Organizer
Gadget news
HoverAir X1 PRO review: the ultimate selfie drone
8:53 pm | October 31, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Drones Gadgets | Comments: Off

HoverAir X1 PRO & PROMAX: one-minute review

With all the recent hype surrounding the launch of the DJI Neo, we can't forget that it was the HoverAir X1 that originally delivered highly effective and, indeed, exciting selfie drone functionality to the mainstream. Building on the success of the HoverAir X1, ZeroZero Robotics has created two new models aimed at more demanding users, with upgraded cameras, improved performance and some interesting new accessories.

The HoverAir X1 PRO and HoverAir X1 PROMAX are more advanced models that will sit alongside the original HoverAir X1. So, this puts more advanced selfie drones at a total of four to choose from. I've flown and reviewed both the DJI Neo and the HoverAir X1, and although both are fantastic drones, for me it's the HoverAir drones that excel in this niche yet growing corner of the drone market.

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX in hand

(Image credit: James Abbott)

With camera drones and FPV drones dominating, the success of selfie drones is a welcome surprise, and they offer something different. The HoverAir X1 PRO is aimed at snow sports and cycling, while the higher-end HoverAir X1 PROMAX is aimed at professional content creation. However, both perform equally well in those scenarios, so cost and camera requirements will be the deciding factor for many people.

Without going into too much detail, and focusing on the profound similarities between the HoverAir X1 PRO and HoverAir X1 PROMAX, both drones offer a variety of intelligent flight modes with drone-only activation, and manual flight control with the smartphone app and a separately available controller.

So, what are the key differences between the two models? We'll go into more detail later, but the PRO can capture 4K video up to 60fps with FHD available up to 120fps, while the PROMAX can capture 8K video up to 30fps with 4K and FHD available up to 120fps alongside 4K 10-bit HLG up to 60fps. Both capture photos in JPEG format.

HoverAir X1 Pro: specs

HoverAir X1 Pro: release date and price

  • Released September 26 2024
  • Several kit options are available
  • More expensive than the DJI Neo

The HoverAir X1 PRO & PROMAX were first available via Indiegogo after a successful crowdfunding campaign, and are now available on the HoverAir website with a shipping date of November 2, with multiple kit options and accessories available. The Standard kit, which includes the drone, one battery, a USB-C cable and a soft storage bag costs $499 / £459 for the PRO while the PROMAX costs $699 / £639. Pricing for Australia is in USD.

The Combo kit includes all of the above plus a second battery, charging hub, 65W power adaptor and a combo case. The PRO version costs $679 / £629 while the PROMAX version costs $879 / £799. This does make the two drones quite expensive for the two main kits that are available, and will likely mean they face fierce competition from the less expensive DJI Neo.

There are also several accessories available, so here's a breakdown of the prices for some of the options available. The PowerCase is $169 / £155, the Beacon and Joystick bundle is $228 / £208, the Multi-function Carry Bag is $79 / £69, the HandleBar Mount is $20, and the ND Filter set is $69 / £65. Buying a Combo kit and several accessories takes the cost of a HoverAir X1 Pro or PROMAX kit into the same price bracket as the DJI Air 3, so this is something to consider.

  • Price score: 4/5

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX OLED screen

(Image credit: James Abbott)

HoverAir X1 Pro: design and handling

  • Compact folding design
  • Enclosed propellers
  • Excellent manual flight control via the app

Both the HoverAir X1 PRO and PROMAX feature an identical lightweight folding design that makes them a similar height and width, but slightly shorter than a VHS cassette when folded. At just 6.75oz / 191.5g and 6.79oz / 192.5g respectively, you'll barely even realise you're carrying them, and both will easily fit inside a jacket pocket.

HoverAir X1 PROMAX key specs

Camera: 1/1.3in CMOS & 16mm lens
Video resolution: Up to 8K
Frame rates: 8K up to 30fps, 4K up to 120fps, 10-bit HLG up to 60fps, FHD up to 120fps
Video transmission range: Phone (App): 500 m / Beacon (Controller) up to 1km
Flight modes: Manual flight and multiple intelligent flight modes
Battery: 1920mAh / up to 16 minutes flight time
Charger type: USB-C cable, charging hub, 65W power adapter
Weight: 6.79oz / 192.5g
Dimensions: 4.13 x 5.86 x 1.34in / 105 x 149 x 34mm folded / 6.81 x 5.86 x 1.53in / 173 x 149 x 39mm unfolded

The overall design is minimalistic, with just a single button surrounded by a directional selector button with a small OLED screen above. This is all you need to initiate flight with just the drone, although to adjust settings and intelligent flight mode parameters you will need to connect the drone to the smartphone app.

The propellers are fully enclosed in a tough plastic frame that keeps the propellers, people and objects safe. Plus, they can withstand bumps and crashesm – and, yes, this was put to the test when I turned quickly on a skateboard ramp and knocked the drone out of the air onto concrete.

The PRO and PROMAX are great at following subjects, but erratic movements where direction is changed in a split second can be problematic, because the drones can't respond quickly enough. Most of the time in these situations, the drones simply lose the subject.

The 1920mAh batteries are advertised to provide up to 16 minutes of flight time, and I was achieving flight times close to this in autumn temperatures, so this appears to be reliable.

Of course, this is nowhere near as long as a traditional camera drone, but the PRO and PROMAX are more suited to short bursts of flight, whether using the intelligent flight modes or manual control. Thermal batteries are available separately for use in cold climates with temperatures as low as -4F / -20C.

Image 1 of 5

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX unfolded for flight

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 5

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX bottom of drone

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 5

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX enclosed propellers

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 5

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX combo case with drone and accessories

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 5

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX combo case

(Image credit: James Abbott)

To prepare the drones for flight, you simply fold the propeller guards out from beneath the airframe and you're ready to go once they're switched on and the desired mode is selected. This can be with just the drone, using the Hover X1 app or using a physical controller that's available separately and we'll cover that in the next section. Once you've finished flying, simply switch off and fold the drone and the gimbal tilts down to protect the lens.

Hover X1 app showing manual flight controls

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Going back to the Hover X1 app, the manual flight interface has been drastically improved and now works in horizontal mode with left and right virtual controls, overlaid on the large camera view, which allows you to enjoy the same level of control as a physical controller.

Admittedly, it's not as good as a physical controller, but I was able to achieve complex maneuvers using both controls at the same time while also incorporating gimbal movement.

This may not sound overly impressive, but for app-based drone control I was hugely impressed and this is the best application of virtual controls that I've ever used. I can confidently say that even if you were to not buy the physical controller, you can still enjoy camera drone-style manual flight, albeit at a shorter distance, with just the Hover X1 app.

  • Design score: 5/5

HoverAir X1 Pro: features and performance

  • Fast follow flight speeds
  • Intelligent flight modes
  • Palm take off

The main flight aspect of the HoverAir X1 PRO and PROMAX is the intelligent flight modes that use advanced AI algorithms to both track the subject and keep them in the centre of the frame. Just like the original HoverAir X1, the PRO and PROMAX perform superbly when tracking or flying around both static and moving subjects. One feature that makes flying and landing simple is palm take-off and landing, although you can land the drones like a camera drone when using the physical controller.

Both drones can achieve a follow flight speed of up to an impressive 26mph, with bursts up to 37mph. During testing, while cycling, both had no problems keeping up, but what was interesting and to a degree frustrating was the seemingly slow horizontal flight when flying manually. This was even after increasing the speed rates for the drones within Joystick settings in the Hover X1 app where 22.3mph should be possible.

The PRO and PROMAX have wind resistance Level 5, which equates to 24mph and is high when you consider the size and weight of the drone. It wasn't tested in winds of this level, but in gusts approaching 20mph, the two drones showed no signs of struggling and video remained smooth. Both can also fly over water, snow, cliffs and at night when OmniTerrain is active.

Image 1 of 3

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX OLED screens

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 3

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX together

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 3

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX together

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The PRO and PROMAX, unlike the HoverAir X1, feature active collision detection with the PRO having active rear-side collision detection thanks to a proximity sensor, while the PROMAX offers this alongside vision-based rear-side collision detection using a vision sensor for more effective collision avoidance. Both systems work well when using the intelligent flight modes, but collision avoidance on the whole isn’t as effective as a 360-degree system.

The intelligent flight modes include Hover, Zoom Out, Follow, Orbit, Bird's Eye, Dolly Track and Side Track. All of these work as you'd expect, with Follow, Dolly Track and Side Track being the most fun.

Tracking performance is also excellent and the drones were able to navigate complex environments with ease. There's also Return to Home functionality that's particularly useful when flying the drone manually, but you do have to keep an eye on the video feed for potential obstacles.

Another difference between the two drones is the amount of onboard storage they offer, with the PRO having 32GB and the PROMAX packing in 64GB. This makes sense since the PROMAX is capable of capturing 8K video which has high storage demands. Both can also take microSD cards up to a 1GB capacity.

One aspect of the PRO and PROMAX that hugely improves useability and extends performance is the optional accessories. Whether or not you'll need these will come down to you, but they are all cleverly designed and transform the PRO and PROMAX into more of a drone system than simple selfie drones.

The Beacon is a small unit with a screen that improves subject tracking and can even be used to control the drones manually, although this is fiddly. The Beacon does improve tracking and provides the ability to change intelligent flight modes alongside displaying the camera view where you can capture video and shoot photos.

Image 1 of 6

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX one handed controller

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 6

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX carry bag

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 6

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX beacon and joystick bundle

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 6

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX beacon attached to bike

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 6

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX joystick controller

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 6 of 6

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX ND filters

(Image credit: James Abbott)

This does undoubtedly provide reliable tracking as tested when cycling using the HandleBar Mount, but the tracking the drones are capable of without the Beacon is so effective that it's not possible to say how much better the Beacon is. The Beacon screen with video record and photo buttons alongside the Live View is still useful and using the Beacon does instil confidence.

The Beacon is best paired with the Joysticks that can be used to create a one-handed motion controller, used together with the Beacon screen providing the camera view, or all of the above with your smartphone acting as the screen. The Joysticks attach to the end of the Beacon with grips that fold down to provide an impressive controller option.

Using the Beacon alone or as part of a controller option extends the range of the drone from up to 1640ft / 500m with the app to 3280ft / 1km with the Beacon. For the former, I'm not sure how reliable this is because when flying at 80m directly overhead I lost the video feed in the Hover X1 app, although I did maintain control of the drone.

Beacon-based control works well, although using early firmware has thrown up some connectivity issues when using a phone attached to the controller; these were being ironed out with updates during the testing period. There's also a Magnetic Clip for the Beacon to attach it to clothing, a Magnetic Adaptor Mount and a Handlebar Mount which make attaching the Beacon to yourself or your bike incredibly simple.

Image 1 of 2

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX power case

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 2

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX  power case

(Image credit: James Abbott)

One accessory that's incredibly innovative and, indeed, useful, is the PowerCase for X1 PRO and PROMAX. This is a hard case where you attach an adaptor to the PRO or PROMAX and the case provides around 2.5 battery charges. There's a window that allows you to see the current charge level on the drone's OLED screen, and a strap can be attached for easy carrying. This case allows you to take out just the drone and a single battery, with plenty of charge for a day out.

Other accessories include a set of four ND filters for controlling shutter speed when capturing video. These are comprised of ND8, ND16, ND32 and ND64 filters in a small hard case. There's also a Multi-functional Carry Bag, which is a great way to carry the drones around and the bag can also be attached to the crossbar of bikes by unzipping the centre of the bag and using the enclosed Velcro straps.

  • Features & performance score: 5/5

HoverAir X1 Pro: image and video quality

  • PROMAX offers the best image quality
  • Video is great with both drones
  • Photo quality is good but not great

HoverAir X1 PRO / PROMAX camera

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Being a selfie drone with intelligent tracking capabilities, both the PRO and PROMAX produce better quality video than photos, with the PROMAX being the superior of the two. It's also the camera department where these two near-identical drones differ with the PRO sporting a 1/2in CMOS sensor with an equivalent focal length of 17mm. The PROMAX features a 1/1.3in CMOS sensor and 7-layer lens, alongside up to 14 stops of dynamic range and an equivalent focal length of 16mm.

The operation of the cameras and settings is identical for each drone, but the PRO is capable of capturing video in 4K at up to 60fps and 1080p at up to 120fps for slow motion capture. The PROMAX expands greatly on this with 8K up to 30fps, 4K at up to 120FPS for slow motion capture, 4K 10-bit HLG up to 60fps and 1080p up to 120fps. Image quality from both is great overall, although the PROMAX does excel here with improved image quality for both photos and videos.

File sizes for 8K videos are huge, and the need for most people to export at this resolution is limited. But with the PROMAX you can capture at 8K and export at 4K to produce sharp results with a future-proofed original resolution. But only if you have the storage available to keep such large video files. There are also 2.7K and 1080p vertical video options with both drones at frame rates up to 60fps.

Image 1 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 6 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 7 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 8 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 9 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 10 of 10

Photo taken with the HoverAir X1 Pro / PROMAX

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Photo quality is good, but you can only capture stills in JPEG format and JPEG processing is visible at all ISO levels. Plus, naturally, color rendition is reduced as the ISO setting is increased so higher ISO photos do appear less saturated than those taken at lower settings. With the PROMAX being aimed more at content creation, the ability to capture photos in DNG format would make sense but is unfortunately unavailable.

The PRO captures photos at 4000x3000px with the ability to use a 2X zoom that produces photos at this resolution with little loss in image quality. The PROMAX can capture in this mode with the zoom feature available, or at a higher 8000x6000px resolution. The larger sensor of the PROMAX undoubtedly produces better image quality, but the PRO remains impressive overall.

  • Image and video quality score: 4/5

X1 Pro Max Beacon tracking video

X1 Pro Intelligent flight modes video

X1 PRO App and controller video

HoverAir X1 PRO & PROMAX: testing scorecard

Should I buy the HoverAir X1 PRO or the PROMAX?

Buy it if...

You want to track your adventures
The HoverAir X1 Pro and PROMAX are the best selfie drones available and are fantastic at tracking moving subjects, both drone-only and using the Beacon.

You value innovative design
These drones and their companion accessories are incredibly innovative and easy to use. They offer a true balance of style and substance.

You'd like a compact selfie drone
The folding aspect of the PRO and PROMAX makes them incredibly portable alongside their compact and lightweight design.

Don't buy it if...

You would like a more powerful drone
The HoverAir X1 PRO and PROMAX offer a wind resistance of Level 5, but larger medium-sized camera drones are much more suited to windy conditions.

You don’t want or need tracking functionality
The main point of selfie drones is their subject-tracking capabilities, so if you don’t want a drone primarily for this the PRO and PROMAX aren’t for you.

You're on a budget
The HoverAir X1 PRO and PROMAX aren't the cheapest selfie drones available, so if you're on a tight budget consider the DJI Neo which is much less expensive.

HoverAir X1 PRO & PROMAX: also consider

How I tested the HoverAir X1 PRO & PROMAX

  • All features and functions tested
  • All accessories tested
  • Flown in challenging conditions

The HoverAir X1 Pro and PROMAX were tested primarily for their subject tracking capabilities using slower and faster-moving activities to test this. Each flight mode was used alongside manual flight with the Hover X1 app and the Joysticks attached to the Beacon for a camera drone-like experience.

All video and photo modes were tested in a range of lighting conditions extending from bright sunlight to overcast to low light at dusk to push ISO settings. All accessories were also tested to see how much and how well they enhanced the overall useability of the PRO and PROMAX.

Having previously reviewed the HoverAir X1 and the DJI Neo, I was aware of what to expect with drones of this type. But with enhanced features including faster flight speeds, it was possible to push these drones harder to fully experience their capabilities.

First reviewed October 2024

Leica Q3 43 review: a stunning premium compact with a unique focal length
8:28 pm | October 29, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Compact Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Leica Q3 43: two-minute review

You know a camera’s special when you don’t want to return it after a review. Almost as soon as I got it in my hands, I knew that would be the case with the Leica Q3 43. To call this one of the best compact cameras is to do it a serious disservice: we’ve already waxed lyrical about how incredible the Q3 model is in our full Leica Q3 review – and this edition shares the same core qualities.

All of the Leica hallmarks are here: beautiful design, stunning build quality, and tactile handling. You get a powerful 60.3MP full-frame sensor, comfortably the most capable you’ll find in any compact camera, with support for 8K 30p video. You also get the same niggles as the standard Q3, including relatively average battery life and autofocus that’s bettered elsewhere. And, of course, there’s the eye-watering Leica price tag.

What sets this edition apart is the glass. This is still a fast, fixed-focal length affair, but the clue with the 43 is in the name: it’s fronted by a 43mm prime lens that’s meant to mimic the natural perspective of your eyes. Wider than 35mm, tighter than 50mm, that focal length offers an unusual field of view which somehow feels instantly and intuitively familiar.

Leica Q3 43 camera in hound, outside

(Image credit: Future)

Even more so than the standard Q3, the Q3 43 feels like the perfect everyday camera. Set aside the cost factor and you’ve got a sublime camera with a focal length that really invites you to view the world, and which also gives you the tools to capture it effectively. With a fast f/2 aperture at its widest, the specially designed APO-Summicron lens nails all of the benchmarks: beautifully smooth bokeh, minimal distortion, and absolutely pin-sharp detail.

That, combined with the high-resolution sensor, makes the Q3 43 a camera that's at home in almost any scenario. Having shot with it for a week, the 43mm focal length lends itself wonderfully to street portraiture, producing stills with a real sense of intimacy. Should you need to re-frame, you have a whole lot of pixels to play with.

There are many things that make the Leica Q3 43 truly unique. No other compact ships with a 43mm prime lens. And you don’t find too many cameras of any description with a 60MP full-frame sensor inside, let alone one that looks and feels this good to shoot with. In short, the Q3 43 is everything a compact camera should be. If you can afford its inordinate price tag, it’s one you’ll never want to leave home without.

Leica Q3 43 camera in hand, outside

(Image credit: Future)

Leica Q3 43: Specs

Leica Q3 43: Price and availability

  • Launched on 26 September 2024
  • Priced at $6,295 / £5,900 / AU$11,890

The Leica Q3 43 was released on 26 September 2024. It’s priced at $6,295 / £5,900 / AU$11,890, which means it will set you back more than many of the best mirrorless cameras. It’s an undeniably premium piece of kit with niche appeal. Red-dot cameras never come cheap, and what you’re paying for here goes beyond the spec sheet; it’s the Leica design, build quality, and shooting experience.

The 43 is slightly more expensive than the standard Leica Q3, which is priced at $5,995 / £5,300 / AU$9,790. At this end of the price spectrum, though, you won’t be choosing between the two cameras based on cost. Instead, it’ll come down to whether you’d prefer your full-frame Leica compact with a 28mm or 43mm focal length.

Leica Q3 43: Design

  • Identical body to the Leica Q3
  • Modern, minimalist design
  • Tactile controls and tilting touchscreen

Besides the lens, everything about the 43 is physically identical to the Leica Q3. That means you get the same weighty, magnesium die-cast construction, with the same beautifully pared-back design and the same wonderfully tactile control layout. There’s nothing quite like it at any price point, and you really have to hold the Q3 43 in your hands to appreciate the way it feels.

Everything about this camera is premium, from the weighting of the body to the perfectly judged resistance of the control rings. This is a camera that you want to handle, and one that rewards you with satisfying physical feedback at every turn. The manual focus ring is just one example: it’s so enjoyable to use that you might forget the Q3 43 also has an excellent autofocus option. It's the same story with the macro ring, which twists to reveal a different set of markings for close-up focusing.

This is the kind of camera that you’ll come back to, when it’s sitting on your kitchen counter or entrance hall table, just to pick it up and appreciate it. It's a camera that you’ll never want to leave home without – not only because you want to shoot stills with it, but because the Q3 43 makes it such a joy to do so.

That also extends to the interface, both physical and digital. Pressing and holding to customize buttons makes it easy to adapt the user experience to your liking, while the quick touch menu on the screen feels responsive and intuitive.

Image 1 of 3

Leica Q3 43 camera on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Leica Q3 43 camera on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Leica Q3 43 camera on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future)

That’s not to say it’s a perfect camera. Like the Leica Q3, the 43 has a small indentation on the rear which serves as a thumb rest, but the compact dimensions mean there isn’t much room for ergonomic sculpting – there are more comfortable cameras to grip over long periods.

As in our review of the Leica Q3, we also felt that the tilting touchscreen isn’t perfectly implemented. While it’s theoretically useful when you're shooting from the hip, it’s not the easiest display to pull out and adjust. During our time with the 43, we were more naturally drawn to the high-res 5.76m-dot viewfinder.

Really, though, it’s very hard to pick fault with a camera that feels as good to use as the Q3 43. Shoot with it for a day, and you’ll wonder how you’ll ever fully enjoy a different camera again.

Leica Q3 43: Features and performance

  • Phase detection autofocus
  • Lens-based image stabilization
  • Single SD UHS-II card slot

In most respects, the Leica Q3 43 shares its spec sheet with the Leica Q3. That includes the 60.3MP full-frame sensor, 8K 30p video recording, and Leica’s best phase-detection autofocus to date, complete with human tracking that’s broadly sticky. And like the Leica Q3, it also has some features which highlight its status as an everyday camera – albeit a very expensive one.

There’s the maximum burst speed of 15fps, which you can only use with the electronic shutter. You also get just one SD UHS-II card slot, while the lens-based image stabilization still can’t compete with the best. You can read more fully about how these features perform in our Leica Q3 review, but the takeaway is that this isn’t a camera with the outright performance to rival the best mirrorless cameras.

What you’re getting here is not a heavyweight workhorse, but a sublime tool for everyday use. That’s reflected in features such as Leica Looks: preset image styles which can be loaded via the Leica Fotos app over Wi-Fi, allowing less-experienced photographers to achieve different and dynamic effects with no editing. The original DNG files are kept, so it’s non-destructive.

Image 1 of 3

Leica Q3 43 camera in hound, outside

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Leica Q3 43 camera in hound, outside

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Leica Q3 43 camera in hound, outside

(Image credit: Future)

Leica Q3 43: Image quality

  • 60.3MP full-frame sensor
  • Fixed 43mm f/2 prime lens
  • Digital cropping up to 150mm

Where the Leica Q3 has an uncropped 28mm field of view similar to that of your smartphone’s primary camera, the 43 mimics human vision with its APO-Summicron 43mm f/2 ASPH lens. That gives you a slightly tighter crop than the more familiar 50mm prime, but a wider angle than the Q3, or any 35mm lenses you might have used. While it’s an unfamiliar number, it’s also an incredibly intuitive one.

By offering a natural, distortion-free view, that glass offers an intimate perspective. It’s one that invites you to look at the world and capture it, whether that’s a portrait, a street scene or something else entirely. Both when framing and reviewing what you’ve shot, there’s a sense of scenes being true to life, both in stills and video.

Specially designed for the 43, the APO-Summicron lens is tightly packaged and pin-sharp. Thanks to its fast f/2 aperture it’s capable of soft backgrounds and beautifully smooth bokeh, strengthening its credentials as a portrait star. We also detected minimal distortion in stills.

Image 1 of 6

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 2 of 6

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 3 of 6

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 4 of 6

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 5 of 6

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 6 of 6

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Paired with the Q3 43's 60.3MP full-frame sensor, this is a lens that can produce stunning images in a whole range of scenarios, from high-contrast backlit portraits to detailed macro shots. Low light wasn’t an issue either: the lens and sensor pairing seemed able to gather a fair amount of light, and where it was necessary to bump up the ISO we didn’t notice a huge loss of detail in the fine grain of noise.

Like the Leica Q3, you have the option to apply a digital crop. This doesn’t alter the perspective or depth of field, but it does give you the versatility to frame in on subjects. Starting at 43mm, you can apply the digital crop all the way up to 150mm, which is notably tighter than the 90mm maximum of the Leica Q3. It’s a useful trick, although I would generally prefer to crop in after the fact. Helpfully, the crop is only applied to JPEG files, with the full area retained in DNG raw files.

On the standard setting, JPEG images out of the Q3 43 are pleasingly sharp and dynamic. Colors can feel a little understated, but there’s a realism to JPEG stills that nicely complements the 43mm field of view. That said, we’d always advise recording shots in both JPEG and Leica’s DNG format, to give yourself maximum editing flexibility.

Image 1 of 3

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 2 of 3

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 3 of 3

Sample image shot with the Leica Q3 43

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Should I buy the Leica Q3 43?

Leica Q3 43 camera

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

You want the ultimate compact camera
With a high-resolution sensor, an incredibly sharp lens and a beautifully designed body, the Leica Q3 43 sets the benchmark for what a premium compact should look, feel, and shoot like.

You want a fresh, unique perspective
Giving a natural and intuitive perspective similar to that of the human eye, the 43mm prime lens is a unique proposition among premium compacts, offering a real sense of immersion.

You want to fall in love with photography again
Quite simply, the Leica Q3 43 is a sublime camera to shoot with. From the tactile handling to the familiar field of view, it’s exactly what photography should feel like.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on any kind of budget
The Q3 43 is a stunning camera in almost every respect, but you’ll also have to pay a hefty sum for the privilege of owning it. Its price tag will mean it stays in wish-list territory for most people.

You want different focal lengths
You can crop in on the 60.3MP sensor to simulate zoom up to 150mm, but you’ll need to look elsewhere if you want the genuine versatility of different focal lengths.

You shoot a lot of video

While it can record 8K footage at 30fps, recording limits, the absence of a 3.5mm input, and average image stabilization mean this is a camera for stills first and foremost.

How I tested the Leica Q3 43

Leica Q3 43 camera

(Image credit: Future)
  • I used the camera for a week
  • I shot more than 300 stills
  • I took pictures in a range of conditions

Premium or not, the Leica Q3 43 is pitched as the kind of compact you’ll want to take with you everywhere – so that’s exactly what I did. With a loan period of only a week, I made the most of every day: it went wherever I went. That meant taking the 43 about town, on a drive to the beach, and just about everywhere else.

I shot more than 300 stills over the course of seven days, covering a whole range of scenes and conditions. That included the brightest sunlight that an autumn day in the UK could muster, the more familiar cloudy skies of September, the honey tones of the golden hour, and dark nights sat by a fire pit.

Because the 43mm prime lens is what distinguishes this edition from the standard Q3, I paid particular attention to how that felt when framing different subjects in different scenarios. That spanned taking portraits, street shots, landscapes, and close-ups, to get a full impression of how it feels to work with that unique frame of view.

First reviewed October 2024

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 review: portraiture on a budget
7:54 pm | October 25, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Camera Lenses Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4: two-minute review

The nifty-fifty lens is a staple in many a photographer's camera bag – a typically compact lens for portraiture that offers good control over depth of field to make your subjects stand out. It's the lens that I would recommend to beginner photographers having grown out of their kit lens and looking for a second lens to elevate the quality of their photos – and if they have a Nikon camera I would recommend the new Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.4.

Where mirrorless lenses can often be much pricier than DSLR equivalents – the classic 50mm f/1.8 lens for Canon and Nikon DSLR cameras is just about the cheapest lens you can buy at around $100 / £100 secondhand – Nikon is looking to buck this trend by creating affordable options for mirrorless, and the new Z 50mm f/1.4 is its cheapest Z-mount f/1.4 lens so far.

This isn't Nikon's first 50mm lens for its mirrorless cameras. It follows the optically-excellent Z 50mm f/1.8, which was one of Nikon's first lenses for its Z-mount, launched back in 2018, while there's also the 50mm f/1.2 pro lens with 'S' moniker, and the beastly 58mm f/0.95 Noctilux which costs a cool $9,000. However, the new Z 50mm f/1.4 is a stripped-back variation, with minimal external controls, a lightweight build, and offering decent rather than spectacular image quality.

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens in the hands

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

It's pretty much in the same mold as the Nikkor Z 35mm f/1.4 lens which I reviewed recently – the pair share practically the same size, weight, 62m filter size and design. One on hand I respect what Nikon is doing; where Canon launches the pro-grade RF 35mm f/1.4 for mirrorless which costs around $1,500 / £1,820 / AU$2,699, Nikon is launching a lens for enthusiast photographers for around a third of the price.

The downside, however, is that optical quality, while very sharp, is decent rather than outstanding, especially when it comes to bokeh. You're not getting buttery-smooth out-of-focus light balls, but a slightly 'fussy' bokeh instead. I pitted it against the F-mount Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S lens for DSLRs launched in 2008 (you can see the two lenses side by side, below) and the older lens has smoother bokeh.

However, bokeh is more circular in shape with the new Z-mount 50mm f/1.4, while its clarity wipes the floor with the F-mount 50mm f/1.4 G when shooting at f/1.4, which is what I suspect many photographers will be doing. In-focus detail is so much sharper at f/1.4, and even skin tones are more accurate – there can be a slight yellow-ish hue with the DSLR version of the lens.

That superior performance when shooting with the aperture wide-open is what you can expect with the best Nikon mirrorless cameras and lenses, while autofocus is snappier and more reliable too.

Nikon Z 50mm F1.4 alongside Nikon's F-mount 50mm f/1.4G lens

Nikon's new Z 50mm F1.4 lens alongside Nikon's F-mount 50mm f/1.4G lens with Nikon Z-mount to F-mount adaptor (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

My F-mount 50mm f/1.4G AF-S, which by the way is almost the same price as the Z 50mm f/1.4, has notoriously bad back-focusing issues when used with a DSLR – you think the focus is on the eyes of your subject, only for it to be on the ears. When you're shooting at f/1.4 with such shallow depth of field, it's noticeable. This issue is somewhat improved when the lens is used on a mirrorless camera via an adapter, but the mirrorless lens still has the edge.

With mirrorless cameras, such as the Nikon Z6 III for which the Z 50mm f/1.4 is a perfect fit, you get the latest subject-detection and eye-detection autofocus, which will nail sharp focus on the eyes. And it's this performance which makes a Nikon mirrorless camera with this new 50mm lens an easy recommendation, even if the icing on the cake would be slightly better bokeh.

Like the 35mm f/1.4, I expect the 50mm f/1.4 to prove popular, even if it's not one of Nikon's best lenses. If you're upgrading from existing DSLR gear, of the two, I would buy the 50mm lens before the 35mm.

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 specs

Image 1 of 5

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens viewed from above

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 5

Profile of the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens attached to a Nikon Z6 II

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 5

Closeup of the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens' control ring

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 5

Closeup of the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens front element

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 5

Closeup of the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens aperture blades

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4: Design

  • Small and simple
  • Decent pairing with Nikon's smallest mirrorless cameras like the Z6 III
  • Quick and quiet autofocus
  • Maximum 0.17x magnification ratio for moderate close-up photography

The Z 50mm f/1.4 design is pretty much a copy-and-paste of the Z 35mm f/1.4, meaning it's a small and simple lens. The lenses are practically the same in size and weight, with the Z 50mm a hair's breadth longer at 88.5mm in length, and tipping the scales at 14.9oz / 420g – that's just 5g more than the 35mm lens.

Nikon's equivalent F-mount lens for DSLRs – the 50mm f/1.4G – is smaller and lighter still, but so far as Nikon Z-mount lenses go, this is one of the smaller ones.

I tested the lens with a Nikon Z6 III and the Nikon Z6 II, mid-sized cameras for which the Z 50mm f/1.4 is perfectly balanced, being compact in form. Unlike those cameras, however, the Z 50mm f/1.4 isn't officially weather-sealed, and so it's probably best to treat it with care. Sure, the occasional light shower is no problem, but sand, dust, and heavy downpours could eventually prove the lens' undoing.

There's not a single button or switch on the lens, and as someone who regularly switches between manual and autofocus, I've missed having a direct control on the lens. I'd love to know Nikon's reasoning for omitting a MF / AF switch – surely it can't be a cost-saving exercise.

The only exterior controls are a generously-sized focus ring, plus a customizable control ring. The latter can be set to various functions, one of which is as a click-less aperture ring, which is a particularly handy control for filmmaking.

Image 1 of 3

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens in the hand

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 3

Closeup of the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens rear mount

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 3

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens attached to a Nikon Z6 II, in the hand

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

The minimum focus distance is 1.22ft / 0.37m, which results in a magnification ratio of 0.18x, which again is very similar to the Z 35mm lens. In real terms, you can easily fill the frame with close-up subjects like flowers, but this is no macro lens.

Autofocus is impressively quick and quiet. Pair this lens with the Z6 III, which boasts eye-detection autofocus and Nikon's best subject-detection autofocus performance, and you have a powerful tool for portraiture. Put simply, you can rely on this lens, mounted on one of Nikon's latest mirrorless cameras, to hit sharp focus where it matters most.

Autofocus is a refreshing and reliable experience when compared to shooting with my Nikon D800 and 50mm f/1.4 G AF-S lens, which I can't trust and; to be blunt, using it can be a little stressful, especially in pressure moments such as a portrait shoot or a wedding. I'm so glad that I upgraded from DSLR to mirrorless years ago, and it's lenses like the new Z 50mm f/1.4 that make the experience so enjoyable.

Image 1 of 2

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens in the hands

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 2

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens on a Nikon Z6 II

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4: Performance

  • Very sharp detail
  • Handy wide aperture for shallow depth of field and low-light scenes
  • Bokeh quality is just 'good'

Autofocus is quick and reliable with one of Nikon's latest mirrorless cameras, like the Z6 III, which is an excellent foundation for portraiture photography. Knowing that you're getting sharp focus on the eyes is one less thing to worry about, helping you relax into portrait shoots. But what is optical quality like beyond accurate focusing? Overall, it's just decent rather than spectacular.

Detail is very sharp. If you're shooting with the aperture set anywhere between f/2 and f/8 you can expect tack-sharp detail across the entire frame for subjects within the field of focus. Even at f/1.4 detail is very sharp, and this lens wipes the floor with the F-mount DSLR equivalent, the 50mm f//1.4G, which is much softer at f/1.4.

The optical construction, as with most 50mm lenses, is relatively basic. There are nine aperture blades for a rounded aperture, and bokeh is nice and round at f/1.4, especially when compared to the bokeh produced by the F-mount 50mm f/1.4G, which is more cat's-eye in shape in the corners of the frame. However, if you stop down the Z-mount lens to f/2.8 you'll see the more octagonal-like shaping.

Image 1 of 4

Head and shoulder portrait, outdoors, shallow depth of field, dappled light through tree leaves

Detail from the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 is sharp at f/1.4, and bokeh rounded. With lens corrections active, aberrations are controlled better. Stop the aperture down and bokeh becomes less rounded (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Head and shoulder portrait, outdoors, shallow depth of field, dappled light through tree leaves

By comparison, the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S lens for DSLRs is much softer at f/1.4, while its bokeh is cats eye-shaped in the corners. Conversely to the Z-mount lens, stop down to f/2.8 and bokeh becomes more rounded. (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Head and shoulder portrait, outdoors, shallow depth of field, dappled light through tree leaves

The Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens at f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Head and shoulder portrait, outdoors, shallow depth of field, dappled light through tree leaves

The 50mm f/1.4G AF-S lens for DSLRs at f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

It's the bokeh quality that could be a deal-breaker for professional portrait photographers, for whom the Z 50mm f/1.2 is the better choice, provided you can afford it (it's almost five times the costs of the f/1.4 lens). For everyone else, bokeh quality is fine.

If you look closely at images with the f/1.4 lens, the edging of bokeh 'balls' is a little pronounced, rather than them having a nice smooth fall-off. Thankfully there's little sign of aberrations in those edges, which would otherwise be impossible to fix at the click of a button. Only in the most extreme scenarios, like backlit water droplets (see above), will you see pronounced aberrations.

Vignetting – which is the light fall-off in the corners of images – is pretty standard. At f/1.4 it's clear to see, while those darker corners significantly brighten at f/2, and the effect is all but gone by f/4. Below you can see the same image shot at f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4 and f/5.6, so you can compare bokeh, aberrations, and vignetting.

Image 1 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass closeup

Left: f/1.4 aperture and aberrations in bokeh Right: f/5.6 fussy bokeh less rounded in shape Note, all lens corrections are switched off (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 at its various apertures

f/1.4 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 at its various apertures

f/1.8 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 at its various apertures

f/2 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 at its various apertures

f/2.8 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 at its various apertures

f/4 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 7

Backlit heather and dew-covered grass, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 at its various apertures

f/5.6 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.4: sample images

Image 1 of 9

Footpath lined with long grass at first light, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 9

Deatils of heather and cobwebs, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 9

Grass and flowers in morning light, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 9

Head and shoulder portrait, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 9

Backlit portrait, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 9

Mushroom, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 9

Mushroom from ground perspective, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 9

Tips of grasshead covered in dew, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 9 of 9

Cobweb on heather, taken with the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4 lens

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Should you buy the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4?

Buy it if...

You take a lot of portraits

There's a reason that wide-aperture 50mm lenses are popular for portraiture – you get a flattering perspective and shallow depth of field.

You want an affordable fast-aperture lens

This is Nikon's most affordable Z-mount lens with a f/1.4 maximum aperture.

You don't need the bells and whistles

Its stripped back design is best suited to those who are happy to let the camera take control, for instance mainly relying on autofocus.

Don't buy it if...

Bokeh matters most to you

Slightly fussy bokeh is the singular biggest disappointment in this low-cost portrait lens.

You like to take control over focusing

With no direct manual / autofocus switch, it's a time sink switching between the two through the camera.

You work in tough environments

No official weather sealing means you'll need to act with a degree of caution in inclement weather and tough environments.

How I tested the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.4

  • Regular use over one month
  • Paired with the Nikon Z6 III and Nikon Z6 II
  • Like-for-like tests with the F-mount Nikon 50mm f/1.4 for DSLRs

Nikon loaned me the Z 50mm f/1.4 for a whole month, and it was my primary lens during this period. I've taken it on early morning photo walks, made portraits, and used it in a wide range of stills and video scenarios. It has tackled some tough tasks, such as shooting close-up photos of water droplets into the light.

All in-camera lens corrections were turned off, and I took all photos in raw and JPEG format to compare the results un-corrected and the processed results. As always, I took several series of an identical image, working down the aperture range (in this case f/1.4, f/1.8, f/2, f/2.8, f/4 and f/5.6) to see how sharpness and bokeh compares at the various settings.

I also dug out my old F-mount 50mm f/1.4 lens, which I've previously used with a Nikon D800 DSLR, and took like-for-like photos with it alongside the Z 50mm f/1.4 on the Nikon Z6 III (via an adaptor for the F-mount lens). The resolution of the full-frame cameras used for this test was 24MP. I avoided using the camera in heavy rain, but felt comfortable using it in cold and moderately wet weather.

  • First reviewed October 2024
Insta360 Ace Pro 2 review: a coming of age
4:00 pm | October 22, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Action Cameras Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Come for the promise of game-changing 8K action cam footage, stay for the genuinely great-looking, great-sounding 4K footage. That’s the top-line story with Insta360’s new flagship action camera, the Ace Pro 2, which makes a big deal of its class-leading 8K video resolution – even if it’s a feature very few owners will end up using due to its file sizes and various limitations.

What they’ll quickly discover instead is that the Ace Pro 2 excels at delivering smooth, stabilized and crisp-looking 4K footage, which it can capture at up to 60fps in regular video modes and 120fps for slow motion playback purposes. It’s particularly impressive in low light conditions (at least by action camera standards) and offers log recording to support post-production tweaking to color and exposure settings.

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera on a rainy day

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

It does all of the above while offering the usual action cam advantages: it’s small, lightweight, waterproof, rugged, simple to operate, blessed with long battery life and able to be fixed onto all manner of first- and third-party accessories like selfie sticks, mini tripods, bike mounts and helmet mounts.

With all that being said, there’s not a lot between any of the main three action camera flagships at this point (the other two being the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro and GoPro Hero 13 Black). The Insta360 Ace Pro 2 does distinguish itself from its rivals not only with the 8K recording option but its single flip screen, which offers a larger display than the camera’s dual-screened competitors.

Put simply, the Ace Pro 2 warrants careful consideration for anyone shopping for a fully featured flagship action camera, and fully deserves its place as an alternative to its DJI and GoPro competitors.

Insta360 Ace Pro 2: price and release date

  • Priced from $399.99 / £389.99 / AU$689.99
  • Available from October 22 2024
  • Sold in Standard and Dual Battery Bundles

The Ace Pro 2 is available to order from October 22 2024, and sold via the Insta360 web store and a host of other online retailers.

There are two packages available at launch. The Standard Bundle ($399.99 / £389.99 / AU$689.99) contains the camera, a wind guard, a microphone cap, one battery, one standard mount and one USB-C cable. The Dual Battery Bundle ($419.99 / £409.99 / AU$719.99), as its name suggests, features two batteries rather than one, but is otherwise the same.

Note that neither of Insta360’s bundles come with a memory card which, given the Ace Pro 2’s lack of built-in storage, is something you’ll need. So, if you don’t already have a microSD card, make sure to obtain one at the same time as the camera. It accepts cards up to 1TB in capacity.

The Ace Pro 2’s pricing is in the same ballpark as its closest action camera competitors such as the GoPro Hero 13 Black and DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro (although, at around $50 cheaper, the latter would leave you a little extra money left over for accessories).

  • Price score: 4/5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2: key specs

Insta360 Ace Pro 2: design and handling

  • Integrated microphone wind guard
  • Waterproof to 12m/39ft
  • Flip-up touchscreen
  • Quick-release magnetic mount system

The Ace Pro 2 looks a lot like the original Ace Pro. A quick side-by-side comparison reveals a few minor differences in styling and size, but it shares the same standard action camera look – blocky, squat and with as few buttons as possible – and red and black color scheme. The detachable, replaceable lens guard has been upgraded according to Insta360, giving a small boost to its protection and dive capabilities.

Probably the biggest difference of note is the new microphone wind guard, a removeable metal grille, lined with acoustic foam, that protects the front mic port from wind noise. It’s inconspicuous and adds virtually nothing size-wise, so can be left in place most of the time while the camera is in use.

The only time it needs to be removed and replaced by the standard mic cap is during underwater use. On that note, the Ace Pro 2 can dive to a depth of 39ft / 12m without additional protection (a slight improvement on the 33ft / 10m of the Ace Pro). Bolder swimmers can fit the optional dive case accessory and take it all the way down to 197ft / 60m.

The control system is simple and straightforward, with only two physical buttons on the Ace Pro 2 itself: one on the side to power it on and off, which doubles as a shooting mode switcher; and a shutter button on top. Everything else is taken care of via touchscreen controls or, if you prefer, the Insta360 mobile app (more on that in the next section of this review). I found the touchscreen controls generally simple: you swipe down to open the main settings menu; right to open the gallery; left to open settings for the current shooting mode; or up to open yet more settings for the current shooting mode.

Image 1 of 3

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera indoors

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera indoors

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera indoors

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The screen itself is a major differentiator between Insta360’s action cameras and those of its main rivals GoPro and DJI. The Ace Pro 2, like the Ace Pro, uses only one screen where its competitors put one at the back and one at the front (that front screen you see is just for menus). The screen here, a nicely crisp and colorful 2.5-incher, can flip up 180º to face forwards, which has its plus and minus points for me. The plus is that it’s a lot bigger than the front-facing screens you get on those rival cameras, giving you a clearer view and more space for touchscreen tapping (it also doubles as a t-shirt clip or bite adapter for POV shots). The minus is that you have to physically flip it back and forth every time you switch from front to back shooting, which is more effort than simply spinning the camera round and continuing to shoot.

One thing I do like a lot is the magnet- and clip-based mounting system, which allows for fast fixing and unfixing of the Ace Pro 2 to mounts and accessories. This is similar to the systems used by the DJI Osmo Action series and latterly the GoPro Hero 13 Black, however, so I can’t say the Ace Pro 2 does any better than its rivals here.

The Ace Pro 2 has two secure flaps on its body, which lock in place when closed and require a button press to open. One flap protects the microSD card slot and USB-C port, while the other protects the removable battery.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2: features and performance

  • 1800mAh battery and Endurance Mode
  • Compatible with Insta360 Android/iOS app
  • Two levels of electronic image stabilization

The Ace Pro 2’s removable batteries boast a larger capacity than the Ace Pro’s (1800mAh opposed to 1650mAh). Insta360 claims it can record for longer as a result, providing a figure of 180 minutes of 4K/30p recording on a full charge – a lot better than the 100 minutes offered by the original camera. Keen to find out if these claims hold water, I performed my own tests. I found that I could get 69 minutes of stabilized HDR footage at 4K/60p. Switching the camera into Endurance Mode, which limits video resolution and frame rate and turns off certain functions, I was able to record about 140 minutes at 4K/30p before the battery died. So, not quite as high as Insta360 claim, but impressive nonetheless.

The battery also supports reverse charging via USB-C, so in a pinch you can use the Ace Pro 2 as a portable power bank for your phone or other portable gear. The USB also supports a webcam function when plugged into a computer.

Overheating can be an issue, if not a major one. When recording at 8K resolution, the Ace Pro 2 will eventually get too warm to function and shut itself down as a result. I tested it at room temperature conditions, finding it was able to record 8K/30p footage for 43 minutes before overheating, and think that’s fine. 8K recording is probably something you’ll use situationally rather than all the time, after all.

Image 1 of 3

Insta360 Ace Pro 2

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 and Insta360 companion app on iPhone 13

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 and Insta360 companion app on iPhone 13

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

As mentioned above, one way to control the Ace Pro 2 is using the Insta360 smartphone app. Connecting via Wi-Fi, it allows users to change the camera settings (and update its firmware), take photos and videos, browse through photos and videos they’ve taken, edit together content and share it on social media. I’ve always found the app an intuitive and stable method of remotely controlling Insta360’s various cameras, and as is customary in 2024 it also features an AI-powered auto editor to swiftly assemble and score short videos from your captured content.

Image stabilization is a vital feature for any self-respecting action camera, and the Ace Pro 2 is well-served in this area. There are two levels of ‘normal’ image stabilization (Standard and High) plus two horizon levelling options (45º and 360º). I found all to be very effective. Being electronic-based, all apply a crop (of varying degrees) to the image.

Other video-centric features include gesture and voice controls, timecode for multi-cam synching, a new dashcam mode and a pre-recording video mode, which records up to 120 seconds before the shutter button is pressed. All useful in certain situations.

The Ace Pro 2 is also compatible with several types of Bluetooth-based wireless microphones (including the DJI Mic and Mic 2, Rode Wireless series and Hollyland Lark series) and several Bluetooth motorcycle headsets (for hands-free camera control while riding).

  • Features and performance score: 4.5/5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2: image and video quality

  • Upgraded 1/1.3-inch 50MP sensor
  • F2.6 lens with 157º field of view
  • Video up to 8K/30p, 4K/120p or FHD/240p

The original Ace Pro’s headline feature was 8K/24p video recording, and the Ace Pro 2 takes things further, if only ever so slightly; you can now record 8K footage in 25 and 30fps as well. The image sensor, while remaining the same 1/1.3-inch size, has been upgraded to also allow for 13.5 stops of dynamic range and 4K/60p Active HDR recording, and is bolstered by the addition of a new 5nm AI Chip that sits alongside the image processing Pro Imaging Chip. Insta360 say this doubles the computing power of the Ace Pro 2 compared to the original Ace Pro. The lens, made by Leica, has also been slightly improved and now offers a wider field of view: 157º opposed to 151º.

Personally, I find 8K to be a bit of a gimmick, especially on a camera so small. The vast majority of us watch videos on devices with 4K or smaller resolutions, so 8K capture feels like massive overkill unless you’re planning on cropping down the video later on. I should point out here that the field of view when capturing 8K is smaller than with 4K, 2.7K or Full HD recordings. 8K also doesn’t support the best level of image stabilization, doesn’t allow you to use the flat I-log color profile and, despite the bump up to 30fps, still limits frame rate compared to the lower resolution modes.

As a consequence, I found myself much more drawn to 4K which, as on the Ace Pro, is excellent. Most of the vlogging footage you see in the embedded sample video here was shot using the I-log profile and color graded and corrected in post, but the night time footage uses the low light PureVideo mode, while the cycling footage below uses the standard color profile with the Active HDR turned on.

Low light footage is strong by action camera standards but still a weakness compared to even a modestly priced mirrorless camera. Insta360 can throw all manner of algorithms at the footage to sharpen, denoise and bring out the detail in gloomy areas, but it’s still coming from a small sensor with limited light-gathering potential. When viewed on a smartphone screen PureVideo footage looks clean and clear, but on a larger monitor or TV strange artefacts and effects become much more prominent. Still, the Ace Pro 2 is much better at low-light video than a GoPro Hero 13 Black and on a par with the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro, although their characteristics are quite different. I've created a short comparison video of the Ace Pro 2 and Osmo Action 5 Pro so you can see for yourself how they fare.

All in all, it’s a very impressive showing. In general, I still think straight-out-of-the-camera videos from a GoPro Hero 13 Black taken in good lighting look slightly more appealing, but for those who like to put in a bit of work in post-processing the Ace Pro 2 is every bit as capable as the Hero 13 Black and DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro.

Audio is unexpectedly clear when using the built-in microphones. The wind guard seems to do its job admirably and voices are picked up well. The camera comes with three AI-assisted audio modes: standard stereo, wind reduction and voice enhancement. Living by the sea, I kept my Ace Pro 2 set to wind reduction at all times and was pleasantly surprised by the results.

Image 1 of 5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera sample still photos

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera sample still photos

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera sample still photos

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera sample still photos

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 5 of 5

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 action camera sample still photos

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The Ace Pro 2 can also take photos (in JPEG and/or DNG RAW) at 12.5MP or 50MP resolution, and while I’ve personally never been a fan of using action cameras for still photography, it does as good a job at it as any of its major rivals. The JPEGs tend to look over-processing and over-sharpened; when I shot images in RAW and processed them myself in Lightroom I was able to achieve much more natural-looking results.

  • Image quality score: 4.5/5

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro: testing scorecard

Should I buy the Insta360 Ace Pro 2

Buy it if...

You absolutely must have 8K footage
Currently this is the best 8K action camera on sale, so if you really require video recording in this resolution it’s the top choice.

You want an all-round image quality performer
With its excellent video performance in good lighting and more than acceptable performance in low light, it’s a jack of all trades.

You hate tiny screens
The Ace Pro 2’s 2.5-inch screen beats its rivals’ dual-screen setups for size. Ideal if you want clearer-looking previews and menus.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You're expecting 8K recording to transform your life
You probably don’t need 8K video, and the Ace Pro 2’s execution of it comes with loads of caveats. It’s still a niche recording mode.

You like to switch between front and back recording quickly
The dual-screen setups of DJI and GoPro rivals suit this style of shooting better than the Ace Pro 2’s flip screen.

Insta360 Ace Pro 2: also consider

GoPro Hero 13 Black

GoPro’s flagship is a polished performer, recording gorgeous 5.3K video and supporting a wide range of accessories – including the auto-detected Lens Mods that drastically widen its creative options. It also features built-in GPS, and finally supports the faster magnetic mounting system already used by rival action cam makers.

Read our in-depth GoPro Hero 13 Black review

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro

Stacked with unique features like wireless Hi-Res audio recording when using a DJI Mic 2 and blessed with excellent battery life, class-leading waterproofing and a generous 47GB of built-in storage, the dual-screen Action 5 Pro is a worthy alternative to the Ace Pro 2. It’s also cheaper than its close rivals, although it doesn’t record 8K, maxing out at 4K/120p.

Read our in-depth DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro review

Insta360 Ace Pro 2

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

How I tested the Insta360 Ace Pro 2

  • A week of vlogging and biking
  • Various weather conditions and times of day
  • Footage edited using Davinci Resolve Studio 19

I spent a week using a pre-release version of the Insta360 Ace Pro 2, capturing vlog-style and cycling videos at different times of the day and in different weather conditions. I also tested battery life and heat management by allowing the camera to continuously record until the battery died or the camera overheated and shut down.

I recorded video at different resolutions and frame rates, using different color profiles and video modes and with the various forms of stabilization on or off. Footage was later edited on my MacBook Air using Davinci Resolve Studio 19 software, which I used to color grade and correct some clips.

First reviewed October 2024

DJI Air 3S review: soaring closer to camera-drone perfection
4:02 pm | October 15, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Drones Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

DJI Air 3S: one-minute review

The Air 3S is the latest flagship model in DJI’s mid-range Air series of consumer camera drones, supplanting the July 2023-launched DJI Air 3. Like the Air 3, the Air 3S’s main draw is its two-camera setup: instead of a single camera for aerial photos and video, its camera module pairs wide-angle and medium-telephoto cameras, mounted on a three-axis gimbal on the drone’s nose.

In many ways – physical design, specifications, battery life, and pricing – the Air 3S and Air 3 are close, if not virtually indistinguishable. That being said, the Air 3S does offer a couple of notable improvements over its predecessor: a larger image sensor on one of its cameras, and a more effective omnidirectional object-sensing system to help it avoid mid-air collisions with obstacles. With the front-facing sensors now powered by LiDAR rather than standard vision tech, DJI says the Air 3S is better at navigating tricky terrain at night. It’s also packed with technology that makes it easy to fly, including automatic take-off and landing, advanced return-to-home flight, and super-stable video transmission courtesy of DJI’s O4 system. The battery life is very impressive too, with a full charge providing up to 45 minutes of flight time.

The cameras are both excellent, able to shoot raw photos and 10-bit 4K video at 60fps (120fps in slow-motion mode) with HLG or D-Log M color profiles that allow more flexibility in post-production. Users can expect up to 14 stops of dynamic range, plus superb stability in footage thanks to the three-axis gimbal. The new larger sensor on the wide-angle camera, meanwhile, gives the Air 3S a distinct advantage over the Air 3 when it comes to shooting in lower-light conditions.

DJI Air 3S camera drone photographed from above

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

DJI suggests that the Air 3S’s compact size and camera arrangement make it ideal for travel photography and video, but potential buyers should note that its take-off weight puts it in a class of drone that requires much more regulatory and administrative hoop-jumping than an ultra-lightweight model like the DJI Mini 4 Pro. EU- and UK-based users will need to have completed a paid competency course and passed an exam in order to fly it in almost any public space or built-up area, and US-based users will have to register the drone and pass an exam.

If you can live with the paperwork and revision, however, the DJI Air 3S is a truly fantastic mid-range camera drone that’s safe and easy to fly, capable of capturing gorgeous photos and videos, and only a little more expensive than the Air 3. If you already own the latter, we’d suggest you stick with it for now, but for anyone upgrading from an entry-level drone, the Air 3S represents a logical progression.

DJI Air 3S: release date and price

  • Released October 15 2024
  • Base kit costs $1,099 / £959 / AU$1,699
  • Fly More Combo bundles from $1,399 / £1,239 / AU$2,129

The DJI Air 3S is available to buy from the day it was announced to the world: October 15 2024.

At launch, it’s available in three different configurations. The base kit, which consists of the drone, a single battery and an RC-N3 controller, costs $1,099 / £959 / AU$1,699, and there are also two Fly More Combo bundles available. These include the drone, three batteries, a battery charging hub, an ND filter set and a shoulder bag, in addition to a controller. The Fly More Combo with an RC N3 controller costs $1,399 / £1,239 / AU$2,129, and the Fly More Combo with an RC N2 controller costs $1,599 / £1,439 / AU$2,429.

This makes the Air 3S slightly more expensive than the Air 3, as you’d expect, slightly cheaper than the larger Mavic 3 Classic and significantly cheaper than the Mavic 3 Pro.

  • Price score: 4.5/5

DJI Air 3S: specs

DJI Air 3S: design and handling

  • Compact folding design
  • Weight puts it in UK A2 subcategory
  • Level 6 wind resistance (up to 12m/s or 26mph)
  • 42GB of internal storage plus microSD card slot

The Air 3S sports a folding design that’ll be familiar to anyone who’s encountered a DJI Mini, Air or Mavic drone before: a blocky main body with a gimbal-mounted camera at the nose and space for a battery at the back, plus four fold-out arms holding the motors and rotors that keep the drone airborne.

When fully folded it’s compact and lightweight enough to carry around in a small bag – although with extras like a controller and spare batteries you’ll probably want to carry it in something with a bit of room and extra protection. I found that the shoulder bag that comes with the Fly More Combo bundles does the job perfectly, as it features padded partitions to keep all the elements snugly and safely in place, plus a zip-up pocket for cables, spare propellers, ND filters and the like. DJI also supplies the Air 3S with a hard plastic cover to keep the delicate camera and gimbal protected during transport.

Image 1 of 4

DJI Air 3S camera drone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 4

DJI Air 3S camera drone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 4

DJI Air 3S camera drone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 4

DJI Air 3S camera drone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

At 724g take-off weight, the Air 3S is subject to more restrictions on its use than a sub-250g drone like the DJI Mini 4K. In the US, for instance, recreational Air 3S users will need to register their drone with the FAA and have passed the TRUST exam. In the UK, recreational users, in addition to getting a flyer ID and passing the CAA’s free online theory test, will also need to fly the Air 3S at least 50m away from people and 150m from ‘residential, commercial, industrial or recreational areas', with the latter including parks, beaches and the like. UK pilots who take and pass the A2 CofC course (which costs around £100 and requires taking a 90-minute invigilated exam) will be able to fly their drone in the above areas, provided it remains at least 50m from people.

So, the Air 3S’s weight does present an issue that sub-250g drones do not. It’s not a deal-breaker by any means – anyone willing to put in a bit of time, effort and money into learning how drones work can have a lot of legal fun with this thing – but I think it’s enough to put off casual users. They should just get a Mini or DJI Neo instead.

I found the Air 3S to be a solidly constructed piece of equipment and, while I’ll talk about its flight capabilities in the next section of this review, its sturdiness and motor power mean it can stand up to pretty strong winds, hovering in place in gusts of up to 12m/s or 26mph.

It’s flown with a remote controller. For this review, I used the touchscreen-equipped, 420g RC 2 controller, which is also solidly built and comfortable in the hand. It has a bright 5.5-inch Full HD screen, 32GB of storage capacity, and controls for both flight and camera functions. It connects to the drone in seconds, and it’s just excellent all-round, and I much prefer it to having to mess around with my iPhone and a smaller controller.

The drone’s connectivity is nice and simple. At the back there's a USB-C port which can be used to charge the battery or transfer data, plus a microSD slot for storing videos and photos. However, you may not need to use the latter, as DJI has added 42GB of on-board storage here – room enough for about one hour of 4K/60p footage, 2.5 hours of FHD/60p footage, over 2,200 raw photos or 5,400 JPEGs.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

DJI Min 4K: features and performance

  • Up to 45 minutes flying time per battery
  • Automatic return-to-home feature
  • Omnidirectional obstacle sensing including forward-facing LiDAR
  • Up to 20km transmission distance

When it comes to flight performance and safety, the Air 3S improves even on the strong showing of previous Air and Mavic drones.

The battery life is roughly the same as the Air 3’s, lasting an impressive 45 minutes in ideal conditions. In reality, due to wind speed and other factors, you’ll get significantly less, but I never felt any major anxiety over the battery running low while flying due to the strong starting point. I also had two additional batteries to use as I was sent the Fly More Combo for testing, so I could land the drone, quickly swap out a flagging battery for a fresh one and get back in the air, all within a minute or so.

Batteries can be charged on the go ‘in-drone’ using the USB-C port, but the Fly More Combo’s charging hub does things much better. Not only can it accommodate three batteries at once, charging them in sequence; it can also consolidate the remaining battery power from two half-spent batteries into a third. Charging speed varies depending on the power adapter used, but a DJI 100W adapter will refill an empty battery in about one hour.

Image 1 of 2

DJI Air 3S camera drone battery charging hub

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 2

DJI Air 3S camera drone RC 2 controller

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Flying itself is about as simple as it gets. The controller’s flight app takes care of a lot of the busy work (you press a button on the touchscreen to take off, for instance), and GPS means the drone can be brought back to its home point at any time for a safe landing; it’ll also return to home automatically in the event of the signal being lost or the battery reaching low levels. As with most DJI drones there are three flight modes: Normal, Cine (which slows things down to help you get smooth video), and Sport, which turns off safety features and increases the top speed to around 21m/s (or about 50mph).

The twin stick controls are easy to learn, and the Air 3S flies much like any other quadcopter – as someone who’s been flying them for over a decade now, very little has changed except for battery life and the level of safety features, both of which just keep getting better. The Air 3S has omnidirectional object sensing, allowing it to avoid crashing into trees, lampposts and the like (either by braking automatically or re-routing itself around them), and is DJI’s first drone to use LiDAR for the front-facing sensors. DJI claims that this helps to make the obstacle detection far more effective at night, where traditional vision-based sensors can fail to spot objects.

Due to UK restrictions about flying in public parks or built-up places, I wasn’t able to test the Air 3S’s obstacle-dodging capabilities as rigorously as I would have liked, but even during some dusk-time flying I noticed the directional sensor indicators blinking on the controller’s screen when I was taking off and landing the drone. I would say, though, that the front-facing LiDAR isn’t going to help object sensing with obstacles to the side or rear of the drone at night. These sensors still use vision to detect things, and in low light they don’t work as well. So you'll still need to exercise caution at night.

DJI’s O4 video transmission system (the same as used on the Air 3) is robust and slick, beaming a low-latency FHD/60fps image live from the Air 3S’s camera to the RC 2’s screen. I never had it cut out or even stutter during the week I was testing the drone. That said, even though the transmission’s theoretical range is up to 20km I never flew the Air 3S further than a few hundred meters from me due to UK drone laws dictating that drones must remain in visual range of the operator.

In terms of special flight modes, the Air 3S features ActiveTrack 360º, which debuted on the DJI Mini 4 Pro and was later added to the Air 3 via firmware update. This feature allows you to drag a box around a subject on the touchscreen and have the drone perform movements around it while keeping it centered in the shot, all while using its obstacle detection system to avoid crashing. The idea is that you can walk, run, ride a bike, ski or skateboard and the drone will automatically follow along, effortlessly dodging potential obstacles while moving around you and creating cinematic shots.

  • Features score: 4.5/5

DJI Air 3S: image and video quality

  • Dual-camera setup (wide-angle and medium-tele)
  • 1-inch (wide-angle) and 1/1.3-inch (medium-tele) sensors
  • 4K video at up to 120fps and 2.7K vertical shooting
  • DNG raw and JPEG still photos

Folded DJI Air 3S drone with camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

The Air 3 has a dual-camera array, with wide-angle (equivalent to 24mm on a standard 35mm camera) and medium-telephoto (equivalent to 70mm) options to switch between. The Air 3S has practically the same setup but better, thanks to DJI upping the physical size of the wide-angle camera’s CMOS sensor from 1/1.3-inch to 1-inch. The tele camera keeps the same 1/1.3-inch CMOS as the Air 3’s. Both cameras’ lenses are fixed-aperture, so videographers will probably want to ensure they get hold of DJI’s ND filter set in order to use slower shutter speeds on sunny days.

I think having more than one camera on a drone is a brilliant asset. The tele lens really expands the Air 3S’s creative options, both by allowing it to get ‘closer’ to subjects while staying physically far away and by giving it the ability to compress perspective to give a scene a different look. There’s a digital zoom option for both cameras, but it does noticeably soften the video quality, and I tried to avoid using it in order to keep my videos and photos as sharp and crisp as possible.

Image 1 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with wide-angle camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with medium tele camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with medium tele camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with medium tele camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 5 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with medium tele camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 6 of 9

Night-time aerial photo of harbour taken with DJI Air 3S drone

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 7 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with medium tele camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 8 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with wide-angle camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 9 of 9

Aerial photographs taken using the DJI Air 3S drone

DJI Air 3S shot with medium tele camera (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

DJI has packed a lot of video and photo options into the Air 3S, albeit nothing that really surpasses the range of options that comes with the original Air 3. Both the wide-angle and tele camera can capture 4K video at 24/25/30/48/50/60/120fps (with 120 reserved for slow-motion footage), FHD video at the same frame rates plus 240fps (again, with 120 and 240fps reserved for slow-motion), and TikTok-friendly 2.7K vertical 9:16 video at 24/25/30/48/50/60fps. Video can be captured in normal, HLG and D-Log M color modes, with 8-bit and 10-bit options for normal (HLG and D-Log M are always 10-bit) encoded in H.264 or H.265.

Photos can be capturing in DNG raw format and/or JPEG. The wide-angle camera takes photos at 12MP or 50MP resolution, while the medium tele takes them at 12MP or 48MP resolution.

The major difference between the cameras here and on the original Air 3 is the larger sensor on the wide-angle camera, which boosts its performance, particularly in low-light situations.

As you can see from the photo and video samples above, image quality is generally excellent – including in those tricky dusk and night-time conditions. I thought the Air 3 was a fine performer in this regard already, but the Air 3S’s larger sensor bumps the wide-angle camera’s low-light capabilities; these images look clean, clear and noise-free in situations where smaller sensor 4K cameras, like the one on the DJI Mini 4 Pro, would struggle.

I had a blast color-correcting and grading the footage shot in 10-bit D-Log M. I used DaVinci Resolve Studio 19 for this, which already includes some DJI LUTs for converting D-Log M footage. There was plenty of scope for grading here, and aerial videographers who want to create great-looking footage and have maximum control over the end results will love what the Air 3S’s cameras can do.

  • Image quality score: 4.5/5

DJI Air 3S sample video 4K

DJI Air 3S: testing scorecard

DJI Air 3S drone hovering in flight

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Should I buy the DJI Air 3S?

Buy it if...

You need a two-camera drone
The Air 3S’s dual-camera setup opens up a world of new shooting possibilities. If you’re used to wide-angle only, having the extra camera feels like a breath of fresh air.

The Mavic 3 Pro is too expensive
The triple-camera Mavic 3 Pro is still the pinnacle of DJI’s consumer range – and still pricey. If you want something approaching its capabilities at a much cheaper price, the Air 3S is ideal.

You want great battery life
Up to 45 minutes from a full battery takes much of the time-related anxiety out of flying. And you'll get three times that with the Fly More Combo bundle.

Don't buy it if...

You want a casual camera drone
The price and weight class of the Air 3S makes it more suited to drone experts than beginners. If you’re starting out, a cheaper sub-250g drone like the DJI Mini or Neo is a much better choice.

You already own a DJI Air 3
The Air 3S is an improvement on its predecessor, but not enough of one to warrant an expensive upgrade – unless you’re really picky about low-light video performance.

DJI Air 3S: also consider

How I tested the DJI Air 3S

DJI Air 3S drone landed on deck

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
  • One week of use
  • Flown with the DJI RC 2 Controller
  • Camera tested in sunny, cloudy, windy and low-light conditions

I’ve been testing the DJI Air 3S for a week using pre-launch firmware and the Fly More Combo, which meant I had a couple of extra batteries and the RC 2 touchscreen controller, plus the ND filter set and a nice sturdy bag to carry everything around in.

I flew the drone in a variety of locations near my home on the English coast, including in potentially tricky windy and low-light conditions, although legal restrictions meant I couldn’t fly it close to buildings or in public parks, which did make testing out the drone’s obstacle avoidance system quite hard.

I captured photos and videos in a wide variety of formats, editing and adjusting my images and clips using Adobe Lightroom and DaVinci Resolve 19 on my computer.

First reviewed October 2024

Fujifilm X-M5 review – a tiny powerhouse of a vlogging camera
5:02 pm | October 14, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Mirrorless Cameras | Comments: Off

Fujifilm X-M5: two-minute review

Fujifilm's new X-M5 is a dinky and stylish beginner mirrorless camera with a focus on video, delivering sharp 6K video recording in color-rich 10-bit. It also features 4K up to 60fps for cinematic half-speed effects, plus open gate video recording, which means the camera can take information from the full height and width of the 3:2 sensor, rather than being restricted to 16:9 or wider.

Open gate 6K video allows for a new 9:16 vertical video mode without you having to rotate the camera 90 degrees, with the new social media-focused mode cropping the central vertical portion of the frame at 1080p resolution, complete with handy preset recording times of 15, 30 or 60 seconds.

The X-M5 is also equipped with an improved wind filter and three internal directional mics, whereby you can employ any of those mics individually or together based on your video needs, with options for surround, front or back priority, or front and back priority. Alternatively, you can use an external mic for even better audio, connecting via the 3.5mm jack and securing it into the X-M5's hotshoe.

Fujifilm X-M5 camera  with flip-screen out, on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

There are some well-considered design touches: the mic port has been positioned on the rear above where the screen sits, while the other ports are on the right-hand side of the camera rather than the left, which means they don't interfere with the flip-out touchscreen when in use. As on the X-T50, you also get a film simulation dial for quickly switching between Fujifilm's legendary color profiles, with three slots for custom profiles.

Price-wise, and indeed for a large part features-wise, the X-M5 matches and therefore sits alongside the photography-focused X-T30 II, and below the X-S20, as an excellent-value starter mirrorless camera for those who shoot more videos than photos. Yet with its tiny form-factor – this is the smallest X-series camera in 2024's lineup – the X-M5 is also a decent walkaround camera, say for street photography, especially with Fujifilm's tiny XF 27mm f/2.8.

Given its low price, naturally there are compromises. The X-M5 does not feature in-body image stabilization, which you get in the pricier X-S20, and which is supremely helpful for smoothing out handheld videos. Instead it employs electronic stabilization which works pretty well, but it incurs a 1.32x to 1.44x crop of the image area, depending on your shooting mode.

That flip-out touchscreen is a lower 1.04m-dot resolution compared to those on other Fujifilm cameras, like the 1.84m-dot one on the X-S20, plus there's no viewfinder as on the X-T30 II, and so the X-M5 might not prove to be the easiest camera to use in bright light. Design-wise, the X-S20 is a better option for enthusiasts – it offers the best of the X-M5 and X-T30 II in one camera, and it has much better battery life, plus image stabilization, although it costs a fair bit more.

Overall, the dinky X-M5 is a highly capable little camera that's not for everyone, but for those starting out making videos it could be one of the most powerful tools available for the money, that's set to trouble our best vlogging cameras guide.

Fujifilm X-M5: price and release date

  • X-M5 body only: $799 / £799 / AU$1,449
  • X-M5 with 15-45mm lens: $899 / £899 / AU$1,649
  • On sale November 14

You can pick up the X-M5 with the 15-45mm kit lens for $899 / £899 / AU$1,649 when it goes on sale on November 14. If you don't need the lens, the X-M5 can be picked up body-only for a little less, at $799 / £799 / AU$1,449.

That price point matches the X-T30 II exactly, making the feature-rich X-M5 one of the cheapest mirrorless cameras available in 2024 with arguably the biggest video bang for buck.

  • Price score: 5/5

Fujifilm X-M5 specs

Fujifilm X-M5: design and handling

  • Tiny and lightweight
  • No viewfinder
  • Film simulation dial

Tipping the scales at just 12.52oz / 355g, the X-M5 is one of the lightest mirrorless cameras around, and it's properly dinky too. I actually found it a little too small at times, regularly knocking controls, unintentionally taking pictures and so on, but I can certainly see the appeal of its tiny proportions, especially as an everyday walkaround camera.

I was testing the X-M5 with the 15-45mm lens, which is available as a kit with the camera, and is a decent pairing physically. With the camera's modest-sized handgrip and such a tiny body, Fujifilm's larger lenses will feel like a bit of mismatch, and the sweet spot will be smaller zoom and prime lenses – I'd especially like to try the X-M5 with the XF 27mm f/2.8 pancake lens as an alternative to my Ricoh GR IIIx every day camera.

Image 1 of 5

Top plate of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 5

Underside of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 5

Fujifilm X-M5 camera  with flip screen out, on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 5

Closeup of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera's flip screen, on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 5

Fujifilm X-M5 camera on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

The Fujifilm X-M5 is sporting the classic Fujifilm retro look with faux-leather finish, plus a top plate (available in black or silver – I had the all-black version) with shooting mode and Film Simulation dials. Like the X-T50, the most popular film simulations are present, plus three customizable slots for your other favorites or recipes. The dial cannot be changed to control something else.

The flip-out screen is unimpeded, unlike on so many other cameras. That's because Fujifilm has smartly positioned the ports on the opposite, right-hand side of the camera. There's also a new position for the mic input, just above where the screen rests. It's a logical placement near the hotshoe, which is where you can secure an external mic, meaning your cable doesn't need to get in the way of camera controls or the screen either.

Image 1 of 6

Closeup of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera's top plate,  on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 6

Closeup of the mic port of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera, with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 6

Closeup of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera's ports, on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 6

Rear of the Fujifilm X-M5 camera with screen folded away, on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 6

Fujifilm X-M5 camera on a marble surface with rich blue background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 6

The battery and a memory for the Fujifilm X-M5 camera on a marble surface

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

That 3-inch touchscreen is the lowest-spec screen in Fujifilm's range of cameras, with just a 1.04m-dot resolution compared to the 1.62m-dot and 1.84m-dot screens of the X-T30 II and X-S20 respectively. Still, you get a revised user interface with handy short cuts to shooting modes such as the new vertical video mode.

The X-M5 is powered by Fujifilm's NP-W126S battery, which is the same battery as found in the X-T30 II and other models like the X-T50 and X100VI. Here you get a 440-shot battery life, which is an improvement on some other models, thanks in part to Fujiflm's latest X-Processor 5 engine, although battery life is reduced to more like 330 shots if you're not in Eco mode, nor is it a patch on the X-S20 which goes for much longer.

The key difference between the X-M5 and Fujifilm's other entry-level camera, the X-T30 II, is that the latter has a viewfinder, which can be very helpful for composing photos in bright light. I mainly used the X-M5 in cloudy weather during which detail on the screen was clearly visible. During a bright sunrise, it was a little more challenging to view the screen clearly, but at least it can angled away from glare and reflections.

During that same sunrise shoot I was also taking photos with a thrice-the-price full-frame mirrorless camera. The contrast between how these cameras felt in the hand was clear, with the latter feeling much more premium. Still, for beginners the X-M5 is going to feel the part.

  • Design score: 4/5

Fujifilm X-M5: features and performance

  • 60-minute video record time
  • Three internal directional mics
  • Less effective digital image stabilization only
  • 8fps / 30fps for up to 173 JPEGs

The X-M5 packs a lot of power for such a small camera, but there are also compromises. For example, like the X-S20 it can shoot up to 8fps continuous burst sequences (using the mechanical shutter) or 30fps (with the electronic shutter), but the pricier model is able to squeeze out more frames.

Both cameras use the same processor, so I can only assume that the limited performance of the X-M5 – a still respectable 173 JPEGs or 25 raws in continuous high mode – is due to the fact that it records onto UHS-I SD memory cards, while the X-S20 is compatible with the faster UHS-II SD-type memory card. The X-M5 is no slouch by any means, but it's a shame that it isn't compatible with the latest SD cards.

Offloading those files onto a smartphone should be a breeze. You don't even need to mess around with unreliable Bluetooth connections and slow transfer speeds – the X-M5 offers high-speed file transfer to a smartphone via USB connection, with Fujifilm's XApp. There's also frame.io camera to cloud storage and sharing available for subscribers. These are super handy features for connected content creators.

Fujifilm has equipped the X-M5's autofocus system with its latest subject-detection algorithms, including animal eye AF and touch tracking autofocus for video. In fact, it's better than Fujifilm X-S20 right now, although we were told that the X-S20 will be improved with this latest algorithm via a firmware update.

Image 1 of 2

Closeup of the Fujifilm X-M5's screen with new UI and the 9:16 portrait video mode

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 2

Closeup of the Fujifilm X-M5's screen with the built-in microphone direction menu

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

For me, a major downside to the X-M5 is that it lacks in-body image stabilization. To be clear, I wouldn't expect such a feature in a beginner camera given that you won't find it at this price point anywhere else. It just feels like a video-focused camera can really benefit from it, and if I was getting serious about video I'd turn my attention to the X-S20 instead.

The X-M5 utilizes digital image stabilization (DIS) instead, should you need it, and you sure will for handheld videos. The X-S20 also features DIS, which incurs a 1.1x crop of the image area; however, that crop is much more severe in the X-M5 – at least 1.32x and up to 1.44x depending on the video modes and frame rates.

If you want steady video, say for handheld vlogs, your frame will be cropped. That means you need a seriously wide-angle lens to fit yourself in the shot, otherwise vlogging won't really be possible with DIS employed. Alternatively, you can buy a gimbal to stabilize footage and keep DIS switched off. However, adding a gimbal pushes the price up, perhaps to the point where you might as well have bought the X-S20 in the first place.

Don't get me wrong, the X-M5's digital stabilization performs pretty well, but you need to be aware of the limitations that come with using it. A saving grace is that Fujifilm has a superb range of lenses, including ultra-wide angle options which will give you the extra space in your shot when vlogging with DIS active.

Audio recording quality is impressive. The X-M5 features three directional mics (there are two on the X-S20 and X-T30 II) that can be isolated or used together – so for example you can have the mics picking up just your voice vlogging, or audio from in front of and behind the camera for the camera-person and subject conversing, or complete surround sound that captures the ambient sound too.

Fujifilm says the X-M5 has an improved wind filter – though I can't vouch for how this has been improved from my testing – plus 'steady state' noise reduction. There's a mic input too, should you need even better audio recording. I attached a receiver into the mic input and did some vlogging with the wireless mic attached to my clothing, and the whole experience was flawlessly smooth.

Despite some of its flaws regarding features and performance, the X-M5 gets it right where it matters the most for video.

  • Features and performance: 4.5/5

Fujifilm X-M5: image and video quality

  • 26MP stills and 6K/30p video
  • 10-bit color depth and wide range of bitrates for various qualities / file sizes
  • New vertical video mode for social media

The X-M5 use the same tried and tested 26MP X-trans CMOS 4 sensor and X-Processor 5 engine as the Fujifilm X-S20, which shares the same 6K video resolution and frame rates. Both cameras are capable of recording superb-quality videos, plus decent photos.

There are two key differences between the X-S20 and X-M5. The X-S20 features in-body image stabilization for smoother handheld video clips, plus a higher maximum 360Mbps bitrate to the X-M5's 200Mbps, meaning its best-quality video is less compressed. The X-S20 also imposes just a 1.1x crop when using its digital image stabilizer, while the X-M5's crop is more severe at 1.32x and higher.

Image 1 of 8

London street photo of a red telephone box and black shop front, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 8

Closeup of London souvenirs in a shop, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 8

London street photo of a pub sign taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 8

Dark alleyway with a lone silhouette and bar sign above, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 8

London street photo of fallen hire bikes, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 8

London street photo of a lady with dog, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 8

China Town in London street photo taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 8

China Town in London street photo taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

The lack of in-body image stabilization will probably have the most noteworthy adverse impact on video quality, especially for those who shoot handheld vlogs. Digital image stabilization (DIS), which works with the lens' optical stabilization, is less effective, and using it incurs that severe 1.32x crop, so you'll need to use a particularly wide lens with the camera for vlogging, or splash out on a gimbal. Still DIS does a reasonable job smoothing out footage for gentle walking and talking scenarios.

Fujifilm has introduced additional 8Mbps and 25Mbps low bitrates for those who want to work with super-small video files sizes and don't mind the additional compression that affects outright quality. These low bitrates are not proxies recorded alongside higher bitrate videos – you choose the bitrate you want and that's that. Low bitrates are handy if you need to work fast on location, and don't have the time or capacity to work with large file sizes. If your videos are only going to be viewed on phones, these low bitrates are an acceptable option.

Image 1 of 10

Autumn sunrise over a common in the UK, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 10

Autumn sunrise over a common in the UK, with a wooden boardwalk, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 10

Autumn sunrise over a common in the UK, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 10

Tree silhouettes at first light, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 10

Backlit cobweb in a tree during sunrise, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 10

Woman walking on a boardwalk among pine trees at first light, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 10

Man's selfie at first light, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 10

Portrait of a male at first light with a still lake backdrop, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 9 of 10

Cobweb between long blades of grass over water, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 10 of 10

Cobweb among ferns, taken with the Fujifilm X-M5

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Otherwise, there's not a lot to choose between the two cameras, which reflects well on the X-M5 because it's so much cheaper, at just 56% the cost of the X-S20. The X-S20 has loads more going for it regarding its build and handling, but the X-M5 offers excellent bang for buck in terms of video quality.

  • Image and video quality: 4.5/5

Fujifilm X-M5: testing scorecard

Should I buy the Fujifilm X-M5?

Buy it if...

You want the best value 6K camera
Open gate 6K video in 10-bit with attractive color profiles? That's some serious video grunt for $800 / £800.

You’d like a tiny every day camera for photos
Paired with a pancake lens like the XF 27mm f/2.8 and you have a tiny snapper ideal for documenting every day life and street photography.

You want a simple, low-cost second camera
Although it's designed for beginners, I can see the X-M5 being popular with hobbyist photographers who already own another Fujifilm camera but are looking for a simple second camera for the every day.

Don't buy it if...

Your focus is on run-and-gun filmmaking
Being limited to digital stabilization means the X-M5's footage will look shaky if your movements are particularly erratic.

You have big hands
If you have large hands you might unwittingly find yourself nudging the X-M5's controls – they are tightly packed together.

You're primarily a photographer
As a primary camera, the X-M5 sure is designed for video. If you take a lot of photos, a camera with a viewfinder like the X-T30 II might be the sensible alternative.

Fujifilm X-M5: also consider

How I tested the Fujifilm X-M5

Fujifilm X-M5 camera with 15-45mm lens, in the hand, with screen flipped out

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
  • A week-long loan period of the camera with the 15-45mm lens
  • Full-production model with final firmware
  • Paired with wireless mic gear
  • Vlogging and photography in a range of scenarios

Following an in-depth briefing with Fujifilm and a central London shooting session ahead of the X-M5's launch, I was loaned a full-production version of the camera, with final firmware, for a one-week period, together with the XF 15-45mm kit lens.

I've used the camera for vlogging, testing its internal mics but also pairing it with an wireless mic kit, plus taken plenty of photos in various scenarios, including a sunrise hike.

First reviewed October 2024

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF review: a street shooter with a dreamy diffusion filter
6:55 pm | October 7, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Compact Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF: two-minute review

With its large APS-C sensor and fixed 40mm f/2.8 lens, we already rated the Ricoh GR IIIx as one of the best premium compact cameras for travel and street photography. This version features a niche tweak that gives it a specific appeal: where the original had a built-in ND filter, the GR IIIx HDF instead has a highlight diffusion filter.

There’s no software trickery at work here. This is a physical filter that's built into the shutter unit and is enabled with a push of the Fn button, and it reduces contrast and blurs bright whites, producing soft, dreamy stills with an ethereal glow that harks back to the days of analog.

Based on our time with both the GR IIIx and the HDF version, the latter is the more creative tool. Whether you're capturing reflections shimmering off water or sunlight through leaves, it allows you to experiment with unique, film-like lighting effects.

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera, rear side controls in a hand

(Image credit: Future)

The GR IIIx HDF also benefits from a couple of new firmware features: there’s support for up to three custom white balances, while zone-select AF gives you more flexibility to target automatic focusing within the center area. These are minor tweaks which will also be introduced to the GR III / IIIx down the line.

Otherwise, the GR IIIx HDF is identical to the existing version. That includes everything from the pocket-friendly dimensions and direct access controls to the APS-C sensor and 40mm lens combination we praised in our original review. It also retains the same drawbacks, though, including average battery life and a fixed screen.

The GR IIIx HDF isn’t the major update that many Ricoh fans were hoping for, and it’s certainly not worth buying if you already own the GR IIIx. But if you’re choosing between the two versions, we think the highlight diffusion filter makes it the more artful and unique option, especially if you’re a fan of the vintage aesthetic. It costs marginally more, but it’s the one we’d pick.

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera front side, in hand

(Image credit: Future)

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF: price and availability

  • Launched on 28 March 2024, alongside the GR III HDF
  • Priced at $1,146 / £1,099 / AU$1,899

The Ricoh GR IIIx HDF was announced in March 2024 with a launch price of $1,146 / £1,099 / AU$1,899. That makes it $147 / £100 / AU$120 more expensive than the standard Ricoh GR IIIx, which already commanded a pretty premium ask. At that price, the GR IIIx HDF is close to mid-range mirrorless money, with cameras like the Sony A7 III available for a similar amount.

While that might seem hard to justify for a compact with a fixed lens, the point here is that Ricoh is making a niche version of an already niche camera. You’ll buy the GR IIIx HDF not because you want the best possible performance for the money, but because you want a sharp-shooting compact with a relatively large sensor, with the added value of a unique built-in filter.

If you’re in the market for one of the best travel cameras, the GR IIIx offers better value objectively. Whether the highlight diffusion filter is worth the extra expenditure will come down to how you plan to use the camera and whether you’ll appreciate the creative aesthetic it’s capable of. But for our money, it’s the more compelling proposition, even with the increase in cost.

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF: design

  • Physically identical to the GR IIIx
  • Truly pocketable dimensions
  • 3-inch, 1.03 million-dot touchscreen

Other than its silver shutter button, the GR IIIx HDF is identical to the GR IIIx. That means it’s a genuinely pocket-friendly compact, measuring a tidy 109.4 x 61.9 x 35.2mm and weighing an impressively light 262g, including the battery and an SD card. It’s pretty much as small as a camera with an APS-C sensor inside can be, making it a portable yet powerful shooting tool.

Not only do those dimensions mean the GR IIIx HDF is a convenient camera to travel with, but it’s also one you can comfortably use with one hand, making it ideal for discreet street photography. Ergonomically, there’s enough of a front grip to get your fingers around, with a moulded thumb rest on the rear.

Direct-access controls are plentiful, including a mode dial and scroll lever for adjusting exposure, and are neatly set out within easy reach of your thumb. Most prominent among them is the function button, which by default is used to activate the highlight diffusion filter. The control layout doesn’t clutter the body, but the camera’s proportions mean some of the rear inputs do require a bit of nimble finger-work to avoid accidentally hitting other buttons.

Image 1 of 5

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)

Like the GR IIIx, the HDF version has a fixed 3-inch LCD touchscreen. It’s sharp enough at 1.03 million dots, although it’s not the brightest, which can make framing in direct sunlight slightly tricky. That’s not helped by the absence of an electronic viewfinder and, while there is a hot-shoe mount on top of the body, the only optional viewfinders available from Ricoh are analog ones.

All that being said, the GR IIIx HDF is just as fun to use as the standard GR IIIx. The touchscreen is responsive, and touch-focus support makes it as easy to shoot with as any smartphone. Its point-and-shoot design also strikes a good balance between accessibility for beginners and creative control for more experienced users.

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF: features and performance

  • Highlight diffusion filter
  • Fixed-focal-length f/2.8 lens
  • New zone-select AF functionality

The headline feature of the GR IIIx is its highlight diffusion filter, which replaces the neutral density filter found in the GR IIIx. The HDF is a physical filter that’s part of the shutter unit, and it has the effect of reducing contrast and softening bright whites when enabled. The net effect of this is dreamy stills with a blurry glow that mimics the look of film photography.

Based on our tests, it’s more than a gimmick. The effect’s strength depends on what and where you’re shooting, but it can be surprisingly potent. In backlit or overcast scenes we found that it could lead to unwanted halo effects; but in the right conditions, such as warm sunlight filtering through trees or lights reflecting off water at night, the filter makes the GR IIIx HDF capable of producing some genuinely unique, creative images.

Image 1 of 4

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 4

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 4

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 4

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF in hand

(Image credit: Future)

On paper, it’s a niche feature. But at a time when analog is all the rage again we can see it appealing to a lot of people. Not only does the GR IIIx HDF produce images with a film-like aesthetic, it does so by way of a genuine physical filter, which lends the results a feeling of authenticity which can’t be achieved with post-processing. It also makes the GR IIIx HDF feel like a fun tool to experiment with creatively, with none of the associated costs of film.

Otherwise, the Ricoh GR IIIx HDF shares most of the rest of its features and spec sheet with the standard version. That’s true of the effective sensor-shift shake reduction system, useful Snap Focus tool and decent macro mode. Unfortunately, it’s also true of the modest 200-shot battery life, lazy burst speeds, and maximum Full HD video resolution.

Also inherited is the 40mm f/2.8 lens, which offers a focal length that’s more versatile for portrait work than the 28mm lens of the GR III. The depth of field is lovely and shallow, although you do need to be careful when using Snap Focus as it’s easy to miss your focus point. Rather than repeat the same observations here, we recommend reading our GR IIIx review for a full insight into how these features stack up in real-world use.

Image 1 of 6

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF test image

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 6

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF test image

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 6

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF test image

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 6

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF test image

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 6

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF test image

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 6

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF test image

(Image credit: Future)

Operation of the HDF version is just as quick as with the GR IIIx, with rapid start-up and shutter response times. Less impressive is the autofocus performance, which suffers from the same laggy tracking as before. One thing that is new for the GR IIIx is zone-select AF. This essentially allows you to zone the AF in on a specific region within the auto-area AF coverage. We could see this being useful for street portraits, but it’s a relatively minor addition, and one that’s also due to be added to existing models in a later firmware update.

More useful is the introduction of three programmable white balance settings, which means you can easily shift between different custom presets without having to dive into the manual settings. We think many users of the GR IIIx HDF are likely to use auto white balance, but it’s nevertheless a welcome addition.

Should I buy the Ricoh GR IIIx HDF?

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF camera on a table

(Image credit: Future)

Buy it if...

You like the idea of an analog-style filter
Enabling the highlight diffusion filter gives images a soft, dreamy glow that, in the right lighting, can produce properly creative images with a film-like look.

You want a sharp-shooting street compact
Sharing most of its features with the GR IIIx, the HDF edition stacks up just as well for discreet street photography, with a travel-friendly body that captures sharp stills.

You want first access to the latest features
The GR IIIx benefits from three pre-programmable white balance settings and zone-select autofocus, which will only be added to existing models with down the line.

Don't buy it if...

You don’t need the highlight diffusion filter
The added cost of the GR IIIx HDF can only be justified if you’re excited by the idea of shooting with a unique physical filter; otherwise, the standard version is better value.

You want the best possible value
The GR IIIx HDF is priced in mid-range mirrorless territory, and it’s possible to get better performance and features from other APS-C cameras with interchangeable lenses.

You shoot a lot of video
With a video resolution that maxes out at Full HD, the Ricoh GR IIIx HDF is very much a camera for stills photographers first and foremost.

How I tested the Ricoh GR IIIx HDF

Ricoh GR IIIx HDF compact camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)
  • I used the camera for two weeks
  • I shot more than 150 stills
  • I took pictures in a range of conditions

Testing the Ricoh GR IIIx HDF involved taking it out into the world and using it as I would use any camera day to day. I took more than 150 photos over the course of a fortnight, in a whole range of shooting scenarios and lighting conditions, from day to night, and from portraits to street details.

As the highlight diffusion filter is the key point of difference between this camera and the standard GR IIIx, I focused in particular on capturing images with the HDF enabled. I also shot a range of reference images across different shooting modes, to assess the actual effect of the filter.

First reviewed October 2024

GoPro Hero review: the action camera king goes back to basics
8:01 pm | October 3, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Action Cameras Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

The GoPro Hero is GoPro’s new entry-level action camera. At half the price of the company’s Hero 13 Black flagship, and about half the size, it’s a small, cheap and rugged mountable camera that keeps the price down by keeping things simple. Perhaps too simple.

While I genuinely appreciate how simple and easy this camera is to use, the fact that it offers little control over image quality, only three recording modes, no way to record audio except via the internal mic, and no way to swap out a battery meant that I butted up against limitations and disappointments all too frequently during my review shoots.

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Image quality isn’t terrible, but the 8-bit footage is a long way below what’s possible with the Hero 13 Black and other higher-end action cameras. The Hero also isn’t the smallest action camera around, with DJI and Insta360 offering even more compact, lightweight alternatives.

The bright spots here are the affordable price tag, reliable image stabilization and solid battery life, which make the Hero a camera that retains some appeal despite its weaknesses. If you’re looking for a cheap, simple action camera (one you could hand over to your kids, perhaps) that slots nicely into GoPro’s vast ecosystem of mounting accessories and apps, the Hero is that camera.

GoPro Hero: price and release date

  • $199.99 / £199.99 / AU$349.99
  • Available now

The GoPro Hero is available to buy now, priced from $199.99 / £199.99 / AU$349.99. That’s half the price of GoPro’s current flagship Hero 13 Black action camera, and quite a bit cheaper than the mini action cameras offered by competitors too: the aging DJI Action 2 costs $229 / £215 and the Insta360 Go 3 and Go 3S cost $319.99 / £319.99 and $399.99 / £349.99 respectively.

That makes the Hero one of the most affordable current action cameras around at launch, and you’ll probably only find something cheaper by buying secondhand or during sales.

  • Price score: 4/5
Image 1 of 4

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 4

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 4

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 4

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

GoPro Hero: design and handling

  • Small, lightweight and sturdy build
  • Quick-release magnetic mounting system
  • Waterproof to 20m without a case
  • Front and rear OLED touchscreens

Like all GoPro action cameras, the Hero is rugged and waterproof. The tough plastic casing feels like it could take a beating, and is sealed against water up to a depth of 16ft / 5m. The camera lens is given extra protection in the form of a toughened, water-repelling glass cover, which can be replaced in the event it gets damaged.

It comes with GoPro's fold-out mounting fingers on the bottom, allowing it to be attached to over 35 GoPro-made (and countless third-party) accessories like selfie sticks, helmet mounts, bicycle mounts and the like. In the box you get a single curved adhesive mount, one mounting buckle and one screw.

The Hero is very small and lightweight, especially by GoPro standards. It weighs just 3oz / 86g, and makes the other ‘tiny’ GoPro model I have to hand, the 2022-released Hero 11 Black Mini, feel quite bulky and awkward in comparison. There are smaller action cameras around, however; the excellent Insta360 Go 3S springs to mind, being half the Hero’s weight and size and able to record 4K video too.

GoPro Hero key specs

Sensor: 1/2.8-inch CMOS
Video: Up to 4K/30fps, 2.7K/60fps
Photo: 12MP
Screens: 1.76-inch LCD touchscreen
Video modes: Standard, Slo-Mo
Connectivity: USB-C, Bluetooth LE 5.2, dual-band Wi-Fi
Weight: 86g

Despite its small proportions, the Hero has room for a touchscreen on the back (the 11 Black Mini had no screen at all). There’s nothing outstanding about the screen’s quality – it’s LCD rather than OLED – but it does its job well, giving you just enough space to swipe though the shooting modes, adjust settings in the menu screens and review the shots stored on the camera.

Physical controls are nice and simple, with just two large, easy-to-press rubber buttons: one to start and stop image capture, and one to power the camera on and off and for switching quickly between the shooting modes. That, really, is it. There are status lights on the front and back of the camera too, so you’ll know when it’s recording or recharging.

Image 1 of 3

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

GoPro Hero connectivitiy

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Storage comes courtesy of a microSD card slot, and without one in the box you’ll have to supply your own. It’ll need to have a V30 or faster UHS-3 rating too.

Alongside the card slot is a USB-C port, which can be used for charging the battery or transferring files; GoPro supplies a short USB-C to USB-C cable in the box. Annoyingly, I wasn’t able to use this to drag and drop files from the Hero onto my Mac, just from my PC. The GoPro Quik app running on a Mac recognized that the camera was connected, but instructed me to use a card reader to import the files. Adding unnecessary steps to the process isn’t a smart design choice in my opinion, especially if they require the user to own another piece of hardware.

The battery, incidentally, is built into the camera and is non-removable. Pricier GoPro models support battery swapping, but the Hero’s streamlined approach means you’re stuck with what's in there.

  • Design score: 4/5

GoPro Hero: features and performance

  • 80-minute battery life
  • Voice controls
  • Image stabilization applied by Quik app

Battery life is solid, mind you. I set up my fully charged Hero review sample to record 4K/30p video continuously and it lasted an impressive 80 minutes. In the low-power battery-saver mode, recording at 1080/30p, it’ll record for over 2.5 hours. When recharging, the indicator light doesn’t change color or turn off to show that the battery is fully charged, so it was difficult for me to gauge how long it takes to go from empty to full – but from periodic checking of the battery levels it seems acceptably fast.

In keeping with GoPro’s bare-bones approach to the Hero, the feature set is limited. The Hero’s menu screen features only six options: voice control on/off; beeps on/off; screen saver on/off; orientation lock on/off; battery saver on/off; screen lock on/off. The voice controls work fine, allowing you to stop and start recordings, take a photo, and turn the power off by saying “GoPro…” followed by a command. It recognized my accent and responded accordingly almost every time.

Image 1 of 3

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 3

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 3

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

GoPro’s HyperSmooth electronic image stabilization is available, but it can't be applied in-camera, only externally via the GoPro Quik app. If you want stabilized videos you’ll need to export your videos to a mobile device or Mac computer (there’s currently no Quik app for Windows PCs; GoPro says it’s ‘coming soon’). The good news is that, once you’ve exported them, videos are automatically stabilized very effectively.

The Quik app itself is generally well designed and easy to use, although it did crash on my iPhone 13 several times while exporting large files to my photo roll, and I did bristle a little at the way it was constantly nudging me to buy a GoPro subscription.

The subscription, which costs $49.99 / £49.99 / AU$69.99 a year (or half that if you’re a new subscriber signing up for your first year) comes with some useful benefits, though: unlimited cloud storage and automatic uploading at full quality for all your photos and videos; automatically edited clip videos, ‘directed’ by AI; money off accessories purchased through the GoPro website and off your next GoPro camera; and up to two replacement cameras per year if your GoPro is lost or damaged. If you own more than one GoPro, I’d say it’s definitely worth it.

  • Features and performance score: 3.5/5
Image 1 of 4

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 4

GoPro Hero and rival action cameras

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 4

GoPro Hero and Insta360 Go 3S

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 4

GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

GoPro Hero: image and video quality

  • 12MP stills and 4K/30p video
  • 8-bit color depth and 50Mbps maximum bitrate
  • Built-in microphones

When I say that GoPro has kept things simple with the Hero, I mean it. There are just three shooting modes available: Slo-Mo, Video and Photo. There’s no room for live streaming, time lapse, burst photos or any of the other modes you find on most action cameras.

And, within the modes you do get, there’s really no way to adjust the settings. The only way to change how image capture works is to flick the camera into battery-saver mode, which reduces video quality in the name of squeezing more juice out of the camera: 4K/30p video becomes 1080/30p and 2.7K/60p slow-motion video becomes 1080/60p; the 12MP still photos remain the same.

Video is captured at 8-bit quality with a maximum bitrate of 50Mbps. There are no options to shoot in a ‘flat’ log color profile for more post-production control; the Hero really is designed to keep things super-simple. As a result, the video quality is poor by GoPro’s standards, and if you’re used to the excellent colors and detail that come out of its flagship models, you’ll immediately notice that the Hero lags a long way behind.

The electronic stabilization may be impressive, but the image quality itself is dull and lifeless in 4K, and noticeably soft in 1080p. And that’s in good lighting. In low light, the quality takes a dive, with increased noise and decreased detail. I’ve edited together a short video to demonstrate the quality in daylight, so that you can see for yourselves what it’s like, and below I’ve posted a few 12MP still photos. I’ve tweaked these photos slightly with Adobe Lightroom to give them more pop, as they look flat straight from the camera.

The Hero limits video clip times. When I left it continuously recording 4K/30p until the battery died it split the resulting video into several files, each about 10 minutes long. You can edit these together to make a single video later, of course, but it does require more work.

Image 1 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 2 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 3 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 4 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 5 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 6 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 7 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 8 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)
Image 9 of 9

GoPro Hero sample shot

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

So overall, I found the image quality disappointing. Yes, the Hero is cheap by big-name action camera standards, but there are plenty of old models from Insta360, DJI and GoPro that you might be able to pick up at cheap prices and which offer more options and better performance.

I should also talk about audio recording, which really isn’t great. The Hero doesn’t support external microphones, even USB mics, so the only options for recording live audio for your videos is the 2-mic internal setup. It’s far from terrible in good conditions, but on a blustery day there’s nothing to reduce the interference from wind.

  • Image quality score: 3/5

GoPro Hero: testing scorecard

Should I buy the GoPro Hero?

Buy it if...

You’re invested in the GoPro ecosystem
For those who already own GoPro cameras, use the Quik app and pay for a subscription, the Hero will slot neatly into their video creation workflow.

You want a cheap, simple camera
With few options, few controls and no add-ons, this is as basic as decent 4K action cameras come. It's also affordable though, making it great for kids or in risky situations where losing a pricier camera would hurt.

Don't buy it if...

You need crystal clear audio
With no way to hook up an external microphone, you’re stuck using the Hero’s built-in mic for all audio recording. Not ideal if you’re using the camera for vlogging.

You want butter-smooth 4K video
The Hero limits 4K video to 30fps, and requires a drop down to 2.7K quality for a slicker 60fps frame rate. Maximum bit rate is 50Mbps too

You want the smallest action cam around
There are several lighter, more compact options on the market – albeit at a higher asking price than the Hero.

DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro: also consider

Insta360 Go 3S

Tiny and flexible, this camera can go to places other action cams can’t. With easy magnetic mounting and a weight and size that makes the GoPro Hero look positively porky, the Go 3S a great way to grab 4K footage from unconventional angles. It does have limited battery life though, requiring frequent recharges.

Read our Insta360 Go 3S review

DJI Action 2

There have been three generations of DJI Action camera released since the Action 2 arrived in 2020, but it remains part of the company’s current range. A modular camera made up of one of two cube-shaped elements, it can be very small and light if required, and records stabilised video at up to 4K resolution.

Read our DJI Action 2 review


GoPro Hero

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

How I tested the GoPro Hero

  • Battery stamina tests
  • Vlogging and cycling outdoors

I spent a few days using the DJI Hero at home and in my neighborhood, testing out its video and photo performance in a variety of locations and conditions and mounting the camera on selfie sticks, mini tripods and my bike.

I also tried out GoPro's Quik app on both my iPhone 13 and MacBook Air, and edited footage both using the app and later with DaVinci Resolve Studio 19.

First reviewed October 2024

DJI Mini 4K review: your best first drone
5:08 pm | October 2, 2024

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Drones Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

DJI Mini 4K: one-minute review

Considering that the DJI Mini 4K is the best budget drone for beginners, it made an understated entrance. There were no bells and whistles, just a quiet appearance on Amazon, and I can see why: it's essentially the same drone as DJI's previous entry-level model, the Mini 2 SE, only with higher-resolution 4K video, which also enables a 2x digital zoom.

Video quality is further bolstered by a higher 100Mbps bitrate, but otherwise this is almost an identical drone to the Mini 2 SE. That's no bad thing – DJI has addressed the former's single weakness – 'just' 2.7K video – and priced its successor aggressively. In one fell swoop, DJI outgunned the growing competition, which includes capable rivals such as the Potensic Atom.

Since the Mini 4K was launched, DJI announced an all-new drone, the DJI Neo, which is even cheaper than the Mini 4K and shoots 4K video. However, the half-size selfie drone is an altogether different proposition. If you want the traditional drone-flying experience, complete with a 3-axis mechanical gimbal and sturdier flight performance including level 5 wind resistance, the Mini series, in which the Mini 4K is the new entry-level model, remains your best bet. If you want even simpler operation, and smart AI-subject tracking features, the Neo is a fun alternative.

DJI Mini 4K beginner drone folded away and in the hand

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

The Mini 4K offers decent battery life of up to 31 minutes on a single charge, and if you opt for the pricier Fly More Combo bundle you'll get an extra couple of batteries and charging hub thrown in for good measure.

DJI offers perhaps the most rounded experience for beginner pilots, with clear tutorials on the DJI Fly app, through which you control the Mini 4K's flights, complete with a scaled-back selection of DJI Quickshots flight moves, including dynamic movements such as Helix, Circle and Boomerang that will quickly elevate the quality of your aerial videos.

If money is no object, the DJI Mini 4 Pro remains the most accomplished sub-250g choice, with its clever subject tracking and industry-leading flight safety features like omnidirectional object sensing. But if you simply want to see what all the fuss is about with drones without risking a huge amount of money, you can't go wrong with the DJI Mini 4K. It's excellent value, and the most capable sub-$300 / £300 drone on the market, even if the Neo has more flight options.

DJI Mini 4K: release date and price

  • Released April 29 2024
  • Not available from the DJI store in Australia
  • The base kit costs just $299 / £269
  • Fly More Combo bundle costs $449 / £399

The DJI Mini 4K was announced in April 2024, and is aggressively priced at $299 / £269 for the base kit, which made it DJI's cheapest 4K drone until the DJI Neo was launched in September 2024 (though as mentioned the Neo is a different kind of drone). That launch price was 10% cheaper than that of the DJI Mini 2SE, which is practically the same drone as the Mini 4K, although the former only shoots 2.7K video, making the Mini 4K excellent value by comparison.

Should you want the Fly More Combo bundle, which includes an additional two batteries, a charging hub and a shoulder bag, the price jumps up to $449 / £399. The Mini 4K is currently not directly available from DJI in Australia.

  • Price score: 4.5/5

DJI Mini 4K beginner drone in flight with soft-focus foliage in the background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

DJI Mini 4K: specs

DJI Mini 4K: design and handling

  • Weighs less than 250g
  • Level 5 wind resistance provides reasonably stable flight
  • Three-axis gimbal for smooth video footage
  • Downward-facing sensors only, no other obstacle avoidance

The DJI Mini 4K is practically a carbon copy of the Mini 2 SE. That means it remains under 250g, and within the regulator-friendly category for most regions (there are no registration or ID requirements for recreational use in the US). Given that it has a camera though, users in the UK will need to register with the CAA for a flyer ID before taking flight.

The Fly More Combo bundle I tested includes replacement propellors and a screwdriver for when you need to swap out old or damaged propellors for new ones, two spare batteries and a charging hub, plus the RC-N1C remote controller. The controller connects to your phone, with a clamp that extends to hold just about any size of phone, plus it comes with USB-C / Lightning cables for a direct connection to your Android phone or older iPhone.

There's a single camera, capable of shooting 12MP photos in JPEG or raw (DNG) format (the latter provides more editing flexibility) and video up to 4K. The camera is supported by a three-axis mechanical gimbal to ensure that your video footage is as smooth as possible.

Image 1 of 4

DJI Mini 4K beginner drone on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Close up of the DJI Mini 4K beginner drone's arm, on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Close up of the DJI Mini 4K beginner drone's weight markings, on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

Closeup of the DJI Mini 4K beginner drone's USB-C and memory card ports

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Once you have the DJI's Fly app installed and your phone connected to the controller, it takes little to no time to get airborne: press and hold the take-off button and the Mini 4K will rise to a height of 1.2m, and hover while you get yourself in the zone for flying.

Wind resistance is rated for up to level 5 – that's up to 19-24mph / 29-38kph, which is slightly more robust than the DJI Neo, which is only rated up to level 4. I found the Mini 4K was able to withstand a moderate breeze, although of course you can hear and see it fighting to remain stable in such conditions, and I'd advise against attempting to fly in properly windy conditions.

The Fly app, together with the controller, offer several functions: Return to Home (RTH), QuickShots flight moves, and a variety of camera modes, including photo and video capture (with a button on the controller to switch between the two), panorama, and Timed Shot (interval shooting).

If you're getting started with drones, the Mini 4K has plenty for you to sink your teeth into. One notable omission, though, which you won't find on a drone at this price point, is obstacle avoidance. There are two downward-facing sensors that assist the drone for landing and can detect objects, with a precision range of 0.5-10m, but you're not getting the sophisticated omnidirectional obstacle avoidance of the pricier Mini 4 Pro.

I've been using the Mini 4K with the RC-N1C controller for months, and naturally, without obstacle avoidance crashes are almost inevitable. However, I've found that the Mini 4K has withstood minor collisions with tree branches and so on, and the consequent tumbling to the ground, admirably. It might be plastic, but the Mini 4K can take a few knocks.

You can register for DJI Care Refresh within 48 hours of activating the Mini 4K, which covers you for two replacements, water damage and flyaway, and which is probably a good idea if you tend to be more gung-ho rather than overly cautious. Prices for this start at $59 / £35.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

DJI Min 4K: features and performance

  • Quickshots for easy flight moves
  • Normal, Sport and Cine flight modes
  • Decent battery life of up to 31 minutes
  • Maximum transmission 10km (FCC) / 6km (CE/SRRC/MIC)

DJI lists the Mini 4K's flight time as up to 31 minutes, but that's measured in a controlled setting. What you actually get in real-world use is almost certainly less, and will be influenced by factors including wind speed and the flight maneuvers you're performing, and overall it's better to keep your expectations on the lower side. That said, with typical use in moderate wind I was averaging over 20 minutes, and I'm not sure that you'll find a better battery performance in another drone at this level.

I was also armed with the two additional batteries included in the Fly More Combo, effectively tripling flight times on any given outing, and the charging hub can be topped up on-the-go via USB-C.

The maximum transmission range is up to 10km, depending on what region you're flying in and what level of interference there is where you're flying. Users in Europe, for example, are restricted to 6km. In any case, beginners are unlikely to get anywhere near those kinds of distances on a single flight, and you'll need to make sure that Return to Home is set up for your take-off point in the likely event you get disorientated as to the drone's position.

You can configure the Mini 4K's max possible altitude and flight distances, and the height at which it rises to when Return to Home is initiated. There's a 500m altitude cap, although if you're playing it safe as a beginner you should stick to 150m or lower, which will likely be the legal limit in your region anyway if you don't have a certificate of competency. Again, max distance can be set up to 5000m or the limit removed entirely, but when you're starting out it's probably a good idea to stick to much closer. The Mini 4K is fed all of this data through GPS + GLONASS + Galileo satellite systems.

Image 1 of 4

DJI Mini 4K's RC controller on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 4

Top of the DJI Mini 4K beginner drone on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 4

Underside of the DJI Mini 4K beginner drone on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 4

DJI Mini 4K beginner drone folded away and in the hand

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

On the controller you'll find three flight modes: Cine, Normal and Sport, each with a different max speed and responsiveness. Cine mode is the slowest of the three, designed to get you the smoothest possible aerial videos, while of course Sport is the niftiest to unleash piloting fun.

Flight speeds in Sport mode top out at 35.79mph and are no match for FPV drones in manual mode such as the DJI Avata 2, but are plenty quick enough while you find your feet and build your piloting skills. Cine mode is significantly slower than that.

And then there's DJI QuickShots flight moves, which include Dronie, Helix, Rocket, Circle, and Boomerang. Circle performs a lateral 360-degree move around your chosen subject – you simply select suggested subjects or draw a box around the chosen subject, and off the drone goes into action. Boomerang does a similar move while gradually gaining height.

These simple flight moves can improve the quality of your aerial videos as you center on points of interest around you. Other DJI drones have additional QuickShots moves in Spotlight and Follow. The Mini 4K does not offer Follow, and it lacks Follow Me subject tracking, which you get with pricier models and even the new Neo selfie drone.

  • Features score: 4.5/5

DJI Mini 4K: image and video quality

  • 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Up to 4K 30fps video, 2.7K up to 60fps
  • 12MP JPEG + RAW photos

DJI Mini 4K beginner drone on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

The Mini 4K's 1/2.3-inch sensor is larger than the sensor found in the Neo, and smaller than the one in the Mini 3 and Mini 4 Pro drones. As such, its 4K video image quality sits somewhere in the middle in terms of color depth, dynamic range and low-light clarity.

That sensor size is roughly equivalent to what you'd find in a standard smartphone, only you don't have the computational photography modes and HDR settings afforded to today's handsets; if the sun is directly in your shot, expect blown-out highlights. However, I still found detail to be very sharp at first light before the sun lapped over the landscape.

Video resolution tops out at 4K 30fps, while cinematic half-speed 60fps videos can be shot in 2.7K and Full HD resolutions. Photos are up to 12MP (in 4:3 aspect, with a 16:9 cropped format also available) and can be shot in either JPEG or raw, with the latter offer more editing flexibility. Files are recorded onto microSD card, with compatibility for cards up to 256GB.

DJI has upped the maximum video bitrate to 100Mbps (it was 40Mbps in the Mini 2 SE). So not only does the Mini 4K offer higher-resolution video than the Mini 2 SE, but its 2.7K video is also less compressed.

Image 1 of 2

Aerial view of lake at dawn, shot on DJI Mini 4K

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 2

Aerial view of fields at golden hour, shot on DJI Mini 4K

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

There's a standard color profile for photo and video – what you see is what you get. However, you can easily edit the colors in raw DNG format photos in your choice of photo editor. If you're a keen editor, you'll probably want to shoot photos in both raw and JPEG, just in case the JPEG photos aren't to your taste. However, there's no flat color profile for video, which is pretty normal for a beginner drone, so there's not much scope for color-grading videos.

What's unusual for a drone at this price point is that you can switch from the Mini 4K's Auto setting to a Pro mode for manual control over exposure settings for photo and video, including the 1/30 to 1/8000 shutter speed and ISO 100 to 3200 ranges. That's an excellent feature for discerning image makers, though I suspect most people will keep the Mini 4K in Auto and be pleased with the results.

The three-axis gimbal offer a -110° to 35° tilt range, -35° to 35° of roll and -20° to 20° pan, and works in tandem with image stabilization to give you smooth video footage. Unless you're fighting high winds or making jerky movements on the controller – which requires significant finesse – then you can expect super-smooth video footage, especially in Cine mode.

  • Image quality score: 4.5/5

DJI Mini 4K sample video 4K

DJI Mini 4K Quickshots

DJI Mini 4K: testing scorecard

DJI Mini 4K beginner drone in flight with soft focus tree foliage in the background

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Should I buy the DJI Mini 4K?

Buy it if...

You want the best 4K drone under $300
Putting the DJI Neo aside, which is a different proposition, the Mini 4K is the best drone money can buy for under $300.

You’re buying your first drone
The Mini 4K is a superb first drone, with decent flight performance and video quality, plus manual control over camera settings.

You want decent battery life
Up to 31 minutes from a fully charged battery is very impressive, and you'll get triple that with the Fly More Combo kit.

Don't buy it if...

You want the very best sub-250g drone no matter the cost
If money is no object, your best first drone is the DJI Mini 4 Pro.

You're more interested in aerial selfies than flying
DJI's Neo is smaller, cheaper and even easier to use, with intelligent subject tracking making selfies on the move an autonomous doddle.

You'd be better off with obstacle avoidance
The Mini 4K only has downward-facing sensors primarily designed to aid landing, whereas the Mini 4 Pro has omnidirectional obstacle avoidance that'll help you avoid crashes.

DJI Mini 4K: also consider

How I tested the DJI Mini 4K

Close up of the DJI Mini 4K beginner drone's arm, on a wooden table

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)
  • Long term use
  • Flown with the DJI RC-N1C Controller and Fly app
  • Videos and photos made with all available file formats

I've had the DJI Mini 4K for months, and during this time have become very familiar with it. The Fly More Combo was bundled with the charging hub, two extra batteries and the DJI RC-N1C controller, through which I have controlled the drone, via the DJI Fly app for Android.

The tiny drone has been flown in all kinds of weather, even inclement, showing it's able to withstand light rain and reasonably brisk wind. It's taken a few knocks into tree branches and has so far withstood this rough treatment.

I've made photos and videos with all of the available settings, which includes 4K, 2.7K, Full HD videos, plus 12MP JPEG and RAW photos, in good light and low light at dusk.

First reviewed September 2024

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra review: the best 8K 360-degree camera?
4:00 pm | September 25, 2024

Author: admin | Category: 360 Cameras Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: one-minute review

Kandao has been making 360-degree cameras for some time now, and the Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra is by far the Chinese company's best 360-degree camera to date. It's an alternative and direct competitor to the highly rated Insta360 X4, and both are among the most interesting of the best action cameras currently available.

The GoPro Max 2 release has been delayed, but when it's finally released we expect this 360-degree camera to also offer up to 8K resolution to further expand the options available for fans of 360-degree shooting. But given this delay, and the fact that the QooCam 3 Ultra and Insta360 X4 are already available, it looks like GoPro could be in danger of missing the 8K boat.

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra LCD screen view

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The QooCam 3 Ultra can capture video in several modes and resolutions up to 8K 30fps for 360-degree video and up to 4K 60fps in Single Lens Mode. Video can be captured in a standard 8-bit Rec. 709 profile or in 10-bit Rec. 2020 (HLG), with LUT support available in QooCam Studio. There's also a Dynamic Range Boost for HDR shooting; this limits resolution when shooting photos, but it's claimed to increase dynamic range by two stops.

This is a versatile action camera that offers IP68 dust and waterproofing to a depth of 33ft / 10m, has 128GB of internal storage alongside a microSD card slot, and can be controlled wirelessly using the QooCam 3 app. It's not a cheap 360-degree camera though, coming in at a higher price than its closest rival, the Insta360 X4.

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: release date and price

  • Launched August 29 2024
  • Costs $599 / £579 / AU$1,033
  • Accessories available separately
Image 1 of 3

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra with lens protectors on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 3

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra battery charging case on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 3

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra selfie stick on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra was released in August 2024 and is available now for $599 / £579 / AU$1,033. The camera is listed at USD$699 for Australian visitors to the Kandao website. This is considerably more expensive than the QooCam 3 and more expensive than the Insta360 X4 which cost $499.99 / £499.99 / AU$879.99 at launch.

At the time of writing, only the QooCam 3 Ultra base kit that includes the camera, battery, PD cable, lens cloth and soft case is the only option available, so accessories have to be purchased separately.

These include a battery charging case, spare batteries, selfie sticks, a car suction mount and detachable lens protectors. A selfie stick in the kit would be preferable because these are essential for 360-degree cameras.

  • Price score: 3/5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: specs

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: design and handling

  • Larger and heavier than the competition
  • Waterproof to 33ft / 10m
  • 1/4-inch screw thread

The QooCam 3 Ultra looks remarkably similar to the QooCam 3 but is both taller and heavier, at 11.85oz / 336g including a battery. This is undoubtedly still lightweight, but at 4.44oz / 126g heavier than the QooCam 3, that's quite a chunk of additional weight. It doesn’t affect handling or usability in most situations, but when attaching the camera to bike handlebar mounts, for instance, you have to be sure that your mount can adequately support the camera.

Build quality is excellent, and the camera certainly feels robust, with dust resistance and water resistance to 33ft / 10m – although as with all 360-degree cameras, the dual fisheye lenses on each side mean that you really wouldn’t want to drop it. Pop-on lens protectors are available separately, and stay attached well to protect from stray stones flying up and minor knocks.

The camera body is designed minimally with a power and mode button on the left, a shutter button below the 2.19-inch rectangular touchscreen, a customizable Q button, a button to change the camera view, and a 1/4-inch screw thread on the bottom. Most settings and functions are accessed by swiping from the top, bottom and sides of the screen, like most action cameras and 360-degree cameras, and this makes the QooCam Ultra 3 intuitive to use.

Image 1 of 5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra case on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)

Using the camera without the phone app works well, but you can also attach it to the QooCam 3 app via WiFi 6 for wireless control. In terms of ports, there's a USB-C port under a waterproof door that can be used to charge the battery and transfer photos and videos on one side of the camera, while on the other is a door keeping the battery and microSD card slot, which can take cards up to 1TB, safe from water ingress. The latter is useful, but with 128GB of onboard storage, it's not always necessary to use a memory card.

In terms of battery life, forgetting anything that Kandao claims, I spent over an hour wandering around a city shooting 8K video, timelapse/hyperlapse videos and photos for well over an hour and hardly dented the battery – it only ran out days later after further shooting.

Of course, this wasn't continuous use, but in real-world terms, I wasn't disappointed. A second or even a third battery is still useful to ensure you can continue shooting when out for the day, and the battery charging case that's available separately makes charging easier, and provides storage for batteries when not in use.

  • Design score: 4/5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: features and performance

  • Dual 1/1.7-inch Quad-Bayer sensors
  • 96MP 360-degree photos
  • 10-bit HLG video option

The key features of the QooCam 3 Ultra are pretty much tied into the hardware where the dual 1/1.7-inch Quad-Bayer sensors and the lenses with f/1.6 apertures and 9.36mm equivalent focal lengths take centre stage. 8K video is oversampled to improve image quality. Other features include 96MP 360-degree photos, 10-bit HLG, SuperSteady Stabilization, Spatial Audio, built-in GPS and Single Lens video capture.

Image Stabilization uses a 6-axis gyro and works well, but unless you walk with bent knees, the way that you have to with professional video gimbals, the bob of walking will be noticeable as can be seen in the example video. This was captured this way on purpose to discover whether improvements had been made on the QooCam 3, but both perform identically in this area.

The camera view on the camera LCD and in the app is also stabilized, unlike the QooCam 3 at launch, so you get much closer to what you’re going to get on-screen, which is an improvement. Although, with 360-degree cameras what you get predominantly comes down to reframing video in software.

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)

QooCam Studio, which is Kandao's desktop editing software for photos and videos still lacks the slick and easy-to-use interface alongside some of the more exciting reframe options of Insta360 Studio. It's still fairly easy to use, and the QooCam 3 phone app still provides more functionality than the desktop version including the ability to use templates, although much work could be done to both to vastly improve them.

Sound quality from the four directional mics for spatial audio capture is pretty good, but don’t be fooled by the choppy sound you'll hear in the QooCam desktop app. Sound is massively improved, and is the way it should be, once videos have been exported. You can also attach external microphones via Bluetooth and USB-C; if sound is important, one of these will be essential to take advantage of the best sound quality possible and to reduce ambient noise.

Single Lens capture is another useful feature that allows you to capture video with one of the lenses rather than both – you can select the camera facing towards or away from you. This is ideal when you know that you simply want a single view and video can be captured in 4K up to 60fps or 3.4K at 100/120fps for slow motion footage.

You still need to run the footage through one of the apps where you can change the field of view – the view captured is square but is cropped to 16:9 with the Reframe Adjustment option. One point to note here is that you can’t actually reframe Single Lens videos because the viewpoint is fixed.

  • Features and performance score: 4/5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: image and video quality

  • Up to 8K 30fps video
  • Up to 96MP photos
  • Slow motion capture

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)

360-degree cameras sound almost unfathomable when you first think about them, but they're much less complicated than they sound and open up a wealth of creative possibilities. You can pan, zoom and change camera direction, allowing you to easily film yourself and the entire environment around you. Although an 8K resolution sounds excessive, this resolution covers 360 degrees and greatly improves image quality for 360-degree videos.

360-degree videos can be captured in 8K up to 30fps, 5.7K up to 60fps and 4K up to 120fps, so although 4K provides the ability to capture 360-degree slow motion, image quality is greatly diminished when compared to 8K. 8K file sizes are huge and even 5.7K are pretty hefty, so you do have to consider how much footage you intend to capture and think about whether or not the 128GB of on-board storage needs to be supplemented with a microSD card.

Reframed 360-degree video

Timelapse/hyperlapse

8K 360-degree videos and timelapse videos look great, although there can be a small amount of wobble where lens images are stitched so hopefully this can be improved. Overall image quality is great even with the Standard bitrate (100Mbps), but this can be improved by opting for High (150Mbps). Color profiles available include 8-bit Rec. 709 for in-camera processed footage or 10-bit Rec. 2020 (HLG).

The latter provides a much greater dynamic range with the ability to apply LUTs in QooCam Studio, with 11 LUTs preloaded and the ability to add your own. Unfortunately, there's no ability to dial down LUT strength, and there are no options available for making adjustments such as exposure, white balance, shadows or highlights to video.

When using the phone app you get a histogram to aid with exposure, but when shooting with just the camera in isolation, you only get an exposure warning where blue denotes shadow clipping and red highlight clipping. This is perfectly adequate and provides a quick and easy way to assess exposure.

Dynamic range isn’t great, so you have to watch your highlights, but Dynamic Range Boost for HDR shooting does increase dynamic range by two stops at the expense of photo resolution which is limited to 24MP. There is a noticeable difference between standard and Dynamic Range Boost images, and the processing of the latter is no heavier than the former. Video looks fine because you're forced into capturing in 10-bit Rec. 2020 (HLG) which is a flat profile and offers greater dynamic range.

Image 1 of 10

Photo of a river and bridge taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 10

Street photo taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 10

Photo of traditional red phone boxes taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 10

Street photo taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 10

Tiny world photo taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 6 of 10

Photo of an old doorway and wall art taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 7 of 10

Photo of of a bike taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 8 of 10

Photo of sign on a wall taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 9 of 10

Photo of punts on the River Cam taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 10 of 10

Photo of a Cambridge University college  taken with the QooCam 3 Ultra

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The best photo quality comes from the DNG8 shooting feature where eight DNG files are captured and then merged in the RawPlus software for increased detail, lower noise and extended dynamic range. The downside is that it's a convoluted process where you have to merge the eight DNGs into a single DNG in RawPlus, export, edit in Lightroom, export a JPEG and then reframe the JPEG in QooCamStudio before exporting a final JPEG.

Standard photo quality is pretty good with brighter conditions providing the best results like most action cameras and drones with small sensors. But when working with DNGs, you have to edit in Lightroom, export a JPEG and then reframe the JPEG in QooCamStudio before exporting again. This process hasn’t been improved since the QooCam 3, and it could and should be much more streamlined.

ISO handling isn’t bad for a camera of this type with such small sensors, and coupled with the f/1.6 apertures it's well suited to low-light shooting when the situation arises. I tested the camera at night in a dark location at ISO 6400, which is the highest setting available, and the results are useable but it's certainly not a setting you'd want to rely on too often. ISO 1600 is much more useable, but shooting at the lowest possible ISO is always preferable.

  • Image and video quality score: 4.5/5

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra: testing scorecard

Should I buy the Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra?

Buy it if...

You want to shoot 360-degree video
If you would like to shoot 360-degree video, the QooCam 3 Ultra will allow you to do this and the 8K maximum resolution produces great image quality.

You would like to be able to easily film yourself
360-degree cameras make it incredibly easy to film yourself using a single camera and without the need for a camera operator, which can simplify the process.

You'd like to be able to reframe photos and videos
The beauty of shooting 360-degree photos and videos is that you can reframe the viewpoint which provides a huge amount of creative freedom with a single camera.

Don't buy it if...

You're on a budget
The Insta360 X4 is less expensive and also offers up to 8K video capture alongside great features in the phone and desktop apps.

You'll only use Single Lens shooting
If you have no intention of capturing 360-degree photos and videos, whether to show in their entirety or reframed to a standard aspect ratio, this camera would be a waste of time for you.

You'd like a more compact 360 camera
The Insta360 X4 is both smaller and lighter than the QooCam 3 Ultra. For some this won’t be an issue, but smaller and lighter will be attractive for more action-oriented activities.

QooCam 3 Ultra: also consider

Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra on a table

(Image credit: James Abbott)

How I tested the Kandao QooCam 3 Ultra

  • All features and functions tested
  • Phone and desktop apps used for editing
  • Image quality reviewed

The QooCam 3 Ultra was tested over several weeks shooting photos and videos in different conditions and locations to test all of the features and functions, alongside handling. With 360-degree cameras, shooting is only half the battle, so the second part of testing was running everything through the QooCam 3 smartphone app and the QooCam studio desktop app to put editing through its paces.

Approaching 360-degree image capture is extremely similar to, yet wildly different to capturing standard photos and videos. So, with this in mind, I was drawing on 30 years of photographic experience and 16 years of working as a photography journalist. Having used these types of cameras before I was aware of what to expect and what to look out for, but with any new product there's inevitably something new to discover.

First reviewed September 2024

« Previous PageNext Page »