ACT! CRM, launched in 1987, is one of the oldest names in customer relationship management. It offers tools for small and medium businesses to manage customers, sales, and marketing. Interestingly, ACT! provides cloud and on-premises options, catering to both productivity- and security-focused businesses.
In my review, I found ACT! CRM to be a lot more than just a CRM platform. Like a few other small business platforms, it includes features for automating sales, marketing, and customer service. It also gives a complete view of customer interactions, helping businesses track data, manage sales, and run targeted campaigns.
Flexibility is a key advantage of ACT!. The platform allows rigorous customization to fit specific business needs. Its adaptability, along with its solid reputation, makes this a top choice for small and medium-sized businesses.
ACT! CRM core capabilities
(Image credit: ACT! CRM )
ACT! CRM has a long-standing reputation as a leading contact management tool. Its records are very detailed, allowing users to store information like notes, documents, and interaction history in one place.
Lead management is strong, helping users track potential sales from initial contact to closure. The customizable sales process allows businesses to align stages with their unique sales methods, benefiting companies with specific workflows. A visual sales pipeline view helps users project revenue, adjust strategies, and prioritize efforts. Contextually-relevant metrics provide quick insights into pipeline health, aiding sales managers in making informed decisions.
For sales forecasting, ACT! has solid functionality, though it may lack the depth of some enterprise CRMs. Users can create forecasts based on opportunity data, closure probability, and historical performance. This suffices for most small to medium businesses, though more complex needs may find it limiting.
Reporting has improved significantly. ACT! Insight offers interactive dashboards for individual, team, and business performance metrics. The range of over 50 pre-configured reports covers sales, marketing, and business health KPIs. Users can also create custom reports, providing deeper data insights.
ACT! also offers a companion app for iOS and Android. The app provides access to key contact details, activities, and some dashboard metrics on the go. While it lacks full desktop functionality, it covers essential needs for field sales and remote work.
Beyond the usual CRM features, ACT! offers tools for creating and managing email marketing campaigns, including a template editor and response tracking. Useful for small businesses looking to streamline operations.
Custom tables also allow users to manage industry-specific data alongside standard CRM information. ACT! also syncs with popular platforms like Microsoft Outlook, Google products, and social media channels like LinkedIn and Facebook, creating a seamless workflow.
But while ACT! has a solid core, some users may find the interface less modern compared to newer CRM solutions. Its software has evolved from its contact management roots, but some legacy aspects remain. Still, it's a good platform with strong customization features that could serve niche and security-focused small businesses well.
How easy is ACT! CRM to use?
When it comes to ease of use, ACT! CRM offers a mixed experience. Its interface is functional but feels somewhat outdated compared to modern CRMs. When I first logged in, I had to slowly adjust to the information-dense layout, which can be overwhelming for new users.
A dashboard displays various widgets with crucial information like daily tasks, open opportunities, and sales pipelines. Navigation is handled through a left sidebar that lists all CRM features, providing quick access to different modules.
However, the top menu adds to the interface's overall complexity. It took me around 30-60 minutes to become comfortable with the layout and navigation, which aligns with feedback from other users about the software's learning curve.
ACT! offers robust customization options, allowing users to tailor the software to their specific business needs. Its flexibility is a significant advantage for businesses with unique workflows. However, making these customizations isn't always intuitive and requires technical know-how.
Accessibility features are present but not particularly advanced. ACT! offers basic screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation but lacks sophisticated accessibility options found in newer CRMs.
On the positive side, ACT! provides comprehensive onboarding and training resources. It includes helpful tutorial videos, a knowledge base, and webinars to assist new users in getting up to speed. The "Welcome Links" on the dashboard, which provide quick access to uploading, importing, and learning about the CRM, was a nice touch.
Available for both iOS and Android devices, the mobile app offers a more streamlined and user-friendly interface compared to the desktop version. I found adding new opportunities or contacts to be much more intuitive on the mobile app, even if it's more limited in functionality.
Overall, ACT! CRM’s ease of use is hampered by an outdated interface and a sometimes overwhelming amount of information. For businesses willing to invest the time in training and setup, however, it can be a powerful tool.
ACT! CRM integrations
(Image credit: ACT! CRM )
ACT! CRM offers a powerful set of integration capabilities, balancing between pre-built integrations and the flexibility to create custom ones.
The ACT! Marketplace serves as the central hub for the integrations, offering a wide array of pre-built connectors categorized by function, such as sales and marketing, business productivity, social media, ecommerce, back office, and customer service.
I particularly appreciated the seamless integration with Microsoft Office suite, including Outlook, which allows for effortless synchronization of emails, contacts, and calendar events. For users of Google Workspace, ACT! also offers solid integrations with Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Contacts.
ACT! also support Zapier, a no-code automation platform that lets you build custom integrations without technical knowledge. This opens up lots of possibilities for connecting ACT! with hundreds of other web applications. During my testing, I was able to create several Zaps (automated workflows) that connected ACT! with tools like Slack for notifications and Trello for project management.
For more advanced users and developers, ACT! provides a comprehensive API. API documentation is well-structured and easily accessible through the ACT! developer portal. It follows REST principles and uses JSON for data exchange, making it relatively easy for developers to create custom integrations or extend the functionality of ACT!.
ACT! also offers a feature called Web API, which allows for more direct integration with web-based applications. This can be particularly useful for businesses with custom web applications or those looking to embed ACT! functionality into their existing web platforms. While powerful, I found that leveraging the Web API requires more technical expertise compared to using pre-built integrations or Zapier.
In terms of data syncing performance, ACT! generally performs well. During my tests, most integrations maintained near real-time synchronization with minimal latency. However, I did notice occasional delays with some third-party integrations, particularly during peak usage times.
How good is ACT! CRM support?
ACT! CRM provides a multi-faceted approach to customer support, offering users various channels to seek assistance. During my evaluation, I found that the quality and accessibility of support resources were generally good, although there were some areas where improvements could be made.
Phone support is available during standard business hours. Response times are reasonable with an average wait time of about 5-10 minutes. Support representatives are knowledgeable about the product. However, it's worth noting that phone support is only available to customers on higher-tier plans, which may be a drawback for smaller businesses.
All users have access to email support. Simple queries are typically answered within 24 hours, while more complex issues sometimes took up to two days for a response. The quality of the email responses is generally good, with clear explanations and step-by-step instructions.
Something that ACT! falls short in is the lack of live chat support. Many users prefer the immediacy of chat for quick questions or troubleshooting, especially when most competitors offer robust chat support options.
ACT! makes up for this somewhat with its extensive self-service resources. Its knowledge base is comprehensive and well-organized, covering a wide range of topics from basic setup to advanced features. I found the search function to be particularly useful, quickly surfacing relevant articles based on keywords. It also includes a good selection of video tutorials.
ACT! CRM's community forum is another valuable resource for users. It's active and well-moderated, with both company staff and experienced users contributing to discussions. ACT! also offers regular webinars and training sessions, which serve as both educational resources and indirect support channels.
In terms of resolution times for support tickets, my experience and research suggests that the company performs adequately but not exceptionally. Simple issues are often resolved within 1-2 business days, but more complex problems can take longer, sometimes up to a week.
User testimonials regarding ACT!'s support quality are mixed. Many users praise the knowledge and helpfulness of the support staff, particularly for phone support. However, some users express frustration with longer wait times for email support and the occasional need to escalate issues to get them resolved.
ACT! CRM pricing and plans
Plan
Premium Cloud
Premium Desktop
Premium Cloud w/ Desktop Sync
Price
$30/user/month
$37.50/user/month
$40/user/month
Best For
Small businesses needing cloud-based CRM with basic marketing features
Businesses preferring on-premises CRM solution with advanced customization
Organizations requiring both cloud and desktop access with data synchronization
Features
Comprehensive contact management
Basic marketing automation
Cloud-based accessibility
Advanced customization options
Robust offline capabilities
On-premises data control
Cloud and desktop access
Data synchronization
Combined cloud-desktop benefits
Limitations
Limited advanced marketing features without addons
Requires IT resources for maintenance and updates
Higher cost may not justify benefits for all users
ACT! CRM offers a straightforward pricing structure with two main plans: ACT! Premium Cloud and ACT! Premium Desktop. There’s also a third plan that brings together the best of both worlds into a single costlier subscription.
The ACT! Premium Cloud plan is priced at $30 per user per month when billed annually. This cloud-based option provides the core CRM functionality along with basic marketing automation features. It offers good value for small to medium-sized businesses that need a comprehensive CRM solution without the hassle of on-premises deployment.
For those who prefer an on-premises solution, ACT! offers the Premium Desktop plan at $37.50 per user per month, billed annually. This higher price point reflects the additional costs associated with self-hosting and maintenance. It provides more control over data and customization, which could be beneficial for businesses with specific security or compliance requirements.
A third plan, ACT! Premium Cloud w/ Desktop Sync, offers a hybrid deployment option for modern businesses who prefer to have an additional layer of security. It lets you create an on-premise backup of your cloud CRM, ensuring redundancy in case of an attack or breach.
ACT!'s pricing includes basic marketing automation features in both plans, providing additional value for smaller businesses. But for more advanced marketing capabilities, ACT! offers additional Marketing Automation plans. These range from $79 to $399 per user per month, billed annually. While these plans significantly increase the overall cost, they provide sophisticated features like advanced campaign management and lead scoring.
ACT! also offers several add-ons that can impact the final pricing. These include enhanced support ($10 per user per month), custom tables ($10 per user per month), additional cloud storage ($5 per month), and SMS messaging capabilities ($19 per month).
A potential drawback I noticed is the lack of a free plan. Many competing CRM solutions offer a basic free tier, which can be beneficial for very small businesses or for those wanting to test the system extensively before committing. ACT! does provide a 14-day free trial, which is sufficient for a basic evaluation of the software, but it may not be enough time for a thorough assessment in a real business environment.
ACT! CRM review: Final verdict
ACT! is a feature-rich incumbent that has successfully adapted to the changing CRM landscape over its long history. Its comprehensive contact management, powerful sales tools, and integrated marketing features make it a compelling choice for small to medium-sized businesses looking for an all-in-one CRM.
The software's strength lies in its flexibility, offering both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options. This, combined with extensive customization capabilities, allows businesses to tailor the platform to their specific needs. However, the somewhat dated interface and steeper learning curve may be deterrents for those seeking a more modern, instantly intuitive solution.
While ACT! may not be the fastest-growing or most innovative CRM on the market, it's well-suited for companies with complex contact management needs or those looking to integrate their sales and marketing efforts within a single platform. It's also a great choice for businesses in regulated industries with complex data security needs.
The minute I heard Emily in Paris season 5 was actually going to be Emily in Rome season 1, I breathed a sigh of relief. After four seasons of Emily (Lily Collins) relentlessly chasing after Gabriel (Lucas Bravo), getting into relationships she shouldn't and making chaotic decisions at work that accidentally made her a PR success story, we needed a change of scene.
I was desperate for an injection of fresh energy and a feeling that the tried-and-tested format could be revamped in a way that still honors the show's foundations. But boy, how wrong I was. As the saying goes, if it ain't broke, don't fix it – and, after watching the entirety of this season, I feel as though I've accidentally manifested a crummier version of what we already had.
The worst part is that the show is now inferior because, rather than let the story evolve naturally, the decisions its creative team made instead are, frankly, baffling.
At the end of last season, Emily had met Italian beau Marcello (Eugenio Franceschini) and was ready to take her career to the next level by heading up the new Agence Grateau office in Rome. However, Emily in Paris 5 u-turns on its forebear's setup by unnecessarily shoehorning Sylvie (Philippine Leroy-Beaulieu), Luc (Bruno Gouery), and Julian (Samuel Arnold) into Emily's new Italian life. On top of that, Marcello is revealed to be the most repulsive and odious boyfriend since Logan (Matt Czuchry) in Gilmore Girls.
We stay in Rome for less than half of season 5, too, and the diabolical heavy handling of Emily's time there had me practically sobbing for more Gabriel screentime. How did things change so much during the show's year-long absence?
Emily in Paris' core concept has been ruined by bad creative decisions
It's not an easy thing to say, but I genuinely believe the fabric of Emily in Paris season 5 has been torn to shreds by misguided creative decisions. Not just in one area either, but across the board.
Let's start with Rome. In this season's premiere, Emily finds out that her season 4 finale dream of heading up Agence Grateau in Rome is nothing more than a sham. Instead, Sylvie decides to dispatch the entire team to Rome and resume her leadership there, which in turn undoes season 4's career step-up for the show's protagonist.
Not only is Emily unfulfilled at work (mostly because everyone around her is determined to make her feel inadequate or bulldoze their own dreadful decisions through), but her personal life isn't going too well, either. The Marcello we met in season 4 is sexy, mysterious and full of possibility. In season 5, though, he's selfish, flippant, and not overly interested in building a partnership.
By episode five, all of the above has fallen apart. What's the point in this colossal upheaval if you're not going to do the best by your main character? In hindsight, it all feels pointless and like a missed opportunity – but we're only just scratching the surface of those.
For instance, spoilers notwithstanding, best friend Mindy (Ashley Park) has a relationship with someone she shouldn't. When she lies about it to Emily, the two get in a massive albeit needless fight. With the pair each flitting between two men at any given time, the weary yearning is yet another sign of subpar storyline development.
Only Gabriel can save the day if Emily in Paris season 6 happens
Yes, give me that sweet Emily-Gabriel reunion, season 5! (Image credit: Netflix)
Despite the fact I've fully signed off on suspending any belief before I've sat down to watch, there's only so much partner-swapping I can take in a Netflix series like this. Now that Mindy has joined Emily's romantically indecisive bandwagon in the worst way, investing in any kind of Emily in Paris relationship has never felt so superficial.
The pair's various romances, nor their friendship, offer anything of value, instead only delving further into shock factor that doesn't do anyone justice. Emily and Mindy used to have such a wholesome, nourishing relationship that has now dissolved into high school mean-girl meddling. Whatever happened to girls before guys?
The same can be said for Emily and Gabriel, who are in an uneasy lovers-to-friends middle ground, though Bravo hardly has any screentime. It almost feels like the show's creators know they've made a mistake sending Emily to Rome, and are now trying to furiously backpedal by shoehorning Gabriel into scenes that subsequently feel less coherent
Thankfully, there's potential for Emily in Paris season 6 (which is currently unconfirmed) to set this right. If it happens, I think season 6 would need to be the series' last – and you'll see what I mean when you watch this season's finale. If our end goal of Emily in Paris is for Emily and Gabriel to finally live happily ever after, it has one last shot to land it the proverbial plane.
Basically, I'm just desperately trying to retcon my own past thoughts and get Gabriel back in the thick of Emily's personal life. We thought a change would work but, after it was butchered, the only way up is for the show's creative team to give us what I initially thought I didn't want.
Even Sylvie, Luc, and Julien have veered too far from their start, with Sylvie's personal life becoming one preposterously stereotypical joke, while Luc and particularly Julian pale into existence. Emily's not being treated well, either, but at least she looks immaculate.
I promise that there are moments of light-hearted normality amid an otherwise subpar season. For the most part, though, Emily in Paris' latest chapter is très mauvais. That said, as long as Marcello never shows his face again, there's still enough reason for me to see any future seasons out...
Emily in Paris season 5 is out now in full on Netflix, aka one of the world's best streaming services.
The Geekom AX8 Max is a mid-range mini PC designed for office workers using Microsoft Office and Google Docs, but also needing a machine powerful enough for some light multimedia editing. Inside is a relatively powerful AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS CPU, complemented by an integrated Radeon 780M graphics processor that enables support for up to 4 displays or a single 8K monitor.
The small size of the machine is ideal for small home offices as well as general offices, with plenty of connection options for easy integration. One of the features I always like to see on a mini PC is a VESA mount on the back, so it can be neatly tucked away, further helping to save space.
The Geekom AX8 Max is a well-specified mid-range machine, and this is reflected in its price point. The mix of a new AI-ready CPU and PCIe Gen4 SSD all comes together in a solid mini PC that will suit many different types of users, although Geekom have tried to make this mini PC a little more interesting by giving it a slightly peculiar pale blue colourway.
For most day-to-day office tasks, the AX8 Max fares exceptionally well, ploughing through large PowerPoint presentations without issue. When working with Word and Excel on dual 4K monitors, it takes the whole process in its stride. Surprisingly for a mid-range machine, it also handles Premiere Pro, editing HD and straight 4K video, as long as the edits don't get too complex and there isn't too much colour grading applied. However, as the render process builds up for more complex projects, you can start to hear the fans kick in, helping to keep everything cool and avoid any thermal throttling.
Having edited a 30-minute video, it was possible to feel that some thermal throttling was happening, as the inner workings of the machine were pushed with 4K video from the Sony A7 IV. However, considering the form factor, it fared incredibly well, and whilst the fans were audible, they were by no means the loudest I’ve come across.
In reality, mobile phone 4K and HD video is better suited for editing on this machine. While it does have the power to edit higher resolution video, the limited upgrade options when it comes to memory, with maximum internal storage only reaching 2 TB and RAM capped at 64 GB, mean even with an upgrade, it only has enough clout for base 4K video editing, with little headroom if effects do get more complex.
When it comes to storage, there is the ability to upgrade the internal capacity. However, with two USB4 ports on the back, you have instant expandability with external SSDs that will provide very decent 40 GB/s transfer rates.
Another point that lends itself towards office use is the wide range of connectivity options. There are plenty of USB-A ports across the front, but unfortunately, no USB-C. Around the back, there’s a full array of HDMI, USB-A and USB4 ports, including network LAN, meaning if you’re working in an office, it’s easy to hook this into your network as well as connect accessories.
Like many of the best mini PC machines I've tested this year, the performance all around is exceptionally good. While its Windows Experience score was like other mid-range machines, an exceptionally fast SSD and DDR5 RAM ensure most applications run quickly and smoothly, giving extremely solid performance throughout the test.
Gaming, as with multimedia editing, is well-handled, but again, the fans kick in with anything too complex. Most games play without issue, and if you're into just a bit of light gaming, even with high-end titles, this small machine will suffice.
My only other comment on this machine is the colorway, which appears to be pale blue. While this machine is exceptionally good considering its mid-range profile, that seems a bit of an odd choice.
The price of mid-range mini PCs has definitely escalated, but then again, so has the processing power. The Geekom AX8 Max certainly raises the bar when it comes to what we now expect from a machine at this price level.
The review machine I tested will set you back around $629 directly from the Geekom website and can also be purchased through most major online retailers, including Amazon.com.
Value: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Geekom AX8 Max: Specs
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS Graphics: AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU RAM: Dual‑channel DDR5, up to 64 GB Storage: M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4×4 SSD, up to 2 TB Front Ports: 4 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 3.5mm headphone, Power Rear Ports: DC Jack, HDMI 2.0, 2 x USB4, 2 x 2.5G RJ45 Connectivity: Dual 2.5G LAN, Wi‑Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2 Audio: HDA CODEC Size: approx. 135 × 132 × 46.9 mm OS Installed: Windows 11 Pro (64-bit) Accessories: VESA mount, HDMI cable, power adapter, user manual
Geekom AX8 Max: Design
Geekom mini PCs have continued to evolve, and with the AX8 Max, you can see an update in the quality of the design. The small mini PC feels exceptionally well built and robust, with a metal chassis that means it's equally at home in a static office setup, used in a van, or taken between locations as a powerful portable mini PC. As a choice for Van Life it’s also well suited offering more protection against moisture, shock and dust than most.
As I mentioned earlier in the review, while the build quality of the mini PC is exceptionally good, it is finished in a slightly peculiar colourway which will appeal to some, but for me personally is a little off-putting and doesn’t really feel very office-centric.
The size is also on the larger side for a mini PC, measuring 135 x 132 x 46.9 mm, still small, but slightly larger than what we've seen recently. Weight-wise, it's also well balanced, coming in at 800 g for the machine with an additional weight for the power adapter, meaning it's equally at home placed on the desktop or mounted onto a VESA mount and placed out of sight behind a monitor or on a dedicated wall mount.
Despite the colourway, it does have a premium finish, and this is reflected in the slightly higher mid-range pricing. This also reflects the quality of the internal components that enable this mid-range mini PC to make an impact with higher-demand applications that would have overwhelmed some older mid-range options.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Around the body, there's a good volume of ports. Across the front of the machine, there are 4 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, a 3.5 mm headphone jack and the power button. It is a bit of a shame there’s no USB Type-C on the front of any denomination. However, around the back, again, there's a good volume of ports. Alongside the DC jack for power, there are also 2 HDMI 2.0 ports, 2 USB4 ports, 2 2.5G RJ45 ports, a USB 2.0 Type-A and a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A — enabling accessories both new and old to be plugged in without much issue.
Inside the machine, there is dual-channel DDR5 5600 MT/s RAM with a maximum of 64 GB. In the review sample, it arrived with 32 GB of RAM — more than enough for day-to-day office tasks and just enough for light multimedia editing. Surprisingly, the SSD storage is a little limited: it's only possible to install an M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4×4 SSD up to 2 TB. This is quite limited for this level of machine, and I would’ve expected support for at least 4 TB. However, while the maximum capacity is limited, I think more due to heat dissipation than anything else, it is exceptionally quick and one of the fastest internal SSDs I’ve seen in recent mini PC tests.
Helping to keep everything cool is the IceBlast 2.0 cooling system, which features air outlets on both sides of the machine to help dissipate internal heat from the CPU, memory and SSD. Access to these components is made through the bottom of the machine by simply undoing the screws and lifting away the base plate. Once removed, it reveals the dual-channel RAM and SSD slot, allowing quick upgrades or replacements.
Design: 3.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Geekom AX8 Max: Features
The speed and specifications of mid-range mini PCs have recently improved with the integration of the latest AI-ready CPUs. The Ryzen 7 8745HS features eight cores, 16 threads, and has been coupled with the integrated Radeon 780M GPU, which has a good track record for performance in mini PCs.
This combination of CPU and GPU, along with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and a PCIe Gen4×4 SSD, is well-suited for anyone looking to use the machine for software beyond standard office applications, including creative programs such as Illustrator, Photoshop and Lightroom, and even photo and video editing at 1080p and light 4K.
What sets this mini PC apart from other mid-range options we’ve seen in the past is that it features the Ryzen 7 8745HS CPU, which includes AMD’s XDNA-based NPU architecture. This means it’s better able to handle lightweight AI workloads locally, such as background blur in video calls, speech transcription, and voice assistants in applications like Photoshop and Premiere Pro. It also enables faster localised AI processing.
It’s not just the CPU that has an AI boost, the integrated Radeon 780M GPU also supports AI-enhanced media. Although it doesn’t feature dedicated AI silicon, it still improves processing in enhanced video encoding and supports hardware-accelerated AV1 codec, which is useful for both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe products.
If you're looking for an AI workstation for development and thinking this mini PC might be a great option, then it’s worth noting that it's not designed for deep learning or running an LLM chatbot locally. Instead, it’s better suited for more mainstream AI use. For something more AI-tuned, it’s probably best to look at something like the Sapphire Edge AI 370.
As covered in the design section, there’s a good number of ports, including exceptional connectivity with USB4 ports on the back that offer 40 Gbps transfer and 100 W PD power. So, if you have other devices that need quick charging, that port is an option. Alongside the physical ports, there's also Bluetooth 5.2 for connecting most wireless keyboards and mice, and Wi-Fi 6E for fast internet connection speeds.
Another big feature is the ability to connect up to four 4K monitors — two through USB4 ports and two through the HDMI 2.0 ports. There's also the option to connect an 8K monitor, although you’ll only be able to use one 8K monitor at a time, rather than four 4K displays.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Features: 4 / 5
Geekom AX8 Max: Performance
Benchmark scores
CrystalDiskMark Read: 6,731.02 MB/s CrystalDiskMark Write: 6,023.3 MB/s Geekbench CPU Multi: 12,660 Geekbench CPU Single: 2,440 Geekbench GPU: 29,050 PCMark Overall: 6,741 Cinebench CPU Multi: 15,518 Cinebench CPU Single: 1,703 Fire Strike Overall: 7,346 Fire Strike Graphics: 7,965 Fire Strike Physics: 27,074 Fire Strike Combined: 2,746 Time Spy Overall: 3,162 Time Spy Graphics: 2,808 Time Spy CPU: 11,076 Wild Life Overall: 16,022 Steel Nomad Overall: 499 Windows Experience Overall: 8.2
Getting started with the Geekom AX8 Max is relatively straightforward. Once plugged in, all you need to do is run through the Windows 11 Pro setup screens, log into your Microsoft user account along with any others, and the machine is ready to go. This process now takes between five and ten minutes to complete, as Microsoft tries to encourage sign-ups to its various services.
However, once done, you don’t have to go through it again, and the speed of the internet connection from the outset, provided by the Wi-Fi 6E, helps speed things up.
During setup and plug-in, it’s worth noting that, while this mini PC is compact, the power adapter must also be considered. While not especially large, it is still a bulky addition.
Starting the tests, both Microsoft Office and Google Docs ran exceptionally smoothly. Microsoft Office applications opened quickly and ran without issue. Checking through the benchmark tests, the Windows Experience score of 8.2 is about average for mid-range mini PCs. While some may experience slight lag in more media-intensive apps like PowerPoint, the very fast SSD ensures image and large file processing is handled exceptionally quickly.
In fact, when I started looking at more advanced applications, I felt like this small machine was able to cope with a lot more than expected. That’s in part due to the speed of the internal SSD, which recorded one of the fastest transfer rates I’ve tested this year, 6,731.02 MB/s read and, more impressively, 6,023.3 MB/s write. This meant it didn’t just handle media-intensive Microsoft applications quickly, but also large image files in Photoshop and Lightroom, as well as video data within Premiere Pro.
This makes it a great option for office workers who need to create large presentations with images or video, or for those involved in multimedia creation using CapCut or Premiere Pro.
Taking processing demands up a notch I loaded a few images from the Canon EOS R5C into Photoshop, the speed was good, and it handled high-resolution image files, applying adjustment layers and effects without noticeable lag.
As I experimented with Lightroom, general use was excellent, and even batch editing was handled without issue. The only time I noticed a slowdown, compared with my desktop, was when using AI features such as Denoise or Enhance Details. While it processed the images, there was a marked difference compared to my desktop machine. In Photoshop, day-to-day work, including layers, effects and exports, was all good, but when using local smart features like Neural Filters or Smart Portrait, some slowdown was noticeable, especially with tasks requiring GPU power.
In multimedia production, starting with CapCut and footage from the iPhone 15 Pro, the machine handled the data with no issue. As templates were applied, the speed remained solid, and CapCut ran smoothly, making editing easy.
Upgrading the production using Premiere Pro, things began to slow down slightly, but the machine still handled thumbnail and timeline renders at a decent pace. It was only when I loaded in 4K video that it started to struggle, with the fans kicking in, especially during grading.
One of the main issues with Premiere Pro was that, while 1080p footage from an iPhone or DJI Action 5 edited without issue, moving to 4K footage led to stuttering during playback and increased render times, along with noticeable fan noise.
When it came to AI features such as Auto Reframe, Scene Edit Detection and Speech to Text, processing was considerably slower compared to my desktop PC.
To finish the test, I played a couple of games, Hogwarts Legacy and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle. Both were fortunately playable, but settings had to be reduced for smooth playback. Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, in particular, showed noticeable stutter, the kind you often get when the CPU and GPU are struggling with the detail.
So overall, this is definitely a machine designed for mid-range office and light multimedia work, less suited to anything beyond that, and especially not a great option if you are gaming.
Performance: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Geekom AX8 Max: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Geekom AX8 Max is a great option for any office looking for a slightly quirky-coloured mini PC that enables them to complete day-to-day tasks, create relatively complex presentations, and do a little light multimedia editing.
Some highlights of this mini PC include its connectivity, with two RJ45 ports at the back enabling direct network connection and offering plenty of storage expansion. I also like that it comes with two USB4 ports, allowing connection to mass external storage or ultra-fast PC accessories.
Colourway aside, the build quality is exceptionally good, and with all those ports, it offers a great office solution. I am, however, a little surprised that upgrade options are limited to just 64 GB RAM and 2TB internal storage.
If you are in the market for a slightly quirky-coloured mini PC, this offers solid performance across the board and is reasonably well priced, particularly compared with a machine like the Beelink SER9.
Should I buy the Geekom AX8 Max?
Value
Good value for money for a solid office machine that allows light multimedia editing
4
Design
Solid design with plenty of ports that enable easy connectivity — just a shame about the colour
3.5
Features
A well-balanced mid-range mini PC with a good range of features, including AI readiness
4
Performance
SSD transfer speeds are exceptionally good, giving the CPU and GPU a performance boost compared with similarly specced machines
4
Overall
A great no-fuss machine for the office that offers excellent speed for day-to-day administration and multimedia editing
4
Buy it if...
You need office desk space You want a compact PC that doesn’t take up much desk space but handles office, coding and creative workloads smoothly.
You're creating a multi‑monitor setup You need 4K/8K output, multiple displays or a hidden setup, but still want good performance in a small form factor.
Don't buy it if...
You're running heavy‑duty GPU workloads You plan extensive 3D modelling, rendering, high-end gaming or anything where a GPU is needed.
You demand maximum performance under load If your workflows involve sustained heavy multi-core or graphics tasks, thermal throttling might limit performance compared with a full-size desktop tower.
The Dome (Gen 2) is a beast. Eating 16-inch pizzas for breakfast and capable of firing multiple smaller pizzas at once, the Dome (Gen 2) and its even bigger Dome XL (Gen 2) sibling are something you’d expect in a commercial kitchen rather than in an urban backyard. This big presence is met with refined design and elegant coloring, giving it the personality to be the centerpiece of the most bourgeoisie of outdoor kitchens.
This grand oven is pitched by Gozney as a great outdoor all-rounder and while I agree with this sentiment, the truth is that your kitchen oven is easier to use for most oven-baked dishes and your stock standard barbecue is arguably more versatile. But what these other devices can’t do is make pizza, and the Dome (Gen 2) is the most competent and easy to master pizza oven that a backyard has ever been graced with.
Gozney’s decision to add a second thermometer under the thick pizza stone compliments the usual ambient temperature gauge and gives relatively inexperienced pizza makers the keys to the kingdom for perfectly cooked pizza every time. But the company has also shifted the dial meaningfully on wood-fired cooking capabilities with the new active rechargeable fan that lets you boost oxygen input to quickly adjust the oven’s temperature as if you’re cooking with gas.
The opportunity for wood-fire or charcoal cooking is where you start to see some of the real versatility of the oven, which can be used to infuse wood-cooked flavors into a variety of dishes that would otherwise require another separate technical oven like a Green Egg or an Argentinian grill.
The included dual meat probes and capability for high-heat cooking means it’s can cook proteins particularly well, possibly better than many barbecues if you pair it with a cast-iron skillet. The new lateral gas burners and redesigned interior arch stretch the flames and heat further and more evenly across the top of the oven, and while the ovens are bigger, they’re more efficient than their predecessor, using only fractionally more gas despite the additional internal space.
The new Dome and Dome XL Gen 2 ovens boast a number of new features that offer major advantages over the original design, but the headline act has to be the bigger internal space added without making the oven considerably bulkier. This additional internal floorspace means that the oven is large enough to cook multiple pizzas or dishes simultaneously, making it capable of serving large dinner parties.
The large cooking space is paired with the ability to achieve sustained temperatures up to 500ºC/932ºF for perfect pizzas in quick rotation, which also allows the user to experiment with wood-fire cooking and smoking to make it an extremely versatile outdoor oven that will appeal to a lot of people.
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Price & availability
Dome (Gen 2): $2,300 / £2,000 / AU$2,999
Dome XL (Gen 2): $2,800 / £2,500 / AU$3,999
The Dome XL (Gen 2) is at the top of Gozney’s current range of pizza ovens and at $2,800 / £2,500 / AU$3,999 the price is a major consideration for any one looking for an outdoor pizza oven. If you’re a sporadic at-home pizza maker, dropping this much cash is steep and, to be honest, the Gozney Arc at $699 / £600 / AU$1,200 or the Tread for $500 / £500 / AU$899 are excellent ovens that’ll more than scratch this level of itch.
Where the Dome (Gen 2) – listed at $2,300 / £2,000 / AU$2,999 – really starts to make a lot of sense is if you're after a professional-level pizza oven at home. Reputable built-in ovens start at more than double what you’re looking at for the Dome (Gen 2) and there are a lot of trade-offs you’ll have to consider if you do go the built-in route. The Dome (Gen 2) may lose out a little on overall thermal mass, but the dual-fuel versatility and Wood-fire Control Kit ($200 / £175 / AU$299), offers additional temperature control that makes it notably easier than managing a traditional pizza oven.
The Dome (Gen 2) can sit directly on the countertop of your outdoor kitchen or can be purchased with the Dome (Gen 2) Series Stand for an extra $500 / £500 / AU$849. The Gozney accessories are all crafted to the same standard as the ovens themselves, so the stand combines sturdy and durable materials with handy hooks for hanging peels, holding gas cylinders and storing wood.
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
The Dome (Gen 2) Door ($100 / £90 / $149) is a handy bit of kit for those looking to use the oven for cooking anything under about 500ºF/250ºC, and the Dome (Gen 2) Mantle ($170 / £140 / $249) helps you use a peel to rotate pizzas and makes it easier to check on dishes using cast-iron pans, baking dishes or dutch ovens.
Gozney’s more recent Pro Placement Peels start at $90 / £90 / AU$179 for a 12-incher, but they are a big step forward from earlier iterations and have a more dispersed perforation pattern to help your bases slide on and off better. Even the $60 16-inch Acacia Wood Pizza Peel and Server boards earn their keep by giving you a board big enough to build on that’ll keep your pizza from sweating, sticking and ripping as can happen when using a metal peel.
Even the Dome (Gen 2) Neapolitan Arch ($60 / £50 / AU$89) makes it considerably easier to give your pizzas perfect leopard spots, although it’s important to note that it’ll make the opening of the Dome (Gen 2) too narrow to get a big 16-inch pizza peel in.
Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Specs
The Dome and Dome XL (Gen 2) ovens are both larger than the original Dome, offering 40% and 90% more internal cooking space respectively. While they’re big jumps in cooking real estate, the ovens actually only take up 17% and 43% more floor space than their predecessors respectively. The (Gen 2) range also includes dual temperature readouts so you can easily see the difference between your stone and ambient oven temperatures.
Both ovens come with LPG gas connections included, with compatibility for the optional Wood-fire Control Kit. Since it’s such a core feature, it would have made sense to include this by default, but those interested in gas only will appreciate the discount.
Dome (Gen 2)
Max temp:
500ºC / 932ºF
Heat time:
40 – 45 minutes
Pizza capacity:
1 x 16-inch pizza or 2x 10-inch pizzas
Weight:
136lbs / 62kg
External dimensions incl. flue (HWD):
986 x 826 x 652 mm / 38.8 x 32.5 x 25.7 in
Oven mouth size (HW):
140mm x 419mm / 5.2 x 16.5in
Dome XL (Gen 2)
Max temp:
500ºC / 932ºF
Heat time:
40 – 45 minutes
Pizza capacity:
1 x 18-inch pizza or 2x 12-inch pizzas
Weight:
161lbs / 73kg
External dimensions incl. flue (HWD):
997 x 946 x 697 mm / 39.3 x 37.2 x 27.4 in
Oven mouth size (HW):
140mm x 470 mm / 5.2 x 18.5 in
Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Design & features
Wood and gas temperature control
Extremely spacious
Stylish design
The overall material selection and considered design of the Dome (Gen 2) ovens are bold enough to make them a hero piece in even the most luxe outdoor kitchens, but the Bone and Off Black color options are also subdued enough to not clash with your home’s unique style.
This wide appeal and versatility continues through the overall design allowing users to make more than just excellent pizza, but also indulge in high-heat steak sears, wood-fired veggies and smoky slow cooks on occasions when you really want to lean into your outdoor cooking.
The original Dome included an adjustable air intake vent to facilitate some control over the heat generated by the wood fire, but the Dome (Gen 2) takes this convenient feature a step further by adding a rechargeable fan that actively pumps air through the burning wood to dramatically increase the level of temperature control. This active ventilation even includes a boost function to supercharge oxygen delivery and considerably speed up temperature-saturation time. The residual ash and other prep requirements mean the option to wood fire your pizza is more work than gas, but the additional airflow control makes this the easiest wood-fire oven on the market.
While Gozney has done an amazing job reducing the additional work in wood-fire cooking, the immediacy and control of gas means it’s still likely to be the go-to fuel for your day-to-day pizza making. The Dome (Gen 2) incorporates the lateral burner design that debuted on the Arc range and combines it with the reengineered ceiling shape to enable the flames to stretch right across to the far side of the oven. This helps to spread heat across the 30mm cordierite stone base during warmup and cooks pizzas more uniformly from the top down.
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
There’s a new digital interface powered by a rechargeable battery that’ll get you through 10 pizza sessions (at least) before needing a recharge. The new display comes with an easy-to-use timer with readings for both stone base and ambient oven temperatures, which does away with the need for remote thermometers and guesswork.
For those that do want to cook non-pizza dishes, the Dome (Gen 2) comes with a pair of meat probes that plug directly into the display to help you cook proteins to the desired level using higher heat or wood-fire methods that would otherwise be a little tricky to translate.
The other main design feature is the flu extension, which helps maintain airflow and improves resilience in windy weather. The oven works best with little to no wind, but it’s also fine in winds that approach from behind the oven. If you do have gusts blowing directly in and you can’t reorient the wheeled oven stand, you’ll need to use the door (or a baking tray) a little off the mouth as a windbreak to help you maintain temperature control.
Design & features score: 5/5
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Performance
Perfect pizza every time
Solid thermal retention
Easy wood-fire operation
It’ll come as no surprise that the Dome (Gen 2) is exceptional at cooking pizza. It nails the basics of being able to sustain 932oF/500oC temps and has a stone base thick enough to cook dough as quickly as the toppings, but all Gozney’s ovens (and many others) are able to achieve this.
Where this range really begins to separate from the pack is in offering a balance of insulation and thermal mass that facilitates back-to-back pizzas in minutes. The added luxury of cooking multiple pizzas at once without seeing major dips in core temperature means you can upscale your production and host larger pizza parties with confidence.
Nothing on the market comes close to the added speed and convenience of wood-fired pizza that the active fan adds. The fan boost function brings the control almost up to the level you get from gas-fired pizza making. This reduces the effort and required skill down considerably and means that frequent wood-fired pizza is a feasible staple rather than an occasional labor of love. This makes the Dome (Gen 2) a difficult option to pass up for anyone serious about wood-fire pizza.
Image 1 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Image 2 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Image 3 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Image 4 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Image 5 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
Throw in the additional height of the Dome (Gen 2) Series stand and it elevates the cooking platform to a comfortable shoulder level for easier delivery and retrieval, plus it makes for better visibility without the need for crouching.
If you really want to perfect your traditional Neapolitan pizzas, then the Arch accessory intensifies the oven’s capacity to maintain perfect ambient temperatures for leopard spots. In fact, all the accessories add convenience or expand capabilities in different ways that do not disappoint.
The larger mouth opening means you can fit a dutch oven or taller pot in and the additional floor space can accommodate a pair of cast-iron skillets or multiple baking trays side by side. All of which adds considerable versatility to your outdoor cooking capabilities.
(Image credit: Future / Joel Burgess)
If you're hoping to use it more as an oven at lower temperatures, don’t expect it to be quite as easy as your electric oven. Maybe in Gen 3 we’ll get a wood-fire thermostat, but for now it still requires active management. The Door does reduce temperature loss to a degree every two or three seconds, so you can prep other dishes or have a short conversation before firing it up again.
The new series does miss out on the Steam Injector bread-making attachment, but given the oven is much better at high-heat cooking, it’s a sensible sacrifice that made way for the improved internal oven arch and heat distribution.
Performance score: 5/5
Should you buy the Gozney Dome (Gen 2)?
Buy it if...
You like wood-fire pizzas
The Dome (Gen 2)’s active wood-fire fan provides unparalleled control and ease for anyone interested in using wood to cook. The boost functionality considerably speeds up initial heating and the rechargeable fan provides enough control to make it easily to master.
You want to make more than pizza outdoors
For anyone hoping to get a little more out of their pizza oven, the Dome (Gen 2) is a standout when it comes to internal capacity and versatility. You can fit an entertainer's feast in there and utilize any oven-safe kit you’d usually use indoors to really stretch and experiment with your outdoor cooking.
You’re keen to make pizza at scale
There are plenty of cheaper Gozney options for those looking to make a few pizzas for the family once a week, but if you’re looking to cook pizza for larger groups or you often daydream about starting your own pizza truck business, then the heat retention of the Dome (Gen 2) allows you to upscale to make tens of pizzas back to back with minimal downtime.
Don't buy it if...
You need a portable oven
If you think you might like to make pizza while camping as much as you will at home, then the Gozney Roccbox or Tread are likely to serve you better.
You won’t cook more than five pizzas in a night
If you’re just going to cook pizza for your family and at the occasional dinner party, then an Arc or Arc XL is a considerably more compact and affordable offering.
You aren’t that interested in wood fire
The Wood-fire Control Kit is an optional extra and there are arguably enough features to justify the Dome (Gen 2) without this attachment, but a lot of the unique appeal of this device comes from its ability to use wood and charcoal to cook pizza and other dishes.
Gozney Dome (Gen 2) review: Also consider
Gozney Roccbox This compact portable pizza oven is more than capable of cooking excellent 12-inch pizzas at home or anywhere you can think to carry it. It’s fast, efficient and makes pizza good enough to be the perfect option for most people’s requirements.
Gozney Arc The Arc and Arc XL are Gozney’s mid-range offerings that provide exceptional 14 or 16-inch pizza capacities in a small enough footprint to sit on an apartment balcony. If you’re keen for the most convenient way to make perfect pizza at home, then the value offered by the Arc ovens is unbeatable.
Noted heat-up time and used a thermometer for temperature readings
Used all available fuels
I tested the pizza oven over a period of a couple of months, making pizzas frequently for guests, family dinners and sometimes even for lunch.
Various other kitchen utensils were utilized to explore the versatility of the oven and all accessories mentioned (with the exception of the wood-fire kit) were tested for usability and frank feedback on each has been provided. The wood-fire kit was in short supply at the time of testing and will be tested following the review publication. The review will be updated with any pertinent findings at a later date.
The internal stopwatch was used to measure heat-up time and an infrared thermometer was used to verify the internal thermometer’s readings.
The oven was tested at various temperatures and using a range of settings to cook different toppings.
Over 40 pizzas and other dishes were cooked before coming to a final conclusion.
More of a purpose-built living room toy box, the Nex Playground is quick to set up, easy to understand, and designed to get bodies moving immediately. Yes, you’ll notice the technical ceiling in visuals and occasional frame stutters, and the Play Pass model won’t work for everyone. But as a family-friendly, camera-controlled alternative that’s safe, approachable, and surprisingly versatile, from party chaos to light fitness, it delivers on its core promise: making play feel effortless for all ages.
The console has carved out a rare lane in gaming, so much so that it reportedly outsold both the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series gaming consoles during one week in November 2025. That outcome isn’t hard to understand: as development budgets climb, hardware R&D gets pricier, and tariffs add pressure, mainstream gaming has become an increasingly expensive form of entertainment. At the same time, the motion-control boom of the mid-to-late 2000s, the massive growth of mobile gaming, and the rise of free-to-play games have expanded the audience, making it easier than ever for anyone to pick up a controller.
Spending over a year with the Nex Playground, I’ve realized that this small cube-shaped gaming console is the little engine that could. On a surface level, this device feels like an extension of what Nintendo did with the Wii. Outside of an included remote to select games alongside managing settings and your account, the 40+ games available are all controlled through an ultra-wide camera that sits on the console’s front panel.
All of that comes at a cost of an MSRP of $249 (around £188 / AU$380 - worldwide availability TBC), despite a handful of retailers selling the Nex Playground at a sale price of $199. This definitely places it as a cheaper alternative to more mainstream consoles. When it comes to games, users of the console are provided five games to start with: a full-scale version of Fruit Ninja, Whack-a-Mole, Goal Keeper, mini-game-centric Party Fowl, and rhythm title Starri. They all do a great job in setting the tone for what the Nex Playground is actually capable of.
(Image credit: Future)
Anyone looking to go deeper into the console’s library of games will need the Play Pass subscription service, which opens users up to over 40 games that, unfortunately, can’t be purchased individually. Some folks may also have an issue with the service only being available in three-month $49 and one-year $89 intervals.
Regardless, the variety of games does offer something for everyone, with age ranges split between preschool level to around 10 years old. It also helps that the Playground is kidSafe+ COPPA certified and lacks any online play capabilities. So games are family-friendly, lacking mature or inappropriate content here.
Alongside fun games like Tennis Smash and Arrow Party, there are more action-oriented options like Sword Slash Adventure, which has some clever RPG elements, alongside Aeon Guard. There are also various licensed IP games, including Bluey, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Miraculous, Barbie, and Peppa Pig, among others. There is also a fitness section featuring games such as Nex Fitness and Zumba Fitness. These games control fairly well and are definitely fun in short bursts or at parties.
Most of the games outside a handful lack depth, length or visual fidelity compared to what’s coming out of mainstream consoles, and many have some performance issues. In fact, many look like games that would be either on the Wii in 2006 or early 2010s mobile games. That’s because the Nex Playground isn’t that powerful when it comes to performance specs.
What’s packed into this small cube is run by an Amlogic A311D2-NOD CPU, Mail-G52 MC4 GPU, and 16GB LPDDR4X RAM. That’s enough to play these games at 4K resolution and up to 120 frames per second. With the specs, that trade means very low poly models, unsophisticated lighting and lack of post-processing effects. So don’t expect anything like Ray Tracing and the likes. When it comes to storage, there’s 64GB of SSD storage, which is fine, as many of the games don’t get any larger than a few gigabytes anyway.
Nex Playground review: price and availability
List price: $249
Available now in the US, worldwide availability to be confirmed
Available through the Nex Playground store alongside other retailers, including Amazon and Walmart
Currently available in the US, the Nex Playground can be purchased right now through the manufacturer’s online store or through other retailers, including Amazon and Walmart. It's available at a retail price of $249, though some retailers occasionally have it listed at an introductory sale price of $199.
Though it’s not directly available in the UK and Australia, individuals in those territories can still purchase the device from the US storefront through services like Big Apple Daddy or Amazon. The price alone places the Nex Playground below mainstream consoles, including the Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 5, and both Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S.
In a modern world where development costs are pushing price points of games to nauseating degrees, the Nex Playground comes packed with a five-game starter pack.
Buyers looking for a bigger selection will need the Play Pass subscription. That’ll run users $49 for three months or $89 for a year. And the catalog of around 40 games has been steadily growing as well. Out of all of the games I played, more than half of the 40+ games provide adequate levels of entertainment. Regardless, for what users pay for the console and the subscription service, it’s definitely worth it.
Nex Playground review: Specs
Price
$249 (around £188, AU$380)
Weight
14.2oz / 403g
Dimensions
5 x 5 x 5in / 127 x 127 x 127mm
CPU
Amlogic A311D2-NOD
GPU
Mail-G52 MC4
RAM
16GB LPDDR4X
Frame rate
Up to 120fps
Resolution
Up to 4K
Optical
N/A
Storage
64GB SSD
(Image credit: Future)
Nex Playground review: design and features
The Nex Playground is beautiful with its yellow and teal accents at the top and off-white on everything else. With dimensions of 5 x 5 x 5 inches (127 x 127 x 127mm) and an overall weight of 0.89lbs / 14.2oz (430g), it’s impressively portable, and there’s a handy carrying case available for purchase through the Nex Playground site for $24.97.
Outside of the ultra-wide camera on the left side, the right side features a small horizontal LED bar that lights up when the device is switched on. On the bottom side, panels are small holes for ventilation purposes. The back panel is where the HDMI and USB-C power port are located. The USB-C power cord also has a string connected to the magnetic camera cover. It connects and disconnects fairly easily from the ultra-wide camera. This will give parents a sense of relief in terms of privacy concerns.
The Nex Playground is an incredibly simple machine and one that’s very easy to set up, then. Just plug in the HDMI cord alongside the power adapter, and users are ready to go.
Also included is a Roku-sized remote to move the on-screen cursor, make selections, return to previous menus, or go to the Home screen. Users initially will use the remote for the simple start-up screen, which also requires a phone to create a Nex Playground account for various settings. After that, the setup is complete, and you’re good to go.
(Image credit: Future)
Nex Playground review: Performance
As mentioned previously, the specs lean more toward a lower spec Android TV boxes include popular options like the Beelink GT King II, the Khadas VIM4 SBC, and a range of generic streaming players from brands such as SZ Tomato through its Amlogic A311D2-NOD CPU, Mail-G52 MC4 GPU, and 16GB LPDDR4X RAM.
Don’t expect anything on the level of Cyberpunk 2077 or even Super Mario Odyssey. The visuals here will remind many of something one would play on a smartphone in the 2010s or a higher-res Nintendo Wii game. Expect simple texture, animation, and lighting work all around that does exactly what it’s supposed to do.
To put things into perspective, Fruit Ninja made its debut in 2010 for iOS devices. Seeing it on the Nex Playground is fine as it runs great, but it’s just Fruit Ninja in 4K. Some games can rely on cool visual design that makes up for the lack of visual fidelity, such as Sword Slash Adventure and Aeon Guard.
Though it’s worth noting that some games I played had performance issues, with some going below 30fps. For example, when too many explosions and effects are happening in games like Arrow Party and Kart Racer Miniacs: Steering Madness, there are noticeable dips in frame rate.
One thing for sure is that the performance of the ultra-wide camera and AI-motion engine is top-notch when it comes to actually controlling games. If there’s an outstanding example of how well camera-based controls have evolved over the decade, the Nex Playground’s catalog of software is definitely it. Pulling an imaginary arrow with a friend feels really good in Arrow Party, and moving side to side while trying to serve in Tennis Smash does feel like an evolution of Wii Sports' Tennis.
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Nex Playground?
Buy it if...
You need an affordable gaming console Not only is the Nex Playground currently available at a $249 MSRP, but the cost of its Play Pass is also affordable.
You want an attractive, compact console that’s simple to set up Setup is effortless; just connect the HDMI for video, plug it into a power outlet, and you’re ready to go. The process is simple enough that even kids or individuals who aren’t technologically savvy can jump in and start playing with ease.
You want a nice amount of games available that work really well Several dozen games are available on the console, and most of them are fun to play solo or with friends. Most importantly, there’s a little something for everyone.
Don't buy it if...
You want games that offer significant amounts of depth and length Most of the games offered on the Nex Playground are more for short bursts than anything incredibly deep.
You want to avoid subscriptions and buy individual games Outside of the five games that come with the Nex Playground, the other several dozen games require a Play Pass service subscription that can only be purchased in three-month or one-year intervals. This also means that users can’t buy games individually.
You want cutting-edge graphics The price and form factor alone should let anyone know that this isn’t going to be a graphical powerhouse. Most of the games on the Nex Playground are definitely mid-range mobile phone or Wii era visuals.
Nex Playground review: Also consider
The Nex Playground is certainly for a specific niche, so here are a couple of other console options worth considering, too.
Nex Playground
Nintendo Switch 2
Xbox Series S
Price
$249 (around £188 / AU$380)
$429.99 / £395.99 / $AU699.95
$399.99 / £349.99 / AU$599
Weight
14.2oz / 403g
18.8oz / 535g
68oz / 1,920g
Dimensions
5 x 5 x 5in / 127 x 127 x 127mm
10.7 x 4.5 x 0.6in / 272 x 114 x 15mm
10.8 x 5.9 x 2.6in / 275 x 151 x 65mm
Connection type
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI Output
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI output (in TV mode)
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-A, HDMI output
Battery life
N/A
2-5 hours
N/A
Features
Ultra wide Camera control, Nex AI-Motion Engine, Remote Control
8-inch OLED multi-touch display (1080p resolution), 256GB internal storage, improved stereo speakers, next-gen dock with 4K output and integrated LAN port, reinforced adjustable kickstand
512GB Storage, Xbox Game Pass
Nintendo Switch 2 Users looking for a more traditional console that’s more family-friendly can look to the Nintendo Switch 2, which provides a wide variety of games that appeal to all age groups. Not only can you get more traditional first-party and third-party games, but the hybrid form factor lends to good portability.
Xbox Series S If a simple box and controller setup is what you’re looking for, then the Xbox Series S has a large library of modern games, backwards compatibility with previous Xbox generation titles, and is ideal for the Xbox Game Pass subscription service as well.
Played a large share of the games including the starting five pack
Experienced the games included with the Play Pass subscription
I’ve owned the Nex Playground for about a year, which gave me plenty of time to really learn the ins and outs of this unique console. Beyond the five games included out of the box, my Play Pass subscription opened up access to more than 40 additional games.
The games that came closest to a traditional console experience were Sword Slash Adventure (RPG), the Wii Sports-inspired Tennis Smash, Arrow Party, and Aeon Guard. Together, they made it easy to see how well the ultra-wide camera and AI-powered motion engine work in tandem.
As the successor to 2023’s OnePlus Pad Go, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is the latest mid-range tablet from OnePlus, sitting between the budget-friendly OnePlus Pad Lite and the premium-tier OnePlus Pad 3. As with any mid-range device, there’s always the expectation that one or two big compromises have been made to keep the price down, but with the OnePlus Pad Go 2, I’ve struggled to find one.
This is as good a mid-range tablet as I’ve tested yet, and it's emboldened by a handful of upgrades that give it far more in common with the more expensive OnePlus Pad 3 than its more affordable sibling. The jump to using the MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra chipset is the biggest change of the bunch, as it doesn’t just pave the way for amazing gaming and everyday performance; it also allows for the inclusion of OnePlus’ excellent Open Canvas software, which is a big win for productivity users.
Having Open Canvas available in tandem with the now larger 12.1-inch display, which uses a 7:5 ratio, means the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is an instant win for students or buyers on a budget who want the productivity experience provided by the OnePlus Pad 3 without having to fork out such a substantial amount of cash.
In fact, with the inclusion of 5G connectivity (something which the Pad 3 does not have), there’s a case to be made that, until OnePlus’ more powerful tablet gets the same treatment, the Pad Go 2 might be more preferable by default for anyone who’s constantly on the move and can’t stay connected to a single Wi-Fi network for too long.
(Image credit: Future)
The battery in the OnePlus Pad Go 2 has also been beefed up, jumping from 8,000mAh to a whopping 10,050mAh cell, which means you can go for longer between charges (always helpful if there isn’t a power outlet in sight).
The only setback with the Pad Go 2 is that the design isn’t quite as striking as what we’ve had before, with the OnePlus moving away from the green colorway that made the original Pad Go stand out, and instead moving towards a subdued style that will feel familiar to anyone who’s seen the similarly redesigned OnePlus Nord 5.
Still, it’s a minor blemish on what is, overall, an outstanding tablet. The next time someone’s shopping on the mid-range market, I can’t imagine a world where the OnePlus Pad Go 2 isn’t immediately brought up as one of the first options to consider.
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: price and availability
Starts at $399.99 / £319 for 8GB of RAM and 128GB storage
A more expensive 8GB RAM/256GB storage model is available in the UK, which comes with 5G connectivity
The OnePlus Pad Go 2 has a starting price of $399.99 / £319 for the 128GB Wi-Fi-only model, which then jumps up to £399 for the UK-exclusive 256GB, 5G-enabled variant. We're still waiting for confirmation of the tablet's availability in Australia.
For context, the OnePlus Pad Go cost £299/$299 at launch, making it something of a lower mid-range option designed to compete with the likes of Apple’s entry-level iPad at the time.
Even though there is a slight uptick over what the original Pad Go went for at launch, such a price increase is far from unexpected given the current state of the world economy. But it doesn’t derail the Pad Go 2’s value, which is the most important thing.
With that $399.99 / £319 starting price, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is still $50 / £10 cheaper than the iPad 11-inch (2025), which is sure to make it a more tempting option for buyers who aren’t completely sold on Apple’s ecosystem.
Value score: 4 / 5
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: specs
As for the Pad Go 2's specs, there are quite a few upgrades this time around, the most notable of which have been applied to the display. With a larger 12.1-inch size, the screen also has a higher resolution and a faster refresh rate of 120Hz.
Although the Wi-Fi and 5G models of the OnePlus Pad Go 2 share a lot of key specs, the latter is ever-so slightly heavier at 599g (as opposed to 597g).
Here are the OnePlus Pad Go 2's specs in full:
Starting price
£319
Operating system
OxygenOS 15.0.1
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra
RAM
8GB
Storage
128GB/256GB
Display
12.1-inch 2800 x 1980 LCD, 120Hz
Weight
597g/599g
Battery
10,050mAh
Charging
33W wired charging
Cameras
8MP main, 8MP front
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: display
(Image credit: Future)
A large 12.1-inch display that's brilliantly bright
The 7:5 ratio is perfect for productivity
As much as I enjoyed testing the OnePlus Pad Lite for what it was (a budget buy) earlier this year, its lower-resolution screen made me realize just how good I had it when the OnePlus Pad 3 came in for testing. I was bracing myself for a similar compromise with the Go 2, but ended up being pleasantly surprised by what's on offer.
Instead of having a display that's a major step down from its more premium siblings, the Pad Go 2 has a gorgeous 12.1-inch display that's both larger than before (up from 11.35 inches) and brighter, at 600 nits. There's even a 2.8k resolution, which makes everything look crisp.
The viewing experience overall is fantastic, and I've been using the tablet to catch up on It: Welcome to Derry, being massively impressed with how well the screen conveys both the saturated colours of 1960s Derry and also the dark, foreboding sewers connected to Pennywise’s lair.
(Image credit: Future)
This alone would make it easy to recommend the OnePlus Pad Go 2 to users who just want a solid tablet to take with them on their next flight, but it's the use of a 7:5 ratio that allows it to double as a great productivity tablet.
With a more squat frame than the true wide-screen look of something like the Pad Lite, the Pad Go 2 is far more aligned with the Pad 3, offering plenty of space for multitasking with two apps sitting side by side. For when I'm studying a press release or testing notes for an article as I write, this is exactly the type of display I want – one that never asks me to squint to see what's right in front of me.
Display score: 5 / 5
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: design
(Image credit: Future)
A bit more subdued than before
It can pick up fingerprints quite quickly
The OnePlus Pad Go 2 has undergone something of a design shift versus its predecessor, moving away from the green backing and center-facing rear camera of old and towards something that feels far more subdued – not too dissimilar to the changes implemented on the OnePlus Nord 5.
The Shadow Black variant that I had in for review feels particularly reminiscent of OnePlus’ mid-range phone, with a sleek albeit unexciting backing that’s designed to look confident rather than eye-catching. It’s also something of a fingerprint magnet, so you may want to put a case on the device before things get too smudgey. These sentiments don’t quite apply to the Lavender Drift alternative, but even that more colourful option is a world away from the head-turning pink of the 11th-gen iPad.
Before I run the risk of sounding overly negative, I want to point out that even though it’s less striking than before, I do like the design of the OnePlus Pad Go 2. As someone who regularly uses tablets for both productivity and entertainment, I appreciate having a device that can blend in as seamlessly as a laptop in my local cafe, and it’s now even easier to carry around in a backpack thanks to a slightly slimmed-down build.
(Image credit: Future)
While the height and width of the tablet have increased, owing to the slightly larger display, OnePlus has managed to fit everything into a thinner chassis that rings in at just 6.83 inches. Not only does this mean it takes up less room in a bag (handy for someone like me who’s constantly carrying multiple devices), but it also makes the Pad Go 2 more comfortable to hold.
With the Wi-Fi and 5G models of the Pad Go 2 coming in at 597g and 599g, respectively, the Pad Go 2 is heavier than its predecessor, but that increase doesn't result in any negative change to the way it feels in the hand. On the contrary, there’s a nice bit of heft that complements the smooth backing of the Go 2, making it comfortable to hold for long periods of time.
Thanks to the more squat nature of the design, my hands were never at risk of covering the center-placed front-facing camera, so even if you are taking a call while holding the tablet vertically, you won’t have any issues there.
Design score: 4 / 5
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: software
(Image credit: Future)
A wonderfully uncluttered experience with next to no bloatware
Having Open Canvas on board is a big win for productivity users
I've tested enough tablets now to know that OnePlus’ secret weapon is its software. OxygenOS is already a delight to use on the best OnePlus phones (which is why next year’s best phones really have their work cut out against the stellar OnePlus 15), but its value feels more palpable when it comes to tablets.
There's no denying that Apple has a comfortable lead above all Android competitors in this area. Everything just works in iPadOS, and it's exactly why the entry-level iPad 11 is such a great-value buy. But for my money, OxygenOS is the next best thing.
For starters, there really isn't any bloatware to speak of, which already sets OnePlus’ software apart. This was also the case with the OnePlus Lite, and nothing’s changed with the Pad Go 2. The only thing that could vaguely be considered bloatware is a handful of OnePlus’ own brand apps, but they’re fairly well designed. OnePlus’ Notes app in particular is a much sleeker alternative to Google Keep, so these apps are worth exploring to see if they can work for you.
It also helps that OxygenOS has a much nicer look than most Android overlays. With circular app icons and easy-to-navigate menus, it feels far more akin to what you’ll find in Google’s stock Android package, and you get a nice selection of wallpapers built in, including OnePlus’ signature mountain range collection.
What really separates the Pad Go 2 from the Pad Lite, however, is the inclusion of Open Canvas. Whether it’s been on the Pad 3 or the OpenPlus Open, I've loved my time with OnePlus’ multitasking software, as it makes the process of setting up apps side by side an easy one. As mentioned earlier, it works so well with the Pad Go 2’s 7:5 display that you could easily use this tablet for work, either as a student or a professional.
(Image credit: Future)
Of all the layout options available via Open Canvas, it’s the 90/10 split that I really enjoy using. As its name implies, this allows one app to take up the majority of the display while another is just peeking out from the side, but the latter can be brought out in a 50/50 split the moment you tap on it. Again, when I want to quickly check on my notes while writing a review like this one, it works incredibly well.
Another key difference here is that, unlike the Pad Lite, the Go 2 has OnePlus’ AI features built in. This may differ for some people, but personally, I can’t stand the way in which a big push in AI is being shipped as a viable alternative to new features in modern tech. Honor is guilty of this, as is Apple, but OnePlus has a fairly relaxed approach, which I appreciate.
(Image credit: Future)
There are AI features onboard, like an AI writer as well as an AI summarizer for web pages, but neither of them is forced upon you and are fairly easy to miss if you’re not looking for them. While I don’t have much use for AI in general, I have appreciated OnePlus’ AI summarizer on occasion if I need to know more about a certain product but don’t have time to read a full breakdown, as it does a decent job of honing in on what’s important and getting that information to me in a concise way.
OnePlus has yet to confirm how long it will be supporting the OnePlus Pad Go 2, but this section will be updated once that information is made clear.
Software score: 4.5 / 5
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: performance
(Image credit: Future)
The MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra is a capable chipset
The tablet doesn't buckle under heavy multitasking
Even though it was pitched as a more affordable tablet, the OnePlus Pad Go certainly wasn’t lacking in terms of performance for its price point. The MediaTek Helio G99 chip did a solid job of keeping day-to-day use feeling smooth, but now that the Go 2 has additional features like Open Canvas and AI integration to consider, a leap forward in performance was always going to be a necessity.
This time around, it’s the MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra powering the show, which is built on a more efficient 4nm process. Almost by design now, I get a bit weary whenever I see a chipset listed that isn’t from Qualcomm (almost certainly a result of Snapdragon chips dominating the flagship market), but any concerns were quickly abated the moment I switched on the Go 2 and started using it.
Jumping between apps felt very smooth, and they would load quickly, too. Wanting to see how far I could push the CPU, I jumped into Open Canvas with Chrome and YouTube sitting side by side, but then had picture-in-picture video playing from Sky Go on top of it, whilst also bringing in OnePlus Notes as a floating window. With effectively four apps running at the same time, I waited to see if the Go 2 would buckle under the pressure of it all, but to my amazement, such a moment never came to pass. For the mid-range market, the Pad Go 2 is a real powerhouse.
When swapping over to a bit of gaming, I connected a wireless Xbox controller over Bluetooth and dove into a match of Call of Duty: Mobile. As expected, based on my experience with the CPU up until that point, it all ran flawlessly (and I knew as much because I won the match, which is rarely a guarantee). Not only did the gameplay run smoothly without any lag or stuttering, but the colors came through tremendously, and I didn’t feel any disconnect between my actions on the controller and what was taking place onscreen.
Moving over to Honkai Star Rail – a more demanding title that can trip up a lot of lesser-powered tablets and phones, I’m glad to relay that the Pad Go 2 ran the game rather well. It didn't run quite as flawlessly as Call of Duty, with the odd frame rate dip when exploring the world of the game, but performance during battles was pretty solid, and even when performing special moves that can involve particle effects and more objects appearing onscreen, the tablet didn’t really budge under the pressure.
What helps the performance of the CPU in delivering a great entertainment experience is the jump to having a 120Hz refresh rate, which, as any gamer can attest, is a night and day difference, but the quad-speaker system that’s onboard is important, too. Even when using the speakers at a low volume, the Pad Go 2 does a great job at projecting its soundscape, so you won’t have to crank up the audio in order to hear anything.
The Pad Go 2 is also the first OnePlus tablet to feature 5G connectivity (in the UK at least), which, oddly enough, might make it a more tempting buy over the Pad 3 for productivity users who are constantly on the go. Even though the Pad 3 is more powerful overall, the ability to latch on to a 5G signal when you’re away from a trusted Wi-Fi network is a huge win.
Alongside my review unit of the tablet, OnePlus was kind enough to send over the OnePlus Pad Go 2 Stylo, which I’ve also put to use during this testing period. Admittedly, I’m not a digital artist (I only wish I had that talent), but I am someone who carries a Remarkable Paper Pro with me at all times for digital notetaking, and in that regard I found the Stylo to be quite handy. It’s a long way from the pen and paper feeling of the Remarkable and similar tablets like the Kindle Scribe (2024), but the Stylo itself is responsive and very comfortable to use, so I can see it being an instant buy alongside the tablet for some users.
Performance score: 4.5 / 5
OnePlus Pad Go 2 review: battery
(Image credit: Future)
A much larger 10,050mAh cell is included
Reverse charging is now possible
No charging brick included
One of my favourite aspects of the OnePlus Pad 3 is just how big the onboard battery is. The company’s flagship tablet packs a 12,140mAh cell, which can really go the distance, but what’s great to see is that the Pad Go 2 has been given such an upgrade in this department that it really isn’t all that far behind what’s achievable on its more powerful sibling.
For the Go 2, OnePlus has leapt from an 8,000mAh battery to a massive 10,050mAh alternative, and it makes a huge difference. OnePlus claims that you can now get up to 15 hours of video streaming at a time, as well as 60 days of standby, which is a big win for anyone who’s always worried about getting to a charger in time.
When testing the tablet on my own terms, I was able to get through about an hour of streaming, half an hour of gaming (which involved online play and downloaded texture packs/content), and another half an hour of web browsing, all with the brightness turned up almost to the max, and the battery had only gone down from 100% to 82%.
Under typical use, I wouldn’t have the brightness anywhere near as high as I did, so I have no worries about getting much closer to OnePlus’ claims of longevity when using the Pad Go 2.
Things have stayed the same where charging is concerned, with 33W SUPERVOOC available on the Pad Go 2, but I don’t see this as a major issue. Of the two options, I would much rather have a larger battery than faster charging, and with the Go 2 now able to run for longer between charges, you won’t have to spend all that much time topping up the tablet anyway.
As an added benefit, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 now supports reverse charging, so if you do need to give your phone or earbuds a quick top-up and you don’t have a battery pack to hand, the Go 2 can step in to plug the gap.
Battery score: 4.5 / 5
Should you buy the OnePlus Pad Go 2?
OnePlus Pad Go 2 scorecard
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
With only a minor uptick in price and a ton of upgrades, the Pad Go 2 is a mid-range bargain.
4.5 / 5
Display
The increased resolution and brightness make for a better viewing experience overall.
4.5 / 5
Design
While functional, the Pad Go 2 isn't as exciting as its predecessor, and it can catch fingerprints.
4 / 5
Software
With Open Canvas and OnePlus' AI features being brought into the mid-range, there's now greater functionality.
4.5 / 5
Performance
The newer chipset is capable of heavy-duty multitasking and solid gaming performance.
4.5 / 5
Battery
With a big 10,050mAh cell, you'll struggle to drain the entire battery in a day.
4.5 / 5
Buy it if…
You want a productivity tablet without spending too much Thanks to its 7:5 aspect ratio and Open Canvas multitasking software, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is perfect for users who want to work on the go.
You want a proper all-day battery life With a massive 10,050mAh cell now under the hood, the Pad Go 2 is capable of going the distance over an intensive day of use.
You want a simple Android overlay free of clutter With a hands-off approach to AI alongside next to no bloatware, OxygenOS is a joy to use.
Don’t buy it if…
You only need a tablet for entertainment If all you want to do is stream films and TV shows, then the OnePlus Pad Lite fits the bill perfectly with a very affordable price tag.
You don’t plan on using 5G connectivity Even with the Wi-Fi version available, you can save more money by opting for a tablet that doesn’t feature network connectivity.
You want super-fast charging If you’re more concerned with having faster charging than a longer battery life, you may want to look elsewhere.
Also consider
Wondering whether or not the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is right for you? Here are some alternatives worth considering:
OnePlus Pad Go 2
Apple iPad 11-inch (2025)
OnePlus Pad Lite
Price
£319 / £399
$349 / £329
£199 / €229
Storage
128GB/256GB
128GB / 236GB / 512GB
128GB
Screen size
12.1-inch 2800 x 1980 LCD, 120Hz
11-inch Liquid Retina, 60Hz
11-inch 1920 x 1200 LCD, 90Hz
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Ultra
Apple A16 Bionic
MediaTek Helio G100
Battery
10,050mAh
28.93Wh
9,340mAh
Charging
33W
20W
33W
Cameras
8MP main, 8MP front
12MP main, 12MP front
5MP main, 5MP front
OS
OxygenOS 16
iPadOS 18
OxygenOS w/ Android 15
Apple iPad 11-inch (2025) Apple’s entry-level iPad is a bargain, given that you’re getting access to almost all of the main features from iPadOS. Despite its low-level price tag, you can still use the tablet for productivity as well as entertainment, especially since the iPadOS 26 update, which allows apps to be windowed, much like how you’d see them on a Mac.
OnePlus Pad Lite Unless you’re dead set on having features like OpenCanvas and AI integration that make productivity feel more seamless, the OnePlus Pad Lite already has the entertainment side of things on lock. With a more portable build and a wide screen that’s perfect for cinematic viewing, the Pad Lite is a great device for on-the-go entertainment, and it’ll save you quite a bit at checkout as well.
For the purpose of this review, the OnePlus Pad Go 2 was used over the course of a week to determine how well it functions as an everyday tablet for both productivity and entertainment needs.
Streaming was conducted via the Sky Go app, whlie Call of Duty Mobile and Honkai Star Rail were used to verify the tablet’s abilities as a gaming machine.
The new Nikon ZR is the first in a new line of Nikon / RED cinema cameras, and instantly makes Nikon a major new player in this space, capable of going to toe-to-toe with Sony, Canon, Blackmagic and Panasonic.
Nikon only acquired RED Digital Cameras 18 months ago, and it's made fast work of producing the surprisingly polished and capable ZR, adorned with Z Cinema Camera and Nikon / RED branding, and available for a tantalizing price that significantly undercuts rivals.
It packs a bunch of Nikon Z6 III tech, including the same 24MP partially stacked full-frame sensor, 5-axis image stabilization, subject-detection tracking autofocus and more, into an extremely compact, weather-sealed cinema camera body.
We get 6K 60fps video with internal RAW recording, with any one of nine industry-favorite RED color profiles baked in – that's the Nikon / RED amalgamation truly bearing fruit – plus 4K 120fps and Full HD 240fps slow-motion recording.
Handily, shutter angle can be set automatically to 180 degrees, so there's no need to mess around with manual exposure settings, plus the shutter angle can be set to any position between five and 360 degrees manually, should you wish.
The Nikon ZR with new ME-D10 shotgun mic attached – the mic supports the camera's 32-bit float audio capture skills (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
We don't get open gate video recording as in some rivals like the Canon EOS C50, but the ZR has another trick up its sleeve: hold the camera vertically, and its UI automatically rotates, with the vertical orientation embedded in the video files and automatically detected in Nikon's editing software, delivering full-resolution vertical video.
The ZR is the first camera of its kind with internal 32-bit float audio capture, plus what Nikon says is the best-quality internal mics yet – a triple mic combo with Ozo audio and a choice of five directional pickup patterns, including binaural.
Alongside the ZR, Nikon has launched the ME-D10 directional mic (you can see it slotted into the camera's hotshoe in the image above), which is compatible with the camera's 32-bit float capabilities.
This is also the smallest cinema camera I’ve used, yet it still squeezes in a large, brightest-in-class 4-inch vari-angle touchscreen which could do away with the need for attaching a bulky external monitor – which is something I would do with other cameras that feature a smaller 3-inch display. Naturally, there's no viewfinder.
Nikon has put both its own and RED's branding on the ZR, together with Z Cinema Camera (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Given its tiny size, there are compromises. We don’t get some of the pro connectivity found in other pricier compact cinema cameras – for example there’s only a micro HDMI port, not a full-size one. However, if you still feel the need to use an external monitor even with the large 4-inch built-in display, all you'll need is a micro-to-full-size HMDI adaptor to get connected.
Sadly, the ZR lacks mounting points for video accessories and, with no grip, you’ll definitely want to rig it up with a grip or a cage for a better hold. That means forking out for ZR-dedicated gear – Nikon outsources to leading accessory maker SmallRig.
However, at just $2,199.95 / £2,199.99 / AU$3,499, no other cinema camera comes close to the ZR for video features – and this aggressive pricing will soften the blow of any additional outlay on accessories.
Image 1 of 6
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 6
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 6
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 6
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 6
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 6
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
I can see the Nikon ZR as a go-to b-cam for many pros, especially those already shooting with a RED camera, for whom the color profile matching will make for a seamless workflow. That said, this is a capable video camera in its own right too.
The Nikon ZR is an incredibly capable and polished compact cinema camera with world-first features, and an exciting first step into the filmmaking space for Nikon. After the ZR launch, Nikon announced at IBC in Amsterdam that it's making video lenses (most Z lenses are designed primarily for photography), so it's clearly gunning to be taken seriously. If it were to launch a higher-end cinema camera with pro connectivity to sit above the ZR, then Nikon will truly find its footing in this space.
The compact body is the smallest in this class of cinema camera, with a fairly simple control layout (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Nikon ZR: price and release date
Costs $2,199.95 / £2,199.99 / AU$3,499
There will be various accessory bundles, TBC
Sales started in October
The Nikon ZR costs $2,199.95 / £2,199.99 / AU$3,499. At that price it significantly undercuts rivals – such a feature set is typically found in cameras that cost around 50% more, and more often in cameras closer to twice the price, even if design-wise it has more in common with the Sony ZV-E1 which is closer in cost.
That said, there are no video accessories included, and you'll want to fork out for some in order to enjoy the ZR's handling and feature set to its full potential. These will likely include a grip and / or cage, plus Nikon's new ME-D10 directional mic, which is compatible with the camera's 32-bit float audio format.
Nikon doesn't make its own accessories such as grips or rigs, relying on third parties such as SmallRig to supply those (see prices in the boxout above).
The Nikon ZR went on sale in October 2025.
The ZR is compact cinema camera for run-and-gun filmmaking – an ideal b-cam (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Nikon ZR: specs
Video
6K up to 60fps, Raw internal
Photo
24MP full-frame
Lens mount
Nikon Z
Autofocus
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Screen
4-inch, 3.07m-dot, vari-angle
Viewfinder
N/A
Weight
19oz / 540g (body only)
Battery
EN-EL15 (same type as Nikon Z6 III / Z8)
Nikon ZR: Design
Smallest and lightest cinema camera of its kind; weather-resistant
Large 4-inch, 3.07m-dot touch LCD with brightest in-class display, no viewfinder
No mounting points for accessories
3x internal mics, Ozo audio with five directional pickup patterns
As far as I know, the Nikon ZR is the smallest and lightest camera of its kind, weighing just 19oz / 540g (body-only). It's also weather-resistant, which is a rarity in the cinema camera world.
There are pros and cons resulting from the tiny dimensions. Drawbacks include enthusiast-level connectivity, like micro HMDI rather than full-size (though you only need an adaptor to remedy this), and the absence of a grip or mounting points for accessories. A camera like the Canon EOS C50 feels more high-end, given its pro-level connectivity.
It feels best to keep things simple with the ZR, making the most of its compact body and powerful features by minimizing the number of accessories in play. A grip is the one accessory I would absolutely look into buying, while if you want to rig up the ZR you'll need a cage, which will in turn allow you to attach accessories such as lights and mics – Nikon has partnered with SmallRig to create grips and cages for the ZR (pricing above).
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Despite its tiny body, the ZR packs a large 4-inch touch display. As such, I don't really see the need for attaching a bulky external 5-inch monitor. It certainly helps that the ZR's 3.07m-dot display is wonderful bright and vivid – the brightest in its class, says Nikon. I've used the ZR in a studio and outdoors, and have been seriously impressed.
Other cinema cameras, like the Sony FX3 and Canon EOS C50, only have 3-inch displays, while the Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K has a mega 5-inch unit. In the case of the Sony and Canon models, I'd absolutely want to add a monitor to my setup.
As great as the screen is – a real standout feature – it's only a flip-out screen. You can't tilt the screen with it tucked up neatly into the camera body, only when it is flipped out. There are unique benefits to both types, but some filmmakers would probably rather a tilt screen instead. There are a few cameras with 4-axis (dual hinge) displays which offer both, such as the Panasonic Lumix S1 II and Sony A7 V.
The camera's top plate is pretty simple: there's a photo / video switch (though sadly the UI remains the same whichever setting you're in, rather than there being dedicated menus for photo and video), record button with rocker, plus three buttons for accessing items such as display settings.
The rear is dominated by the large touch display, which when folded away reveals the Nikon / RED branding. Beside it are a joystick for controls such as autofocus point selection, a menu button (a quick press brings up the main menu and a long press brings up the quick menu, which is a nice touch) and a playback button.
Image 1 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 8
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Battery life promises to be okay, given that the ZR uses the same EN-EL15 battery as the Nikon Z6 III and Nikon Z8. There are no vents or cooling fans, though, which would normally suggest that a camera of this type would be prone to overheating during long recording sessions.
I've recorded short and long clips during my in-depth testing, and haven't run into overheating issues, but I haven't really, really pushed the camera. However, Nikon says the camera's magnesium alloy body is a natural heat sink, and promises that long record times are possible – up to 125 minutes of 6K in one take – and based on my experience with previous Nikon cameras I have no reason to doubt it.
There's exciting tech under the hood, too, namely a totally new Ozo audio setup, which comprises three mics. Together, these offer five directional pickup patterns, including front narrow (like a shotgun mic), front wide, rear and binaural 3D stereo.
Nikon says this Ozo system is the best internal mic setup of any camera, and it's supported by a world-first: in-camera 32-bit float audio capture. Nikon's new ME-D10 shotgun mic, released at the same time as the ZR, supports 32-bit float audio too. Those are impressive audio features for any camera, let alone one at this price point.
Nikon ZR: Performance
6K up to 60fps, 4K up to 120fps, Full HD up to 240fps
Internal RAW recording and RED color profiles (up to nine in-camera at any time)
Subject-detection autofocus and 5-axis image stabilization
24MP stills, partially stacked full-frame sensor
For the most part, the Nikon ZR has the same photo and video specs as the Z6 III (which we awarded five stars out of five in our in-depth review), which means a full-frame partially stacked 24MP sensor equipped with 5-axis image stabilization.
Add in decent subject-detection tracking autofocus and the ZR is a capable stills shooter, although while this is useful for on-set stills, the main focus of my testing is of course the ZR's video chops.
There's the partially stacked 24MP full-frame sensor and Nikon Z mount (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Like the Z6 III, the Nikon ZR shoots 6K up to 60fps, 4K up to 120fps and Full HD up to 240fps. There's the option for shooting internal RAW with a 12-bit color depth, or keeping things simple and baking in the look at capture with 10-bit recording.
Given the array of creative styles and color profiles on board, which includes space for up to nine RED color profiles at any one time, you might just feel happy to skip shooting RAW, with its large file sizes and grading demands, and use one of the many baked-in color profiles instead to save editing time and space on your hard drives.
I shot a variety of video clips during a half-day session with a drummer in action inside a studio, including 6K RAW, a few of the RED profiles baked in, and 240fps slow-motion – see my sample video, above. In this setting, the ZR delivered some superb-looking video. Outside of the studio, the ZR continued to impress me.
Including image stabilization certainly bolsters the ZR's handheld use credentials, but I've shot with other cameras recently with better stabilization for video, such as the Lumix S1 II.
Image 1 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 9 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 10 of 10
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Nikon ZR: testing scorecard
Nikon ZR
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Price
Incredible value considering the features on board, if not the pedigree of design
5/5
Design
Designed to be as compact as possible, it misses pro-level connectivity, but comes with a 4-inch screen
4/5
Performance
Long record times, powerful audio recording options, average image stabilization
4.5/5
Image and video quality
6K video up to 60fps, internal RAW recording, RED color profiles – the results can be stunning
4.5/5
Should I buy the Nikon ZR?
Buy it if...
You want maximum video bang for buck Majoring on video features, the ZR can deliver stunning 6K video and crisp audio.
You want a compact body for on-the-go video The smallest camera of its kind but with a bright and large 4-inch screen that eliminates the need for an external monitor, the ZR is the ultimate portable package.
Don't buy it if...
You want pro-grade design Yes it's weather sealed and sturdy, but the ZR lacks some of the pro-level video camera features such as mounting points.
You prefer a tilt screen The ZR's screen is fabulous, but it's only a flip-out one. If you want the 4-axis tilt and flip-out design, there are alternatives like the Lumix S1 II
Nikon ZR: also consider
Canon EOS C50
Canon announced the EOS C50 just a day before the Nikon ZR. It costs around 50% more, but comes with a top grip. In many ways the two cameras' video features are similar, including video resolution, maximum frame rates, internal RAW recording and autofocus. However, the Canon camera feels slightly more high-end with pro connectivity, while in the ZR's favor are its compact size, larger touch display and, impressively, its sensor-based stabilization.
The Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K is pretty much the same price as the Nikon ZR, and in many respects has similar video features: a full-frame sensor with 6K video, 12-bit internal RAW recording and dual base ISO. It also packs a mammoth 5-inch display and has a solid choice of L-mount lenses. However, its slow-motion recording is more limited, while autofocus performance isn't a patch on Nikon's. It's also much bulkier and heavier.
The Sony FX3 is an industry-favorite compact 4K cinema camera with superb low-light skills, thanks to its 12MP full-frame sensor. Like the ZR, it's designed to be rugged, with accessories such as its (bundled) top handle. It has the pro connectivity you'd hope for, excellent battery life, and a wide range of video lenses. However, its video recording feels somewhat dated compared to the ZR's 6K internal RAW, and it's practically twice the price. In some ways, the ZR has more in common with the Sony ZV-E1 which uses the same sensor as the FX3, but in a more enthusiast-level compact body.View Deal
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
How I tested the Nikon ZR
I had an initial half a day with the ZR in a studio, follwed by a Nikon-hosted event at the IBC show, and then for an extended loan period at my own leisure
I paired the ZR with multiple Nikon Z lenses and tried out the new ME-D10 mic
I've used the camera handheld without any accessories, but also in the dedicated SmallRig cage
I had the opportunity to shoot with the Nikon ZR for half a day ahead of its launch, using it for an indoor stage-lit shoot of a drummer in action. Nikon supplied an array of Z-mount lenses for the shoot, of which I used a few primes and zooms. The new ME-D10 directional mic was also available on the day.
There followed another shoot experience with Nikon at the IBC show, and consequently a long loan of several weeks. SmallRig supplied me with its Advanced Cage kit for that extended review period.
During my test time, I have shot in 6K RAW, 240fps slow motion, and to try out various color profiles, focusing on the RED looks.
I have plenty of experience using rival cinema cameras such as the Sony FX3, so I'm well equipped to make an informed initial assessment of the ZR. That said, cinema cameras need to prove themselves as tools their users can rely on shoot after shoot, which is not something anyone has had the luxury of yet with the camera being so new.
Many years ago I worked in a camera store, and a regular topic of conversation was how to make tripods sound exciting to customers.
Admittedly, they are accessories that many photographers see as necessary tools, but not ones worthy of the same attention as the latest cameras and lenses. I doubt every photographer would be as actively vocal about a new tripod as they might the release of the Canon EOS R6 Mark III, Leica M EV1, or even an action camera like the DJI Osmo Action 6.
Every so often, however, a tripod comes along that truly defines what every content creator should aspire to own in a camera support. These are the models that usually make it onto our list of the best tripods guide.
Some tripods, like the fabulous Manfrotto One hybrid photo and video tripod, hit the headlines due to their mainstream appeal, while others quietly fill a gap in the market for specific uses and a tightly-targeted customer base, and the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II is one such model.
Before diving into what makes this set of legs the best for shooting video, it’s important to understand how a video-centric tripod differs in its features compared to one made solely for stills photography.
Unsurprisingly, a photo tripod is all about providing the ultimate stability for sharpness in a single frame. You need these models to allow you to precisely place the camera for a stationary composition. With a video tripod, meanwhile, you need the freedom to move the camera during a shot, to create a cinematic pan that follows the subject.
You need to keep the target in the frame as it moves through the scene, while maintaining smooth, fluid movement that isn’t jerky or rife with distracting micro-vibrations. If you're shooting with one of the best 4K cameras or best cameras for professional filmmaking, you want to ensure the quality of your footage isn't let down by your tripod.
The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II has a rugged aluminum construction with high-grade plastic joints and control knobs (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
When fully extended, the head can be comfortably raised to head height for dynamic framing opportunities (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
Video models also have a greater provision of accessory attachment points, which allow the user to add audio and lighting equipment, a larger external monitor or teleprompter, for example. The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II has three 3/8-inch accessory mounting points arranged around the tripod bowl, which not only enables multiple accessories to be added to your system but also allows you to select a position for the optimal balance of the setup.
Speaking of stability and balance, the Ace M MS Mk II features a mid-level spreader to prevent leg creep under the weight of a heavier cine camera system and to ensure that all of the legs are properly spaced. The camera level changing between shots is a pain for photographers, but a potential disaster if it happens mid-video clip. The unit on the Ace M MS Mk II is sturdily constructed, and easily removed when it’s not required.
The bundled spreader is well-made, matching the metal construction of the legs themselves (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
The leg sections slide past each other externally, meaning they can be more easily cleaned after a shoot than a collapsing stacked design (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
I’ve always preferred a mid-level type, rather than ground-level, which might provide good stability in a studio setting but quickly becomes an obstruction and speed killer when on location. It’s ideal that such a spreader is removable, giving users the stability needed for high payloads, but the flexibility to spread the tripod and capture lower-level shots.
The Ace M MS Mk II an aluminum tripod, rather than carbon fiber, and with an aluminum design there is always going to be a weight penalty. None of Sachtler’s tripods could be described as lightweight, but this is not uncommon for video models; indeed, it’s necessary to provide the proper support for the larger gear they will be paired with.
Yet at 4.4kg, the Ace M MS Mk II is still highly manageable compared to other professional video products. The Manfrotto MVH502A, for example, weighs in at 11.7lbs / 5.3kg while supporting up to a 22lbs / 10kg payload. Meanwhile, the Sirui BCT-3203 matches the Sachtler’s weight exactly despite being made from carbon fiber.
Build quality is impressive throughout, from the aluminum tubes of the legs themselves to the high-impact plastic of the control points and bowl surrounds. All of the materials are solid to the touch, notably the plastic components, which have very little give when depressed. All threads and screws are precisely milled, and didn’t exhibit any sticking or slipping when operated during testing.
I liked that there didn’t seem to be many potential points for moisture and dirt ingress. Unlike the common stacked multi-segment leg design seen in many photo tripods, where one section collapses into the other, possibly taking contaminants with it that can cause seizing over time, most moving components are external and can be accessed on the Ace M MS Mk II. This makes cleaning and maintenance easier, and less likely to be neglected post-shoot.
Functionality is also excellent. The many dials, knobs, and locks take some familiarization when you first use the tripod, but every control is smooth and logically placed. The friction controls for both head pitch and pan movements are exceptionally effective, allowing fluid motion in dynamic footage. Meanwhile, when locked, static clips were sharp and generally vibration-free, at least in moderately still air.
There are three levels of friction selectable for rotational panning and for pitch control (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
The knobs and locks on the bundled video head are made from plastic, but still have a knurled, high-quality finish (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
The less rigid microstructure of carbon fiber means it has fewer resonant properties, so it transmits less vibration to the tripod head. Despite this, the overall weight of the aluminum Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II made it more resistant to wind buffeting than my Gitzo carbon tripod, and I was able to capture sharper images once the wind speed increased.
Similar to the excellent Manfrotto One hybrid tripod, the legs of the Ace M MS Mk II can be extended with a reduced number of actions. Rather than having to unlock each leg section individually, unscrewing the mid-level locks raises the head to chest height, and then the lower section can be further extended with the secondary screw locks. It’s not quite as smooth an operation as the Manfrotto One, but it still wins points for speed.
The tripod can be extended to full height in two actions, using the leg locks at the mid-point and base of the legs (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
I must also give a mention of the tripod feet, which are both tough and easy to adjust. By simply rotating them on their screw thread, you can reveal or retract the spikes within, depending on the terrain type on which you plan to use the legs. It might sound like a minor point, but I really appreciate that they are also bright red. The weakness of this screw-thread design is that it’s not too difficult to over-loosen a tripod foot, which then detaches, and standard black rubber feet are easy to miss – I’m ashamed to add up how many tripod feet I’ve ‘misplaced’ like this over the years. Perhaps I’m just careless, but in the heat of a rapid shoot, where you're changing locations a lot, the highly visible color is a thoughtful touch.
The mid-level spreader can be removed when the need arises to place the legs on an incline or when uneven ground makes the setup unstable with it in place (Image credit: Future/ Peter Fenech)
Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II: key specs
Maximum height:
66.5 inches / 169cm
Closed height:
30.7 inches / 78cm
Bowl size:
75mm
Materials:
Aluminum
Max payload:
8.8lbs / 4kg
Leg sections:
Two
Tilt Range:
90 to -75 degrees
Attachment points:
3x 3/8-inch accessory threads
Weight:
9.7lbs / 4.4kg
Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II price and availability
TheSachtler Ace M MS Mk II video tripod was launched in April 2024 and is available from several specialist photographic retailers, bundled with the Ace M Fluid Head and flowtech®75 Mid-level spreader. The cost of the kit is $985 / £858 / AU$1,545.
The tripod is available across major markets, in the USA, UK, and Australia, although as this is a specialist video accessory it can be trickier to find at some mainstream retailers, or it is listed but with limited availability. We sourced examples at Adorama in the United States, WEX in the UK, and Videocraft in Australia.
Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II: Also consider
Manfotto One hybrid tripod
The Manfrotto One is probably the best alternative option if you shoot both video content and still photos. It combines several features catered for each type of user. While it lacks a spreader, it does feature a rapid extension system and a balancing center column.
Video content is your primary focus The Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II is a video-oriented product from the ground up, so you'll find plenty of tailored features for motion content creation. The included spreader, quick set-up speed, and fluid head are the ideal tools for pro-looking video.
You use a mirrorless camera system The 4kg payload limit might not be enough if you regularly use a large camcorder or interchangeable lens video camera system. If, however, you make lots of content with your mirrorless system, such as a Canon EOS R5 Mark II, or Sony A7 V, the load-weight balance is perfect.
Don't buy it if...
You don't use lots of accessories The tripod is designed to support a modular system of accessories, which is in part what you're paying for. If you don't plan on using an external monitor, or a rig such as a Magic Arm, these attachment points will be somewhat wasted on you.
You're a vlogger While vlogging still requires a good-quality camera support, if you're used to a POV style of filmmaking, you might find the bulk and weight of the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II more of a hindrance than a help.
How I tested the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II
I spent approximately one month testing the tripod in a variety of weather conditions
I used the tripod to support my camera in various locations, across multiple types of terrain
I mounted a variety of camera types on the tripod to test stability, from a lightweight mirrorless system to a pro DSLR
To ensure I got a representative idea of the capabilities of the Sachtler Ace M MS Mk II, I took it out on location with me several times over several weeks. These shoots covered landscapes, coastal shots, woodland scenics, and even low-light cityscapes.
I captured video footage and examined frame grabs to assess sharpness in windier conditions or when water was moving around the tripod feet. I also shot some long-exposure still images to get a better picture of the type and direction of vibrations, where present.
I tried using the legs with and without the spreader fitted. I placed the feet on different terrain conditions as a routine part of my test shooting, including waterlogged soil, sand, and concrete. I also used the tripod at various heights to test how stability and vibration absorption changed as the legs were extended.
When I made the jump over to using an Honor phone as my daily driver, it only made sense to leave my old Huawei Band 9 behind and pick up a matching fitness tracker. Enter the Honor Band 10, the Chinese tech brand’s latest affordable fitness tool promising a wealth of smartwatch-lite features at an incredibly low price.
But does the Honor Band 10 actually deliver? Absolutely, although there are one or two rough edges to bear in mind before you rush to add it to your cart. Starting with the good, the sleek design is a winner; there’s only one color available, a basic black, but a charming golden accent around the edges of the sleek 1.57-inch AMOLED touchscreen make it look far more premium than the price would suggest.
Sure, the body of the Honor Band 10 is made from plastic, or ‘durable polymer materials’ according to the manufacturer, but it doesn’t feel cheap and my model hasn’t managed to pick up any noticeable scratches even after months of daily use. Unlike other options on the market, the Honor Band 10 doesn’t have any buttons either, giving it a very streamlined appearance.
When you first take it out of the box you have to turn it on by plugging it into its magnetic changing cable and during use, waking the screen is as simple as raising your wrist or a quick tap on the glass – a very seamless, almost Apple-like experience.
(Image credit: Dashiell Wood / Future)
The battery life is solid, lasting about three days with the always-on-display enabled, but there are plenty of smart features to extend that to over a week. I particularly like the ability to schedule the always-on-display, so you don’t waste any charge keeping a clock on screen outside the times you really need it.
It's compatible with the Honor Health app (which you can sync with the likes of Apple Health easily), which is simple to use and offers access to a good amount of data including the usual overall activity level, daily step count, total calories burned, sleep tracking and your heart rate, in addition to a daily health report. The watch comes with a decent number of faces out of the box in both analog and digital styles, but you can always download more if you’re not happy with them thanks to a wide range of both official and community-made options to choose from.
My one complaint comes from the step tracking on the band itself. It’s a little optimistic, especially compared to my other fitness trackers. I make an effort to hit 10,000 steps per day and when I wore it at the same time as an old Fitbit Charge HR, I found that the Honor Band 10 was off by about ten percent or so in the upwards direction, which isn’t the end of the world given the low price – but could be a good reason to consider a more premium option instead.
There are also some small issues with the smartwatch features. Notifications come through almost instantly, but the media playback controls are very hit-and-miss. I often have to tap multiple times to skip a song, or notice that the song title hasn’t actually updated to reflect what’s playing. This feature is also entirely disabled if you’re using iOS, which is a shame. However, you’re not really missing out on too much in my experience.
Honor Band 10: Specifications
Price
£44.99 (around $60 / AU$90)
Dimensions
43.2 x 28.2 x 8.99mm
Display
1.57-inch AMOLED
GPS?
No
Battery life
14 days
Honor Band 10: Price and availability
Costs £44.99 (around $60 / AU$90)
Not available in the US
Expect frequent discounts
I purchased the Honor Band 10 when it first arrived on the Honor store back in May.
It was priced at £49.99 and cost me a total of £44.99 plus shipping thanks to a £5 launch day discount. I can confidently say that the band is great value at the price I paid, though its going rate has since been lowered to £44.99, with frequent discounts down to £39.99, making it an even more tempting proposition.
Unfortunately, as with other Honor products it’s hard to find in the US as it’s not officially sold. Your best option would be to import the band from third-party sellers on sites like Aliexpress, but you should be aware that you may lose any warranty or support and that compatibility isn't guaranteed.
Honor products are also not officially available in Australia, so expect similar hurdles there.
Scorecard
Category
Comment
Score
Value
The Honor Band 10 is fantastic value, especially if you grab it one of the many sales throughout the year.
4.5/5
Design
The classy buttonless look of the Honor Band 10 helps it stand out from the crowd, though it is still a plastic body.
4/5
Features
There are plenty of features here given the low price, including some that you would usually expect from a more expensive smartwatch.
4.5/5
Performance
The performance is good, but has some compromises. The step counter is a tad optimistic, and media playback controls are a bit iffy.
4/5
Should I buy the Honor Band 10?
(Image credit: Dashiell Wood / Future)
Buy it if…
You want a fantastic value fitness tracker It’s hard to complain about the Honor Band 10 given its rock bottom price tag. You’re getting an awful lot of smart band here for not very much cash.
You love the look The Honor Band 10 stands out from its biggest competitors with its sleek, buttonless design. It only comes in black, but the gold accent looks lush on your wrist.
Don’t buy it if…
You want perfect accuracy If you’re after the most accurate possible step counter, then you should probably swerve the Honor Band 10 as it is a little off. You’ll need to spend more to get something significantly better, though.
Also consider
Xiaomi Smart Band 9 This is the budget fitness tracker to beat, and the Honor Band 10 puts up a pretty good fight. The Smart Band 9 is a little cheaper and is more widely available, but I prefer the design of the Honor. Read our full Xiaomi Smart Band 9 review
Fitbit Charge 6 The Fitbit Charge 6 is double the price of the Honor Band 10, but delivers much more accurate step tracking. It’s the one to choose if that’s your biggest concern, though it comes with its own drawbacks. Read our full Fitbit Charge 6 review
How I tested the Honor Band 10
I bought the Honor Band 10 back in May 2025 and have been using it daily since. I’ve taken it on plenty of walks in my quest to hit 10,000 daily steps and measured its accuracy against other fitness trackers that I own. I’ve also been using it as a watch – even occasionally glancing at the time throughout the writing of this review.
Innovation in the world of robot vacuum cleaners is evolving by leaps and bounds – you only have to look at the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra and the Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone to see how far we’ve come. While the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra isn’t so groundbreaking, it still boasts industry-leading vacuum suction (30,000Pa) and features I’ve not seen anywhere else – like all brushes getting raised when mopping and the mop getting covered when rolling over a carpet. In fact, this is Dreame’s first robovac to get a roller mop.
While these unique features are welcome additions, the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra shines where it matters the most – cleaning floors. I’ve previously said the same thing in my Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni review, but this Dreame does a better job of vacuuming carpets.
I wouldn’t put too much stock in that 30,000Pa of suction as that spec doesn’t always translate to 100% hair pickup on very dirty carpets, but I’d say it gets close – 98% to 99% – which is much better than most other robovacs I’ve tested. Edge cleaning on carpets, though, is a little disappointing in comparison, but this isn’t unique to Dreame – most side brushes don’t have stiff bristles to sweep up embedded hair, fur and fibres along room edges of wall-to-wall carpets, and suction power isn’t distributed evenly across the entire length of the central bar brush. In fact, even my Dyson V15s Detect Submarine finds it hard to get right to the edge where carpet meets wall – unless I use the crevice tool.
Hard-floor cleaning, however, is 100% pickup of all visible dirt and debris. Importantly, there's very little scattering of larger debris as the side brush is raised when it senses excessive dirt. And mopping by the roller results in perfect stain removal, no matter how old and deep-seated it is. I love that it dries the dust bag after each cleaning run, which means it can safely go over a little wet area and suck up some moisture, although I would still hesitate to send it over a large wet spill.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Mobility is fantastic, with extremely silent wheels, although the raising mechanism can be heard and the robot dropping back to its normal position after crossing a threshold sounds like something is breaking. And despite some teething issues when I first set it up, I found its navigation abilities quite efficient. I will admit, however, that it does occasionally clean one spot repeatedly even though it’s not excessively dirty, and that eats into its battery life.
Battery use is also affected slightly by the fact that its suction kicks in as soon as the robot exits its dock, so it’s using up precious power even before it gets to its starting point. In my tests, the battery would drop by 1% to 2% depending on which room I would send it to before it began its task. This isn’t a deal breaker for some homes, but it may not finish cleaning larger spaces in one go.
Another minor complaint I have is the app. As nice as it looks, it takes a little getting used to and, even for someone like me who has ample experience with robovacs, I struggled to find some necessary settings (in my case, carpet-cleaning options). Again, not a deal breaker – and I’m yet to meet a robot vacuum with the perfect app (Roborock comes close) – but a touch of streamlining would make it a lot easier to use, especially if you’re going to shell out a four-figure sum on the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Price & availability
List price: $1,599 / £1,299 / AU$2,999
Released date: November 2025
Available in most major markets, including the US, UK and Australia
With a suggested retail price of $1,599 / £1,299 / AU$2,999, there’s no denying that the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra sits firmly in the premium robovac space, although it’s not as expensive as the $1,999.99 / £1,399 / AU$3,499 mop-swapping Dreame Matrix10 Ultra. It’s still a flagship model and has features to justify its high asking price but, if clean floors is what you’re after, you can get something a little cheaper and not compromise on what’s important.
Case in point is the Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni: it performs wonderfully well although, like most robovacs, its app leaves much to be desired, and you get flagship cleaning for $1,099 / £1,099 / AU$2,499 at full price. Given how often robot vacuums get discounted, this Deebot can be had for around the $800 / £800 / AU$1,500 mark, if not cheaper. I suspect the Aqua10 Ultra will also see a similar treatment during major sales, but its full price stings a little.
In comparison, the Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone brings some cutting-edge tech to the table – fast charging and an agentic AI helper to name just a couple – and does away entirely with the replaceable dust bag. It costs $1,499 / £1,199 / AU$2,999 and potentially offers better value for larger homes.
Dreame, however, is known for pricing its robot vacuums quite high – the X50 Ultra Complete, which uses traditional mop pads instead of a roller and doesn’t have all the fancy features of the Aqua10 Ultra, has a list price of $1,699 / £1,299 / AU$2,999.
• Value score:3.5 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Specs
Max suction
30,000Pa
Robot dimensions (W x H)
35cm x 120cm (LDS raised) / 35cm x 9.75cm (LDS lowered)
Robot weight
5.8kg
Dock dimensions (H x D x L)
50.5cm x 44cm x 42cm
Dock weight
11.1kg
Robot bin volume
220ml
Dust bag capacity
up to 3.2L
Dock water-tank volume
4L clean / 3.5L dirty
Mop type
Roller
Battery capacity
6,400mAh
Robot max clearance
4.2cm single step / 8cm double step
Navigation
Retractable LiDAR
Dock type
Charge, dusty emptying, roller hot-water washing, roller drying, auto-dispensing one of two detergents
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Design
First Dreame robovac to get a roller mop
Boasts step-vaulting feet and a retractable navigation turret
Boxy and classy dock design with dual-detergent dispenser drawer
The moment I took the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra out of its box, my first thought was, “It looks like a large Marshall speaker!”. If you aren’t familiar with this speaker brand, they’re quite boxy and most of the models I know about have a black finish. This is in no way a complaint; it’s my brain making connections I didn’t expect it to – and I love the look. It’s very classic, with clean lines and metallic accents that ooze ‘premium-ness’. Somehow even the green light around the main control button of the robot while it's charging makes it look fabulous rather than garish.
There are a lot of thoughtful design elements here other than the looks, like soft rubber washers that make it easy to remove the dock cover, a dual detergent dispenser drawer and a retractable navigation puck on the top of the robot. It even comes with a brush to clean the wash tray, which I’ve even used to scrub the dirty-water tank.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Robot design
Sticking with the usual round robot, the Aqua10 Ultra isn’t all that different from many of its premium competitors, with a sleek look – a black robot in my case – that’s enhanced by a retracting navigation puck. When docked, the puck stays lowered and has a ring of green light when it’s moving up or down, or when it’s charging – but is unlit when fully topped up and on standby.
The top of the puck is brass coloured and houses the main controls. It looks like a single button that’s divided in two, with one half to power the robot up or down, while the other half is to send it back to its dock (home button).
Around the puck is a fully removable lid, under which you’ll find a dust box which, strangely, is a lot smaller than I’ve seen in competing models. It’s just 220ml and while it’s not affected my cleaning routines, I suspect it will be emptying itself a lot more frequently in homes with pets.
Under the lid is also the Wi-Fi indicator light and the all-important QR code to get you set up with the companion app. Watch out for how much you handle the robot, though, because it’s highly prone to picking up fingerprint smudges that aren’t easy to wipe off (I’m fussy, what can I say?).
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The front of the robot, as with all others like it, is the camera window that houses not one, but two AI cameras with HD quality that, Dreame says, allows it to capture a 3D image of the robot's surroundings. A side sensor window is also visible towards the end of the bumper.
The undercarriage is where all the action is and here’s where the Aqua10 Ultra differs from many of its competitors. Firstly, it has a dual-brush system for better cleaning on carpets and hard floors alike without hair tangles.
Second, it’s the first Dreame robot vacuum to get a roller mop and here too there’s been some innovation. The roller is made from slightly more bristly fibres than fluff or microfibre to allow it to get into cracks or grouting to ‘scrub’ as it passes over hard floors. It also has a fluffer that spins in the opposite direction to the roller to keep the fibres, well, fluffed so it’s effective at all times.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Importantly, this is the first robovac I’ve tested that actually has a cover for the roller that engages automatically when it senses a carpet. I couldn’t even see the cover when it was doing a mop and went over my living room rug, but no part of my colorful carpet was damp, something I’ve experienced with other robot vacuum cleaners. The roller also extends to clean along edges, although it does miss corners like pretty much every other robovac I’ve tested.
Like its X50 Ultra and Matrix10 Ultra siblings, the Aqua10 also gets the ProLeap system that allows the robot to traverse shallow steps – it can climb 4cm in one step, and another 4cm in a second step if it needs to. It’s no stair climber though, this only helps it get across higher thresholds that some other robots would have trouble with. At setup, the app will even ask you if you want it to use one ‘foot’ at a time, like a human, or raise both feet and roll over.
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 2
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
I’ve gotten to a point where I wish robovac makers would use stiffer bristles for the side brush because I’ve seen them all struggle to push dirt when moving over carpets, although they work very well on hard floors. It’s the same here – stiffer bristles on my fully carpeted bedroom would have been fabulous. This isn’t a complaint, more a wish for the next iteration.
Dock design
I was sent a black unit for this review, although I’ve seen pictures of a white model too. Either way, the base station for the Aqua10 Ultra looks darn good. Sharp corners and clean lines are reminiscent of mid-Century architectural aesthetics and, as I’ve said before, I get Marshall speaker vibes. And that’s a compliment – I love it!
A lot of thought has gone into the various parts of the base station too. For example, I love that the front cover that hides the dust bag and detergent dispenser is tight thanks to a rubber washer around it, but it comes off and slips on smoothly – no harsh clicks or excessive elbow grease needed as I’ve experienced with other such models that make me feel like I’m about to break something.
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 4 of 4
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
I have to mention the dispenser here before moving on. It has two slots for different solutions (there’s a bottle of detergent and pet odor neutralizer in the box – color-coded so you know which goes in what slot), so you could switch up your detergent use if you wish, but the grip to pull the dispenser out of the base station is designed for right-handed people. That’s not to say left-handers can’t remove it, it will just need a little wrist twisting.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Above this slot is the covered hatch for the two water tanks, while below is the housing for the robot itself. Inside, the wash tray can be removed for cleaning as necessary and you’ll find a brush in the box to aid with that. In fact, I found the brush to be handy in scrubbing out the dirty-water tank when I’ve forgetfully let a little ecosystem grow inside it.
Handily, the rear of the base station has a niche for your fingers when you need to move it to another location, plus cable management that is missing from some robovacs I’ve previously reviewed.
• Design score: 5 / 5
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Performance
Arguably the best vacuuming and mopping I’ve experienced with a robovac
100ºC/212ºF roller mop washing
Mostly good navigation and battery life, but it could be better
Getting the Aqua10 Ultra connected to my phone and set up for mapping barely took any time. Before the map creation, though, I allowed the robot to charge fully while I tried to get familiar with the app.
Mapping took no more than seven minutes in the test space for this review, which was a one-bedroom apartment of about 40sqm/430sq ft area. It has mixed flooring, with wall-to-wall carpeting in the bedroom and two types of tile flooring everywhere else. The map was accurate for the most part, but I merged and divided a couple of rooms to delineate the open-plan space.
One thing I loved about the initial mapping process was that I didn’t hear the robot at all. Other such models I’ve tested, I’ve at least heard the wheels – here, not a sound. Wheels are well oiled and very smooth, at least on the tiles in my test space.
I then had some teething issues with the Aqua10 Ultra in that my very first task for it was a single-room clean, which it refused to do. I kept getting a ‘destination not found’ error. Even after a full reset and remapping, the issue didn’t go away. I later got it to do a full-home clean (what Dreame calls “global cleaning” in the app) and everything worked a charm after that, even custom routines or single-room cleans.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Vacuuming tests
Dreame lists the suction power at an industry-leading 30,000Pa, but don’t get taken in by that number – a few factors go into how well a robot vacuum can suck up hair, dirt and debris, including airflow through the inside of the bot. That said, the Aqua10 Ultra doesn’t disappoint.
I don’t think I’ve been better impressed by any other robovac as much as I’ve been by this Dreame. I made sure there was a lot of hair embedded into the carpet fibers of the bedroom before its first real test and it did a fantastic job on its Intense setting (there is a Max suction too). On hard floors, Standard is more than enough for regular cleaning tasks, although I would recommend switching it up to Intense if you’re trying to clean up a relatively dirty section of tile or wood.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The Aqua10 Ultra is a rare robovac that also managed to get bits of dirt out of grout too. I tested this by sprinkling some tea from a bag into spaces between tiles in my kitchen and not a speck of black was visible on the white background after it was done on its Intense suction setting. Other premium models I’ve tested have struggled with this task.
Another vacuuming feature I love is the raising of the side brush. This happens every time the robot senses a very dirty area with larger pieces of debris (oats in testing) to prevent scattering. And that translates to 100% pickup across the entire area.
Image 1 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 2 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Image 3 of 3
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The only time I used Max suction power was when I allowed dust and hair to collect on the bedroom carpet over three weeks and pickup was about 98%, with only the edges suffering from a not-so-good vacuuming. The reason that edge cleaning on the carpet suffers is not unique to Dreame, it’s all robovacs – the bristles of the side brush just aren’t stiff enough to push all hair and debris within carpet fibers along room edges towards the central brushes.
I tried the lowest suction setting (Quiet) only once and I wasn’t particularly impressed – it might be fine if your floors are cleaned daily and you don’t have pets or kids.
Mopping tests
Mopping is probably what the Aqua10 Ultra was truly designed to do and it does it very well. Not only is the roller continually washed with fresh water as it’s mopping, but you also get two choices of pressure the roller can apply on floors. The latter might seem like a good thing on paper but, to be honest, Light pressure is fine for daily mopping when the floors are relatively clean. I would think Normal pressure is what most users would need on a regular basis.
With water levels set to high (level 27) to suit the kind of tiles in my test space, I found the Aqua10 Ultra was capable of tackling most dried stains. Dusty footprints are very easy for it to remove, but it also managed to get rid of spilt-and-dried tea. It even got rid of an unidentified caked-in stain close to my living room rug that my previous robot vacuum wasn’t able to mop up.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
For the first time when testing a robovac I felt comfortable sending it to mop up a small wet spill – and that’s only because Dreame promised that the central and side brushes would be raised. Sure enough, a few drops of water weren’t an issue and any moisture that got sucked into the onboard dust box and, hence, into the dust bag, isn’t going to be an issue as the bag in the dock is dried after every single vacuum or mop-after-vacuum session is complete.
Admittedly this test is based on small spills, like a few drops of water on the bathroom floor or a tiny bit of milk on the kitchen tiles, but I’ve previously avoided sending any robovac over something wet, no matter how small. That being said, I’d still be very hesitant to get the Aqua10 Ultra to clean a larger wet spill as I’d worry about the filter inside the onboard dust box.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
If you’ve got mixed flooring, you can choose what action the robot takes when mopping – avoid carpets altogether, raise the roller mop or cross without cleaning. I had the Aqua10 Ultra set to mop-raise at all times and, the best part, the roller has its own cover that automatically engages as soon as it senses a carpet.
I’ve never been able to see the cover engage, but I’ve had no damp patches on my carpets, not even the edges or corners where other robovacs would be too slow to raise mops.
Mopping can be done with detergents and a small bottle ships in the box to get you started. Dreame doesn’t specify that the floor cleaner needs to be proprietary, but I’d err on the side of caution and purchase what the brand recommends to avoid damaging the internal mechanisms and voiding warranty.
Dock performance
The standout feature here is the dust-bag drying, which you will need to toggle on in the app under Dock Settings. When switched on, the dock will dry the dust bag with warm air after every cleaning session. This prevents odors building or an ecosystem growing inside if moisture gets trapped when the robot vacuums over a few drops of water or any other small spill.
That's not all, though, because the Aqua10 Ultra also looks after the roller well by washing it at 100ºC / 212ºF. That's as good as sterilization and eliminates any odors, washes out stains and gets the roller ready for its next clean. This feature is optional and, if you don't have pets, you could just have the roller cleaned with warm water, sterilizing it every once in a while. The usual hot-air drying takes place to make sure the roller is dried between uses.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The first time I used the Aqua10 Ultra, though, I thought it was using a lot of water, but from the second mopping run onwards, water use has been quite efficient and I didn't need to constantly ensure the clean-water tank was topped up. The only thing that needs doing is ensuring the dirty-water tank is cleaned frequently or you will have nasty odors to contend with. However, not only does the tank have a tight lid, but there's another lid (not hermetically sealed, though) between you and the bad smells. You still wouldn't want to leave dirty water in there for long.
The Aqua10 Ultra dock also allows you to ensure the wash tray is cleaned thoroughly. This is done via the app to start, wherein clean water is poured over the washboard and excess moisture is removed from the roller. The robot will then exit the dock so you can use the provided brush to scrub the tray – just click on finished button on the app when you're done and the dock will take care of the drying once the bot is nestled back in.
Long story short, dock functionality is just as good as the robot's cleaning.
Obstacle avoidance & navigation
Not only does the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra clean well, but its obstacle avoidance is superb. Every robot vacuum I’ve tested until now has gotten thin charging cables entangled with the central bar brush – not so here. Even when unfurled (lying stretched out on the floor), the Aqua10 Ultra’s sensors can spot a cable and it just cleans right along the side without trying to roll over it (as pictured below).
I have one area in my living room where most robovacs get confused – a narrow section of hard floor edged by a wall on one side, a carpet on the other, plus a couch and a slim-legged chair to add to confusing textures. Not only did the Aqua10 Ultra navigate around the legs of the chair well, but it also managed to ensure the strip of hard floor was cleaned each time without the mop rolling over the rug.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
The automatic 4cm raising of the robot, however, is a little temperamental. Even with a threshold marked in the app – which should tell the robot to rise, step over and carry on – I found the Aqua10 Ultra didn’t often register the threshold and would try to navigate it as any other low-rise obstacle, trying to find the best way over it. When it did rise automatically on its wheels, it was a fun sight to see.
Overall, navigation is great, although I have to note that I had teething issues. Immediately after setup, I wanted to test the robot’s functionality in just one room and it just couldn’t “find the designated area”. A full reset and remapping didn’t fix the problem either. However, it worked just fine if I opted to do a full-house clean (what Dreame calls a “global” cleaning), after which choosing a single room or a zone was fine.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Battery life
Running on a 6,400mAh battery, which is quite standard these days, the Aqua10 Ultra should, on paper, give you upwards of 200 minutes of cleaning. In reality, that’s not going to be the case as most users won’t be running it on its lowest settings to conserve battery life.
In my testing, I found battery use inefficient during its first few runs where the drain was quite significant – dropping from full to 40% on Intense vacuuming after running for 30 minutes. That improved to falling to 62% on the same setting for the same duration as I used the bot more.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Depending on what kind of custom cleaning routine you choose, it’s possible an average one-bedroom home could be cleaned without needing additional time at the mains, but larger homes will definitely have a full-house cleaning interrupted due to battery drain. This is more so if you have mixed flooring as the robot automatically increases suction on carpets.
One small issue that Dreame could consider fixing is not getting the suction to start as soon as the bot leaves the base station. I found that a minimum of 1% battery would always drain before it reached its starting point. That might not seem like much, but that clocks up when it needs to empty its dust box regularly during a single vacuuming session. And unlike the Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone, it doesn’t have fast charging to top up a little while its mop is being washed.
• Performance score: 4.5 / 5
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: App and voice control
Nicely designed app, but some setting options are unclear
Custom routines have limitations
Voice control is easy, but has limited functionality
The Dreame companion app in its current form isn’t bad at all – in fact, it’s one of the more appealing apps, with perhaps just Roborock outdoing it. However, it took me a while to wrap my head around the app as right from the get go I found no option to start the mapping process. A bit of playing around with it solved that problem, and the resulting map was accurate and I found it easy to edit.
What I love about the editing process is that I could manually add thresholds, something I’ve not seen on any other robot vacuum app – although I will admit that didn’t work as I expected it to (the bot sometimes didn’t even realize it needed to raise itself). In fact, the map adds room names intelligently as it’s being created, but it doesn’t always get it right.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Dreame gives you a heck of a lot of control over the cleaning routines, like adjusting cleaning parameters such as suction strength or mop water flow rates on a per-room basis, while scheduling, remote control and notifications help keep cleaning convenient. This is the first time I’ve seen a robovac brand offer extensive control over the ‘intelligent’ automatic mode – I could choose my own suction and water levels here, while all other brands use machine learning to set these automatically. Dreame calls this the CleanGenius mode.
It took me a while to figure out how to set up custom Shortcut routines, like Bedroom Clean, or Daily Clean. Even then, I had to ensure I'd saved and tapped on any tick icons or it didn't save anything. Roborock and Ecovacs, on the other hand, have made setting up custom routines a lot simpler.
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
I also couldn’t figure out why none of the carpets in my test space were getting vacuumed as they’re set to be ‘avoided’ by default and the app doesn’t make that clear – even when you choose to vacuum carpets first. These are little things, but small changes could make the app a lot more streamlined and easier to navigate.
I've also noticed that the Dreame app is slower to respond compared to some other brands I’ve tested – it’s just a few seconds of lag between choosing a clean and the robot exiting the dock, but I’ve seen other brands work a little quicker.
Smart home integration with Alexa, Siri and Google Assistant is available, but the Dreame voice assistant is quite quick to respond if you wake it up. The voice commands you give it are limited in nature, like telling it to start a saved Shortcut or returning to the dock, but it’s an excellent hands-free experience. There’s even Matter support on board for future smart home integration if you ever set up a central hub.
• App & voice control score: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
Should I buy the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra?
Attributes
Notes
Score
Value
Competition is high and there are now models with cutting-edge technology at the same price point.
3.5 / 5
Design
With clean lines and a sleek robot, the Aqua10 Ultra looks classic and modern at once.
5 / 5
Performance
Arguably the best robovac I've tested to date, but its battery use might not be best for large homes.
4.5 / 5
App control
A well-designed app with a comprehensive list of features, but the learning curve is a touch steep.
4 / 5
Buy it if...
You have rigorous cleaning requirements
Whether it's vacuuming, mopping or doing both, the Aqua10 Ultra will not disappoint. While it's excellent for homes with pets, expect it to keep emptying its small onboard bin frequently.
You live in a home with plenty of obstacles
Whether that's kids toys, a pet running across the robot's path or just a charging cable you've forgotten to pick off the floor, you can trust nothing is going to get gobbled up or collided with.
You're wary of odors building
With intense hot-water washing for the roller and regular dust-bag drying, the Aqua10 Ultra eliminates any issues with bacterial or fungal growth. Just be sure to clean out the dirty-water tank regularly.
Don't buy it if...
Money is an obstacle
There's no denying the Aqua10 Ultra is expensive, and even with discounts, there'll always be something a lot cheaper. However, at a discounted price, I'd definitely recommend it over many of its competitors.
You don't need too many bells and whistles in a robot vacuum
If you don't have pets or live in a large home, you could well not need all the features the Aqua10 Ultra offers. That could save you a lot of money too.
You live in a home with wall-to-wall carpets
If you don't have hard floors, buying a robovac that mops is a moot point. Not only that, the edges of the rooms will remain dirty as I am yet to meet a robot vacuum that can do edge cleaning on carpets well.
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra review: Also consider
Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni
Despite missing out on some of the features that you'll find on the Dreame, this Deebot proved to be an excellent cleaning machine, even along room edges. Importantly, it's cheaper even at full price, but is now frequently discounted. Read my Ecovacs Deebot X8 Pro Omni review to learn more
Roborock Saros 10R
Our reviewer called it the "perfect hybrid robot vacuum cleaner even for the most cluttered of homes". Improved navigation and a low profile means it can get to places other robovacs will typically avoid. It's also quiet, has excellent vacuum and mop skills, and it's pretty much a master of its trade. Read our in-depth Roborock Saros 10R review for more details
How I tested the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra
(Image credit: Sharmishta Sarkar / TechRadar)
For this review, I used the Aqua10 Ultra for a period of five weeks, running it on mixed flooring an average of twice a week (there were times when I ran it about four times in a day for various tests).
I initially had issues with the robot unable to navigate to its designated area, but that issue was solved after it did a full-home clean. The test space, as mentioned earlier in this review, was a small one-bedroom apartment with carpet in the bedroom and tiles everywhere else.
I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand the app, but once things were set up as I wished them to be, running the Aqua10 Ultra was easy. I performed full-home cleans, custom routines, single-room cleans, even zone cleaning for some tests. I used the shower divider in the bathroom to test its ProLeap system to clear thresholds.
I also used the provided detergent and odor neutralizer in the dock.
I put the Aqua10 Ultra through TechRadar's usual tests for vacuuming and mopping (using oats and tea from a bag for the former, and a dollop of chutney for the latter). I also conducted our standard obstacle avoidance test, but paid special attention to how it handles cables as Dreame does advertize it to be excellent.
As you've probably already read, the Aqua10 Ultra passed all its tests with flying colors, and my complaints were mostly minor.