My colleagues in the USA are busy covering CES, but HP didn’t want Australia to miss out – so the company shipped me a pre-release version of the new business-focused EliteBook X G2i running the newly released Intel Core Ultra X7 358H CPU.
Sadly, one of the conditions is that I can’t regale you with benchmarks (for now), but I can give you a sneak peek at a very impressive laptop.
While HP announced multiple EliteBook X G2i variants, the one I have is special – it’s the lightweight model that weighs under 1kg. Technically, it actually measured xxxxxx (redacted) grams on my scales, but that’s close enough in my book.
The EliteBook X G2i is impressively light in hand, and despite feeling almost hollow, it’s very sturdy, and has little flex in the 14-inch shell.
(Image credit: Future)
The full spec is below, but I got hands-on with the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H equipped variant, with 32GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD. HP also announced the EliteBook X G2a with the latest CPUs from AMD, as well as the EliteBook X G2q that will use processors from Qualcomm.
There are various display options, but I have the 14-inch 3K OLED (2880 x 1800), with a 120Hz (VRR) refresh rate, a 500 nit brightness and DCI-P3 100% color. In the non-lightweight model (only 100 grams more), you can get the same panel with (or without) a touchscreen, or a range of 1920 x 1200 OLED or IPS screens.
My favorite feature here is that the screen folds back through 180 degrees, which makes it easy to sit the laptop securely in a stand next to a monitor, and minimise the amount of desk space taken up. In use, the OLED is vibrant and bright, and the higher 3K resolution makes it easy to get the most out of the compact 14-inch screen.
USB-C connectivity is great, with dual Thunderbolt 4 on the left, and a 10Gbps port (that also supports charging and DisplayPort 2.1) on the right. You also get USB-A on the right, a Kensington lock port, and HDMI 2.1 and a 3.5mm headset jack on the left.
That’s pretty good for such a compact lightweight laptop, and my only tiny complaint is that I wish there was a little more space between the two Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports, to make it easier to plug in both a dock cable and a fast USB drive.
The laptop will run up to four monitors, or three if you want to stick with USB-C only. You also get Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 (2x2) and Bluetooth 6, plus a facial recognition webcam (with privacy shutter) – though a fingerprint sensor is an optional extra.
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 2
(Image credit: Future)
HP EliteBook X G2i: Price & availability
HP has not given any pricing or an exact date for when the EliteBook X G2i and X Flip G2i will be available, but you can expect them in February 2026.
The wider EliteBook X G2 family, including the EliteBook X G2a and EliteBook X G2q, is not expected until later in the year.
(Image credit: Future)
HP EliteBook X G2i: Specs
There are quite a few variants of the HP EliteBook X G2i, but the specs below are for the lightweight clamshell variant.
The lightweight EliteBook X G2i feels very premium the moment you pick it up and while impressively light, it doesn’t feel flimsy, and the whole 14-inch shell is quite rigid. Even the hinge is nicely tuned and opens fairly effortlessly one-handed, but still holds its position once you’ve set the screen angle.
There’s also very little flex in the lid or keyboard deck, and it generally feels like a laptop that will handle being used on the go, day in and day out.
The laptop's look is understated in the way I personally love: the branding is subtle, it’s very professional looking, and the rounded edges make it nice to handle. The lightweight model only comes in “Atmospheric Blue”, but it suits the design.
It does pick up fingerprints easily, though the finish also wipes clean quite easily, so it’s quick to make it look a bit neater before an important meeting.
The trackpad is large, accurate in use and has a good solid haptic click. The keyboard matches the premium feel, and there’s very little bounce. The keys have reasonably deep travel and it’s comfortable for long typing sessions, even with larger hands. I didn’t see any annoying low-angle backlight glow bleeding out under the keys.
It’s also great to see HP putting real effort into materials, and the clamshell covers use up to 90% recycled magnesium, plus there’s recycled content used across parts like the bezel, speaker enclosure, keycaps and more.
HP EliteBook X G2i: Performance
(Image credit: Future)
Again, I can’t give any specific benchmarks at this stage, but I have run the EliteBook X G2i through the full range of TechRadar tests. While there were a few inconsistent results and teething issues (which are normal for a pre-product sample and a new CPU), overall performance is excellent.
The Core Ultra X7 358H in the EliteBook X G2i isn’t hugely faster than last gen CPUs like the last gen Core Ultra 7 265H in single core tasks, but multicore performance is significantly better. But it’s the Intel Arc B930 that is most impressive, and it runs rings around last gen iGPUs like the Intel Arc 140V and even Radeon 890M.
In fact, it’s good enough to compete directly with low end dedicated GPUs in creator laptops (with more limited power profiles), and will happily handle casual gaming.
(Image credit: Future)
Based on Intel’s numbers, the Core Ultra X7 358H happily bests the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and is much closer to the higher wattage AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 – though the Arc B390 iGPU still falls short of the Radeon 8050S.
In normal everyday use, the EliteBook X G2i is cool and quiet, but when pushed, it is noticeably noisy. That’s to be expected in such a thin and lightweight laptop, and in fact HP has done a great job of getting impressive sustained performance from the CPU, and the sound level is a perfectly acceptable tradeoff.
The lightweight variant of the laptop I have uses a 56Wh battery, while the normal G2i can also be equipped with a bigger 68Wh battery. While I can't share exact runtimes, battery life is very impressive, and it’s on par with (or better than) the best results from similar spec laptops using older Intel CPUs, or the best from AMD and Qualcomm. While battery life drops under sustained heavier workloads, the EliteBook X G2i is more than capable of lasting through an entire day of work.
AI performance is not a major drawcard for most people yet, but the Ultra X7 358H has a 50 TOPS NPU that will help with many workloads, and be increasingly useful as time goes on.
The EliteBook X G2i comes with a compact 65W USB-C charger, and tops up quite quickly, but we found it a little finicky and it didn’t always charge at the full rate from some 65W (or higher) chargers and power banks. Considering it uses USB PD spec for charging, these are likely just early quibbles with the laptop being more conservative about it making sure it is connected to a suitable performance charger.
HP EliteBook X G2i: Final thoughts
(Image credit: Future)
While we'll reserve final judgment until we get hands-on with a production version of the laptop, based on my time with the G2i, it's absolutely one worth putting on your shortlist for a 2026 upgrade.
The Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 is an elegantly designed laptop, marketed for gamers and other power users requiring its high-end specs.
With its brilliant white finish, the Legion 7i stands out from the drubness of the gaming laptop crowd. The minimal branding and bright RGB keyboard backlighting impart a combination of elegance and vibrancy as well.
The Legion 7i has one of the best gaming laptop designs I’ve seen. It's remarkably thin and has some interesting touches, such as the brushed metal sides with their supremely flat surface and rounded corners.
More importantly, it’s supremely well built, with those aforementioned sides being a particular highlight thanks to their solid feel. However, the top panel can flex a little, and the lid even more so. Thankfully, the hinge offers more than enough stability, and pivots very smoothly.
There are a sufficient number of ports on the Legion 7i, but given the amount of empty space on the sides, it’s a shame there aren’t more. Still, you get two USB-C and two USB-A ports, handy for peripheral connections, while the power jack and HDMI interface are sensibly placed at the rear.
There’s also an SD card reader, an uncommon addition for a gaming laptop. More peculiar is a switch for toggling the webcam, placed on the left behind the aforementioned reader. Why there isn’t a physical slider for covering the camera is beyond me, and doubtless many would prefer this failsafe method instead.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 and RTX 5060 proved capable enough to run AAA titles at high settings. You might need Frame Generation and DLSS upscaling set to Balanced to get the highest fps, but this is pretty much par for the course in the current landscape.
As I expected, the fans whirred constantly during my sessions. The noise they generate can be quite loud, but the best PC gaming headsets should be able to drown this out.
(Image credit: Future)
Less expectedly — and more worryingly — the portion above the keyboard became incredibly hot, to the point of being untouchable. However, this spike only lasted a few moments, before returning to a comfortable temperature. Nonetheless, this was still something I found concerning, and haven’t experienced with other gaming laptops to the same extreme degree.
The display of the Legion 7i lives up to its impressive specification. The high 2560 x 1600 resolution is as crisp as you would imagine, while the OLED technology offers fantastic contrast and color representation. I did notice some prominent reflections, but in the main these weren’t too bothersome.
Despite the keyboard looking rather typical for a laptop, the depth and dampening of the keys exceeded my expectations. This imbues presses with a reassuring thud, while their snappy response should see you perform at your best.
These same qualities, coupled with the spacious layout, make the Legion 7i’s board great for typing, too. The touchpad also feels delightful, thanks to its silky finish. However, its small size and alacrity to trigger at inopportune moments make it impractical.
The battery life of the Legion 7i is quite impressive by gaming laptop standards, lasting close to eight hours in our movie playback test. It’s also quick to charge, taking just under two hours to do so from empty to full.
The starting price of the Legion 7i is fairly reasonable: it undercuts some of its rivals, but there are cheaper alternatives with more powerful componentry. However, these often fail to match the superlative design and build quality of the Legion 7i, so if these are priorities for you, the Legion 7i is one of the best gaming laptops around.
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 review: Price & Availability
(Image credit: Future)
Starts from $1,779.99 / £2,069.99 / AU$3,759
Available now
Some cheaper rivals with stronger specs
The Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 starts from $1,779.99 / £2,069.99 / AU$3,759. For this, you get a unit with an Intel Core Ultra 7, an RTX 5060, 16GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage. In the UK, the base (and only) RAM capacity is 32GB. The highest spec of the Legion 7i features an Ultra 9, an RTX 5070, and 32GB of RAM. There are also two display options to choose from, varying only in their refresh rate (165Hz or 240Hz).
This is undeniably a lot of money, although it’s worth mentioning that we’ve seen both low- and high-spec models with considerable discounts on Lenovo's website. But while there are certainly more expensive 16-inch gaming laptops out there (the Razer Blade 16 comes to mind), there are also some considerably cheaper rivals.
One such model is the Asus TUF Gaming A16 (2025). This is one of the best budget gaming laptop options around right now: it impressed me with its performance and surprisingly elegant design when I reviewed it. However, it can’t match the premium construction, slender form, or visual fidelity of the Legion 7i.
Value: 3.5 / 5
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 review: Specs
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 base config
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 max config
Price
$1,779.99 / £2,069.99 / AU$3,759
$2,179.99 / £2,600 / AU$4,159
CPU
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (up to 5.2GHz)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (up to 5.4GHz)
GPU
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 8GB
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 8GB
RAM
16GB DDR5 (US); 32GB DDR5 (UK)
32GB DDR5
Storage
1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD
1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD
Display
16-inch WQXGA (2560 x 1600), OLED, Glare, Non-Touch, HDR 1000 True Black, 100% DCI-P3, 500 nits, 165Hz, Low Blue Light
16-inch WQXGA (2560 x 1600), OLED, Glare, Non-Touch, HDR 1000 True Black, 100% DCI-P3, 500 nits, 240Hz, Low Blue Light
You won’t see too many gaming laptops as elegant as the Legion 7i. The fetching white finish marks it out from the usual bland shades of black seen in this sector, and puts me in mind of MacBooks of yore. The subtle branding and RGB backlighting also help to liven up appearances.
Strange as it is to say, the edges of the Legion 7i are a real highlight. The completely flat surfaces and rounded corners are reminiscent of the best iPad and best MacBook designs, while the brushed metal finish only adds to the appeal.
What’s more, their aluminum construction feels incredibly dense, so there’s little chance of denting them. The top panel that houses the keyboard has more give, but it’s still more solid than many others in this price range. This is all the more impressive given how thin and light the base is. There are no extraneous protrusions either; even the rear ventilation bulge is much smaller than its rivals’.
Even thinner than the 7i’s base is the lid. It’s equally impressive in its resistance to flexing, and its hinge offers a remarkable amount of sturdiness while operating with the utmost smoothness. I also appreciated the slight jut at the top of the lid, which allows you to open the Legion 7i easily with one hand, which isn’t the case with many other gaming laptops.
(Image credit: Future)
The rear features two ports: one for the power adapter and one for HDMI cables. On the left are three USB ports — two Type-C and one Type-A — and a combo audio jack. On the right, you’ll find another USB-A port and, unusually for a gaming laptop, an SD card reader.
Also on the right is a switch for disabling the webcam. This doesn't work as well as a mechanical cover, and its small size and stiff operation meant I wasn't a huge fan, though it's still nice to have this additional privacy feature.
Overall, though, the port selection on the Legion 7i should prove sufficient for most users’ needs. However, given the large gaps present on both sides, I can’t help feeling that more could’ve been squeezed in.
Lenovo’s main utility software, LegionSpace, is simple to use and functions well. It ran without issue during my time with it, and it was quick and easy to view system information and change performance modes.
Design: 5/ 5
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 review: Performance
(Image credit: Future)
Good gaming performance
Some general performance issues
Odd temperature spikes
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 Benchmarks
Here are the results for the benchmarks I ran on the Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10:
Geekbench 6 (Multi Core): 18,459; (Single Core): 3,008 Cinebench R23 (Multi Core): 28,264 Cinebench R24 (Multi Core): 1,664; (Single Core): 132 Crossmark Overall: 2,120 3DMark Night Raid: 79,720; Fire Strike: 27,345; Steel Nomad: 2,730; Solar Bay: 56,673; Solar Bay Unlimited: 57,277; Solar Bay Extreme: 11,267; Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited: 11,429 BlackMagicDisk Read: 5,208MB/s; Write: 4,343MB/s Civilization VII (Max resolution, AMD FSR 3, High): 92fps; (1080p, High): 178fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Max resolution, Highest, Balanced upscaling): 162fps; (1080p, Highest, SMAA x4): 132fps Total War: Warhammer III: Mirrors of Madness (1080p, Ultra)66fps; (Max Resolution, Ultra): 43fps Cyberpunk 2077 (Max resolution, Ultra, Balanced upscaling)74fps; (1440p, Ray Tracing: Ultra, Balanced upscaling): 48fps; (1080p, Ultra): 93fps Marvel Rivals (Max resolution, Balanced upscaling, Ultra): 61fps; (1200p, Low): 106fps
When it came to gaming, the Legion 7i conducted itself well. While playing Cyberpunk 2077, I was getting fps figures in the mid 60s with the Ray Tracing: Low preset selected and DLSS upscaling set to Balanced. Turning on Frame Generation resulted in significant improvements, boosting the rate to about 100fps.
Some general performance issues did blight my time with the Legion 7i somewhat. I experienced occasional lock-ups when navigating Windows 11, with clicks on icons and app windows failing to register. I also encountered stuck loading wheels.
Under load, the Legion 7i’s fans are certainly noticeable, but given many gaming laptops sound like jet engines when running demanding tasks, the sound isn’t too disruptive.
Despite the noise, however, the fans failed to provide consistent cooling. It didn’t take long for the section just above the keyboard to reach worrying high temperatures.
Thankfully, it cooled down to touchable temperatures in the midst of gameplay. The rear of the Legion 7i also became very hot, although thankfully not to the same extent, while the keyboard at least only became lukewarm.
(Image credit: Future)
On a more positive note, the display of the Legion 7i is exquisite. The 2560 x 1600 resolution is as pinpoint-sharp as you would expect, while the OLED technology allows for superb contrast. Color reproduction and brightness levels are also hard to fault. The only minor gripe I had was the reflectiveness of the screen, but this wasn’t bad enough to ruin the visual splendor of the Legion 7i.
The keys are solid and very well damped. They have a greater travel and a more emphatic thud compared to other gaming laptop keyboards I’ve experienced, which makes them very satisfying to game with. The space bar was a particular highlight in this regard, putting it on a level with those fitted in the best gaming keyboards.
What’s more, the keys rebound superbly, which further improves their performance. This applies whether you’re gaming or typing, while the latter activity additionally benefits from the comfortable layout, which, despite the main keys being pushed to the left by the number pad, doesn’t feel cramped.
The touchpad is also a joy to use, thanks to its super-smooth surface and solid clicks. However, it’s relatively small given the overall size of the Legion 7i, which hampers navigation somewhat.
It’s also overly-sensitive. Unintentional swipes and taps frequently registered when I used the keyboard — especially the common Alt and Tab combination, resulting in a very frustrating productivity experience. However, all this might be a moot point if, like many gamers, you plan on using a mouse exclusively.
Performance: 3.5 / 5
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 review: Battery Life
(Image credit: Future)
Decent longevity
Some rivals more enduring
Quick to charge
By gaming laptop standards, the Legion 7i has a respectable battery life. It managed to last just shy of eight hours when I ran a movie on a continuous loop, which means it can outlast many of its rivals, although both the Asus V16 and TUF Gaming A16 (2025) beat it comfortably, with each lasting over 10 hours in the same test.
Fortunately, the Legion 7i is very quick to charge, taking just two hours to fully replenish.
Battery Life: 4 / 5
Should I buy the Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10?
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 Scorecard
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
The price is good considering its upmarket design, but there are cheaper rivals with better performance.
3.5 / 5
Design
This is one of the lightest, thinnest, and sleekest 16-inch gaming laptops around, not to mention the build quality is excellent.
5 / 5
Performance
Gaming performance is pretty good, but there are some issues with general performance. Some temperature spikes also sully the experience somewhat.
3.5 / 5
Battery Life
Pretty good for this class of laptop, and it’s very quick to charge. Some rivals can outlast it, though.
4 / 5
Total
You’re mainly paying for the superb design of the Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 rather than its outright performance, but this is still sufficient for high-end gaming.
4 / 5
Buy the Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 if...
You want a sleek, elegant design You’ll struggle to find a thinner, lighter, and better-made 16-inch gaming laptop than the Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10.
You want a fantastic display Super sharp, bright, and vivid, the WQXGA OLED display in the Legion 7i is excellent all-round.
Don't buy it if...
You want the best performance Gaming performance is great, but don’t expect to run AAA titles smoothly with the highest settings applied. Some hiccups occur with general tasking, too.
You want the best cooling I experienced some odd temperature spikes during my time with the Legion 7i, with some parts (thankfully, not those you’d often touch) becoming blistering hot.
Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 review: Also Consider
Asus V16 The Asus V16 is another thin and light 16-inch gaming laptop, but at a much cheaper price. Granted, with its RTX 40-series GPU, it isn’t as powerful but I still found the V16’s performance to be capable. It can’t, however, match the build or display quality of the Legion 7i, and it’s prone to getting hot, too.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 (2025) Another budget-friendly offering, the TUF Gaming A16 can be optioned with an RTX 5070 and an AMD Ryzen 9 and still undercut the base Legion 7i. Again, though, its display isn’t nearly as impressive, and it can get very loud under load.
I tested the Legion 7i for several days, during which time I used it for gaming, working, and light entertainment.
I played AAA titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 and ran our series of comprehensive benchmark tests, including those for the battery life.
I’ve been PC gaming for over a decade, and have used many systems in that time. I’ve reviewed a large number of gaming laptops professionally, varying greatly in their specs and price points.
As CES 2026 kicks off, right out of the gate, we have one of the biggest surprises of the show as far as laptops go, and that is the return of the Dell XPS 14 and XPS 16.
Last year, Dell underwent a major overhaul of its laptop lines, consolidating them under a kind of grid scheme of Dell, Dell Pro, and Dell Pro Max laptops, each with a base model, a Plus model, and a Premium version for different sizes.
It was controversial, for sure, and whether that controversy prompted Dell to change course or there was something in the sales performance of the rebranded laptops that gave Dell pause, whatever it was has given us back the iconic Dell XPS laptops, and it’s more than just a return to the old name.
The new Dell XPS lineup has had a solid redesign that at first sight goes a long way towards fixing the complaints I had with the last few generations of XPS laptops. It’s also powered by the new Intel Core Ultra 300 series processors, and by powered by Intel, I mean entirely.
With the new redesign, the XPS laptop is losing a discrete graphics option for the foreseeable future, which is putting a lot of trust in Intel’s new chips to deliver the mix of creative and productivity performance users expect from the XPS brand.
Whether the new Dell XPS 14 and Dell XPS 16 achieve that balance remains to be seen, but for right now, these two laptops are a fantastic return for the beloved laptop line.
Dell XPS 14 & Dell XPS 16: Price & availability
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
When is it out? The XPS 14 and XPS 16 go on sale January 6, 2026
How much is it? Starting at $2,049.99 for the XPS 14 and $2,199.99 for the XPS 16
Where can you get it? Only available in the US at launch, with global availability to follow
The Dell XPS 14 and Dell XPS 16 will go on sale in the US on January 6, 2026, with a limited number of configurations, starting at $2,049.99 for the XPS 14 and $2,199.99 for the XPS 16. Lower-priced configurations will be launching soon, as will wider availability in the UK and Australia, though no dates or pricing for those regions have been given yet.
Without knowing what the specific specs of the initial configurations are, it’s hard to tell how much the price of the new XPS laptops will vary from earlier models. With RAM prices being what they are, I would not be surprised if they come in somewhat higher, but Dell is also better able to absorb those price hikes or negotiate volume pricing down, thanks to its size, so we’ll just have to keep an eye on it over the next few weeks and months before I can give it a proper value assessment.
Dell XPS 14 & Dell XPS 16: Specs
Powered by Intel Core Ultra 300 series
No discrete graphics option
Dell XPS 14 2026 & Dell XPS 16 2026 specs
Dell XPS 14
Dell XPS 16
Processor
Up to Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Up to Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Graphics
Intel Arc Graphics, Intel Graphics
Intel Arc Graphics, Intel Graphics
NPU
Up to 50 TOPS
Up to 50 TOPS
Memory
Up to 64GB LPDDR5x-9600
Up to 64GB LPDDR5x-9600
Storage
Up to 4TB PCIe 5.0
Up to 4TB PCIe 5.0
Display
Up to 14-inch 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED InfinityEdge touch display, 400-nits typical, 500-nits peak brightness, 100% DCI-P3 color gamut, VESA DisplayHDR True Black 500
Up to 16-inch 3.2K (3200 x 2000) OLED InfinityEdge touch, 400-nits typical, 500-nits peak brightness, 100% DCI-P3 color gamut, VESA DisplayHDR True Black 500
Wireless
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0
Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0
Ports
3x Thunderbolt 4, 1x 3.5mm Universal Audio jack
3x Thunderbolt 4, 1x 3.5mm Universal Audio jack
Battery
70WHr
70WHr
Webcam
8MP / 4K HDR w/ Windows Hello
8MP / 4K HDR w/ Windows Hello
Dimensions (W x D x H)
12.19 x 8.26 x 0.58 ins | 309.5 x 209.7 x 14.6mm
13.88 x 9.35 x 0.58 ins | 352.6 x 237.47 x 14.6mm
Weight
3.0 lbs | 1.36kg
3.65 lbs | 1.65kg
Dell XPS 14 & Dell XPS 16: Design
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
New, thinner, and more modern design
Fixes most of the accessibility issues with previous gen XPS models
The biggest change here for the Dell XPS 14and XPS 16 is the design of the two laptops, which significantly improves things over earlier generations.
First, the laptop feels lighter and sturdier than its predecessors, and it definitely looks more modern. The move from the Dell logo to the XPS logo on the lid also makes the laptop feel less like an office product and more like a proper ultrabook.
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
From my limited time with the two laptops, the keys had good travel and felt comfortable enough in my testing, but having not typed on them extensively, I can’t say how they’ll feel after a few hours of work.
The three Thunderbolt ports along the sides and the headphone/mic jack are sufficient for most people, and while the lack of USB-A ports might annoy some, at this point, I can’t fault Dell for sticking with the faster, more intuitive USB-C interface.
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
The webcam is an 8MP 4K HDR webcam, which is what I would expect for a laptop in this class, and the 10W audio is spread out between a number of hidden speakers along both sides of the laptop. Given the noise in the testing area, the audio was audible, but it was also really loud. I’ll reserve judgment on that until I can do more extensive testing with it.
The OLED displays looked great on the two laptops, with the XPS 16-inch feeling much more roomy as you’d expect, but the 14-inch display is also more than enough for most. The lighting in the testing space wasn’t the greatest, so I wouldn’t trust my eyes to judge the color accuracy without a longer look in better conditions, but I honestly can’t think of anything I’d fault them for.
The biggest changes, for me at least, are the return of physical Function keys and a more visible border for the trackpads. The old virtual Function key bar along the previous gen devices and the complete lack of a visibly defined trackpad on a smooth, glassy surface were accessibility headaches that simply weren’t necessary. The trackpad could be better defined, I’ll say, but I’m just happy that you can at least see it more clearly.
Dell XPS 14 & Dell XPS 16: Performance
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
I didn’t have a chance to benchmark either the XPS 14 or XPS 16, so I can’t tell you how either will perform versus their predecessors. I will say that the lack of discrete graphics will not work in the new XPS models' favor if you are comparing them to a Dell Premium with an Nvidia RTX 4050, like the Dell 14 Premium I tested last year.
That said, I haven’t fully tested the new Intel Panther Lake chips yet, so the new XPS’s performance might end up surprising me. We’ll know soon enough.
Dell XPS 14 & Dell XPS 16: Final thoughts
(Image credit: Future / John Loeffler)
I personally didn’t lose much sleep over the XPS rebranding last year, the way many of my colleagues did, but I’m sure the XPS’s triumphant return from exile will make plenty of people happy.
What I care far more about, though, is the redesign of these two laptops, particularly the Function keys and the trackpad. Those fixes alone make this the one laptop I’m most excited to test out in the next few weeks, and if Intel Panther Lake can live up to its hype, these two models just might be the laptops to buy in 2026.
TechRadar will be extensively covering this year's CES, and will bring you all of the big announcements as they happen. Head over to our CES 2026 news page for the latest stories and our hands-on verdicts on everything from wireless TVs and foldable displays to new phones, laptops, smart home gadgets, and the latest in AI.
Looking to grab a camera for your Nintendo Switch 2? Well, the Hori USB Camera for Nintendo Switch 2 is a cheaper option that provides video functionality for both GameChat and certain in-game features.
This model comes from video game accessory player Hori, but is actually licensed by Nintendo itself. It’s a pretty interesting model, offering a flexible design that works for both docked and handheld modes. You can insert it directly into your Nintendo Switch 2 via its USB-C connector, or you can instead plug it into a base, which can be connected to your Switch 2 console with an included cable.
In fact, there’s even a clip on the underside of the base that can be used as a mount. I found this to be stable and easy to use, although it’s worth noting that it won’t fit on chunkier displays – my TV, for example, proved to be too thick. Still, the overall versatility of the camera’s design is something that I look for when testing the best Nintendo Switch 2 accessories, and it is highly practical.
(Image credit: Future)
Just generally, this camera is well designed. It’s phenomenally compact and lightweight, making it easy to fit into a top-class case, like the Nintendo Switch 2 All-In-One Carrying Case, for example. The camera can also be angled to your liking, there’s an effective privacy shutter on board, and it’s got a classy, albeit basic, black finish.
Sure, it doesn’t have the pizzazz of the Hori Piranha Plant Camera for Nintendo Switch 2 – that model’s main selling point – but if you’re looking for something understated, then it isn’t half bad.
(Image credit: Future)
But with regret, this is where my praise starts to run dry for Hori’s Nintendo Switch 2 accessory. Why? Well, if you’re looking for strong performance, then Hori’s USB Camera is not for you. It has the same specs as the Piranha Plant camera, meaning it offers a 480p resolution. Yes, that’s the same quality we saw on the Nintendo DSi, which was released in… 2008. Ouch.
That low resolution means that you’re getting pretty dismal picture quality overall. The camera made my face look blurry, with finer details like lines on my face and individual hairs looking blocky and poorly defined. If you’re using the camera in TV mode and sitting at a distance, the restrictions of 480p are even more prominent. A logo on my clothing melded into a blob, and everything in my room lacked clarity.
Even colors look washed out, lacking saturation and that true-to-life tone you’d hope for. When I switched over to the 1080p official Nintendo Switch 2 Camera, these issues were thrown into even sharper relief. With that model, I was instantly struck by more eye-popping colors, with the striking red of a Switch 2 game box and the delicate pink of flowers in my living room a joy to behold. Sure, my face still wasn’t incredibly clear at a distance, but it appeared far less blurry than it did with the Hori USB Camera.
One more small thing. The field of view on the Hori USB Camera isn’t fantastic. At 85 degrees, it can cram a decent amount into the picture, but again, the 110 degrees you get from the official Switch 2 camera is optimized far better for those who want to get four or more players in view, say.
(Image credit: Future)
I want to make one thing clear, though. Despite its low resolution and fairly limited field of view, the Hori USB Camera is, at least, functional. I didn’t experience any bugs or compatibility issues, 30fps performance was pretty consistent, and it tracked my face pretty well when playing Mario Kart World.
Another thing worth considering is that Hori’s USB Camera is usually a fair bit cheaper than the official Switch 2 camera. Although this model has a list price of $59.99 / £29.99 / AU$64.95, I’m already seeing it go for less, with some online retailers selling it for under $35 / £20 / AU$45. Meanwhile, the official camera launched at $54.99 / £49.99 / AU$69.95, and is usually full price in the US – though I’ve spotted it going for less than £30 in the UK and AU$60 in Australia.
Is this model worth buying, then? Well, for the majority of people, I’m tempted to say no. There are the obvious issues, like poor picture quality and color replication, but it’s also worth flagging that there aren’t tons of games that support camera functionality. A few titles – like Super Mario Party Jamboree + Jamboree TVand Mario Kart World –have segments that use video, but the list of supported software is slim at the moment.
If you simply need a camera that functions and is easy to use, then this model works. It’s a little cheaper than the official model, and is pleasingly flexible too. But the Piranha Plant alternative is similarly priced and has a fun factor that the USB Camera lacks, meaning it ends up being a fairly hard sell.
(Image credit: Future)
Hori USB Camera for Nintendo Switch 2 review: price & specs
Price
$59.99 / £29.99 / AU$64.95
Resolution
480p at 30fps
Field of view
85 degrees
Dimensions
1.2 x 1.2 x 2.3in / 30 x 30 x 58mm (camera); 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.6in / 39 x 37 x 40mm (base)
Weight
0.2lbs / 80g
Compatibility
Nintendo Switch 2, Windows, MacOS
Should I buy the Hori USB Camera for Nintendo Switch 2?
(Image credit: Future)
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Design
Flexible build, dual TV / handheld mode, but clip won’t fit all screens and a tad basic-looking.
4/5
Performance
Poor 480p resolution results in blurry picture quality, but framing works well.
2/5
Value
A bit cheaper than the official Switch 2 camera, but performs poorly.
2.5/5
Buy it if...
You want a cheaper way to access video functionality on Switch 2 If you don’t want to pay the higher asking price of the official Switch 2 camera, then this option from Hori will likely suit you better. It regularly sells for less than $35 / £20 / AU$45, making it a fairly affordable option.
You’re looking for a compact option Something I appreciate about this model is just how small it is, which makes it incredibly easy to tuck away inside a Switch 2 case, or even place in a small-sized bag when you’re on the go.
Don't buy it if...
You’re expecting good performance With a 480p resolution, you’re getting underwhelming performance from Hori’s USB camera. Picture quality is pretty blurry, and colors don’t pop in the way they do on pricier alternatives like the official Switch 2 camera.
You want a camera with character Although the Piranha Plant camera shares the same low resolution and more restrictive field of view, it’s got a lot more character. Its colorful and character-filled design is a feast for the eyes, whereas this rival is on the plain side of things.
Hori USB Camera for Nintendo Switch 2 review: also consider
Nintendo Switch 2 Camera You’ll get far better picture quality from the official Nintendo Switch 2 Camera, which boasts a 1080p resolution. It’s solidly made and has a more luxurious feel than Hori’s USB model, though it's lacking in terms of flexibility, and costs a fair bit more.
Hori Piranha Plant Camera for Nintendo Switch 2 This lil’ camera is packed full of charisma, and is based on the classic Super Mario baddie. It can be used while docked or plugged into your Switch 2 for handheld play, and has a mount too. However, it suffers from the same problems as the Hori USB Camera, with a poor 480p resolution and a lower field of view than the official cam.
How I tested the Hori USB Camera for Nintendo Switch 2
(Image credit: Future)
Tested across the course of one week
Used at home in handheld and TV mode
Compared directly against rival models
I used the Hori USB Camera for Nintendo Switch 2 within a one-week testing period, assessing every aspect of its performance and design. For the most part, I had it set up with my Nintendo Switch 2 docked and connected to the Sky Glass Gen 2 TV.
For the testing itself, I made use of the Switch 2’s USB Camera testing function in the settings menu, but also used it while playing Mario Kart World online. I also compared it against the official Switch 2 camera to judge picture quality, color accuracy, and motion.
In a world of smart glasses that can listen and speak to you, show you new worlds, and provide information on top of your world, Xreal's brand of display glasses is almost quaint. They're not smart. There's no effort to bring in information from the outside world or redefine how you see the real world. Put simply, this is a virtual 200-inch screen in your backpack, bag, or pocket that you can put on at any moment to enjoy a movie, gaming, or even a much larger laptop work screen.
Xreal, in fact, delivers this niche capability better than most and, with the new Xreal 1S, offers greater clarity, a wider view, and a better price than ever before.
From a practical perspective, Xreal 1S is a wearable display that uses impressive passthrough technology to take the display feed from almost any display-laden device that offers USB-C output and project it in front of your eyes on a pair of prisms backed by high-resolution Sony Micro-OLED displays.
There's no power source; inside the lightweight frames are powered by the connected device. There is virtually no setup beyond donning the frames and connecting your device.
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Instead of fancy gesture and gaze control, you still control your external device as you would without the Xreal 1S. You use the touchscreen on your phone, the keyboard and mouse on your laptop, and joysticks on your gaming devices.
The Xreal 1S brings a handful of important upgrades, including brighter screens (now 700 nits, up from 600 nits on the Xreal One), higher resolution (was 1080, now 1200), and a slightly wider field of view (was 50-degree, now 52-degree FoV).
Nestled under some settings in the new eyewear is a new Real 3D capability that can turn virtually everything on-screen, including 2D photos and videos, even an interface, into a 3D landscape. It's a work in progress that, as of this writing, provides decidedly mixed results (I suspect slipstream software updates will improve it over time).
As for how the eyewear works, the Xreal 1S headset is an excellent companion at home, work, or on the road (think a long flight or commute). It's quite easy to lose yourself in the immersive screen, and now, with a somewhat cheaper device, this might be the antidote to all those more expensive, immersive, and intelligent wearables. It qualifies as one of the best AR glasses I've used to date.
Xreal 1S: Price and availability
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
The Xreal 1S was unveiled on January 4, 2025, and is now available to order in the US and UK from Xreal.com for $449 / £399.
This is notably a $50 price reduction from the Xreal One, while enhancing several features. The Xreal 1S frames are still more expensive than the Meta AI-sporting Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer Gen 2 ($329), but, despite their intelligence, the Meta frames do not include a pair of displays (See the Meta Ray-Ban Display for that).
Throughout this review, I also test-drove a couple of optional accessories, including the $99 Xreal Eye, a 12MP modular camera, and the Xreal Neo ($99), a battery pack and video passthrough device necessary for using the Xreal with your Nintendo Switch. While the camera is a nice-to-have and nudges the Xreal 1S toward Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses territory (it takes passable photos and fun POV videos), the Neo is a must-have if you want the Nintendo Switch virtual big-screen experience.
Value: 4/5
Xreal 1S: Design
Wired USB-C connection
Lightweight – just 84 grams
Auto-dimming shades
The benefit of the Xreal 1S not being stuffed with technology and battery power is immediately obvious. It's a light, almost stylish piece of eyewear that doesn't weigh heavily on the face.
At a glance, it might be easy to mistake them for a large-ish pair of sunglasses. The flexible stem does get a bit bigger than your standard ones to house microphones, Bose speakers, and, on one side, control and volume buttons.
The frames rest comfortably on your nose with a sort of floating bridge. Xreal provides three sizes of nose pads. I was able to stick with the mid-sized.
Behind the dimmable lenses are a pair of thick prisms that aim the Sony Micro OLED displays, which sit horizontally at the top of each lens, at each eye.
I wear glasses, and since I can't put contacts in my eyes, I needed the optional $99 prescription insert from Honsvr. It's pretty easy to attach the prescription lens's lightweight frame to the main Xreal 1S housing: you just have to pop out a pair of tiny rubber stoppers (I used a SIM car remover) and then stick the tiny matching stems into the newly exposed holes. Once my prescription was firmly in there, it never shifted or fell out.
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Image 2 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Image 3 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Image 4 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
The good news is that the inserts do not push the frames any further from your face (they're already further away than your standard eyewear). If there's one downside to my inserts, it's that the Xreal 1S already looks a little odd when viewed from the side. Now I have another set of lenses in front of my eyes.
Without a companion system, the Xreal 1S is just an inert pair of awkward-looking glasses.
On the back end of one stem is a USB-C port that accepts one side of the roughly, included 4 ft woven cable (the Xreal 1S also ships with a case and cloth for cleaning). The other end plugs into your device of choice. As I mentioned earlier, there's no external battery. Plugging the Xreal 1S into, say, your laptop automatically powers up the glasses.
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
I also added the optional Xreal Eye modular 12MP camera. Like the subscription lenses, I had to remove a rubber plug before inserting the camera at the peak of the bridge. The camera is useful for capturing decent photos and videos (stored locally, you offload them by plugging the frames into a device and switching to transfer mode). The placement of the camera dead-center on the frames may make them less than welcome in some social situations.
Overall, these are relatively low-key digital frames that won't draw much attention at the office, on a plane, in a train, or at home. They are not for deep immersion of walking about and will draw the occasional stare, but are otherwise well-built for their purpose, and even with a cable running out of the back of one stem, they never feel heavy or uncomfortable to wear.
Design score: 4/5
Xreal 1S: Performance
1200p, 120Hz image at 700-nit brightness
Works with almost any USB-C device with a screen
Good Bose audio
As I mentioned, there's minimal setup to use these display glasses. All you need is a device with a screen and a USB-C port that supports video output.
Inside the Xreal 1S is the X1 chip that handles its video processing duties as well as spatial awareness that allows me to either fix the virtual screen in place or let it follow my gaze.
As soon as I plugged into the frames, they powered up (yes, they draw power from the host system), and within seconds, I saw an extended screen; the system does not instantly present you with the Mac's main desktop. Instead, my MacBook Pro saw the Xreal 1S as another display. I was then able to use the Mac to arrange my displays so that the Xreal 1S virtual display was stacked above my laptop display.
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
After that, I could use the mouse to move windows onto that screen. Because the Honsver prescription inserts only had my near-vision prescription and not the far-vision one to match my progressive eyeglasses, I could not effectively see and use the laptop keyboard while wearing the Xreal 1S.
That's okay, though, it's with entertainment and social content where the Xreal 1S's virtual display really shines.
I started my entertainment journey by plugging the lenses into the new Lenovo Legion Go S, where I played Spider-Man Remastered.
As I held the portable game platform in my hand and used the Legion's joysticks to play, I marveled at the large, clear, and colorful virtual display. Not only is the 1200p screen sharp, but the motion is perfectly smooth thanks, in part, to the 120Hz refresh rate, and there is effectively zero lag time (it's been measured at 3ms latency). Even in bright spaces, the now 700nit displays held fast, looking just as bright and solid, almost as if I were in a darkened theater. The Bose speakers delivered clear, crisp, and relatively loud sound to my ears, and I quickly lost myself in the gameplay. If you plan on wearing these while, say, on a flight, I would suggest you use earbuds (they'll still pull audio from the host system) so you don't disturb your seatmates.
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
The Xreal 1S offers two view styles: one fixes the big, virtual screen in place, and if you look away, the display remains anchored in space (this is the extent of the system's spatial capabilities). The other option is to let the screen follow you. Xreal smartly made sure that the screen follows with a smooth lag so that you never feel even a hint of motion sickness.
Switching between these screen modes is easy. You just single-press the control button to anchor the screen or let it move with your gaze. I generally found that I like fixing the screen in place. If you choose the anchored view and you can't see all of the screen, you can long-press the button to realign the view.
There's also the ability to move the screen further away or closer to you, or enlarge os shrink the virtual screen by inch increments. Doing so, though, means accessing the Xreal 1S's slightly confusing menu system. To access the menu, you double-press the control button under the left-hand stem and then press one side of the volume, which also doubles as menu navigation. You can choose to make the screen quite large, but then you're looking all around the 52-degree FoV to see everything. I'd suggest always keeping the four screen corners in full view.
It's through the volume button that you access the lens darkness control. I made it full darkness for a more immersive feel, which is especially useful when watching video.
I next connected the Xreal to my iPhone. As soon as I unlocked the iPhone 17 Pro Max, my virtual screen appeared. I opened social media, including Instagram Reels and TikTok, and had a ball leaning back and flicking through posts on my phone, as the big screen floated in front of my eyes. It's worth noting here that the video feed from the phone to the Xreal 1S does not turn off your iPhone screen. So, yes, someone next to you could still see what you're viewing. You might want to lower the brightness on your iPhone screen for some degree of privacy.
I particularly enjoyed watching Netflix videos in full-screen mode and can honestly imagine myself enjoying a full, big-screen movie on my next cross-country flight.
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Xreal's new Real 3D mode was in beta when I tested the glasses. It can convert any image or video (even interfaces) into 3D. Some of it looks good, but most of my early experiences with it on the iPhone 17 Pro Max were not great. Some images developed duplicate images behind them (there was me and an outline of me behind me), and others looked jagged. I'll withhold judgment on this feature until I get the final version.
Xreal 1S also works with the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2, but not without a special $99 adapter, the Neo. Nintendo has blocked some third-party video adapters, but Xreal quickly updated the Neo to get around the latest block.
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Image 2 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Image 3 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Image 4 of 4
(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
Neo is not just an adapter. It's also a 10,000mAh battery backup and can power the Nintendo Switch or any other device you plug into it. It even has an integrated MagSafe-style magnet if you want to attach it to the back of your iPhone.
It took me a minute to realize I needed to remove the Joy-Cons from the console to make this work. (Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)
To use the Neo, you connect it to the Nintendo Switch or Switch 2 and then plug the Xreal 1S into the Neo. The Nintendo Switch only works with the adapter in docked mode, which means you need to remove the Joy-Cons. After that, it's another great experience. I played Super Mario Kart on both the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2. It was easy to get lost in the big-screen gameplay, and, in a way, not having to hold the entire Nintendo Switch was a side benefit. To play, I just gripped the two Joy-Cons.
The Neo will work with almost any device, delivering power while also passing the video signal through. You can even plug an external power source into it, which will then let you keep using your third-party device even if it's run out of power (and the Neo is tapped, too). Just remember, the Neo will run you another $99.
Performance score: 4.5/5
Should you buy the Xreal 1S glasses?
Xreal One Scorecard
Attribute
Comment
Score
Value
The Xreal 1S are more affordable than the last model but with even better visual clarity and a larger viewport. Does that make then fully-worth nearly $500. That deopends on how much you value a lean-back big, virtual screen experience.
4/5
Design
Sticking to one core feature makes these frames lither and more comfortable than most AR glasses. They still have some awkwardness, but are generally attractive and rugged enough to wear whenever yo want a big virtual screen experience.
4/5
Performance
This is an excellent virtual screen experience that enhances social media, gaming and video watching. I do wish the menu system was easier to navigate.
4.5/5
Buy it if…
You want a big screen wherever you go The Xreal 1S is a no-fuss virtual big screen for all your devices.
You want a lean-back experience Stop leaning over your phone. The Xreal 1S's virtual screen lets you lean back and enjoy.
You don’t need AI and connectivity on your face Xreal 1S do one thing and do it well: deliver a big-screen experience in a wearable, but don't weigh it down with extra AI and notifications.
Don’t buy it if…
You were expecting augmented reality Xreal 1S puts a floating screen in front of you but that image does not interact with the real world in any meaningful way.
You don’t want to spend more than $250 The Xreal 1S are excellent but they do cost almost $450, If you have a Nintendo Switch, you'll be shellign otu another $99 for the Neo.
You want full immersion These glasses can dim to cut out some of the outside world, but the sound is open-eared, and the glasses do not wrap around your face to form a light seal.
Also consider
Xreal Air 2 If you want to stick with Xreal, the Xreal Air 2 or its electrochromic dimming-enhanced Xreal Air 2 Pro are both solid options that cost a little less – though expect a slightly less good image and noticeable inferior audio. Read our Xreal Air 2 reviewView Deal
Meta Quest 3 While not a direct competitor to Xreal’s glasses, the Quest 3 is an XR product that you should consider if you want to experience what VR and MR have to offer – it’s simply superb. Read our Meta Quest 3 reviewView Deal
How I tested the Xreal 1S glasses
I spent a couple of weeks with the Xreal 1S using them to play games. view movies, and pursue social media. I tried them with the Neo adapter on a Nintendo Switch (1 and 2) and also connected that accessory to my iPhone.
Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 6E Wi-Fi Speed: 5.4Gbps Ports: 1x Gigabit Ethernet Antennae: 4 Dimensions: 348 x 106 x 80mm
Wi-Fi 6E, which the Asus RP-AX58 features, is a bit like the missing link of the Wi-Fi family. It was the first version of Wi-Fi technology to introduce the high-speed 6.0GHz frequency band – in addition to the existing 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz bands used by previous generations of Wi-Fi. However, it never really took off as many people had only just upgraded to Wi-Fi 6, and it wasn’t long before the absurdly fast Wi-Fi 7 came along and made poor old 6E look a bit irrelevant.
The advantage of that, though, is that you can now pick up a high-performance range extender that uses Wi-Fi 6E at a pretty competitive price.
We liked TP-Link’s BE3600 range extender thanks to its ease of use and installation, but its dual-band Wi-Fi 7 performance was actually fairly modest, with a top speed of 3.6Gbps. The AXE5400 (model number RE815XE) is around the same price as the BE3600, but the use of Wi-Fi 6E means that it can provide tri-band Wi-Fi performance and a speed of 5.4Gbps that should be more than adequate for use with most home broadband services.
TP-Link AXE5400: Price And Availability
How much does it cost? $139.99/£119.14
When is it available: Now
Where can you get it: US, UK
The AXE5400 costs $139.99/£119.14, which is slightly less expensive than the TP-Link BE3600 with Wi-Fi 7, even though the tri-band Wi-Fi 6E used by the AXE5400 actually provides stronger performance with a top speed of 5.4Gbps.
It’s not currently on sale in Australia, though, where it looks like TP-Link is skipping a generation and going from an older Wi-Fi 6 model to the new BE3600 with Wi-Fi 7 instead.
Value: 4.5/5
(Image credit: Future)
TP-Link AXE5400: Design
Big, bulky design
Four external antennae
Easy-to-use app
It’s safe to say that the AXE5400 is not going to quietly and unobtrusively blend into your home décor.
Its four large external antennae make it one of the biggest and bulkiest range extenders we’ve come across, and with the antennae fully extended the AXE5400 measures a full 348mm high, 106mm wide and 80mm deep (including the plug section that is inserted straight into a mains power socket).
In fact, it’s so large that it actually blocked an adjacent power socket when we set it up in our offices. There’s also a series of status indicator lights on the front panel, which are useful when setting up the AXE5400, but also mean that it may take up even more space in order to keep the front of the unit clear and visible.
The bulky design does serve a purpose though, as the large antennae help to beam the range extender’s tri-band Wi-Fi signal far and wide, and ensure that it obliterates any annoying deadspots in your home. There’s an Ethernet port on the right-hand side of the unit to provide a wired connection too – although, of course, the AXE5400 still relies on Wi-Fi to connect to your main broadband router.
Design: 3.5/5
(Image credit: Future)
TP-Link AXE5400: Features
Simple installation
Helpful status indicators
Plugs directly into mains power socket
It may not support the latest Wi-Fi 7, but the AXE5400 includes plenty of features that enable it to provide strong Wi-Fi performance, and also to help people who may not have used a range extender before.
The use of tri-band Wi-Fi 6E allows the AXE5400 to broadcast a Wi-Fi signal on three separate frequency bands. The 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz bands provide compatibility with older PCs and mobile devices, while the high-speed 6.0GHz band boosts the Wi-Fi performance to a healthy 5.4Gbps – which is significantly faster than dual-band range extenders that use Wi-Fi 7, such as TP-Link’s BE3600, or the Asus RP-BE58.
And, as mentioned, there’s a Gigabit Ethernet port on the AXE5400 to provide a wired connection as well. It also provides a feature called ‘adaptive path selection’ – often just called ‘roaming’ by most other manufacturers – which can monitor a laptop or mobile device as you move from room to room, and decide when to hand the Wi-Fi connection back to your main router in order to maintain the best performance.
Like most range extenders, the AXE5400 will work with routers from any manufacturer, but it also supports TP-Link’s OneMesh system, which allows it to be used as part of a wider mesh networking system if you already own a TP-Link router with OneMesh.
It’s easy to use too (although the annoying Christmas ads that seemed to pop up every now and then within the app were pretty shameless). The TP-Link Tether app can automatically detect the Wi-Fi signal from the AXE5400 and guide you through the process of connecting to the three different frequency bands.
You can use the same name and password as your main network from your broadband router, or create a new name and password just for the AXE5400. There’s even a signal test within the app to help you find the best spot to place the AXE5400 in order to deal with any deadspots in particular rooms within your home. And, for more advanced users, there’s a web browser interface that provides more detailed control over your network settings.
Features: 4/5
(Image credit: Future)
TP-Link AXE5400: Performance
Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E
5.4Gbps Wi-Fi
1x Gigabit Ethernet
Our offices are a good place to test range extenders, as we have one office towards the back of the building that does suffer from a very noticeable Wi-Fi deadspot – which is usually managed with the use of some PowerLine adaptors to provide a wired network connection instead.
TP-Link AXE5400 benchmarks
Ookla Speed Test – 2.4GHz (download/upload)
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 140Mbps / 140Mbps
20GB Steam Download - 2.4GHz
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 110Mbps
Ookla Speed Test – 5.0GHz (download/upload)
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps / 150Mbps
20GB Steam Download - 5.0GHz
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps
Ookla Speed Test - 6.0GHz (upload/download)
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps/150Mbps
20GB Steam Download - 6.0GHz
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps
Thankfully, though, the AXE5400 dealt with that problem in no time at all, providing a strong Wi-Fi signal on all three frequency bands as soon as I set it up in a hallway just outside that back office.
The office broadband runs at 150Mbps, and even the slower 2.4GHz band on the AXE5400 managed to hit 140Mbps with the Ookla Speed Test. Steam downloads were a little slower at 110Mbps, but that speed is still in line with the 2.4GHz performance of other range extenders that we’ve tested.
Switching to the 5.0GHz band immediately boosted performance, hitting the full 150Mbps with both the Ookla and Steam tests. And, of course, the fastest 6.0GHz band had no trouble maintaining those speeds as well.
If you only have older PCs or mobile devices that use Wi-Fi 5 or 6 on the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz bands then you may not need a tri-band range extender such the AXE5400.
But, if you’re able to make use of that 6.0GHz band, then the AXE5400 is a fast, reliable way of getting rid of Wi-Fi deadspots at a more competitive price than newer Wi-Fi 7 models.
Performance: 4/5
Should You Buy The TP-Link AXE5400?
TP-Link AXE5400 Scorecard
Attributes
Notes
Score
Value
Wi-Fi 6E may be the forgotten member of the Wi-Fi family, but that means you can pick up this tri-band range extender at a very competitive price.
4.5 / 5
Design
The sheer size of the AXE5400 and its four large antenna means that it’s a bit of an eyesore, and may even block an adjacent power socket.
3.5 / 5
Features
The four antennae do earn their keep though, providing tri-band Wi-Fi for maximum compatibility with both older and newer PCs and mobile devices.
4 / 5
Performance
Tri-band Wi-Fi and a top speed of 5.4Gbps means that the AXE5400 can even outperform some of its dual-band Wi-Fi 7 rivals.
4 / 5
Final Score
Good performance, maximum compatibility, and an easy-to-use app make this a great option for anyone that needs to fix a Wi-Fi deadspot.
4 / 5
Buy it if...
You need speed Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E with a top speed of 5.4Gbps is more than enough for streaming video and online gaming.
You have a new laptop It may not support Wi-Fi 7, but the Wi-Fi 6E used by the AXE5400 still lets you use the speed 6.0GHz frequency band.
Don’t buy it if...
You’re on a budget The AXE5400 is a fairly high-end range extender, and there are less expensive options available for under $100/£100.
You don't need super-speed Many of us don’t really need Wi-Fi 6E, as we’re still using older PCs, consoles, and mobile devices that only support the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz frequencies.
Also Consider
If you're undecided about the TP-Link AXE5400, I've compared its specs with two other options that might be a better fit.
TP-Link AXE5400
Asus RP-BE58
TP-Link RE700X
Price
$139.99/£119.14
$99.99/79.99/AU$150
$119.99/£56.99/AU$123.90
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6E
Wi-Fi 7
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi Speed
5.4Gbps
3.6Gbps
3.0Gbps
Antennae
4 (external)
2 (internal)
2 (internal)
Ethernet ports
1x Gigabit Ethernet
1x Gigabit Ethernet
1x Gigabit Ethernet
Dimensions
348 x 106 x 80mm
150 x 72 x 87mm
149 x 78 x 36mm
If you do want a range extender that supports Wi-Fi 7 then the RP-BE58 from Asus is a good affordable option. It offers dual-band Wi-Fi running at 3.6Gbps, and can easily handle gaming and streaming video.
This previous-generation range extender from TP-Link is a good budget option for many people. It supports dual-band Wi-Fi 6 with a top speed of 3.0Gbps, which is fine for most domestic broadband services. Read our full review
We liked the RP-BE58 range extender from Asus, which provides dual-band Wi-Fi 7 with good performance at a competitive price. However, most people are still using older PCs and mobile devices that don’t support Wi-Fi 7 yet.
There are also many brand-new PCs and laptops now available that don’t have Wi-Fi 7 either (yes, Apple, we’re looking at you). And, of course, there’s no need to buy a range extender with Wi-Fi 7 if you’re still using an old router that only has Wi-Fi 5 or 6. In that case you might want to look at the Asus RP-AX58 range extender instead, which sticks with Wi-Fi 6 and an even more affordable price.
Admittedly, its dual-band Wi-Fi does run at a relatively modest 3.0Gbps, but that should still be more than adequate for streaming video or gaming in most homes, and the RP-AX58 will be a good, affordable option if you just need to boost your Wi-Fi into an upstairs bedroom or other area that suffers from a Wi-Fi deadspot.
Asus RP-AX58: Price And Availability
How much does it cost? $79.99/£64.99/AU $103.62
When is it available: Now
Where can you get it: US, UK, Australia
Sticking with Wi-Fi 6 means that the RP-AX58 is currently available for a very competitive $79.99/£64.99/AU $103.62.
That makes it one of the most affordable range extenders we’ve seen recently, and it’s considerably cheaper than Asus’ RP-BE58 with Wi-Fi 7, as well as rivals such as TP-Link’s BE3600. It’s available in most regions and, as Wi-Fi 6 is a few years old now, you can find it discounted online quite often if you want to shop around.
Value: 4/5
(Image credit: Future)
Asus RP-AX58: Design
Compact, slimline design
No cables, plugs directly into mains socket
2x internal antennae
The RP-AX58 looks virtually identical to its Wi-Fi 7 stablemate from Asus, with a similar slimline design that hides its two Wi-Fi antennae inside the body of the range extender.
It measures just 150mm high, 72mm wide and 87mm deep and, like most range extenders it’s designed to plug directly into a mains power socket, so its compact design ensures that you can simply plug it into any convenient socket in any room around your home or office.
There’s a Gigabit Ethernet port on the right-hand side of the range extender that can provide a wired connection as well (although the RP-AX58 will still connect to your main broadband router via Wi-Fi).
Design: 4
(Image credit: Future)
Asus RP-AX58: Features
Supports Asus AiMesh technology
Compatible with most routers
App feels a little clumsy
The Asus RP-AX58 provides dual-band Wi-Fi 6, running on the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz frequency bands, which ensures compatibility with most PCs, consoles, and mobile devices.
Its 3.0Gbps performance isn’t going to break any speed records, but it should be more than adequate for use with most home broadband services, and fast enough to eliminate any Wi-Fi deadspots in rooms or other areas that suffer from poor Wi-Fi. The RP-AX58 will work with broadband routers from most manufacturers, but it also supports Asus’ AiMesh technology, which allows it to act as part of a mesh Wi-Fi network in conjunction with Asus’ own routers or mesh systems.
The Asus Extender app has a few rough edges, though. As I’ve seen before, the opening screen of the app displays some jumbled text on the screen of my iPhone (although that’s not a problem on the larger screen of an iPad).
However, even when the text is clear it’s... well... still a bit unclear. The app tells you to enter the ‘default password’ for the Wi-Fi network created by the range extender, when in fact the network doesn’t initially require a password.
It’s only after connecting the RP-AX58 to your existing Wi-Fi network that the app gives you the opportunity to set a password. You can create an entirely new network name and password just for connecting to the RP-AX58, or if you want to keep things simple you can just tell the app to use the same name and password as your existing Wi-Fi network.
The low price of the RP-AX58 means that there’s not much in the way of additional features, but that’s not a problem as long as it delivers the goods when tackling your Wi-Fi deadspots.
Features: 3/5
(Image credit: Future)
Asus RP-AX58: Performance
Dual-band Wi-Fi 6
3.0Gbps speed
1x Gigabit Ethernet port
The use of Wi-Fi 6 and a top speed of 3.0Gbps seems almost quaint when compared to the blazing speeds of the latest Wi-Fi 7 devices. Yet few people really need multi-gig speeds for their home or office Wi-Fi, so the RP-AX58 should still provide all the speed you need for most home broadband services.
Asus RP-AX58 benchmarks
Ookla Speed Test – 2.4GHz (download/upload)
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 120Mbps / 120Mbps
20GB Steam Download - 2.4GHz
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 120Mbps
Ookla Speed Test – 5.0GHz (download/upload)
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps / 150Mbps
20GB Steam Download - 5.0GHz
Within 30ft, three partition walls: 150Mbps
It worked well with my own Wi-Fi deadspot, located in an office towards the back of a building that my normal office router struggles to reach. I installed the RP-AX58 in a hallway just outside that office and immediately said goodbye to the dead zone – and to the PowerLine adaptors that I normally use to provide a wired connection in that room.
My office broadband runs at 150Mbps, and the slower 2.4GHz band provided by the RP-AX58 was able to provide a perfectly reliable speed of 120Mbps in the back office for Steam downloads and the Ookla Speed Test.
Admittedly, the RP-BE58 range extender from Asus ran slightly faster on that frequency band, hitting 135Mps, but the RP-BE58 is more expensive because of its up-to-date support for Wi-Fi 7, and 120Mbps will still be enough to handle web browsing and streaming video with no trouble.
And, as expected, the faster 5.0GHz band delivered the full 150Mbps available with our office broadband for both Ookla and Steam. Owners of newer devices that support Wi-Fi 7 might prefer a more up-to-date router or range extender that can deliver the higher performance of Wi-Fi 7, but if you just need to boost the Wi-Fi in one or two rooms around your home then the RP-AX58 will do the trick without breaking the bank.
Performance: 3/5
Should You Buy The Asus RP-AX58?
Asus RP-AX58 Scorecard
Attributes
Notes
Score
Value
It’s very much an entry-level option, but the RP-AX58 is an affordable option for dealing with Wi-Fi deadspots.
4 / 5
Design
A slimline design that plugs directly into a mains power socket and doesn’t take up too much space.
4 / 5
Features
Entry-level price means entry-level features, but the RP-AX58 does the job of boosting your home Wi-Fi.
3 / 5
Performance
Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 running at 3.0Gbps is far from breath-taking, but it should still be able to handle most online tasks with ease.
3 / 5
Final Score
It’s last-gen Wi-Fi, but still a perfectly good option for those of us that haven’t upgraded to the latest Wi-Fi 7.
3.5 / 5
Buy it if...
You’ve got a deadspot It does what it says on the tin – extending the range of your existing Wi-Fi network to reach into a room that struggles with poor Wi-Fi.
You're on a budget It’s very much a no-frills option, but the RP-AX58 is very good value for money and suitable for use with most home broadband services.
Don’t buy it if...
You’re an early adopter If you own a PC or any mobile devices that already have Wi-Fi 7, then you should probably spend a little extra for a more modern range extender.
You need 'whole home' Wi-Fi Range extenders are great for reaching just one or two rooms, but larger homes with several bedrooms may need a mesh Wi-Fi system with greater range.
Also Consider
If you're undecided about the Asus RP-AX58, I've compared its specs with two other options that might be a better fit.
Asus RP-AX58
TP-Link AXE5400
Asus RP-BE58
Price
$79.99/£64.99/AU $103.62
$139.99/£119.14
$99.99/79.99/AU$150
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6E
Wi-Fi 7
Wi-Fi Speed
3.0Gbps
5.4Gbps
3.6Gbps
Antennae
2 (internal)
4 (external)
2 (internal)
Ethernet ports
1x Gigabit Ethernet
1x Gigabit Ethernet
1x Gigabit Ethernet
Dimensions
150 x72 x 87mm
348 x 106 x 80mm
150 x 72 x 87mm
It’s one of the biggest range extenders we’ve ever seen, but the four antennae used by the AXE5400 provide tri-band Wi-Fi 6E running at a healthy 5.4Gbps.
The Wi-Fi 7 version of the RP-AX58 is a little more expensive, but also a little faster at 3.6Gbps. It also includes Wi-Fi 7 features such as MLO that further help to boost performance.
The Geekom AX8 Max is a mid-range mini PC designed for office workers using Microsoft Office and Google Docs, but also needing a machine powerful enough for some light multimedia editing. Inside is a relatively powerful AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS CPU, complemented by an integrated Radeon 780M graphics processor that enables support for up to 4 displays or a single 8K monitor.
The small size of the machine is ideal for small home offices as well as general offices, with plenty of connection options for easy integration. One of the features I always like to see on a mini PC is a VESA mount on the back, so it can be neatly tucked away, further helping to save space.
The Geekom AX8 Max is a well-specified mid-range machine, and this is reflected in its price point. The mix of a new AI-ready CPU and PCIe Gen4 SSD all comes together in a solid mini PC that will suit many different types of users, although Geekom have tried to make this mini PC a little more interesting by giving it a slightly peculiar pale blue colourway.
For most day-to-day office tasks, the AX8 Max fares exceptionally well, ploughing through large PowerPoint presentations without issue. When working with Word and Excel on dual 4K monitors, it takes the whole process in its stride. Surprisingly for a mid-range machine, it also handles Premiere Pro, editing HD and straight 4K video, as long as the edits don't get too complex and there isn't too much colour grading applied. However, as the render process builds up for more complex projects, you can start to hear the fans kick in, helping to keep everything cool and avoid any thermal throttling.
Having edited a 30-minute video, it was possible to feel that some thermal throttling was happening, as the inner workings of the machine were pushed with 4K video from the Sony A7 IV. However, considering the form factor, it fared incredibly well, and whilst the fans were audible, they were by no means the loudest I’ve come across.
In reality, mobile phone 4K and HD video is better suited for editing on this machine. While it does have the power to edit higher resolution video, the limited upgrade options when it comes to memory, with maximum internal storage only reaching 2 TB and RAM capped at 64 GB, mean even with an upgrade, it only has enough clout for base 4K video editing, with little headroom if effects do get more complex.
When it comes to storage, there is the ability to upgrade the internal capacity. However, with two USB4 ports on the back, you have instant expandability with external SSDs that will provide very decent 40 GB/s transfer rates.
Another point that lends itself towards office use is the wide range of connectivity options. There are plenty of USB-A ports across the front, but unfortunately, no USB-C. Around the back, there’s a full array of HDMI, USB-A and USB4 ports, including network LAN, meaning if you’re working in an office, it’s easy to hook this into your network as well as connect accessories.
Like many of the best mini PC machines I've tested this year, the performance all around is exceptionally good. While its Windows Experience score was like other mid-range machines, an exceptionally fast SSD and DDR5 RAM ensure most applications run quickly and smoothly, giving extremely solid performance throughout the test.
Gaming, as with multimedia editing, is well-handled, but again, the fans kick in with anything too complex. Most games play without issue, and if you're into just a bit of light gaming, even with high-end titles, this small machine will suffice.
My only other comment on this machine is the colorway, which appears to be pale blue. While this machine is exceptionally good considering its mid-range profile, that seems a bit of an odd choice.
The price of mid-range mini PCs has definitely escalated, but then again, so has the processing power. The Geekom AX8 Max certainly raises the bar when it comes to what we now expect from a machine at this price level.
The review machine I tested will set you back around $629 directly from the Geekom website and can also be purchased through most major online retailers, including Amazon.com.
Value: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Geekom AX8 Max: Specs
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS Graphics: AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU RAM: Dual‑channel DDR5, up to 64 GB Storage: M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4×4 SSD, up to 2 TB Front Ports: 4 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 3.5mm headphone, Power Rear Ports: DC Jack, HDMI 2.0, 2 x USB4, 2 x 2.5G RJ45 Connectivity: Dual 2.5G LAN, Wi‑Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2 Audio: HDA CODEC Size: approx. 135 × 132 × 46.9 mm OS Installed: Windows 11 Pro (64-bit) Accessories: VESA mount, HDMI cable, power adapter, user manual
Geekom AX8 Max: Design
Geekom mini PCs have continued to evolve, and with the AX8 Max, you can see an update in the quality of the design. The small mini PC feels exceptionally well built and robust, with a metal chassis that means it's equally at home in a static office setup, used in a van, or taken between locations as a powerful portable mini PC. As a choice for Van Life it’s also well suited offering more protection against moisture, shock and dust than most.
As I mentioned earlier in the review, while the build quality of the mini PC is exceptionally good, it is finished in a slightly peculiar colourway which will appeal to some, but for me personally is a little off-putting and doesn’t really feel very office-centric.
The size is also on the larger side for a mini PC, measuring 135 x 132 x 46.9 mm, still small, but slightly larger than what we've seen recently. Weight-wise, it's also well balanced, coming in at 800 g for the machine with an additional weight for the power adapter, meaning it's equally at home placed on the desktop or mounted onto a VESA mount and placed out of sight behind a monitor or on a dedicated wall mount.
Despite the colourway, it does have a premium finish, and this is reflected in the slightly higher mid-range pricing. This also reflects the quality of the internal components that enable this mid-range mini PC to make an impact with higher-demand applications that would have overwhelmed some older mid-range options.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Around the body, there's a good volume of ports. Across the front of the machine, there are 4 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, a 3.5 mm headphone jack and the power button. It is a bit of a shame there’s no USB Type-C on the front of any denomination. However, around the back, again, there's a good volume of ports. Alongside the DC jack for power, there are also 2 HDMI 2.0 ports, 2 USB4 ports, 2 2.5G RJ45 ports, a USB 2.0 Type-A and a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A — enabling accessories both new and old to be plugged in without much issue.
Inside the machine, there is dual-channel DDR5 5600 MT/s RAM with a maximum of 64 GB. In the review sample, it arrived with 32 GB of RAM — more than enough for day-to-day office tasks and just enough for light multimedia editing. Surprisingly, the SSD storage is a little limited: it's only possible to install an M.2 2280 PCIe Gen4×4 SSD up to 2 TB. This is quite limited for this level of machine, and I would’ve expected support for at least 4 TB. However, while the maximum capacity is limited, I think more due to heat dissipation than anything else, it is exceptionally quick and one of the fastest internal SSDs I’ve seen in recent mini PC tests.
Helping to keep everything cool is the IceBlast 2.0 cooling system, which features air outlets on both sides of the machine to help dissipate internal heat from the CPU, memory and SSD. Access to these components is made through the bottom of the machine by simply undoing the screws and lifting away the base plate. Once removed, it reveals the dual-channel RAM and SSD slot, allowing quick upgrades or replacements.
Design: 3.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Geekom AX8 Max: Features
The speed and specifications of mid-range mini PCs have recently improved with the integration of the latest AI-ready CPUs. The Ryzen 7 8745HS features eight cores, 16 threads, and has been coupled with the integrated Radeon 780M GPU, which has a good track record for performance in mini PCs.
This combination of CPU and GPU, along with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and a PCIe Gen4×4 SSD, is well-suited for anyone looking to use the machine for software beyond standard office applications, including creative programs such as Illustrator, Photoshop and Lightroom, and even photo and video editing at 1080p and light 4K.
What sets this mini PC apart from other mid-range options we’ve seen in the past is that it features the Ryzen 7 8745HS CPU, which includes AMD’s XDNA-based NPU architecture. This means it’s better able to handle lightweight AI workloads locally, such as background blur in video calls, speech transcription, and voice assistants in applications like Photoshop and Premiere Pro. It also enables faster localised AI processing.
It’s not just the CPU that has an AI boost, the integrated Radeon 780M GPU also supports AI-enhanced media. Although it doesn’t feature dedicated AI silicon, it still improves processing in enhanced video encoding and supports hardware-accelerated AV1 codec, which is useful for both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe products.
If you're looking for an AI workstation for development and thinking this mini PC might be a great option, then it’s worth noting that it's not designed for deep learning or running an LLM chatbot locally. Instead, it’s better suited for more mainstream AI use. For something more AI-tuned, it’s probably best to look at something like the Sapphire Edge AI 370.
As covered in the design section, there’s a good number of ports, including exceptional connectivity with USB4 ports on the back that offer 40 Gbps transfer and 100 W PD power. So, if you have other devices that need quick charging, that port is an option. Alongside the physical ports, there's also Bluetooth 5.2 for connecting most wireless keyboards and mice, and Wi-Fi 6E for fast internet connection speeds.
Another big feature is the ability to connect up to four 4K monitors — two through USB4 ports and two through the HDMI 2.0 ports. There's also the option to connect an 8K monitor, although you’ll only be able to use one 8K monitor at a time, rather than four 4K displays.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Features: 4 / 5
Geekom AX8 Max: Performance
Benchmark scores
CrystalDiskMark Read: 6,731.02 MB/s CrystalDiskMark Write: 6,023.3 MB/s Geekbench CPU Multi: 12,660 Geekbench CPU Single: 2,440 Geekbench GPU: 29,050 PCMark Overall: 6,741 Cinebench CPU Multi: 15,518 Cinebench CPU Single: 1,703 Fire Strike Overall: 7,346 Fire Strike Graphics: 7,965 Fire Strike Physics: 27,074 Fire Strike Combined: 2,746 Time Spy Overall: 3,162 Time Spy Graphics: 2,808 Time Spy CPU: 11,076 Wild Life Overall: 16,022 Steel Nomad Overall: 499 Windows Experience Overall: 8.2
Getting started with the Geekom AX8 Max is relatively straightforward. Once plugged in, all you need to do is run through the Windows 11 Pro setup screens, log into your Microsoft user account along with any others, and the machine is ready to go. This process now takes between five and ten minutes to complete, as Microsoft tries to encourage sign-ups to its various services.
However, once done, you don’t have to go through it again, and the speed of the internet connection from the outset, provided by the Wi-Fi 6E, helps speed things up.
During setup and plug-in, it’s worth noting that, while this mini PC is compact, the power adapter must also be considered. While not especially large, it is still a bulky addition.
Starting the tests, both Microsoft Office and Google Docs ran exceptionally smoothly. Microsoft Office applications opened quickly and ran without issue. Checking through the benchmark tests, the Windows Experience score of 8.2 is about average for mid-range mini PCs. While some may experience slight lag in more media-intensive apps like PowerPoint, the very fast SSD ensures image and large file processing is handled exceptionally quickly.
In fact, when I started looking at more advanced applications, I felt like this small machine was able to cope with a lot more than expected. That’s in part due to the speed of the internal SSD, which recorded one of the fastest transfer rates I’ve tested this year, 6,731.02 MB/s read and, more impressively, 6,023.3 MB/s write. This meant it didn’t just handle media-intensive Microsoft applications quickly, but also large image files in Photoshop and Lightroom, as well as video data within Premiere Pro.
This makes it a great option for office workers who need to create large presentations with images or video, or for those involved in multimedia creation using CapCut or Premiere Pro.
Taking processing demands up a notch I loaded a few images from the Canon EOS R5C into Photoshop, the speed was good, and it handled high-resolution image files, applying adjustment layers and effects without noticeable lag.
As I experimented with Lightroom, general use was excellent, and even batch editing was handled without issue. The only time I noticed a slowdown, compared with my desktop, was when using AI features such as Denoise or Enhance Details. While it processed the images, there was a marked difference compared to my desktop machine. In Photoshop, day-to-day work, including layers, effects and exports, was all good, but when using local smart features like Neural Filters or Smart Portrait, some slowdown was noticeable, especially with tasks requiring GPU power.
In multimedia production, starting with CapCut and footage from the iPhone 15 Pro, the machine handled the data with no issue. As templates were applied, the speed remained solid, and CapCut ran smoothly, making editing easy.
Upgrading the production using Premiere Pro, things began to slow down slightly, but the machine still handled thumbnail and timeline renders at a decent pace. It was only when I loaded in 4K video that it started to struggle, with the fans kicking in, especially during grading.
One of the main issues with Premiere Pro was that, while 1080p footage from an iPhone or DJI Action 5 edited without issue, moving to 4K footage led to stuttering during playback and increased render times, along with noticeable fan noise.
When it came to AI features such as Auto Reframe, Scene Edit Detection and Speech to Text, processing was considerably slower compared to my desktop PC.
To finish the test, I played a couple of games, Hogwarts Legacy and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle. Both were fortunately playable, but settings had to be reduced for smooth playback. Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, in particular, showed noticeable stutter, the kind you often get when the CPU and GPU are struggling with the detail.
So overall, this is definitely a machine designed for mid-range office and light multimedia work, less suited to anything beyond that, and especially not a great option if you are gaming.
Performance: 4 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
Geekom AX8 Max: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
The Geekom AX8 Max is a great option for any office looking for a slightly quirky-coloured mini PC that enables them to complete day-to-day tasks, create relatively complex presentations, and do a little light multimedia editing.
Some highlights of this mini PC include its connectivity, with two RJ45 ports at the back enabling direct network connection and offering plenty of storage expansion. I also like that it comes with two USB4 ports, allowing connection to mass external storage or ultra-fast PC accessories.
Colourway aside, the build quality is exceptionally good, and with all those ports, it offers a great office solution. I am, however, a little surprised that upgrade options are limited to just 64 GB RAM and 2TB internal storage.
If you are in the market for a slightly quirky-coloured mini PC, this offers solid performance across the board and is reasonably well priced, particularly compared with a machine like the Beelink SER9.
Should I buy the Geekom AX8 Max?
Value
Good value for money for a solid office machine that allows light multimedia editing
4
Design
Solid design with plenty of ports that enable easy connectivity — just a shame about the colour
3.5
Features
A well-balanced mid-range mini PC with a good range of features, including AI readiness
4
Performance
SSD transfer speeds are exceptionally good, giving the CPU and GPU a performance boost compared with similarly specced machines
4
Overall
A great no-fuss machine for the office that offers excellent speed for day-to-day administration and multimedia editing
4
Buy it if...
You need office desk space You want a compact PC that doesn’t take up much desk space but handles office, coding and creative workloads smoothly.
You're creating a multi‑monitor setup You need 4K/8K output, multiple displays or a hidden setup, but still want good performance in a small form factor.
Don't buy it if...
You're running heavy‑duty GPU workloads You plan extensive 3D modelling, rendering, high-end gaming or anything where a GPU is needed.
You demand maximum performance under load If your workflows involve sustained heavy multi-core or graphics tasks, thermal throttling might limit performance compared with a full-size desktop tower.
The UPerfect Delta Max stacked monitor is a great idea, essentially two monitors, one on top of the other, in a clamshell design with a full metal build that makes it easy to transport and connect. However, from the outset, it's not quite as easy as it seems, and the single USB connection only gives you limited options over how the display works. Sure enough, it is able to mirror or extend the display from your laptop, be that Mac or PC, but the additional options just aren’t as well integrated as you feel they should be, and it takes quite a bit of messing around with the options and settings both on the machine and on the monitor to get it configured exactly as you want.
This use doesn’t initially give you the option to use it as a triple monitor system, so, for example, your laptop monitor and then two additional displays, one stacked over the other. Instead, what it gives you is either a mirror of your laptop display on those two monitors or a display extension, but with the same extension being shown on both and not two different screens, as you’d normally expect with a triple monitor setup. It’s a little bit confusing, and if you want to use this with anything other than a relatively high-powered MacBook Pro or higher-end PC, then you’ll also find that you’ll need to plug in external power.
To get the actual configuration that I was expecting in this test, I ended up having to plug in external power to the USB-C port at the base of the monitor than another USB-C into the USB port, and a second HDMI cable into one of the upper clusters of ports and then into the MacBook Pro in order to get that triple-screen array that I wanted.
Then I could either configure the way the monitor displayed the content through my computer's display options, or there were a few additional configuration possibilities through the monitor’s on-screen display, although these didn’t always seem to work.
Essentially, it all works, but it does take quite a bit of figuring out. Thankfully, UPerfect has included a decent amount of cables in the box, so you're not having to search around for extras or purchase anything in addition.
In use, the monitor actually works surprisingly well, and I really do like that small footprint. However, when running several tests, I came across a number of small glitches, such as the monitor would flicker on and off, or one would suddenly go blank when loading up another bit of software. Also, if my laptop went to sleep and then reawakened, which is common, especially when I disappear for lunch, then I'd have to reset the monitor, as it seems to lose its settings.
When I ran through the usual SpyderX benchmarking test to check out the quality of the screen, it also came out pretty well. It highlighted that the screens are perfectly suited for office work; however, this won't be the best portable monitor for creative use, as the AdobeRGB percentage for the gamut was in the high 60s. Really, if you want to do anything creative, you need a monitor that at least comes in around 80% plus. However, for office work, it is a good solution once you figure it out.
UPerfect Delta Max: Price and availability
How much does it cost? From approximately $450 / £450
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Directly from UPerfect official store or Amazon
The UPerfect Delta Max Touch is widely available online at around the $450 / £450 mark depending on where you buy it. It's available directly from the UPerfect official store and online retailers such as Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.
It's worth noting that a non-touchscreen version of the Delta Max is also available, which is otherwise largely the same device with a cheaper price-tag.
Value: 3 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
UPerfect Delta Max: Specs
Ports: USB-C power, 2× USB-C, 2 × mini HDMI Audio: Stereo speakers Size: Folded footprint approx. 18.5" Resolution: 1080p (FHD) Weight: 2.36kg Accessories: 2 x USB-C cable, 2 x HDMI cable, power adapter
UPerfect Delta Max: Design
The build and design of the Delta Max is extremely well thought through, with the two large 18.5-inch panels set in a clamshell design. Essentially, the two screens fold facing each other, ensuring they're fully protected when transported. The main casing for the monitor is a good, high-quality metal, and there's a very sturdy fold-out stand that folds flat into the design. This enables you to prop it up next to your laptop nice and neatly, and because of that stacked, one-over-the-other design, it takes up a minimal footprint on your desktop.
The full metal design has obviously made this monitor a little bit heavier than some other portable monitors, but because of the quality of the workmanship, I’m not too bothered. Even with the additional weight from the high-quality design, it still comes in at 2.36 kg and has a folded size of 425 x 260 x 20 mm. When unfolded, it extends to 425 x 520 x 10 mm, so it’s actually relatively compact despite the large amount of screen space on offer.
This design also means that you can have it standing next to your laptop, or you can fold it over so the two monitors are in a tent-like position, viewable from either side. That means if you place it in the middle of your desk, people on either side will have a good view of the monitor, something that I really like, especially for presentations where a monitor or projector is not available.
On the left-hand side of the lower monitor are all the connection ports. Starting at the bottom, you have a USB-C port for power, then another USB-C and mini HDMI, which feed the display data connection to the bottom monitor, then you have another set of USB-C and mini HDMI for the top monitor.
The reason for this selection of ports becomes apparent as you start to use the monitor. It essentially enables you to use it as two separate monitors or as an extended display for whatever machine you're plugged into. It’s a little bit confusing in configuration, especially when you start to delve into the on-screen display and all the different display options.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
On the right-hand side of the monitor are the controls and on-screen display functions for the top and bottom monitors. Again, these are set out as a single button and toggle/push switch to enable you to navigate all the settings and options.
When it comes to the actual aesthetic and functional design of the physical monitor itself, it's exceptionally high and one of the best portable monitor designs I’ve come across, making it both ultra-portable and offering plenty of connectivity options.
Beyond the actual design, I also liked the fact that the company has included two very decent HDMI cables and two equally impressive USB cables, so you don't have to go searching around for your own. In the box, alongside those cables, is an AC-USB adapter to supply the monitor with power.
Design: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
UPerfect Delta Max: Features
Taking a look at some of the key features of the Delta Max Touch Stacked Monitor, and first of all, there’s the fact that it is touchscreen. On PC systems, it works as expected with any touchscreen functionality, and on Mac systems, it has limited touchscreen functionality. More often than not, as with other monitors, the touch ability on a Mac can be a bit hit and miss.
For basic use and functionality, you can get away with connecting this stacked monitor set-up with a single cable, although as I discovered through the process of this test, at least two cables, one for power, one for display, is more commonplace. And if you want that display to be properly split into two, then you will need three cables to provide two separate video feeds and additional power for reliable viewing.
The clamshell design of the monitor is really well thought out and enables a 360° foldable design. For transport, you can fold it flat so the two screens face each other and are fully protected when you’re carrying it in a bag or backpack. When you arrive at the location, simply fold it out so it stands on your desk with a minimal footprint, or you can fold it all the way over so that the screens are viewable from both sides.
The stand that's incorporated into the design is simple, but it is one of the most effective that I’ve come across. Again, because it’s really good, high-quality, it holds the monitor nicely and stably, with the base of the monitor screen sitting very close to the desktop, it’s all very neat.
On the back of the monitor, there are speakers. Compared with some other portable monitors, they’re okay, but I wouldn’t rely on them as your primary source of audio for anything other than making video calls or watching back online videos. If you are thinking of watching any modern media or you’re using these monitors for media production, then I would highly recommend plugging in an external audio source.
The design of the monitor means it can be used with both Mac and PC systems, with HDMI and USB connections, which essentially means it’ll work with pretty much any modern system from Windows, Linux, Android, and macOS. It is also fully compatible with consoles, most laptops, tablets and smartphones that are able to output to a display.
When it comes to monitor resolution, it has a max resolution of 1920 x 1080 with a refresh rate of 100Hz, so if you want to do a little bit of gaming, then it will be perfectly suitable.
Whilst this monitor has been designed to be portable, it does include a VESA mount on the back, which makes it extremely easy to mount in your home office or at your desk.
When it comes to brightness, the screen is limited to 300 cd/m², which is okay for most office locations. Setting the brightness around 50–60% should suffice for most settings.
The UPerfect Delta Max will work with both Windows and Mac systems, but its integration with both is a little bit glitchy from the outset. Through this test, I found that having external power for almost all the machines I used was essential. Otherwise, there was the potential for the monitors to flicker on and off, even when plugged into a MacBook Pro M1 Max or the Minisforum S-S1 Max, which was surprising.
The basic idea of these stacked monitors is excellent, as the design folds closed in a clamshell style, helping to protect each of the large screens. When folding out, the high-quality metal surrounds and casing not only ensure that it stays well protected in transport but also give it a solid feel and a premium look.
Unfolded, the two screens stack one on top of the other, with the bottom screen at a slight angle and the top screen on three solid hinges that can be angled perfectly for use. This area of the design and concept of the monitor is exceptionally well thought out and executed, and if you fold over the top screen, the display automatically flips to the correct orientation.
However, it’s once you start to plug the monitor in that things start to fall apart. Initially, connecting a single USB-C cable between the monitor and the MacBook Pro, both monitors flicker into life, mirroring the contents of the MacBook on the two screens. You then go into the MacBook’s display settings and change the display so that instead of mirroring, it acts as an extension. But by default, the two screens display the same extension. This would be good if you’re in a presentation or meeting and need the display mirrored, but if you’re using it as a workflow display, then really, you want those two screens to act independently.
This is where things get a little bit confusing. Using the controls on the side, you can select different options, including clone mode (which clones screen A and screen B), expansion (which should show screen A and screen B in a three-screen set-up sequence, essentially splitting the screen in two), and stand-alone, which means that each screen can act independently.
As I was testing several mini PCs, this feature, stand-alone, was exceptionally useful as I was able to have both mini PCs up and running with the display stacked, which helped with the testing process. For anyone who runs several machines at the same time, this is an especially useful feature.
However, in a normal case scenario, you want three independent screens connected to a single machine, so that one monitor shows your browser, one for whatever application you're using, and I always like to have Word or Excel open. This is what I expected through that single USB connection to the monitor. However, selecting expansion from the settings on the monitor doesn’t enable this. If you go into your computer settings, I noted that rather than showing two displays, you only get one.
It turns out that to get the screen to split as two separate monitors, as with other multi-monitor systems, you need to plug in a secondary USB-C or HDMI cable into your computer. Due to the fact that I have other devices plugged into my MacBook Pro, I opted to have USB and HDMI plugged into each of the right-hand ports, then linked out to the two ports on the left-hand side of the monitor.
The configuration of the ports is interesting, as you have mini HDMI–USB-C, mini HDMI–USB-C, and another USB. Essentially, they’re broken into pairs: the top HDMI–USB linking to the top monitor, the bottom HDMI–USB linking to the bottom monitor, and the final USB is for power.
Once you’ve worked it all out and connected the monitors, it does kind of make sense. But even then, there do seem to be a few glitches with the system. Whilst the touchscreen option enables you to extend the functionality of your Mac, even though MacBook Pros don’t have touchscreen functionality as standard, the integration isn’t 100%.
Once you do finally figure out all of your settings, the monitors do work well. However, every time I reconnected the monitors, I’d have to go through the same setup process and also remember which HDMI and which USB to plug in, which did become a little bit tiresome.
Having tested the monitors on the Mac, I then switched to a PC laptop. Again, I had similar configuration issues, this time, definitely needing external power in order to get those two monitors to work correctly. Then, when I plugged it into a mini PC, for some reason, it just seemed to confuse the monitor, as there was no main monitor connected to the host machine. It took a while to go through the display settings to sort everything out.
Through the process, I also noticed, highlighted by the Mac, that the screens had a bad description tag. It looks like, whilst they’ve done quite a lot of product design on the look and style of the monitors, when it comes to actual application of use, there are still a good volume of glitches. The volume of cables that you end up needing to get it to work reliably is far more than I would’ve expected, especially compared with many other systems, which is a real shame. Ultimately, it’s a great product and a great concept, just not applied quite as well as it should have been.
At the moment, this is one of those products that has huge potential and one that I personally would really love to see working well. But even before you delve into the screen quality options, it seems that its development hasn’t been completed.
When it comes to the monitor’s actual visual quality, it fares pretty well, with decent colour gamut, contrast, and colour uniformity, all highlighted by SpyderX2 software as being between 4.5 and 5 points. Likewise, internal response and white point also look pretty good on the results, with the only real let-down being the luminance uniformity, which comes in at 2.5. However, this gives an overall star rating of 4, which for any monitor isn’t bad at all.
When it comes to who this monitor is suitable for, it’s clearly office space work, with 89% sRGB colour gamut, 68% AdobeRGB, and 68% P3, so it’s not really that ideal for any creative use. The other point about this monitor is its clamshell design. If you do get it up and running and you’re running presentations in an office without a projector or screen, then the clamshell design, placed in the middle of the desk, is an easy way for everyone around that desk to see exactly what’s going on. For this, it works exceptionally well.
Ultimately, when it comes to performance, it can be quite time-consuming to initially configure, which is disappointing, as you would expect it to be a simple plug-and-play device, since that’s what it’s designed to do. But it just hasn’t been that well integrated.
Performance: 3 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
UPerfect Delta Max: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
I really like the idea of the UPerfect Delta Max. It seems like an ideal solution if you're travelling with your laptop and need a compact, easy-to-use monitor to expand your screen real estate. Initial impressions are superb, as the screen features a solid metal surround that gives you a high-quality, premium feel, and with its three large hinges, it all feels of superb quality.
As you fold it out and fold out that rear stand, again, it just reinforces that premium feel, and you start to think that, despite costing nearly £400 / $400, what you have here is something of real value.
Initial setup using a single USB cable into my MacBook Pro and then one of the mini PCs that I was testing duplicated the main screen’s content onto the two displays with no issue. If I were running a meeting and needed screen expansion so that other people could see what I was doing, this screen would be simple to use and straightforward. However, for me, I’d really want this screen as additional real estate when working with documents, applications and email.
This is where things started to fall apart. Whilst the screen itself is good, clear and great for administration work, it took a while to fully figure out the configuration that I needed. In the end, for pure reliability, I discovered that I really needed to plug in power into the base USB port, then connect the first set of ports into either HDMI or USB on my laptop, then connect the second set again into my laptop to split the display output equally between the two monitors. I could then configure them as needed.
The problem was that for most tasks, once set up, it was absolutely fine. However, there were constant glitches; one of the screens would suddenly black out, or suddenly duplicate the other screen’s content or the main display, and trying to reconfigure everything back to how I had it initially was just a complex process.
Having used the monitor for a couple of weeks, I did eventually find a happy medium, but still, there were one too many glitches along the way. Whilst I love the design and the concept of the stacked monitor setup, at present, it's just not reliable enough to meet its full potential.
Should I buy the UPerfect Delta Max?
Value
If the monitors worked as they should, then it would be exceptional value for money. However, the glitches make it expensive and slightly infuriating
3
Design
One of the best designs for portable monitors that I’ve seen. Well-built, robust and full of potential
4.5
Features
Whilst this is limited to full HD resolution, the suggested features do look attractive. It’s only when you start to use the monitors that you realise how limited this is
4
Performance
Unfortunately, just one too many glitches through the test affected the performance of what could have been a superb product
3
Overall
While I love the design, there’s just one too many glitches with this stacked monitor system to make it a worthwhile purchase
3
Buy it if...
You need mobile screens Ideal for professionals or students who need stacked screen space without carrying two separate monitors
You’re short on desk space Compact vertical layout gives you more viewable area without taking up a wide footprint.
Don't buy it if...
You need a colour-critical display The Delta Max is not built for professional-grade image or video colour work.
You don't want loads of cables While this is supposed to be a single cable display, in reality most use requires three.
The UPerfect Delta Max stacked monitor is a great idea, essentially two monitors, one on top of the other, in a clamshell design with a full metal build that makes it easy to transport and connect. However, from the outset, it's not quite as easy as it seems, and the single USB connection only gives you limited options over how the display works. Sure enough, it is able to mirror or extend the display from your laptop, be that Mac or PC, but the additional options just aren’t as well integrated as you feel they should be, and it takes quite a bit of messing around with the options and settings both on the machine and on the monitor to get it configured exactly as you want.
This use doesn’t initially give you the option to use it as a triple monitor system, so, for example, your laptop monitor and then two additional displays, one stacked over the other. Instead, what it gives you is either a mirror of your laptop display on those two monitors or a display extension, but with the same extension being shown on both and not two different screens, as you’d normally expect with a triple monitor setup. It’s a little bit confusing, and if you want to use this with anything other than a relatively high-powered MacBook Pro or higher-end PC, then you’ll also find that you’ll need to plug in external power.
To get the actual configuration that I was expecting in this test, I ended up having to plug in external power to the USB-C port at the base of the monitor than another USB-C into the USB port, and a second HDMI cable into one of the upper clusters of ports and then into the MacBook Pro in order to get that triple-screen array that I wanted.
Then I could either configure the way the monitor displayed the content through my computer's display options, or there were a few additional configuration possibilities through the monitor’s on-screen display, although these didn’t always seem to work.
Essentially, it all works, but it does take quite a bit of figuring out. Thankfully, UPerfect has included a decent amount of cables in the box, so you're not having to search around for extras or purchase anything in addition.
In use, the monitor actually works surprisingly well, and I really do like that small footprint. However, when running several tests, I came across a number of small glitches, such as the monitor would flicker on and off, or one would suddenly go blank when loading up another bit of software. Also, if my laptop went to sleep and then reawakened, which is common, especially when I disappear for lunch, then I'd have to reset the monitor, as it seems to lose its settings.
When I ran through the usual SpyderX benchmarking test to check out the quality of the screen, it also came out pretty well. It highlighted that the screens are perfectly suited for office work; however, this won't be the best portable monitor for creative use, as the AdobeRGB percentage for the gamut was in the high 60s. Really, if you want to do anything creative, you need a monitor that at least comes in around 80% plus. However, for office work, it is a good solution once you figure it out.
UPerfect Delta Max: Price and availability
How much does it cost? From approximately $450 / £450
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Directly from UPerfect official store or Amazon
The UPerfect Delta Max Touch is widely available online at around the $450 / £450 mark depending on where you buy it. It's available directly from the UPerfect official store and online retailers such as Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.
It's worth noting that a non-touchscreen version of the Delta Max is also available, which is otherwise largely the same device with a cheaper price-tag.
Value: 3 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
UPerfect Delta Max: Specs
Ports: USB-C power, 2× USB-C, 2 × mini HDMI Audio: Stereo speakers Size: Folded footprint approx. 18.5" Resolution: 1080p (FHD) Weight: 2.36kg Accessories: 2 x USB-C cable, 2 x HDMI cable, power adapter
UPerfect Delta Max: Design
The build and design of the Delta Max is extremely well thought through, with the two large 18.5-inch panels set in a clamshell design. Essentially, the two screens fold facing each other, ensuring they're fully protected when transported. The main casing for the monitor is a good, high-quality metal, and there's a very sturdy fold-out stand that folds flat into the design. This enables you to prop it up next to your laptop nice and neatly, and because of that stacked, one-over-the-other design, it takes up a minimal footprint on your desktop.
The full metal design has obviously made this monitor a little bit heavier than some other portable monitors, but because of the quality of the workmanship, I’m not too bothered. Even with the additional weight from the high-quality design, it still comes in at 2.36 kg and has a folded size of 425 x 260 x 20 mm. When unfolded, it extends to 425 x 520 x 10 mm, so it’s actually relatively compact despite the large amount of screen space on offer.
This design also means that you can have it standing next to your laptop, or you can fold it over so the two monitors are in a tent-like position, viewable from either side. That means if you place it in the middle of your desk, people on either side will have a good view of the monitor, something that I really like, especially for presentations where a monitor or projector is not available.
On the left-hand side of the lower monitor are all the connection ports. Starting at the bottom, you have a USB-C port for power, then another USB-C and mini HDMI, which feed the display data connection to the bottom monitor, then you have another set of USB-C and mini HDMI for the top monitor.
The reason for this selection of ports becomes apparent as you start to use the monitor. It essentially enables you to use it as two separate monitors or as an extended display for whatever machine you're plugged into. It’s a little bit confusing in configuration, especially when you start to delve into the on-screen display and all the different display options.
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
On the right-hand side of the monitor are the controls and on-screen display functions for the top and bottom monitors. Again, these are set out as a single button and toggle/push switch to enable you to navigate all the settings and options.
When it comes to the actual aesthetic and functional design of the physical monitor itself, it's exceptionally high and one of the best portable monitor designs I’ve come across, making it both ultra-portable and offering plenty of connectivity options.
Beyond the actual design, I also liked the fact that the company has included two very decent HDMI cables and two equally impressive USB cables, so you don't have to go searching around for your own. In the box, alongside those cables, is an AC-USB adapter to supply the monitor with power.
Design: 4.5 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
UPerfect Delta Max: Features
Taking a look at some of the key features of the Delta Max Touch Stacked Monitor, and first of all, there’s the fact that it is touchscreen. On PC systems, it works as expected with any touchscreen functionality, and on Mac systems, it has limited touchscreen functionality. More often than not, as with other monitors, the touch ability on a Mac can be a bit hit and miss.
For basic use and functionality, you can get away with connecting this stacked monitor set-up with a single cable, although as I discovered through the process of this test, at least two cables, one for power, one for display, is more commonplace. And if you want that display to be properly split into two, then you will need three cables to provide two separate video feeds and additional power for reliable viewing.
The clamshell design of the monitor is really well thought out and enables a 360° foldable design. For transport, you can fold it flat so the two screens face each other and are fully protected when you’re carrying it in a bag or backpack. When you arrive at the location, simply fold it out so it stands on your desk with a minimal footprint, or you can fold it all the way over so that the screens are viewable from both sides.
The stand that's incorporated into the design is simple, but it is one of the most effective that I’ve come across. Again, because it’s really good, high-quality, it holds the monitor nicely and stably, with the base of the monitor screen sitting very close to the desktop, it’s all very neat.
On the back of the monitor, there are speakers. Compared with some other portable monitors, they’re okay, but I wouldn’t rely on them as your primary source of audio for anything other than making video calls or watching back online videos. If you are thinking of watching any modern media or you’re using these monitors for media production, then I would highly recommend plugging in an external audio source.
The design of the monitor means it can be used with both Mac and PC systems, with HDMI and USB connections, which essentially means it’ll work with pretty much any modern system from Windows, Linux, Android, and macOS. It is also fully compatible with consoles, most laptops, tablets and smartphones that are able to output to a display.
When it comes to monitor resolution, it has a max resolution of 1920 x 1080 with a refresh rate of 100Hz, so if you want to do a little bit of gaming, then it will be perfectly suitable.
Whilst this monitor has been designed to be portable, it does include a VESA mount on the back, which makes it extremely easy to mount in your home office or at your desk.
When it comes to brightness, the screen is limited to 300 cd/m², which is okay for most office locations. Setting the brightness around 50–60% should suffice for most settings.
The UPerfect Delta Max will work with both Windows and Mac systems, but its integration with both is a little bit glitchy from the outset. Through this test, I found that having external power for almost all the machines I used was essential. Otherwise, there was the potential for the monitors to flicker on and off, even when plugged into a MacBook Pro M1 Max or the Minisforum S-S1 Max, which was surprising.
The basic idea of these stacked monitors is excellent, as the design folds closed in a clamshell style, helping to protect each of the large screens. When folding out, the high-quality metal surrounds and casing not only ensure that it stays well protected in transport but also give it a solid feel and a premium look.
Unfolded, the two screens stack one on top of the other, with the bottom screen at a slight angle and the top screen on three solid hinges that can be angled perfectly for use. This area of the design and concept of the monitor is exceptionally well thought out and executed, and if you fold over the top screen, the display automatically flips to the correct orientation.
However, it’s once you start to plug the monitor in that things start to fall apart. Initially, connecting a single USB-C cable between the monitor and the MacBook Pro, both monitors flicker into life, mirroring the contents of the MacBook on the two screens. You then go into the MacBook’s display settings and change the display so that instead of mirroring, it acts as an extension. But by default, the two screens display the same extension. This would be good if you’re in a presentation or meeting and need the display mirrored, but if you’re using it as a workflow display, then really, you want those two screens to act independently.
This is where things get a little bit confusing. Using the controls on the side, you can select different options, including clone mode (which clones screen A and screen B), expansion (which should show screen A and screen B in a three-screen set-up sequence, essentially splitting the screen in two), and stand-alone, which means that each screen can act independently.
As I was testing several mini PCs, this feature, stand-alone, was exceptionally useful as I was able to have both mini PCs up and running with the display stacked, which helped with the testing process. For anyone who runs several machines at the same time, this is an especially useful feature.
However, in a normal case scenario, you want three independent screens connected to a single machine, so that one monitor shows your browser, one for whatever application you're using, and I always like to have Word or Excel open. This is what I expected through that single USB connection to the monitor. However, selecting expansion from the settings on the monitor doesn’t enable this. If you go into your computer settings, I noted that rather than showing two displays, you only get one.
It turns out that to get the screen to split as two separate monitors, as with other multi-monitor systems, you need to plug in a secondary USB-C or HDMI cable into your computer. Due to the fact that I have other devices plugged into my MacBook Pro, I opted to have USB and HDMI plugged into each of the right-hand ports, then linked out to the two ports on the left-hand side of the monitor.
The configuration of the ports is interesting, as you have mini HDMI–USB-C, mini HDMI–USB-C, and another USB. Essentially, they’re broken into pairs: the top HDMI–USB linking to the top monitor, the bottom HDMI–USB linking to the bottom monitor, and the final USB is for power.
Once you’ve worked it all out and connected the monitors, it does kind of make sense. But even then, there do seem to be a few glitches with the system. Whilst the touchscreen option enables you to extend the functionality of your Mac, even though MacBook Pros don’t have touchscreen functionality as standard, the integration isn’t 100%.
Once you do finally figure out all of your settings, the monitors do work well. However, every time I reconnected the monitors, I’d have to go through the same setup process and also remember which HDMI and which USB to plug in, which did become a little bit tiresome.
Having tested the monitors on the Mac, I then switched to a PC laptop. Again, I had similar configuration issues, this time, definitely needing external power in order to get those two monitors to work correctly. Then, when I plugged it into a mini PC, for some reason, it just seemed to confuse the monitor, as there was no main monitor connected to the host machine. It took a while to go through the display settings to sort everything out.
Through the process, I also noticed, highlighted by the Mac, that the screens had a bad description tag. It looks like, whilst they’ve done quite a lot of product design on the look and style of the monitors, when it comes to actual application of use, there are still a good volume of glitches. The volume of cables that you end up needing to get it to work reliably is far more than I would’ve expected, especially compared with many other systems, which is a real shame. Ultimately, it’s a great product and a great concept, just not applied quite as well as it should have been.
At the moment, this is one of those products that has huge potential and one that I personally would really love to see working well. But even before you delve into the screen quality options, it seems that its development hasn’t been completed.
When it comes to the monitor’s actual visual quality, it fares pretty well, with decent colour gamut, contrast, and colour uniformity, all highlighted by SpyderX2 software as being between 4.5 and 5 points. Likewise, internal response and white point also look pretty good on the results, with the only real let-down being the luminance uniformity, which comes in at 2.5. However, this gives an overall star rating of 4, which for any monitor isn’t bad at all.
When it comes to who this monitor is suitable for, it’s clearly office space work, with 89% sRGB colour gamut, 68% AdobeRGB, and 68% P3, so it’s not really that ideal for any creative use. The other point about this monitor is its clamshell design. If you do get it up and running and you’re running presentations in an office without a projector or screen, then the clamshell design, placed in the middle of the desk, is an easy way for everyone around that desk to see exactly what’s going on. For this, it works exceptionally well.
Ultimately, when it comes to performance, it can be quite time-consuming to initially configure, which is disappointing, as you would expect it to be a simple plug-and-play device, since that’s what it’s designed to do. But it just hasn’t been that well integrated.
Performance: 3 / 5
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
UPerfect Delta Max: Final verdict
(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)
I really like the idea of the UPerfect Delta Max. It seems like an ideal solution if you're travelling with your laptop and need a compact, easy-to-use monitor to expand your screen real estate. Initial impressions are superb, as the screen features a solid metal surround that gives you a high-quality, premium feel, and with its three large hinges, it all feels of superb quality.
As you fold it out and fold out that rear stand, again, it just reinforces that premium feel, and you start to think that, despite costing nearly £400 / $400, what you have here is something of real value.
Initial setup using a single USB cable into my MacBook Pro and then one of the mini PCs that I was testing duplicated the main screen’s content onto the two displays with no issue. If I were running a meeting and needed screen expansion so that other people could see what I was doing, this screen would be simple to use and straightforward. However, for me, I’d really want this screen as additional real estate when working with documents, applications and email.
This is where things started to fall apart. Whilst the screen itself is good, clear and great for administration work, it took a while to fully figure out the configuration that I needed. In the end, for pure reliability, I discovered that I really needed to plug in power into the base USB port, then connect the first set of ports into either HDMI or USB on my laptop, then connect the second set again into my laptop to split the display output equally between the two monitors. I could then configure them as needed.
The problem was that for most tasks, once set up, it was absolutely fine. However, there were constant glitches; one of the screens would suddenly black out, or suddenly duplicate the other screen’s content or the main display, and trying to reconfigure everything back to how I had it initially was just a complex process.
Having used the monitor for a couple of weeks, I did eventually find a happy medium, but still, there were one too many glitches along the way. Whilst I love the design and the concept of the stacked monitor setup, at present, it's just not reliable enough to meet its full potential.
Should I buy the UPerfect Delta Max?
Value
If the monitors worked as they should, then it would be exceptional value for money. However, the glitches make it expensive and slightly infuriating
3
Design
One of the best designs for portable monitors that I’ve seen. Well-built, robust and full of potential
4.5
Features
Whilst this is limited to full HD resolution, the suggested features do look attractive. It’s only when you start to use the monitors that you realise how limited this is
4
Performance
Unfortunately, just one too many glitches through the test affected the performance of what could have been a superb product
3
Overall
While I love the design, there’s just one too many glitches with this stacked monitor system to make it a worthwhile purchase
3
Buy it if...
You need mobile screens Ideal for professionals or students who need stacked screen space without carrying two separate monitors
You’re short on desk space Compact vertical layout gives you more viewable area without taking up a wide footprint.
Don't buy it if...
You need a colour-critical display The Delta Max is not built for professional-grade image or video colour work.
You don't want loads of cables While this is supposed to be a single cable display, in reality most use requires three.
