Ready or Not 2: Here I Come is a direct continuation of the 2019 horror comedy Ready or Not, and a sequel I was very surprised to see on our new movies list.
When I rewatched the original movie on Disney+, I was reminded how great it is. Laugh out loud funny, plenty of shocking moments, and a concluding line that's just perfect. With that in mind, I thought it would be a great standalone movie.
But this is the horror genre, folks. We never seem to get just one movie, do we? Sequels are everywhere, some good, some bad. When it comes to Ready or Not 2: Here I Come, I'd consider it to be decent for what it is, and there's plenty to like about it.
When we pick up, it's right after the ending of the first movie. After surviving the deadly game of hide and seek, resulting in the deaths of her husband and in-laws, Grace (Samara Weaving) wakes up cuffed to her hospital bed. She's not going anywhere because she's now a suspect in the deaths, considering they all, you know, exploded except for her. Very suspicious.
Of course, we know that Grace was innocent, and she was due to be sacrificed to the devil Le Bail, as part of the family's deal with him. And you thought your in-laws were bad, huh?
Anyway, police interrogation would feel like a walk in the park compared to where Grace ends up. After briefly reuniting with her sister Faith (Kathryn Newton), the two are kidnapped, where they learn that the wealthiest and most influential families on Earth have to kill both of them in a new game, or they'll risk losing their power and fortunes.
So, the games begin again. Admittedly, there are plenty of fun sequences here, especially if you want some gruesome kills, which are arguably better than the ones in Ready or Not. Best seen with a crowd, these are definitely crowd pleasers.
The new additions to the cast are very fun to watch, too. Sarah Michelle Gellar stars as Ursula, opposite her on-screen twin, Titus (played by Shawn Hatosy). Horror legend David Cronenberg rounds out this truly awful family as Chester, the patriarch of the Danfords. It was great seeing him in front of the camera, and he's as good there as he is behind it, directing body horror masterpieces such as The Fly.
Gellar has so much fun in this role, too, a far cry from her role as Buffy Summers (no one talk to me about the Buffy reboot cancellation, by the way). She's evil here, and has a blast doing it, as she joins the others in trying to hunt down Grace and Faith.
The movie is strong because of its ensemble cast, which is worth the theater trip alone. Elijah Wood stars as "The Lawyer", an equally fun role that you definitely haven't seen him in before.
Despite all these positives, though, the sequel does feel unnecessary and convoluted in places as the lore has now expanded to accommodate these new families and rules, to the point where it feels a bit silly, even for a horror comedy.
This would be a good place for Ready or Not to stop, in my opinion, as you can easily watch the two back to back and have a good time doing it. Adding another installment with more stakes and more games would feel like a too many cooks situation.
You will very likely have fun with this movie due to its cast, kills, and tense moments. But it does build to a conclusion that never reaches the highs of its predecessor, so unfortunately, round two is by far the weakest.
That doesn't mean it's terrible, though, just don't expect to be blown away like you were last time.
The Kobra range of 3D printers has continued to impress over the years, and while the aesthetic design of their open-frame Cartesian machines has until now been very workshop-like, the reliability and quality of the prints have never failed to impress. So much so that there are still two old Kobra 2’s still running. They might not be the best machines compared to the latest releases, but after three years, they’re still running strong.
The Kobra X is a further progression forward in quality and design, which really started with the Kobra 3 Combo it’s just now the level of quality, along with the touch screen interface, speed and precision, all take another step forward. Anycubic are running to catch up like all others with the market leaders Bambu Lab, and to offer a solid alternative to the dominance of the Bambu Lab A1.
However, by taking on the A1, the Kobra X has had to refine the Anycubic 3D printers that have come before, and they’re not the only manufacturer that is playing catch-up with similarly cheap and excellent machines such as the Creality Hi, which again, for the price, is another outstanding cheap option. These printers are all very much now on a par; they don’t bring anything other than refinement to the older Cartesian style of FDM bed slinger printers.
What the Kobra X does is stamp Anycubic once again as a serious manufacturer in the 3D FDM arena, with a machine that improves the design quality and function. At this entry level, it’s essential that manufacturers get things right, as these are the machines that will endear users to their product lines. That’s why it seems for around the $300 / £300 mark, you’re getting a machine with literally all the features.
This does mean that any 3D printer at this level has to be simple to use, robust, reliable, aesthetically designed and when it comes to the prints, they need to be good, accurate and multicolored.
The market at this level is packed, and more importantly, the machines at this price point already have a solid and proven track record. Any of the best 3D printers I've tested for entry-level users need to compete needs to impress from the outset.
Getting started with the Kobra X instantly showed that the design and quality were on a par with the competition, and once a few updates and the calibration had run its course, the machine was up and running, the first few prints highlighting that the Kobra X was more than capable of standing its ground against the Creality and Bambu Lab machines.
Anycubic Kobra X: Price and Availability
The Anycubic Kobra X is currently only available directly from Anycubic US and Anycubic UK stores, priced at a discount $299 / £259 right now.
Combo versions are also available. If experience is anything to go by, expect this 3D printer to reach Amazon in the near future.
Anycubic Kobra X: Design
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Anycubic has progressed the design of the Kobra machines significantly over the years, and comparing the old Kobra 2 against the latest X, you can see how the design and innovation of the latest model are worlds apart.
Yet, like those older machines, the Kobra X retains the older Cartesian style of design and sees the filament and print area open. While this means that for enthusiasts and those just starting out, you get to see the print being built, for those looking to use more advanced materials, the lack of an enclosure and controlled build area temperature limits the material choice.
Still, for beginners and hobbyists, that material restriction is probably a good thing, and after you’ve mastered the ways of PLA and PETG, you can then progress to the Kobra S1.
As it is, while the frame may be open, it’s been properly product designed and looks, as well as the machines usability compared with past models has all taken a leap forward.
Again, the gantry feels good and solid, and Anycubic has once again worked on the quality of the Cable routing, so less of the workings are on show.
While the design is still open, the motors and power adapter, belts and wiring are all, for the most part, hidden away. The 3.5-inch touch screen is also intuitive and easy to navigate, with the ability to load prints via USB or through the Anycubic Slicer software wirelessly.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The physical size is also relatively compact, with the four filament spools being mounted on the horizontal top bar, enabling easy accessibility. If you want the filament in a dry box, then you can couple the printer with the Ace 2 Pro, in fact, up to four of these filament boxes to enable 19 color printing.
When it comes to the dimensions, it measures in at 455.4 x 445.3 x 461.3 mm with the filaments adding to the height. Weight-wise, this is a printer that is easy to move around if space is limited, and without the filaments, it weighs 12.7kg or 18 kg for the combo model. The Ace 2 Pro will add an additional 4.8 kg per unit.
While the weight can quickly build like its competitors at the base level, it’s still very manoeuvrable and easy to carry and store. The build area is also pretty decent at a perfect 260 × 260 × 260mm, meaning that there’s plenty of room for a good amount of projects.
One of the other big design features is the Ace Gen 2 print head with a new extruder, cutter and multifilament system that helps to cut down on the filament purge compared with other systems.
Design: 4.5/5
Anycubic Kobra X: Features
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Specs
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Print Technology: FDM Build Area: 260 × 260 × 260 mm Minimum Layer Resolution: 0.05 mm Maximum Layer Resolution: 0.30 mm Dimensions: Approx. 500 × 500 × 580 mm Weight: Approx. 9.5 kg Bed: Heated aluminium build plate (up to 110°C) Print Surface: Textured PEI spring steel flex plate Software: Anycubic Slicer (Cura-based) + Wi-Fi / App / Cloud support Materials: PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS Print Speed: Up to 600 mm/s
At first look, the Kobra X follows the same lines of design as the other new bed slingers. Everything is a little neater and less DIY workshop, and it isn’t just the aesthetics; these new machines leap forward with the technology and features as well.
The first point to note is that for those on a budget, the machine, with discounts, can be purchased for around $299 / £259, and for that price you have the ability to print in 4 colors. That is discounted from the usual $399 / £359, but when discounted that makes it £100 less than the competition. That price point is just the start, with several different combo options that then see the price hit a peak of $1148 / £987 with four Ace 2 Pro boxes and the ability to print up to 19 colors.
Like the S1, there’s also the ability to quality swap out the nozzle for different diameters, with the machine arriving with a standard 0.4mm and options for diameters from 0.25 through to 0.8mm. What also stands out here is that many of the parts can easily be swapped out, most notably the Ace Gen 2 print head.
Compared with Anycubic's previous multicolor Cartesian printers, this new system is double the speed and saves more filament through filament purging. It can also print 4 colors out of the box with the option to print an additional 15, taking the total to 19 colors.
The machine also builds in AI detection, which enables perfect first-layer printing, and if any issues are detected, the machine will stop before any damage is caused.
Out of the box, thanks to the new print head, the machine can also print PLA and TPU (68D) simultaneously, enabling you to print far more complex models. This type of feature is more common in multi-tool head printers and not common in single-nozzle systems like this.
A feature that I’ve seen expanding across almost all manufacturers is the ability to monitor and control the printer remotely. Again, while this isn’t a unique feature, the fact that it’s included on a portion of this print point is exceptional.
Anycubic make a big point about the new Ace Gen 2 technology, which features a 52% reduction in the distance between the filament cutter and nozzle and an 81.25% reduction in filament change length, ultimately reducing the time between filament swaps and the amount of filament that needs to be purged.
The most interesting point about this head is that it features an adaptive extrusion force compensator, which adjusts the extrusion force based on the filament hardness so that PLA, PVA and softer TPU can all be extruded without manual adjustment between filament swaps. This means you can print with the following combinations: PLA + TPU, PLA + PVA or TPU + TPU.
One of the other features that stands out, despite its simplicity, is the fact that the spools for the four colors are mounted above the machine. This means that although you do need to have quite a bit of headroom, for smaller workshop areas where desk space might be limited, this four-color solution retains a small footprint.
Print speeds can reach a maximum of 600mm/s with the default being an impressive 300mm/s. As a speed test on the machine, the USB is loaded with a fast 3DBench model that prints in a little over 14 minutes, which by any standards is fast.
Once again, the machine features the latest version of Anycubics LeviQ 3.0 levelling system with 49-point auto-leveling, Flow Dynamic Calibration, and Vibration Compensation. The heat bed has also been redesigned to ensure an even spread of heat under the platform.
The AI detection has a few key new features that I was keen to test. The first, as always, is the spaghetti detection, but then the new object skipping is of real interest. The spaghetti detection will stop the printer if something goes wrong and spaghetti strands of filament start to appear.
Object Skipping is something new. This essentially skips a print that’s failed, so if you have a series of parts printing on the same bed and one fails, usually that means that all will fail. However, once the camera detects a failure, it skips it and continues the rest of the prints without returning to the failed one.
Features: 4.5/5
Anycubic Kobra X: Performance
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Kobra X is one of the most straightforward Bed Slingers I’ve assembled and took a little over five minutes to unbox and build. Once powered up and the calibration steps were run, which takes around 30 minutes, then the printer is set to go.
On the first run, I checked the first layer accuracy, and once finished, the sheet of plastic that had been extruded was of exceptional quality, peeling back to reveal an even and well distributed layer of filament. The next few test models were all from the supplied USB key, and as expected, these ran through without issue.
I then progressed to my own custom test models, all initially single filament. While Anycubic had supplied a 3DBenchy model on the USB, this was highly optimised to enable fast printing, so I loaded my stock version and was able to get a decent model in around 33 minutes with a clear surface and decent structure.
As I progressed through the test, pushing 4 kg of filament through for a variety of parts and projects, the printer remained consistent, and at all times, the four filament spools were left exposed to the elements rather than being protected in dry boxes. The printer was able to withstand the workshop temperatures, which could dip to around 10ºC at night.
Checking out the Autodesk / Kickstarter quality test proved that the printer, despite its price, is an exceptional value considering the quality that it is capable of printing. The highlight here is the dimensional accuracy, which I have seen with other Cartesian printers often appears to be more accurate than many Core XY printers.
Across the board, the quality tests were exceptionally good, and considering the price and the fact that it natively prints with four colors and can support up to 19, as well as having the ability to print with two materials, TPU and PLA, makes this printer an exceptional value for money.
Through the test, there were a couple of points that caused an issue. The first is that if your filaments don’t include the Anycubic RFID chip, then it isn’t always straightforward to update the printer as to what’s loaded in and a bit of fiddling was needed, essentially scanning an Anycubic reel and then popping on a third party. However, using the Anycubic FDilament with the RFID chips, loading and using a multitude of different material options was exceptionally simple.
X Error Average = 0.172 Y Error Average = 0.116 X&Y Error Average = 0.144
Fine Flow Control - score of 2.5 Fine Negative Features - score of 5 Overhangs - score of 4 Bridging - score of 5 XY resonance - score of 2.5 Z-axis alignment - score of 2.5
Adding up the totals gives a final score of 25.5 out of 28.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
One of my other major selling points from Anycubic about this new models is the speed and reduction of filament waste. While actual print speed is increased, the new iteration of the slicer software, AnycubicSlicerNext (Kobra X), doesn’t seem to reflect the speed change compared with the AnycubicSlicer (Kobra 3) software, often quoting the Kobra 3 and Kobra X having similar print times.
Going to multi-color printing, and this is where the machine comes into its own. Again, like print speeds, the software doesn’t seem to highlight the waste difference between this and the Kobra 3; however, after printing, while the filament piles are similar, the X does have a slight filament pile reduction compared to the Kobra 3.
Having run four 1 Kg spools through the system, I’ve been impressed by the dimensional accuracy, speed and surface quality. I would, however, highlight that the print platform should be cleaned regularly.
The platform's surface, while offering good adhesion, does need to be cleaned and seems slightly more prone than usual to finger grease, so just something to be aware of. As an open-framed 3D printer, while there are limitations on what you can print, the overall performance is exceptionally good.
Performance: 4.5 / 5
Anycubic Kobra X: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Anycubic Kobra X is one of the latest highly refined multi-color printers that offers a huge amount of potential. The quality of the build and design is a huge step forward from what I’ve seen in the past from the open design printers, but then, with the likes of the BambuLab A1, which was launched back in 2023, no manufacturer can get away with producing a printer that looks like it’s been put together in a workshop.
The workflow has been smoothed out, and once calibrated, which is of course all handled by the printer, as long as you ensure you maintain the rails and keep things clean after every print, the reliability is superb.
There are a couple of points on the maintenance of this printer. The first is to make sure that the print surface is always given a wipe over with an isopropyl alcohol (IPA) spray and a lint-free cloth.
The other point, which is especially relevant with this and other multi-filament printers, is to clear away the filament waste pile after, and even during, each print. Those tiny piles of filament can get stuck in various parts of the printer, so don’t let them pile up.
The filament waste issue is as ever apparent, but at present, with the design that’s pretty standard and at the price that is the price you pay.
Ultimately, for a printer that is so cheap, the potential and print quality of the Kobra X is superb, and at a competitive price point, it is at present the best value in a crowded field.
Should you buy the Anycubic Kobra X?
Value:
Incredible value for money for a multifilament printer with upgrade potential for even more filaments
5
Design:
Older Cartesian design, but refined, fast and reliable
4
Features:
AnyCubic has thrown every feature going at the Kobra X, camera, advanced auto levelling, and multfilament printing
4.5
Performance:
Fast performance for the design and decent print quality with easy multifilament printing
4
Total:
Outstanding value and one of the cheapest 3D printers at this quality on the market
4.5
Buy it if...
You need multifilament printing.
Able to print with four filament colors straight out of the box, the potential is impressive for a printer at this price, wit hth eability to add more filament boxes when needed.
You want a cheap 3D printer.
At present no other printer can compete when it comes to features and price.
Don't buy it if...
You don’t like filament waste.
Like so many printers of this type, filament waste is a problem when multifilament printing.
You print with advanced materials.
While the printer is exceptional in so many ways, the open design means that it’s not suitable for printing advanced materials such as nylon and ABS.
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact mini workstation aimed at business professionals who need desktop-grade power but lack the space for a full-sized workstation.
The first thing that struck me as I lifted the MS-02 from the box was that, for such a small machine, it’s incredibly heavy at 3.45kg, which instantly gives you the hint that this is a serious piece of kit rather than your run-of-the-mill mini PC.
The matte black chassis is discreetly designed, with plenty of cooling vents running across the casing. There are also rubber feet on the base and side that let you easily orient the machine in either an upright tower or a flat desktop position. It looks and feels like a miniaturised version of a professional workstation rather than a standard Mini PC, and its full-metal exterior gives it a premium look and feel.
Checking the MS-02 reveals that this machine is the link between the Mini PC and the Desktop. It has the small size of a Mini PC but quite a bit of upgradability, including RAM, ROM, and an expansion slot. All of the upgrade potential can be easily accessed via the slide-out internal chassis.
This chassis is held in place by two thumb screws; once they are undone, the entire internals can be pulled out. You can then remove the internal modules, which do require tools, but once unscrewed and laid out, you have access to the SODIMM slots and M.2 bays. The layout and concept are similar to the old Intel NUC 9 Extreme (Ghost Canyon) Mini PC from a few years back.
The front ports are well laid out with two USB4 V2 Type-C ports running at 80Gbps, taking priority over the traditional pair of USB-A ports, and through the test with the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5, I was impressed with the transfer rates enabling me to use the drive to edit 4K video on a drive that was essentially matching the speeds of the internal SSD.
On the rear of the machine, the ports are a little more sparse, but there are some good networking options alongside the three USB-A 10Gbps ports, HDMI 2.1 FRL, and unique to the 285HX machine that I’m reviewing, the dual 25GbE SFP+ sockets alongside the more standard 10GbE and 2.5GbE RJ45 connections. Essentially, for creatives, photographers and videographers working with high-speed network-attached storage such as the UGreen idx6011 pro, this is a great option.
Performance, even with the integrated Intel graphics, was unsurprisingly good throughout all tests, from Microsoft Apps through to editing 4K video in Premiere Pro. Once again, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX showed just how powerful it is, handling 4K editing in DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro without issue or pause on rough cuts, and then moving on to more in-depth grading.
Unsurprisingly, Lightroom Classic and Photoshop ran smoothly and, more impressively, handled large raw files from both the Canon EOS R5 C and the Hasselblad X2D II 100C with ease.
I did find that without a discrete GPU, the extended timeline rendering when editing video required a bit of patience, especially as you get further into the edit, but for the majority of users, whether you're an office worker looking for a powerful machine, a creative, a photographer or a videographer or a developer looking at the AI potential, there’s plenty on offer here.
The key point is that this machine is the base, and unlike some of the best mini PCs I've tested, it offers plenty of potential for upgrades. Out of the box, this is a very powerful workstation for development and power users handling large-scale data and spreadsheets. Add a GPU, and it becomes a very competent editing suite. Essentially, the machine's design enables you to adapt its configuration to suit your needs.
Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Price and availability
How much does it cost? From $1159 / £1039
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Directly from Minisforum or Amazon
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is available directly from Minisforum's store, as well as online retailers such as Amazon.com, Newegg, and Amazon.co.uk.
Prices for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX barebone starting at $1159 / £1039. A 32GB RAM and 1TB SSD configuration available at $1599 / £1455.
A fully specified 192GB DDR5 ECC and 2TB SSD variant is £2,679. There are also other versions of the machine available with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX or Ultra 5 235HX models, and these start at $599 / £559. As barebones, though they lack ECC memory, dual 25GbE networking, and the two additional M.2 slots exclusive to the 285HX.
Value: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Specs
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX GPU: Intel integrated graphics AI Engine: NPU Memory: 4x DDR5 SODIMM slots (Up to 256GB, ECC supported (285HX only)) Storage: 2x M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe (up to 8TB each) + 2x M.2 on 25GbE NIC card (PCIe 3.0/4.0) 285HX only; up to 24TB total Networking: 2x 25GbE SFP+ (Intel E810, 285HX only); 1x 10GbE RJ45; 1x 2.5GbE RJ45; Wi-Fi 7 (Intel BE200); Bluetooth 5.4 Front Ports: 2x USB4 V2 Type-C, USB-A 10Gbps; 3.5mm audio jack Rear Ports: HDMI 2.1 FRL (8K@60Hz); USB4 Type-C (40Gbps); 3x USB-A 10Gbps, 2x 25GbE SFP+, 10GbE + 2.5GbE RJ45 Internal expansion: 1x PCIe 5.0 x16; 1x PCIe 4.0 x4; 1x PCIe 4.0 x16 (occupied by 25GbE NIC on 285HX) OS: Windows 11 Pro Dimensions: 221.5 x 97 x 225mm Weight: 3.45kg (for the 285HX model)
Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Design
The MS-02 Ultra is a serious-looking machine with simple styling and a black matte finish. The machine is larger than your average mini PC; however, it has been designed to be positioned either as a mini tower or laid flat on a desk, with quality rubber feet to support both orientations.
Despite being small, measuring just 221.5 x 97 x 225mm, the 3.45kg weight as I lifted it out of the box immediately signalled that this was something more than a standard consumer mini PC. It’s substantially smaller than a conventional tower workstation but larger than a Mini PC, and it draws on the design of both.
Build quality is excellent throughout. The casing is solid and made entirely of metal, reinforcing its premium aesthetics. It also makes it easy to mount within other furniture and equipment, with the tough metal casing ensuring it will look the part in any stylish office and out in the field if used as an on-site workstation.
The design feature that stood out is the slide-out internal chassis, which is secured in place by two thumb screws. Once these are removed (which takes seconds), the entire internal assembly slides out, giving you easy access to the SODIMM slots, M.2 bays, PCIe slots, and the cooling assembly. This style of access is more familiar to desktop users than to Mini PC owners.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
On the front of the machine, there are two USB4 V2 Type-C ports at 80Gbps alongside a single USB-A port and a standard 3.5mm combo jack for a headset. At the rear, there are three additional USB-A ports, all 10Gbps; HDMI 2.1 FRL; a USB4 Type-C port at 40Gbps; and the 285HX's dual 25GbE SFP+.
Then there are the more common 10GbE RJ45 and 2.5GbE RJ45. When it comes to display output options, the choices are a little limited: either HDMI 2.1 or USB4. While this might not meet the demands of gamers in a professional setup, it should meet most people's demands.
Obviously, being a small workstation, heat can build up, and during the test, the fans kick in early to keep things cool. Given their small size, those fans are notably louder than those on a large workstation, which often run near silent.
I was interested to see if the metal casing also worked as a heat sink, but checking the casing surface, the temperatures under sustained load remained pretty cool, and while warm to the touch around the mid and lower sections, the heat from the internals seemed well distributed.
Design: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Features
The feature set of the 285HX model is where the MS-02 Ultra really sets itself apart from what we’d usually expect from a mini PC.
Even compared with the other model in the range, the 285HX with it’s flagship configuration adds ECC DDR5 memory support (error-correcting memory for greater data reliability), dual 25GbE SFP+ networking via an Intel E810 controller (two 25 gigabit Ethernet ports with SFP+ interfaces for advanced networking), and a fourth and fifth M.2 NVMe slot integrated onto the 25GbE NIC card (additional high-speed storage slots built into the network card).
That takes total on-board storage capacity to 24TB across four drives. The lower-spec 275HX and 235HX models share the same chassis but lose all three of these features, making the 285HX a much more capable model for more power-hungry users.
What these upgraded specifications mean in certain fields, such as creative, is an enhancement in workflow reliability, especially with ECC memory.
The storage options for a machine of this size are significant, with four M.2 slots that can be used independently either as separate drives for project, media, cache, and archive, for example, or you can choose to configure in RAID 0, 1, 5, or 10. This means you can potentially have 24TB of fast SSD storage appear as a single drive, and then offload that content to a NAS when ready.
It’s worth noting that the M.2 slots are limited to PCIe 4.0 rather than the newer PCIe 5.0 standard, which limits transfer speeds; however, in real-world creative workloads, this additional speed is rarely noticeable.
On the front, there are two USB4 V2 ports, which I was able to test with a LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5 external storage device, and the uplift in speed was significant, almost double that recorded on older USB 4.0.
Wired connectivity is the big network feature for this machine, but alongside is the Wifi connection. The machine handles Wi-Fi 7 using an Intel BE200 module. In testing against a Fritz! Box 5690 Pro: the raw throughput connection speed to drives connected to the wireless network was higher than on the Wi-Fi 6 network. But the connection's consistency and reliability were noticeably better.
Wired connectivity via the 10GbE port proved fast in studio use, and the fact that the machine also has 25GbE SFP+ ports offers future upgrade potential, especially for studios building high-speed NAS infrastructure, really highlighting that my network is ready for an upgrade.
The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot adds the ability to upgrade the machine and, to a certain degree, will future-proof your investment, with room for a low-profile GPU should the integrated graphics prove insufficient. This might be of particular concern if you have intensive rendering workloads.
The system also supports Intel vPro with BIOS-level KVM on the 285HX, enabling full remote management for 24/7 deployment, which is essential for larger corporations that will have home and remote workers.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Features: 5 / 5
Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Performance
Benchmark scores
CrystalDiskMark Read: 6,136.46 MB/s CrystalDiskMark Write: 5,338.79 MB/s Geekbench CPU Single: 3,058 Geekbench CPU Multi: 18,366 Geekbench GPU: 19,645 PCMark Overall: 7,983 Cinebench CPU Single: 2,277 Cinebench CPU Multi: 35,080 3DMark Fire Strike Overall: 4,657 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 4,799 3DMark Fire Strike Physics: 49,395 3DMark Fire Strike Combined: 1,806 3DMark Time Spy Overall: 2,315 3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 2,025 3DMark Time Spy CPU: 12,262 3DMark Wild Life Overall: 14,166 3DMark Steel Nomad Overall: 407 Windows Experience Index: 8.2 USB4 V2 External Read (LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5): 6,012.07 MB/s USB4 V2 External Write (LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5): 4,053.44 MB/s
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is an impressive CPU for a machine of this size, and the benchmark results reflect that. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18,366 and Cinebench multi-core result of 35,080 place this well within workstation territory, and the PCMark overall score of 7,983 confirms that real-world productivity performance is excellent across the board. SSD read speeds of 6,136 MB/s and write speeds of 5,338 MB/s from the installed NVMe drive are excellent for a PCIe 4.0 module, although, as mentioned earlier, it would have been great to have seen at least one PCIe 5.0 option.
In creative applications, the machine is ideal for working in a photography and video studio, being able to fit on a desktop neatly, and the size also makes it ultra portable if it does need to be installed into a movable workstation.
Through the test using Lightroom Classic and the power of the machine, it was able to manage large libraries and complex adjustments from Hasselblad X2D II 100C files without issue, and Photoshop ran large raw files with the same ease.
For video, DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro both handled rough cuts and colour grading of Canon EOS R5 C Log3 4K footage as well as any machine I’ve tried. As expected with integrated graphics only, timeline rendering on longer projects required leaving the machine to sit after each significant editing session, just to enable time for the timeline to render before applying grades and effects, essentially a build-and-render approach, which is common.
Loading several more demanding apps at once showed that multitasking abilities were handled well. Switching between Photoshop and Premiere Pro caused no lag, and running Microsoft Office applications alongside the creative suite also proved well within the machine's abilities. For five- to ten-minute 4K edits, at least the 64GB of ECC RAM in the review unit proved well balanced to the workload.
Another point here on the performance is the speed of the internal SSDs that are able to transfer the large amounts of data needed for video editing. The benchmark results returned a CrystalDiskMark Read speed of 6,136.46 MB/s and Write of 5,338.79 MB/s. What was impressive here was connecting the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5 to the USB4 V2 External port on the front, which registered 6,012.07 MB/s read and 4,053.44 MB/s, showing a significant speed increase over standard USB 4.0.
Video editing can put a huge demand on all components in the machine, and thermal throttling can be a real issue. As I started to push the system, the fans kicked in early to help keep things cool, and while the volume of these remained low, they were noticeable, especially compared directly against my usual video workstation.
What this load did reveal was the performance held up over a five-hour editing session with no signs of throttling. The cooling solution inside, which consists of six heat pipes with phase-change material and a dual-fan chamber, managed the sustained processing loads on the electronics.
The GPU performance from the integrated Intel graphics was OK for all creative tasks during the test, but if you are considering this for any process that relies on a graphics card, then connecting an eGPU is going to be essential. The 3DMark scores with Fire Strike at 4,657 and Time Spy at 2,315 reflect the limits of integrated graphics rather than the CPU falling short. Reassuringly, there is room in the chassis for a dual-slot low-profile GPU, and the 350W internal PSU includes a spare 8-pin connector to power it.
Taking a break from testing, I tried out the game Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, which ran surprisingly well at mid-level settings, and far better than many gaming-focused mini PCs I've reviewed. It shows just how powerful that CPU is without the support of a discrete GPU..
One other note on the test: the dual 25GbE SFP+ ports were not tested during the review period due to the absence of a compatible 25GbE switch. A follow-up test is planned once the network infrastructure is in place.
Performance: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra and flagship 285HX variant that I’ve looked at in this review offers a substantial feature set for a machine of this size, which will give it wide appeal for businesses looking for a powerful and compact machine at a reasonable price.
Features such as the ECC memory, dual 25GbE networking, four M.2 slots, PCIe 5.0 expansion, and Intel vPro together add up to a platform that can serve as a creative workstation, a compact server node, a home lab host, or all three.
For larger businesses, the inclusion of Intel vPro means that they can manage the machine securely over a remote connection, which will be of definite appeal.
In the creative field and any photographer or videographer working with large-format files, this machine, with the combination of fast internal storage, high-speed USB4 V2 connectivity, and network offload via 10GbE or 25GbE, makes it an interesting choice, especially with the potential to pop in a discreet GPU. The small size of a machine with this power also means that it will be equally at home as a static desk machine or moved between locations.
There are a few downsides to the machine, and while there is a barebones version, even with the ready-to-go review configuration for many, this will just be the base machine. The out-of-the-box storage of 1TB fills quickly in creative workflows, and upgrading to 4TB or more will be essential.
Then there’s the Intel Graphics that actually proved to be pretty powerful through the test; however, if you are working with graphics or anything that requires the GPU for processing, then a card will need to be added.
The 64GB RAM of the review unit was well matched to the workloads I ran through the test, but anyone running this as a server or AI platform, or editing longer projects, will want to boost the RAM to 128GB or higher configurations. Once those upgrades are factored in, the total cost climbs rapidly and starts to have a value closer to a lower-end full-sized workstation.
Essentially, the small size of the machine and the price make it a viable option; it’s just worth keeping in mind that the out-of-the-box configuration is just the start, and what you install for your workload will add cost. However, even at the top end of Mini PC models, there’s nothing to compete with this flexibility, and even the cheapest workstation is going to be significantly larger, which makes this a great solution all round.
Should I buy the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra?
Value
PC, but budget for upgrades should be factored in to unlock full potential.
4.5
Design
Slide-out chassis and full metal casing are robust and look great.
4.5
Features
Unique 285HX feature set and upgrades are unmatched at this form factor
5
Performance
Ultra-fast CPU and performance across the board, with upgrades available if more power is needed. 4/5
4.5
Overall
Work Stations can be phenomenally expensive, this gives you a powerful base at a great price to build on
5
Buy it if...
You need a compact workstation.
The 285HX CPU, ECC memory, and four M.2 slots make this a great desktop replacement for creative and professional workloads.
You're building a high-speed studio or home lab.
The fast network options, including the dual 25GbE networking and PCIe expansion, make this an option as a network node or dev machine.
Don't buy it if...
You need GPU performance.
Without a discrete GPU, sustained rendering and GPU-intensive tasks will be limited; however, a GPU can be added.
You want simplicity
The barebone configuration requires investment and some technical knowledge to configure optimally.
The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is a compact, rugged tablet designed for outdoor professionals and trades, and is available at an incredibly low price. What makes this impressive is not just the price but the bright yellow design detailing, screen, and build quality.
Considering the relatively low price, the quality of the build and materials is genuinely good, feeling solid and robust which is reinforced by the IP68, IP69K and MIL-STD-810H certifications. Visually, the design highlights the rugged credentials with the usual hardened rubberised corners synonymous with this tablet style.
Unlike many rugged tablets I’ve looked at in the past, this design avoids the bulk and ugliness that often come with heavy-duty certification. The bright yellow accents and ribbed backplate give it a distinctive look, and the Corning Gorilla Glass 3 screen has a slightly matte finish that makes it easy on the eye and comfortable to read in a range of lighting conditions.
With an 8.68-inch screen and a lowish-profile bezel, it comfortably fits in one hand, and, coupled with a weight of 540g, it all feels well-balanced for a certified rugged device. The 860-nit display is also more than bright enough for outdoor use, and the adaptive brightness and Highlight Mode mean it adapts well to the changing light conditions, although these days this is a standard feature.
This is an entry-level model; still, the performance from the Unisoc T7250 CPU is, for the most part, solid. Google productivity apps run smoothly, with the interfaces for each application responsive, though the screen resolution, while clear, is a little limited.
Likewise, the same is true for some light creative work in apps like Photoshop Express and CapCut: as long as you don’t push the resolution of the images or the video editing, most adjustments and edits are perfectly viable.
As long as your expectations for the tablet are at the entry to mid-level, the performance is solid, although as you push the system, the limitations do start to show under heavier workloads such as serious image editing, video rendering, or gaming. Although it has to be said, all applications tested are usable, especially Lightroom, which actually runs exceptionally well, and this is a tablet designed for outdoor professionals rather than creatives and with that in mind, the performance feels well-balanced.
Battery life is good and impressive through the test. During the benchmarking, which lasted about 3 hours, the battery only dropped 10%. This initial 10% drop utilised the tablet's CPU and GPU to the max, and over the rest of the 10-day test, the tablet dropped to 12% charge, a result that actually supports Ulefone's longevity claims.
Another feature that will be especially relevant to trade is the uSmart expansion connector, dock charging, and eSIM support, all of which set a business-focused feature set that makes the RugKing Pad Pro a great choice for anyone working in the field, and a sure-fire inclusion in our guide to the best rugged tablets we've tested.
The standard price is $199.99 / £170 at the time of review. Optional accessories, including the desk charging dock, tablet hand strap with kickstand, and uSmart endoscope and microscope modules, are sold separately. The cost of the 4G SIM or eSIM will be an additional expense.
Value: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Design
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Specifications
Rugged rating: IP68 / MIL-STD-810H certification Battery: 7100mAh / 18W fast charging / 6W reverse charging Screen: 8.68in / 1340 x 800 resolution / 90Hz refresh rate / Corning Gorilla Glass 3 CPU: Unisoc T7250 (12nm), Octa-core (2 x 1.8GHz + 6 x 1.6GHz) Graphics: ARM Mali-G57 MP1 RAM: 8GB (+ up to 8GB virtual RAM expansion) Storage: 128GB UFS 2.2; expandable via microSD up to 2TB Left Ports: USB-C, 3.5mm headphone jack, waterproof port covers Right Ports: Volume buttons, custom programmable key, SIM tray (2x Nano-SIM + microSD) Connectivity: 4G LTE dual SIM + built-in eSIM; Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac); Bluetooth 5.2; NFC; GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + BeiDou + QZSS; FM Radio Audio: Dual speakers; 3.5mm headphone jack; headset-free FM Radio Camera: 16MP rear (PDAF, HDR, LED flash, 1080p/30fps video); 8MP front Size: 222 x 131.5 x 12.4mm; 540g OS Installed: Android 16 Accessories: Desk Charging Dock (sold separately); Tablet Hand Strap with kickstand (sold separately); uSmart E01/E02 endoscope, C01 microscope (sold separately); Buds; Armor Mount Max
The RugKing Pad Pro is a great-looking rugged tablet with its yellow detailing and relatively slim profile. Unlike the more usual blocky, overtly industrial aesthetic that I’ve seen in the past when reviewing rugged tablets, Ulefone has taken a more refined approach: sharp lines, a protective frame, and a bright yellow ribbed back panel that gives it a rugged look without adding unnecessary bulk.
The yellow colour option, applied to the detail elements and the backplate, proved to be a practical choice, as I discovered through the test. That yellow colour makes it easy to spot at the back of a van and in low-light conditions, where high visibility matters. The yellow essentially contrasts well against most working environments and is one of the reasons some camera bag manufacturers also select this colour.
The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, which has a slightly matte surface that I found made extended reading and document work more comfortable than a typical glossy display. Although this is an entry-level device with a low screen resolution, the display quality is one of the best I’ve seen, and the surface was absolutely spot on for me.
When it comes to handling, the 8.68-inch size sits well in one hand and is easy to hold, thanks to its 540g weight. While not light, it is still easy to carry for extended periods. One feature of the design highlighted by the manufacturer is the ribbed back, and while this does look grippy, in practice it offers little more traction than a smooth surface; it’s more aesthetic than functional, and a slightly rubberised texture would have improved real-world grip.
The waterproof port plugs are simple push-fit rubber bungs, which are standard for this category. They’re made from a hard rubber that should last the lifespan of the device, but as with all such designs, you need to ensure they’re fully seated before subjecting the device to being submerged in water.
The pogo pin dock connector holds the tablet firmly, and the charging dock, sold separately, is essential if you are looking for this for the workplace, especially if multiple units need to be managed.
Design: 3 / 5
Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Features
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Fronting the tablet is an 8.68-inch IPS LCD display with a 1340 x 800 resolution, a 90Hz refresh rate, and peak brightness of 860 nits. While the resolution and refresh rate are slightly lower than those of recent rugged tablets, the display still looks good.
A common feature worth highlighting is adaptive brightness, which adjusts the screen automatically to ambient conditions, and there's a dedicated Highlight Mode that pushes brightness even further in direct sunlight. Both features work well in practice, although it is mid-March, so slightly duller day to day than later in the year.
The RugKing Pad Pro supports up to two Nano-SIMs or an eSIM. The physical SIMs, along with the TF/MicroSD card, can be loaded into the slot on the side of the device. It’s worth noting that the eSIM and physical SIMs cannot be used at the same time, and if you do want to switch between them a restart is required.
eSIM activation follows a standard process via Settings > Network & Internet, with setup via QR code or activation code. 4G LTE connectivity is all you get, and there’s no 5G support. Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, and multi-constellation GPS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS) complete the wireless options.
In the past, I’ve been impressed by uSmart's expansion accessories, such as the EndoScope, and it’s great to see that ecosystem from the tough phones now on a larger tablet, as it really does enhance its usefulness. The connector for attaching accessories is on the side and supports Ulefone’s professional accessories, including the E01 and E02 endoscopes and the C01 microscope.
The connector uses a single securing screw for attachment, and the accessories really do provide a genuine professional tool set for trades who need to carry out inspection work. The ability to feed endoscope footage directly to the tablet’s 8.68-inch screen has obvious advantages over a mobile phone screen.
A rugged mobile device wouldn’t be without a programmable custom key, and this can be assigned to any function or app; during testing, it was mapped to the camera for instant access. Other slightly unique features include the Glove mode, activated through the Special Functions menu in Settings, which, when tested, worked well with fabric gloves and lighter work gloves, though heavier-duty gloves didn’t work; however, compared with standard touch screens, this mode does make a big difference to usability.
Another of the big rugged features is the 133LM Super Torch, which sits next to the camera. Here, with the slightly focused beam, it is reasonable and has a decent reach, although there is no brightness adjustment or beam focus control.
The RugKing Pad Pro is preloaded with Android 16 and a host of apps, if anything too many, one of the first things that I would do if owning this phone for business would be to strip the app side back to the essentials. One of those essentials would be the Ulefone’s Service Centre app, which provides support when you need it, along with the user manuals.
The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is a relatively compact Android-based tablet, and as I started the performance test, a couple of points about the design immediately stood out. The first was that the size made it easy to handle, and even without the hand strap, which would have been handy, it was still easy to hold single-handed.
The textured back, which was supposed to give a little more grip, didn’t seem to do much; however, the build quality is solid, and with the usual rubberised corner protection, it all seemed durable enough.
Powering this small tablet is a Unisoc T7250 CPU, which delivers solid if not cutting-edge performance that’s fine for the market the RugKing Pad Pro is designed for. Checking out all the usual apps, including Google’s productivity apps, Docs, Sheets, Drive, and all loaded quickly and ran without issue.
However, I will say that the 1340 x 800 screen resolution only just provided enough working area for comfortable document editing. When used with those Google apps, the overall feel is well-balanced, the physical size, screen clarity and interface responsiveness work together well, and some of the more unique features were genuinely helpful.
The gloved-hand mode increases the screen's sensitivity, so even with non-touchscreen gloves, the screen still responds. I did find that for thicker gloves, the usual non-response was still present; still, it’s better than most.
Using Lightroom, Photoshop, and CapCut shows that despite the entry-level CPU and GPU, the tablet still has some potential, and the Geekbench results (Single: 441, Multi: 1501, GPU: 721) are far from ground-breaking but show good, solid performance across the board.
Where the tablet does start to struggle is with graphics-intensive tasks, and the 3DMark scores in Slingshot showed an overall score of 1884 and a Wild Life score of 160, all confirming that the Mali-G57 MP1 GPU is a competent mid-weight GPU. Flipping back to the real-world tests, sure enough, Photoshop Express, Lightroom mobile, and CapCut video editing were possible, and even NFS Asphalt ran surprisingly well.
GPS performance was generally reliable, though there was significant cloud cover during much of the test period, which made satellite connectivity a little sporadic. On clear days, the RugKing Pad Pro locked on quickly and matched the positioning accuracy of comparable rugged smartphones. 4G connectivity and speed, while not close to what I’m used to with 5G, performed well, and the signal strength in Salisbury, England, was excellent, though, heading to the outskirt towns around the New Forest, where we’re limited to 4G.
Over a 10-day period, the RugKing Pad Pro joined me for work and under normal mixed usage, mainly checking and answering emails, alongside the benchmarking test and using a variety of applications, browsing, Google Docs, and some media playback, the device finished with 12% battery.
One point of note is that the screen powers off by default after 30 seconds, which is incredibly short, so I extended the switch-off time, which has a dramatic effect on battery life.
As a final note, while the tablet does have a camera, the 16MP rear camera resolution and quality is best described as adequate, perfect for taking pictures for site documentation, reference shots, scanning, but it’s worth knowing that the brighter it is, the cleaner the images you capture will be, and this is relevant for both images and stills.
Performance: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is at the budget end of rugged tablets, yet, despite the price, it's a great option if you’re looking for a well-thought-out tablet that delivers decent performance for productivity apps and can withstand most environmental conditions.
The build quality and design are genuinely impressive for the price, and as long as the rubber lugs are pushed in securely, it will be water-tight as well as shockproof, making it ideal for trades. One aspect that sometimes lets these rugged smartphones down is the screen, and once again, the resolution is low; however, the brightness is good, and it's easy to see outdoors, even in bright conditions. The battery life over a 10-day test was also superb.
When it came to the more advanced performance, the Unisoc T7250, while a capable mid-range processor that handles productivity tasks well does start to hit its limitations under heavier creative workloads, however, that’s not really what this device is for and if you just want to enhance a few image or make short site videos then the camera and processing power will more than suffice.
I am a little surprised that a new release is still limited to 4G rather than 5G, but this will be due to price considerations, although it will limit the product's actual lifespan as 5G becomes more widely available. At present, I’m lucky to see E for my network connectivity. Despite it only offering 4G support, you can add an eSIM, which is incredibly easy to do, and the system seems well set up to do this; although you can’t run a standard SIM at the same time as the eSIM, it’s one or the other.
Some of the additional features are unique to this product line, such as the uSmart accessory ecosystem, which, as with previous releases, works incredibly well and, for trades, will be a great asset. Then, with the dock charging compatibility, it further lends itself to use in the workplace.
Should I buy a Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro?
Value
Great value for money for a solid workplace tablet that can withstand the elements
4
Design
The rugged design is slimmer and lighter than many other tablets of this style, making it far more portable
4
Features
A decent set of features, a bright screen, and the ability to connect USmart accessories
4
Performance
While rugged, the CPU and GPU limit the performance
3
Overall
Considering the entry-level price, the tablet has a good range of features and solid all-around performance
4
Buy it if...
You need a tough tablet.
If you need a tablet for work that’s tough, able to withstand the elements, and able to withstand being knocked about, then this is a great option.
Small and rugged
Unlike other rugged tablets, this can easily be held in one hand while still offering a decent 8.68-inch screen.
Don't buy it if...
You need fast networking.
While there is an eSIM available, the cellular network connection is limited to 4G only.
You use creative apps.
While Lightroom runs smoothly on the system and short edits are possible in CapCut as soon as you start pushing the adjustments, the device starts to show its limitations.
Display: 0.6-inch Tandem Micro-OLED per eye; 201-inch equivalent at 6 metres Resolution: 1920 x 1080 per eye (2D); 3840 x 1080 combined (3D) Brightness: 1,200 nits peak Contrast: 200,000:1 Colour space: 98% DCI-P3; 145% sRGB Colour accuracy: Delta E < 2 Refresh rate: 60Hz / 120Hz HDR: HDR10 with HueView 2.0 Processor: Vision 4000 Audio: 4-speaker system, tuned by Bang & Olufsen; Whisper Mode and Surround Mode Eye protection: TUV SUD Low Blue Light and Flicker-Free certified Colour modes: Standard, Movie, Eye Protection Connectivity: USB-C DisplayPort; compatible with iPhone 15/16, MacBook, iPad, Android, consoles Prescription support: Magnetic lens frame; compatible with Lensology custom lenses Weight: 76g Dimensions: 176.5 x 154.3 x 47.4mm Batman Justice Edition extras: Clip-on Batman Bat Shade; standard lens shade; collector's vault packaging Optional accessory: RayNeo Pocket TV (sold separately)
The RayNeo Air 4 Pro Batman Justice Edition are the latest iteration of the company's display glasses and quite a leap forward compared with the RayNeo Air 3S Pro’s that I looked at, at the beginning of the year.
This new iteration runs alongside the standard RayNeo Air 4 Pro but adds a little Batman branding to the package. The glasses arrive in a large collector's vault that will instantly appeal to any DC fan. The presentation of the special edition box is rather restrained rather than garish, with a large bat symbol on an otherwise all-black box. Inside are the glasses inside the usual protective case, just with the addition of the Batman symbol.
Like the box, the glasses themselves are equally discreet: there’s just a small Batman logo on the right arm alongside the Bang & Olufsen branding, otherwise in every other way they look almost identical to the standard Air 4 Pro. The real differentiator is tucked beneath a cardboard divider, which, once lifted away, reveals the clip-on Batman mask. This is a masquerade-style shade that snaps neatly onto the front of the glasses frame, helping to block out light and amusing anyone who may be watching you.
The mask itself is actually well designed and clips and unclips easily; it’s also incredibly light, so it adds little or no perceivable weight to your nose, and does something genuinely useful beyond the obvious fun. The glasses' lenses are slightly opaque, so that you can see a little of what is going on around you. Once the shade is in place, this essentially blocks ambient light far more effectively than the standard shade, making a more immersive experience in brighter environments. Sat still watching The Dark Knight through a MacBook Pro; the effect with the mask in place is impressive once your mind gets used to the little big screen effect.
Through the test, I ran the glasses on a MacBook Pro M1 Max, an iPhone 15 Pro, an iPad mini and the RayNeo Pocket TV device, and the setup was consistently straightforward. The glasses power on automatically when the USB-C cable connects, and the display mirrors immediately with no configuration required. The cable that connects the glasses to a host device runs from the back of the right arm, over your shoulder, to the device, and it becomes easy to ignore.
One of the headline features over previous models is HDR10. In practice, watching HDR content via Netflix and Apple TV on the MacBook, the improvement in shadow detail and mid-tone contrast is real, although subtle. The Vision 4000 chip's AI SDR-to-HDR upscaling adds to the visual crispness of most content. Neither transformation is dramatic. Together, however, they do boost the visual quality over earlier RayNeo glasses.
The Bang & Olufsen audio is a clear improvement, and through the test, I found that the standard mode delivered the best balanced, clear sound, and a decent volume that was definitely better than previous AR glasses. Whisper Mode is once again inaudible to anyone nearby, especially in crowded environments, making this a great solution for commuting, although probably not with the mask in place. Surround Mode is the only disappointment. The spatial effect is noticeable, but the volume drop makes it difficult to use unless you're in a quiet room.
One of the other features I was keen to try is the 2D-to-3D AI conversion. For personal video files shot on your phone, it is genuinely impressive, creating convincing depth that surprised me on the first render to show my dog walking in pretty effectively in 3D. For feature films and streaming content, things are a little more complicated. The AI processing doesn’t work on streamed content at all, and even with locally stored files, the processing seemed to hang on content that was too long. The RayNeo Pocket TV accessory, tested separately, enables standalone streaming via Google TV but similarly does not extend 3D processing to that content.
The RayNeo Air 4 Pros are a great set of display glasses which pack down to the size of a glasses case, enabling you to take them anywhere. If you’re travelling, then it’s a great way to take a decent large-format screen with you. The Batman Justice Edition shade is a bit of fun, so if you're a Batman fan, then these will be a great choice. For all others, the standard edition is, aside from the mask, identical.
RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Price & availability
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The RayNeo Air 4 Pro is available directly from uk.rayneo.com. The standard edition is priced at $249 / £249 direct from the RayNeo website. On Amazon.com, they're priced at $299 and £379 at Amazon.co.uk.
The Batman Justice Edition carries a small additional premium - and at the time of review, I'm only seeing it available on the RayNeo website in the US.
The optional RayNeo Pocket TV, which enables standalone Google TV streaming without a connected device, is sold separately.
Score: 4/5
RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Design & build
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Air 4 Pro are instantly recognisable as a pair of display glasses with that slightly bulkier design compared with a standard pair of glasses. However, the size and bulk are slowly reducing, and these are noticeably slimmer than earlier generations and rivals I've tested.
The build quality of the frame is all well-constructed and has a premium feel despite the relatively low price. Some of the notable signs that these are not standard sunglasses include the thicker-than-standard arms that have space to fit the electronics, speakers, and control buttons. This means that while these are getting slimmer, they are still very noticeable as something different.
One of the main concerns with any set of display glasses is weight and, therefore, how comfortable they will be when worn for extended viewing sessions. At just 76g, the glasses are genuinely lightweight, and wearing them through a full viewing of The Dark Knight produced only the temporary nose pressure you'd expect from any glasses worn continuously.
The nose pad does offer some adjustment if limited by the ability to move the pads in and out to change the screen distance from your eyes, which is a useful calibration tool. The one consistent note from testing, as with the Air 3s Pro, is that to get the screen in the right position required pushing the glasses slightly down the nose from the natural wearing position. I
The glasses are not self-contained and require a host device to stream content, in the same way as a monitor. Here, a USB-C cable exits from the back of the right arm and trails down to your connected device, be that a laptop, mobile phone or Pocket TV. The positioning of the cable is well thought through, essentially over the shoulder rather than dropping straight down, and after an initial positioning, you genuinely forget about it.
There is something more to this edition of the glasses over the standard with the Batman shade that clips to the front of the frame. Once installed, the slightly opaque lenses are screened off to black, and the size of the mask helps to block out more ambient light than the standard shade. While the shade works and is light, it still adds some weight to the unit, and is probably best left at home when using these on your daily commute.
Design & build: 4/5
RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Features
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Air 4 Pro features two 0.6-inch Micro-OLED screens, one 1080p per eye with a max brightness of 1,200 nits, 200,000:1 contrast and 98% DCI-P3 colour. This is essentially the same as the Air 3S Pro that I looked at a couple of months ago.
What this latest release adds is an all-new Vision 400 processor that brings, amongst other enhancements, HDR10 support, better colour mapping and contrast. The other big feature here is the Audio by Bang and Olufsen.
The Vision 4000 chip's enhancements reach right across the feature set, especially with the new AI processing that works in the background to boost the quality of the visuals. AI SDR-to-HDR upscaling is applied in real-time, so it’s one of those features that makes a big difference, but you don’t actually notice it, as it’s so integrated with the workings of the glasses.
The AI 2D-to-3D conversion is another major feature that requires the companion app to use. This is good, but it does seem to be in its early development. For personal video files shot on an iPhone and stored locally, the processing is genuinely impressive, with the depth separation being convincing, and the effect adds genuine visual interest to the footage.
One discrepancy on the site's description of the glasses that is worth noting is that six colour modes are listed: Standard, Game, Movie, Eye Protection, Professional, and Vision Boost, but the review unit had only three: Standard, Movie, and Eye Protection. Game, Professional, and Vision Boost modes were not present in the firmware version tested, but may well be added later. Standard and Eye Protection proved the most useful for general viewing; Movie mode warmed the image far too much for my liking.
The Bang & Olufsen audio partnership is genuinely a great addition with the four-speaker system. Standard mode supplies clear, balanced sound with good depth and enough volume for most environments. Whisper Mode is once again impressive, and sitting in a café, the people I was with were unable to hear any noise from the glasses until they put their heads up close.
One of the audio features that I was looking forward to trying was the Surround Mode, which introduces spatial quality to the audio.
Through the test, I tried the glasses with several devices and for all, the Plug-and-play compatibility was good with the iPhone 15 Pro, MacBook Pro M1 Max, and iPad mini, simply plugging in and being recognised without issue.
Navigation of the on-screen display is handled via a double-click of the left arm menu button to enter settings, volume buttons to scroll, and a single click to select. Switching between 2D and 3D requires a triple press of the volume rocker, followed by the RayNeo XR app to manage content. The control system works, but it takes a while for it to become intuitive.
Features: 4.5/5
RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Performance
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The simplest way to get started with the Air 4 Pros is to simply plug them directly into the USB-C port at the bottom of your phone, laptop or other device that enables display out. Once the glasses are plugged in, they instantly become a virtual 201-inch screen or at least the illusion of one.
Initially, it does just look like two small screens in front of your eyes, but due to the close proximity and resolution, your brain quickly enables the illusion of the scale of the screen to settle in. Once that brain adjustment happens, the effect of the screens is impressive and makes an ideal option for watching back media.
One hope for these display glasses was that I would be able to use them as a wearable screen for the computer; however, at 1080p, the screen resolution is limited. There’s also the fact that you need to keep your head still as the lenses are fixed to the glasses, so every head movement sees the screens move, which is initially a little disorientating. Unlike VR glasses, there’s no image stabilisation, so the more stationary your head, the better the effect.
The way that these glasses work is that what you’re looking at is actually a projection of the screens, rather than directly at the screens themselves. This means that the lens part of the glasses, while dark like sunglasses, is opaque so that you can see what’s going on around you. However, the density of the shades is high, so while in bright conditions you can see in front of you, in shaded rooms they may as well be blacked out, and all you really see are shadows crossing the display.
As with previous editions, there is a plastic shade that clips to the front, helping to block the light and boost the screen visuals. However, these being the Batman edition, as well as the standard shade, there's also the Batman option. This mask is larger than the standard version and helps to illuminate even more light. The effect is good and really does have a dramatic effect on just how immersive the experience is.
The visuals are good, but then so were the visuals of the Air 3S Pro, which share a similar resolution and specification screens. However, with the new Vision 4000 processor, the visual quality gets a boost with HDR10 content, which displays brighter and with greater dynamic range.
In practice, HDR10 content viewed via Netflix and Apple TV on the MacBook Pro showed better shadow and highlight detail than the standard display, and the videos were slightly stronger in contrast and brightness. While there is an improvement, it is subtle, so if you’re expecting a huge difference, then you’ll be disappointed.
HDR content on the MacBook Pro via Netflix and Apple TV is a great place to check the full effect, although again limited by the 1080p resolution, which is apparent. The Dark Knight was used to test the visuals, primarily due to it being a Batman film, but it was also partly shot on IMAX film with extremely deliberate lighting. The effect was notable, but you would only notice it if you were looking for it.
Flicking through the glasses options, there’s a good amount of choice, and those looking to use this with a gaming console will be pleased to see the 120Hz refresh rate option. At 60Hz, action sequences showed a small amount of motion judder, although this is slightly masked by the 1080p resolution. Switching to 120Hz did enable smoother motion, and for gaming, you’d probably want to switch to this option; for standard TV and film, 60Hz will more than suffice.
One of the notable features of these glasses is the 1,200 nit peak brightness, and when these are coupled with the dark opaque lenses, you can view the screens in almost any lighting conditions. There is the usual shade in the box, but then, this being the Batman edition, there’s also the Batman mask that can be clipped to the front. This is probably not something that you would want to wear in and around the office or in public, but in the comfort of your own home, it is a bit of fun.
While the main aim of the Batman shade is to support the partnership with the Batman brand, the larger size of the shade compared with the standard version does help to block out a little more light and further adds to the immersive experience. Other than the visuals of the Batman mask, there really is little other benefit, and unless you’re a Batman fan, then it’s probably best to opt for the slightly cheaper standard version.
One of the other features that had stood out was the 3D potential, especially with these being Batman-branded. To access the 3D features, you can either use the App to view your own content or stereoscopic content by double-clicking the left and right rocker levers on the arms. I was hoping that with the Dark Knight having been shot for IMAX, or at least some of the scenes, would somehow be 3D optimised through the AI feature. Testing this feature with the glasses connected to the App and video content from my phone viewed through the app, the effect is impressive; oddly, still images once processed are less impressive. Having tested some smaller files, I decided to see if this near-realtime 3D enhancement of video was also possible for feature films and streaming content.
Unfortunately, I quickly established that this may be pushing the 3D AI conversion a little too far, and streamed content cannot be processed regardless of the source, and even the RayNeo Pocket TV accessory, which brings standalone Google TV streaming to the glasses, doesn’t add any 3D processing.
Looking at the colour options, and again there’s a good choice, and the effects are quite stark, and through this test I actually found the standard mode was the best for film, TV and other content. Switching to the movie option turned everything a little too yellow.
Another of the big features for these glasses is the audio partnership with Bang & Olufsen, and this is genuinely a good boost to the audio quality. Watching several episodes of Monarch and The Dark Knight through the MacBook Pro, the sound quality through Standard mode was impressive, comfortably better than laptop speakers and on a par with a decent set of over-ear headphones. Whisper Mode's ability, which impressed me in the past, once again manages to contain audio within the immediate vicinity. However, the surround sound option that I was looking forward to testing just seemed to run too quietly, and the only place that I could take full advantage was in a quiet room, and even then, the volume just felt a touch too quiet.
In the final part of the test, I tried using the glasses as a secondary display for the MacBook, and I found that for reviewing product manuals and reference material, it was workable. While for reading, the resolution is ok, and the larger area was good, again, you do need to keep your head still. Throughout the review, while these screens are good and the price well balanced, you still can’t escape that the screens are quite small compared with the latest VR headsets, and the fact that there’s no horizon steady or stabilisation will take a bit of getting used to.
Alongside the Air 4 Pros, I also took a look at the RayNeo Pocket TV accessory, tested as part of this review, and this worked incredibly well once set up as a standalone streaming device connected to the glasses via USB-C, and enables you to connect without a phone or laptop, as long as there’s a wifi connection.
Performance: 4.5/5
RayNeo Air 4 Pro Batman Justice Edition: Final verdict
The RayNeo Air 4 Pro Batman Justice Edition display glasses are great fun if you’re a Batman fan and want something else for the collection. For everyone else, there’s the standard option of the Air 4 Pros, which are slightly cheaper.
If you strip away the fact that the shade is a Batman mask and you’re unlikely to wear it out in public, the effect when clipped to the front of the glasses, with the more extensive coverage over the shades, actually does block more light, so in a way, the mask is practical.
When it comes to the list of enhancements from the Air 3S Pro I looked at earlier in the year, while the screen resolutions remain much the same, the HDR10 display, Bang & Olufsen audio, and a 120Hz refresh rate do make these glasses and far better for media playback when you’re on the move.
The 3D conversion feature again offers great potential, and it works well on personal video footage, but at present, it cannot process streaming content, and even on compatible files, the effect varies depending on the content, but is genuinely impressive.
For DC fans, the Justice Edition is great fun. For everyone else, the standard Air 4 Pro offers identical performance, and at a slightly lower price.
Value
Standard Air 4 Pro at £249 are cheap for this display quality. The Batman Justice Edition Premium is great fun for dedicated fans
4
Design
Slim, well-built, and comfortable for extended viewing sessions. Batman shade looks great and works practically if you’re a fan.
4
Features
HDR10, B&O audio, 120Hz and AI processing are all decent upgrades. The 3D is limited to personal video files, but again shows potential.
4
Performance
HDR enhancement is visible, and the audio is excellent, although the surround sound option is a little low in volume.
4
Total
The Batman edition is great fun for fans and considering the price the standard edition is good value if you want a set of display glasses
4.5
Should you buy the RayNeo Air 4 Pro?
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Buy it if...
You want a personal cinema for travel lightweight, immersive, and genuinely good-looking, these are the best display glasses for media consumption available right now.
You're a DC fan The Justice Edition packaging, Batman shade and collector's vault make this one of the more enjoyable unboxing experiences in tech, and the mask genuinely improves immersion.
Don't buy it if...
You're buying primarily for the 3D feature. AI 3D works impressively on your own video files, but does not extend to streaming content or feature films, which is where most viewers will want it.
You want true augmented reality. These are display glasses that simulate a large screen, not smart glasses with AR overlays or standalone computing. A connected device is always required.
Ceiling-mounted access points have been extremely popular since makers like TP-Link began designing them with PoE in mind.
Positioning the TP-Link Omada EAP787 in a range of these devices, it's either at the top or just below it, since the makers do have the EAP783, which is BE20000 rated.
Depending on the region this equipment is deployed, the EAP787 is either a BE12000 or BE15000 capable device with up to channels covering 2.4GHz, 5GHz and 6GHz frequencies. In the USA(BE15000), these bands offer 5765 Mbps on 6 GHz, 8648 Mbps on 5 GHz and 688 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, totalling 15101 Mbps.
In the EU and UK (BE12000), those numbers are 5765 Mbps on 6 GHz, 5765 Mbps on 5 GHz and 688 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, totalling 12218 Mbps. The hardware is identical; it’s just that in the USA, the FCC permits 320 MHz-wide channels on the 5 GHz band, whereas under European regulators (ETSI/Ofcom), the limit is 5 GHz to just 160 MHz wide.
The caveat to having this much bandwidth available is that the EAP787 must use a 10GbE backhaul to connect to the larger network, and potentially the Internet. And that requires a special switch that supports PoE++ 10GbE.
As with most TP-Links Omada hardware, the EAP787 is packed with Enterprise-class technologies that allow it to be remotely configured and controlled, and this AP also has a frequency monitoring technology that detects interference in real-time and enables the hardware to reconfigure automatically.
The only significant missing feature is APC on 6GHz, something that TP-Link has promised is coming soon via a firmware update.
Given its capabilities, the EAP787 seems implausibly cheap, but it's worth noting that buying these might require larger investments in network infrastructure to make the most of what they can do.
If you have a 10GbE PoE++ switch, then this is probably one of the best access points available. And when TP-Link releases the AFC firmware, it will get even better.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
TP-Link Omada EAP787: price and availability
How much does it cost? $250/£230/€280
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Available from Amazon and other online retailers.
As with most TP-Link hardware, the EAP787 is available from major online resellers, including Amazon. In the USA, it costs $249.99 and in the UK it's £ 250.
However, I wouldn’t recommend buying it on Amazon unless you only need a single unit. Many resellers who specialize in network equipment offer excellent deals on bulk purchases and bundles that include a 12V power supply or a PoE injector.
The competition comes primarily from another TP-Link design, the EAP 873, as well as the Ubiquiti Unifi U7 Pro XGS and U7 Pro Max.
The EAP873 is effectively two EAP787s glued together, offering a massive BE22000 spec, but it lacks the dedicated TF scanning, AFC or Bluetooth. It also requires dual 10GbE LAN ports to provide sufficient uplink. The cost of this item is $499.99 on Amazon, which seems appropriate for the bandwidth on offer.
The Ubiquiti U7 Pro XGS costs $299.99 from Amazon, and that’s a BE15000 specification AP (in the USA), and also uses a single 10GbE PoE++ port for power and data.
The Ubiquiti U7-Pro-Max is very similar from a Wi-Fi perspective, having the same BE15000 capability, but bizarrely, the makers have given this model only a single 2.5GbE PoE+ Uplink. It’s only a little cheaper than the Ubiquiti U7 Pro XGS, so I’d avoid that option.
Based on the specifications and cost, the EAP787 seems something of a bargain, but it’s worth considering the extra infrastructure needed to make the best use of this hardware before making an impulse purchase.
8 spatial streams (4x4 on 5GHz, 2x2 on 6GHz, 2x2 on 2.4GHz)
Modulation
4096-QAM (Wi-Fi 7), 1024-QAM, 256-QAM
Channel Width
Up to 320MHz (6GHz), 160/240MHz (5GHz)
Uplink Port
1x 10G/2.5G Ethernet (2.5G with PoE+, 10G with PoE++)
PoE Standard
802.3bt (PoE++) (51.7W max; also supports DC power)
Dedicated RF Scanning
2x2 radio; requires Omada controller v6.0+
AFC Support
Yes, via firmware update (planned April 2026)
MLO Support
Multi-Link Operation across 5GHz + 6GHz
Concurrent Clients
510+ (lab tested)
Coverage Area
Up to 2,050 ft² / 190 m²
Bluetooth
BLE 5.2
Management
Omada SDN (controller required for advanced features); standalone web UI
Mesh Support
Yes (Omada Mesh)
Seamless Roaming
Yes
TP-Link Omada EAP787: design
Large dish design
Ceiling and wall mounting
10GbE PoE++ implications
The EAP787 follows TP-Link's standard Omada ceiling-mount aesthetic of a large circular disc designed for flush ceiling or suspended tile installation. The push-and-rotate mount mechanism makes installation straightforward for IT teams.
Using it with 51.7W PoE++, that’s a significant power draw, and the unit is notably large, which may create challenges in space-constrained or aesthetics-sensitive environments.
It comes with a circular mounting plate with holes for four possible connection options. These include a basic ceiling/wall mount, a 3.5-inch US round junction box, a US gang outlet, and an EU gang outlet.
In a recess on the underside of the EAP787 is the 10GbE PoE++ port, and a 12V input if you wish to power it directly rather than use PoE. A plastic cover is provided for this area, but I’d only use it if you have Ethernet cables terminated with a 90-degree connector, since with it attached, there is no straight path to the port.
Four internal antennas handle the eight Wi-Fi streams, while a separate pair of internal antennas is used for the dedicated RF scanning radio. BLE 5.2 is also built in, enabling future IoT integration and remote out-of-band management possibilities via the Omada app.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
There is a single 10G/2.5G combo Ethernet port, with the operating speed determined solely by the PoE class provided by the upstream switch. As an alternative, there is a 12V power input, but the PSU for this isn’t included in the box. And TP-Link also makes PoE++ injectors if you want to avoid a PoE++ switch but already have 10GbE networking.
Being generous, this is an elegant design that lets buyers enter at PoE+ and upgrade later. But it’s also worth noting that to get the most from this design requires a 10GbE PoE++ switch, and something like the TP-Link TL-SX3206HPP with four ports of 10GbE PoE++ is likely to cost you £500, substantially more than the EAP787.
For a larger deployment, the 24-port TP-Link SX3832MPP is likely to cost you £1,619.95, though this does have eight 10GbE SFP+ ports to handle the network backbone.
The relatively low price of this Access Point is a lure to get on board the Omada train, as to get all the best features and easiest control requires at least an Omada controller and probably an Omada switch.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Design score: 4/5
TP-Link Omada EAP787: In use
Omada control
AFC is not yet ready
For those unfamiliar with the Omada ecosystem, all TP-Link’s Omada-branded equipment follows the same pattern: it can be used in standalone web-interface mode or via an Omada controller. The controller can be either a hardware controller at additional cost, or a software one configured on a system that remains operationally 24/7.
For an IT professional with lots of TP-Link gear managed by Omada controllers, it makes for an easy life, as the system can be managed globally, including over different sites through a single web-based interface.
Luckily for this review, I already have an Omada controller and a number of Omada access points, so adding this one to the gang is merely a matter of plugging it in and then going to the Omada controller app to adopt it. Once joined to the system, the controller will monitor the EAP787, and automatically deploy the pre-defined SSIDs associated with the network.
That saves me some time, but if I were deploying a dozen of these or other Omada hardware across multiple locations, it could save a substantial amount of effort. It’s also incredibly useful for making sweeping changes and collecting data that might justify buying more (or less) equipment to better meet the demands placed on the network.
Some will argue that TP-Link are attempting to lock you into their hardware, and to a degree, that’s an accurate analysis, but most networking hardware makers do much the same thing, and hardware uniformity makes for greater predictability.
Like all the TP-Link Omada equipment I’ve recently tested, the EAP787 was immediately recognised by the Omada controller and began working alongside the others within minutes.
One special feature I’ve not seen previously, but on the EAP787 is dedicated RF scanning. This is an independent monitoring of the usable spectrum for interference without disrupting client traffic. To leverage this continuous adaptation, the Omada controller v6.0 or higher is required, but it is arguably the device's most compelling enterprise capability.
If there is a blot on this wonderfully cultured Omada landscape, it’s AFC on the EAP787.
AFC, or Automated Frequency Coordination, allows the 6GHz radio to transmit at higher power levels, substantially improving range. That’s important because 5765 Mbps of the available bandwidth is allocated to 6GHz, and if it’s only of use to those standing under the Access Point, then the BE12000 (or BE15000) rating is a little disingenuous.
At the time of writing this review, AFC doesn’t work on the EAP787, although it’s promised in a firmware update coming, allegedly, in April 2026. Until it ships, the 6GHz range will be constrained by standard power limits, as is the case with most current Wi-Fi 7 APs.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
In Use: 4/5
TP-Link Omada EAP787: performance
AFC will improve 6GHz, eventually
EU performance reduction on 5GHz
Performance testing on this hardware is slightly coloured at this point, partly because, depending on what region you are in, there is a different bandwidth topology, and also because AFC isn’t yet ready for public consumption.
The EAP787 uses the same Qualcomm chipset family as its EAP783 brother, though its 5GHz radio is specified at an even higher rate of 8648 Mbps vs the EAP783's 5760 Mbps, suggesting the 5GHz radio has been significantly upgraded.
However, no single client can access that much bandwidth, and in Europe, the 5GHz band is limited to 5760 Mbps anyway.
What’s true wherever the EAP787 is deployed is that the 10GbE port can sustain over 9 Gbps, assuming the wirelessly connected clients are pulling or pushing that much data. As this AP can support more than 500 users simultaneously, that should be possible.
MLO performance, like other 2024-era Wi-Fi 7 APs, will fluctuate until AFC is live. As 6GHz range limitations constrain MLO effectiveness, as noted across the Omada lineup. The EAP787 could be the hardware to fix that issue when TP-Link finally releases the firmware necessary to activate AFC.
It’s worth noting that AFC isn’t yet available on Ubiquiti's alternative devices, so if that feature works as intended when it becomes available, it’s a significant advantage for the EAP787.
While it’s difficult to put hard numbers on its effectiveness, the dedicated RF scanning radio operates independently from the three data radios, meaning real-time interference monitoring does not tax Wi-Fi throughput. This is a notable advantage in high-density or congested RF environments such as convention centres, hospitals, and lecture halls.
In my testing with a suitably Wi-Fi 7 capable laptop, connection speeds of 1.2 Gbps are standard when near the AP, and even at range, 720 Mbps was sustained. The only caveat to that level of performance is that the first ten people will wonder what happened to their amazing connection when more people turn up.
Performance score: 4/5
(Image credit: TP-Link)
TP-Link Omada EAP787: Final verdict
When the wireless network is expanded with devices like the EAP787, then it's likely that other parts will need upgrading to make use of what it delivers. As I mentioned earlier, making the best use of this gear requires infrastructure changes, but new switches and Omada controllers might just be the tip of a considerable iceberg.
Because the majority of Wi-Fi access won’t be for internal systems, but the greater internet, and having a wireless network with access points that can shift up to 15000Mbps, won’t work if you only have 1GbE broadband at the end of that 10GbE infrastructure.
If you choose to embrace the EAP787 or its EAP783 bigger brother, or any of the UniFi U7 Pro equipment, then budget for a wider broadband pipe at the same time.
This hardware is designed for large enterprises and high-density venues, such as convention centres, lecture halls, or hospitals, with 100+ simultaneous clients per AP, where dedicated RF scanning and high client capacity matter.
It fits better with 10GbE infrastructure, since connecting it by 2.5GbE effectively negates the point of this AP, leaving you paying a premium for 2.5G performance available more cheaply elsewhere.
The Omada ecosystems, with their seamless controller integration, no licensing fees, and consistent Omada management, make it a natural upgrade path from earlier EAP models.
I would avoid using the EAP787 in small offices or homes, where a simpler EAP773 or EAP783 suffices. Those environments without 10GbE switching, or where anyone who needs an AP can deploy standalone without a controller and access all features.
This is plenty of AP for a modest price, but making the most of it requires TP-Link to finish its work with AFC, and those who choose this equipment must accept that it could easily lead to significant additional investment.
Should I buy a TP-Link Omada EAP787?
TP-Link EAP787 Score Card
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
Aggressively priced for the specification of this device
4/5
Design
A simple dish with all the clever stuff inside
4/5
In Use
Works with Omada management, and AFC is promised
4/5
Performance
EU performance is restricted, but US bandwidth is epic
4/5
Overall
Better in the US than the EU, but be mindful of the switch you need with this
4.5/5
Buy it if...
You want Wi-Fi 7 While there is better Wi-Fi 7 hardware available, most of it costs much more than this. However, you may find that those clients who are using Wi-Fi 5 or 6 equipment get less of an uplift than expected.
You want central management TP-Link has created a highly organised management system for its Omada-branded equipment, and that includes this access point. For a small IT covering a large facility, the ability to monitor and adjust hardware remotely is a huge cost-saving.
Don't buy it if...
You don’t have Wi-Fi 7 clients Without the right hardware on the client end, there is little point in going with a Wi-Fi 7 access point. And, you might be able to get more bandwidth on 2.4GHz and 5GHz, by spending the same money on a Wi-Fi 6 or 6e access point.
You don’t use 10GbE To make the best use of this equipment, it requires 10GbE and PoE++. Without those things, there is little point in deploying the EAP787.
Professional headsets have always had an image problem. The moment you clip a boom arm to your ear, you look like someone who works in a call centre or is directing air traffic. Jabra has clearly decided that aesthetic just isn’t good enough.
With the Evolve3 85, the company has taken all the voice clarity technology it has spent years developing, stripped away the boom mic entirely, and wrapped everything in a design that would not look out of place in a Copenhagen coffee shop.
The headline technology is Jabra ClearVoice, a boomless microphone system powered by a deep neural network trained on over 60 million sentences. It uses multiple concealed microphones to separate speech from background noise without a visible arm, drawing on expertise from GN's hearing division.
Design-wise, the Evolve3 85 is up to 35 per cent slimmer than its Evolve2 predecessor, claims to be the lightest over-ear headset in its class, and folds into a travel case thin enough to mistake for empty. The over-ear fit gives better passive isolation than the on-ear Evolve3 75 sibling, making it ideal for both open offices and noisy commutes.
Looks aren’t everything, but the Evolve 3 85 can also claim battery life figures that are genuinely remarkable. Jabra quotes 25 hours of call time and 120 hours of music playback on a single charge, with a five-minute fast charge providing five hours of use. That effectively means that by the point your line manager has berated your timekeeping, the headphones are ready to get you through at least half the working day from flat.
And, wireless charging is also supported, via the flat exterior surface of the earcups, avoiding excessive wear on the USB-C port
The adaptive ANC deserves particular attention. Unlike most headsets, which pause noise cancellation the moment you start a call, the Evolve3 85 keeps it active throughout. Combined with the Bluetooth 5.4 connection, LC3 codec support, and dual-device pairing, the package's connectivity looks impressively comprehensive.
If all this sounds way too good to be realistic, the Evolve3 85 sits firmly at the premium end of the market at around $500. Compared with the outgoing Evolve2 85 and similar UC-certified alternatives, that’s price continuity.
The Evolve3 85 makes a compelling case on every front except price, but even at this cost, these deserve to be added to our best noise-cancelling headphone collection.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Jabra Evolve3 85: price and availability
How much does it cost? From $527/£496/€569
When is it out? Pre-order for April 2026
Where can you get it? Direct from Jabra and online retailers
The Jabra Evolve3 85 launched on 1 March 2026 at a recommended price of $649 in the United States, £495 in the UK, €569 in Europe (including VAT), and AU$979 in Australia.
Initially only available in black, a Warm Grey colour variant is due to follow in April 2026 in select markets. The Evolve3 75, the on-ear sibling, is available from the same date at the lower price of £349 / $463.
Checking the larger online retailers, the Evolve3 85 Microsoft Teams model is available for pre-order at only $475 on Amazon.com, for a model with only wired charging, and $527 for one with wireless charging.
Oddly, the wired All Platforms model is the same price as the Microsoft Teams model, but the wireless option is a disturbing $720. I suspect that the final price is a mistake, since in other regions the prices for the two standards are the same.
In the UK, this headset is on Amazon.co.uk, but can be bought directly from the official Jabra website. The Microsoft Teams wired charging model is £429, and the wireless model is £466.80; all prices include VAT, and the same pricing applies to the Unified Communication models.
These are enterprise-grade prices, and Jabra makes no apologies for that. The Evolve2 85, which the Evolve3 replaces, was similarly positioned, and buyers of business equipment will likely have IT budgets rather than personal wallets in mind. That said, Jabra has clearly made a conscious effort to position the Evolve3 as a crossover product, and at this price, it will face meaningful competition from premium consumer headphones that carry genuinely impressive audio credentials.
For organisations deploying at scale, Jabra offers free trials for companies of 500 or more employees who are replacing existing devices, and the Plus Management platform simplifies fleet deployment considerably.
Individual buyers are perhaps less well served by the pricing, particularly when similarly styled competitors undercut it by a meaningful margin. But these are meant to catch the corporate ear, pun fully intended.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Value score: 3/5
Jabra Evolve3 85: Specs
Model
Jabra Evolve3 85
Weight
220g
Form factor
Over-ear, closed-back
Microphone
Boomless (Jabra ClearVoice, multi-mic DNN)
ANC
Jabra Advanced ANC, adaptive (active during calls)
Battery life (calls)
Up to 25 hours
Battery life (music)
Up to 120 hours (ANC/Busylight off)
Fast charging
5 hours use from 5-minute charge; 10 hours from 10 minutes
Wireless charging
Yes (flat exterior surface supports Qi pads)
Connectivity
Bluetooth 5.4, LC3 codec, pre-paired USB adapter, Bluetooth Native
Dual connectivity
Yes
UC certification
Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Google Meet
Software
Jabra Plus mobile app (Android / iOS); desktop app later in 2026
Replaceable parts
Battery, ear cushions
Colours
Black (March 2026); Warm Grey (April 2026, select markets)
Sustainability
Recycled/bio-circular materials; TCO Gen 10 certified
Jabra Evolve3 85: design
No boom arm
Robust construction
Excellent ergonomics
The first thing most people will notice about the Evolve3 85 is what it is missing. There is no boom arm, and no retractable mic stalk. Considering that one feature probably accounts for the demise of at least half the headsets I’ve seen, eliminating it is a win.
No visual shorthand that announces to the world you are working on a helpdesk. Instead, what you get is a clean, minimal over-ear headset with a matte finish, breathable cushions, and a profile that would sit comfortably alongside any premium consumer headphone.
Jabra describes the aesthetic as contemporary Danish design, which made me immediately think of Princess Leia’s hairstyle, but these aren’t like that at all.
This is a noticeably slimmer design than the Evolve2 it replaces, measuring up to 35 per cent thinner according to Jabra's own figures. The result is a headset that folds into a compact travel case that can slip into a work bag without occupying a dedicated compartment.
My only other concern about the carry case is that it doesn’t have an obvious place for the wireless charger, and the compressed paper/fabric material it's made of isn’t as robust as the Evolve3 85.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
While some headsets use plastic throughout to keep weight and cost down, the amount of metal in these and the quality of the plastic materials used feel appropriately premium for the price point, and the overall construction suggests a product designed for long daily use rather than occasional handling.
Jabra has also included replaceable ear cushions and a replaceable battery, both of which are welcome additions from a longevity perspective and bring the product into compliance with current repair legislation.
Finding that kind of consideration in a business headset is encouraging; finding it in any headset at this price is much less common than it should be.
Another feature I appreciated is the 360-degree busylight that signals availability status from every angle, removing the need to actively communicate when you are on a call.
Small details such as this speak to a design team that has actually thought about how people use headsets at a desk, rather than simply engineering for the product brochure.
My review hardware was specifically designed for Microsoft Teams use, and has that logo on a button on the right side. In fact, most of the controls are on the right side, with the exception of the ANC control and the power button, which are on the left. In this respect, the Evolve3 85 is primarily designed for right-handed people.
Overall, these are a surprisingly elegant piece of audiowear that mixes personal and business use effortlessly.
Design score: 4.5/5
Jabra Evolve3 85: Hardware
Bluetooth 5.4
Microsoft Teams vs the World
ClearVoice
Bluetooth 5.4 with the LC3 codec forms the backbone of the wireless connection, and the package includes a pre-paired USB adapter for secure, low-latency connectivity with a PC. Bluetooth Native allows direct device connections without the adapter for users who prefer a simpler setup.
Dual connectivity is supported throughout, meaning the headset can maintain simultaneous connections to both a computer and a smartphone without requiring manual switching.
One-touch voice access is integrated for AI assistant interactions, and Jabra claims accuracy of over nine out of ten words in voice prompts. That is a specific and testable claim, and one that experienced business users will scrutinise closely. UC certification covers Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet, which cover the main platforms used in the UK and European enterprises.
Controls are handled through physical buttons and a straightforward interface. The Jabra Plus mobile app provides equaliser controls, wind noise reduction settings, and firmware update management from a smartphone.
A desktop version of the app is scheduled for later in 2026, which is a notable gap at launch for users who work primarily at a desk. IT teams managing fleet deployments have access to Jabra Plus Management, which handles remote configuration and firmware pushes from a central dashboard.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
The ClearVoice system is the most significant departure from previous generations, since those relied on a physical boom arm to capture voice close to the mouth. The Evolve3 replaces it entirely with a multi-microphone array driven by a deep neural network.
That network was trained on over 60 million sentences and draws on GN's background in hearing aid technology, which gives Jabra a genuine advantage over competitors building similar systems from scratch.
The practical implication is that callers should not notice the absence of a boom arm. Background noise, whether from an open-plan office, a busy cafe, or a commuter train, is intended to be filtered out by the processing rather than physically excluded by proximity microphone placement. Whether that processing holds up in the worst acoustic environments is the most important unresolved question about this product.
Jabra has also added wind noise reduction as a configurable setting in the app, suggesting the microphone system is intended for outdoor use as well as traditional office environments.
That is a meaningful expansion of the use case compared to most UC-certified headsets, and shows how the Evolve3 85 has a foot firmly in both the enterprise and home audio experience.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Hardware: 4/5
Jabra Evolve3 85: Performance
Effective ANC
Excellent charging options
Jabra has made a clear effort to ensure the Evolve3 85 performs as a music headphone as well as a call headset, and the specifications support that ambition. The LC3 codec provides high-fidelity wireless audio, the over-ear closed-back design offers meaningful passive isolation, and the 120-hour music battery life suggests Jabra expects people to use this for listening as well as talking.
Enhanced Spatial Sound is included to make long calls feel more natural and less tiring. The objective is to present voices as though they are positioned in front of you rather than directly inside your ears, which reduces the cognitive load of extended video meetings. It is a feature that sounds modest in description but makes a genuine difference across a full working day.
The equaliser available through the Jabra Plus app allows personal tuning of the sound profile, which is a welcome addition for anyone who wants to adjust the factory calibration to suit their taste or their music library. The desktop app, when it arrives, should make that process more convenient for office-based users.
The adaptive ANC on the Evolve3 85 adjusts in real time based on both the external environment and the fit of the headset. The second of those factors is more significant than it might appear. Most ANC systems apply a fixed cancellation profile regardless of how well the ear cushions seal against your head. Jabra's approach calibrates continuously, which means the performance should remain consistent even as the headset shifts slightly during a long session.
As an example of how well this works, in my small office, I have a Bambu Lab H2D 3D printer only a metre to my left, and with this headset on, it can be printing at full speed, and it's almost silent to me. Not to say that’s a noisy printer, but it’s much less distracting with the headphones on.
The distinction between this and most competitors is that the ANC does not pause during calls. Active noise cancellation on most business headsets disengages the moment a call begins as the microphone signal takes priority. Jabra has engineered around that compromise, and the result is a headset that should maintain a consistent listening environment whether you are in a meeting or working between calls. That matters considerably in open-plan environments where ambient noise levels can be unrelenting.
The headline battery figures are among the most impressive in the over-ear headset market. Twenty-five hours of call time is sufficient for multiple full working days, and 120 hours of music playback is a figure most consumer headphones cannot approach. Both are measured with ANC and the busy light disabled, so real-world figures will be somewhat lower, but even with both features active, the Evolve3 85 should comfortably outlast a working week on a single charge.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Fast charging delivers five hours of use from a five-minute charge, which addresses the specific anxiety of reaching for the headset before an important call and finding the battery low. Wireless charging is supported via the flat exterior of the earcups, which means placing the headset face down on a standard Qi pad while at a desk.
For those looking to reduce the cost of these, Jabra wants another $50 for the model that comes with the official charger, whereas a good quality Qi pad made by Anker is only around $20, and it works just as well.
That the battery is also user-replaceable is a genuinely useful feature for long-term ownership and one that separates the Evolve3 from the majority of similarly priced competitors. Having to bin a generally serviceable headset because the battery won’t hold sufficient charge is something that should never happen.
I’m not going to give you my view of its abilities for the reproduction of music, since I’m not an audiophile, and my ears were never professionally tuned. I’ll just say that with drivers of this scale, there isn’t the level of bass you might expect from larger cans, but the range it does offer is consistent.
Overall, these are great for a working environment and acceptable for more general use.
Performance: 4/5
Jabra Evolve3 85: Final verdict
The Jabra Evolve3 85 ticks so many boxes, it's hard to know where to begin.
It’s stylish, the ANC works exceptionally well, it will last three working days on calls on a single charge, and it can grab enough power in a few minutes to make it to lunch.
The caveat to these beautifully engineered headphones is the cost, above all else.
Yes, the desktop app for these should have been ready at launch, but the phone app is here, and the desktop app is promised soon.
I just wish they were cheaper, since many budget-controlling managers are likely to exclude them purely based on cost. And doing so might prove to be a strategic mistake.
Should I buy a Jabra Evolve3 85?
Jabra Evolve3 85 Score Card
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
Expensive for call centre headphones
3/5
Design
A major upgrade from the Evolve2
4.5/5
Hardware
Always on ANC and ClearVoice
4/5
Performance
Effective ANC and plenty of charging options
4/5
Overall
Business headset that feels like much more
4.5/5
Buy it if...
You work in a noisy environment The need for consistent noise cancellation during calls and between them is paramount in a call centre or similar environment. With these, it's easier to understand the caller and focus on their needs.
Your business likes efficiency These are the perfect choice if your organisation needs UC-certified headsets that can be centrally managed and remotely updated. And if you value repairability, the replaceable battery and cushions make this a product designed to last.View Deal
Don't buy it if...
You are working with a budget For those buying personally rather than through a business, the price tag is genuinely prohibitive. However, you can make some cost savings on the charging technology, and being able to replace the battery and cushions might make them last longer in the end.
Let’s be clear from the start. For everyday listening, the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 are the best earbuds you can get without spending significantly more. They tick every box, deliver across the board and make a compelling case that there’s life beyond Apple for those who have been reluctant to shop around.
They’re the fifth generation of Huawei’s FreeBuds Pro line, which has been around since 2020 and we’ve always rated them well. In fact, I tested the FreeBuds Pro 2 back in 2022. The FreeBuds Pro 4 landed in November 2024 and scored four stars in our review. They were strong but not quite there. The Pro 5 are different and good enough to go head-to-head with the best at this level, including the Apple AirPods Pro 3.
The FreeBuds Pro 5 look and feel more premium than their price suggests, and so does the charging case. They’re smaller and lighter than the Pro 4 at 5.5g per bud, which is noticeable. Build quality is excellent, the stems have a high-shine finish and the case has a satiny coating that feels upscale.
Most importantly, the design translates into a supremely comfortable wear. As someone with small, particular ears who put these through gym sessions, runs and full working days, I can tell you the fit is impressive.
The feature set is extensive. There’s smooth multipoint connectivity, customisable gesture controls that are responsive and the Huawei Audio Connect app is one of my favourites at this level. Battery life reaches around 8.5 hours with ANC off and nearly 6 with it on, with 38 hours total from the case. That’s not as good as rivals for ANC listening time, but the amount of power the case holds is great.
ANC is one of the headline upgrades here. The FreeBuds Pro 5 use a dual-driver system and they work together as noise-cancelling engines, paired with an AI sensing model. In practice, it’s close to silence but without that airless, pressurized quality that heavy ANC can sometimes produce. Call quality benefits from the same tech, I found it to be clear and natural, even in busy environments.
Then there’s sound, which is very good indeed. The dual-driver acoustic system delivers a wide, rich soundstage with strong low-end response, excellent instrument separation and detail that holds up across genres, from driving rock to expansive orchestral soundtracks. I think you’d have to spend significantly more or go wired to do meaningfully better.
Our audio editor Becky Scarrott called these “hands-down Huawei’s best buds yet” after five days of early testing at launch. After several weeks with them, I wholeheartedly agree. They earn their five stars because they’re excellent value, genuinely well-made and perform at a level that earbuds costing more would be proud of.
Now, are they perfect? Not quite. Lossless audio requires a Huawei device, which many don’t have. The design is fractionally chunkier than some rivals at this price too and you don't get foam tips in the box like you did with the Pro 4. But if those are the only cons (and they are), they’re doing well. I’d bet none of these would register on the radar of most everyday listeners.
That’s precisely who I think these buds are for. Not the audiophile chasing the absolutely best sound or the dedicated athlete who needs purpose built workout buds. But the everyday listener who wants the best all-rounders. They've got wide appeal, strong value and no meaningful ecosystem restrictions.
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Price and release date
(Image credit: Future)
Released globally in February 2026
Sells for £179.99 in the UK
No price hike from past models
The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 were released in February 2026 in many markets across the UK, Europe and Asia. Though there are still ongoing trade restrictions between Huawei and the US.
The buds cost £179.99 in the UK. But it's worth noting that, at the time of writing, the official Huawei website is offering a £30 off coupon for the FreeBuds Pro 5. This may not last long, but it makes an already great value pair of buds even easier to recommend.
Whether you find them for £179.99 or get the £149.99 deal, they're a good price for earbuds designed to compete with high-end rivals.
Let's put that into context. The latest AirPods Pro cost $249 / £219 / AU$429. So they're undercutting those while being a very solid alternative, particularly for Android users. Similarly, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, which are going to be seen as the top AirPods Pro alternative for Androids users, sell for $249 / £219 / AU$399.
They're pricier than some of our favorite mid-range picks, like the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 at $149 / £119 and the Nothing Ear (a) at $99 / £99. But I'd say they're positioned as a step above both of those options, so that would make sense here.
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Specs
Drivers
11mm dynamic woofer and micro-planar tweeter
Active noise cancellation
Yes
Battery life (ANC off)
9 hours buds, 38 hours case
Weight
5.5g per bud, 43g case
Connectivity
Bluetooth 6
Frequency response
10 Hz to 48 kHz
Waterproofing
IP57 buds, IP54 case
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Features
(Image credit: Future)
9/38-hour battery life, less with ANC or features
Plenty of useful features in the easy-to-use app
Fantastic ANC
The FreeBuds Pro 5 are packed with features, and almost all of them live inside the Huawei Audio Connect app, which is one of the cleanest companion apps I’ve tested. Everything is easy to find and nothing is buried in sub-menus.
Huawei claims the FreeBuds Pro 5 are the world’s first dual-driver ANC earbuds, meaning both the dynamic driver and the micro planar diaphragm unit work together to tackle noise. The low-frequency driver targeting rumble and bass-heavy interference, the high-frequency driver handling sharper sounds. This hardware is then paired with a real-time AI sensing model that samples ambient noise 400,000 times per second (yes, you read that right!), which means it’s continuously adapting to whatever environment you’re in.
In practice, it’s incredibly effective. I tried them in all sorts of environments and low rumbles, like traffic, air conditioning, the hum of a commute, are all handled incredibly well. The overall effect is close to silence without tipping into the slightly pressurized, airless quality some ANC can produce. I know some people do prefer that, but what Huawei does here is my preference. There’s also a good passive isolation baseline here thanks to the secure fit.
There are four ANC models to pick. Dual-Engine, which adapts automatically to your surroundings. Cozy, which is for quieter environments. General for everyday noise and Ultra for loud environments. With Ultra you might notice more of a pressure sensation, which is worth knowing if you’re sensitive to that feeling, but it does do a good job at eliminating almost all ambient sound.
There’s a good Awareness mode here, which has a bunch of options within it. Standard, Voice Awareness, which filters in voices while suppressing other noises, and Adaptive Awareness, which adjusts dynamically.
Conversation Awareness is also on board. When you start speaking, the buds automatically switch from ANC to Awareness mode and lower the volume, then gradually fade back after around ten seconds once you stop. I found I could hold a natural conversation without touching the buds at all, and the transition back was gradual and smooth rather than jarring. Sony’s Speak to Chat works similarly.
The FreeBuds Pro 5 move up to Bluetooth 6.0 from the Pro 4’s 5.2, and multipoint pairing of two devices is supported. Switching between my laptop and phone during testing was smooth with no lag. There’s also Find My Earbuds, which emits a round from whichever bud you’ve lost. I used it several times when one slipped under my desk, it’s one of those features you’ll be more grateful for than you’d expect.
A new internal antenna promises a 38% improvement in Bluetooth range alongside better interference rejection. I had no dropouts during testing across gym sessions and on the move.
(Image credit: Future)
On the codec side, iPhone users get AAC, Android users get LDAC and Huawei devices get access to lossless audio via L2HC 4.0 at 2.3Mbps. So that lossless tier is firmly Huawei ecosystem only. For the rest of us though, LDAC and AAC are still solid options and the good news is very few other features here are gated behind a Huawei device.
Control across the stems are tap, pinch and swipe, which is a good range for buds. You can customize these in the app and I really liked that they registered with a satisfying, audible little click. Head gesture controls let you answer or reject calls with a nod or a shake, which worked well most of the time. Wear detection pauses playback when you remove a single bud, and you can listen with ANC active in just one earbud, which I liked. There’s also a low-latency mode here for gamers.
Huawei says the FreeBuds Pro 5 last 9 hours with ANC off and around 6 hours with it on, with 38 hours in total from the charging case. During testing, I got just over 8.5 hours with ANC off at 50% volume. I then got nearly 6 hours with ANC on. So that’s close to the claimed figure, though it is worth bearing in mind that these real-world results with ANC active do tend to vary based on environment and mode – I had the Dual-engine setting on for testing.
For context, the AirPods Pro 3 offer 8 hours with ANC on and 10 hours with it off, with 24 hours in total from the case. The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro come in at 6 hours with ANC on and 7 hours with it off, and 30 hours from the case.
So the FreeBuds Pro 5 don’t beat those figures, but do hold up fairly well. Though the case’s 38 hour total is an advantage over the AirPods. Worth knowing if you travel a lot and know you may have to rely solely on the case for a few days.
One final point worth making when it comes to the battery is that thanks to the solid fit and passive isolation, you won’t always need ANC. I found that for lower noise environments, running on ANC off really extended my listening time without a sacrifice.
Features score: 4.5/5
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Design
(Image credit: Future)
Design is smaller, lighter and more comfortable than ever
IP57-rated buds make them genuinely workout-friendly
Lovely case with strong magnets and a handy ring light
The FreeBuds Pro 5 are a clear evolution of the Pro line, and that’s a good thing. As long as you’re on board with stems. They work particularly well for smaller ears and make gesture controls far more reliable than tap-based alternatives. That said, stem-free designs might suit some ear shapes better, so this is a subjective thing.
Huawei says the FreeBuds Pro 5 are 10% smaller and 6% lighter than previous buds and at 5.5g per bud, you can feel it. I do think they’re a fraction chunkier than say the AirPods Pro 3 and a few rivals at this level, but once they’re in the comfort level is genuinely impressive.
I wore them for around three hours straight one morning and for a further four in the afternoon without any ache or fatigue, and this is coming from someone with smaller ears who can be sensitive to heavier buds.
(Image credit: Future)
Huawei says it used more than 10,000 ear profiles to inform the fit here, and it shows. Four silicone tip sizes are included,and I found the medium worked well for me, despite usually needing to reach for the smallest pair.
The one minor gripe here on comfort is the absence of foam tips, which have come with some previous FreeBuds Pro models and are still mentioned in the app, which suggests they may arrive later. Most people seem to prefer silicone anyway, but foam can add passive isolation and a slightly more immersive ANC effect. Though this omission isn’t a dealbreaker by any means.
The stems themselves have shifted from rectangular to a flat oval profile, with a high-shine front panel and metallic detailing round the edges that reads as genuinely premium. I tested the sand/gold shade, which adds to the premium feel, though white, silver and a blue option with a vegan leather case are also available too.
(Image credit: Future)
The new IP57 rating on the buds is a real highlight. That covers sweat, splashes and brief submersion, making them as workout-friendly as an everyday pair of buds gets. I took them out on several runs and to the gym throughout testing and they stayed secure throughout.
The charging case is nicely designed too. At 43g it’s light and pocket-friendly with a smooth, rounded shape and soft film coating that feels premium when you gold it. Strong magnets snap it shut and a hidden hinge keeps the lines clean.
On the front, the halo ring light glows in different colors to indicate battery and pairing status, which is both practical and a nice-looking design touch. The case is IP54-rated now as well, offering solid splash and rain resistance.
All in all, there’s very little to fault where design is concerned. If you want stems, these are among the best-looking and best-built options at this price.
Design score: 5/5
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Sound quality
(Image credit: Future)
New dual-driver acoustic system.
Dynamic and energetic sound
Huawei phone needed for lossless audio
The big hardware news for the FreeBuds Pro 5 is a new dual-driver acoustic system, combining a low-frequency dynamic driver with a high-frequency micro planar diaphragm driver.
The low-end response is strong and present from the get-go, with the buds leaning into bass-forward tuning that feels deliberate and punchy. There’s also a bass boosting mode available if you want to push that even further. Impressively, even with that boost applied, the low-end stays controlled. No muddiness or bloat, just a lot of energy and power.
Crucially, they’re not bass-heavy though, a lot of detail survives alongside it. That dual-driver setup handles separation well across the whole frequency range, which keeps mids and highs really clean even when the low-end is doing a lot of work. So the overall character is dynamic and energetic, nothing feels lost in the mix here.
Listening to Queens of the Stone Age’s No One Knows, that dynamic quality is front and centre. Josh Homme’s vocals have a real presence, they’re bright and cutting, but the guitars still drive hard underneath without crowding them out of the picture. Instrument separation is confident here too, and there’s this pleasing sense that the track is opening up at higher volumes rather than compressing. It’s the kind of rock mix that rewards earbuds with genuine low-end grunt, and the FreeBuds Pro 5 deliver that in spades.
But I also loved listening to anything orchestral with them too. Hans Zimmer’s Dune soundtrack is a demanding test, spanning whispered, layered vocals, sweeping strings, dark percussion and heaps of bass, and the Freebuds Pro 5 handle it without flinching.
The Bene Gesserit chants land with an appropriately unsettling, layered depth, while Ripples in the Sand opens into a wide, rich soundstage where every element holds its place. Strings, percussion, and those haunting high vocals all occupy their place in the mix. The soundstage here is genuinely impressive for earbuds at this price, with no detectable distortion even pushed to higher volumes.
(Image credit: Future)
All of the above was tested on default settings, but there’s plenty of room to customize the sound. Eight EQ presets are available, each developed in partnership with the Beijing Central Conservatory of Music. Balanced is the default, which is the most accurate and natural-sounding. That’s the one I kept returning to despite trying and enjoying many of the rest.
Voice brightens things up for vocals. Classical adds a concert hall quality that worked particularly well with those big movie soundtracks, and Bass does exactly what it promises. There are also some purpose built presets for movies, podcasts and games. If none of these work for you, there’s also a 10-band custom EQ that gives you full control.
Spatial Audio with head-tracking is also on-board here and it doesn’t require Dolby Atmos tracks, it works with whatever you’re playing. It’s not usually my preference for music, but paired with the movie preset it added a genuinely immersive quality to films and TV. Worth knowing too that you don’t need a Huawei device to access it.
Call quality is also worth noting here. In a quiet space it’s clean and natural. In a busy market with chatter, loud sounds and low-level rumbling of vans and traffic nearby, some background noise crept in. But my voice remained clear and isolated, which I still found impressive given the conditions. Wind interference caused some wobble on a really blustery day, though I was still perfectly audible. As a serial voice note leaver, these passed that test too.
Between the new hardware, tuning options and the spatial audio, the FreeBuds Pro 5 make a strong case across almost any genre or use case you throw at them.
Sound quality: 4.5/5
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Value
(Image credit: Future)
Great value for money
Undercuts rivals
Already promotions on the official Huawei website
It's a bold claim, but I think the FreeBuds Pro 5 are the strongest all-round option at this price right now for everyday listening.
If you have a very specific priority, such as dedicated workout buds or audiophile-grade lossless sound, you may find better value elsewhere. And if you're one of the few people who think the weaknesses are dealbreakers, like no Huawei phone for lossless audio or a preference for tiny, stemless designs, then it's worth factoring that in.
But everyone else who wants great sound, strong ANC and a comfortable, premium-feeling design with all the essential features, then these deliver a lot.
They're even easier to recommend because they're priced lower than most of their rivals at launch. In fact, Huawei is already offering a discount code on them at the time of writing if you head to their official site, which makes them even harder to argue with on value. Can I give them 5.5 stars out of 5 for this section? No? Fine.
Value: 5/5
Should I buy the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5?
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 score card
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Features
An excellent suite of features, upgraded driver system and lovely app. Battery life with ANC playback is good but is bested by high-end rivals.
4.5/5
Design
Smaller and lighter than predecessors. They fit very well, look more premium than they should and gestures work are nice with that stem.
5/5
Sound quality
They sound great, call quality is improved and there's a lot of customisation. You only get lossless with Huawei phones, though.
4.5/5
Value
Everything you need is here at a price that undercuts most rivals.
5/5
Buy them if…
You want an AirPods Pro alternative Maybe you’re on Android, want a cheaper option or just don’t gel with the sound signature of the AirPods. Whatever the reason for wanting to ditch Apple, these are a solid alternative pick.
You want all-rounders for everyday listening If you really care about audio, workouts or ANC you can find high-end options that specialize in those things, sure. But for an everyday listening experience that ticks all of the boxes, they’re really hard to beat.View Deal
You want premium sound, looks and build at a good price They really do look, feel and sound more premium than they should. And while we wouldn’t describe them as affordable, they’re certainly excellent value for the price. View Deal
Don’t buy them if…
You don’t like the stem design They have long stems, there’s no getting away from it. Some people love how they look, fit and work with gestures. But if you’re not a fan, you might prefer a more compact look, like the Technics EAH-AZ100.
You want lossless If you have a Huawei phone these are a no-brainer, have at it. If you don’t and you’d really like lossless sound, you won’t find it here. Try the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 instead.
You already own the FreeBuds Pro 4 There are upgrades here, so if only the best ANC, transparency and calls are a priority for you, it’s worth it. For everyone else, you shouldn’t rush to upgrade.
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Also consider
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5
Apple AirPods Pro 3
Technics EAH-AZ100
Drivers
11mm dynamic woofer and micro-planar tweeter
'Custom high-excursion' Apple driver
10mm free-edge dynamic
Active noise cancellation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Battery life (ANC on)
6 hours (buds) 25 hours (case)
8 hours (buds) 24 hours (case)
10 hours (buds) 28 hours (case)
Weight
5.5g (buds) 43g (case)
5.6g (buds) 44g (case)
5.9g (buds) 42g (case)
Connectivity
Bluetooth 6
Bluetooth 5.3
Bluetooth 5.3
Waterproofing
IP57
IP57
IPX4
AirPods Pro 3 The Freebuds Pro 5 give them a run for their money. But Apple's AirPods Pro are still some of the best wireless earbuds for iPhone owners, with great ANC, unique features and slightly better battery life with ANC playback. Read our full AirPods Pro 3 review
Technics EAH-AZ100 Not many earbuds will beat the FreeBuds Pro 5 for sound, but these Technics are the best. They also don't have a stem-like design, which some of you may prefer. Though they are considerably more expensive. Read our fullTechnics EAH-AZ100 review
How I tested the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5
Tested for three weeks
Tested at home, on walks, on public transport in a city, working in a cafe and a co-working space, while running and at the gym
I tested the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 for just over three weeks to write this review. I mostly had them paired with an iPhone 16 Pro, but I also used them with a MacBook Pro.
I used a range of different music and film apps to test the buds. They played music from Spotify, Qobuz and tunes from internal storage, as well as videos from YouTube, Prime Video and Mubi.
I’ve tested many headphones and earbuds over the past 13 years as a tech journalist. Including devices from top audio brands, like Bose, Sony, Sennheiser, as well as cheaper buds from the likes of JLab, Nothing, Skullcandy and more. I’m interested in tech that prioritises comfort and ease of use.
I’ve become very fond of open earbuds recently, and was pretty excited when Asus announced the ROG Cetra Open. If you’re not familiar with the open ear style, they’re basically earbuds that clip onto your ears and have drivers that sit a few millimeters away from your ear canal rather than plug with a silicon tip.
They’re incredibly comfortable to wear and help you maintain awareness of your surroundings, which is great when you're out and about and would rather avoid getting hit by passing bikes and the like. The trade-off is generally that you lose out on noise cancellation, isolation, and the earbuds’ ability to effectively produce bass.
Open earbuds seem like a bit of a strange choice for gaming, given the fact that they are usually towards runners or gymgoers, but I think Asus might be on to a winner with the concept. The level of comfort they offer is second to none, and I always appreciate the ability to hear myself while chatting in a match.
Unfortunately, the Asus ROG Cetra Open really stumble, presumably as a result of being the brand’s first pair of open gaming earbuds. For starters, they’re ridiculously expensive at an eye-watering $229.99 / £174.99 - that’s more than many of the best wireless gaming headsets and triple excellent non-gaming alternatives such as the Huawei FreeArc Buds. While the Asus pair does sound much better overall and has vastly superior microphones, they’re still not worth such a higher cost in my eyes.
The case that they sit in is also absurdly massive. It’s big enough to be uncomfortable in your pocket and, at the point you have to carry around a rucksack just to have space for your earbuds, it’s safe to say something has gone seriously wrong in the design department. To make matters worse, it feels very hollow and plasticky, which is unacceptable in a product at this price.
All of this leaves the Asus ROG Cetra Open difficult to recommend outside of a sale or if you’re really, really desperate for an open gaming pair. Hopefully, the brand’s next attempt is cheaper and more feature-dense, because there is real potential here.
(Image credit: Future)
Asus ROG Cetra Open: Price and availability
Cost $229.99 / £174.99 / around AU$330
Available via the Asus website, Amazon, and Newegg
Very expensive for gaming earbuds
The Asus ROG Cetra Open earbuds retail for $229.99 / £174.99 and can be purchased via the Asus website in the US and UK, in addition to Amazon and Newegg in the US.
At this price, they’re substantially more expensive than our current favorite premium gaming buds, the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds, which go for $159.99 / £159.99 / AU$359, and you’re paying a massive premium for the open design.
They’re also pretty pricey compared to other open earbuds, costing much more than the Huawei FreeArc Buds and Honor Earbuds Open, but less than the super premium Bose Ultra Open Earbuds.
Asus ROG Cetra Open: Specs
Price
$229.99 / £174.99 / around AU$330
Weight
0.3oz / 11g (per earbud bud)
Compatibility
PC, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile
Connection type
Wireless (Bluetooth / 2.4GHz dongle)
Battery life
16+ hours (48+ hours with case)
Features
Immersion mode, RGB lighting, EQ settings
Software
Gear Link (web)
Asus ROG Cetra Open: Design and features
Generic, cheap-looking design
Browser-based software
A few gaming features
I’ll be completely honest here: I absolutely hate how the Asus ROG Cetra Open looks. They’re bulky and weirdly angular for a pair of open earbuds, and look nowhere near as sleek and stylish as the alternatives by Huawei and Honor. In fact, they look more like they’re by a weirdly named off-brand that you would find scrolling too far down Amazon rather than a major hardware manufacturer. This certainly isn’t helped by the RGB lighting with its overly garish default rainbow pattern, or the fact that the plastic materials used on each bud don’t feel too premium.
The case is just as hideous and, worse still, comically large: it’s only slightly more compact than the average mid-size phone and about four times as thick. This makes it difficult to fit in a pocket and annoying to bring around with you. Sure, lots of open-ear buds have cases on the bulkier side, but I’ve not used any quite as impractical as this. I don’t quite understand why Asus is advertising these earbuds so heavily as suitable for sports, as a result of this, as surely anyone running or at the gym would favor something with a case that's more compact.
(Image credit: Future)
Part of the reason the case is so big is to make room for the 2.4GHz USB-C wireless dongle. The dongle has a pass-through feature, with its own USB-C port that you can use to charge a controller, for example, but it’s an odd L-shape that tends to block more than one port when it’s plugged in.
Rather than a traditional application, the Asus ROG Cetra Open relies on a browser-based program called Gear Link. I really appreciate this, as it removes the need to install any software bloat and gives you immediate access to settings on practically any PC or phone when you need them. Major features it lets you tweak include equalizer settings (with pre-sets for gaming, movies, music, and so on), RGB lighting effects, and Immersion Mode. Immersion Mode seems to be some form of active noise cancellation (ANC), though I found that it wasn’t particularly effective at blocking even low-level background sound.
There’s also optional multipoint connectivity, letting you pair two devices at once for the times when you want to game while listening to music or taking a phone call.
(Image credit: Future)
Asus ROG Cetra Open: Performance
Sound great with a surprising amount of bass
Secure and comfortable fit
Microphones are decent
For a pair of open earbuds, the Asus ROG Cetra Open sounds great with some surprisingly punchy bass. The sound is crisp and clean, with decent tuning out of the box - though I would still recommend selecting the flat EQ in its software. It’s hard to overstate just how comfortable they are to wear, too. I have used them for an entire day of work with absolutely no discomfort or fatigue, making them some of the most comfortable earbuds that I’ve ever used.
They’re very secure on the ears too, and can easily withstand walking or even running. The included neck band can be used for some added peace of mind, too, ensuring that they will stay on your person even if they do come loose.
The ability to hear your surroundings is also surprisingly useful, though it does come with some drawbacks. If you’re using these headphones in an office environment, you can easily chat to others without taking them out of yours and when exercising outdoors, you don’t need to worry about drowning out oncoming traffic. In a gaming context, though, it’s a bit of a double-edged sword. You’re going to hear pretty much everything in your surroundings, even if you’re playing at home, which makes it difficult to get truly immersed. The headphones do have an Immersion Mode feature, which seemingly enables some kind of ANC, but it’s not effective at blocking noise at all.
The microphones of the Asus ROG Cetra Open are decent for a pair of earbuds. They’re not broadcast quality by any means, but they do a decent job picking up your voice and will ensure that you can be heard clearly in most situations. The battery life is also nothing to complain about, with around 16 hours of use for each bud and an additional three charges held in the case.
The included dongle makes it easy to use the headphones with consoles, and cuts down potential latency, though I do find its L shape design a little awkward. If you’re not careful, it can block adjacent USB ports, though it does offer USB-C passthrough that somewhat mitigates this annoyance.
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Asus ROG Cetra Open?
Buy it if…
You're after open gaming earbuds If you want a pair of open earbuds designed specifically for gaming, there really aren’t any real alternatives to the Asus ROG Cetra Open, making them your best option by default.
You’re desperate for earbuds suitable for both gaming and sport If, for some reason, you really, really want to use the same earbuds for gaming and sport, then the Asus ROG Cetra Open is one of the few products geared towards both.
Don’t buy it if…
You’re on any kind of budget The biggest drawback of the Asus ROG Cetra Open is easily its massive price tag. If you’re after a pair of open earbuds, there are plenty of cheaper options out there, and if you can sacrifice the open design, premium gaming earbud models come in much cheaper.
You love being immersed in your games The open design inherently can’t block noise as effectively as closed models that create a seal in your ear. If you value immersion and cutting out distractions, choose something else.
Also consider...
After some alternatives to the Asus ROG Cetra Open? Here’s one gaming model and one more general pair of open earbuds to consider.
Asus ROG Cetra Open
SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds
Huawei FreeArc Buds
Price
$229.99 / £174.99 / around AU$330
$159.99 / £159.99 / AU$359
£99.99 (around $130 / AU$200)
Weight
0.3oz / 11g (per earbud bud)
0.19oz / 5.3g (each bud); 1.7oz / 48.7g (case)
0.31oz / 8.9 g (per bud)
Compatibility
PC, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile
GameBuds for PlayStation: PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, PC, Mac, Meta Quest 2/3, mobile; GameBuds for Xbox: Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, PC, Mac, Meta Quest 2/3
Mobile
Connection type
Wireless (Bluetooth / 2.4GHz dongle)
2.4Ghz (via USB-C), Bluetooth 5.3 (mobile)
Wireless (Bluetooth)
Battery life
16+ hours (48+ hours with case)
Up to 40 hours (buds 10 hours; case 30 hours)
7 hours (earbuds), 23 hours (total)
Features
Immersion mode, RGB lighting, EQ settings
360° Spatial Audio, Qi Wireless Charging Case, 6mm neodymium drivers, four-mic ANC, transparency mode, in-ear detection/sensor, IP55 rating, fast charge, companion app with more than 100 presets
SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds My go-to gaming earbuds and easily the best premium pair that money can buy right now. They boast excellent sound, great companion software, and some highly effective ANC to keep you immersed in your game.
Huawei FreeArc Buds This more affordable, general-use pair is my current open earbuds of choice for when I’m outdoors. They’re just as comfortable as the Asus pair, but much more stylish. They’re not designed for gaming, though, and you lose some sound quality.
Compared against other open earbuds and gaming earbuds
I tested the Asus ROG Cetra Open earbuds for more than a month, using them as my go-to headphones for practically everything in that time. I spent hours using them for gaming on both PC and PS5 in addition to taking calls with friends over Discord. I took them with me daily to the office too, wearing them outside to listen to music and for taking meetings at work,
Throughout my time with the earbuds, I compared them frequently to many of the best gaming earbud models, particularly the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds. I also evaluated them against open earbuds that I have tried, like the Honor Earbuds Open and Huawei FreeArc Buds.
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is a budget phone with its sights firmly trained on flagships. It offers a huge 5000-nit AMOLED display, a seriously stylish 0.31-inch / 7.95mm thick aluminum unibody, and a sufficiently powerful mid-range chipset to play games without breaking much of a sweat. More importantly, it continues to champion Nothing’s disruptive attitude to design and brings back the Phone 3’s super-flexible Glyph Matrix.
Let’s start with the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro’s display: at 6.83 inches, it gives you a serious amount of screen estate. I fired up some 2K videos and its picture always looked clean and precise, while its 5000-nit peak brightness is probably enough that you could use it as a reading torch. I did find its colors weren’t quite as rich as my iPhone 16 Pro’s Super Retina XDR display, but it looked pretty lush all the same.
But for me, the (4a) Pro’s design is what earns it a place among the best phones. Its aluminum unibody feels solid yet light, and while I think some diehard Nothing fans might miss the transparent back plate from its predecessors, it keeps just enough of those iconoclastic design touches in its camera and glyph module to really stand out in a world of interchangeable gray rectangles.
Not gonna lie: I had a lot of fun playing with Nothing’s Glyph Matrix. While it could easily be read as gimmicky, the sheer quantity of functions it offers meant I found a bunch of ways to use it that genuinely felt helpful. From being able to tell when my girlfriend had messaged to seeing a custom dollar glyph every time I got a transaction notification from my bank, I could easily keep tabs on important things without getting distracted by the daily noise. It went beyond flashing lights and started to actively feel really useful.
More generally, software on the (4a) Pro is also seriously polished, feeling fun to use yet knowing when to stay out of your way. Built on Android 16, Nothing OS 4.1 offers a whole load of customizability, while still feeling clean and bloat-free. Its AI tools allow you to analyze notes, screenshots, and recordings but – crucially – you can also choose which files you want this AI to access, and how much you want to engage with it.
This is backed up by the phone's admirable performance. While its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset isn’t exactly top of the range, I found that, coupled with the 12GB RAM of my testing model, it handled productivity tasks and multitasking without complaint. On top of this, the (4a) Pro happily crunched through any game I threw at it on the highest settings without any perceptible lag or frame rate drops; its 5,300mm2 vapor chamber cooling system keeps it from getting too hot during these kinds of heavy loads.
Unfortunately, this can’t be a total love-fest, and I’m a little less enamored with the (4a) Pro’s camera system. On the positive side, the images I shot with it felt sufficiently sharp and detailed – the 3.5x optical zoom produces deliciously crisp images, for example – while night photography is bright and grain-free. However, I did find color reproduction to be a little more subdued than on the best phones on the market, and the exposure on my snaps could be weirdly inconsistent at times.
There’s a slightly mixed picture with the (4a) Pro’s battery, too. While it offers a seriously ample 5,080mAh cell, I couldn’t quite eke out the 21 hours of YouTube vids that Nothing indicated it should deliver – I found it delivered a little over 13 hours of 2K streaming instead. Still, that’s very decent and, thanks to its 50W wired charging, you can quickly top it up to full in a little over an hour.
Fundamentally, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is just a little bit different from everything else out there. After finishing up my testing, I honestly felt a bit sad going back to my play-it-safe iPhone, something I never would have predicted going into this review.
Of course, if you want top-of-the-range power and an unimpeachable camera, you’ll want to pick up a flagship. But if you’re after a mid-range handset, I’d happily recommend the (4a) Pro.
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: price and availability
Launched on March 19, 2026
List price from $499 / £499
Launched on March 19, 2026, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is available now. It has a list price of $499 / £499, which will net you the spec with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. While that version isn’t available in Australia, don’t feel left out – you can still get your hands on the edition with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage, which retails for $599 / £549 / AU$949.
As well as those two different versions, you can also pick between three different colorways: black, white, and a dusty pink. The pink looks awesome and I’m glad there are options for those who don’t just want a monochrome handset, but the pick of the litter for me is the white I tested here, as it really shows off that aluminum body and stark, semi-transparent camera module.
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: specs
Dimensions
6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches / 163.66 x 76.62 x 7.95mm
I’ll be honest: when Nothing phones first entered the market, I wasn’t totally swayed by their style. At the time the Phone (1) was released, it both felt a little too brutalist and yet not quite as outré as the pre-release hype had led me to expect. I’ve gradually come around on this, particularly as more concrete innovations like the series' Glyph notifications have been introduced alongside those stark looks.
Why do I mention this? To add a little context to what I’m about to say next.
I love the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro’s design. There’s something effortlessly understated about its build, which manages to remain both unique and instantly recognizable. I know some will be sorry not to see the series’ full transparent backplate here – you might want to opt for the base (4a) if you prefer that look – but the (4a) Pro’s aircraft-grade aluminium body still looks suitably industrial while also feeling pleasingly premium to the touch.
It’s also Nothing’s slimmest phone to date, measuring just 7.95mm / 0.313 inches and weighing in at 210g / 7.41oz. As a result, even taking into account its expansive 163.66 x 76.62mm / 6.44 x 3.02 inches height and width, the (4a) Pro never felt anything less than comfortable in my hand. Yet it’s no delicate flower either – its Gorilla Glass 7i screen should help protect it against scratches and drops, while its IP65 rating should entirely keep dust at bay and, Nothing promises, allow it to endure a dunking in 25cm / 9.84 inches of water for up to 20 minutes.
Undoubtedly, the phone's most prominent feature is that chunky camera module on the back. Nothing is very much on board with the full-width camera trend we’ve seen from the Google Pixel series and the iPhone 17 Pro. But while these blocky camera bulges sometimes look a little unsightly to my eye, I have to say, Nothing has nailed it here – not only has the brand broken it up by using its transparent design language, but that expansive Glyph Matrix turns it from dead space into a striking visual feature.
Speaking of: the Glyph Matrix itself is also seriously well designed. Comprising 137 mini-LEDs, it offers fantastic versatility, allowing you to display a wide range of moving and still glyphs to accompany various functions on your phone, which I’ll explore more in the software section below. And it’s also ludicrously bright at 3,000 nits – when I first excitedly showed off what it could do to my partner, she winced as if I’d just let off a flashbulb in her face. Oops. Fortunately, you can turn the brightness down if you don’t want it set to ‘stadium floodlight’.
After using the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro, my trusty iPhone 16 Pro has genuinely felt a little drab by comparison. Given how much I loved the latter’s looks when I first bought it, that shows the high bar the (4a) Pro has set in terms of its design.
Design score: 5 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: display
Huge 6.83-inch screen
Wonderfully bright
Colors less vibrant than some flagships
Almost immediately, the first thing that will strike you about the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro’s display is its size. It’s huge. At 6.83 inches, it’s only a shade smaller than the Samsung Galaxy 26 Ultra’s gargantuan 6.9 inches, although the 2,800 x 1,260 resolution of its AMOLED panel can’t quite reach the 3120 x 1440 pixels offered by Samsung’s flagship.
Still, during my testing, I found it looked impressively crisp. To really try out what it could do, I watched Planet Earth III on BBC iPlayer and was impressed by how clear the footage seemed, rendering elements like the huge, red glistening eyes of a gliding tree frog in gorgeous detail. It also shows off images with bags of contrast; that AMOLED display is capable of hitting deep blacks that offer a real HDR pop to everything you see.
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is also impressively bright. While it didn’t quite hit the supernova-like glare that its 5,000 nit peak brightness would suggest – I’d peg it as not dissimilar to the brightness hit by the 3,000 nit-peak iPhone 17 Pro – it still absolutely glowed. Whether I was testing under our office’s fluorescent lights or one of those rare guest appearances the sun makes in the British sky, it never appeared anything less than luminous.
There’s pretty much only one area in which I found the (4a) Pro's display wasn’t quite able to keep pace with flagships: color. Comparing it side-by-side with my iPhone 16 Pro, its hues felt just a tiny bit too cool by contrast – for example, a burning sunset over a colossal river delta looked a tiny bit less amber and glowing, missing out on the rich realism of the more premium phone. But the fact that the (4a) Pro can be credibly compared with handsets nearly twice its price, even if it can’t quite best them, shows just how impressive its display is.
Display score: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: software
Slick, bloat-free OS
Wonderfully innovative Glyph Matrix functions
Good AI tools that aren’t forced on you
Software can be the Achilles heel of some Android handsets. I’ve seen a few too many OSes over the years that focused on aesthetics over usability and came crammed with low-quality, third-party apps – forcing apps like Temu on me does not endear me to your phones.
Fortunately, Nothing OS sidesteps all of these issues. It’s lean and intuitive – within a few hours of starting to use the (4a) Pro, I understood pretty much everything about how it worked – but more importantly, there’s almost zero bloat. After setting the phone up, pretty much the only third-party apps in the App Drawer were ones I’d imported from my old phone, while the homescreen was kept wonderfully clean. Take note, Android developers.
It also looks great. I’ve tried minimal, monochrome interfaces on phones like the iPhone in the past, but I’ve often found that, without the cognitive cue color provides, I just spend longer hunting for the app I need. Yet here, Nothing OS not only looks pleasingly stylized, but it also manages to do so without increasing my cognitive friction when navigating, thanks to those clear app icons and the ability to scale up my most commonly used apps.
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro also offers plenty of AI features. But unlike some brands that make these tools impossible to avoid, Nothing largely confines them to its Essential Space section.
Press the button on the left side of the screen to capture a screenshot, record your screen, or take a voice note – these are then added to the Essential Space app for your easy access, and made available to be analyzed and have key information extracted. This info can then be harnessed by Essential Search or Essential Apps, which are effectively apps created by your prompts, customized to your specific needs. Kudos to Nothing for taking such a balanced approach here between giving users access to these tools and allowing them to choose how much they want to engage with them.
Right, time to put adultish things away – let's talk about some of the fun stuff the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro has to offer.
The Flip to Glyph feature allows you to mute your ringtone and notifications by turning your phone face down – I found this invaluable, given I often place my phone screen down to minimize distractions at work. You can even restrict calls and notifications to only come through from essential contacts like your partner or kids. Should you want to see a caller’s ID or check your battery level without getting drawn in by the screen, you can just wiggle your phone, and it’ll show up on the Glyph Matrix.
That’s far from all the Glyph Matrix can do, though. Always-on Glyph Toys let you assign information like the time, battery level, sun’s position in the sky, or even the phases of the moon to the display. On a more practical level, you can also use it to track the progress of timers or even third-party apps – although currently the only ones that appear to offer integration right now are Google Calendar, Uber, and Zomato, which rather limits this feature’s usefulness right now.
But perhaps my favorite feature is the ability to create your own rules and assign custom glyphs to them. As well as allowing you to assign unique glyphs to specific people – I set my partner's calls and messages to display as a heart, for example – you can also set rules for specific apps, allowing you to differentiate between a WhatsApp and an Instagram notification. You can even set glyphs for specific keywords: I set it so any message mentioning my cat’s name would flash the cat glyph.
Not only is the Glyph Matrix an incredibly fun feature, but Nothing has found countless ways for it to actually materially improve your experience using the device. I definitely think that elevates it from a mere gimmick to something I genuinely used.
Software score: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: cameras
Crisp, well-defined details
Sometimes looks over-exposed
Colors a little pale
Overall, I found images captured with the Nothing (4a) Pro to be pretty crisp. While using the 50MP main camera, edges were largely as well defined as on my iPhone 16 Pro, and it maintains this detail well when using the 3.5x optical zoom. I’m less keen on digital zooms, given the same results can usually be achieved with judicious cropping, but the (4a) Pro’s 7x lossless zoom was almost as crisp as the 16 Pro’s 5x optical zoom, despite some slight haloing around highlights.
On the whole, night photography was pretty impressive too. The (4a) Pro merges seven frames into one, which Nothing claims lets in 500% more light than rival cameras, and you can definitely see that in the finished results. None of the photos I took looked dingy or underexposed, and there wasn’t a hint of grain there, although I would personally prefer a little less brightening of the mid-tones, as a bit more HDR punch would make these photos look even more bold and contrasty.
Unfortunately, the (4a) Pro’s camera system has some definite weaknesses too. Although black levels were consistently deep, highlights were a lot less reliable – some of my shots of feeding swans ended up looking totally overexposed, while my snaps of magnolias in the park didn’t quite capture the same brilliant whites as the ones I shot on my iPhone. I’m used to exposure levels remaining pretty stable from shot to shot, but sometimes the Nothing feels like it can produce weirdly divergent shots from the exact same lighting conditions.
Additionally, colors don’t always look totally true to life. Shooting tulips on the brink of bloom, some of the hues were a lot more muted than I was hoping, looking a little more washed out than the iPhone’s intense reds. And while I look pretty pale and pasty in most selfies, the (4a) Pro’s front-facing cam sometimes made me look a little like Gary Oldman in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.
Fundamentally, you can’t expect a totally flagship experience from a mid-range phone – compromises have to be made somewhere to keep costs this low. But I think the (4a) Pro meets such a high standard in several other areas that this one shortcoming is a lot more noticeable by contrast. It’s a decent camera on the whole – it just doesn’t reach the same heights as the rest of the phone.
Cameras score: 3.5 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: performance
No noticeable lag or hanging when multi-tasking
Great gaming performance
Stays cool even under a heavy load
The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro’s impressive design isn’t just skin deep – under the hood, it’s packing the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. While this isn’t the most powerful CPU on the market, it still gives the (4a) Pro the edge over many mid-market rivals – for example, the Samsung Galaxy A56 relies on the weaker Exynos 1580. Add in the fact that you can spec Nothing’s phone with up to 12GB RAM, and you can see why I was expecting some pretty serious performance here.
And I’m delighted to say that the (4a) Pro more than lived up to these expectations. During everyday use, I didn’t experience any hanging or appreciable slowdown. Swiping between various apps, I was able to quickly pivot from watching YouTube videos to navigating on Google Maps. Even when multi-tasking, the phone didn’t seem to break much of a sweat – I cheekily loaded up a game and left it running picture-in-picture while I typed some of this review in Google Docs, and both apps continued to run fluidly, like this wasn’t a slightly outrageous thing to ask of the phone.
On top of that, while we criticized the Samsung Galaxy A56 for its weaker gaming capabilities, I found the (4a) Pro’s gaming performance to be pretty unimpeachable. Loading up Genshin Impact, I found there wasn’t a hint of lag or stuttering, whether I was battling Hilichurls or charging around cities. Meanwhile, Call of Duty: Mobile was silky smooth, seeming to deliver on Nothing’s promise of 90Hz refresh rates and making it easy to gun down my bewildered opponents while they were still desperately swiping their screens trying to train me in their sights.
But this kind of performance is no good if your phone can’t sustain it. Fortunately, I found that, thanks to its 5,300mm2 VC cooling system, the (4a) Pro was able to keep its cooling under this kind of strain. Despite the fact that I spent a couple of hours gaming on the (4a) Pro, there was only very mild warming on the back – and I think that was much more likely from my sweaty mitts than its CPU overheating. Given that quite a few phones still get blisteringly hot from demanding games, I was really glad to see how chill the Nothing Phone was.
Performance score: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: battery life
Large 5,080mAh capacity
Fell a little short of Nothing’s usage estimates
50W charging juices it up fast
With a capacity of 5,080mAh, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is able to keep pace with huge flagships like the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, which has a typical capacity of 5,000mAh – although it can’t quite beat the OnePlus 15 with its voluminous 7,300mAh battery.
What does this mean in practical terms? Well, despite using it pretty intensively during my testing, I found that the (4a) Pro would often last well into a second day’s usage, meaning you’re unlikely to need to worry about it lasting your whole day.
In terms of hard numbers, Nothing estimates it should give you 17 hours of combined usage or 21 hours of YouTube viewing. Putting this claim to the test, I set the (4a) Pro streaming 2K video for hours on end to see how it held up. After six hours, its battery had dropped to 56% – that means I’d expect it to last around 13 hours 40 minutes in total. That’s quite a way short of what was estimated, but this was at max brightness, which likely brought its life down somewhat.
Fortunately, even when the phone does run out, juicing it up again is lightning fast, thanks to its 50W wired charging. Nothing’s estimates weren’t quite borne out by my testing here either: rather than the 0% to 60% they suggested I’d see in just 30 minutes, I got to 47%. Still, that’s seriously fast, meaning you’ll likely be full after just an hour’s charging – that's still speedier than many mainstream handsets, even if the phone can’t quite hit the absurd pace of something like the 100W charging of the OnePlus 15.
Battery score: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Future)
Should I buy the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro?
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Design
Both stylishly understated and utterly singular, huge yet perfectly ergonomic, slim yet robustly built.
5/5
Display
Absolutely enormous and wonderfully bright, crisp even if it’s not quite as high resolution as some flagships. Colors less vibrant than the best phones though.
4/5
Software
OS is simple to use, feeling slick and streamlined. Can engage with AI tools as much or as little as you like. Glyph Matrix tools both fun and surprisingly useful.
4.5/5
Cameras
Crisp detail, decent black levels and impressive night photography. But inconsistent exposure levels and muted hues hold it back from greatness.
3.5/5
Performance
Strong chipset and RAM options for a mid-range phone, handles multi-tasking and gaming without noticeable issues, and stays impressively chill under heavy workloads.
4/5
Battery life
With its 5,080mAh capacity, the battery lasts a good long while, although it fell a little short of Nothing’s estimates. 50W fast-charging topped it up super fast though.
4/5
Buy it if…
You want fab design and performance for your buck Not only does the Nothing Phone look and feel great in your hand, but it’s capable of surprisingly potent performance. Neither demanding mobile games nor multitasking seems able to knock it off its stride.
You just want to have fun Fundamentally, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is just a joy to use. It doesn’t take itself too seriously, it stays out of your way for the most part and, if you don’t enjoy playing with the Glyph Matrix, you’ve got a heart of stone.
Don’t buy it if…
You want more camera than phone The (4a) Pro’s camera system is not bad by any means. But given its slightly washed out colors and occasionally wobbly exposure, it can’t compete with more camera-first phones.
You prefer Nothing’s more brutalist designs This is the most restrained a Nothing handset has looked to date. So, if you want more of that bold, industrial design on show, go for the transparent-backed (4a) instead.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review: also consider
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Samsung Galaxy A56
Nothing Phone (4a)
Dimensions
6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches / 163.66 x 76.62 x 7.95mm
Samsung Galaxy A56 I’ll level with you. The Samsung Galaxy A56 can’t compete with the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro when it comes to performance, as it’s not as dab a hand for gaming. Neither does it have as innovative features as the Glyph Matrix. So why am I recommending it? Because you can already get it for as little as $319.99 from Walmart, £247 from Amazon UK or AU$559 from Amazon AU – that’s a substantial reduction from its $499 / £499 / AU$699 list price, making it a great value alternative.
Nothing Phone (4a) For some die-hard Nothing fans, I appreciate that the (4a) Pro might be a little too conservative in design. Where’s the unabashedly techy transparent backplate? On the more affordable (4a), that’s where. On top of this, the (4a) offers still impressive performance, similarly streamlined software, and the same epic 5,080mAh battery capacity. Not bad, given it starts from as little as £349 / AU$649 – although US users can’t get their hands on it currently.
Tested every core function in real-world scenarios
Utilized years of gadget testing experience
I tested the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro over the course of a week and a half. To test out its display, I engaged in plenty of browsing and watched multiple 2K HDR videos to compare it to flagship devices. When assessing performance, I tested it out both in a variety of productivity contexts and by playing demanding games like Genshin Impact and Call of Duty: Mobile on max settings.
When putting its camera through its paces, I took a variety of photographs in different contexts, from floral shots during bright sunlight to nighttime shots in a city, comparing them to my iPhone 16 Pro for context. And to try out its battery life, I looped 2K YouTube videos for six hours to see how much the battery drained, before juicing it up with a 50W charger to see how quickly it would refill.
In terms of my experience, I’ve been reviewing a wide variety of gadgets for many years, as well as editing plenty of phone and tablet reviews written by the reviews team. I’m also a regular mobile gamer and have shot some 46,000 photos on my iPhone over the years, meaning I have a lot of experience shooting on mobile.
