Gadgets - Organizer

Meze’s walnut-cupped wired headphones impress with a bassy sound, but their headband dings my noggin

3:30 pm | December 20, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Audio Computers Gadgets Headphones | Tags: HP | Comments: Off

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen: Two-minute review

The Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen are some stunners. These walnut-cupped beauties are an upgrade not just on their predecessors, but also on any bona fide entry-level listening headphones in your roster.

Improved earcup and baffle design adds up to better bass control, giving these headphones a controlled oomph above and beyond most closed-backs. High end is crisp without being sharp, and voices sit gloriously in the top end with all the air and throat you could ever want. The 2nd Gens handle most sources admirably, but shine especially bright with vinyl.

A sometimes-obvious scooped middle and a tendency to distort slightly at high volumes – a function of the low impedance, which allows them to work with just about any audio source – leads me, unfortunately, to conclude that they look better than they sound. But that doesn’t mean that they don’t sound good. They sound great. They just look phenomenal.

With the amount of effort that Meze puts into what is, effectively, their step-up set of over-ear headphones, it’s clear that this is a matter of passion as opposed to sheer profit. The design principles on display here are so listener-focused that it’s hard not to be charmed by them, even if basic things such as a tuning-fork headband can sometimes interfere with that listener experience.

In the following paragraphs, I get a bit nitpicky about these things – but it's only because I’m working back from a position of absolutely loving them. And there’s a lot to love about them. Between their excellent build quality, user-friendly part replaceability and a versatility of sound difficult to find in some less-expensive listening options, these close-backs are a great prospect and are among the best wired headphones on the market.

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen over-ear headphones on a headphone stand in front of a window — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Price & release date

Released October 29, 2025
Priced $349 / £319 / AU$649

As the name implies, the 99 Classics 2nd Gen are a redux of Meze’s timeless 99 Classics over-ear headphones. Ten years on from the latter's launch, the 2nd Gens arrive on the scene, with a broad smattering of listener-forward tweaks that build on the enormous goodwill already fostered by this particular line of cans.

Hearteningly, the 99 Classics 2nd Gen are on the cheaper end of Meze’s price spectrum, too, at $349 / £319 / AU$649 – bringing some exceedingly tasteful design (both in sound and aesthetics) in below the brand's mid-range 105 Silvas I reviewed so favourably back in October.

This might be a little on the rich side for wired headphones more generally, unless you’re already of a mind to buy some more audiophilically focused big-budget fare. Even so and for what you’re getting, the Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen are a compelling prospect indeed. Let’s find out if they’re a compelling purchase, too!

Earcups of the Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen over-ear headphones, laid down on their side on a wooden table — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Specs

Type	Wired over-ear, closed-back
Drivers	40mm dynamic
Weight	290g
Connectivity	Dual 3.5mm TS output
Frequency response	15Hz - 25kHz
Impedance	16 ohms
Extras	Dual-TS to 3.5mm TRS cable; 3.5mm-to-6.35mm TRS adapter; USB-C DAC/AMP dongle; carry case

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen over-ear headphones in their hard carry case, placed on a wooden table. — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Features

Wired over-ears, dual 3.5mm TS inputs
16 ohm input impedance
Mini tweaks for improved balance and performance

The Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen, much like the first-gen model, are a set of wired headphones with little in the way of modern jiggery-pokery. There’s a lot of familiar stuff here, from the closed-back design to that fabled aesthetic thrust. But, as a serious 2nd Gen update, there’s been some serious performance-improving changes.

One of their more obvious improvements is the provision of bigger earcups, for better low-end control. This is part of a general movement towards a more balanced overall frequency response, something also aided by the addition of a new bass port in each ear cup. Within each earcup, small, iterative changes to shape and construction have made for a wider soundstage, too.

The newly ultra-low 16 ohm impedance of the drivers (down from 32 ohms in the OGs) encourages you to use these with ultra-modern listening devices, like laptop or smartphone outputs, as opposed to hi-fi amps and mixers. Depending on who you ask, this is a genius leveler of a move, enabling these headphones to sing wherever you put them – for me, it’s a bit of a shame, simply for the distortion potential at louder volumes.

The hard-ish case in which these headphones are delivered is trustworthy enough, with a water-resistant inverted zip and some comforting phone-protecting rigidity. Within this case is another, smaller, case – a soft, cylindrical affair, into which the 99 Classics 2nd Gens’ cable and gubbins safely nestle. Whether you trust yourself to take these out on the daily commute is another thing entirely, of course.

Speaking of gubbins, the 99 Classics 2nd Gen come not just with the requisite wiring, but nice requisite wiring in the form of a hefty, braided dual-core cable. There’s also a 3.5mm-6.35mm jack adapter for mating with phone-plug-toting home hi-fi stuffs, and a new USB-C DAC/AMP dongle, so you plug into smarter, non-jack-plug-toting stuffs (i.e.: your phone, tablet or analog-challenged new computer).

Features score: 4.5/5

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen over-ear headphones placed on a wooden table, alongside their hard carry case, provided cables, adapters and mini DAC. — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Sound quality

Phenomenal low end; butter-smooth highs
Balancing act of volume, soundstage and saturation
Excellent passive sound isolation

Meze knows exactly what it’s doing with the low end in the 99 Classics 2nd Gen, working with the boomy confines of the closed cup to create some seriously controlled wub. Domenique Dumont’s Amants ennemis is a bulging burlap of bass, helped along by the ported earcups in its delivery of blubbering synth-bass and chicken-picky guitars.

Snapped Ankles’ Smart World, too, is an abrasive, dancy delight, with deep thrumming bass, urgent live drumming and Numan-esque clarion-call vocals, the latter of which do a phenomenal job of illustrating the 2nd Gen’s prowess with upper-mid ranges. I’ll take this opportunity to mention USB-C DAC/amp dongle with which the 2nd Gen ships, too – which is transparent enough to my ears that I noticed no appreciable difference in sound when trying these same songs again.

I did start to notice a vague, middish hollowness in these headphones, that threatened to rob guitarry songs like Queens of the Stone Age’s Everybody Knows That You’re Insane, and Foo Fighters’ Good Grief (forgive me, Father, for I think the Foos’ first album is Actually A Bit Underrated Really) of some key propulsive energy.

Fortunately, this lack seems limited to the rocky stuff, and that at the lower-volume end of listening. The same can also be said of the somewhat-narrow soundstage these headphones possess, which can feel corridor-like in the face of usually-quite-expansive tracks like Amant ennemis. The solution to both is simply to have a little less fear, and whack them up a bit more. Unfortunately, doing this sometimes crowds the soundstage, and can even result in a little distortion thanks to the low impedance of the drivers. It’s a balancing act.

Closeup of the headband of the Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen over-ear headphones, on a wooden table. — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

That balancing act, along with the scooped mids, seem a little less obvious when moving over to vinyl, which, as a source, seems a little smoother on the way in. My copy of Alabaster DePlume’s GOLD is an undisputed delight – any sense of ‘lack’ gone altogether, replaced with fulfillingly dense wellsprings of bassy voices, plucked double-basses, throaty saxophones and more besides.

A Gente Acaba (Vento Em Rosa) soars in profound and fulsome brilliance; The World Is Mine is a Nick-Cave-y, almost Tom-Waits-y exploration of staccato instrumentation and monotone spoken word, syncopated snare rimshots. Turning things up, I encountered some unfortunate oversaturation of voices in The Sound of My Feet on This Earth…, a sad reminder of the balancing act in play.

Generally, the 99 Classics 2nd Gen respond well to vinyl records – even the rocky stuff, to an extent. Land of Talk’s Applause Cheer Boo Hiss is a brighter record than anything QOTSA have made, and scrappy to boot, but still a thrilling joy in these headphones. This is a function of some sharp transients, smooth tissy high end and that excellent vocal-forward representation.

I usually focus on the performance of the audio thingies I review from a technical perspective. Sometimes, though, there’s an experiential aspect that muscles its way in. Here, it’s the headbands, which – fetchingly minimal as they are – are quite resonant by nature. Their tuning-fork tendencies mean the slightest of bumps, rubs, taps, or head-nods can set them off. The ringing can even be triggered by light handling of the wires close to where they connect with your earcups.

Thankfully, this ringing doesn’t usually interfere with your listening, provided you’re listening at a moderate volume; still, major moves or cable-rubbings in motion can bring some unwanted “plunk” into your private wig-out sesh.

To make something of a ‘compliment cracker’ out of my experiential experience, so to speak, I will say that the passive isolation provided by the 2ndGens is outstanding; even if sound isn’t outright canceled, the sound mitigation and separation on display here are massive. When something’s playing even slightly cranked, it’s easy to forget where you are.

Sound quality score: 4/5

Closeup of the walnut earcups of the Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen over-ear headphones, on a headphone stand. — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Design

Beautiful walnut earcups
Pleasingly minimal design
And everything’s replaceable!

The first-edition Meze Audio 99 Classics were an unusually stunning prospect at launch: a gleaming lighthouse of wood and brass in an unforgiving ocean of bleak gunmetal and bleaker lightweight plastics. When a pair of decently affordable, excellent-sounding over-ears wear walnut earcups with the fullest sincerity, you know you’re looking at something special.

Thankfully, the 2nd Gen 99 Classics have done little to mess with this magic 10 years on. Instead, there’s technically even more of it. The bigger earcup designs, engineered for better low-end control, also mean a greater surface area of delicious (and unavoidably unique) walnut on the exterior, against which the electroplated zinc hardware is set off wonderfully.

As far as comfort goes, though, I have no notes. The self-adjusting headband is a delight here just as it is on Meze's 105 AER, with the newly capacious ear cushions an excellent fit for most ears. Wearing these is like receiving a lightly firm hug, and one you’re happy to receive for hours at a time.

With respect to setting up and using the 99 Classics 2nd Gens, the TS connection points on each earcup are firm enough that I nearly started second-guessing the amount of pressure I was applying to the connectors, before that reassuring ‘click’ told me everything was going to be ok. That is to say, the wired connection is firm enough you’ll never need worry about accidental yankage. The 99 Classics Gen 2 have got you. They’ve got you. It’s alright now. Shhhh, it’s ok.

To revisit my aforementioned experiential gripe, the needlessly ringy headband is a real shame, and something Meze did have an opportunity to fix here. The solution for the user – not banging your head against anything, where possible – is a simple one, but a little inconvenient for, even inconsistent with, out-and-about wear. Especially when the solution for Meze – put some kind of dampener on each band – is even simpler.

More widely with respect to design, though, and to its great credit, Meze’s done something rare – at least, rare in that ocean of bleak gunmetal and bleaker lightweight plastics. The 99 Classics 2ndGen’s construction is such that parts are easily replaceable, allowing you to keep your headphones keen for as long as you are keen to keep them.

Design score: 4.5/5

Close up of the cable inputs of the Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd, on a wooden table — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Value

Great value for great design...
…though a shame about the resonant headband
A truly versatile step-up set of listening headphones

So, should you get them? My vote: yes. Despite being closer to the budget end of the price spectrum, the 99 Classics 2nd Gen’s $349 / £319 / AU$649 is a fair bit to put away for headphones. But it gets you some of the most versatile wired headphones on the market.

This is because a great deal of versatile wired headphones end up compromizing quite significantly on something related to build quality, sound fidelity or comfort – and, to my mind, the Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen don’t really compromize all that much on any of these.

There are arguments to be made against that low impedance, and the resulting distortion you can experience when listening at particularly loud volumes, but they’re small against the 2nd Gen’s supreme on-ear comfort, incredible low-end control and general genre versatility. Added versatility from the nicely included USB-C dongle is highly welcomed, as is the better-than-average case design.

Whether all this literally adds up to a good deal for you is something only you can decide. But altogether, and off the back of both the incredible design and design journey made by the 99 Classics, it’s fair to say these are intrinsically worthwhile cans.

Value score: 4.5/5

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen hard carry case — (Image credit: Future / James Grimshaw)

Should I buy the Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen?

Section	Notes	Score
Features	Hefty wires and new USB-C dongle for better connectivity among listener-friendly updates	4.5/5
Sound quality	Stunning bass with excellent control; mechanical ring when headband gets dinged is a shame	4/5
Design	Extremely pleasing to look at, and designed so parts can be replaced with extreme ease	4.5/5
Value	Well-built, with unique wood earcups, great versatility and broad sound profile, they're a great prospect for the price	4.5/5

Buy them if...

You’re a sucker for visual stunners
It’s hard to say anything against the Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen's aesthetic value, because in my opinion there’s nothing to say against the aesthetic value of the Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen. Look at ‘em!

You listen widely
Low impedance and great all-round sound profile make these a pair of listening headphones that’ll work with practically anything.

Don't buy them if...

You’re a Bluetooth-only household
They’re wired, duh. You could get a dongle, but maybe you want a decent pair of wireless headphones instead, eh?

You want to get the most from your well-curated hi-fi rig
Lovely as the 99 Classics 2nd Gen are, the 16 ohm impedance is extremely low – a boon for listening across a bunch of devices, but not so much for getting the best out of your expensive hi-fi headphone amp.

Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen review: Also consider

	Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen	FiiO FT13	Sennheiser HD-660S2
Price	$349 / £319 / AU$649	$329 / £269 / AU$499 (approx.)	$599 / £499 / AU$949
Type	Closed-back over-ears	Closed-back over-ears	Open-back over-ears
Drivers	40mm dynamic	60mm 'W'-shaped dynamic	38mm
Weight	290g	365g	260g
Impedance	16 ohms	32 ohms	300 ohms
Connectivity	Dual 3.5mm TS output	Dual 3.5mm TS output	Dual 3.5mm TS output
Frequency response	15Hz - 25kHz	7Hz - 40kHz	8Hz – 41.5kHz
Extras	Dual TS to 3.5mm TRS cable; 3.5mm-to-6.35mm TRS adapter; USB-C DAC/amp dongle; carry case	Dual-TS Y-cable; 3.5mm TRS/4.4mm balanced/6.35mm TRS/XLR cable terminators; carry case	Dual TS to 6.35mm TRS cable; Dual TS to 4.4mm balanced cable 6.35mm-to-3.5mm TRS adapter; carry pouch

FiiO FT13
FiiO’s FT13 closed-back headphones are relatively new kids on the block, but truck in the same surprisingly cheap magnificence as the much of FiiO’s output elsewhere. Similar to the 99 Classics 2nd Gen, these are wood-cupped low-impedance affairs, but with outsized 60mm drivers and some posh cable connectivity. A great budget option.
Read our FiiO FT13 review for the full story

Sennheiser HD-660S2
Though another 2nd Gen upgrade of another set of wired headphones, the Sennheiser HD-660S2 differ from the 99 Classics 2nd Gen in being high-impedance open-backed headphones. If you want something more suited to enjoying your hi-fi stack at home, this could be it.
See our Sennheister HD-660S2 for the full story

How I tested the Meze Audio 99 Classics 2nd Gen

Tested for 3 weeks
Used as listening headphones at home
Predominantly tested on streaming and digital files, heard through a Universal Audio Volt 4 audio interface and a HP laptop’s USB-C port; also tested with vinyl records through a Vestax mixer

Three glorious weeks were spent putting the Meze Audio 99 Classics Gen 2 through their paces at home, as a primary set of listening headphones for work and leisure.

They spent most of their time in my attic office, delivering audio from Spotify and my digital music library via a Universal Audio Volt 4 audio interface. I gave a little time to listening through the provided USB-C DAC/amp. too, using my laptop’s USB-C port.

Lastly and for a little while, I used them on my living room vinyl setup as well – listening through an old-school Vestax PCV-275 turntable mixer.

First reviewed: December 2025
Read more about how we test

I tested the UPerfect UColor O Lite – and this 13-inch 4K portable monitor is going to make a lot of tech and business professionals happy

10:47 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

The UPerfect UColor O Lite is a 13.3-inch 4K OLED portable monitor with one cable power and display, a few ports for those who may need them, and the ability to be slightly modified to make a massive difference.

I’ve reviewed plenty of the best portable monitors. I have one or two tucked away in just about every single one of my workspaces. And after testing out this particular model, it's earned a place on my tech cart where I run Systems and IT.

This display is spectacular for those niche workspaces - it's touted by UPerfect as a portable monitor for MacBooks thanks to the high resolutions and and 109% DCI-P3 color coverage. And I get that.

I will say, a 13-inch screen may not be the best for your primary display at your workstation, as it’s the same size as most smaller laptops out there, but for secondary screens or those unique spots, I found the UColor O Lite fits the bill beautifully.

UPerfect UColor O Lite: Price and availability

This monitor is usually sold for around $330 / £247 direct from UPerfect - although at the time of review, it's discounted to $280 / £209. It comes with the basic cables you need, and a little folio case that doubles as a kickstand. So, a neat all-in-package.

UPerfect UColor O Lite: Unboxing and First Impressions

Right out of the gate, this monitor shows off its thinness and portability. It’s lightweight on purpose. Its best use case is a single USB-C to your device. Simple, easy. But there is the flexibility to run a full-size HDMI to a display, or to plug in another USB-C device in a pinch.

I paired this monitor with the Rolling Square Edge Pro - although I suspect any strong mag-lock will be suitable. This little magnetic hinge has made this monitor 10x more valuable in my arsenal. Since it’s so lightweight, these magnetic brackets can hold the portable display on the side of a standard display, hanging from a door frame, mount on the side of a metal cart, mount to the side of a laptop if you want to, or just free-stand at any angle you desire. It unlocks a whole new tier of usability.

UPerfect UColor O Lite: Design & Build Quality

Like all good portable monitors, this one is thin and light. It feels like an iPad when you hold it, without Apple's premium build. However, it still feels like it’s a quality display.

Then, you turn it on and realize it’s actually a pretty solid display after all, putting out a good amount of brightness, brilliant colors and 4K resolution, all in a tiny little package. I test a lot of monitors, and I fully expected it to be average across the board. This panel proved me wrong.

It has enough ports to do what it needs to do, it crammed in a full-size, all-grown-up, standard HDMI, and it still managed to stay as small as it is. This is the panel that once you start looking, you’ll be able to find a dozen little ways you could use it.

UPerfect UColor O Lite: In use

Specs

Panel: 13.3-inch 4K OLED, 3840 × 2160, 16:9
Color & contrast: 109% DCI-P3, 100,000:1 contrast, HDR support
Brightness: up to ~390–500 nits (manufacturer rating)
Response time: 1 ms
Viewing angle: 178°
Ports: 2 × full-featured USB-C (audio + video) 1 × mini HDMI (audio + video), 1 × USB-A OTG, 1 × 3.5 mm audio out
Audio: dual 1 W stereo speakers
Build: aluminum chassis, ultra-thin 3–8 mm body, narrow bezels
Weight: 0.47 kg (1.03 lb)
Mounting: 75 × 75 mm VESA

I've been running the UColor O Lite typically plugged into a Mac mini that I use as a server. This gives me quick access to pop in, control from my phone, and see what I am doing on a bigger screen, or to use a mouse and keyboard.

When not in use, it is mounted on the cart using the previously mentioned magnets. I can pop it off with one tug and use it with my MacBook, another Mac mini, whatever laptop I am testing at the time, or with any number of other devices I may need to test and fix. When I need a little more screen real estate for a big project at my desk, I have a mounting plate on my Dell monitor, so I pop this display over there and immediately add another display to my setup. For quick meetings where I need to showcase something, I can bring this display for whoever is in the meeting.

When I am testing a Mac mini for issues, I can plug right in; the same goes for old laptops, old servers, and Apple TVs. My creative team can even pull this display if needed as a camera output for a photo shoot, or I could use it for digital signage in a pinch. It’s the perfect little display to have on hand for so many things if you’re in that kind of work.

So, it's had a pretty thorough work-out for a portable monitor. I’ve used this display for over 100 days, and I have had absolutely zero issues with it. No qualms, no disappointments. For those who need a little display for anything, this is it.

During this 100+ day stretch, I’ve pushed this display with Mac, Windows, iPads, Cameras, Servers, AppleTV, Switch, iPhone, a PlayStation, an XBOX, and a Nex Playground system. I even used this display for a quick test to make sure that my Eufy POE NVR camera system I was installing for a client was working before tucking the brain away.

In short, if you are the kind of person who does a lot, works in tech, may use a portable display, or just have a lot of gadgets around you or in your life, then you should check out this portable monitor. Don’t just think of it as a portable monitor; think of it as a 13-inch Swiss Army Knife that can do just about anything you may need it to do.

For those who are working out of a backpack, have a lot of portable meetings, work from a coffee shop or maybe just not a dedicated office, this can add to the power of an office in a backpack

UPerfect UColor O Lite: Final verdict

The UColor O Lite 13-inch display is a spectacular little device that can truly do just about anything you may need a display output for. It’s got a great panel, a beautiful OLED, with a wide color coverage and a high resolution (even if you don't really need 4K on a screen this small).

Beyond the great display, I really liked the hyper-portability. It's thin, light, and perfect for business travel or carrying around the office - which is how I use it. And yes, the screen may be too small for some users, but there are plenty of 15- and 16-inch portable displays out there. At the 13-inch mark, this is one of the best.

Image 1 of 8

Image 2 of 8

Image 3 of 8

Image 4 of 8

Image 5 of 8

Image 6 of 8

Image 7 of 8

Image 8 of 8

For more options, we've tested the best business monitors.

I tested the Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500 – a sleek power station hamstrung by its software

10:45 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

The Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500 is a unique power station in my army of different options.

It's got a sleek, perhaps even beautiful style - a design that separates it from the best portable power stations I've tested. It proved reliable during my time using it, I appreciated the 1.5kWh capacity And I like the port selection here.

However, what really lets it down is the app. It's difficult to navigate, and I'm hoping that a future update will sort out the issues I experienced, because beyond that, there's a lot to like about this power station.

Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500: Price and availability

Enphase | Power Pack 1500 — (Image credit: Collin Probst // Future )

The Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500 is available for $ 1549 on their website; however, at the time of writing, it is on sale for $1199. It's also available on Amazon.com, with the base model costing $1299, but also variants bundled with solar panels or the cart.

For those who want the whole experience, make sure you pick up the portable solar panel and IQ Cart as well. While not vital, both add an extra little bit to the PowerPack 1500.

Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500: Unboxing and First Impressions

I've unboxed a lot of power stations. This one was the first to have the box-opening stand out. In a pleasing Apple-esque fashion, the boxes open up, lifting the front panel almost like a Tesla Model X gullwing door. Once open, I can grab out the power station, cables, and documentation, lifting easily out of the front and top of the box rather than just the top.

Upon my first inspection, this unit appears to follow Apple's design language. It has rounded edges, handles that look like Apple could have designed them, a simple yet functional front screen, and functional port covers that can be popped off when helpful.

The box includes the unit, some power cables, and basic documentation. Grabbing the app, installing, and connecting was easy too. After the initial setup, I found the app pretty clunky, but more on that later.

Right off the bat, this power station looked well-equipped to handle what I may throw at it. The interface is a touchscreen, which is unique for the power stations I usually work with, which use a button-first design. Further, the port coverings, handle, and build quality make this feel like a professional-grade power station, not just something you'd bring with you on a camping trip for a few nights of phone charging.

One more nice touch is that this unit has a proximity sensor, so when you get close, a faint light comes on. Small, but it's a nice touch that adds to this unit's premium feel.

Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500: Design & Build Quality

The IQ PowerPack 1500 is rugged, yet refined. It's built for indoor or outdoor use, and functions well in both environments, though I wouldn't want to keep this out in the rain or freezing weather. The handles are comfortable and make transporting significantly easier.

But, if you want an even easier time toting this hefty piece of kit around, Enphase has an optional cart accessory that the IQ PowerPack 1500 clips into. Sadly, there are no stacking units, but the cart is nice if you are older, have a bad back, don't want to tote it around in your hands, or enjoy an easy way to carry it.

One more thing I will mention about the design is that, in a moment of curiosity getting the better of me, the power port covers pop off super easily and pop back on just as easily. I don't know if this is a feature or just a happy accident, but if you have ports you don't want covered, popping off the rubber flip-down covers is super easy.

Lastly, for those who do plan to run the IQ PowerPack 1500 on a job site, as a battery backup, or in a place they are not going to be, the IQ PowerPack 1500 has both LTE and Wi-Fi, allowing you to stay connected even when you're away.

Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500: In use

Specs

Ports: 4 × AC 120 V, 1 × USB-C PD 100 W, 4 × USB-A, 1 × 12v car port, 1 × 12 V DC port
Weight: 55.7lbs (with packaging)
Capacity: 1.5kWh
Dimensions: 16.5x9.3x13.7 inches

I have had this in my arsenal of portable power solutions for 104 days now, and in that time, I have gotten several opportunities to get quite a bit out of it. I used this to run a leaf mulcher in my yard for several hours at a time, recharge my drills, test Christmas lights, charge up some review gear, and more.

For the leaf mulcher, I was able to get 5 hours of mulching without going below 50% of my battery, if I remember correctly. I placed the power station in a good central spot and then went to town, mulching as much as I could reach.

For a few months, while I was handling some installation jobs for my business, I kept the Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500 in the back of my Jeep. I used it to recharge my drills, my Hoto Electric Screwdrivers, some lights I was using on the job, and I even used it to test power to some gear before installing it in a hard-to-reach area.

Using the physical unit itself is a great experience. No complaints. The UI is easy, the buttons are sleek. The touchscreen is responsive, and the whole experience makes sense.

The software side of things, on the other hand, is where my frustration kicks in. The software, in my experience is lacking considerably. It's clunky, has only one particular use in mind, not the general pro-user, and it works, but in an odd way.

While the Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500 is so much more, keep in mind it can also serve as a UPS, providing reliable power to essential devices if the power goes out.

Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500: Final verdict

All in all, the Enphase IQ PowerPack 1500 is a beautiful unit that is severly hamstringed by it's software, though the software is what can be modified with a simple push update in the future. This power station has LTE, Wi-Fi, fast charging, LFP Cells and a great build, making it a spectacular pro-level option for those who need power on a job site, or somewhere that is not with them at all times.

Image 1 of 20

Image 2 of 20

Image 3 of 20

Image 4 of 20

Image 5 of 20

Image 6 of 20

Image 7 of 20

Image 8 of 20

Image 9 of 20

Image 10 of 20

Image 11 of 20

Image 12 of 20

Image 13 of 20

Image 14 of 20

Image 15 of 20

Image 16 of 20

Image 17 of 20

Image 18 of 20

Image 19 of 20

Image 20 of 20

I tested the Blacklyte Atlas Lite and it’s an ultra-cool standing desk for work and play

10:10 pm | December 19, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

The Blacklyte Atlas Lite is a heavy-duty yet straightforward desk with solid adjustability, bold branding, and the ability to transition seamlessly between work and play. The instructions are easy to follow for setting this desk up, the controls are easy to learn, and the desk motors are very quiet.

Blacklyte is well known in the gaming world, but then started making some professional desks as well, or at minimum, desks that gamers could also use for professional desks. The Atlas Lite is a good example of that. It still has some gamer vibes, but is also very much a professional desk, transforming your gamer central to a business professional workspace for your day job as well.

Ignore that branding on the desktop - if you can. If you prefer a more stylish design over the standard metal frame and wood-colored desk, and demand a truly useful cable tray (often lacking on similar models), it's one of the best standing desks I've used for work and play.

Blacklyte Atlas Lite: Pricing and Availability

The Blacklyte Atlas Lite is usually sold for around $700 but is currently on sale for $569 from the official US site and UK site (for £439) at the time of review. It's also available from a handful of other retailers, but availability seems sporadic right now.

There are a handful of sizing and color options. I chose Obsidian Black, but Moonstone White looks gorgeous too. The natural oak to me was a third option, but it didn’t look nearly as good as the Obsidian or Moonstone to me.

Blacklyte Atlas Lite: Unboxing and First Impressions

The Blacklyte Atlas Lite shipped in two boxes, as most standing desks do: the desktop for one and the legs and building materials in the other. These pieces were pretty well tucked into the box with packaging. One thing I couldn’t help but think about while unboxing was that the boxes were super deep black. I had a moment of worry about ink transfer or it rubbing off on my carpet or walls, but that worry quickly dissipated.

A lot of desks are the same main idea for assembly, but most people don't build a plethora of desks; some may build only one ever. So, it’s nice to see Blacklyte including a QR code to a YouTube assembly video for those who are more visual learners, are not familiar with assembling a desk, or perhaps run into issues with assembly.

If you have experience building desks, though, the entire process should be an absolute dream. The bags of screws are labeled, the instructions are actually helpful, and the parts are easy to get together. All in all, this shouldn’t take you more than 30 minutes to assemble from boxes in your living room, office, or wherever you open large boxes into a fully assembled desk.

Blacklyte Atlas Lite: Design & Build Quality

The Blacklyte Atlas Lite feels heavy-duty. I’ve tested a lot of desks. Some feel flimsy but look pretty; some are all-around bad; some are a whole art piece. The Blacklyte Atlas Lite sits in the middle. It’s a functional piece that feels like a real workhorse with a bit more style than most.

The desktop itself is a bit textured, but it feels nice even for long periods of use and work sessions. I also like it as it doesn’t feel like I need to baby the desktop. Granted, I don't plan on beating it up anytime soon, but it’s nice to know that I can use this desk without worry of a scratch from moving something across the desktop.

Another thing worth mentioning in the design is the cable management. The rear notch allows for easy cable drops, especially if you have the back of your desk up against a wall in your workspace, or even to keep things clean, so your cables aren’t draping over the edge of the desk. I also like the built-in cable management tray. While this one isn't a grid or mounting plate like some, the tray is a welcome addition.

Blacklyte Atlas Lite: In use

Specs

as tested

Dimensions: 47x32-inches
Height Range: 27 to 46in
Max Load: Up to 265lbs
Warranty: 3 years

I've got this desk set up for a simple laptop, podcast, or meeting setup for some of my team. While I haven't added a monitor, there is plenty of room for one here alongside a laptop, with room to spread out your tablet, notes, diagrams, or whatever else you may need.

Switching between sitting and standing is rarely timed for me; I usually work, and when my knees start aching, or I get antsy, I'll jump up to stand. For the desks that don't have presets, that takes switching focus to choose where I want the height, then adjusting ever so slightly because it's slightly off, and so on. For desks with presets, such as this one, it's so much easier. Once I decide whether to stand or sit, I can press the corresponding preset button and get to work. And it works flawlessly here.

Another thing that makes switching between sit and stand more enjoyable is that it's smooth and relatively quiet. I don't hear clicking, knocking, creaking, or anything else. Just smooth up and down.

Perhaps that's Blacklyte perfecting the art of quiet motors, especially for their gamer crowd, or maybe that's something else. Still, regardless, the Atlas Lite is noticeably quiet (or is that un-noticeably quiet?).

Blacklyte Atlas Lite: Final verdict

This desk is for those who want a gaming vibe and a desk they enjoy, while still looking professional enough for work, before a night of gaming, or for those who want a simple, high-quality standing desk that lifts and lowers smoothly.

Maybe standing desks have become too complex, maybe not, but either way, the Atlas Lite is a solid option for most people. It's solid, quiet, has good lifting capacity, is durable, and offers enough space and options for most users.

Image 1 of 8

Image 2 of 8

Image 3 of 8

Image 4 of 8

Image 5 of 8

Image 6 of 8

Image 7 of 8

Image 8 of 8

For more workspace essentials, we've tested the best office chairs.

Checkr review

8:01 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Pro | Comments: Off

Checkr is a next-generation background-check platform that accelerates and simplifies hiring through automation and advanced data analysis. It draws from thousands of official databases, including county courts, criminal registries, and motor vehicle departments, to produce timely, accurate reports.

Using artificial intelligence, Checkr standardizes diverse legal terms and classifications, helping hiring teams interpret results quickly and consistently.

The service has become particularly popular among companies handling high hiring volumes, such as gig platforms, retail chains, staffing agencies, and tech firms, thanks to its real-time data retrieval, API-driven integrations, and intuitive dashboards.

Checkr: Plans and pricing

Checkr structures its pricing into tiered packages that scale with organizational needs:

Basic+ Plan ($29.99 per check): Includes SSN trace, sex offender search, national criminal database screening, and global watchlist monitoring. County verifications, when necessary, add roughly $15 per record.
Essential Plan ($54.99 per check): Expands on Basic+ by adding searches for all counties tied to a candidate's past seven years of residence.
Professional Plan ($79.99 per check): Adds employment and education verification to the Essential Plan to provide more complete candidate profiles.

International background checks cost $32 to $124 per report, and add-ons, such as motor vehicle record (MVR) checks or employment verifications, range from $6 to $40. Organizations conducting 300+ checks annually typically qualify for volume discounts.

This transparent, mix-and-match pricing model helps businesses tailor their screening programs to job types while controlling costs.

Checkr: Features

Checkr stands out for its extensive automation and advanced data-handling capabilities:

AI-powered charge classification: Automatically interprets and standardizes criminal charges from multiple jurisdictions, translating complex terminology into consistent, easy-to-read summaries.
Extensive data coverage: Accesses county criminal courts, sex offender registries, global watchlists, and other verified government sources for comprehensive results.
Integration ecosystem: Connects with over 100 HR platforms and applicant tracking systems (ATS), streamlining the hiring pipeline.
Automated candidate communication: Sends real-time notifications--including check initiation, progress updates, results, and adverse action letters--to both employers and candidates.
Bulk and batch tools: Ideal for high-volume hiring, allowing employers to process multiple candidates simultaneously and trigger workflows at scale.

Checkr integrations — (Image credit: Checkr)

Checkr's speed, often delivering results within one or two business days, remains a primary selling point for companies that can't afford delays in staffing or onboarding.

Checkr: Setup

The onboarding process is straightforward. After signing up, administrators can invite team members, configure access controls, and connect Checkr to their HR systems through prebuilt integrations or APIs.

Organizations can choose which screening packages to apply to specific job roles, set compliance notifications, and automate report delivery. For candidates, setup requires little more than completing a brief authorization form and submitting personal details through a secure online portal.

Checkr: Ease of use

Checkr's web dashboard emphasizes visual clarity and efficiency. Reports are organized into collapsible panels covering criminal searches, employment history, and motor vehicle records. Color-coded highlights signal pending charges, clear results, or items needing review.

Because of its automation-first design, HR teams can handle large batches of background checks with minimal manual input. Candidates also benefit from transparency: they can track progress, upload documents, or dispute errors through a 24/7 self-service portal.

That said, customer support primarily operates via a ticket-based system, which can delay responses during peak periods--an area where some competing services still outperform Checkr.

Checkr: Security and privacy

Checkr employs enterprise-grade security measures, including encryption in transit and at rest, strict data access controls, and continuous system monitoring.

The company complies with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) where applicable, ensuring candidates' data is handled lawfully and privately.

Candidates must provide explicit consent before a background check begins, and all adverse action notices are automatically sent to maintain compliance with federal and state laws. Checkr also allows users to dispute information directly through the candidate portal, providing added transparency.

Checkr: The competition

Checkr's closest competitors include GoodHire, Sterling, and HireRight, all of which offer employment background screening with varying emphases on compliance, support, and global coverage.

Checkr stands out for its automation, real-time data network, and speed, making it especially strong for high-volume, tech-forward employers that care about quick turnaround and HRIS/ATS integrations.

Compared with GoodHire, Checkr offers similar per-check pricing tiers and overlapping core checks. Still, GoodHire offers robust U.S.-based phone and email support and a very low reported error rate, which may appeal to smaller businesses that prefer more hand-holding.

GoodHire also supports very low-volume, pay-per-check use and historically charges a one-time setup fee. At the same time, Checkr leans toward scalable, API-driven workflows with no prominent setup fees, making it better suited to companies that expect frequent or bulk screenings.

When stacked against Sterling, Checkr takes the lead in automation and speed, with a higher percentage of criminal checks completed within an hour and more steps handled without manual review.

Sterling, on the other hand, offers a long-established, compliance-heavy product set, including drug testing, I-9, and specialized packages, making it more attractive to large enterprises or regulated industries that need deeper policy support and more customized verification programs.

Checkr's self-service package customization from the dashboard is generally more straightforward. In contrast, Sterling often routes customization through account managers, which can be helpful for complex but slower for fast-moving teams.

Versus HireRight, Checkr typically delivers faster turnaround times and a higher "hit rate" for specific criminal searches due to its AI-driven data-matching engine and more automated workflows.

HireRight is stronger for organizations with extensive global hiring, offering mature international coverage and compliance tools. Still, it may involve slower processing and more traditional, enterprise-style onboarding and support, which can feel heavier for smaller or more agile businesses.

In practice, Checkr tends to be the better fit for gig platforms, tech companies, and staffing firms prioritizing speed and modern UX. At the same time, HireRight is often chosen by large, globally distributed enterprises that value broad jurisdictional coverage and long-standing compliance expertise.

Checkr: Final verdict

Checkr brings innovation and efficiency to background screening, emphasizing automation, speed, and integration. Its AI classification tools, real-time data retrieval, and candidate transparency make it a forward-looking choice for companies scaling their hiring operations.

Despite its limited human-support options and less robust compliance in highly regulated fields, Checkr remains one of the most compelling solutions for fast-moving organizations that prioritize digital workflows.

For gig employers, startups, and HR teams seeking speed and scalability without sacrificing accuracy, Checkr strikes a smart balance between cost, functionality, and user experience.

The Competitor is a no-nonsense symmetrical Xbox controller that barely puts a foot wrong

8:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets Gaming | Tags: Final Fantasy, PC, UK, US | Comments: Off

The Competitor: one-minute review

The Competitor is an Xbox and PC-compatible controller from manufacturer Hyperkin that adopts a DualSense-like appearance and symmetrical thumbstick layout. While it does feature niceties like drift-resistant Hall effect sticks and triggers, I’ve found it to be a blissfully simple controller.

The Competitor has no fancy RGB lighting, no gyro sensors, no trigger locks, no wireless connectivity options, and no supporting apps or software. It’s also impressively cheap, has a nice design, and a great idea or two of its own. Its straightforward nature serves it well, and it’s one reason why it’s one of the best Xbox controllers I’ve tested in quite a while.

Some of my favorite controllers in recent years have been the likes of the Razer Wolverine V3 Pro and GameSir Tarantula Pro - both gamepads that are stuffed with desirable features that definitely make their price tags trend upward. The Competitor’s stripped-back, simplistic nature is actually quite refreshing in comparison, and is a staunch reminder that controllers don’t need to be a smorgasbord to remain appealing in the contemporary market.

There are some slight missteps. I’ve never been a fan of the PlayStation-style D-pad adopted here, the Menu and Share buttons are rather awkwardly-placed, and - while this is certainly personal preference and not indicative of The Competitor’s quality - it lacks wireless connectivity. Though at its relatively low price point, it’s easy to forgive these shortcomings.

The Competitor review: price and availability

List price: $49.99 / £39.99 (around AU$74.95)
Available from most major retailers in the US and UK
Compares in price to similarly cheap controllers like the GameSir Kaleid

You can get The Competitor today for $49.99 / £39.99 (around AU$74.95), making it one of the cheaper Xbox and PC controllers that’s actually worth recommending. Readily available at Amazon in the US and the UK, you’ll also likely find it at your local retailers of choice, including Best Buy in the US and Argos in the UK.

The cheaper Xbox controller spectrum has gotten broader in recent years, with pads like the GameSir Kaleid ($49.99 / £59.99) and 8BitDo Pro 2 ($44.99 / £39.99) also coming in at similar price points. The Competitor, rather fittingly, has some tough competition in the space, then, but I’d definitely say it’s comparable in quality to those aforementioned pads.

The Competitor review: Specs

Price	$49.99 / £39.99 (around AU$74.95)
Weight	7.1oz / 200g
Dimensions	6.2 x 5.0 x 2.5in / 158 x 127 x 64mm
Compatibility	Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC
Connection type	Wired (USB-C)
Battery life	N/A

The Competitor review: design and features

The Competitor differs from most Xbox controllers in its symmetrical thumbstick layout and design that’s practically identical to that of the DualSense Wireless Controller. You’ll find the same boomerang-esque shape here, with similarly designed D-pad and face buttons.

I wouldn’t say build quality is luxurious, certainly not up to the DualSense standard, but it does the job at its price point. That is to be expected, though, given the lower price. Otherwise, nothing about the controller screams cut corners or lazy design; it’s an extremely tight ship. Usually, you’d expect one or two blemishes to stand out on budget-friendly controllers.

But my only issues, really, are the slightly awkward placement of the central Menu and Share buttons, as well as the spongy-feeling PlayStation-style d-pad. However, the latter comes down to personal preference more than anything else.

The color scheme of The Competitor is quite pleasing, too. It sports a black and white aesthetic in a sort of ‘X’ pattern across the front of the pad. The face buttons and d-pad have a translucent, glossy finish that feels quite nice against your thumbs, too.

The Competitor review: Performance

The Competitor is a strictly wired controller. However, that’s not strange at its relatively low price point, so easy to forgive. That said, if you’d prefer a wireless model, you may be better off checking out similarly priced gamepads like the Xbox Wireless Controller or 8BitDo Pro 2.

What isn’t a guarantee for cheap controllers is the inclusion of drift-resisting Hall effect thumbsticks, but they are here on The Competitor. The sticks themselves feel great, too, with solid responsiveness and a rugged textured finish around the edges.

The Competitor features two remappable buttons on the rear of the controller. And these are easy enough to customize by holding the mapping button on the back, in conjunction with one of these rear buttons and one of the main ones on the front.

These remappable buttons are assigned by default, which I typically find a touch annoying. However, this is alleviated by a handy feature you don’t see on all that many controllers. There are lock switches for both remappable buttons, which can prevent them from being pressed in entirely. It’s arguably a bit of a workaround to keep them unassigned, but I welcome the ability to manually enable or disable them in such a way.

Should I buy The Competitor?

Buy it if...

You want an affordable, effective controller
The Competitor simply does what it says on the tin (or, um, the cardboard box, I suppose). It’s a straightforward gamepad with no obvious flaws, available at a fittingly competitive price point.

You’re looking for a drift-beating option with light features
Hall effect sticks and two remappable buttons are present here. It’s on the lighter side in terms of features, but it’s really all a controller at this price needs to stand out.

Don't buy it if...

You want a more robust D-pad
Some game genres, like fighting games and platformers, benefit from a more well-rounded d-pad than the one on The Competitor. I actually love the circular design of the Xbox Wireless Controller's d-pad, and would recommend it over The Competitor if that's something that will be important to you.

You’re on PS5
The Competitor isn’t compatible with PlayStation hardware, despite the DualSense-looking design. Consider checking out our best PS5 controllers guide if you’re shopping for a Sony gamepad instead.

The Competitor review: Also consider

If The Competitor isn’t quite competitive enough for you, here are a couple other options very much worthy of consideration.

	The Competitor	Xbox Wireless Controller	GameSir Super Nova
Price	$49.99 / £39.99 (around AU$74.95)	$59.99 / £54.99 / AU$74	$44.99 / £49.99 / AU$89
Weight	7.1oz / 200g	8.5oz / 241g	9.3oz / 263g
Dimensions	6.2 x 5.0 x 2.5in / 158 x 127 x 64mm	5.9 x 4.1 x 2.4in / 150 x 105 x 60mm	6.1 x 4.2 x 2.3in / 156 x 106 x 59mm
Compatibility	Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC	Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC	PC, Switch, Switch 2
Connection type	Wired (USB-C)	Wireless (Xbox), Wired (USB-C)	Wireless (Bluetooth, 2.4GHz USB dongle), Wired (USB-C)
Battery life	N/A	Varies, around 20-40 hours	15 hours

Xbox Wireless Controller
Always an incredibly solid choice, the official Xbox Wireless Controller isn’t big on bonus features, but it offers incredible reliability and is available in countless color options these days.

Read our full Xbox Wireless Controller review

GameSir Super Nova
While losing Xbox compatibility, this is a fantastic and affordable wireless controller for PC and the Switch family of consoles. I’d go for this one if you’re after a PC controller and interested in a budget-friendly wireless option. Oh, it comes with a charging dock and some lovely color options, too.

Read our full GameSir Super Nova review

How I tested The Competitor

Tested for one week
Primarily tested on PC
Played a wide range of games

I tested The Competitor over the course of about a week, putting the wired wonder through its paces primarily on a gaming PC with my Steam library. All my go-to games were present here, including Final Fantasy 14 Online, Tekken 8, Elden Ring Nightreign, and Tokyo Xtreme Racer.

Given the shape and feel of the controller, I tried to compare the experience of playing with The Competitor to that of the DualSense Wireless Controller. Obviously, the PlayStation controller is more feature-rich, with bespoke haptic feedback and adaptive triggers, as well as its touchpad. Build quality isn’t quite as strong with The Competitor, in comparison, but it’s certainly not miles off, given the price.

First reviewed December 2025

Ricoh GR IV: two-minute review

I'm already a fan of the Ricoh GR series of premium compact cameras, having purchased the GR IIIx several years ago. There really is no other camera this small that can shoot photos that look this good – and that's why I've featured it in my best compact camera and best point-and-shoot camera guides.

My GR III series camera is far from perfect, though. It's prone to damage, its autofocus can be really sluggish at times, and it could do with a built-in flash. I'd also love a tilt screen – oh and poor battery life is another gripe among users.

Despite these limitations I still carry my Ricoh with me most days, but I've been keeping a keen eye out for the arrival of its successor, in the hope it could deliver particular upgrades and become my perfect compact. Well, the Ricoh GR IV is finally here, six years after the GR III, and I've had my hands on it for around three weeks, with the new camera in one pocket and my GR IIIx in the other.

So is the GR IV my dream upgrade? Not quite... but it is a better camera in many other ways. I'm disappointed that the build quality is mostly the same (besides what Ricoh says is better sealing on the new lens), in that it isn't technically weather-sealed and so will need looking after, even though its feels decent in the hand.

On the plus side, I was already happy with the image quality from my GR III, but Ricoh has introduced a new 26MP sensor and refined the lens to further improve quality, while the sensor has improved 5-axis stabilization.

Ricoh GR IV compact camera in user's hand, flowers behind — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

As mentioned, I was hoping for a built-in flash this time around, but the GR IV doesn't have one; ditto a tilt screen. I also wanted much better autofocus performance, but I'm not seeing enough of a difference.

On the flip-side, again, the GR IV delivers some significant upgrades that I didn't see coming: internal storage is bumped up from 2GB to 53GB, there's a new bigger battery with approximately 20% better capacity, and the body is even slimmer, with a refined grip making the camera feel even better in the hand.

You get the picture – the GR IV is a decent upgrade for certain users, but one to skip for others. I for one can't see a good enough reason to splash out, but I understand why others would. And for those who are new to the series and looking for a premium compact, you won't find a better one at this size.

A word of thanks

A special mention goes to Park Cameras (UK) who loaned me the Ricoh GR IV and made this review possible.

One final, and significant, entry for the 'cons' column is that the list price has been hiked by around 20% over the GR III's, depending on where you live (the GR III originally cost $999 / £899 in 2019). I firmly believe that $1,150 / £1,000 is a much fairer price for the GR IV than $1,500 / £1,200 / AU$2,200.

What has caught my eye, however, is Ricoh announcing that a GR IV Monochrome is in the pipeline, which would be the first black-and-white-only camera in the series. I'm a fan of the black-and-white profiles in these cameras, and I shoot the majority of my pictures in monochrome, so this niche version could well be my next camera purchase.

🇬🇧 The Ricoh GR IV costs £1,199 at Park Cameras

Ricoh GR IV compact camera in user's hand — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Ricoh GR IV: price and availability

Launched on August 20, 2025
Announced alongside the new Ricoh GF-2 flash
Priced at $1,499 / £1,199 / AU$2,199

The Ricoh GR IV was first unveiled in May 2025 and went on sale from August, with a launch price of $1,499 / £1,199 / AU$2,199. That's an approximately 20% mark-up over the GR III, depending on which region you live in.

I wish the GR IV had a built-in flash, but in its absence Ricoh has done the next best thing, launching a new GF-2 flash that sits in the GR IV's hotshoe and is suitably tiny. It wasn't available to me while I was testing the camera, so I'm yet to use it, but it's also compatible with GR III cameras (with reduced funtionality) so I expect I'll be buying one.

Ricoh GR IV: specs

Ricoh GR IV Specs
Sensor	APS-C, 5-axis stabilization
Resolution	26MP
Video	1080p up to 60fps
Lens	18.3mm (28mm equiv.) f/2.8-16
Screen	3.0in, 1.04m-dots
Dimensions	109.4 x 61.1 x 32.7 mm
Weight	262g (with battery + card)
Battery life	250 shots (approx)
Memory	microSD, internal 53GB

Ricoh GR IV: design

Slim body and refined grip give a secure and comfortable single-hand hold
Easily slips into a pocket
Still no built-in flash or weather sealing
Internal storage upped from 2GB to 53GB
Fixed touchscreen can be hard to see in bright light

The GR IV might look largely the same as the GR III, but there are design tweaks to the new camera that add up to improve the overall handling.

Its width and height are essentially the same, meaning the GR IV will still easily slip into a trouser pocket – the same can't be said for the bulkier Fujifilm X100VI. What's new, and seriously impressive, is that Ricoh has slimmed down the GR IV compared to the GR III, while keeping the grip depth the same.

The GR IV immediately felt different in the hand to me, having been so used to the GR III – the slimmer body and refined grip give a secure and comfortable hold with just one hand, however you're holding the camera. It's a tiny design tweak that makes a big difference – I often want to shoot with one hand using my GR III, but to do so comfortably I've had to attach a separate thumb grip.

Ricoh has reverted back to the ± button that was on the GR II, but dropped from the GR III. This can control the likes of exposure compensation, and overall it's a welcome return, even if I found myself tapping the button all too easily.

Image 1 of 8

Ricoh GR IV compact camera on a wooden table, with strong sidelight and dark shadows — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 8

Image 3 of 8

Close up of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera's video button — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 8

Closeup of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera's rear controls — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 5 of 8

Closeup of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera's USB-C port — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 6 of 8

Ricoh GR IV compact camera on a wooden table, with strong sidelight and dark shadows, view of the back — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 7 of 8

Ricoh GR IV compact camera on a wooden table, facing up, lens active — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 8 of 8

Ricoh GR IV compact camera on a wooden table, facing up, lens closeed — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Three of my top wishes as a GR III user interested in this successor sadly remain elusive – there's no built-in flash, tilt screen, or weather sealing. Those upgrades alone would have had me reaching for my wallet.

A built-in flash would be supremely helpful for portraits at parties – without one, I wouldn't really use the GR IV in such scenarios. Ricoh has, as mentioned, announced the tiny GF-2 external flash, which is an accessory I will absolutely look into purchasing.

I find the fixed touchscreen of my GR III hard to see clearly in bright light, and it doesn't make low-angle shooting easy. A tilt screen would help no end, but sadly this is another potential upgrade that didn't materialize.

However, it's the lack of weather sealing that's the real kicker for me. I've taken my GR III in for minor repairs twice in the years I've had it – cheap repairs for seized buttons, caused by moisture ingress – while the pop-out lens is beginning to struggle on start up. Ricoh says there is better sealing in the new lens, but besides this, build quality is the same. As such, I'd be conscious of the need to look after the GR IV, which is something I don't want to think about with an everyday camera that's in my pocket.

To Ricoh's credit, there are other upgrades. The internal storage has been upped from 2GB to 53GB, and there's a larger-capacity battery inside too, even if this has necessitated a switch from SD card to micro SD, which is a fiddly card slot on the GR IV.

Ricoh GR IV: features and performance

New 26MP sensor with improved 5-axis stabilization
Speedier start-up time and longer battery life
(Unchanged) 1080p video is an afterthought

If you're unfamiliar with the Ricoh GR series of digital compacts, then you'll probably struggle to spot meaningful upgrades in the GR IV over the GR III – and the former camera is six years old now, having been released in 2019.

For those like me that are familiar, however – and I suspect that's many of you reading this review – the headline upgrade is the new 26MP sensor.

Sure, a 2MP bump from 24MP to 26MP is hardly worth mentioning, but the improved 5-axis stabilization certainly is, and in my opinion it's a key improvement. The GR III has less effective 3-axis stabilization.

Image 1 of 7

Ricoh GR IV sample gallery: big ben at night with a London red bus light trail in front — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 7

Ricoh GR IV sample gallery: commuters in a busy London train station, those moving are blurred — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 3 of 7

Ricoh GR IV sample images - London underground, the train's movement is blurred — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 7

Image 5 of 7

Ricoh GR IV sample images - blurred movement of commuters in london underground — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 6 of 7

Image 7 of 7

Ricoh GR IV sample gallery: a busy London street, moving people are blurred — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

I was able to shoot handheld images with a shutter speed as slow as one second, and for most shots at half a second, and detail still looked sharp. This offers the potential for creative long-exposure effects and can improve low-light image quality, assuming you don't need to freeze movement. Check out a few long exposure effect images in the gallery above.

Image 1 of 2

Ricoh GR IV sample gallery: a lone tree on a hillside of a common, black and white — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 2

Ricoh GR IV sample images - trees ina clearing, black and white photo — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

The GR IV isn't short of color profiles either. I'm a fan of the hard monotone profile which produces punchy black-and-white images with an infrared photography-like effect (see the punchy sky images in the gallery above). At other times, I was drawn to the cinema color profiles for a gritty effect which suited nighttime images across London. In the gallery of images below, I've used a range of these color profiles.

Image 1 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - backlit smoke exiting a ventilation pipe on a London street at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - classic car parked up in front of victorian houses in London at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 3 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - outside a London bar at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - London skyline at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 5 of 14

Image 6 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - commuter standing a reading a book while waiting for a train — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 7 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - commuter on underground — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 8 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - London commuters — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 9 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - London commuter — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 10 of 14

Image 11 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - grafittied underpass — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 12 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - blurry image of commuters running to catch a train — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 13 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample images - big ben in London across the thames at night — (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 14 of 14

Ricoh GR IV sample gallery: man in winter jacket with a patch of light illuminating one side of his face — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

There's a macro photography setting, which reduces the minimum focus distance and enables proper close up photography. This, as like with GR III cameras, is another string to the GR IV's bow.

Image 1 of 2

Ricoh GR IV sample images - closeup of a mushroom from the ground level — The macro photography setting is totally usable and makes the GR IV an even more versatile snapper. This shot is taken with the aperture set to f/2.8 (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 2

Start-up time has been improved too, not that the GR III was a slouch. I had the GR III and GR IV side by side and turned the cameras on at the same time, and the GR IV was ready to go a fraction quicker – it makes a real difference for an everyday camera with which you'll often want to be ready to shoot quickly. If this was a wild west showdown against most other cameras, the GR IV would be busting open the saloon doors and demanding a victory whiskey.

I can't say the same for autofocus performance. Ricoh has improved autofocus speed and reliability from the GR III, but not by much. The AF assist light helps in low-contrast lighting, as do additional focusing modes added to the series via firmware updates in recent years, such as new zone-focusing options, but it would be generous of me to Ricoh to say better autofocus is a reason to upgrade here.

Image 1 of 8

Closeup of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera's open battery door — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 2 of 8

Ricoh GR IV compact camera on a wooden table, alongside its battery — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 3 of 8

Closeup of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera's hotshoe — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 4 of 8

Underside of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera, on a wooden table — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 5 of 8

LCD screen of the Ricoh GR IV compact camera — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 6 of 8

Person holding the Ricoh GR IV compact camera up to their chest — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Image 7 of 8

Ricoh GR IV sample images - man in window light — One of the many occasions that autofocus missed the mark (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Image 8 of 8

Ricoh GR IV sample images - blurred london street scene — One of the many occasions that autofocus missed the mark (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Battery life sees a decent improvement. There's a new larger-capacity unit inside which delivers a 20% bump in shot life. Still, where the GR III has poor battery life at around 200 shots, the GR IV's is only less poor at 240 shots. Personally, though, I think limited battery life is completely forgiveable for such a small camera, and it's impressive that Ricoh has squeezed a better battery into what is actually a fractionally smaller camera.

Overall, there are some decent improvements in the GR IV, depending on how and what you like to shoot.

Should I buy the Ricoh GR IV?

Ricoh GR IV compact camera in user's hand with wooden slats in the background — (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Buy it if...

You want a truly pocketable camera with supreme image quality
The 5-axis stabilized 26MP APS-C sensor and refined 28mm lens are a superb combo for photo-philes.

You want an everyday carry that isn't your phone
Slipping into a pocket, the GR IV is a camera that you can carry with you almost everywhere – just don't take it to the beach.

Don't buy it if...

You shoot a lot in low light
With no built-in flash and autofocus that can struggle at times, the GR IV has its limitations in low light.

You want an indestructible camera
Ricoh says it has improved the sealing of the lens to repel dust ingress, but the camera isn't weather sealed, and as such you need to look after it – as I know from my experience with my GR III!

You shoot a lot of video
Maxing out at 1080p, video recording is very much an afterthought in the GR IV. It's nice to have all the same, but you'll be better off using your phone.

How I tested the Ricoh GR IV

Park Cameras loaned me the camera for several weeks
I shot 1,000-plus photos in RAW + JPEG
I carried the camera every day, using it in a range of scenarios

I used the Ricoh GR IV regularly for around three weeks, with thanks to Park Cameras (UK) for the loan. During this time I took over 1,000 photos, documenting everyday life and of course playing with the various color profiles and creative techniques possible with the GR IV.

I pushed the limit of the camera's stabilization, taking handheld long-exposure photos. I shot photos of the same scenes at different apertures to assess the quality at each setting, and checked for lens distortions.

I noted how many photos I could take with a fully charged battery, and in general I've looked after the camera rather than push it in adverse conditions. I bring several years of experience with the Ricoh GR series into this review, most recently as an owner of the GR IIIx.

First reviewed November 2025

I tested the Ricoh GR IV compact camera — it’s a surprising upgrade, for good and for bad

3:36 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Compact Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off