Organizer
Gadget news
Check out the new arrivals in our merch store!
8:39 pm | May 24, 2023

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

We're here with an exciting update about our merch store. We have two brand new T-shirt designs in multiple colors, as well as mugs in three sizes! We've been getting requests for Mugs since we launched the store and we are finally able to answer those. To mark the occasion we're running a special 15% discount on EVERYTHING until the end of June - just enter ROBOTSFTW-15 at checkout. Kicking things off with our new 'I Sound Like a Robot' tee in two designs. This is inside joke well familiar to our YouTube channel followers and Will fans (if you know you know). There are two...

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: A cheap and cheerful fitness tracker with built-in GPS
7:42 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , | Comments: Off

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: One minute review

The Amazfit Bip 3 Pro is an affordable fitness tracker and one of the best cheap running watches, with all the basics you could ask for. It has an optical heart rate reader. It has full-on GPS, unlike the non-Pro edition of the Bip 3. Want phone-free run tracking? You got it. 

And where Fitbit offers a small lozenge of a display for this sort of money, the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro looks a lot like a smartwatch. 

The bad bits? It comes across cheaper in person than it does in photos. The display is compromised on multiple fronts. And while the location tracking is really quite excellent based on our testing, heart rate accuracy is mediocre. 

What does this add up to? A solid affordable fitness tracker, although the Honor Band 7 pulls off budget gloss better. 

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: Specifications

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: Price and Availability

  • $69.99 in the US
  • £69.99 in the UK
  • AU$119 in Australia. 

Amazfit launched the Bip 3 Pro in June 2022 as one of its cheaper fitness watches. It costs $69.99 / £69 / AU$119. 

This is just $10/£20 more than the standard Amazfit Bip 3, which is a largely similar watch, but one that lacks full GPS. It uses Connected GPS instead. 

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: Design and Display

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro

(Image credit: Andrew Williams)
  • Low weight equals high level of comfort
  • Screen is basic
  • Feels cheap in places

The Amazfit Bip 3 Pro is a watch made to look a little like an Apple Watch, without going all the way and becoming a potentially embarrassing low-rent clone. It has the classic rounded square-ish display of Apple’s smartwatch, but the dimensions are different and the side button is in a completely different place.

Its display glass looks great in photos, particularly when papped with a wide aperture lens, but don’t come to the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro expecting it to drip in that luxurious smartwatch sense of quality. The casing is plastic, and the side button’s click feels cheap. This isn’t a rotary controller either. While the crown turns, doing so does nothing. 

However, the simple construction does lead to super-low weight. At just 35g, including strap, the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro is a watch you can forget you are wearing. In a positive sense. 

It’s a 5ATM watch too, so you’re rarely need to take it off — including when you go swimming.  

Amid all this breezy low-maintenance stuff, the screen stands out as a potential irritant. It does not have an ambient light sensor, meaning you need to manually alter the brightness level when you go out for a workout. 

You will need it maxed, too, as the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro can barely get bright enough for solid visibility on a sunny day. This is less of an issue with the OLED Honor Band 7. 

As with most more smartwatch-like designs we’ve tested at this level, the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro has an LCD screen. It’s a 1.69-inch panel of 240 x 280px pixel resolution. 

This is not a high pixel count for the screen’s size, leading to a slightly craggy appearance to menu text. However, it’s only the lack of auto brightness that grates. You’re pretty much forced to ramp up brightness when you go out for a run. And when you get back it, the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro will then look too bright indoors. 

The screen doesn’t look all that smooth when you scroll through menus either. It’s hard to tell whether this is down to the refresh rate of the screen of the frame rate of the interface, but you don’t get the smoothness of a top-tier watch. Typical of an LCD watch, there’s no “always on” mode either. This is only really suitable for OLEDs, because with an LCD like this the entire screen is lit whenever a tiny part of it is. 

It is good in other areas, though. Some of these budget watch LCD screens have fairly poor contrast, and a too-high black floor, making the black areas of the screen appear to glow. Not so here. It takes a pretty dim room to highlight this definitely isn’t an OLED. 

  • Design score: 4/5

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: Features

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro

(Image credit: Andrew Williams)
  • Very basic smartwatch-style features
  • Solid use of the display for data visualisation
  • Full GPS

We reviewed the Amazfit GTR 4 recently. It tries to further blur the lines between simple fitness watches and true smartwatches. The Amazfit Bip 3 Pro isn’t one of these. It’s a classic health and fitness watch with some smart basics, like message notifications, alarms and weather reports. It can also control music played on your phone, but not play music directly. 

Simple as it sounds, the diversity of the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro’s watch faces is one of its top features. There are loads available through the Zepp phone app. And while some are paid downloads, we counted 74 freebies. It gives you much greater control over the personality of your watch. In one face the time is displayed on a zombie’s rotting teeth, for example. Charming. 

Amazfit squeezes the usual array of metrics out of the relatively simple combo of motion sensors, and an optical heart rate reader. It records heart rate 24/7, can take blood oxygen readings on command, will track your sleep and stress, and count daily steps.

There are also some features that don’t really on daily data. You can set up to-do lists in the Zepp app, and tick them off on the watch. There are simple guided breathing exercises and the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro can also track menstrual cycles. But it appears to be based on following your established pattern, rather than the smart body temperature method used in an Apple Watch Series 8. 

You can use the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro to set off an alarm on your phone too, should you misplace it. 

Notifications is probably the feature we’ve appreciated most, though. The 1.69-inch screen offers a decent amount of space to see the top line info of emails and messages. You can’t reply to anything, and once dismissed notification cards are gone. But that’s the fundamentals covered at least. 

The Amazfit Bip 3 Pro does not have an altimeter, to count flights of stairs. There are no ECG readings on offer. However, the large screen does let Amazfit dress up the fitness watch essentials to look smart. For example, when you tap on the heart rate screen you will see a graph detailing the entire day’s readings as a data-packed graph. 

Useful? That’s up for debate, but this wouldn’t be feasible on a truly tiny-screened wearable. The Bip 3 Pro also has lots of exercise tracking modes, 61 one of them, but most are identical in practice, just showing your heart rate and a calorie estimate. 

  • Features score: 3/5

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: Performance

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro

(Image credit: Andrew Williams)
  • Good location tracking
  • Frequently patchy heart rate readings
  • Long battery life

Amazfit says the Bip 3 Pro can last up to 14 days of light use, a week of heavier use. We found it lasts around 10 days with our kind of lighter use, six and a bit days with an hour of GPS tracked exercise on most days. 

45 minutes of GPS tracking took 4% off the battery, suggesting you may be able to get 16 hours of tracking out of a full charge. 

Looking a little deeper at the recorded exercise results, the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro has two sides. Its GPS location tracking is surprisingly great. It is not too slow to triangulate for a budget watch (perhaps 10-20 seconds), and its distance results were eerily similar to those of a Garmin Forerunner 965 — a watch that costs eight times the price. 

Over the course of an 11km run, the two watches ended up within 20m of each other.  Ridiculously close results. The watch does not have any particularly special GPS skills, with support for four satellite arrays — GPS, Galileo, QZSS and GLONASS. However, the quality of this   feature justifies the $20/£20 bump over the standard Bip 3, which lacks full GPS.

The heart rate reader’s performance is much more mixed. We found its all-day readings to often be way off the mark, featuring far too high spikes of 110bpm and up after just heading to the kitchen to grab a glass of water or make a coffee. 

Results during exercise were also quite messy. The first few minutes of recording are typically poor, which is quite normal for lower-end wrist-worn hardware. Readings throughout an hour-long run were also peppered with a few odd spikes there the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro was 15-20bpm off the mark.

This led to the Amazfit Bip 3 Pro recording inaccurate maximum heart rate readings during more easygoing mid-week workouts. But it’s not a total bust. 

The Amazfit Bip 3 Pro did not flat-out miss any exertion spikes in a mixed intensity workout, and aside from a dubious first five minutes, its general readings were not too wide of the mark. After an hour-long session its average reading was only 2bpm higher than that of a Garmin Forerunner 965. 

  • Performance score: 3.5/5

Amazfit Bip 3 Pro: Should I buy?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Oppo launches Reno10 series, the Pro variants bring 100W charging
5:31 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Oppo introduced today its latest Reno lineup in China. The Reno 10 series includes three phones - vanilla Reno10, Reno10 Pro, and Reno10 Pro+. Oppo Reno10 Pro+ The Oppo Reno10 Pro+ is upper midrange smartphone with a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and 16GB of RAM as well as the MariSilicon X NPU. It comes wiht a 10-bit OLED panel of 6.74” diagonal and 120 Hz adaptive refresh rate. The resolution is 2772 x 1240 pixels Around the back of the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ is a capable 50 MP main shooter, alongside a 64 MP telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom and OIS. The third camera is...

OnePlus 11 Marble Odyssey limited-edition announced for India
4:13 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

OnePlus today announced a limited-edition OnePlus 11 Marble Odyssey for the Indian market. This variant is essentially a rebranded version of the OnePlus 11 Jupiter Rock edition for China that we have covered in the past. Just to reiterate what this particular edition is, the phone uses a material that OnePlus calls 3D microcrystalline rock for the back panel. We are not sure what the exact chemical composition of this material is but OnePlus claims that it is difficult to make with 25% production efficiency of the standard glass panels and only 50% of its yield. The unique...

AMD Radeon RX 7600: a major gift for gamers on a budget
4:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: , , , | Comments: Off

AMD Radeon RX 7600: Two minute review

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is probably the best 1080p graphics card you can buy right now, and in all honesty, it should be the last of its kind.

Team Red has been a bit gun-shy of late with its graphics card offerings, with the last graphics card we saw being the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. While that was a great card, it launched almost half a year ago, and we haven't heard much from AMD since. 

Meanwhile, its rival has released a steady stream of cards, and at this rate, it's almost through its main GPU stack at this point, so it's interesting that AMD chose to release a very budget-friendly midrange card rather than go down the list of higher-end offerings the way Nvidia has.

In a way, it's a very smart strategy (and one I actually recommended back in February), and with the Radeon RX 7600 going on sale on May 25, 2023, for just $269 (about £215/AU$405), AMD manages to make it to market with its all-important midrange offering at least a full month ahead of Nvidia's competing RTX 4060 while also managing to undercut its rival on price.

In terms of performance, the RX 7600 is a major improvement over the AMD Radeon RX 6600 it replaces, while also generally outperforming the competing Intel Arc A750. It does fall short of the RTX 3060 overall, but not by much, and a lot of that is relative to ray tracing performance, which isn't great on either card to begin with, so this advantage looks bigger than it really is in practice.

If there is one knock against the RX 7600, it's its power draw, which is pulling down 165W TGP, which is more than the 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and about 33W more than the RX 6600, so this is definitely the wrong direction for AMD to be going in, power wise.

AMD also has to step up its game when it comes to FSR. Nvidia's most recent launch, the RTX 4060 Ti, was a fairly disappointing card when it came to its baseline performance, but there was no denying that DLSS 3, especially with Frame Generation, is a huge value-add for Team Green. And while DLSS 3 is only available on about 50-ish games, FSR 2 is generally more available with about 120 games featuring FSR 2, but DLSS 2.0 is available in more than 200 games, so AMD has some catching up to do.

When it finally does, the RX 7600 will be an even better buy for midrange gamers, and while it's a sad state of affairs that $269 is about as "budget" as we can hope to see for a while, it's a substantially better value than just about any card on the market right now.

That might change when the RTX 4060 lands, but given that the performance of the baseline performance of the RTX 4060 is expected to be about 20% better than that of the RTX 3060, I expect that it will fall in pretty close to where the RX 7600 currently is, only with a more expensive MSRP and no Founders Edition to keep third-party partners honest in terms of price. 

So unless the RTX 4060 pulls a rabbit out of a hat, I still expect the AMD Radeon RX 7600 to hold the edge over its rival on value, which at this price point is really the only thing that really matters. As it stands, it is the best cheap graphics card you can buy right now, and I expect that will remain the case for the rest of this generation.

AMD Radeon RX 7600: Price & availability

An AMD Radeon RX 7600 on a desk

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
  • How much is it? MSRP listed at $269 (about £215/AU$405)
  • When is it out? It goes on sale May 25, 2023
  • Where can you get it? You can buy it in the US, UK, and Australia

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 goes on sale on May 25, 2023, with an MSRP of $269, (about £215/AU$405), making it the cheapest card of this generation to launch. Not only that, it's a substantial price drop from the Radeon RX 6600, which launched at $329 (about £265/AU$495), so you're getting a much better graphics card for almost 20% less. This is more like it! 

Ostensibly, the rival to the RX 7600 is the RTX 4060, but since that card has yet to launch, we can only really compare it to the last-gen midrange offerings from Nvidia and Intel.

The Nvidia RTX 4060 when it launches will sell for $299 (about £240/AU$450), which is 9% cheaper than the RTX 3060's official MSRP of $329. The RX 7600 has a cheaper MSRP than either of those, but I expect that the RTX 3060 especially will see some heavy discounting as a result of both the RTX 4060 and the RX 7600, so the value proposition of the RX 7600 might shift depending on what SKU you're looking at.

The RX 7600 does come in slightly more expensive than the Intel Arc A750, and while you might do a double-take at the mention of Intel, the Arc A750 can give the RX 7600 a run for its money at times, so you definitely can't write it off completely.

AMD Radeon RX 7600: Features and chipset

An AMD Radeon RX 7600 on a desk

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
  • More ray tracing cores and new AI cores
  • Higher TGP

With the move to RDNA 3, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 starts off on a 6nm TSMC process over the RX 6600's 7nm, which gives the RX 7600 a roughly 20% jump in the number of transistors it has to work with (13.3 billion to 11.1 billion). And even though the actual GPU die on the RX 7600 is about 14% smaller than that of the RX 6600, it manages to pack in four additional compute units for a total of 32 compared to the RX 6600's 28.

This is also a more mature architecture, so the 2,048 stream processors (a roughly 14% increase over the RX 6600), are more performant, and the second-generation ray accelerators are a huge improvement over the first-gen RAs in the RX 6600.

The RX 7600 also has faster clocks than the RX 6600, with a boost clock improvement of about 6%, but the big improvement comes with the memory clock speed, which is 2,250MHz for the RX 7600 and 1,750MHz for the RX 6600. This means a nearly 30% boost to memory speed, so even though the RX 7600 is still rocking the same 8GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 128-bit bus as the RX 6600, it has an 18 Gbps effective memory speed compared to 14 Gbps for the RX 6600.

There is also the addition of 64 AI accelerators for the RX 7600, which the RX 6600 simply didn't have. This means that things like Radeon Super Resolution (RSR) will run better than it did on the RX 6600, and it will enable advanced AI workloads like generative AI content creation.

All this does come at the cost of power though, as the RX 7600 has a 25% higher TGP than the RX 6600. This isn't good, and given how Nvidia's cards are typically getting better performance with less power gen-on-gen, this is definitely the wrong direction for AMD to be going in. It still keeps the card "reasonable" when it comes to your PSU, and AMD recommends a 550W PSU for the RX 7600 at a minimum, but this still manages to keep things under 600W overall.

AMD Radeon RX 7600: design

An AMD Radeon RX 7600 on a desk

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

The AMD reference card for the Radeon RX 7600 is a compact dual-fan number that will fit in just about any case. This is a dual-slot card, but it's just over eight inches long and a little over four inches tall, so it's great for mini-tower builds, and with just a single 8-pin power connector, you won't have any issues with cable management here.

In terms of outputs, we get three DisplayPort 2.1 ports, with a single HDMI 2.1a port, though no USB-C output. Honestly, having the DisplayPort 2.1 output is nice, but really unnecessary. With just 8GB VRAM, there is no universe where this card can output 8K video that doesn't default to a slow sequence of still images, so it's a nice-to-have that you are almost guaranteed to never use. Far be it for me to be a buzzkill, though, so if you want to push this card at 8K, do let me know how that turns out.

As for the lack of USB-C, this really isn't a creative card, so this isn't something that you should worry about unless you have one of the best USB-C monitors and nothing else. Even then, I recommend looking further up the stack (like the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT), since USB-C monitors are almost universally for creative pros and this card isn't going to cut it for the kind of work you'll need to do with it.

In terms of its actual aesthetics, like the two RDNA 3 cards before it, the RX 7600 eschews any RGB and features a matte black design with some subtle accent touches like the red stripes on the fins of the heat sink which would be visible in a case. Overall, it's a cool-looking card, especially for those not looking to have excessive RGB lighting up everything in their case.

AMD Radeon RX 7600: Performance

An AMD Radeon RX 7600 on a desk

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
  • Best-in-class 1080p rasterization performance
  • Much improved ray tracing performance
  • Can manage some decent 1440p performance, especially without ray tracing

Given the missteps Nvidia has been making lately, AMD has a real shot of taking some market share if it can offer compelling performance for gamers. Fortunately for Team Red, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 manages to pull off quite a coup when it comes to gaming performance.

Test system specs

This is the system we used to test the AMD Radeon RX 7600:

CPU: Intel Core i9-13900K
CPU Cooler: Cougar Poseidon GT 360 AIO
RAM: 64GB Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5-6600MHz
Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk Wifi
SSD: Samsung 990 Pro 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD
Power Supply: Corsair AX1000
Case: Praxis Wetbench

For the most part, the RTX 4060 is the RX 7600's main competition, but with the Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti just being released, it's the natural comparison at the moment. Is this necessarily fair? No, it's not, and the RX 7600 does lose out to the RTX 4060 Ti on just about every measure, but it really doesn't lose that badly.

In rasterized workloads at 1080p, the RX 7600 is only about 12% slower than the RTX 4060 Ti, and only about 13% slower at 1440p. This changes drastically as soon as you start factoring in ray tracing and upscaling, but it's something I definitely wasn't expecting. Against the RTX 3060 Ti, the RX 7600 fares better, obviously, and generally it outperforms the RTX 3060 in rasterization workloads.

In terms of its predecessor, the RX 7600 is the kind of gen-on-gen improvement I was really expecting to see from the RTX 4060 Ti and didn't get. The RX 7600's rasterization performance is great, but its improved ray accelerators really outshine what the RX 6600 is capable of, and really makes ray tracing at this price point accessible to the midrange.

Synthetic Benchmarks

In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 7600 roundly beats its predecessor, as well as the RTX 3060. Against the card it's replacing, the RX 7600 outperforms the RX 6600 by about 19%, while the RX 7600 beats the RTX 3060 by about 18% overall.

Digging into the results a bit further though, we can see some of the biggest gains come in ray-traced workloads like Port Royal, where the RX 7600 saw a 33% improvement over the previous gen.

The only benchmark where the RX 7600 comes up a bit short is in the Speedway benchmark, which is a 1440p, ray tracing benchmark. Here, the RTX 3060 just barely edges out the RX 7600 by just 219 points, which is close enough to be a bit of a wash.

Gaming Benchmarks

As you can see, when it comes to general rasterization performance at 1080p, the RX 7600 is the hands-down winner, only falling to the RTX 3060 in Counterstrike: Global Offensive, and only then by the barest of margins. Everywhere else, you can expect roughly 15-20% better performance out of the RX 7600 overall.

Things take a bit of a turn when it comes to ray tracing performance, but the results here are a bit deceptive for a couple of reasons. First, Cyberpunk 2077 is Nvidia's major showcase game, and that game is very well optimized for Nvidia cards, so the ray tracing performance for the RTX 3060 is substantially better than for either AMD card. However, take Cyberpunk 2077 out of the mix, and the RX 7600 actually outperforms the RTX 3060 in ray tracing performance. 

It's not all good for AMD though, since the minimum fps for the RX 7600 in both Returnal and Cyberpunk 2077 is in the single digits, and it's not just for a brief moment, but fairly regular dips into slideshow territory, especially around volumetric fog with applied lighting effects.

It's a similar story when you apply upscaling to either Cyberpunk 2077 or Returnal, where the RTX 3060's DLSS 2.0 is simply better optimized for the former, and the AMD RX 7600 struggles on the minimum fps on the latter, so even though the average fps on Returnal looks like it's north of 60 fps, you'll dip as low as 6 fps on the Quality FSR preset or 15 fps on the Ultra Performance preset, and trust me, it's noticeable. 

Of course, turn ray tracing off and you probably won't have this issue, but that will be a series of settings compromises you will have to decide for yourself. Overall though, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 manages to perform well above where you would expect from this generation at this price point. If you're looking for an outstanding and reasonably cheap 1080p graphics card, you can't go wrong with this one.

Should you buy the AMD Radeon RX 7600?

An AMD Radeon RX 7600 on a desk

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

Buy it if…

Don’t buy it if…

Also consider

An AMD Radeon RX 7600 on a desk

(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)

If my AMD Radeon RX 7600 review has you considering other options, here's two other graphics cards to consider.

How we test graphics cards

I spend several days with the RX 7600 running benchmarks, playing games, and generally measuring its performance against competing cards.

I paid special attention to its 1080p performance, since this is the main target audience for this card, while also stretching into 1440p gaming as well.

Having covered and tested many graphics cards in my career, I know how a graphics card should perform at this level and what you should be spending for this level of performance. 

Read more about how we test

Fujifilm X-S20 review: mid-range marvel?
1:00 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

The Fujifilm X-S20 takes on the mantle from the X-S10 as Fujifilm's mid-range mirrorless camera. If you're even remotely familiar with how to use a camera, the X-S20 is easy to use, while also offering features to keep more advanced users happy. 

Like the Fujifilm X-S10, the new camera is a very capable all-rounder, but the Japanese camera maker has added some new features that make the X-S20 feel more targeted towards entry-level users. There’s a dedicated Vlogging mode to simplify content creation, and new features have been added to the Auto photography mode that make taking pictures even easier.

But if the target audience for the Fujifilm X-S20 is, indeed, beginner photographers and content creators, then the price might be a sticking point, particularly since the X-S10 is still an excellent camera, and can be had for a lot less, even at full price. The X-S20 has big shoes to fill if it's also going to rank as one of our best cameras for beginners

Fujifilm X-S20 camera front with 8mm F3.5 lens attached

(Image credit: Future)

Fujifilm X-S20: release date and price

  • Announced May 24 2023
  • Available to buy from June 2023
  • Body-only price: $1,299 / £1,249 / AU$2,349

Fujifilm announced the Fujifilm X-S20 at the X Summit held in Bangkok on May 24, alongside a new wide-angle lens, the XF 8mm f/3.5 R WR. Both will be available from June 2023 around the world.

The camera body will set you back $1,299 / £1,249 / AU$2,349, while a single-lens kit with the XC 15-45mm costs $1,399 / £1,349 / AU$2,499. 

That’s a pretty steep price hike over the Fujifilm X-S10 which launched with a very reasonable body-only price of $999 / £949 / AU$1,699 in 2020. Admittedly, there are a whole bunch of new features here that arguably justify the price hike, but if you don’t necessarily need those features – which include double the battery capacity – then the X-S10 looks to be the more economical option for those looking for a very capable mirrorless camera.

The Fujifilm X-S20 body standing beside a kit lens

(Image credit: TechRadar / Sharmishta Sarkar)

Fujifilm X-S20: design

  • Physically identical to the Fujifilm X-S10
  • No weather sealing
  • Bigger battery

The Fujifilm X-S10 had a chunky grip and a really well-balanced body, and that's been inherited by the X-S20, which I'm all for. It sits very comfortably in the hand, especially for those with small mitts, and the button placements are just right.

Unlike the quintessential lots-of-dials Fujifilm design, the X-S series offers more simplified controls on the top plate. This should make it easy for people who are just beginning their photography or videography journey to get to grips with a relatively advanced camera.

The only change on the top plate is on the main PASM dial, with the Scene Position (SP) mode on the X-S10 replaced by a dedicated Vlog mode on the X-S20. 

The new camera remains compact, and weighs in at just 491g – that's 26g more than the X-S10, with the added weight coming from the physically larger and higher-battery capacity. The X-S20 gets the NP-W235 battery pack that's used in Fujifilm's medium-format cameras and which effectively doubles the shot life to about 800 (from 325 on the X-S10) on a full charge.

Image 1 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera front with 8mm F3.5 lens attached

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera front with built-in flash up

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera side with closeup of connectivity ports

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera back with screen folded away

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera back with screen flipped out

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera top plate

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera side with headphone jack

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 8

Fujifilm X-S20 camera closeup of battery and memory card door

(Image credit: Future)

Those minor changes aside, the design of the X-S20 is largely identical to that of the X-S20 – and, disappointingly, given the price increase, that includes the lack of weather sealing. There's the same 2.36 million-dot viewfinder with a magnification of 0.62x, and the same 3-inch 1.84 million-dot fully articulating touchscreen.

As on the X-S10, instead of the D-pad controls found on Fujifilm's X-T cameras there are just three buttons beside the monitor and four along the top, each clearly labeled. The joystick controller offers good feedback when you use it to move the focus point or navigate the menu system.

Bolstering the dedicated Vlog and Movie modes are a 3.5mm audio input jack for attaching external mics, and a micro HDMI port for video capture to an external recorder – although, as mentioned, there's no weather sealing, so you'll need to be careful when shooting in inclement conditions outdoors.

Image 1 of 5

Fujifilm X-S20 camera closeup of shooting mode dial

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Fujifilm X-S20 camera close up of control dial

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Fujifilm X-S20 camera with screen flipped out to the side in vlogging mode

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Fujifilm X-S20 camera in hand

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Fujifilm X-S20 camera front with sensor

(Image credit: Future)

A USB-C cable connects the camera to a PC for file transfer, and can be used to charge the battery in-camera.

The X-S20 handles remarkably well, even with a long lens attached. As a relatively petite person with small hands, I found it comfortable even to use the camera single-handed for some still shots, although I didn't quite trust myself or the camera's IBIS for steady video capture with one hand.

Fujifilm X-S20: features and performance

  • New Vlog mode
  • Easy Auto shooting features with better subject tracking
  • Proven sensor and better IBIS

While things remain more or less the same on the outside, a lot has changed on the inside to make the X-S20 a worthy upgrade for some – if you can spare the cash.

The new camera inherits the same 26.1MP X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor that's used in the X-S10 and the Fujifilm X-T4, so we already know how well it can perform, and speed and performance are improved courtesy of Fujifilm's latest-generation imaging engine, the X-Processor 5, which also makes the X-S20 a little less power-hungry.

To make the X-S20 even more beginner-friendly, Fujifilm has improved the Auto shooting mode, which can now automatically select an appropriate scene setting depending on what you're shooting – I photographed a riverside scene, and the camera made the colors in the images more vivid. The Auto mode can also now automatically detect a subject and track it, which is particularly handy for animals and video capture.

Subject-tracking autofocus can recognize people, animals (including birds and insects), cars, motorbikes, airplanes, trains, and even drones.

Image 1 of 1

Fujifilm X-S20 camera with screen flipped out in vlog mode

(Image credit: Future)

The dedicated Vlog mode is another ease-of-use improvement. Content creators using this mode have features like Product Priority and Background Defocus options available at a tap of a button, so they can get their videos looking the way they want without having to think about how to do this.

Fujifilm has also improved the in-body stabilization, upping the compensation from 6.5 stops in the X-S10 to seven stops, for better results when shooting video and low-light stills.

Fujifilm X-S20: image and video quality

  • 6K 'open gate' video and Full HD 240p slow motion
  • Same 26MP APS-C sensor as X-S10
  • 19 color profiles, plus filter effects

Further similarities between the X-S20 and the X-S10 include Fujifilm's plethora of color profiles – Fujifilm calls these Film Simulation modes – and filter effects. With Film Simulations such as the divine Fujifilm Acros and Nostalgic Neg just a scroll of the top-left dial away, the process of applying effects is beginner-friendly, and I found myself playing around with different looks more regularly than usual.

Image 1 of 11

Black and white photo of cactus and sunny sky

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 11

Street scene in ancient mediterranean city

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 11

Closeup of wine bottle, bread and tomatoes in basket

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 11

Vibrant blue doors and honey-coloured walls in ancient mediterranean town

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 11

Ornate ceiling of mediterranean cathedral

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 11

Ornate ceiling of mediterranean cathedral

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 11

Light trails on a road curving on the seaside front

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 11

Cathedral exterior at night

(Image credit: Future)
Image 9 of 11

Night street scene outside a cafe

(Image credit: Future)
Image 10 of 11

A purple classic car on a grassy verge

(Image credit: Future)
Image 11 of 11

Traffic on a bridge in black and white

(Image credit: Future)

You can easily find a profile to adopt for various scenarios – I love Fujifilm Acros for bright sunny weather, for example. The filters have a dedicated place on the mode dial, while the Film Simulation modes – which are available for every shooting mode, including video – can be found in the Quick Menu (Q button) on the top plate. You can see what some of those filters and Film Simulations look like in the image galleries.

Auto mode subject tracking was a little hit and miss for me while trying to capture a pair of dogs playing, but the auto detection of scenes works like a charm.

Image 1 of 3

A small riverside boathouse

Shot in Classic Chrome Film Simulation (Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

A small boathouse on the banks of a river in Vivid Film S

The same boathouse scene in Provia/Standard (Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Tiny fruit shot with the Pop filter

The miniature filter on the X-S20 (Image credit: Future)
Image 1 of 9

Portrait in the sun with ocean backdrop

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 9

Seaside cliffs on a sunny day

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 9

Seaside harbour townscape

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 9

Portrait of driver at the wheel from behind with view in front in soft focus

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 9

Details of old mediterranean town in the sun

(Image credit: Future)
Image 6 of 9

Black and white, Boat and rolling hills from sea-level perspective

(Image credit: Future)
Image 7 of 9

An iron bridge across a river

(Image credit: Future)
Image 8 of 9

A large 19th century building in black and white

(Image credit: Future)
Image 9 of 9

A blue and white boat moored at a jetty

(Image credit: Future)

Video capture has gone up a couple of notches on the Fujifilm X-S20, and what's on offer here is close to overkill for a camera at this level, with 6K open-gate 10-bit 4:2:2 video, plus options to shoot in ProRes RAW. 

Conversely, the Vlog mode makes it easy for less experienced users to get to grips with video capture. Image stabilization for movies is good, but on windy days and when shooting with a long lens a tripod is still a must.

Fujifilm X-S20 early verdict

The Fujifilm X-S20 simplifies both stills photography and video content creation. To do this, the company has added a dedicated Vlogging mode to the top dial, improved Auto shooting by adding automatic scene detection and better subject tracking, and upped the video ante by offering 6K/30p 4:2:2 10-bit internal recording. It also gets a bigger battery, plus everything that made the X-S10 a great all-rounder. However, these updates have warranted a steep price hike over its predecessor, which makes it a hard sell when the older model is still excellent.

Oppo K11x announced: Snapdragon 695 SoC, 108MP camera, and 120Hz screen
12:45 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Oppo launched the K10x last September, and today it unveiled its successor - Oppo K11x. It's powered by the Snapdragon 695 SoC paired with up to 12GB RAM and boots Android 13-based ColorOS 13.1. The smartphone has up to 256GB of storage onboard and packs a 6.72" FullHD+ 120Hz screen having 680 nits peak brightness (550 nits typical). Oppo doesn't mention if it's an LCD or an AMOLED panel, but chances are it's the former since the fingerprint scanner is embedded in the power button. The Oppo K11x features three cameras - a 108MP primary camera, a 2MP depth camera, and a 16MP selfie camera....

Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic renders show the return of rotating bezel
11:30 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Comments: Off

Samsung is rumored to have its summer Unpacked event in late July, where we traditionally see the latest Galaxy wearables, among other flagship products. Rumors already suggested we will see the return of the rotating bezel, and the latest leaked renders suggest this is really happening. The Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic will be a premium product and will have a minimalistic design with a metal body and two keys on the right side. Samsung Galaxy Watch6 Classic renders The design of the Watch6 Classic is pretty similar to the Watch4 Classic. The strap in the renders has a...

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed review: superior to its great predecessor
10:01 am |

Author: admin | Category: Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed: Two-minute review

The Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed clearly has some massive shoes to fill. Its predecessor, the Logitech Pro X Lightspeed, may be almost three years old at this point, but Logitech has done such a fantastic job with it, it’s kind of become iconic with its gorgeous luxe gaming aesthetic and its impressive sound making it very hard to top. 

But Logitech is nothing but inventive when it comes to its flagship products – and inventive is exactly what you need to be when you’re hoping to improve upon an already amazing release. It rolled up its sleeves not just to refine that already stunning design on the Logitech Pro X Lightspeed, but also to improve the innards – or more specifically, the diaphragm inside. You know, that part of a speaker driver that’s responsible for turning an electrical audio signal into airwaves to create sound.

Yeah, that’s right. To usurp one of the best gaming headsets of the last 10 years, Logitech went back to its labs and created its one 90% graphene diaphragm-fitted drivers all for the sake of giving you an even better gaming experience. And its efforts were not in vain.

Still, there’s an elephant in the room that needs to be addressed: is this gaming headset worth all the effort?

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)

Before I do, let’s talk about design. The Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed, as I mentioned, boasts some external improvements over its predecessor. First of all, it’s noticeably lighter – 40g less, to be specific – and more compact, which makes it a lot more travel-friendly. It’s a nice perk as I adore its overall look that blends elegance with that pro-gamer style and want to take it with me on my travels as a pair of headphones.

Image 1 of 2

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)
Image 2 of 2

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)

There’s another addition here that lends itself well to that, the rotating hinge on each yoke, which lets you rotate the ear cups to flatten the headset for stowing (although, just like its predecessor, it also comes with a fancy travel pouch). That’s not to mention it allows the headset to conform to different head shapes and improve its overall comfort.

Adding to its versatility and travel-friendliness are the detachable 6mm cardioid mic and the three different connectivity options. You’re getting Logitech’s LIGHTSPEED wireless that has a maximum range of 30m as well as Bluetooth and 3.5mm wired connectivity. 

Image 1 of 3

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)
Image 2 of 3

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)
Image 3 of 3

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)

Back to comfort, both its earcups and headband are still swathed in soft-to-touch leatherette. But to give users another option, Logitech throws in a pair of velour earpads that you can easily switch in for the leatherettes especially if you tend to run hot and sweat a lot when gaming.

Because it is lighter, it does feel better on my head than my Pro X Lightspeed. However, I have tested even lighter gaming headsets in the past, and with Logitech really touting how light its graphene drivers are, I’m surprised it couldn’t design the actual headset to be a lot lighter. As far as the clamping force, there’s just enough for a secure but not too tight fit.

Internally, there’s considerable refinements as well, primarily in the drivers inside the earcups. As I mentioned earlier, Logitech essentially designed its own Pro-G Graphene audio drivers, each of which house a diaphragm that is 90% graphene by weight. Now, I’m not going to get into the specifics of how it works exactly, but essentially this diaphragm is better than the mylar diaphragm that most gaming headsets use as it’s more rigid and lightweight, resulting in more accurate reproduction of sound waves. In addition, Logitech set the graphene diaphragm on a live edge suspension, which also minimizes distortion.

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)

As a result, you should be getting more accurate and more detailed audio as well as a more immersive experience. And, in that, the Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed succeeds.

The original Logitech Pro X Lightspeed was a pleasure to use but was far from neutral. Its bright frequency range with restrained mids and bass is a far cry from what its successor has become.

While on the warmer side, the highs on the Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed are present with certain in-game elements sounding just as detailed as they would on brighter headphones. Even the twinkling sounds of revealed items in Hogwarts Legacy still sparkle with clarity though the audio overall sounds darker. Meanwhile, the mids are full without getting muddy. However, that changes when surround sound is on (more on that later). Finally, there’s a big low end that is quite present but well controlled. In Cyberpunk 2077, there was a lot of low end information from music to sound cues  yet it never seemed to overpower the rest of the sound frequencies.

The soundstage is quite impressive. In stereo mode, the soundstage is already wide with excellent sound imaging. Also in Cyberpunk 2077, I can clearly hear elements off to the side even when there’s a lot of ambient noise – like when I’m walking into a bar where the music is blasting punctuated by the sounds of arcade machines, I can still distinctly recognize three or four different voices coming through the TVs and radios in the room. Better than that, I’m able to accurately place them.

I do have mixed feelings about the audio as soon as I turn on the DTS X Spatial Sound. Though that virtual surround sound makes everything much more immersive, especially compared to its predecessor, it doesn’t make the soundstage wider, just more three dimensional. It also greatly affects the frequency range. In particular, the mids, which are already prominent to begin with, tend to be even more pronounced so that while you’re still hearing all the other elements clearly, you’re hearing a lot more of the environmental sounds and score. It’s not too bad, but, after a while, you might get a slight headache.

The DTS X Spatial Sound does lend itself surprisingly well to music thanks to its Super Stereo mode. With both Rihanna’s Lift Me Up and Aoife O’Donovan’s Loretta, turning on that mode makes me feel like I’m in a concert hall watching a live performance, instead of at my desk playing something on Spotify.

Just be careful when using these headphones, however, as they have a lot of volume. I find that having the volume at 70 out of 100 is more than enough for immersion, and too much when the surround sound is on.

Image 1 of 2

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)
Image 2 of 2

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)

The mic has plenty of volume as well. Though it’s not the crispest sounding, losing some definition even to the original Logitech Pro X Lightspeed, it does come through loud and clear. It also does a good job of minimizing background noise as well as handling sibilance. As this is a Blue-enabled mic, just be careful when using all the processing available in the G Hub as the mic audio can quickly get distorted. If you decide to dive into the app and use Blue Voice, fully commit and really finetune all the settings.

Speaking of the G Hub app, there’s a lot of customizations on hand as well as game-specific presets. The Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed already sounds great without customizations, but just know that you do have things like a five-band EQ, all the surround sound settings, and game presets to play around with.

Rounding all that out is its decent battery life of up to 50 hours on a single charge. That’s not too bad, but there are certainly longer lasting headsets out there. If you play for eight hours a day, just make a habit out of charging at the end of every week.

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed: Price & availability

  • How much does it cost? $249 / €269 (about AU$375)
  • When is it available? Available now
  • Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

At $249 / €269 (about AU$375), the Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed is pricier than many gaming headsets on the market. It’s also pricier than the Logitech Pro X Lightspeed, which is kind of disappointing as I was hoping it would be around the same price.

Compared to the best wireless gaming headsets on the market, it sits comfortably in the mid range, however. There are several pricier options like the Audeze Maxwell, the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless, and the Turtle Beach Stealth Pro

There are also cheaper alternatives like the Corsair HS55 Wireless and the Corsair HS80 RGB USB.

However, with its new drivers, fantastic sound stage and imaging, and comfortable fit, not to mention all the features crammed into the app, it deserves to be in the conversation with the more premium headsets on that list, which means you’re really getting a great value here.

  • Value: 4 / 5

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed: Specs

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed on a white table

(Image credit: Future / Michelle Rae Uy)

Should you buy the Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed?

Buy it if...

You want an immersive and very detailed gaming headset
The Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed delivers a lot of detail, a wide soundstage, and very accurate sound imaging. It’s perfect for competitive gamers. 

You enjoy listening to music as much as you do playing PC games
The Super Stereo mode makes any song you play on Spotify or Apple Music sound like a live performance. Even the most intimate songs sound epic. 

You want a high-quality headset without the steep price
Due to its comfort, build quality, features, and audio quality, this seems like a premium headset with a premium price. However, that mid-range price makes it accessible to more people.

Don't buy it if...

You want a wider surround sound experience
Toggling surround sound on means a much more immersive audio, but it also feels like there’s less headroom due to the mids being pronounced. 

You’re scrimping right now
It’s not super expensive, but it’s not a budget gaming headset either.

Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed: Also consider

How I tested the Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed

  • Spent a couple of days testing it
  • Used it for gaming, streaming, and music listening
  • Tested it with a variety of games, songs, and movies

I used the Logitech Pro X 2 Lightspeed as my gaming headset for a couple of days, using it as my main headset for gaming, music listening, and making video calls at work.

Besides using it with games like Cyberpunk 2077, and Hogwarts Legacy, I also used it to listen to songs like Rihanna’s Lift Me Up and Aoife O’Donovan’s Loretta.

I’ve been testing, reviewing, and using gaming headsets for years as a freelance tech journalist and now as one of the Computing editors at TechRadar. My years of experience along with my discerning audio tastes make me more than qualified to test and vet these devices for you.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed [Month Year]

Tecno Camon 20 series is launching in India on May 27
10:00 am |

Author: admin | Category: Mobile phones news | Tags: | Comments: Off

Tecno has announced it will launch the Camon 20 series smartphones in India on May 27. It comprises four models - Camon 20, Camon 20 Pro, Camon 20 Pro 5G, and Camon 20 Premiere. However, the company will only introduce the Camon 20 and Camon 20 Pro 5G in India at its May 27 event. The vanilla model will come in Glacier Glow, Serenity Blue, and Predawn Black colors, and the Pro 5G version will come in Serenity Blue and Dark Welkin colors. Since the Camon 20 and Camon 20 Pro 5G are already available in other markets, we know what they offer. Both smartphones have similar specs, with the...

« Previous PageNext Page »