Computing - Organizer

Can a gaming laptop replace your PC? I put the MSI Titan 18 HX AI to the test for three weeks

2:43 am | July 17, 2025

MSI Titan 18 HX AI: Two-minute review

MSI Titan 18 HX AI gaming laptop's back lid — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

When I think "gaming laptop," I think of a portable machine with just enough juice to squeeze out 60 FPS in modern titles at medium settings. The MSI Titan 18 HX AI, however, seeks to break that mold and offer something closer to a desktop replacement, boasting a tagline of "total dominance."

With enough power under the hood to crank out 90+ FPS in fairly demanding titles like NBA 2K25 and Black Myth: Wukong, the MSI Titan 18 HX AI lives up to its name. It's a behemoth of a laptop, weighing in at 7.93 lbs (3.6kg) and sporting an RTX 50-series GPU.

It's not going to live out of your backpack - it's going to sit still on your desk and look pretty doing it. But it does offer much more portability than a traditional desktop PC.

As for that massive 18-inch display, it's a joy to game on. The miniLED 4K resolution and 120Hz refresh rate offer the perfect balance between high refresh rate competitive gaming and high fidelity story gameplay. You're probably not going to hit 4K and 120 FPS in most titles, but the ability to pick is enough for me, especially on a laptop.

There are only a few areas I wish the Titan 18 HX executed differently - namely, the trackpad and cooling system. While the trackpad is a nice size, I found myself muttering under my breath at the accidental inputs and unclear distinction between left- and right-clicks far too often.

As for the cooling system, I can tell you with complete certainty that this is not a fanless laptop. If you've ever heard a jet engine whirring up, you have a good idea of what the MSI Titan 18 HX AI sounds like under load.

And then there's the price. There's no beating around the bush; this system is going to cost you an arm and a leg. But when you consider the hardware on offer in a (somewhat) portable machine, that price point starts to make more sense. Still, it's a tough pill to swallow.

When all is said and done, the MSI Titan 18 HX AI is an incredibly performant machine with a few scant drawbacks and a price point that makes it perfect for a select few.

MSI Titan 18 HX AI: Price and availability

How much does it cost? Starting at $5,799.99 / £5,999.99 / $11,799AU
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? US, UK, and Australia

With great power comes great...asking prices. You get what you pay for with the MSI Titan 18 HX AI, and you get quite a bit. At a starting price point of just under $6,000, with options to upgrade the CPU, RAM, and display for a higher premium, that's going to prove a very high barrier to entry for most.

Frankly, you can find a lot of the best gaming PCs on the market well under that price point and still have some cash left over to get yourself a gaming handheld or decent gaming laptop.

But if you're set on a top-of-the-line laptop, you'll have to pay for it.

It looks like the only model available in Australia is the MSI Titan 18 HX AI Dragon Edition Norse Myth, which features the same set of specs along with a unique graphic on the lid and trackpad.

Price: 2.5 / 5

MSI Titan 18 HX AI: Specs

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Specs
Price	Starting at $5,799
CPU	Up to Intel Core Ultra 9 200HX series
GPU	Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 laptop GPU, 24GB GDDR7
RAM	Up to 96GB DDR5-6400
Display	18-inch UHD+ (3840x2400), MiniLED, 120Hz
Storage	3x M.2 SSD slot (NVMe PCIe Gen4), 1x M.2 SSD slot (NVMe PCIe Gen5)
Ports	2x Thunderbolt 5, 3x Type-A USB3.2 Gen2, 1x SD Express Card Reader, 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x 3.5mm headphone jack
Wireless	802.11 be Wi-Fi 7 + Bluetooth v5.4
Camera	IR FHD (1080p, 30 FPS)
Weight	3.6 kg (7.93 lbs)
Dimensions	404 x 307.5 x 24-32.05 mm

MSI Titan 18 HX AI: Design

MSI Titan 18 HX AI gaming laptop on black mouse pad — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

Big and bulky
Clean aesthetics
Noisy fans under stress

In terms of design, the first thing you'll notice is how large this laptop really is. It's not afraid to take up space, and at 7.93 lbs (3.6kg), there's some serious heft to it. It's not making our list of the best thin and light gaming laptops anytime soon, but it was never trying to.

Instead, the MSI Titan 18 HX AI's design lends itself more to a desktop replacement than a portable gaming rig. Don't get me wrong, it would still be far easier to lug this laptop around in a large backpack, tote, or suitcase than a traditional gaming PC. But I wouldn't opt for a Titan if you're planning to take your gaming laptop to and from college or a friend's house.

Imposing size aside, the Titan 18 HX looks great. It features an understated black and grey design with subtle accents like an MSI logo on the clamshell lid and light texturing on the speakers and chassis. If you have to have your RGB, you'll be happy to know the Cherry mechanical keyboard is per-key customizable.

Image 1 of 3

MSI Titan 18 HX AI's keyboard and trackpad — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

MSI Titan 18 HX AI keyboard and trackpad — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

Speaking of the keys, this is one of the first gaming laptops that didn't make me want to break out my own typing piece. It does come with a high-pitched metallic pinging sound on some keys that I'm not crazy about, but the typing feel is quite springy and satisfying. Plus, you get a full-sized keyboard with a tenkey numpad and function keys here, which is a big plus for quick adjustments and games that utilize a lot of inputs.

Moving to the port selection, you've got a Kensington security slot, two USB-A 3.2 Gen2 ports, and an SD Express card reader on the left side. On the right, you get two Thunderbolt 5 USB-C ports, another USB-A 3.2 Gen2 slot, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Around the back side, there's an HDMI 2.1 port, an RJ45 slot, and a slot for your 400W power adapter.

Image 1 of 3

MSI Titan 18 HX AI port selection — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

Image 2 of 3

Image 3 of 3

Overall, that's a really solid port selection you'd be hard-pressed to complain about. I love seeing the USB-A and USB-C combo here as a lot of PC peripherals (including the best gaming mice) still use that tried and true USB-A connection.

Now, for something I wish were a bit different: the cooling. When I tell you these fans are loud, it doesn't quite do it justice until you've heard them yourself. I had to raise the volume of the game I was playing multiple times just to hear over the whir required to keep that RTX 5090 cool.

This is only when the laptop is under load, so if you're just browsing the web or listening to music, you get a pretty noise-free experience. But this is a gaming laptop after all, and unless you're sticking to Stardew Valley (in which case, don't shell out for this laptop), those fans are going to make themselves known.

Design: 4 / 5

MSI Titan 18 HX AI: Performance

MSI Titan 18 HX AI Intel and Nvidia stickers — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

Outstanding 1080p and 1440p performance
Solid 4K capabilities
Offers fast-paced, competitive gaming and gorgeous story gameplay

Performance is the name of the game for the MSI Titan 18 HX AI. With an Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX processor, RTX 5090 laptop GPU, and a whopping 64GB of DDR5 RAM (upgradeable to 96GB), this laptop is the heavyweight main event of the evening.

MSI Titan 18 HX AI Benchmarks
Benchmark		Score
Geekbench 6.4 Single Core		3,046
Geekbench 6.4 Single Core		22,082
Crossmark Overall		2,269
Crossmark Productivity		2,033
Crossmark Creativity		2,757
Crossmark Responsiveness		1,760
25GB File Copy Transfer Rate (MB/s)		2,636
3DMark Fire Strike		40,374
3DMark Time Spy		22,437
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra		15,621
3DMark Time Spy Extreme		11,644
3DMark Speed Way		6,094
3DMark Steel Nomad		5,530
3DMark Port Royal		15,289
Assassin's Creed Shadows (Ultra High, 1080p)		54 fps
Black Myth: Wukong (Cinematic, 1080p)		59 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra, 1080p)		71 fps
Metro: Exodus (Extreme, 1080p)		93 fps
Monster Hunter Wilds (Very High, 1080p)		87 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Very High, 1080p)		196 fps
Total War: Warhammer III (Ultra, 1080p)		220 fps
Web Surfing Battery Informant		2:16
PCMark 10 Gaming Battery Test		1:37

I've been on a sports sim kick lately, with titles like NBA 2K25 and Rematch dominating my playtime. While 2K25 is fairly demanding, the Titan chewed through it like nothing, easily spitting out 90-120 FPS at 2K resolution. Rematch, on the other hand, is pretty lightweight, but that just means the 120Hz display can really shine.

I also ran the MSI Titan 18 HX AI through synthetic benchmarks and tested it in several triple-A games, including Cyberpunk 2077, Black Myth: Wukong, and more, which you can check out in the chart above.

Performance definitely takes a hit at 4K, but many of the games are still playable at around 30-70 FPS. Plus, if you tweak a few settings and use upscaling where available, you can definitely land a sweet spot between decent frame rates and gorgeous 4K visuals, even without Frame Generation.

You'll also get a solid rendered FPS at 4K with DLSS 4, so Multi-Frame Generation won't introduce the kind of noticeable input latency that it would on less powerful devices, so feel free to turn it on and maximize the capacity of the 120Hz display when you can.

Performance: 5 / 5

MSI Titan 18 HX AI: Battery life

MSI Titan 18 HX AI gaming laptop closed lid — (Image credit: Future / Marcus Mears III)

Considering this is a gaming laptop with a 50 series GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and a massive 120Hz display, the battery life here is actually pretty passable. Not to mention that with a machine this bulky, it's going to be plugged in most of the time anyway, so battery life isn't a big concern in my eyes.

It's not going head-to-head with the Razer Blade 16 anytime soon in terms of battery life, so if you're looking to game on the go at 4K without a power bank or outlet nearby, forget it.

But it does buy you about an hour and a half from full charge to dead under moderate stress (at 60Hz with RGB off), and if you need to break it out of your bag to send a few quick emails and watch a little Netflix, it'll get the job done.

Battery life: 3 / 5

Should you buy the MSI Titan 18 HX AI?

MSI Titan 18 HX AI scorecard
Category	Notes	Rating
Value	While you do get a lot of horsepower with the MSI Titan 18 HX AI, the price tag isn't pretty. You're looking at well over $5,000 for a gaming laptop here, even if you do get a mobile RTX 5090.	2.5 / 5
Design	Gripes are far and few between when it comes to design - I wish the trackpad was a bit more consistent, and the fans get very loud under load. But you get a fantastic port selection, gorgeous display, satisfying keyboard, and sleek aesthetics.	4 / 5
Performance	This is where the Titan 18 HX really shines. You can crank the settings at 1080p or 1440p, and even get a respectable 60FPS at 4K with some settings tweaks.	5 / 5
Battery Life	It's a powerful gaming laptop, so you shouldn't expect all-day battery here. But for the hardware under the hood, it's actually pretty decent.	3 / 5
Final score	Overall, the MSI Titan 18 HX AI is a fantastic desktop replacement that offers more portability than a traditional tower PC.	4 / 5

Buy the MSI Titan 18 HX AI if...

You need more portability than a tower PC
While "portable" isn't one of the first words I would use to describe the MSI Titan 18 HX AI, it is definitely easier to move than a traditional tower PC, monitor, and peripherals setup.

You want paramount performance from your laptop
There's serious power packed into this gaming laptop, including an RTX 5090, Intel Core Ultra 9 processor, and 64GB of DDR5 RAM.

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for something affordable
While the MSI Titan 18 HX AI is many things, affordable is far from one of them. You're going to have to pay for what you get here, and there are plenty of gaming laptops at half the price or cheaper.

You need to move your laptop often
While the Titan offers some semblance of portability, it wouldn't be my first pick for tossing in a bag and taking to work or a friend's house.

Also consider

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W
The Vector A18 HX A9W is like the Titan's little brother. It still packs a punch in the performance department, but at half the asking price.

Read our full MSI Vector A18 HX A9W review

Razer Blade 16 (2025)
The Razer Blade 16 (2025) is our top pick of the best gaming laptops for a reason - well, several reasons actually. It also comes equipped with an RTX 5090, but comes in at nearly $2,000 cheaper.

Read our full Razer Blade 16 (2025) review

How I tested

I used the MSI Titan 18 HX AI for over three weeks
Gaming, media, and everyday browsing
Our suite of gaming laptop benchmarks, including synthetic and in-game

I used the MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG as my primary gaming system for three weeks. I played several different titles, including NBA 2K25, Rematch, and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered. I also put the Titan to the test with everyday browsing and media enjoyment on YouTube, Max, Gmail, and more.

We put the Titan 18 HX through its paces in our suite of gaming laptop benchmarks, including synthetic tests and in-game benchmarking.

If you want to learn more about how we test our laptops and desktops, check out this page.

First reviewed July 2025

Netgear Nighthawk RS100 review: Netgear sees the light and releases an affordable Wi-Fi 7 router

3:00 pm | July 16, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Internet Wi-Fi & Broadband | Comments: Off

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: One-Minute Review

There’s an old saying about the zeal of the convert, and Netgear certainly seems to have changed its ways – or perhaps just its management – in recent months.

After establishing itself as the Apple of the Wi-Fi world, with a series of stylish but expensive routers and mesh systems, the company has recently brought out a number of more affordable products, culminating in the new Nighthawk RS100, which is not just Netgear’s most affordable Wi-Fi 7 router, but also more affordable than many of its rivals too.

Inevitably, though, that low price involves some compromises, and like several of the less expensive Wi-Fi 7 products that we’ve seen recently, the RS100 is a fairly basic dual-band router.

This means that it supports just the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz frequency bands, and omits the high-speed 6.0GHz band that is also available with both Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7. Even so, the RS100 provides Wi-Fi speeds of up to 3.6Gbps, which is still more than fast enough for most home broadband services.

One of the other advantages of Wi-Fi 7 is that the RS100 should also be more reliable than older routers when connecting to lots of computers, mobile devices and other smart devices within your home simultaneously.

That makes it a good, affordable Wi-Fi upgrade for many home users who may still have older computers and mobile devices that don’t need the full speed available with tri-band routers that also support 6.0GHz Wi-Fi.

Netgear Nighthawk RS100 router on wooden table — (Image credit: Future)

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: Price And Availability

How much does it cost? $129.99/£129.99/ AU$259
When is it available? Now
Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

Product prices are wildly erratic all over the world at the moment because of he-who-shall-not-be-named. But, at the time of its launch, the RS100 was priced at $129.99/£129.99 and we were pleased to see that – unlike many Wi-Fi 7 products – it’s also available to our friends down under for AU$259.

That makes the RS100 a full $100 less expensive than the RS200 that we reviewed from Netgear recently. The RS200 is also a dual-band router, but it’s faster, with a top speed of 6.5Gbps.

Even so, the 3.6Gbps of the RS100 should still be perfectly adequate for most home broadband connections. Netgear also states that the RS100 can connect to as many as 50 devices simultaneously, and can cover areas of up to 2,000sq.ft, making it a good option for most small and medium-sized homes (although regions outside the US may quote an area of 1,500sq.ft due to differences in regional regulations).

Value: 4/5

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: Design

Compact design
2.5Gb Ethernet for broadband connection
4 Ethernet ports for wired connections

Unsurprisingly, the RS100 shares the ominous-black-obelisk design of other Nighthawk routers, although it’s actually quite a bit smaller than other models in the range.

The RS100 stands just 184mm high, 66mm wide and 122mm deep, so it’s easy to set it up on any convenient shelf or desk without taking up too much space.

That’s partly because the relatively modest speed of the RS100 only requires two internal antennae, compared to four antennae in the RS200 and RS300 models that we have reviewed recently.

However, one sign of cost-cutting is that the router’s black plastic casing does feel a little flimsy, so it’s probably a good idea for parents to place it somewhere that’s out of reach for curious little hands.

Netgear hasn’t cut too many corners, though. The RS100 provides a 2.5Gb Ethernet port for your broadband connection (WAN), along with four Gigabit Ethernet ports to provide wired (LAN) connections for a PC or games console if required.

The only minor compromise here is the lack of a USB port that would allow you to connect a USB storage device (or printer) to your network, but that’s not a major problem at this price.

Design: 4/5

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: Features

Easy to set up and use
Poor parental controls
Useful diagnostic tools

As always, Netgear makes it very easy to get started. You can just plug in the power supply and connect the RS100 to your existing router, and Netgear provides a QR code for downloading the Nighthawk app, and a second code that connects you to the new RS100 network.

But, reflecting the router’s low price, the Nighthawk app is a bit basic when it comes to providing additional features. The app automatically merges the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz frequency bands into a single network, which keeps things simple for home users, although more experienced users might prefer an app that provides more detailed control over their network settings.

Netgear Nighthawk app screenshot — (Image credit: Netgear)

There are some basic diagnostic tools, such as a speed test to check network performance, and you have the ability to create two guest networks for visitors, or to block network access for individual devices. However, there are no parental controls available within the app, and the information on Netgear’s website indicates that the RS100 isn’t currently compatible with Netgear’s Smart Parental Controls subscription service.

Security features are also fairly limited, as you get just a one-month trial of Netgear’s Armor security service, but then have to pay $99.99 (around £75 / AU$150) per year to continue using the service.

To be fair, most rival manufacturers offer software subscription services as well, but there are other routers that still provide better parental controls and other features within their apps free of charge.

Features: 3/5

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: Performance

Dual-band Wi-Fi 7
3.6Gbps maximum speed
2.5Gbps Ethernet for broadband connection

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: Benchmarks

Ookla Speed Test – Single merged network

Within 5ft, no obstructions: 150Mbps/150Mbps
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps/150Mbps

20GB Steam Download –Single merged network

Within 5ft, no obstructions: 150Mbps
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps

The lack of support for the 6.0GHz frequency means that the RS100 is very much an entry-level router, but Wi-Fi 7 is so ridiculously fast that the router’s relatively modest 3.6Gbps should still be more than fast enough to handle most domestic broadband connections.

My aging office router struggles even with a modest 150Mbps broadband connection, and can only manage a speed of around 120Mbps even for devices that are in the same room as the router.

And, at the rear of the building, I actually have a ‘deadspot’ where the Wi-Fi signal is so unreliable that I end up using powerline adaptors to provide a wired network connection instead.

The RS100 solved all my network problems, though, immediately allowing devices in the same room to hit the maximum 150Mbps for both the Ookla Speed Test and game downloads on Steam. The router’s speed did dip slightly as I walked with our laptop along the corridor to the deadspot in the back office, but quickly recovered again and hit 150Mbps once more for both tests.

So, while the RS100 is no speed demon, it can still provide a worthwhile upgrade for many people who own an older router that only uses Wi-Fi 5 or 6, and my only real complaint is the lack of parental controls and additional features within the Nighthawk app.

Should you buy the Netgear Nighthawk RS100?
Category	Verdict	Score
Value	It’s very much an entry-level dual-band router, but the RS100 does provide a very affordable upgrade for owners of older routers.	4/5
Design	The plastic casing feels a little flimsy, so you’ll need to keep it on a safe shelf or desk. The hardware features are up to scratch, though, with 2.5Gb Ethernet for your broadband connection and four gigabit ports for wired connections.	4/5
Features	The Nighthawk app is easy to use, but it’s a little threadbare, especially when it comes to parental controls, and Netgear’s habit of trying to sell you additional subscriptions remains irksome.	3/5
Performance	It’s relatively slow for a Wi-Fi 7 router, and the lack of 6.0GHz support could be a deal-breaker for more demanding users, but a speed of 3.6Gbps will still be a welcome upgrade for owners of older routers.	3.5/5
Overall	It’s undeniably a basic, entry-level router, but at this price the RS100 is one of the most affordable Wi-Fi 7 routers currently available and worth considering if you’re still using an old router provided by your ISP.	4/5

Buy it if...

You’re on a budget
It can’t match the speed of more expensive Wi-Fi 7 routers, but the RS100 can handle most domestic broadband connections with ease.

You have a lot of gadgets
Millions of people are still using computers and mobile devices that only support Wi-Fi 5 or 6, so they really don’t need to splash the cash on a cutting-edge Wi-Fi 7 router.

Don't buy it if...

You’re a gamer
The RS100 is a basic, dual-band router and lack support for the high-speed 6.0GHz band, so it’s not the best option for gamers who need fast and reliable network coverage.

You're a parent
The Nighthawk app doesn’t provide any free parental controls and – at the moment – doesn’t even support Netgear’s separate Smart Parental Controls subscription service.View Deal

Netgear Nighthawk RS100: Also consider

Netgear Nighthawk RS300

It’s twice the price, but at 9.3Gbps the tri-band RS300 is more than twice as fast as the RS100, and will be a good option for owners of new computers and mobile devices that support Wi-Fi 7 and the 6.0GHz frequency band.

Eero 7

Mesh wi-fi systems that support Wi-Fi 7 are still fairly expensive, but the Eero 7 is one of the more affordable options for larger homes that need a far-reaching mesh system.

Netgear Nighthawk RS100 vs its competition
Router	Netgear Nighthawk RS100	Netgear Nighthawk RS300	Eero 7
Price (as reviewed)	$129.99/£129.99/ AU$259	$329.99/£299.99/AU$649	$349.99 / £349.99
Wi-Fi Type	Dual-band Wi-Fi 7 (2.4GHz, 5.0GHz)	Tri-band Wi-Fi 7	Dual-band Wi-Fi 7
Wi-Fi Speed	3.6Gbps	9.3Gbps	1.8Gbps
Connectivity	1x 2.5Gb Ethernet (WAN), 4x Gigabit Ethernet (LAN)	1x 2.5Gb Ethernet (WAN), 2x 2.5Gb Ethernet (LAN), 2x Gigabit Ethernet (LAN), 1x USB-A (3.0)	2 x 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet ports, 1 x USB-C port
Processor	Quad-core 2.0GHz	Quad-core 2.0GHz	Quad-core 1.1GHz
Memory	1GB RAM	2GB RAM	1GB RAM
Storage	512MB NAND Flash	512MB NAND Flash	4GB Flash
Dimensions	184 x 66 x 122mm	249 x 150 x 102mm	130 x 130 x 64mm

First reviewed: July 2025

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: great on-the-go gaming, but at a cost

5:02 pm | July 15, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Gaming Computers Gaming PCs | Tags: AAA, Razer Blade, Total War | Comments: Off

Asus ROG Flow Z13: Two-minute review

This year has seen some of the best gaming laptops and gaming handhelds ever made hit the market, which means it can be hard to decide which device you want to pick up for your on-the-go gaming needs.

However, what if you were to take both device categories and smoosh them together? You get the Asus ROG Flow Z13: a high-performance gaming tablet which, unlike other gaming tablets on the market, actually allows you to play ambitious AAA titles and achieve not just playable but good frame rates, all while staying cool and quiet.

Asus ROG Flow Z13 gaming tablet on wooden surface — (Image credit: Future)

The downsides, which stop this device from achieving a perfect score, is the battery life not being great when gaming. However, it does last a decent amount of time when using it for general browsing or watching videos.

It’s also very expensive, coming in at over $2,000, which means this device is not for those who are on a budget, with gaming laptops in the same price range delivering much higher performance.

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: Price and availability

How much does it cost? $2,099 / £2,199
When is it available? Available now
Where can you get it? Only available in certain regions

Coming in at $2,099 / £2,199, this is an exceptionally expensive device in terms of gaming tablets. However, with alternatives unbale to offer a similar level of performance, it's hard to compare price-wise with other gaming tablets.

More similar alternatives are products like the Asus ROG Ally X, the gaming handheld from the same company, which comes in at $799 / £799 and provides you with the same kind of performance.

The Asus ROG Flow Z13 is available in certain regions including the UK and US, however unfortunately it cannot be picked up worldwide.

Value: 3 / 5

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: Specs

This gaming tablet from Asus ROG Flow Z13 comes in one iteration in 2025. You get an AMD CPU with a built-in NPU and GPU paired with 32GB of RAM and 1TB SSD making for a powerful machine.

Price	$2,099 / £2,199
CPU	AMD Ryzen AI MAX 390 12-Core Processor
Graphics	Integrated
RAM	32GB DDR5
Screen	13.4-inch WQXGA IPS 180Hz 100% DCI-P3 Screen
Storage	1TB SSD
Ports	1x USB-A, 2x USB-C with DisplayPort, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm Audio Jack, 1x MicroSD Card Reader
Wireless	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4
Camera	13MP camera and 5MP IR camera
Weight	2.65lbs (1.20kg)
Dimensions	11.81 x 8.03 x 0.51-inches (30 x 20.4 x 1.30cm)

Unfortunately you only get a 1TB SSD with no way to expand the storage, so you may have to invest in an external hard drive if you’re planning on installing large games.

There are other iterations of the Asus ROG Flow Z13 from previous years if you’re looking for other specifications.

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: Design

Very portable
Fantastic design
Good selection of ports

One of my favourite parts of the Asus ROG Flow Z13 is how compact it is, as you’d expect from a gaming tablet.

This is a device you can take pretty much anywhere, chucking it into any bag, even a small handbag thanks to how small it is (measuring 30 x 20.4 x 1.30cm). Compared to many gaming laptops that weigh around 3kg, the Asus ROG Flow Z13 comes in at just 1.2kg, perfect for taking your device on the go.

In terms of style, you get a simple and sleek tablet with a detachable keyboard and trackpad. There’s a small window on the back of the device that allows you to view some of the components inside, which is a really nice touch.

While it doesn’t have an OLED screen - something that did shock me initially - the Asus ROG Flow Z13 still has a pretty nice display. It won’t blow you away by any means, but it has a great color range and an exceptional refresh rate for a tablet at 180Hz.

There are a fair amount of ports on the Asus ROG Flow Z13 , including USB-A, two USB-C ports (either can be used for charging), HDMI, an audio jack, and a microSD card reader. This is great for those who are hoping to use other gaming peripherals with their device as there are plenty of options to plug in.

The included keyboard is extremely slim, and while I usually despise tablet keyboards, this one wasn’t as squidgy as alternative options. It made for a satisfying typing and gaming experience, however for those playing competitive titles, I would recommend opting for an external gaming keyboard for those precise responses.

Design score: 5 / 5

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: Performance

Gaming performance is impressive
Overall user experience is great
Quiet when in use

Benchmarks

These are the results of our benchmarking tests for the Asus ROG Flow Z13:

3DMark: Night Raid: 36,307; Fire Strike: 11,230; Time Spy: 4,634
GeekBench 6: 2,162 (single-core); 11,575 (multi-core)
CrossMark: Overall: 1,417; Productivity: 1,241; Creativity: 1,760; Responsiveness: 1,100
Total War: Warhammer III (1080p, Ultra): 63; (1080p, Low): 122
Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, Ultra): 73; (1080p, Low): 93
Dirt 5 (1080p, Ultra): 39; (1080p, Low): 80
PCMark 10 Battery Life: 6 hr 4 min
TechRadar movie test: 5hr 55 min

In terms of performance, the Asus ROG Flow Z13 delivers some pretty good framerates for a gaming tablet, however considering the price point, I was actually expecting more.

While for the most part, you get above 60 fps when playing in 1080p at Ultra graphics presets, equivalently-priced gaming laptops would likely be delivering significantly better performance, as they can make use off more powerful hardware without having to fit it into a tablet-like form factor.

The Asus ROG Flow Z13 stayed very quiet the whole time I was using it. Even when putting it through its paces, like running AAA titles at Ultra, I was barely able to hear the device which makes it perfect for using on the go so you’re not disturbing everyone around you.

As you’d expect, due to how quiet it was, it also stayed very cool which is great for a tablet as it means you can still hold it and use the touchscreen as intended without worrying about burning your hands and fingers.

The speakers are pretty good, however as always I would recommend plugging in and using a headset to ensure the best gaming experience. For watching videos and movies, the speakers are absolutely perfect since you don’t need the directional precision.

Outside of the actual performance I was getting in-game, using the device itself has been a very pleasant experience. I enjoyed typing on it, and I found it easy to switch between tablet and laptop mode by just removing or flipping the keyboard back.

One downside for me was the built in trackpad, I found it a little bit slow in terms of responsiveness, while fine for browsing and general use, I obviously opted for a gaming mouse when playing.

Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: Battery life

The battery life of the Asus ROG Flow Z13 is actually surprisingly great, surpassing even some of the highest-performance and more expensive gaming laptops I’ve tried recently.

When benchmarking the battery, I was able to get around sixhours of usage, which is more representative of watching videos on the device rather than gaming. When gaming on the Asus ROG Flow Z13, I found I got closer to four hours of battery, with AAA games draining the device even faster.

For example, when playing Cyberpunk I only got around an hour of half of game time before the device shut off, which certainly limits how portable this device actually is, no matter how thin and light it might be.

Battery life: 3 / 5

Should I buy the Asus ROG Flow Z13?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Price	This is a very expensive device, but it’s hard to compare to alternatives as it's so unique.	3 / 5
Design	You get a sleek and stunning device which is lightweight and has an excellent range of ports.	5 / 5
Performance	This tablet delivers great performance while staying cool and quiet however laptops at a similar price point would surpass this easily.	4 / 5
Battery life	While delivering a better battery life than some gaming laptops on the market, it's significantly reduced when gaming.	3 / 5
Total Score	This unique gaming tablet can be used as a more traditional laptop, and offers impressive performance and a fantastic and innovative design. Its high price and compromised battery life prevent it from being perfect, however.	3.5 / 5

Buy it if...

You want a portable gaming device
This is super lightweight and compact, making for a great on-the-go gaming device.

You want something cool and quiet
Even when put through its paces, it stays very cool and quiet.

You’re looking for good performance across AAA titles
I got decent frames in all of the titles I tested out, including AAA titles at 'Ultra' graphical settings.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget
You do get a decent battery capacity here, but it won’t last you very long when gaming.

You want a long-lasting battery
You do get a decent battery capacity here, but it won’t last you very long when gaming.

Asus ROG Flow Z13 review: Also consider

	Asus ROG Flow Z13	Razer Blade 14 (2024)	MSI Katana 15
Price	$2,099 / £2,199	From $2,199.99 / £2,149.99 / AU$3,999	$999 (about £785 / AU$1,543)
CPU	AMD Ryzen AI MAX 390 12-Core Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	Intel Core i7-13620H
Graphics	Integrated	Nvidia RTX 4060 - RTX 4070	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 - 4070
RAM	32GB DDR5	16GB DDR5 - 32GB DDR5	16GB DDR5 - 32GB DDR5
Screen	13.4-inch WQXGA IPS 180Hz 100% DCI-P3 Screen	14-inch QHD+ 240Hz, 2560 x 1600p, up to 100% DCI-P3, Factory calibrated, Calman Verified	15.6-inch FHD, IPS-Level 144Hz
Storage	1TB SSD	1TB SSD	1TB SSD
Ports	1x USB-A, 2x USB-C with DisplayPort, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm Audio Jack, 1x MicroSD Card Reader	2 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A , 2 x USB4 Type-C Ports with Power Delivery and Display Port 1.4, Charging supported with 20V USB-C chargers with PD 3.0 (100W), 1 x HDMI 2.1, 1 x Power port, 1 x 3.5mm combo jack	1x USB-C 3.2, 2x USB-A 3.2, 1x USB-A 2.0, HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm Combo-Jack
Weight	2.65lbs (1.20kg)	4.05 lbs (1.84kg)	4.96 lbs (2.25 kg)
Dimensions	11.81 x 8.03 x 0.51-inches (30 x 20.4 x 1.30cm)	12.23 x 8.97 x 0.70 inches (310.7 x 228 x 17.99mm)	14.13 x 10.20 x 0.98 inches (359 x 259 x 25mm)

Here are some alternatives if the Asus ROG Flow Z13 doesn't sound right for your needs:

Razer Blade 14
You can grab this powerful gaming laptop which provides you with immaculate performance regardless of if you’re looking for stunning visuals or high frame rates all packed into a compact and stunning chassis, then the Razer Blade 14 is a great option.

Read our full Razer Blade 14 review

MSI Katana 15
For those not looking to spend too much, then the MSI Katana 15 is a great budget option for those who are looking for a powerful gaming laptop. You can pick it up at less than $1,000 and still get decent AAA performance in 1080p.

Read our full MSI Katana 15 review

How I tested the Asus ROG Flow Z13

Tested for two weeks
Used for work and for gaming
Ran benchmarks

I spent two weeks using the Asus ROG Flow Z13 as my everyday laptop for work and leisure. I was sure to use the device all day for my typical workday, and then also used it for gaming in the evening.

I took it on the go with me to different locations where I needed to work to see how it would feel outside of my workstation. As well as using it every day, I also benchmarked the laptop using a range of different benchmarking software and in-game benchmarking tools for a range of titles.

First reviewed: July 2025
Read more about how we test

The ultra-portable Belkin Boostcharge Pro Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 ain’t cheap, but its versatility won me over anyway

8:48 am | July 4, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Mice Peripherals & Accessories | Comments: Off

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2: Two-minute review

Belkin Boostcharge Magsafe power bank on iPhone 15 — (Image credit: Max Delaney / Future)

The 15W Belkin BoostCharge Pro Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 (10K) has a long name, but writing out its title might be the only challenging part of using it. Easily pairing with my iPhone 15, it instantly felt like a high-end accessory, snapping onto the back with a satisfying click and staying firmly in place.

I’ve been testing the white model (it also comes in black in the US and Australia, and many other colors in the UK) for the past few weeks and I really like the smooth, slightly soft finish and sleek minimalist design. It magnetically latches securely onto any Qi2-compliant phone or MagSafe iPhone without leaving any scratches. When holding the phone in awkward or unusual positions, I did find it can slide a little (or if you give it a deliberate push), but in my day-to-day use it's stuck very firmly in place.

My favorite thing about the power bank is how easy it makes it to use your phone while charging it. It makes charging-and-using your phone more convenient and comfortable than using a wired cord, making it ideal for content creators or anyone needing a quick power boost on the go. Its compact, lightweight design means your phone remains easy to hold and use, even for smaller hands. Plus, since it sits comfortably under the camera bump on iPhones (and most other phones), you can take photos or shoot video as you normally would.

I also appreciated its built-in kickstand and the versatility it provided. It's sturdy enough that I never felt like I had to worry about its stability (even when using larger, heavier phones like the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL) and I liked that it stays hidden away until you need it. It was especially handy for propping up my phone in both portrait and landscape orientations when watching video, which also makes it a great bedside wireless charger – effectively transforming iPhones into smart display thanks to Apple's StandBy mode.

As the name of the power bank suggests, its standout feature is the Qi2 MagSafe charging. Since most Apple phones since the iPhone 12 offer MagSafe (or Qi2) charging, it's widely compatible with Apple devices. Conversely, built-in magnets are much rarer on Android devices (even flagship models), so this power bank is decidedly one that's best suited to iPhone owners. Although the power bank can technically function as a regular wireless charger without the phone needing its own magnets, its ability to attach magnetically is a big part of why the premium price tag ($99.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.95) is justified.

Image 1 of 4

Belkin Boostcharge Pro 15W Qi2 power bank on the back of a Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — The Google Pixel 9 Pro doesn't technically offer Qi2, but the power bank still holds strong to this magnetic case. (Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 4

Image 3 of 4

Image 4 of 4

When charging wirelessly, the power bank has two speeds. It uses 7.5W charging when used as a standalone power bank, but that output is upped to 15W when it’s plugged in to mains power and you're, for example, using it as a charging stand.

While fast charging speeds are all the craze these days, with many flagship devices offering up 125W speeds with a wired connection, in practice I found the 15W wireless charging plenty fast. When your phone is idle during charging, you can expect about a 10% battery gain in the first five minutes. While charging slows as it progresses, I was able to fully charge my iPhone 15 from about 20% to full in just over an hour. Though keep in mind that, even when plugged in, the Belkin does slow to 7.5W if it's charging two devices simultaneously (one wireless, one wired).

When plugged into a wall outlet you can use it in passthrough mode, and it delivers the full 15W wireless charging speed more consistently, and recharges both the phone and itself.

In real-world use, I found the 10,000mAh capacity incredibly useful with my iPhone 15 (which has a roughly 3,349 mAh battery), as it could provide just under three full recharges. This will obviously vary depending on your phone, but iPhones often have smaller battery capacities than the best Android handsets, with even the monster iPhone 16 Pro Max sporting a battery capacity of around 4,685mAh.

For comparison, a 5,000mAh capacity is about the expected size for even mid-range Android phones. For devices of that capacity or more, this power bank would only provide two or fewer recharges, meaning you'd need to be more careful about keeping it charged to ensure it's ready when you need it.

Luckily, it's easy to see the bank's current battery level. A button on the side activates four LEDs, clearly showing the remaining battery level (25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%). Recharging the Belkin from empty using a 20W wall charger typically takes about 2.5 to 3 hours. The unit does get warm during prolonged wireless charging, especially if using your phone at the same time, but it was never uncomfortably hot.

Belkin Boostcharge Pro 15W 10K Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 — (Image credit: Max Delaney / Future)

While it won't offer multiple full recharges for larger, power-hungry devices, its true value lies in its effortless 15W magnetic charging convenience – making it a great pick if you own an iPhone 12 or newer and value the ability to continue using your device on the go even when it's low on battery.

However, if you need a large-capacity power bank for several full charges, or are looking for a more budget-friendly option without magnetic or wireless charging, other devices might be a better fit.

This particular family of Belkin power banks is also available in 5,000mAh and 8,000mAh variants, costing $59.99 / £49.99 / AU$99.95 and $79.99 / £69.99 / AU$109.95 respectively.

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 review: Capacity and output testing capacity

Belkin Boostcharge Pro magnetic power bank sitting on its kickstand — (Image credit: Max Delaney / Future)

For capacity and output testing, I handed off the Belkin BoostCharge to my colleague, who put it through some deeper benchmarks. Wireless charging efficiency depends on the device being charged, but generally it was excellent. For wired phone charging, we were able to get 30Wh (out of 37Wh), which is around 81% – a reasonable but not standout efficiency.

The power bank is rated for 20W output at 9V (used when charging devices like phones) and could supply this, but not for sustained periods. In testing, it could only maintain 20W (9V 2A) wired charging for 15Wh (about 50% of its capacity) before dropping to a slower 5V/10W output.

Charging the power bank took 32Wh, which is less than the 37Wh rated capacity. This suggests Belkin has opted for a conservative approach to cell management, not making the full rated capacity available to the user. While this doesn't change that it charges phones and other devices just fine, it’s still a slightly underwhelming result considering the premium price.

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 review: price & specs

Belkin Boostcharge Pro 15W 10K power bank with Qi2 — (Image credit: Max Delaney / Future)

Price	$99.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.95
Capacity	10,000mAh (also available in 5K and 8K models)
Dimensions	107 x 68 x 17.7mm
Total wattage	15W
Number of ports	2
Wireless Charging	Yes
Weight	222g (as tested)
Power-to-weight	45mAh/g

Should I buy the Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2?

Buy it if...

You want to use your phone while it charges

The MagSafe compatibility of the BoostCharge Magnetic power bank makes it a breeze to continue using your device while it charges, with no cords that can get tangled up.View Deal

You want a versatile bedside charger

Turning your iPhone into a smart display thanks to its rear kickstand, this power bank is perfect for those who want a power bank that is also a great bedside charger and stand. And, as a bonus, you can just grab both and put them in your work bag. View Deal

You have an iPhone

While there are ways around it – like buying a Qi2-compatible phone case – this power bank's features make it best-suited to iPhones. Apple handsets also have smaller battery capacities than many Android competitors, so this 10,000mAh power bank should recharge most iPhones two or three times.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You need more capacity

This power bank works well with iPhones not only because it's MagSafe-enabled, but also because iPhones typically offer smaller battery capacities, compared to many Android phones that often have 5,000mAh or larger.View Deal

You only need charging away from home, not on-the-go

Unless you really need to use your phone while it charges, there are cheaper power banks that don't magnetically attach but can still recharge your device while you're away from your regular wired charger.View Deal

Also consider...

Ugreen Magnetic Wireless Charger

If you're looking for a MagSafe compatible power bank, then this Ugreen offering is worth considering. It's much cheaper, also offers a 10,000mAh (37Wh) capacity and can do 15W Qi wireless charging for Android devices. However, Apple devices are limited to 7.5W charging with this device. The magnetic grip is strong and works well with MagSafe compatible accessories and devices.View Deal

INIU B6

If you don't need MagSafe charging, this INIU B6 power bank is likely going to offer all you need for a fraction of the price of the Belkin. It offers a 10,000 mAh (37 Wh) capacity and fast 20W wired charging.View Deal

The ultra-portable Belkin Boostcharge Pro Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 ain’t cheap, but its versatility won me over anyway

8:48 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Mice Peripherals & Accessories | Comments: Off

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2: Two-minute review

Image 1 of 4

Image 2 of 4

Image 3 of 4

Image 4 of 4

When plugged into a wall outlet you can use it in passthrough mode, and it delivers the full 15W wireless charging speed more consistently, and recharges both the phone and itself.

However, if you need a large-capacity power bank for several full charges, or are looking for a more budget-friendly option without magnetic or wireless charging, other devices might be a better fit.

This particular family of Belkin power banks is also available in 5,000mAh and 8,000mAh variants, costing $59.99 / £49.99 / AU$99.95 and $79.99 / £69.99 / AU$109.95 respectively.

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 review: Capacity and output testing capacity

Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2 review: price & specs

Price	$99.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.95
Capacity	10,000mAh (also available in 5K and 8K models)
Dimensions	107 x 68 x 17.7mm
Total wattage	15W
Number of ports	2
Wireless Charging	Yes
Weight	222g (as tested)
Power-to-weight	45mAh/g

Should I buy the Belkin BoostCharge Magnetic Power Bank with Qi2?

Buy it if...

You want to use your phone while it charges

The MagSafe compatibility of the BoostCharge Magnetic power bank makes it a breeze to continue using your device while it charges, with no cords that can get tangled up.View Deal

You want a versatile bedside charger

You have an iPhone

Don't buy it if...

You need more capacity

You only need charging away from home, not on-the-go

Also consider...

Ugreen Magnetic Wireless Charger

INIU B6

I used the Acer Chromebook Spin 312 for all kinds of tasks, and it handles most of them well – just not at the same time

12:10 pm | June 30, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Chromebooks Computers Computing Gadgets Laptops | Tags: Acer Chromebook Spin, RAM, SD | Comments: Off

Acer Chromebook Spin 312: Two-minute review

The Acer Chromebook Spin 312 is the smallest device in the brand’s line of 2-in-1 Chromebooks, measuring just 12.2 inches. Despite this, it’s not the sleekest Chromebook around, with its sharp angles and juts spoiling the otherwise elegant design, which is aided by the quality of the materials used in its construction.

It’s quite thick and heavy for its size, so it’s perhaps not ideal for using as a tablet, despite its convertible nature. But thanks to that solid hinge for the lid, it can be propped upside down and used exclusively in touchscreen mode with ease.

It’s not just the hinge mechanism that’s well made – all aspects of the Spin 312 feel as solid and sturdy as any of the best Chromebooks, including the keys and trackpad, which feel premium to the touch as well.

Port selection is reasonable, too, although I would’ve liked to have seen more than just one USB-C port, and the lack of an SD card slot might be detrimental for some. Thankfully, there are two USB-A ports to improve connectivity options, and the HDMI port and audio jack are further additions I welcome.

The review unit I had came equipped with an Intel N100 processor and 4GB of RAM. Despite these underwhelming specs, the Chromebook Spin 312 performed admirably, handling many typical Chromebook workloads quite well. However, slowdowns can occur when pushed a little too far.

Close-up of keyboard and touchpad on Acer Chromebook Spin 312, on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

Such cases include gaming, where the Chromebook Spin 312 struggled to run even fairly modest mobile games on high settings during my testing. However, lowering these did improve matters to the point where games such as Asphalt Legends Unite were playable to an enjoyable extent.

More pleasing on the performance front is the display. The resolution looks especially sharp on the 12-inch screen, although colors aren’t rendered as vibrantly as they are on some rival Chromebooks. The bezels also encroach quite considerably on the allotted real estate for the screen, and the display can be quite reflective under certain conditions. In most cases, though, it makes for a pleasant viewing experience.

The touch inputs are also quite responsive, tracking well with swipes to make drawing and handwriting a realistic option, although it can be a little grabby at times. You’ll also need to provide your own stylus if you want to make the most of your creative time with the Chromebook Spin 312.

I found the touchpad disappointingly inaccurate by comparison, as it failed to track with what I was expecting from my movements, leading to a lagging and stuttering, which in turn made it imprecise.

Thankfully, I had a better time typing on the Chromebook Spin 312, thanks to the generous spacing of the keys and their satisfying dampening. Their lack of indentations and grip, however, can lead to slipping and mispresses on occasion.

Its battery life is impressive, lasting just over 11 hours in our test. This places it near the higher end of the Chromebook spectrum – the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook performs significantly better on this front, although admittedly this is somewhat of an outlier.

The Chromebook Spin 312 sits somewhere in the middle of the convertible Chromebook market. Some rivals are better performers, while others have a sleeker design. But, overall, if you won’t be demanding too much from it in terms of performance, the Chromebook Spin 312 is a good 2-in-1 Chromebook for those who prize portability and a sharp image.

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review: Price and availability

Starts from £329.99 (about $450 / AU$690)
Various CPU, RAM, and storage options
Middle of the market

The Chromebook Spin 312 starts from £329.99 (about $450 / AU$690). It can be configured with 64GB or 128GB of storage, 4GB or 8GB of RAM, and an Intel Core i3 or Intel N100 CPU.

This places the Chromebook Spin 312 somewhere in the middle of the market considering its spec. It’s considerably cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Chromebook 2 360, which it bests in terms of performance, although its display isn’t quite as sharp or as vibrant, and lacks its premium design (although it isn’t too far behind in this regard).

However, the Chromebook Spin 312 is more expensive than the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook, which is one of the best budget Chromebooks in our view. This lacks the compactness of the Chromebook Spin 312 and the performance isn’t exactly impressive either, but it makes up for these deficiencies with its great build quality and enduring battery life.

Value: 3.5 / 5

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review: Specs

These are the specs of the particular Acer Chromebook Spin 312 I reviewed:

Price	Starting from £329.99 (about $450 / AU$690)
CPU	Intel N100 (4 threads, 3.4GHz)
Graphics	Integrated, Intel UHD Graphics
RAM	4GB LPDDR5
Screen	12.2-inch WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS LCD, 16:10, 60Hz touchscreen
Storage	64GB eMMC
Ports	2x USB-A, 1x USB-C, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm audio
Wireless	Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2
Camera	1280 x 720
Weight	2.84lbs (1.29kg)
Dimensions	11.4 x 8.1 x 0.8in (29 x 20.5 x 2cm)

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review: Design

Close-up of left ports on Acer Chromebook Spin 312, on desk — (Image credit: Future)

Bulky for the size
Solid lid hinge
Only one USB-C port and no SD card slot

The Chromebook Spin 312 takes a somewhat utilitarian approach to design, with its sharp angles, large vents and lid hinges appearing quite conspicuous. However, it's still a compact device, and has enough flat sides to help impart some sleekness.

This is further aided by the steely grey colorway and look of the chassis materials, which have a subtle shine to them. What’s more, the quality of these materials seems high, feeling solid and fairly premium to the touch. This extends to the lightly textured keycaps and silky smooth touchpad.

The hinge mechanism is also reassuringly solid. There’s no wobble at any angle, yet it’s smooth and easy to open and adjust. This stability also helps when tenting the Chromebook Spin 312 to use it in touchscreen mode.

However, it can’t compete with the best tablets for usability. Despite its small 12-inch size, the Chromebook Spin 312 is a relatively thick and heavy slab, which can make it awkward to hold in the hand when folded back all the way.

The screen has a large bezel around it, which somewhat compromises the already limited real estate for the display. On a more positive note, it's made from Corning Gorilla Glass, so it should prove resistant to wear and tear when taking the Chromebook Spin 312 on your travels.

Port selection is reasonable for a Chromebook this small, although it’s a minor shame there’s only one USB-C port and SD card slot, as you’ll find two on many modern Chromebooks. Still, you do at least get two USB-A ports, and I also welcome the inclusion of a dedicated HDMI port and a 3.5mm audio jack.

Design score: 4 / 5

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review: Performance

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 open upside down on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

Capable of light work
Sharp but reflective display
Struggles with intensive tasks

Benchmarks

These are the results of our benchmarking tests for the Acer Chromebook Spin 312:

TechRadar Battery Life Test: 11 hours and 12 minutes
Jetstream2 Benchmark: 179.327
Kraken Benchmark: 1309.3ms
Speedometer 3.0: 9.52 (±0.52)

The Chromebook Spin 312 offers capable enough performance for everyday tasks, meeting the demands typically placed upon Chromebooks. Apps load fast and light productivity and general browsing are handled well. Despite its somewhat limited 4GB of RAM, it’s even capable of some degree of multitasking, coping well with multiple browser tabs open, for instance.

However, it can come a little unstuck when those tabs are running more complex activities, or when multiple apps are in play. The Chromebook Spin 312 can also generate a fair amount of heat underneath, which is bothersome when on your lap.

Gaming performance isn’t particularly impressive, either. It can handle some mobile titles, but you’ll likely have to play with modest graphics settings. When I played Asphalt Legends Unite, for instance, high settings caused stutters and considerable slow downs, rendering the game almost unplayable. However, it ran much better on lower settings, if not quite as smooth or as fast as some rivals can manage – and certainly the Chromebook Spin 312 isn’t a match for the best gaming laptops in this regard.

When it comes to video playback, the Chromebook Spin 312 can handle streaming content in 4K, although it’s not always the smoothest experience. The WUXGA display at least provides a sharp image: the 1920 x 1200 resolution might sound a little low compared to other laptops and some Chromebooks on the market today, but due to its small screen size, it looks sharper than you might imagine.

Close-up of right-hand side ports on Acer Chromebook Spin 312, on desk — (Image credit: Future)

It’s also quite bright when displaying lighter shades. However, while colors are rendered well enough, they don’t appear quite as vibrant as those on the displays equipped in the best laptops or best MacBooks, looking slightly washed-out by comparison.

The screen is also quite reflective, which, combined with its somewhat lackluster backlighting, makes darker scenes hard to view at times. However, the effect isn’t too troublesome, and compared to many other Chromebooks, the Chromebook Spin 312 is still great for viewing content.

The touchscreen capability is impressive, too. It responds well to all sorts of swipes and gestures, making for smooth doodles and handwriting, even if it's a little grabby at times. It’s also a shame no stylus is included to unleash the full potential of its functionality.

Unfortunately, the touchpad is less responsive, and I experienced issues with its tracking: many times it felt as if it was either dragging or jumping ahead, lacking the smoothness I was expecting. As a result, I struggled to use it accurately, which can really hamper productivity.

By contrast, typing with the Chromebook Spin 312 is a largely pleasant experience. The keys are satisfyingly damped and are spread surprisingly wide for a Chromebook this small. The keycaps also feel nice under the finger tips thanks to their texture, although they lack grip, which is made worse by the lack of indentation as well. This made the keyboard feel less secure in use, but overall I still found it amenable for typing quickly on.

Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review: Battery life

Back of Acer Chromebook Spin 312 open on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

The battery life of the Chromebook Spin 312 is quite impressive. During our tests, where we ran a movie on a continuous loop, it managed to last over 11 hours. This makes it much better than the Samsung Galaxy Chromebook 2 360, which could only manage six and a half hours. It also beats the Acer Chromebook Spin 314 (2023), one of the best Chromebooks around in our view, which managed over 10 hours.

However, it can’t outlive the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook, which, when we tested it, endured for a remarkable 16 hours and 20 minutes. However, this is rather exceptional in the Chromebook world, and the Chromebook Spin 312 can still lay claim to having one of the best battery lives in the market.

Battery life: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Acer Chromebook Spin 312?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Price	The Chromebook Spin 312 sits somewhere in the middle of the market given its design and spec, being cheaper than some rivals but more expensive than others.	3.5 / 5
Design	It’s solidly made and small enough to make it portable, although it’s a little bulky for tablet-style use.	4 / 5
Performance	The Chromebook Spin 312 can handle basic tasking, while the display is pleasingly sharp, if not the most vibrant and a tad too reflective.	3.5 / 5
Battery life	It may not have the very best battery life of a Chromebook, but its 11-hour performance still places it in the upper echelons.	4.5 / 5
Total Score	If you’re looking for a Chromebook you can use with touch inputs and doesn’t take up much space, you shouldn’t be disappointed with the Chromebook Spin 312 – so long as you don’t demand too much from it.	4 / 5

Buy it if...

You want something compact
The 12-inch size makes the Chromebook Spin 312 easy to travel with, and yet it doesn't feel compromised when typing or getting work done.

You want a 2-in-1 device
The 360-degree rotating touchscreen makes the Chromebook Spin 312 versatile, although it’s perhaps not best suited for full-on tablet-style use.

Don't buy it if...

You want the fastest Chromebook
Although it's surprisingly capable, those with more demanding workloads should seek more powerful models.

You want the sveltest device
Despite its small size, the Chromebook Spin 312 is fairly bulky and weighty, which impairs its tablet-style credentials.

Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review: Also consider

	Acer Chromebook Spin 312	Samsung Galaxy Chromebook 2 360	Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook
Price	Starting from £329.99 (about $450 / AU$690)	$429.99 / £419 / AU$707	$339 / £299 / AU$499
CPU	Intel N100 (4 threads, 3.4GHz)	Intel Celeron N4500 1.10GHz (2 threads, 2.80GHz)	1.1GHz Intel Celeron N4020 (dual-core, 4MB cache, up to 2.8GHz Burst)
Graphics	Integrated, Intel UHD Graphics	Integrated, Intel UHD Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 600
RAM	4GB LPDDR5	4GB LPDDR4x	4GB DDR4
Screen	12.2-inch WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS LCD, 16:10, 60Hz touchscreen	12.4-inch WQXGA LED Display (2560 x 1600), touchscreen	11-inch IPS touchscreen, 1,366 x 768 pixels
Storage	64GB eMMC	64GB eMMC	64GB eMMC
Ports	2x USB-A, 1x USB-C, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm audio	1x USB-A, 2x USB-C, 1x microSD, 1x 3.5mm audio	2x USB-C with charging, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen1, microSD
Wireless	Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2	Wi-Fi 6, LTE (Option), Bluetooth v5.1	802.11AC (2 x 2) WiFi, Bluetooth® 4.2
Camera	1280 x 720	720p / 8MP	720p
Weight	2.84lbs (1.29kg)	2.82lbs (1.28kg)	2.64lbs (1.2kg)
Dimensions	11.4 x 8.1 x 0.8in (29 x 20.5 x 2cm)	11.3 x 8.1 x 0.7 inches (28.8 x 20.7 x 1.7cm)	0.7 x 11.41 x 8.18 inches (17.8 x 290 x 207.8mm)

Here are some alternatives if the Acer Chromebook Spin 312 doesn't sound right for your needs:

Samsung Galaxy Chromebook 2 360
The Galaxy Chromebook 2 360 is about the same size as the Chromebook Spin 312, but it has a thinner and lighter construction, as well as a more upmarket design, which is one of the best in class. The display is even sharper and more vibrant, too. It’s a shame that its performance fails to live up to its looks, but if you only have very light workloads, it’ll make a pleasant companion. Read our full Samsung Galaxy Chromebook 2 360 review.

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook
The IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook boasts great build quality and excellent battery life. However, it’s let down by unremarkable performance and uninspiring looks. Still, it’s powerful enough for light productivity and schoolwork, hence its inclusion on our best Chromebook guide. Read our full Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook review.

How I tested the Acer Chromebook Spin 312

Tested for two days
Used for work and for entertainment
Chromebook reviewing experience

I tested the Chromebook Spin 312 for a couple of days, during which time I used it working, gaming, and general browsing.

I used word processing and spreadsheet applications, streamed 4K content on YouTube, and played games such as Asphalt Legends Unite. I also connected various peripherals via Bluetooth.

I have been using Chromebooks for a while, and have reviewed a number of them as well, ranging in price, form factor, and spec. I have also reviewed plenty of Windows laptops.

First reviewed: June 2025
Read more about how we test

I tested the Acer Chromebook Plus 516 and liked its large display and fast performance – but it doesn’t have the best battery life

12:10 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Chromebooks Computers Computing Gadgets Laptops | Tags: UK | Comments: Off

Acer Chromebook Plus 516: Two-minute review

The Acer Chromebook Plus 516 is a large device with a reasonably strong spec, making it ideal for various productivity and entertainment needs. It might not look terribly auspicious, and the color is a little dour, but it's surprisingly thin for a Chromebook this size, which helps to make it more sleek.

It’s also a well-made machine, with materials that feel durable yet light. What’s more, the lid hinges allow for easy opening and offer stability at any angle all the way up to 170 degrees.

It also has one of the best Chromebook keyboards in terms of layout, with plenty of keys included, such as a number pad, without compromising spacing. This makes typing easy, and the snappy nature of the individual keys makes them satisfying, too.

The touchpad is equally capable, providing responsive inputs and plenty of accuracy, which, combined with its large size, makes for easy navigation. It also manages to keep out of the way while typing.

Close-up of keyboard and touchpad on Acer Chromebook Plus 516, open on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

Port selection on the Chromebook Plus 516 is quite good, and I was pleased to see the inclusion of two USB-C ports. However, it’s a minor shame both are on the same side, which may limit your options when plugging into an outlet. Still, the two USB-A ports, HDMI port and audio jack are all welcome additions.

In terms of performance, the Chromebook Plus 516 handles most tasks well. It loads apps quickly and multitasks very well. Even mobile gaming on high settings is viable. It also takes Ultra HD content in its stride, streaming it without a hitch for the most part. Viewing such content is made all the more enjoyable thanks to that large, crisp, and vibrant display, which also does an admirable job of keeping reflections at bay.

Unfortunately, the battery life of the Chromebook Plus 516 isn’t particularly impressive relative to its rivals. During our movie playback test, it failed to break past eight hours, a threshold many modern Chromebooks can exceed.

With a starting price of £399.99 (about $540 / AU$830), the Chromebook Plus 516 sits somewhere in the middle of the market. However, it's good value when you consider its performance, display, and productivity credentials.

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 review: Price and availability

Starts from £399.99 (about $540 / AU$830)
Available from August in the UK
Mid-market pricing

The Chromebook Plus 516 starts from £399.99 (about $540 / AU$830) and is available in the UK from August in one colorway. Multiple storage, CPU, RAM and graphics options are configurable. A backlit keyboard can also be specified, as can a touch screen.

It’s about the same price as the equally capable but slightly smaller Acer Chromebook Plus 514. Like that model, the 516 sits somewhere in the middle of the market, but perhaps represents slightly better value owing to the larger screen size and extra keys.

However, if you still want great performance but at a lower price, the older Acer Chromebook Plus 515 remains a great pick, and its 15.6-inch measurement is still big enough to please those who prefer large displays; there’s a reason we think it’s one of the best student Chromebooks, after all.

If you’re after something cheaper still, we think the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook is the best student laptop for those on a budget. Its performance is no match for the mightier Chromebook Plus 516, and it’s also much smaller, but it has the advantage of being a 2-in-1 device, thanks to its 360-degree rotation and touchscreen.

Value: 3.5 / 5

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 review: Specs

These specs pertain to my review unit of the Acer Chromebook Plus 516:

Price	£399.99 (about $540 / AU$830)
CPU	Intel Core 3 100U (8 threads, 4.7GHz)
Graphics	Integrated, Intel UHD Graphics
RAM	8GB LPDDR5
Screen	16-inch WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS, 16:10
Storage	128GB UFS
Ports	2x USB-A, 2x USB-C, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm audio
Wireless	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3
Camera	HD 1080p
Weight	3.75lbs (1.7kg)
Dimensions	14.1 x 10 x 0.8 inches (359 x 253 x 19mm)

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 review: Design

Close-up of left-side ports on Acer Chromebook Plus 516, open on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

Smart and well made
Plenty of keys
Both USB-C ports on same side

The Chromebook Plus 516 adopts the fairly typical Acer aesthetic, with a sleek but understated appearance. There’s nothing particularly spectacular about its looks, but it’s at least free from too many fussy details.

Despite its large size, it’s pleasingly thin and not quite as heavy as you’d expect it to be. It’s no match for smaller Chromebooks in terms of portability, but all sides are quite flat and smooth, which helps when sliding it into your bag.

The build quality is on par with the best Chromebooks. Certain materials look more premium than others, but all feel solid and durable. The keycaps are perhaps the least impressive visually, but they’re tightly fitted.

The hinge mechanism is similarly well-engineered. The lid is easy to open and move into any position, and its maximum recline angle of 170 degrees makes it versatile for various setups. What’s more, it remains stable in any position; there’s next to no wobble, which is all the more impressive given its thinness and lightness.

The keyboard features numerous shortcut keys on the F row, all of which are quite useful. Highlights include one for taking screenshots, one for dictation, and one for opening a menu containing various accessibility functions.

Being a Chromebook Plus, you also get a Quick Insert key, used for accessing files, opening recent documents or creating new ones, inserting links, using AI tools, and other productivity-based functions.

The keyboard even includes a navigation cluster and number pad, both of which I welcome. More impressively, these don’t compromise the layout spacing, thanks to the width of the device itself. The touchpad also manages to not get in the way while typing, despite its relatively large size.

I was pleased to see the Chromebook Plus 516 features two USB-C ports, although unfortunately they’re both the same side, which somewhat limits versatility when plugging into an outlet. Still, it’s nice to have more than one, and the further ports – two USB-A ports, an HDMI port, and a 3.5mm headset jack – are all welcome additions. There’s no SD card slot, though, which might be a problem for some users.

Design score: 4 / 5

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 review: Performance

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 open wide on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

Fast and capable multitasker
Can handle light gaming
Sharp display

Benchmarks

These are the results of our benchmarking tests for the Acer Chromebook Plus 516:

TechRadar Battery Life Test: 7 hours and 35 minutes
Jetstream2 Benchmark: 295.772
Kraken Benchmark: 398.5ms
Speedometer 3.0: 18.8 (±1.0)

The Chromebook Plus 516 is quite a capable performer. Creating and editing documents and spreadsheets is no problem for it, while switching between apps and multiple tabs is taken in its stride.

Gaming performance is also admirable. I managed to play Asphalt Legends Unite on high graphics settings without issue, running smoothly with little stutter. This was especially impressive given that the game recommended I play on lower settings based on the specs, but you’ll still want one of the best gaming laptops if you plan on playing more intensive games.

It can stream ultra HD content with relative ease as well. During my testing, I encountered little in the way of buffering or stuttering, making for seamless viewing in the main.

Back of Acer Chromebook Plus 516 open on desk with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

The experience is made even better thanks to the surprisingly vibrant display, which also avoids the washed-out appearance that afflicts some Chromebooks. Reflections do reveal themselves somewhat in darker scenes and unfavorable lighting conditions, but generally they’re kept at bay quite well.

Moreover, the 1920 x 1200 resolution is suitably sharp for its large size, which makes the UI very clear, while the thin bezels ensure that the most is made of the allotted real estate.

Typing on the Chromebook Plus 516 is also a pleasure. Despite the inauspicious looking keys, they perform well, with their light actuation and just enough dampening to make them tactile. Despite the inclusion of a number pad and other extra keys, I didn’t find the layout cramped, which made for an accurate and comfortable typing experience.

The trackpad is brilliantly smooth and very precise, tracking perfectly with my finger movements and gestures. As with the keys, it only requires a light touch, which makes it easy to use.

Performance score: 4.5 / 5

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 review: Battery life

Close-up of camera on Acer Chromebook Plus 516 with pink background — (Image credit: Future)

The Chromebook Plus 516 doesn't have a terribly impressive battery life, posting a below-average score during our test. We ran a movie on a continuous loop, and it gave up the ghost after seven hours and 35 minutes.

The Acer Chromebook Plus 514 we tested fared better, managing to last almost an hour longer. The much smaller Chromebook Spin 312 also eclipsed it, running all the way past 11 hours before total depletion.

However, the Chromebook Plus 516 still did better than the older Chromebook Plus 515, which only managed five hours. However, if you’re after a device that can really go all day, the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook is perhaps your best choice, as this lasted over 16 hours in our movie playback test.

Battery life: 2.5 / 5

Should I buy the Acer Chromebook Plus 516?

Attributes	Notes	Rating
Price	The Chromebook Plus 516 has a price you might expect for a Chromebook Plus, although its size and keyboard impart extra value.	3.5 / 5
Design	The Chromebook Plus 516 is pleasingly thin for such a large device, and the build quality is respectable. The keyboard is great for productivity, too.	4 / 5
Performance	The Chromebook Plus 516 can handle all sorts of tasks, including light gaming, while the sharp and vibrant display is great for viewing Ultra HD content.	4.5 / 5
Battery life	The Chromebook Plus 516 is far from the best in class when it comes to battery life, with many others capable of outliving it.	2.5 / 5
Total Score	The Chromebook Plus 516 is a great performer with a vibrant display and a useful keyboard. If you’re after a large Chromebook for work and play, it fits the bill quite well – so long as you don’t plan on using it unplugged all day long.	4 / 5

Buy it if...

You want a large display
At 16 inches, the Chromebook Plus 516 is one of the larger Chromebooks on the market, and the resolution is sharp enough to match.

You want fast performance
The Chromebook Plus 516 can handle most productivity tasks and even light gaming, thanks to its relatively strong spec.

Don't buy it if...

You want a convertible device
The Chromebook Plus 516 isn’t a 2-in-1 device, so it can’t be used like the best tablets.

You want the best battery life
Seven and a half hours is all you’ll get with continuous movie playback, which ranks in the lower half of the Chromebook league.

Acer Chromebook Plus 516 review: Also consider

	Acer Chromebook Plus 516	Acer Chromebook Plus 514	Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook
Price	Starts from £399.99 (about $540 / AU$830)	$399 / £399 (about AU$560)	$399.99 / £399.99 (around AU$633)
CPU	Intel Core 3 100U (8 threads, 4.7GHz)	Intel Core 3 100U (8 threads, 4.7GHz)	1.1GHz Intel Celeron N4020 (dual-core, 4MB cache, up to 2.8GHz Burst)
Graphics	Integrated, Intel UHD Graphics	Integrated, Intel UHD Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 600
RAM	8GB LPDDR5	8GB LPDDR5	4GB DDR4
Screen	16-inch WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS, 16:10	14-inch WUXGA (1920 x 1200) IPS, 16:10	11-inch IPS touchscreen, 1,366 x 768
Storage	128GB UFS	128GB UFS	64GB eMMC
Ports	2x USB-A, 2x USB-C, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm audio	2x USB-A, 2x USB-C, 1x HDMI, 1x 3.5mm audio	2x USB-C with charging, 2x USB-A, microSD
Wireless	Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3	Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2
Camera	HD 1080p	HD 1080p	720p
Weight	3.75lbs (1.7kg)	3.15lbs (1.43kg)	2.64lbs (1.2kg)
Dimensions	14.1 x 10 x 0.8 inches (359 x 253 x 19mm)	12.9 x 8.9 x 0.8 inches (32.7 x 22.5 x 2cm)	0.7 x 11.41 x 8.18 inches (17.8 x 290 x 207.8mm)

Here are some alternatives to the Chromebook Plus 516:

Acer Chromebook Plus 514
An almost-equally large Chromebook Plus, the 514 boasts a similar performance and spec, although I would say the 516 has a slightly better display quality. The 514 also lacks the extra keys of the 516, which might deter those interested in extracting the maximum productivity from their machine. Read our Acer Chromebook Plus 514 review.

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook
If you want something smaller, cheaper, and more versatile, look no further than the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook. It’s convertible, so you can use it like a tablet, and it has an excellent battery life to boot. However, it’s not the quickest performer, but it's still sufficient, which is why it makes the best student laptop for those on a budget in our view. Read our Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 Chromebook review.

How I tested the Acer Chromebook Plus 516

Tested for two days
Used for a variety of tasks
Abundant Chromebook reviewing experience

I tested the Chromebook Plus 516 for a few days, during which time I used it for a variety of tasks, including productivity, gaming, and browsing.

I edited spreadsheets and documents, used multiple tabs when browsing in Chrome, and streamed 4K content. I also played Asphalt Legends Unite, and connected various peripherals via Bluetooth.

I have used various Chromebooks and other laptop devices for decades, and have reviewed a number of them too (including other Acer models), varying in their price points, form factors, and performance.

First reviewed: June 2025
Read more about how we test

I spent weeks testing the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and RX 9060 XT 8GB, and both offer compelling value

7:57 pm | June 23, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Computing Components Gadgets | Tags: AI, GPU, RTX, RX | Comments: Off

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT: One-minute review

Having missed the initial AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT review cycle earlier this month for logistical reasons, I wanted to do more with this review than just try to play catch-up with my peers who got to review the 16GB card prior to launch.

Fortunately, doing this post-launch meant that I was able to get my hands on both 16GB and 8GB versions of the RX 9060 XT for a single review, and I'm honestly glad I waited.

Both AMD RX 9060 XT cards bring a compelling value, with the 8GB version starting at $299.99 / £269.99 / AU$569 and the 16GB versions starting at $349.99 / £329.99 / AU$689. This puts it roughly in the middle of the price pack for the best cheap graphics cards of the current generation.

The branding along the top of an AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

Spec-wise, the only difference between the two cards is really the amount of GDDR6 video memory available, either 16GB or 8GB.

This matters, as that extra 8GB VRAM does improve the performance of the RX 9060 XT (and even makes modest 4K gaming possible), but the difference between the two isn't so large that it overrides any consideration of the additional cost.

However, Nvidia's RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and RTX 5060 (an 8GB card) offer better performance vis-à-vis the RX 9060 XT 16GB and RX 9060 XT 8GB, respectively. In the case of the RTX 5060, there's no difference in price with the RX 9060 XT 8GB, so that is a much tougher call between the two for reasons I'll dig into in a bit.

On the other hand, the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers better performance over the RX 9060 XT 16GB, but not so much better that it justifies the much higher price.

In the end, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB strikes the best balance of price and performance in this class, making it easy to recommend as the best graphics card in this segment for most people, and both are two of the best AMD graphics cards the company's ever put out.

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT: Price & availability

An AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT sitting on its retail packaging on a table — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

How much is it? $299.99 / £269.99 / AU$569 for 8GB, $349.99 / £329.99 / AU$689 for 16GB
When can you get it? Now
Where is it available? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT starts at $299.99 / £269.99 / AU$569 for the 8GB version, with the 16GB version starting at $349.99 / £329.99 / AU$689.

There's a much more direct comparison between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT 16GB and the RX 9060 XT 16GB, as both are very comparable spec-wise. In that regard, the RX 9060 XT is a slight price increase over the RX 7600 XT (about $20 in the US), but it's not really large enough to ding its score.

The RX 7600 XT and RX 7600 are very similar, but there are differences beyond just their memory pools, so the RX 9060 XT is not quite as comparable to the RX 7600, meaning even though the RX 9060 XT is slightly more expensive (about $30 in the US), it's much more reasonable given the comparably faster clock speeds.

The RX 9060 XT 8GB is one of the cheapest graphics cards on the market right now, and unlike many others out there, it's easy enough to find at its MSRPView Deal

The RX 9060 XT 16GB is easily the best graphics card you can get this generation under $400, and with 16GB VRAM, it comes with a solid bit of future-proofing built into it.View Deal

Nvidia's competing cards, the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and RTX 5060, are more expensive ($429 / £419.99 / AU$799 for the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) or about the same price or slightly more expensive ($299 / £269.99 / AU$599) for the RTX 5060.

Neither RX 9060 XT version has an AMD reference card, so you'll need to buy one from a third-party manufacturer, such as Asus, Gigabyte, or XFX.

The same is true for Nvidia's RTX 5060 Ti and RTX 5060, though, so it's hard to knock the 9060 XT cards too hard for this, especially as we've seen fairly wide availability of MSRP cards for sale online that you can actually buy.

Fortunately, we also haven't seen any real stock shortages of the RX 9060 XT cards, so finding stock at MSRP is fairly easy right now.

Value: 4.5 / 5

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT: Specs

The power connector on an AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

PCIe 5.0
16GB and 8GB VRAM

AMD RX 9060 XT Specs
	RX 9060 XT (16GB)	RX 9060 XT (8GB)
Process Node	TSMC N4P	TSMC N4P
Transistor Count (Billion)	29.7	29.7
Compute Units	32	32
Shaders	2,048	2,048
Ray Accelerators	32	32
AI/Matrix Processors	64	64
Render Output Units	64	64
Cache (MB)	32	32
Base Clock (MHz)	1,700	1,700
Boost Clock (MHz)	3,130	3,130
Memory Clock (MHz)	2,518	2,518
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Pool (GB)	16	8
Memory Interface (bits)	128	128
Effective Memory Speed (Gbps)	20.1	20.1
Memory Bandwidth (GB/s)	322.3	322.3
PCIe Interface	5.0 x16	5.0 x16
TGP (W)	160	150
Recommended PSU (W)	450	700
Power Connector	1 x 8-pin	1 x 8-pin

Both versions of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT have effectively identical specs, other than different memory pools and the slightly higher TDP for the 16GB version to account for powering the additional memory.

Otherwise, they use the exact same GPU die with identical clock speeds, so your decision between the two is really about whether that 8GB of additional GDDR6 VRAM is worth the extra investment.

The number of compute units, ROPs, and available cache on the RX 9060 XT is unchanged over the RX 7600 XT and RX 7600, so the RX 9060 XT is effectively an upgraded version of those cards using the new RDNA 4 architecture and faster game and memory clock speeds.

There's also the issue of whether 8GB is enough for a modern graphics card, even at a sub-$300 price point. Given the performance I found while testing, an 8GB card can perform well right now, even at 1440p, on many games, so long as you don't go anywhere near ray tracing. How much longer will that be the case? It's hard to say, but 8GB cards are already starting to struggle, so even a 10GB card would have been better, much less a 12GB version for the lower-end 9060 XT.

Add to this AMD's maddening decision to stick with a 128-bit memory bus for these cards, which unnecessarily constrains memory bandwidth and inevitably limits the potential performance of the RX 9060 XT. This alone knocks some points off, because if the Intel Arc B570 can use a 160-bit memory bus, there's no reason why AMD or Nvidia continue to do so on their 60-class cards.

That simple widening of the bus could noticeably improve gaming frame rates, and it's something neither AMD nor Nvidia has been able to explain to me beyond vaguely gesturing at cost constraints. If Intel can afford a 160-bit bus, so can AMD, and it makes me wonder how much better these cards might have otherwise been.

OK, end of rant.

Specs & features: 3.5 / 5

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT: Design

The backplate of an AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT from Sapphire — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

No AMD reference card
Good for SFF cases

There is no AMD reference cards for either of the RX 9060 XT versions, so the design of the card you get will depend on the manufacturer.

The two cards I tested, the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and the Asus Dual Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB, are both fairly slender and compact cards.

Neither have any RGB lighting, so if you're looking for something with more bling, other cards can definitely offer that.

Also, there are some cards from some manufacturers that use triple-fan designs, which seems overkill to me, but if you want a bigger-looking card for a specific build, you'll definitely have that option.

Design: 3.5 / 5

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT: Performance

An AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT slotted into a testbench — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

Big difference between 16GB and 8GB versions
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and RTX 5060 offer slightly better performance than the two RX 9060 XT cards

A note on my data

The charts shown below offer the most recent data I have for the cards tested for this review. They may change over time as more card results are added and cards are retested. The 'average of all cards tested' includes cards not shown in these charts for readability purposes.

As far as performance goes, there's a lot to like about both AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT cards, from their modest power draw to their solid 1440p gaming performance.

It's not all positive though, as there are several points where Nvidia's competing cards outperform AMD's latest offerings, making the final assessment much closer than I initially thought it would be when I began testing these cards.

Across synthetic benchmarks, the RX 9060 XT and RTX 5060 Ti are more or less tied across resolutions, with Nvidia's card only edging out AMD's in ray tracing performance. The RX 9060 XT 16GB is only about 15% slower than the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB in synthetic ray tracing performance. While this is expected, it's not as wide as it's been in previous generations.

The RX 9060 XT 8GB, meanwhile, outperforms the RTX 5060 in 1080p (about 4% better), in 1440p (about 10% better), and in 4K (about 10% better), though the RTX 5060 does hold a slight lead in ray-tracing performance (about 3%).

In creative benchmarks, the RX 9060 XT cards are largely competitive against Nvidia's GPUs in everything but 3D model rendering. Unfortunately, I can't say more about this since Blender Benchmark wasn't able to run on either RX 9060 XT card, so I can't say how they'd fare against the Nvidia RTX 5060 Ti 16GB.

The RTX 5060, interestingly enough, couldn't run Blender Benchmark either, so this will have to be an issue I'll investigate further and update my results once I have them, but given that Blender Benchmark Cycles renderer is optimized for Nvidia CUDA (as is nearly all 3D modeling software), I am very confident that the RX 9060 XT cards aren't going to be competitive on this workload, it's really just a matter of how far behind the RX 9060 XT cards land in the end.

An AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB slotted into a testbench — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

Creative workloads aren't what AMD Radeon cards are most known for, though. PC gaming is where these cards really compete, and in this regard, the RX 9060 XT 8GB comes in about 4% slower than the RTX 5060 in 1080p overall, while the RX 9060 XT 16GB comes up about 9% slower than the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB at 1080p overall.

Gen-on-gen, though, the RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms the RX 7600 XT by about 44% at 1080p, overall, while the RX 9060 XT 8GB similarly comes in about 46% faster than the RX 7600 at 1080p overall.

At 1440p, the story is similar for the RX 9060 XT, with it coming in about 9% slower than the RTX 5060 Ti, overall. For the RX 9060 XT 8GB, the gap widens a bit as it comes in about 8% slower than the RTX 5060, overall.

At 1440p, the gen-on-gen performance improvement is even greater, with the RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforming the RX 7600 XT by about 53% overall, while the RX 9060 XT 8GB outperforms the RX 7600 by a massive 62.5% overall.

In terms of power consumption, the peak power consumption of the RX 9060 XT cards are in line with where the RTX 5060 Ti lands and slightly above the listed TDP for the two cards. The RTX 5060, meanwhile, comes in a good bit lower at peak, in my tests.

Temperature, meanwhile, will largely depend on the model card you end up buying, as they will all have different cooling systems. That said, the Sapphire Pulse RX 9060 XT 16GB stayed a few degrees cooler than the Asus Dual RX 9060 XT 8GB in my tests, buy your mileage may vary.

The output ports on an AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

In the end, the RX 9060 XT cards kept things pretty close to their respective competition from Nvidia, though couldn't quite overtake them, even considering that I didn't factor Blender Benchmark's results into the final creative score for any of the cards tested, given that I wasn't able to run it on three of the cards in question.

Had those tests run successfully and been factored into the final scores, the two Nvidia cards would have pulled further ahead, most likely.

But would they have pulled far enough ahead to justify buying them? In the case of the RX 9060 XT 8GB, the RTX 5060 simply offers you a better value given that both can be purchased for MSRP right now, but if you don't want to give Nvidia your money, you're not really losing anything by going with the RX 9060 XT 8GB instead.

For the RX 9060 XT 16GB, though, it comes within just a few points of the RTX 5060 Ti at a much lower price, making it the one I'd recommend to anyone shopping for a GPU in this price range.

Performance: 4.5 / 5

Should you buy the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT?

A masculine hand holding an AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT — (Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT Scorecard
Category	Notes	Score
Value	Both RX 9060 XT cards offer great value for their price.	4.5 / 5
Specs & features	While the 16GB option for the RX 9060 XT is great, 8GB is just too little for a modern GPU.	3.5 / 5
Design	Since there's no AMD reference card for either version of the RX 9060 XT, your design will vary depending on which card you get. The ones I tested were fine, but nothing spectacular.	3.5 / 5
Performance	Both RX 9060 XT versions are capable cards with fantastic gen-on-gen performance, though Nvidia's competing offerings edge them out slightly.	4.5 / 5
Final score	While both RX 9060 XT cards don't quite overtake Nvidia's competing cards, they offer a very compelling value for gamers, especially those who are getting tired of what Nvidia has been offering lately.	4 / 5

Buy the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT if...

You want excellent 1080p gaming
If you're still gaming at 1080p, these cards are fantastic.

You're making the move to 1440p gaming
If you just got a new 1440p gaming monitor and want to upgrade your GPU to handle the higher resolution, both of these cards are solid picks for 1440p.

You don't want to spend a fortune
While $300-350 isn't cheap, for graphics cards with this kind of performance, they're both excellent values.

Don't buy it if...

You want the best possible performance
While the RX 9060 XT cards performed very well, Nvidia's RTX 5060 Ti 16GB and RTX 5060 are still the better GPUs if you want the best performance.

You want to game at 4K
The RX 9060 XT 16GB can play some titles at 4K without ray tracing, largely thanks to upscaling, though it definitely struggles. The RX 9060 XT 8GB can only game at this resolution with some pretty heavy compromises.

You can afford to get the AMD RX 9070
If you have some room in your budget, moving up to the RX 9070 is definitely recommended if you want a more future-proofed gaming rig.

How I tested the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT

I spent about three weeks with the RX 9060 XT 16GB and 8GB versions
I used my complete GPU testing suite to analyze the card's performance
I tested the card in everyday, gaming, creative, and AI workload usage

Test System Specs

Here are the specs on the system I used for testing:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite WiFi 7 ICE
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
CPU Cooler: Gigabyte Auros Waterforce II 360 ICE
RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6600 (2 x 16GB)
SSD: Samsung 9100 Pro 4TB SSD
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower PF3 1050W Platinum
Case: Praxis Wetbench

I spent about three weeks with both RX 9060 XT cards, using my standard suite of benchmark tests with industry standard tools like 3DMark, PassMark, PugetBench for Creators, and more.

For gaming, I use built-in benchmark tools in games like Black Myth: Wukong, Cyberpunk 2077, and F1 2024.

I also used both cards for about a week each as the GPU in my own PC at home where I used it for work, content creation, and gaming outside of formal testing.

Originally reviewed June 2025

These Rokid Max 2 glasses have a feature every pair of AR smart glasses needs to have

11:00 pm | June 22, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Software Virtual Reality & Augmented Reality | Tags: AR, UK, US | Comments: Off

Rokid Max 2: One-minute review

The Rokid Max 2 AR glasses are a solid pair of smart specs that are ideal for entertainment – watching films, and playing games – if you’re a fan of the big-screen experience, and especially if you’d like to take that experience on the go.

They boast a comfortable design which you can wear for hours, and while they’re generally very similar to rival smart glasses they do boast built-in myopia adjustment. Using a dial above each lens you can adjust the screens to suit a prescription in the 0.00D to -6.00D range without the need for add-on lenses.

This factor alone will be enough to win over some who have been frustrated by the difficulty of getting prescription lenses for other smart glasses.

Performance-wise they sit in the middle of the pack, with a solid 600-nit full-HD image from their 120Hz OLED displays. At a 50-degree field of view they can produce a large virtual screen, though their rivals can offer bigger.

What’s more, their audio is only, in a word, fine. You could make do without headphones if you’re at home, but if you’re out and about, or want the best possible sound, Bluetooth cans are a must.

At their full price of $529 / £399 this performance is a little disappointing, but at their regularly discounted price of $429 / £319 or less they're a much more compelling option in the smart glasses space.

If you won’t be advantaged by the myopia adjustment, though, you’ll probably prefer one of their competitors, such as the more affordable and impressive RayNeo Air 3S which feature on our best smart glasses list. But the convenient adjustments are a massive benefit that shouldn’t be ignored by people who would benefit from them.

The Rokid Max 2 smart glasses — (Image credit: Future / Hamish)

Rokid Max 2: Price and availability

Available in the US and UK for $529 / £399
They can often be found discounted

The Rokid Max 2 AR glasses are available in the US and UK priced at $529 / £399, though you can often find them discounted for $429 / £319 at sites including Rokid’s own store.

If you get them for full price you’re probably overpaying compared to some of their rivals (at least in the US), but at a discounted price the Rokid Max 2 AR glasses are a very competitive option.

You can turn the glasses into a more standalone device by picking up the Rokid Station – an Android TV puck for the specs – for an additional $199 / £159 (though we’ve often seen this discounted to $139 / £109)

Value: 3.5/5

Rokid Max 2: Design

Lightweight and comfortable design
Myopia adjustments between 0.00D and -6.00D
Polarized outer lens and cover to cut out background distractions

We’ve been here before. These Rokid Max 2 smart glasses, like others of their kind, look a lot like sunglasses, albeit with thicker frames, and a few details which become noticeable on closer inspection.

There's a USB-C port at the end of the left arm for connecting them to compatible devices via their USB-C to USB-C cable. There are control switches on the right arm for volume and screen brightness, and replaceable nose clips, so you can find the best fit for your face.

They’re comfortable to wear – at 2.65oz / 75g they’re very lightweight, and can be easily worn for hours at a time.

Plus, to help the glasses’ image stand out while you’re using them, you have two backdrop options.

The more open choice are the glasses’ polarized lenses. These cut out background distractions but still allow some light in – perfect for keeping an eye on your surroundings while you watch a show.

You can also outfit the specs with their lens cover to block out all light and enjoy an improved (but more closed off) visual experience. There’s much less background light to compete with the image, giving it a sharper look and brighter colors, though you will have to be okay with being cut off from the outside world.

I’ve become quite used to electrochromic dimming tech in these sort of glasses, which has its advantages – chiefly it’s easier to swap between full immersion and full passthrough in a pinch – but the Rokid Max 2’s approach has proved itself as the next best thing in my testing thanks to its simplicity yet effectiveness.

Something the Rokid specs bring to the table which is fairly unique is built-in myopia adjustment. A dial above each lens allows you to adjust the screen in real-time from 0.00D to -6.00D.

This won’t be ideal for every user, but it’s certainly a handy upgrade that will mean fewer people will need to buy an optional lens upgrade to make the smart glasses usable.

Design: 4.5/5

Rokid Max 2: Performance

Uses Sony micro-OLED panels
120Hz refresh rate, 600-nit brightness, full-HD image
Mediocre audio

Rokid Max 2 AR glasses being used to play a game — (Image credit: Rokid)

With Sony micro-OLED panels – which in conjunction with the optical setup boast a 120Hz refresh rate, 600-nit brightness, and 100,000:1 contrast ratio – the full-HD image these glasses can produce is really good.

That's especially the case when you use the lens cover as a backdrop. With a complete lack of background light the image can seriously pop, with good contrast and bright colors, that, combined with a 50-degree field of view that leaves space for a giant virtual screen, create an immersive private cinema experience.

I used the Rokid Max 2 glasses to watch several shows and films including Captain America: Brave New World and Dandadan, and played games by connecting the specs to my PS5 – using them, among other things, to collect the last few Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 trophies I was missing.

Audio-wise the glasses aren’t bad, but they’re nothing to write home about either.

Their performance is passable if you’re in a quiet space, but they can feel a little lacking at times, with dialogue and music coming through the built-in speakers feeling as if it's been hollowed out. My advice: pick up a pair of the best Bluetooth headphones along with these specs (if you don’t already have some) if you want to get the best experience.

Not only will this improve the sound, it’ll help you to minimize ambient noise if you wear the smart glasses while traveling on a plane or train, which are the best places to use these kinds of AR specs.

The only let-down performance-wise is that the optical system the glasses use can mean the image is disrupted by reflections.

The glasses use lenses to reflect the OLED screen’s image into your eyes, but that same lens can also reflect your chest into your view as well. In darker environments it’s less noticeable, and unless you’re wearing something very loud it’s generally not too distracting, but since testing the Xreal One Pros which use a different (and better) lens setup I’ve found the issue is much more pronounced on other glasses, and that's certainly the case here.

That said, the Xreal One Pros cost considerably more, and if you haven't tried those specs and been spoiled by their new approach to AR optics, which minimizes issues with reflections, you shouldn’t find too many reasons to get frustrated by the Rokid Max 2 and other glasses with the older style of lenses.

Performance score: 3.5/5

Should you buy the Rokid Max 2 glasses?

Attribute	Notes	Score
Performance	Performance-wise the Rokid Max 2 glasses are, in a word, fine. We've seen and heard worse, we've seen and heard better.	3.5/5
Design	The myopia adjustment helps elevate the Rokid Max 2 experience for prescription-glasses users, but they're not quite flawless in other areas.	4.5/5
Value	If you can pick up the Rokid for a discounted price it’s much better value; at its list price it’s a less appealing option compared to the competition.	3.5/5

Buy them if…

You have prescription glasses
If you need eye glasses and a prescription in the 0.00D to -6.00D range these specs have in-built myopia adjustment that’ll save you having to pay extra for a lens insert to use these smart glasses.

You travel a lot
Smart glasses are perfect for travelers – I use them all the time while commuting to work on the train, or when I fly.

You want privacy
These glasses can help you hide what you’re watching from people around you while still letting you see the screen, making it perfect for binging that comfort watch you’re embarrassed to admit you like, or to get some work done while commuting without having people peeking over your shoulder.

Don't buy them if…

You’re getting them at full price
The glasses seem to be perpetually on sale at Rokid’s own store, and the reduced cost is a much better deal than paying full price.

You want the best specs possible
The Rokid Max 2 glasses are good, but there are better options out there, though they will generally cost you more.

You want 4K
If you’re waiting for 4K quality visuals you’ll need to keep waiting, as like every other pair out there the Rokid Max 2 glasses are full-HD only.

Also consider

Xreal One
The Xreal One AR smart glasses cost more at $499 / £449, and offer a better HD image and enhanced Bose audio.
Read our Xreal One review

RayNeo Air 3S
These budget smart glasses punch well above their weight with an overall quality that's generally on a par (even slightly better in some ways) than these Rokid glasses, though they do have downsides.

Read our: RayNeo Air 3S reviewView Deal

Meta Quest 3
While not a direct competitor to these AR smart glasses, the Quest 3 is an XR product you should consider if you want to experience what VR and MR have to offer – it’s simply superb.
Read our Meta Quest 3 reviewView Deal

How I tested the Rokid Max 2 AR glasses

To review the Rokid Max 2 glasses I tested them over a two-week period, using them in a variety of environments including at home, on a plane, and on the train.

I mostly used the glasses with my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 to watch movies and shows, but using an HDMI-to-USB-C cable I was also able to use the Rokid Max 2 to enjoy some gaming through my PS5, which allowed me to test their refresh rate and input delay, and see if the specs helped or hindered my gaming abilities.

First reviewed June 2025

Xreal has changed the game with its One Pro AR smart glasses, and I think I’m in love

4:00 pm | June 18, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Computers Computing Gadgets Software Virtual Reality & Augmented Reality | Comments: Off

Xreal One Pro: One-minute review

After testing the Xreal One glasses I declared them the best smart glasses you could buy, and as you’d hope from an upgraded model, the Xreal One Pro glasses have just bested them.

Overall the specs are more similar than different, but the ways in which they do differ make a world of difference.

The larger 57-degree field of view allows for a bigger image – perfect for a private movie night – and the image quality is better too, thanks not only to the Pro model using the latest Sony micro-OLED displays, but also to a new optic engine which allows the specs to achieve a higher 700-nit perceived brightness, and reduces distracting reflections and blurriness.

On top of the upgrades you can also look forward to the same solid audio tuned by Bose engineers, 120Hz 1080p visuals, an electrochromically dimmable lens backdrop, and a sleek design which helps make the Xreal Ones and now the Xreal One Pros excellent.

There are just two downsides. For one, the Xreal One Pro glasses are 3g heavier than the Xreal Ones at 87g, which is admittedly a fairly minor difference. The bigger issue is that they’re pricer – these glasses will set you back $649 / £579.

The Xreal One Pro smart glasses — The Xreal Eye (Image credit: Future / Hamish Hector)

Factor in add-on costs like the $199 / £189 Xreal Beam Pro, prescription lenses (if you need them) and extra adapters (like an HDMI to USB-C cable), and the complete Xreal One Pro package can get very expensive. You don’t need these add-ons, as the Xreal One Pro glasses come with enough in their box to use them with a wide range of compatible devices, but they're a lot better with add-ons like the Beam Pro.

That said, the Xreal One Pro are meant to be a high-end offering, and you can absolutely see what you’re paying extra for. That's why they've cemented themselves as one of the best smart glasses of 2025.

If you have the cash to splash you’ll be delighted by what the Xreal One Pro offer as an entertainment and productivity device. If, however, you’re on a budget there are more affordable options that offer excellent value for money, even if they’re not able to match the Pro’s highs.

Xreal One Pro: Price and Availability

Costs $649 / £579
On the pricier side of things, but boast high-end specs

A pair of Xreal One Pro glasses cost $649 / £579 which puts them on the higher end of the smart glasses spectrum. For that you’ll get the glasses, a USB-C to USB-C cable, a cleaning cloth, and a hard carry case.

If you’re looking to improve them you can grab the Xreal Beam Pro for $199 / £189. It’s a phone-like Android device with nifty features like a camera setup for 3d spatial photography, easy access to a suite of apps for downloading and watching shows, and two ports so you can use your glasses and charge the Beam Pro at the same time.

There’s also the Xreal Eye for $99 / £99. Right now it is just a camera for snapping some simple photos, but it slots into the glasses comfortably and might allow for some other exclusive features in the future.

Value: 4/5

Xreal One Pro: Design

New optical design is best yet
Comfortable to wear for hours
Offer electrochromic dimming

At a quick glance the Xreal One Pro glasses look almost identical to the base Xreal One specs.

They both resemble typical sunglasses with a few noticeably technological features. For a start one arm has a USB-C port at the end so you can use a cable to tether the spaces to a compatible USB-C device (like a phone, computer, or console).

They have the same button layout – a button on the top of the right arm to quickly swap into transparency mode, as well as a brightness control button (which adjusts the electronic dimming, and the brightness of the image) and a red menu control button on the bottom.

There’s even the same interchangeable nose clips and hard carry case, though their cleaning cloths are different colors (the Pro uses a gray cloth while the regular model uses black).

But one obvious change is the optical setup.

Smart glasses like this use lenses to reflect an OLED screen into your eyes so you can see the screen and what’s going on behind it. The Xreal One Pro glasses have a new shape of lens which is flat and thinner, rather than being chunky and more triangular in shape.

This means the resulting image is disrupted by fewer reflections caused by light from the world around you, and it’s able to boast a wider field of view to boot (giving you a larger virtual image, more on that below).

It’s also easier to look through these lenses when the screen isn’t in use than with the Xreal One glasses. Previously transparency mode was good for simply quickly checking your surroundings, whereas now I’m comfortable moving around while wearing the Xreal One Pro glasses in this mode.

Design: 5/5

Xreal One Pro: Performance

700-nit bright 120Hz full-HD image
Bose tuned audio from in-built speakers
57-degree field of view provides a giant virtual screen

The Xreal One Pro glasses deliver a truly superb performance that’s a Pro-worthy upgrade over the base Xreal One glasses.

This is thanks to the new optical engine I touched on above as well as new Sony OLED panels which combine to deliver some top-notch stats.

You’re getting 700 nits of perceived brightness (100 more than the Xreal One) which helps to further improve contrast and make bright scenes dazzle – qualities which are further aided by the black backdrop provided by the outer lenses with electrochromic dimming.

The field of view is now larger too, at 57-degrees. This makes the virtual screen much larger at a max size of 171-inches – for comparison the 50-degree Xreal One boasted a max screen size of 147-inch.

It’s further enhanced by the optical engine’s reduced blurriness and lack of reflections. The old shape of lens used by other smart glasses can reflect light from the outside world into your eyes distorting the image. Thanks to its new design the Xreal One Pro has far fewer reflections which makes for a far superior viewing experience.

If I’m ever travelling with a pair of smart glasses again, it’ll be these – no doubt about it.

As for the audio the Bose tuned sound is just as impressive as it was with the Xreal One glasses.

That is to say at home you’ll be fine just relying on the glasses’ in-built speakers but while travelling you’ll want a pair of headphones – not only to reduce the noise from the outside world, but reduce the noise your glasses cause.

Headphones are still an upgrade when using the smart specs at home, but with the Xreal One Pro glasses (as with the Xreal Ones) they don’t feel like a necessity for a good sonic experience.

Thanks to its plethora of upgrades the only remaining gripe is still that the image quality is still only 1,080p (full-HD) rather than 4K. 4K is a barrier other smart glasses have yet to cross, and frankly the image looks pretty darn good even at this lower resolution and runs at 120Hz which is nothing to sniff at.

Performance: 5/5

Should you buy the Xreal One Pro?

Xreal One Pro scorecard
Attribute	Notes	Score
Design	The Xreal One Pro glasses don’t mix up the formula much, but there was already a lot to love and their new optical design has only elevated the experience.	5/5
Performance	With a bright 700-nit 120Hz full-HD display, Bose tuned audio, and reduced reflections which make combine into first-class performance.	5/5
Value	The Xreal One Pro glasses are expensive but they’re also an excellent pair of smart specs which makes them solid value for money.	4/5

Buy it if...

You demand peak performance
The Xreal One Pro glasses are very very good. If you’re after the best pair money can buy for entertainment, that’s these glasses.

You want a (near) complete package
Ignoring the need for a device to connect them to, thanks to their great visuals and solid sound the Xreal One Pro glasses feel like a complete package rather than necessitating add-ons like headphones to make up for their sonic deficiencies (something which can’t be said of many of their predecessors).

You appreciate privacy
With the glasses on you can put your phone in your pocket or adjust your laptop settings to ensure only you can see your screen even in public places.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a budget
The Xreal One Pro glasses are great, but very pricey. You can spend less on alternatives like the base Xreal One glasses or non-Xreal alternatives such as the RayNeo Air 3S and still get something good (albeit not as good).

You don’t plan to get a Beam Pro
You don’t need a Beam Pro to use the Xreal One Pro, but it’s easily the best Xreal glasses add-on out there and runs right up to the line of being a must-buy for Xreal’s specs.

You want Android XR
The Beam Pro, even with the Xreal Eye, doesn’t seem like it’ll support Android XR – if you want Xreal’s Android XR glasses you’ll need to wait a little longer for Project Aura to launch.

Also consider

Xreal One
The Xreal One AR smart glasses cost less at $499 / £449, and offer a solid HD image and Bose audio, but their overall picture quality isn't as impressive.
Read our Xreal One review

RayNeo Air 3S
These budget smart glasses punch well above their weight. Their overall quality doesn't match that of the Xreal One Pro, but if you're after the bets value pair you can find it's these.

Read our: RayNeo Air 3S reviewView Deal

Meta Quest 3
While not a direct competitor to the Xreal One Pro glasses, the Quest 3 is an XR product that you should consider if you want to experience what VR and MR have to offer – it’s simply superb.
Read our Meta Quest 3 reviewView Deal

How I tested the Xreal One Pro

I tested the Xreal One pro glasses over a couple of weeks and predominantly used them with the Xreal Beam Pro, my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, and my computer.

I would also frequently use noise cancelling headphones with them as I love to wear them when travelling, but I made sure to test their in-built speakers in a range of environments to judge their performance.

I also directly compared them with the Xreal One glasses to get a sense of the upgrades the One Pros deliver.

First reviewed: June 2025

« Previous Page — Next Page »