Organizer
Gadget news
Sony’s 50-150mm F2 telephoto zoom lens is so good, I’m tempted to switch to Sony
4:00 pm | May 29, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Lenses Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: two-minute review

Sony's lens department is on a roll. Its superb FE 85mm F1.4 GM II bagged our 2024 lens of the year award; the recent FE 28-70mm F2 GM picked up a five-star rating; and now we have the FE 50-150mm F2 GM, which is the world's first telephoto zoom with consistent f/2 maximum aperture – and it's another stunning flagship optic.

When I was first presented with the 50-150mm lens in April, I wasn't convinced by its unique focal length. Especially when you consider the 28-70mm F2 GM, plus a string of other pro 70-200mm lenses from down the years, which includes the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.

However, following extended use, I'm convinced the 50-150mm is probably the single most versatile lens for the type of photography I often do – events, grass-roots sports, weddings, candids – and it's easily one of the best Sony lenses ever.

The 50-150mm lens is part of Sony's professional G Master (GM) range, which means handling, durability, autofocus performance and optical quality are all top-drawer. Add its bag-of-primes-in-one-lens credentials, and the result is an eye-watering list price.

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM lens attached to a Sony A9 III, in the hand

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

The real kicker, though, is the 50-150mm's heft – it weighs a wrist-tugging 1,340g. It was fine over the course of a soccer match, but all day at a wedding would be a proper workout. It's chunky, too, measuring 102.8 x 200mm – that's a particularly big diameter that will stretch the compartments of a regular camera bag.

Having what is effectively several fast aperture primes in one versatile optic makes sense for a certain type of user. It's the telephoto zoom flexibility and bright maximum f/2 aperture at any focal length that make the 50-150mm the goat for events photography, where speed, low-light performance, rapid autofocus, pin-sharp detail, shallow depth of field and buttery bokeh are needs, not wants. The 50-150mm ranks highly across the board.

Before the 50-150mm lens was announced, my go-to lens combination for events was a 24-70mm f/2.8 and a 135mm f/1.8. However, having put Sony's impressive telephoto zoom through its paces, I'm now reconsidering this setup – and even the camera system I've spent years building up. I can't think of any higher praise for a lens.

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: specs

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM specs

Type:

Standard to telephoto zoom

Mount:

Sony E-mount

Sensor:

Full-frame

Focal length:

50-150mm

Max aperture:

f/2

Minimum focus:

0.4(W)-0.74(T) m / 1.32(W)-2.43(T) ft

Filter size:

95mm

Dimensions:

102.8 x 200mm (4-1/8 x 7-7/8 in)

Weight:

47.3oz / 1,340g (excluding tripod mount)

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: price and availability

  • $3,899 / £3,799 / AU$6,799
  • Available for pre-order

Beyond its size and weight, if there's one thing that the FE 50-150mm F2 GM lens has going against it, it's the list price – which at the best part of $4,000 / £4,000 / AU$7,000, is eye-watering.

To put that into context, you could pick up both Sony's 24-70mm F2.8 and 135mm F1.8 G Master lenses and have change left over – or, for a little extra, the 24-70mm with Sony's 70-200mm F2.8 GM II.

Put simply, you have to really need the maximum f/2 aperture over f/2.8 to justify the extra outlay, and to put up with that extra weight. I'll get onto the benefits of the brighter aperture later in the reivew.

Naturally, the 50-150mm lens is billed as an ideal pairing with the 28-70mm F2 to cover a huge range of scenarios that would otherwise require an army of primes. I actually think the 50-150mm is the more compelling of the two f/2 lenses.

I'd happily pick up the 50-150mm and a wide prime such as the (cheaper) 24mm F1.4GM instead of the 28-70mm to cover the times when the telephoto zoom isn't wide enough – I'm not sure 28mm is wide enough for me.

Sony announced the 50-150mm lens in April, and at the time of writing it's available for pre-order, with the anticipated sales start date some time in June, 2025.

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: Design

  • Big and heavy
  • Robust, weather-sealed build
  • Internal zoom and focusing

The bigger the maximum aperture, the bigger the lens, so it should come as no surprise that the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM is a substantial optic – a cumbersome 47.3oz / 1,340g, excluding the tripod mount.

For context, Sony's second-generation 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II lens weighs 36.9oz / 1,045g – that's 20-25% lighter. The pair are identical in length, measuring 200mm, but the diameter of the 50-150mm lens is wider at 102.8mm.

Such is the diameter of the lens, I found it struggled to fit into the padded dividers of numerous camera bags, requiring a reconfiguration of the dividers in most instances. Naturally, the 50-150mm lens' filter thread is bigger than most, too, accepting pricey 95mm lens filters.

Paired with the a7R V, I felt the combination was a little front-heavy and wished for Sony's vertical grip, which would make for a more comfortable setup. Without the grip, I happily photographed a soccer match, while supporting the lens with my second hand.

I would hesitate using the lens for weddings, but the action on such days can be in bursts, so weight might not be an issue. For lengthier, sustained shoots, the 50-150mm isn't too far off the size and weight of pro lenses benefiting from a monopod support.

The handling of the lens is otherwise superb – every G Master lens I've tested is. Here, in the same mould of the FE 28-70mm F2 GM, you get a full complement of controls; rings for focus, zoom and aperture; plus customizable focus hold buttons, AF/MF, iris (aperture) lock and full time DMF switches – the latter lets you manually override autofocus.

However, optical stabilization is absent, which I find a little surprising. More on this later.

Aperture can be changed on the lens through smooth or clicked adjustments. In general, photographers opt for the tactile clicked feedback, while videographers prefer the smooth movement through f-stops, for whom the ridged ring will be compatible with follow-focus systems.

Zoom is internal, which means the lens barrel remains the same length whatever the focal length. That's one less point of potential weakness in this a fully weather-sealed lens built to withstand the rigors of professional use and inclement weather.

Put simply, no corners have been cut here – this is a top-quality lens. I'd just advise getting hands-on before you buy to check that its size and weight work for you.

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: Performance

  • Fast f/2 maximum aperture at every focal length
  • Strong center sharpness across the zoom range
  • Four XD linear motors for rapid, accurate autofocus

In many respects, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM lens is a copy and paste of the superlative FE 28-70mm F2 GM – it's also equipped with four XD linear motors that drive autofocus. Together, these motors make light work of the sizable lens elements, for a truly rapid, reliable and remarkably quiet autofocus.

Autofocus speed and accuracy are paramount for high-pressure events and sports photography, and I've been consistently impressed by the 50-150mm. This is especially the case with the a7R V's subject-tracking capabilities – when shooting grass-roots soccer, in particular. There isn't the slightest hint of hesitation.

As mentioned, what's missing is optical stabilization (OIS). However, Sony's flagship mirrorless cameras, which are the natural choice for such a lens, are equipped with in-body image stabilization (IBIS). Armed with IBIS and the bright maximum f/2 aperture, I haven't given OIS a second thought.

Like the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM, the FE 50-150mm F2 GM delivers incredible image quality across the board. And of the two, it's the telephoto option that enhances the maximum f/2 aperture with smooth focus fall-off and buttery-smooth bokeh, even if its shaping can be cat's eye.

The series of the same image, above, is shot in sequence with the aperture set to f/2, f/2.8. f/4 and f5.6. Bokeh at f/2 is notably bigger and smoother than f/2.8 – that's one of the reasons to splash out on a bright aperture lens.

A difference of one stop between f/2 and f/2.8 lenses might not sound like much, but bokeh is much bigger at f/2, and you're gathering an extra stop of light that's supremely useful in low light – as is often the case in professional work.

The 50-150mm's qualities aren't all about bokeh, either – the lens is consistently sharp from center to edges across the zoom range and aperture settings, besides the natural focus fall off when shooting at wider apertures with shallow depth of field.

Having shot all pictures during my test in RAW and JPEG, I further assessed quality through Adobe Camera Raw by directly comparing like-for-like files, keen to know the extent of in-camera correction at play.

Minor pin-cushion distortion across the entire zoom range surprised me – I'd normally expect it just at the telephoto end of this zoom range, not at 50mm. JPEGs are notably sharper than in RAW, too. Still, neither pin-cushion distortion nor relative lens softness are an issue – corrected RAW images are spectacular.

As for vignetting and color fringing, both are kept under tight control, as are ghosting and flare artifacts when shooting into direct sunlight. Optically, the 50-150mm F2 GM is pretty much flawless, save for easily corrected pin-cushion distortion.

When pairing the lens with a high-resolution full-frame sensor, like I did with the 61MP Sony a7R V, there's no trouble cropping in on stills to effectively further extend reach. I shot a solid set of soccer images, capturing players across the pitch largely from one position on the touchline with the 50-150mm lens.

And it's this cropping flexibility that has convinced me the 50-150mm's wider focal length is much more versatile than 70-200mm.

Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM: sample images

Should you buy the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM?

Buy it if...

You shoot events photography

For weddings and other events, the 50-150mm F2 offers a versatile zoom range and maximum aperture combination. Depending on the assignment, it could be the only lens you need.

You want top quality performance

Packing prime lens quality and bright aperture versatility, together with snappy autofocus, the 50-150mm doesn't skip a beat.

You need a robust lens

Heavy and big it may be, but the 50-150mm is a superbly built lens that will withstand the rigors of demanding professional use.

Don't buy it if...

You know your focal length

Designed to do the job of several primes, the 50-150mm is overkill for users who usually stick to a specific focal length. If this is you, you'll find a cheaper and smaller alternative prime.

You want a lightweight zoom

If the maximum f/2 aperture is overkill for your work, Sony also offers f/2.8 and f/4 zooms that are both smaller and much cheaper.

How I tested the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM

  • I had the lens and the Sony a7R V camera for a three-week loan
  • I've shot portraits, sports and more
  • I've also taken multiple series of identical images with the lens at different settings

I had a decent length of time with the Sony FE 50-150mm F2 GM lens – almost a month, during which time I was able to test it in multiple scenarios, including sports and for portraits.

Sony loaned me the a7R V to pair the lens with. With the camera's 61MP sensor and superb autofocus, the lens has felt even more versatile – giving greater scope for cropping into images such as distant players in football (soccer) match.

To really show the benefit of the f/2 aperture, I have made sure to use it regularly, and to take like-for-like images at different apertures to compare handling and quality.

  • First reviewed May 2025
I used the AI PeckPerk bird camera for the first time, and I was amazed by how many different species are visiting my garden
6:08 pm | May 28, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera: one-minute review

If you're interested in installing one of the best bird feeder cameras in your garden but don't quite know where to start, the PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera is a great option.

It's not only one of the more affordable options (on sale for $119 / £85 at the time of writing), it also offers superb 2K image quality, live broadcasting, a night vision camera, playback features, a built-in feeder compartment, and a unique perch, plus the option for smart AI bird detection of over 10,000 species if you subscribe to PeckPerk's VIP package.

I hadn't used a bird camera before getting my hands on the PeckPerk, and I was pleasantly surprised by how easy this camera was to set up and operate in just a few minutes. The camera arrived pre-charged and ready to go right out of the box; I just needed to add some bird seed, download the free PeckPerk app to my phone, and connect the camera to Wi-Fi.

The PeckPerk comes with a separate optional solar panel, which makes it easy to keep the camera charged up 24/7 without needing to move it indoors. The package also includes an array of assembly tools, including brackets and screws, offering plenty of options for installing the camera. I initially opted for the belt strap tied around a tree, which I highly recommend starting with if you plan on moving the camera around to test multiple spots in your garden or outdoor space.

PeckPerk bird camera review

The PeckPerk camera and connected solar panel (Image credit: Beth Nicholls)

It might take a day or two for local birds to find and adjust to your new feeder camera, but once they do, you can sit back and enjoy the different bird species visiting your space and interacting with the camera – and if you subscribe to PeckPerk's VIP features, the app will identify bird species for you. I had no idea that there were so many blue tits in my local area in south-west England, but other frequent visitors caught on the camera included crows, seagulls, pigeons, cats, and even a few foxes at night.

Top tip: set up your bird feeder camera opposite a bird bath if you want to capture the most interaction – I found that birds loved to bathe later in the evening as the sun set.

I didn't have the highest of hopes that I'd get much activity with the PeckPerk bird feeder camera at first, considering that my dog tends to scare off most of the local wildlife, and the sheer size of the feeder stood out like a sore thumb against our smaller tree. But I was pleasantly surprised, and I thoroughly enjoyed my time testing out this camera and spotting all of the different bird species.

The sensors on the PeckPerk are excellent at detecting movement, the setup process is quick and easy, the app offers everything you could need, and it has superb battery life thanks to the included solar panel.

PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera: price and availability

  • US$319 / £247 / AU$505
  • VIP subscription plan US$36.99 / £29 per year or US$3.99 / £4 per month

The PeckPerk has a pretty high list price of $319 / £247 / AU$505. However, at the time of writing, it perches at the more affordable end of the scale, having been reduced to just $109 / £85 / AU$173 at PeckPerk's website.

That discount suggests that PeckPerk feels it's overpriced this camera, and my opinion it's very much worth the current asking price – though I'd be reluctant to spend anything over $200 on it, unless the camera quality could be boosted to 4K or higher. There's nothing much wrong with the image quality of the PeckPerk, but there's certainly room for improvement to match its high full asking price.

Compared to more premium yet similarly styled options like the Birdfy Feeder 2 Duo ($419.99 / £379.99 / AU$665), the PeckPerk does offer a lot for your money, considering that the Birdfy Feeder is only capable of Full HD resolution, whereas the PeckPerk has a generous UHD 2K output. For a more affordable option than both of these models, check out our review of the FeatherSnap Scout bird feeder camera which costs $179.99 / £159.99 (and the design is great, too).

PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera: specs

PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera specs

Camera

Built-in

Video output

2K UHD live stream

Field of view

165 degrees

Memory

MicroSD (not included)

Sensor

Detection proprietary

Microphone

Yes + audio

Battery

5200mAh (USB-C rechargeable)

Weather resistance

IP65

Operating temp

(-20.5C to 48.5C)

Seed capacity

1.6qt / 1.8 liters

Dimensions

25.3 x 16 x 19.2cm

Weight

1.45lbs / 660g (Unfilled)

PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera: design

  • Bird-friendly IP65 weatherproof design
  • Multiple install options supplied
  • Made from Recycled Plastics (BPA Free)

The PeckPerk stands out compared to more traditional-style bird cameras thanks to its large and slightly odd acorn-like design, which is necessitated by the camera's size and the large-capacity seed tray surrounding it. You can get the PeckPerk in a beige color, which is the variant that I was sent and which blended in nicely with the bark of our tree, or a more vibrant orange hue, which I'm less of a fan of).

The nature-inspired design of the PekPerk makes it appealing to birds, and it's easy to remove from the mount and clean, too. It's made from recycled plastics and food-grade ABS materials, along with UV-resistant, anti-oxidation materials intended for lasting protection.

Design and aesthetic aside, the PeckPerk is built to be robust and sturdy, with its IP65 rating ensuring that it'll survive outdoors all year round. It arrives fully assembled, minus the perch and solar panel, which are great-quality optional accessories that you can choose to attach or leave out.

I think the perch is a really nice touch that encourages birds to visit the PeckPerk, and the solar panel works wonderfully (at least in the spring season in the UK) to keep the camera fully charged without the need to bring it indoors to charge via the USB-C port every so often.

The fiddliest part of setting the bird feeder camera up was keeping it in place while strapping it securely to our tree, but this installation option is the best method for getting started with the PeckPerk, as you might decide that you want to change its location at a later time while getting to grips with using it, and this way you can avoid having to unscrew it each time.

PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera: performance

  • 2K Infrared night vision or color night vision
  • Two-way communication and live broadcast
  • Free 7-day looped cloud recording included

The PeckPerk bird feeder is a lot fun to use, and I was impressed by its performance. The unit comprises a single camera with an ultra-wide 165-degree field of view, and makes use of proprietary motion sensors to detect when a bird is visiting.

You can adjust the sensitivity of the motion detectors via the free PeckPerk app, and I found that it worked extremely well at detecting any movement in the garden from several meters away. The Playback feature is excellent, and will instantly record 10-second clips whenever motion is detected to ensure you never miss a moment.

You can view all of the playback events from the day and up to seven days prior via the app, and download or save any video captures to your phone or the in-app album as you please. The best part is that all of this is accessible for free, and not hidden behind a subscription fee or paywall, as you might find with other bird cameras on the market.

PeckPerk gave me a free trial code to test out the AI services it offers through its VIP subscription plan, but this really didn't hit the mark for me. On several occasions the AI would state that no birds were detected when there was very clearly a bird in the frame, and I would often get notifications that a squirrel was visiting the feeder, but there was nothing to be seen, and no evidence on playback either. I think the PeckPerk bird camera performs just as well on its own, and you really aren't missing anything by not upgrading to the VIP subscription.

I also found it just as easy and sometimes more accurate to use Google's Circle to Search feature on my Samsung phone to identify birds, and after a few weeks of use the only bird that PeckPerk's AI managed to detect and register in the app was a common pigeon.

While the AI might need some work, the overall performance of the PeckPerk has been wonderful, and it's a breeze to use. I started off by setting the PeckPerk up in my garden, but, as I suspected, no birds arrived after five days of me patiently waiting, adding more seed, and regularly checking the app (this is not fault of the PeckPerk, I should add).

I then moved the camera to my mother-in-law's house a few doors down, where we set the camera up opposite her bird bath. This worked an absolute treat, and within a few hours we were getting blue tits, magpies and blackbirds drinking from the fountain and hesitantly approaching the feeder.

The camera's real-time observation via live streaming through the app is easy to access, making it suitable for users young or old who might not be especially tech savvy. There were a few occasions where it would take a minute or longer for my phone to connect to PeckPerk's live feed, but given that it relies on a stable 2.4GHz network connection, this could be down to poor Wi-Fi coverage where the camera was placed, and not necessarily an issue with the device.

If you tend to get a lot of wildlife wandering through your garden at night you'll definitely appreciate the PeckPerk's infrared night vision and color night vision options. The camera's playback feature is activated 24/7, so you can check on any nighttime visitors you may have had the next morning – I spotted a few foxes and cats dropping by during the night.

The PeckPerk is equipped with a mic and two-way audio, so you can not only hear the chirps of birds but you can talk through the camera should you wish (though I never found a use for this). There's also an alarm feature via the app which allows the camera to blast a sound scaring away any unwanted guests, animal or otherwise.

I'll finish off by saying that the camera quality of the PeckPerk is more than enough for spotting and detecting birds, though it could definitely be better (especially for the price). This is the first bird feeder camera that I've used, and I have no complaints about its 2K camera quality, other than that the playback feature can sometimes be a bit blink-and-you-miss-it, and I'd like the option to record for longer or watch the footage back at a slower speed.

Should you buy the PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera?

Buy it if...

You want to spy on your backyard wildlife
Bird feeder cameras are an affordable option for getting a close-up view of the wildlife around you, and could technically double as a deterrent to put off potential intruders.

You want a gift for a budding bird watcher
The PeckPerk is relatively affordable (when on sale) and would make an excellent gift for anyone interested in bird spotting. The app is very user-friendly and suitable for all.

You want a bird feeder camera that you can leave outdoors
The PeckPerk is weatherproof and comes with a separate solar panel, which can be positioned close to the camera to maintain stable charging in warmer months. View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for 4K quality
The PeckPerk is great for bird watching, but it won't win you any prizes for wildlife photography. The quality isn't up to par with a smartphone, but it's fine for fun.

You want reliable AI bird detection
The PeckPerk has an optional VIP package for detecting thousands of bird species with AI, but I found that it's not quite up to scratch yet.

You want a budget bird feeder camera
While the PeckPerk is excellent value for money at its current price (see the price section above), it's not the most budget-friendly when retailing at full price.

How I tested the PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera

  • I set it up in multiple areas across two different gardens
  • I monitored the feed via the app during both the day and night
  • I tested the paid VIP upgrade subscription

I attached the PeckPerk Smart Bird Feeder camera to a tree in my garden to begin with, and it performed just fine, although very few birds made an appearance. After I moved to a more discrete location near a bird bath I saw much more activity, bird and otherwise, which the camera had no issues detecting.

I tested the PeckPerk in the UK during the warmer spring months of April and May, and it withstood several rain showers, though I'd be interested to see how this camera holds up in the colder months when more birds and animals are seeking warmth and shelter.

I used the paid VIP PeckPerk upgrade to test the full capabilities of AI bird detection and registering of species in the app's database.

I used the Hollyland Lark M2S Combo mic kit to record audio content – and I can’t believe how tiny it is
2:00 pm | May 26, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Accessories Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Hollyland Lark M2S Combo: two-minute review

Understatement isn’t a common characteristic among content creators, but it’s a winning feature for this wireless mic kit. With two tiny receivers weighing just 7g apiece, the Hollyland Lark M2S is designed to fly under the radar. Hooked over your collar, only a small part of each pick-up is visible. The result is an audio solution that doesn’t distract your audience.

It’s also a versatile one. Available in several variations, the Hollyland Lark M2S Combo kit on test here includes two transmitters, a USB-C mobile receiver and a cold-shoe unit that connects to cameras via USB-C or 3.5mm. There’s also a Lightning cable in the box for connecting to legacy Apple devices. That makes it a pretty complete kit, whatever you choose to shoot with.

Each transmitter is held in place by a rubberized clip, with grips at the tips for extra security. Many of the best wireless mics used magnetic backs to give you more flexibility when positioning. In practise, most users will want the mic on their lapel anyway – and even with the hook on show, the M2S is as subtle as they come.

Despite their discreet size, the omnidirectional pick-ups do a better job than any built-in mic, whether you’re shooting with a smartphone or one of the best video cameras. How the 24-bit audio signal is processed depends on the pre-amp inside your recording device, but voice clips are generally clear and rich enough for the casual listener.

Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Blustery conditions can be an issue. The bundled windshields do a good job of buffering against buffeting, though attaching them raises the profile of the mics. You also have the option of enabling noise reduction. This tends to flatten and crisp up the sound slightly, but it’s an effective solution where background noise would otherwise be too intrusive.

Noise cancellation can be activated by pressing the single button found on each transmitter, the button on the USB-C receiver or the dial on the camera receiver. The latter is also used to adjust the output volume, while a long-press switches between mono and stereo recording. That makes the interface sound more complicated than it is. There is a slight learning curve, but once you’ve got your head around the meaning of each indicator light, it’s intuitive enough.

Battery life is far from featherweight, with each transmitter rated for up to nine hours on a single charge. Returning them to the charging case yields a further 18, giving the whole package some serious longevity. Together with its neat proportions, that makes it an attractive solution for creators who need to shoot on the go – even though the case itself feels quite plasticky and the components are prone to rattling inside.

Other wireless mics feel more premium, while the DJI Mic Mini uses a neater single receiver. But if you want a compact and cost-effective way to upgrade your audio quality, the Hollyland Lark M2S Combo kit offers solid value.

Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Hollyland Lark M2S Combo: price and release date

  • $149 / £140 / AU$269 for the Combo kit
  • Includes 2x mics, 2x receivers, Lightning cable and charging case
  • Several kit versions available for different devices

Launched in January 2025 as a follow-up to the Lark M2, the Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic is available to buy now in one of several bundle variations. On test here is the Combo kit ($149 / £140 / AU$269), which includes the following:

  • Transmitters x2
  • Receiver (camera)
  • Receiver (USB-C)
  • Charging case
  • Windshields x2
  • 3.5mm cable
  • USB-C to Lightning cable
  • USB-A to USB-C cable

The Combo kit is designed to give content creators the flexibility to work with both smartphones and cameras. The Lightning cable allows you to connect the camera receiver to older Apple devices. The Combo kit offers good value for what’s included, but other options will be better suited to specific creator requirements.

The cheapest Hollyland Lark M2S option is the barebones USB-C kit ($119 / £110 / AU$219). This includes two transmitters and a USB-C receiver for use with a smartphone. With no option to connect to a camera, it’s the best choice for mobile-only recording.

The next step up is the Mini Combo ($139 / £130 / AU$249), which is the same as the Combo kit, except it doesn’t include a Lightning adapter cable. It’s the best choice if you want the flexibility to connect to a camera and USB-C smartphone.

Top of the pile is the Ultimate Combo ($159 / £150 / AU$289). In addition to the USB-C and camera receivers, this adds a dedicated Lightning receiver to the mix. Given that the Combo kit includes a Lightning cable, there are few people for who this will be a necessity. Unless you absolutely need a physical Lightning receiver, this version is best seen as a legacy option.

Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Hollyland Lark M2S Combo: specs

Dimensions

24 × 9mm (transmitter), 40 × 16.7 × 9mm (mobile receiver), 40.5 × 25.5 × 13mm (camera receiver), 86 × 39 × 60.5mm (case)

Weight

7g (transmitter), 6g (mobile receiver), 12g (camera receiver), 110g (case)

Range

300m

Connectivity

USB-C, Lightning, 3.5mm

Battery

9 hours, plus 18 hours from the charging case

Audio

24-bit

On-board recording

No

Noise cancelling

Yes

Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Hollyland Lark M2S Combo: Design

  • Lightweight transmitters with built-in rubber clips
  • USB-C receiver with two indicator lights
  • Camera receiver with indicator lights and control dial

Dinky is the order of the day with the Lark M2S. From the tiny transmitters (7g each) to the compact camera receiver (12g), everything in the bundle is ultra-light. The components weigh less than almost every other kit in our list of the best wireless mics, including the DJI Mic Mini and the Rode Wireless Micro.

Despite being housed in plastic, the transmitters and receivers feel well-built and sturdy enough for long-term use. The little orange buttons on each device give satisfying feedback, as does the click-scroll of the control dial on the cold-shoe adapter. It’s only the charging case that lets the side down: the hinge for the lid creaks and moves, while the parts rattle around while charging inside.

Still, for a low-weight, low-cost kit, the Lark M2S feels like it’s been assembled with thought. Effort has certainly gone into the design of the transmitters. Most wireless mic kits have rectangular units held in place by a magnetic back. This gives you versatility when mounting, but means the pick-up is quite visible in video footage.

Hollyland has taken a different approach with the Lark M2S. The transmitters are attached by a U-shaped hook with a titanium arm inside. This clips over a collar, with rubber ridges on either side for extra grip. It’s a foolproof solution: it has enough flexibility to fit over different fabrics, with sufficient resistance to hold firm. No magnets means one less piece to lose – and most users will place the mic on a hem anyway.

The added benefit is that the larger side of the transmitter unit is hidden beneath your clothing. Only part of the arm and the smaller puck sits on the outside. The result is a very subtle setup. With mini dimensions and no branding, the mic could easily go unnoticed in interview footage. It’s a lot less distracting than larger alternatives.

That design does mean the button and indicator light on the transmitter are hard to access when you’re wearing it, particularly as the little LED is obscured beneath the hook arm. Helpfully, there are corresponding lights on the receiver units which indicate the mode and connection status.

The user experience differs slightly depending on which receiver you’re using, but the setup is the definition of plug-and-play. Recording on mobile couldn’t be simpler: remove the transmitters and mobile receiver from the case, insert the USB-C unit into your smartphone and the two LEDs will turn solid to show that everything is connected. The single orange button on the receiver toggles noise cancelling on (green light) or off (blue light). You’re good to go.

Connecting to a camera is no more complicated. Take the cold-shoe receiver and transmitters out of the case and they’ll pair automatically. Then simply hook it up to your camera via 3.5mm or USB-C (or both at the same time) and you’ll get an audio signal. You can also use the bundled USB-C to Lightning cable to connect the camera receiver to an older Apple device.

The camera receiver’s interface is a touch more complicated than the mobile one. You get the same LEDs for connection and noise cancelling status, plus an orange button for power. Then there's an arc of three additional lights to indicate the output volume, which can be adjusted by turning the dial. Pressing the dial changes the noise reduction setting, while a long-press switches between mono and stereo.

There’s a slight learning curve when it comes to the meaning of each LED, but it’s intuitive enough to get your head around after a few minutes. What you don’t get is any kind of display for real-time audio monitoring. That’s a luxury reserved for premium mics that cost and weigh more. It’s also one that’s absent from the DJI Mic Mini and Rode Wireless Micro.

Hollyland Lark M2S Combo: Performance

  • Omnidirectional audio with optional noise cancelling
  • 9 hours battery life (transmitter), 18 hours battery life (case)
  • Up to 300m range

Rating audio quality is a tricky thing, because it depends on your expectations. If you’re a professional sound engineer, you’ll find things to fault with what the Hollyland Lark M2S produces. But if you’re comparing it to the built-in mic on your smartphone or camera, the M2S is leagues ahead.

The additional caveat here is that results are influenced by the device you’re using and its built-in pre-amp. Send the same signal from the Lark M2S to an iPhone and a DSLR camera, as I did, and you’ll notice differences which result from how each device processes the audio.

The Hollyland Lark M2S has strong foundations. It records 24-bit audio at 48khz, which sets it up well for capturing detail. You can also set the output level to high, giving your device more to work with. Serious users will balk at the lack of 32-bit float recording or on-board storage, but that reflects the target market of the M2S. There’s enough detail and depth here to satisfy content creators and anyone who wants to improve the quality of their voiceovers.

The omnidirectional pick-ups do a decent job of isolating speech against background hubbub. As with many wireless mics, though, wind noise is an issue. The bundled fluffy windshields help to tackle this, but also make the mics more visible.

Your other option is to enable Environmental Noise Cancellation. This is highly effective at limiting the impact of blustery conditions on your recordings. It also works well at reducing traffic noise to a barely audible level. The trade-off is that noise cancelling tends to make vocals sound slightly flatter and more processed – although not as significantly as some wireless mics.

Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

You can adjust the level of noise cancelling through the LarkSound app, with high and low options. Usefully, the app can also be used to monitor the audio level from each mic in real time, giving you a visual indication of whether the gain setting needs to be changed to avoid clipping. This can be controlled in the app, as can the channel mode, which allows you to switch from mono to stereo recording when using the camera receiver.

Transmission range is rated at 300m. Unless you’re working at telephoto distances, there are few occasions when you’d need to be that far from your recording device. Still, with a clear line of sight from transmitter to receiver, I didn’t encounter any signal drop-out at a distance of about 100 paces. That changed as soon as something came between the two. In reality, most users will work at close range, where clear transmission won’t be an issue.

Longevity is also assured. Despite the miniature dimensions of the Lark M2S, battery life comes in at a competitive nine hours. The case can also recharge the components twice over, giving you a total recording time of close to 30 hours before you’ll need to use a wall charger. The case itself needs around 90 minutes to go from flat to full.

It’s unlikely that most users will encounter a shoot where they have to record for 9 hours straight, but it’s reassuring to know that the Lark M2S can live through a lot of takes before it needs returning to the case. Using it as many content creators would – on the move, taking out the components to record clips on location, then storing them back in the case – the M2S simply ran and ran. For such a compact kit, the battery life is seriously impressive. This is a wireless mic that’s easy to live with.

Should I buy the Hollyland Lark M2S Combo?

Buy it if…

You want a discreet wireless mic kit

Thanks to a low-profile lapel clip design, the Lark M2S transmitters hide most of their mass behind your collar. Paired with a lightweight build and one-button interface, the mics offer a simple, subtle solution for recording audio content.

You want cleaner audio for your content

Recording 24-bit audio at 48Khz, the Lark M2S can capture voiceovers with more detail than your device’s built-in microphone. Bundled windshields and the optional noise reduction mode help to reduce background sound, too.

You want a plug-and-play setup

The Combo kit comes pre-paired out of the charging case. Connect the mobile or camera unit to your device and you’re ready to go. Lights on the receivers and transmitters make it easy to check mode and connection status.

Don’t buy it if…

You want transmitters to clip anywhere

The clip-on transmitters are neat and tidy, but the rubber hook design means they can only be worn on a lapel or collar. Other wireless mics have magnetic backs that offer more versatility in where you can wear them.

You want bulletproof audio quality

By producing a 24-bit signal, the Lark M2S is capable of decent results. That said, sound quality can be affected by noise cancellation, as well as the quality of the pre-amp in the device that you’re working with.

You only need smartphone audio

This Combo Kit includes a cold-shoe and USB-C receiver, as well as a Lightning adapter cable. If you only create content with a smartphone, you can save money by choosing the standard kit, which ditches the camera module.

Hollyland Lark M2S Combo: also consider

Hollyland Lark M2S

Rode Wireless Micro

DJI Mic Mini

Dimensions

Transmitter: 24 × 9mm (transmitter)
Mobile receiver: 40 × 16.7 × 9mm
Camera receiver: 40.5 × 25.5 × 13mm

Transmitter: 40 x 27 x 17mm
Receiver:
44 x 24 x 9mm

26.55 x 26.06 x 15.96mm

Weight

7g (transmitter), 6g (mobile receiver), 12g (camera receiver), 110g (case)

12g (transmitter, without magnet), 102g for the whole kit

10g (transmitter, without magnet)

Transmission range

300m

100m

400m

Connectivity

USB-C, Lightning, 3.5mm

USB-C or Lightning

USB-C / Lightning, 3.5mm

Battery

9 hours, plus 18 hours from the charging case

7 hours, plus two additional charges from the fully charged case for a total of 21 hours

11.5 hours (transmitter), 10.5 hours (receiver), up to 48 hours with fully charged case

Audio

24-bit

24-bit

24-bit

Noise cancelling

Yes

No

Yes

Bluetooth

No

No

Yes

Rode Wireless Micro

A simple, reliable solution for recording quality smartphone audio, the Rode Wireless Micro captures 24-bit audio with zero fuss. It’s available in Lightning and USB-C versions, with no camera connectivity. The transmitters are visibly bigger than the Lark M2S, but they do have the flexibility of magnetic mounting.

Read our Rode Wireless Micro review

DJI Mic Mini

The DJI Mic Mini is a compact wireless mic. It comes with just one receiver that works with both smartphones and cameras, meaning there’s less kit to think about. An optional Lightning adapter is available, too. You can even record 16-bit audio directly via Bluetooth, without using the receiver.

Read our DJI Mic Mini in-depth review

Hollyland Lark M2S wireless mic kit

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

How I tested the Hollyland Lark M2S Combo

  • Tested extensively over several weeks
  • Paired with both the camera and USB-C receivers
  • Recorded audio in a range of indoor and outdoor settings

Given that the Hollyland Lark M2S is a wireless mic kit that’s designed to let content creators capture quality audio on the go, that’s how I approached this review. I packed the kit in my backpack every time I headed out of the house, then recorded voiceover content wherever the day took me.

That meant I captured audio clips in a whole range of settings and scenarios, from noisy cafes to windy walks along busy roads. I tested the transmitters at all three volume levels, with and without the windshields installed, and with noise reduction enabled and disabled. This gave me a catalog of recordings with which to make comparisons on clarity and quality.

Because the Lark M2S Combo is pitched as a full kit for creators, I tested it with both the USB-C mobile receiver and the cold-shoe camera adapter. With the latter, I wired up to a Nikon D7100 using a 3.5mm cable, as well as using the bundled Lightning cable to connect an iPhone 12.

During my time with the Lark M2S, I tried to use it as someone might do in the real world. That meant clipping the transmitters to different items of clothing. I also purposefully interacted with interface before consulting the instructions in detail, to get a realistic idea of how accessible the system is for beginners.

I tested the Fujifilm X half retro compact, and it’s double the fun – I’m still smiling
8:06 am | May 22, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Compact Cameras Computers Gadgets | Tags: | Comments: Off

Fujifilm X half: Two-minute review

Every now and then, a refreshingly unique camera hits the market, and the Fujifilm X half retro compact is one of those few examples.

It's a niche, digital alternative to half-frame film cameras such as the Pentax 17, and for most people is the better choice of the two.

Fujifilm has really let loose in designing the X half, and it's a love letter to film photography, specifically half frame. It offers quirky features such as a touch-sensitive film canister window-like screen, plus a Film Roll mode which is so charming that I dedicated a whole article to it. Each idea, weird as they might seem for digital, actually make perfect sense in the spirit of film.

There's no other digital camera that comes as close to the film camera experience as the X half, and the beauty is that you can take or leave many of these features because it's digital, nor are you hobbled by the ongoing costs that come with using an actual film camera.

Fujifilm X half compact camera being held up to person's eye

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

On a technical level, the X half is pretty basic. The vertical-format 1-inch sensor records JPEG-only photos up to 18MP, while video is limited to vertical Full HD. Its fixed 32mm (equivalent) lens with f/2.8-11 variable aperture is only moderately sharp, too.

To mark the X half down for such reasons, however, misses the point – this camera is all about the fun, in all the right ways. Those perceived limitations such as JPEG only are rightly there, in the spirit of film – the Film Simulation you choose is locked in once you press the shutter.

The X half is a tidily packaged retro model too. Its robust plastic body tips the scales at just 8.5oz / 240g, plus its fixed 32mm f/2.8 lens is tiny, meaning you can slip the camera into a pocket. Battery life is particularly good, too.

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar

I love the unique design touches – that touch-sensitive LCD which emulates a film canister window, and a lever that mimics the film wind lever for diptych composites and to move onto the next frame in the Film Roll mode.

Picture quality is actually pretty decent, but after a month using the X half, I'm less focused on outright quality – this is a different kind of camera.

I've read many comments bemoaning the price of what is a toy-like X half, and to an extent I see the point. However, I see value in products that I will actually use, and after a month with the X half, the novelty hasn't worn off.

Fujifilm designers with a soft spot for analog have clearly let loose with the X half, and it's simply in a world of its own.

Fujifilm X half: Price and availability

  • The X half was announced on May 21 and available globally from June 12 2025
  • It cost costs $849/ £699 / AU$1,349 and is available in three colorways: silver, charcoal and black
  • There's a (free) dedicated Fujifilm X half app on iOS and Android stores

Fujifilm launched the X half globally on June 12 for $849 / £699 / AU$1,349, which for most people counts it out as an impulse purchase – if it was about 30% cheaper I think the X half would fly off the shelves.

The price feels high, but an alternative such as the Pentax 17 film camera costs $499 / £449, and that camera doesn't have all the digital components that the X half does.

There are three colors to choose from: silver, charcoal and black. I think the silver version is most in keeping with the spirit of the X half, but I can also envisage it being produced in additional colors down the line if it sells well, which I expect to be the case.

There were no dedicated accessories at launch. I'd like to see optional accessories such as a half-leather case, which could look the part.

Alongside the camera, Fujifilm announced a dedicated app for the X half for iOS and Android devices, which can be used to upload images from the camera, and through which you load photos taken using the Film Roll mode. It's a really fun app.

  • Price score: 3.5 / 5

Fujifilm X half compact camera in the hand

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Fujifilm X half: specs

Quick Specs

Camera type:

Compact

Lens

10.8mm f/2.8 (32mm equivalent)

Sensor:

Vertical 1-inch, 13.3 x 8.8mm, 18MP

Video:

Full HD, vertical

Battery:

880 shots

Weight:

8.5oz / 240g

Fujifilm X half: design

  • Unique twin vertical displays
  • Fixed 32mm (equivalent) f/2.8 lens
  • Weighs just 8.5oz / 240g with battery and SD card inserted

The X half is unmistakably a Fujifilm camera, while packing unique features and sharing certain similarities with the Pentax 17.

It might be plastic, but the X half is a well-built and lightweight retro compact, packing a tiny fixed lens with a 32mm-equivalent focal length and mechanical aperture, which can be manually adjusted between its f/2.8 to f/11 settings using a handy lever.

There's an on-off switch on the top of the camera. When set to on, a lever – which is designed to mimic a film-wind lever – juts out from the camera for easy access. This lever is used to activate the diptych feature, which we'll get into shortly, plus move onto your next frame in the charming Film Roll mode.

The shutter button is set within an exposure compensation dial, and I must say that all of these controls ooze a reassuring quality, with a suitably stubborn resistance.

Also on the top is a coldshoe for mounting accessories, but it's not a hotshoe, so that means no accessories such as a flash gun.

Fujifilm X half compact camera in the hand

The top plate of the X half, with its film wind lever folded away. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

In the absence of optional flash accessories, a low-powered LED flash sits above the lens to provide some fill light that's particularly handy for indoor close-ups. The flash can be turned on and off using a switch on the X half's left side, while on the other side is a USB-C port for charging the camera.

Battery life is a healthy 880 shots, with the X half utilizing the WP126S battery that's been a long time staple in the Fujifilm X series range, used by cameras like the X100VI.

On the back there's a small and basic look through optical viewfinder at the top-left, which comes in handy particularly for the Film Roll mode – more on this shortly.

There are no control buttons or dials on the camera's rear, just a photo / video switch and a playback mode. Instead, the action happens through the twin touch displays – and this is where things get really interesting.

Fujifilm X half compact camera in the hand

The rear of the X half, with its twin touch displays and optical viewfinder. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

First up, I adore the new touch-sensitive LCD which (by default) mimics the film canister window present in many film cameras.

A swipe up or down on this display scrolls through the various Film Simulation modes, with a stripped back selection of 13 looks. It can also be used to adjust certain camera settings, depending on which part of the menu you're navigating.

Then there's another unique touch LCD: a vertical display for live view and the X half's four menus, each of which is accessed via a swipe from one of the four sides.

One menu accesses basic camera settings such as exposure mode, another the Film Simulations and picture effects – Fujifilm has added several new film photography-inspired effects, including light leak.

With a picture effect active or when in another menu, that second LCD displays the picture effects or camera settings instead of Film Simulations, effectively making it a secondary navigation tool.

Another menu on the main LCD accesses a new Film Roll mode, which is a fabulous concept. Select your 'film roll' – if you're not already familiar with them, Fujifilm Film Simulation color modes mimic the look of actual Fujifilm film stock – and the number of shots you'd like in the film, and start shooting.

Once the Film Roll mode is active, the display is inactive, so your only compositional tool is the optical viewfinder. Given the lens is moderately wide, you can point in the direction of your subject without relying on the viewfinder for composition.

In the Film Roll mode, you're also locked into the selected Film Simulation and settings such as ISO. And with no raw format available, once you've picked your look, you've made your bed. It's such a fun idea which pays homage to film photography.

  • Design score: 4/5

Fujifilm X half: Performance

  • 18MP JPEG-only vertical photos, Full HD vertical video
  • 13 Film Simulations and new picture effects
  • Face-detection autofocus

If you take photography seriously, a word of advice – don't write the Fujifilm X half off on the basis of its image-making qualities, which on the face of it are pretty basic.

For one, JPEG-only photos and no raw? That's a bold move by Fujifilm, but I get it. After all, the X half is supposed to be like a film camera, and since when could you work from uncompressed raw data to make drastic color and exposure adjustments to film? Locking in the look at the point of capture is in the spirit of film.

The X half's video-making skills are also fairly stripped back, maxing out at Full HD resolution, but once again I don't mind that.

Those vertical photos and videos are recorded using a vertical 1-inch sensor. It's a 20MP 2:3 aspect sensor, but output is 3:4, which means the maximum photo resolution is 18MP.

Just taking the 3:4 portion of the 2:3 sensor also means the lens, which would be a 28mm-equivalent focal length, is actually more like 32mm – that's a suitable perspective for everyday photography.

For close-ups, that 1-inch sensor and maximum f/2.8 aperture lens can capture nice blurry backgrounds, especially when you're pushing nearer the minimum 0.1m focus distance.

Fujifilm's Film Simulations number 20 in all, but the X half includes a stripped-back selection of 13 of the supposedly most popular looks.

It also gets some new picture effects, so in addition to the gimmicky mirror and toy-camera effects you have aptly analog-inspired options like light leak.

Fujifilm's tagline in the X half marketing is, 'Half the size, twice the story'. This refers to the half-frame format of the pictures and the diptych-making feature for photos and videos.

The diptych feature is activated using the 'film-wind' lever, and composites two 3:4 images side by side, just as a half-frame film camera does onto a roll of 35mm film (it works for video, too).

However, they're not strictly half-sized; the resolution of each photo is preserved, meaning a diptych composite is doubled in width, from the 3648 x 4864 pixels of each photo to a 7296 x 4864 pixel composite with a 3:2 aspect – that's the same aspect as a frame of 35mm film.

There's a modest selection of autofocus modes. As far as I could tell, focus is locked to the central portion of the frame; however, there's face-detection autofocus too, which is active anywhere in the frame.

I must also touch on the Film Roll mode which is guaranteed to charm photographers with a soft spot for analog photography. You select the film simulation you want and the number of frames in the film roll; 36, 54 or 72.

Once the roll starts, you're locked into the film simulation – just as if you were using a roll of film – and the rear display switches from live view to a frame count instead.

After each shot, you 'crank' the lever on the rear to move onto the next frame – the camera won't take the next shot until you do this. Like liveview, image playback isn't available mid-roll.

Once the 'roll' is done, you upload the shots wirelessly to the Fujifilm X half app, which is where you'll see your photos for the first time. The app reimagines the photo lab in such a fun way, 'developing' the roll and then displaying it as a contact sheet – as someone who learned photograph in the darkroom, this feature has won me over.

If you approach the X half as a fun camera for casual snaps with some creative looks to try out, and as a convenient digital reimagining of analog photography, then you'll be wholly satisfied.

  • Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Fujifilm X half: testing scorecard

Fujifilm X half

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Price

Given the fun factor, the X half feels pretty expensive. But if it gets you out shooting, then it's decent value.

3.5/5

Design

Packed with charming features, the X half's retro plastic body is truly pocketable and eye catching

4/5

Performance

Not one for outright quality or high speed performance, the X half is a different kind of camera that reimagines the analog photography experience beautifully.

3.5/5

Fujifilm X half camera in the hand at golden hour

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Should I buy the Fujifilm X half?

Buy it if...

You have a soft spot for film photography
The X half is clearly made be film camera fans, and wonderfully reimagines the format in digital form.View Deal

You simply want a bit of photography fun
Forget the specs, the X half is a cute, retro bundle of fun.View Deal

You'd like a truly compact camera
The X half is so small, even with its fixed lens, that'll easily slip into your pocket.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You’re a stickler for image quality
Shooting 18MP JPEG-only photos and Full HD video with a vertical 1-inch sensor, the X half's image quality is pretty basic.View Deal

You're on the look out for a 'regular' compact
The X half is essentially in a category of its own and clearly geared to film photography fans.View Deal

Fujifilm X half: Also consider

Three Fujifilm X half compact cameras side by side, each a different color

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

How I tested the Fujifilm X half

  • A short session with the camera ahead of its global announcement
  • Fujifilm consequently loaned me the camera for several weeks
  • I've tried various Film Simulations and picture effects, plus the diptych and Film Roll modes

I had the Fujifilm X half in my pocket for several weeks, during which time I tried out the various Film Simulation modes, picture effects, and shooting modes for photos and video. These include the diptych feature and the Film Roll. In essence, I've tried out every feature the camera has to offer.

On a technical level, I shot a series of images adjusting the lens aperture stop by stop, from its maximum f/2.8 aperture to f/11, and examined those images to compare image quality at each setting.

I've also switched between various autofocus and manual focus modes to see how each option handles. I shot images at the minimum focus distance too in order to check the camera's close focusing capabilities and for any lens distortion.

  • First reviewed May 2025
I shot video with the affordable Canon EOS R50 V vlogging camera, and it is a solid option for aspiring content creators
2:30 pm | May 17, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Video Cameras | Comments: Off

Canon EOS R50 V: two-minute review

The Canon EOS R50 V is the company’s latest mirrorless camera. Put simply, it’s an affordable video-centric model aimed at content creators and vloggers, offering 4K video recording at up to 30fps, four-channel 24-bit audio from its built-in microphone and decent wired and wireless connectivity.

I’ve reviewed a lot of vlogger-focussed cameras recently, including Canon’s own PowerShot V1, a fixed-lens compact that launched alongside the EOS R50 V and costs a similar amount, so I was interested to see how this interchangeable lens camera performed in comparison. In some ways, the PowerShot V1 has more appeal: it’s more compact and its lens is faster and wider than the 14-30mm kit lens that can be purchased bundled with the EOS R50 V. It comes with a built-in ND filter too.

What the R50 V has on its side is future versatility, thanks to an RF lens mount. With the ability to use other lenses in the RF system, upgrading image quality or gaining a new field of view is easily achievable here. With the PowerShot V1, you’ve only got that one lens.

The EOS R50 V’s 24.2MP APS-C sensor is also physically bigger than the 1.4-inch sensor on the PowerShot V1. Not by much, mind you – and image quality isn’t too different on the two cameras.

The EOS R50 V can capture video at 4K at up to 30fps, or a cropped 4K at up to 60fps. The latter isn’t really ideal for vlogging, as it greatly reduces the field of view and I found it difficult to get myself comfortably in frame while holding the camera. The uncropped 4K delivers a much more expansive field of view, albeit at the expense of frame rate – but I don’t think many will require 60fps for vlogging. The other resolution on offer is 1080p, which can capture at up to 120fps – ideal for slow-motion playback.

Canon EOS R50 V camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Videos and JPEGs look great straight out of the camera, as I’ve come to expect from the best Canon cameras and their color science. For those who want to edit or grade in post, however, RAW photos and a flat C Log color profile are also available.

There’s a lot to like about the EOS R50 V’s all-round performance. Its autofocus system is fast and accurate, and able to recognize and track human, animal and vehicle subjects. Its optical image stabilization is decent (if unremarkable, thanks to no in-body IS) and its on-board microphones perform well indoors in quiet conditions. Testing outside on a blustery day, I found the wind reduction mode to be almost completely ineffective, so a decent external mic is required; the PowerShot V1 includes a fluffy windshield that works quite well, and it’s odd Canon didn’t supply one here.

Connectivity is what you’d expect from a video-centric camera, while the LP-E17 battery supplies around 480 photos according to Canon. I did find it drains quite quickly while shooting 4K video, as you might expect – but thankfully the USB-C port can be used for on-the-go recharging or even constant power supply.

I’m quite impressed with the EOS R50 V. There’s nothing particularly fancy about it, and in many ways its sister camera the PowerShot V1 is a much more interesting device – being more of an all-in-one vlogging machine. But the R50 V’s lens mount means it might be a better choice for vloggers who plan on gradually upgrading their setup over the years.

Canon EOS R50 V on a wooden table, alongside the EOS R50

The EOS R50 V (left) alongside the EOS R50 (right). They share much of the same tech, but the R50 V id designed more specifically for video. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Canon EOS R50 V: Price and availability

  • $649 / £729 / AU$1,169 body only
  • $849 / £959 / AU$1,499 with Canon 14-30mm lens

The EOS R50 V is available to order, priced at around $649 / £729 / AU$1,169 body only or $849 / £959 / AU$1,499 in a kit with Canon’s new 14-30mm f4-6.3 IS STM PZ power zoom lens.

That strikes me as a competitive and affordable price, particularly with the lens – and especially for US-based consumers. I think the kit is the one to go for, unless you already own a few RF lenses, of course – but do bear in mind that you may need to buy an external microphone too.

  • Price score: 4/5

Canon EOS R50 V camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Canon EOS R50 V: specs

Quick Specs

Camera type:

Mirrorless

Lens mount:

Canon RF

Sensor:

APS-C, 24.2MP

Video:

4K 30fps / Cropped 4K 60fps / 4:2:2 10-bit

Battery (CIPA rating):

480 shots (LCD)

Dimensions:

119.3 x 73.7 x 45.2 (body only)

Weight:

370g (body only)

Canon EOS R50 V: Design and handling

  • 3-inch, 1.04m-dot vari-angle LCD touchscreen
  • Front tally lamp and record button
  • Camera weighs just 370g without a lens

The EOS R50 V is a small and mostly plastic-bodied camera designed primarily for video. There’s no built-in flash and no viewfinder like you get with the EOS R50, which photographers might miss. For video users, the vari-angle screen handles composition more than adequately and the 21-pin multi-function hot shoe and extra, side-mounted tripod thread are very useful additions.

Canon EOS R50 V camera

The side mounting point is ideal for recording 9:16 portrait ratio videos. (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

I found the control layout to be user-friendly, particularly the second video recording button on the front. There’s also a front-facing tally lamp, to let you know when you’re recording video. On the back and up top you’ll find the usual well-labelled dials and buttons, and with the help of the touchscreen I never struggled to change a setting or switch between shooting modes.

The camera isn’t weatherproofed, and the plastic body feels lightweight. In fact, at just 370g without a lens, it’s one of the lightest mirrorless cameras I’ve used in a long time. Adding the 14-30mm kit lens doesn’t tip the scales by much either: it’s just 181g, keeping the complete weight for camera and lens well under 600g.

  • Design score: 4/5

Canon EOS R50 V camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Canon EOS R50 V: Performance and features

  • No in-body image stabilization
  • 12fps continuous shooting with mechanical shutter
  • 24-bit or 16-bit stereo audio via internal mic

Image stabilization is very important for a vlogging camera, but with no in-body stabilization here, it all has to come from the lens. The kit lens, for example, comes with optical stabilization and I think that’s just about enough for vloggers who want to walk around with the camera. You can see some real-world examples of the stabilization in action in my sample video in the next section of this review. Just be aware that you won’t get assistance if you fit a non-stabilized lens.

The Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocus system is excellent: fast, accurate and able to recognize and track humans (eyes, face, head or body), animals (dogs, cats, birds and horses) or vehicles (cars, motorcycles, trains and aircraft). I encountered no problems with it at all during my time using the camera, during which I was mostly filming myself in a mock vlog style. It kept me in focus no matter how I moved around the frame.

Canon EOS R50 V camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Despite the EOS R50 V’s video-first design, it does have a mechanical shutter. It’s a pretty adept stills camera, actually, thanks both to the aforementioned autofocus setup and its ability to shoot at a respectable continuous speed of 12fps (with mechanical shutter) and 15fps (with electronic shutter).

Connectivity-wise, I wasn’t disappointed. There are dedicated 3.5mm jacks for a mic and headphones, a micro HDMI output (while I’d prefer full-size, the compact body always made this unlikely) and a USB-C 3.2 port that works for data transfer, battery charging and power supply. It’ll also support live streaming when connected to a computer and allows users to set up the EOS R50 V as a webcam. There’s Wi-Fi and Bluetooth too, supporting wireless image transfer, printing and upload to Canon’s cloud services.

The built-in microphone can record in four-channel 24-bit or two-channel 16-bit modes, and comes with a wind noise reduction mode that is supposed to kick in automatically if needed. I tested in indoors and found it excellent quality, but outside on a windy day the noise reduction feature was next to useless. I’d have liked at least a furry windshield included to help mitigate interference, but I think vloggers using the EOS R50 V outside in anything but the calmest of conditions will need an external microphone of some kind.

  • Performance and features: 4.5/5

Canon EOS R50 V on a wooden table alongside the 14-30mm PZ lens

The 14-30mm kit lens is compact, but its maximum f/4 aperture is quite limiting especially in low light. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Canon EOS R50 V: Image and video quality

  • APS-C sensor delivers 4K video and 24.2MP photos
  • Full HD slow-motion capture at 100fps or 120fps
  • Canon Log 3 color mode supported

Canon’s much lauded color science makes the EOS R50 V almost too easy to use. Whatever you point it at, it’ll produce great-looking JPEGs and videos right out of the camera, with no need for intervention on your part. I’ve made some very minor tweaks to the photos you see below in Adobe Lightroom to draw a bit more detail out of shadows, but overall I could have left them be and been more than happy to use them.

The kit lens is pretty poor in terms of brightness, having only a maximum f/4 aperture. Coupled with the smallish APS-C sensor, it makes this camera quite unsuited to low light photography out of the box. Slap a faster lens on here and you might get good results, however.

For the 4K sample video (I apologize for the lack of camera audio on the outdoor shots – but the wind noise was just too intrusive to keep it in), I made no adjustments at all. All these clips are presented here exactly how they came out of the camera.

I recorded these at 4K 24fps quality, to make the most of the full sensor size. You can also capture cropped 4K video at up to 60fps, but for vlogging I felt that crop was a bridge too far, reducing the frame too much to comfortably get my head in. It’d be fine for capturing b-roll, however. I’ve not included any here, but the camera can also shoot in Full HD, and in up to 120fps for some smooth slow-motion playback if desired.

The EOS R50 V shoots RAW photos and can capture video in Canon’s flat C Log 3 color profile, should you want to perform more editing and grading yourself. So, there’s plenty of support here for imaging enthusiasts who want to achieve their own look.

  • Image quality score: 4/5

Canon EOS R50 V: testing scorecard

Canon EOS R50 V

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Price

Decent price, especially in the US.

4/5

Design

Compact and video focused by design.

4/5

Performance and features

Shame not to have in-body IS, but that's understandable given the price.

4/5

Image and video quality

Canon knows how to do gorgeous colors, but the EOS R50V's kit lens is so-so.

4.5/5

Should I buy the Canon EOS R50 V?

Buy it if...

You want an expandable cheap video camera
The RF mount and connectivity make the R50 V a great starting point for a content creator. You can always add more lenses to widen your creative capabilities as you gain popularity.

You love Canon’s color science
It’s hard to fault the look of the images and videos that come straight out of the R50 V. Canon knows how to produce punchy, pleasing pictures with minimal user effort.

Don't buy it if...

You want an all-in-one vlogging camera
You’ll still need a decent external mic if you plan on vlogging outdoors with the R50 V, as wind noise is an issue.

You’re a stills photographer first
With no flash and no viewfinder, photographers get a bit of a raw deal here. That’s fine – it’s a video camera first – but it’s something to be aware of.

Canon EOS R50 V camera

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

Canon EOS R50 V: Also consider

How I tested the Canon EOS R50 V

  • Tested a full production model for three days
  • Shot clips handheld and on vlogging handle
  • Used a range of video resolutions and frame rates

Owing to a short loan time, I didn't have as long as I would have liked to review the EOS R50 V – just a few days. Even so, I was able to get outside multiple times to test its photo and video capabilities in real-world conditions, which I did in generally favorable weather conditions (wind aside). I mounted the camera on a Joby GorillaPod for vlogging purposes.

  • First reviewed May 2025

I’ve reviewed every DJI drone, and the triple-camera Mavic 4 Pro sets a new benchmark for what’s possible
3:03 pm | May 13, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Drones Gadgets | Tags: , | Comments: Off

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: one-minute review

I’ve flown and reviewed every DJI drone from the past 10-plus years, and I’m blown away on an almost yearly basis; and that's the case once again with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro, which sets a new benchmark for what’s possible with consumer and prosumer UAVs. The Mavic 4 Pro is, without a doubt, one of the best DJI drones you can buy.

The responsiveness of the controls and speed and smoothness of flight remind me more of the DJI Inspire 3 than the Mavic 3 Pro. Let’s not get carried away though; the Inspire 3 and Mavic 4 Pro are different in many ways, and the Mavic 4 Pro takes prosumer drones to a whole new level.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro unfolded ready for flight

(Image credit: James Abbott)

And this is all before we consider the three impressive cameras with true vertical shooting. That’s right – the gimbal rotates 90 degrees, which is a first for a drone with more than a single small camera and sensor, let alone one with a Four Thirds camera.

The Mavic 4 Pro camera offering is headed by a 28mm 4/3 camera with up to a 100MP resolution and an adjustable f/2-f/11 aperture. This is complemented by a 70mm camera with a 48MP 1/1.3-inch sensor, and a 168mm camera with a 50MP 1/1.5-inch sensor. Video is available up to 6K 60fps with the main camera, and up to 4K 120fps with the two telephotos.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: release date and price

  • Released on 13 May 2025
  • Three kit options
  • Prices start at $TBC / £1,879 / AU$3,099

The DJI Mavic 4 Pro was announced and released on 13 May 2025, and is available directly from DJI and authorized retailers. There are three kits, starting with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro (DJI RC 2), which costs £1,879 / AU$3,099; as mentioned, DJI has yet to confirm when or if the Mavic 4 Pro will be available in the US. This kit includes the Mavic 4 Pro, RC 2 smart controller, 64GB of internal storage, an Intelligent Flight Battery and accessories.

The DJI Mavic 4 Pro Fly More Combo costs £2,459 / AU$4,039. This includes all of the above plus two additional Intelligent Flight batteries, a DJI 100W USB-C Power Adapter, a Battery Charging Hub and a shoulder bag. In my opinion, this kit offers exceptional value for money.

The third and most high-end kit option is the DJI Mavic 4 Pro 512GB Creator Combo. This costs £3,209 / AU$5,359, and includes everything in the standard kit plus 512GB of internal storage, a 240W power adapter, two additional Intelligent Flight batteries, a Parallel Battery Charging Hub, a USB-C to USB-C High-Speed Data Cable and a Shoulder bag.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro camera and gimbal from above

(Image credit: James Abbott)

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: specs

Specs

Camera

28mm 100MP 4/3 sensor / 70mm 48MP 1/1.3-inch sensor / 168mm 50MP 1/1.5-inch sensor

Video resolution

Up to 6K

Frame rates

6K up to 60fps / 4K up to 120fps / FHD up to 60fps / Vertical 4/3 up to 4K 60fps, Tele 2.7K up to 60fps

Video transmission range

18.6 miles (FCC) / 9.32 miles (CE, SRRC, MIC)

Flight modes

Sport, Normal, Cine

Battery

6654mAh / up to 51 minutes flight time

Charger type

USB-C / charging hub

Weight

2.34lbs / 1063g

Dimensions

10.14 x 4.91 x 4.07 inches / 257.6 x 124.8 x 103.4mm folded / 12.94 x 15.37 x 5.32 inches / 328.7 x 390.5 x 135.2mm unfolded

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: design and handling

  • Excellent design and build quality
  • Impressive gimbal
  • Great new controller

The DJI Mavic 4 Pro features the folding design we’ve become accustomed to, but the drone is slightly larger than the Mavic 3 Pro, with larger propellers. As a result, the Mavic 4 Pro is also slightly heavier than its predecessor at 2.34lbs / 1063g. In use, you don’t notice this, but the increase in speed, power, and maneuverability are noticeable.

The most obvious difference between this drone and the Mavic 3 Pro is the new camera and gimbal design. We get three cameras as before, but the camera housing is more spherical, with a more robust gimbal that supports upright shooting, with vertical movement of the camera available between -90 and 70 degrees.

Image 1 of 4

DJI Mavic 4 Pro on a wooden floor ready for flight

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 4

DJI Mavic 4 Pro top view

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 4

DJI Mavic 4 Pro bottom view

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 4

DJI Mavic 4 Pro with the gimabl guard attached

(Image credit: James Abbott)

This opens up new creative possibilities, and during testing I was able to capture the northern lights by flying at a low altitude and tilting the camera up to capture more of the night sky. Further enhancing creative convenience, the drone switches on automatically when you unfold the propeller arms, while the controller switches on when you raise the screen to reveal the controls beneath. The controller goes into sleep mode when closed, unless you switch it off first.

Image 1 of 3

DJI RC 2 smart controller on a wooden floor

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 3

DJI Mavic 4 Pro DJI RC 2 smart controller switched off and folded on a wooden floor

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 3

DJI Mavic 4 Pro DJI RC 2 smart controller detail

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The new DJI RC 2 smart controller features a completely new design with an impressive 2000-nit 7-inch high-bright Mini-LED display. This can be rotated 90 degrees when shooting in portrait format to give you a full-screen camera view.

There’s also a new adjustment dial that makes changing camera settings easy, an HDMI port for video-out, up to four hours of battery life, and 128GB of built-in storage, while audio can be recorded with the built-in mic or when paired with a DJI Mic.

The screen also covers the control sticks when closed to make the controller more compact for transport and storage. Since the controller runs Android, you can view a standard Android interface that supports third-party apps.

This wasn’t tested because I didn’t have any relevant APK files to install and the Google Play Store isn’t installed on the controller. The Firefox web browser is, however, installed, so this would provide one way to install apps.

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: features and performance

  • Fast and positive flight
  • Excellent Return to Home
  • Advanced subject tracking

The Mavic 4 Pro's responsive controls and speed and smoothness of flight remind me of the Inspire 3. It’s not as powerful, of course, but flight performance overall is noticeably improved compared to the Mavic 3 Pro. Flight is incredibly smooth and positive, with a top speed of 60.4mph in Sport mode and 40.3mph when tracking moving subjects. Wind resistance is 26.8mph. You also get all the usual features including Quickshots, timelapse, burst shooting, exposure bracketing and free panorama.

Subject tracking is great, and tracking cars works well, with the Mavic 4 Pro maintaining tracking even when the target vehicle is partially obscured by trees, as claimed by DJI. During testing, I tried to position the drone in front of, directly above, and to the side of the car, as well as the standard behind. Above and behind worked well, but when I tried the other two orientations the drone reverted to behind automatically, so although highly effective, the Mavic 4 Pro isn't as versatile as the DJI Flip or Neo for general tracking. The drone also allows adjustment of the gimbal and flight parameters during tracking.

The Mavic 4 Pro features DJI's 0.1-Lux Nightscape Omnidirectional Obstacle Sensing system, comprising six low-light fisheye sensors, a forward-facing LiDAR on the right propeller arm, and an infrared sensor at the bottom of the aircraft. When flying in highly complex environments the obstacle avoidance worked well in both daylight and at dusk, with Brake and Bypass options available alongside off. Sometimes, the latter is essential for smooth flight but is naturally high-risk. The drone is also backed up by DJI O4+ with up to 18.6 miles and 10-bit HDR Video Transmission.

Car tracking with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

Adding to the safety credentials, Return to Home has seen some impressive improvements, including the ability to take off and Return to Home without a GPS signal. This is achieved using real-time vision positioning and map construction technologies, with the drone capturing flight paths when light levels allow.

Then there’s Dynamic Home Point, where the Home Point is set by the controller location rather than the take-off point. This is useful when tracking vehicles if you’re in the vehicle, but if doing so you should always maintain visual line of sight (VLOS) of the drone.

The Mavic 4 Pro can transfer files to your computer without being switched on when connected via USB-C, and it can also transfer files to the DJI Fly app when switched off using off-state quick transfer. I’ve never found phone transfer functionality useful myself, but many people do, and it allows you to view and download files to the DJI Fly app on your phone using WiFi 6, which could be useful for sharing photos and videos quickly to social media and clients.

Flight times per battery are claimed to be up to 51 minutes, and during testing my flight times were typically around 37 minutes, with the drone offering Return to Home at 15% battery. Also, during one test flight, an airplane flew around my flight area at an altitude of roughly 660ft / 200m, and the controller alerted me to the aircraft being close. This is impressive, although I had seen the plane 30 seconds before the alert was displayed on the controller.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: image and video quality

  • Three impressive cameras
  • Up to 6K 60fps and 4K 120fps video
  • Up to 100MP photos in raw and JPEG

DJI Mavic 4 Pro camera and gimbal close up

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The cameras on the DJI Mavic 4 Pro, along with the innovative gimbal, are impressive, and each offers excellent image quality alongside some impressive features. There is some fall-off in sharpness towards the edges of the frame when shooting photos, and the higher-resolution images aren’t as sharp as those taken at lower-resolution settings, while video doesn’t suffer from the fall-off in sharpness.

All three cameras feature Dual Native ISO Fusion, a feature seen in previous DJI drones to reduce noise in photos and videos. A photo of the northern lights shot with the main camera at 100MP was quite noisy but still useable, although in theory 25MP should have been more effective. The short duration of the phenomenon didn’t allow for a lower-resolution example to be captured, unfortunately.

Image 1 of 7

Aerial photograph of a windmill silhouette at night with the northern lights in the starry sky

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 7

Photo of allotments taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 7

Photo of a wind turbine and fields taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 4 of 7

Photo of a riverside town taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 5 of 7

Photo of a river and bridge from above  taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 6 of 7

Photo of a river lock taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 7 of 7

Aerial photograph of rural UK town

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The main Hasselblad camera features a 28mm equivalent focal length and an adjustable f/2-f/11 aperture. F/2 is a hugely welcome upgrade over the Mavic 3 models, which have a maximum f/2.8 aperture. The new Four Thirds sensor can be set to capture at 100MP or 25MP. The 70mm equivalent camera features a 48MP / 12MP 1/1.3-inch sensor, while the 168mm equivalent camera uses a new 50MP / 12.5MP 1/1.5-inch sensor. Both of these telephoto cameras have a fixed f/2.8 aperture. Photos can be captured in raw and JPEG formats.

Image 1 of 3

Photo of a church on a sunny day taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

Shot with the 28mm camera (Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 2 of 3

Aerial photograph of UK church towering above a town

(Image credit: James Abbott)
Image 3 of 3

Photo of a church on a sunny day taken with the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

Shot with the 168mm camera (Image credit: James Abbott)

DJI Mavic 4 Pro 4K 30fps video

The main Hasselblad camera can capture up to 6K 60fps video, while the 70mm can capture up to 4K at 120fps and the 168mm up to 4K at 100fps. Cropped vertical video is also available with all three cameras, with the main camera offering up to 4K 60fps, and the telephoto cameras able to capture up to 2.7K up to 60fps. You can also rotate the camera to portrait orientation to capture video.

During testing rotating the camera allowed me to capture 6K vertical video with the main camera and 2.7K with the 70mm camera. Sometimes, this caused the drone to fly slowly, which may be a quirk of the pre-release firmware because it wasn’t consistent.

Video color profiles include Normal for straight-out-of-the-camera use, D-Log, D-Log M and HLG (HDR). Shooting HDR, the 28mm can capture up to 16 stops of dynamic range, the 70mm up to 14 stops, and the 168mm up to 13 stops. The 512GB Creator version of the Mavic 4 Pro can also capture video in the ALL-I 4:2:2 codec. Overall, you've got plenty of options for a variety of workflows and requirements.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: testing scorecard

DJI Mavic 4 Pro

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Price

A surprisingly inexpensive Fly More Combo.

5/5

Design

New design for aerodynamics with an innovative new gimbal.

5/5

Performance

Flight is fast and smooth while features perform well.

5/5

Image and video quality

Excellent image quality from the three cameras with upgrades to the main Hasselblad camera.

5/5

Should I buy the DJI Mavic 4 Pro?

Buy it if...

You require speed and power
The Mavic 4 Pro is a fast and powerful drone with excellent flight performance that allows the drone to be flown in winds of up to 26.8mph.

You need three cameras
With impressive 28mm, 70mm and 168mm equivalent cameras capable of capturing a variety of photo and video formats, you have many creative possibilities available to you

You capture professional aerial video
If you use a drone for professional video capture, the Mavic 4 Pro can capture D-Log, D-Log M and HLG (HDR). The 512GB Creator version can also capture video in the ALL-I 4:2:2 codec.

Don't buy it if...

You’d like a less restricted drone
If you’d prefer an easier-to-carry, more regulations-friendly DJI drone, the DJI Mini 4 Pro is the best sub-250g drone money can buy.

You'd like a less expensive dual-camera drone
The DJI Air 3S offers dual cameras and is smaller and lighter than the Mavic 4 Pro. What’s more, the smart controller kit is considerably less expensive.

You’d like to capture a first-person view
If you'd like to capture immersive FPV video, the DJI Avata 2 is a beginner and expert-friendly FPV drone that offers excellent video quality. Photos, however, are extremely limited with this drone.

DJI Mavic 4 Pro: also consider

How I tested the DJI Mavic 4 Pro

  • All features and functions tested
  • All three cameras tested for photo and video capture
  • Tested in different conditions

I tested the DJI Mavic 4 Pro over several weeks, testing all of its features to assess their effectiveness in real-world situations. I also captured a variety of photos and videos to test the quality of the three cameras.

Photos and videos were captured in a range of conditions including overcast, sunny, and windy to see how well the drone performed in these situations.

First reviewed May 2025

I tested Sony’s 28-70mm f/2 GM lens and it’s the best standard zoom I’ve ever used
3:01 pm | May 12, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Camera Lenses Cameras Computers Gadgets | Comments: Off

Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM: two-minute review

Wisdom dictates there’s no such thing as an all-purpose lens. Yet in the FE 28-70mm F2 GM, Sony’s had a stellar go at making one. Pitched as a do-it-all solution for photographers who demand versatility without compromise, this is flagship glass that could replace a trio of primes in your kit bag.

Thanks to a constant f/2 maximum aperture, the FE 28-70mm F2 GM delivers the kind of results you’d expect from a prime lens, paired with the versatility of a standard zoom. The sweetener is that it’s packaged with dimensions that are easy enough to work with on a daily basis, more so than Canon's ungainly equivalent.

This isn’t a lightweight lens by consumer standards, but for G Master glass with fast optics, Sony’s done an impressive job of keeping measurements in check. The solid build and weather seals reflect its premium status, as does the way it handles, with tactile control rings and buttons.

In performance terms, the FE 28-70mm F2 GM hits the mark at every focal length. That maximum aperture gives it excellent low-light credentials, allowing you to shoot fast even in dim conditions. F/2 also unlocks beautifully smooth bokeh and striking subject isolation with a shallow depth of field. The lens is as effective for night-time street scenes as it is for 70mm portraits.

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

It’s optically excellent too, with no discernible sacrifice in quality for the sake of flexibility. Central detail is consistently sharp across the zoom range, with only the tiniest hint of corner softness when shooting wide open. There’s no shortage of contrast either, with minimal evidence of vignetting or chromatic aberrations.

In-camera correction does address some barrel distortion at 28mm, but this is less impactful than if the lens went to 24mm like most standard zooms. That slight restriction on wide-angle coverage will give some users pause for thought. In practise, the f/2 aperture more than makes up for the slightly tighter focal length.

The only major omission is lens-based stabilization, even this isn’t felt in real-world conditions; with the ability to shoot at fast shutter speeds, paired with rapid, accurate autofocus, you won’t encounter issues with blurring.

In truth, there’s only one drawback to the Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM and that’s the price. There’s no escaping that this lens is a serious investment. But when you consider that this is professional glass which delivers prime performance at several focal lengths, its value is self-evident.

If you want a new go-to lens that’s manageable on a full-frame mirrorless body and can handle everything from landscapes to weddings, this might just be the most complete standard zoom Sony has ever made.

Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM specs

Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM: Design

  • Tidily packaged for such a fast zoom lens
  • Robust G Master build with weather seals
  • Tactile controls with zoom ring switches

Sony has managed to keep the FE 28-70mm F2 GM surprisingly compact for such a fast standard zoom. It’s by no means a lightweight lens at 32.4oz / 918g, but it’s only a fraction larger and heavier than the FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM. That’s quite a feat, given the optics required to achieve its f/2 maximum aperture. It’s also significantly more portable than the comparable Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM.

Paired with a full-frame body like the Sony A7S III, the FE 28-70mm f/2 GM balances well without feeling too front-heavy. It helps that the lens is fantastic to handle. You get a full complement of controls, including rings for zoom, focus and aperture. A pair of customizable focus hold buttons offer useful flexibility, together with the familiar AF/MF and aperture lock switches. Two additional switches let you further influence the shooting experience.

We’ve seen the aperture click switch on other Sony lenses. It’s a welcome one, letting you choose whether you’d like tactile feedback while moving through f-stops. More unusual is the torque switch, which gives you the option of tight or smooth zoom ring rotation. The former is helpful for preventing zoom creep, while the latter lets you change focal lengths with a light touch – something that videographers are likely to appreciate.

Image 1 of 3

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 2 of 3

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 3 of 3

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

Given the price and the G Master badge, it’s no surprise that the FE 28-70mm F2 GM feels solid. This is a professional lens that’s built for the elements, with weather seals throughout. It’s all sturdy and purposeful, with a lovely weighting to the controls and no sense of compromise anywhere on the barrel.

It’s worth noting that the large front element requires equally large 86mm filters, which are more expensive than smaller standard thread sizes. That shouldn’t be a revelation: with a lens of this calibre, there’s an expectation that budget won’t be an issue.

Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM: Performance

  • Fast f/2 maximum aperture at every focal length
  • Strong center sharpness across the zoom range
  • Four XD linear motors for rapid, accurate autofocus

When it comes to performance, the FE 28-70mm F2 GM is nothing less than superlative. Autofocus is rapid and reliable, as you’d expect with a quartet of XD linear motors at work. While its size might conjure expectations of a sluggish response, there’s not even a hint of hesitation as the lens hunts for a subject. It’s remarkably quiet, too.

That speed puts another string in the bow of the FE 28-70mm f/2. While a standard zoom wouldn’t be the traditional choice for capturing action, its autofocus capabilities, paired with the ability to use fast shutter speeds at its widest aperture setting, make it a real sporting performer. It had no trouble tracking subjects in motion, locking with laser accuracy.

That constant f/2 maximum aperture is what sets the FE 28-70mm apart from other standard zooms. It unlocks prime performance at every focal length. Whether you’re shooting a night-time street scene at 35mm or a portrait at 70mm, you get the full light-gathering, background-defocusing power of a wide aperture.

F/2 is one stop faster than f/2.8. That means you need half as much light to shoot at the same shutter speed with the FE 28-70mm f/2 GM as you would with the FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM. That makes a big difference in the real world, allowing you to shoot sharp and fast even in tricky conditions. Only with an f/1.4 prime would you get a meaningfully faster shooting experience.

Image 1 of 3

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 2 of 3

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 3 of 3

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

The net result is a standard zoom that can replace several primes in your kit bag. And it can do so without optical compromise: bokeh and background blur at f/2 is exceptionally smooth, with beautiful subject isolation.

Taken all together, that recipe makes the FE 28-70mm F2 GM a uniquely versatile option. For wedding and event photographers who don’t want the hassle of switching lenses throughout the day, it’s a compelling proposition – as it is for any well-heeled photographer who covers a wide range of genres.

Arguably its only limitation besides the price is the slight loss of wide-angle coverage: its 28mm starting point is tighter than on a typical 24-70mm zoom. Whether that extra 4mm makes a difference will come down to how you shoot, but the constant f/2 maximum aperture is your pay-off. For most people, that number is probably the more useful of the two.

Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM: sample images

Image 1 of 5

Test images shot with the Sony A7S III and FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 2 of 5

Test images shot with the Sony A7S III and FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 3 of 5

Test images shot with the Sony A7S III and FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 4 of 5

Test images shot with the Sony A7S III and FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 5 of 5

Test images shot with the Sony A7S III and FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

A close look at images shot with the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM reveals that it really is a master of all trades. Central sharpness is consistently superb across the zoom range and the lens is able to render magnificent detail. Paired with a high-resolution full-frame sensor, you’ll have no trouble cropping in on stills.

Edge sharpness is also excellent. Only at the wide end does a touch of corner softness become visible. There’s some in-camera correction at play here, addressing minor barrel distortion at 28mm. You’ll need a keen eye to spot it, though. Sony has certainly made its life easier by not extending the zoom range to 24mm, where distortion would have been a more significant issue.

Image 1 of 5

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens test images, shot with the Sony A7S III camera body

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 2 of 5

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens test images, shot with the Sony A7S III camera body

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 3 of 5

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens test images, shot with the Sony A7S III camera body

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 4 of 5

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens test images, shot with the Sony A7S III camera body

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)
Image 5 of 5

Sony FE 28-70mm f/2 GM lens test images, shot with the Sony A7S III camera body

(Image credit: Chris Rowlands)

In fact, there’s little evidence of any major imperfections. Both vignetting and chromatic aberrations are kept under tight control, with no color fringing to speak of. Contrast is strong as well, with just a trace of ghosting and a few flare artifacts visible when shooting wide open into direct sunlight. Optically, it’s very hard to find fault with this G Master glass.

In short, the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM gives an almost flawless demonstration at every focal length. Even the absence of lens-based stabilization doesn’t hold it back: at f/2, shutter speeds are more than fast enough to eliminate the risk of blur. If you’re willing to dig into your pockets, Sony will reward you with a standard zoom that excels in every respect.

Should you buy the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM?

Buy it if...

You want a do-it-all zoom lens

Combining the optical performance of a prime lens with the versatility of a standard zoom, the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM can cover everything from landscapes to portraits with aplomb, whether day or night.

You want quality at every focal length

Sony has made very few optical compromises here. Pin-sharp at the center across the zoom range, the FE 28-70mm F2 GM also displays little in the way of vignetting, aberrations or distortion.

You want a lens you can live with

Cleverly packaged and lovely to handle, the FE 28-70mm F2 GM pairs well with a full-frame Sony body. It’s manageable to walk around with, while the G Master build includes full weather seals.

Don't buy it if...

You’re on a tight budget

This is flagship glass that’s priced to match. With a premium build, versatile reach and professional performance, you’re getting your money’s worth, but the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM is still a major investment.

You need a 24-70mm lens

Most standard zooms start at 24mm. Sony’s sacrifices 4mm in favor of a constant f/2 maximum aperture. That’s a stellar trade-off, but if you need the wide-angle coverage, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

You shoot at specific focal lengths

Much of the Sony zoom’s value lies in the versatility of its reach. If you only plan to shoot at specific focal lengths, such as 35mm and 50mm, you’ll get faster apertures for less from a pair of prime lenses.

How I tested the Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM

  • Tested in-depth for seven days
  • Paired with a Sony A7S III body
  • Shot a range of test scenes

The FE 28-70mm F2 GM was only available on a short loan from Sony. That gave me a week to run the zoom through a series of in-depth tests. Given that it’s pitched as the kind of lens you’ll keep on your camera by default, that’s exactly how I lived with it. Paired with a Sony A7S III body, I picked it up every time I left the house.

That gave me a good impression of how easy the FE 28-70mm F2 GM would be to live and shoot with as a long-term standard zoom. Walking around with it allowed me to get a feel for its weight and handling, while shooting a range of scenes in different light conditions yielded a diverse catalog of stills. Covering everything from floral close-ups to abstract street scenes, the results gave me a good basis on which to assess its optical performance.

I’ve shot with several Sony lenses recently, including wide-angle primes and super telephotos, so I had a good benchmark for comparing the build quality. I also regularly shoot with both prime optics and standard zooms on my own Nikon camera, which means I know what to look for when it comes to both image quality and the physical shooting experience.

  • First reviewed May 2025
The Printique photo book I designed stunned me with its high-quality finish – even if it comes at a premium price
7:50 pm | May 7, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Photography | Comments: Off

Printique photo book: review

The Printique photo book service offers a great option for whipping up a personal gift for a loved one or presenting your photography portfolio in its best light. It offers a wide range of pre-formatted themes, while allowing you all the flexibility you need to design a truly custom photo book from scratch.

If you’re just looking for quick and easy results, Printique’s photo books offer plenty of templates to choose from. Whether you’re looking for a clean and classy wedding photo book, a striking photography portfolio, or a photo album of your pet pupperino, there are a good number of options – although at 88 themes, its options are dwarfed by the more than 500 options listed by Mixbook. Just select a template and Printique will apply it to your whole project, then all you need to do is drag and drop your chosen snaps into the provided frames.

For those who want a little more customizability, Printique also provides layouts you can drag into individual pages and spreads in your photo book. From full-bleed images that span both pages to inset grids of thumbnail-size pics, these make it easy to include more variation in layouts and really adapt your book to fit your photos, rather than the other way around.

But what if you don’t want to color within the lines? What if you want to make a completely original photo book from scratch? Well there’s good news: building my own DIY Printique photo book was a snap, easily rivaling the best photo book services.

Placing images is simple: I just dragged my photos onto the page and they’d be added as image frames. On top of this, Printique’s built-in snap functionality made it easy to align them with each other or clip them to each spread’s margins. It even allows for really granular control over the size and position of image frames: the pop-up menu’s Properties section let me manually set images to specific dimensions and XY coordinates, as well as checking the DPI of each one to ensure it would print at a decent resolution.

There was the occasional bug here though – some images stubbornly insisted on defaulting to weirdly specific decimals like 4.97 inches, and resisted all of my attempts to set them to a whole integer. Odd behavior, but ultimately not a deal breaker.

Recreating the colored blocks and ribbons from TechRadar’s photo book test template was also pretty painless. Printique offers a range of shapes that you can add to your projects, and these are all super-flexible: I could precisely control their dimensions, add borders, and apply drop shadows from the properties menu. I was also able to change their color by entering a HEX code, setting RGB values or dragging a cursor to set saturation or brightness. However, the latter exhibited some odd behavior – changing either value would cause the color I’d chosen to creep away from my chosen hue, which occasionally proved irritating when I had a specific tone in mind.

Images of TechRadar's Printique photo book

(Image credit: Future)

Adding captions and credits to my photo book was also easy. Once I’d dropped a text box onto the page, I quickly was able to choose the font, size, styling and alignment. A small time-saver I especially appreciated is the ability to save chosen font settings as a style, which made it easy to achieve a consistent look for text throughout my photo book.

Thanks to some extra settings, it’s possible to get really creative with your layouts. First, Printique provides a wide range of shaped frames that allow you to show off your pics in rounded, slanted or even letter-shaped frames. While some of these are potentially a bit cheesy – star-shaped frames anyone? – they do add a high degree of flexibility that allows you to create some sleek, professional-looking designs.

You can also add extra flourishes and detail to your photo book using Printique’s background and sticker tools. Backgrounds offer everything from customizable block colors to a wide array of illustrations and patterns. Meanwhile, the stickers allow you to add pre-formulated text and illustrations to your photo book, from inscriptions about love to holiday iconography. Personally, some of the stickers aren’t to my tastes, giving things a distinctly clip-art vibe, but there are still a lot of choices there that could make useful ornaments to your text.

You will have to pay a premium for such powerful tools, however. Printique’s photo books were marginally more expensive than some of the other services we've tested. A 12 x 12 inch photo book cost $145.78 including delivery (roughly £112), whereas Shutterfly cost $132.5 (roughly £102) and Mixbook cost $133 (£102.25). It’s only a tiny price increase though, and I would argue one that’s more than worth it, given the flexibility of Printique’s platform.

Images of TechRadar's Printique photo book

(Image credit: Future)

Printique photo book review: performance

The printed photo book we received from Printique offered very high-quality results, with extra-thick pages and consistently good color and accuracy. Hues looked excellent throughout, whether it was a bright, sunny photo or more nuanced fog with creamy bokeh.

All of the photos were arranged perfectly, exactly as we set them, with no printing errors or unexpected margins. The book excels at photos that cross the binding, with a consistent look that feels mostly unbroken, allowing for very large spreads. I especially liked the brightness of the print and paper on our magenta TechRadar signature cover pages. Branding from Printique was minimal, but still present.

The heavy feel of the Printique photo book adds a nice bit of gravity to photos with the weight of the paper. I was almost worried that I would tear the heavy paper as I turned the pages, but the book held its binding nicely, and the photos feel even more special on such a thick presentation. This would make a fine photo book for wedding photography, very special occasions, or to highlight the best shots in your portfolio.

The pages may be a bit too thick if you're printing a large volume of work, and I still worry about those thick pages tearing with constant turning over the years. But for making a selection of photos feel extra premium, Printique’s photo books are a great choice.

Images of TechRadar's Printique photo book

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Printique photo book?

Buy it if…

You want a high degree of customizability
Whether it’s precisely controlling image dimensions, adding shaped image frames, including shapes in every color of the rainbow, or stamping your book with illustrations, you’re free to customize your photo book your way.

You want a polished final product
With quality tactile paper, vivid colors and unerringly precisely alignments, Printique's photo books are finished to an excellent standard, making them a gorgeous gift for loved ones.

Don’t buy it if…

You want big savings
There are cheaper photo book services out there. While Printique offers one of the best services we’ve tried, you can absolutely save some money elsewhere.

You want a huge array of ready-to-go templates
Printique has a decent number of templates for you to start plugging your photos into, but if you don’t care about customizability and just want the most prefabricated options, services like Mixbook offer many more.

Printique photo book review: also consider

Mixbook
With over 500 templates locked and loaded, Mixbook is a great choice if you want a no-hassle layout without needing to get into the nitty-gritty of creating your own designs. However, during our Mixbook photo book review we did find there were a few marks left by the printing process, so it’s worth bearing this in mind if you’re considering it for a gift.

Mimeo
For sheer simplicity, Mimeo can’t be beat – its stripped-back offering allows you to just get on with the design without having to wade through too many options. However, it is pricey. Creating a 10 x 10-inch layflat photobook – the closest you can get to the 12 x 12 inch one we created here – will set you back $169.51 (£133.11) and that’s not including the $13.99 (around £10.80) shipping fee. Read our full Mimeo photo book review.

How I tested the Printique photo book

  • I exactly recreated TechRadar’s photo book test template
  • I spent many hours using the platform and experimenting with templates
  • I have over a decade’s experience working in print and design

At TechRadar, we use a set photo book template that we attempt to recreate using every photo book platform we review. I followed this as closely as possible, sizing images according to precise measurements, adding colored shapes in specific hues and shades, and recreating captions and credits in specific fonts and styles, allowing me to assess how easy it was to recreate specific designs that users might have in mind.

Our US Mobiles Editor Philip Berne then assessed the final product, analyzing its overall quality and finish, and comparing it to the template to identify any potential errors in the printing process.

Additionally, I spent several hours playing around with the platform’s templates, layouts, shaped frames and illustrations to see how effective its off-the-shelf design elements were.

I’m an experienced photographer, having spent many years shooting both on my Canon DSLR and my iPhone 16 Pro. I’ve also spent many years working in print, creating layouts for magazines and doing post-production on images, meaning I've spent a lot of time using design tools for producing printed products.

The Printique photo book I designed stunned me with its high-quality finish – even if it comes at a premium price
7:50 pm |

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Photography | Comments: Off

Printique photo book: review

The Printique photo book service offers a great option for whipping up a personal gift for a loved one or presenting your photography portfolio in its best light. It offers a wide range of pre-formatted themes, while allowing you all the flexibility you need to design a truly custom photo book from scratch.

If you’re just looking for quick and easy results, Printique’s photo books offer plenty of templates to choose from. Whether you’re looking for a clean and classy wedding photo book, a striking photography portfolio, or a photo album of your pet pupperino, there are a good number of options – although at 88 themes, its options are dwarfed by the more than 500 options listed by Mixbook. Just select a template and Printique will apply it to your whole project, then all you need to do is drag and drop your chosen snaps into the provided frames.

For those who want a little more customizability, Printique also provides layouts you can drag into individual pages and spreads in your photo book. From full-bleed images that span both pages to inset grids of thumbnail-size pics, these make it easy to include more variation in layouts and really adapt your book to fit your photos, rather than the other way around.

But what if you don’t want to color within the lines? What if you want to make a completely original photo book from scratch? Well there’s good news: building my own DIY Printique photo book was a snap, easily rivaling the best photo book services.

Placing images is simple: I just dragged my photos onto the page and they’d be added as image frames. On top of this, Printique’s built-in snap functionality made it easy to align them with each other or clip them to each spread’s margins. It even allows for really granular control over the size and position of image frames: the pop-up menu’s Properties section let me manually set images to specific dimensions and XY coordinates, as well as checking the DPI of each one to ensure it would print at a decent resolution.

There was the occasional bug here though – some images stubbornly insisted on defaulting to weirdly specific decimals like 4.97 inches, and resisted all of my attempts to set them to a whole integer. Odd behavior, but ultimately not a deal breaker.

Recreating the colored blocks and ribbons from TechRadar’s photo book test template was also pretty painless. Printique offers a range of shapes that you can add to your projects, and these are all super-flexible: I could precisely control their dimensions, add borders, and apply drop shadows from the properties menu. I was also able to change their color by entering a HEX code, setting RGB values or dragging a cursor to set saturation or brightness. However, the latter exhibited some odd behavior – changing either value would cause the color I’d chosen to creep away from my chosen hue, which occasionally proved irritating when I had a specific tone in mind.

Images of TechRadar's Printique photo book

(Image credit: Future)

Adding captions and credits to my photo book was also easy. Once I’d dropped a text box onto the page, I quickly was able to choose the font, size, styling and alignment. A small time-saver I especially appreciated is the ability to save chosen font settings as a style, which made it easy to achieve a consistent look for text throughout my photo book.

Thanks to some extra settings, it’s possible to get really creative with your layouts. First, Printique provides a wide range of shaped frames that allow you to show off your pics in rounded, slanted or even letter-shaped frames. While some of these are potentially a bit cheesy – star-shaped frames anyone? – they do add a high degree of flexibility that allows you to create some sleek, professional-looking designs.

You can also add extra flourishes and detail to your photo book using Printique’s background and sticker tools. Backgrounds offer everything from customizable block colors to a wide array of illustrations and patterns. Meanwhile, the stickers allow you to add pre-formulated text and illustrations to your photo book, from inscriptions about love to holiday iconography. Personally, some of the stickers aren’t to my tastes, giving things a distinctly clip-art vibe, but there are still a lot of choices there that could make useful ornaments to your text.

You will have to pay a premium for such powerful tools, however. Printique’s photo books were marginally more expensive than some of the other services we've tested. A 12 x 12 inch photo book cost $145.78 including delivery (roughly £112), whereas Shutterfly cost $132.5 (roughly £102) and Mixbook cost $133 (£102.25). It’s only a tiny price increase though, and I would argue one that’s more than worth it, given the flexibility of Printique’s platform.

Images of TechRadar's Printique photo book

(Image credit: Future)

Printique photo book review: performance

The printed photo book we received from Printique offered very high-quality results, with extra-thick pages and consistently good color and accuracy. Hues looked excellent throughout, whether it was a bright, sunny photo or more nuanced fog with creamy bokeh.

All of the photos were arranged perfectly, exactly as we set them, with no printing errors or unexpected margins. The book excels at photos that cross the binding, with a consistent look that feels mostly unbroken, allowing for very large spreads. I especially liked the brightness of the print and paper on our magenta TechRadar signature cover pages. Branding from Printique was minimal, but still present.

The heavy feel of the Printique photo book adds a nice bit of gravity to photos with the weight of the paper. I was almost worried that I would tear the heavy paper as I turned the pages, but the book held its binding nicely, and the photos feel even more special on such a thick presentation. This would make a fine photo book for wedding photography, very special occasions, or to highlight the best shots in your portfolio.

The pages may be a bit too thick if you're printing a large volume of work, and I still worry about those thick pages tearing with constant turning over the years. But for making a selection of photos feel extra premium, Printique’s photo books are a great choice.

Images of TechRadar's Printique photo book

(Image credit: Future)

Should I buy the Printique photo book?

Buy it if…

You want a high degree of customizability
Whether it’s precisely controlling image dimensions, adding shaped image frames, including shapes in every color of the rainbow, or stamping your book with illustrations, you’re free to customize your photo book your way.

You want a polished final product
With quality tactile paper, vivid colors and unerringly precisely alignments, Printique's photo books are finished to an excellent standard, making them a gorgeous gift for loved ones.

Don’t buy it if…

You want big savings
There are cheaper photo book services out there. While Printique offers one of the best services we’ve tried, you can absolutely save some money elsewhere.

You want a huge array of ready-to-go templates
Printique has a decent number of templates for you to start plugging your photos into, but if you don’t care about customizability and just want the most prefabricated options, services like Mixbook offer many more.

Printique photo book review: also consider

Mixbook
With over 500 templates locked and loaded, Mixbook is a great choice if you want a no-hassle layout without needing to get into the nitty-gritty of creating your own designs. However, during our Mixbook photo book review we did find there were a few marks left by the printing process, so it’s worth bearing this in mind if you’re considering it for a gift.

Mimeo
For sheer simplicity, Mimeo can’t be beat – its stripped-back offering allows you to just get on with the design without having to wade through too many options. However, it is pricey. Creating a 10 x 10-inch layflat photobook – the closest you can get to the 12 x 12 inch one we created here – will set you back $169.51 (£133.11) and that’s not including the $13.99 (around £10.80) shipping fee. Read our full Mimeo photo book review.

How I tested the Printique photo book

  • I exactly recreated TechRadar’s photo book test template
  • I spent many hours using the platform and experimenting with templates
  • I have over a decade’s experience working in print and design

At TechRadar, we use a set photo book template that we attempt to recreate using every photo book platform we review. I followed this as closely as possible, sizing images according to precise measurements, adding colored shapes in specific hues and shades, and recreating captions and credits in specific fonts and styles, allowing me to assess how easy it was to recreate specific designs that users might have in mind.

Our US Mobiles Editor Philip Berne then assessed the final product, analyzing its overall quality and finish, and comparing it to the template to identify any potential errors in the printing process.

Additionally, I spent several hours playing around with the platform’s templates, layouts, shaped frames and illustrations to see how effective its off-the-shelf design elements were.

I’m an experienced photographer, having spent many years shooting both on my Canon DSLR and my iPhone 16 Pro. I’ve also spent many years working in print, creating layouts for magazines and doing post-production on images, meaning I've spent a lot of time using design tools for producing printed products.

I thought the Canon EOS R100 was a poor camera, but then my family used it for six months and now I’d recommend it to beginners in a heartbeat
1:00 pm | May 3, 2025

Author: admin | Category: Cameras Computers Gadgets Mirrorless Cameras | Tags: | Comments: Off

Canon EOS R100: two-minute review

The Canon EOS R100 looks like a pretty dated camera in every sense, and it'll feel alien if you've only used a smartphone camera before. However, don't judge a book by its cover – it actually makes perfect sense for people looking for a cheap camera, especially for the family, and in particular for any budding photographers in the family.

This is the cheapest mirrorless camera that you can buy new, and it's one that utilizes the same 24MP APS-C sensor and reliable dual-pixel autofocus as Canon's pricier models, the EOS R50 and EOS R10.

Naturally there are compromises. The build quality is basic, especially the fixed rear screen, which isn't even touch sensitive, and the video specs are dated too.

However, after using the EOS R100 for many months my family has found it to be an excellent little snapper, and a perfect fit for small hands. Furthermore, I actually think the EOS R100's limitations are its strength, especially for first-time photographers.

With its old-school DSLR-style design, a viewfinder, and a rear screen lacking touch functionality the EOS R100 isn't trying to compete with a smartphone, and this has led my kids to explore what each external control does, and consequently pick up some photography basics.

Canon EOS R100 camera in the hand

The Nikon Z5 II with the Nikkor 24-50mm f/4-6.3 kit lens (Image credit: Future)

There's been further good news since the EOS R100 launched, too. Canon opened its RF-mount to third parties for manufacturing APS-C lenses, and Sigma has already seized this opportunity, launching RF versions of many of its excellent DC DN Contemporary lenses that enhance the EOS R100's photography chops, where previously lens choice for Canon's mirrorless cameras was severely limited.

I've particularly enjoyed using a quartet of Sigma f/1.4 prime lenses, which are all compact, lightweight, high quality, and an excellent physical match with the EOS R100 – I'd highly recommend the Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary as a second lens after Canon's 18-45mm kit lens, which is pretty basic.

There's a part of me that still can't warm to the EOS R100; but I'm an experienced photographer, and it's not designed for me. It's my family that have really taken to it and actually used it – which is more than I can say for some of the dedicated cheap kids camera we've tested, and pricier alternatives that are complicated to use.

I felt like I can trust my kids with the EOS R100, and they've taken some excellent photos with it, taking the experience to another level by (easily) printing some of their favorite shots using a low-cost Canon Selphy printer. It's this sort of positive engagement with creative tech that I've always hoped my kids would have.

Canon EOS R100: price and release date

  • The Canon EOS R100 and 18-45mm kit lens launched for $599 / £669 / AU$1,099
  • That bundle now sells for as little as $350 / £410 / AU$800
  • It's available body-only too, and in a twin lens kit with the 18-45mm and 55-210mm lenses

I often have friends asking me to recommend a first camera for their young kids / tweens, with a budget around $500 / £500, and naturally they'd rather buy new. That leaves few other options besides the EOS R100.

And that's exactly the point of this beginner mirrorless camera. The design is stripped back, it has basic build quality and some of Canon's earliest mirrorless tech, and it's mass produced, readily available, and sold on the cheap. If general photography is your intended use and you don't need flagship power, the EOS R100 still holds up well today.

The camera was launched in May 2023, and with the 18-45mm kit lens it cost $599 / £669 / AU$1,099. However, since then I've seen some incredibly good deals, especially in the US during Black Friday 2024 and other seasonal sales, during which time the camera and lens price fell to as low as $350 / £410 / AU$800. It costs even less body-only – it's quite simply the cheapest mirrorless camera you can buy new.

  • Price score: 5/5

Canon EOS R100: specs

Canon EOS R100: design and handling

  • Canon's smallest mirrorless camera, and an ideal fit for smaller hands
  • It features a viewfinder and a fixed rear screen that's not touch sensitive
  • Images are recorded onto a single SD card

The EOS R100 feels like a shrunken-down version of Canon's DSLRs of old, only with mirrorless tech under the hood.

It's comfortable to hold thanks to a pronounced grip, and its diminutive proportions are a perfect fit for little hands – my kids, aged between five and 12, could all hold the camera comfortably and easily take photos with it.

A dinky viewfinder provides a clear view of your scene for when it's otherwise tricky using the rear screen, such as in bright daylight.

Personally, I'd rather the rear screen at least tilted for easy viewing from awkward angles – the slightly pricier EOS R50 features a vari-angle touchscreen – although the fixed screen was less of a limitation for my kids, whose knees are rather less creaky than mine.

Image 1 of 3

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table front view

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 3

Canon EOS R100 camera on table

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 3

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table front with flash up

(Image credit: Future)

At first my kids were thrown that the rear screen didn't respond to touch – they've grown up with tech and are familiar with smartphones, and the camera's screen felt alien to them.

Eventually, however, the lack of touch functionality caused them to turn their attention to the EOS R100's physical controls, and I felt like this encouraged them to they explore the camera more, figuring out what each control and button did.

I initially called the camera 'out of touch' with beginners, precisely because of its old-school design and non-touch screen, but after extended use I've changed my mind – this is in fact an ideal camera with which to learn photography basics.

Image 1 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera in the hand rear screen with scene mode displayed

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of model name

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of hotshoe

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of shooting mode dial

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of shooting mode dial

(Image credit: Future)

The body is built from a sturdy plastic. It's not weather-sealed, but as it's cheap and feels solid I felt comfortable letting my kids get on with using it without intervening too much, although I was also conscious of its potential vulnerability in inclement weather and dusty outdoor areas.

As I'm an experienced photographer, the EOS R100 isn't enough for me – there would be far too many occasions when I'd miss having a certain control or a feature at my fingertips. However, for beginners the EOS R100 makes a lot sense.

  • Design score: 3.5/5

Canon EOS R100: features and performance

  • Canon's original dual-pixel autofocus is snappy for general photography
  • Burst speeds are a fairly average 6.5fps for continuous shooting
  • Video specs are basic – this is primarily a camera for stills

As you can imagine, Canon's cheapest mirrorless camera is fairly stripped back when it comes to features, and limited when it comes to outright speed.

It does, though, feature Canon's dual-pixel CMOS autofocus with face detection and human subject-tracking autofocus, which I found to be really sticky and reliable for portraiture.

Should you wish to employ a different autofocus mode, such as spot AF, the convoluted process involves diving into a menu, while there's no joystick for speedily selecting focus points manually.

Canon's latest autofocus system in the pro EOS R5 Mark II is another level, with a range of subject-detection modes for animals and vehicles, sports priority, the option to store specific people to prioritize, plus Eye Control AF – the two cameras are worlds apart. However, for general photography, the EOS R100's autofocus is very good.

The EOS R100 has rudimentary burst shooting speeds of up to 6.5fps, with sequence lengths up to 97 JPEGs or just six raws – an action photography camera this is not.

Image 1 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of mic port

(Image credit: Future)
Image 2 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of USB-C port

(Image credit: Future)
Image 3 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table closeup of the battery door

(Image credit: Future)
Image 4 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table rear with LCD screen on

(Image credit: Future)
Image 5 of 5

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table, right side profile

(Image credit: Future)

Video recording options include 4K up to 30fps, plus Full HD up to 60fps; that's the minimum I'd expect for a video-capable camera launched in 2023. Dig deeper into the specs and you'll find that video recording is in 8-bit color, which is much less color-rich than 10-bit.

The camera has a hotshoe for attaching accessories such as a flash gun. It's the more basic 5-pin type, meaning not all of Canon's flash guns are supported by the EOS R100, so if you're looking to purchase such an accessory check that it's compatible with the camera first.

  • Features and performance score: 3.5/5

Canon EOS R100: image and video quality

  • Same trusted 24MP APS-C sensor as pricier Canon cameras
  • 4K video recording up to 30fps, 8-bit color
  • No C-Log color profile or 'recipes'

There's not too much more to say about the EOS R100's image and video quality that hasn't already been covered in our EOS R10 review – it has the same potential for natural-looking photos with Canon's lovely color profiles.

This also means the EOS R100 can grab detail-rich photos of similar quality to the likes of the Sony A6100, Nikon Z50 II and Fujifilm X-T30 II, all of which utilize a sensor with a resolution around the 24MP mark, which is impressive considering that the EOS R100 is a much cheaper camera.

Image 1 of 11

Cat portrait, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 11

Trees in a common during a misty morning, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 11

Photo of a misty landscape at first light, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 11

Photo of a sunrise on a misty morning, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 11

Photo of a lake with mist hoerving over the water and an arboretum behind it, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 11

Silhouette of a tree at first light, vibrant orange sunrise, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 7 of 11

Backlit pine trees with their shadows cast on the ground, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 8 of 11

Blubell woodland at first light, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 9 of 11

Closeup of wild garlic at first light, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 10 of 11

Dew covered reeds, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 11 of 11

Ducks in a pond, taken with the Canon EOS R100

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

All of the photos above were taken with either Canon's RF-S 18-45mm or RF-S 55-210mm.

Canon's RF-S 18-45mm kit lens doesn't quite match the quality of Nikon's 16-50mm kit lens, while the RF-S 55-210mm lens, which is available in a twin-lens kit with the EOS R100, is decent without overly impressing; detail is a little soft in the images of ducks, above, while bokeh in the cat portrait has an onion-ring effect.

To truly elevate image quality, I would recommend buying another lens. The photos included in the first gallery directly below are made with some of Sigma's DC DN Contemporary f/1.4 primes – the 16mm , 23mm and 30mm. In the second gallery below, all the photos are made with Sigma's 56mm lens, which is ideal for portraits.

Image 1 of 5

Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: a life ring next to a lake on a sunny day

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 5

Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: a tree-lined lake

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 5

Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery – a dead tree in front of a blue sky

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 5

Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: three trees side by side in woodland, each with a different color bark.

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 5

Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: yellow gauze in a woodland, very shallow depth of field.

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 1 of 6

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: head and shoulder portrait of a man during first light, with dappled light through background foliage

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 2 of 6

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: head and shoulder portrait of a man during first light, with dappled light through background foliage

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 3 of 6

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: a golden retriever dog sat at its owner's feet on a footpath during a cloudy day

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 4 of 6

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: young child, biking on a path during a sunny day

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 5 of 6

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: an expansive view of hills and trees

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image 6 of 6

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary image gallery: two ponies underneath a large tree in the countryside

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Video quality is rudimentary. Yes, the EOS R100 can shoot 4K, but only up to 30fps and with 8-bit color depth, which isn't as rich as 10-bit, which cameras like Fujifilm's X-M5 offer.

Flat color profiles for video, which would give color graders more to work with when editing, are missing too, as are custom profiles that can be uploaded to the camera, something that's available with the Nikon Z50 II via Nikon's Imaging Cloud

None of this is surprising given the EOS R100's price point and target user, though, and we're left with Canon's familiar range of color profiles which, thankfully, are better than most.

  • Image and video quality score: 3.5/5

Canon EOS R100: testing scorecard

Should I buy the Canon EOS R100?

Buy it if...

You're looking for a first 'proper' camera
With its small form factor, comfy grip, decent photo quality and changeable lenses, the EOS R100 is an excellent camera for budding photographers.

You want a cheap camera
The EOS R100 is not only Canon's cheapest mirrorless camera, it's the cheapest mirrorless camera from any brand – and there are usually superb deals during seasonal sales that further lower the price.

Don't buy it if...

You want versatile handling
The EOS R100's basic build quality and fixed rear screen with no touch functionality do limit where and how you can shoot.

You shoot photo and video
The EOS R100 has decent photography credentials, but its video specs are limited by today's standards.

Canon EOS R100: also consider

How I tested the Canon EOS R100

Canon EOS R100 camera on a table front angled

(Image credit: Future)
  • I picked up the EOS R100 more than six months before writing this review
  • During that time both I and my children have used it regularly
  • I've paired the camera with many lenses, primarily the RF-S 18-45mm kit lens, but also third-party ones

This review is a reflection of long-term testing over many months. And it's not just my thoughts and testing of the camera that have informed my thoughts, as my kids have taken a keen interest in the camera too.

Initially, I used the camera with just the RF-S 18-45mm kit lens, but we've also tried out Canon's RF-S 55-210mm telephoto zoom, plus four Sigma Contemporary lenses – 16mm, 23mm, 30mm and 56mm f/1.4 primes.

We've primarily used the camera for taking photos rather than video, shooting landscapes, portraits, wildlife, pets, closeups and more.

First reviewed April 2025

« Previous PageNext Page »