but this machine aims to deliver your favorite frozen drinks, from milkshakes to spiked slushies, at the perfect temperature, with an ideal texture, in under 60 minutes. That’s thanks to RapidChill Technology, which uses an evaporator, auger, and motor to continuously rotate the liquid while chilling. But does this kitchen gadget deliver on these promises? For the most part, yes. 

Ninja has been in the small appliance game for a while and is known for creating quality, mid-range products from coffee makers to air fryers. However, the Slushi is a completely new and unique product from the brand, paving its own path. In fact, there’s really nothing like it on the market. Sure, there are a few at-home slushie machines, but none come close to the Slushi’s versatility, making this device worth the higher price tag. 

It’s even poised for the same viral popularity as the Ninja Creami; at the time of writing, the Slushi is sold out. But Is the Ninja Slushi worth the hype? Yes, as long as you love a frozen drink and set your expectations accordingly. 

Making an orange juice slushie with Ninja Slushi machine

You can prepare a frozen juice drink in just 15 minutes with the Ninja Slushi (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

This slushie machine is a bit heavy and tall, but surprisingly easy to use with a straightforward control panel featuring presets that automatically set the optimal temperature. The five presets are slush, spiked slush, frappe, milkshake, and frozen juice. Some recipes are as simple as pouring a juice or soda into the vessel and watching the machine turn your drink into slush in as little as 15 minutes, all while staying whisper quiet. 

I managed to test out most of the Ninja Slushi’s presets to varying results. The machine produced the best consistency using tropical juice in the frozen juice setting, and Coke in slush mode, with both beverages ready to drink in under 20 minutes. Making those drinks thicker using the temperature controls on the panel was also simple.

However, when testing the frappe mode, my drink came out extremely frothy, and the strawberry daiquiri on the spiked slush mode was too liquid, even after adjusting the temperature to the coolest setting.

Ninja Slushi machine making orange slushie

Texture can sometimes be an issue, but you can adjust the temperature of your drink using simple touch controls (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Though there were some slight texture issues, the drinks were delicious and never watered down like the ones made in blenders tend to be. Clean-up afterward is less hassle than you'd expect, too. A rinse cycle does a great job of removing stuck-on residue, and most components are easily removable and dishwasher-safe. 

The Ninja Slushi is a solid machine that’s especially well-suited for those who love to entertain, as it’s capable of making up to 64oz of frozen drinks that will remain frozen for up to 12 hours, and has an easy-pour handle for guests to serve themselves. However, given the high $299.99 (about £240 / AU$470) price tag, it’s only worth the investment for those who adore a variety of frozen drinks and plan to use this kitchen gadget regularly. 

Ninja Slushi review: price and availability

  • List price: $299.99 (about £240 / AU$470)
  • Launch date: July 2024
  • Availability: US only

The Ninja Slushi retails for $299.99 (about £240 / AU$470) and is only available in the US. However, it’s currently sold out. It’s possible to join a waitlist on the Ninja website to be notified when the machine is back in stock. Given this product is brand new and extremely popular, don’t expect to see any major discounts on the Ninja Slushi for a few months to a year. 

Slushie machines are few and far between. When comparing the Ninja Slushi to others on the market, nothing beats its versatility and ease of use. The Slushi is in a category all its own, and the high price tag reflects the uniqueness of this kitchen gadget. Since the build quality is solid and the machine delivers on the promise of producing less watered-down frozen drinks quickly, it’s good value for money. However, I would only invest in this machine if you love frozen beverages and plan to use it regularly. 

 Value for money score: 4.5 out of 5

Ninja Slushi review: specs

Ninja Slushi review: design

  • Heavy and tall build 
  • Sleek, simple design that highlights drinks
  • Straightforward control panel

The Ninja Slushi resembles a smaller version of the slushie machines you see at the movie theater or convenience store. It’s still a hulking device that takes up a good amount of space, weighing 24.25lb / 11kg and measuring 16.28 x 6.52 x 16.92in / 414 x 166 x 430mm (L x W x H).

The narrow design allows it to squeeze between other appliances. My biggest issue was height, as the Slushi failed to fit under my kitchen cabinets. That led to lots of rearranging of kitchen gadgets. Given its size and weight, the Slushi isn’t something you’ll want to move often. At least the power cord reached a long way, which was necessary for my final placement. 

Ninja Slushi machine straight after box with instruction manual

The Ninja Slushi comes almost fully assembled (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Assembling the Ninja Slushi was an absolute breeze. Out of the box, it came almost fully assembled. The two-part drip tray was the only component not attached. There's a handy notch on the side panel to slot the drip tray when you store the machine, ensuring it doesn’t get lost. 

Before the first use, I washed the vessel and auger. The evaporator needs to be wiped down, as it’s not removable. That process was fairly simple, and the machine comes covered in stickers and has multiple instruction booklets to help you along while removing different components. 

Once it's set up, the Ninja Slushi looks awesome, and is definitely a conversation piece when you have friends over. The arctic blue and gray coloring is simple and stylish, while the clear vessel for frozen beverages looks especially flashy with colorful, fruity drinks inside. It’s mesmerizing watching the evaporator and auger do their thing, creating and spinning the slush.

Side view of Ninja Slushi machine

The machine is narrow but tall, which may make it challenging to fit in your kitchen (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Most of the machine’s components are plastic, but feel sturdy. However, the vessel, which can hold up to 64oz / 1.9L of slush, seems a little flimsy and could crack if accidentally dropped during cleaning. I also would have loved a metal handle for pouring, but the one included feels solid enough to last several years. 

The Ninja Slushi’s control panel is straightforward. There are five presets to choose from when making a drink: slush, spiked slush, frappe, milkshake, and frozen juice. After selecting a preset, the machine will begin the cooling process with a small LED illuminating the selection. A beep indicates that the beverage has reached the desired temperature (each option sets the optimal temperature for your drink of choice). 

On the opposite side of the presets is the temperature control with easy-to-press up and down arrow buttons to adjust the preset temperature. The LEDs indicate the current set temperature, and will blink as the beverage cools to the set temperature. Blinking will stop and the LEDs will remain lit when that temperature is achieved. It’s
super simple and took me less than a minute to figure out how the control panel worked. 

Design score: 4 out of 5

Ninja Slushi review: performance

  • Easy to create frozen drinks quickly
  • Not always the best drink consistency
  • Quiet operation

The Ninja Slushi may be one of the easiest kitchen appliances to master, as it mainly involves pressing a couple of buttons and letting the machine do its thing. Sure, I had to mix up a few beverages before pouring them into the vessel, and occasionally tap the temperature control for the proper slush consistency, but that’s it. Never needing to deal with ice makes life so much easier. 

Out of the five different drink presets available, I tested four. My first drink was a tropical juice slush. It just involved pouring juice straight from the carton into the vessel. There’s a 16oz / 473ml minimum for liquids, and it’s well-marked on the vessel. The inability to make smaller portions is a slight annoyance, but you can leave the machine on for up to 12 hours – plenty of time to finish the frozen beverage.

Ninja Slushi machine control panel

The machine's control panel is extremely easy to use; just select a drink type, then dial the temperature up or down if you like (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Since I was drinking the tropical juice slush alone, I only filled the drink to the minimum mark. After turning on the machine and pressing the Frozen Juice preset, the Ninja Slushi’s auger attached to the motor immediately began to spin. Thanks to the Whisperchill compressor, the machine only hit about 55dB while in use. The noise level is consistent and around the same level as an electric fan. I found it quickly became a barely noticeable background sound. 

After about seven minutes, I noticed the drink getting thicker, and after 15 minutes it beeped and the temperature control LED stopped flashing, indicating the drink was finished. Ninja was right on the money, stating you could have a frozen drink in under 15 minutes.

Ninja Slushi machine easy-to-pull handle

The easy-to-pull handle makes it straightforward for guests to serve themselves at parties and BBQs (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Immediately after finishing, I poured myself a glass of frozen juice. As I pulled the handle towards me, the beverage started to come out, but it didn’t dispense smoothly, coming out in clumps. Still, the drink itself had a lovely consistency but melted rather quickly. With the RapidChill technology that allows the machine to forgo ice, my tropical frozen juice wasn’t watered down in the slightest, maintaining a rich, tangy flavor.

I tested the machine further using the temperature control panel to make the beverage thicker. It worked like a charm, with the consistency getting chunkier in under 10 minutes. I also let the drink just spin for about four hours. Even after all that time, it tasted the same with a similar texture. Just be prepared for the machine itself to get a little warm

Thick consistency of frappe made using Ninja Slushi machine

The finished frappe was almost entirely foam (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Beyond the frozen juice setting, I was hyped to try the frappe mode, as I love these blended coffee beverages. To make it, I followed a recipe in the instruction manual. Around 25 minutes after pressing the frappe preset, the drink was finished. Unfortunately, when I poured it out, it was excessively frothy. Still delicious, but almost my entire glass was filled with foam. That’s not the ideal situation when trying to get your caffeine fix, but not having it become a watery, tasteless drink after melting was a huge boon. 

Using the spiked slush preset also had its own issues, as the drink would come out too liquid, even on the coolest setting. It was also ready surprisingly fast, at under 25 minutes, when the drink was estimated to take closer to 45 minutes. That could be due to the alcohol content, as the recipe for the strawberry daiquiri I created called for a tiny amount of rum (a third of a cup to served between four and six people), so I added more. However, the machine alerts you when too much alcohol is in the vessel, and that didn’t happen. Maybe pre-mixed alcoholic beverages or wine slushies would’ve worked a little better. The drink still tasted great and had some slushiness to enjoy. 

Ninja Slushi machine prepared to make a frappe

The machine will warn you if you've not used enough sugar, or if your ingredients contain too much alcohol (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Similar to alcohol, a low sugar warning goes off when the minimum sugar levels aren’t met. It’s an easy fix, as you can add sugar, syrups, and honey to meet the requirements. Just don’t expect to be drinking low-calorie beverages, as artificial sweeteners and sugar-free substitutes will not meet the recommended sugar minimum. 

Another slight qualm with the machine was the martini glass for the daiquiri didn’t fit under the spout when the drip tray was installed, leading to drips on the tabletop when I was pouring. Also, at one point, I didn’t have the removable shroud attached to the spout, and the slush splashed everywhere, so don’t make that mistake. 

For my final frozen beverage, I made a Coke slush using the slush preset. After about 20 minutes, this soda slush yielded the best results of the bunch with a great consistency that took me straight back to my childhood of getting slushies from the machine at the movie theater. 

Ninja Slushi machine immediately after making frappe

Even if the finished texture isn't always perfect, the Ninja Slushi delivers on its promise, making tasty frozen beverages in minutes, with just a few button presses (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

Even if the results weren’t always perfect when making my different beverages, the Ninja Slushi achieved what it promised, creating a less watered-down frozen drink quickly. Sure, the texture wasn’t always ideal, but I was never left with the random ice chunks you’d get from a blender. Some of the machine’s problems could have been human error; more experimenting could’ve yielded better results. 

Cleaning the Ninja Slushi was easier than it looked. The machine runs a rinse cycle after finishing the frozen drink, which does a solid initial clean, helping to remove any sticky residue from the components. After that, a bail handle lets you remove the vessel, auger, and drip tray for a more thorough cleaning. I had some issues with dripping upon removal, but tipping the vessel upwards helped alleviate the problem. The condensation catch also needs to be dumped and rinsed. 

Ninja Slushi machine bail handle to remove parts before cleaning

a bail handle lets you remove the vessel, auger, and drip tray for thorough cleaning (Image credit: Danielle Abraham)

If you’re hand washing the vessel, it’s a bit of a pain to get in all the nooks and crannies, but it didn’t take me more than two minutes to clean. The auger and drip tray took less time. Most components are dishwasher safe, but note that the motor base and evaporator need to be wiped down by hand. Other than cleaning, no regular maintenance is required on the Ninja Slushi. 

Performance score: 3.5 out of 5

Should you buy the Ninja Slushi?

Buy it if...

You love a frozen beverage
If you enjoy drinking slushies, frappes, and frozen juice, this machine makes these drinks quickly with minimal effort. The results never taste watered down like many frozen beverages that require ice.  

You like to entertain
The Ninja Slushi makes up to 64oz of slushies, has an easy-pour handle, and can run for up to 12 hours. It’s perfect for pool parties or BBQs.  

You want an easy-to-use machine
It takes just a couple of button presses and a little time to enjoy a refreshing frozen drink. Clean-up is a little more involved, but most components are dishwasher safe. 

Don't buy it if...

You have limited space
The Ninja Slushi is a large, tall machine that takes up a good amount of room on the counter and won’t fit under some cabinets. It’s also heavy, weighing almost 25lb, making it a pain to move around. 

You want to make low-calorie drinks
Every slushie has to contain at least four per cent sugar. Sugar-free or artificial sweeteners won’t work with the Ninja Slushi.

You’re on a tight budget
Retailing for almost $300, the Ninja Slushi doesn’t come cheap. It also only serves a single purpose (making frozen beverages), making it a luxury appliance rather than a necessity.

How I tested the Ninja Slushi

I tested the Ninja Slushi for a couple of weeks, making various frozen beverages in the machine for myself and a few friends. I used four out of the five presets available: slush, spiked slush, frappe, and frozen juice. Beyond observing the texture and taste of the different slushies, I used a decibel reader on my phone to measure the noise levels. 

First reviewed August 2024

Dyson Ball Animal vacuum review: a super-sucky upright
9:00 am | July 28, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances Vacuums | Comments: Off

Dyson Ball Animal review: two-minute review

Product info

The Dyson Ball Animal on review here is an update on the Ball Animal 2. In the UK and Australia it's just referred to as the Ball Animal, whereas in the US, it's called the Ball Animal 3.

Suffixes like 'Extra', 'Origin' and 'Multi-Floor' refer to the selection of tools included – the base model is the same.

For this review, I tested the UK Dyson Ball Multi-floor. Note, there may be minor differences between different countries' models.

The Dyson Ball Animal is an upright, corded vacuum that prioritizes suction power and dust capacity over a lightweight form factor. Once upon a time there were two camps of vacuum buyer – the upright evangelists versus the cylinder snobs, and never the twain did meet. Nowadays most people have converted to cordless stick vacuums, and never looked back. But clearly there are a few lingering souls who remain loyal to corded vacuums and, for those wedded to the corded upright in particular, Dyson's Ball Animal remains king.

I tried one out to see how it compares to the rest of today's best upright vacuums, and if it's worth considering over one of the best cordless vacuums on the market. This generation launched in 2022 and is an update on the Ball Animal 2 – although generally it's just referred to as the Ball Animal, no number, aside from in the US, where they typically put a 3 on there. 

The Ball Animal boasts multiple filtration systems (with lots of engineering jargon to make them sound extra whizzy) that make it popular with allergy sufferers. There’s no doubt it is incredibly sucky and drags dust from the very core of carpets, and I also appreciated the massive bin capacity, which felt like a treat after the daily emptying demanded by most cordless vacuums.

At times the suction power can make it a tough ride – you need Popeye-grade muscles to push this vacuum along a deep-pile carpet – and the pull-out hose is a little stiff and unwieldy. Then there’s the cord. Once you’ve gone cordless, it really is hard to tolerate this annoying trip hazard.

Disclaimer: I have never owned (or wanted to own) an upright vacuum in my 40+ years on this planet but in the interests of fairness to those who want a new one, I've tried really hard to ignore my prejudices when testing this vacuum in my four-bed Victorian family home. Instead, I focused on the genuine pros and cons of the Dyson Ball Animal vacuum to suss out it if could be considered the best Dyson vacuum for anyone. Read on for my full review.

Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

(Image credit: Future)

Dyson Ball Animal review: price & availability

  • List price: from $499.99 / £279.99 / AU$599
  • Launched: 2022
  • Prices vary for different iterations (with different tools)

As with all Dyson vacuums, there are a few different variations available, just to keep buyers on their toes. Generally speaking, the difference is just the selection of tools included – the actual vacuum is the same. There are also slightly different naming conventions in different parts of the world. To get a general picture of how much you can expect to pay for a Ball Animal, I'll base this section on availability and pricing when you buy direct from Dyson, but be aware there will likely be more options, and different deals available via third party retailers. 

In the US, it's a little tricky to figure out which models are gen 2 and which are gen 3. After some sleuthing, it looks like the two third-gen models are the Ball Animal 3 Extra for $499.99 or the Ball Animal 3 Complete for $549.99. You can still get the Ball Animal 2, in various iterations, in some places, too. 

In the UK, it's the regular Ball Animal for £279.99, the Ball Animal Origin for £329.99 (down to £229.99 at time of writing), the Ball Animal Multi-floor for £379.99 (this is the version I tested) or the Ball Animal Complete for £429.99.

In Australia, you'll find the Dyson Ball Animal Origin for AU$599, down to AU$449 at time of checking. 

All that means that generally speaking, the Ball Animal sits in the mid-range bracket, based on TechRadar's price bands for vacuums. It's also typically the cheapest Dyson you can get – and much more affordable than any of the cordless models. The Dyson V8 (the oldest and cheapest model in the current lineup at time of writing) is around $470 / £330 / AU$800. In short, the price of the Ball Animal upright is incredibly reasonable and you’re getting a lot of machine and power for your money.

As with all home appliances, shopping events like the Black Friday sales tend to be a good time to snag a Dyson vacuum deal.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Dyson Ball Animal specs

Dyson Ball Animal review: design

  • Upright corded vacuum with ball that allows floorhead to pivot
  • Wand can be extended on flexible hose for harder-to-reach areas
  • Solidly built, but bulky and heavy compared to stick vacs

There’s no denying the Dyson Ball Animal Multi-floor has an exciting design, almost futuristic, and I love the vibrant copper and red colorway of my review model. That said, I’d want to store it in a utility room or similar, as it’s too big and out-there – 42.13 x 11.10 x 15.24" / 106.5 x 28 x 39cm (H x W x D) – to sit quietly in corner of the kitchen or living room.  

Unboxing was easy and I appreciated the thought that had gone into the packaging on the eco front; the components were all securely contained in recyclable cardboard rather than yards of plastic. 

You have to download the full instruction manual (another saving of resources) but a handy fold-out leaflet illustrated how to assemble. The hardest part was clicking the main roller head on, but only because the vacuum is heavy. Then it was just a case of clicking various pipes together in three steps, and then loading on the attachments. Three of attachments have a permanent home on the vacuum, which means they’re close to hand when you need them.

This vacuum isn’t terribly futuristic on the user tech front. There are no complicated LED displays or program menus to master, just a solid red on/off switch and another next to it to turn the electric roller brush bar on/off. Dyson recommends turning the brush off when vacuuming hard floors, and I later explain why.  

Power switch on Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

(Image credit: Future)

Emptying the bin is super easy, you just unclip the bin, carry it to your trash can and then press a button to release the flap at the bottom. I was less impressed by the cable tidy, which is manual and tedious. Not least because there’s 10m of cable to wind and unwind from the two clips at the back. It’s good exercise though!

Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

Emptying the massive bin (Image credit: Future)

There are two ways to clean with the Ball Animal: the main method is with the upright unit and its massive floorhead, which is supported by a large ball in an attempt to make it easier to maneuver and twist around corners. Then there’s the high-reach wand that pulls out with the handle and has a 4m flexible hose that’s aimed at getting into the corners of ceilings, under furniture and up the stairs. The handle is hinged to make the hose more flexible, and it almost works like a traditional cylinder vacuum if you attach the flat floor head. In theory, anyway.

Tester holding Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner next to the Dyson V8 to show comparison

The Dyson Ball Animal next to the V8, for comparison (Image credit: Future)

One of the main downsides I immediately noticed with the Ball Animal is that it’s just so cumbersome. Perhaps it's because I am not used to uprights but I just found it heavy, and not in a good way. The upside is that with this weight comes durability and a sense of robustness. 

The other thing I spotted is that, while the attachments do clip on at various points of the main build, they’re not terribly easy to get on and off but this might improve with time and use as the connections soften. The lowest attachment is clipped the wrong way for easy access when vacuuming. 

  • Design score: 3 out of 5

Dyson Ball Animal review: performance

  • Extraordinarily powerful
  • Best on carpets
  • Big and noisy

My first foray with the Dyson Ball Animal involved tackling the carpets upstairs – four bedrooms (approx. 4m sq each) and a generous landing to be precise. It’s hard to beat any Dyson on carpet-cleaning power and I was excited (sad, I know) to see just how much dirt it would suction up.

Our carpets are less than six months old, and the upstairs is vacuumed once a week. No dogs are allowed upstairs and only three days had passed since the last clean, but the Dyson Ball Animal still managed to half-fill its 1.8L capacity bin. Kinda grim, but it did look like a lot of the load was carpet fibers, which was slightly worrying!

Dyson Ball Animal 3

First load from upstairs carpets (Image credit: Future)

The Ball Animal’s impressive suction can create problems with maneuverability and, unless you are quick to adjust the suction at the floor head (with the slider control), it will drag carpets along or just prove impossible to push. This slider has three settings, one for deep and medium pile carpets, one for low pile and large debris and one for hard floors and ground in dirt. 

Close up of main floorhead on Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

The multi floor head with suction slider (Image credit: Future)

It is definitely worth figuring out which suction setting is best for your different floor types as soon as possible, but you do need to bend down to the floor to move the slider. Upstairs I didn’t have to move it once set, but as I have three types of flooring downstairs there was a lot of stopping and bending down to adjust the suction. I didn’t really mind, apart from the disruption (at 46 years old I can still bend down without effort), but maybe not so fine for elderly or infirm users. Many modern vacuum cleaners, especially cordless models, adjust the suction automatically and, frankly, Dyson needs to get with the program! 

As I’ve said, moving the Ball Animal around the floors isn’t very easy and although it does corner well, it is heavy to move about and you can’t get it under any furniture. The cable is a complete pain in the rear and made me a bit sweary on several occasions. It’s 14m, which is handy in terms of not needing to move the plug to different sockets, but it just gets in the way. All the time. 

Three images showing how the flexible hose can be extended on the Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

(Image credit: Future)

I found pulling out the hose, to vacuum up high and underneath the furniture, awkward and tricky. Perhaps the hose will soften eventually but it was really hard to stretch it to its full reach and it just didn’t flex well at all. I vacuumed our home throughout around 14 times during testing and had to take my sweater off every time because I worked up a sweat. I am pretty fit and healthy but using the Ball Animal was like an extra little workout that I really didn’t want or need!

Close up of upholstery tool on Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

The Tangle-Free Turbine tool (Image credit: Future)

Saying all this, I can’t deny the Ball Animal did a great job at cleaning my home, especially on the pet hair front. We have two crazy-hairy spaniels and also had a heavily moulting labrador for a sleepover one weekend (how she had any hair to go home with I do not know). The tangle-free turbine tool was absolutely epic on our sofas and cushions and the main motor-driven floor brush lived up to its tangle-free promise, too. The bin was 99% dog hair after doing all three sofas and the main kitchen rug on one day.  

Close up of cyclones on Dyson Ball Animal upright vacuum cleaner

(Image credit: Future)

The results of our two standard controlled tests – one with flour and one with porridge oats (to mimic bigger debris), on both hard flooring and carpet – were interesting. On carpet, I couldn’t fault the Ball Animal, it cleared everything, thoroughly, in a single pass, but on the hard flooring (engineered oak), it left streaks of flour behind and required several passes. Oats on hard flooring was also problematic. The brush head seemed to ping them about, so I turned it off, which stopped that nonsense, but it still took several passes to get all the oats up.

Image 1 of 3

Dyson Ball Animal 3

(Image credit: Future)

Flour on hard floors

Image 2 of 3

Dyson Ball Animal 3

(Image credit: Future)

Oats on carpet

Image 3 of 3

Dyson Ball Animal 3

(Image credit: Future)

Oats on hard floors

If, like me, you are noise intolerant, you will seriously not enjoy how loud the Ball Animal is. That's perhaps to be expected given the power levels going on, but my Decibel Meter recorded at 81dB, which is louder than most vacuum cleaners and closer to a busy food blender. As this vacuum is big, and the cord winding so annoying, I only really used it for thorough, whole house cleans (rather than a quick whip round with a cordless), so its noisiness was not appreciated. I couldn’t hear my audiobook, even with my EarPods in.  

Maintenance

Cleaning the Dyson Ball Animal is mostly easy. The roller brush pulls out at one side of the floor head (and didn’t require any scissor work to release hairs) and the filter in the main cylinder is the same as those in Dyson’s cordless vacuums – a long, sock-like thing that you wash under a tap. There’s a second filter in the Ball, which was harder to release (you have to lie the vacuum on its side, unscrew the ball and then do a hard twist and turn action to pull the filter out) and also washes under the tap. Dyson recommends both filters are cleaned once a month to maintain efficiency, but I’d bet my left foot that most people don’t. 

Dyson Ball Animal 3

Removing the second filter (Image credit: Future)

I have to admit I missed my light and nimble cordless vacuum many times during the two weeks I spent testing the Ball Animal and my previous conviction that uprights are impossibly cumbersome was not overturned. Sorry, Dyson. 

  • Performance score: 3 out of 5

Should I buy a Dyson Ball Animal?

The cleaning performance was very impressive on carpets and decent on hard floors, but I found it hard work to use.

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Dyson Ball Animal Multi-floor vacuum

  • I used this vacuum in my own home for two weeks
  • I vacuumed carpets, hard flooring, and upholstery
  • I recorded the sound levels using a decibel meter app

I used the Dyson Ball Animal to clean our four-bed family home for a couple of weeks, using it every day on all our floors, which include terracotta and porcelain tiles, engineered timber, vinyl laminate, carpet and several rugs. 

I also road-tested all five attachments (the upholstery one was my fave), vacuumed up the staircase and all three sofas. I took both brush heads apart to clean the rollers, cleaned both filters, and emptied the bin several times. I also cleaned the dog’s beds and had a go at the blinds with the softest brush attachment.

During testing, I used the decibel meter on my iPhone to monitor noise levels and conducted two specific tests to see how the vacuum dealt with flour and oats on carpet and hard flooring. 

As part of my job as a journalist specialising in kitchens and bathrooms, I’ve been reviewing vacuum cleaners for publication both online and in print for several years now. I take testing very seriously and feel a real responsibility to provide honest, accurate feedback that’s (hopefully) useful and not biased in any way. 

Read more about how we test

First reviewed July 2024

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender review: enjoy the freedom of a battery-powered hand blender
9:02 am | July 22, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Juicers & Blenders Small Appliances | Comments: Off

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender two-minute review

The KitchenAid brand needs little to no introduction, but the concept of battery-powered kitchen appliances like the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender might be unfamiliar to many people.

The beauty of the KitchenAid Go range of appliances is that they all use the same removable, swappable battery. This means if you invest in several appliances from the range they can share batteries, so you can save some cash and buy some of them without a battery included.

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender is designed to be used just like any other hand blender. But because it doesn’t need to be near a power outlet, you have a lot more freedom to blend soups on the stove or blitz a fruit puree on the dining table, something you'd struggle to do with any of the best blenders.

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender in its box

(Image credit: Future)

On test it certainly proved it was up to the job, creating smooth soups, milkshakes, and pureed vegetables. But I did manage to break the pan guard on the first use, which was a bit of a negative. You can read more about that in the performance section below.

Overall though, I found it easy and comfortable to use. And if you get frustrated by the lack of available power outlets in your kitchen, it could be a game-changer.

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender review: price & availability

  • List price: US$129.99 / £179 / AU$268
  • Availability: US / UK / AUS

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender is currently available in the US, UK and Australia. It can be purchased directly from KitchenAid.

It’s available with or without the battery. The prices above are for the model that includes a battery. Without a battery it’s around $30/ £30 / $69 cheaper at $99.99 / £149 / AU$199.

It’s important to point out that while KitchenAid does sell the compatible battery as a standalone accessory, it costs $49.99/ £69 / AU$69. Therefore if you're in the US or UK it's always cheaper to buy the appliance with the battery bundled in.

Being cord-free does come with a premium price tag. A standard variable speed corded hand blender from KitchenAid will cost significantly less at around $60/ £109.

Whether or not a cordless hand blender is worth the additional investment does depend on your individual budget as well as your kitchen setup. But for many people it does solve a frustrating problem of working around the position of power outlets.

Discounts are sometimes available, so if the premium price tag is a sticking point for you, it’s worth keeping an eye out for a discount. For example at the time of writing there was a $10 reduction on the hand blender on the US KitchenAid website.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender review: design

  • Built-in safety feature
  • Well balanced
  • Straightforward controls

The main hand blender features a removable blending arm with a stainless steel blade. This twists easily onto the main body of the blender. At the very top of the body, above where you hold it, is where the battery attaches.

The blender dimensions when assembled, including the battery are: 16 x 2.8 x 3.1" / 40.5 x 7 x 7.9cm (h x w x d). The weight is 1.9lbs / 880g which will feel weighty for some people, but it’s pretty well balanced so that the weight is distributed down through the blender and not into your arm.

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender with all its accessories

(Image credit: Future)

As well as the main hand blender, in the box there’s also a 23.6oz / 700ml BPA free blending jar, with a handy lid, so you can easily store your creations in the fridge. There's also a plastic pan guard that clips onto the end of the blender to avoid damaging pans if you’re blending something directly in a non-stick pan.

There’s one main power button and the firmer it’s pressed, the higher the blending speed. However, the blender won’t work unless the unlock button beneath it is pressed simultaneously. At first this can feel like a bit of pain, but you soon get used to it and it’s a great safety feature - something that’s often lacking with hand blenders.

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender's battery

(Image credit: Future)

The removable battery comes with a USB charging cable, but no plug, so you’ll have to supply your own or buy the separate charging dock for $29.99 / £29. The battery itself features four small lights that each represent 25% power. So by pressing a button on the side of the battery, you can get a rough idea of how much power is left depending on how many lights illuminate.

  • Design score: 4.5 out of 5

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender review: performance

  • Speedy blending
  • Comfortable to use
  • Good battery life

For my first try with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender I made a protein shake. I added 8oz milk, a sliced banana, a scoop of protein powder and a heaped teaspoon of peanut butter to the blending jar and blended until it appeared smooth.

I stopped blending after 40 seconds and the drink was well mixed and pretty smooth. There was still a slight graininess so it wasn’t as smooth as if I'd made it in a high powered blender, but it was a pleasant texture nonetheless.

Image 1 of 2

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender about to make a protein shake

KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender about to make a protein shake (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Making a protein shake with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender

Making a protein shake with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender (Image credit: Future)

I tested the noise level when blending the protein shake and it hit 94dB on my noise meter, which is pretty loud and equivalent to a motorcycle at 50ft. But I must admit that I didn't think it was loud during use, I’ve certainly used louder hand blenders over my years of kitchen appliance testing.

I was concerned that with the battery on top, the hand blender might feel weighty or unbalanced, but thankfully that wasn’t the case. I actually found it very comfortable to use.

To test out its ability to puree I used it to make pureed potatoes. Now, to clarify, this is essentially a mash potato, but when you blitz the cooked potato with a hand blender it creates more of a silky puree texture than a fluffy mash.

This is where I had a bit of a mishap. I’d attached the pan guard so that I could puree the hot, freshly cooked potatoes in the pan. However, during blending I heard a funny noise and when I checked, the pan protector had come off and subsequently been chopped by the blade.

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender's pan protector comes off and gets chopped while making potato puree

(Image credit: Future)

While I am pretty certain I had attached it correctly, I can’t say for definite whether it was the thick gloopiness of the potato puree that dislodged it, or incorrect installation. Either way though, I would urge you to exercise caution when using it in thicker foods. And it was disappointing to break it on the first use.

After retrieving all the broken plastic, I carried on pureeing the potatoes, which took around 90 seconds in total for a small pan of potatoes. I wouldn’t advise using this method for a big batch of potatoes though.

Next time I used it in a pan, I had to do so without the broken pan guard. This time, I was blitzing a homemade pea and mint soup. This task was a breeze for the hand blender and the soup was smooth after just 2 minutes of blending.

Image 1 of 2

Making pea and mint soup with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender: before

Making pea and mint soup with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender: before (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2

Making pea and mint soup with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender: after

Making pea and mint soup with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender: after (Image credit: Future)

The variable speed button does noticeably increase the blending speed the firmer it’s pressed. But to be honest, I found that I naturally tended to press it all the way in and had to really think about loosening my grip for a slower speed.

Image 1 of 3

Pancake batter made with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender

Pancake batter made with the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Raspberries before meeting the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender

Raspberries before meeting the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender (Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Raspberries after meeting the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender

Raspberries after meeting the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender (Image credit: Future)

Pancake batter was no match for this hand blender. In just 15 seconds my egg, milk, and flour were combined into a lump free batter. Similarly, 6.6oz of fresh raspberries were liquified in just 20 seconds. The seeds weren’t pulverized, but I’d have been very surprised if they were.

The battery takes around three hours to charge. But after all of the above tests it still showed 75% power on the battery level indicator lights. I had to use it for a further 6 minutes at full speed before the battery level was drained to 50%. It’s encouraging to know I could use it for several blending tasks and not need to recharge it too often.

The main blade is the only part that can’t go in the dishwasher. But on the whole, as long as I rinsed it immediately after use, it came clean very easily. The blending cup, lid, and pan guard can all go in the dishwasher. That said, none of it is too tricky to wash by hand either.

  • Performance score: 4 out of 5

Should you buy the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender?

Buy it if…

You want to blend at the stove

Trailing power cables across your stovetop to reach into a pan of hot soup is dangerous from a number of perspectives. So if you want to blend soups and sauces on the stove, a battery operated hand blender is the answer.

You want an in-built safety feature

Having to press a safety lock button in order for the main power button to work might not seem like a big deal, but if you’ve got small children around, this added step is an important one when dealing with sharp blades.

You don’t have space for a full size blender

A hand blender is a great compromise for a smaller kitchen. You can still blend soups, sauces, and shakes, but you don’t have to find space for a massive blender.

Don't buy it if…

You’re looking for the best value for money

Just a glance at the price should tell you this isn’t the one for you if you’re on a budget. If that’s the case, opt for a corded hand blender and you’ll get much more bang for your buck.

You don’t have the best hand or finger dexterity

Holding in two buttons to operate the hand blender might be a great safety feature, but not everyone has the hand or finger mobility to allow this. If you suffer with hand or finger mobility issues it might not be the model for you.

You won’t remember to charge the battery

A cordless appliance relies on you periodically checking and charging the battery. If you’re likely to forget about it, you’ll kick yourself when you come to use it and there's no charge left. In this case a corded model might be a better option.

How I tested the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender

I set up the KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender in my own kitchen at my house. I used it several times for a variety of foods, including soup, pancake batter, protein shakes, pureeing potatoes, and pureeing raspberries.

I used it in hot food in a pan as well as for smaller volumes in the supplied blending cup. During this time, I was paying attention to the ease and comfort of use, as well as any issues or problems that arose. I also kept an eye on the battery to see how quickly it was drained.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed July 2024

KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper review: ditch the power cable and chop anywhere
12:00 pm | July 20, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Juicers & Blenders Small Appliances | Comments: Off

KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper two-minute review

KitchenAid is a trusted kitchen appliance brand that already offers a range of food choppers, but the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper stands out for being battery-powered. Moreover, the same battery can be used across the KitchenAid Go range of appliances.

Whether you’re short on space, short on power outlets, or you simply want the best blender to use wherever you choose, having a battery-operated food chopper can offer the convenience you crave.

The size and functionality is similar to KitchenAid’s plug-in 5 cup food chopper, except the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper offers two speeds and the freedom of not having to place it near a power outlet. But with this convenience comes a higher price tag.

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper in its box

(Image credit: Future)

On test, it reliably chopped, mixed and whipped its way through a variety of ingredients. I was relieved that the battery lasted long enough for several uses and didn’t need charging at all during testing. Plus all the accessories can be easily washed in the dishwasher.

It’s compact and easy to move around, which also means it doesn’t take up too much storage space. But the flip side of this is that its capacity won’t be enough for everyone. Read on further for my in-depth review of its design and performance.

KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper review: price & availability

  • List price with battery: US$129.99 / GBP £179 / AU$228
  • List price without battery: US$89.99 / GBP £149 / AU$159
  • Availability: UK / US / AUS

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper can be purchased with or without the battery. This makes a lot of sense because the KitchenAid Go Cordless Collection is a range of battery-powered small kitchen appliances that all work using the same removable, swappable battery.

The prices above are for the version that includes the battery, and buying it without the battery will save you $30/ £30 / AU$69. A word of warning though, a spare battery will cost $49.99 / £69 / AU$69. So if you're in the US or UK and think you may need it, then it makes sense to buy it bundled in with the appliance itself.

Being cord-free does come with a premium price tag, however: a standard variable speed corded food chopper from KitchenAid will cost significantly less at around $70/ £109 / AU$159.

Whether or not being cord-free is worth the extra investment will depend on your circumstances. For example, in a kitchen that lacks power sockets it’ll be worth considering spending the extra for the convenience of battery power.

Of course, you can always keep your eyes peeled for a discount. In the US it was on sale at the time of writing for $99.99 including a battery, so if it’s not discounted when you look, check back again later.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper review: design

  • Compact and easy to store
  • Streamlined appearance
  • Simple to use and assemble

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper is a 39.9oz / 1.18 liter capacity food chopper. In addition to a chopping blade, it comes with a plastic whisking accessory.

There are two speeds to choose from, each speed represented by a button that has to be held down for the duration of the chopping or whisking task. Alternatively, the buttons can be pressed briefly but repeatedly, for a pulse action. There are no other controls to worry about, so using it is very straightforward.

KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper with all its attachments

(Image credit: Future)

The removable, swappable battery is charged via the supplied USB cable, but you’ll have to supply your own plug. Or, you can invest in a charging dock if you prefer.

In terms of dimensions, it measures 10.4 x 5.7 x 7.2" / 26.5 x 14.5 x 18.4cm (h x w x d) and weighs just 2.9lbs/ 1.3kg. It’s compact compared with a standard food processor, but still a usable size for chopping small to medium quantities and portions. It’s small and light enough to store neatly away in a drawer or cupboard, without being a hassle to move around.

The BPA free clear plastic bowl slots directly into position without a twisting or locking action. The lid however, does have to be twisted to lock it into place. On top of the lid there’s a handy little hole for drizzling oil or water in during mixing.

Unlike many other KitchenAid appliances, it doesn’t come in a multitude of colors, just the matte black finish. The appearance overall is streamlined and inoffensive.

  • Design score: 5 out of 5

KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper review: performance

  • Fast, efficient chopping
  • Copes well with all ingredients
  • Useable capacity for smaller batches

For my first test I added roughly 7oz of a mixed whole nut selection including brazil nuts, hazelnuts, and pecan nuts. I was looking for a chopped, not ground nut texture, so I pressed the lower speed button for quick one second bursts to pulse the nuts.

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper chopping nuts

(Image credit: Future)

I stopped pulsing once there were no large nut pieces left, which took about 20 pulses. The finished texture of the nuts was a combination of chunkier chopped pieces and some powder. But in my experience it’s quite difficult to achieve a consistent chopped nut texture, especially when chopping a variety of nuts at once. With that in mind, this wasn’t a bad result.

When I needed to chop some whole dried apricots, I started off trying to pulse them like with the nuts, but it was quickly obvious this wasn’t doing a lot. So instead I kept the lower speed button pressed.

Apricots chopped in the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper

(Image credit: Future)

The apricots were chopped up in just 30 seconds and the pieces were impressively even given how sticky and difficult-to-chop dried apricots can be.

To make hummus, I put all the ingredients into the chopper and blended on the lower speed setting. It took just 25 seconds to create an evenly textured, slightly coarse hummus. It did wobble a little during blending but not so much that I felt the need to put a hand on the top to steady it.

Pouring olive oil into hummus made in the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper

(Image credit: Future)

Just before the end, I poured some extra olive oil in through the drizzle hole at the top. It’s very convenient to be able to do this without taking the lid off.

It’s not too noisy and since it’s generally only used for short bursts, I didn’t find the noise offensive. My noise meter registered 84dB on the lower speed setting and a slightly louder 88dB on the higher speed setting. These are pretty average noise levels for a blender or one of the best food processors.

A small red onion chopped in the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper

(Image credit: Future)

When making a falafel mixture I used the chopper for several stages. First I chopped a small red onion. I peeled and quartered the onion before adding it to the chopper, then chopped on high speed for five seconds. I scraped down the sides and chopped for a further five seconds, which was all that was needed for a finely chopped texture.

Next I added roughly 1oz / 30g of parsley and cilantro including stalks, and again it speedily chopped the fresh herbs in just five seconds on the high speed setting. Finally I added all the falafel ingredients back into the chopper and blended it for 30 seconds on the lower speed, followed by 30 seconds on the higher speed.

Making a falafel mixture in the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper

(Image credit: Future)

The falafel mixture is relatively dry and heavy, so I had to stop mixing every 15 seconds and scrape down the sides. But the end result was beautifully evenly mixed and chopped.

To try out the whisk accessory I whipped up a ½ pint / 300ml carton of heavy cream on the high speed setting. After just 20 seconds I switched to the lower speed and it took only another five seconds before it was thick and whipped.

Whipping heavy cream in the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper

(Image credit: Future)

The battery life will vary somewhat depending on the type of use. But to give you a realistic observation from my time using the chopper, after all the chopping, mixing and whisking I’ve described above, the battery level still displayed 75%. After a further two minutes chopping on high speed, it was down to 50%, but I think that’s still pretty impressive, given how much I used it.

A full charge takes around three hours, but you can buy more batteries if you’d prefer to always have a backup charged and ready to go.

A hand holding the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper's battery

(Image credit: Future)

Any appliance with a sharp blade is always going to be a bit of a pain to clean. But all in all I didn’t find cleaning the parts by hand to be too tricky. In part this is because everything is small and cleans quickly. Additionally, though, after making particularly messy or oily mixes I just popped all the parts into the dishwasher, which was an easy and convenient way to clean up.

  • Performance score: 5 out of 5

Should you buy the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper?

Buy it if…

Your kitchen lacks convenient power outlets

With so many appliances in our kitchens, the battle for a power outlet is real. And even if you do have enough, they aren’t always located where you need them. If these problems are familiar to you, then cordless, battery-powered appliances might be the answer.

You don’t have space for a full-size food processor

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper is much more compact than a big food processor, but it still has the ability to chop, mix, and whisk. The 39.9oz / 1.18 liter capacity is enough for smaller portions.

You want to take the hard work out of chopping

Having a food chopper really speeds up mundane tasks like chopping herbs or onions. Even if you own a large food processor, most people wouldn’t bother to use it for such simple tasks, but that’s where a smaller food chopper comes in super handy.

Don't buy it if…

Budget is your priority

Thanks to the battery technology, the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper is more expensive than a plug-in equivalent. So if budget is driving your decision, opt for a food chopper with a cord and save some cash.

You’ll forget to charge the battery

Being cord-free is all well and good, but if you don’t remember to charge the battery, this appliance will quickly become more frustrating than it is useful.

You need to chop large quantities

If you regularly batch cook, or feed a crowd, you may find that this food chopper doesn’t have the capacity to meet your needs. In which case, a full size food processor might be more appropriate.

How I tested the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper

I used the KitchenAid Go Cordless Food Chopper in my own home. I kept it on my kitchen counter for several days and used it to chop a variety of single ingredients, as well as to mix up hummus, and even whip cream.

I kept a keen eye on the battery to see how much I could use the chopper before it needed a re-charge. And I also noted how easy it was to clean, as well as any other design quirks or ease of use issues that I came across during normal day-to-day use.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed July 2024

Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler flat iron review
2:00 pm | July 19, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Hair Care Home Small Appliances | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler review: two-minute review

There are a number of ways in which the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler stands out from the crowd, and the majority are positive. Firstly, there's its unique blue ombre design with a matte finish which is a welcome change; not only from the typically basic black and white models seen elsewhere, but even among the small but growing number of single-color stylers. 

It measures 11 x 1.5 x 1.7in (28 x 3.8 x 4.3 cm), and it's lightweight at 10oz (285g). It has two buttons near the base: one for power and temperature control (280 - 430F / 138 - 221C), and another for the built-in cooling fan, which reduces heat damage and sets the style. This temperature range has been designed to suit various hair types, but I found the default 350F (180C) setting to be more than sufficient, so I rarely took full advantage of this range. 

Controls and temperature gauge on the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler

(Image credit: Future)

Instead of a traditional hinge, the AirGlide uses buttons to control the 1.5in (3.8 cm) tourmaline plates, which are clamped shut by default. This design is another standout feature and helps manage the amount of hair styled at once, not to mention the fact that the plates deliver smooth, sleek results with reduced frizz. Plus by holding your hair in place, coupled with the AirGlide's rounded edges, this design gives you much more freedom and precision, especially when creating curls and waves.

Finally, the use of cooling vents is a nice touch because they help to set your style, so this sleek finish lasts much longer than with other stylers I've used. However, these pros are accompanied by a couple of cons. The styler doesn't have an automatic shut-off feature, which I've become accustomed to during my years testing the best hair straighteners. I missed the peace of mind this gives. 

The narrow plates and cooling vent feature can significantly increase styling time. For instance, it takes about 15 minutes and 35 seconds on average to straighten long, thin hair, compared to just over three minutes with other stylers like the GHD Chronos. Curling takes even longer, around 20 minutes. If you then add the fact you need to hold the hair in place for 5-10 seconds to set the style with the cooling vents, you're looking at long styling times.  

The Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler has a lot going for it. It's not the cheapest styler on the market, but it's also far from the most expensive and offers great, long-lasting performance which goes a long way. My only concern is that it will be a hard sell for many now there is a newer, redesigned model called the Calista AirGlide Pro Cool that only costs $10 more. 

Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler review: price & availability

  • List price: $99 / £78 / AU$150
  • Available in US, UK, Australia
  • International shipping comes with fees

The Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler costs $99 / £79 / AU$150 and is available in one color – Brilliant Blue. It was previously sold in other colorways including Peach Mai Tai, Bluewater Green, Berry Spritzer and Cool Blue Pink but these are no longer available on the official Calista site, and you can only seemingly buy them from eBay and similar second-hand retailers.

The styler is not to be confused with the Calista AirGlide Pro Cool Breeze Styler, a newer, redesigned model released in June 2024 that costs $109 / £88 / AU$166, comes with more vents and plates that open wider, and is available in Rose Quartz, Blue Topaz, White Pearl and Lavender Topaz. 

The price of both the original, and newer AirGlide Cool Breeze stylers puts them in the lower-to-mid-range flat iron category, alongside the CHI Original Digital flat iron and just below the BaBylissPRO Nano Titanium Ultra-Thin straightener.

There isn't a huge selection of flat irons at this price point and the closest, like-for-like stylers I found range from the $69.99 VAVOOV Pro Airflow Styler to Conair's $79.99 Cool Air Styler Luxe, all the way up to the Cortex Beauty $249.99 AirGlider. All of these Calista rivals double up as curling tongs; a feature the AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler is missing, despite the fact it costs more than the majority of these alternatives. 

You can buy the styler from Calista, or Amazon in the US. It is possible to buy it in the UK and Australia, but Calista ships it from the US and this comes with additional costs. At the time of writing, shipping to the UK adds £30 to the price. To ship it to Australia, you'll pay an extra $70 on top of the styler's price. Any relevant customs charges are then applied separately.

In my opinion, the Calista AirGlide and AirGlide Pro sit a little higher on the price range than they should, especially considering the lack of the explicit curling tong functions seen on rivals. That said, you can still use the AirGlide for curling, as you can all straightening irons. It also looks more stylish than some of its cheaper alternatives. 

All things considered, it's decent value for money, but not great, especially given that you can now get a newer, redesigned model for almost the same price.

  • Value score: 3.5 out of 5

Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler review: design

  • Smooth, sleek ombre design
  • 280 to 430F (138 to 221C) heat range
  • Cool air button and vents for setting hair

In a sea of black, white and even one-tone stylers, the Calista AirGlide's ombre design stands out, as does its smooth, matte finish. Colored stylers have a tendency to look cheap or child-like, but Calista has managed to make the AirGlide look and feel premium. It's an incredibly attractive straightening iron that sets off against the white cord brilliantly. It's a shame that only one color seemingly remains because the peach, pink and berry-colored versions all look equally great. 

Controls on the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler

(Image credit: Future)

Near the base of the 11 x 1.5 x 1.7in /  28 x 3.8 x 4.3cm (L x W x D) body are two buttons – one to turn the AirGlide on and off, and the other to control the built-in fan. You press and hold the Power button to switch the styler on. You can then press this button to cycle through the different temperature settings, from 280 - 430F / 138 - 221C. If you don't want, or need, to change these settings, the styler's default temperature is 350F / 180C. 

You can then choose to have the cool air vents running, by pressing the fan button, or leave them off. The purpose of these vents is to run cool air over your style to both reduce heat damage, and set your style in place. I had expected the addition of a fan to add to the weight of this styler, but it's instead incredibly lightweight at 10oz / 285g. The vents aren't designed to dry your hair, like the vents seen on the GHD Duet Style or Dyson Airstrait; they're purely for cooling the hair. Don't be tempted to use the Calista AirGlide on wet hair because you'll destroy the strands. 

Instead of the hinge seen on the majority of flat irons, which causes the straightener's arms to stay in the open position, the AirGlide's 1.5in / 3.8cm plates are controlled by buttons positioned either side of the body. When you're not using the AirGlide, these plates are clamped shut by default. To open them wide enough to place your hair inside, press these buttons together. 

The Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler's plates

(Image credit: Future)

On first impression, I couldn't see how the hair could fit inside such a narrow gap but not only does it fit, this feature helps you control the size of the hair sections you're styling. Calista recommends styling sections that measure 2in / 5cm and 1in / 2.5cm thick but you can't get much more hair than that inside the plates anyway so this is slightly moot. The AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler doesn't have an automatic shut-off feature, which is becoming increasingly standard of hot tools, but the contained design of the plates does at least add a layer of safety. 

The plates themselves are made of tourmaline and are floating, meaning they can respond and move based on the hair's thickness. This prevents them gripping the hair too hard and causing unnecessary damage. 

  • Design score: 4.5 out of 5

Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler review: performance

  • Fiddly and lengthy styling
  • Straightens and curls 
  • Style lasts hours

If you're looking for a quick styler or have long thick hair then I'd give the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze a miss. The narrow gap between the plates is great for controlling how much of your hair you style each time, which – if you have time and patience – adds a welcome level of precision. However, if you're short on time or have a lot of hair to style, this design adds a significant amount of time to the styling process. To put this into perspective, it takes an average of 3 minutes and 15 seconds to straighten my long, thin hair with the GHD Chronos. It took me almost five times longer – 15 minutes and 35 seconds on average – with the Calista. This is even with only needing to pass the straighteners over your hair once to achieve the desired finish. 

Curling my hair took longer, unsurprisingly, at 20 minutes, but the actual process of creating the curl was straightforward. This was, in large part, because the design of the AirGlide's plates means you don't have to grip the styler tightly to keep them clamped on the hair. Once you let go of the buttons, the plates come back together. This gives you more freedom to move the styler around your hair – a particular benefit for curling or adding waves – because you don't have to grip and twist. This frees up your other hand for greater control. It also prevents you accidentally clamping the hair too tight and causing unnecessary damage.

Despite these long styling times, though, whether I was using the AirGlide to straighten, curl or create waves, the results always looked great. My hair was smooth and sleek, and thanks to the cool air vents setting the style, frizz was vastly reduced and the style held its shape for hours. Even when I left the house. I'm not sure it's quite worth the extra styling time but it softens the blow considerably. 

Air vents on the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler

(Image credit: Future)

I also appreciated the fact that the styler ranges from 280 to 430F (138 to 221C), but my hair is too thin for the highest temperature setting and I didn't want to unnecessarily fry my hair. At the same time, the lower temperatures weren't hot enough to create the desired styles. The default 350F / 180C setting was more than enough for my fine hair, so if you're like me, you may end up paying more for a specification you don't need. However, if you have damaged, thick or natural hair, or if it's naturally straight, you'll likely get more use out of this temperature range than I did.  

I had worried that the air vents on the Calista would blow the hair in all directions and cause flyaways, but the airflow is gentle enough to simply cool and set, living up to the use of the word 'breeze' in the styler's name. If you want to get the most out of this feature, the brand recommends you hold the hair in place for between five to 10 seconds to set the hair properly. This can add to the already long styling times, not to mention expose the hair to potentially more damage, plus in my experience it's not entirely necessary, but it's worth noting. 

  • Performance score: 4 out of 5

Should you buy the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler

  • Used as my main styler for four weeks
  • Experimented with different heat settings
  • Created curly and straight styles

To test the Calista AirGlide Cool Breeze Styler, I used it as my main styler over the course of four weeks. Initially, I straightened my long, thin hair to test its basic functionality and performance. I timed each session to compare it with other stylers, like the GHD Chronos. I also used it to create waves and curls. 

Throughout those four weeks, I experimented with a range of temperature settings, to see how the styler performed and how long the style lasted. I made a note of how well the cooling vents reduced frizz and set different styles. Throughout the testing period, I tracked the styler's ease of use and overall performance in achieving smooth, sleek results, and monitored how my hair felt and looked at the start and the end. 

Read more about how we test

First reviewed June 2024

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD robot lawn mower review
9:00 am | July 15, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances | Tags: , | Comments: Off

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD two-minute review

If you’re in the market for wire-free robotic lawn mower that cuts grass as well as a human using a good-quality mower, the new Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD is an absolute shoo-in. I’ve been using this F1 racing car-inspired mowbot for the past three weeks and I’m struggling to come up with anything negative to say about it.

The LUBA 2 AWD’s inch-accurate GPS RTK navigation and grass-cutting technology is so dependable that every time I look at the finish of my lawn I wonder how on earth an autonomous robot could be so capable of such a flawless job without me having to endure any major technical shenanigans. If you want unswervingly straight and wide 15.7" / 40cm grass stripes 24/7, this is the lawnbot for you. Yes, it’s extremely expensive but then again the level of engineering on display here is near Formula One spec.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD climbing an incline

(Image credit: Future)

The LUBA 2 features all-wheel drive and has the ability to scale inclines up to a ridiculously steep 80%. It can also traverse very rough terrain, turn on a sixpence and negotiate borders and obstacles with aplomb. It is, to all intents and purposes, one of the very best pieces of technological kit this reviewer has seen over the years.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD review: price & availability

  • Price: from $2,099 / £2,149
  • Available now
  • On sale in the US and UK

Are you sitting down? Good, because even the cheapest model, the LUBA 2 AWD 1000, costs a whopping $2,099 / £2,149. However, given the huge amount of advanced technology on board, the enormous amount of time saved mowing the lawn yourself and possibly the cost of employing a human gardener to do it for you, this seemingly high price is actually pretty reasonable, especially given how well it does the job.

So where can you buy one of these sci-fi machines? If you’re in America, try Mammotion, Amazon or Walmart where the LUBA 2 AWD costs from $2,099. If you’re in the UK, head to the Mammotion store or Amazon where prices start at £2,149. 

  • Value for money score: 4.5 out of 5

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD specs

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD review: design

  • Formula One styling
  • 3D camera
  • Omni-directional front wheels

Robotic lawn mowers have been around since the early 90's but they’ve always been regarded as a bit of a niche product, due to the fact that they have all required having a long, complicated boundary wire installed to prevent them from straying into flower borders, ponds, swimming pools and other no-go zones. But that’s all set to change with the advent of the latest slew of self-navigating robot mowers that no longer need a perimeter wire.

Not only do the latest autonomous wire-free lawnbots require very little setup, they’re also incredibly efficient at keeping a lawn and, in many cases, several interconnected lawns perfectly manicured on a daily basis. With their advanced sensors, GPS navigation and smart connectivity, these cutting-edge sward scythes will negotiate a wide variety of complex lawn designs with ease, leaving you to get on with some of the more important things in life. I have one such technological marvel mowing my lawn right now, so let me tell you more about it.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD in front of a house

(Image credit: Future)

I’m a sucker for a well-designed piece of kit and the sterling LUBA 2 AWD is right up there when it comes to looks. Just seeing a photo of this robot mower’s striking Formula One-inspired body makes you want to rush out and buy one. And should you do that, you’ll doubtless be thrilled to discover during the unboxing process that it’s not just the body that screams high-end quality but practically every on-board component, too.

Let’s start at the beginning. After you’ve manhandled the giant box onto your lawn and sliced through the sealing tape, you’re presented with the gleaming robot in most of its glory. I say most because you will need to screw on the provided 3D camera and clip in the front bumper – but more on that in a moment. Reach down to the sides of the robot to get a hold of its two hidden grab handles and haul the 38.9lb / 17.12kg beast out of the box. Spend a little time at this juncture to admire what might turn out to be one the best purchases you’ve ever made.

Before I get to setting it up, here are a few tantalizing specs that make this mower such a stand-out product. Firstly, because this model uses ultra-accurate RTK GPS and a camera to navigate, there are no perimeter wires involved so you won’t need to spend hours on your knees digging silly little trenches around the edge of the lawn – a major bonus that cannot be ignored. Secondly, the LUBA 2 comes with a 15.7" / 40cm motorized cutting deck with remote-controlled height adjustment from 1 to 2.7" / 25 - 70mm in 5mm increments. The deck itself comprises two spinning discs, each equipped with four razor blades that cut and mulch grass almost as well as a cylinder mower, and as close to the edge of the lawn as any conventional mower. 

Since the deck is the same size as a standard medium-sized push lawn mower, it means that the specific LUBA 2 model on review here will cut lawns up to 0.25 acre / 1,000 square meters in next to no time. Fear not if your lawn is on the large size because the same unit is available in three other variants – 0.75, 1.25 and 2.5 Acres / 3,000, 5,000 and 10,000 square meters.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD on a lawn

(Image credit: Future)

The LUBA 2 AWD is renowned for its ability to traverse even the gnarliest of terrain and inclines up to a phenomenal 80% (38˚) – trust me, that’s steep! It manages this feat by dint of its all-wheel drivetrain, a pair of wide ribbed wheels on the rear, two grippy omnidirectional front wheels designed for zero turns and front suspension to help keep all four wheels on the ground.

Since practically all functions of the LUBA 2 are controlled via an app, there are just five buttons on the unit itself – on/off, mow, home, start and emergency stop. Facing straight ahead is the all-important 3D camera which is used for three levels of obstacle avoidance – direct touch, slow touch and less touch – plus self navigation when there is poor satellite reception. Meanwhile, various onboard sensors on the body and in the bumper help with further navigation, obstacle avoidance and detection of rain.

The LUBA 2 AWD features a long-lasting battery that provides ample runtime for extensive mowing sessions – up to two hours. When it runs low, the robot makes a bee-line for the charging station in readiness for the next task or, if the plot is extra large, completion of the current mowing session.

Most wire-free lawnbots are equipped with a range of security features. While there’s no guarantee this model won’t be lifted off the lawn, it does at least securely lock itself to the individual’s wi-fi network making it redundant to anyone beyond the wi-fi range. Mammotion also provides a slot for a 4G sim to further enhance its security by making the LUBA 2 trackable, though I haven’t been able to test that. For extra peace of mind, Mammotion also suggests fitting an Apple AirTag under the camera housing.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD with all its accessories

(Image credit: Future)

When it comes to setting it up, the LUBA 2 arrives with what seems like a daunting bunch of accessories. However, you’ll find the setting up process a veritable breeze. For the record, the package includes the robot, a top-mounted camera and obstacle bumper that need to be screwed into position, a charging base station (optional roof advised to keep sun off the bot), a 12v transformer for the charging base, a circular satellite receiver on a 1.7m pole with ground spikes for positioning next to the charging base, two lengths of 10m low-voltage cable, a bunch of ground screws to hold the base in position and a box of eight spare razor-style cutting blades.

Once you’ve mounted the aforementioned camera and bumper, installed the charging station and satellite receiver as instructed, and logged into the Mammotion app (iOS and Android), it’s time to map your lawn – or lawns, as the case may be, since this mowbot can handle up to 10 different lawns (or zones) by linking them all together using virtual passageways.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD app

(Image credit: Mammotion)

To map a lawn, simply tap ‘map’ in the app and create an area. Now drive the LUBA 2 around the perimeter of the lawn using the app’s virtual joysticks – just like an RC car. And that’s all there is to it – the LUBA 2 is now ready to roll out and do its first cut. I should add at this point that you should first mow the lawn yourself using your old-fashioned lawn mower so the grass is down to about 40mm in height. That way, the LUBA 2 can continue cutting the lawn at a height of, say, 35mm on a regular basis, without the sight of grass clippings littering the lawn. Instead, these tiny clippings will work their way into the soil, adding lots of lovely nitrogen which in turn will keep the lawn looking swanky throughout the summer.

There are two main types of navigation that today’s wireless robotic mowers employ: an HD camera like the Worx Landroid Vision and, as in the case of the LUBA 2 and others like the Segway Navimow iSeries, military-style RTK GPS which provides unerringly accurate navigation to within a few centimeters. This amazing pin-point accuracy allows RTK GPS-enabled mowbots like the LUBA 2 to mow the lawn in perfectly straight lines, leaving beautiful Wimbledon-style stripes in their wake. GPS guided lawnbots also work in a very logical manner, rather like a human being.

However, a good line of sight to at least 20 satellites is imperative for the system to work as advertised; the good news is that, even on a garden like mine where nearly two sides of the lawn are completely surrounded by tall trees, the LUBA 2’s RTK GPS aerial and the receiver in the bot itself have been able to see between 20 to 26 satellites at any given time, so all is not lost.

  • Design score: 5 out of 5

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD review: performance

  • Game-changing navigation
  • Creates pristine stripes
  • Excellent obstacle avoidance

When it comes to cutting performance, the LUBA 2 AWD truly excels. Its powerful but surprisingly quiet 60dB motor and AWD capabilities enable it to tackle steep inclines and grass as tall as the unit itself, though the latter isn’t advised unless you don’t mind clumps of grass littering the lawn. Crucially, the LUBA 2’s intelligent RTK GPS navigation system ensures extraordinarily efficient and very logical mowing patterns which cover every inch of the lawn without the mower ever venturing off into the flower beds. This beast’s wide 40cm cutting deck can handle large areas quickly, making it an ideal choice for sizeable properties.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD cutting stripes into a lawn

(Image credit: Future)

My main lawn is about half the size of a tennis court and pretty much square so it posed no challenge to the LUBA 2. It has been out every two days and, aside from one anomaly where it would stop in front of a border bush, it has performed impeccably well, cutting right to edge with its wide rear wheels leaving incredible pseudo stripes in their wake. And by stripes I mean truly stunning, perfectly straight lines that have been noticed by every guest who’s popped in for a visit. 

It turns out the aforementioned hiccup was due to my poor mapping in that area so I pulled up the app and edited it by steering the bot around that area once more, this time leaving more space to the border. I have had no stopping issues since.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD cutting along the edges of a flowerbed

(Image credit: Future)

My next test involved programming the LUBA 2 to cut our smaller front lawn and that of our adjoining neighbor, whose small lawn is much more complex and separated by a driveway. Unfortunately there’s a set of steep stairs between my main lawn – where the charging station and GPS receiver are situated – and the front lawn, so I wasn’t able to connect the two unless I created a permanent ramp between them. Had I done that, I could have theoretically connected all three lawns together by creating a set of different zones and connecting them all using the app’s clever virtual passageway function.

Instead I simply carried the LUBA 2 to the other side of the house and drove it RC-style around the perimeters of both lawns to create two different maps. I then created a virtual passageway between them. Given that the RTK GPS station was on the other side of the house I was amazed that it seemed to make no difference to how the LUBA 2 performed. Just like my main lawn, it cut the front section in straight lines, then did a perimeter lap before raising its cutting deck and crossing the driveway to my neighbour’s lawn where it dropped the deck again and performed the same exquisite cut while negotiating the curvy borders without its wheels falling into the flower bed. This truly amazed me because I spent very little time on the mapping of both lawns and didn’t expect the LUBA 2 to perform nearly as well as it did when used on my main lawn. In the pantheon of autonomous lawnbots, this thing is astonishingly competent and a bit like being thrust into the future.

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD on a gravel driveway

(Image credit: Future)

Another thing that has impressed me is the noise level, or rather the lack of it. Like most robot mowers, the LUBA 2 is unbelievably quiet. It can be passing you within a few feet and all you might here is the sound of grass being snipped – the motor itself is practically silent. This means you can mow the lawn at any time of day and your neighbors need never know.

In terms of any improvements to the overall cutting system, I personally would like to see Mammotion offer a similar automatic method like the Segway Navimow iSeries I recently reviewed for TechRadar’s sister publication T3. Without asking, the Navimow cut my lawn differently each time it went out. For instance, day one was vertical as expected but on sessions two and three, it cut the lawn horizontally and then diagonally. This method of cutting is thought to be good for the lawn so it would be great to have a feature like that with the option to turn it off if not required. You can still perform a multi-directional sequence like this with the LUBA 2 but you will have to program it yourself to cut in different directions each time and therefore create several different schedules in the process.

  • Performance score: 5 out of 5

Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD review: Mammotion app

  • Provides full remote access
  • Highly customisable
  • Perhaps too complex for some

Like most modern wire-free lawnbots, the LUBA 2 AWD is best used with the Mammotion app which allows you to control and monitor the bot, schedule mowing sessions, adjust an insane amount of settings including cutting height, angle of cut, speed of cut and the number of perimeter laps. You can even drive the LUBA 2 around FPV-style while viewing the image from the front camera. Furthermore, a brand new feature was recently launched that enables the user to create patterns and even words on the lawn.

Lawn printing with the Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD app

(Image credit: Mammotion)

It’s called ‘lawn printing’ and, although I haven’t tried this function, it shows just how accurate the LUBA 2 is at inch-perfect navigation. The app also provides the wherewithal to install firmware updates and these should not be ignored because they not only address known minor issues but chances are they will also include some features that will enhance the experience of using the mower.

However, while I find the app relatively easy enough to navigate, some users consider it too complex and confusing, especially with some of the terminology used. I agree that there is room for improvement in this regard. Nevertheless, like the comprehensive Roborock app for its robot vacuum cleaners and DJI’s Fly app for its drones, it's definitely worth spending time in the Mammotion app so you can familiarize yourself with its myriad features and functions. At first it may seem overly convoluted with all its customizable settings, but judicious scrutiny of the app will bear fruit and you’ll soon be setting the LUBA 2 up in exactly the way you want it.

  • App score: 4.5 out of 5

Should you buy the Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD?

Buy it if…

You want reliable performance

The LUBA 2 AWD comes with rock solid hardware and receives regular software updates for increased reliability.

You want beautiful lawn stripes

This mowbot leaves stunning grass stripes – and at any angle you prefer.

You want full remote control

Control LUBA 2 from anywhere in the world and even drive it around the lawn using the FPV camera.

Don't buy it if…

Your lawn is too small

If your lawn is of typical small urban size, the LUBA 2 may be overkill.

You want to keep to a tight budget

The LUBA 2 is expensive with a capital E.

You are a bit of a technophobe

The LUBA 2’s app may be too comprehensive for some users.

How I tested the Mammotion LUBA 2 AWD

I’ve been putting the LUBA 2 AWD 1000 through its paces for the past three weeks on a simple large square lawn layout plus a test of its multi-zone functionality and ability to pass from one zone to another without any input by the user. In many respects, the LUBA 2 has been one of the easiest of products to test because it hasn’t thrown up any conundrums or done anything out of the ordinary. It has just worked – and that’s quite a rarity.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed July 2024

Miele Classic C1 vacuum cleaner review
9:00 am | July 13, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Small Appliances Vacuums | Tags: | Comments: Off

Miele Classic C1 Flex two-minute review

The Miele Classic C1 vacuum cleaner comes in three very similar and identically-priced options: a Junior version with a sectioned suction tube, a standard version with a telescopic tube and XXL handle, and a Flex version with a telescopic tube and  an extra long, flexible crevice nozzle for cleaning difficult-to-reach places. In this review I tested the Miele Classic C1 Flex vacuum cleaner.

Although the Miele Classic C1 Flex is very well engineered and comes with an enormous amount of suction power – 800 watts of it – one questions whether a corded cylinder vac of this nature still has a place in the 21st century, let alone among the best vacuum cleaners. Aside from having to keep plugging it into different power outlets around the home and the extra baggage of having a long suction hose that makes it tricky to carry, the most awkward facet of this vacuum cleaner is the static brush head that makes it very strenuous to push on anything other than smooth hard flooring.

Miele Classic C1 Flex and a cuddly toy

(Image credit: Future)

Budgetary concern may sound like a very valid reason for opting for a corded model like the Classic C1 Flex but when you bear in mind that today's marketplace is filled with many modern cordless alternatives from the likes of Shark, Samsung, Vax and Tineco that cost roughly the same while performing just as well on hard floor and even better on carpet, it starts to look like the Classic C1 Flex may have passed its sell-by date.

Miele Classic C1 Flex review: price & availability

  • Price: $349 / £199 /  AU pricing varies
  • Available in a few variants (C1, C1 Flex, C1 Junior) for the same price
  • Flex version only available in the UK

The pricing and options for the Classic C1 depend on where you live. In the UK, there are a few variants – the C1, C1 Flex, C1 Junior – all for the same price of £199. In the US, there's a Classic C1 for a list price of $349 or a C1 Turbo Team PowerLine for $469 (this one comes with an added 'Turbobrush' aimed at tackling pet hair specifically). In Australia the range isn't as clear-cut because it's not listed on the official Miele website, but there are various options available at third party retailers, at a range of prices.

In terms of value for money, it's acceptable but not amazing. There are plenty of competitors' options in a similar ballpark, which I think offer better performance. 

  • Value for money score: 3 out of 5

Miele Classic C1 Flex specs

Miele Classic C1 vacuum cleaner review: design

  • Excellent build quality
  • Easy to pull around
  • Disappointing multi-floor head

Ask any modern tech-savvy householder whether they would ever consider buying a corded vacuum cleaner and they will probably tell you that that ship has sailed. I would tend to agree given that I am now so fully invested in everything cordless, from my stick vacs and robot vac to every outdoor garden power tool I have in the shed, including the lawnmower. Let’s face it, a corded cylinder vac like the Miele Classic C1 Flex I have on review here could never match a cordless stick for outright convenience and the ability to quickly vacuum a room before guests arrive.

On the flip side, corded cylinder vacs are quite often cheaper to buy than their equivalently powered cordless brethren and they'll never run out of power, which means you could vacuum every floor of a country mansion and then do the gatehouse and the rest of the neighborhood while you’re at it. Try that with a cordless stick vac and see how far you get.

Miele Classic C1 Flex and accessories on a rug

(Image credit: Future)

When it comes to household items, Miele is unquestionably one of the most prestigious brands around, and this is due in no small part to the overall quality of everything the company’s design team turns its hands to. After all, German-made Miele products are known to last for years – decades even – and this is testament to both the quality of materials used and the way they’re put together.

Take the Classic C1 Flex. Miele doesn’t advertise the types of plastic used in its vacuum cleaner bodies, but take it from me, this model is tough enough to withstand a fall down the stairs. I know this because I accidentally pulled my test model down a short flight and the body survived unscathed, even after clouting the wall at the bottom.

However, I am also mindful that there are are couple of oddities with the Classic C1 Flex that I find disheartening given Miele’s generally impeccable design ethos. For instance, other Miele cylinder vacs I’ve reviewed or owned have always had a handy little hideaway area under the lid to store away the provided detail tools. By contrast, this one comes with a plastic tool holder that clips on to the base of the concertina hose.

The Miele Classic C1 Flex's cylinder

(Image credit: Future)

This not only looks incongruous but the tools have a tendency to fall off if snagged against furnishings when pulling the unit along. I have since resorted to removing the holder and storing the tools in a bag along with the other 1,001 detail tools I’ve gathered over the years. For the record, the Classic C1 Flex ships with a rectangular upholstery nozzle, a crevice nozzle, a dusting brush and, as the ‘Flex’ moniker suggests, a long flexible nozzle tool for cleaning in hard-to-reach places.

Another element I’m not at all keen on is the main brush head. This is a much more serious anomaly in my opinion because this sole item is key to how well the cleaner works and how easy it is to push and pull, especially when used on carpet. Where most modern vacs are equipped with an optimally-positioned motorized brush head that swallows most larger items while beating its bristles deep into carpet pile, the Miele Classic C1 Flex ships with an old-fashioned static head comprising a single layer of stiff bristles at the front and two flexible plastic strips just behind it.

Underside of the Miele Classic C1 Flex's floor head

(Image credit: Future)

I’ll tell you more about this floor head in the performance chapter but, in short, it is extremely grippy when used on carpet and very difficult to push without breaking into a sweat. Given that its stablemate, the Miele Complete C2 Cat & Dog, ships with an easier-to-push motorised head for just £40 more, it seems like a missed opportunity on Miele’s part to not to equip all of its corded vacs with a motorised floor head.

The Classic C1 Flex features six levels of suction power which are accessed via a dial on the rear. Each setting is illustrated with an icon – curtains, upholstery, rugs, energy-saving, carpet and hard floor – but you can ignore that and just go for the most suitable level of suction for the task in hand. You can also reduce suction power further by opening the vent on the handle, though this increases the vac’s volume from a standard 71dB in full-power mode to an unpleasant 84dB.

Since this is a mains-powered model, you get 5.5 meters of spring-loaded cable tucked away inside its rear housing and this amounts to an operating radius of around 9m. To release the cable you simply pull it out to your required length and it will lock itself automatically. When finished, give the cable a short tug to release the locking mechanism and it’ll scoot back into its housing with the speed of an angry snake. However, you’re advised to hold the main unit in position with your foot when pulling the cable on hard floors or the whole vac will roll towards you. This is because the spring mechanism itself is strong enough to counteract the vac’s three extremely smooth-rolling, multi-directional micro castors. It’s not ideal, I know, but virtually every self-retracting cylinder vac I’ve ever used has had this very same issue.

Mains cable housing on the Miele Classic C1 Flex

(Image credit: Future)

At 12lbs / 5.8kg, the Classic C1 Flex is light enough to carry from the under-stairs cupboard to its place of work and it can be stored either horizontally or vertically. Crucially, the floor head with ungainly hose attached can be clipped to the main unit in either orientation though it’s still a cumbersome package to transport from room to room.

One of the main highlights of all Miele cylinder vacs, including this one, is the way their stainless steel suction tubes can be lengthened or shortened by pulling on a sheath. It’s inarguably the most tactile element on this machine and a system I’d love to see on all vacs, including sticks.

Heading into the enclosed bin section, the Classic C1 Flex is fitted with a substantial 4.76qt / 4.5L microfibre HyClean GN dust bag and just behind it, Miele’s excellent AirClean filter which helps keep carpet dust smells to a minimum. As I explain in my Bagged vs Bagless article, I’m a big fan of bagged vacuum cleaners because they produce almost zero dust when emptying, are better at collecting fine dust particles like ash and they require very little filter maintenance. That’s true of the Classic C1 Flex. However, you only get one dust bag with this model and a set of four extra bags will set you back $22.99 / £13.99.

  • Design score: 2.5 out of 5

Miele Classic C1 vacuum cleaner review: performance

  • Excellent suction power
  • Too difficult to push on carpet
  • Dust-free emptying

I remember the days before cordless stick vacs took hold and you had to wrestle with a snake-like hose while pulling the main unit around behind you, which in turn was connected to a mains plug. It was a system of many foibles, including the cable getting snagged on furniture and the main unit turning turtle because you yanked it so hard out of frustration. You also had to keep unplugging it and plugging it back in every time you changed rooms.

Sorry to report, but this is one such model. However, the Miele Classic C1 Flex isn’t totally devoid of merit because it’s a sterling dust sucker on hard floors, even though it’s not great at collecting larger pieces of detritus like biscuit crumbs.

Power is something the Miele has in spades – all 800 watts of it. In fact, even in lower ‘carpet mode’, this vac’s limpet-like suction is strong enough to lift a rug off the floor. Which is why I say to ignore Miele’s power level guidance and just use the most suitable power level for the job in hand.

Miele Classic C1 Flex sucking flour and crushed biscuits off a wood floor

(Image credit: Future)

As per usual, my first hard floor test involved a good sprinkling of flour and crumbed biscuit with the main brush head set to ‘hard floor’ mode – i.e. with the front-mounted stiff bristle brush engaged. This brush is constructed like a castle battlement with nine small 5mm gaps positioned at regular intervals so larger items can slip through and up the suction tube.

Miele Classic C1 Flex sucking corn flakes off a wood floor

(Image credit: Future)

As anticipated, the floor head snowploughed most the flour and larger biscuit crumbs on the forward stroke so I simply lifted the rear of the head by a few centimeters and pulled it backwards. Everything vanished up the tube. I then tried it using a handful of Crunchy Nut corn flakes and, again as predicted, the head simply pushed everything ahead of it with no evidence of even a single flake making its way to the suction area. Again, I was able to collect every last flake when using the head in reverse and lifted at a short angle. No it’s not ideal, but that’s generally what happens when you don’t use a motorized head with a decent gap between the front of the head and the floor.

Miele Classic C1 Flex gripping a rug while trying to clean up flour

(Image credit: Future)

I then proceeded to perform the same test on a medium pile rug and had to reduce the suction to level three – two levels lower than the recommended setting – because the head was impossible to budge. Despite still being very stiff to push, the brush head made a surprisingly good fist of collecting most of the crumbs and all the flour, though I did have to perform a few back and forth sweeps to collect the cornflakes. I also tried the same test with the handle’s suction reduction vent open and this made it easier to push at the expense of a massive increase in volume – from 71dB to 84dB – that made it sound like a jet engine during take off.

As it stands, Miele’s universal floor head is perfectly useable on most hard floors bar, say, delicate polished concrete or premium wood. After all, it picked up all dust – right to the very edge – and most items smaller than an oat flake. However, I’m not convinced that this is the right type vac for carpets or rugs of any depth because it takes far too much effort to push. In fact, I can’t see anyone other than the very fittest managing to finish a single carpeted room without needing to have a little lie down. By comparison to most cordless stick vacs, this specific model’s brush head felt outdated and of another age.

On the plus side, the Miele has oodles of suction power for tasks like vacuuming down the side of sofa cushions, while its extra long and flexible suction tool is one of the very best for sucking up crumbs and crisps between car seats and the center console.

  • Performance score: 2.5 out of 5

Should you buy the Miele Classic C1 vacuum cleaner?

Buy it if...

You have a lot of hard flooring

The Classic C1 Flex is a decent performer on hard floors.

You have a lot of rooms to clean

This vac will vac till the cows come home.

You want reliability

Miele is renowned for the high quality of its products.

Don't buy it if…

Your home is mostly carpeted

The Classic C1 Flex’s static brush head is not suitable for carpet.

You don’t want to be tethered to a mains plug

You will need to keep plugging this vac in from room to room.

You don’t have much storage space

The hose and long suction tube make it ungainly to store.

How I tested the Miele Classic C1 vacuum cleaner

Having hauled all parts out of the box, I first tested this model on hard engineered wood flooring using a combination of fine flour and crumbed biscuits, a handful of raw porridge oats and some Crunchy Nut corn flakes. 

I then carried out the same test on a medium pile rug. I also gauged the amount of hassle it posed when using it, plugging it into various power outlets and carrying it upstairs and storing it away.

  • First reviewed: July 2024
Nutribullet 600 Series blender review
8:00 am | July 12, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Home Juicers & Blenders Small Appliances | Comments: Off

Nutribullet 600 Series: two-minute review

The Nutribullet 600 Series is a simple, affordable and effective model from the brand behind many of the best blenders on the market. It offers one blending speed and a twist-to-blend mechanism that works well, although some might prefer a good old-fashioned button instead. 

On test, I found it tackled frozen berries, fibrous fruit and nuts with ease, although wasn't powerful enough to crush ice. If that's a priority, you should opt for the 900 Series (which you can read about our Nutribullet 900 review), which is identical except for having a more powerful motor (900W vs 600W for the 600 Series), and being more expensive as a result.

It's not ideal for creating chunkier blends, because the single, fast speed means the lower ingredients immediately get pulverized into a paste, while the higher ones never reach the blades at all. I managed to use it to make a (rather wet) hummus, with a bit of shaking up in the middle on the process, but it was pretty useless when it came to pesto. (Really, blenders are designed to be used for creating liquids – if you want to be making salsas, pestos and the like, you're much better off reaching for one of the best food processors instead.)

The build quality is solid, as I'd expect from Nutribullet. And because it's a well-known brand that specializes in blenders, you have the benefit of a wide range of compatible accessories – cups of different sizes, and assorted lid options. Some are included with certain configurations of the 600, but if not they're available to buy if you need them. 

This budget model is pared-back in terms of functions and features, but it does the essentials (blending, even tough ingredients) really well. If you just want something reliable and effective for your morning smoothie, then it's a good shout. Read on for my full Nutribullet 600 Series review.

Nutribullet 600 Series review: price & availability

  • List price: $69.99 / £59.99 /AU$99.95
  • Available: US / UK / AU
  • Lower-middle of the Nutribullet range, and budget price bracket overall

Price-wise, the 600 sits towards the lower-middle of the Nutribullet range, and in the budget price bracket overall. For the price, I think it's excellent value. It's simple in design and function, but does the essentials well. 

In the US, there's only one option. It comes with a blending cup and separate takeaway cup with lid and handle, and has a list price of $69.99. 

In the UK, you can choose the 'starter kit' version with just the blending cup, which costs £59.99. Alternatively, the 600 Series comes with an extra takeaway cup and costs £69.99. I'd actually recommend this second version, because it's super useful to have a lid, and not to have to decant your smoothie into a separate cup. 

In Australia, the version with a cup is called the 'Essentials set' and costs AU$109.95, while the no-cup version is AU$99.95. The takeaway cup is a little different with that version compared to the UK and US versions. 

The main difference between the different Nutribullets is the wattage – which translates roughly to 'how powerful is it?'. The 600 Series has 600W of power. The Magic Bullet To Go is cheaper ($58.95 / £34.99 / AU$59.95) but has only 200W of power, which means it's for very basic blending jobs only.

The version up is the 900, with 900W of power, and a list price of $109.99 / £89.99 / AU$99.95 (read our Nutribullet 900 review for more on that one). Head to the comparison table in this review for a basic rundown of how the different models compare.

Small appliances often attract discounts around major shopping events like the Black Friday sales or Amazon Prime Day deals, so that can be a good time to shop if it suits when you need to buy.

  • Value for money score: 4 out of 5

Nutribullet 600 Series specs

Nutribullet 600 Series review: design

  • Twist-to-blend, no presets or pulse option
  • To-go cup / lid included with some packages, or can be purchased separately
  •  BPA-Free cup is dishwasher-safe, but blade isn't

The Nutribullet 600 Series has the classic Nutribullet design. The motor that powers everything is built into the base, while the extractor blade that does all the hard work comes in its own separate unit that screws onto the blending jug. The jug and blade then twist on to the base, which is weighty (so it won't go juddering across your countertop as you blend) but smartly designed. 

Rather than having buttons, this twisting mechanism is what starts and stops the blending. It's straightforward and works well, but some people might find a button easier to operate. If you're seeking presets or different blending speeds, you'll need to look elsewhere – this is an on/off situation only.

Nutribullet 600 Series in reviewer's kitchen

(Image credit: Future)

Nutribullet as a brand has a few different sized blending cup options, as well as handles, lids, sip rings (to cover the screw threads for more comfortable drinking) and drinking lids, that can be used with the Nutribullet blender range. Some 600 Series packages come with to-go accessories included, but if yours doesn't then they can be purchased separately to increase the versatility of your blender.

Cleaning

In terms of cleaning, the cups can be popped into the dishwasher on the top rack, but the blade isn't dishwasher-safe. Nutribullet recommends rinsing it under warm water to clean it, but I think this is one of the trickier blenders to clean. Mixture builds up around the edge of the blade section, and when the cup is removed, spills into the screw threads, which are very difficult to get properly clean. Food also gets stuck in crevices between the wide, flat blades. 

Hummus stuck in blades of Nutribullet 600 Series in reviewer's kitchen

(Image credit: Future)

Even if you rinse (or, as I find most effective, add water to the cup, screw on the blade, and vigorously shake) straight after blending, there'll often be a bit of residue left in the nooks and crannies. And if you leave food to dry on the blade... forget about it. 

  • Design score: 3.5 out of 5

Nutribullet 600 Series review: performance

  • Effectively blends frozen berries to a smooth consistency
  • Drier mixes often leave paste at the bottom and unblended mix at the top
  • Not powerful enough for making crushed ice

I tested the Nutribullet 600 by making a smoothie and some hummus. Let's start with the smoothie. I added a puck of frozen spinach, frozen blueberries and frozen banana, alongside almond milk. It blitzed the fruit fine, but struggled with the frozen spinach. I'm not surprised, as it was a fairly large and solid chunk. After leaving it to melt slightly, it managed to break the spinach up fine. I'd surmise from this that it would be powerful enough to create crushed ice. 

For the hummus, it worked effectively, but required just the right amount of liquid. Too little liquid and it blended the ingredients next to the blade too effectively, leaving a paste at the bottom and never reaching the ingredients at the top. I had the same issue with pesto. I tend to reach for a food processor (or even just a mini-chopper) when I need to create a chunky blend, and to be fair that is the tool that's designed for the job. 

I'd say the fact that this model is powerful enough to blend frozen berries to a smooth consistency means it'll be plenty powerful enough for most people's needs. If you're regularly needing to tackle larger chunks of hard ingredients, you might consider one of the models with higher wattage. Smaller, handheld models often don't have the power to tackle anything hard (so while I haven't tested the To-Go blender from Nutribullet yet, I suspect it wouldn't have enough blending power for frozen berries).

There's only one blend speed here, but it'll work for most blending jobs. It's also easy to 'pulse' by just twisting the cup quickly, although some people may prefer buttons and presets. 

Like all blenders I've tested, it's noisy, although it doesn't feel overly so, and it's not at a particularly ear-splitting pitch. If you're very sensitive to noise, the pricier Ultra is designed to be quieter and operate at a more ear-pleasing pitch, relatively speaking (read TechRadar's Nutribullet Ultra review for more on that model). 

  • Performance score: 4 out of 5

Nutribullet 600 review: comparison table

Keen on the Nutribullet brand, but not sure which model is right for your needs? Here's a quick run-down of the differences between them...

Should you buy the Nutribullet 600 Series?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Nutribullet 600 Series

  • Made a smoothie, hummus and pesto, and tried crushing ice
  • Assessed how easy it was to clean
  • Compared performance to other blenders and choppers

To test the Nutribullet 600 Series, I used it to make hummus, a smoothie and pesto, as well as seeing if it could crush ice. I made a note of the consistency of results and whether it needed a mid-blend shake-up. I also assessed the build quality, how easy the blender was to use and if it was overly or unpleasantly noisy. I hand-washed the cups and blade after each test to see how easy it was to get clean. I compared my results to other blenders and choppers I've used.  

Read more about how we test

First reviewed June 2024

« Previous PageNext Page »